What he is doing is acting, expressing his prolonging his thinking, as if not sure or skeptical and disliking. You never use reason to prolong but you use force to prolong and whoever must apply force on his mind must suffer and further conditions himself to be better at prolonging and degrading his mind with force that will end in tragedy.
The person who lets his yes be yes only has a calm clear mind and because he always says what he means and means what he says, he comes up with the answer instantly and there is no need to use force to deliberate or prolong.
Recently he denied he knew the source of the damaging revelation that the Opposition leader visited a strip joint in New York. Whether he knew or not can be established and if he lied he is heading for punishment. The wise person says I know but I won’t tell.
Not only is he prolonging but the force used to prolong is fluctuating in speed and strength as he prolongs.
Everyone benefited from the consciousness changes:
Everyone, good or bad, smart or stupid, human or animal benefited from the consciousness changes after 1977 and in recent years just as everyone who is trapped under an impossibly low ceiling will benefit if someone caused the ceiling to be elevated to a more hospitable height that permits them to stand upright where they could not before.
I was definitely the trigger in 1977 (and people most probably started to change after 1978) and unless there are co-triggers (impossible), I too was the trigger for changes today because I did not copy anyone when I started changing.
Therefore I have benefited everyone twice both after 1977 and in recent years by triggering the consciousness changes.
Prolonging for what?
To people who are themselves accustomed to prolonging it is only natural that one should pause to think about or formulate an answer to a question but this is untenable and it is because of dishonesty that one has to pause to fabricate an answer that will be to one’s advantage and not give away information that one does not wish to share with others.
If you examine situation or more specifically the question or the reason why Howard is pausing or prolonging it is likely a simple question eg Did he know who exposed the Opposition leader’s visit to a strip joint and the reason he is pausing or prolonging is because he does not like the question and he is trying to tailor a dishonest reply that will be at his advantage. If he was a truthful person there is no need to use force to prolong but he just says ‘Yes I know’ or “I know but won’t tell you”.
THERE IS SELDOM A SITUATION OF SUCH IMPORTANCE THAT YOU MUST PAUSE TO CONSIDER OR USE FORCE TO PROLONG TO CONSIDER BUT THE REASON WHY PEOPLE DO SO IS OUT OF HABIT TO IMPRESS OTHERS THEY ARE VERY RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE OR THEY ARE PAUSING TO FABRICATE A FALSE ANSWER THAT IS TO THEIR ADVANTAGE.
Always prolonging:
The person who lets his yes be yes only has a calm clear mind and because he always says what he means and means what he says, he comes up with the answer instantly and there is no need to use force to deliberate or prolong.
Recently he denied he knew the source of the damaging revelation that the Opposition leader visited a strip joint in New York. Whether he knew or not can be established and if he lied he is heading for punishment. The wise person says I know but I won’t tell.
Not only is he prolonging but the force used to prolong is fluctuating in speed and strength as he prolongs.
Everyone benefited from the consciousness changes:
Everyone, good or bad, smart or stupid, human or animal benefited from the consciousness changes after 1977 and in recent years just as everyone who is trapped under an impossibly low ceiling will benefit if someone caused the ceiling to be elevated to a more hospitable height that permits them to stand upright where they could not before.
I was definitely the trigger in 1977 (and people most probably started to change after 1978) and unless there are co-triggers (impossible), I too was the trigger for changes today because I did not copy anyone when I started changing.
Therefore I have benefited everyone twice both after 1977 and in recent years by triggering the consciousness changes.
Prolonging for what?
To people who are themselves accustomed to prolonging it is only natural that one should pause to think about or formulate an answer to a question but this is untenable and it is because of dishonesty that one has to pause to fabricate an answer that will be to one’s advantage and not give away information that one does not wish to share with others.
If you examine situation or more specifically the question or the reason why Howard is pausing or prolonging it is likely a simple question eg Did he know who exposed the Opposition leader’s visit to a strip joint and the reason he is pausing or prolonging is because he does not like the question and he is trying to tailor a dishonest reply that will be at his advantage. If he was a truthful person there is no need to use force to prolong but he just says ‘Yes I know’ or “I know but won’t tell you”.
THERE IS SELDOM A SITUATION OF SUCH IMPORTANCE THAT YOU MUST PAUSE TO CONSIDER OR USE FORCE TO PROLONG TO CONSIDER BUT THE REASON WHY PEOPLE DO SO IS OUT OF HABIT TO IMPRESS OTHERS THEY ARE VERY RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE OR THEY ARE PAUSING TO FABRICATE A FALSE ANSWER THAT IS TO THEIR ADVANTAGE.
Always prolonging:
He is not just smiling but prolonging his ‘wonderful’ smile for as long as comfortable to impress you.
It is the truth that to greater or lesser extent people who express or actors always prolong their poses or the expressions they are wearing on their faces or bodies because these expressions are intended for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate and what is intended for show must be prolonged for as long as comfortable to enable others to see them.
Thus actors always tend to prolong to greater or lesser extent, their smiles or frowns or scowls long after the event as when they keep smiling long after the joke has passed.
You never need reason to prolong but you must use force to prolong any expression and that is prolonging the application of force on your mind that causes stress, restlessness and distraction and conditions you to greater prolonging and degrades your mind.
This constant prolonging is the cause of the lingering, sentimentality and sadness that must afflict them and leads to depression when intense and control is lost.
The agony of the simultaneous urge to prolong and move on:
Because style is meant to be seen or heard, it must be prolonged as long as one can comfortably sustain to enable others to see the facial expressions or hear the marvelously stretched syllables but at the same time there is an urge to move on because prolonging is delaying foolishly just for show and there is usually pressing demands on his time to move on and thus all actors are harassed, caught in a vice between a forceful urge to prolong or delay and an forceful urge to move on, to catch up with the present that his prolonging has left him behind. Like a man balancing on a tightrope he is heading for a fall down the abyss of hell for his deceitful conduct that also forces his audience to entertain simultaneous prolonging and moving on.
IT IS NEVER BLISS BUT AN AGONY TO CONSTANTLY ENTERTAIN THE URGE TO PROLONG YOUR FABRICATIONS IN SPEECH OR MOTION OR POSTURE SO THAT THEY CAN BE SEEN OR HEARD BY OTHERS AND THE URGE TO MOVE ON BECAUSE THERE ARE PRESSING MATTERS THAT YOU HAVE LEFT BEHIND IN PROLONGING.
IF YOU ARE PROLONGING ALL THE TIME AND YOU DON’T KNOW THAT, AREN’T YOU A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING AND A ROBOT BECAUSE IF YOU CAN DO SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING YOU MUST BE AN AUTOMATON?
Pull push:
Once you use force to prolong or delay you must further use force to cancel your forceful delaying to move on. If you did not use force to delay or prolong to impress others, you will not have to use further force to move on that clash with your urge to delay or prolong.
THUS PROLONGING OR DELAYING WHICH IS A CRUCIAL INGREDIENT OF STYLE IN POSTURE, SPEECH AND MOTION IS EVIL NOT GOOD AND ALL STYLE IS EVIL NOT GOOD, MERELY FOR SHOW TO BE SEEN OR HEARD THAT FORCES THE PERPETRATOR AND OTHERS TO BE CAUGHT IN A NEVER ENDING BIND OF WANTING TO DELAY AND MOVE ON.
Why everyone here is suffering:
No matter how good or genuine (truthful) you think you are you must suffer, even be tormented if in truth there is stretching or prolonging in your syllables that have their equivalents in your poses, expressions and motion.
Because there is objectively discernible stretching or prolonging in the poses, expressions, speech and motion of everyone here they must all suffer.
TO PROLONG YOUR SYLLABLES AND POSES IS ITSELF SUFFERING BECAUSE FORCE IS ALWAYS NEEDED TO PROLONG AND THEN OPPOSITE FORCE IS NEEDED TO STOP THE PROLONGING BUT ON TOP OF THAT IF YOU ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AS YOU PROLONG (AS ALL THOSE WHO PROLONG DO) IS TO INTENSIFY THE USE OF FORCE AND THE AGONY EXPERIENCED.
YOU CAN STRETCH A SYLLABLE AT CONSTANT SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
YOU CAN STRETCH A SYLLABLE WITH ACCELERATING SPEED OR LOUDNESS OR BOTH AND THIS INVOLVES GREATER USE OF FORCE AND GREATER STRESS.
BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THROUGH A SYLLABLE THEY STRETCH, THEY INTENSIFY THEIR SUFFERING MUCH GREATER THAN MERELY STRETCHING SYLLABLES.
Just as you must use force to cause a syllable or sound or expression to be prolonged you must use an additional opposing force to bring the prolonging to an end and thus the person who prolongs incurs two penalties of the use of force to prolong and then stop. If you did not use force to prolong you would not have to use another opposite force to stop it.
(A car in motion can only be stopped by applying brakes and thus if a car’s trip is unnecessary and not undertaken you would not have to use force to stop it. Because it is unnecessary to stretch syllables but it is only for show, you are unnecessarily using force to prolong for show that further requires you to use opposite force to stop the prolonging)
NO MATTER HOW GOOD, PIOUS OR TRUE YOU THINK YOU ARE, IF YOU STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, YOU MUST SUFFER NOW, SUFFER WORSE LATER BECAUSE SUFFERING IS CONDITIONING AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR MORE SUFFERING AFTER DEPARTURE.
Repetition too is prolonging:
When seized by rage people do not shake their fists once but many times not at constant speed and strength of force but violently changing speed and strength of force which is a form of prolonging the shaking of fist. If your fist shaking is meaningful a single shake suffices and it is meaningless to repetitively or prolong shake your fist.
Similarly when excited, people jump up and down many times or they shake the fence many times and this too is prolonging that demands the use of force to keep shaking and the use of force to stop shaking or stop the urge to keep shaking.
To say ‘yes, yes, yes’ or ‘come, come, come’ or ‘ha, ha, ha’ or ‘I say, I say, I say’ too are forms of prolonging by repetition.
