How Doubt & Uncertainty Are Related:

How Doubt & Uncertainty Are Related:
DOUBT OR QUESTIONING IS AN IMMEDIATE & REFLEXIVE OR AUTOMATIC REACTION TO FALSITY AND SELF HARM THAT PRECEDES UNCERTAINTY WHICH IS A DELAYED RESIGNED RESPONSE TO DOUBT IN A MIND THAT PLAYS HOST TO FALSITY AND SELF HARM INSTEAD OF EXPELLING THEM. DOUBTING PRECEDES AND IS THE ONLY CAUSE OF UNCERTAINTY.
There is no reason to doubt what is true (eg bread is food) or does not harm oneself and it is only truth’s imposter, what is false (eg sand is food) or self hurting that if not rejected but is forced by self or others to be accepted, that must be subject to constant doubt or questioning in an exercise in futility because so long as falsity or self hurt remain doubt remains.
A mind that keeps generating doubt that cannot be resolved because it dwells in falsity and self-harm must then become forcefully or emotionally uncertain.
Thus doubt precedes uncertainty and is the only cause of uncertainty.
(Because there is no reason to doubt what is true or does not harm self, there is no doubt and uncertainty in minds free from falsity or self harm and conversely any mind that experiences doubt and uncertainty must be consorting with falsity and self harm)
In this cutthroat world of goats where everyone is coercing the other to falsely fake and go against himself constantly generating self doubt and uncertainty that can reach intense levels, people are faced with two equally unpalatable choices that will both end in agony. The weaker ones with some conscience are so wracked by self reinforcing doubt and uncertainty they descend into despair and even suicide whilst the more cutthroat ones galvanized themselves to suppress and control the increasingly intense doubt and uncertainty to present a false façade of forced certainty that is subject to control failure and bouts of doubt and uncertainty in moments that may be inopportune when their resolve weakens or they are tired. As the intensity of their doubt and uncertainty inexorably intensify with age, they too are headed for an appointment with mad intense doubt and uncertainty.
Doubt and uncertainty is what actors experience all the time, try to control and suppress in an harassed fashion all the time without realization and they only become aware of doubt and uncertainty when they have become too intense to ignore and they are the precursors of depression & self hate.
Doubting is the forceful or aggressive questioning of personal or other people’s trivial or important matters that is never let your yes be yes only but repetitive and difficult if not sometimes impossible to stop until the person’s obsession is displaced by something else happening often merely for the sake of being antagonistic and buttressed by false rationalizations to justify.
There is faked facetious doubt that is designed to persecute others, to raise doubts in others and this is a singular non-repeated expressed doubt. For instance they say (often with a disingenuous smile or grave faked seriousness)“I have serious doubts that you can do it” to question the person’s ability and undermine his belief when the proper thing to say is “I think you cannot do it” that implies in my estimation you cannot do it but I may be wrong. Even though it is facetious, the person is not tormented by doubt that he struggles to shake off, he is nevertheless conditioning himself to doubt even as he casts doubts on others to manipulate them.
True doubting is where the customer keep asking the vendor irrationally whether the fruit is sweet even after repeated assurances it is so, even as he departs with the fruit because he cannot trust what is said to him and have been cheated before. In so doing he is not letting his yes be yes only but persecuting himself and the other person with doubt that conditions both. The person who lets his yes be yes only accepts the vendor’s word and finds out the truth objectively when he eats the fruit.
First you force yourself to doubt but increasingly, because doubt is always forceful it conditions your mind so that you are now forced against your will to doubt, you cannot not doubt even if you want and you are a trapped man.
Uncertainty is the disturbed indecisive or unable to decide emotional state of mind that inevitably follows doubt.
THERE ARE FOUR CAUSES OF DOUBTING THAT THEN LEADS INEVITABLY TO UNCERTAINTY.
THE APPLICATION OF FORCE ON ANY MIND IS ALWAYS OPPOSED BECAUSE FORCE ALWAYS HARMS THE MIND AND BECAUSE FALSITY IS ALWAYS ACCOMPANIED BY FORCE ITS INTRODUCTION WILL ALWAYS BE OPPOSED WITHOUT NEED FOR REASONING. NO MATTER HOW SINCERE THE LOVER BELIEVES HIS FORCEFUL (FALSE) LOVE IS AND THE LOVED IS THOROUGHLY DECEIVED TO BELIEVE LIKEWISE, BOTH THE LOVER AND THE LOVED MUST EXPERIENCE SUBCONSCIOUS AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSED RESISTANCE TO THAT LOVE BECAUSE THE FORCE IN THE LOVE CAN BE EXPERIENCED AND AUTOMATICALLY RESISTED BY BOTH IN THEIR EMBRACE OF DECEIT.
IN ADDITION, WHATEVER THAT IS FALSE THAT IS INTRODUCED TO A MIND WHETHER BY SELF OR OTHER (EG THAT YOU DO NOT STEAL WHEN YOU DO) MUST BE USING REASON QUESTIONED OR DOUBTED BECAUSE THE PERSON IS NOT MAD YET AND HE KNOWS HE DOES STEAL. TO TOTALLY BELIEVE YOU DO NOT STEAL WHEN YOU KNOW YOU DO STEAL IS TO BECOME MAD.
THE THIRD AND MOST IMPORTANT CAUSE OF DOUBT IS THAT GENERATED BY THE INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT REGULARLY BUILD UP AS A RESULT OF THE WAYS THEY SPEAK, BEHAVE, THINK AND PERCEIVE. ANYONE WHO IS REGULARLY BESET BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTIBILITY THAT HE CANNOT PERMANENTLY ELIMINATE BUT CAN ONLY STRESSFULLY CONTROL AND SUPPRESS IN A HARRASSED FASHION MUST QUESTION OR DOUBT HIMSELF. ORDINARY PEOPLE CANNOT SEE EVEN AFTER I HAVE DEMONSTRATED TO THEM, LET ALONE THAT THEY CAN SEE IT BY THEMSELVES THAT THEY ARE CONSTANTLY APPLYING FORCE ON THEIR MINDS BY PERCEIVING, THINKING, SAYING AND DOING THINGS WITH ADDED FORCE THAT STRESSES THEIR MINDS, THEY CANNOT SEE THERE ARE CONSTANT UNNECESSARY CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS/FORCE IN THEIR SPEECH, MOTION, THOUGHTS AND PERCEPTIONS THAT IS THE ONLY INFALLIBLE CAUSE OF THE RESTLESSNESS THEY MUST EXPERIENCE AND THE SIMULTANEOUS COMBO OF SUBSTANCE AND STYLE IN THEIR SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR THAT CANNOT BE RENDERED LIVE BUT MUST BE PRERECORDED AND RENDERED WITHOUT NEEDING CONSCIOUSNESS BY ROTE FROM MENTAL JUKEBOXES IS THE SOURCE OF THE DISTRACTIBILITY THEY MUST SUFFER FROM. EVEN IF THEY CANNOT SEE THAT THEIR BEHAVIOR IS FALSE, THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTABILITY THAT REGULARLY HOUND THEM AS A RESULT OF THEIR FALSE BEHAVIOR MUST FORCE THEM TO DOUBT THEMSELVES AND THE MEANING OF LIFE.
THE FOURTH CAUSE OF DOUBT IS THE ADDITIONAL DELIBERATE MALICIOUS DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY PRACTICED BY ACTORS CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY TO MANIPULATE AND PERSECUTE OTHERS.
MOST ACTORS HAVE ALREADY BURNT THEIR BRIDGES WITH TRUTH, THEY HAVE FORSAKEN THEMSELVES TO FALSITY AND THE AUTOMATIC RESISTANCE TO THE APPLICATION OF FORCE AND FALSITY TO THEIR MINDS ARE TOKEN OR FEEBLE; THEY TOTALLY BELIEVE WHAT THEY FALSELY ACT, THEIR SMILES, THEIR STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES AND CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE GOOD FOR THEMSELVES AND OTHERS. WHAT REMAINS FOR THEM TO DOUBT THEMSELVES IS THE SUFFERING THAT RESULTS FROM THEIR FALSE BEHAVIOR. THERE MAY BE PATCHY AREAS WHERE THEY QUESTION THEIR FALSITY EG THEY DO NOT STEAL WHEN THEY KNOW THEY DO STEAL BUT BY AND LARGE THEY HAVE ACCEPTED THE ACTED WAYS IN WHICH THEY SPEAK, MOVE, THINK AND PERCEIVE AS TRUE, CANNOT SEE EVEN WHEN POINTED OUT THAT THEY ARE FALSE.
THE GREATER ROLE OF PRACTICED FALSITY OF ANY FORM IS THAT IT IS ALWAYS MAD OR HARMFUL EVEN TO THE EXTENT OF BEING FATAL THAT THE BEING NEVER PRACTICES PASSIVELY OR BY CHOICE BUT HE ONLY FORCES HIMSELF OR IS FORCED BY OTHERS AGAINST HIS AUTOMATIC SELF RESISTANCE TO PRACTICE IN A FASHION THAT MUST BE NECESSARILY CONTROLLED TO GET ALONG OR MANIPULATE OTHERS AND HE IS ALWAYS WALKING A TIGHROPE BETWEEN PRACTICING WITH AS MUCH FORCEFUL CONVICTION AS HE FOOLISHLY DARES TO DECEIVE OTHERS HE IS GENUINE WHEN HE IS FAKING IT AND FORCEFULLY HOLDING BACK FROM THE BRINK TO NOT TOTALLY GIVE IN TO THE FORCE BEHIND HIS GOING AGAINST SELF TO ACT TO BECOME UNCONTROLLABLE OR DE FACTO MAD.
Sarcasm is an important practice in which people persecute themselves and others with doubt and uncertainty. When you are sarcastic, you forcefully mean to yourself and others the opposite of what you say and this creates doubt in yourself and others as to the true meaning of what you say that then leads to emotional uncertainty. Often, ordinary people are unaware that they are being sarcastic in what they say or express. For instance when they laugh at the own misfortune (they say business is bad with laughter), they are being sarcastic or generating doubt and uncertainty).
Speaking Abstractly: Not calling a spade a spade; saying “American cars don’t cross the pond well” when he means American cars are not well received in Europe.
Joking and appreciating jokes, an addictive and frequent pastime too is another practice that similarly creates doubt and uncertainty. All jokes are false in a mischievous way that hurtfully pokes fun at the victim at the brunt of the joke; if a joke was the truth it would not be called a joke. No one truly appreciates or enjoys jokes or falsity but they force themselves to forcefully emotionally fabricate appreciation that is in truth masochistic to get along such that it is now so realistic, they largely cannot help themselves responding they believe they truly enjoy when jokes stir up stress, restlessness and distraction.
Worry or anxiety: Worry that afflicts people regularly, from minor to major matters is a form of doubt and uncertainty because it is a form of preoccupation, recurring doubting and being uncertain over matters that may be totally out of their hands and it is a waste of time to worry.
Paranoia Is Mad Doubt: The doubting of what you perceive (see, hear) is a crucial element in paranoia apart from mad perception. Because paranoid people repeatedly forcefully question what they see or hear, they are unable to shake off their doubts about what they see and hear and they therefore perceive falsely insults and chicanery by others where there are none.
Faith In Rites & Precepts:













If you truly believe in such ceremonies or rites, you have faith in rites that is according to the Buddha one of three lower fetters to states of future woe. If you go along to act as if you appreciate, you don’t quite believe, you are a hypocrite and will similarly go to woe.
All those participating in such ceremonies are participating in rituals and although they may not see themselves doing so, they are forcing themselves to conform eg to be solemn and forcefully believing the ceremonies.
As the Buddha said, no matter how people may circumambulate and pray, the evil are not going to heaven and the truly good are not going to hell. Your destination after death is not influenced by prayers, offerings or whatever others do but by your nature and therefore if you believe such rites are meaningful you have mad logic or delusion and is headed for the destination of wrong view (hell or the animal womb).
An Appeal To The Emotion & An Appeal To Reason:
What the pope says below appeals to the emotions of the audience not their rationality whilst what I say appeals entirely to the rationality or reason of the person, never his emotions.
(If you are an emotional man you will be moved by his entreaties and similarly be repelled by my appeal to your reason that reminds you of unpleasant truths about yourself and others. If you are an emotional man stirred by his words, emotionally partisan, you will be angered to lash out at me thinking God is behind you. It remains for posterity to tell you who is right)
Pope asks for spiritual 'wake-up'
Pope Benedict XVI has used his first Christmas message to issue a wake-up call to Catholics and to all humanity.
Addressing thousands in St Peter's Square, the pope said people of the 21st Century risked becoming "victims of their intellectual achievements".
He decried (if he did decry, it is being emotional which even if you did not believe is sin, stresses his mind as it stresses those who hear) the "menace" of terrorism (menace provokes emotion or dislike in the listener), the "humiliation" of worldwide poverty (humiliation is an emotion and there is nothing intrinsically humiliating about being poor, although it may be suffering or depriving) and said pandemics and environmental destruction were dangerous new threats.
His warnings about the series of dangers facing humanity today came ahead of traditional prayer calls for peace and goodwill around the world. (It might sound emotionally gratifying but how many will remember it for long and how many will put it into practice and even if they tried in their own ways, would such individual efforts be largely misguided even deluded? Even those who think they are good and discerning cannot see themselves and stop themselves stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness after they have been told in no uncertain terms, even when it is the key to permanent exit from stress, restlessness and distraction that benefits themselves as they will then benefit others, so how many will listen to and realize his plea? It is easy for you to call for this and that but to carry it out is impossible. If they are in truth ineffectual platitudes that appeal to the listener’s emotions than reason then whoever believes they are meaningful may be courting future insanity. The Buddha and Jesus never called for peace and goodwill around the world but instead Jesus said he has not come to bring peace on earth but with a sword. If peace and goodwill on earth is impossible not even on a modest scale and even Jesus cannot bring peace on earth how can the pope’s mere entreaties do so? If instead he brought to the people’s attention how they all stretched their syllables, changed speed and loudness constantly whilst speaking leading to insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction in themselves and their listeners that thus stressed they persecute each other with violent conduct, this might bring insight to some and truly help bring some much needed peace and true not fabricated goodwill in the world. If everyone in this world is acting and this is always driven by very strong implacable ill will never goodwill and there can be no true peace and goodwill between men without first exiting acting, you are like the man chasing the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow in calling for peace and goodwill in this world)
He prayed for those working for peace and against conflict in Africa and Asia, and for harmony in Latin America.
In the Holy Land, Iraq and Lebanon, the pope said, signs of hope need to be confirmed by action inspired by "fairness and wisdom".
He followed his address with the now-traditional Christmas greeting, delivered this year in 33 languages including Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese and Finnish.
Calling on Roman Catholics to think of those in Bethlehem, he said: "We wish to pray for peace in the Holy Land."
A Stunned Man:









