Thursday, June 29, 2006

The Truth Is One Not Many

The Truth Is One Not Many:
What Jesus said is possible that ‘they may all be one; even as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be in us’ is because for whatever that happens in the world of existence, however complicated, however many things are happening at the same time, there is only one correct version of it that may partially or totally describe it, not many equally valid competing differing versions.
No two views of a subject that DIFFER can be true but either one is partially or totally true or both are wrong, never both true because they differ.
It is wrong view to say that my view that is different from yours is just as valid. Either what I have said eg that there are constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness in the speech of all ordinary people and that these are the roots to the stress, restlessness and distraction they must regularly experience is correct or wrong and if you have a view that is different on these matters, either you or I or both are wrong, we cannot be both right. It does not matter if there are a hundred persons with a hundred different views of this subject about constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness, if I am correct, and their views differ in different ways from mine, they are all wrong.
The reason is because in any event occurring however complicated with many things occurring at once, there is only one version that is true that encompasses all that happened. No one can be in two places at once or do two things at once. If you are sitting you cannot be at that same time standing, if you are talking you cannot be at the same time silent. Therefore, even if an event is very complicated, there are many things at once, they are all fixed not negotiable as they happened together. Only the view that accurately registered in part or totality this event that may have many things happening together is true, whatever else is false.
Stretching of syllables, speed and loudness changes are objective not subjective matters. It is not because I say there is or you insist there isn’t that it is so. They can be demonstrated objectively or in truth to be present or absent. Because it can be objectively demonstrated whether a person’s speech contain stretched syllables, changes in speed and loudness, if you say there aren’t and it can be shown there are, you have wrong view.
How does one derive at the ONLY truth in any event or scene?
There is only one truth of what happened in any event and it is that truth that can only be accessed by seeing that event continuously (not in snapshots) without changes in speed and strength of mental force, without liking (that may lead to staring) or disliking (that may lead to eyeing through the corner or quick withdrawal of gaze) that leads to a live identification of all the relevant factors that occurred in that event in order to come to a conclusion one wants to make. Depending on the person’s discernment, if he sees an event continuously without changes in speed and strength of his mental force, he will arrive at a partial or complete ONLY truth of the event.
Whatever else, anything that is seen partially (in snapshots that may be furtive) or totally (staring forcefully) with constant changes in speed and strength of mental force or with liking and disliking to then look up in one’s mental dictionary to prescribe a meaning to it, is always faulty if not totally false.
There are these two views:
One view is that there is no objective single truth in this world, not one objective truth in anything that occurs and each person is entitled to see or interpret any event as he sees fit, likes or dislikes and they are all equally valid and to be appreciated even if they are logically wrong or faulty or bizarre. This is a tenet of democracy but it is wrong view or laissez faire that anything goes and far from harmless it leads even to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha. Wrong view is the progenitor of wrong speech and conduct and thence the mass of suffering.
The other view is that there is only a single truth of what happened in any event that can be determined in part or totality by someone who sees things as they are.
Just as there is always a truth to whatever happened, even if the truth is that whatever happened is false or deceptive, there is always reason or reasons to whatever someone says or does even if the reasons are false, not as stated or emotional. Even the man who runs amok has reason or reasons to run amok. It may be because as a result of situational provocation or degenerative impairment of his usual capacity to control his violent impulses so that now he cannot control his paranoia (false perceptions) that trigger violent uncontrollable insane lashing out.
Quote: Expressing a seemingly different view does not in itself negate the truthfulness of the other view. It is only a view. Taken in that context it is a discussion - food for thought.
Comment: Many reading, including the person who wrote it, a riposte to advice I gave him, will see nothing amiss (the writer may even be thrilled by his ‘elegant’ or ‘sophisticated’ reply when it is nothing more than cloaked lashing out), when it can be proven objectively to be untenable, based on false logic and if the person who says it and those who see nothing wrong do not turn back, they are headed for future madness (mad logic to be precise).
I unreservedly reject his view and my view that is borne not out of knee jerk emotional antagonism but calm appraisal, is the complete opposite, namely:
“Expressing a different view ALWAYS negates the truthfulness of the other view. It is not only a view but wrong views or views that can be proven logically wrong lead even to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha. Taken in that context, it (different views) is not a discussion but a parting of ways after stating both parties’ differences of views.”
All views, no matter how muddled or confused or rambling, after careful examination must convey an essential message that can only be either the same (or similar) or different, they cannot be seemingly different. If you believe seemingly different views exist (give examples) and they do not, you believe (in a forcefully controlled manner) in falsity and will ultimately become mad.
For instance my view is this: Because all sinful conduct is forceful or applies mental force on that person’s mind, every moment’s experience of suffering/ anger (lashing out)/ like & dislike is every moment’s reinforcement of it such that with repeated practice, mental suffering, etc become easier to arise to more intense levels that are increasingly difficult to shake off and the person does not realize he is headed for loss of control and mad uncontrollable suffering, he is at the same time progressively degrading his mind permanently.
I may be right or wrong, partly right or wrong in what I say above but I cannot be also wrong for the parts or the whole that I am right.
If your view is different in part or whole to what I say, it cannot be seemingly different or seemingly the same for the parts or whole that you differ or concur.
THEREFORE THE USE OF ‘SEEMINGLY’ WHETHER CARELESSLY OR INTENDED REFLECTS THE PERSON’S UNCERTAINTY OR HESITANCY WHICH IS NEVER ISOLATED OR HARMLESS BUT SYSTEMIC AND AS THE BUDDHA WARNS, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE STATES OF WOE, NOT HEAVEN.
Any view that is different must detract from the other view (otherwise why don’t you drop your view and embrace mine or why don’t I drop mine and embrace yours?) and therefore any different view (rightfully or wrongfully) negates the truthfulness of the other view.
THEREFORE TO SAY “Expressing a seemingly different view does not in itself negate the truthfulness of the other view” IS TO SAY SOMETHING THAT MAY APPEAR SOPHISTICATED BUT IT IS BASED ON FALSE LOGIC, LIKE SAYING THAT BLACK IS WHITE AND WHITE IS BLACK AND THOUGH HE MAY STILL BE ABLE TO CONTROL OR REPRESS THE CONTRADICTION THEREIN, HE IS HEADED FOR MAD LOGIC WHEN FOOD IS SHIT AND SHIT IS FOOD.
UNLESS THE PERSON HARBOR DOUBTS ABOUT HIS OWN VIEWS, HE SECRETLY AGREES WITH THE OTHER PERSON, IF HE SEES CALMLY AND CLEARLY THAT HIS VIEW IS CORRECT (EG THAT THERE ARE CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED WHEN PEOPLE STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES) HE CANNOT TRULY APPRECIATE ANY VIEWS THAT DIFFER (PEOPLE DON’T STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES, THEY DON’T CHANGE SPEED WHEN THEY STRETCH IT). ORDINARY PEOPLE NEVER TRULY APPRECIATE THE VIEWS OF OTHERS THAT DIFFER FROM THEIRS, THEY ONLY CONDESCEND THEY DO OR FAKE SO FORCEFULLY, EMOTIONALLY WELL THEY APPRECIATE THAT THEY NOW BELIEVE THEY ‘GENUINELY’ APPRECIATE WHEN IT IS ELABORATE SELF AND OTHER DECEPTION AND THEY HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH MAD PERCEPTION OR PARANOIA IN THE FUTURE.
It is not ‘only a view’ as he states because views are deadly according to the Buddha who said the destination for wrong view is hell or the animal womb, not a slap on the wrist. It is not because the Buddha says so that it is so but it is because as the Buddha said, wrong views lead to wrong speech and conduct and all the mass of trouble that ensues.
Taken in that context it is a discussion – it is not food for thought as he suggests but it is a parting of ways. If you must have your views that differ from the Father and that in heaven, then you must go your own lonely way, suffering and in darkness even for another eternity.
(Nobody truly appreciates others’ different opinions; they only fake to be egalitarian and appreciative in an endeavor that is not without danger because it will lead to final madness, truly believing what he initially faked to believe)
THEREFORE STATEMENTS LIKE THAT ABOVE THAT PEOPLE AND THE PERSON TAKES FOR GRANTED AS TRUE OR VALID CAN BE PROVEN OBJECTIVELY TO BE FALSE AND HARMFUL. THE MOTIVE BEHIND HIS MESSAGE IS EMOTIONAL, TO DELIVER ANOTHER SWIPE AT ME THAT A LESSER PERSON MIGHT BE COWED TO ACCEPT AND THEREFORE FEEL GUILTY WHEN HE IS NOT GUILTY.
YOU MAY AGREE THAT SUCH FALSE STATEMENTS THAT THE SPEAKER OBVIOUSLY WANTS THE OTHER PERSON TO BELIEVE OR ENTERTAIN IS NOT HARMLESS BUT GRIEVOUS BECAUSE IT EXERTS PRESSURE ON THE OTHER PERSON TO ADOPT THE SAME VIEWS OR EXPERIENCE CONFLICT OR DOUBT IN HIS OWN VIEWS.
MANY CANNOT AND WILL NOT BELIEVE THEY ARE HEADED FOR MAD LOGIC, MAD PERCEPTION (PARANOIA) AND MAD VIOLENCE/EMOTIONS BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY ARE GREAT LOGICIANS, THEY HAVE FORCEFULLY BELIEVED WHAT THEY SAY AND BELIEVE IS TRUE WHEN IF SUBJECT TO LOGICAL ANALYSIS THEY CAN BE SHOWN TO BE FALSE AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR THE CLIFF NOT SAFETY.
THERE IS ONLY ONE TRUTH IN ANY EVENT OR SUBJECT AND IT IS THAT WHICH IS SEEN IN PART OR TOTALITY BY ANY & ALL PERSONS WHO SEE IT CONTINUOUSLY WITHOUT CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OR WITHOUT LIKING OR DISLIKING IT, WITHOUT RELYING ON A MENTAL DICTIONARY OF LEARNT EMOTION CUM APPARARENT LOGIC (ALSO KNOWN AS EXCUSES) MEANINGS TO ATTACH TO THAT EVENT AND THIS IS THE BASIS OF THE UNITY IN HEAVEN, BETWEEN GOD AND ALL THE BEINGS IN HEAVEN, NOT BLIND OBEISANCE TO GOD.