When people exercise they repetitively swing their arms, sway side to side, repetitively do pushups and touch their toes with their fingers and this too is a form of repetition or prolonging in the name of preserving their lives here defying Jesus would said you should care for what you shall eat or wear and who amongst you can in any way prolong your life one cubit.
Beating around the bush too is a form of prolonging.
I was correct about Mother Teresa:
I said that it is not in the province of men to determine who is and isn’t a saint and the following revelations about Mother Teresa’s private life does not surprise me.
It is impossible for a person who obeys Jesus’ command to let your yes be yes only and therefore does not stretch his syllables, change speed or loudness to suffer mental torment and therefore if a person suffers, he must be stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and not letting his yes be yes only.
To one who sees correctly she too is a tough person and has a style of her own and it reflects how difficult if not impossible for ordinary people to find the ONLY way out of suffering that exists, namely pay attention to not stretch syllables, change speed or loudness and even after I have demonstrated many times people still do so not realizing that when they leave here, all they have may be taken from them and they shall have nothing and in the future though they may be tormented and beseech why they suffer, no one will tell and no light will shine through since you have forsaken the only way out of suffering that I have now pointed it out for you.
BY THEMSELVES IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO COME TO A REALIZATION THAT WHAT THEY ARE DOING ALL THE TIME NAMELY STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HAVE PARALLELS IN THEIR MOTION, THOUGHT AND PERCEPTION IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT REGULARLY ASSAIL THEM AND WILL MAKE THEM MAD AND THE SIMPLE SOLUTION IS TO PAY ATTENTION TO STOP STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS. IF YOU MISS THIS OPPORTUNITY TO ESCAPE SUFFERING YOU MAY RUE IN REGRET FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY AND BY YOURSELF YOU WILL NEVER DISCOVER THE WELL HIDDEN WAY OUT OF TORMENT.
Mother Teresa's diary reveals her crisis of faith
By Bruce Johnston in Rome
Last Updated: 12:26am GMT 29/11/2002
Mother Teresa, who was put on the fast track to sainthood by the Pope after her death five years ago, was tormented by a crisis of belief for 50 years, her writings reveal.
Her letters and diaries present a completely different picture of the nun and Nobel peace prize winner from her public image as a woman confident of her faith.
Biographies would have to be rewritten to take the revelation into account, it was said in Rome yesterday.
The previously unpublished material is to be brought out as a volume in Italy. It was collected by Roman Catholic authorities in Calcutta after her death at the age of 87.
Mother Teresa, who worked for years among the poor of Calcutta, wrote in 1958: "My smile is a great cloak that hides a multitude of pains." (so her smile is a lie and you think your smile is genuine where she admits hers is a lie?)
Because she was "forever smiling", people thought "my faith, my hope and my love are overflowing and that my intimacy with God and union with his will fill my heart. If only they knew . . ."
Mother Teresa, who was greatly admired by Diana, Princess of Wales, said in another letter: "The damned of Hell suffer eternal punishment because they experiment with the loss of God.
"In my own soul, I feel the terrible pain of this loss. I feel that God does not want me, that God is not God and that he does not really exist." (Because I do not have a disturbed mind, I can see clearly the way out of suffering and falsity it is impossible for me to utter what she said. Doubt and uncertainty according to the Buddha is one of three lower fetters to future woe)
Il Messeggero, Rome's popular daily newspaper, said: "The real Mother Teresa was one who for one year had visions and who for the next 50 had doubts - up until her death."
Her years of doubt coincided with the period when, after having visions, she decided to leave her teaching post at a privileged Calcutta school to help India's poor.
After her death the Pope waived the Vatican rule that prohibits investigation of the cause for beatification until five years after the subject's death. It was the first time the rule had been put aside in recent memory.
Mother Teresa's personal writings are being published next month as Il Segreto di Madre Teresa (Mother Teresa's Secret).
Why are you so rude?
It was basically over a simple cough and cold in an otherwise fit young adult in which she had already seen another GP and from what I understood, wanted a medical certificate for the afternoon in which some more honest patients will even tell me straight they just want a ‘MC’ so what is there for me to be rude, impatient, inattentive and not interested except that she may have unrealistically high expectations of others and in now complaining, of wanting to get me into trouble because of vindictiveness for which she was actually entirely at fault.
If you already find me rude surely you will have a better idea than me why I am rude and therefore you yourself cannot be sincere in asking me as if you are puzzled ‘why are you so rude’ but instead the motive is concealed, to use the question to venomously tick me off and you are a great fool if you are not aware that the question is provocative challenging the other person to an argument or even fight and therefore your question is rude. You tell me why I am rude, don’t ask me to tell you why I am rude expecting me to give you an answer. Because I was offended and not wishing to get into an argument that I am not rude as she accused, I raised my voice but not explosively and told her to ‘get out’ which must have further spurred her vengefulness so that she waited until the girl had finished dispensing to request for her signed chit to deprive me of any possibility of remuneration and her vengefulness still simmering she was moved to lodge a complaint that is aimed at getting me into trouble.
She did not pay for the transaction but has the gall to lodge a complaint over something that she actually provoked. There are many rude people including doctors in this world, why pick on me except that in her estimation I am someone to push over with impunity?
If my “Get out” was examined carefully I raised my voice in loudness and speed but the syllables were not stretched nor was there an explosive rise in speed and loudness to qualify it as lashing out or rude. It is your false perception that you do not realize will end in mad perception that I was nasty when you yourself was nasty and insincere in asking me to answer your question “Why are you so rude” as if I am so rude it is unquantifiably ‘so’.
There cannot be any reason except to get me into trouble in writing a letter to my superior complaining that I was rude, impatient, inattentive and not interested in treating a patient because it is none of her business to bring to others' attention I am nasty and she should let others judge whether I am rude, impatient, inattentive and not interested about them and therefore the only reason she is doing so is to get me into trouble.
It may be coincidental or there may be intention why did she not terminate the transaction but waited until the girl prepared the dispensations and medical certificate to then request a return of her signed chit as if to deprive me of any claim to the transaction?
If you have not paid me for my service, what right have you and don't you think you have the gall to complain about my poor service? I may have a case for complaining about non-payment but given the choice I would rather not have such patients.
If you want to get others into trouble then there may be opportunities in this and other lives to come that you do not realize is possible when you may get into far greater trouble than you ever imagined or bargained possible.
And if it turns out that I am largely if not completely blameless and you are to blamed then you are slandering me with grave consequences on top of trying to get me into trouble.
As I remembered it was the first time she saw me and she had some minor complaints (fever, cough, cold, sore throat, body aches) and had already seen another doctor and basically wanted an afternoon off.
It was recorded I took her temperature and it was normal and her blood pressure was 140/70 so what more interest does she want from me?
What is there for me to be interested or not, attentive or not over a trivial simple ailment in an adult who is otherwise fit who may be seeing me for a medical certificate? Interest and attention that is visible or audible is expressed in how someone speaks and his facial expressions and is falsely for show to be seen.
Just because someone displays great interest in the way and what he says does not mean he is truly interested in you but he is faking it to deceive you to get what he wants.
As an example this patient I had just seen kept asking me whether her blood pressure was OK when I have told her a few times it was OK. Was it me or she who is not attentive? Once I pointed out to another parent that I have already explained to him three times what might be wrong with his son when he again asked me “Actually what is wrong with my son?” and he got angry and accused me of being arrogant.
As far as I was concerned it was a routine transaction but I was taken aback when she asked me at the end, “Why are you so rude?” to which, if I had refuted I would get into an argument since she has already decided in her opinion I am rude and thus angered I raised my voice in speed and loudness said, “Get out” which, being such a sensitive and falsely perceptive person, must have upset her to become vengeful and made her feel vindicated that I am indeed rude.
You yourself are guilty of hypocrisy in asking me the question because you should have a good idea why I am rude to not need me to answer the question for you but instead the question is a ploy or excuse to hurtfully let me know you think I am rude without assuming responsibility as if it is not just your perception I am rude but it is an universal fact I am rude and I should therefore tell you why I am rude. Does she really want me to tell her I am rude because of a, b, c? If she is not aware her question is provocative, challenging others to an argument, itself rude, she must be a great fool. If I was a hulk or a gangster I do not think she would dare ask me that and unless you are looking for trouble, if you think someone is rude the wise thing for you to do is terminate the dialogue as soon as possible and have nothing to do with the person in the future.
Only a person who speaks with forcefully stretched syllables, changes of speed and loudness can be rude and because nowadays I do not use force to stretch my syllables, change speed and loudness, not because I want to impress others I am so good but because I do not wish to suffer from stress, restlessness and distraction, I CANNOT BE RUDE except in a person's false perception that she does not believe will end in mad perception.
You have a right to say YOU think I am rude and you may or may not give me the reasons why you think I am rude but you have no right to ask me why I am so rude which apart from implying my rudeness is so terrible it is unquantifiable it also implies my rudeness is a forgone conclusion and I better provide the reasons why I am so rude.
I disagree with her that I was in anyway rude and so what does she expect me to say to her question that I must accept what she says that I am rude and give the reasons why I am so rude? Others may be able to put on a great show of decorum but to me I just wanted to get her out of sight and therefore I said, “Get out”.
If what someone says or does or the way he says or does pleases a person, it is experienced as ‘like’. Nowadays I do not say or do things in a way that pleases others and because I do not convey my liking for them, they may think I have no interest in them or are rude. Just because I do say or do things to please you does mean I am rude or uninterested and if you think so, you may be the one asking too much of others and have false perception that will end in mad perception.
Rudeness and politeness is subjective and varies from culture to culture. For instance in Japan people bow to each other and if you did not you may be considered rude. In Thailand you can be killed for showing someone the sole of your foot.
Therefore you must tell me in what ways I have been rude to you because what you consider rude may be OK to others and it is unreasonable to ask why to explain why I am so rude. Is it because I did not stand up or bow when you came in, I did not smile and shake your hands or pamper you with flattery? If it is never a pleasure to be polite but it is stressful then in wanting others to behave politely according to others you want others to put on show and you may not realize that it is possible in future lives for politeness that you so crave others possess to be painfully imposed on you.
