Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Say & Do What You Like

SAY & DO WHAT YOU LIKE:

Quote: I disagree with what you say. I smile because I like the person.

SAY AND DO WHAT YOU LIKE, DISAGREE WITH EVERYTHING I SAY BUT MAKE SURE THERE IS NO STRETCHING OF YOUR SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION, NO CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE (LOUDNESS) WHEN YOU SAY OR DO IT.

IF THERE ARE, ENERGY MUST BE CONSUMED TO ACCOMPLISH THEM THAT WILL EXHAUST YOU, FORCE THAT OTHERWISE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN, MUST BE APPLIED ON YOUR MIND TO STRESS IT & THIS FORCE CAN BE FELT BY ALL OTHERS TO ALSO STRESS THEM, THE CONSTANT UNNECESSARY FORCEFUL CHANGES IN SPEED & STRENGTH OF FORCE WILL INDUCE RESTLESSNESS IN YOU AND OTHERS YOU INTERACT WITH, THE SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE (WHAT YOU SAY OR DO) AND STYLE (STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND FORCE) WILL DIVIDE YOUR ATTENTION AND THAT OF OTHERS. FURTHER BECAUSE WHATEVER IS FORCEFUL CONDITIONS, YOUR MIND WILL BECOME PROGRESSIVELY CONDITIONED TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT CAN RISE RAPIDLY TO INTENSE LEVELS THAT BECOME HARDER TO SHAKE OFF, YOU ARE HEADED FOR MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION APART FROM DESTROYING YOUR MIND. BECAUSE THIS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO IS NEVER LIVE BUT REGURGITATED BY ROTE, YOU WILL SUCCUMB TO MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR AND SPEECH.

WHETHER YOU CAN SEE OR NOT THAT THERE IS CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN YOUR SPEECH, IF IT IS PRESENT, YOU MUST SUFFER AND MAKE OTHERS WHO INTERACT WITH YOU SUFFER FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND IF YOU THINK YOU ARE BLAMELESS, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR MAKING A MONUMENTAL ERROR.

YOU ARE A SHOWMAN BECAUSE THE CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND ARE DESIGNED FOR STYLE OR SHOW.

THERE IS NOTHING TO GAIN IN AGREEING OR DISAGREEING WITH WHAT I SAY BECAUSE WHAT I SAY IS A MATTER FOR DISCERNMENT. WHAT MATTERS IS WHETHER YOU CAN SEE YOU CONSTANTLY STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THESE ARE INFALLIBLY LINKED TO THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT YOU MUST SURELY EXPERIENCE.

IF THERE IS NOTHING MORE CRUCIAL THAN WHAT I SAY ABOVE THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR JESUS SPOKE OF MUST ALSO SAY IT. IF I HAVE ALREADY SAID IT WHERE NO MAN IN THE PAST AND TODAY WILL SAY, THEN I WILL HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM OR RENDERED WHAT JESUS SAID AS FALSE.


Why smiling because you like someone is false logic:

When you rebuke me to say that you smile because you like someone you are implying that your smile is genuine, good for yourself and others because you like him or it is based on liking, not as I contend that smiling is to falsely please, impress or intimidate others.

You say your smile is based on liking but because liking is not exclusive to good people, nasty people also like and the liking in “good” and bad people are the same, there is nothing intrinsically good or true about liking and your smiling that is based on liking is therefore not based on something that is true or good. Because ‘good’ people are in truth poisonously nice to others, they too are bad and therefore all bad people like.
Although people who like some (and therefore must dislike others that they may struggle to conceal behind a smile) may disagree or cannot see it is so, liking is never based on reason or logic but liking is always blind, forceful and based on mental force or emotion.
Liking or attraction for something is like magnetism, it is magnetic force not magnetic reasoning or choice that draws iron fillings to a magnet.
Not only is liking powered by force that is never maintained at constant speed and strength in ordinary people but this forceful liking always accelerates in strength and speed to accentuate the stress, restlessness and distraction in whoever who likes that can also be experienced by the target of his liking.
It is possible to like something or someone with minimal constant force and speed that minimizes the stress, restlessness and distraction but it is never seen on earth.
If you must like some things you must also dislike other things otherwise what is the point of liking or speaking of liking everything? If you like everything in this world eg shit as well as food, you must be insane. The truly sane way is not to like food nor dislike shit. You know one is pleasant and another is unpleasant, you appreciate that food is pleasant and shit is unpleasant but you are not driven to (emotionally) like food or (emotionally) dislike shit.
Just because you like me does not mean that you are good to me or good but precisely because you (emotionally) like me you are driven by blind force to ignore stress to forcefully exaggerate and falsify in order to express your liking, to ignore the rising stress to forcefully express your charming smile to impress me.
It is because people are emotional attracted to some people for some reason (eg pretty or handsome, he talks like a guru, he is an authority figure) that they will force themselves to express themselves to convey their liking to please or impress the other person.
Whether your liking that is expressed in your smiling is beneficial to yourself and the other person can be OBJECTIVELY established. If it is in truth going against yourself, you will afterwards experience stress, restlessness and distraction that you must struggle to shake off.
Love Is Not To Be Confused With Liking:
Jesus did not say that if you LIKE me you will obey what I command but he said if you LOVE me, you will obey what I command.
Therefore you are not meritorious to say "I smile because I like someone" but you are unwittingly acknowledging your sinfulness and foolishness. Would you dare correct yourself to say "I smile because I love someone"?
Although reflecting their confused thoughts ordinary people regularly interchange love and liking, love and liking are very different things that are not to be confused one for another. Love has nothing to do with liking and they are two very different things.
Liking is emotional attraction that though ordinary people may insist are based on loftier ideals is merely based on physical characteristics (beauty, nice smell of perfume, nice taste) and all ordinary people who are poisonously nice not good and overtly evil people like so there is nothing intrinsically good in liking but instead seized by forceful liking, people might throw caution to the wind and commit all kinds of evil to satisfy their liking (like smile falsely to show their like), whilst love is the calm clearly thinking intention to respect & be concerned for the welfare of the target and not say or do anything to harm or hurt it.
IT IS FALSE LOGIC THAT WILL END IN MAD LOGIC (IRRECONCILABLE IRRATIONALITY) TO IMPLY THAT ONE’S SMILING THAT IS BASED ON ONE'S LIKING IS GENUINE AND GOOD BECAUSE LIKING IS NOTHING MORE THAN A BLIND ATTRACTIVE MENTAL FORCE TARGETTED AT SENSORY OBJECTS (VISUAL, SOUND, SMELL, TOUCH, TASTE) THAT APPLIES FORCE THAT STRESSES THE MIND AND WHOSE FORCE CAN BE TRANSMITTED TO THE TARGET TO SIMILARLY CAUSE HIM STRESS THAT THE PERSON WHO LIKES WILLFULLY CHOOSES TO IGNORE UNTIL ITS SUFFERING IS TOO STRONG TO IGNORE IN THE NAME OF SENSATE GRATIFICATION AND THEREFORE BECAUSE LIKING IMPARTS THE SEVERE SIDE EFFECT OF STRESS ON THE PERSON AND HIS TARGET, IT IS HARMFUL AND SMILING THAT IS BASED ON LIKING IS BASED ON SOMETHING THAT IS HARMFUL AND THEREFORE SMILING ITSELF IS SIMILARLY HARMFUL, BECAUSE NO GOOD CAN COME OUT OF EVIL.
THE LOVING KINDNESS THAT THE BUDDHA SPEAKS OF AS THE KEY TO HEAVEN AND THE ‘LOVING HIM’ THAT JESUS SPEAKS ABOUT MUST NOT BE CONFUSED WITH EMOTIONAL LIKING. LOVING KINDNESS IS A FULLY COMPREHENDING CALM CLEARLY THINKING REASONED INTENTION TO NEVER HARM OTHERS WHATEVER THE PROVOCATION, TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT CLEARLY BENEFITS OTHERS, NOT A BLIND FORCEFUL ATTRACTION FOR SENSORY OBJECTS.
(Loving kindness is when you don’t laugh or look down at others, don’t speak sarcastically, don’t pester others and you slow down so as not to knock down a cat rushing across the road. Loving kindness has nothing to do with emotional liking and disliking)
Love is not speaking harshly and you can only speak harshly if there is violent stretching, violent acceleration in speed and loudness of what you say and what you say is hurtful.
You may say what I say is harsh but if what I said is without stretching, changes in speed and loudness, is true but unpalatable to you, it is your sinful emotions that can be stirred by what I say that hurts you, you are wrong to blame me. It is not my fault that you are a slave to emotions you cannot give up. Because I am not emotional, what people say cannot hurt me like they did in the past.
Be careful if you accuse me of being nasty, critical of others. If what I say is the unpalatable truth that you cannot accept, that hurts you because you are a sinner with emotions that can be stirred by what I say, you are accusing me wrongly and adding karma to yourself.
BECAUSE SMILING IS FORCEFUL AND SEPARATE FROM LIKING THOUGH IT MAY ISSUE FROM LIKING, IT CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO OTHER TARGETS SO THAT IN TIME THE PERSON WHO FORCEFULLY SMILES BECAUSE HE LIKES WILL DEGENERATE TO SMILE WHEN HE DISLIKES OR FEELS NOTHING EVEN IF HE STRIVES TO AVOID THAT. IF YOU THINK YOU SOLELY SMILE BASED ON LIKING, IT MAY BE TRUE OR YOU ARE DELUDED WITH SERIOUS CONSEQUENCE IN ULTIMATE MADNESS. THUS ALTHOUGH IT MAY BE INITIALLY BE TRUE (QUESTIONABLE) THAT YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE SOMEONE, IN TIME, WITH CONSIDERABLE SOCIAL PRESSURES, YOU START TO SMILE TO DECEIVE.
Why is it that people dare speak against me but they dare not speak against Jesus? It is not because they can see the truth that there is in what Jesus said (although they believe they can) but it is because they have faith in who Jesus is and dare not speak against him for fear of punishment but they cannot see or refuse to accept the truth of what I say and they think they know who I am and I am a nobody in their eyes that they dare to speak against me. If I can be compared to the stone that the builders rejected, then it may become the capstone and he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but when it falls on any one, it will crush him.
In the past it may not be important that people do not know what Jesus said that those who spoke against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven because He was not around to be spoken against. But if the counselor is a being who will come as Jesus said he will and he will speak, Jesus is warning you that when he comes and should you choose to speak against him in your foolishness and arrogance, you will not be forgiven.
The wise never speak against anybody. I am only pointing out the errors of others, not speaking against them. If you emotionally disparage me, you use your words to attack me, you are speaking against me.
One wrong leads to another wrong:
Wrong without remorse and corrective action as a result of that remorse never leads to right but one wrong always leads to another wrong so that in time the fool strays so far from truth he cannot see head or tail of his quagmire.
If it is true as I say that contrary to the popular perception, liking is forceful, false, blind, stresses and induces restlessness and distraction in the person and his recipient, is it any surprise that what is false and stressful (liking) leads to another wrong or stressful entity(smiling)?
It is impossible that something that is false and stressful should lead to something that is true and stress free but it should lead to another thing that is also false and stressful and so rather than justifying your smile you are unwittingly affirming that your smile is false and harmful just as your liking too is false and harmful.
It is because of your original error or delusion that liking is good for yourself and others that led to your second error that your smiling is similarly good for yourself and others and therefore you feel justified to say “I smile because I like someone” implying that your smile and liking are both based on truth or what is good for you and others.
Why it is dangerous to say you smile because you like someone:

If you are often unaware you are smiling when you do so, that smile cannot be consciously intended because you like him but it is produced impersonally by rote from memory and therefore not intended as you say because you like a person.

You cannot intend something (smiling and liking) if you are not aware you are doing it.

So unless on every occasion you are mindful that you are smiling because you like the person, what you say is false. Should you smile without awareness you are smiling or that you like the person, on that occasion that smile is not because you like the person but by mindless rote and you have told a lie to say you only smile because you like a person.

