Wednesday, March 28, 2007

God May Not Need To Think

IT IS PRESUMPTUOUS TO THINK THAT GOD NEEDS TO THINK LET ALONE THINK JUST LIKE YOU THINK BECAUSE IF HE KNOWS AND SEES EVERYTHING AS THE BUDDHA SAID, HE MAY NOT NEED TO THINK LIKE YOU DO BEFORE COMING TO A CONCLUSION.
SINCE GOD KNOWS AND SEES EVERYTHING, WHAT IS THERE FOR GOD TO THINK OR WORK OUT?
Why It Is Not Possible For People To Stop Thinking:
If you can see and know everything as God & the Buddha can, then you may not need to think or you only need to think sparingly. It may be presumptuous that the Buddha needs to think before he composes an answer to your question. Because he knows and sees everything, he can come up with the exact not just appropriate answer. Just as the Buddha said it is possible for him to stop breathing at the highest levels of meditation, he can sit in meditation for days, he can go without food for days, it may be possible he does not need to think just as he does not dream. No one who is enlightened entertains dreams anymore.
THE CRUCIAL REASON WHY PEOPLE CANNOT STOP THINKING IS BECAUSE THERE IS ALWAYS ADDED FORCE IN THEIR THINKING THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS OF THEIR MENTAL SYLLABLES. ANYTHING THAT IS FORCEFUL HAS MOMENTUM THAT IS DIFFICULT TO STOP AND IF YOU KEEP STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN YOUR MENTAL SYLLABLES, THE THINKING BECOMES SELF PERPETUATING LIKE A MAD CAROUSEL THAT ONCE GOT ON, IS HARD TO GET OFF.
THE REASON WHY I CAN STOP THINKING FOR INCREASINGLY EXTENDED PERIODS IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO STRETCHING OF MY MENTAL SYLLABLES, NO CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS SO THAT MY THOUGHTS DO NOT ECHO IN MY MIND, DO NOT GENERATE AN URGE TO SUSTAIN THINKING.
THE CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE OF LEARNING TO STOP THINKING WHEN THERE IS NO REASON TO THINK IS THAT A PERSON WHO THINKS CONSTANTLY UNNECESSARILY IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS THAT WILL DESCEND INTO FINAL MADNESS AND THE CESSATION OF THINKING LEADS TO TWO EONS IN HEAVENLY BLISS ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
People think to distract themselves:
Emotion is the drive to constant thinking. When people are angry they keep on thinking about the incident or thing that causes them to be angry, they try to justify their anger and blame others by fabricating things. When people are sad, they are driven by self pity to keep thinking things that reinforce their sadness. Therefore emotion is a major reason why people think continuous and because emotion is nothing more than speed and strength changes of the person’s mental force of going against self, it is a false reason to think.
People also think to distract themselves. For instance in awkward social situations, to avoid social contact, they force themselves to think so they will be mentally transported from the awkward physical situation eg sitting in a bus facing a bellicose man. When they run out of things to say in the midst of a conversation, they force themselves to think of things to say just to break the ‘awkward’ silence. This is not harmless but deadly because you are training yourself to think for no reason or training yourself to become mad.
Getting It All Wrong:
If something can be deduced and you say it cannot be deduced whilst another thing cannot be deduced and you say it can, you have wrong perception and logic and is headed for madness.
Thus if in the Altanturya case, it is possible to deduce that the police are not pursuing the truth of the matter, Razak must be more guilty than what he admitted (he called in the police to patrol his house but not harm her) because no man will admit more guilt than his true guilt and you say it is not possible for me to righteously say that, you have false perception and are dicing with future mad perception. If it is not possible that the trial will be fair and you say it is possible, again that is dicing with false perception.
How It May Be Possible For God To See & Know All:
Because this is a consciousness generated universe and there is a permanent video like record of all that has happened not just in this Age or eon but all the past eons that an enlightened person can access, it may be possible for God to similarly access this record even though you cannot and thus he can see and know everything that has ever happened.
JUST AS A COMPUTER HARD DISK HAS A PERMANENT RECORD OF WHATEVER IS STORED ON IT FOR ANYONE TO ACCESS, BECAUSE THERE IS A PERMANENT VIDEO LIKE RECORD OF WHATEVER THAT HAS HAPPENED NOT JUST IN THIS EON BUT ALL PAST EONS, IT IS POSSIBLE FOR ENLIGHTENED ONES AND GOD TO ACCESS THIS RECORD AND KNOW AND SEE ALL.
If you can effortlessly and directly know and see everything, why should you trouble yourself to think, to work what has happened or what is the truth of what someone said has happened? If you can travel at the speed of light like angels can, why bother getting yourself a Ferrari or driving a Ferrari? Therefore there may be no need at all for God to think and rather than glorious or exalted, thinking is an impediment, a trap and fetter to lower states of existence and the Buddha is right to say that you must work towards the cessation of all thinking.
WHEN YOU CAN SEE CLEARLY ALL THAT IS HAPPENING AT THE MOMENT, WHAT IS THERE TO THINK ABOUT? WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO CONSULT THE PAST RECORD OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED WHAT IS THERE FOR YOU TO THINK WHAT REALLY HAPPENED? THUS IT IS ONLY FOR BEING WHO DO NOT SEE, CANNOT SEE, WHO DO NOT KNOW, CANNOT KNOW THAT THEY MUST RESORT TO THE OFTEN UNRELIABLE AND LABORIOUS INSTRUMENT OF THOUGHT.
NAME ME SOMEONE APART FROM THE BUDDHA WHO HAS TOLD IT IS POSSIBLE TO PRACTICE TO STOP THINKING AND FAR FROM DEGENERATE IT IS INCOMPARABLY MORE BLISSFUL MODE OF EXISTENCE AS I CAN ATTEST AND WILL OPEN VISTAS NEVER IMAGINED BEFORE.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO THINKS WITH FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO STOP THINKING. ONLY WHEN YOU HAVE ACHIEVED THE ABILITY TO THINK WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WILL IT BE THE NATURE OF THINGS FOR YOU TO INCREASINGLY CLOSE SHOP TO STOP THINKING WHEN THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT.
Prerequisites To No Thinking:
Before you can stop thinking, you must achieve letting your yes be yes only in not just whatever you say or do but what you perceive (see, hear, smell, taste and touch) and think. It is impossible for someone who does not let his yes be yes only to stop thinking and because people in this world never let their yes be yes only they have never stopped thinking and that is the reason why no one, not even your favorite guru has taught you about it.
Before you can stop thinking you must first achieve the stopping of all application of force on your mind that necessitates stop stretching of syllables, stop changing speed and loudness, stopping being emotional, stopping all liking and disliking. Because people in this world always apply force on their minds, always like and dislike, are always emotional and always forceful stretch syllables, change speed and loudness, they have never stopped thinking and that is the reason why no one, not even your favorite guru has taught you about it.
Before you can stop thinking you must stop saying or doing things to please, impress, intimidate and dominate others. Because pleasing, impressing, dominating and intimidating others is going against self, you must apply force on your mind to say or do things to please, impress, intimidate or dominate others you cannot stop thinking. Even if you think your immaculate, charming and benevolent smile, if it applies force that is changing in speed and strength on your mind and conveys no meaning except to please or impress or even intimidate (eg an evil or menacing smile) others, you cannot stop thinking.
BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE THEMSELVES GUILTY OF THE IMPEDIMENTS THAT DETAIN THEM IN THINKING, THEY ARE SOMNOLENT THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO STOP THINKING AND THE INCOMPARABLE BENEFITS IT BRINGS.
Reason To Think:
TRUE THINKING IS ESSENTIALLY REASONING, WORKING OUT OR RECOLLECTING WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AND JUST AS TRUE THINKING IS REASONING, THERE MUST BE REASON OR CAUSE TO REASON OR THINK.
Unless you want to court and finally succumb to madness there must always be reason for you to think or for what you think. Just as true thinking is essentially reasoning (even if it is trying to recollect past events as faithfully as possible), there must be reason to think (or reason) otherwise you are unwittingly courting madness thinking without reason or for emotional reasons (eg conceit, egotism, dislike, like, malice, lust, greed). There cannot be reason to think all the time and therefore continuous thinking is never due to reason but due to force or emotion or an urge to keep thinking reflecting loss of control like a monstrous freight train that the driver cannot or is indulgently unwilling to stop.
IT IS WRONG VIEW AND DELUSION (THAT LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB) THAT IT IS A NATURAL HARMLESS CONDITION TO THINK CONTINUOUSLY WHEN ONE IS CONSCIOUS BUT IT REFLECTS THAT ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE’S THINKING IS FORCEFUL BASED ON FALSE REASON NAMELY EMOTIONS (THAT CAN ULTIMATELY BE TRACED TO LIKING AND DISLIKING) NOT TRUE REASON OR NEED THAT THEIR THINKING HAS NOW TURNED MALIGNANT OR UNCONTROLLABLE THAT IT IS NOW CONTINUOUS.
THE WISE PERSON, THE PERSON OF TRUTH, THINKS ONLY WHEN THERE IS REASON OR CAUSE TO THINK OR REASON, IF THERE IS NO REASON TO THINK, HE CLOSES SHOP TO NOT THINK AND ONLY PERCEIVE (SEE OR HEAR) OR PERCEIVE TO SAY OR DO. HE IS TRULY A MASTER OF HIMSELF NOT THE PERSON WHO THINKS ALL THE TIME OVER THIS AND THAT LIKE A MONKEY JUMPING FROM BRANCH TO BRANCH.
True reasons to think are few but false reasons to think are many.
What are the true reasons to think?
To recollect as accurately as possible what happened in the past to learn its lessons or apply them to the current or future situations.
To establish what is the basis or truth of or underlies a current scenario or explain why something is happening.
To make decisions of what to do or say if there are possible different options in courses of actions or to solve problems.
What are the false reasons or excuses to think?
To think because of emotions (anger, sadness, lust, greed, envy, hate) or like or dislike or they compel you to do so.
To recollect the past repetitively in a biased even falsified way that magnifies your perceived strengths and diminish your weaknesses and evils.
To emotionally fantasize about realities that do not exist like if you struck a lottery, you are married to a certain girl, if you were a rich man, if you are superman, etc.
Recollecting about what happened in the past so that you may discover what went wrong or right too is a form of reasoning but it will be false reasoning to keep revisiting the past selectively to exaggerate or falsify your feats and refuse to countenance your past follies to boost your ego and self image.
To think to worry or you cannot help worrying.
Thinking to doubt or antagonize or refuse to accept yourself or others either intentionally or reflexively.
Thinking to falsify or lie about a situation. Giving excuses are thinking to falsify.
Anyone who tells lies or tampers with the truth must think first or orchestrate first more than the person who lets his yes be yes only speak the truth.
To think to see the funny side of things or fabricate and present jokes.
To think to impress yourself or others how intelligent and knowledgeable you are.
IF YOU EXAMINE WHATEVER THOUGHTS THAT PEOPLE ENTERTAIN, THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED OBJECTIVELY AS EITHER TRULY NECESSARY OR UNNCESSARY (SUCH AND SUCH ARE NECESSARY THOUGHTS AND SUCH AND SUCH ARE UNNECESSARY THOUGHTS). IF YOU DID SO YOU WILL FIND THAT MANY OF THEIR THOUGHTS ARE BASED ON FRIVOLOUS OR FALSE REASONS AND IT IS NOT SURPRISING THAT SUCH THOUGHTS ARE THEMSELVES DELUSIONS THAT VERY FEW IF ANY DELUDED PEOPLE DO NOT HOLD DEAR TO THEIR BOSOMS.
There is truth to be gleaned even from falsity:
If one is presented with falsity, provided one can recognize falsity, one can establish the truth which must be the opposite of what is presented falsely, thus there is truth to be gleaned even from falsity.
When I mentioned the Altantuya murder case, I was ticked off for drawing conclusions and told that I may be prejudicing a case that is still in process by drawing (unjustified) conclusions.
The apparent purpose in telling me to withhold comment is based on reason or ‘fair play’ but it is an excuse and the motivation is actually emotional, to tick me off (I am wrong or bad to comment).
If you believe justice will prevail in this Altantuya case when it is a foregone conclusion it will be a trial that is for show with much vested interests already exposed, then you have wrong view or poor perception that will end in suffering.
It is the police and the judiciary that is prejudicing the case, not me.
The police has prejudiced the case in summarily dismissing the possibility of others being involved when they have only ridiculously charged two policemen with carrying out the murder and Razak for abetting. In any murder there must someone who ordered and surely the policemen know who ordered them and they are likely to have told fellow police officers who did so and it is no feat of investigative prowess to ascertain who ordered the killing.
Razak has admitted complicity that must be more than what he admitted in his affidavit that he merely requested the policemen to patrol his house and not harm her because it is not credible that two policemen will carry out murder without inducements merely because someone told them to patrol the house. His mention about the policeman killing six people is half the convenient truth to shift blame that he failed to mention the other half that it was said in relationship to a mission to exterminate her without trace.
The judiciary has acted unfairly in granting Razak bail in an offence that should not be bailed, the judge acted beyond his official role as impartial judge by scolding the defense lawyer for bringing the good name of the deputy PM into this case in mentioning meeting the police officer in the DPM’s office the next day. He has false perception if he thinks that mention of meeting in the deputy PM’s office on official business the next day sullies his good name. Why is he so keen to uphold the DPM’s good name?
Why hasn’t the police charged Razak with ordering the murder but only charged him with abetting when they should know who did it? Either it is true he only abetted or there is again favoritism that is again not conducive of justice prevailing.
WHETHER YOU REALIZE IT OR NOT, IN TICKING ME OFF FOR SPEAKING ABOUT THE CASE FOR FEAR OF PREJUDICING THE CASE, YOU ARE TELLING ME I AM WRONG OR BAD TO DO SO AND IF WHAT YOU SAID TURNS OUT TO BE DRIVEN BY EMOTIONAL RESENTMENT TO PUT ME DOWN, THERE WILL BE PENANCE DOWN THE LINE.

