Thursday, October 25, 2007

Politeness Is Hypocrisy

Politeness is hypocrisy:
Because politeness is essentially faking that you liked what others did or said to you that you did not like, it is practicing falsity and essentially hypocrisy.
Did Jesus say the destination of hypocrites is heaven or perdition?
It reflects advanced false perception that ordinary people worship politeness and think it is good when it is disguised shit.
Thus those who desire others to be polite want others to be hypocrites and is asking for judgment that is far graver than they ever imagined possible.
By asking me why are you so rude, you imply that I should be polite or a hypocrite and if that is advocating sin and suffering to me, you may rue in eternal regret for your wickedness.
It is not that you should express your dislike or be nasty to the other person as a result of what he said or did but you should never fake you liked it.
A person who does not stir his mental force to like or dislike whatever happens or is done to him so what is there for him to fake he liked when he disliked? Only a person who likes and dislikes is forced to not express his dislike to what has happened or fake he liked what he disliked has happened.
Whatever that is false or harmful matters nothing:
Whatever that is said or done that is false does not matter but what matters is the force that always accompanies to force the perpetrator himself to believe as forcefully as possible it is true and to force you to accept with force not true reason what is false is true.
Hence when something said or done is false (eg a lie), it does not matter what was said or done but what matters is the force that accompanies that forces the perpetrator to believe and act as realistic as possible what he said or did falsely is true and the force or ill will that he transmits with what he said or did falsely to force you to accept it as true.
WHATEVER THAT IS SAID (A LIE OR SARCASM) OR DONE FALSELY (WEEPING AS IF SORRY FOR YOU WHEN HE FELT NOTHING) MEANS NOTHING BECAUSE IT IS FALSE OR DID NOT HAPPEN. WHATEVER DID NOT HAPPEN IS MEANINGLESS.
WHAT MATTERS IS THE ILL WILL OR FORCEFULNESS TO ACT AS IF WHAT HE SAID (LIE) OR DID (WEEP) IS TRUE OR GENUINE AND FORCE IN WHAT HE LIED OR WEPT TO FORCE YOU TO ACCEPT IT AS TRUE.
THUS WHATEVER SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE IS ALL ABOUT THE USE OF FORCE OR A VEHICLE FOR ILL WILL.
Whatever that is said or done hurtfully does not matter because what matters is that what is said (eg why are you so rude) or done (slap in the face) is just a convenient vehicle to convey force that attacks the victim.
THUS THERE ARE THREE FACETS OF ILL WILL, NAMELY THE USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE A STYLE OR THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT CREATE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN OTHERS, THE USE OF FORCE TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL TO OTHERS WHERE WHAT IS SAID OR DONE FALSELY OR HARMFULLY IS JUST AN EXCUSE TO CONVEY FORCE TO DECEIVE OR HARM OTHERS.
SAYING OR DOING WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SUBSTANCE OR MEANING BUT EVERYTHING TO DO WITH FORCE OR ILL WILL.

ILL WILL & SENSUALITY:
IT IS NEVER TRUE REASON BUT FORCE THAT IS ILL (ALSO KNOWN AS ‘ILL WILL’) THAT PROPELS YOU TO FIRST MANUFACTURE AND THEN TO DESIRE OVER NATURAL RESISTANCE THAT MUST BE THERE TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING (PUTTING ON A SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE) OR HARMING OTHERS AND IT IS AGAIN FORCE THAT IS ILL OR IT IS ILL WILL THAT WILL BE REQUIRED TO POWER WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY OR DO THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL.
WHATEVER THAT IS SAID (EG A LIE OR SARCASM) OR DONE (EG FAKED WEEPING) FALSELY OR HARMFULLY (EG SLAP) DOES NOT MATTER BUT WHAT MATTERS IS THAT IT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL AND THE MENTAL FORCE THAT IS REQUIRED TO CAUSE SOMEONE TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL PLUS THE EXCESSIVE FORCE THAT IS ALWAYS REQUIRED TO POWER THE SAYING OR DOING OF WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL.
THUS IF YOU SAY OR DO SOMETHING THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL, IT IS ILL WILL OR FORCE THAT IS ILL THAT CAUSES YOU TO FABRICATE AND DESIRE TO EXECUTE IT AND FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT POWERS WHAT YOU SAID OR DID THAT WAS FALSE OR HARMFUL.
A PERSON’S ILL WILL CONSISTS OF HIS DESIRE AND USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE A STYLE IN WHATEVER HE PERCEIVES, THINKS, SPEAKS AND DOES THAT DEMANDS THE USE OF FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY TO PROLONG SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACT OTHERS. IN ADDITION TO HIS STYLE HIS ILL WILL CAUSES HIM TO FABRICATE, DESIRE TO EXECUTE AND POWER WHATEVER HE SAYS OR DOES THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL TO OTHERS.
SENSUALITY IS MERELY THE COUNTERPART OF ILL WILL IN ONE’S SEEING, HEARING, SMELLING, TASTING AND TOUCHING WHEREIN ONE USES FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY IN FABRICATING THE STYLE WITH WHICH ONE SEES, HEARS, SMELLS, TASTES AND TOUCHES AND ONE’S MENTAL FORCE STIRS TO LIKE OR DISLIKE WHAT ONE SEES, HEARS, SMELLS, TASTES AND TOUCHES.
(SENSUALITY AND ILL WILL ARE TWO OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS TO EXISTENCE IN THE LOWER REALMS)
Boosting your force of self preservation:
Whenever force either externally or internally generated impacting on his consciousness exceed significantly the strength of the force of self preservation, the being experiences pain or hurt.
Thus in order to avoid or minimize painful hurt experiences, a being must strive to be on guard, to be alert and keep his force of self preservation heightened and ‘on the ball’ so that it will snuff out or shield all forceful assaults, internal or external on their consciousness.
However, it is stressful and tiring to keep your force of self preservation constantly artificially heightened in anticipation and even then occasional assaults will get through as when someone spits violently in your presence or someone roars off violently in his motorbike.
You can artificially boost the idling speed of an engine to prevent it stalling but it involves greater wear and tear and unnecessary energy consumption.
An artificially boosted force of self preservation consumes energy and cannot be sustained indefinitely so that every now and then it flags exposing the person to hurt and pain from others or self.
By contrast, a person who does not act, who has no style, who does not force himself to go against himself to say or do things that pleases or impresses others has puny forces of going against self that cannot be stirred much by others or self and he is automatically immune to hurt or pain caused by the bombardment of force from others.
FOR PEOPLE WHO WISH TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS AND SUCCEED IN LIFE, THEY WILL HAVE TO CONSTANTLY BOOST THE STRENGTH AND RESPONSIVENESS OF THEIR FORCES OF SELF PRESERVATION IN ORDER TO WARD OFF FORCE BLOWS FROM OTHERS AND SELF. APART FROM NECESSITATING GREATER ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND STRESS, THIS ARTIFICIALLY BOOSTED LEVEL OF THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION CANNOT BE MAINTAINED AND MUST SOMETIMES FLAG OFTEN AT INOPPORTUNE MOMENTS LEAVING THE PERSON VULNERABLE TO HURT. EVEN IF IT IS HEIGHTENED THERE WILL STILL OCCUR EVENTS WHERE THE FORCE RECEIVED OVERWHELMS THE FORCE OF SELF PERSERVATION TO CAUSE HURT.
A PERSON WHO DOES ACT, HAS NO STYLE, DOES NOT GO AGAINST HIMSELF TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS HAS A PUNY FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT CANNOT BE STIRRED TO VIOLENT STRENGTH BY OTHERS AND HE IS EFFORTLESSLY IMMUNE TO HURT BY OTHERS.
A lost cause:
No matter how you strive to shield yourself from hurt generated by others or yourself by keeping your force of self preservation heightened and alert, it takes energy and stress to do so and even then many events will still penetrate the heightened barricade to cause hurt. Goats know this and they strive to hurt others by making sudden unexpected violently accelerating noises and motions that attempt to catch bystanders’ forces of self preservation off guard thereby hurting them. Furthermore such heightened and alert force of self preservation cannot be indefinitely sustained and there will be occasions that you dread when your guard will be dropped and you become vulnerable, open to hurt by the considerable force strength and force changes in audio visual input from others.
There is a way out of this predicament or no win situation. Because whatever force transmitted by others or self impacts on one’s consciousness through the intermediary of that being’s force of going against self, if his force of going against self is absent or very weak, it cannot be stirred to violent strength and violent changes by whatever happens and therefore there is little or no hurt.
IF YOU DID NOT POSSESS A FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF, IT CANNOT BE SEIZED BY WICKED OTHERS TO HURT YOU. THE STRONGER YOUR FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IS, THE MORE PAINFUL THE HURT YOU MUST EXPERIENCE WHEN IT IS STIRRED TO LEVELS THAT FAR EXCEED YOUR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION.
Self identity is possessiveness:
The essence if not entirety of self identity views that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe is possessiveness.
As the Buddha said, he has cut off all “I” making, all is not self.
By contrast foolish ordinary people (who do not realize they are headed for perdition) are making all sorts of claims:
My money, my house, my car, my stocks, my wife, my children, my career, my rank, my diplomas, my views or opinions, my thoughts, my ideas, my style or charm, my beautiful body and pretty face.
Possessiveness is irrational and it is never based on reason or understanding why but it is always based on force, on liking or attraction or emotional attachment.
A PERSON’S ATTACHMENT TO HIS STYLE IN WHAT AND HOW HE SAYS OR DOES THINGS, HIS STYLE IN WHAT AND HOW HE THINKS AND PERCEIVES IS A CRUCIAL IF NOT PARAMOUNT COMPONENT OF HIS SELF IDENTITY VIEWS. IF YOU DID NOT LIKE YOUR STYLE OR ARE ATTACHED TO IT, THINK IT REFLECTS YOU, YOU WOULD NOT STICK TO THIS SAME STYLE YOUR WHOLE LIFE LONG.
Only motive never meaning:
If something said or done is false (eg a lie) or harmful (eg slap) it cannot have any intrinsic MEANING (that can be understood) but it can only have MOTIVATION (only force can motivate, reason can only guide) that can only be to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others. This motivation behind what is false and harmful is ill will. Because ordinary people perceive emotions, like and dislike as meaningful they may perceive falsely that whatever said or done that is false or harmful is meaningful.
Everything that can be said or done, and that includes how it is said or done (also known as style) can be examined and determined as true (happened or can happen) or false (did not happen or cannot happen) and if it is determined to be false then the person cannot mean what he said or did falsely and because he is not mad (at least not yet), he must mean to deceive you or impress, please, intimidate or dominate you with what and how he said or did.
Whatever that is said or done whether true or false, must be powered by force.
The force that powers what is said or done falsely is usually excessive with unnecessary prolonging of syllables or units of motion, changes in speed and strength of force, and is called the person’s ill will or force for ill.
The force that powers what is said and done that is true is powered by force that is never excessive, without prolonging, changing of speed and strength and is called the person’s good will or force for good.
Unless the person is mad, he must have motivation for saying or doing something.
The motivation for saying or doing something false is never true reason (which will tell the person what he said or did was false) but it must be emotional, specifically to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate the other person.
When the recipient is deceived, he believes or accepts with force not true reason (which would have told him it is false) what is said or done falsely is true and this is stirring his mental force to forcefully accept what is false is true. Whatever stirs another person’s mental force to be deceived cannot be meaningful but a meaningless stirring of force.
When the recipient is impressed his mental force is stirred to be attracted to you, when he is pleased, his mental force is stirred to like himself as a result of what you said or did, when he is intimidated or dominated his mental force is stirred to fear or submit to you.
Thus the aim of saying or doing what is false to stir the mental forces of others to be deceived, impressed, pleased, intimidated or dominated is a meaningless nonspecific stirring of mental forces, not specific to the occasion discrete meaning.
This false motivation (to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate) behind what is said or done falsely is the ONLY basis for saying or doing what is said or done because what is said or done has false meaning. Thus all intentions in saying or doing something that is to impress, please, intimidate or dominate are false and the fact that you think this is not false but nevertheless meaningful reflects advanced false perception and logic on your path.
Thus the motivation behind what is said or done falsely is also harmful and false and therefore ill and it is again ill will that motivates people to say or do what is false.
THERE CANNOT BE ANY MEANING IN WHAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE BECAUSE WHAT IS FALSE IS MEANINGLESS AND THEREFORE IT IS THE MOTIVATION FOR SAYING OR DOING IT, NAMELY TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE THAT GIVES IT LEGITIMACY OR MEANING AND THIS TOO IS FALSE BECAUSE IT IS MERELY A STIRRING OF FORCE OR EMOTION IN THE RECIPIENT, NEVER ADDRESSED AT HIS REASON OR LOGIC OR UNDERSTANDING.
THE FORCE THAT POWERS THE SAYING OR DOING OF WHAT IS FALSE IS ALWAYS EXCESSIVE WITH CONSTANT UNNECESSARY PROLONGING, CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH AND THE MOTIVATION THAT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE IS MERELY A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IS ALSO FALSE AND THEY BOTH CONSTITUTE THE PERSON’S ILL WILL OR FORCE FOR ILL OR EVIL THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS A FETTER TO THE LOWER REALMS.
Whatever that is said or done that is true is meaningful and understandable by itself and there is no need for it to be accompanied by false, harmful force changes like forcefully prolonging syllables, changing speed or loudness and because it is meaningful by itself, there is no need for false motives like to impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS TRUE IS FULLY UNDERSTANDABLE BY ITSELF AND HAS SPECIFIC MEANING THAT CANNOT BE CONFUSED WITH OTHER SITUATIONS, MUST BE FREE FROM ALL FALSE FORCE ENCUMBERANCES LIKE FORECFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS (NAMELY STYLE) AND IS NOT MOTIVATED TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE.
THE FORCE THAT POWERS WHAT IS SAID OR DONE IN TRUTH IS ESSENTIAL NEVER EXCESSIVE PLUS THE MOTIVE TO SAY OR DO IT TO CONVEY WHAT IS TRUE OR MEANINGFUL TO THE RECIPIENT IS THE GOODWILL OR WILL FOR GOOD THAT UNDERLIES IT.
If a person has examined and knows what he is saying or doing is false and yet he says or does it, then his motivation for saying or doing it must be to deceive you (to falsely make you believe what is false is true) or he likes the style of what he said (eg ‘deafening silence’ or ‘a saree is anything but a piece of cloth’ sound cute and profound) or he wants to impress, please, intimidate or dominate you with what he says or does. This is a person who is deliberately ill willed.
If a person has not examined what he said or did, does not know what he said or did is false then he must have copied it blindly from others because he emotionally liked it (eg deafening silence or a new dance). This is a person (or fool) who does not know what he is saying or doing although he may think he does.
If a person has examined what he said or did and nevertheless believe or have faith what he said or did is true and good then he is deluded, he has false perception and logic of what is false is true and good. For instance you have examined your gorgeous smile and attractive liking for others and determined that they are genuine and beneficial for yourself and others when in truth they are both stressful and lead to getting hurt, then you are deluded and nothing can be done for you except for you to play out your delusions for however many eons or Ages it may take before you develop discernment or seeing things clearly as they are.
Any dance be it classical or contemporary, western or ethnic is totally meaningless and the fact that you perceive they have meaning reflects your advanced false perception. When you sweep the floor, you want to get it clean and that is meaningful. When you prepare your food and cook it, that is meaningful because you get a meal afterwards. Whatever meaning in a dance is emotional or for show, it is to see the repetitive sequences of prolonging, direction, force and speed changes of the body and limbs of the dancer that stirs your mental force to be attracted or repulsed. People undertake a dance career because of money, fame and impress others with their ability to move their bodies in a way that is attractive to many (not all) paying people. People learn the cha, cha, cha to impress others of their social graces or use it to get near girls. Because all dances are meaningless, are for show, only have emotional meaning and they are etched in the person’s mind, he is headed for madness, mad meaningless writhing movements in an acute crisis or old age.