This expression is never a pleasure, never calm clear thinking but it is always suffering, uncertain, restless and stressed that is not in his control.
He is one of the richest men on earth, has donated much to charity and so he should be the happiest master of himself so why is he possessed by this stunned fearful look?
Either by himself or as a result of provocation he has put himself in a agitated daze that for time being he can now still extricate himself with a forceful struggle but a time will come when he will descend into a deep forceful daze from which he cannot retrieve himself.
This look is never harmless but is indication of future torment that may even be everlasting. Even if I want, it is not possible for me to wear this expression on my face because the intense force and emotion required to wear this expression does not exist in my mind.
Stingy But Profligate:
Many are very stingy but yet they are willing to constantly waste prodigious energy in the process creating insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction by mindlessly stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness not frequently but constantly when they speak.
Increasing speed within a stretched syllable is never free but you must use energy to blow faster. Increasing speed between syllables is never free but you have to use energy to increase the speed with which you reconfigure your vocal apparatus for the next syllable.
Increasing loudness is never free but you have to increase the force with which you blow air through your vocal apparatus.
Even when they are personally demonstrated how they change speed and loudness in speech, they continue to flout and even get upset, let alone they can see themselves doing so by themselves.
Even when it is possible to speak without stretching syllables, without changing speed and loudness and that is the way to the permanent exit from stress, restlessness and distractibility, people (and animals) everywhere throughout the ages and today continue to persecute themselves and others by practicing constant stretching of syllables, constant changes in speed and loudness even when they have been personally pointed out how they do so. It is therefore no minor feat for me to awaken to this universal unwitting self and other abuse and put a stop to it when others seem unable to.
I Am Not High Standing:
I agree without reservations I am not high standing and I do not contemplate being high standing and I do not think any title whether human or divine will make me high standing. Even if it was a certainty that I am the counselor it does not make me glower with pride or make me instantly high standing because as the Buddha said, to one who sees, there is nothing. To one who does not see, there is everything including high standing and he is a fool heading for suffering even for another eternity.
I am not a forceful, intimidating or dominating person, I am not emotional and you need them to be high standing.
High standing is a conditioned state in which someone who is emotional and insecure keeps dwelling on thoughts of how high standing he is stirring up pride that progressively gather in strength until it seizes him and he is helplessly high standing, cannot help being high standing which is never joy but suffering because just as he strives to impress others who can never be impressed because they are all fakers, he receives real and imagined brickbats and is hurt. No one need to condemn a high standing person except to ask for judgment himself because high standing is suffering no matter how you may deny.
Therefore you accuse me wrongly to say you gravely doubt my high standing. How do you know what and how I think? You are presumptuous, a defilement of your mind. Say you don’t think I am high standing in which case you admit you value high standing; don’t gravely doubt my high standing as if I practice high standing.
Many like to think they are great friends of others but others are only faking to them how much they appreciate his friendship. Because I am not an actor, I am never warm to anyone nowadays; I do not speak with stretched syllables and constant speed and loudness changes to be falsely nice as if very friendly I cannot be a hypocrite like others. I need such nice friendships as much as I need a bullet in my head and that he should think I might be interested in continuing the friendship shows he does not know me, not just in this instance but in every instance he accuses me.
I may not be being judgmental but it may be that sin is rife and I may be convincing others of judgment and if you yourself are judgmental and trying to shut up someone who convinces of others of judgment so that they may mend their ways, you may be the one headed for (grave) judgment.
THERE IS NO NEED TO RESORT TO SHAMEFUL ATTACKS ON THE PERSON BECAUSE IF PEOPLE ARE TRULY HONEST WITH THEMSELVES AND OTHERS (THEREFORE NOT ACTORS), THEY CAN JUST INFORM THE OTHER PARTY THEY DO NOT APPRECIATE HIS VIEWS AND STOP SENDING THOSE EMAILS THAT THEY FAKE THEY APPRECIATE. I WOULD RATHER PEOPLE SHOW ME THEIR TRUE COLORS AND BE TOLD NOT TO SEND THESE EMAILS THAN THAT THEY SHOULD SNIPE AT ME IN SILENCE.
Many have conveniently forgotten the incomparable woe and dark days of existence prior to 1977 and even a few years ago existence was significantly more difficult and what I said may have brought significant insight to those who heard, understood and put them to practice. It may be you who is ungrateful, who belittles my achievement in triggering that initial change in 1977 and just as the consciousness change I triggered in 1977 spread by domino effect without anyone knowing who did it, similarly even though the vast majority has not seen or heard me, it may be a domino effect again that causes everyone to change yet again in recent years. What they do not envisage is that they will be returned to those previously incomparably tormenting consciousness constraints and the next time there will be no one to change the consciousness settings for them.
HOWEVER OTHERS MIGHT PRETENTIOUSLY DENY, I KNOW WITHOUT DOUBT THERE ARE EXTRA ORDINARY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES BACK IN 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS AND THE DOUBT FREE AND UNCERTAINTY FREE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION FREE CALM AND CLEARLY THINKING MENTAL STATE THAT I NOW EXPERIENCE IS NOT POSSIBLE, UNTHINKABLE IN THE NORMAL COURSE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE. IF YOU STILL SUFFER GRAVELY, YOU HAVE NOBODY TO BLAME EXCEPT YOUR INTRANSIGENCE IN STILL BEING FORCEFUL, BEING EMOTIONAL, STRETCHING ALL YOUR SYLLABLES AND CONSTANTLY CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN YOUR SPEECH NOT BECAUSE YOU ARE SO GOOD BUT BECAUSE YOU CANNOT GIVE UP MANIPULATING OTHERS.
Slander Is Deadly & Gratefulness Is To Be Exalted:
Slander is deadly and your mind can be split into seven pieces if you did not apologize according to the Buddha below. You should never attack a person physically or in speech and every time you want to attack a person or what he says or does, examine carefully whether he is attacking you and even if you think you are justified to attack, the price in future pain may be forbidding:
Venerable Sariputta was once falsely accused. At the end of the rainy season the Elder took leave of the Master to depart on a journey with his retinue of monks. A large number of monks also took leave of Sariputta and he addressed those who were known by their names by those names. Among them there was a monk who was not known by his name but was desirous that the Chief Disciple should address him by his name.
In the great throng of monks Sariputta did not give him this distinction and the monk was aggrieved. "He does not greet me as he does the other monks," he thought. At the same time the hem of the Elder's robe brushed against him, and this added to his grievance. He approached the Buddha and complained; "Lord, the Venerable Sariputta, doubtless thinking to himself, 'I am the Chief Disciple' (accusing him of being high standing), struck me a blow that almost damaged my ear. And having done that without so much as begging my pardon, he set out on his journey."
The Buddha summoned Sariputta. Meanwhile, the Venerable Maha Moggallana and the Venerable Ananda summoned all the monks, convoking an assembly.
When the Master questioned the great Elder, instead of denying the charge he said: "O Lord, one who is not firmly established in the contemplation of the body with regard to his body, such a one may be able to hurt a fellow monk and leave without apologizing." Then followed the Venerable Sariputta's lion's roar; he compared his freedom from anger and hatred with the patience of the earth which receives all things, clean and unclean; his tranquility of mind to a bull with severed horns, to a lowly Candala youth, to water, fire and wind and to the removal of impurity; he compared the oppression he felt from his own body to the oppression of snakes and corpses, and the maintenance of his body to that of fatty excrescences. In nine similes he described his own virtues, and nine times the great earth responded to the words of truth (by shaking). The entire assembly was moved by the majestic force of his utterance.
As the Elder proclaimed his virtues, remorse filled the monk who had unjustly traduced him. Immediately, he fell at the feet of the Blessed One, admitting his slander and confessing his fault. Thereupon the Buddha said: "Sariputta, pardon this deluded man, lest his head should split into seven pieces." Sariputta's reply was: "Venerable sir, I freely pardon this venerable monk." And with joined palms, he added, "May this venerable monk also pardon me if I have in any way offended him." (Notice Sariputta apologized to the monk even though he was the innocent party, but only after the monk apologized and he had pardoned the monk. When Sariputta took leave of the Buddha for the final time, he similarly asked the Buddha to forgive him should anything he said or did displease the Buddha. Sariputta was noted for his gratefulness and he may be showing final gratefulness to the Buddha for pointing him to the way to enlightenment out of suffering.)
The Buddha's comment was: "Bhikkhus, it is impossible for Sariputta and his like to cherish anger or hatred. Sariputta's mind is like the great earth, firm like a gate post, like a pool of still water."
Unresentful like the earth, firm like a gate post,With mind like a clear pool, such is the virtuous manFor whom the round of births exists no more.
****
The person who says he will not listen to me unless I am truly the counselor, unless I am impeccable or truly high standing and non judgmental is like the foolish man the Buddha said who is mortally wounded by an arrow but refuse to allow the physician to remove it unless he knew who struck the arrow:
Cula-Malunkyovada Sutta
The Shorter Instructions to Malunkya
Ven. Malunkyaputta reflected: "These positions that are undisclosed by the Blessed One -- 'The cosmos is eternal, not eternal,' 'The cosmos is finite, infinite,' 'The soul is one thing and the body another,' 'After death a Tathagata exists, does not exist.' I don't accept that the Blessed One has not disclosed them to me. I'll go ask the Blessed One. If he discloses to me similarly then I will renounce the training and return to the lower life."
Then, Ven. Malunkyaputta went to the Blessed One.
"Lord, if the Blessed One knows that 'The cosmos is eternal,' then may he disclose to me.' If he knows that 'The cosmos is not eternal,' then may he disclose to me.' But if he doesn't know or see, the straightforward things is to admit, 'I don't know. I don't see.'
"Malunkyaputta, did I ever say, 'Come, Malunkyaputta, live the holy life under me, and I will disclose to you that 'The cosmos is eternal or not eternal,' or 'The cosmos is finite or infinite?" "No, lord."
"And did you ever say to me, 'Lord, I will live the holy life under the Blessed One and [in return] he will disclose to me that 'The cosmos is eternal,'
"No, lord."
"Then that being the case, foolish man, who are you to be claiming grievances/ making demands of anyone?
"Malunkyaputta, if anyone were to say, 'I won't live the holy life under the Blessed One as long as he does not disclose to me that "The cosmos is eternal; the man would die and those things would still remain undisclosed by the Tathagata.
"It's just as if a man were wounded with an arrow thickly smeared with poison. His friends would provide him with a surgeon, and the man would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know whether the man who wounded me was a noble warrior, a priest, a merchant or a worker.' He would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know the given name & clan name of the man who wounded me...or until I know whether the bow with which I was wounded was a long bow or a crossbow...until I know whether the bowstring with which I was wounded was fiber, bamboo threads, sinew, hemp. The man would die and those things would still remain unknown to him.
"It's not the case that when 'The cosmos is eternal,' there is the living of the holy life. Whether, 'The cosmos is eternal,' or 'The cosmos is not eternal,' there is still the birth, aging, death, sorrow, pain, despair, & distress whose destruction I make known right here & now.
"So, Malunkyaputta, remember 'The cosmos is eternal,' is undisclosed by me. 'The cosmos is not eternal,' is undisclosed by me.
"And why are they undisclosed by me? Because they are not connected with the goal, do not lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calming, direct knowledge, self-awakening, Unbinding.
"And what is disclosed by me? 'This is stress,' 'This is the origination of stress,' 'This is the cessation of stress,' 'This is the path of practice leading to the cessation of stress,'. And why are they disclosed by me? Because they are connected with the goal. They lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calming, direct knowledge, self-awakening, Unbinding.