Stretching Is Prolonging The Use Of Force:


No amount of reasoning or thinking can cause syllables to stretch but prolonging the application of force on a syllable will cause it to stretch and (true) reason will never advice the stretching of syllables because there is not only no need to stretch but it prolongs the application of force on the mind that stresses and cumulatively harms it. Thus if you can be proven to be objectively constantly stretching your syllables to greater or lesser extent then you are de facto constantly prolonging your application of force on what you say and you are therefore a man of force, a man who likes to use or prolong the use of force, not a true man of reason who will never contemplate the use of force let alone the constant prolonging use of force.
Whenever someone stretches a syllable or fundamental unit of motion he is prolonging the use of force more than is (objectively) necessary to produce that syllable or motion that is intended for show to please, impress, intimidate or dominate. Stretching a syllable or unit has nothing to do with reason or meaning but it is all about prolonging the use of force to achieve that stretching. Stretching a syllable or unit of motion divides the person’s and his recipient’s attention because he must pay attention at the same time to fabricate the syllable and to at the same time stretch it. In practice he memorizes the combo and rehashes it automatically without need for attention to what he is saying or how he is saying.
If you are not a man of force, you do not like to use force and you are not mindless (an unperceiving automaton), why are you constantly using force to prolong your syllables?
ANYONE WHO IS CONSTANTLY PROLONGING HIS USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH HIS SYLLABLES MUST LIKE TO USE FORCE, MUST BE A MAN OF FORCE NOT A MAN OF REASON (BECAUSE IT IS MAD TO CONSTANTLY PROLONG YOUR USE OF FORCE) OR HE MUST BE A MINDLESS AUTOMATON OF FORCE IF HE IS NOT AWARE HE IS CONSTANTLY PROLONGING HIS USE OF FORCE.
Therefore no matter how good or wise you like to think you are, if there is objectively demonstrable constant stretching of your syllables, you are bad and foolish because you are constantly intentionally or mindlessly unnecessarily using force to prolong your syllables that harm yourself and others.
THERE IS NO NECESSITY TO PROLONG THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES EXCEPT BECAUSE IT IS DEEMED STYLISH (YOU LIKE IT OR ARE APING OTHERS) OR IT IS NECESSARY TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS AT THE PRICE OF UNNECESSARY CONSUMPTION OF ENERGY CREATING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS.
IN THE SAME WAY CHANGING SPEED & LOUDNESS WITHIN AND BETWEEN SYLLABLES IS ALL ABOUT USING FORCE TO CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HAS NO MEANING EXCEPT FOR STYLE TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS.
THEREFORE THE PERSON WHO OBJECTIVELY HAS CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS A MAN OF FORCE WHO USES FORCE ALL THE TIME NOT A REASON OF REASON WHO DOES NOT USE UNNECESSARY FORCE, A BAD PERSON WHO CONSTANTLY HARMS HIMSELF AND OTHERS BY CONSTANTLY STRESSING, MAKING RESTLESS AND DISTRACTING, NOT A GOOD PERSON.
Insanity:
Insanity is basically loss of control for what and how one says, does, thinks and perceives so that it is inappropriate for the situation at hand and it is only possible for a person to become insane if what he says, does, thinks and perceives is not guided by reason but blindly driven by force (but he and others are deceived to think or likes to think emanates from reason). Reason has no force in it and therefore no force to lose control of. Whatever that one says, does, thinks and perceives that is guided by reason is always necessary for the occasion and has no unnecessary accompanying force that can go out of control or go mad.
It is only when what one says, does, thinks or perceives is unnecessary (reason that is true not faked will never issue or instruct what is unnecessary) and thus blindly driven by force against reason to deceive, please, impress, intimidate and dominate others that insanity can ensue with loss of control.
It is therefore a reflection that all the activities of ordinary people are driven by mental force not truly guided by reason (reason is only apparently present or appears to be present) that they all harbor significant mad impulses or volitions that they are only now controlling and will finally overwhelm them.
Reason is only apparently not truly present in what they say or do because what they tout as their capacity to reason can be shown to be false. For instance ordinary people see nothing wrong with the statement “No wonder I can’t find it” when it is always false because it is never a wonder but an annoyance that you cannot find something. They smile or laugh as if they like or enjoy bad business when they say “Business is bad!” When people swiftly avert their gaze at something, it is not reason that is the cause for their looking away but it is their intense dislike or aversion that irresistibly pulls their gaze away.
If one examines carefully, the motivation for what people do or say is actually their like or dislike which are the alternative ways in which their mental force of going against self can react, not their reason or rational basis for behaving or saying so. Whatever reasons they may tender as the rational basis for what they say or do are excuses and can be proven to be logically untenable.
TO THOSE WHO ARE THEMSELVES UNAWARE THEY ARE ACTING, PUTTING ON A SHOW, THE SPEECH AND ACTIONS OF OTHERS SEEM TO BE QUITE REASONABLE AND NOT DRIVEN BY FORCE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AS LIKE (FORCEFUL ATTRACTION) AND DISLIKE (FORCEFUL AVERSION) OR EMOTIONS (ANGER, HATE, PRIDE, SHAME, GREED, ENVY, JEALOUSY) BUT FOR ONE WHO SEES THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE, EVERYTHING THAT PEOPLE SAY OR DO ALWAYS HAS ACCOMPANIMENTS OF (NAKED) FORCE, LIKE OR DISLIKE OR EMOTION THAT ARE OFTEN MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO AND WHAT THEY SAY OR DO CAN OFTEN BE SHOWN TO BE LOGICALLY FALSE OR UNTENABLE AND THUS WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS ACTUALLY IN SUBSTANCE AND STYLE ALL ABOUT FORCE, LIKE OR DISLIKE OR EMOTIONS.
IT MAY BE A MYTH THAT PEOPLE INCLUDING TOP INTELLECTUALS & RELIGIOUS PEOPLE ARE BEINGS OF REASON IF NOT TRUTH BUT THEY ARE BEINGS OF FORCE AND IT IS LIKE AND DISLIKE AND EMOTIONS THAT PROVIDE THE BASIS OF WHAT THEY SAY, DO AND BELIEVE. THEY HAVE EMOTIONAL WORLD VIEWS OR WHAT THINGS ARE ALL ABOUT THAT THEY ARE STRONGLY ATTACHED TO OR LIKE AND IF WHAT IS PRESENTED TO THEM DOES NOT FIT THEIR WORLD VIEWS THEY CAN BECOME OPENLY OR SECRETLY HOSTILE.
No Use Liking Or Disliking What I Say:
Foolish gullible people are thrilled (like) and falsely perceive it as meaningful when people praise them or express liking for what they say or do or are (eg they are good looking).
I am not thrilled nor find it meaningful if someone expresses liking for what I say because it means that the person’s mental force of going against self has been stirred in speed and strength under the control of his force of self preservation. It does not mean he understands or did not misapprehend what I say nor will he practice what I say.
In the same way it is no use disliking what I say and then citing excuses that can be objectively proven to be untenable as the reasons why you reject what I say. If you believe your excuses or rationalizations for disliking what I say are true you have false perception that if not corrected will end in mad perception.
All ordinary people or people with style or who stretch syllables, change speed and loudness when they speak automatically react with force, with either like or dislike (that he often conceals and denies to himself) and whatever reasons he gives to support his dislike are excuses or make believe.
What I say is likely to arouse dislike that they cannot help in all ordinary people because it is critical and people have been sensitized by past abusive criticisms to have intense aversion for criticism. What I say is an unique appeal to their true reason and not their emotion and faked reason and much as they like to imagine they appreciate reason, people even have an implacable revulsion for true reason because it is against their creed to transact in niceties or platitudes or patting each other. Even though it is stressful, they rather hide in their own private shells and dish out condescending platitudes and fake they appreciate others’ hurtful platitudes. People usually like to hear things that praise them and what I say is critical.
ANYONE WHO DID NOT LIKE OR DISLIKE WHAT I SAID WOULD HAVE UNDERSTOOD AND PUT INTO PRACTICE WHAT I SAY TO STOP STRETCHING HIS SYLLABLES, STOP CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO EXPERIENCE A PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION TO NOT BE ANTAGONISTIC AND KNOW WHAT I SAY IS TRUE. THEREFORE THEIR DISAGREEMENT CANNOT BE BORN OF REASON BUT EMANATES FROM THEIR DISLIKE OR STIRRING OF THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THEIR MENTAL FORCE.
IS IT TRUE THAT YOU MUST PROLONG THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES? IS IT TRUE THAT IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY PROLONGING YOUR USE OF FORCE AS IS EVIDENT FROM THE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF YOUR SYLLABLES YOU ARE MAN WHO CONSTANTLY LIKES TO USE FORCE OTHERWISE WHY WOULD YOU CONSTANTLY USE FORCE? IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY SUBJECTING YOUR MIND TO FORCE BY CONSTANTLY PROLONGING THE USE OF FORCE, AREN’T YOU CREATING STRESS THAT LEADS TO RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT CAN ALSO BE IMPARTED TO ALL WHO INTERACT WITH YOU AND THEREFORE YOU ARE NOT GOOD BUT BAD.
IF WHAT I SAY IS TRUE, HOW CAN IT BE REJECTED WITH REASON BUT IT IS REJECTED WITH FORCE, WITH DISLIKE.
ANY MOTION THAT HAS ACCELERATION IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE INSTEAD OF CONSTANT SPEED AND STRENGTH WILL BE STRETCHED PAST ITS TARGET HAD IT NOT BEEN FORCIBLY ARRESTED BY THE TARGET AND IF YOU OBSERVE CAREFULLY, PEOPLE TYPE WITH ACCELERATING SPEED AND STTRENGTH OF FORCE OF THEIR FINGERS, NEVER WITH CONSTANT SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT THOUGH POSSIBLE IS NEVER SEEN.