Whatever else a saree can be it is still a piece of cloth and there are many things a saree cannot be like be a car and so the statement that a saree is anything but a piece of cloth is false just as silence cannot deafen but only a very loud sound can decouple the ear ossicles to cause temporary deafness and the basis for saying them is because they sound contradictory and outrageous and you liked it and want to impress others with what you say.
THUS WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT CAN BE PROVEN TO BE FALSE HAS NO INTRINSIC MEANING BUT WHAT GIVES IT MEANING IS THE MOTIVATION TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE AND IN ADDITION THE EXCESSIVE FORCE USED TO COMMISSION IT VIA FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT IS INTENDED TO SIMILARLY STIR THE RECIPIENT AND INTENTIONALLY OR UNINTENTIONALLY HARM HIM AND THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF ILL WILL THAT LEADS TO THE LOWER REALM.
Why don’t you slap a tree or a stone? There is nothing intrinsically good or bad or meaningful in slapping something but the reason why someone slaps another is to hurt or harm him and that is ill will. Thus whenever someone says or does something that hurts or harms the other person it is motivated out of ill will and there is no meaning in what is said or done.
You can also attack others with what and how you say something that is aimed to hurt or make him angry eg ‘nobody can be more foolish than you, you idiot!’. You can attack or obstruct others with what you do eg accelerating your car to stop someone crossing the road or drive slowly in the middle of the road to stop someone behind passing you.
WHATEVER YOU SAY OR DO THAT HURTS, HARMS OR OBSTRUCTS OR PESTERS SOMEONE NEVER MATTERS BUT THEY ARE MERELY EXPEDIENT VEHICLES TO HARM OTHERS DRIVEN BY ILL WILL THAT LEADS TO THE LOWER REALMS. INSTEAD OFTEN PEOPLE WHO INTEND TO ATTACK AND HURT OTHERS WILL DENY THEIR INTENTION AND INSIST THAT YOU HAVE MISCONSTRUED THEIR INTENTIONS, EG THEY DID NOT ACCELERATE TO STOP YOU CROSSING BUT THEY ARE IN A HURRY.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYTHING SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL TO HAVE ANY INTRINSIC MEANING AND THEY ONLY HAVE MOTIVE TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE APART FROM THE EXCESSIVE FORCE THAT ALWAYS ACCOMPANIES IT. IN SHORT ILL WILL IS THE MOTIVATION AND POWER OF WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL AND THERE CAN BE NO DISCRETE MEANING IN WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL. IF YOU PERCEIVE SOMETHING SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL AS MEANINGFUL, YOU HAVE SERIOUS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
Motive that is false or harmful is ill will:
Whatever that is false or harmful cannot have meaning that can be understood and so they can only have motive to harm, deceive, impress, please, dominate or intimidate. Motive is about force and only force can motivate whilst (true) reason can only guide or illuminate and this motivation behind the saying or doing what is false or harmful is the person’s ILL WILL.
THE BUDDHA SAID ILL WILL IS ONE OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS THAT DETAIN A PERSON IN THE LOWER REALMS.
A PERSON’S ILL WILL COMPRISES HIS UNNECESSARY CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN WHATEVER HE THINKS, SAYS OR DOES AND HIS DOING OR SAYING WHATEVER THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL BECAUSE WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL HAS NO MEANING ONLY MOTIVATION THAT IS ILL TO HARM, DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE. APART FROM THE ABOVE YOU CANNOT BE EVIL.
What meaning is there in a slap?
What meaning is there in a slap?
If you agree there is no meaning, then it can only have motive that is to physically and emotionally hurt the other person.
What meaning that can be understood is there in something false like ‘deafening silence’ when silence cannot deafen or ‘a saree is anything but a piece of cloth’ when a saree is a piece of cloth and there are many things a saree cannot be?
If you agree they do not have meaning then there must be motive to say them which is wicked eg to be mischievous, to deceive you that it is something profound when it is nonsense or to impress you.
What meaning is there in a dance?
If you agree that the dance achieves no useful work then it is meaningless for show to impress you or stir your liking and whatever sustenance the dancer derives is emotional (want others to be impressed with her) or material (wealth, fame).
ILL WILL IS ALL ABOUT FORCE AND THE USE OF FORCE.
ILL WILL CAN ONLY BE:
A) THE CONSTANT UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE A STYLE IN WHATEVER ONE THINKS, SPEAKS AND DOES THAT IS ESSENTIALLY FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IMPACTS ON OTHERS CAUSING THEM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
B) THE SAYING OR DOING OF THINGS THAT ARE FALSE OR HARMFUL THAT NEVER HAVE UNDERSTANDABLE MEANING BUT ALWAYS HAVE MOTIVE TO HURT, DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE & DOMINATE.

Dollar plunges to fresh euro low:
It reflects the predilection of the person for force that he uses the word that actively denotes the use of force 'plunge' instead of the more passive 'fall' as in 'dollar falls to fresh euro low'.
It is false perception that the dollar can plunge. The dollar can drop or fall or decline but it cannot plunge which denote a violent active process as when a diver plunges into the sea.
By using 'plunge' you stir the reader's mental force that causes him stress and restlessness and you foster his false perception that the dollar can plunge when it can only drop or decline in value.
Quote: Expectation that the US will lower borrowing costs - while intended to boost the economy - can also make the currency less attractive.
It again reflect a penchant for strong words to use 'boost' when stimulate the economy may be more appropriate. Lowering interest rates may not will stimulate the economy but boosting is a bit farfetched.
EVERY TIME A PERSON USES FORCEFUL WORDS IN PREFERENCE TO MORE FORCE NEUTRAL WORDS, HE IS FOSTERING HIS INCLINATION TO USE FORCE THAT IS REINFORCING SO THAT HE INCREASINGLY BECOMES A SLAVE TO HIS MENTAL FORCE THAT GROWS INCREASINGLY MONSTRUOUS IN SIZE UNTIL IT SEIZES HIM LIKE A DEMON. THEREFORE CONTINUE TO BE CARELESS IN YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS AND IF THERE IS WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH AHEAD THEN YOU DESERVE IT.
Motive that harms or falsifies is ill will:
What a person says may be true, false, make no sense (nonsense eg yabadabadoo, uh oh), contradictory or sarcastic (opposite what he meant).
If what you say or do is false, makes no sense, contradictory or sarcastic then whether you know it or not, you believe it is true when it is not, you cannot mean what you say or do but you only have motive for saying or doing it which can only be to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
Because motive is not about reason or meaning but force that drives what is said or done, this force or motive that drives what is said or done that is false, nonsense, contradictory or sarcastic is ill will.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO MEANING IN WHAT IS FALSE AND THERE IS ONLY MOTIVE FOR SAYING OR DOING IT, THIS MOTIVE THAT IS ALWAYS BASED ON FORCE IS THE PERSON’S ILL WILL, THAT ALSO DRIVES HIM TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT HARM OTHERS (EG SLAP ANOTHER) AND FABRICATE A STYLE BY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT PERSECUTES OTHERS WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
What is the Dalai Lama’s Motive?
If what the Dalai Lama says below is false then it has no meaning but only motive that is to deceive, impress or please.
Quote:
Compassion key for peace
Force can't subdue the desire for freedom, writes Dalai Lama.
Comment: Force can subdue the desire for freedom as amply demonstrated many times in the Iron Curtain countries and also in North Korea, Burma and Zimbabwee. Even those liberated countries are subject to continued tyranny, Putin can be seen as a present day Czar and many countries are only nominally democratic.
Therefore force can subdue the desire for freedom if not indefinitely then for a very long time. It cannot kill the desire for freedom but it certainly can suppress.
Even the desire for freedom itself is irrational and emotional and once delivered from tyranny those who were previously oppressed then become the oppressors.
Compassion is not the key for peace. There may be no keys to peace because peace is impossible on earth. As Jesus said, he did come to bring peace but with a sword. No peace is possible if you understand the nature of beings trapped here, even those who are the religious leaders are deluded.
Thus it is likely if not certain what the Dalai Lama said is false so since it is meaningless, what is his motive in saying so?
His motive may be because he is a religious leader and rightly or wrongly, he is championing his way and telling you his way is the way to salvation whatever that might mean.
EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD WANTS TO CHAMPION HIS WAY AS THE WAY TO SALVATION BUT ARE THEY EQUALLY DELUDED LEADING OTHERS TO DOOM?
I have not come to bring peace:
Jesus said he had not come to bring peace but with a sword.
You can accuse Jesus of giving up before giving it a try but it may be that it is physically impossible for true and everlasting peace to reign on earth because of the nature of the beings trapped here.
Again if you understood the true Buddha speaking you will realize that it is fatuous to seek peace on earth.
Thus why are so many lesser men harping of bring peace to earth and saying amongst many things like prosperity, science, etc, that compassion is the key to peace? Do they know something that Jesus or the Buddha did not know?
Jesus said: "Do not think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man's foes will be those of his own household. He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.
Goodwill not compassion is the key to peace:
This is irrefutably true: It is the absence of ill will or the presence of goodwill in all the beings here and not compassion or anything else that is the indispensable key to peace. Without the presence of goodwill in all the people present, there can be no genuine or lasting peace.
Because peace is the inevitable product of the absence of strife and only ill will present in the beings can cause strife (it is impossible to have strife without ill will which although never seen here is possible), it is goodwill and nothing else that is the requisite for peace.
Goodwill is the absence of unnecessary force transmitted in the speech and deeds of a being that is only for show (meaning no style, no forceful prolonging, changing speed and strength of force), no saying or doing things that are false (eg lies, joking or dancing) or harmful (slapping, obstructing or antagonizing others). If all beings here possess genuine goodwill as defined above, it is the nature of things that peace will be the state of existence here but because true goodwill cannot be found here, even amongst those who tout themselves as good and wise, peace is impossible on earth.
Because ill will (opposite of goodwill) is one of five lower fetters binding beings here according to the Buddha, all beings here are imbued with ill will (so disguised they call it their goodwill) and it is impossible for peace to exist on earth. Because beings here believe they are not deluded, they are perfectly capable of knowing and seeing the truth, perfectly capable of goodwill and compassion they believe peace is possible on earth.
The statement purportedly by the Dalai Lama that ‘compassion is the key to peace’ may appear reasonable but when examined, it is false and untenable in this world of ill will and because it is false and meaningless, it is motivated or has motive, addressed to the recipient’s emotion and because most people have well developed easily stirred emotion and poorly developed genuine reason, ‘compassion is the key to peace’ moves them and they find it meaningful just as they find their likes and dislikes and emotions meaningful when it is suffering and merely the alternative ways of stirring of their mental forces of going against self.
Peace can be in one’s mind (inner peace) or it can be in relationship with others when it is then an absence of strife or acrimony in the relationship between beings.
If peace is a matter of calm or absence of strife in one’s mind then it is not dependent on the existence of compassion in one’s mind but it is dependent on the presence of calmness and clarity of one’s mind and thoughts and that can only come about if one’s mind is free from force, like, dislike and emotions. A mind without calm clarity cannot be at peace with itself.
Because this is a world of ill will (it is according to the Buddha a fetter that binds all beings here and therefore all beings here possess ill will) and ill will is the requisite for strife and acrimony, without the cessation of ill will in all the beings here there cannot be peace. Even if you eliminate your ill will, others may not do so and so long as they have ill will there will be no peace on earth.
Ill will must not be confused with compassion. Compassion is less about thinking, let alone emotionally thinking but more about the willingness to assist and help others to alleviate their mental and physical hardships or guide the way out of their torment. Ill will is all about force, the urge to harm others in the forceful way one talks and does thing, say and do false or harmful things. It is ill will, the urge to harm others that lead to strife and the absence of peace, not the absence of compassion or assisting others that leads to strife or lack of peace. All the assisting and helping may fall on ungrateful ill willed minds who will nevertheless turn around and cut your head off, so what peace is your compassion the key to?
So long as all beings here possess ill will, are unwilling the relinquish their ill will, whatever peace that is achieved is under tension because they have to suppress or control their ill will to maintain the controlled peace that is subject to easy disruption for real or apparent provocation by one or the other party. Whatever peace that is achieved amongst people harbouring ill will is an illusion, inherently unstable, deceptive and vulnerable to disruption.
Because all ordinary people are emotional people, when they speak of compassion they are speaking more of an emotional state of their mind when they have this ‘tremendous’, ‘indescribable’ love and kindness for others, of benevolence for others that may not be backed up by or backed up scantly with genuine physical deeds that assist or benefit others.
Because the Buddha has no emotions, when he speaks of compassion there is no emotion involved but his compassion is a calm clearly thinking unencumbered knowing and seeing to help or assist others whom he perceived as trapped in suffering pointing the way to safety in heaven and even enlightenment to those amenable.
COMPASSION IS NOT SOMETHING YOU THINK A LOT EMOTIONALLY ABOUT (YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF AND WILL GO MAD IF YOU THINK A LOT ABOUT COMPASSION) OR TALK A LOT ABOUT, BUT COMPASSION IS ABOUT WHAT YOU DO OR SAY A LOT TO ASSIST OR HELP OTHERS. COMPASSION IS WHAT YOU SAY OR DO TO HELP OTHERS NOT WHAT YOU PIOUSLY THINK AND TALK ABOUT.
IT IS ILL WILL RESIDENT IN ALL BEINGS HERE THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRIFE HERE THAT PREVENTS PEACE ESTABLISHING AND IT IS THE ELIMINATION OF ILL WILL, NOT THE CULTIVATION OF COMPASSION THAT IS THE KEY TO PEACE IN THIS WORLD AND BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR BEINGS IN THIS WORLD TO SHED THEIR ILL WILL, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE PEACE IN THIS WORLD.
FOR ONE WHO SEES CORRECTLY EVEN THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD OR BENEVOLENT AND WISE ARE DELUDED, ARE STRESSFULLY, RESTLESSLY AND DISTRACTINGLY NICE THAN TRULY GOOD, THEY TOO POSSESS SIGNIFICANTLY ILL WILL THAT ARE LIKE LONG FANGS THAT ARE CAREFULLY CONCEALED FROM THE PUBKIC GAZE AND SO IT IS HYPOCRITICAL FOR THEM TO TALK ABOUT COMPASSION AND BRINGING PEACE TO THIS WORLD.
BECAUSE WHAT THE DALAI LAMA SAID IS FALSE, IT MEANINGLESS AND THEREFORE HE CAN ONLY HAVE MOTIVE SAYING IT AND THE MOTIVE MAY BE TO APPEAL TO YOUR EMOTIONS SO THAT YOU ARE ATTRACTED TO HIM AND BECAUSE HE IS A RELIGIOUS LEADER, HE IS APPEALING TO HIS FLOCK AND THOSE WHO MIGHT BE ATTRACTED TO JOIN HIM.
Hypocritical talking about peace:
If there is style in your speech and actions that require the use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness that stress, make restless and distracted anyone who interacts with you, how can you possess genuine goodwill or harmlessness to all beings?
Because all beings here, including the Dalai Lama can be shown objectively to have a style (to forcefully stretch syllables, change speed and loudness), to say or do things to be nice not good to others, they are hypocrites to talk about goodwill and indeed compassion (what sort of compassion is that stressing, making restless and distracted others?)
In addition, it can be demonstrated objectively that those who preach compassion and goodwill speak & do falsely and harmfully to others apart from the harm of their styles.
Thus like the emperor with no clothes, they are hypocrites preaching goodwill or compassion.
What can compassion & ill will do?
If you are talking about peace between men, what can your compassion and ill will do to others?