SEEING WITH CONSTANCY IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IS LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY SEEING BECAUSE THE CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IS THE MORE THAT COMES FROM EVIL NOT GOOD, ACCORDING TO JESUS. IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE IT IS EVIL, IT IS UNNECESSARY WASTE OF ENERGY THAT APPLIES FORCE ON YOUR MIND CREATING INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
MENTAL FORCE IS THE (BLIND) EVIL IN THE PERSON’S MIND AND MENTAL FORCE CAN ONLY ACT THROUGH CHANGING SPEED, DIRECTION AND STRENGTH. THE ONLY WAY SPEED AND STRENGTH CAN CHANGE IS EITHER UNDULATING UP AND DOWN GIVING RISE TO LIKING OR CONTINUOUS RISING GIVING RISE TO DISLIKE AND DEPENDING ON THE SITUATION, STRENGTH, DIRECTION, WHETHER IT IS FOCUSED OR DIFFUSE, THE VARIOUS EMOTIONS ARE EXPERIENCED.
(Anyone who says that Buddhism and Christianity are incompatible has better sure his view is derived with calm clear reason and not emotion because there is broad agreement in tenets and the scheme of things.
The Buddha said there is heaven and hell, Jesus spoke of eternal habitations that may be in line with what the Buddha said you can be born a animals.
The Buddha said there is God or Great Brahma whom he described as the All-Seeing, All-Powerful, the Maker, Creator, Father of All That Have Been and Shall Be and in one place he said Great Brahma has two sons, Tissa (may be Jesus who is Isa in Islam) and Sanankumaran. He said there have been at least 91 eons that may correspond to what Jesus said about this Age and the Age to come. One eon is the time in which a being wandering from life to life will create a pile of skeleton as high as a mountain. The Buddha calls himself the Perfect One, the One Who Thus Comes and said that for seven eons, he himself had been the powerful One but he has grown tired of all existences and this is his final existence to be born amongst men to teach the path either to heaven or nirvana the total cessation of all separate existence)

***
Like & dislike are the only two possible first order consciousness experiences of mental force in action because it is only possible for mental force to change in speed and strength in an undulating up and down manner (experienced as like) or in an accelerating rise (experienced as dislike). There are no other ways for speed and strength of force to change.
Emotions are the second order consciousness experiences of like and dislike in action depending on the strength of like or dislike, whether it is directed inwards or outwards, whether it is sharp or diffuse and what the targets of like and dislike are.
If you vary the current to a bulb in an up and down manner, it will glow and dim in brightness in compliance with the variations in current or strength of electrical force. This glowing and dimming is attractive or liked by beings in this world, a fact that is exploited by advertisers who make the messages they want to convey eg “only fifty cents” or “Buy two get one free” blink to attract attention or trigger undulating rises and falls in the consciousness of those who perceive it.
No one truly likes the flash of a camera flashlight because it is a violent acceleration in brightness caused by the violent acceleration in current (strength of electrical force) applied to the bulb that triggers a similar violent unabated acceleration of speed and strength of the perceiver’s mental force.
These two observations again provide insight into the nature of like and dislike that it is nothing more than the consciousness experiences due to undulating or violently accelerating speed and strength of one’s mental force.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO SUBDUE ONE’S MENTAL FORCE SO THAT IT DOES NOT RISE AND FALL IN STRENGTH AND SPEED IN REACTION TO PHENOMENA BUT IT WILL NOT BE GRANTED BY WISH BUT IT REQUIRES DEDICATION TO PAY ATTENTION TO ONE’S STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO EFFACE THAT BY NOW IMPLACABLE URGE TO MINDLESSLY STRETCH AND CHANGE SPEED & LOUDNESS.









By smiling as he is doing he is expressing liking (not love) that is experienced as undulating changes in speed and strength of his mental force. Sometimes there is basis for his smiling and liking, for example he sees adulating journalists swooning on him but often there is actually no reason to smile but he is smiling for show or even hiding his distresses.
If there is in truth nothing for you to smile or like on an occasion and you are only faking it to impress others or hide your distress, aren’t you practicing controlled insanity that you do not realize will become uncontrolled with prolonged practice and old age debility? Even if there is basis for your smile eg you saw a pretty girl smiling at you, you are subjecting your mind to undulating changes in speed and strength of force that conditions it to reproduce it with greater ease with time and also degrades it because force degrades a mind.









Again there is nothing special about him or his smile, he is smiling to express liking that may be genuine or faked to impress others. If it is faked, he is going to go mad with uncontrollable mad or meaningless smiling because he is smiling for no reason in a controlled way to impress others and even himself.
Even if there is genuine liking behind his smile, he is headed for mad restlessness because the liking and the smiling has undulating rising and fall strength of force and speed that is mesmerizing, that with practice increasingly conditions his mind to mindless undulating changes that will end in agony not unalloyed bliss.
KEEP ON SMILING LIKE THEM AND TEMPT FATE. YOU ARE A FOOL. TO SMILE AND KNOW YOU ARE PUTTING A SHOW, HURTING YOURSELF AND OTHERS IS ONE LEVEL OF DECEIT THAT IS REMEDIABLE IF YOU CHOOSE BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE THE ROOT OF YOUR PROBLEM, TO SMILE AND BELIEVE YOUR SMILES ARE GENUINE, GOOD FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS IS AN EVEN GREATER LEVEL OF DECEIT THAT WILL BE EVEN MORE AGONIZING BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE THE WAY OUT.
AS SARIPUTTA, THE BUDDHA’S DEPUTY SAID, THE MAN WHO IS GUILTY AND KNOWS HE IS GUILTY IS HIGHER THAN THE MAN WHO IS GUILTY AND DOES NOT KNOW HE IS GUILTY BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF HIS PREDICAMENT.
Disappointment & Complaining Is Dislike:
Disappointment eg at one’s exam result is a reaction that is a form of dislike. Did Jesus ever express disappointment at anything? It is a form of discontent. Just because your exam result or salary rise is below your expectations does not mean you must be disappointed but if you must be disappointed, you incur additional suffering that is reinforcing.
Complaining is an expression of dislike. Just because something disadvantages you unfairly does not mean you must complain. You can speak out without complaining which demands you speak emotionally with dislike.
THEREFORE ORDINARY PEOPLE SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE EXTENT WITH WHICH LIKE AND DISLIKE RULE THEIR LIVES. OFTEN THEY ARE UNAWARE THEY ARE EXPERIENCING OR EXPRESSING LIKE AND DISLIKE THAT ARE SOURCES OF STRESS NOT UNALLOYED PLEASURE IT IS MADE OUT TO BE.
Stunning:
Quote: Buffet to give stunning $37 billion to charity.
Comment: The news does not stun me one bit and the person who can be stunned is in danger of grave future suffering. By using the word stunning you are also promoting stunning with karma for leading others to suffering.
It is because the person is greedy, for whom money is a preoccupation who will be stunned. When you are stunned there are rapid violent rises and falls of the speed and strength of mental force that seizes the mind into dazed paralysis in response to an event.
Many will be called but few are chosen:
Jesus said many (not all) will be called but few are chosen suggesting that there are those who are not even invited to go to heaven.
He said many are called but few not many or some are chosen suggesting that there is some exclusivity in those chosen.
The reality is that all beings have minds of their own that they do not realize are false and selfish, they desire to exist, they cling on to existence but the price of existence especially deluded existence is exorbitant because each individual’s existence in this world is based on the misery and suffering of others to support it and since they are deluded, they see little or no wrong with themselves when they are constantly persecuting themselves and others with the ways they behave, they will have wander on in suffering from life to life until the day if ever they realize they are the source of their own suffering and they work steadfastly to extricate themselves from sin.
Whether you like it or not, there is heaven and hell and it is the Father (not you) who determines whether you go to heaven or you do not. The Father’s retinue is the highest in heaven and as Jesus said, you must be perfect, as your Father in heaven is perfect. There are many retinues and levels in heaven and at the lower levels the life spans are shorter eg hundreds of thousands of years compared to Brahma’s retinue that is one eon or Age.
The Buddha: Few among men are those who cross to the farther shore. The rest, the bulk of men, only run up and down the hither bank.
And again Jesus spoke to them in parables, saying, 2 "The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who gave a marriage feast for his son, 3* and sent his servants to call those who were invited to the marriage feast; but they would not come. 4 Again he sent other servants, saying, 'Tell those who are invited, Behold, I have made ready my dinner, my oxen and my fat calves are killed, and everything is ready; come to the marriage feast.' 5 But they made light of it and went off, one to his farm, another to his business, 6 while the rest seized his servants, treated them shamefully, and killed them. 7 The king was angry, and he sent his troops and destroyed those murderers and burned their city. 8 Then he said to his servants, 'The wedding is ready, but those invited were not worthy. 9 Go therefore to the thoroughfares, and invite to the marriage feast as many as you find.' 10* And those servants went out into the streets and gathered all whom they found, both bad and good; so the wedding hall was filled with guests.

11 "But when the king came in to look at the guests, he saw there a man who had no wedding garment; 12* and he said to him, 'Friend, how did you get in here without a wedding garment?' And he was speechless. 13* Then the king said to the attendants, 'Bind him hand and foot, and cast him into the outer darkness; there men will weep and gnash their teeth.' 14 For many are called, but few are chosen."

Not The Buddha’s Doing:
'This is stress... This is the origination... This is the cessation... This is the way leading to the cessation of stress... These are fermentations... This is the origination... This is the cessation... This is the way leading to the cessation of fermentations.'
The foolish reader may think that the stretching of spaces thus . . . were perpetrated by Buddha when it may not even be in the original Pali version but the stretching of the spaces depicted are the work of the scholar who did the translation into English.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Real & Apparent Meaning To Life:

Real & Apparent Meaning To Life:
Because LIKE is nothing more than the consciousness experience generated by undulating changes in the speed and strength of mental force and DISLIKE is the consciousness experience generated by accelerating speed and strength changes of the mental force, because no one is a master of his likes and dislikes but he is increasingly their helpless slave, because likes and dislikes are never part time but full time, only their intensities vary depending on the object, if your life revolves around likes and dislikes (as is the case of not just ordinary people but all animals) then you may derive some emotional sustenance or meaning from liking and disliking in your existence here but this meaning or satisfaction is always attended by malaise, doubt, uncertainty, stress, restlessness and distraction and it is ultimately hollow or meaningless and no matter how you may deny it is so, this reality you willfully repress will rear up to haunt you every now and then and you must feel sick of yourself and others for constantly subjecting yourself to likes and dislikes that can reach tormenting levels.
On the other hand, if your life is not predicated on likes and dislikes, you eschew them COMPLETELY by practicing constancy in speed and strength of force in whatever you perceive, think, speak and do, then your life here is not based on the two yoyo consciousness experiences generated by mindless fluctuations of mental force but it is based on true, calm and clearly thinking unwavering reason, based on seeing things clearly as they are not as you like or dislike them to be, based on true passive love and concern for yourself and others and this is a true and everlasting meaning to your life here and thereafter (in heaven) because you cannot hurt yourself or others by neither liking nor disliking (but you ALWAYS hurt yourself and others by liking and disliking that you can only deny and keep denying until it becomes too cancerous to deny).