A Person Who Sees & Knows Need Not Think:
A person who can sees who another person is from his appearance, behavior and speech need not bother himself to think who that person is and it is only a person who cannot see who another person is from his appearance, behavior and speech who must think and no matter how wonderful his thinking is, it is laborious and not as reliable as directly instantaneously seeing.
A person who knows or has information who another person need not bother himself to think who that person is and it is only a person who does not know who another person who must think and no matter how wonderful his thinking is, it is laborious and not as reliable as directly instantaneously seeing.
THUS THINKING IS NOT MANDATORY NOR IS IT VIRTUOUS WITHOUT QUALIFICATIONS BUT IT IS ROUNDABOUT, LABORIOUS, STRESSFUL AND UNRELIABLE MEANS OF ARRIVING AT KNOWLEDGE THAT CAN BE ABANDONED WITHOUT DETRIMENT TO THE PERSON BUT INSTEAD IT IS AN INCOMPARABLE BOON BESTOWING PEACE OF MIND AND CERTAINTY APART FROM BEING A GATEWAY TO TWO EONS IN HEAVENLY BLISS IF IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED.
ANYONE WHO KNOWS AND SEES EVERYTHING NEED NOT RESORT TO THINKING AT ALL AND BECAUSE GOD KNOWS AND SEES EVERYTHING, HE NEED NOT RESORT TO THINKING.
If you ask anyone, including mankind’s most eminent scientists and philosophers whether it is possible to exist as a human without thinking it is likely they will (even shake their heads and) say that it is not possible because they are unable to do so, their minds are constantly roiled by thoughts of all kinds. Thus they have wrong view that what is not just possible but an incomparably better way to exist is not possible.
Why Stretching Syllables Is Not Letting Your Yes Be Yes only:
Stretching syllables is not a harmless matter of personal choice but it is not letting your yes be yes only and the more that comes from evil according to Jesus.
Whether you realize or not, agree or not, stretching your syllables is prolonging the use of force than is necessary to produce the syllable and anyone who prolongs his use of force is doing more that comes from evil instead of just using force to just produce that syllable.
BECAUSE THE APPLICATION OF FORCE IS HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS, THE PROLONGING USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH A SYLLABLE IS NOT HARMLESS OR CHARMING BUT THE MORE THAT COMES FROM EVIL (BECAUSE IT HARMS YOUR MIND AND YOUR VICTIM).
Is Force Good Or Bad?
If you slap someone, you use force to hit someone, is it hurtful and painful or pleasant?
If you scold someone, you use force to say something hurtful to someone is it painful to you and the target?
Can you reason with force, can you talk to or negotiate with force?
If you agree that the use of force in speech or actions is harmful to you and your target, is without reason then if you are constantly prolonging the use of force by stretching your (mental and physical) syllables and units of motion, you constantly use force to change speed and strength of force (loudness), you are a harmful man both to yourself and others who come into contact with you, even if you are not aware that you are prolonging your use of force.
Constantly Late & Playing Catch Up:
A person who is constantly acting, putting on a show, being nice not good to himself and others, stretching his syllables, changing speed and loudness exists out of touch with common reality and is looking anxiously or eagerly for opportunities to insert himself into common reality and because he is always delaying himself by prolonging his syllables, changing speed and loudness, it is inevitably late by the time he finishes what he is saying or doing and he is struggling to catch up with what is happening around him and trying hard not to expose his concern and fear of discovery. Thus he is constantly exiting common reality into his own private make believe reality and anxiously looking around to fitfully rejoin common reality and because he is always hopelessly delaying himself by his for show stretching, changing speed and loudness, he is always late, left behind by a common reality that has moved on and struggling afterwards to catch up, to find out how the current situation has changed whilst he was busy putting on a show.
In reality the individually stable characteristic brand of style or way he says and does the same things with the same style cannot be produced live but must be painstakingly recorded in a mental jukebox to be selected and played back and therefore the person with style or his stereotypical brand of stretching, changing speed and strength of force must be faking it, rehashing what he says and does and faking it as a genuine specific response for the situation at hand that he has willed himself with much determination to refuse to see and accept that he is faking it, putting on a recurring show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others.
There is only so much time for you to say or do your piece without stretching, changing speed or strength of force and if you must jazz it up, indulge in cock and bull, the moment will pass you by and you will be left to do so in your private time and reality whilst the situation or moment has already moved on and afterwards you will be left to anxiously find out what the new situation is, whether you have made a fool of yourself saying and doing things that may not apply to the new situation and whilst you are busy saying or doing things in your private reality, you are at risk of even physically danger because out of touch you may have things stolen or even be stabbed by someone you fail to be aware of in your private reality.
TIME WAITS FOR NO MAN AND IF YOU MUST ALWAYS DELAY YOURSELF AND OTHERS UNNECESSARILY BY PROLONGING YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THEN YOU WILL BE LEFT TO YOUR OWN DEVICES OR LEFT ALONE, LEFT BEHIND BY TIME TO SAY WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY IN YOUR OWN PRIVATE REALITY AND REJOIN THE SITUATION LATER WHEN YOU HAVE FINISHED YOUR SHENANIGANS.
ANYONE WHO STRETCHES, CHANGES SPEED AND LOUDNESS MUST BE ANXIOUS BECAUSE HE IS NOT IN TOUCH WITH THE REALITY HE DEARLY LIKES TO EXIST IN, HE IS ANXIOUSLY LOOKING TO INSERT HIMSELF INTO COMMON REALITY BUT ONCE IN, HE KEEPS BEING LEFT BEHIND AND ISOLATED BECAUSE HE IS WASTING HIS AND EVERYONE’S TIME STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHILST EXPOSING HIMSELF TO DANGER BY BEING NOT TOTALLY IN TOUCH WITH REALITY AND AFTER HE HAS FINISHED, HE IS ANXIOUSLY TRYING TO DISCOVER WHAT THE NEW SITUATION IS WHILST HE WAS BUSY STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
A person constantly transacting in force cannot be constantly transacting in reason:
Force and reason exists in inverse proportion in any mind, if force is strong then reason is diminished even absent. Whenever a person becomes very emotional, eg very angry or excited or anxious, he cannot think or reason and might do silly or harmful things that he would otherwise not do.
Thus if you are constantly transacting in force you cannot be at the same time constantly transacting in reason because force banishes reason.
A person who in truth has constant stretching, changes in speed and strength of force in how he perceives, thinks, says and does things is constantly transacting (unnecessarily) with force and therefore a person of poor if not absent genuine (as opposed to faked) reason.
A person who can be objectively demonstrated to have constant stretching of units of speech or motion, changes in speed and strength of force is constantly (unnecessarily) transacting in force because:
By constantly stretching his syllables or units of motion, he is constantly prolonging his use of force in fabricating that syllable or unit of motion.
By constantly changing speed he is using force to constantly change speed.
By constantly changing strength of force (loudness) he is constantly changing the strength of the force he uses.
Because he is constantly using force, constantly changing force, he is beholden to force and false reasoning that justifies his constant use of force and is deficient if not totally lacking in true reason or reasoning that reflects what actually happens or is true.
By contrast a person who does not stretch his syllables, change speed or loudness is never transacts in force because he is not constantly prolonging his use of force, not using force to constantly change speed and not constantly changing the strength of his force used. He is therefore a man of minimal and only necessary use of force who can devote his attention to the full use of true reason that reflects what actually happens or is true.
Careful what you say or do:
Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you and say and many severely underestimate the carelessness of their speech and actions.
Even though you suffer from stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate, life is relatively agreeable and many who cannot see that what and how they say or do things (eg they have an explosive cough that irritates others that they think is blameless when it has a conditioned or learnt violent acceleration of speed and loudness that is unnecessary that is indiscriminately intended to lash out in general or in particular, it possible to cough loudly with constant speed and loudness and a person who does not abuse himself has few coughs and colds) are constantly accruing karma (even when you tick me off saying, “I disagree with you, I smile because I like someone”, you are creating karma for yourself that may be far more serious than you dream possible because if I am right and you are wrong, you who are wrong in ticking off someone who is right).
If you think it fun existing being joined in the head to another person then you should continue to be heedless, to be funny and mischievous.
There are far more tormenting things that can happen to you then being joined in the head and the wise person will learn to wipe the smile off his face and thenceforth go about life solemnly, letting his yes be yes only because anything more comes from evil not good.
For instance, if you like to falsely impress others about the ‘love’ (actually emotional liking) you have for another by saying we are inseparable, then your wish may be granted if you are born stuck together, truly inseparable.
Cutting Each Other Short:
People are frequently cutting others short in what they say or do because they are irritated, they cannot stand being delayed by the song and dance in what they are hearing or seeing, they have heard enough to know through the song and dance what the man is trying to convey and what they are doing without realization is cutting short the unnecessary delays so that they get on with it, the discrepancy between reality and make belief is minimized. Instead of two persons ‘taking their own sweet time’ talking or broadcasting past each other they cut each other short regularly so that their delay and separation from reality is minimized. They are still separated from common reality whilst talking, but not so much by cutting each other short.
Better In Touch With Reality:
A person who does not stretch all his syllables, does not change speed and loudness finishes his sentence faster compared to the person who always stretches his syllables, changes speed and loudness and therefore he does not wastes his and the listener’s time as much as the latter.
Finishing faster, his mind not exposed to the violent changes in speed and strength of force that is mandatory if you stretch, change speed and loudness, he is calmer and clearly thinking in touch with reality, with what is happening around him.
Mutual Reinforcement That Will End In Madness & Hell:
The constant forceful stretching or prolonging of the application of force, changes in speed and strength of force that are present in ordinary people’s activities that can only be their speech, motion, thoughts and the ways they perceive (see, hear, smell, taste and touch) is the only key to the emotions, stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate that they experience and in turn the emotions, stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate that they thus experience is the only key to the constant stretching or prolonging, changing of speed and strength of force that if left on its own will aggravate with time and conditioning and end in agony and even hell.
No one has ever said this in the past or present and if what I say is true and beneficial, there is nothing more advantageous to you than if I will to guide you on the way out of emotions, stress, restlessness and distraction and in addition I triggered the consciousness change that occurred after 1977 and in recent years. In accordance with what the Buddha said, I am not an ordinary person because he said the person who preaches from the teachings and discipline declared by him is rare and I may be even more rare because no one has preached from the teachings and discipline declared by him in the way I have.
Fighting Poverty:
Quote headline: Fighting poverty.
Comment: The person who wrote the article is a Christian but he does not know what he says is false and appeals to the reader’s emotions not reason.
You never fight poverty or anything because that is stirring up force in you and others with karma attached not merit. Did you ever hear Jesus say you must fight for this and that? What kind of Christian are you to see nothing wrong in fighting poverty?
If you think you can fight poverty, poverty is an entity you can fight against you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
You can fight with another person but can you fight poverty? Did poverty challenge you to a fight? Why do you hate poverty?
You can work in ways that will alleviate poverty and help the disadvantage but you never fight unless you want to be part of this world that is always fighting.
THEREFORE HERE AS IN MANY PLACES, PEOPLE THINK THEY HAVE PERFECT REASON, WHAT THEY SAY IS TRUE WHEN THEY ARE LIKE EMPERORS WITH NO CLOTHES, GUILTY OF FAULTY IF NOT DOWNRIGHT FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION AND HEADING FOR WOE NOT SAFETY. WHAT PEOPLE CALL THEIR REASONING OR LOGIC IS COPIED FROM OTHERS THAT THEY ADMIRE OR UNDER DURESS (EG PARENTS OR TEACHERS), THEY DID NOT WORK OUT THEIR FAULTY LOGIC BY THEMSELVES BUT ADOPTED THEM WITHOUT QUESTION AND THUS BRAINWASHED THEY WONDER WHY THEIR MINDS ARE DISTURBED, SOMETIMES THEY BECOME CONFUSED OR DISTURBED FOR NO APPARENT REASON. THE REASON WHY PEOPLE BECOME DISTURBED FOR NO APPARENT REASON IS BECAUSE THEY CANNOT SEE THE CONFLICT IN THEIR REASONING OR WHAT THEY ACCEPT AS VALID.
Fixing Cricket:
There are many words in English and other languages that have through time and corruption come to have many different meanings that can be confusing and this different meanings or connotations are intentionally exploited by some people who like to fool others to think they are talking about one thing when they are talking of another and they enjoy making a fool out of you.
For instance you think cricket is in decline or disrepair and he is talking about repairing cricket when he is talking about manipulating or predetermining the results of cricket. If you like to mislead others, one day you will be misled with grievous even deathly consequences for you.
Ideally and in the beginning each word has only one meaning but through corruption that has karma attached by those who subsequently use the word, it has come to take on additional meanings that may be totally different from the original meaning and it is a source of uncertainty and suspiciousness in existence in this world.
IN A TRUTHFUL SCHEME OF THINGS, EACH WORD HAS ONLY ONE MEANING THAT CAN BE UNEQUIVOCALLY DEFINED BUT THROUGH THE MISCHIEF AND DECEPTIVENESS OF MANKIND THE SAME WORD HAS COME TO TAKE ON MANY DISPARATE MEANINGS THAT MANKIND TOLERATE AND EVEN APPLAUD BECAUSE IT CAN BE UTILIZED TO POKE FUN AND CONFUSE OTHERS.
EVEN IF OTHERS LIKE TO PLAY WITH WORDS, YOU WILL BE WISE TO USE WORDS WITH A SINGLE SOLEMN INTENDED MEANING THAT IS CONSISTENT IN EVERY APPLICATION BY YOU OF THAT WORD SO THAT YOU DO NOT CONFUSE YOURSELF AND OTHERS WITH DEBT NOT MERIT.
Marginalized By Your Liking:
Rather than you being a master of smiling and liking who decided to smile because you liked, you may be conned, deceived by what is truly going on in your mind that you or your reason is in charge when you and your reason is being increasingly marginalized through conditioning and the addition of greater acceleration in speed and strength of your liking and smiling to increasingly bypass you to cause you to helplessly smile and like.
First, through a combination self and other pressure, you force yourself to smile and fake you like to please and impress others but imperceptible to your distracted mind, you are increasingly forced by increasingly irresistible urge to smile and like even for no apparent reason and madness is beckoning in the distance.
You think you are the master of your mind and your likes and dislikes but it may be or is the truth that your blind mental forces are the ones pulling the strings, calling the shots and plotting behind your back to finally overthrow you and send you into insanity.
When you say you like someone or something, you mean you are attracted to someone or you find him attractive. Just as a magnet attracts mental filings, attracting is about a force pulling you towards someone or something, not reason pulling you to someone or something because reason has no force that pulls or attracts. By inference this force that pulls you towards something may be a stirring in speed and strength of your mental force provoked by the appearance, way of moving or speaking of the person.
Attraction (also known as liking) is something that is ephemeral or whimsical, the mere stirring of mental force that is also always based on physical characteristics of the target that are not everlasting. For instance you are attracted to the appearance of a person because he is handsome, he wears attractive clothes or he is dripping with gold and diamonds, the way he walks or does things or speak with undulating rhythmic stretching, changes of speed and strength of force that stirs your mental force or what he says (eg fight, funny) that stirs your mental force.
Wasting Time & Energy To Create Stress, Restlessness & Distraction For Yourself & Others:
Because it takes time and energy to prolong syllables, change speed and loudness whilst speaking as compared to not doing so, the person who does so is wasting his own and others’ time and energy to create stress, restlessness and division of concentration and if after a lifetime’s constant (not frequent) practice you expect to escape the crutches of mad stress, restlessness and distraction (daze) and melancholy (constant prolonging is the root of melancholy or emotional lingering), you are filled with merit (even if the way you speak and do things wastes others’ time and energy, stresses, make restless and distracts them) and headed for heaven, it may be true or you are deluded and a great fool.
THEREFORE DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE IMPORTANCE OF PAYING PERSISTENT (NOT SPORADIC) ATTENTION TO DETECT AND ERADICATE PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE THEY ARE THE KEYS TO SAVING YOUR TIME AND ENERGY, SAVING YOURSELF AND OTHERS UNNECESSARY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND EVEN THE WAY TO HEAVEN.
Sounds that have prolonging of its notes are audibly distinct and cannot be mistaken for sounds without prolongation.
Sounds that have speed changes within each note (changes in pitch) and between different notes are audibly distinct and cannot be mistaken for sounds without speed changes.
Sounds that have loudness changes within each note and between different notes are audibly distinct and cannot be mistaken for sounds without loudness changes.
Although speaking and singing without prolonging notes, changing speed and loudness is possible, ordinary people have never heard it and even those who have me describe it many times nevertheless continue to manifest stretching, changing speed and loudness reflecting either they fail to recognize stretching, changing speed and loudness or they cannot help doing so, see nothing wrong or think it is beneficial for them and others.
No matter how good you think stretching, changing speed and loudness is, if you cannot detect their presence in your speech and those of everyone else’s, it reflects your lack of discernment or ability to see things as they truly are.
THUS IF YOU CANNOT PERCEIVE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS EVEN AFTER I HAVE ALERTED YOU THEN YOU MAY BE THE PERSON JESUS IS DESCRIBING (THAT IS NOT A COMPLIMENT) AS SEEING THEY DO NOT SEE, HEARING THEY DO HEAR.
The Buddha says you are a robot:
By preaching mindfulness of the condition of one’s mind, speech and behavior, the Buddha is implying that ordinary people are not mindful, they do not pay attention to what their minds, mouths and body parts are doing.
Anyone who does or says things without paying attention to them is a robot and the reason why he can say or do things without paying attention is only because what he says and does is rehearsed, regurgitated mindlessly from a mental jukebox and he is therefore a robot or programmed automaton.
Keep your liking and smiling to yourself:
You will be wise to keep your liking and smiling to yourself rather than encourage others to follow your example because if they turn out to be the way to agony (mad liking and smiling) and perdition, you will be judged for leading others astray.
I have no hesitation about encouraging not liking and disliking and not smiling because I have experienced the states of liking/disliking/smiling and the state of not liking and smiling and I know the latter is an incomparable peace of mind. Further I know what I advocate is in accordance to what the Buddha and Jesus taught.
Show me one occasion in the New Testament in which Jesus encouraged you to like or smile. There is only one mention of liking and it is a warning to beware of priests who like (or are attracted to) to wear long robes. A smile is laughter without sound and Jesus said woe to you who laughs for you shall weep. If you think smiling and laughing are unrelated when they are siblings, then you are a fool.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Is It Necessary & Sustainable To Talk Nonstop?