If your compassion is an emotional state of mind, no matter how intense or moving or caring it is for others, it does not concern others, cannot be shared with others.
On the contrary if your compassion is your emotional state of your mind, you are applying force on your mind that not only stresses but conditions and degrades it and if you can induce others to make their minds similarly compassionate, you are inducing them to similarly suffer with debt accrued rather than merit.
Thus the only way your compassion may benefit others is you say or do things that do not harm them, make them happy (that is loving kindness not compassion), assist or help them. No matter how much you might help others, it does not mean they will be grateful to you, they will eliminate their ill will. Without them erasing their ill will, they can potentially attack you and that is the end of the peace that you seek to build with your compassion.
What can your ill will do to others? Your ill will which is forceful will stress, make restless and distract others, will provoke them to retaliate with deeds and words that are false or harmful.
Thus ill will definitely will provoke others to retaliate in kind and that is the end of the peace you strive with your compassion or whatever else you might nominate and the beginning of strife or hostility.
JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE COMPASSIONATE TO OTHERS DOES NOT MEAN THEY WILL RELINQUISH THEIR ILL WILL. EVEN IF YOU SHOW GENUINE GOODWILL TO OTHERS, IT MAY NOT STOP THEM FROM HAVING ILL WILL TOWARDS YOU, MAY NOT STOP THEM FROM HATING YOU WITHOUT REASON BUT THAT IS THE MOST ANYONE CAN DO, NOT PROVOKE OTHERS WITH ILL WILL. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE GENUINE OR LASTING PEACE WITHOUT GOODWILL AND YOU CANNOT LEGISLATE GOODWILL IN OTHERS.
Goodwill is higher than compassion:
It is ill will and not the lack of compassion that according to the Buddha detains a being in the lower realms and it is goodwill (to all as to himself) and not compassion that the Buddha said led to one eon or Age in heaven.
The person who is perfect in goodwill will be perfect in his compassion but a person who is compassionate may not necessarily be perfect in his good will. Why is this so?
You may have a sword in hand with your defeated adversary’s head at your mercy and become so moved by your compassion in sparing him of his life not realizing that it takes ill will to have a sword in your hand and think of killing him in the first place.
Thus although he showed compassion in sparing his conquest his head, he has ill will in wielding a sword and entertain thoughts of killing.
It is impossible for a person of true or perfect goodwill to entertain thoughts of harming another let alone carry a sword and therefore the question that he will spare someone his life does not arise at all.
Therefore the person with perfect goodwill is higher than the person with compassion, will always have perfect compassion whilst the person of compassion does not (never) possess perfect goodwill.
What people mistake here for compassion may be mercifulness or sparing someone of his suffering or death at your hands. Whilst it may all be very emotionally evocative it is not necessarily without selfish motives, eg to take him or her as a slave, because he or she is attractive to you or to impress the gods.
These acts of mercy are usually accompanied by an emotional state of ‘feeling for others’ or appreciating the possible suffering of others as a result of your actions or words that because they are forceful, may colour negatively the person’s perspective and actions as compared to the person who is emotionless but can see the suffering others might suffer as a result of his actions. Therefore the person who sees with reason the harm that he can do is higher than the person who sees with emotion the harm his actions might do to others.
Whilst your emotional compassion may be gratifying to you, it only involves you and cannot do anything for others and it is a form of deluded self indulgence how wonderfully compassionate you are and does not compare with what you do or say that assists or benefits others, the bread and butter of compassion. Further the mental state of compassion is addictive, stressful and harms your mind.
YOU STILL HAVE TO TAKE UP A SWORD AND ENTERTAIN THOUGHTS OF KILLING A PERSON BEFORE YOU CAN BE COMPASSIONATE OR MERCIFUL IN SPARING HIM HIS LIFE BUT A PERSON OF IMMACULATE GOODWILL WILL NOT HARBOR THOUGHTS OF HARMING THE OTHER PERSON LET ALONE WIELD A SWORD SO THE QUESTION OF COMPASSIONATELY SPARING HIS LIFE DOES NOT ARISE AT ALL. THEREFORE GOODWILL IS HIGHER THAN COMPASSION OR MERCY.
Goodwill is the only final pathway to peace:
Any key to peace proposed may be true (does lead to peace) or false (does not lead to peace).
There can be no peace within oneself or with others without goodwill and whatever true key to peace can be traced to goodwill or must go through goodwill or the absence of ill will.
Any key to peace tendered that does not contain goodwill that requires the absence of ill will is false.
Without the absence of ill will, whatever peace within oneself and with others is an enforced unstable, stressful peace subject to disruption by force.
Because a person of compassion still harbours ill will (eg in wanting to kill and in holding a sword), his compassion for others (eg in sparing his defeated foe his life) is tainted, does not lead to true or everlasting peace.
Compassion can only mitigate the deleterious effects of ill will but only the abolition of ill will itself can finally bring to an end the deleterious effects of ill will (of which the denial of peace is just one) and deliver that person and all those of like mind to peace.
The absence of ill will is not a requisite for compassion but it is in the nature of things that one with perfect true goodwill is endowed with genuine motive-less unemotional calm clearly thinking compassion.
For instance it can be proposed that there cannot be peace within oneself and thence peace with others if one is restless and therefore the absence of restlessness is a valid key to peace in oneself and with others. But this key, the absence of restlessness is not a standalone entity but a product of ill will that drives one to falsely forcefully unnecessarily constantly change speed and loudness in one’s speech and motion for show to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others.
In the same way it is impossible for a person who is beset by stress and distraction to be at peace with himself and others but stress and distraction are by products of ill will that drives the person to adopt a forceful style in his perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing in the name of deceiving, pleasing, impressing, intimidating and dominating others.
WITHOUT GOODWILL THAT REQUIRES THE ABSENCE OF ILL WILL, THERE CANNOT BE PEACE WITHIN ONESELF OR WITH OTHERS. BECAUSE ALL BEINGS HERE, INCLUDING ANIMALS ARE CONSTANTLY BESET BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT ARE THE INEVITABLE PRODUCTS OF THE FORCEFULNESS OR ILL WILL IN FABRICATING AN UNNECESSARY FOR SHOW STYLE IN THEIR PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING, THEY CANNOT BE AT PEACE WITH THEMSELVES OR OTHERS AND THERE CAN BE NO PEACE ON EARTH. WHAT REMAINS IS FOR THE PERSON TO DENY HIMSELF (BY NOT PARTAKING OF ILL WILL CARRIED THROUGH HAVING STYLE), CARRY HIS CROSS OF PERSECUTION AND EXIT THIS WORLD TO HEAVEN.
THERE IS EVEN FORCEFULNESS OR ILL WILL IN THE COMPASSION OF BEINGS HERE AND IT IS AN ALMOST INSURMOUNTABLE BARRIER FOR BEINGS TRAPPED HERE TO DEVELOP GENUINE GOODWILL BECAUSE THEY HAVE MISTAKEN THEIR FORCEFULNESS (THAT IS ALWAYS ILL WILL) FOR THEIR GOOD WILL. SO LONG AS YOU ARE UNWILLING TO RELINQUISH YOUR STYLE, UNWILLING TO STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, YOU EVEN ENJOY TELLING LIES (ALL JOKES ARE FALSE OR ENJOYING THE MISFORTUNE OF OTHERS) AND HURTING OTHERS (OBSTRUCTING AND PESTERING OTHERS), WHATEVER COMPASSION OR OTHER KEY TO PEACE YOU MIGHT TOUT ARE MERELY HYPOCRISY OR EMPTY BABBLE WITHOUT CONVICTION.
NOT ONLY DO PEOPLE POSSESS CONSTANT ILL WILL, THEY THINK THEIR ILL WILL IS FUN AND GOOD AS THEY THINK THEIR STYLES OF SPEECH, DOING THINGS, POSTURES ARE TRUE AND GOOD, THEIR LIKES AND DISLIKES AND SMILES ARE GOOD & TRUE, THEIR JOKES ARE APPRECIATING TRUTH AND GOODNESS WHEN IT IS APPRECIATING FALSITY AND THE MISFORTUNE OF OTHERS.
Compassion:
There is compassion based on reason and compassion based on emotion:
Compassion that is based on reason and true is a seeing as it is or discerning and knowing or understanding the suffering that afflict others that leads to conduct that truly does not harm others in any way together with the saying or doing of things that assist others out of their suffering or benefit them.
As the Buddha said, this dharma is for one who delights in non complication not for one who delights in complication. If you delight in non complication then compassion is just this.
To those who delight in complication and they are always emotional, disturbed people, compassion is much more, even indefinable. Just as there is only one version of what happened but there are many possible versions of what did not happen, even so there are many versions of false emotional compassion depending on the imagination and delusion of the emotional person.
Thus false emotional compassion has a virtual addictive mental component that may be disproportionately large in the frequent emotional experience of sorrow or sadness anxious concern for the sufferings of others and this world and a dramatic conduct in speech and action component that projects a pained, anxious sympathy for others. Being merciful or undertaking actions that spare others of suffering is a manifestation of this emotional compassion. Amongst other motives, it gives the person a sense of power or control over the victim (that emotional people value highly) to determine the fate of others by sparing them their lives or punishment.
BECAUSE EMOTIONAL COMPASSION IS FALSE, IT IS UP TO THE PERSON TO DEFINE WHAT IT SHOULD BE AND SO THERE ARE MANY INDIVIDUAL INTERPRETATION OF WHAT COMPASSION SHOULD BE BUT WHAT IS INVARIABLE IS THAT THERE IS FORCEFULNESS OR ILL WILL UNDERLYING IT AND IT HAS MOTIVE.
GOODWILL HAS NO MOTIVE BUT IT HAS FULL MEANING. GOODWILL IS JUST THE ABSENCE OF FORCE IN THE WAY ONE SPEAKS OR DOES THINGS AND THE ABSENCE OF FORCE THAT IS REQUIRED TO FABRICATE WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS. IT IS BECAUSE THE PERSON OF GOODWILL DOES NOT WANT TO SUFFER THAT HE DOES NOT USE FORCE. COMPASSION HAS MOTIVE OR INTENTION AND THE BUDDHA SAID INTENTION IS KAMMA.
The Buddha:
"Intention, I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.
"And what is the cause by which kamma comes into play? Contact is the cause by which kamma comes into play.
"And what is the diversity in kamma? There is kamma to be experienced in hell, kamma to be experienced in the realm of common animals, kamma to be experienced in the realm of the hungry shades, kamma to be experienced in the human world, kamma to be experienced in the world of the devas. This is called the diversity in kamma.
"And what is the result of kamma? The result of kamma is of three sorts, I tell you: that which arises right here & now, that which arises later [in this lifetime], and that which arises following that. This is called the result of kamma.
"And what is the cessation of kamma? From the cessation of contact is the cessation of kamma; and just this noble eightfold path -- right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration -- is the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma.
"Now when a noble disciple discerns kamma in this way, the cause by which kamma comes into play in this way, the diversity of kamma in this way, the result of kamma in this way, the cessation of kamma in this way, & the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma in this way, then he discerns this penetrative holy life as the cessation of kamma.
"'Kamma should be known. The cause by which kamma comes into play...The diversity in kamma...The result of kamma...The cessation of kamma...The path of practice for the cessation of kamma should be known.' Thus it has been said, and in reference to this was it said.
It takes force to deny peace and it takes the absence of force to establish peace:
Peace which is always calm and clearly thinking will automatically ensue if there is no unrest, strife or agitation or conflict going on.
You cannot have unrest, strife, agitation or conflict without the presence of opposing forces present either internally between one’s force of going against self and force of self preservation or externally between individuals or tribes or nations embodying force.
BECAUSE UNREST OR STRIFE WITHIN SELF AND WITH OTHERS NECESSITATES THE PRESENCE OF OPPOSING OR ANTAGONIZING FORCES, THE ESTABLISHMENT OF EFFORTLESS TRUE PEACE REQUIRES THE ABSENCE OF FORCE IF IT IS POSSIBLE.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST WITHOUT FORCE AND IF ALL BEINGS EXISTING IN THAT PLACE DO NOT USE FORCE THEN PEACE SHALL PREVAIL.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST WITHOUT USING FORCE IF ONE DID NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OF ONE’S STYLE OF PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST WITHOUT USING FORCE IF ONE DID USE FORCE TO FABRICATE FALSE OR HARMFUL SPEECH OR DEEDS WITH THE INTENTION OF DECEIVING, IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING OR DOMINATING OTHERS.
BY SO DOING ONE WOULD EXIST FREE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND ONE WOULD NOT PERSECUTE ALL OTHERS WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH ONE AND THERE WILL BE PEACE AND HARMONY.
WHERE IN THIS EQUATION DO YOU FIND THE APPEARANCE OF COMPASSION? AT MOST COMPASSION IS AN ACCESSORY TO PEACE NOT THE KEY COMPONENT.
BECAUSE IT TAKES OPPOSING FORCES TO DENY PEACE, IT TAKES THE NEGATING OF FORCE OR GOODWILL (AND NOTHING ELSE) TO ESTABLISH PEACE.
Examining The Keys To Peace:
IT TAKES FORCE (AND NOTHING ELSE) TO DISRUPT PEACE AND IT WILL TAKE THE ABSENCE OF FORCE (AND NOTHING ELSE) TO RESTORE PEACE AND WHATEVER KEY TO PEACE THAT IS TRUE OR WORKS MUST ACT THROUGH DISCONTINUING THE PRESENCE OF FORCE THAT CAUSES STRIFE, UNREST OR AGITATION.
(No matter how you cannot see it is so, so long as there is objectively demonstrable forcefulness transmitted in your appearance, posture, style of speech or motion, so long will you be inviting others to react not respond in kind with force to you and that is the beginning of strife and the negating of true effortless peace. Only an uneasy truce or enforced breakable peace is possible.
And if you are person with style, a person who transmits force in your appearance, expressions, speech and motion, you are a hypocrite and emperor with no clothes talking about bringing peace to this world because the force in your style is constantly provoking others to return force and this is inviting strife that negates peace that you wax lyrical about.
When you screw up your face to express irritation or dislike, others can see the transmission of force that stirs their mental force and once mental force is stirred in you and him that is the end of any true peace. What is left is an enforced or uneasy peace to avoid open conflict)
There are many keys to peace that people can tout like prosperity, law and order, wisdom, discernment and virtue.
Law & order and prosperity are keys to relative enforced peace not absolute or true peace.
Prosperity is a form of bribery for people to maintain a status quo so that they can together enjoy their prosperity or the logic that ‘a full stomach is a happy one’.
Law and order is externally enforced or force coerced peace just as you can summon your mental force of self preservation to enforce a relative unstable mental peace.
True virtue is a matter of not stealing, killing, telling lies, tale bearing and indulging in intoxicants that is a key to peace in the sense of reducing or eliminating ill will and therefore virtue as a key to peace is via its practice of goodwill.
Again discernment or seeing things clearly as it is (not as you like or dislike it) may be a key to peace in the sense that discernment is needed to see that there is unnecessary force transmissions in the speech and conduct or people, there is falsity and harmfulness in what people say or do whose avoidance by lack of ill will on the part of that discerning person is the key to peace.
Wisdom again may be a key to peace in the sense that it is essential to see things clearly (that there is irrational force and force driven falsity and harmfulness in the behaviour of those in strife), understanding how force begets force to thence negate peace and arriving at the conclusion that goodwill or the absence of ill will or force brings peace.
When people talk of peace they talk of calm, of the absence of strife, unrest or conflict. Reason cannot disrupt calm, only force be it mental or physical can disrupt calm and cause strife, unrest or conflict.