The Nature Of Doubt & Uncertainty

The Nature Of Doubt & Uncertainty:
THE MORE INTENSELY & LONGER YOU FORCE YOURSELF TO BELIEVE WHAT YOU FALSELY SAY OR DO IS TRUE (IN ORDER TO MAKE YOURSELF AS CONVINCING OR CONFIDENT AN ACTOR TO OTHERS AS POSSIBLE), THE MORE INTENSELY OR URGENTLY MUST YOU REMIND YOURSELF OR DOUBT YOURSELF DEEP INSIDE THAT WHAT YOU SAY OR DO SO CONVINCINGLY IS ACTUALLY FALSE BECAUSE TO TOTALLY FORCEFULLY BELIEVE WHAT YOU FALSELY SAY OR DO IS TRUE IS TO BECOME TRULY MAD AND FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR SURVIVAL YOU MUST DEVELOP A HEALTHY DOUBT AND CYNICISM FOR YOURSELF AND EVERYTHING. THUS FALSE ACTING WHICH ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE PRACTICE NEVER OCCASIONALLY BUT ALL THE TIME EMBRACING WHAT AND HOW THEY SAY, DO, THINK AND PERCEIVE, IS THE MOTHER OF ALL THE DOUBTING AND UNCERTAINTY THAT THEY MUST ALL COMPULSORILY SUFFER FROM AND IN ADDITION ACTORS DELIBERATELY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY PRACTICE DOUBTING OF SELF AND OTHER FOR MANIPULATIVE OR PERSECUTORY PURPOSES.
This lady that I was drawing blood from asked me whether the lab boy will collect the blood today and I said yes. She again asked me a short while later the same question and as she left she turned at the door to ask me the third time whether the lab boy will collect the blood. She is suffering from mad doubt over a trivial matter that she can still control and suppress to enable her to function with a semblance of normality but she is tormented by doubt and unless she quits false acting (unlikely if not impossible) that is the true insoluble source for her doubts, she is headed for final totally uncontrollable mad doubt. Many (and those who accuse me of being hypercritical) do not realize they are on the same boat with her. She denied she was worried when her husband disagreed and she had seen various specialists for her unfounded fear of cancer, she complained that her blood looked too dark and she had lost weight when the machine showed her weight unchanged from a couple of years back.
PAUSE TO THINK WHENEVER YOU EXPRESS OR CAST DOUBT ON YOURSELF OR OTHERS EITHER FACETIOUSLY OR YOU ‘TRULY EXPERIENCE’ DOUBT BECAUSE YOU DO NOT REALIZE YOU ARE SETTING YOURSELF UP FOR MAD DOUBT BY PRACTICING DOUBT AND THEREFORE CONDITIONING YOUR MIND FURTHER TO DOUBT. EVEN IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE ‘TRUE’ DOUBT, YOU WILL BE WISE TO KILL IT AND LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY. EITHER YOU KNOW OR YOU DON’T KNOW SOMETHING SO WHAT IS THERE TO DOUBT? IT IS ONLY BECAUSE YOU KNOW AND YOU PRETEND YOU DON’T KNOW OR YOU DON’T KNOW AND YOU PRETEND YOU KNOW THAT YOU MUST EXPERIENCE DOUBT IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS TRUE DOUBT BUT IT IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE FORCEFULLY AND EMOTIONALLY FAKED OR EXPERIENCED EMOTIONAL DOUBT SO LONG SO INTENSELY THAT IT NOW RISES WITH SUCH INTENSITY AND REALISM THEY BELIEVE THEIR DOUBTS ARE REAL OR NATURAL WHEN IT IS A SIGN THAT THEIR DOUBT HAS BECOME WELL CONSOLIDATED AND FUTURE MAD DOUBT BECKONS.
Doubt and uncertainty are two related involuntary forceful or emotional false mental states that are always suffering that can and will episodically rise to agonizing levels in all sinners but they can also be faked to deceive others. Anyone who experiences genuine doubt is a sinner or practices falsity.
Doubt and uncertainty are never harmless because they are painful and can and will rise to even tormenting levels, they further condition that mind to further more intense doubt and uncertainty so that it increasingly gets harder to eliminate doubt & uncertainty. Together they are one of three lower fetters or bonds that according to the Buddha lead to future states of woe that you ignore at your own risk.
Doubt is the emotional or forceful questioning or not accepting the truth or reality of something said or done or has happened that can be rational or irrational. Even if the doubt is rational or justified, it is sinful and causes stress because it is forceful and applies force on the mind. Doubt is initially rational and restricted but with age and practice it becomes progressively more irrational or bizarre, more widespread and easier to arouse, more intense and hard to shake off.
Uncertainty is the emotional state of being unsure, unable to make up one’s mind or be hesitant what something is all about, what to do or say, what decision or choice to make, unsure of what is true or false, what is harmful and what is beneficial that may initially be isolated to important decisions eg what is the correct answer to an exam question but because it is forceful and addictive it spreads to involve every facet of life like what to eat, what to say.
(Therefore the Buddha was not engaged in gibberish when he said doubt and uncertainty together is one of three lower fetters or bonds to states of future woe. Doubt and uncertainty are different but related conditions)
According to the Buddha, all beings that exist, including God are bound to existence by ten fetters. The Buddha said he had been the All Powerful One in the past. If you are totally not fettered, you become enlightened and do not desire to exist in any form anywhere anymore. There are five lower fetters of which three namely doubt & uncertainty, self-identity views and faith in rites and precepts lead to states of future woe whilst additional sensuality or attachment to the five senses not just sex and ill will the urge to harm others bond beings to this impure and therefore suffering world on earth. Heavenly beings are freed of these five lower fetters but are bonded by five higher fetters that also afflict lower beings namely attachment to forms {angels are formed beings in formed heaven}, the formless (higher brahmas are formless}, conceit (passive basking in one’s woe free joyful glory), rational or purposeful restlessness or desire for change that is not the mad forceful restlessness on earth and ignorance {once you are enlightened or awakened, you shed all ignorance and cease to desire existence in any form which is always unsatisfactory. Unchanging nirvana with neither coming nor going is the ultimate peace}
Doubt can only occur in a person who has fed himself falsity or has been fed falsity by others that he then forced himself or was forced by others to accept as true. Only after a person has accepted what is false is true does he start to entertain doubt that can initially be traced to the cause but as time passes and with repeated forceful denials and multiple similar abuses his doubting develop a reality of its own and becomes increasingly detached or dissociated from their causes so that it can infect trivial things that have little justification for doubt.
ANYONE WHO ACTS MUST HARBOR INSOLUBLE CONSTANTLY RENEWING DOUBT & UNCERTAINTY THAT HE CAN ONLY REPRESS BECAUSE HE IS FALSELY CREATING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACIBILITY FOR HIMSELF AND HE MUST ALSO EXPERIENCE INSOLUBLE DOUBT OF OTHERS WHO ALSO POISONOUSLY ACT TOWARDS HIM THAT HE CAN ONLY REPRESS AND INSTEAD HE HAS TO FAKE AS REAL AS HE CAN HE APPRECIATES THEIR POISON.
ANYONE WHO IS BESET BY RECURRING INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION MUST EXPERIENCE DOUBT IN HIMSELF AND EVERYTHING, INCLUDING THE MEANING OF LIFE ITSELF.
There are two dire torments of forcefully accepting whatever is false is true, namely mad logic and mad doubt.
As one repeatedly forces oneself to accept what is false is true in a controlled fashion to get what one wants in life, one increasingly believes what is false is true until it can become very compelling, one is forced to believe by mental force that what is false is true. This is mad logic and for one who sees correctly this has already happened to many who cannot see no matter how they are demonstrated what is meant by acting in themselves and others. They are deluded but their delusions have not turned violent yet and they still can control the expression of their delusions not realizing they will ultimately lose control.
Anyone who forcefully say or do things that are false but forcefully insist to others they are true must develop a healthy doubt or question himself because to totally give in to believe what he says or does that is false is true is madness. How can anyone be certain of himself if he is constantly saying or doing false things as realistically as he can whilst treading the tightrope not to totally give in, to often dare himself to go right to the cliff of madness but turn back at the last moment? This is mad forceful doubt that cannot be quelled.
DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH REALITY OR EXISTENCE BUT IT IS A CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL STATE ROOTED IN PEOPLE’S FALSE ACTING AND WHICH THEY FURTHER FECKLESSLY PRACTICE TO PERSECUTE EACH OTHER.
IF YOU NEVER PRACTICED FALSE SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR AND THEREFORE NEVER HAVE TO FORCE YOURSELF TO BELIEVE WHAT IS FALSE IN YOURSELF IS TRUE, YOU NEVER ACCEPT AS GENUINE WHAT YOU CAN SEE IS HARMFUL FALSE BEHAVIOR FROM OTHERS, YOU CANNOT EXPERIENCE ANY DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY ABOUT YOURSELF OR ANYTHING IN THIS WORLD.
EVERY TIME YOU EXPRESS DOUBT, WHETHER REAL OR FAKED, TO INTIMIDATE OTHERS YOU COMMIT YOURSELF AFRESH TO DOUBT WHILST YOU ALSO WICKEDLY WANT OTHERS TO SHARE YOUR DOUBT. ON EVERY OCCASION YOU EXPERIENCE UNCERTAINTY EG WHAT TO COOK, YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO UNCERTAINTY AND ON EVERY OCCASION YOUR UNCERTAINTY BECOMES INTENSE EG YOU FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE IN A SITUATION, YOU HAVE INTENSIFIED THE UNCERTAINTY YOU ARE CAPABLE OF EXPERIENCING. THEREFORE THE WISE PERSON WILL DROP EVERYTHING HE IS DOING TO DISPEL ANY DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT ARISES UNTIL THEY NO LONGER ARISE IN HIM.
There are two sources of doubt and uncertainty in ordinary people: One is the mandatory result of their constant hurtful and false acting and the other is the additional unconscious or deliberate practice of doubting and being uncertain to manipulate or persecute others.
Because ordinary people know too well the pain of doubt and uncertainty, they often mischievously or maliciously try to cast doubt and uncertainty on others that can be subconscious or concealed so that they do not realize they are doing so.
Whether expressed doubt and uncertainty is faked or genuine, because it is always forceful, you are conditioning yourself each time you raise doubt and uncertainty in yourself or others.
On top of the doubt and uncertainty they must compulsorily experience because of their constant false acting in speech, behavior, thought and perception, ordinary people frequently practice either intentionally or unintentionally doubt and uncertainty by casting doubt and uncertainty in themselves and others they think is justified but it is a delusion by saying with pretentious quizzicality “Are you sure???!!!” “Is that so???!!!” “Really???!!!” “I don’t believe you!!!” “I beg your pardon?” or “say that again” “Think again” “Take a hard look at yourself”. They fuss or tantalize over what they shall wear, eat, do or say in the process conditioning themselves to doubt and uncertainty.
Keeping others in suspense by remaining silent, startling someone by creeping up on them, making sudden loud noises, gambling and investing are forms of inducing or renewing doubt and uncertainty in yourself and others.
Hesitancy in speech and motion may either be involuntary (due to ingrained doubt and uncertainty) or voluntary intended to please or impress others (eg you are thoughtful or charming) and they are actually a form of self doubt and uncertainty and if actors watch themselves they are often in doubt or uncertain what they do or say and even how they should do or say it eg to change gears or not, to turn or not. Trembling and shaking is violent uncontrollable uncertainty that may be caused by fear, a mental force or emotion. Like stress, restlessness and all emotions, fear is not compulsory and not everyone is fearful or must experience fear in any situation.
Many do not realize they are practicing and reinforcing doubt and uncertainty for themselves when they speak with pauses or utterances such as ‘errr’, ‘hmmm’ that are partly for show and partly involuntary reflecting intrinsic doubt and uncertainty. Instead of speaking with constant speed and loudness “I don’t like it” they pause with stretched syllables “I … errr… don’t like it” to be impressive. Syllables are sometimes stretched because of hesitancy or doubt and uncertainty that can be involuntary or voluntary to be impressive.
Often people say “I think”, “Perhaps”, “Maybe” when they are actually certain and that is practicing and reinforcing doubt and uncertainty that leads to mad doubt and uncertainty.
To emotionally doubt and be uncertain is irrational and a form of mad logic because for any given situation if you let your yes be yes only you either know or do not know, it is either true or false, so what is there to doubt or be uncertain about?
Patronizing & Conceited:
Quote: Well I am still your friend even if you do not believe....I do not abandon people even if I think they may be deluded (Sounds high handed or patronizing and discriminating against those who are deluded. If you understood what the Buddha said, you will realize you won’t be here but in heaven if you are not deluded. Jesus said woe to you who laughs for you shall weep and if you are not deluded and heedless you will realize what he said is absolute because your laughter that is appreciable when you speak is never pleasure as it is faked to be but it disturbs and warps your mind. You laugh when you tell me your business is bad. Aren’t you sick to laugh as if it is fun when your business is bad? If you cannot say any of the many things I say, if I am calm and clearly thinking whilst you are evidently emotional & can be provoked to lash out, what dispensations can you offer me who may be deluded?).
Erase ‘well’ from ‘Well I am still your friend’ and there is no loss of meaning and therefore ‘well’ is said meaninglessly wasting substantial energy and it is not letting your yes be yes only but saying more that comes evil because it distracts. If you think ‘well’ is meaningful, you may be headed for madness. The meaning of ‘well’ that false actors hold dear is to express poignancy or uncertainty or emotion. Because all emotions are false and harmful, the only recognizable meaning of expressed ‘well’ is emotional and false. “I am still your friend” is the substance of the speech and ‘well’ is the useless for show style of the speech and therefore he is an actor. Have you ever heard Jesus said ‘well’ this and ‘well’ that? You are practicing madness because actors believe their ‘wells’ are meaningful that leads to total madness by saying ‘well’ and not letting your yes be yes only.
If the person does not believe you are his friend, you are being malicious not benevolent to create doubt, guilt and conflict by telling him you are still his friend as if you are such a great indispensable person you are still his friend even if he did not believe. What does it matter to tell him you are still his friend when he does not consider you his friend except to undermine his resolve and impress him how good you may not be?
Without unconditionally renouncing the personal attacks he made on my person, he is a shameless hypocrite or a sick or mad man to think he is still my friend or I can truthfully not make believe trust him as a friend knowing he harbors resentment or his warmth may belie his inner thoughts. Many see nothing wrong with love-hate relationships but think they are such wonderful ‘forgiving’ people when it is a mutual embrace of deceit and agony that leads to madness and violence.
You may have the right to tell another person “I am still your friend IF you believe” but you are saying more that comes from evil if you say “EVEN if you do not believe”.
It is easy or cheap for you on the emotion of the moment to say you are still my friend but can you ‘walk the talk’? You are a fool to make promises that you might not be able to fulfill and you would have then said something false.
If you were such a great or true friend you would not have emotionally attacked my person as being hypercritical, without insight, high standing, you would not have use strong words like take a hard look instead of close, careful or good look, you would not have said ‘certainly’ and ‘gravely doubt’ in an intimidating fashion.
His conciliatoriness is not necessarily motivated by goodness but it may be motivated by a mixture of emotional stress, guilt, selfish desire to continue the friendship and a feeling of power to not abandon people who may be deluded.
(No ordinary person will say the things I say. No one can say in truth he changed the world’s consciousness after 1977 as I did. If you think you are nevertheless my intellectual and moral peer, you may be correct or it may be you who thinks too highly of yourself)
Can you imagine the Buddha or Jesus saying, “Well I am still your friend even if you do not believe.... (The numerous dots are the written version of the urge to stretch things in this case the space between words and objectively prove I am correct to say he stretches his syllables not just here but everywhere. Stretching the space serves no function except for show to falsely impress with his deliberation or lingering, consumes prodigious energy cumulatively to create stress, restlessness and distraction because it detracts from the substance said. He says I may be deluded when he himself can be demonstrated objectively to be deluded) I do not abandon people even if I think they may be deluded”? He does not realize he is advocating conflict for himself and others, advocating the ‘earth rending’ ‘touching’ love hate relationship that is in truth intense pretense.
He thinks he is more wonderful than the Buddha in not abandoning me even if I may be deluded because the Buddha said he will abandon any tamable being who does not submit to taming or Jesus who said maidens who forgot to bring oil for their lamps when they came to meet the groom will not be admitted but will go to eternal punishment even if they afterwards fetched oil.
No Fellowship With Fools:
If you gain a mature companion,a fellow traveler, right-living & wise,overcoming all dangers go with him gratified &mindful.
If you don't gain a mature companion,a fellow traveler, right-living & wise,go alone like a king renouncing his kingdom,like the elephant in the Matanga wilds his herd.
