Wednesday, May 30, 2007

How Many Times Do You Want To Impress Others?

A major purpose of posing, doing and saying things with style is to impress others.

If wanting to impress others is meaningful, surely posing or doing or saying something once or a few times suffices to impress others to get the message across?

Surely it is maddening, meaningless & endless to keep posing, saying and doing the same and many other very different things with the same purpose of impressing others?

Because impressing others takes energy and is stressful, restless and distracting, this endless insatiable pursuit of impressing others is like chasing after a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow that does not exist or much ado about nothing.

Because impressing others is forceful, driven by force than reason, it is addictive or mindlessly conditioning and the more times one has posed, said or done things to impress others the more one urges to impress in a mindless, irrational pursuit that will end with inevitable loss of control in uncontrollable torment.

Therefore posing, saying or doing things with style to impress others is not a reason, is not reasonable but emotional or forceful or derived from force and mad.

In the same way, posing, doing and saying things with style is to please, intimidate or dominate others (often without awareness he is doing so because of past denials) are not reasons or based on reason but based on emotions or force and irrational. If wanting to please, intimidate and dominate others is meaningful, a single time (or at most a few times) suffices to get the message across. Surely it is maddening, meaningless, with no end to keep posing, saying and doing the same thing and many other very different things just to keep pleasing, intimidating and dominating others? Because pleasing, intimidating, dominating others is forceful, driven by force than reason, they are addictive and the more times one has posed, said or done things to please, intimidate and dominate others the more one urges to repeat in a mindless, irrational pursuit that will end with inevitable loss of control in uncontrollable torment.

THEREFORE POSING, SAYING, DOING THINGS WITH STYLE TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE & INTIMIDATE OTHERS IS NOT A REASON, IS NOT REASONABLE BUT AN EMOTION OR CRAVING BASED ON FORCE AND IRRATIONAL THAT MANY DO NOT BELIEVE WILL END WITH LOSS OF CONTROL IN TORMENT.

AS THE BUDDHA SAID THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE POSSIBLE AND THINGS THAT ARE IMPOSSIBLE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS, THAT IS EVERYTHING ABOUT FORCE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON (STYLE) TO HAVE MEANINGFUL PURPOSES AND SO IT IS THAT THE PURPOSES OF STYLE THAT ARE TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE, DOMINATE AND INTIMIDATE ARE IRRATIONAL, EMOTIONAL & INSATIABLE. STYLE IS MEANINGLESS BECAUSE IT IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN INDIVIDUAL'S CONSISTENT BRAND THAT HAS TO BE MEMORISED TO BE REHASHED OF HOW HE PROLONGS HIS USE OF FORCE, CHANGES SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WITHIN AND BETWEEN FUNDAMENTAL UNITS OF SPEECH OR MOTION THAT FALSELY DIFFERENTIATES HIM BY FORCE NOT TRULY DISTINGUISHES HIM BY REASON FROM OTHERS.
THE FACT THAT YOU NEVERTHELESS SEE STYLE AS MEANINGFUL REFLECTS ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END SIMILARLY IN MAD PERCEPTION THAT SHIT IS FOOD (STYLE IS GOOD) AND FOOD (STYLE IS HARMFUL) IS SHIT.

SO YOU THINK THAT ONLY OTHERS HAVE STYLE, YOU ARE WONDERFULLY STYLE FREE? THE ANGER WITH WHICH YOU SAY THINGS THAT HAVE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FROM OTHERS IS THE STYLE THAT YOU EXPRESS ON THAT OCCASION TO INTIMIDATE OTHERS, THE GENTLE WAY WITH WHICH YOU SAY SOMETHING IS YOUR STYLE ON THAT OCCASION THAT HAS SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FROM OTHERS THAT YOU USE TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS AS TO YOUR FRIENDLINESS.

WHEN A PERSON SPEAKS IN A GENTLE WAY TO SAY, “I DISAGREE WITH YOU, I SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE SOMEONE”, THE STYLE IS TO FALSELY IMPRESS ME WITH HIS FRIENDLINESS OR LACK OF ILL WILL. SHORN OF THIS FALSE STYLE HIS MESSAGE IS HOSTILE, HE IS CHALLENGING ME. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU WANT TO IMPRESS ME AND OTHERS WITH YOUR FABRICATED GENTLENESS THAT IS BASED ON STYLE, HOW YOU SAY OR DO SOMETHING THAN SUBSTANCE (NOT KILLING, NOT HARMING, NOT SARCASTIC, NOT FORCEFUL OR EMOTIONAL OR LIKING NOR DISLIKING)? MESMERIZED BY YOUR ADDICTION TO STYLE AND FIRMLY BELIEVING AND PERCEIVING IT AS GOOD WHEN IT IS ONLY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS WITH YOUR FRIENDLINESS, YOU ARE HEADED FOR ULTIMATE LOSS OF CONTROL AND MADNESS. TRUE GENTLESSNESS IS NEVER BASED ON HOW YOU SAY OR DO THINGS (STYLE) BUT WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT DOES NOT HARM OR HURT OTHERS BUT TRULY BENEFITS OTHERS.
WHAT IS SO INTRINSICALLY GENTLE OR FRIENDLY ABOUT “I DISAGREE WITH YOU; I SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE SOMEBODY”? IF THERE IS NOTHING INTRINSICALLY GENTLE OR FRIENDLY THEN YOUR FRIENDLINESS OR GENTLENESS MUST BASED ENTIRELY ON YOUR STYLE OR WAY YOU SAID IT THAT ACTUALLY BELIES YOUR INTENT TO OPPOSE ME, CREATING CONFLICT IN YOURSELF AND ME. YOUR STYLE ALWAYS COUNTS AGAINST YOU, NEVER FOR YOU AND IT IS THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT YOU SAY THAT WILL (AS JESUS SAID) JUSTIFY YOU IF IT IS TRUE AND CONDEMN YOU IF IT IS FALSE.
Not only is the gentle style false but the substance of what is said can be examined and proven false and therefore what is said is based on false premises to rebuke me accompanied by a false gentle style.
Just because your smiles are always white as lilies does not mean others' smiles are similarly so and I am wrong to criticize others' smiles as your disagreement suggests. You are actually vouching that all others' smiles are similarly white as lilies and so back off, stop criticizing smiling.
If you want to tell me why you smile you should tell me all the motivations behind your smiles. Don't tell me you never smile to hide your dislike for someone, you never smiled because you are embarrassed, you are smiling not at the falsity but the truth of a joke, you never smile to exert pressure on others?
If smiling is merely an exercise of force of the muscles of your face that is meaningless, only for show and liking is nothing more than the meaningless stirring in speed and strength of force of your mental force of going against self controlled by the force of self preservation then you are saying you lied with your facial muscles because your mental force stirred in speed and strength.

BECAUSE STYLE IS FORCEFUL, IT IS A POTENT ATTRACTOR OF ATTENTION WHENEVER IT IS PRESENT THAT DRAWS ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE PUNY FORCE-FREE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID OR DONE AND SO IF YOUR INTENTION IN SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING IS TO DECEIVE OR MANIPULATE OTHERS TO ACCEDE TO YOUR WISHES, IT IS CRUCIAL THAT YOU HAVE AN ACCOMPANYING STYLE TO DISTRACT OTHERS SO THAT THEY FAIL TO EXAMINE THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO CAREFULLY OR WITH UNDIVIDED ATTENTION. IF YOU TRULY MEAN EVERYTHING YOU SAY OR DO, YOU WANT OTHERS TO DEVOTE THEIR UNDIVIDED ATTENTION TO IT, WHY DISTRACT ATTENTION FROM IT BY PRESENTING A POWERFUL DISTRACTOR, STYLE, BASED ON FORCE? THEREFORE STYLE IS INTENDED FOR DECEPTION NEVER WHOLESOME OR AUGMENTARY.
**
IF WHAT I SAY ABOVE AS IN MANY OTHER DIFFERENT THINGS I SAID ARE TRUE, BENEFICIAL AND CRITICALLY IMPORTANT AND NOBODY HAS EVER SAID THEM, THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST SAY SO AND IF I HAVE SAID SO I WILL HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM AND PROVEN WHAT JESUS SAID AS FALSE THAT ONLY THE COUNSELOR CAN DO SO.
IF A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE HAS OCCURRED AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS AND THEY HAVE BENEFITED EVERYONE THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR MUST ALSO CAUSE THIS CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IF HE IS TO BENEFIT YOU. IF I HAVE DONE SO, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO DO SO AGAIN AND I WOULD HAVE SUPERSEDED THE COUNSELOR.
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor (like Jesus was a counselor, a person who came), to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive (Jesus says the world that may include you cannot receive or accept or welcome the counselor) neither sees (can recognize) him nor knows (have knowledge, can work out or have been told) him; you know (Jesus did not say you can recognize him but you can work out who he is or know him) him, for he dwells with you (if the counselor is a counselor in your mind and you still need Jesus to tell you he dwells with you he must be a hard to detect or false counselor. If the counselor is someone who dwells physically with you and you do not realize then Jesus is merely informing you that he will be dwelling in your midst), and will be in you. "These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (The counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things (he will cover a broad range of subjects), and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you (if the church has brought you remembrance of what Jesus taught, it would be redundant for the counselor to come).But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (If consciousness changes are possible and it alleviates suffering then whoever is the counselor must also cause consciousness to change)And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. (When the counselor comes, it will be time for mankind to be judged)"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. (Did a consciousness change in recent years enable you to bear what you could not previously? Only a previously unimaginable consciousness change can make you bear what you could not bear then just as you could not bear a consciousness change is possible before it happened and I was the trigger of the change after 1977 as I am on the sidelines of changes today) When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority (if he does not appear as someone speaking on his own authority why should Jesus inform you so?), but whatever he hears he will speak (if the counselor knows everything, he will not need to hear and then speak) and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you (have I not taken from what is Jesus’ and the Buddha’s and declared to you in a way that no man has ever done? Jesus said let your yes be yes only, anything more comes from evil. I have demonstrated in many ways how people including those who call themselves good never let their yes be yes only but emotionally do and say much more that comes from evil). All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
Jesus referred to the counselor as the Holy Spirit and he said whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.
Jesus: Therefore I tell you, every (not some) sin and blasphemy will (not may) be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against (blasphemes) the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against (blasphemes) the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
If someone spells out precisely in many ways where no one else has done so the only sources of the woes that afflict you (namely your constant use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness) and you speak against him then if you are suffering you shall be permitted to go your own way and whatever harm you have done others shall be accounted for.
The Buddha referred in one place to the All Powerful One having two sons one of whom he called Tissa that may be Jesus who is called Yeshua in Aramaic and Isa in Arabic:
Subrahma and Paramatta Brahma,together with sons of the Powerful One,Sanankumara and Tissa:They too have come to the forest meeting.Great Brahma (the Father), who stands over 1,000 Brahma worlds,who arose there spontaneously, effulgent:Prestigious is he, with a terrifying body.And ten brahma sovereigns, each the lord of his own realm -- and in their midst has comeHarita Brahma surrounded by his retinue."
If you don’t believe style is meaningful, how come you are still stylish?
If you do not believe style is meaningful, how come there is still style in yours and everybody’s speech, motion and postures that I can demonstrate objectively?
Because there is still style, you must find it meaningful or have an irresistible attraction for style or you are its helpless slave than master, you cannot help being stylish even if you did not want to be stylish. A large part of style is subconscious, people aren’t aware there is unnatural fabricated style in the ‘quiet’ way they go about, they are unaware there is significant forceful prolonging, changes of speed and strength of force even when they are relatively sedate and composed.
Nobody loves (reason based concern for) style but they all forcefully like style, are attracted to style and because force is blind, reflexive, they are instantly automatically mindless attracted to style and it would take effacement, paying persistent attention to painstaking identify and eliminate forceful prolonging, changing speed and strength of force before one finally is released from the tormenting prison of style that leads to the execution chamber.
Impressing Others Is An Urge:
You want to impress, please, dominate or intimidate others, you never reason to impress, please, dominate or intimidate others. Reason will never recommend that you impress, please, intimidate or dominate others because they are stressful, restless and without end.
Therefore impressing, pleasing, dominating and intimidating others come from a want or desire or urge and they are all emotions or emotional drives that are senseless, cannot be satisfied but instead reinforcing so that the urge to impress, please, intimidate, dominate becomes easier to arise to more intense levels that become increasingly hard to shake off with practice and will end in loss of control or insanity.
THEREFORE THE PURPOSES OF STYLE, NAMELY TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, DOMINATE OR INTIMIDATE ARE ALL WANTS OR URGES THAT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH MENTAL FORCE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MINDFUL UNDERSTANDING THE NECESSITY FOR.
Pleasing Others:
There are many things people say or do and styles with which they say or do things (often without awareness) not because they truly want to say or do so but to falsely or hypocritically to please others.
People may say things to flatter others, bow courteously or submissively not because they truly desire to do so but just to please them.
Shyness is the way with which you say or do things and therefore a style and it is never natural but is the way you behave or say things or a style that you learn or is conditioned by others to please others because others (eg parents) like you to behave in a way dependent on them. People can speak and do things in a fearful way not because they are fearful but to please others that they are subordinate.
Being an extrovert or introvert or taciturn or morose or gregarious are all about styles and how you say or do things not about substance. Thus for those who see, this is a world of stylish humans and creatures.
(You too can learn to speak and do things shyly by copying the behavior of shy people and although initially you may have to pay attention to fabricate shyness, if you persist, shyness becomes second nature to you and you start to identify with shyness, you develop false self identity view that the Buddha said led to future states of woe that you are by nature shy and shy is good)
People fabricate friendliness in their speech or motions partly to impress others and partly to please others because they perceive it is expected of them or there are rewards for behaving in this way that pleases others.
School children may remain quiet or well behaved not because they want to, not because they know the reasons why they should behave themselves but to please their teachers for fear of punishment.
If you are doing or saying something to please others, you are adopting a certain style to please others then you are not a sincere person but putting on a show and a hypocrite.
Sometimes husbands ask their spouses how they are feeling and act concerned or caring not because they truly want to but to please their spouses or to get rewards like sexual favors.
The behavior that people are aware in which they want to please others may be like the tip of the iceberg compared to the totality of all their behavior in which they want to please others. It is not natural or healthy to be unaware of the real purpose of your behavior that is to please others but it reflects extended forceful denial and their behavior to please others are mindlessly copied from others without knowing why.
Styles to please others must be distinguished from styles to impress. Pleasing and impressing are two different things. You boast either openly or in a camouflaged way to impress others not please them.
IT IS NOT COMPULSORY OR UNAVOIDABLE THAT YOU SHOULD SAY OR DO THINGS OR ADOPT A STYLE (EG SHY) TO PLEASE OTHERS, IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO DISCARD SUCH BEHAVIOR AND BE A FREE MAN.
SAYING OR DOING THINGS JUST TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS OR SAYING OR DOING THINGS WITH AN ADDED STYLE THAT IS MEANT TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE IS THE ESSENCE OF HYPOCRISY WHICH IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT RUIN AND MANY DO NOT REALIZE THEY FACE RUIN EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY.
THE PURPOSES (NOT REASONS FOR STYLE BECAUSE STYLE NEVER HAS REASON) OF STYLE ARE TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS. THESE ARE ALL URGES OR DESIRES NOT REASONS OR RATIONAL SPECIFIC DEEDS. BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL DESIRES BASED ON MENTAL FORCE, THEY CAN NEVER BE SATISFIED BUT THE PERSON KEEP DOING IT, KEEP GET BETTER AT DOING IT THAT BECAUSE IT IS TORMENTING, WILL END IN TRAGEDY.
(If what I say above is true and beneficial and nobody has said it to you then whoever is the counselor Jesus described must also say so and if I have already done so, I will have superseded him. I know I am not foolish saying the things I say because I know nobody has said them)