In reality it is impossible that ordinary people smile because they like the person because there is always a simultaneous substance and style in their smile that cannot be rendered live but must be prerecorded and played back as constituted. Further, ordinary people always do many things at the same time eg smile whilst they talk or do something and the smile therefore cannot be totally conscious, is often not even partially conscious but TOTALLY unconscious.

There is such a thing called a substance only smile that is never seen in this world that can be defined as a smile without added force, without stretching or prolonging (to impress), without changes in speed or strength of force and only this smile can be produced live intended for the observer.

There is another thing called a substance and style smile that in keeping with all the other activities of people who are actors, are a combination of substance (the smile) and the added force, added stretching, changes in speed and strength of force that are totally unnecessary but necessary to impress or please others, that impart forceful changes on the mind to create stress, restlessness and distraction not just in the person who smiles but also the recipient. This substance and style smile can NEVER be produced live but must be memorized and rendered by rote triggered by occasions that the person is vulnerable to smile helplessly.


WHETHER YOUR SMILE IS FULLY INTENDED BY YOUR LIKING & THEREFORE ACCOMPANIED BY ATTENTION OR NOT, HAS ADDED FORCE WITH STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED OR FORCE OR NOT CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED, IS NOT BECAUSE I SAY SO AND IF IT IS UNCONSCIOUS, HAS STYLE THEN IT IS UNINTENDED BY STANDARDIZED ROTE AND YOU HAVE SAID FALSELY THAT YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE THE PERSON.

PEOPLE WITH SUBSTANCE AND STYLE SMILES MIGHT LIKE TO THINK THEY ARE MASTERS OF THEIR SMILES BUT THEY ARE SLAVES WHO HELPLESSLY SMILE WHEN THE SITUATION THAT TRIGGER SMILING OCCURS BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE URGE TO SMILE THAT THEY CAN OCCASIONALLY FORCEFULLY SUPPRESS BUT THEY HAVE NEVER ELIMINATED. BECAUSE THEY ARE REACTORS, SLAVES RATHER THAN MASTERS OF THEIR SMILES AND IN ADDITION THEY BELIEVE IN THEIR SMILES, THEY HAVE NEVER TASTED THE STATE OF HAVING NO URGE TO SMILE AND THEY UNRIGHTEOUSLY DISPARAGE IT WHEN THEY HAVEN'T TASTED IT.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED BOTH THE PREVIOUS STATE OF SMILING TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE OTHERS BELIEVING IT IS BENEFICIAL TO ME AND OTHERS AND THE PRESENT STATE WHERE I HAVE TRULY NO URGE OR DESIRE TO SMILE AND THINK IT IS EVIL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND I KNOW THERE IS A DAY AND NIGHT DIFFERENCE IN THE FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
(THERE ARE SOME WHO MAY KID THEMSELVES THEY HAVE NO URGE TO SMILE WHEN THEY STILL HARBOR THE URGE AND THEREFORE HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED THE DIFFERENCE IN NOT SMILING)

I DO NOT HAVE THE URGE TO SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE THE PERSON AND I NOT ONLY DO NOT BELIEVE SMILING IS GOOD FOR MYSELF AND OTHERS BUT IT IS DETRIMENTAL.

NOT ONLY DO YOU HARBOR STRONG COMPELLING URGES TO SMILE, BUT YOU BELIEVE YOUR SMILE IS GOOD FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS. IS IT ANY SURPRISE YOU NEVER SHED YOUR URGE TO SMILE?

Do you stretch, change speed and force in your smile because you like the person?
You may say you smile solely because you like someone but do you stretch your smile, change speed and strength of force during your smile because you like the person? If not then they are false accompaniments to impress others with your smile.

Just because you like to smile because you like someone does not mean you must ALWAYS (not sometimes) stretch it, change speed and strength of force but you always do so because it is unconscious and standardized.

If in truth there is ALWAYS (not sometimes) stretching, changes in speed and strength of force in your smile that I can demonstrate to you and you are not even aware of them, how could they be intended but instead they are unconscious, blindly across board reproduced from memory. If it is live for the occasion then surely there are occasions that you smile without changing speed or strength of force.

The stretching, changes in speed and loudness in your smile is totally unnecessary, consumes energy and applies force on your mind to create stress, restlessness and distraction, is intended for show, not because you like the person (YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE THE PERSON BUT SURELY YOU DON'T CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE SMILING BECAUSE YOU LIKE THE PERSON BUT TO IN ADDITION FALSELY IMPRESS HIM HOW MARVELLOUS YOUR SMILE IS), but to falsely impress him.

Even though the recipient cannot tell and he even expresses gratefulness for your smile, he can experience your smile as well as the stretching, changes in speed and strength of force whose effect is to divide his attention between the substance and the style of your smile, incite restlessness and stress him.

WHETHER THERE IS STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN YOUR SMILE CAN BE OBJECTIVELY ASCERTAINED.

NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY SAY IT IS NECESSARY TO SMILE LIKE YOU ALWAYS DO WITH CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, THESE CHANGES ARE UNNECESSARY AND FALSELY INTENDED TO IMPRESS, THEY CONSUME ENERGY AND CREATE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN YOURSELF AND THE TARGET PERSON, OBLIGES HIM TO RETURN YOUR SMILE EVEN THOUGH HE IS INDISPOSED AND THEREFORE IS HARMFUL THAN VIRTUOUS.

No Right To Comment Let Alone Disagree Or Praise:
My message to everyone in a nutshell is:
Pay attention to make effort to stop stretching your syllables, changing speed and loudness because it (and its equivalents in motion, thought and perception) is the only source of stress, restlessness and distraction that must beset the person that will not may turn increasingly malignant to become ultimately mad stress, restlessness and distraction.
If you think that you can speak without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and I can demonstrate to you that you are constantly stretching your syllables, changing speed and loudness, then you are both blind (cannot see you do so) and deluded (you believe what is false eg that you don’t stretch syllables is true) and must suffer because stress, restlessness and distraction are mandatory to anyone who constantly stretches his syllables, changes speed and loudness. If you think that being blind and deluded you are nevertheless headed for heaven you may right or foolish.
If you can see yourself stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and you haven’t tried its alternative, not stretching, changing speed and loudness, you have no right to dismiss it just as you have no right to say a car is lousy without testing it.
It is because people do not know they severely underestimate the extent of the stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness present in their speech and that of everyone else’s that they think they are qualified to comment on the matter. It is because people do not realize that they have never tried truly not stretching their syllables, not changing speed and loudness and therefore never tasted its fruit which is freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction that they think they are qualified to dismiss what I say when they have no right to comment or dismiss.
Until you are reasonably proficient in recognizing stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness, you have no right to comment on the matter and what I say, until you have successful tried not stretching your syllables, not changing speed and loudness you cannot dismiss what I say.
The reasons why people do so despite having no right is because they are presumptuous, arrogant and derisive. They presume they know what I am talking about when they don’t. They think they know everything, they know what is good for them when they don’t. They look down on the significance of not stretching, not changing speed and loudness thinking it is worthless when it is the most important thing in life because it is the key to freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction that was previously unattainable, inconceivable.
You have a right to comment on or discuss a topic if you know a topic. You are right to comment on Indian cooking if you have interest in it and know it reasonably.
You have a right to dismiss or praise something if you have tried and found it worthless or meritorious. If you have not tried something you have no right to dismiss or praise it. You have the right to dismiss a dish if you have tasted it but you have no right to dismiss it without tasting it.
I say confidently that no one has the right to comment let alone disagree with my assertion that there are constant stretching of syllables, constant changes in speed and loudness in the speech of everyone in this world and they are the only sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that they must suffer from and induce in others and if they do not desist they are headed for a certain appointment with mad uncontrollable stress, restlessness and distraction (daze) unless death supervenes.
And I further say confidently that I have the right to comment on the topic because I know precisely every instance anyone stretches his syllables, changed speed and loudness, I have the right to praise and recommend not stretching syllables, not changing speed and loudness because I can switch mode between stretching and not stretching, between changing speed and loudness and not, to experience the unmistakable absence of stress, restlessness and distraction that accompanies not stretching, not changing speed and loudness.
If anyone should comment let alone dispute or disagree he is speaking un-righteously and headed for judgment.
What I say above is not based on arrogance or intolerance but based on perfect logic.
A person is only qualified to speak on a topic if he has interest and knows the topic quite well. If you have no interest in or does not know the topic well you are not qualified to comment and if you do you are sticking your neck out foolishly.
A person is only qualified to dispute or disagree with something if he has personally successfully tried what is suggested and found it to be worthless or harmful. If he has never tried it and he disputes it, he is speaking without righteousness and sticking his neck out for judgment.
Just as a person has no right to disagree with a topic if he had not tried it, he also has no right to APPLAUD OR PRAISE it if he has not tried it otherwise his praise is false or insincere flattery.
If you are interested in and know quite well the matter about stretching syllables, changes in speed and loudness, you should be able to demonstrate to me how distinctively different your speech and those around you sounds like without stretching, changes in speed and loudness. If you cannot show me how not stretching, not changing speed and loudness sounds like you do not know and are not interested in them and have no right to comment on them.
I have yet to come across someone who can tell me coherently how they have stretched syllables, changed speed and loudness even when they are audibly doing so all the time. Therefore all ordinary people are not interested, are not conversant about stretching of syllables, change in speed and loudness and have no right to comment.
I know people have difficulty seeing how they stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness and are further largely powerless to stop themselves doing so because when I demonstrate to people how they have just stretched their syllables, just changed speed or loudness, their BLANK, WITHDRAWN, LOOKING AWAY (BLINKING, EYES DARTING AWAY), UNCOMFORTABLE reaction visible in their facial expressions and eyes shows me they are unfamiliar or uncomfortable with what I am saying, they have resistance to or difficulty absorbing what I am trying to convey to them and after I have demonstrated to them they nevertheless continue to speak in their usual ways as if they are inflexible tape recorders.
It is no accident they have difficulty seeing but there is a very strong willfully emotional refusal or aversion to see precisely how they are hurting themselves and others namely by stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness. Until you are mad nobody knowingly kills himself. It is because stress, restlessness and distraction are never fun but always deadly, nobody who knows, can see clearly the connection between his conduct and his stress, restlessness and distraction will permit himself to kill himself. It is only because they have turned a very strong blind eye not to see that they are constantly stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness such that they now even believe in delusion that the way they sound when they speak which nothing more than their individual ways of using force to constantly stretch their syllables, changed speed and loudness is charming, benefits themselves and others when it is a deadly killer.
The reason why they are largely powerless to stop is because the way they speak is driven by very powerful mental force from a mental jukebox that they must first stop and then pay attention to fabricate speech without stretching, changing speed and loudness.
You can only dispute what I say as worthless if you have successfully tried what I recommend for a reasonable period. If you have never tried it you have no right to dispute what I say.
You are a bigot and foolish to dismiss a car as worthless if you have never driven it.
If you have successfully tried out what I have said you must surely be able to demonstrate to me how your speech will otherwise sound if you did not stretch any syllable, changed any speed or loudness (something I can demonstrate whatever the speech involved). Because I have yet to come across a person who can speak without stretching his syllables, without changing speed and loudness even to this day, even amongst all those who have read what I have said many times, they are not qualified to dispute what I say and are asking for judgment disputing something that nobody today or throughout the ages has said. If there are no other ways out of the prison of stress, restlessness and distraction, by foolishly rejecting it you are unwittingly affirming your desire to continue even for another eternity in the prison of endless unremitting senseless stress, restlessness and distraction.
By contrast I am fully qualified to both comment and praise or recommend not stretching of syllables, not changing speed and loudness because I can at will speak mindfully with or without stretching, with or without changing speed and loudness and experience the presence and absence of stress, restlessness and distraction that respectively attend.
Anyone who has successfully tried not stretching syllables, not changing speed and loudness will have experienced a never before experienced incomparable effortless release from stress, restlessness and distraction to not dispute what I say.
Finally, because I have experienced it for myself the difference between previously constantly mindlessly stretching my syllables, changing speed and loudness with its attendant tormenting stress, restlessness and distraction and now mindfully not stretching, changing speed and loudness and its exquisite freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction, I can further experience stress, restlessness and distraction building up in me if I deliberately stretched my syllables, changed speed and loudness to demonstrate to others, I know without doubt THAT NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO DISPUTE WHAT I SAY THAT THERE ARE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE SPEECH OF EVERYONE AND THEY ARE THE ONLY SOURCES OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MUST TORMENT THEM AND UNLESS THEY DESIST THEY ARE HEADED FOR MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
HOW CAN ANYONE COMMENT ON OR DISCUSS INDIAN COOKING WHEN HE DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING OR KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT INDIAN COOKING? IF YOU THINK YOU KNOW STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO POINT OUT TO ME MANY OF THE INSTANCES WHEN THEY OCCUR IN YOUR AND OTHERS’ SPEECH.
HOW CAN ANYONE DISMISS NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AS WORTHLESS WHEN HE HASN’T EVEN SUCCESSFULLY TRIED IT? IF YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY TRIED THEM HOW COME YOU CANNOT JUST ONCE DEMONSTRATE TO ME HOW YOUR SPEECH WILL SOUND DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT IF YOU NEVER STRETCHED ANY SYLLABLE, CHANGED SPEED OR LOUDNESS? IF YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY TRIED IT YOU WOULD HAVE EXPERIENCED A NEVER BEFORE EXPERIENCED FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION TO NEVER REVERT TO CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
ANYONE WHO PAID CAREFUL ATTENTION CAN & WILL HEAR HOW DISTINCTIVELY DIFFERENT OR UNMISTAKABLE SPEECH WITH AND WITHOUT STRETCHED SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS SOUNDS LIKE. AND JUST AS THEY ARE DISTINCTIVELY DIFFERENT IN SOUND, THE END RESULT OR FRUITS NAMELY INSOLUBLE MOUNTING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION OR THEIR ABSENCE ARE DISTINCTIVELY DIFFERENT OR UNMISTAKABLE.
Secretly Foretelling:
If Jesus wanted everyone to know he was foretelling the coming of a counselor, he would have said it to all his disciples and they would have reported it in all the versions of the gospels. It is because Jesus wanted to secretly foretell the coming of a counselor that he chose John as his conduit and scattered his references to make it less obvious.
If Jesus wanted readers to know with certainty that the counselor is the Holy Spirit and whoever speaks against the counselor will not be forgiven then he would have said that the counselor is the Holy Spirit and whoever speaks against the counselor will not be forgiven.
It is because Jesus did not want readers to know precisely what he was referring to that he chose to say in the passing that the counselor is the Holy Spirit and elsewhere instead of saying whoever spoke against the counselor will not be forgiven, he chose to say whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.
Speaking against the Holy Spirit cannot be personal or directed at his person because that would be upholding his style but it would be speaking against what he has to say. If what the Holy Spirit has to say is the way out of suffering that you will never discover by yourself and you repudiate it then it is understandable why you should not be forgiven.
Jesus’ Warning To Christians:
Who are the people who read the New Testament?
It is largely if not entirely Christians who read or scrutinize or study it regularly apart from casual passing interest by the curious.
Therefore in saying that whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven either in this Age or the Age to come and indirectly saying elsewhere that the counselor is the Holy Spirit, Jesus may be giving a warning to Christians or those who read the New Testament seriously that they will not be forgiven if they spoke against the Holy Spirit, whoever He is. It makes no difference to the masses who do not or refuse to read the New Testament because they are given to this world. You can only address and treat who turn to you for aid, not those who see no wrong or seek no aid.
"Truly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter; but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin"-- for they had said, "He has an unclean spirit."
Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.