(Better alone than company with fools)
HE IS FAR FROM ALONE IN EXPRESSING OPENLY OR SECRETLY THAT I WHO AM FREED FROM DOUBTS, UNCERTAINTY, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION MAY BE DELUDED. THE FACT THAT THEY SUFFER FROM REGULAR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY CAN ONLY MANAGE TO CONTROL AND SUPPRESS SHOULD SERVE AS WARNING OF FUTURE DOOM BUT UNTIL THEY WEEP AND GNASH THEIR TEETH EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY THEY CANNOT BELIEVE THEY WILL DO SO.
Mad Logic:
Being an emotional attacking person, why hasn’t he been outraged to directly deny my suggestion that he pries? If you do not or dare not say “I did not pry” but you ask me to give you a list of taboo topics, it means there is or may be truth in what I say.
Since you likely do pry, you unrepentantly laugh when speaking, you stretch your syllables with constantly changing speed and loudness (that can be objectively demonstrated by me) even after you have been told so, you should be pleased or proud that I have noticed you do so and sent an Email to thank me profusely for having noticed rather than lash out at me tit for tat without refuting my criticism?
If you are ashamed of your laughing whilst speaking and stretching syllables, why have you not desisted?
If there is substantial truth in what I say then you are scurrilous to launch an attack on me on totally unrelated matter.
To think that self insight is better than hypercriticism and ignoring others’ views is mad logic because anyone who has self insight will also have insight into others, it is impossible to have self insight in isolation and if you think it is possible, you have mad logic and courting future full blown madness. The emotional person does not think of the logic or consistency of what he says, he merely grasps at a concept eg in this case self logic is better to persecute others, feels smug in his correctness and forgets all about it or embrace even the opposite view (other insight is better than self insight because it enables one to see through the deception of others) in another occasion.
Hypercriticism:
You can only be hypercritical if you emotionally or forcefully criticize indiscriminately without reason everything that impinges on your awareness.
If my criticism although widespread is not emotional, there is no force, it is discriminate (I don’t criticize God, Jesus or the Buddha) and backed by rational reasons (not excuses) you are slandering me in saying I am hypercritical.
Paranoia Is Mad Perception:
When you perceive slights and insults where there are none, you take things personally when there is nothing you are paranoid, you see or perceive things falsely or you have mad perception that you can still control but you will inevitably become madly paranoid like all dictators do.
Actors are all very forcefully or emotionally sensitive or touchy people and never perceive things as they are but they are selective in their perceptions, wanting only to see and hear things that conform with their perverted world views and forcefully refusing or avoiding seeing and hearing things that are against their world views and they are sensitive to perceived slights real or imagined for others.
If ordinary people pay attention to themselves, they will detect themselves regularly helplessly getting hurt intensely by something someone said or did that they perceived as insulting when it is presumptuous. They are already owners of mad perception or paranoia that they do not realize will become completely mad unless they eliminated all force eliminated all emotion in their lives.
Proves Himself He Pries:
Contrary to people’s belief, prying is never subjective but it can be objectively and impartially determined. I have no interest in others’ personal affairs nowadays and what I advise is not personal, does not touch on any person’s personal lives. I have no interest in asking anyone about his personal life or habits eg what he does with his money, wife or broadband. Unless your interest in a person’s personal affairs is motivated out of goodwill or true concern for his wellbeing not salaciousness/sensationalism or ulterior motives, you are prying. It only makes it worse to deny because it creates the shadow of doubt in yourself. Whoever you are, however good you might believe you are, if in truth you pry, you must suffer because prying is forceful addictive attachment to the affairs of others that clutters your mind with information that is a burden, takes effort to conduct and conceal from yourself and the other person and there is a lurking fear of discovery.
Unless your intervention in the affairs of someone is constructive, motivated out of goodwill, you are meddling into the other person’s affairs or prying.
His criticism of me cannot be construed as unemotional or constructive but it was disparaging and intimidating, wanting me to know it is certainly true and therefore he is meddling in my business that is none of his business but motivated in this case by persecution.
UNLESS YOU SPEAK OF MY HIGH STANDING, BEING JUDGMENTAL AND BEING ATTACHED OUT OF CONCERN FOR ME, YOU ARE MEDDLING, A BUSYBODY AND PRYING INTO MY AFFAIRS IF YOU SPEAK OF THINGS THAT DO NOT CONCERN YOU TO PERSECUTE ME OR IF YOU ENQUIRE ABOUT PERSONAL THINGS FOR WHICH YOU HAVE ULTERIOR MOTIVES.
To say spending a lot of money on variours objects definitely does not show a sign of detachment shows a lack of understanding what attachment is about and it cannot be construed as a statement of concern but it is not only disparaging but disparaging in an intimidating fashion to want the recipient to believe he is definitely attached as a result of spending a lot of money.
It is actually evidence of mad perception or paranoia that he can now still control and suppress but will escape his grasp permanently later that he perceived I was attacking him (otherwise why retaliate when he has been so cordial to me all these while?) when it was an objective communication.
Slander Or Accusing Me Of Hypocrisy:
Unless I have said that I am high standing or I am judgmental you are slandering me to say I am not as high standing as I think I am or you are implying I am a hypocrite by secretly harboring emotions of being high standing.
ACTION SPEAKS LOUDER THAN WORDS. WHO IS MORE STATUS CONSCIOUS OR HIGH STANDING, ME WHO NEVER ENTERTAIN THOUGHT OF REVEALING MY STATUS IN MY EMAIL ADDRESSES OR PEOPLE WHO ‘BY THE WAY’ USE STATUS INFORMING EMAIL ADDRESSES EG dr_xxx@yahoo.com or justice_xxx@yahoo.com?
Because I am not emotional, I am not proud or ashamed of my profession, I have no urge to let anybody know what my profession is and although I was around, I did not attend my graduation ceremony because they are pretentious and against my nature to be low key.
Do not imagine the pope’s life must be Spartan because he has Alpine resorts at his disposal and his food and amenities may be far from humble.
If I sprouted wings on my back and a halo over my head more people will worship me but you think they worship me? They are worshipping my wings and halo. Similarly the pope will be a fool if he thinks people worship him; many are worshipping his position rather than his person just as they worship Jesus because of who they think he is, not what he says.
No Accident: It is not an accident but reflects his forceful or emotional nature that is reflected elsewhere that he used ‘hard look’ when he could have used many alternatives like good, close or careful. Anyone who is forceful or emotional is an actor because force or emotion is never isolated but detain that mind driving it to go against self to act to deceive, please, impress, intimidate (as he has demonstrated by using ‘grave’ doubts and ‘certainly’) and dominate others.
Many like to use shorthand like ‘4’ for ‘for’, ‘u’ for ‘you’ that becomes habitual and they think it is trendy or impressive when it is sinful disrespect for the language, reflects their laissez faire or anything goes attitude and also confuses the reader who sees ‘4’ but must interpret it as ‘for’. In the same way, by using ‘i’ instead ‘I’ and ‘hg’ instead of ‘high’ he is showing disregard for language rules. Many will disagree and only time will tell them whether they are being foolishly stubborn and disrespectful to the language with deadly consequences (Jesus said what you did to the least of me you did it to me) or right that it is just harmless shorthand.
ORDINARY PEOPLE WILL NOT SAY THE THINGS I SAY BECAUSE THOSE THINGS DO NOT OCCUR IN THEIR MINDS AND WHEN THEY HEAR WHAT I SAY THEY ARE OFTEN UNEASY EVEN HOSTILE AND EVEN THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE GOOD AND SMART DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY BECAUSE THEY CONTINUE TO ACT EVEN WHEN NOT TO ACT (NOT TO SMILE, STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS) IS THE PERMANENT WAY OUT OF THE TORMENT OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION. IT THEREFORE TAKES AN OUT OF THE ORDINARY PERSON TO SAY WHAT I SAY WHO IN ADDITION CHANGED THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE WORLD IN 1977 AND WITH ALMOST CERTAINTY DID THE SAME IN RECENT YEARS. YOU THINK I AM CONCEITED BUT IT MAY BE YOU WHO IS CONCEITED TO THINK YOU ARE MY PEER OR I AM NO BETTER THAN YOU.
Hypocritical & Hypercritical:
Many people react to what is said or has happened with laughter or a ‘ho, ho, ho’ not realizing that although it is not as articulate or extended as my critiques, they are discounting what is said rather than appreciating what is said. They are a hypocrite if they think their ‘ho, ho, ho’ is appreciative when it is discounting or even mocking.
Whatever it is, by mentally or physically expressing ‘ho, ho, ho’ they have passed judgment or criticism of what is said or happened, they have not been uncritical except in their delusion they have not.
WHENEVER ANYONE SMILES OR FROWNS AT WHAT IS SAID OR DONE, THEY ARE PASSING COMMENT POSITIVELY OR NEGATIVELY. OFTEN THE SMILE IS POLITE OR INSINCERE, EVEN BELIES WHAT THEY TRULY THINK AND THAT IS BEING HYPOCRITICAL AND CRITICAL. JUST BECAUSE IT IS BRIEF AND ACCOMPANYING THOUGHTS UNEXPRESSED DOES NOT MAKE IT ANY LESS VALID AS A FORM OF CRITICISM OR HYPOCRISY.
FURTHER, BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONAL OR FORCEFUL PEOPLE, THERE IS ALWAYS FORCE OR EMOTION THAT CAN RISE TO INTENSE LEVELS IN THEIR CRITICISMS OR COMMENTS AND THEY ARE ALWAYS MORE INTENSELY CRITICAL THAN AN UNEMOTIONAL PERSON LIKE ME.
NOWADAYS I DO NOT FROWN OR SMILE AT EVERYTHING OTHERS SAY OR HAPPENS NOT BECAUSE I AM VERY GOOD BUT I DO NOT WANT TO SUFFER, DO NOT WANT TO EXERT FORCE ON MY MIND THAT LIKE A FALLING DOMINO BECOME A NIDUS FOR ESCALATING USE OF MENTAL FORCE. IF YOU THINK I AM HYPOCRITICAL AND HYPERCRITICAL AS THE PERSON WHO CANNOT HELP HIMSELF BUT MUST ALWAYS SMILE OR FROWN, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR YOU MAY BE A FOOL.
SO IT MAY BE NOT JUST A CASE OF THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK BUT IT IS SLANDER FOR THE EMOTIONAL MAN WHO CANNOT HELP REACTING TO ANY SITUATION TO CALL A PERSON WHO IS NOT FORCEFUL, NOT EMOTIONAL, WHO CAN DOES NOT SMILE OR FROWN TO ANY SITUATION, WHO CAN HELP NOT REACTING IS HYPERCRITICAL AND HYPOCRITICAL.
THE BUDDHA AND JESUS WERE SCOFFED AT TOO:
People have scoffed at the Buddha (as recorded below) and Jesus in their presence so what makes you think that you know Jesus or the Buddha and will not similarly scoff at them in their presence?
Scoffing is never driven by goodwill but it is always driven by ill will to disparage and whoever harbors ill will is not headed for heaven but the opposite direction because as the Buddha said you must have loving kindness. It is far fetched to think what he said about me with the liberal use of emotive and strong words reflected loving kindness:
"Here, bhikkhus, a certain person abides with his heart imbued with loving-kindness extending over one quarter, the second, the third, the fourth quarter, and so above, below, everywhere, and to all as to himself; he abides with his heart abundant, exalted, measureless in loving-kindness, without hostility or ill-will, extending over the all-encompassing world.
"He finds gratification in that, and looks to it for his well-being; steady and resolute thereon, and if he dies without losing it, he reappears among the gods of a High Divinity's retinue.
***
2. Sunakkhatta, had recently left this Dhamma and Discipline. He was making this statement before the Vesali assembly: "The recluse Gotama does not have any superhuman states, any distinction in knowledge and vision worthy of the noble ones.
3. Then, Sariputta went into Vesali for alms. Then he heard Sunakkhatta making this statement before the Vesali assembly.
4. (The Blessed One said:) "Sariputta, the misguided man is angry. Thinking to discredit the Tathagata, he actually praises him; for it is a praise of the Tathagata to say of him: 'When he teaches the Dhamma to anyone, it leads him when he practises it to the complete destruction of suffering.'
ALREADY WELL SEIZED:
I AM QUITE CERTAIN NOW THAT EVEN IF THEY WANTED, MOST ACTORS ARE HELPLESS OR UNABLE TO STOP THEMSELVES LAUGHING, TO NOT STRETCH SYLLABLES LET ALONE NOT CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS BECAUSE THE FORCE DRIVING THESE ACTIVITIES ARE TOO POWERFUL FOR THEM TO RESIST AND BECAUSE THEY CAN STILL SUPPRESS THEM NOW, THEY THINK THEY WILL ALWAYS MANAGE. THEY ARE ALREADY TRAPPED, TORMENTED BY SERIOUS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTIBILITY AND WAITING TO COMPLETE THEIR SENTENCE NOW AND HEREAFTER.
THE REASON WHY PEOPLE CANNOT STOP THEMSELVES STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES AND ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THROUGH THEIR STRETCHED SYLLABLES IS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT IN CONTROL OF THEMSELVES BUT THEY ARE ALREADY WELL SEIZED BY THEIR RESIDENT MENTAL FORCE AND ITS PROXIES THE EMOTIONS THAT THEY HOLD DEAR TO HELPLESSLY DO SO.
THEY DO NOT REALIZE THAT IF THEY DO NOT MAKE EFFORT TO FREQUENTLY MEDITATE TO CALM THEMSELVES DOWN & INSTIL STILLNESS, MAKE DEDICATED EFFORT TO PAY ATTENTION TO STOP STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES AND CHANGING SPEED & LOUDNESS, THERE ARE EVEN NOW CONTINUING TO CONDITION THEMSELVES TO STRESS AND RESTLESSNESS THAT WILL LEAD TO FINAL MAD STRESS AND RESTLESSNESS.
***
Blow faster both gradually and rapidly into a flute and hear the pitch differences and if you cannot detect similar pitch changes whenever people stretch their syllables you have poor discernment. If you can detect the pitch changes and you think nothing wrong, you think it is necessary and pleasing, you are a great fool and pervert and deserve to suffer and go mad if that is the only destination of such speed changes.
Next blow gradually and then suddenly with more force to hear the differences in loudness in the musical note.
Effort must always be made and energy consumed to create stress, restlessness and distraction whenever one changes speed or increase loudness and it is totally unnecessary except to be falsely charming. It is actually not pleasing but a pain to the ear creating stress, restlessness and distraction to the listener.
No one throughout the ages have pointed this out to you and not to stretch syllables, not to change speed and loudness is the only way out permanently of stress, restlessness and distraction and if for whatever reason you fail to act on it then you deserve your lot if it is eternal punishment.
No Blood Found:
Falconio’s blood was not found on his van so the body must have been carried in the gunman’s 4WD. Bearing in mind he is a simpleton who even publicly said the police were after him (perhaps because friends told him he looked like the gunman), it is unlikely that he will so thorough clean his vehicle so that no trace of blood or hair was ever found. Not only has he to load a heavy body in but he has to load it out and it is amazing he spilt not one drop of blood or scrape some skin or hair off even if the head was covered by cloth and he cleaned it so obsessively no trace was ever found.
The judge was wise in telling the jury not to convict Murdoch because he was a drug smuggler and not to be influenced by emotion (Falconio’s mother walked off court at suggestions against his son) but he is foolish, asking to be judged unnecessarily when he told the jury they were correct in convicting him. It is none of his business to say so and if it turns out to be wrong, he will be judged himself.
Even Falconio’s parents are guilty of sin in being emotional and walking off court as if distressed that may influence the jury.
***
The rate of melting of glaciers at both poles is much faster than scientifically predicted and may be accelerating or get even faster.
Greenland glacier races to ocean
Scientists have been monitoring what they say may be the fastest moving glacier on the planet.
Kangerdlugssuaq Glacier on the east coast of Greenland has been clocked using GPS equipment and satellites to be flowing at a rate of 14km per year.
It is also losing mass extremely fast, with its front end retreating 5km back up its fjord this year alone.
The glacier "drains" about 4% of the ice sheet, dumping tens of cubic km of fresh water in the North Atlantic.
This gives it significant influence not just on global sea level rise but on the system of ocean circulation which drives through the Arctic.
"We've seen a 5km retreat of the terminus, we've see an almost 300% acceleration in the flow speed and we've seen about a 100m thinning of the glacier - all occurring in the last one or so years.
"These are very dramatic changes." And they are not confined to Kangerdlugssuaq.
Helheim Glacier, just to the south of Kangerdlugssuaq, is flowing only slightly slower at 12km per year.
Hamilton thinks a couple of factors may be triggering the quick melt.
The observed recent increase in summer surface melting on the Greenland Ice Sheet is producing large quantities of liquid water which, if it percolates down to the base of the glacier, can lubricate its flow over rocks towards the ocean.
And if that same warming is bringing higher-temperature sea waters into contact with the front of Kangerdlugssuaq and Helheim, this could explain their rapid retreat.
If other large glaciers in the region are seen to go the same way, it could begin to "pull the plug" on Greenland, said Dr Hamilton.
"The model predictions for sea level rise do not include the effects of rapid changes in ice dynamics," he added.
" the predictions for both the rate and the timing for sea level rise in the next few decades will be largely underestimated."