Buddhist drug detox ritual calls for group vomiting:
This is a ritual with the vomiting symbolizing the vomiting of the desire or addiction to drugs. What has group vomiting got to do with detoxifying yourself? If you believe it is efficacious you have false perception and logic that will end in mad perception and logic.
If people want to vomit they will do so. Instead by organizing grouped vomiting you are forcing them to vomit against their wills when they have no desire to vomit or you are training them to act or put on a show.
It reflects that many who call themselves Buddhists, even their leaders do not understand what they claim to represent, faith in rites is deadly because it is one of three lower fetters to future states of woe.
What Is A Ritual?
A ritual is something you perform with your body or speech that is intended to achieve a target that it is impossible to achieve.
If you believe that by inducing vomiting in yourself you can cure yourself of drug addiction that is faith in a ritual that can sometimes be efficacious, because if you believe in it and you stop yourself taking drugs you can believe that it is your vomiting and not simultaneous determination to stop taking drugs that was responsible for curing you. You are now deluded, seeing a connection where there is none that induced vomiting can cure drug addiction.
If you believe that bathing in the Ganges at a certain spot on a certain day can wash away your sins and it cannot then it is faith in rituals that leads to perdition.
If you believe certain chants and prayers and death ceremonies can sent a person to heaven that too is faith in rituals.
Nothing else, whatever prayers or items of diets or medicines or exercise or shrines or ways you behave can ameliorate your suffering here and send you heaven except genuine virtuous conduct (letting your yes be yes only, obeying what Jesus commanded or not killing, telling lies with mouth and body, not stealing, not taking intoxicants, not coveting, idle chattering and tale bearing and illicit sexual activities.
The Buddha can make people disappear:
Just as God can make you disappear (He has power over you), the Buddha too can make people disappear or invisible as related in the incident below where a householder was unable to see his missing son who had sought refuge with the Buddha seated next to the Buddha because the Buddha willed it so perhaps so that he will not be too emotional as to be incapable of being instructed.
Thus my missing VCD and this software CD that ended up sitting at the top of a pile of CDs that I searched many times just earlier may have been rendered invisible to me just as God can, according to the Buddha make things disappear.
No one has reason or cause to rubbish the account below because how would you know it is false? If you rubbish the Buddha as you rubbish Jesus, you may be called to account that will be far greater than you imagine possible if you are wrong.
8. And the Blessed One saw the seññþi, the householder, coming from afar. On seeing him, He thought: `What if I were to effect such an exercise of miraculous power, that the seññþi, the householder, sitting here, should not see Yasa, the noble youth, who is sitting here also.' And the Blessed One effected such an exercise of His miraculous power.
9. And the seññþi, the householder, went to the place where the Blessed One was; having approached Him, he said to the Blessed One: `Pray, Lord, has the Blessed One seen Yasa, the noble youth?'
`Well, householder, sit down. Perhaps, sitting here, you may see Yasa, the noble youth, sitting here also.' [\q 106/] (The Buddha did not tell a lie that he had not seen the youth or he is not around. What he said did not deceive the householder)
And the seññþi the householder, who thought: ,indeed, sitting here I shall see Yasa, the noble youth sitting here also !' became glad and joyful, and having respectfully saluted the Blessed One, he sat down near Him.
10. When the seññþi, the householder, was sitting near Him, the Blessed One preached to him in due course; that is to say, He talked about the merits obtained by alms-giving (&c., as at end of sect.5). And the seññþi, the householder, having seen the Truth, having mastered the Truth, having penetrated the Truth, having overcome uncertainty, having dispelled all doubts, having gained full knowledge, dependent on nobody else for the knowledge of the Doctrine of the Teacher, said to the Blessed One: `Glorious, Lord ! Glorious, Lord! Just as if one should set up, Lord, what had been overturned, or should reveal what had been hidden, or should point out the way to one who had lost his way, or should bring a lamp into the darkness, in order that those who had eyes might see visible things, thus has the Blessed One preached the Doctrine in many ways. I take my refuge, Lord, in the Blessed One, and in the Dhamma, and in the fraternity of bhikkhus; may the Blessed One receive me from this day forth while my life lasts as a disciple who has taken his refuge in Him.'
This was the first person in the world who became a lay-disciple by the formula of the holy triad.
11. And Yasa, the noble youth, while instruction was administered (by the Buddha) to his father, contemplated the stage of knowledge which he had seen with his mind and understood; and his mind became free from attachment to the world, and was [\q 107/] released from the àsavas. Then the Blessed One thought: `Yasa, the noble youth, while instruction was administered to his father, has contemplated the stage of knowledge which he had seen with his mind and understood; and his mind has become free from attachment to the world, and has become released from the àsavas. It is impossible that Yasa, the noble youth, should return to the world and enjoy pleasures, as he did before, when he lived in his house. What if I were now to put an end to that exertion of my miraculous power.' And the Blessed One put an end to that exertion of His miraculous power.
12. Then the seññþi, the householder, saw Yasa, the noble youth, sitting there. On seeing him he said to Yasa, the noble youth: `My son Yasa, your mother is absorbed in lamentation and grief; restore your mother to life.'
13. Then Yasa, the noble youth, looked at the Blessed One. And the Blessed One said to the seññþi, the householder:, `What do you think then, O householder? That Yasa has (first) won only an imperfect (47) degree of knowledge and insight into the Truth, as you have yourself? Or that rather he was contemplating the stage of knowledge which he had seen with his mind and understood; and that his mind has thus become free from attachment to the world, and has become released from the àsavas? Now would it then be possible, O householder, that Yasa should return to the world and enjoy pleasures as he did before, when he lived in his house?' `Not so, Lord.' [\q 108/]
`Yasa, the noble youth, O householder, had (first) won, like yourself, an imperfect degree of knowledge and insight into the Truth. But when he was contemplating the stage of knowledge which he had seen, with his mind and understood, his mind has become free from attachment to the world, and has become released from the àsavas. It is impossible, O householder, that Yasa, the noble youth, should return to the world and enjoy pleasures as he did before, when he lived in his house.'
14. `It is all gain, Lord, to Yasa, the noble youth, it is high bliss, Lord, for Yasa, the noble youth, that the mind of Yasa, the noble youth, has become free from attachment to the world, and has become released from the àsavas. Might, Lord, the Blessed One consent to take His meal with me today together with Yasa, the noble youth, as His attendant?'
The Blessed One expressed His consent by remaining silent. Then the seññþi, the householder, when he understood that the Blessed One had accepted his invitation, rose from his seat, respectfully saluted the Blessed One, and passing round Him with his right side towards Him, departed thence.
15. And Yasa, the noble youth, soon after the seññþi, the householder, was gone, said to the Blessed One: `Lord, let me receive the pabbajjà and upasampadà ordinations from the Blessed One.'
`Come, O bhikkhu,' said the Blessed One, `Well taught is the Doctrine; lead a holy life for the sake of the complete extinction of suffering.'
Thus this Venerable person received the upasampadà ordination. At that time there were seven arahats in the world.
Absolute Abstention From Sex, Stealing, Killing & Lying:
There are great fruits from a virtuous life and the reason why people never reap those fruits is because they have never practiced true abstention that the Buddha lists below:
You must not have sex with humans or animals.
You must not take even a blade of grass that is not given to you.
You must not intentionally kill even a worm or ant.
You must not tell lies, make claims that are not true.
The Buddha spoke of seeing danger in the slightest fault and the price for laxity may be far greater than you can imagine possible.
1. At that time the bhikkhus, after having conferred the upasampadà ordination on a certain bhikkhu, left him alone and went away. Afterwards, as he went alone (to the àràma), he met on the way his former wife. She said to him: `Have you now embraced the religious life?' (He replied): `Yes, I have embraced the religious life.' `It is difficult for persons who have embraced religious fife, to obtain sexual intercourse; come, let us have intercourse.' He practised intercourse with her, and in consequence, came late (to the àràma). The bhikkhus said: `How is it, friend, that you are so late?'
2. Then that bhikkhu told the whole matter to the bhikkhus. The bhikkhus told it to the Blessed One. [\q 235/]
`I prescribe, O bhikkhus, that you give a companion to a newly-ordained bhikkhu, and that you tell him the four interdictions:
`"A bhikkhu who has received the upasampadà ordination, ought to abstain from all sexual intercourse even with an animal. A bhikkhu who practises sexual intercourse is no samaõa and no follower of the Sakyaputta. As a man whose head is cut off, cannot live any longer with his trunk alone, thus a bhikkhu who practises sexual intercourse is no samaõa and no follower of the Sakyaputta. Abstain from doing so as long as your life lasts.
3. `"A bhikkhu who has received the upasampadà ordination, ought to abstain from taking what is not given to him and from theft, even of a blade of grass. A bhikkhu who takes what is not given to him, or steals it, if it is a pàda (i.e. a quarter of a kàrshàpana), or of the value of a pàda, or worth more than a pàda, is no samaõa, and no follower of the Sakyaputta. As a sear leaf loosed from its stalk cannot become green again, thus a bhikkhu who takes, &c. abstain from doing so as long your life lasts.
4. `"A bhikkhu who has received the upasampadà ordination, ought not intentionally to destroy the life of any being down to a worm or an ant. A bhikkhu who intentionally kills a human being, down to procuring abortion, is no samaõa and no follower of the Sakyaputta. As a great stone which is broken in two, cannot be reunited, thus a bhikkhu who intentionally, &c. abstain from doing so as long as your life lasts.
5. `"A bhikkhu who has received the upasampadà ordination, ought not to attribute to [\q 236/] himself any superhuman condition and not to say even: `I find delight in sojourning in an empty place.' A bhikkhu who with bad intention and out of covetousness attributes to himself a superhuman condition, which he has not, and which he is not possessed of, a state of jhàna (mystic meditation),or one of the vimokkhas (182), or one of the samàdhis (states of self-concentration), or one of the samàpattis (the attainment of the four jhànas and four of the eight vimokkhas), or one of the paths, (of sanctification), or one of the fruits thereof, is no samaõa and no follower of the Sakyaputta. As a palm tree of which the top sprout has been cut off cannot grow again, thus a bhikkhu who with bad intention, &c. abstain from doing so as long as your life lasts."'
Force Has Direction:
In the dimensionless or spatial-less world of the mind only two forces are possible, one acting forward or in one direction to power all activities and another acting in the opposite to control and stop those activities because force will not listen to reason and must be controlled and neutralized or stopped by another force.
There are no third or fourth forces in mind because there are no dimensions in the mind to permit their existence.
Because speech has no dimensions, does not occur in a three dimensional world, direction change is impossible in speech.
Apart from duration, speed and strength that are variable, force too has direction that can only be opposites in the two dimensioned world of speech or the dimensionless world of the mind.
In a three dimensional world like this, force has an infinite array of possible directions in the 360 degrees of a compass in one plane with an infinite number of such planes that make up a globe.
Just as there are an infinite numbers of radii possible in a globe, there are infinite number of directions force can take in a three dimensional world.
Because there is an infinite number of directions force can take in a three dimensional world, direction is exploited ‘to the ‘hilt’ in motion to manifest style by curving motion where straight line motion will do, by prolonging along the line of the motion and by rotating whirling motion around the axis of the motion. Many people’s signatures have outrageous number of whorls that are unnecessary but to impress at great cost in ink and energy used.
However in the dimensionless world of speech or mental force, force can only be directed in two directions namely forwards or backwards. For instance the attractive force that is in like that is turned inwards is experienced as pride and the same like turned outwards is experienced as desire, lust, greed and envy. The repulsive force that is dislike turned inwards is experienced as sadness or self hate and outwards as hate, anger, jealousy.
Similarly there can only be two forces in the dimensionless mental world. One force driving forwards that is the source of all the beings activities that because it hurts the person, is called the force of going against self and the only other possible that must be necessary to oppose, modulate and bring to a halt that force called the force of self preservation. Force will not listen to reason or anything but force once activated will exhaust itself, be renewed or must be controlled or neutralized by another opposite force and thus in the dimensionless mental world, there can only be two forces, the force of going against self that must be opposed by an opposite force of self preservation because force is dangerous and cannot be permitted to run wild but must be controlled and neutralized by another opposite force.
BECAUSE THE MIND IS NOT THREE DIMENSIONAL, THERE CAN ONLY BE TWO MENTAL FORCES, ONE THAT IS THE DRIVE OF ALL ACTIVITIES THAT HARMS THE MIND AND THEREFORE CALLED THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF AND ANOTHER THAT IS NECESSARY TO CONTROL AND NEUTRALIZE IT TEMPORARILY CALLED THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION BECAUSE FORCE NEVER LISTENS TO REASON AND CAN ONLY BE NEUTRALIZED FOR A PARTICULAR INSTANCE.
The Difference Between Pleasing & Impressing Others:
When you say or do something with style to please someone you want that something you said or did with style to make him like himself or his current situation.
When you say or do something with style to impress someone you want that something you said or did with style to make him like you.
Thus both pleasing and impressing is about making someone experience ‘like’ or making others like (stir their mental forces, not make them reason or love) but the target differs in that impressing is about making someone like you and pleasing is about making the target like himself.