IT IS THE PRESENCE AND CLASHING OF TWO OR MORE OPPOSING FORCES BE IT IN THE MIND OR PHYSICAL WORLD THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRIFE, UNREST OR THE ABSENCE OF PEACE AND IT IS THE ABSENCE OR LACK OF CLASHING BETWEEN OPPOSING FORCES THAT WILL BRING PEACE. WHATEVER KEYS TO PEACE MUST BRING ABOUT THE ABSENCE OF FORCE OR END THE CLASH OF OPPOSING FORCES TO BRING ABOUT PEACE.
THEREFORE IN THE FINALITY OF THINGS IT IS ILL WILL OR THE USE OF FORCE TO ATTACK OTHERS EITHER THROUGH THE STYLE OF SPEECH OR CONDUCT THAT NECESSITATES AN UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE OR THE SAYING OR DOING OF FALSE AND HARMFUL THINGS THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRIFE, UNREST OR CONFLICT THAT NEGATES PEACE AND IT IS THE ABSENCE OF ILL WILL OR THE PRESENCE OF GOODWILL THAT WILL RESTORE PEACE, NOT COMPASSION OR ANYTHING ELSE.

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Defining Ill Will

ILL WILL OF WHICH FIERCENESS IS A COMPONENT IS NOT AN EMOTION OR STATE OF MIND BUT IT IS ABOUT YOUR USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE TO FABRICATE (SAY OR DO) OR WHAT YOU FABRICATE THAT HARMS OTHERS, WHETHER YOU KNOW IT HARMS OR NOT OR YOU EVEN THINK IT BENEFITS OTHERS. IF YOU HAVE ILL WILL THAT IS OBJECTIVELY DEFINABLE (SUCH AND SUCH IS ILL WILL) YOU ARE HEADED FOR PUNISHMENT.
(Anyone whose behaviour stresses, make restless and distract others harms others and has ill will and because all ordinary people have a constant style that requires an unnecessary use of force that always stresses, make restless and distract others, they have ill will that is resident in them)
IT IS A BEING’S ILL WILL IN CONSTANTLY USING EXCESS UNNECESSARY FORCE TO FABRICATE HIS STYLE THAT IS NOTHING MORE THAN FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT ARE FALSE AND HURTFUL THAT NECESSITATES THE EXISTENCE IN THEIR MINDS OF A COUNTERACTING FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION WHOSE CONSTANT STRUGGLES WITH THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF CREATES THE EMOTIONS DERIVED FROM LIKE AND DISLIKE, SADNESS, FEELING HURT AND FEAR.
IT IS THEIR ILL WILL THAT DICTATES TO BEINGS, NOT THEY DICTATE TO THEIR ILL WILL WHICH IS NEVER PUNY BUT VERY STRONG AND HAVE A TENACIOUS GRIP ON THEIR MINDS WHICH SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH THE WAY THEY BEHAVE OR HAVE LITTLE CONCERN FOR OTHERS AND THAT IS WHY IT IS VERY DIFFICULT FOR BEINGS TO TURN EVEN THOUGH IT IS FIRST AND FOREMOST FOR THEIR OWN GOOD IN RELEASE FROM SUFFERING.
Ill will is not an emotion, is not a mental state but it is HOW and WHAT you fabricate in terms of perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing that harms others or make them suffer. Fierceness is one manifestation of ill will and it is essentially how a person adds excess unnecessary force to how he says or does things intended to persecute others.
The importance of knowing ill will is that it is one of five lower fetters that the Buddha said detained beings in the lower realms (human, animal, ghost and hell).
Although dislike can lead to acts of ill will, ill will must not be confused with dislike. Dislike is a repulsive emotional state that can (but not necessarily) lead to acts of ill will (eg spitting, telling lies, sarcasm) or a way of speaking and doing things that is ill willed (eg fierce). Just because you dislike someone does not necessarily mean you will say or do things that will harm him and so dislike and ill will are two different things.
The only way through the manner with which you fabricate (specifically speak and do things) can be ill willed is through the unnecessary incorporation of force in how you say or do something and that can only be through style or the use of force to prolong, accelerate speed, strength of force and direction where possible that can be transmitted to all recipients without regard to their intelligence to thereby harm them with force or hurt them. For instance your spitting exerts momentary force greater than the current strength of the listener’s force of self preservation causing him to experience hurt.
The only way a person can speak or do something in a fierce way which is a form of ill will is to use excessive unnecessary force to violently prolong his syllables or units of motions, violently accelerate in speed and strength of what he says or does.
If you stare fiercely at a person, you are using strong force to see and prolong your gaze that cause pain and stress to the person you stare at.
EVERYTHING THAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT HARMS OTHERS CONSTITUTE YOUR ILL WILL IN SUBSTANCE. PEOPLE SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE EXTENT OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO WHICH HARM OTHERS. MANY THINGS THEY THINK THEY SAY OR DO THAT BENEFIT OTHERS (EG JOKES, SAYING NICE THINGS, FLATTERY) HARMS OTHERS.
Divisive speech or things you say (poke fire) that cause people to be alienated or angry with each other is what you say out of ill will that harms others. Lies are always harmful because you want others to believe what is false is true. Therefore telling lies is saying something out of ill will. Sarcasms is a form of lying because you mean the opposite of what you say. Calling others hurtful names like ‘stupid idiot’, moron, ‘bitch’ too are saying what that harms others that is a form of ill will. Pestering others, obstructing others, asking questions that demand difficult and complicated answers and secretly delighting in others struggling to answer, making others say again what they said that you heard too is saying things out of ill will.
Because jokes are about appreciating falsity or finding the misfortune of others pleasurable, telling jokes too is driven out of ill will that harm others by inciting them to appreciate jokes.
If you injure or kill someone you are doing something out of ill will that harms others. Spitting at others or coughing and sneezing with venom that is lashing out at others in a disguised way too is ill will. If you are aware the way you park your car carelessly (careless means without care) or drive occupying the centre of the road inconveniences others and you still do it then that is doing something out of ill will that harms others.
(Jesus said you will judged for every careless word you say. Careless is care-less and means without care, thus if you speak without caring for others, you will be judged. The fact that you think careless is excusable reflects you are so inured to casually harming others you think nothing of hurtful words)
You can have thoughts of ill will like how you will take revenge or steal or beat him up without saying or doing anything to harm another person and so ill will pertains too to thoughts.
Smiling and laughing too are manifestations of ill will both in style and substance not goodwill as deluded people think. The style that persecutes others in smiling and laughing is the use of force to prolong, change speed and strength that stirs the recipient’s mental force harming him. The substance of smiling and laughing that harms others is that it is often smiling and laughing at the misery of others or the falsity of a situation or it is a lie to say you like someone when you did not.
Arguing and disagreeing with others too is a form of ill will. Unless your views or positions you adopt are right, accords with your Father in heaven, if your views are false then by disagreeing or arguing based on false views you are driven by ill will to persecute others with your wrong views whether you are conscious or not.
THUS HOW YOU SAY OR DO SOMETHING CAN HARM OTHERS AND THAT CAN ONLY BE THROUGH YOUR STYLE OR THE UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE.
WHAT YOU SAY OR DO CAN ALSO HARM OTHERS LIKE DIVISIVE SPEECH, TELLING LIES, PHYSICALLY HARMING SOMEONE, OBSTRUCTING OTHERS, MAKING OTHERS DO THINGS (EG REPEAT WHAT THEY SAID) SO AS TO MAKE THEM SUFFER.
THUS ILL WILL CAN BE THE WAY YOU SAY OR DO THINGS THAT IS FIERCE, AGGRESSIVE OR WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT IS COMBATIVE, ANTAGONISTIC OR STUBBORN (FORCEFULLY REFUSE TO YIELD THAT OBSTRUCTS OTHERS).
ILL WILL IS NOT AN EMOTION BUT IT IS WHAT AND HOW (THAT CAN ONLY BE THE UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE) YOU FABRICATE THAT HARMS OTHERS.
Feeling upset:
When people say they are upset by what happened they can mean they dislike what happened or they feel hurt or they can mean both disliking and hurt.
Complaining can be deadly for you:
Complaining is a form of dislike. You won’t complain if you did not dislike certain things like stray dogs because they may bring disease or bite you. But as a result of complaining, if the dogs should be put down or shot by dog shooters, you do not realize you have serious even deadly karma for being instrumental to their deaths.
When people complain they usually also moan and groan or carry on with a forcefully dragging style that is a pain in the ear and that is not letting your yes be yes only as Jesus commands.
The wise person learns not to complain, not to make others get into trouble, he just quietly gets on with his life here and make best with what he has.
Eternal Life:
Jesus spoke of eternal life in heaven but that eternal life is one denarius not many more. The Buddha said angels in heaven are according one eon or Age in heaven after which they pass away and depending on what they have done previously they may even end in hell.
The Buddha said even 60,000 eons in heavenly formless bliss is possible depending how one is able to stop all thinking, neither perceive nor not perceive, concentrate one’s mind and is equanimous.
Nirvana may not be the annihilation of the being but it is the highest eternal life, the going beyond existing that is truly permanent eternal life free from coming and going.
Ill Will Is Essentially Forcefulness:
A being’s ill will is essentially his forcefulness because it is his forcefulness of nature that causes him to fabricate with a constant style that is essentially the unnecessary use of force to stretch, change speed and strength and it is his forcefulness (never reason) that drives him to say or do false or harmful things (kill or injure).
The nature of a being:
A crucial part of the nature of a being is his propensity for force or reason (seeing the truth or working out and understanding the truth).
True reason cannot coexist with force and the moment force rules a mind, true reason goes out of the window to be replaced by false reason which is a puppet pulled by strings held by mental force.
It is because true reason and force cannot coexist that there are separate worlds for force in the lower realms and higher worlds for reason in heaven and they do not mix just as water and oil do not mix.
APART FROM HIS TRUTHFULNESS OR COMMITMENT TO TRUTH THAT GIVES RISE TO HIS VIRTUES OR HIS FORCEFULNESS THAT GIVES RISE TO HIS FALSITY AND HARMFULNESS, HIS DISCERNMENT OR ABILITY TO SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE, NOT AS HE LIKES OR DISLIKES IT, HIS WISDOM, CONCENTRATION AND EQUANIMITY OF MIND, THERE MAY BE NOTHING ELSE IN A BEING’S NATURE.
Forcefulness dominates over all else:
If a person is by nature forceful then his discernment, wisdom, concentration and equanimity are poorly developed or stunted.
Only when a person is by nature reasoning, devoted to seeing the truth, working out and understanding the truth does his discernment, wisdom, concentration and equanimity start to bloom.
Only force can dominate:
Only force can dominate, reason has no force to dominate and therefore when force rules a mind, it dominates or subjugates the person’s reason, his discernment by directing him to see and hear things he likes and not see or hear things he don’t like, stunts his wisdom, concentration and equanimity.
Because all beings have force in their minds and only force can dominate and stifle out the rest, it is in the nature of beings that they start off as lowly beings in the lower realms to progress higher to the heavens as soon as they learn to wean themselves off their overbearing mental forces.
Doubting others is an act of ill will:
People often express doubt in others trivially with indifference thus, “Really?”, “Is that so?”, “Are you sure”, “I can’t believe it”, “You got to be kidding”, “No way, man” which are consciously or subconsciously designed to sow doubt in others and because it is always suffering to be uncertain and doubt and uncertainty is one of three lower fetters to future woe, doubting others is deadly and the person has ill will and himself headed for future states of woe.
It is not the matter at hand that is questioned that is important and the questioning is just a convenient false vehicle to transmit force to hurt the other person and the doubting is usually accompanied by dramatic forceful faked gravity.
IT IS SELDOM IF EVER THE PERSON’S TRUE REASON THAT IS THE SOURCE OF THE DOUBT BUT IT IS THE PERSON’S OVERBEARING MENTAL FORCE AS ILL WILL THAT IS THE DRIVE OF THE QUESTIONING.
Guess:
Quote: Guess what astronaut Peggy Whitson carried into space?
By inviting you to guess, the person wants to stir interest or like in a matter you might otherwise show no interest and that is sinful.
If you knew what she would be carrying, you would not have to guess but if you guessed, no matter how frivolously, you must entertain with some force or emotion or like what you guessed is correct and if it was wrong, you will feel some disappointment (hurt) and doubt and uncertainty. If you were fortuitously correct, you might be drawn to the delusion that you can somehow predict the future when you cannot. Thus it is sinful asking others to guess because it stirs the other person’s mental forces not reason and when he is sucked in to guess, you will sow doubt and uncertainty if he guessed wrong and if he guessed right he might become deluded he can predict the future that will be dashed when in future he guesses wrong. Guessing is a form of gambling and by encouraging others to guess, you are encouraging them to gamble.
Furthermore by asking someone to guess you want them to do work guessing and so it better be important otherwise you have karma unnecessarily troubling others.
People often think they are friendly and good natured or ‘good fun’ asking others to guess but they may be or are sowing serious karma for themselves ensnaring others.
Stretching is putting under strain:
When one group of muscles around a joint do work by pulling the appendage towards its direction, the muscles on the opposite side must be stretched to accommodate.
Thus if a joint is bent whether in the name of style (watch female fingers and they are femininely bent) or driven by tension, one group of muscle must work to pull whilst the opposite group is stretched or under strain (if I stretched your neck would you feel pain?) and hence if the bending is unnecessarily, you are subjecting your muscles to a ‘double whammy’, unnecessary work and unnecessary strain.
By contrast if the joint is straight both groups of muscles are neither working nor strained.
As a result of subjecting the muscles to unnecessary work and strain, stress and tension builds up that then further compel the person to maintain the joints in unnaturally bent or twisted postures in a vicious cycle that becomes unbearable so that the fool switches to another bent and twisted posture for a change like a restless monkey jumping from one branch to another, all the while ignoring the tension in the unnatural postures he is assuming because paying attention to his body and postures is not what interests him but affairs of the world, delicious food and women, money to be made and business ventures are what interest him.
It may not be that you are right to ignore the tension in your body created by your bent and twisted joints but it may be you are wrong, you fulfil the Buddha’s description of the masses who see the essential in the unessential and see the unessential in the essential (paying attention to unnecessarily bent and twisted appendages to straight and de-rotate them).
No big deal:
The reason the person wants you to guess what she took into space is because he thinks it is very interesting or attractive or funny or odd. If it was boring why would he want to ask you to guess?
To stir interest, attractive or puzzlement is not to guide another’s reason but to stir his mental force and because force is suffering, conditioning and degrading, whoever wants to stir another’s mental force is putting a noose not laurel around his neck.
If you guess you expose yourself to wrong:
If you are invited to and you make a guess, you are exposing yourself to the possibility of thinking something that is wrong. Once you have found out what you guessed is wrong, you know you can think wrong and that is to remind yourself that you can be wrong and that is cultivating doubt and uncertainty in yourself.
If you never made guesses, you refuse to be drawn by others to make guesses, you can never be wrong because you cannot be wrong for things you never made guesses and there cannot be any question arising in your mind that you can be wrong sometimes.
BY NEVER GUESSING IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO BE WRONG IN WHAT YOU NEVER GUESSED OR BE CONFRONTED WITH THE REALITY THAT YOU CAN AND WERE WRONG WITH YOUR EARLIER GUESS AND SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY TO ARISE IN YOU ON ACCOUNT OF YOUR GUESSING.
EACH TIME YOU GUESS YOU ARE EXPOSING YOURSELF TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT YOU MAY BE WRONG AND WHEN YOU FIND OUT YOU WERE WRONG, IT REINFORCES YOUR VIEW THAT YOU ARE FALLIBLE AND THAT IS THE SOURCE OF DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY.
BECAUSE GUESSING OR GAMBLING AND REALIZING YOU CAN BE WRONG ARE CONDITIONING IT CAN BECOME MORE INTENSE AND BE TRANSFERRED TO OTHER AREAS OF LIFE.