IT MAY BE THAT IN SPEAKING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, JESUS IS SPEAKING OF SOMETHING OR SOMEONE THAT NOBODY CAN KNOW FOR SURE OR IT MAY BE THAT IN SPEAKING OF THE COUNSELOR AS THE HOLY SPIRIT AND WHOEVER SPEAKS AGAINST THE HOLY SPIRIT WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN JESUS IS GIVING WARNING TO THOSE WHO READ THE NEW TESTAMENT (DE FACTO CHRISTIANS) THAT THEY WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN IF THEY SPOKE AGAINST THE COUNSELOR, WHOEVER HE IS.
Jesus said to them, "Have you never read in the scriptures: 'The very stone which the builders rejected has become the head of the corner; this was the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes? Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruits of it. And he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but when it falls on any one, it will crush him."
Jesus may be referring to the Jews or chosen people above but what he says may apply equally to the many who call themselves Christians.
JUST AS THE KINGDOM OF GOD WILL BE TAKEN AWAY FROM THE CHOSEN ONES AND GIVEN TO A NATION THAT PRODUCES THE FRUITS OF IT, IT CAN AND WILL BE TAKEN AWAY FROM CHRISTIANS AND GIVEN TO A NATION THAT PRODUCES THE FRUITS OF IT.
IT IS FOOLHARDY AND FALSE LOGIC (THAT ENDS IN MAD LOGIC) TO SUGGEST I AM INDULGING IN SELF GLORIFICATION.
IS IT TRUE OR NOT THAT JESUS SAID WHOEVER SPOKE AGAINST THE HOLY SPIRIT WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN?
IS IT TRUE OR NOT THAT JESUS SAID THE COUNSELOR IS THE HOLY SPIRIT.
IS IT TRUE OR NOT THAT JESUS DESCRIBED IN SOME DETAIL WHAT THE COUNSELOR WILL SAY?
IS IT TRUE OR NOT THAT THOSE WHO WILL READ THE NEW TESTAMENT SERIOUSLY WILL BE CHRISTIANS AND THEREFORE THE MESSAGE IS INTENDED FOR CHRISTIANS?
It did not matter in the past if people did not understand what Jesus was trying to say but when the counselor comes then he will become the target for speaking against and Jesus’ warning becomes relevant.
Convincing The World Of Sin, Righteousness & Judgment:
JESUS SAID THE COUNSELOR WILL SPEAK AND HE WILL CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT.
ONLY WHEN WHAT THE COUNSELOR SAYS IS ENTIRELY A MATTER FOR DISCERNMENT OR SEEING OR PROVIDING KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY PREVIOUSLY DID NOT HAVE RATHER THAN A MATTER FOR FAITH OR BELIEF OR TRUST CAN WHAT THE COUNSELOR SAY CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT.
SIN CAN ONLY BE CONDUCT IN SPEECH AND BODY THAT HARMS OTHERS, RIGTHEOUSNESS CAN ONLY BE CONDUCT THAT DOES NOT HARM OTHERS AND JUDGMENT CAN ONLY BE PUNISHMENT OR SUFFERING THAT THE SINNER WILL EXPERIENCE WHILST HE IS SININING, IN LATER LIFE AND THEREAFTER.
THEREFORE IN ORDER TO CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT, THE COUNSELOR MUST DEMONSTRATE TO THE WORLD HOW THEIR CONDUCT HARMS OTHERS OR IS BLAMEWORTHY (SIN), HOW THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE WAY OF CONDUCTING ONESELF THAT DOES NOT HARM OTHERS AND HOW THEIR SINFUL CONDUCT WILL LEAD TO CERTAIN SEVERE SUFFERING.
IF IT IS TRUE AS I SAY THAT THERE ARE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES AND CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITH THEIR EQUIVALENTS IN THEIR MOTIONS IN EVERY BEING ON EARTH AND HOW THESE UNFALINGLY INDUCE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS (SIN), HOW IT IS POSSIBLE TO SPEAK WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT DOES NOT INDUCE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN SELF AND OTHERS (RIGHTEOUSNESS), HOW THEIR MINDS ARE BEING CONSTANTLY CONDITIONED TO CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES THAT WILL LEAD TO FINAL UNCONTROLLABLE MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (JUDGMENT).
IF NO MAN IN THE PAST OR TODAY HAS EVER SAID THIS, YOU ARE A BRAVE MAN TO SCOFF AT ME BECAUSE IF I AM CORRECT, THERE WILL BE ACCOUNTABILITY.
IF WHAT I SAY IS TRUE THAT WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR MUST ALSO SAY THIS AND IF I HAVE SAID THIS AND THERE IS NOTHING ELSE ABOUT SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT THEN I WILL HAVE RENDERED THE COUNSELOR OBSOLETE OR PROVEN JESUS WRONG IN SAYING THE COUNSELOR WILL CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGTHEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT.
Deluded Or Blind:
If there is constant stretching of syllables, constant changes in speed and loudness in the speech of all people and animals, including yourself and you cannot see it is so, you are seriously blind or undiscerning because they are not harmless but the inalienable roots to stress, restlessness and distraction that they and you must suffer from and persecute all who come into contact with them. If you think you can be seriously blind and go to heaven, can escape eternal punishment, you may be a great fool.
If you believe you can and do speak without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and I can demonstrate that you speak with constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness then you are deluded or have wrong view that the Buddha said has two destinations: hell or the animal womb.

Thursday, May 18, 2006

The Mango

The Mango:
There is nothing that says that only good men can love mangoes. Both evil and good men (can) love mangoes and love of mangoes has nothing to do with virtue.

Even if a person is genuinely fond of another it does not mean he must be good or good to that person because goodness and being good to that person has nothing to with fondness for him and it is a common mistaken notion and confusion people make to equate fondness with goodness.

Just as you should not think you are doing good to the mango by being fond to eat it and you should not expect the mango to be grateful to you for eating it, in the same way you should not think you are doing good to someone just because you are fond of him and he should be grateful to you for being fond of him. But in reality, nice people with faulty logic think that because they have gone out of the way to stress themselves creating restlessness and distraction (swooning over a person is a state of distraction) they have created merit being good to you and you should be grateful to them for being fond of you.

I will be a fool if I equate anyone who likes me to being good people or being good to me because liking me has nothing to do with that person’s goodness just as liking mangoes has nothing to do with a person’s goodness or badness but both evil and good people appreciate the taste of a mango, both evil and good people appreciate the absence of stress, restlessness and distraction that the way I conduct myself without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, without speaking of nonsense that forces them to act as if they appreciate, impart on them.

Because I am not a fool, I do not equate liking me to being good or good to me and I am not conned to be confused or harbor mixed or disturbed ‘feelings’ (actually emotions) why people who like me and are therefore (supposed to be) good creates stress, restlessness and distraction in me.

It is actually a form of false logic that will culminate in mad logic to think that just because you are fond of someone you are good to him and just because someone is fond of you he is good or good to you. Many do not realize they subscribe to this false logic and they are headed for mad logic apart from being conned by others to experience emotional conflict.

Although there are violent evil men who cannot stand the sight of me (their hate is stirred on seeing me not suffering whilst they are), some evil men do appreciate talking to me because I do not talk nonsense to them and exert psychological pressure on them to act as if they appreciate, I do not stretch my syllables, change speed or loudness to incite stress, restlessness & distraction. Even evil men are intolerant of stress, restlessness or distraction but they are things they have to put up with in the name of deceiving, intimidating and dominating others. A lot of people who consider themselves good are nice, hurting others with velvet lined gloves and therefore nasty people; they too can appreciate my company. You do not have to be a good man to experience and therefore appreciate the absence of stress, restlessness and distraction in speaking to me; it does not mean that just because you appreciate, you will reform or be good.