Is it necessary and would it be sustainable if you were to talk nonstop whenever you are conscious or would it not be maddening, stressful and exhausting if you have to do so?
(Suppose I were to ask you to try to set a Guinness world record for nonstop talking by keep talking to everyone and yourself for as long as you can. Initially you will have to force yourself to do so but increasingly the urge to keep talking is irresistible and not to talk is the thing hard for you to do. The reason why nonstop thinking is more sustainable is because it is less demanding than physical talking and the reason why you see nothing wrong is because you are used to it and cannot help it even if you wanted as a result of conditioning to keep thinking)
A large proportion if not the entirety of thinking in ordinary people is composed of talking even arguing with themselves or virtual voices of others berating them rather than constructive thinking related to the task at hand. This constant mental talking is only more sustainable because there is no physical only mental expenditure of energy, no usage of the vocal apparatus (except for occasional outbursts when the mental talking becomes too uninhibited).
Therefore is it similarly necessary and sustainable or would it be mad and a struggle (hard to sustain) for you to think (talk constantly in your mind) to yourself whenever you are conscious?
Therefore it is not meritorious or meaningful to be constantly thinking or mentally talking to yourself as conceited people and intellectuals like to think in delusion or wrong view but nonstop thinking is a conditioned practice of controlled madness that has now become involuntary, cannot be helped that ordinary people has come to think continuously often repetitively in a silly antagonistic fashion.
Every moment you practice or allow your mind to practice nonstop thinking or incessant mental talking to yourself you are conditioning yourself, training yourself to further do so with greater perfection and urge that because it is meaningless and stressful will end either acutely in a situational crisis or in old age debilitation with insanity or uncontrollable nonstop emotional inappropriate thinking.
THEREFORE THERE IS NOT ONLY NO NECESSITY TO THINK NONSTOP BUT IT IS FRIVOLOUS, PRACTICING SOMETHING MEANINGLESS AND EXHAUSTING THAT MUST BE CONTROLLED (BY ONE’S MENTAL FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION) AND WHATEVER THAT IS SUBJECT TO CONTROL IS SUBJECT TO LOSS OF CONTROL AND MADNESS. EVEN THOUGH ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE OF IT NOR ARE THEY CAPABLE OF IT, IT IS POSSIBLE (AND I HAVE ACHIEVED IT) TO PRACTICE PASSIVE FORCE FREE THINKING (NO STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS) ONLY WHEN IT IS NECESSARY OR ON DEMAND AND TO STOP OR EXTINGUISH THINKING WHEN THERE IS NO NECESSITY OR DEMAND FOR THINKING.
THEREFORE THE BUDDHA HAS PENETRATIVE DISCERNMENT AND THE HIGHEST TEACHER IN POINTING OUT TO YOU WHERE NO ONE ELSE, NOT EVEN JESUS HAS DONE SO THAT IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO STOP THINKING AND IT IS A HIGHER, MORE NOBLE STATE OF THE MIND THAN CONSTANT GOODWILLED THINKING THAT IS IN TURN HIGHER THAN CONSTANT ILLWILLED THINKING. HE FURTHER TELLS YOU THAT THE ABILITY TO STOP THINKING AT WILL SO THAT YOU MERELY PERCEIVE OR PERCEIVE AND ACT IF DESIRED IS NOT THE BE AND END ALL BUT THERE ARE EVEN HIGHER STATES OF A MIND IN THE DIRECTION OF INCREASING EFFORTLESS PASSIVE CONCENTRATION AND EQUANIMITY (TRUE NOT FORCED NEITHER LIKING NOR DISLIKING). TO BE ABLE TO STOP THINKING IS ONE THING BUT TO CONCENTRATE ONE’S MIND THAT CRUCIALLY REQUIRES THAT ONE FIRST STOP ALL THINKING IS ANOTHER THING AND SO IS TRUE EQUANIMITY THAT CRUCIALLY REQUIRES ONE’S MIND BE CONCENTRATED.
IF IT IS TRUE THAT IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON TO EXIST WITHOUT THINKING AND IT IS AN INCOMPARABLY MORE BLISSFUL STATE THAN CONSTANT THINKING THAT IS THE ONLY STATE OF MIND YOU KNOW THEN THE BUDDHA IS THE HIGHEST TEACHER AS FAR AS YOU ARE CONCERNED BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE NOT ONLY BEFORE HIM BUT MUCH LONGER AFTER HIM HAS TOLD YOU SO. IT IS NOT THE BUDDHA’S FAULT THAT YOU FAILED TO GRASP WHAT HE SAID AND IF YOU STILL REFUTE HE IS THE HIGHEST TEACHER AFTER WHAT I SAY, YOU ARE AN EMOTIONAL MAN OF BIAS NOT A MAN OF REASON.
FORCED NO THINKING:
It is possible for some ordinary people to use considerable mental force to briefly stop themselves from thinking but this is not effortless, not natural but is false, controlled and unsustainable.
People say they are so angry that they are speechless or don’t know what to think. What they are saying is that the intense mental force has momentarily arrested the flow of thought and this is an example of temporary involuntary force driven suspension of thinking and therefore you can train yourself to summon mental force to force yourself briefly not to think but it is delusion if you think you have achieved noble non thinking. Your forceful unsustainable non-thinking is like a circus act to impress yourself and others (your disciples as to your psychic prowess). Therefore it is possible for you to kid yourself that you can stop thinking by using force to briefly stop thinking just as you can use force to briefly stop breathing. True passive noble cessation of thinking is sustainable, can be carried out with increasingly lengths of time effortlessly or without contriving.
The Still Camera Compared To The Video Camera:
People who see, hear, smell, taste and touch without thinking about what they see, hear, smell, taste and touch or some other thing is like the video camera that faithfully captures every frame of action and initiates direct responses whilst perceiving everything that is relevant.
People who see, hear, smell, taste and touch always thinking about what they see, hear, smell, taste and touch or some other thing is like the still camera that only takes often random hasty snapshots upon which they depend in order to make decisions of what to say or do that may turn out to be inappropriate.
PEOPLE WHO THINK ALL THE TIME ARE THE ONES WHO ARE DETACHED FROM VERY REALITY THAT THEY SO CRAVE TO EXIST IN, IN THEIR PRIVATE MAKE BELIEVE WORLDS SPEAKING AND BEHAVING BY STANDARDIZED REHASH OR FAKED LIVE PERFORMANCES.
PEOPLE WHO DO NOT THINK ALL THE TIME, CAN ELECT NOT TO THINK WHEN THEY SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE OR TOUCH ARE VERY MUCH IN TOUCH WITH THE PRESENT, WITH THE REALITY THAT THEY DO NOT CRAVE TO EXIST IN AND WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IN RESPONSE TO WHAT THEY SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE AND TOUCH IS TRULY LIVE, SPECIFIC FOR THAT OCCASION.
THE CONSTANT THINKING PEOPLE UNDERTAKE IS LARGELY MENTAL TALKING TO THEMSELVES. WOULD IT NOT BE INSANE AND UNNECESSARY IF YOU WERE TO PHYSICALLY TALK NONSTOP? THEREFORE THE CONSTANT THINKING OF ORDINARY PEOPLE IS NOT VIRTUOUS BUT INSANE AND UNNECESSARY AND THE PERSON WHO IS ABLE TO NOT THINK WHEN IT IS NOT REQUIRED HAS A HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAN A PERSON WHO CANNOT HELP THINKING OR TALKING TO HIMSELF MENTALLY.
PEOPLE ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES IF THEY THINK THEY CAN CHOOSE TO NOT THINK IF THEY WISHED BECAUSE THEY ARE SLAVES OF CONSTANT OFTEN MEANINGLESS REPETITIVE THINKING.
HOW CAN YOU BE PROVOKED BY ANOTHER IF YOU CAN STOP YOURSELF THINKING AT WILL? IT IS ONLY BECAUSE YOU CANNOT HELP STOP THINK IS IT SO THAT WHAT SOMEONE SAYS OR DOES PROVOKES YOU IN A WAY YOU CANNOT RESIST. ONCE YOU CLOSE SHOP, STOP THINKING, NOTHING OTHERS SAY OR DO CAN PROVOKE YOU. THEREFORE THE PERSON WHO CAN STOP THINKING AT WILL IS HIGHER THAN THE PERSON WHO CANNOT.
How To Stop Thinking:
Because constant thinking is a conditioned forceful state of the mind you must de-condition yourself to not think by a laborious process that may have ups and downs, progress interspersed with regression that may lead to final success or failure.
The first step is to pay attention to stop applying force on your mind by examining to find and stop the force driven stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness and to keep telling or commanding oneself mentally ‘stop thinking’ each time you become aware of mindless irritating thinking. Just because you tell yourself not to think does not mean your mind will listen to you but merely by telling yourself “stop thinking” you have interrupted the usual flow and momentarily stopped thinking in its tracks and if you keep so, a time will come when your mind stops thinking.
Meditation is also indispensable by a combination of isolating yourself from the corrupt influences of others and instilling stillness or accustoming yourself to inactivity that is the essence of meditation.