Politeness has nothing to do with virtue which according to the Buddha is not killing (even insects), not stealing, not telling lies, not gossiping or tale bearing, not indulging in illicit sex and intoxicants. Whether you like it or not what the Buddha spelt out may correspond with God's view about virtue and therefore virtue is not negotiable, it is objective and applies to everyone. On the other hand rudeness and its desired counterpart politeness is subjective, different people have different ideas of what is polite or rude (here it is rude to walk into people's houses with shoes on but not in Australia). Rather than meritorious, politeness may be a facade, for show to please others and hypocritical.
YOU SHOULD TELL ME YOU FIND ME RUDE AND WHEN PEOPLE DO SO THEY ARE USUALLY LOOKING FOR A FIGHT OR THEY THINK THE OTHER PERSON IS A PUSHOVER THAT THEY CAN BULLY OR CHALLENGE.
IT IS RUDE OR PROVOCATIVE AND UNRIGHTEOUS TO ASK ME WHY I AM SO RUDE THAT IMPLIES MY RUDENESS IS SO TERRIBLE & A FORGONE UNIVERSAL CONCLUSION AND THEREFORE I SHOULD COME UP WITH THE ANSWERS WHY I AM SO RUDE A.
IT TAKES A VINDICTIVE PERSON TO DEMAND RETURN OF HER SIGNED CHIT TO DEPRIVE ME ANY CLAIMS AND DESPITE DEPRIVING ME OF ANY REMUNERATION YOU FIND IT FIT TO RUB SALT TO THE WOUND BY WRITING A LETTER TO GET ME INTO TROUBLE.
JESUS SAID IF YOU DO NOT FORGIVE OTHERS THEIR TRESPASSES, YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN WILL NOT FORGIVE YOU YOUR TRESPASSES THAT MAY FAR EXCEED WHAT YOU ARE AWARE AND YOU CANNOT BE FORGIVING IN WRITING COMPLAINING LETTERS ABOUT OTHERS, ESPECIALLY WHEN I DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PAYMENT FROM YOU.
POLITENESS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH VIRTUE OR GOODNESS AND THE TWO ARE VERY DIFFERENT THINGS, POLITENESS IS ALL ABOUT THE WAY AND WHAT YOU SAY OR DO TO PLEASE OTHERS OR MAKE THEM LIKE THEMSELVES THAT IS FOR SHOW AND HYPOCRITICAL THAT IS THE WAY OF THIS WORLD.
JUST BECAUSE I DON'T SAY OR DO THINGS IN A WAY THAT PLEASES OTHERS DOES NOT MEAN I AM RUDE AND IF YOU DO, YOU MAY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION OR ARE ASKING TOO MUCH OF OTHERS THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
UNLIKE OTHERS I DID NOT STRETCH MY SYLLABLES NOR ACCELERATE IN AN ACCELERATED WAY MY SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHEN I SAID ‘GET OUT’ BUT IT WAS ONLY CONSTANTLY LOUDER AND FASTER AND THEREFORE I WAS NOT RUDE AND IT WAS YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION TO PERCEIVE I WAS NASTY (JUST AS JESUS WAS NOT NASTY WHEN HE TOLD PETER TO GET BEHIND HIM, SATAN) BUT SHE WAS RUDE AND LYING IN ASKING ME ‘WHY I AM SO RUDE’. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE THAT SHE WANTS TO KNOW THE REASONS WHY I AM RUDE BUT IT IS JUST A VEHICLE TO TICK ME OFF NOT REALIZING SHE IS CHALLENGING ME TO AN ARGUMENT OR EVEN FIGHT.
DO YOU THINK SHE IS TRULY INTERESTED IN THE REASONS WHY I AM SO RUDE? IF SHE WAS NOT INTERESTED THEN WHY IS SHE ASKING ME FORCING ME TO REPLY TO A QUESTION SHE IS LYING SHE IS INTERESTED TO KNOW. IF SHE WAS NOT INTERESTED TO KNOW WHY I AM SO RUDE BUT SHE IS USING IT TO TICK ME OFF, SHE IS GUILTY OF LYING OR DISHONESTY.
ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA THE PERSON WHO SLANDERS AN INNOCENT PERSON CAN HAVE HIS MIND SPLIT INTO SEVEN PIECES. (YOUR MIND MAY BE LIKE A PORCELIAN PLATE THAT MAY SHATTER TO PIECES IF DROPPED. YOU MAY SCOFF BUT IF IT TURNS OUT TO BE TRUE THEN WHEN IT HAPPENS YOU CANNOT DO AYTHING EXCEPT AS JESUS SAID, WEEP AND GNASH YOUR TEETH EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY THAT MAY LAST BILLIONS OF YEARS.
Science tells us this universe is about 15 billion years old and the earth is 4.5 billion years old and mankind has only been around for about 70,000 years old. The Buddha said the person transmigrating as animals for an eon or Age (there is no chance to be human until the last 70,000 years) will build himself a pile of skeleton that is as high as a mountain and so if you cannot go to eternal life in heaven you are headed for eternal punishment and weeping and gnashing of your teeth passing from one life to another or eternal habitations according to Jesus at the close of this Age.
Be careful who you offend because if you offend someone noble, the Buddha said you are headed for perdition.
The Buddha:
When a fire burns down a forest-- that flame with its blackened trail -- the shoots there take birth once morewith the passage of days & nights.But if a monk, his virtue consummate,burns you with his potency, you won't acquire sons or cattlenor will your heirs enjoy wealth.They become barren, heir-less,like palm tree stumps.
So a person who's wise,out of regard for his own good,should always show due respectfor a serpent, a fire,a noble warrior with high status,& a monk, his virtue consummate.
As a consumer:
Many people do not realize they speak nonsense and are headed for insanity but instead think what they say are full of meaning.
For instance in the course of a conversation, this person said, “As a consumer, we should be careful in borrowing money”. As a consumer is unnecessary and meaningless, you mean only as a consumer you should be careful in borrowing? Even if you are not aware it is nonsense, inside you are vaguely aware and you want others to appreciate nonsense and therefore have karma on top of going mad practicing nonsense that you believe it necessary.
Not meaning what they say not saying what they mean:
It is impossible that she is interested in knowing why or the motivations for my rudeness but what she meant is that she wants me to know she finds me rude and she is faking she does not know why I should be rude.
Ask her or listeners whether she meant what she said, she and listeners might say ‘Of course, she meant it’ when she did not mean she wants to know the motives behind my rudeness but she is using the question to tick me off and challenging me to argue with her.
Like the tip compared to the iceberg ordinary people may underestimate the occasions when they never meant what they said nor said what they meant.
They tell you about their new car or son or house but they never say I want you to be impressed by my new car, what my son can do or my house.
IF YOU HABITUALLY DO NOT MEAN WHAT YOU SAY OR SAY WHAT YOU MEAN, EVEN IF ARE UNAWARE, YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE AND HYPOCRITES DO NOT GO HEAVEN.
A hell of a difference:
There is even a hell of a difference between “I find you very rude” and “Why are you so rude” and it reflects a person’s poor discernment that he thinks there is no appreciable difference.
If a person tells another, “I find you very rude” he is merely stating to another his opinion and there is no demand for a reply on the other person but on the other hand by asking another “Why are you so rude?” you are asking a question that demands an answer and if it is not the reason for my rudeness that you are after, you are sending me on a wild goose chase telling you why I am rude.
It takes well practiced emotional or force control to ask another relatively calmly and softly “Why are you so rude” and rather than meritorious, it is wanting the other person to accept as friendly a question that is actually laced with venom. The goat in sheepskin may be punished by God more than a goat who does not disguise his nature.
Will you understand my rudeness if I told you why?
Does she mean she will understand my rudeness and forgive me if I told her why I am being rude to her?
If it does not make any difference whether I told her the reasons why I am rude, is she mad or courting future madness asking me a question that is irrelevant?
Preferring the company of money she paid with her life:
There was a news report of a female beggar in front of a restaurant in Jln Pudu who was given a pet Chihuahua by a patron but perhaps she preferred the company of money or found having to feed the pet a burden, sold the dog to a pet shop for $500 and started to wave the money to passersby saying that she is now rich. She was found brutally murdered at the place where she begged in the early hours of the morning.
There is such a thing called the nature of beings and it can be very lowly in some as it can be lofty in others and some will struggle to appreciate goodness and truthfulness. To them money, material gains and sensate gratifications are what sustain them and it will take even many lifetimes and shedding blood that is as great as the four great oceans before they start to say enough is enough.
As Jesus said, for what does it profit a man to gain the world and forfeit his life? If you ask me, I would rather prefer the company of the pet than the $500 it fetched.
Killing others softly is an art:
Killing others softly is copied from others and honed by repeated practice so that perpetrators become so good they even mistake the force powering their killing softly as their goodwill or their force for good.
It take great force to mobilize one’s force of self preservation to exert immaculate control over one’s force of going against self so as to say or do something that has ill will, that harms self and others with controlled gentleness that it appears gentle and genuine to those who are undiscerning and easily deceived by appearances.
The reasons why people develop the art of killing others is by imitating others (you learn to be sarcastic after bearing the brunt of others’ sarcasm), they have been beaten down by more powerful people for being directly aggressive so that they have to learn to disguise their lashing out and they cannot voice directly their urge to hurt those people whom they need to survive who are close to them like their wives, children and bosses and so they must device means to lash out in a cloaked manner.
As stressful as directly lashing out is, it is far more agonizing or mind bending to kill others softly because increasingly the person cannot see the ill will in his killing others softly and cannot see a way out of his suffering.
Killing softly is like driving with the feet on both brakes and accelerator:
Killing others softly can be compared to driving quite fast with both feet being on the brake and accelerator pedals so that the forward motion reflects the net excess of the force of going against self over the force of self preservation and you may appreciate it is more excruciating or precarious than direct lashing out or merely pressing or ‘gunning’ the accelerator pedal and this person is headed for hellish mental torment when control is finally lost.