Geologists witness 'ocean birth'
By Roland Pease BBC science unit, San Francisco
Scientists say they have witnessed the possible birth of a future ocean basin growing in southern Ethiopia.
The team watched an 8m rift develop in the ground in just three weeks in the Afar desert region last September.
It is one small step in a long-term split that is tearing the east of the country from the rest of Africa and should eventually create a huge sea.
The UK-Ethiopian group says it was astonished at the speed with which the 60km-long fissure developed.
"It's the first large event we've seen like this in a rift zone since the advent of some of the space-based techniques we're now using, and which give us a resolution and a detail to see what's really going on and how the earth processes work; it's amazing," said Cindy Ebinger, from Royal Holloway University of London.
Researchers have long recognised that the Afar region, an inhospitable depression in southern Ethiopia, has been contorted by similar forces in recent geological time.
But the event in September is said to be unprecedented in scientific history.
It began with a large earthquake on the 14th of the month and continued with a swarm of moderate tremors.
Start and stop
"About a week into the sequence, there was a volcanic eruption," explained Dr Ebinger.
"A lot of ash was thrown up in the air, and a lot of cracks appeared in the ground; some of which were more than a metre wide.
"Using satellite techniques we can see ground deformation, and about a month after the sequence, we could see a 60km long section had opened up, and it opened up about 8m in its central part.
"It appears that we've seen the birth of an ocean basin."
The movements of September are only a small part of what would be needed to create a whole ocean - the complete process takes millions of years - and in other regions of the planet, ocean development has been started only to stall at a later time.
Record Drought Cripples Life Along the Amazon
By LARRY ROHTER
The Amazon River basin, the world's largest rain forest, is grappling with a devastating drought that is the worst since record keeping began a century ago. It has evaporated whole lagoons and kindled forest fires, killed off fish and crops, stranded boats and the villagers who travel by them, brought disease and wreaked economic havoc.
"There have been years before in which we've had a deficit of rainfall, but we've never experienced drops in the water levels of rivers like those we have seen in 2005,". "It has truly been without precedent, and it looks like it is only going to be December or January, if then, that things return to normal."
Scientists say the drought is most likely a result of the same rise in water temperatures in the tropical Atlantic Ocean that unleashed Hurricane Katrina. They also worry that if global warming is involved, it may be the beginning of a new era of more severe and frequent droughts in the region that accounts for nearly a quarter of the world's fresh water.
"We have no idea of the game we have played into by running this worldwide experiment of pumping so much greenhouse gases into the atmosphere," Mr. Nepstad said.
"I am very frightened," said Jair Souto, the mayor of a sleepy market town, Manaquiri.
In Acre State in western Brazil, parched trees turned to tinder, and the number of forest fires recorded tripled to nearly 1,500 at its peak in September compared with a year earlier.
On the Madeira River navigation had to be suspended when water levels fell to barely one-tenth of their rainy season level. Peasant farmers have watched their crops rot because they cannot ship them to market.
"The water level wasn't but two fingers high, and the channel was choked in the grass that sprang up, so you couldn't even paddle a canoe". "With the fish all dead and our watermelon and banana crop all rotted, we'd be starving if it weren't for the food packages the government brings."
As water levels dropped, areas where the river normally flowed free instead became stagnant pools, the ideal breeding ground for mosquitoes.
A vast majority of communities rely on the river to carry away human waste. With sewage now accumulating near the settlements, the risk of cholera and other diseases is expected to rise with water levels when the rainy season.
Whether the increases in deforestation registered in the Amazon in recent years have also played a role is less clear.
But river-dwellers old enough to remember the era before deforestation began on a large scale say that the cutting down of trees along rivers and lakes has aided in the accumulation of silt. As a result, they say, navigation channels that remained open even in the most severe of previous dry seasons are now blocked and choked.
Research also suggests that the forest itself, and consequently the entire ecosystem, has been made more vulnerable by the drought. When deprived of an adequate ration of rainfall, trees instead drain water from the soil and curb the growth of their trunks, which are vital to their role in pulling immense quantities of carbon dioxide out of the air.
"Because droughts remain registered in the soil for up to four years, the situation is still very critical and precarious, and will remain so," Mr. Nepstad said. Where there are "forests already teetering on the edge," he added, the prospect of "massive tree mortality and greater susceptibility to fire" must be considered.
While scientists largely agree that higher temperatures in the Atlantic are responsible for the severity of this year's drought, they are still searching for an explanation for that phenomenon. It could be just a one-time disturbance, or it could be more permanent, perhaps brought on by greenhouse gas emissions.
"Yes, a global warming effect would explain increases in ocean temperatures, but no one is saying that yet, because it is still very early, and we don't yet have enough data," said Carlos Nobre, director of Brazil's National Institute of Space Research, which monitors climatic patterns in the Amazon. "Droughts like this one are very rare, but one consequence of a warmer planet would be that they occur with more frequency, which is something we are going to have to be watching for."

Seeing & Knowing:

The Difference Between Seeing & Knowing:
Jesus was not engaging in meaningless babble when he said the world cannot receive or welcome the counselor because it neither sees nor knows him.
Seeing is recognizing someone visually as to who he is whilst knowing is having knowledge or information of who someone is either because you have been told or you worked it out logically or have evidence.
You may not know or see that someone is the prime minister’s son but if someone you trust tells you so you then know he is the prime minister’s son but you may still not see him as the prime minister’s son either because you belittle him or you cannot or have not changed your perception that he is just another person but after some time of knowing and seeing him, you may gradually begin to see or recognize him as the son of the pm.
JESUS IS SAYING THAT BECAUSE THE WORLD CANNOT SEE THAT HE IS THE COUNSELOR, DOES NOT KNOW HE IS THE COUNSELOR (BECAUSE NO ONE HAS TOLD THEM DEFINITELY AND THEY CANNOT WORK IT OUT LOGICALLY) IT CANNOT RECEIVE OR WELCOME HIM. THEREFORE HE WILL BE (COMPLETELY) IGNORED BY THE WORLD AND TREATED AS A NONENTITY WHEN HE MAY BE TRULY UNIQUE IN THIS WORLD.
AND WHAT DOES JESUS SAY THAT YOU SHOULD NOTE ABOUT HIM? HE IS THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH OR REPRESENTS TRUTH IN CONTRADISTINCTION TO THIS WORLD OF PERVASIVE PRETENSE THAT IS SO INTENSE THOSE WHO BELIEVE THEY ARE GOOD DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE WICKED, WHO IS TO YOUR ADVANTAGE TO COME, HE WILL COUNSEL YOU, TEACH YOU ALL THINGS, GUIDE YOU TO ALL THE TRUTH AND TAKE FROM WHAT IS HIS AND MAKE IT KNOWN TO YOU AND CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT.
Quote: and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and alighting on him; and lo, a voice from heaven, saying, "This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased."
Comment: Christians even the top of the hierarchy routinely speak of their pride in this and that without realizing that pride is a forceful emotion and sin that drives men to irrationally subject themselves and others to suffering eg hide their hurt at a sarcasm and instead to pile on the agony to smile as if they are not hurt.
Notice God said he was pleased not proud with his Son.
He Dwells With You:
If the counselor is in your mind who is to your advantage to come, teaches you all things, brings you remembrance all that Jesus has said and convinces you of sin, righteousness and judgment and he still needs Jesus to tell you that he dwells in your mind, he must be a very secretive or hard to see or false mental counselor. Whatever is true is plain and needs no effort or imagination, let alone stretching your imagination to see.
Therefore unless you believe Jesus is speaking nonsense or the obvious, that he said the counselor dwells with you indicate the counselor cannot be a mental being.
If the counselor is a physical being who will come and you know he dwells with you, then Jesus need not tell you so.
It is only when the counselor to come is a physical being and people in general do not know he dwells with them that Jesus has to tell you so.
Taken logically, something that correlates completely with what Jesus said in quite a few other instances, the only premise that can be true that makes Jesus’ statement valid is that the counselor is (definitely) a physical being who will come and the vast or entire majority of people are unaware of his presence.
**
It was because Jesus was drawing crowds that alarmed authorities felt threatened enough to plot to get rid of him. In the same way if the counselor was to draw crowds, it will alarm latter day authorities to get rid of him. If the counselor was to appear in person drawing crowds in this modern global day it is a certainty that he will not last long.
It is because the world cannot receive the counselor because they neither see him (recognize by appearance he is the counselor) nor knows him (no one who knows has told them) that Jesus has to presage his arrival. If the world can see or know him and therefore receive him as the counselor or he by himself can convince the world he is the counselor just as he will convince the world of sin, righteousness and judgment, it would not be necessary for Jesus to speak in advance or introduce him to you like masters of ceremonies introduce the next speaker.
The Buddha said that kingship over men is meager compared to heavenly pleasure and no heavenly being in his right mind (and you must have a right mind to be in heaven) will volunteer to come to earth for men to spit at and persecute him, even those who think they are good are goats in sheepskin trying to poison him with their niceness they insist he should accept gratefully.
Therefore the fact that Jesus said that it is to your advantage that he goes, if he does not go the counselor will not come to you indicates the counselor will be a person who will come not a mental entity because no heavenly being in his right mind will come on his own into this mad violent world but he has to be sent and if Jesus remains, there is no need for another being from heaven to come.
Convincing The World: Jesus did not say the counselor will convince the world that he is the counselor or that the world will become convinced he is the counselor.
Baring Concealed Fangs:
I pointed out unemotionally in an Email to a friend that he was prying into my affairs, he often sprinkled his speech with laughter and there was stretching of syllables and constant changes in speed and loudness in his speech and he replied cryptically “peace be with you”.
When I asked exactly what he meant by that, he did not let his yes be yes only but exploded saying:
i have grave doubts about your own hg (high) standing & being judgmental about others.Maybe you should take a hard lood at yourself first.Spending a lot of money on variours objects definitely does not show a sign of detachment.
Being hypercritical & ignoring the views of others does not show any (he is not generous enough to grant me even poor insight) insight, self insight is better.

DOUBT IS A PAINFUL FALSE CONFLICTED EMOTIONAL STATE THAT CAN REACH AGONIZING INTENSITY AND IT IS ALSO AS THE BUDDHA SAID ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO STATES OF FUTURE WOE SO IT IS WICKED AND A GRAVE SIN AND YOU NEVER CAST DOUBT LET ALONE GRAVE DOUBTS ON YOURSELF OR OTHERS. (It may not be true his doubts are grave but it is to forcefully intimidate me to believe him and therefore he is an actor, not just here but everything in him is acted. Many can see others are actors but they do not realize they are academy award standard actors in their own quiet ways)

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY I AM LOW STANDING AND TO TELL ME NOT TO BE JUDGMENTAL BUT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY YOU HAVE DOUBT LET ALONE GRAVE DOUBTS ABOUT MY ALLEGED HIGH STANDING AND BEING JUDGMENTAL WHICH IS TANTAMOUNT TO ACCUSING ME PRESUMPTUOUSLY OF HOLDING MYSELF IN HIGH STANDING AND THAT I AM JUDGMENTAL LIKE YOU ARE JUDGING ME.

BECAUSE DOUBT IS A FORCEFUL CONDITIONING STATE, EVERY TIME YOU DOUBT YOURSELF AND OTHERS WHETHER GENUINELY OR IT IS A LIE, YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO DOUBT THAT LEADS EVEN TO MENTAL HELL.

(When Peter said he will never fall away, Jesus did not say he had grave doubts about Peter’s faithfulness but he said, truly I say to you, you will deny me three times before the cock crows. Jesus respected Peter’s belief and merely expressed his own opposite belief. Have I not taken from what is Jesus’ and made it known to you in a way no one has done? Do I not convince you of sin, righteousness and judgment? Has anybody explained as succinctly what the Buddha meant by doubt and uncertainty being one of three lower fetters together with self identity views, faith in rites and precepts to states of future woe?).

OFTEN WHEN PEOPLE SAY THEY ARE DEFINITE IN THEIR ACCUSATIONS IT IS TO INTIMIDATE THE LISTENER TO BELIEVE HIS ACCUSATION AND THAT IS MALICIOUS.

YOU MAY BE SMUG IN SUCCEEDING TO CONVINCE YOUR VICTIM THAT YOUR ACCUSATION IS DEFINITELY TRUE BUT NOT ONLY HAVE YOU INCURRED KARMIC DEBT FOR BRAINWASHING OTHERS BUT BECAUSE YOU MUST ALSO FORCE YOURSELF TO BELIEVE WHAT YOU FALSELY SAYS IS DEFINITELY TRUE, YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOUR MIND EACH TIME TO INCREASINGLY BELIEVE DEFINITELY YOUR OWN FALSITY SUCH THAT YOU HAVE A TRULY DEFINITE APPOINTMENT WITH FUTURE UNCONTROLLABLE MAD LOGIC.

JUST AS THE INTEGRITY OF WHAT THE BUDDHA OR JESUS TAUGHT IS INDEPENDENT OF THEIR NATURES ALTHOUGH WHAT THEY SAY REFLECTS THEIR NATURE, IF YOU THINK THEY ARE HYPOCRITES AND YOU CAN PRACTICE WHAT THEY PREACH BETTER THAN THEM, YOU WILL BE A BETTER MAN AND EXPERIENCE LESS SUFFERING, IN THE SAME WAY THE INTEGRITY OF WHAT I HAVE SAID IS INDEPENDENT OF MY PERSONAL NATURE ALTHOUGH IT REFLECTS MY NATURE AND TO BELIEVE MY LOW STANDING, BEING ATTACHED, HYPOCRITICAL, HYPERCRITICAL AND WITHOUT ANY INSIGHT (HE DOES NOT GRANT ME EVEN POOR INSIGHT) ABROGATES ALL THAT I HAVE SAID BEFORE REFLECTS A LACK OF UNDERSTANDING & BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE. IF YOU HAVE UNDERSTOOD & PRACTICED WHAT I PREACHED NAMELY NOT SMILING, NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN IMBUED BY A STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION FREE MENTAL & BODILY CALM CLARITY TO NEVER HAVE SAID WHAT YOU SAID IN THE EMOTIONAL WAY YOU SAID.

EVEN IF ALL THAT YOU ACCUSE ME OF IS TRUE IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS AND YOU ARE MEDDLING OR PRYING INTO MY AFFAIRS THAT IN THIS CASE YOU ARE UNABLE TO RESTRAIN BECAUSE YOU ARE DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO RETALIATE FOR A PERCEIVED ATTACK ON YOUR PERSON BY ME IN WHICH THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL’S BACK MIGHT HAVE BEEN MY JUSTIFIED QUERY AS TO EXACTLY WHAT YOU MEANT BY ‘PEACE BE WITH ME’ IN REPLY TO MY SAYING YOU PRY, LAUGH, STRETCHES SYLLABLES WITH CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS. I NEVER IMAGINED HE HARBORED SUCH GRAVE DOUBTS ABOUT ME ALL THE WHILE AND IF HE DID HARBOR SUCH NEGATIVE SENTIMENTS ABOUT ME, THEN HIS FRIENDLINESS IS FABRICATED OR HYPOCRITICAL. BECAUSE I AM NOT EMOTIONAL, I DO NOT SMILE OR EXPRESS EAGERNESS TO ANYBODY, I AM NOT ‘WARM’ TO ANYBODY I CANNOT BE HYPOCRITICAL TO HIM OR ANYBODY.

DO YOU PAY ME A STIPEND FOR MY DETACHMENT OR INTEGRITY SO THAT YOU FEEL CHEATED IF I AM NOT UP TO (EMOTIONAL) STANDARDS YOU EXPECT OF ME?

THE MANY THINGS I DWELT ON (eg that ‘a saree is anything but a square piece of cloth’ is always a false statement because whatever else a saree may be it is still a square piece of cloth and there are many things a saree cannot be like a cat or a fridge) MAY BE CONSIDERED BY YOU TO BE HYPERCRITICAL BUT THEY SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES, HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH MY INTEGRITY OR HIGH STANDING. IF YOU THINK IT IS VALID AND I AM NITPICKING YOU MAY BE COURTING FUTURE MAD LOGIC BECAUSE IT IS TOTALLY FALSE AND NEVER GOOD FOR THE RECIPIENT OR THE SPEAKER WHO OBVIOUSLY BELIEVES IN THE VERACITY OF HIS SWEEPING STATEMENT.

I HAVE SAID THAT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES I TRIGGERED AFTER 1977 BENEFITED EVERYONE, I HAVE INTEPRETED IN MANY INSTANCES WHAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA SAID IN A WAY NEVER BEFORE HEARD, I HAVE SHOWN THAT RESTLESSNESS IS NOT BLAMELESS OR MANDATORY BUT CAN BE ABANDONED AS THE BUDDHA SAID, IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIT RESTLESSNESS PERMANENTLY, SOMETHING UNHEARD OF, NEVER DREAMT POSSIBLE, BY PRACTICING NON STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, NON CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHILST SPEAKING. IF WHAT I SAY IS APPLICABLE TO EVERYONE AND TRULY LEADS TO A PERMANENT CESSATION OF RESTLESSNESS, THEN THE COUNSELOR THAT JESUS SPOKE OF MUST ALSO DWELL ON THEM TO BENEFIT YOU AND IF I HAVE DONE SO, I HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM.

DID I EVER SAY I WAS THE COUNSELOR OR THAT YOU SHOULD WORSHIP LET ALONE EMOTIONALLY WORSHIP ME AS THE COUNSELOR? DID I EVER SAY THAT TO BE THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED IS HIGH STANDING OR THAT I CRAVE HIGH STANDING? JESUS SAID HE AMONGST YOU WHO WILL BE THE GREATEST WILL BE THE SERVANT TO THE REST, NOT THE HIGHEST STANDING. ALTHOUGH YOU NEVER STATED PRECISELY WHY YOU PERCEIVE ME AS HIGH STANDING, YOU MAY BE FOOLISHLY JUMPING TO UNWARRANTED CONCLUSIONS BASED ON WHAT I SAY AND THEREFORE ATTACKING MY IMAGINED HIGH STANDING LIKE A FOOL ATTACKING HIS OWN SHADOW.

WHAT I SAID IMPLIES I MAY BE AND LOGICALLY AM THE COUNSELOR JESUS SPOKE ABOUT. I DID NOT SAY I AM OR MUST BE. YOU THINK I AM PROMOTING MY HIGH STANDING BUT I MAY BE GLORIFYING JESUS AS NO ONE HAS DONE BEFORE BY POINTING OUT THE TRUTH OF WHAT HE SAID IN THIS AND MANY OTHER INSTANCES THAT YOU CANNOT EMULATE EVEN IF YOU WANTED. LET OTHERS & MYSELF DECIDE WHETHER I AM A FAKE OR NOT, IF YOU EXPRESS OPINION THAT EMOTIONALLY INFLUENCE OTHERS (EG YOU WANT ME TO THINK THAT IT IS LAUGHABLE IF I THINK I AM THE COUNSELOR) UNRIGHTEOUSLY, YOU ARE ASKING FOR ACCOUNTABILITY.

(There is a medical story that a consultant on a ward round stuck a finger into a patient’s bedside urinal and then put a finger into his mouth and remarked how sweet it tasted and invited an inattentive student to emulate him whereupon he recoiled at the taste. What the student failed to notice was that the consultant put a different finger into his mouth)

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO UNEMOTIONALLY, CALM AND CLEARLY THINKING TOTALLY REJECT EVERYTHING THAT I SAY BUT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO EMOTIONALLY ATTACK MY PERSON AS HYPERCRITICAL BECAUSE THAT IS HURTFUL DERISION, A SIN. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO EMOTIONALLY ATTACK EVEN ONE THING I SAY LET ALONE ATTACK MY PERSON FOR WHAT I SAY.

I DID NOT EVEN ATTACK HIS ALLEGED PRYING, LAUGHING, STRETCHING SYLLABLES, LET ALONE ATTACK HIM, I MERELY POINTED OUT CALMLY WITH CLEAR THINKING THAT I PERCEIVED HE PRIES, LAUGHS WHILST SPEAKING AND STRETCHES HIS SYLLABLES.

SIMILARLY I HAVE NO RIGHT & I WOULD BE FOOLISH TO EXPECT OR INSIST THAT OTHERS ACCEPT WHAT I SAY BECAUSE I MUST THEN BE HURT IF I AM SPURNED.