What The Buddha Said Indicates I Am Correct:
5. Dhàtusuttaü- Elements.
011.05. Bhikkhus, these three are things. What three?
The sensual element, the angry element and the hurting element
Bhikkhus, for the purpose of developing three things, these three should be dispelled. What three?
To dispel the sensual element (liking) the non-sensual element (not liking) should be developed, to dispel the angry element (disliking) the non-angry element (not disliking) should be developed and to dispel the hurting element (feeling hurt and sad) the non-hurting element (not feeling hurt and sad) should be developed.
Bhikkhus, for the purpose of developing three things, these three should be dispelled.
I said a person’s emotions are essentially his attractive liking, repulsive disliking, his sadness and feeling hurt and his fears.
Dwelling on the same issue, the Buddha said that there are three things, the sensual element, angry element and hurting element that should be dispelled.
The sensual element that the Buddha said should be abandoned is attraction or liking for sights, sounds, tastes, smells and touch whilst the angry element is about dislike because anger is a form of dislike. Sadness is dull prolonging hurt whilst feeling hurt is sharp waves of pain. Thus sadness and feeling hurt that I described are the dull and sharp forms of hurting.
What the Buddha says indicates that like, dislike and feeling hurt (that includes sadness) are all there is in terms of emotion, fear is different in that it is the only emotion where the force of self preservation is dominant and it has protective functions that stops one from doing and saying the things one would have said or done if not for fear.
THUS WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID TALLIES WITH WHAT I SAY THAT THE EMOTIONS OF A PERSON IS NOTHING MORE THAN HIS LIKES AND DISLIKES AND HIS HURTS THAT CAN BE DULL (SADNESS) OR SHARP AND IMMEDIATE (FEELING HURT) APART FROM WHICH THERE IS ONLY FEAR WHICH IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE IT IS DOMINATED BY ONE’S FORCE OF SELF PERSERVATION AND STOPS ONE DOING OR SAYING THINGS THAT MAY HARM.
Sensual, angry and hurting are emotional states of the mind:
Because the Buddha spoke of developing the non sensual, non angry and non hurting elements he must be speaking of sensual, angry and hurting elements as mental states or conditions of a person’s mind that can be changed not immediately but by a gradual process and only emotional states or conditions can be changed by a process of gradually effacement or scrubbing off.
No one can instantly switch off his emotions eg anger instantly but it takes time and effort to permanently erase his anger.
When the Buddha speaks of the sensual element he can only be speaking of delight or liking for sensual stimulations.
THUS I AM CORRECT THAT APART FROM LIKE AND DISLIKE (ALL EMOTIONS ARE DERIVATIVES OF THEM), SADNESS (A FORM OF HURTING) AND SEARING FEELING HURT AND FEAR THERE ARE NO OTHER EMOTIONAL STATES. FIERCENESS OR AGGRESSIVENESS IS NOT AN EMOTIONAL STATE BUT A BEING’S FORCEFULNESS OR THE PRESENCE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE IN THE WAY HE SPEAK OR DOES THINGS.
Forcefulness Is The Father Of Emotions:
It is a person’s forcefulness or ill will that is the father of his emotions (likes, dislikes, sadness, feeling sharp hurts and fears), not the other way round.
It is a person’s ill will or forcefulness (eg fierceness, aggressiveness) that causes him to forcefully prolong syllables or units of motion, change speed or loudness (strength of force) and as a result of doing so, he impacts force on his consciousness that depending on whether it is shielded or not by his force of self preservation, he experiences like, dislike, sadness, feeling hurt or fear.
Whatever a person says or does can either be true or false or neither true not false but harmful or harmless.
There is nothing true or false about stabbing someone with a knife but it is harmful to the other person and also you because you can be jailed.
False or perverted reason can but true reason cannot guide a person to say or do what is false. You do not true reason to say or do what is false (eg tell a lie) but you need mental force to bulldoze through that lie and insist to yourself and the other person that it is true.
THUS WHATEVER A PERSON SAY OR DOES THAT IS FALSE REQUIRES NO TRUE REASON BUT REQUIRES FALSE REASONS (JUSTIFICATIONS) AND ILL WILL OR FORCEFULNESS TO POWER IT.
WHATEVER THAT IS HARMFUL (KILLING, HITTING SOMEONE, SPITTING) REQUIRES NO REASON BUT REQUIRES FORCE OR ILL WILL. HARMFUL SPEECH AND DEEDS REQUIRE MENTAL FORCE.
THUS MENTAL FORCE IS THE DRIVE TO FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE SPEECH AND MOTION OF PEOPLE WITH ILL WILL AND IT IS ALSO THE DRIVE TO FALSITY AND HARMFULNESS IN SUBSTANCE OF WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO AND AS A RESULT OF THE FORCE CHANGES IMPACTING ON HIS CONSCIOUSNESS HE EXPERIENCES AND CONDITIONS HIMSELF TO EMOTIONS, SADNESS, FEELING HURT AND FEAR THAT THEN SEIZES HIM SO TIGHTLY TO CONTINUE HIS ILL WILLED WAYS HEADING FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY OF PERDITION.
Politeness:
A large part of what people call being polite is to fake that you liked what you disliked.
To like is itself suffering (because it is stirring of attractive force in the mind) that foolish people have the perversion it is pleasurable.
To dislike is more suffering than liking because it is the stirring of repulsive force in the mind.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to like what you disliked and so all liking (expressed by smiling or eagerness) for what is disliked is FAKED.
Because both liking and disliking involve the use of force, every time you fake you like something that you disliked, you are generating forceful conflict that must be controlled, suppressed and denied but no matter how well denied, it is still there, you have a disturbed mind that is not certain what the source of the disturbance, tension and conflict is because of your denial. This disturbance, tension and conflict can rise to agonizing strength and be hard to shake off and as he ages he is headed for episodic loss of control in acute crises or permanent loss of control in old age degeneration.
People severely underestimate the occurrence of faking like for what they disliked in their lives.
When do people fake like for what they disliked?
When someone offends them, eg park a car that obstructs them they speak smiling as if they like it so much to ask the person to shift the car. When asked how their businesses are or how much they smoke, they are embarrassed but they laugh as if they enjoy it that business is bad or they smoke three packs.
Because jokes are about the misery, misfortune of others or the falsity of an occasion and you cannot like the suffering of others or falsity, when they appreciate jokes they are faking liking for what is dislikeable.
When someone says something that is hurtful or sarcastic and they are aware it is hurtful but they smile as if they liked it.
Whenever people feel down they try to cheer themselves up by whistling a tune as if they are happy which is a form of sweeping the dirt under the carpet. There is always a cause to why someone feels down (eg his own behaviour stresses himself) and rather than whistling to gee oneself up one should examine to see clearly the cause and avoid future repetition. So long as you keep behaving in a way that causes you to feel down, all efforts to cheer yourself up is denying and delaying the inevitable final reckoning that is even more painful.
Sword & Shield:
The person’s force of going against self can be represented by the sword constantly striking the shield that is his force of self preservation struggling to protect his consciousness from the nonstop striking sword.
When the blows are not too strong and the shield is adequately fully shielding the impacts, the consciousness experiences liking. When the blows are getting too violent and jars the shields badly it is experienced as disliking.
When the blows get through the shield and strike the consciousness it is experienced as hurt.
When the shield is held close to the chest then although the blows are still shielded, they impact on the consciousness because of the defensive proximity of the shield and this is experienced as sadness.
When the shield stirs to great strength to beat back the sword, it is experienced as fear.
Ill Will:
Ill will is one of five lower fetters that according to the Buddha led to the lower realms (and therefore not heaven).
Sensuality is another and it is essentially a liking or attraction for or stirring in the speed and strength of a person’s mental forces when seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling and touching something. If your mental force did not stir, you merely experienced pleasant or very pleasant, unpleasant or very unpleasant feeing on contact, you cannot be sensual.
The other three lower fetters that also lead to future states of woe (you can become an animal or human with or without woe eg born as wealthy man or beggar) are self identity views, faith in rites and precepts or rules and doubt and uncertainty.
Reason has no will or force but it only has seeing, knowing and calm deducing that has nothing to do with force or emotion but everything to do with clear thinking. Next time you become very emotional or angry or upset or excited or fearful, observe how you cannot thinking clearly.
Therefore the will in ill will is all about force and ill will is ill forcefulness.
Forcefulness is ill if the products of its forcefulness are false or harmful to others and yourself.
Thus the use of force to prolong syllables, change speed and loudness that have equivalents in motion, thought and perceiving is a ubiquitous manifestation of ill will because they create stress, restlessness and distraction that harms self and others.
The use of force to tell lies and steal or disguise one’s tennis shots is another instance of ill will. Reason will tell you what you said or did is false and harmful and you need an absence of true reason fortified by justifications to use your ill will to power through what you said (a lie) or did (a disguised shot to trick your opponent). People seldom steal openly but they do so secretly, they are pretending they did not steal when they did and that is false that also harms others.
There is nothing true or false about using force to slap, punch or stab someone or saying hurtful sarcastic things but you have to use force or your ill will to power what you want to say or do that is copied from others and a rehash from your mental jukebox.
THUS THE ILL WILL THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS TO THE LOWER REALMS IS A BEING’S FORCEFULNESS IN HOW AND WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES. HOW HE SAYS OR DOES CAN ONLY BE HIS CONSTANT FOR SHOW STYLE OR HOW HE ALWAYS USES FORCE OR HIS ILL WILL TO CONSTANTLY UNNECESSARILY STRETCH HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACTS HIMSELF AND OTHERS AND WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES THAT IS HIS ILL WILL CAN ONLY BE WHATEVER THAT IS FALSE (LIES) THAT HE SAYS OR DOES OR THAT HARMS OTHERS (EG STAB, KICK, SPIT AT OTHERS, OBSTRUCT OTHERS WITH HIS CAR).
THUS IF YOU HAVE STYLE WHETHER YOU CAN SEE OR NOT YOU ARE A PERSON OF FORCE AND ILL WILL AND HEADED FOR THE LOWER REALMS NOT HEAVEN.
IN ADDITION IF YOU ALSO SAY OR DO FALSE THINGS (TELL LIES) OR SAY OR DO THINGS THAT HARM OTHERS (ASSAULT, OBSTRUCT, PESTER, ARGUE) YOU AGAIN HAVE ILL WILL THAT IS A PATH TO THE LOWER REALMS.
Sensuality & Ill Will Encompasses Forcefulness In All Fabrications:
The sensuality and ill will that the Buddha described as two fetters to the lower realms encompass the unnecessary use of force in all a being’s fabrications. Thus sensuality and ill will always go together in a forceful person who always uses excessive force in all his fabrications (in perceiving giving rise to sensuality and in style, falsity and harmfulness of his thoughts, speech and deeds giving rise to ill will)
A being has only four fabrications, namely his perceiving (seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting and touching), his thinking, speaking and doing.
Sensuality is about the stirring of (attractive) force in his perceiving and the use of force to prolong change speed and strength in his perceiving.
Ill will is all about the unnecessary use of force to prolong, change speed and strength to fabricate the style of what he thinks, says or does and the use of force to drive WHAT he thinks, says or does that is false or harmful to others.
THUS SENSUALITY AND ILL WILL THAT THE BUDDHA DESCRIBES AS TWO FETTERS TO THE LOWER REALMS MERELY COMPREHENSIVELY DESCRIBES THE USE OF FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY IN HOW AND WHAT ONE PERCEIVES (SENSUALITY), THINKS, SAYS AND DOES (ILL WILL) APART FROM WHICH THERE ARE NO OTHER POSSIBLE WAYS IN WHICH TO USE FORCE.
FAITH IN RITES AND PRECEPTS OR RULES IS MERELY THE BELIEF IN AND COMPELLING PRACTICE OF RITUALIZED OR RULE BOUND CONDUCT IN SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR THAT ARE MINDLESSLY RECORDED IN THE MIND AND REHASHED (FALSE SUBSTANCE) BLINDLY CARRIED OUT BY FORCE.
SELF IDENTITY VIEWS IS POSSESSIVENESS (OF MATERIAL OBJECTS OR BEINGS AND IMMATERIAL OBJECTS LIKE VIEWS OR OPINIONS) AND PRIDE OR LIKING FOR SELF THAT IS ALSO DRIVEN BY FORCE NOT REASON.
DOUBT IS FORCEFULLY QUESTIONING OR ACROSS BOARD NOT ACCEPTING AS TRUE WHILST UNCERTAINTY IS THE EMOTIONAL STATE OF THE MIND WHERE ONE IS CONFUSED AND HESITANT OR NOT SURE WHAT IS RIGHT OR WRONG, TRUE OR FALSE.
THUS ALL THE FIVE LOWER FETTERS PERTAIN TO THE PRESENCE OF FORCE IN ALL THE BEING’S FABRICATIONS AND FORCEFUL OR EMOTIONAL STATES OF THAT BEING’S CONSCIOUSNESS.
IF YOU EXPERIENCE LIKING AND YOU PERCEIVE WITH PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, YOU ARE SENSUAL OR POSSESS SENSUALITY AS A FETTER TO THE LOWER REALMS.
IF YOU THINK, SPEAK AND DO THING WITH STYLE OR CONSTANT FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND IN ADDITION YOU THINK, SAY, DO FALSE OR HARMFUL THINGS YOU HAVE ILL WILL THAT IS ANOTHER FETTER TO THE LOWER REALMS.
(The five higher fetters that in addition bind beings to existence in the higher realms are ignorance or passive not knowing, restlessness or the desire for change, attachment to forms and formless existences and conceit, attachment to a self in an exalted woe free state of existence.)
2 parts of sensuality:
There are two forceful parts in sensuality, one is the stirring of mental force to like or dislike what one sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches and the other is the use of force to prolong, change speed and strength whenever one sees, hears, smells, tastes or touches.
When you stare with accelerating speed and force you are using force to prolong your gaze, change speed and strength. When you slurp with rising speed and strength you are using force to prolong, accelerate in speed and strength. When you caress sensually you are using force to prolong by extending the track of your caressing finger in a way with curved direction changes, you also change speed and strength of force as you extend the track.
THUS A PERSON IS SAID TO BE SENSUAL IF HIS LIKING OR DISLIKING IS STIRRED BY WHAT HE SEES, HEARS, SMELLS, TASTES OR TOUCHES AND HE USES FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH WHAT HE SEES, HEARS, TASTES, SMELLS AND TOUCHES.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Tying All Together

When a thief sees something to steal, he rushes excitedly (not with reason but attraction) to the object and the policeman guarding him must also rush with him there to make sure he does not commit something grievous. When the object is lost the policeman sees no reason to waste his energy to continue to accompany the thief who still foolishly keeps going to the place where the object used to be thinking there is still something to steal and this unaccompanied going by the thief is the basis of the hurt something liked is lost.
Anyone whose mind possesses mental forces must be hurt when someone spits in his presence because his mental force of going against self is automatically stirred by the spitting to rise way above the strength of his force of self preservation exposing his consciousness to unshielded force and that is pain or hurt.
The force of going against self is like a criminal that you invited or allowed into your house or mind. Because he is in your mind and is a criminal, you must employ a policeman, the force of self preservation to guard him. Because the two are separate not Siamese twins, it is not necessary that the policeman will always stick close to the criminal. When the policeman is accompanying him around and he does not do any mischief that is liked but when the policeman accompanies him but struggles or fails to stop him from doing mischief; that is disliked. When the policeman gives up and only observes him from a distance then if the criminal is just mucking around not doing much that is experienced as sadness but if he is actively throwing his weight around that is experienced as hurt. If the policeman should become suddenly alarmed, jumps up and seizes the criminal immobilizing him that is experienced as fear.