If you have an eye for truth, animals also like and dislike just as humans do and their lives similarly revolve around little more than like and dislike and if your life in truth revolves around little more than an endless litany of likes and dislikes, you may be destined to join the animals after you depart here, not just for one or two life spans but even for another eternity or Age.
Jesus said ‘Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to eternal life’. Likes and dislikes are the (only) food that sustains people here and it perishes (because they are nothing more than the consciousness experiences due to ephemeral or evanescent changes in one’s mental force) and are ultimately meaningless whilst true unwavering reason, concern and loving kindness for others endures.
(If I am a fake, not the counselor Jesus described, can you or anyone fake like me? Even the Buddha and Jesus did not speak like me, not because I am greater but because as Jesus said, you could not bear them then and it is a reflection that there have been unmistakable previously inconceivable consciousness changes occurring to everyone both after 1977 and in recent years in which I was the unacknowledged trigger that it is possible for me to speak thus whilst even today there is not one other man who will say, “Why is everybody changing in an unprecedented way and why are we constantly stretching our syllables, changing speed and loudness when it is the root to our tormenting stress, restlessness and distraction?” and even when it is demonstrated to them how they do so, they nevertheless continue somnolently either because they cannot see, they are helpless or indifferent, not as good or devoted to truth as they pretend to be.)
Faked & False Logic:
Reasoning is either the process of working out the meaning of what has happened and therefore what appropriate actions are to be taken or it is the rationale behind what you say or do and how you say or do it.
There is true reasoning that must be formulated live specific for that occasion and it can only be based on seeing the event in its entirety clearly as it is, not excerpts as you like or dislike to then identify ALL (not some) of the information therein that may be relevant to form (or not form) a conclusion.
There is false reasoning that is based on seeing a situation selectively as you like or dislike it and then identifying some of the relevant information present (either through hastiness, carelessness or deliberate like or dislike) to come to a conclusion that will be and can be objectively shown to be false. The reasons you do or say something or the style with which you say or do it is false if it is harmful or unnecessary.
There is faked reasoning that is reasoning you did not work out by yourself but you copied into your mental jukebox from others eg under social pressures or you reproduced unreasoning from your mental jukebox to apply to a situation empirically based on past experiences. This faked reasoning is always a false mixture of emotional (eg liking or resenting) meaning and faulty if not false rationale. Ordinary people all have a considerable dictionary of learnt meaning in their mental jukeboxes that they can apply to a situation so everything that occurs to them accords with their world views.
For instance, it is both false and faked logic to say “A saree is anything but a square piece of cloth”
It is false logic because whatever a saree is, it is still a square piece of cloth. There are many things a saree cannot be like it cannot be a cat, food or a house.
It is faked logic is because this is not the first time he said this but he rendered it from his mental jukebox to apply to the situation after having copied it from others; for instance he might have heard someone say before “A Ferrari is anything but a car” and thought it was cute and worth aping without examining the logic behind it.
Quote: Police ruled out the same gang because the modus operandi is different.
Comment: Although criminals usually stick to a certain modus operandi, it can be changed and so it is not logical to say that just because the modus operandi is different the same gang is not involved.
There is actually pervasive faked rote logic in society that people adopt unquestioningly as a result of self and other conditioning. For example some people always smile when others greet them or when they say something without questioning why and ignoring the stress, they have been told to be a winner, it is shameful to be a loser and they therefore conduct themselves accordingly unquestioningly, it has been drummed into them to be assertive or add force in whatever they say or do when there is no reason why it should be so especially when it is stressful. Try telling the person there is no reason to smile when someone greets him or to be forceful in what he says or does and he will think you are odd reflecting that he has accepted his false rote logic that was brainwashed into him without question.
THERE ARE TWO WAYS OF APPROACHING A SITUATION, DO AS YOU ARE TOLD OR THINK LOGICALLY AFTER CONSIDERING ALL RELEVANT FACTORS WHAT IS APPROPRIATE. VERY OFTEN PEOPLE DO OR SAY THINGS BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD SO BY SOCIETY WHICH IS WHY THERE ARE CULTURAL DIFFERENCES.
Ordinary people seldom if ever reason fresh for the occasion, they always search their jukeboxes for a ready emotion cum faulty reason explanation to fit it conveniently after having seen it as they liked or disliked it. They usually sample or take snapshots that may be haphazard of a situation before they search their jukeboxes for explanations that may be applicable rather than reason live from their snapshots.
IF YOU LIKE OR DISLIKE, A BLIND FORCEFUL ATTTRACTIVE OR REPULSIVE REACTION BASED ON PHYSICAL ATTTRIBUTES, YOU HAVE ALREADY PREJUDGED AN EVENT, SO HOW CAN YOU HAVE TRUE LOGIC?
IF YOU ALWAYS LAZILY SEARCH YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX FOR CONVENIENT INSTANT EXPLANATIONS FOR OCCURENCES, HOW CAN YOU HAVE TRUE LOGIC BUT INSTEAD YOU HAVE MINDLESS REHASHED LOGIC THAT IS AT BEST APPROXIMATE THAT CAN NEVER FIT THE SITUATION PERFECTLY?
IN ORDER TO HAVE TRUE REASONING IT MUST BE LIVE FOR THE OCCASION, NOT A REHASH FROM A MENTAL DICTIONARY. YOU MUST SEE THE SITUATION IN ITS ENTIRETY (NOT TAKE SNAPSHOTS) CLEARLY AS IT IS NOT AS YOU LIKED OR DISLIKED IT. YOU MUST THEN IDENTIFY ALL NOT SOME OF THE RELEVANT FACTORS IN THE SITUATION TO FORMULATE YOUR CONCLUSION. IN ADDITION, THE REASON FOR SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING CAN ONLY BE TRUE IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO DOES NOT HARM YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND IS NECESSARY OR USEFUL. ALL STYLE OR WAY OF DOING OR SAYING IS FALSE, UNNECESSARY, WASTES ENERGY AND STRESSFUL.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO HAVE TRUE REASON EXCEPT IN THE FIGMENT OF THEIR IMAGINATION THEY CAN AND DO.
Why is that so?
First, people never see things in their entirety, but they always take snapshots of a situation, often they only take one snapshot to decide presumptuously what it is all about.
The snapshots they often take are hurried and pretentiously through the corner of their eyes rather than honestly frontally and therefore prone to error.
Secondly they always see things as they like or dislike it which automatically precludes them seeing them clearly as they are.
There is objective incontrovertible proof people cannot see things clearly as it is.
If it is true you can see things clearly as it is then even though you like and cannot give up stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, you should be able to tell me precisely every occurrence of stretching of your syllables, changing speed and loudness. Because I have yet to come across someone who can pinpoint to me even after I have demonstrated to them how speed and loudness changes sound like (let alone that they should come to a realization themselves), they cannot see (as there is) that there are constant stretching of their syllables, changes of speed and loudness that are the only sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that torment them.
THE TRUTH IS THAT PEOPLE NEVER SEE THINGS AS THEY ARE BUT THEY SEE THINGS AS THEY LIKE OR DISLIKE THEM, THEY NEVER SEE THINGS ENTIRELY BUT THEY ALWAYS SEE THINGS PARTIALLY IN SNAPSHOTS THAT THEY THEN USE AS THE BASIS TO FORM NOT LIVE DECISIONS BUT THEY SEARCH THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES FOR CONVENIENT MEANING TO ASCRIBE TO THE SITUATION.
ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE A DICTIONARY OF MEANINGS THAT CAN BE ASCRIBED TO WHATEVER HAPPENS TO THEM PRERECORDED IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES THAT THEY CAN SEARCH FOR AND APPLY TO MOST IF NOT ALL SITUATIONS AND THESE ROTE MEANINGS ARE BLENDS OF EMOTIONAL MEANING AND FAULTY LOGICAL MEANING THAT THEY OFTEN DID NOT FORMULATE THEMSELVES BUT THEY COPIED WITHOUT REASONING FROM OTHERS (EG THEY ADOPT THE VALUES OF THEIR IDOLS LIKE ELVIS OR PLATO). THEREFORE THEY NEVER TRULY REASON, NEVER LIVE REASON FOR A SITUATION OCCURRING.
The first indispensable step for true reasoning to occur is that you must see things clearly as they are, not as you like or dislike them to be.
For instance if you want to make a reasoned decision whether someone is telling you the truth or not, you must see everything what and how he is telling you clearly. If you already like him maybe because he is handsome or a smooth talker who confesses that he shares many common values with you, you may miss crucial telltale signs that he is lying.
The next crucial step to reasoning as to whether a person is telling you the truth is to identify ALL aspects of the situation (what he says, the way he says it, his bodily and facial expressions) that are relevant for you to decide. Because people take snapshots, they are colored by their liking for the person, they often miss glaring evidence that the person is lying.
YOU WILL BE SURPRISED HOW LITTLE OR NO TRUE LIVE REASONING IS NEEDED IN THE COURSE OF DAILY LIFE, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS DO AS YOU ARE TOLD OR CONSULT YOUR MENTAL DICTIONARY FOR READY MADE MEANING AFTER TAKING SNAPSHOTS OF THE SITUATION.
JUST AS YOU CAN COMPOSE A LIVE LETTER FOR THE OCCASION OR YOU CAN SELECT A FORM LETTER FROM YOUR COMPUTER STORE THAT YOU ONLY FILL IN APPROPRIATE CURRENT DETAILS FOR A SITUATION, YOU CAN ALSO REASON OUT LIVE OR FAKE REASONING FROM YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX.
As they say, rubbish in rubbish out. No matter how good a computer is, if you feed it rubbish data, rubbish results will come out. Therefore seeing the situation clearly, impartially without like or dislike is crucial to perfect reasoning.
Very often people are not even aware their reasoning is faulty or false.
For example when Christians read Jesus saying, “Do not kill or you will be judged” they assume Jesus meant just killing humans when he could have meant all killing including animals. The same venom that you used to smack a mosquito or cockcroach is the same venom you use to stab someone and the wise person will refrain from all killing so that there is no urge to harm anything and this in accord to what the Buddha preached.
Jesus said: Beware of the scribes, who like to go about in long robes and to have salutations (by the people) in the market places.
It is likely that ordinary people who read what Jesus said will conclude falsely that the wearing long robes and being saluted in the market places is censured by Jesus when it is the liking for or the enjoyment of wearing long robes and salutations that is criticized by Jesus because he did not ask you to beware of those who go about in long robes or have salutations in marketplaces.
Quote BBC Headline: Crunch time for Pluto
The headline is clearly false and misleading and the fact that supposedly staid BBC sees nothing wrong reflects its laxity in governing truth that is in keeping with mankind’s attitudes.