MY DETACHMENT IS NOT TO IMPRESS YOU OR ANYBODY OR GOD BUT I AM DETACHED BECAUSE I TRULY DO NOT WANT TO SUFFER WHEREAS OTHERS ARE ONLY ACTING OR PRETENDING SO WELL THEY BELIEVE FALSELY THEY DO NOT WANT TO SUFFER, DO NOT WANT TO MAKE OTHERS SUFFER. YOU ARE A FOOL TO MEDDLE OR PRY INTO MY DETACHMENT BY EQUATING MY SPENDING A LOT OF MONEY (THAT YOU OBVIOUSLY TOOK TO HEART AND CAST JUDGMENT YOURSELF) EQUATES DEFINITELY TO ATTACHMENT WHEN IT IS FALSE LOGIC. THEREFORE YOU ARE FOOLISH AND A BUSYBODY OR PRYING TO CONCERN YOURSELF WITH MY DETACHMENT THAT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.

EVEN A SUPPOSEDLY COMMITTED INTELLIGENT CHRISTIAN FAILED TO GRASP WHAT I HAVE SAID NOT ONCE BUT MANY TIMES IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, CANNOT LET HIS YES BE YES ONLY, CANNOT SEE OR KNOW THAT I AM SOMEONE OF SOME UNCOMMON NOBILITY, WHAT MORE THAT THE MASSES WILL? IT MAY BE THAT I AM RUBBISH OR IT MAY BE AS JESUS SAID, THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH THAT THE WORLD CANNOT RECEIVE (WELCOME) BECAUSE IT NEITHER SEES (RECOGNIZE) NOR KNOWS (HAVE BEEN TOLD) HIM.

GODATTA:
No matter what the praise from foolsor the censure from those who know,the censure from those who knowis better than if there were praise from fools.

Those who've abandoned sensuality & anger,whose minds are calmed from becoming & non- becoming,go through the world unattached.For them there is nothing dear or undear.Developing the factors of Awakening, faculties & strengths, attaining the foremost peace,without fermentation, they are entirely Unbound.

Do I criticize the statement above? No, I am in total agreement.
Why should I be upset with him if he turns out to be a hypocrite? If I can practice what he spoke better than him I will be a better man.

Have you heard me criticize God, Jesus or the Buddha? Many have criticized them without realizing they do eg “Act of God” attributed to calamities or why is God so cruel. You may think I am hypercritical when I pick on “peace be with you” but you may be flirting with future madness if you think it is meaningful not just to you but to others. If you have not attained the foremost peace how can you offer peace to others?
If you understood what the Buddha or Jesus said, you will realize this world is far from blameless and you have to be very careful in upholding the views of men.
“Peace Be With You”
(In the light of his uncharitable remarks about me, I was right to question what he meant by ‘peace be with me’ because the cryptic statement can mean opposite things)
If I knew what he meant by “Peace be with you” I would not ask him exactly what he meant. If he thinks it is a crystal clear reply, he may be courting future mad logic to believe it is clear to himself and others when it is an abstract or not let your yes be yes only answer.

A person who lets his yes be yes only replies “I acknowledge your comments”, “I am sorry if I offended you” or “I refute your charges”. “Peace be with you” is like saying ‘American cars don’t cross the pond well’ when you mean American cars are not well received in Europe.

Does he mean “I am sorry I made you angry therefore peace be with you” or “although you accuse me wrongly and I am annoyed I forgive you therefore peace be with you”? If I am in peace do I need you to tell me peace be with me? If I am not in peace, do you think merely what you say will confer peace on me? If it serves no purpose then ‘peace be with me’ is a mere nicety.

If you think your ‘peace be with you’ is emulating Jesus’ “My peace I give to you” you are mistaken because you are aping Jesus. When Jesus was speaking of his true assuaging peace that is unknown in this world but when you speak of peace it is the forceful make believe suppressed restlessness type that is the only kind you know that you think others should share with you. Further what Jesus spoke was live specifically intended for an occasion whilst your ‘peace be with you’ is likely a rote standard therefore insincere rehash that you think is chic or groovy for similar occasions not caring that it creates uncertainty in the recipient as to exactly what you mean.

A person who lets his yes be yes only when asked what he meant by ‘peace be with you’ will merely reply that he meant such and such. Instead by launching a broadside at me he said much more which came from evil:

i have grave doubts (A person who lets his yes be yes merely says he has doubts. The motive is likely to exaggerate or intimidate. Whoever must be grave must suffer gravely and be careful what you wish for because since you like graveness so much you shall have all the graveness your heart desires in the future) about your own hg (high) standing & being judgmental about others.
(High standing is a derivative of emotional pride and never a pleasure it is faked to be but it is always a fabricated deluded stressful state of a foolish mind. I do not value high standing nor do I look down on anybody and you don’t know me and are accusing me falsely to say I adopt a high standing attitude.
A wise person does not sinfully cast doubt on himself or others because doubt is an agitated emotional state or reaction to a situation that is reinforcing & one of three lower fetters to future states of woe according to the Buddha. Not only do you think nothing about harboring grave doubts, you want me to share your grave doubts and become doubt ridden. “I do not think you are high standing” is a wiser less emotional way to speak. You have every right not to think I am high standing but you have no right to cast doubt on my perceived high standing or being judgmental.)Maybe you should take a hard lood (“Hard” is a strong word reflecting a forceful or emotional acting mind; a person who let his yes be yes only says take a look at yourself. Again this is wickedly casting doubt on me) at yourself first.
Spending a lot of money on variours objects definitely does not show a sign of detachment.
(He is likely using ‘definite’ to intimidate me to believe what he says is right. Each time you forcefully say something is definite when it is not, you are reinforcing yourself to falsity that becomes increasingly compelling you do not realize you will succumb to be madly illogical.)

Being hypercritical (if you let your yes be yes you say ‘critical’ but if you are emotional you say ‘hypercritical’ and it is you who suffers because emotion is applying force on your mind causing stress) & ignoring the views of others does not show any (I don’t even possess poor insight in his estimation) insight, self insight is better (if you have self insight you would have realized you laugh when you speak, you constantly stretch your syllables and change speed and loudness when you speak and how these create stress, restlessness and distraction in yourself and others who have to bear the brunt of it).

Spending A Lot Of Money:
You may think I am hypercritical and hypocritical to criticize the pope (because you identify with him or your church) for wearing designer gowns when I own two relatively expensive cars and an old car that I cannot dispose off at a reasonable price but whereas I did not buy my cars for style or prestige (many do), I do not drive around in a flaunting or proud or abusive manner and they provide superior handling and ride that I can appreciate (therefore I am not practicing something irrational or controlled madness, what I do has purpose), the pope’s garments are all for show, does not improve his performance as pope, are in fact likely to be uncomfortable or unwieldy to wear, he may flaunt them and they promote appreciation of appearances (therefore he is practicing what is irrational or courting future madness to believe all those gowns are meaningful and necessary). How do you know that he is not more emotionally attached to the trappings of his office than I am to my cars? A beggar might attack you for taking a penny off him whilst I was hardly upset when I found a long gash in my parked car a year or so ago. Can you react without anger when you find your dear car vandalized?

Many do not realize their perception is selective and they pry without realizing. For instance they take note when I inform them about my three cars but when I speak about stretching syllables, constant changes in speed and loudness they do not take note, it falls on deaf ears that think it does not apply to them. If they have taken note and applied accordingly they would have discovered there are constant not frequent stretching of syllables in their speech and that of everyone around and taken action to stop them.

People who accuse me of being hypercritical do not realize they are more intensely (because they are emotional and I am not) and constantly (because they cannot help themselves reacting whilst I can) critical than me. Whatever impinges on their awareness they helplessly must react or express an opinion that they may keep to themselves like (thrilled) or dislike (disgusted) or ‘ho, ho, ho’. Just because they laugh when they think negatively of others, they think they are tolerant when they are secretly laughing or looking down at others or being hypercritical and hypocritical. Even when they defend the views of others it is actually hypocritical, they force themselves to act as if they appreciate whilst hiding their disagreements so well they believe they truly appreciate or respect others’ opinions. Because they are forceful people they sometimes force themselves to suppress any reaction to events or they smile with force as if they are indifferent and they kid themselves they have not been critical in those instances. They may think they are advocating tolerance or peacemakers but their attitude is ‘I shit, you shit and everybody shits so shut up and let’s shit together’ or ‘see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil’ when there is plenty of evil around to see, hear and speak against. Because my mind is now calm and clearly thinking, risen above the fray, I do not react to many things happening around me, let alone be hypercritical all the time. Whoever is hypercritical will suffer even agony so you do not have put your head on the chopper board to openly accuse me or others of being hypercritical.

Attachment is always a forceful or emotional woeful state of mind whilst detachment can be either forced or acted or passive or effortless or woe free.

Detachment is not something anyone can practice in isolation but as the Buddha said, it is the culmination in the nature of things of a process of awakening whereby mindfulness (eg paying attention to how you speak) leads to analysis of qualities (examination and the discovery of rampant stretching, speed and loudness changes) leads to persistence (as you discover more and more insights that reduces your mental suffering you become motivated or persistent) leads to rapture that is not of the flesh (as you reduce defiling yourself, the suffering load reduces and your body becomes suffused with bliss that is not sensual) leads to passive effortless calm (the swirling in a beaker of water allowed to stand gradually settles or calms down) leads to passive concentration (when a beaker of turbid water is allowed to stand still suspended particles in time settle down and the water becomes concentrated or pure) leads to equanimity or true detachment (neither like or dislike).
Hitting the jackpot:
You never belittle anyone, not even the madman who cries that his dead son is back alive.
If you think I too belittle you, you may be right or you may be again accusing me wrongly, hammering yet another nail into your coffin of future pain.
If the person you foolishly scoff is a person of some nobility then you are in trouble with the Buddha because he said those who scoffed at noble ones are headed for perdition.
Indeed these worthy (you are worthy but if you sin you are punished) beings who were possessed of wrong conduct in body (Jesus said woe to you who laughs for you shall weep), who were possessed of wrong conduct in speech, who were possessed of wrong conduct of thought, scoffers at the ariyans (noble ones), holding a wrong view, incurring deeds consequent on a wrong view -- these, at the breaking up of the body after dying, have arisen in a sorrowful state, a bad bourn, the abyss, Niraya hell. But these worthy beings who were possessed of good conduct in body, who were possessed of good conduct in speech, who were possessed of good conduct in thought, who did not scoff at the ariyans, holding a right view, incurring deeds consequent on a right view -- these, at the breaking up of the body, after dying, have arisen in a good bourn, a heaven world.
You will hit the jackpot if you foolishly scoff at the counselor:
And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
YOU WILL BE BACK HERE AND THE NEXT TIME THERE MAY NOT BE ANY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT WAS TRIGGERED BY ME TO MAKE LIFE APPRECIABLY EASIER FOR YOU, YOU WILL BE LEFT TO YOUR OWN DEVICES, TO APPRECIATE ALL THE DISPARATE CONFLICTING INDIGESTIBLE VIEWS YOU SO ADVOCATE OTHERS AND ME TO APPRECIATE.
Repudiating With Reasons Not Ignoring, Hypercritical & No Insight:
Quote: Being hypercritical & ignoring the views of others does not show any insight, self insight is better.
This is a no holds barred attack with strong words ‘hypercritical’ instead of ‘critical’, ‘ignoring’ instead of ‘paying little attention’ and what I say shows NO insight. Few people have no insight and he is flirting with falsity in his haste to persecute and is not generous enough to concede ‘poor insight’.
Jesus said you will be judged for every careless or emotional word you say and if it turns out that most if not everything I say does not ignore the opinions of others but rationally repudiate them, not only is there not NO insight in my critique but it is penetrative, he is asking for big trouble putting down someone is uncommonly penetrative is no insight.
He has a right to unemotionally reject totally all I say but he has no right to tell me off that ‘it does not show any insight’ as if he is an arbiter of what is insight. If it turns he himself has poor insight and he is telling off someone who has exceptional insight he is a great fool.
A possible example of my hypercriticism, ignoring others’ views and showing no insight:
Quote Bush: Many advocating an artificial (timetables can be fixed or flexible but is there a natural timetable?) timetable for withdrawing out troops are sincere, but I believe they are sincerely wrong. Pulling out our troops before they’ve achieved their purpose is not a plan for victory”
Comment: Bush stumbling on his language is not just isolated oddity but it reflects his mind is seriously jumbled or warped and he is mentally tormented not calm and clearly thinking.
He was trying to say that he sincerely believes his critics are wrong but he garbled it to become he believes they are sincerely wrong.
Does anyone need him to tell or remind them that pulling out the troops before they have achieved their purpose (possibly security) is not a plan for victory but failure to achieve their purpose? You might expect a child to say that B is not A, but you might expect a president of a so called mighty country to do better than that.
YOU MAY SAY I AM NITPICKING BUT IT MAY BE YOU WHO IS SO TOLERANT OF SIN TO SEE, HEAR AND SPEAK NO EVIL WHEN THERE IS PLENTY OF EVIL TO SEE, HEAR AND SPEAK AGAINST. YOU MAY THINK YOU ARE MERITORIOUSLY NON JUDGMENTAL BUT YOU MAY BE AN ACCOMPLICE TO SIN AND ON THE SIDE OF MEN NOT GOD.
Adding Insult To Injury:
He subsequently suggested that I should provide him with a list of taboo subjects that he should avoid.
He obviously thinks he is being good and may not realize that he is shifting the onus on me to do work that may be fruitless to give him a list and implying I am sensitive and he is not to blame because he does not he know what topics are taboo to me.
It is easy for you to tell others to do this and that, provide me with a list but make sure it is not sending me on a wild goose chase or shifting blame or you are unknowingly piling fresh karma.
No one is a master of his prying but like everything that is forceful or emotional, it grows in strength with practice and even if he is supplied with a list it is likely he will transgress.
A Miser May Be More Attached:
The miser who spends hardly at all may be more attached to his money and miserly possessions than the person who spends.
Only a person who has become a Buddha is completely detached and without desire but if you think the desire of heavenly beings is the same as your emotional possessive constantly unnecessarily changing in speed and forcefulness desire, you may be a fool.
The Buddha says below that a noble person can enjoy his righteously gained wealth:
Adiya Sutta:Benefits to be Obtained(from Wealth)
Then Anathapindika the householder went to the Blessed One. The Blessed One said: "There are these five benefits that can be obtained from wealth.
"There is the case where the noble disciple (someone noble can enjoy his wealth) -- using the wealth earned through his efforts & enterprise, righteous wealth righteously gained -- provides himself with pleasure & satisfaction. He provides his mother & father with pleasure & satisfaction. He provides his children, his wife, his slaves, servants & assistants with pleasure & satisfaction. This is the first benefit.
"Furthermore, the noble disciple -- using the wealth earned -- provides his friends & associates with pleasure & satisfaction. This is the second benefit.
"Furthermore, the noble disciple -- using the wealth earned -- wards off from calamities coming from fire, flood, kings, thieves, or hateful heirs, and keeps himself safe. This is the third.
"Furthermore, the noble disciple -- using the wealth earned -- performs the five oblations: to relatives, guests, the dead, kings & devas. This is the fourth benefit.
"Furthermore, the noble disciple -- using the wealth earned -- institutes offerings of supreme aim, heavenly, resulting in happiness, leading to heaven, given to priests & contemplatives who abstain from intoxication & heedlessness, each taking himself to Unbinding. This is the fifth benefit. (What you give to a Buddha is far more meritorious than that given to a beggar)
(As the Buddha said there is lust also in heaven and heavenly nymphs make human beauties look like monkeys with cauterized faces but if you think that heavenly lust is the same furtive, pretentious, self and other defiling even violent emotional lust with constant forceful changes in speed and force as humans do, you may be deluded. The lust in heaven may be passive, not forceful, not emotional, not defiling or hurting self and other)
No Fellowship With Sin:
Many have this mistaken view that Buddhism and Christianity preaches tolerance for the views of others. Not that you should condemn others but you should not approve with reason the wrong views others hold nor act as if you appreciate them because wrong view is deadly and leads to hell or the animal womb.
For instance whoever you are, I do not approve and maintain that all investment is gambling, greed for unrighteous gain and even if you do not believe it is, you are conditioning yourself to emotional doubt and uncertainty as you frequently anxiously check your investment, hesitate on what decision to make and fear unexpected loss. Whether you will take heed is another thing but I do not approve or encourage you to invest.
Jesus is not speaking of compromise when he spoke below.
"Do not think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; 36 and a man's foes will be those of his own household. 37* He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; 38 and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.