If you did not allow the criminal in or got rid of him, something that is possible, you would not have to employ a policeman and will not suffer from like and dislike, sadness, hurt and fear.
If you must have like then you must have dislike, sadness, hurt and fear that will also increasingly condition and degrade your mind and you are headed for final madness that is not the way to heaven.
The Buddha said he was the seer and knower of all, what he taught compared to what he knew by direct seeing is like the few leaves in his hand compared to the leaves in the forest above and he said God is all seeing and all knowing implying that whatever can happen is knowable or understandable.
Whatever exists or can happen can be known and therefore accurately defined as such and such.
Thus if like, dislike, sadness, feeling hurt or grief and fear exist, their natures can be known and defined.
Name: Force of going against self.
Function: The only force that acts on the consciousness and is the drive to whatever the person perceives, thinks, does or says. It resonates with the force changes in the behaviour of others thereby transmitting external forces to the consciousness. Because it acts on the consciousness and force is painful, it causes pain unless shielded by opposite force. It can only prolong, change speed, strength and direction where possible. Apart from pain if unshielded, causes stress on prolonged exposure.
(There may be those who are antagonistic who might argue that who in their right mind would permit harmful force to cohabit their minds. It is not a question of people permitting but they are unwitting slaves or robots of this force of going against self who often think it (emotions, likes and dislikes) are their great friends when they will torment them and finally kill them off and pack them off to eternal perdition. Ignorant and foolish, constantly bombarded by force from others, people permit and cultivate force in their minds to go against themselves in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others to get what they want, namely sensate pleasures.)
Name: Force of self preservation.
Function: Only force that acts away from the consciousness to oppose the force of going against self shielding consciousness from pain. It is the force that always resists whatever the person perceives, thinks, says or does. It does not cause pain as it always acts away from consciousness but stresses the consciousness on prolonged exposure. It is reactive and usually stirs when force of going against self stirs but on occasions when alarmed can stir sharply on its own or become apathetic, refusing to stir. It can only prolong, change speed, strength and direction where possible.
Name Of Emotion: Like
There is faked liking that is much more common and more stressful than genuine liking because there is forceful conflict when you fake.
Aliases: Interest, fascination, excitement, thrill, greed, lust, eagerness, pride, envy, thirst and hunger.
Dominant Force: force of self preservation.
Disparity of strength: slightly in favour of the force of self preservation.
Characteristics: In genuine liking, the prominent feature is that the person's force of going against self is mostly accelerating in speed and strength in an attractive way whilst prolonging is secondary and itself always also accompanied by accelerating speed and strength of force within the stretched syllable or unit of motion well under the control of the stronger force of self preservation.
Because like is an emotion that has nothing to do with reason, it needs no reason to be transferred and can be transferred to other situations and hence different people have different likes and he can develop new likes or like is infectious.
Pain: Absent because stronger force of self preservation always shields consciousness completely from the pain inducing force of going against self. Stress: Less stressful than disliking but still stressful in proportion to duration and intensity of exposure and exhausting consciousness.
Name: Dislike
There is faked disliking but it is much rarer. Sometimes people fake anger to frighten others or get what they want. Faked dislike is more stressful than genuine disliking because there is forceful conflict when it is faked.
Aliases: Hate, anger, jealousy, disgust, derision, antagonism, boredom, fed up.
Dominant Force: force of going against self.
Disparity of strength: slightly in favour of the force of going against self.
Characteristics: In genuine disliking, the prominent feature is that the person's force of going against self is mostly accelerating in speed and strength in an aggressive way whilst prolonging is secondary and itself always also accompanied by aggressively accelerating speed and strength of force within the stretched syllable or unit of motion poorly under or out of the control of the weaker force of self preservation.
Because dislike is an emotion that has nothing to do with reason, it needs no reason to be transferred and can be transferred to other situations and hence different people have different dislikes and he can develop new dislikes or dislike is infectious.
Pain: Mildly present because only slightly weaker force of self preservation mostly shields consciousness from the pain inducing force of going against self.
Stress: More stressful than liking depending on the duration and intensity of exposure and exhausts consciousness.
AN INDICATION THAT LIKE AND DISLIKE ARE FALSE IS THAT THEY ARE NOT PERMANENT BUT FICKLE, AT THE SAME TIME AS A PERSON LIKES SOMEONE (EG SON) OR OBJECT (FAVORITE TUNE) VERY MUCH HE CAN ALSO HARBOR DISLIKE (EG ANNOYED BY HIS BEHAVIOR OR IN BAD MOOD HE FINDS TUNE IRRITATING) AND REVERSIBLE (LIKE FOR GIRL TURN TO WRATH WHEN JILTED). DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT LIKES AND DISLIKES INDICATING THEY ARE NOT UNIVERSAL BUT INDIVIDUALLY CONDITIONED.
Name Of Emotion: Sadness
Aliases: Melancholy, sentimentality, depression is partly severe unresponsive sadness.
Dominant Force: force of going against self.
Disparity of strength: significantly in favour of the force of going against self.
Characteristics: The force of going against self is mostly prolonging or stretching syllables or units of motion at low speeds. Speed and strength changes within and between syllables or units of motion are less accelerating but more usually decaying as if dying. Sad people stretch their syllables with decaying speed and loudness and they tend to decelerate in speed and loudness between syllables and words.
Reflecting that the force of self preservation is depressed in sadness, the person who is sad loses interest (a form of liking) and fear because you require a dominant force of self preservation in order to be interested or fearful.
Because sadness is an emotion that has nothing to do with reason, it needs no reason to be transferred and can be transferred to other situations and hence different people have different sadnesses and he can develop new sadnesses or sadness is infectious.
Pain: Because the force of self preservation is significantly weaker than the force of going against self it fails to shield the consciousness allowing it to causes a dull pain because the force of going against self is primarily prolonging with slow decaying speed and strength changes rather than aggressive accelerating speed and strength changes.
Stress: Present, proportionate to duration and intensity of exposure.
Name of emotion: Feeling hurt or grief
Aliases: Disappointment, upset
Dominant Force: force of going against self.
Disparity of strength: significantly in favour of the force of going against self.
Characteristics: The much stronger force of going against self is mostly accelerating in speed and strength aggressively rather than prolonging that is itself also accompanied by accelerating speed and strength.
Reflecting that the force of self preservation is depressed in feeling hurt, the person who is hurt loses interest (a form of liking) and fear because you require a dominant force of self preservation in order to be interested or fearful.
Because feeling hurt is an emotion that has nothing to do with reason, it needs no reason to be transferred and can be transferred to other situations and hence different people have different hurts or sensitive spots and he can develop new hurts or hurt is infectious.
Pain: Significant to strongly present as a sharp or searing pain because the much weaker force of self preservation fails to shield the consciousness against the aggressive force of going against self.
Stress: Present, proportionate to duration and intensity of exposure.

Unless a person's mind is centred (possible but not in ordinary people), they will get hurt of someone suddenly spit with violent prolonging, accelerating speed and loudness because they will be caught off guard, the attacking force of the spitting stirs their mental forces of going against self to rise rapidly to be overwhelmingly superior to their forces of self preservation and that causes searing hurt that stir them to want to retaliate.
Whenever the force conveyed in what people said or did is greater than the person’s force of self preservation at that moment, he experiences hurt. Alternatively if the memory triggered by what someone said or did gently stirred his force of going against self greater than his force of self preservation he also experiences hurt.
ANYONE WHO POSSESSES MENTAL FORCE THAT CAN BE STIRRED BY OTHERS MUST GET HURT BY WHAT OTHERS SAY OR DO BECAUSE THEIR FORCES OF SELF PRESERVATION CAN BE CAUGHT OFF GUARD WHEN THEIR FORCES OF GOING AGAINST SELF ARE STIRRED BEYOND THEIR CONTROL BY EXTERNAL PROVOCATIONS TO RISE SUDDENLY MUCH STRONGER THAN THEIR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION EXPOSING THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS TO UNSHIELDED FORCE AND THENCE HURT. IN ADDITION WHAT OTHERS SAY OR DO GENTLY CAN STIR HURT IF THEY BRING IRRESISTIBLE MEMORY OF HURT.
Because liking is always the force of self preservation rising to control the force of self preservation on perceiving a liked person, when a loved one (actually liked one) is lost, the consciousness experiences hurt because his force of self preservation no longer rises to control his force of going against self that still gets stirred on perceiving the lost liked person and that now unshielded rising force of going against self now causes hurt.
When a thief sees something to steal, he rushes excitedly to the object and the policeman guarding him must also rush with him there to make sure he does not commit a crime. When the object is lost the policeman sees no reason to waste his energy to continue to accompany the thief who still foolishly keeps going to the place where the object used to be thinking there is still something to steal and this unaccompanied going by the thief is the basis of the hurt when a liked object is lost.
THEREFORE IF YOU MUST LIKE, YOU MUST BE ATTRACTED TO OR ATTACHED TO OBJECTS, YOU MUST GET HURT BECAUSE WITH THE LOSS OF THE LIKED OBJECT YOUR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION NO LONGER STIRS BUT YOUR FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF CONTINUES TO BE STIRRED EXPOSING YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS TO UNPROTECTED FORCE TO CAUSE HURT.
NOT ONLY IS GETTING HURT ALWAYS PAINFUL, IT HAS MEMORY AND INCREASES IN INTENSITY, EASE OF AROUSAL AND DIFFICULTY IN SHEDDING WITH CONDITIONING, IT DEGRADES THE MIND AND THE PERSON WHO IS REGULARLY GETTING HURT IS HEADING FOR THE CLIFF OF DOOM DOWN WHICH HE MUST JUMP. IF YOU DON’T TURN BACK BY STOP LIKING, STOP SMILING, YOU ARE MAKING A BET I AM WRONG.
Name of emotion: Fear
Aliases: Alarm, panic, stunned, shocked, horror.
Dominant Force: force of self preservation.
Disparity of strength: significantly in favour of the force of self preservation.
Characteristics: The force of self preservation is accelerating rapidly in speed and strength without prolonging to a strength that is significantly greater than the force of going against self that is plunging in speed and strength.
Fear causes the person to become hesitant, to stop what he is perceiving, thinking, saying and doing and want to run away because the now dominant force of self preservation always opposes the force of going against self that drives all the person's activities. Because his force of self preservation is rising rapidly in speed and strength in recurrent cycles, fear makes him restless.
Because fear is an emotion that has nothing to do with reason, it needs no reason to be transferred and can be transferred to other situations and hence different people have different fears and he can develop new fears or fear is infectious.
Pain: Not present because force of self preservation dominant and acts away from consciousness.
Stress: Present, proportionate to duration and intensity of exposure.
Emotions like excitement, interest, envy, pride, eagerness, greed, lust, thirst and hunger are derivatives of like in specific situations.
Emotions like boredom, disgust, derision, jealousy, antagonism, hate and anger are derivatives of dislike.
Shame is the emotion that is essentially a loss of pride allowing dislike of self associated with feeling hurt to arise.
Jealousy in partly feeling hurt associated with dislike for a person as a result of his desirable attributes or possessions.
When dislike is diffuse it is anger, when it is focussed or targeted it is hate. Like directed inwards is pride and like attracted outwards is greed (material things) & lust (sexual things).
WHATEVER IS TRUE SHOULD APPLY TO EVERYONE. DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT LIKES, DISLIKES, SORROWS, HURTS AND FEARS WITH DIFFERENT INTENSITIES INDICATING THAT THEY ARE NOT UNIVERSAL BUT INDIVIDUALLY CONDITIONED, FALSE AND SUFFERING NEVER ENJOYABLE TO OWN.
IT IS PEOPLE'S LIKES AND DISLIKES, THEIR EMOTIONS THAT ARE DERIVATIVES OF LIKE AND DISLIKE, THEIR SADNESS, FEELING HURT AND FEARS THAT DOMINATE THEIR LIVES AND WHAT AND HOW THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO ARE PRERECORDED AND REHASHED FROM THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES, WHATEVER GENUINE REASON THEY HAVE IS RUDIMENTARY, WHAT THEY CALL THEIR REASONING ARE GENERALIZATIONS AND PRINCIPLES BORROWED OR COPIED FROM OTHERS INTO THEIR MENTAL DICTIONARY OF MEANINGS THAT THEY CONSULT WHEN FACED WITH SITUATIONS REQUIRING REASONING. WHAT MOTIVATES THEM IS SENSATE PLEASURES AND MATERIAL GAINS FOR WHICH THEY PRACTICE STYLE IN WHAT AND HOW THEY SAY OR DO IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS. BECAUSE THEY ARE CONSTANTLY REHASHING, THEY ARE MERELY OVERRATED DISC JOCKEYS DECIDING WHAT TUNES TO PLAY AND CHANGE AND VOYEURS EXPERIENCING WHAT THEIR JUKEBOXES DISHES OUT.
(Just as there are many who cannot read or write or even add, there are many who have reasoning that are actually copied from others or are virus software installed by others and what true reasoning that exist in them are rudimentary)
A PERSON'S STYLE WHICH IS ALWAYS PRESENT AND CONSISTENT IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE REGURGITATED WAY WITH WHICH HE USES FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED, STRENGTH OF FORCE AND EVEN DIRECTION IN WHATEVER HE PERCEIVES (SEES, HEARS) THINKS, SPEAKS AND DOES IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS.
HIS USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE STYLE IS THE SOURCE OF THE EMOTIONS, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT HE EXPERIENCES WHICH IN TURN COMPEL HIM TO CONTINUE TO BE STYLISH. STYLE THAT CONSTANTLY NEED FORCE TO FABRICATE CAUSES STRESS THAT THEN SEIZES HIM TO CONTINUE TO USE FORCE TO BE STYLISH IN A VICIOUS CIRCLE HE DOES BELIEVE WILL END IN HELL.
STRESS THAT THEY MUST REGULARLY SUFFER FROM IS JUST THE PAINFUL SEIZURE BY FORCE OF THEIR MINDS AND BODIES THAT TAKES TIME TO SUBSIDE AS A RESULT OF THEIR HEEDLESS CONSTANT SUBJECTING THEMSELVES TO FORCE.
THEIR RESTLESSNESS REFLECT EPISODIC LOSS OF CONTROL OF THE CONSTANT FORCE CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THEIR STYLES AND THEIR SAYING AND DOING OF UNNECESSARY THINGS TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, DOMINATE AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS.
THEIR DISTRACTION OR INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE OR ASSMILIATE WHAT IS HAPPENING IS THE RESULT OF THEIR CONSTANT SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE THAT DIVIDES OR SCATTERS THEIR CONCENTRATION.
THEY SOMETIMES SIGH TO SAY LIFE IS MEANINGLESS. THEY SHOULD LOOK THEMSELVES IN THE MIRROR AND SEE WHY BECAUSE THEY NEVER SAY OR DO WHAT THEY MEAN AND NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY OR DO.
Evidence of weak force of self preservation in getting hurt:
When a person is hurt it is impossible for him to like but it is very easy for him to dislike even to an extent of loss of control.
For instance if a person is spat at, he experiences hurt and thus stirred he may become uncontrollably angry to want to retaliate even violently but it is impossible for him to like anything until his hurt subsides. The reason this is so is that when he is hurt his force of self preservation is significantly lower than his force of going against self that is actively stirring in speed and strength impacting unshielded on his consciousness to cause searing pain and this situation make it impossible to like because like requires a strong force of self preservation that is controlling the force of going against self but it is ideal for experiencing anger, a form of dislike where the force of going against self is out of control of the force of self preservation.
If the feeling hurt is not very strong, the person can hide his hurt and even fake liking it by artificially forcing his force of self preservation to rise in strength but this is faked and easily detected by those who are discerning. However if the feeling hurt is very intense it is impossible to fake liking for what happened because the discrepancy in strength in favour of the force of going against self is too steep for the person to push up his force of self preservation to disguise his hurt.