An astronomical meeting soon will decide Pluto’s fate as a planet, an event that is unlikely to perturb Pluto or any reasonable minded person.
It is clearly said in jest but mischievous because the mention of crunch time will arouse anxiety in those vulnerable with karma attached. Many see nothing wrong with such headlines; they do not believe that they and those who like to speak in jest are heedless and headed even for eternal punishment.
Many think nothing about but they think it is full of meaning when they utter: Well, huh, uh oh, hmm, jeez, gee whiz when they are meaningless, only to express emotions like disgust or poignancy.
It is illogical or false logic to always speak with stretched syllables, changes in speed and loudness because they are totally unnecessary except for show, they consume prodigious energy cumulatively, create stress, restlessness and distraction that are insoluble and because all ordinary people manifest constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness they must be illogical or falsely logical people not occasionally but mindlessly constantly and this is borne out in practice.
If you listen to someone you are familiar talking, you will realize that what he says and the way he says it is uncannily similar to what he has said in the past and he is therefore little more than a biological tape recording playback machine.
What logic is there in a tape recorder and what difference does it make if the recorder is biological?
Ordinary people who appreciate jokes are essentially appreciating the absurdity of what happened or the misfortune of others. Appreciation of jokes is therefore a form of false logic that what is absurd or is the misfortune of others is funny or enjoyable.
AS I HAVE SAID, FORCE (EMOTION) AND REASON ARE MUTUALLY INCOMPATIBLE AND ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE THIS DELUSION THAT THEY CAN BE EVEN INTENSELY EMOTIONAL AND STILL BE A PERSON OF REASON, THEY CAN REASON WITH GREAT FORCE OR EMOTION AND IT IS STILL TRUE REASON WHEN IT IS NOT THE REASON THAT IS RELEVANT BUT IT IS THE FORCE THAT IS THE PUPPET MASTER OF FORCEFUL REASONING. FORCE IS A BIG BULLY AND WHENEVER IT IS PRESENT, TRUE REASON IS BANISHED TO THE SIDELINES IF NOT EXTERMINATED. WHATEVER REASONING THERE IS IN FORCEFUL REASONING IS FAULTY AND A DECOY TO JUSTIFY THE FORCE OR EMOTION BEHIND IT.
There is no reason in force except faked reason. There is no force in (true) reason. If there is palpable force in the reasoning, it is an imposter and false.
Animals Also Like & Dislike:
Animals also like and you can demonstrate that by throwing a fist of grain in a chicken yard and see them scamper towards and pecking the grain with gusto that can be concluded from the animated rapid bobbling or undulating speed and strength up and down movements of their heads as they pecked.
Animals also dislike as you can demonstrate to your peril by trying to disturb a tiger by throwing stones or spraying it with water.
So what is so great about your like that you should uphold it?
Just as you are born and will die, animals are also born and die, they have eyes, ears, mouths and organs just like you, there is a possibility that you can be born after you depart as an animal as the Buddha tells you is possible and you can indulge your liking and disliking as animals just as well as you can as humans. And if you think you don’t mind being an animal the Buddha said he can think of nothing more tormenting than hell or the animal womb. The reason may be the compression or serious restrictions of your consciousness that existing as animals entail.
Emotions:
Depending on whether liking or disliking is directed inwards or outwards, depending on the target or situation or specificity in which like or dislike rise, the intensity, sharpness or diffusion of the liking or disliking, different emotions are experienced.
Depression and rage are nothing more than intense sadness and anger. Anger is ill directed outward dislike whilst hate is pointed or directed outward dislike. Lust is like directed at sexual objects, greed is like targeted at money and possessions. Pride and shame are inwardly directed like and dislike.
So what is the big deal about your emotions that you adulate when they are nothing more than like and dislike dressed up in fancy clothes for different occasions?
People Wants Others To Like Them To Bond Them:
Even though they cannot articulate what the nature of liking is, ordinary people know it is an attractive process that becomes helpless and therefore they behave in manners that are seductive to attract the opposite sex so that they become attracted or bonded by attractive force to them that because it is blind or irrational and has strength, bond their targets to them which is what their hearts desire.
For instance a lovesick man may call repeatedly “Maria, Maria, Maria” in a voice with undulating variations in speed and loudness to himself whilst visualizing her with similarly undulating force and speed often in an idealized manner way above her actual physical beauty so that he becomes increasingly bonded to her, becomes even obsessed and jealous of any man who dare express interest in her.
Love Is Blind:
People say love is blind because the love they refer to is sexual like and it is blind because it is nothing more than seeing the person with undulating changes in speed and strength of force. Force and the undulating changes of force in the mind is always blind.
The more intense the force invested in one’s ‘love’, the more violent the changes in speed and strength of force, the blinder and stronger that love or like.
True Love Cannot Turn To Hate:
True love is a passive or forceless concern & loving care for the other person without conditions attached and therefore cannot turn to forceful hate.
Only something that is forceful, liking that has intensity that can become very strong, that is always stressful and tiring to the person and his recipient that if unrequited or spurned can turn to hate.
And therefore if your love or the love you see between others can turn to hate, it is not love but it is liking. The more intense the liking the more intense the hate that is likely to ensue.
Instant Like Or Dislike:
When ordinary people read the headline: Bill Gates To End Daily Role, they instantly helplessly react with ‘like’ like interesting, ‘wow’, good or dislike like ‘this is sad’, ‘good riddance’ or ‘I don’t give a damn’ or ‘big deal’.
If the person read the headline with disdain, he will invariably read the story in a disdainfully manner looking for things to mock ‘ho, ho, ho’ and thus he may think he has read it objectively but he is kidding himself.
In the past I too would react automatically to like or dislike whatever came to my attention, nowadays I just become aware of the headline without any liking or disliking.
People like praise and hate criticism:
Ordinary people like never love praise and they dislike or hate criticism even if it is rational and not abusive.
You can only like or have an attraction for praise, you cannot have loving kindness for praise.
As a result of abusive criticism from others in the past, all ordinary people are very sensitive, they react even violently to all forms of criticism including mine that is not abusive and irrational.
They cannot help reacting with instant strong dislike to hearing or reading what I write that is critical and thus colored, they only take snapshots that they use to justify their rejection of everything I say.
For instance they swiftly pounce on me for saying all ordinary people are robots to say I am arrogant or deluded to think I am special and deprecating others and because they think I am arrogant they think they are just to dismiss everything I say.
The Buddha spoke of ordinary people and noble ones who are exceedingly uncommon in this world. Anyone who scoffs at noble ones is headed for perdition compared to scoffing at ordinary people.
If in truth all ordinary people stretch their syllables, changed speed and loudness and I do not, I am objectively not an ordinary person.
AS A RESULT OF INNUMERABLE ABUSIVE CRITICISM THAT ARE SOMETIMES VALID AND SOMETIMES NOT FROM OTHERS, INCLUDING THEIR ‘LOVED’ ONES, ORDINARY PEOPLE ALREADY POSSESS MAD HATE FOR CRITICISM THAT WELL UP SWIFTLY AND CANNOT BE SUPPRESSED WHEN THEY SENSE CRITICISM EVEN BEFORE THEY COMPLETE HEARING WHAT IS SAID TO THEM.
True Love Cannot Turn To Hate:
You can only truly love someone worthy of love, not someone who is an actor or actress with manipulative behavior. You can only learn to like someone with manipulative behavior because there are physical attributes in the person that attracts you are you wish to be drawn in a possessive relationship of mutual using each other.
True love is passive, without force, is blissful for the giver and receiver, is not possessive (you need force or emotion to be possessive), is aimed at seeing the other person happy or free from suffering that the recipient who is not a goat will receive without reservations.
Liking Can Be Known:
Whether someone likes wearing long robes can be known.
If he looks at himself in the mirror wearing long robes and smiles admiringly, he turns to admire his side and back views, he regularly adjusts his robes so as to present the best appearance he likes wearing long robes, is officious and likes the trappings of his office.
Jesus was born in a manger not the roadside or a palace. He entered Jerusalem on a colt not a donkey or stallion. Essentially it is about quiet dignity without ostentation or deprivation.
***
Because what I speak regarding the cause of suffering and the way out of suffering is unique, nobody in the past or present has ever spoken thus before, what I say applies to all beings (humans and animals) in this world, whoever is the counselor Jesus is referring to must also say so and if I have already done so, I would have superseded him.

What I say is that there are constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness in the vocalizations of all humans and animals in this world that have equivalents in their movements, thinking and perceptions that are the only causes of the stress, restlessness and distraction that must beset them and they impart on all who interact with them (sin) and the only way permanently out of stress, restlessness and distraction is the paying attention to identify and then eliminate without remainder all stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness.
In addition I was the person who triggered never before consciousness changes that swept around the world, benefiting everyone, not once but twice first in 1977 and then in recent years. Despite the blatant nature of the changes, mankind has turned a blind eye to them as if nothing has changed.
If Jesus wanted the world to know exactly who the counselor was, he would have pinpointed him and because he did not do so, it is his intention not to identify the counselor irrefutably. If Jesus did not want you to know of the coming of the counselor, he would not have spoken about a counselor and because he gave a description of the counselor, it means that the description is sufficient to identify the counselor in all but name to those who are discerning:

Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor (the counselor will come like Jesus came), to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive (to receive is to welcome and therefore the counselor will not be welcomed), because it neither sees (can recognize who he is) him nor knows him(can work out for themselves or have been told); you know him, for he dwells (if the counselor will be a prominent figure or self identifying, Jesus will not need to inform you that he lives amongst you) with you, and will be in you. "These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (The counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things (he will cover a broad range of subjects), and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you (if the church has brought you remembrance of what Jesus taught, it would be redundant).But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (The counselor must bring you advantage as no man has done)And when he comes, he will convince the world (a voice in the minds of Christians cannot convince the world) concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. (When the counselor comes, it will be time for mankind to be judged)"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. (Jesus may be alluding to a consciousness change that will make you able to bear and I was the trigger of the change after 1977 and in recent years) When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak (if the counselor knows everything, he will not need to hear and then speak) and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you (if the church and Christians have glorified Jesus, there would be no need for a counselor to do so. If what the counselor speaks is similar to the Church, there would be no need for a counselor to speak). All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.

Jesus: Therefore I tell you, every (not some) sin and blasphemy will (not may) be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against (blasphemes) the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against (blasphemes) the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Force & Reason

Force & Reason:
There are two mutually incompatible entities in a person’s mind, namely his hypertrophied blind evil or harmful mental force that is always instantly stirred by any passing event (like the aggressive bulldog is always the first to rush to greet the doorbell well before the owner does) and his stunted reason which is a passive function of his consciousness that is usually rudimentary and sidelined.