It is a delusion that pleasing others is the result of selflessness because pleasing others is seldom selfless but usually if not always self serving to get what you want from others that may be so well denied that the nice person is blind to his motives.
When you say things to flatter others in terms of physical attributes (wealth or handsome) or intelligence or witticism or sociability you want to please others.
People often say and do things in a nice way that is only so because of forceful stretching, changes of speed and loudness that sounds musical or melodious in order to please you so that you can give them what they want and that is manipulating others not being good.
For instance when a boy is courting a girl, he will do and say everything that he knows she likes to hear and seen done to her, not because he wants to or believes what he is doing but to convince her to marry him. When children want their parents to buy them something or want money, they will usually shed their nasty or abrasive behavior to become obedient or submissive to get what they want. Subjects say pleasing or nice things to their rulers or dictators not because they believe in what they say or do (bow) but to keep their heads and escape punishment. If customers without their patronage of your shop you will be punished and hence many shopkeepers say things to please their customers and cultivate their friendship not because they believe what they say or do but to please customers with the motive that they continue to patronize him.
THEREFORE SAYING OR DOING THINGS TO PLEASE OTHERS OR TO BE NICE TO THEM IS SELDOM IF EVER SELF SACRIFICING AS DELUDED NICE PEOPLE LIKE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE BUT IT IS MOTIVATED SELFISHLY TO GET WHAT THEY WANT OR AVOID PUNISHMENT AND THIS IS DEBT INCURRING MANIPULATION OF OTHERS NOT MERITORIOUS.
When you want people to respect you or find you attractive in terms of physical attributes (wealth or handsome) or intelligence or witticism or sociability, you want to impress others.
When a person speaks with excitement it may be to impress or please others. If you are conveying you are excited by what someone tells you he has done, you want to please him, make him like himself for doing something wonderful but when you speak excitedly about what you have done, you want to falsely exert pressure on him to appreciate or like what you have done that may be no big deal.
Even though people are striving to please and impress others all the time, they are often not even aware they are doing so (partly because of automatism and partly because of denial because it is shameful) let alone that they understand the nature of this impressing and pleasing that they are conducting and this means their behavior is not based on reason but copied without understanding from others.
When what you say or do with style is intended to intimidate others, you want them to be fearful of you, and you do so with an angry voice that can only be because there is violent prolonging use of force to stretch syllables, violent acceleration of speed and strength of force within and between syllables or units of motion.
When what you say or do with style is intended to dominate others, you speak or do things with added force so that the voice and how you do things is loud and powerful. Even if you are truly a strong person if you display more power than is necessary for the situation, you are putting on a show to dominate others.
Another important purpose of style is purely to deceive others. When you are trying to sell a get rich scheme to another, you speak with enthusiasm and dramatic conviction that it is a sure winner to deceive others to take part. When you tell a lie, you use force and deliberation with dramatic facial expressions as if remembering it happening to convince the person that what you say is true and he should trust you.
Fabricated and genuine gentleness:
You cannot be gentler than speaking or doing things with minimal force that is constant in speed and strength. There is no style in this gentleness.
Gentleness that is fabricated is about using unnecessary extra force to prolong the fundamental units of speech or motion, change speed and strength of force in a ‘melodious’ way that perverted people find attractive and pleasurable when it stirs restlessness (uneasiness) that they must control to ‘enjoy’ it. For instance when someone caresses you in a nice way, you want to squirm but you force yourself (using force) to stay still to enjoy that pleasure because you lust after that girl who is caressing you in a fabricated way.
Gentleness that is the style of touch or speech can be compared with driving a car slowly with the accelerator and brakes simultaneously active in a venture that is unnecessary and stressful. Don’t you think it would suffice to drive with the accelerator alone rather than also applying the brakes that would necessitate the use of excessive propulsive force with forward motion the net result of propulsive force greater than retarding force present?
YOU CANNOT BE WHITER THAN WHITE. SIMILARLY YOU CANNOT BE GENTLER THAN USING MINIMAL NECESSARY FORCE AT CONSTANT SPEED AND STRENGTH TO SAY OR DO THINGS. PERVERTS BELIEVE THEY CAN BE WHITER THAN WHITE AND USE FORCE TO PROLONG THEIR UNITS OF SPEECH OR UNITS OF TOUCHING MOTION, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT ACTUALLY STRESSES THEMSELVES AND THEIR RECIPIENTS WHO MUST GALVANIZE THEMSELVES TO WITHSTAND THE EXCESSIVE FORCE TRANSMITTED TO ENJOY THE ‘FEMININE’ TOUCH FROM OTHERS THAT THEY SO CRAVE. PEOPLE FEEL ‘TCIKLISH’ OR SQUIRM WHEN CARESSED BECAUSE THEY CAN EXPERIENCE THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH PRESENT EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT AWARE OF THEIR NATURES AND THESE FORCEFUL PROLONGING AND CHANGES EXERT A POWERFUL REFLEX TO SQUIRM OR BE ‘TICKLISH’.
The Difference Between Yoga & Meditation:
Yoga is putting your body through contortions that you have faith that it will cure your mental and physical ailments. Even when they sit crossed legged, yogins are obsessed with the style or particular proper way to sit that they think will be healing. It is a form of faith in rituals that leads to future states of woe.
Meditation when properly done is merely secluding your person from external distractions and bringing mindfulness or attention to the fore to examine your mental state (moods, stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate), what and how you are thinking with constant stretching, changing speed and strength of force) and to use your force of self preservation to dispel emotions, like and dislike that have arisen, to slow down your thoughts and finally arrest them if possible, as you finally will if you practice correctly long enough. There is no particular posture that is conductive but there must be some discipline like sitting upright rather than slumped. Meditation is not sleeping although you may lapse into sleep because sleep according to the Buddha is about torpor or scattering of your mind to dream and one should endeavor with meditation to remain alert mindfully aware of what is happening in your mind and your surroundings.
Meditation is for the purpose of eradicating the five hindrances as described by the Buddha namely greed and worries regarding the world, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty and sloth and torpor.
By secluding oneself and sitting in a disciplined posture, one summons mindfulness to set aside greed and concern for the world, drive out thoughts of ill will, dispel restlessness, doubt and uncertainty ad laziness (idleness) and sleepiness. One prefers to be alert than sleep. One learns to cultivate alertness than sleepiness or drowsiness.
Two sources of restlessness that must afflict ordinary people:
If you constantly use force (and force must be used if you stretch syllables or units of motion, change speed or loudness or strength of force), with time force automatically activates itself and rather than you forcing yourself to activate force, you are struggling to mobilize your force of self preservation to suppress the activation of force that can be stressful to your mind and body. The constant mindless urge to activate force is itself restlessness and can only be controlled if it is not permanently exterminated and what is controlled is doomed for final total loss of control or madness.
Because a major use of force is to constantly forcefully change speed and loudness (accelerate and decelerate in speed and strength) that is in truth meaningless or unnecessary except for show to impress, please, intimidate or dominate, this constant forceful change of speed and strength of force is itself tending to become automatic or self perpetuating that must be countered or modulated by one’s mental force of self preservation and with inevitable momentary losses of control the person becomes seized by restlessness or meaningless speech or motion that he does not realize are harbingers of future total loss of control or mad restlessness.
The Buddha never told a lie:
When asked by the householder whether the Buddha had seen his son, the Buddha who knew the son was sitting there but invisible did not tell a lie to say he has not seen his son or his son did not come but he told the householder that if he sat there patiently, he might see his son.
THEREFORE THE BUDDHA IS SKILFUL, CONFRONTED BY A SITUATION WHERE MOST FOOLISH PEOPLE MIGHT RESORT TO A LIE OFTEN WITHOUT REALIZING THEY DID, THE BUDDHA SKILLFULLY OBVIATED A LIE BY SAYING SITTING HERE YOU MAY SEE YOUR SON.
Curved Motion Is Constant Direction Change Plus Prolonging:
When you describe a curved motion between A & B where an economical straight line motion will do, you are stretching or prolonging your motion in the name of style to impress others.
A motion is curved only because there are gradual constant direction changes that never come free but force must be used to constantly correct direction and so a curved motion is not just prolonging a motion unnecessarily but using force to constantly change direction because beings in this world worship curved motion as desirable when it is stressful and not letting your yes be yes only.
Just because you and your cohorts idolize curved motions as in dancing and curved motions of their fingers, hands and arms of the conductor of an orchestra does not mean beings in heaven share your perversion.
FORCE MUST BE USED TO CHANGE DIRECTION AND IF YOU LIKE TO EXPRESS CURVED MOTIONS YOU MUST USE FORCE TO CHANGE DIRECTION AS YOU MUST TO PROLONG YOUR TRACK TO THE TARGET. YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE NOT REASON WHO LIKES TO USE FORCE UNNECESSARILY FOR SHOW.
Style Is All About Using Force To Tamper:
Style is all about mobilizing whatever facility available in force to tamper with reality.
Because force has direction, duration, strength and speed, these are all utilized by beings in this world of suffering to fashion their different brands of style that falsely differentiates themselves whilst persecuting themselves and others by creating mutual stress, restlessness and distraction.
Beings here utilize duration in force by prolonging the duration of their use of force in powering a syllable or unit of motion to stretch it that is perceived in perversion as charming.
Where direction change is possible in motion that occur in three dimensions, being use the available direction change to fashion curved or whorled movements.
Beings here utilize strength of force and speed of force to fashion their particular style of how they change speed and strength of force within and between units of speech or motion.
Style is all about using force never reason to fashion changes that are to be seen to deceive, impress, please (so as to get what you want), intimidate and dominate in the process creating insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that further conditions your mind that is heading for loss of control and insanity.
Style Is Never Learnt But Always Copied:
Learning requires you understand why you should have style. Because there is no meaning in style, it is all about the use of force to fashion your individual brand of direction, speed and strength of force changes and your brand of prolongation of force, there is nothing in style that can be learnt, that can be understood why it is meaningful or necessary and therefore style is always copied from others either completely or by cobbling pieces of different people’s styles.
Not only are their styles copied but the substance of what they say or do is also copied in the same way, the way they reason too is copied with such force that they believe their reasoning and perception is true when it is false or deluded.
LEARNING REQUIRES YOU UNDERSTAND WHY YOU DO OR SAY SOMETHING. CAN YOU UNDERSTAND WHY YOU MUST SAY OR DO SOMETHING WITH STYLE? PEOPLE NEVER HAVE REASONS FOR THEIR STYLES, THEY JUST LIKE AND DISLIKE THEIRS’ AND OTHERS’ STYLES. STYLE IS ALL ABOUT LIKING AND DISLIKING WHICH IS ALL ABOUT STIRRING THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES.
The Purpose Of Meditation:
The Buddha said meditate now Cunda, don’t afterwards regret. You think you can decline to meditate and not regret, not realizing you are pitting yourself against the Buddha. If cultivating meditation is a blissful existence here and even greater bliss as you age and you are headed even for 60,000 eons, each lasting billions of years in heavenly existence then you may rue in regret if you end up transmigrating in eternal habitations as Jesus said and not necessarily as humans, building up a pile of skeletons that is as high as a mountain according to the Buddha.
There is nothing fanciful or artful or mysterious or methodical in meditation and the purpose of meditation is to address the five hindrances that the Buddha described as obstructing wisdom and detains one in suffering and once these five hindrances have been addressed, ‘the sky is the limit’ and depending on how you have cultivated non-thinking, concentration and equanimity, bliss that is higher than the pleasures of the flesh and increasingly sublime is available that leads when well practiced even to 60,000 eons in bliss.
The five hindrances are greed and concerns or preoccupations for the world, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty, ill will and sloth and torpor.
By secluding yourself from the corrupting influences from others, you permit yourself a breather that permits your greed and concerns or preoccupations for affairs of the world to fade away temporarily.
You cannot be restless in body or speech if you are remaining still and silent and what remains is restlessness of thought that you can devote your full attention to unravel.
Once a person has experienced rapture that comes from seclusion his previously strong doubts and uncertainty start to weaken. In the same way a person who is free from suffering becomes imbued by goodwill, his ill will loses drive.
Sloth is laziness. Sitting upright disciplined and alert is an antidote to sloth or laziness or idleness. Torpor is actually sleepiness. Contrary to ordinary people’s perception that sleep is good and healthy, the Buddha prescribed minimal sleep. Sleep is descending into drowsiness and dreaming and confusion and the meditating person is not sleeping even if in his early career there is a tendency to lapse into sleep. Meditation is cultivating alertness to a person’s mind and body and even when he falls into sleep he falls into sleep mindfully and remain in sleep minimally.
I have been asked by people how to meditate as if there are secret ingredients to meditation because people are ritualistic actors who believe there must be particular ways of doing things. One requisite is that you never use force. People use force to force themselves to concentrate and that is counterproductive. No amount of stirring of an agitated beaker of cloudy water will make it settle but you must resist the temptation to intervene and allow the swirling water to settle permitting the colloid particles to precipitate by themselves.