Water & oil do not mix and as Jesus said, you are either with him or against him. You may think you are with Jesus and I am against him, you may be right or you may be wrong. You may think it is virtuous to be 'tolerant' to appreciate others' points of views and act as if you are their friends when you may be an actor, a hypocrite generating conflict in yourself and others.
Fondness is no substitute for goodness or virtue. It is a form of bribery that foolish people succumb to; just because others like them they feel obliged to accept them as good and beneficial when it is presumptuous or unjustified to conclude thus.
MANY EVEN THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE QUITE SHREWD MAY INSIST THAT OF COURSE THEY ARE NOT SO FOOLISH AS TO EQUATE LIKING WITH GOODNESS AND TRUSTING BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE BY NATURE COMPROMISED PEOPLE WHO TEND TO CLOSE ONE EYE THAT CAN BE BRIBED BY OTHERS’ EXPRESSED LIKING TO OPEN THEIR HEARTS TO HURT OR BETRAYAL BY OTHERS.
THERE ARE MANY IN THIS WORLD WHO ARE NOT EVEN AWARE THEY PLY THEIR WICKED TRADE OF FABRICATED LIKING FOR OTHERS THAT THEY INSIST IS GENUINE IN ORDER TO ENTRAP THEM SO THAT THEY CAN MANIPULATE OTHERS LIKE A YOYO TO BEHAVE ACCORDING TO THEIR OPINIONS.
No Right:
Nobody has the right to doubt or not accept either what the Buddha said below or all the things Jesus said and if they do, they do not realize they will be punished with suffering far greater than they ever dreamt possible, even if it turns out that what the Buddha or Jesus said is false.
If what the Buddha or Jesus said is false, misleads others they will be punished by themselves (As Jesus said, by your words you will be condemned and it applies to Jesus as to others). It is in the nature of things that whoever lies or is deluded subjects himself to suffering. It is none of your business to doubt them or anyone and if you do you are asking for big trouble.
There are those who for example are partisan Christians who scoff at what the Buddha said, doubt the miracles the Buddha is purported to have performed and think Buddhism is a fake.
Did you see Jesus performing those miracles that he is said to have performed? If you haven’t what gives you the right to accept the miracles Jesus is said to have performed but not those of the Buddha apart from emotional prejudice?
The Buddha: "And, monks, as long as this knowledge & vision of mine -- -- was not pure, I did not claim to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos with its deities, Maras (Evil ones) & Brahmas, with its contemplatives & priests, its royalty & commonfolk. But as soon as this knowledge & vision of mine -- was truly pure, then I did claim to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos. Knowledge & vision arose in me: 'Unprovoked is my release. This is the last birth. There is now no further becoming.'"
NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO QUESTION WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID ABOVE AS FALSE. IF YOU THINK YOU DO (OPINIONATED PEOPLE THINK ‘OF COURSE’ THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO REJECT), YOU ALREADY HAVE SERIOUS MAD LOGIC THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.
IF FOR ANY REASON WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID ABOVE IS FALSE EG HE IS DELUDING HIMSELF, CONCEITED OR INSANE, HE WILL BE PUNISHED, SO WHY FOOLISHLY STICK YOUR NECK OUT TO DOUBT HIM? YOU ACCEPT OR DO NOT COMITT YOURSELF TO WHAT HE SAID WITHOUT SCOFFING BECAUSE YOU CANNOT KNOW THAT IT IS TRUE OR FALSE. IF YOU HAVE AN EYE FOR TRUTH YOU WILL KNOW THAT NO FAKE, DELUDED OR MAD MAN CAN SPEAK THE MANY THINGS THE BUDDHA SAID THE WAY HE SAID IT. THEREFORE EVEN IF YOU CANNOT KNOW FOR CERTAIN WHAT HE SAID IS TRUE, YOU WOULD BE FOOLISH, STICKING OUT YOUR NECK UNNECESSARY ON THE CHOPPING BOARD TO DOUBT HIM. YOU THINK GOD OR JESUS IS ON YOUR SIDE BUT GOD MAY BE MUCH CLOSER TO THE BUDDHA THAN YOU.
SCOFFING IS NEVER MADE WITH REASON (BUT MAY BE BOLSTERED BY WARPED LOGIC OR EXCUSES) BUT IT IS ALWAYS DRIVEN BY FORCE, EMOTION (HOSTILITY, REJECTING, LOOKING DOWN) AND WHOEVER SCOFFS WILL SUFFER AS HE FEELS EMOTIONALLY JUSTIFIED OR SUPERIOR AND BECAUSE HE IS GOING AGAINST HIMSELF IN THE PROCESS, HE MUST EXPERIENCE LINGERING DOUBT AND FEAR THAT HE IS SETTING HIMSELF UP FOR FUTURE PUNISHMENT. ANYTHING THAT IS FORCEFUL HAS MEMORY AND EACH TIME HE SCOFFS, HE IS CONDITIONING HIMSELF TO EMOTION SO THAT IT GETS INCREASINGLY EASY TO PROVOKE TO INTENSE LEVELS AND WILL FINALLY END IN INSANITY.
IF YOU SCOFF AT WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID AND IT TURNS OUT HE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH, THEN YOU ARE ASKING FOR BIG TROUBLE.
SIMILARLY IF YOU SCOFF AT WHAT I SAID THAT WHEREAS I CAN SPEAK WITHOUT STRETCHING ANY SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, NO ORDINARY MAN OR ANIMAL CAN DO SO AND IT TURNS OUT I AM CORRECT, YOU ARE ASKING FOR BIG (UNNECESSARY) TROUBLE FOR ARROGANTLY THINKING YOU ARE RIGHTEOUS SCOFFING.
IF YOU THINK YOU CAN OR DO SPEAK WITH CONSTANT SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES OR IT IS WORTHLESS TO DO SO WHEN IT TURNS OUT THAT YOU ARE NOT AND CANNOT DO SO AND IT IS THE ONLY PREVIOUSLY INCONCEIVABLE WAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THEN YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB AND IF YOU THINK THAT IT MIGHT NOT BE TOO BAD, THE BUDDHA FURTHER SAID THAT HE CAN THINK OF NOTHING MORE TORMENTING THAT HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB AND IT BE FAR MORE EVERLASTING THAN IN WILDEST DREAMS.
ANYONE WHO DOUBTS OTHERS WHETHER HE IS CORRECT OR WRONG IS DOOMED BECAUSE DOUBT IS FORCEFUL OR EMOTIONAL AND CONDITIONS HIS MIND SO THAT INCREASINGLY HE IS UNABLE TO ACCEPT THINGS AS THEY ARE UNTIL IN THE END HE DOUBTS FUNDAMENTAL TRUTHS TO THINK THAT FOOD IS SHIT AND SHIT IS FOOD. FIRST YOU DOUBT OTHERS FORCEFULLY BUT INCREASINGLY YOU ARE FORCED BY YOUR FORCEFUL DOUBT TO DOUBT OTHERS AND EVERYTHING NOT REALIZING YOU ARE DESCENDING INTO FINAL INSANITY.
I SAID I CHANGED THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE WORLD AFTER 1977 AND IN ALL PROBABILITY WAS THE TRIGGER TO SIMILAR CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS. YOU HAVE NO REASON TO DOUBT THAT BECAUSE HOW WOULD YOU KNOW I HAVEN’T DONE SO? IF YOU DENY THERE WERE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES WHEN THERE WERE THEN THAT IS WRONG VIEW, NOT SEEING THINGS AS THEY ARE THAT WILL BE LEAD TO SUFFERING. IF I AM DELUDING MYSELF I CHANGED THE WORLD’S CONSCIOUSNESS, I WILL SUFFER.
THE WISE PERSON WHEN PRESENTED WITH ANY PROPOSITION EXAMINES IT CAREFULLY (MANY ONLY READ APPROXIMATELY & HASTILY FORM AN ILL ADVISED OPINION) WITHOUT EMOTION USING LOGIC (EG ONE PLUS ONE IS TWO) WHETHER IT IS TRUE, FALSE OR UNKNOWABLE. IF IT IS FALSE HE REJECTS IT AS FALSE WITHOUT RIDICULING OR LAUGHING. IF IT IS TRUE HE ACCEPTS IT AS TRUE WITHOUT ANY SONG AND DANCE. IF HE CANNOT KNOW WHETHER IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, HE DOES NOT COMMIT HIMSELF EXCEPT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS IS WHAT IS PROPOSED TO HIM. ANYTHING ELSE YOU ARE ASKING FOR SUFFERING BECAUSE IT IS SUFFERING WHETHER YOU RIDICULE OR GET EXCITED.
Turning Off The Tape Recorder First:
In order to use your Hi Fi system to play your turntable you must first switch off the cassette recorder using it.
In order for people who always speak with automated constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness by prerecorded rote from mental jukeboxes to speak live without stretching, changing speed and loudness, they must first switch off their automatic mindless force driven speaking from their mental jukeboxes and then pay constant attention to speak without stretching syllables, change speed or loudness.
Actors are not even aware they are speaking by rote from mental jukeboxes, so how are they going to switch it off? They have never switched off their jukeboxes, never spoken live for the occasion so it is impossible for them to meet the request to speak without stretching, changing speed and loudness.
Only a mind that has reached a certain level of calm clarity can speak without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness because a mind that harbor significant restless distraction will be harassed, driven to speak mindlessly with constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness.
This is the THEORY why people will not be able to speak without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness if they were asked to do so and is borne out in practice because everywhere people and animals vocalize with appreciable constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness.
If you think you speak or can speak if you want (you are a master not slave to how you speak) without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and I can demonstrate to you how different your speech will sound without stretched syllables, changes in speed and loudness, then you are deluded or have false perception and headed for madness.
No matter if you believe your speech is natural without artificial stretching, changes in speed and loudness, if objectively there is stretching, changes in speed and loudness you must suffer from stress, restlessness and distraction that will not end there but will progressively warp and degrade your mind and you are doomed to be mad in some form when your force of self preservation ultimately desert you.
Mischief & Deception Is Never Part Time:
Quote Headline: Shootout at EU- Americas summit but it is only penalties.
Comment: Whoever penned the headline is mischievous and deceptive.
He is trying to deceive readers to believe it is a shootout using guns and corrects himself by saying it is a penalty shootout as in soccer.
People are kidding themselves if they think they sometimes have the urge to be mischievous and deceive others because for one who sees correctly, mischief and deception is never part time but it is fulltime. Until the day if ever the person washes his hands permanently off mischief and deception, he is a constantly mischievous and deceptive person, not a man of truth and he is suffering, heading for madness and perdition not safety. When he is not overtly mischievous or deceptive, he is only forcing himself (a fabrication or acting) to be sober, itself a form of self and other deception and he is therefore always deceptive, never sometimes deceptive.

Knowing Does Mean Devotion Or Awe:

Just because Jesus said you can know the counselor does not mean you must hold him in awe, worship or be devoted to him but it means you are receptive to what he says. No faith is ever needed to receive what I say but discernment or the ability to see as it actually is, is crucial. There is no point having any faith in what I say that there is stretching, changes in speed and loudness in everyone’s speech but what is crucial is the ability to see that it is so and how they are not beneficial but are the inalienable roots to stress, restlessness and distraction of yourself and those who have the misfortune to relate to you.
Quote: Bush denies spying infringes on privacy.
Comment: All spying is sin, if you want to know something from someone you should ask him. If you spy you are stealing information from someone and therefore infringing on his privacy and it is stealing just as much as stealing material objects.
If you are aware your denial that spying infringes on privacy is false, because denial is always forceful, even emphatic, every time you affirm what is false is true to yourself and others, you are strengthening the belief in you of what is false is true not realizing a day will come when you will helplessly believe what is false is true, in other words, you will become mad.
If he truly believes his denial is true then he is well on the way to madness. Spying always infringes on the privacy of those spied and nobody likes to be spied.
An Indictment Of The Church:
It cannot be a mistake or accident but it is an indictment of the church that in reference to the counselor Jesus did not mention his linking up with or leading the church.
For one who sees things clearly as they are, he realizes that just like Buddhism and all other religions, Christianity is also led by deluded men who reinforce the values of this world that tend to maintain them in this world.
If God wanted everyone to know that God exists, then it is a simple matter for him to address the world but it must be the divine intention that evil people be allowed to continue their delusions of non accountability. Even those who think they are good and smart cannot understand what I am telling them, telling me they smile because they like a person, they stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness because they like it that way; what do you expect from the masses? Many are conceited that they know best, they know what is the truth and it is not what I speak. But if in truth your smiles are lies, your stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness is the only source of stress, restlessness and distraction that you must experience and induce in others, you are headed for suffering and punishment for harming others.