True and false politeness:
IF THE POLITE WAY OR POLITE THINGS YOU SAY OR DO INDUCES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THE OTHER PERSON WHAT TRUE GOODNESS CAN THERE BE IN YOUR POLITENESS? INSTEAD ISN’T YOUR POLITENESS HYPOCRITICAL, KILLING OTHERS IT PRETENDS TO BENEFIT? THEREFORE ONLY IF A PERSON DOES NOT CONVEY FORCE BY NOT FORCEFULLY STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS HE TRULY POLITE.
There is politeness that is subjective and false and there is politeness that is objective and true.
If you expect others to say or do certain things in a certain way in your presence that is determined by society or yourself then that is ritualized idiosyncratic politeness that varies from individual to individual and culture to culture.
For instance if you expect others to smile to you, ask you sek pau beh, bow to you, take off their shoes before they enter your house, not prop their legs on their desks then these are rules that you or society imposes on others then if a person follows regardless of whether he means it or not he is polite and if he does not practice he is rude.
Another criterion for subjective politeness is if a person’s behavior pleases you it is polite and if it displeases you that is rude. Because what pleases one person may not please another it is subjective and false. In any case pleasing another has nothing to do with reason but it means a person’s behavior in what and how he says or does stirs the speed and strength of the mental force of the person pleased.
Thus if you are a woman who crave affection or for people to lust after you then the man who expresses lust or affection for you is polite and the man who does not is rude. On the other hand if you are a woman who despises others lusting or expressing affection for you, then the man who expresses lust or affection for you is rude and the man who does not is polite.
There is an objective and genuine politeness. Any behavior that is not accompanied by force is to be considered polite and any behavior accompanied by force is considered harsh and rude. Thus if a person speaks and does things with the use of additional force to stretch syllables or units of motions, change speed and loudness it is harsh, stressful to the recipient and impolite and if a person does not use force to stretch his syllables, change speed and loudness then he is truly gentle and polite.
IT CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DEMONSTRATED THAT I DO NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHERE ALL OTHERS DO AND THEREFORE I AM TRULY GENTLE IN NOT BOMBARDING OTHERS WITH FORCE CHANGES THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACT.
ONLY A TRULY GENTLE PERSON IS TRULY POLITE AND THE ONLY WAY A PERSON CAN BE TRULY GENTLE IS IF HE DOES NOT CONVEY FORCE IN HIS SPEECH AND ACTIONS AND THAT CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED IF HE DID NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES.
Full of manners but full of shit:
Manners are often confused with politeness and there are many who are full of manners or decorum but full of shit in their hearts. They have painstakingly encoded and honed in their mental jukeboxes what are the proper things to say and do and how to say or do them in the contexts they find themselves in but inside they are bristling with resentment and unkind thoughts for others and they expect others to similarly suffer to be full of manners to them and you are rude if you do not do so.
Don’t judge a book by its covers:
A muddled rule bound doctor (faith in rules is a fetter to future woe) may ask you a hundred questions and poke into every hole, nook and cranny in your body and still come up with the wrong diagnosis whilst a calm clearly thinking observant doctor will spot diagnose correctly your condition even as you walk into the room and he is examining you even as he talks to you and so you may be wrongly accusing him of showing no interest when he has examined you.
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO GET OTHERS INTO TROUBLE WHETHER HE HAS A CASE OR NOT IS HEADING FOR TROUBLE HIMSELF THAT MAY BE FAR MORE THAN HE EVER BARGAINED FOR AND IF IT TURNS OUT HE HAS NO CASE THEN HE IS UNRIGHTEOUS AND HEADED FOR EVEN GREATER PUNISHMENT.
YOU CANNOT GET OTHERS INTO TROUBLE IN HEAVEN AND THEREFORE IF YOU HAVE AN URGE OR LIKE TO GET OTHERS INTO TROUBLE YOU MUST REMAIN IN THIS WORLD AND IF THIS MEANS EXISTING AS ANIMALS BUILDING UP A PILE OF SKELETONS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN THEN THAT IS WHAT YOU HAVE ELECTED FOR YOURSELF. SO NEXT TIME YOU WANT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT OTHERS OR REPORT OTHERS OR TALK ABOUT OTHERS BEHIND THEIR BACKS (DIVISIVE SPEECH) THINK TWICE, YOU MAY BE COMMITTING YOURSELF TO ANIMAL EXISTENCE NOT JUST A FEW LIFETIMES BUT ANOTHER ETERNITY.
Think carefully before you ask any question:
Ordinary people like to or their mental forces stir attractively to ask questions and they even ask questions not because they want to know the answer but to impress others with their intelligence or thoughtfulness or to test your knowledge. If you already know the answer but you want to test whether the other person knows according to your view point you are being deceitful and cannot mean the question but you mean to test.
EVERY TIME A PERSON ASKS A QUESTION HE IS ASKING THE OTHER PERSON TO DO MENTAL WORK AND SO IF THE QUESTION IS FLIPPANT OR EVEN ABSURD YOU ARE ASKING THE OTHER PERSON TO TROUBLE HIMSELF ANSWERING YOU FOR FLIPPANT OR NO REASONS. THIS YOU DO NOT REALIZE IS CREATING KARMA FOR YOU THAT CUMULATIVELY IS, AS THE BUDDHA SAID, AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND TAKES AN ETERNITY TO REPAY. SO EITHER YOU REMAIN A ROBOT OF ASKING QUESTIONS GOING ABOUT ASKING THE SAME OLD QUESTIONS THE SAME OLD WAYS HEAPING MORE KARMA OR YOU LEARN TO PAY ATTENTION TO ERASE THE URGE TO ASK OTHERS QUESTIONS. EVEN IF THE PERSON REFUSES TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION HE HAS TO USE FORCE THAT IS CONDITIONING TO IGNORE YOUR PROVOCATIVE QUESTION THAT CONDITIONS HIM TO SHUT OUT REALITY.
It reflects the depth of delusion to think you are wonderful and doing me good in asking me why I am so rude and you expect me to be grateful to you and think I am truly rude and unreasonable in taking offence and asking you to get out.
Sek pau beh?
The Chinese routinely greet each other thus ‘Sek pau beh’ or ‘eaten or not?’ that those who are not Chinese might agree is odd.
Whether you mean what you asked or it was copied from others and rendered automatically by rote from your mental jukebox can be determined if not by you then by those who discern and God.
Again you are asking a question that troubles the person addressed to reply with karma due compared to a person who says ‘hello’ or greetings to you that poses no questions.
The person who habitually asks ‘sek pau beh?’ develops an increasingly irresistible urge to utter that and he is headed for certain mad jukebox behavior that is automatically triggered for him that may become completely inappropriate.
It is Time For Us To go Home:
Apparently the parents of the missing UK girl in Portugal have now declared that it is time for them to go home apparently to express their disappointment with Portuguese police’s handling of the case.
If you are going home in a huff just to express displeasure you have false perception and logic & headed for madness. You go home because you want to go home, not to express disappointment with others and if you keep doing so, you will end up a very mixed up person doing and saying things to dispense like and dislike for others rather than because you want to do or say so.
MANY PEOPLE SAY OR DO THINGS TO SEND EMOTIONAL MESSAGES TO OTHERS THAT DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THEIR DECLARED REASONS AND THAT IS COURTING FUTURE MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION THAT YOU ARE DOING OR SAYING THINGS FOR THE REASONS YOU SAID WHEN IT IS FOR OTHER REASONS.
Confronting me:
You are confronting me with my rudeness when you ask me ‘why are you so rude’ and confronting is always about force addressed to the other person’s mental force that may appear as if addressed to his reason and so you are a great fool if you think you are or can be good in confronting others and you expect others to be grateful to you for confronting them and to even provide you an answer that may be irrelevant to what you are confronting me about. If you are confronting me, don’t imagine that you are being friendly or the seemingly friendly way with which you ask the question is sincere.
If you are feeding others sugar laced poison and you expect others to be grateful to you, you must be sick and so it is they are sick that they cannot understand why others tell them to ‘get out’ when they merely ‘innocently’ ask others ‘why are you so rude’. They can see others provoking them but they cannot see themselves provoking in the first place.
Prolonging and out of touch:
It is the truth that to greater or lesser extent people who express or actors always prolong their poses or the expressions they are wearing on their faces or bodies because these expressions are intended for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate and what is intended for show must be prolonged for as long as comfortable to enable others to see them.
Thus actors always tend to prolong to greater or lesser extent, their smiles or frowns or scowls long after the event as when they keep smiling long after the joke has passed.
You never need reason to prolong but you must use force to prolong any expression and that is prolonging the application of force on your mind that causes stress, restlessness and distraction and conditions you to greater prolonging and degrades your mind.
This constant prolonging is the cause of the lingering, sentimentality and sadness that must afflict them and leads to depression when intense and control is lost.
The agony of the simultaneous urge to prolong and move on:
Because style is meant to be seen or heard, it must be prolonged as long as one can comfortably sustain to enable others to see the facial expressions or hear the marvelously stretched syllables but at the same time there is an urge to move on because prolonging is delaying foolishly just for show and there is usually pressing demands on his time to move on and thus all actors are harassed, caught in a vice between a forceful urge to prolong or delay and an forceful urge to move on, to catch up with the present that his prolonging has left him behind. Like a man balancing on a tightrope he is heading for a fall down the abyss of hell for his deceitful conduct that also forces his audience to entertain simultaneous prolonging and moving on.
IT IS NEVER BLISS BUT AN AGONY TO CONSTANTLY ENTERTAIN THE URGE TO PROLONG YOUR FABRICATIONS IN SPEECH OR MOTION OR POSTURE SO THAT THEY CAN BE SEEN OR HEARD BY OTHERS AND THE URGE TO MOVE ON BECAUSE THERE ARE PRESSING MATTERS THAT YOU HAVE LEFT BEHIND IN PROLONGING.
IF YOU ARE PROLONGING ALL THE TIME AND YOU DON’T KNOW THAT, AREN’T YOU A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING AND A ROBOT BECAUSE IF YOU CAN DO SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING YOU MUST BE AN AUTOMATON?