Showing Off Is Enslaving To Others:
No matter how you may deny you are a show off, how it is meaningful and enjoyable instead of stressful or restless, showing off is losing your independence to become dependent on others.
If in truth you show off, you must want to be seen or heard, you must do and say things in a way that you perceive as desirable that you want others to notice and that is enslaving yourself, tailoring your actions and speech to be seen and heard rather truly as you mean.
If you are a show off, you must be self conscious because you want to be seen or heard, you are anxious that you be seen or heard favorably and because you are conscious you will put on a show. Thus anyone who puts on a show whether he is aware or not must be self conscious and as a result of being self conscious he must put on a show in a vicious positive feedback loop that is tormenting and will end in insanity.
Anyone whose style is intended to impress, please, intimidate or dominate must be conscious of himself and being thus self conscious he has an urge to put on a show. He is no longer independent but like a calf, has a tether on his neck that is held by others.
NO MATTER HOW PEOPLE WHO ACT OR PUT ON A SHOW MAY STRIVE TO EXERT THEIR INDEPENDENCE OR BELIEVE THEY ARE INDEPENDENT, THEY ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES AND ENGAGED IN A VAIN PURSUIT THAT ONLY BRING GREATER VEXATIONS AND EVEN INSANITY BECAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN BE AND ARE INDEPENDENT WHEN YOU ARE ALWAYS COURTING OTHERS’ OPINIONS AND TRYING TO IMPRESS OTHERS IS INSANE. ANYONE WHO IS ALWAYS PUTTING ON A SHOW IS IN TRUTH A SHAMELESS SLUT PROSTITUTING HIMSELF TO OTHERS AND THAT IS THE REASON THEY ARE ALL VERY SENSITIVE TO SLIGHTS OR TOUCHY WHERE THEIR PRIDE ARE CONCERNED.
IT IS MAD AND CULTIVATING INSOLUBLE (FORCEFUL) CONFLICT THAT WILL END IN INSANITY TO THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL TO ASSERT YOUR INDEPENDENCE THROUGH VARIOUS ACTIONS OR BELIEFS WHEN YOU ARE CONSTANTLY BEHOLDEN TO OTHERS THROUGH YOUR CONSTANT STYLE THAT IS CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY AIMED AT IMPRESSING & PLEASING OTHERS.
FURTHER, PUTTING ON A SHOW ENTAILS CONSTANTLY REHASHING STANDARDIZED FROM MEMORY TO FAKE LIVE FOR THE OCCASION AND THAT IS ANOTHER ENSLAVEMENT TO A ROBOTIC EXISTENCE WHEREIN ONE IS MERELY A DISC JOCKEY DECIDING WHICH TUNE IN ONE’S MENTAL JUKEBOX TO PLAY FOR THE OCCASION.
Because adopting style is all about prolonging the use force and using force to change direction, speed and strength of force that is intended for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate, there is no justification to use force and no meaning in putting on a show, there is nothing to understand why you should adopt a style and therefore all styles are copied or forcefully conditioned from others without need for understanding or learning.
When a person dances there are constant often violent direction changes in direction of all his or her body parts, the flaying of the head, neck, torso, limbs, hands and feet involved mindless constant forceful direction changes that are meaningless (you shut your mind or reason and just do it copying others) and only intended for show to impress observers and the opposite sex how stylish or attractive and adept you are.
If you think such constant forceful direction changes as depicted in dancing are meaningful you may be courting madness as disco dropouts gyrating in mental wards may attest how tormenting it can be. Many females and males who are reluctant to dance or inhibited often feel compelled to similarly dance just to prove themselves and join in and once they do so, they may become hooked because others encourage them and the forceful changes in dancing is conditioning or addicting just like alcohol, smoking and gambling.
THUS DANCING IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS AND INVOLVE USING FORCE TO CONSTANTLY PROLONG MOVEMENTS, CHANGE DIRECTION, SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND A DAZE AFTERWARDS. TRY DANCING ALONE BY YOURSELF WITHOUT ANY MUSIC AND SEE IF DANCING PER SE DOES SO.
Why everything is so difficult:
It is impossible for people who have style, who are constantly prolonging, changing speed and loudness not to find life difficult, it seems to take so much effort for them to say and do even simple things because they are doing and saying things the hard way with energy sapping forceful prolonging, changes of speed and loudness.
THEREFORE THE FACT THAT YOU FIND IT SUCH AN EFFORT TO SAY OR DO EVEN SIMPLE THINGS (ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR FAKED ENTHUSIASM WANES) IS AN INDICATION THAT THERE IS ACCOMPANYING FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT MAKES SAYING AND DOING THINGS UNNECESSARILY MUCH MORE DEMANDING.
ALTHOUGH IT IS STILL SUFFERING EXISTING TODAY, LIFE WAS EVEN CONSIDERABLY TOUGHER IN THE DAYS BEFORE THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AFTER 1977 AND BEFORE THE FURTHER CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS AND THUS IN THE USUAL COURSE, LIFE IN THE LOWER REALMS THAT INCLUDE HUMAN EXISTENCE IS VERY TOUGH AND REGULARLY PUSHES PEOPLE TO THE BRINK OF MADNESS, HOMICIDE OR SUICIDE AND SO IF YOU DO NOT USE THIS GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO EXTRICATE YOURSELF FROM THIS INSANE WORLD, YOU MAY RUE IN ETERNAL REGRET AT YOUR HEEDLESS FOLLY.
The Trojan Horse:
Nobody likes to be attacked by others but if you have to be attacked, would you prefer a frontal assault at the city gates that you can see and prepare to defend yourself or would you prefer your enemy to present you with a Trojan Horse that you think is a marvelous present when it is a vehicle for hidden troops that will attack you when you are asleep once it is in the bowels of your fortress?
Therefore, rather than meritorious, those people who attack others with a gentle manner may be even more evil than those who are overtly nasty, like a wolf in sheepskin is even more evil than a plain wolf because everyone knows its intent and can be wary at its approach.
THERE ARE MANY WHO HAVE LEARNT TO KILL OTHERS SOFTLY, SAY NASTY THINGS WITH SUCH GENTLE MANNER THAT YOU FEEL OBLIGED TO ACCEPT GRATEFULLY AND FEEL GUILTY YOU ARE AT FAULT WHEN HE IS DISHING SHIT THAT HE WANTS TO TRICK YOU TO ACCEPT AS FOOD. THEY ARE OFTEN DELUDED TO BELIEVE THEY ARE DOING GOOD TO OTHERS AND THEMSELVES WHEN IT IS THE OPPOSITE. FAR FROM MERITORIOUS THEY ARE ACCRUING DEADLY KARMA.
NOT TO SEE HOW YOU HURT YOURSELF IS EVEN MORE AGONIZING:
NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY DENY OR CANNOT SEE YOU ARE PUTTING ON A SHOW TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE OTHERS, IF YOU DO SO, YOU MUST EXPERIENCE CONFLICT AND A DISTURBED MIND AND THE FACT THAT YOU CANNOT SEE HOW YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR DISTURBED MIND MAKES IT EVEN MORE AGONIZING THAT WILL END IN INSANITY BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE YOURSELF HURTING YOURSELF.
THE FOOL WHO KNOWS HE IS HURTING HIMSELF AND OTHERS BUT CANNOT HELP IT IS WISE SO MUCH BUT GREAT IS THE FOOL WHO THINKS HE IS BENEFITING HIMSELF AND OTHERS WHEN IT IS THE OPPOSITE.
Meditation Is Not Incompatible With Christianity:
Meditation as taught by the Buddha means regularly secluding yourself for extended periods to summon mindfulness to the fore to dispel the five hindrances namely greed and preoccupations with the world, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty and sloth and torpor.
Jesus said: But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.
Is shutting yourself in a room to pray secluding yourself as in Buddhist meditation or communion with the world? And when you pray, should you pray for greed and preoccupation with worldly affairs, restlessness, ill will, doubt and uncertainty or should you pray to be released from greed and preoccupation with the world, release from tormenting restlessness, pray for faith that Jesus said is the opposite of doubt and uncertainty (he rebuked Peter who began to sink, saying why did he doubt, man of little faith) and pray to be imbued with goodwill than hate and anger?
When you pray in private, should they be infrequent and as brief as you can or should you engage in frequent extended prayers? If your prayer sessions are regular and extended, might they not be comparable to the meditative sessions described by the Buddha?
How can you be guilty of sin when you can turn off all thinking at will with the second meditative trance? If your body is withdrawn from this world, you are silent and even your thoughts are stilled but you are fully aware, how can you commit any sin in mind, body or speech?
Jesus said you should deny yourself, carry your cross and go with him.
Are you denying yourself if you are fully involved with the affairs of this world and do not set apart some time to seclude yourself to meditate to free yourself from greed and concerns for the world or are you truly denying yourself if you set aside frequent protracted periods when you seclude yourself to dispel greed and concerns for the world, ill will, instill faith by displaying doubt and uncertainty and restlessness?
Is this a world of restless men who are tormented or men at peace with themselves? If you yourself are afflicted by restlessness are you a man of this world or a man apart from this world? Therefore is meditating to dispel restlessness denying yourself as Jesus advocated or not denying yourself as the world does not deny itself by tormenting themselves and others with restlessness?
Doubt and uncertainty whose dispelling is one of the purpose of meditation is the opposite of faith that Jesus advocated (he rebuked Peter who began to sink by asking why he doubted, man of little faith). This dispelling doubt and uncertainty which is one of the purposes of meditation is to instill faith that is in line with Christianity.
Is dispelling ill will to be replaced by goodwill, another purpose of meditation compatible or incompatible with Christianity?
Sloth is laziness. Because the usual condition of ordinary people is sinful, sloth or laziness is indifference to let things be as they are that is permitting the continuation of sin and the banishment of laziness is to instill one with a sense of urgency to address one’s present suffering condition. You can be diligent with affairs of the world to increase your material wealth or you can be diligent in spiritual matters that is what the Buddha is advocating that will lead to self awakening and the deathless.
Sleep that is beyond the minimum required to sustain one is a luxury that the Buddha censures and rather than devotion to sleep or torpor with its descent into drowsiness and dreaming or fabricating, one should be alert and train to descend into sleep in an orderly or mindful manner. The Buddha does not sleep in a haphazard or disarrayed manner but it is said the Buddha mindfully falls into sleep.
Restless Means No Rest:
Restless means rest-less or no rest and the opposite of restless is restful or full of rest.
Which do you prefer, no rest or full of rest?
Jesus said my peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you. Do you think Jesus’ peace is restless or restful? If you think it is full of rest then meditation must be wholesome if one of its purposes is to dispel restlessness.
In theory meditation must be efficacious in dispelling restlessness because if you can sit still without movement that is restfulness of the body, if you can remain silent that is restfulness of speech and if you can still your thoughts as the Buddha tells you is possible with attainment of the second meditative trance, you have attain restfulness of thought.
In practice meditation is efficacious because I know that my restlessness in motion, speech and thought as a result of regular meditation and attentive elimination of stretching, speed and loudness changes is today a pale shadow of the past.
In the same way meditation is efficacious in dispelling greed and preoccupation with affairs of the world because seclusion removes the corrupting influences of others.
A mind and body increasingly imbued by serenity increases in faith and goodwill that dispels doubts and uncertainty and ill will.
A calm clear thinking mind has less inclination to sleep and becomes more vigilant and motivated to seek that is an antidote for sloth or laziness.
THUS MEDITATION IS EFFICACIOUS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE IN DISPELLING GREED AND PREOCCUPATION WITH THE WORLD, ILL WILL, RESTLESSNESS, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY AND SLOTH (LAZINESS OR INDIFFERENCE) AND TORPOR (DROWSINESS AND SLEEPINESS) AND ANYONE WHO SPEAKS AGAINST MEDITATION AND THEREFORE RECOMMENDS OTHERS AVOID IT MAY BE EMOTIONALLY WALKING ON THIN ICE ASKING FOR JUDGMENT.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Peer Pressure