Thursday, May 11, 2006

The Process Of Knowing

THE PROCESS OF KNOWING:
THERE IS NOTHING SUPERNATURAL OR MYSTERIOUS INVOLVED WHEN YOU COME TO KNOW SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, EG HOW A TV WORK.
WHAT IS INVOLVED IN KNOWING IS INFORMATION DISSEMINATION AND POSSIBLY PUTTING TOGETHER ALL THE INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ENABLE YOU TO KNOW SOMETHING OR SOMEONE.
When someone introduces someone as his wife and you trust him, you accept as you are told to then know she is his wife.
If someone explains to you how a TV works, provided you are conversant in electronic gadgets, you begin to correlate his explanations with knowledge you already have, put them together to know to an extent dependent on your ability to grasp, how a TV works.
BECAUSE JESUS SAID ‘YOU KNOW HIM’ REGARDING THE COUNSELOR, IT MUST BE POSSIBLE FOR READERS TO KNOW HIM BASED ON THE INFORMATION JESUS PROVIDED WITHOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF ANYTHING SUPERNATURAL OR SPECIAL WHICH HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH KNOWING AS IT IS COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO OTHER MENTION OF THE COUNSELOR APART FROM THAT IN JOHN’S GOSPEL, THAT MENTION MUST BE THE BASIS FOR KNOWING THE COUNSELOR AND IT SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE ELSE TO FULFIL THE DESCRIPTION JESUS GAVE.
KNOWING IS EITHER A PROCESS OF ACCEPTING BY FAITH WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD OR WORKING IT OUT FOR YOURSELF LOGICALLY WHO THE COUNSELOR IS. THEREFORE IN SAYING ‘YOU KNOW HIM’, JESUS IS SAYING IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING TO WORK OUT LOGICALLY WHO THE COUNSELOR IS BASED ON HIS CONCISE DESCRIPTION.
CLEARLY JESUS WAS TELLING YOU OF SOMEBODY WHO IS TO COME IN THE FUTURE THAT HE WANTS YOU TO KNOW, THAT HE THINKS YOU CAN KNOW FROM THE DESCRIPTION HE GAVE AND IT IS NOT JESUS’ FAULT (HE GAVE YOU INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO PINPOINT THE COUNSELOR) THAT MANY EVEN AMONGST WHO THINK THEY ARE GOOD AND SMART WHO HAVE READ THOSE PASSAGES ARE IN DOUBT AS TO WHAT JESUS WAS TALKING ABOUT LET ALONE USE THE DESCRIPTION AS A GUIDE TO KNOW THE COUNSELOR AS JESUS SAID IS POSSIBLE.
Those who see but do not see (and they are far more numerous than pretentious humans like to believe) will not know the counselor. Only those who seeing, they see will know the counselor.
Not A Delusion Of Grandeur:
The Buddha: "And, monks, as long as this knowledge & vision of mine -- -- was not pure, I did not claim to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos with its deities, Maras (Evil ones) & Brahmas, with its contemplatives & priests, its royalty & commonfolk. But as soon as this knowledge & vision of mine -- was truly pure, then I did claim to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos. Knowledge & vision arose in me: 'Unprovoked is my release. This is the last birth. There is now no further becoming.'"
The Buddha does not say anything that has no rational basis or truth. He only claimed to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos when his knowledge and vision was truly pure. If he could not survey all the beings not just on earth but in the heavens to see that he is truly not make believe without compare, he would not speak so.
IN THE SAME WAY, MY CLAIM TO UNIQUENESS IS NOT BASED ON CONCEIT, MADNESS OR DELUSION BUT THERE IS OBJECTIVE BASIS.
MY CLAIM IS BASED ON THE FACT THAT WHEREAS I CAN SPEAK EFFORTLESSLY WITHOUT STRETCHING MY SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED OR LOUDNESS TO THEREBY PERMANENTLY EXIT STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, SOMETHING PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE, NO BEING, HUMAN OR ANIMAL CAN BE HEARD TO DO SO, EVEN THOSE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE SMART AND GOOD CANNOT DO SO AFTER I HAVE PERSONALLY DEMONSTRATED MANY TIMES TO THEM WHAT NOT STRETCHING, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS SOUNDS LIKE.
IF I DID NOT CHANGE MY CONSCIOUSNESS NOT ONCE BUT TWICE AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS TO EXPERIENCE AN INCOMPARABLY SUPERIOR PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE CONSCIOUSNESS STATE IN WHICH TO EXIST IN THAT THEN WAS THE TRIGGER FOR CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD WHERE THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE, I WOULD NOT CLAIM TO ANY EXCLUSIVITY.
IF I HAVE NOT SAID MANY, NOT A FEW THINGS THAT ARE UNIQUELY BENEFICIAL AND INSIGHTFUL, NEVER BEFORE SAID BY ANYONE IN THE PAST OR PRESENT, I WOULD NOT CLAIM TO ANY EXCLUSIVITY.
CANNOT DO SO:
I HAVE YET TO COME ACROSS ANYONE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO HAVE READ WHAT I HAVE SAID MANY TIMES, EVEN THOSE WHOM I HAVE PERSONALLY DEMONSTRATED HOW THEY STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGED SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHO CAN SPEAK WITHOUT STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED OR LOUDNESS.
I AM CERTAIN NOT JUST CONFIDENT THAT IF I WERE TO ASK ANYONE, EVEN THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE VERY SMART AND GOOD TO TAKE THEIR TIME TO ASSESS CAREFULLY WHAT THEY HAVE JUST SAID AND THEN REPEAT IT WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THEY WILL BE UNABLE TO DO SO, EVEN IF THEY ARE GIVEN UNLIMITED TIME AND ATTEMPTS TO CORRECT THEMSELVES. IN OTHER WORDS, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO SPEAK WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS EVEN IF THEY WANTED BECAUSE THE WAY THEY SPEAK WITH ITS CHARACTERISTIC STRETCHING, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE AUTOMATED, MINDLESSLY BY ROTE FROM MENTAL JUKEBOXES THAT THEY CANNOT INSTANTLY SWITCH OFF IN WHICH THEY ARE MERELY DISC JOCKEYS WHO HAVE NO SAY HOW THE TUNE IS PLAYED ONCE THEY PRESS THE START BUTTON. BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE NEVER SWITCHED OFF OR DISARM THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES FROM WHICH THEY ALWAYS FUNCTION FROM, THEY CANNOT SPEAK WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
YET I CAN RENDER TO THEM WHAT THEY HAVE JUST SAID WITHOUT STRETCHING ANY SYLLABLE, WITHOUT CHANGING SPEED OR LOUDNESS AT MILD/MODERATE AND HIGH LOUDNESS AND OR SPEED. THE REASON IS BECAUSE I DO NOT OPERATE A MENTAL JUKEBOX THAT NEEDS TO BE SWITCHED OFF, THE WAY I SPEAK IS ALWAYS LIVE FOR THAT OCCASION WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
THERE ARE TWO REASONS WHY ORDINARY PEOPLE EVEN THOSE WHO ARE VERY INTELLIGENT CANNOT INSTANTLY STOP STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS WHEN SPEAKING:
FIRSTLY, UNTIL THEY GO MAD, NOBODY WILL KNOWINGLY DO THINGS THAT HARM THEMSELVES. IT IS BECAUSE THEY DO NOT KNOW THEY ARE HARMING THEMSELVES THAT THEY SOMNOLENTLY DO SO. BECAUSE STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, ONLY NECESSARY FOR SHOW AND CREATES INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IS ULTIMATELY FATAL, ACTORS MUST WILL THEMSELVES TO REFUSE TO SEE THEY ARE DOING SO, AN ENDEAVOR THAT IS ABETTED BY THEIR POOR DISCERNMENT, INABILITY TO SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE BECAUSE THEIR MINDS ARE UNDER THE CONSTANT DURESS OF DISTRACTING FORCE THAT MAKES IT UNABLE TO FOCUS WELL AND THEREFORE SEE IN ITS ENTIRETY EVERY INSTANCE THAT THEY STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS (WHICH IS IN TRUTH NOT FREQUENTLY BUT CONSTANTLY).
SECONDLY, MUCH AS THEY LIKE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE GENUINE PEOPLE, THEY ARE MERELY OVERRATED DISC JOCKEYS OPERATING MENTAL JUKEBOXES THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE ALWAYS FOR THE WAYS THEY SPEAK WITH THEIR INDIVIDUALLY CHARACTERISTIC STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS. JUST AS YOU HAVE NO SAY, YOU CANNOT ALTER THE TUNES YOU RECORDED IN YOUR CASSETTE UNLESS YOU STOP THE PLAYBACK CUM RECORDER TAKE IT OUT AND RE-RECORD IT, IN THE SAME WAY, IN ORDER TO STOP STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, STOP CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, ACTORS MUST PAY ATTENTION TO STOP PLAYBACK FROM THE JUKEBOXES (SOMETHING THEY HAVE NEVER DONE IN THEIR LIVES) TO THEN PAY ATTENTION TO SPEAK LIVE (NOT FAKED LIVE FROM JUKEBOXES) WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHICH IS AGAIN SOMETHING THEY HAVE NEVER DONE IN THEIR LIVES BEFORE. THIS IS TOO TALL AND INTIMIDATING AN ORDER FOR EVEN THE MOST INTELLIGENT ACTORS TO FULFILL.
ALTHOUGH ORDINARY PEOPLE DO PAY ATTENTION TO THE WAYS THEY AND OTHERS SPEAK, THEY CANNOT SEE THEMSELVES & OTHERS STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE THEY ONLY PAY ATTENTION TO HOW STYLISH OR DISAGREEABLE THEIRS & OTHERS’ SPEAKING IS, THEY DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO HOW THEY STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. THE WAYS THEY SPEAK ARE NEVER RENDERED LIVE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF ATTENTION BUT THEY ARE ALWAYS RENDERED BY ROTE MINDLESSLY FROM MENTAL JUKEBOXES THAT MUST FIRST BE IDENTIFIED (ACTORS ARE NOT EVEN AWARE IT IS THEIR JUKEBOX AND NOT THEM THAT DOES THE SPEAKING) SO THAT IT CAN BE TURNED OFF, SOMETHING THAT THEY HAVE NEVER DONE BEFORE TO ENABLE THEM TO THEN SPEAK LIVE FOR THE OCCASION WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHICH IS AGAIN SOMETHING THEY HAVE NEVER DONE BEFORE. JUST AS A STEREO CANNOT PLAY THE TAPE RECORDER AND PHONOGRAM AT THE SAME TIME THROUGH THE LOUDSPEAKERS, EITHER HAS TO BE SWITCHED OFF FOR THE OTHER TO PLAY, EVEN SO THE JUKEBOX MUST BE SWTICHED OFF TO ALLOW THE PERSON TO SPEAK LIVE.
HOWEVER IMPRESSIVE A TAPE RECORDING IS, IT CANNOT BE INSTANTLY ALTERED BUT MUST BE LABORIOUSLY RE-RECORDED. ALL ACTORS ARE NOT EVEN AWARE THAT THE WAYS THEY SPEAK ARE BY ROTE FROM JUKEBOXES JUST AS THEY ARE NOT AWARE THERE ARE CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THESE ARE THE ONLY CAUSES OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MUST BESET THEM, SO IT IS AN IMPOSSIBLE NOT DIFFICULT TASK FOR THEM TO FULFILL TO ASK THEM TO INSTANTLY SPEAK LIVE (NOT ROTE) WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE IN ORDER TO DO SO, THEY MUST FIRST STOP THEIR AUTOMATIC JUKEBOXES (SOMETHING THEY HAVE NEVER DONE IN THEIR LIVES & THEY ARE NOT EVEN AWARE THEY ALWAYS SPEAK FROM MENTAL JUKEBOXES) AND SPEAK LIVE, ATTENTIVELY WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS (SOMETHING THEY HAVE AGAIN NEVER DONE BEFORE AND HAVE NO IDEA HOW IT SOUNDS LIKE).
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO INSTANTLY STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE IF IT WAS POSSIBLE THEY WOULD ALL HAVE DONE SO LONG AGO BECAUSE NOT TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE FROM THE PRISON OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION. THEY CANNOT EVEN SEE IN ITS ENTIRETY HOW THEY CONSTANTLY STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS LET ALONE STOP THEMSELVES DOING SO.
BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE NEVER SPOKEN WITHOUT STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS (THOUGH THEY MIGHT IMAGINE THEY DO & CAN), IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO DO SO ON REQUEST.
IT IS ONLY POSSIBLE TO EXIT CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS BY A GRADUAL TIME CONSUMING PATIENT PROCESS OF PAYING ATTENTION TO INITIALLY DETECT GROSS STRETCHING, CHANGES OF SPEED & LOUDNESS TO UNCOMPROMISINGLY ELIMINATE THEM THAT THEN MAKES THE MIND MORE FOCUSED TO SEE STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HE PREVIOUSLY COULD NOT SEE THAT HE CAN NOW ELIMINATE IN A STEPWISE PROCESS UNTIL HE REACHES THE REMAINDERLESS NOT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS. JUST AS YOU CAN EFFACE YOUR STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, IF YOU ARE LACKADAISICAL OR COMPLACENT, YOU CAN SLOWLY REVERT TO MAXIMAL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND SUFFER THE HORRENDOUS CONSEQUENCES. EVEN HELL AWAITS.
ONLY WHEN A PERSON HAS ACHIEVED THE COMPLETE CESSATION OF STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND THEREFORE EXPERIENCED FOR HIMSELF THE INCOMPARABLE DIFFERENCE THEY BRING AND CAN ALSO SEE IN ITS ENTIRETY WHAT CONSTITUTE STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS HE SAFE FROM BACKSLIDING BACK TO SUFFERING BECAUSE THUS KNOWING AND SEEING, HE WILL NOT PERMIT HIMSELF TO SUFFER UNNECESSARILY. SO LONG AS A PERSON HAS NOT PUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO A TOTAL END, HE CANNOT SEE HIMSELF COMPLETELY DOING SO AND THUS BLIND, IS IN DANGER AND CAN BE INDUCED TO REVERT TO THE TORMENT OF THE PAST.
THE PROBLEM WITH MANY IS THEIR ABIDING UNSHAKEABLE DELUSION THAT THE WAYS THEY SPEAK ARE CHARMING, IMMUTABLE & GOOD FOR THEMSELVES AND THEIR RECIPIENTS WHEN IT IS STRESSFUL, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTING. THEY EVEN HAVE THIS PERVERTED LOGIC THAT IT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE SO GOOD THAT THEY WILL SUBJECT THEMSELVES TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION TO SPEAK THE WAYS THEY DO TO BENEFIT OTHERS.
Monumental Folly:
Do not underestimate the importance of stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness because they are never isolated or merely frequent but they are always constant and there are equivalents in all the being’s activities, namely his motion, thinking and perceptions.
According to the Buddha, a being consists of his fabrications which can only be speech, motion, thinking and perceptions and the consciousness that arises as a result of these ignorant fabrications.
Therefore if stretching, changes in speed and strength of force of units of speech, motion, thought and perceptions are constant, they are totally unnecessary except for show to deceive, please, impress, dominate and intimidate others, they are the only sources of stress, restlessness and distraction that not only torment the being, but is warping and degrading his mind so that he is headed for madness, there can be no other more important consideration for the being to address than his constant stretching, changing of speed and strength of force.
Can The Blind Be Taught To See?
If a person’s blindness is complete and he sees nothing wrong with his condition (which is being blind), nothing can be done for him but he must be allowed to continue to suffer even to agonizing levels for extended periods for as many eons as it takes until the day if ever his blindness diminishes or he is distressed enough to seek redress.
You can miraculously restore the eyesight of the visually blind but you cannot miraculously install wisdom or discernment or the ability to see things clearly as they are. If it is possible to make the spiritually blind or foolish and wicked to be wise then everyone will be in heaven not suffering here.
If a person’s blindness is only partial and he is motivated to change then it is possible to cure him of his blindness or foolishness but only by a process of gradual effacement.
A person is foolish or undiscerning only because his consciousness is under the spell of significant mental force that prevents it from focusing and therefore see things clearly as they are. This mental force will not suddenly depart on its own accord but it must be grappled with and painstakingly dismantled by progressively effacing it until it is vanquished.
The conscientious practice to the best of one’s ability of paying regular attention to not stretch one’s syllables, not change speed and loudness will appreciably reduce the force acting on one’s mind, will appreciably reduce the stress, restlessness and distraction impacting on one’s mind, enabling it to see things more clearly which will then permit it to see stretching, changes of speed and loudness that previously escape his awareness that he can put a stop to them to further reduce the application of force on his mind to experience even greater discernment.
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO INSTANTLY SEE IN ITS ENTIRETY HOW HE CONSTANTLY STRETCHES HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGED SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND THEREFORE INSTANTLY PUT THEM TO A STOP BECAUSE HIS SEVERE LACK OF DISCERNMENT DOES NOT PERMIT HIM TO DO SO BUT IT IS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO IS CONSCIENTOUS TO PAY ATTENTION TO STOP WHATEVER STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HE CAN DETECT SO THAT HE WILL EXPERIENCE A MEASURE OF RELIEF FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT WILL ENABLE HIM TO SEE AS THEY ARE, STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HE PREVIOUSLY COULD NOT SEE THAT HE CAN NOW ADDRESS TO THEREBY FURTHER INCREASE HIS DISCERNMENT UNTIL HE CAN COMPLETELY SEE IN EVERY INSTANCE HOW HE STRETCHES HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGED SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND THEREFORE PUT A TOTAL STOP TO THEM TO EXPERIENCE A PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE RELEASE FROM THE PRISON OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
As the Buddha said; great becomes the gain of concentration when fully developed by virtuous conduct; great becomes the gain of wisdom when it is fully developed by concentration. Virtuous conduct in practicing not stretching, not changing speed and loudness results in great concentration from releasing the mind from incessant force, stress, restlessness and distraction impacting which then allows it to see clearly or have great wisdom which then allows it to further see and eliminate sinful conduct that it previously was unable to see.
Those who cannot see have to take it on faith from those who can see that what is said to them is true; this was said by the Buddha’s deputy, Sariputta. Those who are discerning, who can see things truly as they are, need not have faith in others who can see but they can see it directly for themselves.