Pull push:
Once you use force to prolong or delay you must further use force to cancel your forceful delaying to move on. If you did not use force to delay or prolong to impress others, you will not have to use further force to move on that clash with your urge to delay or prolong.
THUS PROLONGING OR DELAYING WHICH IS A CRUCIAL INGREDIENT OF STYLE IN POSTURE, SPEECH AND MOTION IS EVIL NOT GOOD AND ALL STYLE IS EVIL NOT GOOD, MERELY FOR SHOW TO BE SEEN OR HEARD THAT FORCES THE PERPETRATOR AND OTHERS TO BE CAUGHT IN A NEVER ENDING BIND OF WANTING TO DELAY AND MOVE ON.
Why everyone here is suffering:
No matter how good or genuine (truthful) you think you are you must suffer, even be tormented if in truth there is stretching or prolonging in your syllables that have their equivalents in your poses, expressions and motion.
Because there is objectively discernible stretching or prolonging in the poses, expressions, speech and motion of everyone here they must all suffer.
TO PROLONG YOUR SYLLABLES AND POSES IS ITSELF SUFFERING BECAUSE FORCE IS ALWAYS NEEDED TO PROLONG AND THEN OPPOSITE FORCE IS NEEDED TO STOP THE PROLONGING BUT ON TOP OF THAT IF YOU ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AS YOU PROLONG (AS ALL THOSE WHO PROLONG DO) IS TO INTENSIFY THE USE OF FORCE AND THE AGONY EXPERIENCED.
YOU CAN STRETCH A SYLLABLE AT CONSTANT SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
YOU CAN STRETCH A SYLLABLE WITH ACCELERATING SPEED OR LOUDNESS OR BOTH AND THIS INVOLVES GREATER USE OF FORCE AND GREATER STRESS.
BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THROUGH A SYLLABLE THEY STRETCH, THEY INTENSIFY THEIR SUFFERING MUCH GREATER THAN MERELY STRETCHING SYLLABLES.
Just as you must use force to cause a syllable or sound or expression to be prolonged you must use an additional opposing force to bring the prolonging to an end and thus the person who prolongs incurs two penalties of the use of force to prolong and then stop. If you did not use force to prolong you would not have to use another opposite force to stop it.
(A car in motion can only be stopped by applying brakes and thus if a car’s trip is unnecessary and not undertaken you would not have to use force to stop it. Because it is unnecessary to stretch syllables but it is only for show, you are unnecessarily using force to prolong for show that further requires you to use opposite force to stop the prolonging)
NO MATTER HOW GOOD, PIOUS OR TRUE YOU THINK YOU ARE, IF YOU STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, YOU MUST SUFFER NOW, SUFFER WORSE LATER BECAUSE SUFFERING IS CONDITIONING AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR MORE SUFFERING AFTER DEPARTURE.
Repetition too is prolonging:
When seized by rage people do not shake their fists once but many times not at constant speed and strength of force but violently changing speed and strength of force which is a form of prolonging the shaking of fist. If your fist shaking is meaningful a single shake suffices and it is meaningless to repetitively or prolong shake your fist.
Similarly when excited, people jump up and down many times or they shake the fence many times and this too is prolonging that demands the use of force to keep shaking and the use of force to stop shaking or stop the urge to keep shaking.
To say ‘yes, yes, yes’ or ‘come, come, come’ or ‘ha, ha, ha’ or ‘I say, I say, I say’ too are forms of prolonging by repetition.
When people exercise they repetitively swing their arms, sway side to side, repetitively do pushups and touch their toes with their fingers and this too is a form of repetition or prolonging in the name of preserving their lives here defying Jesus would said you should care for what you shall eat or wear and who amongst you can in any way prolong your life one cubit.
Beating around the bush too is a form of prolonging.
I was correct about Mother Teresa:
I said that it is not in the province of men to determine who is and isn’t a saint and the following revelations about Mother Teresa’s private life does not surprise me.
It is impossible for a person who obeys Jesus’ command to let your yes be yes only and therefore does not stretch his syllables, change speed or loudness to suffer mental torment and therefore if a person suffers, he must be stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and not letting his yes be yes only.
To one who sees correctly she too is a tough person and has a style of her own and it reflects how difficult if not impossible for ordinary people to find the ONLY way out of suffering that exists, namely pay attention to not stretch syllables, change speed or loudness and even after I have demonstrated many times people still do so not realizing that when they leave here, all they have may be taken from them and they shall have nothing and in the future though they may be tormented and beseech why they suffer, no one will tell and no light will shine through since you have forsaken the only way out of suffering that I have now pointed it out for you.
BY THEMSELVES IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO COME TO A REALIZATION THAT WHAT THEY ARE DOING ALL THE TIME NAMELY STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HAVE PARALLELS IN THEIR MOTION, THOUGHT AND PERCEPTION IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT REGULARLY ASSAIL THEM AND WILL MAKE THEM MAD AND THE SIMPLE SOLUTION IS TO PAY ATTENTION TO STOP STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS. IF YOU MISS THIS OPPORTUNITY TO ESCAPE SUFFERING YOU MAY RUE IN REGRET FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY AND BY YOURSELF YOU WILL NEVER DISCOVER THE WELL HIDDEN WAY OUT OF TORMENT.
Mother Teresa's diary reveals her crisis of faith
By Bruce Johnston in Rome
Last Updated: 12:26am GMT 29/11/2002
Mother Teresa, who was put on the fast track to sainthood by the Pope after her death five years ago, was tormented by a crisis of belief for 50 years, her writings reveal.
Her letters and diaries present a completely different picture of the nun and Nobel peace prize winner from her public image as a woman confident of her faith.
Biographies would have to be rewritten to take the revelation into account, it was said in Rome yesterday.
The previously unpublished material is to be brought out as a volume in Italy. It was collected by Roman Catholic authorities in Calcutta after her death at the age of 87.
Mother Teresa, who worked for years among the poor of Calcutta, wrote in 1958: "My smile is a great cloak that hides a multitude of pains." (so her smile is a lie and you think your smile is genuine where she admits hers is a lie?)
Because she was "forever smiling", people thought "my faith, my hope and my love are overflowing and that my intimacy with God and union with his will fill my heart. If only they knew . . ."
Mother Teresa, who was greatly admired by Diana, Princess of Wales, said in another letter: "The damned of Hell suffer eternal punishment because they experiment with the loss of God.
"In my own soul, I feel the terrible pain of this loss. I feel that God does not want me, that God is not God and that he does not really exist." (Because I do not have a disturbed mind, I can see clearly the way out of suffering and falsity it is impossible for me to utter what she said. Doubt and uncertainty according to the Buddha is one of three lower fetters to future woe)
Il Messeggero, Rome's popular daily newspaper, said: "The real Mother Teresa was one who for one year had visions and who for the next 50 had doubts - up until her death."
Her years of doubt coincided with the period when, after having visions, she decided to leave her teaching post at a privileged Calcutta school to help India's poor.
After her death the Pope waived the Vatican rule that prohibits investigation of the cause for beatification until five years after the subject's death. It was the first time the rule had been put aside in recent memory.
Mother Teresa's personal writings are being published next month as Il Segreto di Madre Teresa (Mother Teresa's Secret).
Why are you so rude?
It was basically over a simple cough and cold in an otherwise fit young adult in which she had already seen another GP and from what I understood, wanted a medical certificate for the afternoon in which some more honest patients will even tell me straight they just want a ‘MC’ so what is there for me to be rude, impatient, inattentive and not interested except that she may have unrealistically high expectations of others and in now complaining, of wanting to get me into trouble because of vindictiveness for which she was actually entirely at fault.
If you already find me rude surely you will have a better idea than me why I am rude and therefore you yourself cannot be sincere in asking me as if you are puzzled ‘why are you so rude’ but instead the motive is concealed, to use the question to venomously tick me off and you are a great fool if you are not aware that the question is provocative challenging the other person to an argument or even fight and therefore your question is rude. You tell me why I am rude, don’t ask me to tell you why I am rude expecting me to give you an answer. Because I was offended and not wishing to get into an argument that I am not rude as she accused, I raised my voice but not explosively and told her to ‘get out’ which must have further spurred her vengefulness so that she waited until the girl had finished dispensing to request for her signed chit to deprive me of any possibility of remuneration and her vengefulness still simmering she was moved to lodge a complaint that is aimed at getting me into trouble.
She did not pay for the transaction but has the gall to lodge a complaint over something that she actually provoked. There are many rude people including doctors in this world, why pick on me except that in her estimation I am someone to push over with impunity?
If my “Get out” was examined carefully I raised my voice in loudness and speed but the syllables were not stretched nor was there an explosive rise in speed and loudness to qualify it as lashing out or rude. It is your false perception that you do not realize will end in mad perception that I was nasty when you yourself was nasty and insincere in asking me to answer your question “Why are you so rude” as if I am so rude it is unquantifiably ‘so’.
There cannot be any reason except to get me into trouble in writing a letter to my superior complaining that I was rude, impatient, inattentive and not interested in treating a patient because it is none of her business to bring to others' attention I am nasty and she should let others judge whether I am rude, impatient, inattentive and not interested about them and therefore the only reason she is doing so is to get me into trouble.
It may be coincidental or there may be intention why did she not terminate the transaction but waited until the girl prepared the dispensations and medical certificate to then request a return of her signed chit as if to deprive me of any claim to the transaction?
If you have not paid me for my service, what right have you and don't you think you have the gall to complain about my poor service? I may have a case for complaining about non-payment but given the choice I would rather not have such patients.
If you want to get others into trouble then there may be opportunities in this and other lives to come that you do not realize is possible when you may get into far greater trouble than you ever imagined or bargained possible.
And if it turns out that I am largely if not completely blameless and you are to blamed then you are slandering me with grave consequences on top of trying to get me into trouble.
As I remembered it was the first time she saw me and she had some minor complaints (fever, cough, cold, sore throat, body aches) and had already seen another doctor and basically wanted an afternoon off.