There is such a thing called peer pressure and it may be far more widespread and unconscious, unspoken than people are aware.
Peer pressure is not about reason but pressure is force and peer pressure is psychological and physical force or threat to conform without knowing the reason why you should and that may go against your wishes. Even those who pride themselves as rebels and nonconformists are in truth conformists and as guilty as society that they rebel against. You do not rebel or fight or attack wrong rebels but you dissociate and have nothing to do with them by rising above the fray.
When people join a gang or society they must learn (actually copy) the norms or rules of the gang (eg extorting or going around damaging property) and put them into practice without knowing their meaning and that is copycat behavior.
THE SOURCE, NATURE AND INTENT OF YOUR BEHAVIOR MAY BE KNOWN:
Even if you are clueless, God and those who discern know the source of behavior, whether it was mindlessly copied without knowing why from others in the distant past or you fabricated it yourself.
Even if you are clueless, God and those who discern know the nature of behavior, whether it was mindlessly rehashed faked live from a mental copy or fresh specific for an occasion.
Even if you are clueless, God and those who discern know the intent of behavior, whether it was mindlessly rehashed to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others or you truly mean what you say or did.
AND IT MAY BE THE TRUTH THAT ALL NOT JUST SOME OF THE BEHAVIOR OF ORDINARY PEOPLE AND INDEED ANIMALS ARE COPIED FROM OTHERS WITHOUT KNOWING WHY, THEY ARE REHASHED BY ROTE RATHER THAN LIVE SPECIFIC FOR EACH OCCASION AND IS MEANT PRIMARILY TO STIR LIKE OR DISLIKE, TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE THAN MEANT LITERALLY OR WHAT THE APPARENT SUBSTANCE STATES.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR MY BEHAVIOR TO BE COPIED:
It is impossible that I can be a copycat because there is no one from whom I can copy not smiling not glum when I interact with others, no one I can copy not stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness when I speak.
It is impossible that I copied others what I write because there is no one who said the many things I say. There is no one who states that the only reason why people are stressed, restless and distracted is because of the constant not frequent stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in their speech that have equivalents in their motion, thoughts and perceptions.
IT IS POSSIBLE FOR OTHERS TO BE COPYCATS MERELY COPYING OTHERS IN WHAT AND HOW THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO BECAUSE THERE ARE COPIES OF THEIR BEHAVIOR EVERYWHERE AND THERE IS FORCE IN EVERYONE’S BEHAVIOR THAT IS A POTENT INDUCEMENT TO COPY TO THOSE WHO ARE VULNERABLE TO PEER PRESSURE.
ONLY BEHAVIOR THAT HAS STYLE CAN BE COPIED BECAUSE WITHOUT AN ARTIFICIALLY OR FALSELY ACCOMPANYING DISTINCTIVE STYLE IN WHAT IS SAID OR DONE, THERE IS NOTHING TO BE COPIED THAT IS RECOGNIZABLE AS COPIED OR CAN BE TRACED TO ANOTHER PERSON IT WAS COPIED FROM WITHOUT KNOWING WHY.