You will have to take it on faith from me that I am not conceited, not deprecating others and not deluded (seeing things where there is none) that although it is possible not to do so, I have yet to meet another person (or animal) who speaks or vocalizes without stretching his syllables, changing speed and loudness.
For anyone who speaks I can demonstrate to him how what he had just said will sound like if he had not stretched, not some but ALL his syllables, not changed speed or loudness when he just spoke.
If a person can see that he is constantly stretching his syllables, changing speed and loudness he will see they are the infallible links to the stress, restlessness and distraction that must beset him and therefore it is because they cannot see that it is so (out of ignorance) that ordinary people continue to defile themselves and others with abusive constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness.
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Which came first, their inability to see that they are constantly stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness that thus causes them to continue defiling themselves and others by stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness OR their constantly stretching, changes in speed and loudness that constantly apply divisive or distracting force cause their consciousness to be permanently blurred or out of focus so that they cannot see that they are constantly doing so enabling them to continue witlessly stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness?
LIKE THE CHICKEN AND EGG, LIKE A VICIOUS CIRCLE THAT IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO BREAK BUT MUST SOMEHOW BE BROKEN IF ONE ASPIRES TO EXIT THE TORMENTING PRISON OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, THE INABILITY OF ALL (NOT SOME) BEINGS IN THIS WORLD TO DISCERN THAT THEY ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, CAUSES THEM TO CONTINUE DOING SO IN THE PROCESS APPLYING CONSTANT DIVISIVE FORCE ON THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS MAKING IT BLURRED OR UNABLE TO SEE THAT THEY ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
THE MOST I CAN DO IS TO POINT OUT TO OTHERS THAT THEY DO SO AND IN CERTAIN CASES DEMONSTRATE TO THEM EXACTLY HOW WHAT THEY HAVE JUST SAID WILL SOUND LIKE WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS (THEY OFTEN GET CROSSED OR DEFENSIVE IF I SHOW THEM), THE REST IS UP TO THE INDIVIDUAL WHO IS CONCERNED ENOUGH FOR HIS OWN GOOD TO REGULARLY EXAMINE THE WAY HE SPEAKS FOR EVIDENCE OF STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN A LABORIOUS PROCESS OF UNDOING HIS STRONG HABIT ENERGY TO MINDLESSLY STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
As the Buddha: Just as the ocean has a gradual shelf, a gradual slope, a gradual inclination, with a sudden drop-off only after a long stretch, in the same way this Doctrine and Discipline has a gradual training, a gradual performance, a gradual progression, with a penetration to gnosis (and therefore joyful release from suffering) only after a long stretch.
THERE IS NO SHORTCUT TO HARD WORK AND PERSISTENCE. FOR EVERY OCCASION YOU DETECT GROSS STRETCHING OR CHANGES IN LOUDNESS OR SPEED AND PUT A STOP TO THEM, YOU WILL EXPERIENCE A MEASURE OF RELEASE FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT WILL THEN ENABLE YOU TO SEE A LITTLE BIT MORE CLEARLY AND THEREFORE DETECT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT PREVIOUSLY ESCAPED YOUR DETECTION BUT YOU CAN NOW SEE AND THEREFORE ELIMINATE.
IF THERE IS A TIGHT NOOSE AROUND YOUR NECK, YOU MUST EXERT YOURSELF TO LOOSEN IT A BIT TO ENABLE YOU TO BREATHE A BIT BETTER AND BECOME MORE AWARE OF YOUR PREDICAMENT SO THAT YOU CAN FURTHER ATTACK THE NOOSE TO LOOSEN IT FURTHER ALLOWING BETTER BREATHING AND AWARENESS UNTIL YOU FINALLY CAN SEE THE NOOSE CLEARLY AND REMOVE IT COMPLETELY FROM YOUR NECK.
THE PROBLEM WITH PEOPLE IS THAT THEY ARE CONCEITED, FOOLISH AND LACKADAISICAL, THEY CANNOT BELIEVE THEY ARE AT FAULT, REFUSE TO EXAMINE THEMSELVES CAREFULLY OR CAN’T BE BOTHERED TO APPLY THEMSELVES TO CHANGE.
THUS REGULAR PAYING ATTENTION TO YOUR SPEECH MAY (NOT WILL) ENABLE YOU TO DETECT AT FIRST GROSS STRETCHING, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IF YOU PUT TO A STOP, WILL LEAD TO A MEASURE OF RELIEF FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEN ENABLES YOU TO SEE MORE CLEARLY AND THEREFORE DETECT MILDER FORMS OF STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT YOU PREVIOUSLY COULD NOT SEE THAT BECAUSE YOU NOW CAN SEE YOU CAN ELIMINATE SO THAT STEP BY STEP, WITH PERSISTENCE, YOU CAN INCREASINGLY SEE IN ITS ENTIRETY HOW EXTENSIVE AND SEVERE YOU AND EVERYONE STRETCHED THEIR SYLLABLES AND CONSTANTLY CHANGED SPEED AND LOUDNESS, EVEN TODAY. THIS COUPLED WITH REGULAR MEDITATION OR SECLUSION THAT MAKES YOUR MIND MORE CALM AND THEREFORE CLEARLY SEEING, WILL ENABLE THOSE WHO PRACTICE CORRECTLY TO FINALLY SEE AND THEREFORE PUT A STOP TO THE MAD PRACTICE OF CONSTANT UNNECESSARY STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
Unheeded Clues To The Nature Of Intelligence:
You hear people say without realizing they are shedding light into the nature of intelligence that “He is very smart or intelligent, he learns very quickly”. What they are implying is that intelligence is about learning or remembering or memorizing facts or how to do certain things (eg drive car or sing). Therefore intelligence is about superior memorizing of information and how to do things in which case the computer is superior because whatever data is consigned to the computer is instantly and permanently recorded. The more intelligent person has a broader and deeper store of knowledge, a broader and deeper store of skills of how to do certain things like play tennis or the piano.
Again you hear people comment thus: “He is very intelligent, he is always saying the right things, finding the right answers to a problem or situation”. Therefore superior intelligence is the ability to retrieve from his memory information that are relevant or apply to a situation where the less intelligent person cannot see the connection between the current situation and information he has stored in his brain or he retrieves information that are inappropriate or wrong. Thus the other facet of intelligence is superior retrieval of information to apply to a situation.
When people read something eg what I write, they try to remember as much as they can what they read whilst trying to make sense by comparing what they read to what they know or have memorized.
A dog is considered intelligently if it can be trained (nothing more than memorizing and rendering) to perform certain tasks. It is considered stupid if it struggles to learn and retain things.
Thus intelligence is mechanical, it is a laborious process motivated by greed or success in the world to greedily memorizing as much and as faithfully as possible and the ability to retrieve the right information from the vast repository to apply to a situation. Intelligence is a fabrication, an activity of the mind that is driven by force and consumes energy to memorize and retrieve.
By contrast, discernment or the ability to see clearly things as they are, is not a fabrication but a property or ability of the consciousness, has nothing to do with memorizing and retrieving, there is no database and retrieval that is vulnerable to disruption or glitches on which it is dependent on. Discernment depends on the consciousness being focused, not blurred and that depends on not subjecting it (consciousness) to incessant violent, constantly changing force. Only virtuous conduct in speech, bodily conduct, thought and perception can shield the consciousness from force abuse and therefore the criteria for discernment or wisdom as the Buddha said is great virtue that gives rise to great concentration that is a requisite to discernment or wisdom that is a property of the consciousness that needs no effort, no memorizing and retrieving.
The Eight Forms Of Madness:
Apart from these eight forms of madness there may be no other forms of madness.
Apart from forceful acting, forcefully going against self to say, do, think and perceive things in a way to deceive, please, impress, intimidate and dominate others, there are no other causes of madness which is the unavoidable fate of all who act unless death supervenes.
No matter how you may deny or cannot see you are an actor, how you may deny or cannot see there are constant stretching of your syllables, changes in speed and loudness, if you do you must suffer from mad stress, restlessness, distraction, violence, emotions, rote behavior, perception and logic.
And this is the inevitability or inescapability of judgment; by your actions and speech you will condemn yourself to suffering.
Mad stress: Anyone who applies force on his mind, who allows others through their actions to apply force on his mind must suffer pain or stress that lingers and if the rate of production far exceeds the rate of dissipation, he will be constantly detained in a residual level of stress.
Because consciousness has the property of memory, can memorize the experience of stress with all its intensity, it can even recreate the stress virtually by recalling the hurtful words that caused it, with lifelong heedless exposure to stress, it becomes malignant. Rather than being ‘orderly’ proportionately induced by provocation, increasingly stress can rise rapidly intensely out of proportion to the insult or application of force on the mind.
Mad restlessness: For one who sees correctly without deprecating others, even those who are supposed to be good and intelligent who have heard what I have said many times continue to speak with appreciable constant changes in speed and loudness. Because constant changes in speed and strength of force in speech, motion, thought and perception are totally unnecessary but necessary for show, are always driven by force, they must be controlled and vulnerable to episodes of loss of control or restlessness. All actors must experience bouts of restlessness, an inability to stay still, the urge to do or say something that becomes more severe with age and if nothing is done will culminate in total loss of control.
Mad distraction: A daze is a severe forceful state of distraction or separation from reality or the moment. When an actor is deeply absorbed in thought that he does not respond even if you shake him, he is in a daze that becomes more intense with age and he may never exit it. The reason why actors must be distracted is because his attention is constantly being forcefully divided between the simultaneous substance and style of his own and everyone else speech, motion, postures, thoughts and perceptions. Further actors greedily do more than one thing at a time eg talk and eat at the same time thereby practicing division of their attention.
When you smile whilst you talk, you must divide your attention between your smiling and what you are saying or you say and smile mindlessly by rote without paying attention. When someone scolds you, you have to divide your attention between the angry way he is speaking and what he is scolding you about.
With age and therefore unabated abuse, dazes and distraction becomes easier or more rapidly induced to more intense levels that are harder to shake off and if he does not take measures to correct himself he is headed for mad distraction like catatonic patients in mental institutions.
Mad logic: To believe what is false or makes no sense is true and meaningful is mad logic. To believe that “you know, I haven’t the vaguest idea how history will judge me” or “A saree (which is essentially a square piece of cloth) is anything but a square piece of cloth” is valid is mad logic. To believe that nonsensical or emotional utterances like ‘yabadabadoo’, ‘well’, ‘uh huh’ make sense is mad logic. Increasingly you believe with compelling reality what is false or nonsensical is true or valid and you have an appointment with mad logic wherein food is shit and shit is food.
To believe others know you haven’t got the vaguest idea how history will judge you or to believe it is true you know Rumsfeld haven’t got the vaguest idea how history will judge him is mad logic.
Mad perception: Doubt and uncertainty, visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory hallucinations, paranoia and denial are forms of mad perception.
When you see insults where there are none, you are suspicious of others you are paranoid and have mad perception that will get more severe with unabated practice.
When you tell lies or do or say things that are false, stressful to your yourself to please and impress others and you deny, refuse to see that it is so, you are practicing false perception that will turn mad.
It is because people see, hear, touch, smell and taste with added force, they in addition engage in elaborate visual, auditory, tactile and gustatory fantasies that they are vulnerable to hallucinations, seeing, hearing, smelling and experiencing touching that are not there.
Mad violence: All actors possess capability for considerable mental and physical violence that must be subject to constant stressful control because all acting is not driven by reason but driven by force that can reach violent levels that are never forgotten to go against oneself to deceive, please, impress, intimidate and dominate. Because actors are constantly hurting themselves by stress, restlessness and distraction in the name of deceiving, pleasing, impressing, dominating and intimidating others, they must hate themselves and others that they must also hide from others and even themselves resulting in violent conflict that must be regularly vented.
Therefore all actors must experience moments when they lose control to thump a table, smash a racket or utter expletives and if they do not correct themselves by stopping acting, they are headed for mad total violence.
Mad emotions: Because actors are constantly expressing emotions that sometimes even faked eg faked anger to intimidate someone, faked hurt to manipulate your boyfriend, these emotions (eg excitement, anger) have become very slick, easily aroused by minor events and they do not realize they are headed for mad uncontrollable emotions.
Mad rote behavior: Much as actors like to think they are such genuine live people, they are fakes, constantly rendering the substance and style of what they say or do by rote or faked live from mental jukeboxes so that regularly they must experience glitches where they say or do the wrong or inappropriate thing for an occasion.
For instance, the Chinese routinely greet others, “Eaten already?” and though they might to think their greeting is genuine from the bottom of their hearts, they are mindless insincere rote and on occasions they may have an irresistible urge to utter it inappropriately when they meet say the prime minister or a foreign friend and they blurt out, “Eaten already?”
Many cannot help smiling when they see someone because it is mad rote behavior that they now cannot help that will be inappropriate in certain circumstances eg when someone is grieving.
If you suffer from these eight forms of madness that you can now still largely hide from public view or rapidly suppress, you are doomed for future florid madness either here or in the next world. No matter how you may deny you are not an actor, if you suffer from these madness you must be an actor, you must be constantly stretching your syllables, changing speed and loudness.
If what I say is true and applies to all ordinary people then whoever is the counselor Jesus spoke of must also dwell on what I have said and if I have already done so, I will have rendered him obsolete.
In Denial:
When I first changed after 1977, after I have checked to make sure I was not kidding myself that I have permanently, joyously changed, I eagerly wrote to my family about the good news and was not abashed to tell those who would listen that I have permanently changed in a way I never dreamt possible before.
By contrast people everywhere are even not inclined to admit to themselves that they and everyone has changed, reflecting their incipient mad perception of seeing things where there are none and seeing nothing where there is something, they are even not quite sure they have changed, let alone publicly discuss changes in themselves and others. Everywhere people are behaving as if nothing has happened when to my eyes, their demeanor and the ways they conducted themselves indicated that they have all changed in recent years yet again.
How can it be possible that people who are all reluctant to admit blatant changes in themselves and others be possibly the triggers of the recent changes but instead they were all dominoes that only changed or toppled as a result of the adjacent domino toppling on them?
How many if any amongst ordinary people will admit that they and the world have changed in ways that are out of the ordinary? I will be the first to admit to myself and others that I have changed in wondrous ways that were inconceivable beforehand both after 1977 and in recent years, not because I am proud I was the trigger but I am not pretentious and must acknowledge what is reality.
HOW CAN PEOPLE WHO ARE ABASHED (BEING ABASHED IS NOT MERITORIOUS BUT IT IS PRETENTIOUS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR A BUDDHA OR JESUS TO BE ABASHED ABOUT ANYTHING) AND NEVER QUITE CERTAIN TO ADMIT THEY AND THE WORLD HAS CHANGED BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRIGGERING THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD? INSTEAD THEY ARE MERELY MINDLESS, CLUELESS INTERMEDIARY PIECES OF DOMINO IN THE UNBROKEN CHAIN OF CONTAGION THAT SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD.