Fish That Turns Evolution Upside Down?





















Science states that fish precedes legged animals like amphibians, reptiles and mammals. Legs evolved slowly starting with fish with fins that slowly evolved to have a fleshy stem (like the coelacanth below) to joints and digits.


Thus for this fish to evolve appendages that look remarkably like legs with multiple joints and feet with digits, it would have to suddenly possess or acquire a set of new genes that will be necessary for it to encode those legs or do science now say that all fish already have the array of genes necessary to form legs but they are not expressed and somehow in this fish it got expressed?
I MAY BE WRONG, BUT THE EXISTENCE OF THIS FISH TURNS SCIENTIFIC EVOLUTION UPSIDE DOWN. HOW DID THIS FISH THAT BELONG TO A CLASS OF ANIMALS PRECEDING LEGGED ANIMALS IN THE EVOLUTIONARY TREE SUDDENLY GET THE MANY GENES (NOT ONE) THAT MUST BE NECESSARY FOR IT TO PRODUCE OR EXPRESS THOSE FEET?
WHAT THIS FISH’S EXISTENCE SUGGESTS IS THAT EVOLUTION AND GENES MAY BE AN EXPLANATION FOR WHAT HAPPENS IN THIS WORLD THAT IS NOT NECESSARILY TRUE, THIS WORLD MAY BE A MIND OR CONSCIOUSNESS FABRICATION AND JUST AS ‘PIPPING HOT’ FRESH BREAD CAN BE PRODUCED OUT OF THIN AIR, PEOPLE CAN BE BROUGHT BACK FROM THE DEAD, MY VIDEO CD CAN DISAPPEAR AND REAPPEAR IN ITS CONTAINER, GENES AND EVOLUTION MAY NOT BE HOW IT HAPPENED, MAY NOT BE SACROSANCT.
How To Explain?
Because it is not impersonal, immutable scientific principles that govern the anatomy of all creatures, it is God who is the creator and who has power over the form of beings, He can instantly create a fish that defies scientific tenets.

According to what the Buddha said, God is the creator and therefore He can create anew fish with legs.
Quote:
the Great Brahma said, 'I, monk, am Brahma, the Great Brahma, the All-Seeing, All-Powerful, the Maker, Creator, Father of All That Have Been and Shall Be.'
Why It Would Be False & Sinful To Say A Fish That Defies Science:
It would have been false and sinful (with karma attached) for me to say a fish that defied science because defiance is emotional and stirs emotion in the reader and it is false to perceive that the fish is defying science. Turning something upside down has nothing intrinsically emotional and it is true that the anatomy of this fish turns the order of science upside down.
Anyone who perceives that this fish is defying science has false perception that will end in mad perception. Do you see the fish defying science? Is science an entity that the fish can defy?
Note Also I Said 'Turn' Not 'Shake':
'Turn' has no transmission of force but 'shake' implies at least some violent force used and therefore to say the fish shakes evolution upside down denotes a person given to force who wants to transmit unnecessary force to his readers because the appearance of the fish does not shake anything but it turns science upside down.