Headline in The Age: Bloody big cane toad found in Seaford.

Comment: This statement is never made matter of fact but it is actually addressed like everything else ordinary people do, to the reader's like and dislike.

It is likely the writer is trying to convey as if it is funny what should be disliked, the finding of the cane toad that is a scourge in Australia in a location it is not supposed to be found.

Thus the writer is trying to convey that what he dislikes or detest, a bloody big cane toad is funny or likeable and this stirs emotional conflict in himself and others and he is headed for madness. Liking itself is stirring mental force that harms the mind but he is not content with that but he wants you to join in to like what is dislike and that is another layer of deceit. The fact that you think nothing about this, you think it is good fun reflects how sick you are.
ONLY BEHAVIOR THAT HAS STYLE CAN BE COPIED:
If it is the truth that what and how a person perceives, thinks, speaks and does things is by rote from a mental jukebox then at minimum all a person’s behavior comes from a internal copy on his mental hard disk that he wrote himself and at maximum all the files on his hard disk from which his behavior is derived is also copied from others just as you download files from the internet that you may then customize for yourself.
WHAT IS THERE TO COPY IN SUBSTANCE OR MEANING ONLY SPEECH AND ACTIONS?
IF THERE ARE NO VIRTUALLY INFINITELY VARIABLE PERMUTATIONS OF STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT CAN POSSIBLE DISTINGUISH DIFFERENT STYLES OF SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING THAT CAN BE COPIED LIKE A MOULD BY OTHERS, WHAT IS THERE TO COPY IN WHAT IS SAID OR DONE WITHOUT KNOWING THE REASON WHY?
BECAUSE THERE IS NO MEANING IN STYLE, THERE CAN BE NO REASON FOR LEARNING STYLE, IT CANNOT BE LEARNT BUT MUST BE COPIED WITHOUT KNOWING THE REASON WHY AND THEREFORE ALL STYLE MUST BE COPIED OR SYNTHESIZED BY SELF, SOMETHING THAT IS UNLIKELY IF THERE ARE MULTIPLE COPIES OF THE SAME SIZE IN THE SOCIETY.
BECAUSE THERE ARE MULTIPLE COPIES OF THE SAME STYLE PRESENT IN ANY SOCIETY, THE SAME STYLE CANNOT HAVE COME ABOUT SPONTANEOUSLY BUT IT MUST HAVE BEEN PASSED ON BY COPYING AND THEREFORE ALL STYLES THAT HAVE SIMILARITIES IN SOCIETY MUST HAVE BEEN COPIED FROM OTHERS.
BECAUSE THERE IS ALWAYS STYLE IN THE ACTIONS, POSTURES AND SPEECH OF ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE THAT HAVE SIMILARITIES WITH OTHERS, ALL THEIR POSTURING, ACTIONS AND SPEECH, EVEN THE WAY AND WHAT THEY THINK, PERCEIVE AND REASON MUST HAVE BEEN COPIED FROM OTHERS EITHER WHOLESALE OR FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.
AS I SAID, FOR ONE WHO SEES CORRECTLY ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE WITH STYLE MUST BE ROBOTS THAT ARE NEVER PART TIME BUT ALL THE TIME AND THEY MUST BE COPYCATS BECAUSE THEIR BEHAVIOR IS NEVER SPONTANEOUS BUT COPIED FROM A MASTER COPY IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOX.
JUST AS THEY ARE CONSTANTLY COPYING THEIR BEHAVIOR FROM THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOX INSTEAD OF FRESHLY FORMULATING BEHAVIOR, THEY CAN AND DO COPY BEHAVIOR FROM EXTERNAL SOURCES. KEEPING UP WITH THE JONES IS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON BUT COPYING WHATEVER THE JONES DO OR ACQUIRE. JUST AS PEOPLE SCOUT AROUND TO KEEP UP WITH THE JONES THEY ALSO SCOUT AROUND FOR NEW BEHAVIOR OR WAYS OF DRESSING, DOING OR SAYING THINGS NOT TO LEARN BUT TO COPY. THUS THEY ARE THRILLED TO LEARN TO SAY ‘VIVA LA MALAYSIA’ IN COPYING THE FRENCH WHO SAID ‘VIVA LA FRANCE’. A LOT OF SEEMINGLY DE NOVO NEW STYLISH BEHAVIOR AND SPEECH ARE NEW PERMUTATIONS OF OLD STYLED BEHAVIOR LIKE ‘VIVA LA MALAYSIA’ IS A JUGGLED NEW PERMUTATION OF ‘VIVA LA FRANCE’. OFTEN PEOPLE SAY VIVA LA FRANCE WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT IT MEANS BECAUSE THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE UTTERANCE OF IT SOUNDS NICE OR ATTRACTIVE TO THEM.
Because there are multiple copies of the same styled behavior existing in a society, either they arose spontaneously or they are copied from each other and it is likely it is copied just as customs are passed on often with reasons that are can be examined to be false or unwarranted.
There are many people who habitually say “I say”, “Well”, “Let me see” and others who never say so and it may be that they all spoke thus by themselves or they copied from others in a process of contagion.
Copying may be involuntary. If you watch your mother or father do or say a certain thing many times, because there are forceful changes in the way he or she does or says it, even if you have no intention to copy it or you refuse to, it sticks in your mind and you start to do the same thing the same way. This is how some people can instantly switch to speak in a way that is recognizably like their father or mother.
Copying can also be voluntary or deliberate. For instance you are attracted to the way Elvis or John Lennon speaks and you deliberately try to ape the way they speak and in time it sticks and you are such a good copy others might remark that you speak remarkably like Elvis.
Thus the entirety of a person’s being, his beliefs and values, how and what he perceives, thinks, says and does may be strongly influenced if not totally copied from others and that may be part of the reason why they sometimes find their lives meaningless because to do or say things that you do not realized you copied from others without understanding why and you even willfully deny and insist is meaningful can be maddening and itself meaningless.
Style must either be copied or synthesized never learnt:
Style if present in a person’s posture, movements or speech must either be copied from others or be synthesized by the person by recombination of pieces of different styles but it can never be learnt because style is all about the infinite variations in the use of force to prolong, change speed and strength of force that cannot be understood and given meaning why you should have this particular style. There cannot be reasons to adopt any style or why you should have a particular style.
Because style must be copied or synthesized either completely de novo or by recombination (very unlikely because virtually all styles that can be synthesized are already existent) and all beings in this world can be demonstrated objectively to possess style, their behavior must be copied from others.
WHEN PEOPLE COPY THE SPEECH AND ACTIONS OF OTHERS THEY COPY THE STYLE THAT IS INHERENT IN THAT SPEECH OR ACTION AD THAT CAN ONLY BE THE CHARACTERISTIC WAY THAT DIFFER FROM OTHERS OF THE WAY THE PERSON PROLONGS HIS USE OF FORCE, CHANGED SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN SPEAKING OR DOING SOMETHING. APART FROM COPYING OR MEMORIZING IT, THERE IS NO OTHER WAY YOU CAN ACQUIRE A STYLE AS YOUR OWN BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING TO UNDERSTAND IN STYLE, NO MEANING IN STYLE, ONLY CHARACTERISTIC TRANSIENT FLUCTUATIONS OF FORCE. BECAUSE STYLE IS ALL ABOUT FORCE AND FORCEFUL CHANGES IT INEVITABLY CONDITIONS OR MOULDS THE RECEIVING MIND AND THAT IS DE FACTO COPYING TO THAT RECEIVING MIND APART FROM CAUSING PAIN AND DEGRADING THAT MIND.
Style will be drummed into you:
Whether you like or not, style will be drummed into you if there is sustained contact with a significant person because style from that person is nothing more than an incessant impact of his characteristic pattern of forceful prolonging, changing speed and strength of force that can become compelling or mindlessly conditioning.
Only the few whose minds are steady and largely immune to the bombardment of force by practicing correct meditation and seclusion with minimal contact with society can escape the incessant attempts by others to imprint their styles on him.
People talk about a nagging mother or wife and it is the incessant characteristic fluctuations of force in that mother or wife’s voice that nags or dogs that mind such that it is imprinted or copied onto that mind.
This is also how people get brainwashed by propaganda such that even though he resists he subsequently become a servile recruit.
Thus a lot of style is forcefully copied onto a person’s mental hard disk merely by constant sustained bombardment whether the person likes it or not and sometimes if the person is enchanted he may make deliberate effort to copy the style of someone he idolizes.
Style Is Largely Compulsorily Stamped Than Copied:
Just as although they do occasionally search for and download copies of software from the internet, no one voluntarily downloads and installs copies of viruses onto his computer but they are involuntarily, surreptitiously downloaded onto it without consent against his wishes by wicked others, in the same way although people occasionally do scout around and copy others’ styles that they find impressive, no one voluntarily downloads and installs the majority of their existing styles but they are downloaded onto them without consent or choice and against their wishes by wicked others who wish to see them suffer, who want to initiate them into the suffering they are beset with.
A person's style is largely forcefully stamped without choice on that person's mind by others than copied by choice.
Not only does the constant forceful prolonging, changing of speed and strength of force that constitutes the style of a person induces stress, restlessness and distraction of all observers' consciousness but it automatically causes all observers' resident mental forces to similarly prolong, change speed and strength of force effectively installing the style being experienced onto the person's consciousness without him doing anything.
In the past I used to be aware that tunes I have heard seem to continue to play in my mind without my being able to shake them off but I have noticed that nowadays with the considerable attenuation of my mental force, tunes I have heard no longer keep playing involuntarily in my mind. This suggests that external audio-visual inputs that have style or forceful prolonging, changing speed and strength of force automatically imprint on any mind that possesses significant mental force and exert great pressure on that mind to similarly prolong, change speed and strength of force that would be tantamount to adopting a style or having a style installed where previously it wasn’t.