Friday, May 05, 2006

All Beings Always Exist:

All Beings Always Exist:
All beings always exist, once they come into existence from an inconstruable moment, as the Buddha said:
From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on.
Therefore to ask the Buddha whether a being exists, does not exist, both exist and does not reflects confusion and lack of understanding. The Buddha said all beings except enlightened ones have a destination after they depart namely hell, animal womb, ghost, hungry shades or heaven.
Birth and death are merely transition points to different existences and the true birth of a being is that inconstruable point where a beginning point is not evident and the death or cessation of a being is his final enlightenment or awakening.
To a mind that is thoroughly brainwashed by fabricating, given to fabricating, there is a world of a difference between existing and not existing after death.
To a mind that has gone beyond fabricating there is no difference between existing and not existing, both existing and not existing because they are all the same, all forms of fabricating.
In a world of fabricating or activity there is difference between existing and not existing. In a world without fabricating, without activity, there is no difference between existing and not existing because both are forms of fabricating.
What the Buddha said 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply stands or is valid because all these notions or reappearing, not reappearing, both reappear and not reappear are forms of similar fabricating that does not apply in a realm without fabricating that beings trapped in this realm of fabricating have no idea about.
In any case all beings who continue to beings always exist in one form or another, so not to exist or not to reappear does not apply to all who are beings, who cherish being or existence.
Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta:To Vacchagotta on Fire
The wanderer Vacchagotta went to the Blessed One. He asked the Blessed One: "How is it, does Master Gotama hold the view: 'The cosmos is eternal: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'The cosmos is not eternal: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
" 'The cosmos is finite: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
" 'The cosmos is infinite: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
" 'The soul & the body are the same: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
" 'The soul is one thing and the body another: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
" 'After death a Tathagata exists: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
" 'After death a Tathagata does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
" 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
" 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"How is it, when Master Gotama is asked, he says '...no...' in each case. Seeing what drawback, then, is Master Gotama thus entirely dissociated from these ten positions?"
"Vaccha, the position that 'the cosmos is eternal' is a thicket of views, a fetter of views. It is accompanied by suffering, distress, despair and does not lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation; to calm, direct knowledge, full awakening, Unbinding.
"Does Master Gotama have any position at all?"
"A 'position,' Vaccha, is something that a Tathagata has done away with. What a Tathagata sees is this: 'Such is form, such its origin, such its disappearance; such is feeling, such its origin, such its disappearance; such is perception...such are mental fabrications...such is consciousness, such its origin, such its disappearance.' Because of this, I say, a Tathagata -- with the ending, fading out & relinquishment of all construings, all I & mine-making & tendencies to conceits -- is, through lack of sustenance/clinging, released."
"But, Master Gotama, the monk whose mind is thus released: Where does he reappear?"
"'Reappear,' Vaccha, doesn't apply."
"In that case, Master Gotama, he does not reappear."
"'Does not reappear,' Vaccha, doesn't apply."
"...both does & does not reappear."
"...doesn't apply."
"...neither does nor does not reappear."
"...doesn't apply."
"How is it, Master Gotama, when Master Gotama is asked, he says, '...doesn't apply' in each case. At this point, Master Gotama, I am confused. "
"Of course you're befuddled, Vaccha. Deep, Vaccha, is this phenomenon, hard to see, hard to realize, tranquil, refined, beyond the scope of conjecture, subtle, to-be-experienced by the wise. For those with other views, it is difficult to know. That being the case, I will now put some questions to you. Answer as you see fit. How do you construe this, Vaccha: If a fire were burning in front of you, would you know that, 'This fire is burning in front of me'?"
"...yes..."
"And suppose someone were to ask, Vaccha, 'This fire burning, dependent on what is it burning?' Thus asked, how would you reply?"
"...I would reply, 'This fire burning is burning dependent on grass & timber as its sustenance.'"
"If the fire burning were to go out, would you know that, 'This fire burning has gone out'?"
"...yes..."
"And suppose someone were to ask you, 'This fire that has gone out, in which direction has it gone? East? West? North? Or south?' "
"That doesn't apply, Master Gotama. Any fire burning dependent on a sustenance of grass and timber, being unnourished -- is classified simply as 'out' (unbound)."
"Even so, Vaccha, any physical form by which one describing the Tathagata would describe him: That the Tathagata has abandoned, deprived of the conditions of existence, not destined for future arising. Freed from the classification of form, Vaccha, the Tathagata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea. 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply.
"Any feeling...Any perception...Any mental fabrication...
"Any consciousness by which one describing the Tathagata would describe him: That the Tathagata has abandoned, its root destroyed, deprived of the conditions of existence, not destined for future arising. Freed from the classification of consciousness, Vaccha, the Tathagata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea. 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply."