TO FABRICATE 'LIKE' YOU NEED A DOMINANT FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION AND THIS IS DIFFICULT IN GETTING HURT BECAUSE IT IS WEAK.
TO FABRICATE ANGER YOU NEED A STRONG AND ACTIVELY CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF WHICH IS ALREADY IN PLACE IN GETTING HURT.
THUS THE FACT THAT IT IS VERY EASY FOR PEOPLE WHO FEEL HURT TO BECOME EVEN VERY ANGRY WHILST IT IS VERY DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO FAKE LIKING WHEN THEY ARE INTENSELY HURT INDICATES THAT IN FEELING HURT THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT DISPARITY IN STRENGTH BETWEEN THE FORCES OF GOING AGAINST SELF & SELF PRESERVATION FAVORING THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF WHICH IS ACTIVELY CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH TO CAUSE SEARING PAIN.
The difference between dislike and getting hurt: Whilst one can get angry or hate oneself, it is attacking usually at external targets whilst getting hurt is about sharp pain felt, not attacking oneself or others. Dislike is stressful but it is much less painful that getting hurt because although the mental force of going against self may rise to great strength and speed, it is being tracked by an overworked force of self preservation that isn't far behind and still shielding the consciousness from the blows of the force of going against self whilst in getting hurt the force of self preservation is lagging significantly and not shielding the consciousness against the force of going against self that is changing in speed and strength aggressively.
Four ways to get hurt:
There are four ways people get hurt, no matter how tough they think they are:
First is loss of liked object. When you like something, your force of self preservation must rise to match the rise of going against self when you perceive that object. When the object is lost, the force of self preservation sees no reason to stir and the unaccompanied stirring of the force of going against self exposes the consciousness to naked force and pain or hurt.
Secondly, the consciousness experiences hurt when the force in the way people say or do things exceed significantly their force of self preservation to subject their consciousness to excess unshielded force and pain. If the force in a spit is stronger than your force of self preservation then, you experience hurt.
Thirdly, even if something is said or done to them gently, the memory of hurt is triggered by what they said or did and cause hurt to well up.
Fourthly, their forces of self preservation are constantly harassed even to their limits and occasionally this force throws in the towel and refuses to be stirred and then the consciousness is exposed to pain or hurt. When tired or stressed, the person is more easily hurt.
Just liked also hurt:
If you just knew a girl yesterday and you liked her very much, news of her demise will hurt you because your like for her is recorded in your mind or mental jukebox and news of her demise will hurt you, make you sad because your force of self preservation will now not rise when your force of going against self stirs to like her.
Fun & Funny Is Liking:
Having fun or seeing the funny side of things is seeing the liking side of things, joking is faking liking the misery of others or the falsity of something. Smiling is to express genuine or faked like.
Thus if you must have smile, you must have fun, must joke, must the see the funny side of things, you must get hurt and it is the hurt that lasts, even for an eternity whilst the fun lasts as long as it lasts.
Want to be all seeing or a fish?
Which do you prefer, a fish swimming in the ocean or an all seeing formless being without any woes of a body seeing everything and enjoying bliss for two eons?
The Buddha said he was all seeing and all knowing and what he taught compared to what he knows is like the few leaves in his hand compared to the leaves in the forest above.
The first crucial step to become all seeing is to stop thinking and just see and hear. Then it is neither see nor not see. But people in this world are infatuated by their thinking, they think they are such great thinkers and by thinking they can work out everything and what this world is about. Thus trapped, they see very little and see up the wrong trees.
No one has told you this and now I have and it is up to you that the Buddha said it is possible for a being to be conscious to see everything without entertaining a single thought. Thus if you are wise you will learn to curtail your thinking rather than pursue or be infatuated with your thinking by meditating to calm yourself. Without calming your mind you cannot stop thinking and then from thinking with constant forceful prolonging, changes in speed and loudness that have momentum that is impossible to stop, you think without unnecessary force that is much easier to stop, you progress from dingdong silly thinking to orderly goal orientated thinking to finally put a stop to all thinking and just watch.
IT IS EMOTION & THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THEIR THOUGHTS THAT HAVE MOMENTUM THAT CAUSE THEM SLEEPLESS NIGHTS. THE BUDDHA SAID IT IS POSSIBLE TO JUST SEE WITHOUT THINKING AND IT IS THE WAY TO TWO EONS IN HEAVEN. THUS YOU ARE A FOOL TO BE INFATUATED WITH YOUR THINKING, TO WANT OTHERS TO BE IMPRESSED BY YOUR INTELLECT.
The top dog:
It is never their reason but motivated by a need for sensate gratification and to show off, to please, impress, intimidate and dominate other, their emotions, likes and dislikes, sadness, hurts and fears determine what ordinary people see, hear or do not see or hear, think or do not think, speak or do not speak.
Driven by the emotions, they act as overrated conceited disc jockeys who select the appropriate things to say or do and find reasons from their mental libraries of explanations to rationalize things or give excuses.
The conundrum:
When you can see everything you do not need to think because what is there to think when you can see everything there is?
It is because you cannot see everything that you need to think but as a result of thinking, it is impossible for you to see everything because a person who sees everything does not need to think because he saw.
Not a conundrum:
There are no conundrums, puzzles or mysteries because everything is knowable and understandable.
A person who sees everything does not need to think and a person who thinks cannot see everything.
Why is that so?
The reason is that no one can fabricate or do more than one thing at a time, when people are seeing, thinking and speaking at the same time it is an illusion because his speaking and thinking and seeing is rehashed by rote without attention or his consciousness is rapidly switching between the three fabrications only taking snapshots of each.
When a Buddha eats he does not speak and when he speaks he does not eat indicating that a person can only mindfully or LIVE specific to that occasion do only one thing. If he eats as he speaks, he is regurgitating either one or both from memory and only paying attention to both or neither intermittently.
Thus when a person thinks, he must press the pause button of his seeing whilst he attends to his thinking and because the world waits for no one, whilst he thinks the world is passing him by and therefore he cannot see everything.
A PERSON WHO APPEARS TO SEE, THINK AND SPEAK AT THE SAME TIME IS RENDERING ALL BY ROTE MINDLESSLY WITH AT MOST INTERMITTENT ATTENTION TO EACH ACTIVITY. PAYING ATTENTION TO EACH ACTIVITY IS DIFFERENT FROM FABRICATING EACH LIVE SPECIFIC FOR THAT MOMENT. A PERSON CAN ONLY FABRICATE ONE ACTIVITY LIVE WITHOUT REHASHING AND SO IF HE IS THINKING AND PERCEIVING HE MUST SWITCH BETWEEN BOTH INTERMITTENTLY. PERCEIVING IS THE MOST PRIMARY ACTIVITY AND SO BY DROPPING ALL COARSER FABRICATIONS LIKE THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING, THE BEING MERELY PERCEIVES.
Disliking Never Caused Hurt:
Whatever is disliked is never welcomed and the loss of what is not welcome never hurts anybody but it is welcomed.
The loss of what you hated or what makes you angry or filled you with disgust never hurts the person but is greeted with delight or like.
HENCE THE LOSS OF WHAT IS DISLIKED NEVER HURT ANYBODY AND IT IS ONLY THE LOSS OF WHAT IS LIKED, ATTACHED TO, FOND OF AND ATTRACTED TO THAT CAUSES HURT AND GRIEF.
Thus no matter how good you think you are, how much you insist you like to like, if what I say is true and the Buddha also said so, if you must like you must get hurt even to the extent of uncontrollable weeping and afterwards if you think you are going to heaven, you may be right or deluded.
Nervousness:
All emotional people must suffer from attacks of nervousness or trembling which although may be associated with restlessness, is different.
Nervousness are involuntary (although it can be faked by actors) episodes that reflect loss of control of the forceful conflict between the force of going against self that drives all their fabrications (perceiving, thinking, saying and doing) and the style in their fabrications (stretching, changing of speed, strength and direction where possible) and the force of self preservation that always resist. This conflict is always present but usually suppressed and associated with shame and it reflects conflict too intense to be suppressed, a situation that the person finds too intimidating or he is tired and stressed to keep a lid on his forceful conflict or tension that he becomes nervous (twitchy, trembling or shaking, hesitant, restless).
ALL STYLISH PEOPLE MUST BE NERVOUS ALTHOUGH TOUGH GOATS CONCEAL AND DENY IT VERY WELL BUT ONE WHO IS DISCERNING CAN DETECT TELL TALE SIGNS OF NERVOUSNESS THAT MAY ESCAPE THOSE WHO ARE THEMSELVES PREOCCUPIED AND DISTRACTED.
NERVOUSNESS MUST NOT BE CONFUSED WITH RESTLESSNESS ALTHOUGH RESTLESSNESS ALWAYS ACCOMPANIES NERVOUSNESS. NERVOUSNESS OR JITTERINESS IS THE EXPERIENCE OF ANYONE WHO FORCIBLY GO AGAINST THEMSELVES TO SAY OR DO THINGS DISHONESTLY TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS OVERRIDING SELF RESISTANCE THAT SOMETIMES CAN WELL UP TOO STRONGLY SO THAT THE CLASH IS TOO INTENSE TO SUPPRESS.
Mental blocks:
All stylish people must suffer from episodic mental blocks when they forget what they wanted to say or do and get flustered. This is partly because whatever they say or do is mindless, regurgitated and sometimes there is a block in streaming, the flow of the program that determines what and how they want to say or do something is interrupted eg by emotion or tiredness or the resistance by their forces of self preservation which always there sometimes rise inappropriately to too great a strength as to block what they want to say or do.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A BUDDHA OR A PERSON WHOSE SPEECH AND DEEDS ARE FRESHLY COMPOSED FOR THE OCCASION, WHO IS NOT GOING AGAINST HIMSELF IN WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES AND THEREFORE HAVE NO INHERENT FORCEFUL CONFLICT IN THEIR MINDS TO SUFFER MENTAL BLOCKS.
STAMMERING IS AN INDICATION THERE IS MENTAL BLOCK BY THE STRONG FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO WHAT THE PERSON WANTS TO SAY.
Paying full attention is not fabricating live:
If what you said is rehashed, there is a copy of it in your mental jukebox then even if you paid 100% attention to it throughout it is not a live fabrication but still a stale rehash. Only when you synthesized it live for the occasion is it live fabricate and for that to happen the person cannot be simultaneously perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing.
PAYING TOTAL ATTENTION THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF WHAT YOU SAID THAT CAME FROM A COPY THAT EXISTS IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX IS JUST PERFECT VOYEURISM, IT IS NOT SAME AS FRESH LIVE ATTENTIVELY SPECIFICALLY FABRICATING IT WITHOUT A COPY IN THE MENTAL JUKEBOX.
Thoroughly deluded:
I saw an article in the newspapers describing the restless leg syndrome that afflicts a lot of people from the high to low classes and it seems especially at night its sufferers experience paraesthesia and the urge to keep moving their legs, they went on to describe treatments that I did not bother to read.
If the treatments cured the syndrome it would not exist anymore, if they did not cure the syndrome, merely suppress or attenuate the symptoms then there are merely props and even delaying the inevitable.
I do not suffer from restless legs or any form of restlessness and so long as you must constantly change speed and strength of force in what you perceive, think, speak and do, so long must you suffer restlessness of which restless legs is one specific manifestation.
Why do these people who earnestly study this syndrome not realize that they themselves have constant forceful changes in their motion and speech that is the cause to their restlessness? They are barking up the wrong tree and deluded, it is wrong view that is the way to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.
It is never an accident why they are deluded but it is because they are not very good people driven by ill will that is often disguised so that they believe their stylish niceness is their goodness and they are blameless and therefore their restless legs are blameless part and parcel of living instead of their sins of which what they are aware is like the tip of the iceberg.
The force struggling most in tiredness & stress:
The force of self preservation is the one that tires most and want to give up when the person becomes tired or stressed or the person is pushed to the extreme of his acting or putting on a show envelop.
The force of going against self usually wants the show to go on come what may and it is this discrepancy that causes hurt and sadness to emerge when the person becomes tired or stressed because their force of self preservation cannot be mustered further and the force of going against self is given free rein.
Thus no matter how tough a goat you are, fear of loss of your usual immaculate control must lurk in you that should you become too exhausted or stressed or you are stoked by others beyond your performance envelop, you will break and make a fool of yourself.
Lesser goats feel quite comfortable in this world when they are not in the spotlight or there are few acting demands but when they are threatened, their feeble forces of self preservation cannot cope and they become tongue tied or frozen.
AL ACTORS NO MATTER SUAVE MUST HAVE A DREAD OR FEAR THAT THEY TRY TO HIDE THAT THEY MIGHT BE PUSHED BEYOND THEIR ACTING LIMITS AND BECOME INCOHERENT OR MAKE A FOOL OF THEMSELVES AND ONE DAY THEY WILL. SO GOOD LUCK TO YOU WHO WILL NOT GIVE UP ACTING OR STYLE.
What is nervousness?
Nervousness occurs in situations that may be recurrent in the person in which he wants to say or do something and there is hesitancy that reaches intense proportions.
It can be stage fright. When he is rehearsing it or saying it in private to his loved ones he is not nervous but when he has to say it on stage he becomes nervous or there is excruciating hesitancy that he may make a fool of himself.
This is an indication that whatever they say or do is forced, driven by force with self resistance (from the force of self preservation) that usually can be easily overcome but in threatening situations (eg on stage) the force of self preservation rises tremendously because of fear and now becomes a formidable barrier to say the thing.
When you are stealing something minor and you are used to it, you may not be nervous but if you now committing a bank robbery with a lot at stake and you may get killed, you will be more nervous because of fear.
Nervousness is old fashioned fear:
Nervousness is just a fancy name for fear. When you are saying or doing something the umpteen time, it becomes very slick and the force of self preservation that is always there is just steamrolled through but there may be occasions like on stage or it is a big event that fear stirs, essentially your force of self preservation rises significantly above its usual strength when you say and you become nervous.
THUS NERVOUSNESS IS OLD FASHIONED FEAR ARISING IN THINGS YOU USUALLY SAY OR DO THAT DO NOT AROUSE FEAR.
Hence ordinary people severely underestimate the occurrence of emotions in their lives. What they call nervousness is fearfulness.
When they say they are hopeful or optimistic, they are saying they are looking to the future with like. When they say they are pessimistic, they mean they are looking forward to the future with dislike.
Fear with regard to your fabrications:
Nervousness is stirring fear that threatens loss of control with regarding to what you want to say or do in a specific situation. Nervousness is fear threatening to go out of control but not yet.
A person may experience nervousness when he enters a dark alley not because of the alley itself but his action in entering the alley instead of not doing exposes him to danger of being mugged.
Fear is a general emotion whenever a situation that does not necessarily relate to your fabrications causes your force of self preservation to rise strongly and your force of going against self to plunge.
For instance a sudden earthquake or explosion has nothing to do with what you want to do but what has happened independent of you that threatens.
Fierceness:
When people speak of someone being fierce, he is not speaking of him being angry or disliking and so fierceness must be something other than disliking or anger. It is being aggressive, forceful or attacking or provoking.
There is a state of mind called ‘ill will’ that encompasses fierceness or aggressiveness, attacking, provoking, toughness, strength, competitiveness, combativeness, being quarrelsome, antagonism to stubbornness that is apart from liking and disliking, sadness, getting hurt and fear.
A person's fierceness may be all about how much force he uses when he fabricates (perceives, thinks, speaks and does things, his maximal capacity for force or violence and the rapidity with which his forcefulness can accelerate. The more force he uses the fiercer he is.