Approximate appropriate standard replies to a situation regurgitated from one’s mental jukeboxes may appear to be reasoning but it is a decoy or fake and imitation of reasoning orchestrated by mental force that fools the person and those who are undiscerning. Emotion is a big bully that loathes true reason and it is not possible for emotional people to possess anything more than stunted marginalized true reasoning whose place is usurped by puppet like decoy pseudo reason to fool others that he has reason when it is mental force that is pulling the strings behind the scene and you are deluded if you think you can be emotional and nevertheless be a man of reason. What you call your reason is your clichéd verbalized responses to give yourself and others you have reason when it is nothing more than knee jerk self serving protective like and dislike.
Like and dislike are the only two possible secondary derivatives of this mental force whilst the emotions are the tertiary derivatives of this mental force that is the drive to going against self to say and do things that create stress, restlessness and distraction in the name of deceiving, impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others. Depending on whether this mental force is turned inwards or outwards, attractive or repulsive, you have the various emotions like pride (inward directed attractive force), shame (inward directed repulsive force), anger (outward directed repulsive) and lust (outward directed attractive force).
Reasoning must not be confused with thinking that in ordinary people is largely mentally talking to oneself not unlike talking to others that may not be attended by any reason.
The reasoning in ordinary people is actually faked reasoning issued by rote from their mental jukeboxes. Because there is a choice of previously orchestrated rationale that they can dish out from their mental jukeboxes in reaction to a given situation, emotional people and their undiscerning listeners may be fooled to think what they hear is reasoning when it is decoy reasoning.
TRUE OR PERFECT REASONING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INTELLIGENCE WHICH IS MERELY SUPERIOR ROTE OR MECHANICAL MEMORIZING AND SUPERIOR OR APT RETRIEVAL OF MEMORIES BUT PERFECT REASONING IS NOTHING MORE THAN PERFECT DISCERNMENT OR SEEING THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE, NOT AS YOU EMOTIONALLY OR FORCEFULLY WANT THEM TO BE. IF YOU CONSTANTLY EMOTIONALLY LIKE AND DISLIKE TO GREATER OR LESSER EXTENT, YOU ARE A PREJUDICED OR PARTISAN MAN AND CANNOT SEE THINGS OBJECTIVELY AND THEREFORE CANNOT HAVE PERFECT BUT HAVE FLAWED REASONING BASED ON YOUR LIKES AND DISLIKES. IF YOU SEE EVERYTHING CLEARLY AS THEY ARE, NOT AS YOU LIKE OR DISLIKE THEM TO BE, THEN YOU PERFECTLY UNDERSTAND THINGS AND YOUR REASONING OR WAY OF THINKING BASED ON THIS PERFECT UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS MUST BE PERFECT.
THE APPLICATION OF FORCE ON THE MIND WHICH IS CONSTANT IN ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE, ONLY THE STRENGTH AND SPEED VARIES, DISTORTS THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS, MAKES IT BLURRED AND UNABLE TO FOCUS SHARPLY IN ITS PERCEPTION OF THINGS THROUGH THE SENSES AND THEIR REASONING BASED ON THIS POORLY FOCUSED VISION IS ALWAYS SERIOUSLY FLAWED.
THE MECHANISM THROUGH WHICH MENTAL FORCE BLURS THE VISION OF THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS THROUGH THE GENERATION OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DIVISION (BY AT THE SAME TIME SUBSTANCE AND STYLE ACTING) OF THAT CONSCIOUSNESS THAT ALWAYS LINGER OR TAKE TIME TO SUBSIDE AND BECAUSE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION ARE CONSTANTLY BEING RENEWED BY THE FOOLISH BEING’S CONTINUED DIVISIVE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE PUTTING ON A SHOW FOR HIS AND OTHERS’ CONSUMPTION, IT PERMANENTLY DETAINS HIM IN BLURRED VISION AND FLAWED REASONING BASED ON BLURRED VISION.
AS AN EXAMPLE, BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE THAT YOUR SPEECH HAS CONSTANT UNNECESSARY ELIMINABLE FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE INSOLUBLE STRESS THAT MEDICAL STUDIES NOW SHOWS LEAD TO HYPERTENSION AND HIGH CHOLESTEROL, YOU MUST SUBSCRIBE TO THE FALSE REASONING THAT YOUR HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE AND HIGH CHOLESTEROL IS DUE TO YOUR DIET, YOUR GENES AND WHATEVER YOU CARE TO BLAME EXCEPT YOURSELF. AS A RESULT OF THIS FALSE BELIEF, YOU FURTHER REASON THAT CORRECT MEDICINES IS THE ANSWER TO YOUR HYPERTENSION OR HIGH CHOLESTEROL WHEN, AS MEDICINE WILL TELL YOU, PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE, ELIMINATION OF THE STRESS BY STOPPING THE STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS BETTER THAN THE DRUG CURES THAT CAN HAVE SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS. TRUE OR PERFECT REASON CAN ONLY COME IF YOU SEE CLEARLY YOU ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THEY ARE THE SOURCES OF YOUR DAILY STRESS SO THAT YOU THEREBY EXERT EFFORT TO STOP DOING SO THEREBY EXPERIENCING A RELEASE FROM STRESS THAT RESULTS IN YOUR BLOOD PRESSURE AND CHOLESTEROL RETURNING TO NORMAL AND YOU THEREFORE DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THE FALSE REASONING THAT HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE IS DUE TO YOUR GENES & SALT INTAKE.
(If you think you can see clearly all the stretching, changing of speed and loudness in your speech and I can demonstrate to you gross stretching, changes of speed and loudness in your speech that you failed to notice before and are helpless to correct, then you are deluded or have flawed vision that leads to flawed reasoning because you think what is false, that you can see all your stretching, changes in speed and loudness, is true. As a result of your poor discernment, your inability to see as there is that there are constant not frequent stretching, changes in speed and loudness in your speech, you continue to suffer from stress, restlessness and distraction and you may then reason falsely that what I say is without merit when it is the opposite, what I say is completely true but you have never achieved the absence of stretching, changes of speed and loudness and therefore never tasted the incomparable difference what I say make.)
IF YOU MUST HAVE FORCE (AND EMOTIONS ARE PROXIES OF FORCE) YOU CANNOT HAVE REASON BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE. IF YOU MUST HAVE REASON THAT DEPENDS CRUCIALLY ON SEEING EVERYTHING CLEARLY AS THEY ARE, YOU CANNOT HAVE FORCE OR EMOTIONS BUT FOOLISH PEOPLE THINK THEY CAN HAVE THE CAKE AND EAT IT AS WELL, THEY CHERISH THEIR EMOTIONS, THEY POSSESS INTENSE EMOTIONS THAT THEY WILL NOT GIVE THEM UP BUT THEY BELIEVE THAT DESPITE THIS HANDICAP THEY HAVE REASON IN ABUNDANCE WHEN IT IS RUDIMENTARY AND SERIOUSLY FAULTY IF IT WERE SUBJECT TO OBJECTIVE EXAMINATION. AS JESUS SAID, YOU CANNOT SERVE TWO MASTERS, MORMON AND GOD, YOU WILL LOVE ONE AND HATE THE OTHER, ONE (EMOTIONS) LEADS TO RUINATION AND ETERNAL PUNISHMENT AND THE OTHER (REASON, SEEING THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE) TO ETERNAL LIFE.
The only source of sin and suffering in any person is the presence of force in his mind. It is impossible to experience mental and physical pain that can reach excruciating levels and seem everlasting without possessing mental force.
All forces are blind and their sole function is to move or drive activities and they therefore must possess speed and strength that can vary. The only activities a mind is capable that mental force can drive are perceiving (seeing, hearing, touching, smelling and tasting), thinking, speaking and moving.
Apart from speed and strength there may be nothing else in a force except perhaps direction change if it is acting in three dimensions as in bodily movements.
Changes in speed and strength of a force ALWAYS go hand in hand, they never occur independently even though this is physically possible because changes in speed and strength are totally unnecessary, only necessary for show and whatever is false, unnecessary, meant for show will garner all available instruments for change to achieve its nefarious ends.
In order to change speed without changing strength of force or vice versa, one must pay attention when doing so and it is a reflection that combined changes in speed and strength are attention-less standardized regurgitations from one’s mental jukebox that they always occur together in practice.
THERE ARE ONLY TWO WAYS IN WHICH SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE CAN CHANGE TOGETHER AND THAT IS EITHER AS A CONTINUOUS RISE CREATING THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE OF DISLIKE BECAUSE A CONTINUOUS RISE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH EXERTS RISING INTENSITY OF FORCE THAT IS PAINFUL OR DISLIKED BY CONSCIOUSNESS OR THEY CAN BOTH CHANGE IN AN UNDULATING OR UP AND DOWN MANNER THAT IS RELATIVELY PLEASANT BECAUSE THERE ARE LIMITATIONS TO THE RISE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WITH PERIODIC RESPITES WHEN SPEED AND STRENGTH FALLS AND THIS IS EXPERIENCED BY THE CONSCIOUSNESS AS LIKE. WHILST LIKE IS COMPARATIVELY PLEASANT WHEN COMPARED TO DISLIKE, AT INTENSE LEVELS OF LIKE WHEN RISES AND FALLS IN SPEED AND STRENGTH BECOMES SHARP, LIKE BECOMES INCREASINGLY UNPLEASANT. HOWEVER PLEASANT LIKE IS, IT CANNOT COMPARE WITH PASSIVE NEITHER LIKING NOR DISLIKING BECAUSE THE MIND THEN EXPERIENCES NO RISING FORCE ACTING ON IT.
REFLECTING THAT IT IS A MINDLESS PROCESS REGURGITATED BY ROTE FROM ONE’S MENTAL JUKEBOX RATHER THAN A LIVE PERFORMANCE EACH TIME, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE ARE ALWAYS RENDERED TOGETHER NEVER INDIVIDUALLY TO MAXIMIZE THE DRAMATIC EFFECT OF CHANGING THAT IS MEANT FOR SHOW, TO BIND IN A SPELL OR DETAIN SELF AND OTHERS NOT JUST IN ONE AREA BUT ACROSS BOARD INVOLVING ONE’S PERCEPTIONS, THOUGHTS, SPEECH AND MOTION.
Why Jesus Used Like Not Love Or Neither:
Quote: Beware of the scribes, who like to go about in long robes and to have salutations (by the people) in the market places and the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at feasts, who devour widows' houses and for a pretense make long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation.
You cannot love or have loving kindness towards wearing long robes, being saluted in the market places and having the best seats in synagogues but you always like or are attracted to (a physical or forceful process) wearing long robes, being saluted in market places and having the best seats in synagogues.
Jesus could have omitted ‘like’ thus: “Beware of the scribes who go about in long robes and have salutations (by the people) in the market places and the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at feasts”. If Jesus said this it would mean that you must indiscriminately beware of EVERYONE who wears long robes and is saluted in market places.