(If I were to say that I have come to set a man against father and he who loves his son more than me is not worthy of me, I would be branded a heretic and no one will read what I write anymore. Why should people acquiesce if Jesus said that and not me? It is not because they perceive the truth of what Jesus said but because they know who Jesus is and his promise of eternal life make them afraid to speak out even when the statement is likely to place them in a quandary. I am a nobody and they do not respect me because I do not have a halo on my head. Appearances are important to humans. The truth of what Jesus said is that this is a world of ubiquitous pretense wherein even intimate family members are killing each other with poisonous niceness they insist is goodness and therefore whoever loves his acted life here, his acted love for family members above his love for Jesus or truth or non suffering non acting is not worthy of him. What Jesus said indicates truth and goodness is a rarity in this world and therefore you have to forsake the rampant falsity of family ties to exit to heaven)
Similarly do not imagine the Buddha is indulgent because he says below he will kill those who are tamable but refuse to subject themselves to taming. There are many who cannot be tamed and there are those who can be tamed but decline to be tamed. You may be one of those and don’t think the Buddha looks on kindly to you. Similarly Jesus said many will prophesy in his name but he will tell them he does not know them because they are evil doers or do not obey what he commands.
Kesi Sutta: To Kesi the Horsetrainer
Then Kesi the horsetrainer went to the Blessed One. The Blessed One said to him: "You, Kesi, are a trained man, a trainer of tamable horses. And how do you train a tamable horse?"
"Lord, I train a tamable horse [sometimes] with mildness, [sometimes] with harshness, [sometimes] with both."
"And if a tamable horse does not submit by the combination, Kesi, what do you do?"
"If a tamable horse does not submit, then I kill it. Why is that? [I think:] 'Don't let this be a disgrace to my lineage of teachers.' But the Blessed One, is the unexcelled trainer of tamable people. How do you train a tamable person?"
"Kesi, I train a tamable person [sometimes] with mildness, [sometimes] with harshness, [sometimes] with both mildness & harshness.
"In using mildness, [I teach:] 'Such is good bodily conduct. Such is its result. Such is good verbal conduct. Such is it’s result. Such is good mental conduct. Such is it’s result. Such are the devas. Such are human beings.'
"In using harshness, [I teach:] 'Such is bodily misconduct. Such is the result. Such is verbal misconduct. Such is the result. Such is mental misconduct. Such is the result. Such is hell,the animal womb, the realm of the hungry shades.'
"If a tamable person does not submit either to mild or harsh training or both, then I kill him, Kesi."
"But it's not proper for our Blessed One to take life! "
"It is true, Kesi. But if a tamable person does not submit to training, then the Tathagata & his fellows in the holy life do not regard him as being worth admonishing. This is what it means to be totally destroyed in the Doctrine & Discipline."
"Yes, lord, one would be totally destroyed if the Tathagata and one's fellows in the holy life do not regard one as being worth admonishing.
Again the Buddha below refused to recite the vow of purity throughout the night because someone in the audience was unclean.
Uposatha Sutta: The Observance
Now the Blessed One -- it being the observance day -- was sitting surrounded by monks. Then Ven. Ananda said to him: "The night, venerable sir, is far advanced. The community of monks has been sitting here long. Let the Blessed One recite the Patimokkha to them." When this was said, the Blessed One remained silent.
Then a second time Ven. Ananda repeated his words." When this was said, the Blessed One remained silent.
Then a third time, when the night was far advanced, at the end of the third watch, as dawn was approaching, Ven. Ananda arose from his seat, and said to him: "The night, venerable sir, is far advanced.Let the Blessed One recite the Patimokkha to the community of monks."
"Ananda, the gathering isn't pure."
Then the thought occurred to Ven. Maha Moggallana: "To whom did the Blessed One just now say, 'Ananda, the gathering isn't pure'?" So he directed his mind, encompassing with his awareness the awareness of the community of monks. He saw that individual -- unprincipled, evil, unclean and suspect in his undertakings, hidden in his actions, not leading the holy life though claiming to do so. He went over to that individual, and said, "Get up, my friend. You have been seen by the Blessed One. You have no communion with the community of monks." Then the individual remained silent. A second time...A third time, Ven. Maha Moggallana said. And for a third time he remained silent.
Then Ven. Maha Moggallana, grabbing that individual by the arm, having expelled him through the outside door of the porch and locking the bolt, approached the Blessed One and on arrival said, "I have expelled that individual. The gathering is now pure. Let the Blessed One recite the Patimokkha."
"Isn't it amazing, Moggallana. How that individual waited until he was grabbed by the arm." Then the Blessed One said: "From now on I will no longer perform the observance or recite the Patimokkha. You alone, monks, will perform the observance and recite the Patimokkha. It is impossible, that a Tathagata would recite the Patimokkha with an impure gathering.
UNHEEDED WARNINGS:
ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO ARE ACTORS ARE ONLY CONTROLLING AND SUPPRESSING THE INTENSE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY CONTINUE TO CHURN UP FOR THEMSELVES DAILY BY BEHAVING IN A MANNER WITH ADDED FORCE, STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES AND MOTIONS AND CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS/FORCEFULNESS.
THEY ARE ALREADY WITHOUT FAIL ALL OWNERS OF MAD STRESS, MAD RESTLESSNESS, MAD DISTRACTION, MAD EMOTIONS (ANGER, SADNESS, FEAR, JEALOUSY AND GREED), MAD LOGIC, MAD PERCEPTION AND MAD VIOLENCE THAT CAN BE TRIGGERED TO INTENSE LEVELS BY SEEMINGLY MINOR STIMULI AND THEY DO NOT REALIZE THESE ARE WARNINGS OF CERTAIN FUTURE LOSS OF CONTROL AND FULL BLOWN MADNESS AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR PERDITION IF THEY DON’T MAKE PERSISTENT EFFORT TO CALM THEMSELVES DOWN AND PRACTICE CONSTANCY WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES.
Why It Is Difficult:
Why is it easier for you to appreciate the pitch changing when you blow faster at a same forcefulness into a flute than if you were to blow faster whilst you stretch a syllable?
The reason is when you stretch your syllable you are trying to consciously do three things at once whilst if you just blow into a flute you are doing only two things at once.
In order to consciously blow or exhale faster whilst you are stretching a syllable you must simultaneously pay attention to stretch your syllable, pay attention to increase the speed of your exhalation and also pay attention to observe the change in sound quality, something which is physically impossible and so you have to rapidly switch attention in order that everything does not unravel.
Because the flute takes care of making the note for you, you only have to pay attention to blow faster and pay attention to any sound change that result.
Therefore blowing into the flute (or referee whistle) is easier test to perform in order to experience pitch or frequency and loudness changes that result from exhaling faster and harder respectively.
Listen:
Listen to the way people everywhere speak and if you think they occasionally or frequently change speed or loudness you are defective in discernment because every syllable is stretched to greater or lesser extent and whenever they stretch their syllables they always forcefully change speed or loudness.
And the only way anyone can change speed or loudness within a syllable is to exhale with increasing speed or force wasting energy to create stress on his mind and vocal apparatus and induce restlessness and distraction.
Does the truth of what I say above depend on whether I am the counselor or not, whether I am not as high standing as I think I am or I am hypercritical or hypocritical? If you are better at me at detecting stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness and how they lead to stress, restlessness and distraction, you will see through the true natures of others better than me, if you are better than me at practicing not stretching syllables, not changing speed and loudness you will experience less stress, restlessness and distraction than me so why accuse me of not being as high standing as I think and hypercritical?

Even if you cannot see he is putting on a show or acting and you think I am hypercritical, the man in the picture is posing or acting and displaying conflict. He is turning his head stressfully to face the camera to greet viewers whilst crossing his right leg away to hold back and digging his hands into his pockets with more force than is in truth necessary because there is bodily and mental tension and he is forcing himself to go against himself to be nice or act casually confident to impress onlookers.
The least stressful posture that is impossible for him and all actors to adopt because their mental forcefulness and sense of style do not permit is to stand upright without propping forward his chest to face the camera without smiling or grimacing, without crossing the legs and with his hands possibly in the pockets without force or tension or clenching.
Does what I say above depend on my integrity? Can any fake saying the things I or Jesus or the Buddha says? If what I say is true that he is creating stress, restlessness and distraction for himself and others to whom he can transmit his stress, restlessness and distraction to and you are color blind to what I am speaking about, you must remain in his world not to enjoy yourself but to suffer and even get your throat cut by this world of cutthroats and the next time you are back as a human there may be no consciousness changes to make life that much easier.
You may feel emotionally superior in your being non-judgmental at his behavior but if his behavior causes tension, restlessness and distraction in him that can rise to tormenting levels, your non-judgmental attitude may maintain him in his suffering and rather than merit you may be destined to return here through a circuitous route to continue your non-judgmentalism until a day if ever it awakens in you your attitude is neither good for yourself or him.
Quote: Outsourcing to earn India $60 billion.
Comment: $60 billion of what? $60 billion of US dollars that are intrinsically worthless pieces of paper that the world foolishly values without consideration that it may be worth nothing if the issuer defaults. So long as they keep accepting these worthless pieces of paper so long will they be conned they are making so much money and the US think they are more wealthy than they think. India thinks it has made so much money and America thinks it has so much money to spend when there is nothing at all and if you add $60 billion that India earned and $60 billion America spent, you might think this world has $120 billion that is not there.
Jury Convicts:
Just because the jury convicted the criminal in the Falconio trial does not mean they are wiser than the prosecutor.
There are stories that the convicted man kidnapped, tied up and raped a mother and daughter but then many men and even women share this fantasy. He allegedly said the police was looking for me, which is not surprising considering he is a simpleton aware of his sexual urges/ deeds and have been told by associates he looked like the person in the identikit pictures.
Whatever the verdict, one faux pas or ‘howler’ remains unanswered. The couple’s van was found much later suggesting it is quite far from the site and a police site said it was found about 2 km from the scene.
What I ask is how could a lone gunman abandon his vehicle with the girl and body at the scene to drive the couple’s van 2 km away when he must walk back in the apparent pitch darkness?
She claimed that the gunman used her jacket to cover Falconio’s head so that no blood leaked is far fetched if not impossible. No matter how well covered there must be traces of blood in the couple’s van or the gunman’s 4WD.
UNLESS THE COUPLE’S VAN WAS FOUND AT THE SCENE OF THE CRIME, IT IS HARD IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO EXPLAIN HOW ANY LONE GUNMAN CAN CARRY IT OUT. YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD HAVE THOUGHT OF THAT BUT YOU MAY BE PRESUMPTUOUS THAT PEOPLE ARE NOT THAT DUMB.