IT ALWAYS REFLECT A PROPENSITY OF THE WRITER TO BE EMOTIONAL TO USE WORDS THAT CONVEY FORCE OR EMOTION IN WHAT HE SAYS AND CONSCIOUSLY OR SUBCONSCIOUSLY HE DESIRES TO AROUSE THE EMOTION OF HIS READERS WITH KARMA NOT MERIT ATTACHED.
Just See & Do:
There are many things in daily life that can be done or carried out without need for any thinking by just perceiving the situation at hand and (directly) initiating the appropriate or obvious response.
You can drive, walk, eat, speak, see or listen live fully immersed in the present without need to invoke thinking better than the person who is constantly thinking.
The thinking that is constant in ordinary people in their waking state, that ordinary people cannot stop because there is momentum and force in it, is usually superfluous reflecting their inability to let their yes be yes only, a form of mental talking (nonsense) to themselves, even arguing with themselves that is often repeated and unrelated to the task or matter at hand (they fly off a tangent in thought to whatever they are faced with). Seldom do they need to reflect or think what course of action they should take or reason out the meaning of the situation at hand. In fact when they think they are searching their jukebox of explanations that were indoctrinated into them by society, or they copied by rote to apply to the situation at hand and they delude themselves that they have reasoned out the truth of the situation.
Do you need to think when you walk or in order for you to walk? People do not think about their walking when they walk but they think of other things when they walk. You do not even need to think when you overtake another car, all is required is that you see the situation at hand that is relevant, the speed of all vehicles involved, any approaching vehicle to initiate the appropriate overtaking maneuver.
I am quite certain now I am capable of not thinking for extended periods of time when I go about my daily work and it is a far superior and clearly thinking, blissful way to exist than constant maddening forceful ding dong thinking. How do you know not to think whilst fully conscious is boring and stupid when you have not experienced it?
THUS, IN ACCORDANCE TO WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID, THE PERSON WHO IS CAPABLE OF EXISTING CONSCIOUSLY WITHOUT THINKING, WITH A ONE POINTED CONSCIOUSNESS IS SUPERIOR TO A PERSON WHO CANNOT HELP THINKING BUT THINKS WITHOUT SENSUALITY AND ILL WILL ACCOMPANIED BY RAPTURE NOT OF THE FLESH (WHO IS IN TURN SUPERIOR TO ORDINARY PEOPLE WITH CONSTANT FORCEFUL, SENSUAL AND ILL WILLED THOUGHTS), AND HE IS REWARDED WITH TWO EONS IN HEAVEN COMPARED TO ONE EON OF THE OTHER, A PERSON WHO IS CAPABLE NOT ONLY OF NOT THINKING BUT HAS A MIND THAT IS SIGNIFICANTLY CONCENTRATED AND EQUANIMOUS (NEITHER LIKES NOR DISLIKES) IS HIGHER AND ENJOYS 4 EONS IN HEAVEN WHILST THE PERSON WHO HAS ACHIEVED ALMOST TOTAL PURITY OF CONCENTRATION AND EQUANIMITY IS REWARDED WITH 500 EONS IN BLISS.
It is wrong to think that ‘no thinking’, noble concentration of the mind and equanimity are unrelated qualities of the mind because the Buddha has described their precise relationship. He said great is the concentration when it is perfected by virtue, great is the wisdom (equanimity is ultimate wisdom or equanimity is wise) when it is perfected by concentration. Thus the Buddha is telling you that you cannot have great concentration (which is never subjective but objective, such and such is concentration) if you have not developed great virtue which is not subjective but objective (such and such is virtue).
And what is virtue? It is not telling lies (excuses and joking are lies), not indulging in idle chatter or divisive tale bearing, not killing (killing mosquitoes too is killing), not taking what is not given (taking sweets from your good friend’s table without asking too is stealing), not being sensual (slurping, sniffing and liking food is sensual) and indulging in intoxicants. It is because ordinary people, even those who call themselves good do not truly practice not stealing, not lying, not chattering, not tale bearing, not killing (they kill cockcroaches) that they do not experience discursive thinking that is free from ill will and sensuality accompanied by rapture that is not of the flesh.
THUS VIRTUE IS INDISPENSABLE FOR YOU ENJOY RAPTURE THAT IS NOT OF THE FLESH ACCOMPANIED BY DISCURSIVE THINKING WITHOUT ILL WILL AND SENSUALITY THAT IS THE WAY TO ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVEN, THAT DEPENDING ON YOUR WISEDOM, MAY LEAD TO YOUR FURTHER DEVELOPING A ONE POINTED MIND FREE OF THINKING THAT LEADS TO TWO ETERNITY IN HEAVEN, THAT AGAIN DEPENDING ON YOUR INCLINATION, MAY LEAD TO DEVELOPMENT OF A MIND WITH RELATIVE THEN PURE CONCENTRATION AND EQUANIMTY WITH THEIR FUTURE HIGHER REWARDS IN FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING.
EXSTENCE IS ALL ABOUT CHANGE THAT IS RATIONAL IN HEAVEN AND IRRATIONAL, FORCEFUL AND MADDENINGLY CONSTANT HERE. IF YOU CEASE TO DESIRE CHANGE, YOU CEASE TO DESIRE EXISTENCE AND THEREFORE A DISCIPLE OF THE BUDDHA WHO SEES THE EMPTINESS OF CHANGE CEASES TO DESIRE CHANGE, ATTACHMENT TO FORM, THE FORMLESS, CONCEIT & IGNORANCE AND IS UNBOUND AND RELEASED FROM ALL BECOMING.
WHETHER YOU TRULY DO NOT HARBOR ANY FURTHER DESIRES FOR CHANGE IS NOT SOMETHING YOU CAN INSIST FALSELY BUT IT IS OBJECTIVE AND WHEN IT IS TRUE YOUR DESIRE FOR CHANGE IS EXTINCT, YOU ARE UNBOUND, GONE BEYOND.
NAME ME ANOTHER PERSON TODAY OR IN THE PAST WHO HAS PREACHED FROM WHAT THE TEACHINGS AND DISCIPLINE DECLARED BY THE BUDDHA AS I HAVE? THE BUDDHA SAID THE PERSON WHO PREACHES FROM THE TEACHINGS AND DISCLIPLINE DECLARED BY HIM IS RARE. BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONE WHO PREACHES LIKE ME, WHO HAS DEMONSTRATED THE VERACITY OF WHAT HE SAID LIKE ME, I MAY BE RARE TO THE POINT OF BEING EXCLUSIVE.
(Only if the fish belongs to a species that has existed for a very long time but has somehow escaped detection can science explain its existence. Can an isolated fish suddenly on its own fashion legs with joints and digits without the complex genetic instructions to do so?)
The Different Types Of Persons In This World:
There are these differing persons in the world.
There is the person who always thinks sensually, emotionally, restlessly, mischievously, filled with ill will about what he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches or he thinks about other things sensually, emotionally, restlessly, mischievously, filled with ill will whilst he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches. This is the run of the mill person in the world who has not achieved any higher states of the mind.
There is the person who is always thinking without sensuality or emotion, calmly, filled with goodwill about what he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches or he thinks about other things without sensuality or emotion, calmly, filled with goodwill whilst he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches. This is the person who has achieved the first higher state of the mind as described by the Buddha and is heading for one eternity in heaven.
There is the person who is able to not think at all about what he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches or not think at all about other things whilst he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches. This is the person who has achieved the second higher state of the mind as described by the Buddha and is headed for two eons in bliss in the heavenly realms.
There is the person who is able not only to not think at all about what he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches or not think at all about other things whilst he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches but he has developed a considerable measure of concentration of his mind and equanimity. This is the person who has achieved the third higher state of the mind as described by the Buddha and is headed for four eons in bliss in the heavenly realms.
There is the person who is able not only to not think at all about what he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches or not think at all about other things whilst he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches but he has developed a perfect concentration of his mind and equanimity. This is the person who has achieved the fourth higher state of the mind as described by the Buddha and is headed for five hundred eons in bliss in the heavenly realms.
Perfect virtue (not emotional, not stretching syllables, not changing speed and loudness, not telling lies, idle chattering or speaking divisively, not taking what is not given, not killing) is a requisite to developing perfect passive noble concentration of the mind which is a requisite to the development of perfect wisdom or discernment or equanimity which determine how long and how well you exist without woe.
There is no such thing as an unthinking fool because all ordinary beings that include the unthinking fool is thinking all the time and he may even think about the dire consequences of his actions if he is caught but he cannot resist himself, cannot deny himself and think or hope he will escape being brought to account. The person who truly can or is able to not think is not a fool but he has attained a higher state of his mind from which vantage point he sees better that is denied lesser mortals.
It is false perception that the person who sees without thinking is an idiot detached from reality and on the contrary it is the person who thinks about what he sees or other things who is detached from reality. People who think all the time never see continuously but they take snapshots of the situation they are in and based on this snapshot they presumptuously think of what is their appropriate reaction whilst their minds are elsewhere daydreaming or scheming.
Thus it is the person who is able not to think who can see the situation he is in all the time and take action without thinking whilst the person who thinks usually (if not always) takes presumptuous snapshots and hastily select a reaction he thinks is appropriate whilst his mind is elsewhere.
People who tell others not to worry or think too much are not meritorious but they are persecuting the person they address by telling him to do something (not to worry or think) that is physically impossible. No one can elect not to think or worry about one situation that is to his disadvantage (his grief over his parted wife) whilst he likes to think and worry about other situations that are to his advantage (about the prices of his stocks or possessions).
Open Office Exceeds My Expectations:
I installed and briefly used the OpenOffice in my Vista computer and it works fine and far exceeded my expectations when I downloaded it.
There are differences but it is more of familiarizing with the different layout of buttons. It serves my purposes well and I do not have to pay $500 for the basic version of Microsoft Office. Even if Microsoft has to employ an army of experts to design its suites, it shouldn’t cost that much to produce and it may reflect that Microsoft is not coming clean; it may be making unjustifiable fat profits in a cornered market. I suspect that Linux may be a viable alternative to Vista if only people will try it.
By contrast, it is not because I am biased but the new Vista and Microsoft Office were significantly below my expectations. The New Word & Excel is too cluttered with too many features (buttons and tool bars) that do not apply for me.
A Good Comparison of OpenOffice & Microsoft Office:
A good comparison between Open Office & Microsoft Office is the difference between the free Firefox internet browser and Microsoft’s Internet Explorer. The latter looks slicker and there are differences but once you get use to Firefox it serves its purpose admirably.
Cats have personality:
This scrawny kitten used to watch from a distance as I lavished affection on a couple of juvenile female cats and finally it could not resist approaching me ostensibly for the food that I was feeding the more mature cats.
Possibly because of past karma, it looked miserable in facial features and was emaciated. I fed it some cat biscuits and put some next to it for the other cats and it was greedy, a few times it spread out a paw to block the food nearby that it was not eating from the much larger cats. It may have passed away because I have not seen it again. As the Buddha said, because of past karma you may be short lived and miserable wherever you are born. Yet, it may have partially redeemed itself in approaching me and having been comforted by me. All the cats which were all females are delighted to be stroked by me, they even climb up my chest to peer into my eyes at close range and become completely relaxed to spread eagle on the ground when I stroke them (with constant speed and strength without jazzed up stretching). Thus even if the kitten has departed, it had the experience of being comforted by me without condescension in a way that others have not.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Fancy 500 Eternities In Heaven

The Buddha said there have already been eons or Ages too many to enumerate in the past. According to Jesus the reward of a person who is a faithful sheep is one Age (lasting many billions of years) in a formed heaven. According to the Buddha, depending on how lofty you develop your mind you may achieve a lifespan of two, four or 500 Ages after which the same person may descend even to hell depending on his past deeds but the noble disciple of the Buddha puts an end to all existing after enjoying his lifespan there.
If you have attained and established well the first meditative trance (with discursive benevolent thoughts freed from ill will and sensuality) you will be reborn in heaven amongst Brahma’s retinue for one Age or eon.
If you have attained and established well the second meditative trance (one pointed mind free of thinking) you will be reborn amongst the gods of radiance with a lifespan of two Ages or eon.
If you have attained and established well the third meditative trance (mindful abiding in pleasantness with equanimity) you will be reborn with the lustrous gods for a lifespan of four Ages or eon.
If you have attained and established well the fourth meditative trance (purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither-pleasure-nor-pain) you will be reborn with the gods of space for a lifespan of 500 Ages or eons.
THUS HOW LONG YOU EXIST FREE OF SUFFERING AND HOW HIGH THE BLISS YOU ENJOY DEPENDS ON HOW HIGH AND WELL DEVELOPED YOUR MIND IS AND THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR MIND DEVELOPMENT THAN PRACTICING MEDITATION. NOWADAYS I SLEEP HARDLY A FEW HOURS AT NIGHT AND I FIND MEDITATION BETTER THAN SLEEPING.