It was recorded I took her temperature and it was normal and her blood pressure was 140/70 so what more interest does she want from me?
What is there for me to be interested or not, attentive or not over a trivial simple ailment in an adult who is otherwise fit who may be seeing me for a medical certificate? Interest and attention that is visible or audible is expressed in how someone speaks and his facial expressions and is falsely for show to be seen.
Just because someone displays great interest in the way and what he says does not mean he is truly interested in you but he is faking it to deceive you to get what he wants.
As an example this patient I had just seen kept asking me whether her blood pressure was OK when I have told her a few times it was OK. Was it me or she who is not attentive? Once I pointed out to another parent that I have already explained to him three times what might be wrong with his son when he again asked me “Actually what is wrong with my son?” and he got angry and accused me of being arrogant.
As far as I was concerned it was a routine transaction but I was taken aback when she asked me at the end, “Why are you so rude?” to which, if I had refuted I would get into an argument since she has already decided in her opinion I am rude and thus angered I raised my voice in speed and loudness said, “Get out” which, being such a sensitive and falsely perceptive person, must have upset her to become vengeful and made her feel vindicated that I am indeed rude.
You yourself are guilty of hypocrisy in asking me the question because you should have a good idea why I am rude to not need me to answer the question for you but instead the question is a ploy or excuse to hurtfully let me know you think I am rude without assuming responsibility as if it is not just your perception I am rude but it is an universal fact I am rude and I should therefore tell you why I am rude. Does she really want me to tell her I am rude because of a, b, c? If she is not aware her question is provocative, challenging others to an argument, itself rude, she must be a great fool. If I was a hulk or a gangster I do not think she would dare ask me that and unless you are looking for trouble, if you think someone is rude the wise thing for you to do is terminate the dialogue as soon as possible and have nothing to do with the person in the future.
Only a person who speaks with forcefully stretched syllables, changes of speed and loudness can be rude and because nowadays I do not use force to stretch my syllables, change speed and loudness, not because I want to impress others I am so good but because I do not wish to suffer from stress, restlessness and distraction, I CANNOT BE RUDE except in a person's false perception that she does not believe will end in mad perception.
You have a right to say YOU think I am rude and you may or may not give me the reasons why you think I am rude but you have no right to ask me why I am so rude which apart from implying my rudeness is so terrible it is unquantifiable it also implies my rudeness is a forgone conclusion and I better provide the reasons why I am so rude.
I disagree with her that I was in anyway rude and so what does she expect me to say to her question that I must accept what she says that I am rude and give the reasons why I am so rude? Others may be able to put on a great show of decorum but to me I just wanted to get her out of sight and therefore I said, “Get out”.
If what someone says or does or the way he says or does pleases a person, it is experienced as ‘like’. Nowadays I do not say or do things in a way that pleases others and because I do not convey my liking for them, they may think I have no interest in them or are rude. Just because I do say or do things to please you does mean I am rude or uninterested and if you think so, you may be the one asking too much of others and have false perception that will end in mad perception.
Rudeness and politeness is subjective and varies from culture to culture. For instance in Japan people bow to each other and if you did not you may be considered rude. In Thailand you can be killed for showing someone the sole of your foot.
Therefore you must tell me in what ways I have been rude to you because what you consider rude may be OK to others and it is unreasonable to ask why to explain why I am so rude. Is it because I did not stand up or bow when you came in, I did not smile and shake your hands or pamper you with flattery? If it is never a pleasure to be polite but it is stressful then in wanting others to behave politely according to others you want others to put on show and you may not realize that it is possible in future lives for politeness that you so crave others possess to be painfully imposed on you.
Politeness has nothing to do with virtue which according to the Buddha is not killing (even insects), not stealing, not telling lies, not gossiping or tale bearing, not indulging in illicit sex and intoxicants. Whether you like it or not what the Buddha spelt out may correspond with God's view about virtue and therefore virtue is not negotiable, it is objective and applies to everyone. On the other hand rudeness and its desired counterpart politeness is subjective, different people have different ideas of what is polite or rude (here it is rude to walk into people's houses with shoes on but not in Australia). Rather than meritorious, politeness may be a facade, for show to please others and hypocritical.
YOU SHOULD TELL ME YOU FIND ME RUDE AND WHEN PEOPLE DO SO THEY ARE USUALLY LOOKING FOR A FIGHT OR THEY THINK THE OTHER PERSON IS A PUSHOVER THAT THEY CAN BULLY OR CHALLENGE.
IT IS RUDE OR PROVOCATIVE AND UNRIGHTEOUS TO ASK ME WHY I AM SO RUDE THAT IMPLIES MY RUDENESS IS SO TERRIBLE & A FORGONE UNIVERSAL CONCLUSION AND THEREFORE I SHOULD COME UP WITH THE ANSWERS WHY I AM SO RUDE A.
IT TAKES A VINDICTIVE PERSON TO DEMAND RETURN OF HER SIGNED CHIT TO DEPRIVE ME ANY CLAIMS AND DESPITE DEPRIVING ME OF ANY REMUNERATION YOU FIND IT FIT TO RUB SALT TO THE WOUND BY WRITING A LETTER TO GET ME INTO TROUBLE.
JESUS SAID IF YOU DO NOT FORGIVE OTHERS THEIR TRESPASSES, YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN WILL NOT FORGIVE YOU YOUR TRESPASSES THAT MAY FAR EXCEED WHAT YOU ARE AWARE AND YOU CANNOT BE FORGIVING IN WRITING COMPLAINING LETTERS ABOUT OTHERS, ESPECIALLY WHEN I DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PAYMENT FROM YOU.
POLITENESS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH VIRTUE OR GOODNESS AND THE TWO ARE VERY DIFFERENT THINGS, POLITENESS IS ALL ABOUT THE WAY AND WHAT YOU SAY OR DO TO PLEASE OTHERS OR MAKE THEM LIKE THEMSELVES THAT IS FOR SHOW AND HYPOCRITICAL THAT IS THE WAY OF THIS WORLD.
JUST BECAUSE I DON'T SAY OR DO THINGS IN A WAY THAT PLEASES OTHERS DOES NOT MEAN I AM RUDE AND IF YOU DO, YOU MAY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION OR ARE ASKING TOO MUCH OF OTHERS THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
UNLIKE OTHERS I DID NOT STRETCH MY SYLLABLES NOR ACCELERATE IN AN ACCELERATED WAY MY SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHEN I SAID ‘GET OUT’ BUT IT WAS ONLY CONSTANTLY LOUDER AND FASTER AND THEREFORE I WAS NOT RUDE AND IT WAS YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION TO PERCEIVE I WAS NASTY (JUST AS JESUS WAS NOT NASTY WHEN HE TOLD PETER TO GET BEHIND HIM, SATAN) BUT SHE WAS RUDE AND LYING IN ASKING ME ‘WHY I AM SO RUDE’. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE THAT SHE WANTS TO KNOW THE REASONS WHY I AM RUDE BUT IT IS JUST A VEHICLE TO TICK ME OFF NOT REALIZING SHE IS CHALLENGING ME TO AN ARGUMENT OR EVEN FIGHT.
DO YOU THINK SHE IS TRULY INTERESTED IN THE REASONS WHY I AM SO RUDE? IF SHE WAS NOT INTERESTED THEN WHY IS SHE ASKING ME FORCING ME TO REPLY TO A QUESTION SHE IS LYING SHE IS INTERESTED TO KNOW. IF SHE WAS NOT INTERESTED TO KNOW WHY I AM SO RUDE BUT SHE IS USING IT TO TICK ME OFF, SHE IS GUILTY OF LYING OR DISHONESTY.
ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA THE PERSON WHO SLANDERS AN INNOCENT PERSON CAN HAVE HIS MIND SPLIT INTO SEVEN PIECES. (YOUR MIND MAY BE LIKE A PORCELIAN PLATE THAT MAY SHATTER TO PIECES IF DROPPED. YOU MAY SCOFF BUT IF IT TURNS OUT TO BE TRUE THEN WHEN IT HAPPENS YOU CANNOT DO AYTHING EXCEPT AS JESUS SAID, WEEP AND GNASH YOUR TEETH EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY THAT MAY LAST BILLIONS OF YEARS.
Science tells us this universe is about 15 billion years old and the earth is 4.5 billion years old and mankind has only been around for about 70,000 years old. The Buddha said the person transmigrating as animals for an eon or Age (there is no chance to be human until the last 70,000 years) will build himself a pile of skeleton that is as high as a mountain and so if you cannot go to eternal life in heaven you are headed for eternal punishment and weeping and gnashing of your teeth passing from one life to another or eternal habitations according to Jesus at the close of this Age.
Be careful who you offend because if you offend someone noble, the Buddha said you are headed for perdition.
The Buddha:
When a fire burns down a forest-- that flame with its blackened trail -- the shoots there take birth once morewith the passage of days & nights.But if a monk, his virtue consummate,burns you with his potency, you won't acquire sons or cattlenor will your heirs enjoy wealth.They become barren, heir-less,like palm tree stumps.
So a person who's wise,out of regard for his own good,should always show due respectfor a serpent, a fire,a noble warrior with high status,& a monk, his virtue consummate.
As a consumer:
Many people do not realize they speak nonsense and are headed for insanity but instead think what they say are full of meaning.
For instance in the course of a conversation, this person said, “As a consumer, we should be careful in borrowing money”. As a consumer is unnecessary and meaningless, you mean only as a consumer you should be careful in borrowing? Even if you are not aware it is nonsense, inside you are vaguely aware and you want others to appreciate nonsense and therefore have karma on top of going mad practicing nonsense that you believe it necessary.
Not meaning what they say not saying what they mean:
It is impossible that she is interested in knowing why or the motivations for my rudeness but what she meant is that she wants me to know she finds me rude and she is faking she does not know why I should be rude.
Ask her or listeners whether she meant what she said, she and listeners might say ‘Of course, she meant it’ when she did not mean she wants to know the motives behind my rudeness but she is using the question to tick me off and challenging me to argue with her.