Just because you are saluted in the market place does not mean you are guilty of sin or have done something wrong because people may salute you because you are worthy of respect and they respect you but it is when you LIKE being saluted, you literally expect salutations that it is sinful.
What Jesus said using ‘like’ suggests that it is not per se wearing long robes or being saluted in the market place that is sinful but liking them that makes it so. Even people with very limited intelligence can tell if someone likes or enjoys doing something, likes or enjoys wearing long robes and being saluted in the market place and this sets a bad example for them to similarly like shows of religiosity, to practice style or what is for show or appearances that achieve nothing over practicing substance without show.
Scottish men wear skirts and if in that society those who wear skirts are accorded high status, then it should be wearing skirts not long robes that should be censured.
BASED ON WHAT JESUS SAID ABOVE ONE CANNOT TRUTHFULLY SAY THAT ALL LIKING IS SINFUL (ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT SAY SOME LIKINGS ARE OK) OR THAT WEARING LONG ROBES OR BEING SALUTED IS SINFUL BUT IT IS THE LIKING FOR OR ENJOYMENT OF WEARING LONG ROBES AND BEING SALUTED THAT IS SINFUL.
Jesus was born in a manger not a palace and he entered Jerusalem riding a colt not a magnificent stallion. There can be no double standards in Christianity or heaven and this is implicit in Jesus’ rebuke of his disciples for displaying discontent and hypocrisy in complaining about having no bread when they forgot to bring bread on a boat journey.
Therefore if it is true that popes in the past and present wear long robes, are saluted in the public, have the best seats in the synagogues and places of honor at feasts and they liked it or enjoyed it, something that can be determined by someone who discerns, by themselves and God, then what Jesus said above applies to them and you are foolish to take issue with what I say.
(If I did not say it, would you have thought of it yourself and can or will anyone else say the things I have said?)
Defining Like & Dislike:
Liking:
When a person perceives (sees, hears, smells, tastes & touches), thinks, speaks or does something with undulating or rising falling changes in speed and strength of force, he has the consciousness experience of liking.
In addition if whatever he perceives (usually either seen or heard) has undulating changes in speed and strength of force, he will like it unless he has learnt to dislike it by seeing and hearing it with crescendo like rising speed and strength of force.
LIKING IS MERELY THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE CREATED BY UNDULATING CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OCCURRING IN THE MIND.
Disliking: When a person perceives (sees, hears, smells, tastes & touches), thinks, speaks or does something with crescendo like rises in speed and strength of force, he will have the consciousness experience of disliking.
In addition if whatever he perceives (usually either seen or heard) has crescendo like rises in speed and strength of force, he will dislike it unless he has learnt to like it by seeing and hearing it with undulating rises and falls of speed and strength of force.
DISLIKING IS MERELY THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE CREATED BY THE CRESCENDO LIKE RISING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OCCURRING IN THE MIND.
Neither Liking Nor Disliking: When a person perceives (sees, hears, smells, tastes & touches), thinks, speaks or does something without constant speed and strength of force, he will have the consciousness experience of neither liking nor disliking.
In addition if whatever he perceives (usually either seen or heard) has undulating changes or crescendo like rises in speed and strength of force, he will neither like nor dislike it however provocative it is because he sees and hears them with constant speed and force. This is how a Buddha cannot be provoked or is imperturbable. His constancy in speed and strength of mental force cannot be disrupted.
NEITHER LIKING NOR DISLIKING IS THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE WHEN THERE ARE NO CHANGES IN SPEED OR STRENGTH OF FORCE OCCURRING IN THE MIND.
Proving The Buddha Correct:
What I postulate proves the Buddha is correct when he spoke of the existence of the state of neither liking nor disliking, a state that is not a deprivation but an incomparable release from the prison of constant liking and disliking.
You attain the blissful serene state of neither like nor dislike by simply training yourself to perceive, think, speak and move with constancy in speed and strength of force, something that is inconceivable in the past and although it is spurned even by those who think they are good and intelligent, it is possible for anyone who is discerning, dedicated and concerned for his suffering to do so and exit liking and disliking.
The Practice Side Of Liking & Disliking:
The theory side is that liking and disliking are nothing more than the different consciousness experiences created respectively by undulating or crescendo like changes in speed and strength of mental force.
What about liking and disliking in practice or daily life?
Whether stupid or smart, good or bad, male or female, black or white, even animal or human, people (and animals) have many pet likes and dislikes that though there may be individual variations share many common ground.
Without need for thinking they react with like or dislike rigidly automatically to the occurrence of various things eg money - like, food - like, holiday - like, new car - like, pretty girl - like or no money - don’t like, hot - don’t like, work - don’t like, ugly girl – don’t like. You can go forever compiling a list of an individual pet likes and dislikes that are usually quite fixed, immutable to change. Their likes and dislikes are forceful and if challenged, they will defend their likes and dislikes.
No intelligence is needed in the process of liking above but it is a matter of applying attractive or repulsive force to the way the person views an object that gets increasingly intense and rapid every time he practiced liking or disliking it and will end in loss of control. And the essence of liking something is viewing it with force that is accelerating and then decelerating in speed and strength whilst disliking is viewing it with fore that is accelerating in speed and strength unabated.
So what is so intelligent, discerning, noble and meaningful about liking and disliking that it should be a consideration for qualifying for heaven? Suffice that you realize that you cannot help liking and disliking depending on events occurring, you should not think much of it and encourage others to like and dislike like you.
THERE IS NO REASON OR CEREBRAL OR HIGHER MENTAL FUNCTION INVOLVED IN LIKING AND DISLIKING BUT IT IS A BASE REACTION ORGANIZED BY EMOTIONAL PEOPLE’S MENTAL FORCE THAT MAY HAVE PRIMITIVE SELF PRESERVING, SIMPLE KNEE JERK PLEASURE SEEKING AND PAIN AVOIDANCE AIMS.
Speaking Without Knowing:
Ordinary people often talk about and promote liking but if you were to ask them what it is this ‘like’ that they so cherish and worship, they will all be at loss how to do so.
Let alone define like and dislike, often they cannot even tell reliably when they are experiencing like or dislike.
Aren’t you a great fool to talk about liking and disliking when you cannot define what it is you speak so highly and you cannot tell without fail each time you liked and disliked?
Shedding Light Into Like’s Nature:
There is anecdotal evidence I am correct that ‘like’ is the experience of consciousness as a result of undulating speed and strength of force changes in that mind’s activities (perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing).
When people jump up and down with joy they are jumping up and down cyclically in tandem with the strong liking that they experience in their minds which are nothing more than up and down changes in speed and strength of force in their minds.
When football fans jump up and down en masse after their team has scored a goal, are they expressing like or dislike?
Are the up and down movements at constant speed and force strength or are they at rhythmic rising and falling speed and strength of force that are very strong and rapid because of the intense liking they experience as result of witnessing the goal?
When girls scream at the sight of their pop idols, they are expressing violent or hysterical liking partly by contagion and one who discerns sees that the hysterical liking is never at constant speed and force but there are violent rapid waves of rising falling speed and strength of force in their hysteria. What is so wonderful or wholesome about such intense heedless stressful restless liking that you should stick your neck out to rebuke me to say you smile because you like someone?
WHEN PEOPLE SEIZED BY LUST OR DESIRE DESCRIBE WAVES OF PASSION OR DESIRE RIPPLING OR COURSING THROUGH THEIR BODIES AND MINDS, THEY ARE UNWITTINGLY PROVIDING UNCANNY INSIGHT INTO THE NATURE OF THE SEXUAL LIKE THEY ARE EXPERIENCING AND VINDICATING WHAT I SAY THAT LIKE IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE OF UNDULATING RISES AND FALLS IN THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF MENTAL FORCE THAT IS REFLECTED IN EXPRESSIONS OF THEIR BODIES LIKE TRASHING OR WRITHING WITH DESIRE. (TRASHING ARE HIGHER AMPLITUDE MORE RAPID UNDULATING BODY MOVEMENTS COMPARED TO WRITHING THAT REFLECT SIMILAR FORCE CHANGES IN THE MIND EXPERIENCING THE DESIRE OR LIKING)
Wrong View: You can have wrong views for two reasons, as a result of delusion or foolishness.
The wise man proffers no views concerning things that he does not know.
Whether it is because you are deluded (you forcefully or emotionally believe what is false is true) or foolish (you stick out your neck to express opinions on things you have no knowledge) the destination of wrong view is as the Buddha said, hell or the animal womb. If you think there is much more to liking and disliking than I say, liking and disliking is not what I say it is and it turns out you are wrong, then hell or the animal womb awaits you.
There are many things most people do not know anything about eg how a car works and they will be quite content not to venture any opinion and it is only their emotions, their desire to antagonize or denigrate or what is said to them arouses their dislike or hate that they will venture to hold an opinion eg that what I say about liking is wrong and thus foolishly committing themselves, they do not realize even hell awaits them.
Nonstop Liking & Disliking:
Liking and disliking is in truth nonstop and often people are faking liking especially in the social context and because life is by and large stressful, genuine dislike dominates genuine like as can be seen by the glum or surly faces of many people.
People speak of liking and disliking as if they are things that they decide to do eg I like this and I don’t like that when they have long graduated from the stage when they have to force themselves to like or dislike but confronted with certain things or situations their likes and dislikes are rapidly aroused even to intense levels eg intense excitement when someone gives them a present.
From the trivial to the life threatening, whenever something is said (whispered or shouted) or happens (mosquito bite or a physical disaster) to them people automatically react either with disinterest, irritation, anger, indignation, scoffing, fear or terror, embarrassment & shame which are all forms of dislike or they react forcefully helplessly with smiling, excitement, interest & pride which are all forms of liking. What they never do is to assess the situation using reason to compose an appropriate live response to that situation. They may imagine they can and do but if they examine themselves carefully, they react emotionally to either like or dislike and then they select an appropriate response from their mental jukebox for the occasion that fools them and others it is a reasoned emotion free response.
To Appreciate Is To Like:
How many people realize that when they express appreciation for something or they want others to appreciate what they have done or said, they are expressing liking and wanting others to like?
When people talk proudly about their cars or computers, talk about the effort they made to cook something for you, they want you to appreciate or like them or what they have done. Because liking is sinful and stressful, they are practicing and coercing sin.
Not only is what they say calculated to demand appreciation but the way they say it with style or verve is calculated to extort liking so that some people half heartedly sarcastically remark, “Is it so?” or “Really?” in the process indulging in sinful doubting.
WANTING TO BE APPRECIATED IS WANTING TO BE LIKED AND FAR FROM HARMLESS, IS SINFUL AND STRESSFUL. SUFFICE YOU DO SOMETHING FOR SOMEONE AND LET YOUR YES BE YES LET IT END THERE RATHER THAN HINT OR DRAW ATTENTION. AS JESUS SAID, YOUR FATHER WHO SEES IN SECRET WILL REWARD YOU AND IT IS FAR GREATER THAN ANY HUMAN REWARD.