CONFRONTED BY BEINGS ALL WITH STYLES OF THEIR OWN, THERE IS GREAT SOCIAL PRESSURE TO ADOPT A STYLE OF YOUR OWN. THIS 'SOCIAL PRESSURE' IS PARTLY CONSCIOUS COAXING FROM OTHERS TO ACT OR PUT ON A SHOW BUT PREDOMINANTLY INEVITABLE BECAUSE THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OF THE STYLES THAT THE PERSON IS IN CONTACT WITH CAUSES THE RECIPIENT'S MENTAL FORCE TO SIMILARLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT EFFECTIVELY ATTEMPTS TO INSTALL STYLE IN HIM WHETHER HE LIKES IT OR NOT. IN OTHER WORDS, THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE STYLES OF OTHERS ARE HYPNOTIC, TENDING TO MAKE OBSERVERS WHO THEMSELVES POSSESS SIGNIFICANT MENTAL FORCE TO SIMILARLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED OR STRENGTH OF FORCE OR IN EFFECT ADOPT A STYLE OF HIS OWN.
THEREFORE STYLE INA ANY PERSON IS NEVER LEARNT OR ADOPTED CONSCIOUSLY KNOWING REASONS WHY BECAUSE THERE IS NO REASON IN STYLE, NO MEANING IN STYLE TO BE LEARNT BUT STYLE IS LARGELY STAMPED AUTOMATICALLY INTO ANY MINDS THAT POSSESS SIGNIFICANT MENTAL FORCES IRREGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE LIKES OR NOT BY EXPOSURE TO THE FORCEFUL STYLES IN OTHERS SUPPLEMENTED ON OCCASIONS BY AN INDIVIDUAL'S INTENTIONAL COPYING OF THE STYLE OF SOMEONE HE IDOLIZES.
Different ways of using force cannot be learnt but is always copied:
Only something with meaning that can be understood can be learnt knowing or understanding why you should do or say certain things.
Force or how force changes in time and characteristics have no meaning that can be understood and learnt and so you cannot learn force or force changes but you must use force to condition to or memorize force and its characteristic changes.
An individual style is an individual way that differs from others of using force in his postures and how he speaks and does things and cannot be learnt but must be copied from somewhere.
Because style is nothing more than the visible and audible products of the use of force to prolong syllables or units of motion, change speed and loudness, there is nothing to understand and learn about style, one just has to pay close attention to how force is changing in the style one wants to mimic and laboriously encode and refashion until an acceptable copy is well recorded in one’s mental hard disk.
You do not learn to recite Shakespeare or sing a particular song like your favorite crooner but you pay close attention and repeatedly practice to mimic the sounds or words he produces until it becomes perfectly registered in your mental hard disk and then you confidently retrieve it with aplomb even before a public audience.
If reciting Shakespeare and singing a song like someone is learning then why do you need to keep practicing and memorizing? What is there to understand how to recite Shakespeare or sing like your idol? You keep practicing with reference to the source you want to copy until it is well copied and easily retrieved from your hard disk.
ONCE IS ENOUGH TO KNOW OR LEARN AND REPETITIVE PRACTICE IS ONLY NECESSARY IN COPYING BECAUSE ENCODING REQUIRES REPEATED COMPARISONS WITH THE ORIGINAL TO ADJUST UNTIL A PERFECT COPY IS MADE.
THEREFORE THE STYLE THAT IS PRESENT IN ALL BEINGS HERE IS NEVER LEARNT (BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING TO LEARN OR UNDERSTAND) BUT COPIED FROM OTHERS. IN FACT MOST OF THE STYLE IS FORCED ON THE INDIVIDUAL BY THE CONSTANT BOMARDMENT OF FORCE STYLE ON HIS CONSCIOUSNESS HYPNOTIZING ITS MENTAL FORCE TO SIMILARLY ACTIVATE.
Why style has no meaning:
There are many different things with very different meanings that can be said (eg talk or boasts about my car, my investments, my house, my wife) and done for show or specifically to impress, please, intimidate or dominate others.
How can many different things with very different meanings that can be said and done specifically for show, to impress, please, impress, dominate and intimidate others have true meaning but they have false meaning because the many different things that can be said and done are different? Instead all these different things that can be said or done are merely convenient irrelevant vehicles to convey the desire to be seen or heard, to impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
WHETHER YOU REALIZE IT OR NOT, STYLE IS MEANT ENTIRELY FOR SHOW, TO BE SEEN OR HEARD TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE.
IF MANY DIFFERENT THINGS CAN BE SAID OR DONE WITH SAME INTENTION OF SOLELY TO BE SEEN, HEARD OR FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE, IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS THEN THE INTENTION TO SHOW OFF, PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE CANNOT BE TRUE OR SPECIFIC MEANING BUT ONLY FALSE NONSPECIFIC MEANING.
PEOPLE CAN SAY MANY DIFFERENT THINGS THAT CAN BE REPRESENTED AS DDCCT, SSPTTY, AABXS, ETC WITH THE PURPOSE WHETHER CONSCIOUS OR UNCONSCIOUS OF IMPRESSING YOU. WHAT TRUE OR SPECIFIC MEANING CAN WANTING TO IMPRESS BE (EXCEPT THAT IT IS AN EMOTIONAL IRRATIONAL DESIRE THAT CAN NEVER BE ASSUAGED OR QUENCHED) IF MANY DIFFERENT UNRELATED THINGS CAN BE SAID WITH THE SAME PURPOSE OF IMPRESSING OTHERS?
SIMILARLY THE WAY PEOPLE SPEAK OR DO THINGS OR POSE IS MEANT TO IMPRESS OTHERS. WHAT TRUE OR SPECIFIC MEANING CAN THERE BE IF MANY DIFFERENT WAYS OF SPEAKING, DOING THINGS AND POSING CAN BE DEEMED IMPRESSIVE OR INTENDED TO IMPRESSIVE?
THEREFORE ANYTHING THAT IS SAID OR DONE FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE, ANY WAY OF SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT IS MEANT TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE HAS NO MEANING, IS MEANINGLESS AND IF YOU PERCEIVE IT IS MEANINGFUL YOU HAVE ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
Guide you all the truth:
Jesus said he had yet many things to say to you but you cannot bear them now but when the counselor comes he will guide you into all the truth.
This indicates there are many things Jesus did not say because you could not bear them then and it may in part be the teaching as declared by the Buddha. By saying that the counselor will guide you into all the truth, Jesus is acknowledging that what he said is only part of the truth and there are other parts of the truth that may correspond to what the Buddha declared that the counselor will guide you to.
Jesus further said that the counselor will teach you all things which mean that what the counselor teaches will be all embracing. If I have taught you many things that are meaningful or beneficial and true then I will have usurped the counselor in many areas.
Getting The Hang Of Style:
Because style is nothing more than the use of force to stretch, change speed and strength, if your consciousness is constantly bombarded by such forceful stretching, changing speed and strength of force from all sources, you soon get the hang of it and no matter how you resist, you or your mental force of going against self get sucked in like a whirlpool to similarly stretch, change speed and strength of force and therefore initiated into the rites of style.
TO ADOPT STYLE IS THE EASIEST THING LIKE GOING DOWNHILL, NOT TO ADOPT A STYLE IS THE HARDEST THING AGAINST UNANIMOUS RELENTLESS INTIMIDATION BY ALL OTHERS LIKE CLIMBING UP A STEEP MOUNTAIN.
Copying & Learning From Jesus:
Although few if any Christians pay any attention and behave accordingly to what Jesus declared that ‘woe to you who laughs for you shall weep’, a conscientious Christian might be motivated to stop himself laughing and even smiling without understanding why because Jesus said so and this is COPYING Jesus.
You LEARN from Jesus if you understand why you should not laugh as Jesus said. You do not laugh because laughter is false, for show to impress, please, intimidate or dominate others depending on the occasion, it is subjecting your mind to even violent changes in speed and strength that gives rise to stress, restlessness and distraction, conditions your mind addictively to laughter and will degrade and thence destroy your mind. Laughter also subject all who hear and see to violent changes in speed and strength of force that similarly harms them and you have debts not merit. The fact that you cannot help laughing is not because it is spontaneous or natural but you have become a slave with a strong urge to laugh on internal or external cues or you are a robot of laughter who cannot choose when he laughs or not.
There may be those who argue how do I know what Jesus said is absolute (it is OK to laugh in ‘moderation’ as Christians do) or he has not been misquoted? You are expressing doubt or not accepting that you cannot believe will end in mad doubt even over simple matters that cannot be satisfied. If you understood the nature of laughing that it is false and harmful you will know that it is likely that Jesus said so.
YOU LEARN WITH REASON, NEVER EMOTION AND THE LESS EMOTIONAL YOUR MIND AND THEREFORE MORE CALM CLEARLY THINKING, THE BETTER YOU LEARN OR UNDERSTAND WHY YOU SHOULD BEHAVE IN A CERTAIN WAY OR BELIEVE CERTAIN THINGS.
YOU COPY WITH EMOTION INDIRECTLY OR FORCEFULLY OR USING FORCE DIRECTLY AND THE LESS CALM CLEARLY THINKING AND THEREFORE MORE EMOTIONAL OR FORCEFUL YOU ARE, THE BETTER YOU COPY WITHOUT QUESTIONS WHY YOU SHOULD BEHAVE IN A CERTAIN WAY OR BELIEVE CERTAIN THINGS.
IT IS A GRAVE MISTAKE OR SERIOUS WRONG VIEW TO CONFUSE LEARNING WITH COPYING, TO PERCEIVE YOU ARE LEARNING WHEN YOU ARE COPYING (AS WHEN STUDENTS ‘STUDY’ FOR THEIR EXAMS WHEN THEY ARE FORCEFULLY TRANSFERRING DATA WITHOUT QUESTION FROM NOTES TO THEIR MINDS). ONLY WHEN YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE YOU ARE COPYING WHEN YOU ARE COPYING, LEARNING WHEN YOU ARE LEARNING WILL YOU ESCAPE FROM THE MIRE AND MINEFIELD OF THIS DECEITFUL WORLD.
The Difference Between Goodness & Niceness:
People mistake their niceness for their goodness and this is a grave mistake because niceness is faked goodness.
True goodness is what you say or do that truly benefits the other person whilst niceness is how you say or do it to impress your concern for the other person that no matter how you might falsely perceive as genuine is only for show or false.
If you say something full of sadness or pain or eagerness or anxiously it is only for show, unnecessary and imparts prolonging force and constant changing of speed and strength of force on the other person that harms yourself and the other person.
NICENESS IS ABOUT THE SOFT GENTLE WAY YOU COO TO YOUR LOVER AND CARRESS HER WHILST GOODNESS IS WHAT YOU SAY AND DO TO HER THAT BENEFITS HER WITHOUT ANY EXPECTATIONS OF REWARDS OR PRESENTS FROM HER.
NICENESS IS THE WAY YOU DO OR SAY THINGS THAT ALTHOUGH HAVING SIMILARITIES, VARIES FROM PERSON TO PERSON THAT PEOPLE HAVE LEARNT TO ACCEPT UNQUESTIONING AS GOOD FOR THEMSELVES AND OTHERS WHEN THEY ARE STRESSFUL BECAUSE IT INVOLVES THE USE AND TRANSMISSION OF FORCE THROUGH THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE CHANGES THAT ALWAYS OCCURS WHILST GOODNESS IS WHAT YOU DO OR SAY THAT BENEFITS THE OTHER PERSON EG ASSISTANCE OFFERED.
Thus if your goodness is the gentle, anxious, concerned or eager way you do or say things to others, you are nice not good, a showman no matter how you might deny. If what you say or do benefits others without any accompanying contrived gentleness, anxiety or concern, then you are truly good not a show man.
Like a yoyo:
A person’s mind or his mental force of going against self may be compared to a yoyo that can be caused to rise and fall with constantly changing speed and strength of force on a tethered string faithfully mirroring the input of the hand on the other end of the string. The hand that controls the yoyo represents the forceful style or forceful prolonging, changing of speed and strength of force in the audio-visual expressions of others that is universally present in all beings’ behavior that impact on that person’s mind.
THE INDIVIDUALLY CHARACTERISTIC PROLONGATIONS, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT IS ALWAYS PRESENT IN THE SOUNDS AND SIGHTS OF PEOPLE’S BEHAVIOR CAUSES AUTOMATIC MIRROR IMAGE PROLONGING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OF THE RECIPIENT’S MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT AUTOMATICALLY ATTEMPTS TO RECORD OR INSTALL THE PERCEIVED STYLE ONTO THE RECIPIENT’S MENTAL HARD DISK AND IT IS THIS VERY SAME MIRRORED FORCE CHANGES IN THE RECIPIENT’S MIND THAT CAUSES HIM TO EXPERIENCE A JOLT WHEN SOMEONE SPEAKS TO HIM OR APPEARS AND WITH EXTENDED EXPOSURE, CREATES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT BECOMES INCREASINGLY UNBEARABLE SUCH THAT HE MAY LASH OUT.
JUST LIKE ARTICLES IN THE ROOM CAN VIBRATE IN SYMPATHY WITH A LOUDSPEAKER CONE’S VIBRATIONS, THE MENTAL FORCE OF A RECIPIENT CAN RESONATE PRECISELY WITH THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND STRENGTH PRESENT IN OTHERS’ SPEECH AND MOTION TO CAUSE THEM TO HAVE AN URGE (NOT REASON) TO SIMILARLY CHANGE.
NOT ONLY ARE ALL BEINGS HERE, IRRESPECTIVE OF INTELLIGENCE, CAPABLE OF EXPERIENCING THE FORCE TRANSMITTED IN THE STYLES OF OTHERS’ BEHAVIOR BUT THEIR MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF CAN ACTUALLY FAITHFULLY RESONATE MIRROR LIKE ACCORDING TO THE AUDIO-VISUAL INPUT AND THIS HAS A TENDENCY TO RECORD THE FORCE CHANGES INTO HIS MIND AND RATHER THAN ACTIVELY COPYING OTHERS’ STYLE, THEY HAVE TO RESIST HAVING OTHERS’ STYLES COPIED OR INSTALLED INTO THEIR HARD DISKS JUST AS YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PLANT WEEDS BUT WEEDS WILL COME TO ANY GARDEN.
THE INTELLIGENT PERSON IS MERELY A SUPERIOR COMPUTER OR ROBOT WHO HAS A BETTER LIBRARY OF COPIED DATA OR HOW TO DO THINGS AND WHO CAN RETRIEVE FROM THIS LIBRARY MORE EFFICIENTLY AND APPROPRIATELY, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WISDOM OR THE ABILITY TO SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE BUT IT REQUIRES THE INTELLIGENT PERSON TO SEE THINGS RELEVANT TO HIS AGENDA THAT CORRESPONDS TO SOCIETY’S. WHATEVER IS NOT THERE TO BE COPIED, THE INTELLIGENT PERSON IS CLUELESS WHICH IS WHY EVEN THE MOST EMINENT SCIENTISTS, PHILOSOPHERS, CLERICS AND MEDICS ARE CLUELESS THAT THERE ARE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN EVERYONE’S SPEECH AND THIS IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT TORMENTS THEM AND THREATEN TO DRIVE THEM TO HOMICIDE OR SUICIDE. EVEN NOW IF I ASK INTELLIGENT PEOPLE TO DEMONSTRATE HOW WHAT THEY JUST SAID WILL SOUND LIKE IF THEY DID NOT STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS, THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO DO SO BECAUSE THEY HAVE NEVER DONE SO AND THEY ARE LIKELY TO BE UNAWARE OF PITCH CHANGES WHEN THEY STRETCH SYLLABLES THAT ARE DUE TO SPEED CHANGES OR INCREASE IN THE SPEED OF EXHALING AIR AS THEY STRETCH A SYLLABLE.
Projecting & maintaining an image:
All those who possess self identity consciously or unconsciously desire to project and maintain an image of themselves either to themselves or others.
For example they desire to project and maintain an image by words or actions that they are tough, smart, humorous, trendy, shy, gregarious, a miser or a big spender, a doctor, a family man, etc.
It takes energy and stress to project and maintain an image that also mindlessly conditions the person and this too is a significant part of self identity view that according to the Buddha leads to future states of woe not heaven.
I do not identify myself as tough or gentle, nor do I desire to behave in a way that will project me as tough or gentle. I am not conscious that I am a doctor; I am not proud or ashamed to be a doctor.
Remembering & Forgetting:
Quote Headline: An affair to remember. Reflections on Bush & Blair’s enduring relationship.
Comment: People never passively, objectively remember everything but they emotionally or forcefully remember selectively things they like or are attracted to remember whilst consciously or subconsciously refuse to remember things that are unpleasant or embarrassing. This is tampering with reality or the truth and flirting with false perception that will lead to mad perception that what happened did not happen and what did not happen did happen.
When you say an affair to remember you are saying it is worthy of memory or it is good. Not that the Bush and Blair relationship should be consigned to oblivion but it is not an affair to remember with fondness.
PEOPLE DO IT FREQUENTLY, OFTEN WITHOUT AWARENESS THAT THEY ARE WILFULLY FORGETTING THINGS THAT ARE TOO PAINFUL OR EMBARRASSING TO REMEMBER WHILST THEY FONDLY OR EMOTIONALLY LIKE TO REMEMBER OTHER THINGS SEEING NOTHING WRONG WHEN THIS IS DEADLY, IT IS CONDITIONING THEMSELVES TO SELECTIVE MEMORY OF REALITY THAT THEY DO NOT BELIEVE WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
PEOPLE NEVER PASSIVELY REMEMBER OR FORGET BUT THEY FORCEFULLY REMEMBER OR FORGET AND THAT IS SELECTIVE REMEMBERING AND DENIAL OF REALITY THAT IS CONDITIONING AND LEADS TO MAD PERCEPTION.
When you change speed listeners have an urge to follow blindly:
Even if they do not realize it is speed change that they are hearing, whenever a person changes speed in speech, all listeners have an (forceful) urge to similarly change speed.
Why should anyone have an urge to change speed just listening to what someone is saying? Because there is no reason to change speed merely listening to what another is saying the changing speed in a person’s speech is inducing restlessness or unnecessary urge to change speed in the listener and that is persecuting others never beneficial.
SIMILARLY IF YOU USE FORCE TO PROLONG SYLLABLES, CHANGE LOUDNESS ALL LISTENERS HAVE AN URGE THAT THEY MUST SUBDUE TO ALSO FOLLOW SUIT TO PROLONG AND CHANGE LOUDNESS AND BECAUSE THERE IS NO REASON TO PROLONG AND CHANGE SPEED MERELY UPON LISTENING TO SOMEONE, YOUR STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING LOUDNESS PERSECUTES OTHERS, CONDITIONS THEM TO MINDLESS UNNECESSARY STRETCHING AND CHANGING LOUDNESS AND YOU HAVE DEBTS NOT MERIT.
I CAN DEMONSTRATE CONSTANT (NOT FREQUENT) STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE SPEECH OF ALL PEOPLE AND THEREFORE THEY ARE FORCEFULLY INDUCING THE UNNECESSARY URGE TO DO LIKEWISE IN THEIR LISTENERS WITH DEBTS NOT MERIT ACCRUED.
***
High Definition Force Perception:
All beings regardless of intelligence are capable of high definition reception of force, specifically the forceful prolongation, changing of speed and strength of force present in the motion and vocalizations of all others and their resident mental force are intrinsically capable of resonating faithfully to mirror these perceived changes. There is actually overwhelming if not irresistible urge or automation to adopt a perceived style, not to adopt the impacting styles and up keeping one’s style is instead a struggle. This may be evident to students who go overseas to study when they start to adopt the local slang, content of language and values and it is a struggle to stay aloof or loyal to one’s roots.
It is this same hijacking and automatic resonating of the recipient’s residential force that when sustained leads to the buildup of stress, restlessness and distraction (cannot concentrate) that cause some beings to lash out.
IT IS NO MYSTERY OR WONDER AT ALL WHY BEINGS ALL ADOPT STYLE OR PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR OR SPEECH IN THE SOCIAL SETTING IN WHICH THEY EXIST BECAUSE STYLE AND ALL STYLISH BEHAVIOR AND SPEECH ARE ALL ABOUT FORCE AND FORCE CHANGES THAT ALL BEINGS’ RESIDENT MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF ARE CAPABLE OF RECEIVING AND THENCE CAUSED TO RESONATE IN MIRROR FASHION AND THEREBY COPY THE STYLE TO WHICH IT IS EXPOSED.
Forgetting and remembering:
People use force to remember things they like (attracted to) and they use force to forget things they don’t like.
It is never reason or truth but it is always force and falsity, like and dislike that causes people to selectively remember and forget things and as a result their recollection of the past becomes highly distorted or tampered and they are heading for insanity as their minds degenerate with old age.