Like the tip compared to the iceberg ordinary people may underestimate the occasions when they never meant what they said nor said what they meant.
They tell you about their new car or son or house but they never say I want you to be impressed by my new car, what my son can do or my house.
IF YOU HABITUALLY DO NOT MEAN WHAT YOU SAY OR SAY WHAT YOU MEAN, EVEN IF ARE UNAWARE, YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE AND HYPOCRITES DO NOT GO HEAVEN.
A hell of a difference:
There is even a hell of a difference between “I find you very rude” and “Why are you so rude” and it reflects a person’s poor discernment that he thinks there is no appreciable difference.
If a person tells another, “I find you very rude” he is merely stating to another his opinion and there is no demand for a reply on the other person but on the other hand by asking another “Why are you so rude?” you are asking a question that demands an answer and if it is not the reason for my rudeness that you are after, you are sending me on a wild goose chase telling you why I am rude.
It takes well practiced emotional or force control to ask another relatively calmly and softly “Why are you so rude” and rather than meritorious, it is wanting the other person to accept as friendly a question that is actually laced with venom. The goat in sheepskin may be punished by God more than a goat who does not disguise his nature.
Will you understand my rudeness if I told you why?
Does she mean she will understand my rudeness and forgive me if I told her why I am being rude to her?
If it does not make any difference whether I told her the reasons why I am rude, is she mad or courting future madness asking me a question that is irrelevant?
Preferring the company of money she paid with her life:
There was a news report of a female beggar in front of a restaurant in Jln Pudu who was given a pet Chihuahua by a patron but perhaps she preferred the company of money or found having to feed the pet a burden, sold the dog to a pet shop for $500 and started to wave the money to passersby saying that she is now rich. She was found brutally murdered at the place where she begged in the early hours of the morning.
There is such a thing called the nature of beings and it can be very lowly in some as it can be lofty in others and some will struggle to appreciate goodness and truthfulness. To them money, material gains and sensate gratifications are what sustain them and it will take even many lifetimes and shedding blood that is as great as the four great oceans before they start to say enough is enough.
As Jesus said, for what does it profit a man to gain the world and forfeit his life? If you ask me, I would rather prefer the company of the pet than the $500 it fetched.
Killing others softly is an art:
Killing others softly is copied from others and honed by repeated practice so that perpetrators become so good they even mistake the force powering their killing softly as their goodwill or their force for good.
It take great force to mobilize one’s force of self preservation to exert immaculate control over one’s force of going against self so as to say or do something that has ill will, that harms self and others with controlled gentleness that it appears gentle and genuine to those who are undiscerning and easily deceived by appearances.
The reasons why people develop the art of killing others is by imitating others (you learn to be sarcastic after bearing the brunt of others’ sarcasm), they have been beaten down by more powerful people for being directly aggressive so that they have to learn to disguise their lashing out and they cannot voice directly their urge to hurt those people whom they need to survive who are close to them like their wives, children and bosses and so they must device means to lash out in a cloaked manner.
As stressful as directly lashing out is, it is far more agonizing or mind bending to kill others softly because increasingly the person cannot see the ill will in his killing others softly and cannot see a way out of his suffering.
Killing softly is like driving with the feet on both brakes and accelerator:
Killing others softly can be compared to driving quite fast with both feet being on the brake and accelerator pedals so that the forward motion reflects the net excess of the force of going against self over the force of self preservation and you may appreciate it is more excruciating or precarious than direct lashing out or merely pressing or ‘gunning’ the accelerator pedal and this person is headed for hellish mental torment when control is finally lost.
True and false politeness:
IF THE POLITE WAY OR POLITE THINGS YOU SAY OR DO INDUCES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THE OTHER PERSON WHAT TRUE GOODNESS CAN THERE BE IN YOUR POLITENESS? INSTEAD ISN’T YOUR POLITENESS HYPOCRITICAL, KILLING OTHERS IT PRETENDS TO BENEFIT? THEREFORE ONLY IF A PERSON DOES NOT CONVEY FORCE BY NOT FORCEFULLY STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS HE TRULY POLITE.
There is politeness that is subjective and false and there is politeness that is objective and true.
If you expect others to say or do certain things in a certain way in your presence that is determined by society or yourself then that is ritualized idiosyncratic politeness that varies from individual to individual and culture to culture.
For instance if you expect others to smile to you, ask you sek pau beh, bow to you, take off their shoes before they enter your house, not prop their legs on their desks then these are rules that you or society imposes on others then if a person follows regardless of whether he means it or not he is polite and if he does not practice he is rude.
Another criterion for subjective politeness is if a person’s behavior pleases you it is polite and if it displeases you that is rude. Because what pleases one person may not please another it is subjective and false. In any case pleasing another has nothing to do with reason but it means a person’s behavior in what and how he says or does stirs the speed and strength of the mental force of the person pleased.
Thus if you are a woman who crave affection or for people to lust after you then the man who expresses lust or affection for you is polite and the man who does not is rude. On the other hand if you are a woman who despises others lusting or expressing affection for you, then the man who expresses lust or affection for you is rude and the man who does not is polite.
There is an objective and genuine politeness. Any behavior that is not accompanied by force is to be considered polite and any behavior accompanied by force is considered harsh and rude. Thus if a person speaks and does things with the use of additional force to stretch syllables or units of motions, change speed and loudness it is harsh, stressful to the recipient and impolite and if a person does not use force to stretch his syllables, change speed and loudness then he is truly gentle and polite.
IT CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DEMONSTRATED THAT I DO NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHERE ALL OTHERS DO AND THEREFORE I AM TRULY GENTLE IN NOT BOMBARDING OTHERS WITH FORCE CHANGES THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACT.
ONLY A TRULY GENTLE PERSON IS TRULY POLITE AND THE ONLY WAY A PERSON CAN BE TRULY GENTLE IS IF HE DOES NOT CONVEY FORCE IN HIS SPEECH AND ACTIONS AND THAT CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED IF HE DID NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES.
Full of manners but full of shit:
Manners are often confused with politeness and there are many who are full of manners or decorum but full of shit in their hearts. They have painstakingly encoded and honed in their mental jukeboxes what are the proper things to say and do and how to say or do them in the contexts they find themselves in but inside they are bristling with resentment and unkind thoughts for others and they expect others to similarly suffer to be full of manners to them and you are rude if you do not do so.
Don’t judge a book by its covers:
A muddled rule bound doctor (faith in rules is a fetter to future woe) may ask you a hundred questions and poke into every hole, nook and cranny in your body and still come up with the wrong diagnosis whilst a calm clearly thinking observant doctor will spot diagnose correctly your condition even as you walk into the room and he is examining you even as he talks to you and so you may be wrongly accusing him of showing no interest when he has examined you.
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO GET OTHERS INTO TROUBLE WHETHER HE HAS A CASE OR NOT IS HEADING FOR TROUBLE HIMSELF THAT MAY BE FAR MORE THAN HE EVER BARGAINED FOR AND IF IT TURNS OUT HE HAS NO CASE THEN HE IS UNRIGHTEOUS AND HEADED FOR EVEN GREATER PUNISHMENT.
YOU CANNOT GET OTHERS INTO TROUBLE IN HEAVEN AND THEREFORE IF YOU HAVE AN URGE OR LIKE TO GET OTHERS INTO TROUBLE YOU MUST REMAIN IN THIS WORLD AND IF THIS MEANS EXISTING AS ANIMALS BUILDING UP A PILE OF SKELETONS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN THEN THAT IS WHAT YOU HAVE ELECTED FOR YOURSELF. SO NEXT TIME YOU WANT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT OTHERS OR REPORT OTHERS OR TALK ABOUT OTHERS BEHIND THEIR BACKS (DIVISIVE SPEECH) THINK TWICE, YOU MAY BE COMMITTING YOURSELF TO ANIMAL EXISTENCE NOT JUST A FEW LIFETIMES BUT ANOTHER ETERNITY.
Think carefully before you ask any question:
Ordinary people like to or their mental forces stir attractively to ask questions and they even ask questions not because they want to know the answer but to impress others with their intelligence or thoughtfulness or to test your knowledge. If you already know the answer but you want to test whether the other person knows according to your view point you are being deceitful and cannot mean the question but you mean to test.
EVERY TIME A PERSON ASKS A QUESTION HE IS ASKING THE OTHER PERSON TO DO MENTAL WORK AND SO IF THE QUESTION IS FLIPPANT OR EVEN ABSURD YOU ARE ASKING THE OTHER PERSON TO TROUBLE HIMSELF ANSWERING YOU FOR FLIPPANT OR NO REASONS. THIS YOU DO NOT REALIZE IS CREATING KARMA FOR YOU THAT CUMULATIVELY IS, AS THE BUDDHA SAID, AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND TAKES AN ETERNITY TO REPAY. SO EITHER YOU REMAIN A ROBOT OF ASKING QUESTIONS GOING ABOUT ASKING THE SAME OLD QUESTIONS THE SAME OLD WAYS HEAPING MORE KARMA OR YOU LEARN TO PAY ATTENTION TO ERASE THE URGE TO ASK OTHERS QUESTIONS. EVEN IF THE PERSON REFUSES TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION HE HAS TO USE FORCE THAT IS CONDITIONING TO IGNORE YOUR PROVOCATIVE QUESTION THAT CONDITIONS HIM TO SHUT OUT REALITY.
It reflects the depth of delusion to think you are wonderful and doing me good in asking me why I am so rude and you expect me to be grateful to you and think I am truly rude and unreasonable in taking offence and asking you to get out.
Sek pau beh?
The Chinese routinely greet each other thus ‘Sek pau beh’ or ‘eaten or not?’ that those who are not Chinese might agree is odd.
Whether you mean what you asked or it was copied from others and rendered automatically by rote from your mental jukebox can be determined if not by you then by those who discern and God.
Again you are asking a question that troubles the person addressed to reply with karma due compared to a person who says ‘hello’ or greetings to you that poses no questions.
The person who habitually asks ‘sek pau beh?’ develops an increasingly irresistible urge to utter that and he is headed for certain mad jukebox behavior that is automatically triggered for him that may become completely inappropriate.