Why the person who likes must also dislike:
The person who likes must also dislike for the simple reason that if you can and do use your mental force in a manner with undulating changes in speed and strength you can also learn partly by coercion from others to use it with constantly rising speed and strength to also dislike.
How ‘Love’ Turns To Hate:
(What people call their love for others is mostly if not entirely their forceful liking that is based on sensory attributes and not without selfish or possessive or ulterior motives. If what you call love turns out to be like, something that can be objectively determined not just by me but by God then you have wrong view and there are two destinations for wrong view according to the Buddha, hell or the animal womb,)
People can change their like for another person or object to dislike and vice versa, for instance their like for their spouses can turn to implacable hate or intense dislike and the same sexy seductive walk of a girl can be liked by one person and hated or disliked by another.
Why is that so?
The secret to converting like to dislike and vice versa is to use force to learn through conditioning or habit to perceive (see, hear, smell, taste, touch) that object in a different way.
For instance where you usually look upon a fattening type of food with undulating speed and strength of force changes to experience a liking for the food that may become intense and irresistible, as a result of education that such food are harmful to your health, as a result of suffering a heart attack you blamed on such food, you learn to see such food with crescendo like changes in speed and strength of force and if you do succeed, you in time see such food with disgust or dislike.
After a watershed argument, a person may learn to see and think about his spouse with force that is accelerating in speed and strength in a crescendo like fashion such that in time his previously like for her is converted to intense dislike or hate for her. People never instantly convert from like to dislike somebody but they go through a transition period when they sometimes perceive (see and think) of that person with ‘fond’ liking and sometimes with raging dislike and as they keep thinking and seeing with dislike their dislike becomes dominant and then implacable.
In the same way you can learnt to see self mortifying sexual behavior with undulating changes in speed and strength of force such that in time you begin to see such acts in this way and experience a perverted liking for sadomasochistic acts.
IT DOES NOT MATTER IF AN OBJECT ELICITS AN UNIVERSAL PASSIVE SENSATION ON CONTACT OF PLEASANTNESS, IF THE PERSON LEARNS (BY USING REPEATED FORCE) TO EXPERIENCE (SEE AND THINK) IT WITH CRESCENDO LIKE RISES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF MENTAL FORCE, HE WILL IN TIME LOATH IT. SIMILARLY IT DOES NOT MATTER THAT AN OBJECT ELICITS AN UNIVERSAL PASSIVE SENSATION OF UNPLEASANTNESS ON CONTACT, IF THE PERSON LEARNS TO EXPERIENCE IT WITH UNDULATING CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF MENTAL FORCE, HE WILL LIKE WHAT IS UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED AS UNPLEASANT (EG NECROPHILIA). THEREFORE CONVERTING LIKE TO DISLIKE AND VICE VERSA IS A MATTER OF REVERSING THE WAY YOU AUTOMATICALLY FORCEFULLY PERCEIVED IT IN THE PAST FROM UNDULATING TO CRESCENDO LIKE OR VICE VERSA.
IF LIKING FOR SOMEONE CAN CHANGE TO DISLIKE MERELY BY A PROCESS OF CHANGING THE WAY YOU SAW THAT PERSON FROM UNDULATING CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE TO EXPLOSIVE ACCELERATION IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, WHAT IS SO GREAT OR EVERLASTING ABOUT YOUR LIKING FOR THE PERSON THAT YOU SHOULD ASSERT IT AS THE REASON TO SMILE AT HIM? YOUR LIKING IS IN TRUTH WHIMSICAL, NEITHER GOOD FOR YOURSELF OR THE RECIPIENT BUT INSTEAD HARMFUL TO BOTH.
How faked like becomes true like:
There are many inducements to fake ‘like’ in this world.
For instance if you are a diffident or anxious medical student introduced into a hospital ward setting with many disparate people you have to get to know and work with, there is tremendous pressure for you to fake that you like them in order to succeed. People may ignore you if you did not act as if you like them or are submissive to them.
Thus you fake your liking for its people, its patients, its setting by smiling or speaking in an eager manner as if you liked. Because there are undulating changes in speed and strength of force in your expressions of ‘liking’ you soon start to experience emotion of liking when you meet them, when you are in the ward that becomes increasingly compelling so that you are convinced your liking is natural not contrived and good for yourself and others even though you always experienced considerable stress, restlessness and distraction afterwards.
First you force yourself to go against yourself to smile and fake you are happy in situations that are in truth not happy or likeable and in time there develops an irresistible and maddening urge to smile and like those situations and you are struggling to keep your sanity and if you did not desist, you have an appointment with mad liking.
Laughter As Like And Dislike:
Laughter can be an expression of like and dislike and most ordinary people are able to tell them apart even though they cannot tell why they can do so.
When something is said to them, people can laugh in delight (like) or ridicule (dislike). The laughter that denotes liking have undulating rising and falling speed and strength of force whilst the laughter that denotes dislike or ridicule at what is said have explosive unabated rises in speed and strength of force.
Here again is affirmation I am correct that liking is basically the consciousness experience attended by undulating rising and falling of the speed and strength of mental force whilst dislike is merely an explosive rise in speed and strength of mental force.
Jesus said woe to you who laughs for you shall weep. Laughter is always either an expression of like or dislike (there is nothing else to laughter) and what Jesus said is indication that both like and dislike are sinful and leads to suffering. Whether your laughter is an expression of liking or disliking, you are headed for weeping.
When Like & Dislike Converge:
In theory and practice, reflecting their illusory natures determined only by how speed and strength of force changes, at their extreme levels like and dislike become increasingly difficult and academic to tell apart because their suffering converges so it makes little or no difference whether it is extreme like or dislike that is experienced.
Excitement is an extreme level of liking that is not the enjoyment that it is wrongly construed to be. At extreme excitement or mania it becomes increasingly hard for onlookers to tell whether the person is ‘enjoying himself’ as he would like observers to believe or mad or suffering.
The reason is because at extreme levels of liking, the undulations of changes in speed and strength of force becomes more closely spaced and higher in amplitude such that they increasingly become saw toothed or spiky or strident than the friendlier sinusoidal form. The extreme wide amplitude frequent fluctuations and intense rise and falls in force are hard to tell apart from the crescendo rises in dislike and just as harsh or painful.
A lot of the extreme excitement seen in the public gaze (eg movies) is faked for public consumption, it is actually very stressful behaving in the faked extremely excited ways they do and they are not really excited or strongly liking as they would like you believe.
Nevertheless there is genuine extreme excitement as when a passionate man sees the naked body of a girl he is extremely attracted to or liked for the first time. Here there is a violent or sharp acceleration of speed and strength of his mental force, very rapid cycles of rise and fall that is every bit as suffering or stressful as intense dislike and an undiscerning observer might think there is a crescendo like rise in speed and strength of force when it is actually saw toothed rises and falls (as poets say, “waves of passion swept through and convulsed his body and mind as he surveyed the naked body”).
AT EXTREME LEVELS OF LIKING THE SHARP RISES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE BECOMES HARD TO TELL APART FROM EXTREME DISLIKE AND EXTREME LIKE BECOMES LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM DISLIKE IN TERMS OF SUFFERING. BECAUSE THE NATURAL COURSE OF LIFELONG PRACTICE IS THAT LIKE AND DISLIKE BECOMES MORE INTENSE, MORE EASY AND RAPID TO AROUSE AND HARDER TO SHAKE OFF, ANYONE WHO HEEDLESSLY PRACTICES LIKE AND DISLIKE IS HEADING FOR AN APPOINTMENT WITH INTENSE TORMENTING LIKE AND DISLIKE (IF THEY ARE NOT ALREADY SUFFERING REGULARLY FROM IT).
How Liking & Disliking Turns Cancerous:
Although liking and disliking are both false and stressful, they are emotional experiences of the mind and therefore cannot be faked directly because like is always the emotional experience by the mind as a result of undulating rise and fall in speed and strength of force in one’s perceptions, thoughts, speech and motion whilst dislike is always the emotional experience by the mind as a result of crescendo like rises in speed and strength of force of these activities. You require undulating changes in speed and strength of force in your perceiving, thinking, speaking and motion to experience liking and crescendo like changes to experience dislike.
However you can always fake EXPRESSIONS of liking (eg smiling, laughing, nodding, eyes agog) and disliking (frowning, shaking head, sighing, cursing) when you did not experience them or you experienced the opposite (fake like when you dislike).
Because there are characteristic undulating changes in speed and strength of force in faked expressions of liking (eg smiling) and characteristic crescendo like rises in speed and strength of force in your faked expressions of disliking (eg sighing or moaning) you increasingly start to experience genuine liking or disliking in the situations where you faked them and your liking and disliking becomes malignant, spreads like a wildfire. Where previously things or situations did not cause you to like or dislike, because you have faked so well you liked or disliked them with expressions that have characteristic speed and strength of force changes in order to please or impress others, you soon start to experience genuine liking and disliking in those situations and you are well on the slippery slope to final mad uncontrollable intense widespread like and dislike.
For example you may fake expressions of liking to your abusive father or teacher in order to escape punishment, you may fake liking for social situations that are in truth stressful to impress others with your social competence but because there are undulating changes in speed and strength of force in your faked expressions of liking for situations and objects that are in truth unpleasant you soon develop a taste or a liking for them but you nevertheless still hold dislike for your teacher and social situations and this set up emotional conflict that may reach intense or insane proportions that you must struggle to control.
Because liking and disliking are blind forceful automated or mechanical reactions to events not mindful responses, it can be disembodied or detached from objects and situations that genuinely caused them to arise, can be indiscriminately applied to objects that in the past did not cause liking or disliking, can become more intense, more easy to arouse and shake off and the fool who cherishes his liking and disliking and encourages others to follow suit is heading for torment not everlasting pleasure.
NOBODY CAN FAKE MENTAL EXPERIENCES AND LIKE AND DISLIKE ARE MENTAL EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCES THAT ARE THE RESULT OF UNDULATING OR CRESCENDO LIKE CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN ONE’S WAY OF PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS. YOU CAN ONLY FAKE EXPRESSIONS OF LIKE AND DISLIKE THAT BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE CHARACTERISTIC CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT WILL INDUCE EXPERIENCES OF LIKE AND DISLIKE, IN TIME THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE THEY WEREN’T EXPERIENCES OF LIKE OR DISLIKE WILL HAVE.