Stubbornness is a form of aggressiveness in which a person uses force to resist change or stand his ground irrationally. When you forcefully maintain a course of action that harms yourself and others, you are stubborn, when you use reason to maintain a course of action that benefits you (eg not to get angry when provoked) you are persistent.
When a motorist or motorcyclist is revving his vehicle violently at the traffic lights he is usually not disliking but exercising his aggressiveness or fierceness that conditions himself to be aggressive, namely his strength of fierceness becomes increasingly stronger, easier to arouse and harder to dissipate and he is headed for torment thence loss of control and ruin.
How does a person become fierce?
You have to use force in order to become fierce, aggressive, attacking, antagonistic and stubborn. Without using force you cannot be fierce or have ill will.
You can be fierce in the substance of what you say or do that attacks others with force eg cut off someone’s head or spit at him or scold him and you can be fierce in the way you do things or your style.
(You may scold someone because you dislike him or what he has done but it is not necessarily so but scolding is just verbally attacking someone that is separate from disliking him)
People are never part time fierce (aggressive) but they are full time fierce or aggressive because they constantly use unnecessary force to prolong, change speed, strength of force and even direction where possible in whatever they perceive, think, speak and do in the name of intimidating or dominating others.
The use of force to stretch your syllables, change speed and loudness is not your emotion but it is your style of speech and as a result of your style or use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness you generate emotions (like or dislike, sadness, hurt or fear).
Thus a person’s ill will (fierceness, aggressiveness) causes him to constantly or generally use force that is unnecessary to stretch, change speed and strength of force (also called his style) in whatever he perceives, thinks, speaks and does and specifically to attack others verbally and physically (spit at someone or punch him) and as a result of this use of force that is constant, he experiences emotions.
What is the relationship between fierceness and a person’s emotions (likes & dislikes, hurt, sadness and fears)?
You cannot be fierce unless you use force that is unnecessary and excessive and for show to intimidate and dominate. Because all use of force impacts on the person’s consciousness as pain if unshielded, the person’s desire to use force necessitates the presence of another opposite mental force to shield his consciousness from the impact of force and it is the tango between these two forces or the constant power struggle between the two that give rise to all the emotions.
Using force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness is itself not an emotion but it is aggressiveness and as a result of using force to stretch, change speed and loudness you experience emotions that then serve as the drive to further be aggressive, to further stretch, change speed and loudness in a vicious circle that increasingly tightens.
FIERCENESS IS LARGELY YOUR STYLE, HOW YOU USE FORCE THAT IS EXCESSIVE IN WHAT YOU DO OR SAY WHILST EMOTIONS ARE THE PRODUCTS OF THAT STYLE, THE CONSCIOUSNESS’ EXPERIENCES OF THE POWER STRUGGLE OF FORCES IN YOUR MIND.
All ordinary people with style are fierce or aggressive because you need to constantly use force that is unnecessary to fabricate style and what differentiates them is that some do not disguise their fierceness whilst others’ camouflage their fierceness in their fabricated gentle style that nevertheless have discernible forceful prolonging, changing speed and loudness.
THUS FIERCENESS IS ABOUT HOW YOU USE FORCE TO DO THINGS OR YOUR STYLE AND IT GIVES RISE TO EMOTIONS THAT ARE THE INEVITABLE RESULTS OF THE POWER STRUGGLE IN YOUR MIND BECAUSE ANOTHER FORCE MUST BE SET UP TO OPPOSE IT IN THE NAME OF SELF SURVIVAL AND IN TURN YOUR EMOTIONS DRIVE YOU TO BE FIERCE, TO USE FORCE IN WHAT YOU SAY OR DO.
THUS APART FROM A PERSON'S LIKES AND DISLIKES (AND EMOTIONS THAT ARE DERIVED FROM THEM LIKE GREED, LUST, EXCITEMENT, ANGER, HATE), HIS SADNESS, FEELING HURT AND FEAR, THE PERSON ALSO POSSESS FORCEFULNESS WITH A SPECTRUM FROM FIERCENESS TO STUBBORNNESS THAT IS INDIVIDUALLY VARIABLE.
ILL WILL THAT ENCOMPASSES FIERCENESS, ATTACKING, PROVOKING, TOUGHNESS, COMBATIVENESS, ANTAGONISM AND STUBBORNESS IS ONE OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS (SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY, FAITH IN RITES AND RULES, SENSUALITY) THAT THE BUDDHA SAID DETAINED A BEING IN THE LOWER REALMS (HUMAN, ANIMAL, HELL, GHOST).
THEREFORE THERE IS ANOTHER CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT FORCE ASPECT OF A BEING APART FROM HIS EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, HURTS, SADNESS & FEARS), NAMELY HIS FIERCENESS-ANTAGONISM-STUBBORNESS THAT DETERMINES WHETHER HE IS DETAINED HERE.

FIERCENESS, ATTACKING OR PROVOKING ANOTHER, COMBATIVENESS, BEING ANTAGONISTIC OR OPPOSING (saying A when I say B and saying B when I say A), STUBBORN OR RESISTING ARE ALL ABOUT THE SAME THING NAMELY ILL WILL AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH LIKING OR DISLIKING ANOTHER AND IT IS A DEFINING FEATURE OF A GOAT OR GOAT IN SHEEPSKIN NOT A TRUE SHEEP AND WILL DETAIN YOU HERE.
Ill Will:
Ill will that encompass fierceness, combativeness, antagonism, stubbornness, is one of five lower fetters (others are self identity, faith in rituals and precepts, doubt & uncertainty, sensuality) that detain beings in the lower realms (hell, animal, ghost and human) and hence it must be absent in the higher realms. The five higher fetters are ignorance, conceit, attachment to form and formless, restlessness (desire for change or being).
BEINGS IN THE LOWER REALMS ARE ALL FORCEFUL OR LIKE TO USE FORCE (TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE) OR ARE DRIVEN BY FORCE AND THIS MENTAL STATE IS NOT THE SAME AS DISLIKING OR LIKING AND GIVE RISE TO SUCH CHARACTERISTICS AS AGGRESSIVENESS, COMPETITIVENESS, ANTAGONISTIC AND STUBBORNNESS.
Worry is fearful:
When people say they worry about the future they mean they are fearful for the future and here again there are many different words that basically describe the few basic emotions like like or dislike, sadness, being hurt or fearful.
When people speak about worry they are speaking about emotion not reason. Apart from emotional suffering, worry serves no useful function. You need calm clear reason to assess clearly if a solution is at hand, by worrying you cloud your mind that may obscure the presence of a solution or delay its discovery. If there are no solutions available, no amount of worrying will do any good.
Satan tells Buddha to like:
Satan tells the Buddha to like and the Buddha refutes him. Thus if you like to like, Satan is your pal.
Nandana Sutta: Delight
Then Mara the Evil One went to the Blessed One:
Those with children delight (a form of like)because of their children.Those with cattle delightbecause of their cows.A person's delightcomes from acquisitions,since a person with no acquisitionsdoesn't delight.
[The Buddha:]
Those with children grievebecause of their children.Those with cattle grievebecause of their cows.A person's grief comes from acquisitions,A person with no acquisitions doesn't grieve.
Always bent & twisted:
The body contains many joints and usually if not always there are two opposing groups of muscles (agonists and antagonists) arranged around the joints that will move the appendage around that joint in opposite directions (flex or extend).
In this situation the most relaxed posture of any joint is when it is straight, neither bent to one side or twisted around its axis (eg turning your head around your neck or rotating your forearm inwards or outwards) because then both groups of muscles (agonists and antagonists) are not doing any work.
If you watch the appendages of people (fingers, wrists, forearms, legs, head) when they are still or moving, they are invariably bent never straight and what is bent or curved or rotated is stretched and it is therefore an instance of unconscious use of force to stretch their movements or postures.
This permanent bending or twisting of their joints requires force and use of energy, causes an imbalance in work between the opposing muscles is partly a desire of the person to express style to impress others (if you want to stand like Elvis you must prop or rotate your left shoulder and hip forwards as you stand) and partly because the tension in their minds and bodies do not permit them to adopt truly neutral stress free postures or straight joints.
IT IS MOSTLY THE INNATE TENSION IN THEIR MINDS THAT FORCES STYLISH PEOPLE TO ADOPT COMPLICATED POSTURES WITH MULTIPLE BENDING AND ROTATION OF JOINTS OF THEIR TORSO AND APPENDAGES AND IT IS PARTLY THEIR DESIRE FOR STYLE THAT CAUSES THIS. NOT TO BEND OR TWIST THEIR JOINTS IS SOMETHING THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE EXCEPT IN THEIR DELUSION THEY CAN AND DO. WATCH YOUR BODY POSTURES AND JOINTS WHILST YOU ARE AT REST AND SEE IF THEY ARE NOT BENT OR ROTATED AND HOW THEY ARE STRESSFUL NOT EASEFUL.
PEOPLE WHO CANNOT KEEP THEIR JOINTS STRAIGHT DO NOT KNOW WHAT EASEFULNESS THEY ARE MISSING. THEY THINK THEY ARE ENJOYING THEMSELVES WHEN THEY ARE MASOCHISTS PUNISHING THEMSELVES WITH THEIR STYLISH TWISTED AND BENT JOINTS.
Nirvana is the ultimate eternal bliss:
Birth and death are illusions, mere transition points because after passing away all beings have a destination although most can expect perdition in one form or another after they pass away. No beings are permanently dead but they are reborn elsewhere and no beings are truly born but they arrived from a previous destination.
Even eternal life in heavenly bliss that range from one Age to 60,000 eons are not truly eternal but relatively eternal compared to your sojourn here and rather than annihilation, nirvana that the Buddha said exists is permanent release from coming and going and truly permanent eternal life in bliss that are accorded to those who have become totally pure.
Although the Buddha did not quite state it specifically, he said nirvana is not to be conjectured, if you try to conjecture about it, you will go mad, you will know when you achieve that state, he did say it involved the final giving up of individual existence and he said that in becoming the One he becomes the many, in becoming the many he becomes the One indicating that the being who attains nirvana may still exist because no being is ever destroyed, only he permanently has made an end to all coming and going.
NO MATTER HOW LONG BLISSFUL EXISTENCE IS IN HEAVEN, EVEN UP TO 60,000 EONS, IT IS AN INDIVIDUAL EXISTENCE AND NOT FINAL AND THERE IS A PASSING AWAY EVEN TO HELL DEPENDING ON WHAT YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY DONE. A PERSON WHO IS ENLIGHTENED HAS NOTHING BY WHICH HE CAN BE BORN ANYWHERE OR PASS AWAY AND RATHER THAN BEING A STATE OF NON EXISTING IT MAY BE A STATE OF NEITHER EXISTING NOR NON EXISTING THAT IS TRULY PERMANENT BLISS. EONS MAY COME AND EONS MAY GO BUT THE ENLIGHTENED BEING IS UNCHANGED.
The Buddha: Freed from the classification of form, Vaccha, the Tathagata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea. 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply.
"Any feeling...Any perception...Any mental fabrication...
"Any consciousness by which one describing the Tathagata would describe him: That the Tathagata has abandoned, its root destroyed, deprived of the conditions of existence, not destined for future arising. Freed from the classification of consciousness, Vaccha, the Tathagata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea. 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply."
What the Buddha is saying above is that if you try to perceive the Buddha in terms of a physical form, feeling, perception, mental fabrication or consciousness, you are like the man trying to scoop water with a net (you will fail). He has gone totally beyond existence and is unknowable by those who still exist. It is a delusion that you do not exist after death. You will exist after death only that the destination is likely to be unpalatable unless you turn around.
People are attached to their bodies (especially females) but at best the body is still a restriction, restricting you to one location and it has its woes like hunger, disease and aging. Brahmas are attached to their formless existences but enlightened ones have returned to the source. As the Buddha said, in becoming the One he becomes the All, in becoming the All he becomes the One.
Unconjecturable
"There are these four unconjecturables.
"The Buddha-range of the Buddhas [i.e., the range of powers a Buddha develops as a result of becoming a Buddha]. If conjectured about, it would bring madness & vexation.
"The jhana-range of a person in jhana [i.e., the range of powers that one may obtain while absorbed in jhana]...
"The [precise working out of the] results of kamma...
"Conjecturing about [the origin, etc., of] the world would bring madness & vexation to the person.
A bent or twisted joint is always stressful:
When a joint is straight both opposing groups of muscles are not doing any work.
If a joint is bent, one group of muscles must work to maintain that bending whilst the other must be stretched (strained), similarly an appendage is twisted only because force is applied to keep it twisted.
WHENEVER A JOINT IS BENT, ONE GROUP OF MUSCLE MUST DO WORK AND THE OPPOSITE GROUP MUST BE STRAINED OR STRETCHED BY FORCE.
IF YOU ARE BENDING YOUR JOINTS TO TIE YOUR SHOE LACES IT IS DOING MEANINGFUL WORK BUT IF YOU ARE BENDING YOUR JOINTS TO BE STYLISH OR BECAUSE YOU ARE TENSED, YOU ARE DOING WHAT IS USELESS OR PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS THAT WILL END IN UNCONTROLLED MADNESS.
THEREFORE IF IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO KEEP THE JOINT BENT OR TWISTED (IT IS NOT DOING USEFUL WORK LIKE WRITING) AND YOU DO SO BECAUSE YOU WANT TO BE STYLISH OR YOU CANNOT HELP IT, YOUR TENSION CAUSES IT, YOU ARE STRESSING YOURSELF AND PRACTICING WHAT IS USELESS, FOR SHOW THAT WILL END IN MAD RESTLESSNESS.
SO IGNORE YOUR BENT AND TWISTED JOINTS IF YOU LIKE BUT YOU ARE SUFFERING UNNECESSARILY AND ONLY CONTROLLING IT AND HEADED FOR LOSS OF CONTROL AND MAD BENT RESTLESSNESS.
(When a person sits in the lotus position, his posture is gravity neutral, he does not have to do work to keep his body falling to one side as compared to the stylish man who tilts and rotates his head and body.)
JUST AS YOUR JOINTS ARE ALWAYS BENT AND TWISTED, YOUR MIND IS ALSO BENT AND TWISTED BUT YOU HAVE A PERVERSION OF PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS BENT AND TWISTED IS STRAIGHT.
Ill Will & Emotions:
Fierceness (a manifestation of ill will) is the presence of force in a person’s fabrications eg a fierce look is the piercing force in his stare, fierce way of speaking and fierce way he drove his golf ball is the palpable added force in how he speaks and does things.
Thus fierceness is all about style, about the presence of excess force that is dissipated through prolonging, changing speed and strength of force and direction where possible whenever one perceives, thinks, speaks and does things.
Emotions are the different experiences of the mind as a result of the power struggles of the force of going against self and self preservation.
WHEN THE BUDDHA SPOKE OF ILL WILL HE IS TALKING ABOUT FIERCENESS OR AGGRESSION AND WHEN HE TALKED ABOUT PASSION HE IS TALKING ABOUT EMOTIONS.
Disappointment is about being hurt:
When someone experiences disappointment it is about being hurt by what has happened. Usually he likes something and does not get it and he is disappointed or hurt.
Thus if you are a supporter of Manchester United and you scan the papers and learnt they lost, you immediately experience disappointment or hurt that because it is painful you automatically try to suppress by smiling or act as if you are happy.
Not only do people experience disappointments or being hurt frequently throughout a day as a result of their liking certain things that are dashed but they ALWAYS use force, their force of self preservation that they stir up to try to banish their disappointments but invariably some of the disappointment will seep or break through this barricade and they experience even searing pent up hurt from previous denials hurting out of proportion to what happened.
They say big boys (and girls) don’t cry and so it is that goats always hide and deny their daily hurts and every now and then it takes only a straw to break the camel’s back and they may then ‘go bonkers’ with hurt and lashing out.