3. Pañhamananakaraõasuttaü - The first on diversity.
Bhikkhus, these four persons are evident in the world.
Here, a certain person secluding from sensual desires and demeritorious thoughts, with thoughts and discursive thoughts and with joy and pleasantness born of seclusion attains to the first higher state of mind. Enjoying it, longing for it, he attains prosperity in it. Keenly applying himself to it, making much of it and not decreasing from it, he dies and is born with the gods of the sphere of Brahma. The life span of those gods is a forward world cycle (one Age). Finishing his complete life span there, he would either be born in hell, as a beast, or as a ghost. As for the noble disciples of The Blessed One, they would finish the complete life span there and would extinguish in that same birth. Bhikkhus, this is the difference and diversity between the learned noble disciple and the not learned ordinary man in their course of action, birth and conscience
Again, bhikkhus, a certain person overcoming thoughts and discursive thoughts and internally appeasing the mind making it one pointed without thoughts and discursive thoughts and with joy and pleasantness born of concentration attains to the second higher state of mind. Enjoying it, longing for it he attains prosperity in it. Keenly applying himself to it, making much of it, not decreasing from it he dies and is born with the gods of Radiance. The life span of those gods is two forward world cycles. Finishing his complete life span there, he would either be born in hell, as a beast, or as a ghost. As for the noble disciples of The Blessed One, they would finish the complete life span there and would extinguish in that same birth. Bhikkhus, this is the difference and diversity between the learned noble disciple and the not learned ordinary man in their course of action, birth and conscience
Again, bhikkhus, a certain person with equanimity to joy and detachment abides mindful and aware experiencing pleasantness with the body too that the noble ones say mindful abiding in pleasantness with equanimity. He attains to this third higher state of mind. Enjoying it, longing for it he attains prosperity in it. Keenly applying himself to it, making much of it and not decreasing he dies and is born with the lustrous gods. The life span of those gods is four forward world cycles. Finishing his complete life span there, he would either be born in hell, as a beast, or as a ghost. As for the noble disciples of The Blessed One, they would finish the complete life span there and would extinguish in that same birth. Bhikkhus, this is the difference and diversity between the learned noble disciple and the not learned ordinary man in their course of action, birth and conscience
Again, bhikkhus, a certain person dispelling pleasantness and unpleasantness, and earlier having dispelled pleasure and displeasure without unpleasantness and pleasantness and purifying mindfulness with equanimity attains to the fourth higher state of mind. Enjoying it, longing for it he attains prosperity in it. Keenly applying himself to it, making much of it and not decreasing he dies and is born with the gods of Space. The life span of those gods is five hundred forward world cycles. Finishing his complete life span there, he would either be born in hell, as a beast, or as a ghost. As for the noble disciples of The Blessed One, they would finish the complete life span there and would extinguish in that same birth. Bhikkhus, this is the difference and diversity between the learned noble disciple and the not learned ordinary man in their course of action, birth and conscience
What Distinguishes Disciples Of The Buddha:
The Buddha said that there is a difference between ordinary beings and his disciples in that there is no further destination for his disciples after they have enjoyed their last span in heaven.
What distinguishes disciples of the Buddha?
They have given up all considerations of self. All is not self taught the Buddha.
They have given up all passions.
They have seen and known for themselves that existence even in heaven is impermanent, ultimately unsatisfactory (even suffering) and empty.
Jesus said all that his Father has is his, suggesting that a time may come when Jesus succeeds his Father. The Buddha said he is the highest teacher and he is this eon’s only Buddha or self awakened one (no one awoke him as he awoke his disciples) and it may be the truth that no being can exceed the Buddha in virtue, wisdom and supernatural powers. A Buddha’s virtue, wisdom and powers can be equaled but not exceeded.
Just as not all beings are destined to become Brahmas, not all beings are destined to be Buddhas. The ultimate end of many beings is to unbind themselves after an eon in heaven, they will not progress to become brahmas let alone become self awakened.
Targeting Your Emotion Not Reason:
Most people do not realize it may not be entirely their fault that their emotions become aroused by what they read below but they are unwitting victims of the way the writer addressed them.
Quote: Membership of world’s exclusive billionaire club jumps.
Comment: Although even the person responsible may not be aware, he is targeting your emotions partly to attract attention to his article. It is not an accident he uses emotion arousing words like exclusive to imply being a billionaire is exclusive in an envious way and he uses the forceful word ‘jump’ instead something more sedate like ‘increases’.
The net effect is to attract readers to the headline to exclaim ‘wow’ or to scoff (dislike).
An unemotional person who intends to convey a substance only message might say: Number of billionaires in the world increases.
THUS MANY INCLUDING THIS PERSON MAY THINK THEY MEAN WHAT THEY SAY BUT THEY DON’T BECAUSE THE EMOTION THAT THEY STIR WITH THE WAY THEY EXPRESS THEIR MESSAGE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY WANT TO SAY. THEY MEAN TO WOW YOU MORE THAN TELL YOU THAT THE NUMBER OF BILLIONAIRES HAVE INCREASED. IF YOU DON’T GIVE A DAMN, YOU MAY BE UNDISCERNING AND SETTING UP YOURSELF TO BE CONNED BY OTHERS.
What he said is false:
Is there a billionaire's club in this world? If there is no official billionaires' club where all billionaires are registered and given membership he is speaking falsely and headed for madness.

Just because it is exclusive to you does not mean it is exclusive to everyone so it is presumptuous to label this virtual club exclusive.

HE IS TALKING NONSENSE REFERRING TO A CLUB THAT DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT IN THE FIGMENT OF HIS IMAGINATION AND PRESUMPTUOUS TO LABEL IT EXCLUSIVE.

Eight Forms Of Madness Awaiting All Actors:
All those who speak with style or the constant stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness must suffer to some degree from these eight forms of madness that they can now still suppress that they do not realize will ultimately overwhelm them.
These eight forms of looming madness are mad perception, mad logic, mad rote or robotic behavior, mad stress, mad restlessness, mad distraction, mad violence & mad emotions.
Mad Perception: Paranoia is a form of mad perception that others are out to get you. Hallucinations (visual, auditory, taste, touch, smell) are forms of sensory mad perceptions. Mad perception is when the alcoholic sees pink elephants or you feel ants crawling all over you when there are none. When you perceive something is true or beneficial to you when it is false and harmful, that is false perception that will culminate in loss of control to mad perception. If you perceive your smiling, laughing, stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness is beneficial, enjoyable when it is stressful, restless and distracting, that is false perception that will end in mad perception.
Mad Logic: Just as people are unaware they are constantly stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, they are unable that their logic is seriously flawed. For instance, they think they are meritorious thanking you for something they did not appreciate. When you thank me for emails that you did not tell me you delete, you are de facto saying that you are grateful for receiving emails that you obviously were not grateful because you deleted them without reading. It is again false logic that will end in mad logic if you think you may not be grateful for my emails but in thanking me you are expressing gratefulness for my effort in sending the emails. You did not say specifically that you thank me for sending the email but you do not thank me for the emails; it is an excuse and false logic if you think thanking me for emails means thanking me for sending them. It is again unwitting false logic to say I smile because I like someone because you are saying you smile because your mental force is stirred in speed and strength at the sight of someone. If you do not know the nature of your liking, that it is merely the stirring of your mental force, then you are foolish if you do not know what you are speaking about. (I know what I am talking about when I speak of liking, do you know what liking is when you talk about liking?)
Mad Rote Behavior: Because ordinary people’s speech and motion never live specific for the occasion but reproduced memorized standardized as if live for the occasion, they are vulnerable to mad jukebox speech and actions. What they reproduce frequently by recall can become very slick so that they have an urge to say or do things that are out of context or madly for no reason. Obsessions and compulsions (eg uttering profane phrases) are examples of mad rote behavior.
Mad stress, restlessness and distraction: Because ordinary people have subjected themselves to stress, restlessness and distraction for so long, so many times to even intense levels, their stress, restlessness and distraction (cannot concentrate) can now be provoke by minor insults to rise to disproportionately intense levels that they find hard to shake off.
Mad violence: When a person runs amok, he has succumbed to mad violence. To one who sees correctly, there is mindless unnecessary added force in the speech, motion, perception and thinking of all beings that the person who stretches, changes speed and loudness is merely controlling with is force of self preservation and it is inevitable that he will lose control of this force in a fit of violence.
(When a person runs amok he is not angry but he is madly violent, violently destroying things)
Mad emotions: It is inevitable that people who are practicing their emotions lifelong should become owners of strong emotions that can be easily aroused by seemingly innocuous provocations to intense levels that are hard to shake off. As they age, their emotions (eg sadness, pride, anger, shame) become easily provoked to intense levels or even inappropriate and they are headed for a (deserved) appointment with mad emotions (eg weepiness). When you become angry or sad for no reason that is mad emotion.
Do you know what you are talking about?
I know what I am talking about when I speak of like or dislike, stress, restlessness, distraction, emotions, fear and love but do you know what you are talking about when you talk of like or dislike or emotions?

If you do not know what you are talking about, you cannot define like and dislike, love or emotions, aren't you a fool to talk about things you do not know?

There is such a thing as mad violence as distinct from mad anger because if you observe people who have gone amok, they are not angry but they are seized by strong mental force to be directly destructive rather than be angry like roaring and shouting.

When you suddenly become angry or sad for no apparent reason that is mad emotion.