TO BE FORCED TO LIKE WHAT YOU TRULY DISLIKED AS A RESULT OF HAVING FREQUENTLY FAKED LIKING IT, TO HARBOR BOTH INTENSE LIKING AND DISLIKING FOR THE SAME OBJECT THAT YOU INITIALLY ONLY HARBOR DISLIKE IS AGONY AND HEADING FOR FINAL MADNESS.
How To Exit Like & Dislike:
You can only exit it if you attack it by two prongs: you learn to identify every instance you like and dislike and put them to an immediate stop as soon as you catch yourself liking and disliking rather than condone them. You pay attention to identify all speed and force changes in your perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing things because they are the generators of your liking and disliking.
Mad Like & Dislike:
Because of their forceful mindless (automated) conditioning nature, as a result of lifelong practice often to intense levels, all ordinary people are already (foolishly proud) owners of mad liking and mad disliking that can be aroused rapidly helplessly to intense levels by circumstances that they then struggle to subdue because they are getting on their nerves or stressful.
As a result of regular helpless seizures by this intense liking and disliking beyond their control and they are unwilling to work to scrub them off, it is not surprising that they will uphold and defend their liking and disliking not realizing they are headed for final uncontrollable unremitting liking and disliking and that is hell not heaven.
If you observe animals with discernment you will realize they too are strongly liking and disliking although perhaps not to the sophisticated and disguised or deceitful manner as humans. Thus owners of intense like and dislike you will depart to the animal world to continue your mindless like and dislike perhaps after a sojourn in hell.
IF LIKING AND DISLIKING ARE SO WONDERFUL, WHY ARE PEOPLE GUILTY ABOUT THEM? THEY OFTEN HIDE THEIR LIKING AND DISLIKING FROM OTHERS, THEY OFTEN FAKE LIKING WHEN THEY EXPERIENCE NOTHING OR THE OPPOSITE. IF LIKING AND DISLIKING WERE SO WONDROUS AND ENJOYABLE THEY SHOULD EXPRESS THEIR LIKING AND DISLIKING CONSTANTLY IN AN UNINHIBITED FASHION.
Unwitting Liking & Disliking:
Just as people severely underestimate the extent of stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness in their speech which is constant not frequent, they unsurprisingly similarly also underestimate the occurrence of like and dislike which is not frequent but constant.
For instance they may suddenly experience hunger and straightaway they experience dislike. They may think of making themselves a sandwich and straightaway they experience like. They drag themselves out of their sofa reluctantly to go to the kitchen experiencing dislike at the prospect of work. Thus it is that filled with mild to moderate dislike they open the fridge door, scan it for items to make their sandwich, expressing like and dislike depending on whether they can or cannot find the items they want. They reluctantly open the container of margarine and spread it sloppily disinterestedly onto the bread, then spread the jam with delight or like on the bread and hurry with emotion of like back to their couch to watch the TV and eat their sandwich with delight or like. Their handphones ring and they may feel annoyance but when they discover it is their best friend on the line they suddenly burst into excited like.
(By contrast, in the same situation, I feel hungry and I neither like nor dislike that. I decide to make myself a sandwich and I neither like nor dislike that, I get up to go to the kitchen and I make myself a sandwich without liking or disliking throughout and then I eat it without liking or disliking even though it may taste very good.)
People are often impatient and if the impatience is tinged with annoyance it is a form of experiencing dislike, if it is tinged with eagerness or anticipation it is a form of experiencing like.
Why Like & Dislike Are Constant:
In theory ordinary people never cease to like or dislike for even a moment of their conscious life because force never leaves their minds and this force in the mind is never stationary but constantly changing in speed and strength that is manifest in the way they perceive (look at things eg with darting, oscillating eyes), speak and move and therefore their consciousness experiences are always an endless litany of departing from one like or dislike to another and this can get very tiresome and even tormenting every now and then.
A Vicious Circle Ending In Agony:
Speak and do things with speed and strength of force changes of an undulating or waxing waning fashion and you must experience emotional liking and experience emotional liking and you will do or say things with forceful undulating changes in speed and strength of force so that with innumerable cycles of reinforcement, the urge to like and change speed and force in an undulating fashion becomes irresistible and intense in ever tightening spiral that will end in agony or uncontrollable liking and uncontrollable constant unnecessary changes in speed and strength of force.
One must not confuse experiences of liking and disliking with expressions of disliking that may concur, be faked (experience no like but express like) or contradict each other (experience dislike but express like).
In theory only perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing things that have an rhythmic undulating rising falling changes in speed and strength of force produces the experience of liking and crescendo like rises in speed and force produces the experience of dislike but in practice many people fake expressions of liking (eg smiling as if they like) in their interactions with others where they experience no liking in order to get along, to please and impress others. And just as you can fake expressions of liking for situations where you experience no liking, you can also fake liking for occasions when you are experiencing dislike and this is the basis behind the seeming enjoyment by tough goats to music and sounds that are in truth harsh and likely to evoke dislike.
IN TRUTH A LOT OF THE LIKE AND DISLIKE YOU SEE EVERYWHERE IS FAKED AND EVEN THE OPPOSITE OF THE EMOTION THE FAKER IS EXPERIENCING BUT EVEN THOUGH IT IS FAKED, BECAUSE IT IS FAKED SO REALISTICALLY (OFTEN THE FAKER DOES NOT REALIZE AND DENIES HE IS FAKING IT), HE SOON EXPERIENCES A MEASURE OF THE LIKE OR DISLIKE THAT HE IS FAKING, NOT REALIZING HE IS ON THE SLIPPERY SLOPE TO INSANITY WHEN MAD LIKE AND DISLIKE THAT ARISES WITHOUT ANY BASIS OR IS THE OPPOSITE OF HIS TRUE EMOTION ARISES UNCONTROLLABLY.
WHY THIS SHOULD BE SO IS BECAUSE OF THE CHICKEN AND EGG RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMOTIONAL LIKING AND EXPRESSIONS OF LIKING. FAKE LIKING EG WITH A SMILE OR EAGER WAY OF SPEAKING THAT HAVE RHYTHMIC RISING AND FALLING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND YOU START TO GENERATE LIKING AND START TO EXPERIENCE LIKING AND YOU WILL START TO PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND MOVE WITH RHYTHMIC RISING AND FALLING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE SO THAT EVEN THOUGH YOU INITIALLY FAKED LIKING, THE IMPETUS OR MOMENTUM WILL PERPETUATE YOUR EXPERIENCING EMOTIONAL LIKING AND BEHAVING TO EXPRESS LIKING THAT CAN BECOME UNBEARABLE RATHER THAN PLEASURE THAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE.
BECAUSE THE BEHAVIOR OF EVERYONE INDUCES STRESS IN EACH OTHER, THE OCCASIONS FOR ‘GENUINE’ LIKING ARE FEW AND FAR BETWEEN, PEOPLE ARE ONLY FAKING ‘LIKE’ TO GET ALONG AND IT CAN FREQUENTLY GET QUITE AGONIZING TO PRETEND YOU LIKE, YOU ARE ENJOYING YOURSELF WHEN YOU ARE STRESSED, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED INSIDE. OCCASIONS FOR GENUINE LIKING ARE ANTICIPATION OF GOOD FOOD, TIME TO GO HOME FROM WORK, GOING FOR THE FAVORITE GAME BUT USUALLY THE LIKE THEY EXPRESS TO CASUAL ACQUAINTANCES ARE FAKED.
Forgetfulness Is Involuntary Pretense:
Blame it on old age or failing faculties but people become more forgetful as they grow old, some more than others.
It may be largely because people have practicing pretense their whole life long, pretending what happened did not happen, pretending not to know what they know that the pretense gets increasingly automatic or involuntary and now they keep forgetting things they have been told or taught, they struggle to remember things and this is torment, never pleasure.
Nowadays I remember things better, do not forget things like I used to because I have quit pretending, I have quit putting on a show. What people who lament about their forgetting things do not realize is that it will get increasingly worse unless they quit pretending not to see when they saw, not to know when they knew and ultimately they will forget themselves when they pass away and if they think they are headed for heaven they may be foolish but instead after completely forgetting themselves they will wander afresh in what Jesus called eternal habitations.
WHAT IS FREQUENTLY WELL PRACTICED INCREASINGLY BECOMES INVOLUNTARY AGAINST THE FOOLISH PERSON’S WISHES. IF YOU KEEP PRETENDING WHAT HAPPENED DID NOT HAPPEN, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU KNOW, THEN INCREASINGLY IT WILL BE SO AND THAT IS ESSENTIALLY FORGETFULNESS AND IT IS SUFFERING THAT WILL LEAD TO INSANITY OR DEMENTIA.
A Warning They Do Not Heed:
All beings who still continue to act, whether they can see or not they act, behind the veneer of calm civility they present, are already owners of very strong mad emotions, mad violence, mad stress, restlessness and distraction, mad likes and dislikes but for the moment they can still beat back the tides of madness sometimes with a struggle. They cannot and will not believe that one day the tide of these mad forceful impulses will sweep them away and they are headed even for another eternity of suffering that will reach intensities they never dreamt possible.
If you continue to suffer today it is a warning of even more dire suffering in the future and after departure from this world.
The wise person whenever he is seized by mental suffering will dissociate himself from social contact to meditate to calm himself, to increasingly instill calmness so that he can no longer become stressed by anything. Further he will watch himself like a hawk to detect all stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness so that there are remainderless stretching, changes in speed and loudness.
Deliberate Speed & Loudness Changes:
Even though they are often if not always unaware they are changing speed and loudness when they speak, some of the speed and loudness changes are deliberate because they like (not love) the charming or stylish nature of such changes, not realizing they are the sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that regularly beset them or they don’t give a damn partly because they are not concerned for others and therefore not concerned for themselves, because they can still beat back their stress, restlessness and distraction they believe in delusion they will always be able to handle them when they are doomed to lose control over the stress, restlessness and distraction that is in truth generated by themselves in the name of deceiving others with their charm and style.
People want to provoke you to like and dislike:
Not only do people speak of and encourage you to like and dislike but they provoke, sometimes deliberately sometimes unconsciously others to like and dislike them and things because they are suffering and even though they may not directly know that their liking and disliking is at the heart of their suffering, they want you to join them and thereby also suffer.
Even though they deny to themselves and insist that their liking is pleasurable, good to themselves for so long so well so that now they have a tremendous will to believe liking is good, deep down they know liking is suffering, mad or meaningless and often they are merely faking liking to get along and since they cannot kick their addiction, they want others to join them.
For instance they speak or do things in a nasty or outrageous way to provoke you to dislike them.
They speak and dress seductively in order to seduce you so that you will lust or sexually like them. Even though they like to lust, they do not realize their suffering is rooted in their lust, they want you to lust too so that you can suffer just like them.
What they do not realize is that their suffering from liking and disliking will not may intensify with age, will become uncontrollable and they are headed for suffering that lasts even an eternity as a result of their wickedness.