Perversely someone can fall into the negative rut to keep remembering or revisiting traumatic events and exaggerating their gravity so that his self esteem is increasingly shaken until he has a nervous breakdown or become convinced there is something seriously wrong with him. The reason is because there is force not reason in their selective remembering and forgetting and force is reinforcing and conditioning such that the more they think, the more they become what they think. And if what they think is self destructive it becomes so real they totally believe in their worthlessness.
Force Can Only Transmit Or Act:
Force has nothing else in it like meaning or reason apart from force and the only thing force can do is to be transmitted to a target or to move a target.
Hence if this force has characteristics that can only be duration of its action or prolonging, change of speed or strength then these characteristics can be and will also be faithful transmitted to its target and because force is molding or conditioning, force that has characteristics like duration (prolonging) changing speed and strength will also condition its target eg the mind of the recipient to its characteristics and it is innate for the style of a person to be imposed or attempt to impose on all who are capable of receiving it.
This may be the reason how such powerful figures like Alexander the Great or Genghis Khan could impose their personality or style which is brutal and indomitable on their armies that then march as one man to be all conquering.
STYLE IS ALL ABOUT FORCE, IS AN INDIVIDUAL’S FORCE SIGNATURE, IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE INDIVIDUAL’S CHARACTERISTIC WAY OF FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MEANING OR REASON, IS ALL FOR SHOW TO BE SEEN OR HEARD TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE, NEEDS NO REASON TO PROPAGATE AND AUTOMATICALLY TENDS TO INSTAL ON ALL RECIPIENTS’ MINDS. RATHER THAN THE PERSON ACTIVELY COPYING OTHERS’S STYLES IT IS PRIMARLY A CASE OF OTHERS’ STYLES CONSTANTLY WANTING TO COPY INTO HIM AND HIS STRUGGLE TO MAINTAIN HIS SEPARATENESS. WHETHER INTENTIONALLY OR NOT, EVERYONE WITH STYLE IS TRYING TO IMPOSE OR INDOCTRINATE HIS STYLE ON OTHERS AND ALL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN STYLISH PEOPLE ARE IN PART A CONSTANT BATTLE OR LOCKING HORNS OF STYLES OR A BATTLE OF WILL BETWEEN DIFFERENT STYLES THAT IS IN TRUTH MEANINGLESS, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON AND TRUTH AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK THAT STYLE IS MEANINGFUL, HAS MORE TO IT THAN A MERE EPHEMERAL PLAY OF FORCE OR YOU ARE NOT QUITE CERTAIN WHAT STYLE IS ALL ABOUT REFLECTS ADVANCE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT YOU DO NOT REALIZE WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
FORCE CAN ONLY HAVE THESE CHARACTERISTICS: ITS DURATION OR PROLONGATION OR MAINTENANCE OF ITS ACTION, ITS VARIABLE SPEED OF ACTION AND ITS VARIABLE STRENGTH AND ALL THESE ARE GARNERED OR RECRUITED TO FASHION STYLE: STRETCHING IS THE PROLONGATION OF THE APPLICATION OF FORCE BEYOND NECESSARY, SPEED CHANGE AND CHANGING THE STRENGTH OF FORCE ARE THE OTHER THINGS FORCE CAN DO.
STYLE IS ALL ABOUT FORCE, IT IS AN INDIVIDUAL’S RELATIVELY DIFFERENT CONSISTENT BRAND OF FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT AUTOMATICALLY MOULDS OR RESONATE ALL RECIPIENTS’ MENTAL FORCES TO CONFORM TO IT TO ATTEMPT TO INSTAL THAT STYLE IN HIM, IT IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL CAUSING INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION FOR THE STYLISH PERSON AND TO ALL ON WHOM HIS STYLE IMPACTS ON.
WHILST THERE ARE HIGHER CONSIDERATIONS, THERE IS NOTING MORE IMPORTANT OR ESSENTIAL FOR THOSE WHO POSSESS STYLE TO PAY PERSISTENT ATTENTION TO DETECT AND ELIMINATE ALL STYLE OR FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE BECAUSE STYLE WILL CONDEMN THEM TO SUFFERING NOW AND EVENTUAL MADNESS AND THENCE PERDITION FOR HARMING OTHERS.
THE PERSON WHO IS UNAWARE OF THE PRESENCE OF STYLE IN HIMSELF AND OTHERS OR IS UNCERTAIN AS TO WHAT STYLE IS ALL ABOUT OR IS AWARE BUT IS INDIFFERENT AND DOWNPLAYS STYLE’S CRUCIAL SIGNIFICANCE IS FOOLISH BECAUSE IT IS THE STYLE IN HIM AND OTHERS THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT DOGS HIM OFTEN TO UNBEARABLE INTENSITY AND WILL ONE DAY KILL HIM OR MAKE HIM INSANE, IT IS THE PRIMARY WAY WITH WHICH PEOPLE PERSECUTE EACH OTHER, STYLE CONDEMNS THEM TO A ROBOTIC CONSTANTLY REHASHING FAKED PASSING ON AS LIVE EXISTENCE AND THEY ARE HEADED EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY OF WEEPING AND GNASHING OF THE TEETH.
Force Has Duration, Speed & Strength But No Reason Or Meaning:
Whatever other properties there may be, force has these primary properties of duration, speed and strength.
Depending on the consistent, stable way with which you prolong your use of force or the duration with which you maintain force, how you change speed and strength of force during and between fundamental units of motion or speech you project a style that differs from others and distinguishes you from others.
FORCE HAS VERY LIMITED POSSIBILITIES FOR VARIATION THAT NEVER INCLUDES REASON OR MEANING AND THEY ARE DURATION, SPEED AND STRENGTH. DEPENDING ON THE CHARACTERISTIC STABLE WAY WITH WHICH A PERSON MANUPULATES THE DURATION, SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, HE FASHIONS HIS STYLE.
The Difference Between Raison D’etre & Purpose:
Quote:
These are cars whose raison d’etre is to provide their fortunate owners maximum joy (you mean other cars like vintage cars cannot provide their owners with maximum joy?) and personal (you mean it is possible for impersonal satisfaction?) satisfaction.
Comment: Is the writer French or writing in French? Why is he using such high sounding words as ‘raison d’etre’ if not for show to impress others when the word ‘purpose’ would do just as well and be easier to understand to readers?
What is so intrinsically high class about the French or English language? Therefore you have false perception that will end in mad perception if you think high sounding words and French are ‘class’. Language should just be a tool for communication, not to show off just as clothes are meant to protect not to show off (with sequins, different styles, etc) and food to sustain not drool over.
Ownership of fine cars does not necessary confer ‘fortune’ and you are presumptuous because expensive cars can be cantankerous and bring even misery by attracting vandals. What is the difference between maximum joy and personal satisfaction? The writer is besides himself to dispense accolades because he is addressing your emotions, wanting to wow you. If ownership of such cars is not what it is made up to be, there are drawbacks as well as benefits then you are guilty of misleading others with karma that is far graver than you imagine possible.
If it is possible for other types of cars to provide their owners with maximum joy then what he said is false and if there is no satisfaction that is impersonal he is saying something useless or meaningless in talking of personal satisfaction. Of course satisfaction must be personal or a person’s.
THEREFORE MANY THINK WHAT THEY WRITE AND SAY ARE PERFECTLY LOGICAL OR MEANINGFUL WHEN IT CAN BE OBJECTIVELY PROVEN AS FALSE & FOR SHOW. THEY HAVE ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE WILL END IN AGONY FOR THEM.
NOT ONLY IS THERE STYLE IN HOW PEOPLE SPEAK, EVEN THE SUSBATNCE OF WHAT THEY SPEAK HAS STYLE OR FALSITY.
What might a man of truth say? He might say: These are cars that will provide their owners joy and satisfaction.
Why is style so difficult to eradicate? The reason is that style emanates from force and there is no reason in it. Whatever is forceful that is without reason is hard to stop and must be effaced as the Buddha said. You must wear down the urge to show off until nothing remains. So long as the urge to show off remains, then like ambers that can flare up anew into flames, you are at risk of relapsing into full blown show off behavior.
Not Exactly:
Quote:
So it's journalistic integrity versus the almighty buck. The Bancroft family, which controls 64 percent of Dow Jones's voting stock, must decide. Well, not exactly.
Comment: If you know what you say is not exactly so, why do you still say it except that you knowingly intend to mislead others thinking nothing and even that it is funny or meritorious?
He and those believe that he is deliberately misleading readers and therefore telling a lie. His 'not exactly' indicates that the first part of his statement is intentionally false or misleading and he knows he has to correct himself by saying it is not exactly. It may sound 'cute' but it is flirting with falsity that many do not believe will end in insanity.
To purposely contradict yourself in a situation where you do not invest much if any emotional weight may seem without consequences but in truth you are willfully conditioning yourself to unnecessary conflict that will turn mad.
Unnecessary Use Of Force:
When you stretch your syllables, you must prolong your use of force during the configuration of your vocal passages that is necessary to produce that syllable that would have been unnecessary if you did not stretch your syllable.
When you change speed within and between syllables, you must use force to exhale with changing speed during the configuration that produces that syllable and change the rate with which you configure you vocal apparatus to produce a sequence of syllables that would be unnecessary if you spoke with constant speed.
When you change loudness within and between syllables, you must use force to exhale with changing force within and between syllables that would be unnecessary if you did not change loudness.
STYLE IN SPEECH IS ALL ABOUT USING FORCE TO PROLONG SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITHIN AND BETWEEN SYLLABLES AND THOUGH IT IS LARGELY UNCONSCIOUS, FORCE NEVERTHELESS MUST BE USED, ENERGY CONSUMED, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION GENERATED THAT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SO IF YOU DID NOT STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS. IF YOU DO SO, IF YOU ARE STYLISH, YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE NOT REASON AND THE MAN OF FORCE IS PERSECUTING OTHERS AND HEADED FOR DOOM NOT SAFETY.
Why practicing style is practicing controlled insanity:
The sole purposes of style are to deceive, more specifically depending on the occasion, to impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
Because style is never part time but it is constant and automated often escaping the awareness of the stylish person, what meaning can there be in style that is constantly practiced often without realization (it is mindless) that is intended depending on the occasion to impress, please, intimidate and dominate? In order for something to be truly meaningful, it must be specific to an occasion and style that is constantly practiced and for a limited number of purposes cannot be truly meaningful.
Because style is always forceful, the person who practices style whether he realizes or not is practicing controlled insanity or meaningless, he often takes himself to the brink of insanity and then hauls himself back from the edge not realizing his unwitting desire to practice insanity or the meaningless will be consummated, he will finally become insane without being able to correct or rescue himself as he now still can rescue himself in the nick of time.
IMPRESSING OTHERS AND WANTING OTHERS TO BE IMPRESSED WITH YOU, PLEASING OTHERS, WANTING TO INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE ARE URGES (URGES ARE ALL ABOUT FORCE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON) THAT WITH PRACTICE BECOMES INCREASING INTENSE AND HARD TO RESIST EVEN DICTATING TO HIM THAN HE DICTATING TO IT. IT IS MAD TO CONSTANTLY BE WANTING TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, DOMINATE AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS AND BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE NOT MAD YET, THESE URGES MUST BE CONTROLLED BUT WHAT IS SUBJECT TO CONTROL IS SUBJECT TO LOSS OF CONTROL AND FINAL MADNESS AWAITS ALL STYLISH PEOPLE.
Therefore if on occasions you are aware you are stylish or charming, you appreciate style or charm in the way people speak and conduct themselves, then you appreciate and practice falsity that will end in insanity.
Beating Your Own Drum:
(You can only beat your drum or blow your trumpet using physical force never reason and whatever pattern in the drumming is repetitive and mindlessly rendered by rote often without awareness and so it is that whenever people beat their drums, they use mental force or emotions, never reason to do so. In fact it is preferable that reason is totally absent when you beat your drum because reason will make you self conscious or hesitant.)
Malaysia PM, Abdullah Badawi explained that it is because of the economy’s strong growth that the government is able to give workers a pay rise and he denied it is an electioneering ploy.
The country’s economic growth had been much stronger in the past and the government employees’ pay has been grossly inadequate (I think soldiers and police earn a few hundred dollars officially, nurses used to earn RM$600 per month, doctors $1400) for a long time so how come only now, when there are indications that all may not be well with the economy contrary to what official figures say?
The true reasons for the pay rise may be because the civil servants are restive or threaten demonstrations and the realization that their salaries are grossly inadequate for the cost of living today rather than booming economy as a result of brilliant governance.
Instead it is likely if not certain that Badawi is using the occasion as an opportunity to blow his own trumpet that will hopefully sway the gullible at the ballot box. Whether it is true that the gesture is not an electioneering ploy will be evident with time and if it turns out to be a lie there is divine punishment waiting. Ask yourself honestly if there is no intention to please voters, if there is, then by denying you are courting future madness that what is true (courting voters) is false. If you have no intention to impress voters why do you say the raise is because of the robust economy that implies you must take credit for that?
If you believe the lies you told is the truth you are headed for insanity. For example, if you believe the salaries are raised because the economy is doing well (to beat your own drum) when it is a long overdue redress or elections is in the mind then you are courting insanity. Even if you secretly tell yourself they are not true, because lies are powered by force, it conditions the distracted mind that slowly falls into their tentacles and as the liar’s mind degenerate, he believes more and more what is false is true.
Anwar slandered: I have seen a few times on RTM two side by side split video one on the left showing Bush dancing with some black people and the right showing Anwar gyrating at a recent election campaign rally. I usually watch without sound (irritating), I do not know in what context the comparative videos are being shown but it has the visual effect of comparing negatively Anwar with Bush who is loathed by the Malays as similarly dancing. Dancing is sin and false and I think Anwar is wrong or unbecoming to gyrate to the music but it is slander to publicize and compare him with Bush. Anwar too is an emotional actor and I am not a partisan person who will defend people I ‘like’, like Anwar or Lim Kit Siang (who is also a great actor in his own right). Why repeatedly compare Anwar dancing with Bush dancing? Don’t any of the Barisan leaders also dance with great styles that also merit comparison with Bush?
Deadly Games People Play:
People may not be aware of the meaningless games they play like looking away to avoid greeting someone or disliking someone or conversely refusing to change the direction of his gaze when confronted by another’s presence because he feels it is a loss of face.
Just because you do not like someone or declines to greet someone does not mean you must use force to look away but it is false perception that will end in mad perception that it is meaningful that you look away almost hastily, partly to pretend that it is not because you do not want to greet or dislike the person but you did not see.
Just because someone is staring at you does not mean you must force yourself not to change the direction of your gaze because you fear loss of face.
All these and many others are deadly meaningless games that people play that they do not realize will end in madness.
Just as their constant likes and dislikes are meaningless, harms themselves and others they think is beneficial, just as their styles are false, meaningless and harmful but they think it is the opposite, all these games they play are deadly and lead to inevitable madness that they cannot and refuse to see.
Stepping Up a gear: Acting is nonstop and actors have never tasted what it is like not to act. When they are alone, their acting is at a lower gear but as soon as someone appears or approaches or they are aware of the presence of another, ordinary people automatically step up a gear in their acting or pretense.
What are you doing? Ordinary people who are all acting and robots must occasionally chide themselves often playfully, “what are you doing?”, “Are you crazy doing or saying that?”, “Why am I doing this?” The reason is because what they say or do is automatically rendered from their mental jukeboxes no matter how they may insist they are genuine people and sometimes they become aware they are doing things without realization or what they say or do is absurd, does not match the situation. It is not just on these occasions that they are behaving like automatons or absurdly but always but because their behavior is usually deceptively apparently appropriate, they fail to discern that as always their behavior is rehashed to fake as if they are specific for the occasion and they are always absurd because whatever is rehashed is absurd.
Suspiciousness Is Never Natural Nor Justified:
All ordinary people must be suspicious because they cannot see the truth and therefore distinguish it from falsity. If you cannot tell the truth from falsity you must be suspicious. If you can tell the truth from falsity, what is there to be suspicious?
It is because people constantly compromise themselves in the name of getting along and putting on a show to impress, please, impress, intimidate and dominate others that they perceive as meaningful and true when it is meaningless and harmful to self and others that they cannot see true truth and they are suspicious because they cannot truth from falsity.
THEREFORE THE PRESENCE OF SUSPICIOUSNESS IN YOU IS AN INDICATION YOU CANNOT OR HAVE DIFFICULTY SEEING THE TRUTH AND JUST LIKE FOOLISHNESS IS NOT BLAMELESS BUT BLAMEWORTHY ACCORDING TO JESUS, SUSPICIOUSNESS IS NOT BLAMELESS BUT A SIGN OF SIN.
STYLE IS DISTINGUISHING YOURSELF BY FORCE:
All forces have these three properties namely duration, speed and strength that are variable and depending on the duration with which you use force, how you change speed and strength of force on each occasion that is consistent in you but differs from others, you ‘distinguish’ yourself in style from others.
Depending on how you typically prolong the use of force, change speed or strength of force within and between fundamental units of speech and motion, you have your own style that identifies you as different from others.
STYLE IS ALL ABOUT HOW YOU USE MENTAL FORCE (AND NEVER REASON) TO FALSELY, MEANINGLESSLY DISTINGUISH YOURSELF FROM OTHERS. WISDOM IS ALL ABOUT HOW YOU USE REASON, USE SEEING AND KNOWING WHAT IS TRUE, WHAT CAN AND DOES HAPPEN TO TRULY, MEANINGFULLY DISTINGUISH YOURSELF FROM OTHERS. THERE IS A HIERARCHY OF WISDOM IN EXISTENCE WITH THE BUDDHA WHILST HE EXISTED BEING THE ALL KNOWING AND SEEING PINNACLE WHILST IN THE NORMAL COURSE OF EVENTS, GOD THE FATHER IS PERFECT AND THE HIGHEST.