Why People Cannot Tell:
Why is it that even though all ordinary people are stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness not just all the time but in complex multiple layers (within stretched syllables, between syllables and words), they cannot tell exactly how they do so (even when it is repeatedly demonstrated to them), although no matter how stupid they are, they can ALL experience the application of force and forceful changes on their minds that unfailingly results in the build up of stress, restlessness and distraction?
The reason they cannot tell is because they learnt how to speak (and behave) the ways they do by blind, rote imitating others.
It is like brainwashing, everywhere people speak and behave to them with constant stretching, changing in speed and strength of force and they get the hang of it, adopt modified versions and learn to render them by heart driven even by violent mental force and determination so much so that they now believe the ways they speak are natural, good for themselves and others when it is the opposite.
Thus you can approach even the most intelligent man and ask him to demonstrate in every instance he has stretched his syllables, changed speed and loudness and he will be dumbfounded, unable to do so.
When you stretch your syllable, you must maintain the vocal apparatus configuration to render that syllable and maintain speed and strength of force of exhaling during the stretched syllable.
When you increase speed during a stretched syllable, you must exhale with increasing or accelerating speed to produce a pitch change (more shrill). Try say ‘mmm’ and pay attention to exhale faster as you say it to appreciate the pitch change. Alternatively, blow into a whistle or flute with rapid acceleration of speed to appreciate how the pitch rises.
When you increase loudness during a stretched syllable, you must exhale with rising strength of force. Blow into a whistle or flute with rapidly increasing force and appreciate the loudness increases.
THEREFORE ALL SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES IN SPEECH REQUIRE ENERGY AND APPLIES FORCE ON THE MIND. IF THEY ARE IN TRUTH UNNECESSARY, ONLY NECESSARY FOR SHOW TO DECEIVE, PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS, THEN THEY ARE FALSE AND YOU ARE PRACTICING SOMETHING THAT IS NOT ONLY FALSE AND USELESS, BUT STRESSES, DISTRACTS AND INDUCES RESTLESSNESS IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR MADNESS WITH LOSS OF CONTROL AND DEGRADATION OF YOUR MIND AND IF YOU THINK YOU CAN AVOID HELL AFTER YOU LEAVE, YOU MAY BE A GREAT FOOL.
UNLESS YOU DO NOT MIND EXPERIENCING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, YOU DON’T MIND GOING MAD LATER, YOU DON’T MIND GOING TO ETERNAL PUNISHMENT, THEN THERE IS NOTHING MORE IMPORTANT THAN TO PAY CONSTANT ATTENTION TO DETECT AND ELIMINATE FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
IT IS FOLLY OF MONUMENTAL PROPORTIONS TO NEGLECT OR SCOFF AT THE IMPORTANCE OF NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHEN SPEAKING.
IF YOU MUST STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU MUST BE ASSAILED BY REGULAR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, YOU MUST SUFFER FROM MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT CAN ARISE SUDDENLY INTENSELY FOR LITTLE REASON, YOU ARE HEADED FOR MADNESS AND EVEN ETERNAL PUNISHMENT FOR HARMING OTHERS.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON WHO STRETCHES HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGED SPEED AND LOUDNESS SHOULD BE FREE FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON WHO DOES NOT STRETCH HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGED SPEED AND LOUDNESS SHOULD SUFFER FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD, INCLUDING THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD IS TELLING YOU THAT THE WAY THEY AND EVERYONE SPEAKS WITH CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS GOOD FOR THEMSELVES AND OTHERS AND IF YOU ARE COMPROMISED, YOU FALL INTO THEIR TRAP TO BELIEVE THAT BEING NICE WITH CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS GOOD, YOU WILL BE BACK HERE NOT NECESSARILY AS HUMANS, FOR MORE SUFFERING NOT ENJOYMENT.
No Shortcuts:
The Buddha: Just as the ocean has a gradual shelf, a gradual slope, a gradual inclination, with a sudden drop-off only after a long stretch, in the same way this Doctrine and Discipline has a gradual training, a gradual performance, a gradual progression, with a penetration to gnosis (and therefore joyful release from suffering) only after a long stretch.
What the Buddha says above is that there are no shortcuts to effacement, purging oneself of sinful conduct, to escape from suffering. Even if you are on the correct path (and many who seek are on wrong paths or on the right path but practicing wrongly), it will take painstaking application and persistence with seemingly scant rewards before one breaks through.
It is because all sinful or non virtuous conduct in speech, behavior, thought and perception is blind and forceful, driven by tremendous force of habit & memory that is hard to placate and reinforced, encouraged by society that it is hard to eliminate that it is as the Buddha said, that this Doctrine and Discipline has a gradual training, a gradual performance, a gradual progression, with a penetration to gnosis.
In other words, all ordinary people are saddled with such heavy burdens of suffering and sin that their backs are permanently hunched and they cannot see more than a few steps ahead and it will take much time and effort or practice to reduce the considerable load on their backs so that they can walk more upright and see an end to their suffering.
There was no prior guarantee or knowledge that if I persist, I would achieve an incomparably joyous, calm and clearly thinking consciousness state as reward and just as any man walking in that long journey towards the edge of the continental shelf could fail to consummate that journey, he could be arrested by obstacles on the way or turned back, it was similarly possible that I could have faltered or turned back and it is a reflection of my nature and achievement that I doggedly saw it through to the end despite hostility, obstruction and frowning by society, even those who call me friend.
Do not think that society applauded my unique behavior and assisted my cause because I have been spat at venomously on sight, sniped at or ridiculed directly and behind my back and the attitudes of even those who call themselves good implied I am on the wrong path and I should abandon my path and follow them.
Not only had I (before I achieved the current consciousness change) to pursue a protracted path of change in my behavior (speech and conduct) that was without precedent in others, with no others as guide and encouragement, with no guarantee I would achieve a permanent escape from suffering to a consciousness change, I had to face unpopularity, intimidation and hostility from society, even those who calls themselves good were hostile or condescending.
MY ACHIEVEMENT IN BRINGING ABOUT IN RECENT YEARS AN UNPRECEDENTED ALLEVIATING CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN ME THAT MAY HAVE SERVED AS CONTAGION THAT CAUSED CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN OTHERS THAT AGAIN SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD CAN BE COMPARED TO THE MAN WHO FACED HEAT, THIRST AND ATTACKS BY WILD ANIMALS TO CROSS A DESERT WHEN HE NEED NOT DO SO, WHEN NOBODY IN THE PAST HAS DONE SO AND SOCIETY RIDICULED AND FROWNED UPON HIS ENDEAVOR AND THERE WAS NO PRIOR GUARANTEE OR KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE WILL BE AN OASIS AT THE END OF THE LONG JOURNEY. THE ONLY MOTIVATION FOR ME TO EMBARK ON THE JOURNEY WAS BECAUSE I WAS DISSATISFIED WITH THE STATUS QUO AND ITS MALAISE AND I MUST SOMEHOW TRY TO GET OUT, EVEN IF IT MEANT CROSSING A HOSTILE DESERT.
THE (MINDLESS) REASONS THAT CAUSE NOT SOME BUT ALL BEINGS ON EARTH TO CONSTANTLY UNNECESSARILY FORCEFULLY STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF VOCALIZATIONS, CONSTANTLY CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE THE SAME REASONS WHY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANY AMONGST THEM COULD HAVE SPONTENEOUSLY TRIGGERED THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS. REFLECTING HOW RECALCITRANT OR RESISTANT THOSE REASONS, EVEN THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE GOOD AND INTELLIGENT WHO HAVE BEEN DEMONSTRATED BY ME IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS REPEATEDLY HOW THEY CONTINUE TO STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS NEVERTHELESS CONTINUE TO DO SO EVEN WHEN NOT TO DO SO IS THE PREVIOUSLY UNTHINKABLE ESCAPE FROM THE PRISON OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION. IF THEY CANNOT EVEN CHANGE THEMSELVES FROM STRETCHING TO NOT STRETCHING AFTER BEING POINTED OUT, WHAT MORE THAT THEY SHOULD BY THEMSELVES CHANGED THEIR OWN CONSCIOUSNESS AND THEREBY TRIGGER THE GLOBAL CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN RECENT YEARS?
THE SAME REASONS THAT CAUSED NO ONE ELSE NOT JUST THROUGHOUT THE AGES BUT TODAY WHEN THE SAME CONDITIONS APPLY, NOT TO SPEAK WHAT I SPEAK THE WAY I SPEAK ARE THE SAME REASONS WHY THEY CANNOT HAVE BEEN THE TRIGGER OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES OF RECENT YEARS.
ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE NOT MASTERS OF THEMSELVES, BUT THOROUGHLY BRAINWASHED ENFORCING SLAVES OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES THAT ARE NEVER PUSSYCATS BUT VERY POTENT & IMPLACABLE EVEN IN APPARENTLY MILD MANNERED PEOPLE. THEY ARE DRIVEN BY THEIR ILL WILL THAT THEY HAVE MISTAKEN AND BEEN TOLD BY OTHERS TO BE THEIR GOODWILL. THEY HAVE BEEN THOROUGHLY BRAINWASHED THAT THEIR ILL WILL (EG JOKING, TRYING TO BE FUNNY, FAKED SELF DEPRECATING) IS THEIR GOODWILL. EVEN WHEN THEY ARE TOLD THEIR JOKING, HUMOR AND CONSTANTLY CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS STRETCHED SYLLABLED NICENESS IS NEITHER GOOD FOR THEMSELVES NOR OTHERS, THEY NEVERTHELESS BELIEVE IT IS, WHAT MORE THAT THEY SHOULD SEEK BY THEMSELVES TO CHANGE THE EXISTING CONSCIOUSNESS CONDITIONS?
The Duties Of A Leader:
Then the Jañila Uruvelà Kassapa prostrated himself, inclining his head to the feet of the Blessed One, and said to the Blessed One: `Lord, let me receive the pabbajjà and upasampadà ordinations from the Blessed One.'
18. (Buddha replied): `You, Kassapa, are chief, leader, foremost, first, and highest of five hundred Jañilas; go first and inform them of your intention, and let them do what they think fit.'
Just as leadership has its privileges, the leader has obligations and duties to those who trust him with leadership. He is not free to do as he pleases unless he wants to court karma.
Therefore when the leader of the Janilas requested ordination, the Buddha told him to first inform his followers; as leader he had the obligation to let his followers know what he wanted to do with himself.
Quote: PM Lee calls on opposition to be serious and not evade real issues.
Comment: You are saying something negative or deprecating to voters that the opposition is not serious and therefore not fit to govern. It is up to others, the voters to decide if the opposition is not serious and you should concentrate on presenting your case how serious you think you are. If your accusation turns out to be unjustified and malicious, calculated to influence voters unfairly, there is grave karma for you.
This too is a form of libel and if you sue others for libeling you, you should make sure you do not libel others.