When someone keeps shouting "I know you" in an identical way for no apparent reason, that is mad rote or jukebox speech.
Unscrupulous, reckless & mischievous:
Far from harmless or fun, it is the way of this world that leads to death and torment, unscrupulous, reckless, mischievous and flirting with future mad logic and perception to equate a Forbes report concerning a rise in the number of billionaires to a jump in membership of world’s exclusive billionaire club that does not exists.
Because falsity is whatever did not happen and cannot happen, if you believe and by writing want others to believe that such an entity as an exclusive billionaires club exist when it does not exist and cannot exist, you are flirting with make belief that when its control is lost, descends into insanity.
Anyone who condones or appreciates such unwarranted liberality in the interpretation of reality will similarly head for perdition. Because you appreciate his way of saying it, you must appreciate however briefly or ‘light-heartedly’ the existence of something that does not exist, a billionaires’ club.
If I were to say that the existence of a billionaires’ club is a figment of his fertile imagination I would be sarcastic or mocking but if I said it was a figment of his perverted or bizarre imagination I would not be sarcastic.
NO ONE IN THE PAST OR PRESENT WILL SAY THIS TO YOU BUT IT IS DEADLY MISTAKE TO THINK IT IS FUNNY AND HARMLESS TO PRESENT A RISE IN NUMBER OF BILLIONAIRES AS A JUMP IN MEMBERSHIP TO THE WORLD’S EXCLUSIVE BILLIONAIRES CLUB.
IT REFLECTS WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THIS WORLD, A RELENTLESS TRANSFER OF WEALTH BY HOOK OR BY CROOK FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW SO THAT INCREASINGLY THERE ARE MANY WHO HAVE NOT WITH A FEW WHO HAVE A FILTHY A LOT.
Do You Know What You Are Doing?
Ordinary people, including those who are very intelligent do not know what they are doing because they cannot tell me precisely when they are stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness even when they are doing it all the time and it is the source of their tormenting stress, restlessness and distraction. Further, they do not know what they are doing because they are rendering it by rote or standardized rehash from memory or faked live whilst their minds are distracted, elsewhere.
IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING, DO NOT KNOW YOU ARE STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, AREN’T YOU A GREAT FOOL DOING THINGS THAT YOU DO NOT KNOW THAT TORMENTS YOU?
Why Laughing Is Not Letting Your Yes Be Yes & Controlled Madness:
Whenever a person emits a sound vocally it is intended to communicate.
Vocalized sounds can be categorized as meaningful (to communicate something discrete) or meaningless (nothing defined is communicated).
A group of sounds that represent ‘book’ or ‘take’ is meaningful in that it conveys a message to the listener. A group of sounds ‘ha, ha, ha’ that is what laughter is about is essentially a mindless repetition of ‘ha’ that has no meaning either alone or when grouped together.
If you let your yes be yes only, you say ‘ha’ if you do not let your yes be yes only but you say more that comes from evil, you mindlessly repetitively say ‘ha, ha, ha’.
‘Ha’ by itself is meaningless and if you are capable of merely saying or laughing ‘ha’ instead of automatic ‘ha, ha, ha’ you will know that it is meaningless whilst consuming energy to create stress on the mind and vocal apparatus.
What meaning is there in laughing, in issuing ‘ha, ha, ha’? It is intended for show to impress others how happy, socially competent and appreciative you are (of someone’s joke) and intimidate others (as when the evil man laughs to threaten his victim). Laughing is merely a transmission of force with the intention of imparting that grievous force onto the listener that is purely for show.
LAUGHING IS THE FORCEFUL PRACTICE OF SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS THAT MUST BE CONTROLLED BECAUSE IT CAUSES STRESS THAT PILES UP AND BY INCESSANTLY PRACTICING LAUGHTER YOU BECOME INCREASINGLY BETTER AT IT NOT REALIZING THAT WITH SITUATIONAL OR OLD AGE LOSS OF CONTROL YOU ARE HEADED FOR MADNESS, THEREFORE JESUS SAID, ‘WOE TO YOU WHO LAUGHS, FOR YOU SHALL WEEP’.
For Show Is A Nice Word For Deception:
Whenever people say what he said or did is for show, they mean he did not mean to say or do it but it was only for show and because he did not mean it, it is deceptive. Thus style in what you say (angrily or charmingly) is always for show or for deception because what you said is not genuine, you need an accompanying style to divert attention from what you said.
By Hook Or By Crook:
People use the phrase by hook or by crook but how often do they know what it means? They use it by imitation and think they approximately know what it means.
By hook means you use force as in a hook to pull something desirable towards you, by crook means by devious means or cheating.
Thus when you say ‘by hook or by crook’ you mean you get what you want by force (confiscation, robbery) or by cheating (stealing).
Meaningless sounds:
Sounds like ‘yabadabadoo’ (like), ‘phew’ (dislike), ‘huh’ (anger or dislike), ‘hmmm’ (dislike or scoffing), ‘mmm’ (like), ‘uh oh’, ‘ahhh’ (like), ‘arggh’ (dislike) are meaningless and merely intended to communicate emotion or like and dislike. ‘Uh Oh, look who is coming’ is to express dislike at the coming of someone.
Thus a lot of sounds people issue are nonsensical, merely to convey like or dislike or the controlled or uncontrolled stirring in speed and strength of their mental forces and the fact that they are unaware reflects they severely underestimate the occurrence of nonsense in their habits and they do not know what they are doing. Aren’t you a fool if you do things (smile, utter sounds) that you do not know what they mean?
If you think they are meaningful, you may be right or have wrong view or perception that may end in hell or the animal womb.
Laughter is smiling accompanied by sound and smiling is laughter without sound and therefore a person who smiles whilst speaking is also not letting his yes be yes only and practicing controlled nonsense that will end in torment.
Obsessions Are Intense Liking:
Obsessions & compulsions differ from person to person and they are merely intense, hard to resist liking for certain objects or for doing or saying certain things.
The reason why it is irrational, you cannot reason or persuade a person out of his obsession is because it has nothing to do with reason but everything to do with mental force or the intense stirring in speed and strength of his mental force of going against self when he sees an object or certain thing he wants to say or do.
Because ordinary, lesser forms of liking have less driven force, they can sometimes be denied or suppressed to give a semblance of reason or rationality in it but in truth, there is never reason in liking, only a controlled stirring in speed and strength of that person’s mental force.
Thus you can develop an intense liking for a certain woman that if you look carefully she can be quite ugly, you can develop an intense liking for thanking others that become indiscriminate, you thank others for every real or imagined deed they do to you, you thank them for things you did not appreciate.
No one develops intense liking or obsession instantly but in a person who likes and dislikes, he progressively conditions himself by rousing his mental force with more rapid speed and strength at the sight or thought of that object (eg an actress) until his liking for her is so intense, so rapidly aroused, he is in a swoon, must do something or is driven to something, anything to satisfy his desire.
Because obsessions are all about force, nothing about reason, they are hard to wean because the person may be reluctant to relinquish his mental force, relinquish his obsession even when it causes him much distress (he is a fool). Even if he wanted to get rid of his obsession (something many fools refuse) he has to pay attention to progressively efface or erase the speed and strength of the mental force that he has developed around his obsession.
Why Smart People Also Get Conned:
The reason why even very smart, ‘street wise’ people get conned is because it is a myth that people use reason to assess proposals made to them. In truth it is their liking and disliking that dominates proceedings.
When presented with a scheme to make money, it is their liking for the fabulous profits there for the taking that dominates proceeding, once their initial skepticism or disinterest has been dispelled by the skillful conman. Thus liking for the opportunity for fabulous gains, their assessment (using reason) of the risks involved is impaired and they decide to go ahead.
THE REASON WHY SMART PEOPLE ALSO GET CONNED IS BECAUSE IT IS NOT REASON THAT PRESIDES OVER DECISIONS THEY MAKE BUT IT IS BLIND LIKING FOR THE GAINS ON OFFER THAT DRIVE THEM TO THROW CAUTION TO THE WIND AND AGREE. ONLY IN SITUATIONS WHERE THEIR LIKING IS NOT STRONGLY AROUSED WILL THEY MAKE RELATIVELY SOUND OR CAUTIOUS DECISIONS.
WHATEVER IS PRESENTED TO PEOPLE (HOWEVER INTELLIGENT THEY ARE) IS GREETED BY LIKE OR DISLIKE AND BASED ON THIS LIKE OR DISLIKE THEY FASHION EXCUSE WHY THEY LIKE OR DISLIKE. IN OTHER WORDS PEOPLE WHO PROFESS TO LIKE AND DISLIKE CANNOT RESIST LIKING OR DISLIKING WHATEVER IS PRESENTED TO THEM AND IT IS THIS NEVER REASON THAT GREETS WHATEVER IS PRESENTED TO THEM. THIS INITIAL DISLIKE CAN BE SKILLFULLY REVERSED BY CONMEN AND WHATEVER MILD INITIAL LIKE CAN BE STIRRED TO BECOME IRRESISTIBLE BY THAT SAME SKILLED SWEET TALKING CONMAN. IF A PERSON IS NOT STRONGLY DESIROUS OR COVETOUS OF THE GAINS ON OFFER (BE IT MONEY OR A PRETTY GIRL) HE WILL NOT BE SWAYED TO OVERRIDE HIS CAUTION.
Not irritated, worried or panicked:
As I was submitting my EPF & SOCSO monthly bills to the cashier for payment I discovered the SOCSO bill was missing. I was unfazed, was not annoyed or irritated, nor worried or panicked about what happened to the bill.
Even though it is not a major mishap, many people through habit would have been instantly crossed, worried about where the bill is and even exclaimed as if surprised and panicked about the discovery.
Being irritated is disliking and worry has nothing to do with reality but it is a false or fabricated suffering state of the mind that the person by himself and as a result of coercion by others, has learnt to condition to arouse and experience in his mind. Apart from suffering and further conditioning the mind to worry that can become increasingly easier to arouse to more intense levels that gets harder to shed, worry is not conducive to finding a solution to one’s predicament because a calm clearly thinking mind free of worry is better equipped to solve a problem if a solution exists. If no solution exists, all the worry in the world will not solve it either.
Panic is an agitated state of the mind and body that may be genuine or faked. Even if it is faked, it conditions the mind that will end in mad panic the fool does not realize. Again apart from suffering and conditioning oneself to future suffering, panic is inimical to resolving the problem at hand.
IRRITATION, WORRY AND PANIC WHICH ARE THE BANE OF ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE WARNING OF FUTURE SUFFERING NOT JUST HERE BUT AFTER YOU DEPART BECAUSE IT INDICATES THE PERSON IS ATTACHED TO HIS LIFE HERE AND HE IS CONDITIONING HIS MIND TO STATES OF WOE.
A Poor Conductor Of Truth:
Quote author: If you had asked paleo-anthropologists a generation ago what lice DNA might reveal about how we became human, they would have laughed you out of the room. But research into our origins and evolution has come a long way.
Scientists and intellectuals like to think they are devoted to reason and unemotional but in truth they are just as emotional and opinionated in a presumptuous or unwarranted way as others they like to decry.
It is only a presumptuous person who has discounted a link between lice DNA and human origin without access to facts who will find the idea incredulous. Nothing is incredulous to an unemotional person whose mind is open without presumptions of what can and cannot be and therefore he does not find the suggestion of a link between lice DNA and human origins incredulous.
What she, as an intellectual, said is false because it is unlikely if not impossible that paleo-anthropologists a generation ago would have laughed you out of the room even if they had been thus asked. It is a hypothetical situation and why speculate on something that never happened except that you are foolishly flirting with false perception (imagining as if it happened) that will end in mad perception.
What her intention in saying so is to impress you ‘wow’ lice DNA is linked to human origin or she is targeting the reader’s emotions than reason and therefore she too is an emotional person.
Even though she is a scientist, she is an emotional or forceful person and if one cannot see the truth, one should be wary whatever she presents as truth; that is not take what she says as gospel. For one who sees, even without hearing her speak, her way of expressing herself in writing exposes her lack of objectivity she claims to represent.
Just as wood is a poor conductor of electricity whilst copper is a good conductor, people who are emotional are poor conductors of truth and a person who is a good conductor of truth is a poor conductor of emotion or force.
Because people are emotional and poor conductors of truth, it needs a being out of this world it needs a Buddha, Jesus or Spirit of Truth who is not of this world to come to teach them the way out of emotion and suffering.