It is Time For Us To go Home:
Apparently the parents of the missing UK girl in Portugal have now declared that it is time for them to go home apparently to express their disappointment with Portuguese police’s handling of the case.
If you are going home in a huff just to express displeasure you have false perception and logic & headed for madness. You go home because you want to go home, not to express disappointment with others and if you keep doing so, you will end up a very mixed up person doing and saying things to dispense like and dislike for others rather than because you want to do or say so.
MANY PEOPLE SAY OR DO THINGS TO SEND EMOTIONAL MESSAGES TO OTHERS THAT DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THEIR DECLARED REASONS AND THAT IS COURTING FUTURE MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION THAT YOU ARE DOING OR SAYING THINGS FOR THE REASONS YOU SAID WHEN IT IS FOR OTHER REASONS.
Confronting me:
You are confronting me with my rudeness when you ask me ‘why are you so rude’ and confronting is always about force addressed to the other person’s mental force that may appear as if addressed to his reason and so you are a great fool if you think you are or can be good in confronting others and you expect others to be grateful to you for confronting them and to even provide you an answer that may be irrelevant to what you are confronting me about. If you are confronting me, don’t imagine that you are being friendly or the seemingly friendly way with which you ask the question is sincere.
If you are feeding others sugar laced poison and you expect others to be grateful to you, you must be sick and so it is they are sick that they cannot understand why others tell them to ‘get out’ when they merely ‘innocently’ ask others ‘why are you so rude’. They can see others provoking them but they cannot see themselves provoking in the first place.
Prolonging and out of touch:
When you are staring thus you are prolonging your gaze or prolonging the emotional state in your mind that may be blank and in the mean time, things are passing you by such that when you exit your daze or prolonging you must catch up with what is happening around you and usually causes you to become restless or anxious or to rush and thus the person who does not let his yes be yes only but prolongs must reside in his private world of make belief and only sample the common reality in snapshots. He craves to exist but his actions isolate him from the world of existence that he so craves. Isn’t he a great fool?
When is politeness subjective and objective?
If by politeness you mean gentleness and by rudeness you mean harshness or forcefulness then politeness and rudeness are objective and can be clearly defined that applies to everyone.
If by politeness you mean what and how you say or do that you expect others to carry out or behavior that pleases (flattering is also pleasing) you and rudeness is the opposite then politeness and rudeness are subjective and false.
And the only way anyone can be truly gentle and therefore polite is if he does not convey force by forcefully stretching, changing speed and loudness and because I do so, anyone who accuses me of being rude is making a malicious slanderous accusation.
Poking they call love:
If you truly love the other person you should keep your private organ in the other person for as long as possible in an act of union but what people call making love is rapid, stereotyped in and out poking that is inflicting punishment on themselves and the other person.
Thus what people call making love is sating their passion and venting their aggression or urge to hurt themselves and others. If they truly love each other they should keep their organs united without motion for as long as possible and cherishing that moment for as long as possible.
Here as everywhere else ordinary people are indulging in pretense that they are making love when they are making use of each other to satisfy their lusts.
IT MAY BE TRUE YOU ARE MAKING LOVE WHEN YOU ARE HAVING INTERCOURSE WITH YOUR WIFE BUT WHETHER IT IS JUST MECHANICAL POKING ACCOMPANIED BY EMOTION RATHER THAN PHYSICAL UNION ACCOMPANIED BY LOVE OR CARE AND CONCERN AND ENJOYMENT OF EACH OTHER'S COMPANY CAN BE KNOWN BY THOSE DISCERNING OR GOD.
You can poke just as well as animals:
If you like poking then you can poke just as well as animals and there is no need for you to go to heaven for that and there may be no poking in heaven.
Mechanical movements can only achieve mechanical results and if you think your repetitive poking can achieve love for the other person you may be flirting with false perception that will end in mad perception.
PARANOIA IS ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT IS VERY REAL FOR THE PARANOID PERSON AND THE WOMAN WHO ACCUSED ME OF BEING RUDE MAY BE SUFFERING FROM ADVANCED PARANOIA IN WHICH SHE PERCEIVED MY BEHAVIOR AS RUDE, INATTENTIVE, IMPATIENT AND UNINTERESTED. IF ORDINARY PEOPLE EXAMINE THEMSELVES CAREFULLY THEY ALREADY SUFFER FROM QUITE ENTRENCHED PARANOIA OR SUSPICIOUSNESS.
Why it is sarcastic calling a fool great:
Even though people hear and speak of others being great fools and see nothing wrong, they must be stirred emotionally because there is subconscious conflict and it is false and sarcastic to call a fool great.
There are big fools but never great fools because greatness denotes respectability and superiority whilst bigness merely indicates the size or magnitude of the fool. Therefore the person who describes a fool as great cannot mean what he says but he is sarcastic. Again here as everywhere else people think they mean what they say when they cannot mean what they say that a fool is great.
Jesus said the Holy Spirit will teach you in that hour what you ought to say. Am I not teaching you here as in many other places what you ought and ought not say that no one else can and will?
I admit that I too have labeled a fool ‘great’ and it is wrong and sarcastic for me to do so. The difference is I can awaken to my deceit whilst ordinary people see nothing wrong and even think they are perfectly right to say so. All words have clearly definable meanings and it reflects perversion that a word such as ‘great’ has taken on secondary meanings like ‘big’. Great and big are two very different things and if you think they are interchangeable you have poor discernment and will become confused and conflicted.
UNLESS YOU ENJOY ENTERTAINING SUBCONSCIOUS CONFLICT AND ALSO PERSECUTING OTHERS, YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO CALL A FOOL BIG RATHER THAN GREAT.
Normally when a person asks another ‘why are you so rude’ it is meant as a joke as when a lover chides the other in a moment of intimacy “why are you so rude?” when she likes what is being done to her or when a parent or teacher who is domineering browbeats a child she knows she has power over, “why are you so rude” as if to reprimand the child. This patient cannot be joking neither am I a child beholden to her that she can browbeat and the fact that she dares to challenge me thus indicates she knows I am someone whose behavior she does not like (that is not based on reason but emotion or dislike) that in her estimation she can get away confronting me. Would she dare say the same thing to Mike Tyson or the prime minister or her boss? Therefore the fact that she can ask me that reflects she knows I am bully-able and therefore cannot be that rude.
You think I am so rude, wait until the occasion as it may be possible for you to experience when you are stranded alone with a brute who can rape and tear you apart and see who is truly so rude.
It was reported that a man who had his arm trapped in a rocky crevice in a remote area without access to assistance was forced to use a knife to cut it off at the elbow in order to free himself so there are many avenues for suffering in this world that you should be careful not to bequeath yourself.
When someone asks you ‘why are you so rude’ she must have a concept of a manner of behaving that differs from the way I behaved that she thinks I should adopt obviously because she thinks it is superior or good. If that behavior you think is superior or good that you want me to adopt is instead bad, leads to torment and actually persecutes others, fate may give you opportunities over and over again to practice in future lives the politeness you so wished to preach to others.
For instance, this drug sales representative who did not do so in the past and may have undergone a sales training (or copying) course will utter “Thank Dr X for ordering YSP’s ecconazine cream, for your information Dr X, YSP’s ecconazine cream is manufactured under the strictest conditions, and when I order another medication he again thanks me and launches himself off into another blurb.
The above behavior may be considered polite and desirable which is why people train others to speak thus but if such behavior is stressful and robotic and means the person becomes a robot rendering by rote prerecorded behavior and he will end up with mad robotic behavior then in desiring others to behave thus you may have opportunities in future lives to behave like a robot of polite behavior.
YOU WANT ME TO BEHAVE IN A POLITE WAY ACCORDING TO YOUR TASTE. IF THAT POLITENESS LEADS TO TORMENT AND DEATH THEN YOU SHALL HAVE A TASTE OF IT YOURSELF EVEN OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
A sharp tongue:
There are many in this world who have developed a very sharp tongue especially with the lifting of consciousness constraints permitting them to be more direct in their attacks on others and it is their urge to attack others that they have harnessed or controlled with much finesse with their forces of self preservation that enable them to attack you with relative or apparent calm, “Why are you so rude?” as if it is an objective unemotional fact and they relish seeing other people squirm at their assault with a velvet lined gloved fist.
Looking back to look ahead:
It is not reality that is contradictory but it is the way deceitful people who delight in mischief like to phrase what they want to say that makes what is impossible appear possible.
It seems such a paradox that one should look back to look ahead but the person wanted to convey is reviewing the past to guide one’s actions for the future.
If you think that looking back to look ahead is the same as consulting the lessons of the past to guide one’s future course, you may right or you have false perception that you deliberately cultivate to impress others that will end in mad perception.
IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO LOOK BACK TO LOOK AHEAD BUT YOU LOOK AHEAD TO LOOK AHEAD AND IT REFLECTS A MISCHIEVOUS PERVERSIVE NATURE TO TWIST THINGS AROUND SO AS TO PRESENT AS SCENARIO THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE OR OUTRAGEOUS IS POSSIBLE. WHAT HE MEANT IS USING HISTORY AS A GUIDE TO FUTURE ACTIONS. YOU THINK IT IS FUNNY. WAIT UNTIL YOU GET MAD TO SEE IF IT IS STILL FUNNY.
Not trying to outrage your (false) modesty:
IT MAY BE TRUE YOU ARE MAKING LOVE WHEN YOU ARE HAVING INTERCOURSE WITH YOUR WIFE BUT WHETHER IT IS JUST MECHANICAL POKING ACCOMPANIED BY EMOTION RATHER THAN PHYSICAL UNION ACCOMPANIED BY LOVE OR CARE AND CONCERN AND ENJOYMENT OF EACH OTHER'S COMPANY CAN BE KNOWN BY THOSE DISCERNING OR GOD.
When I dwelt on the topic of sex it is not to be outrageous but it has relevance to most if not all ordinary people because no matter how coy or aloof they might pretend they are, they are fascinated by and usually practice sex in one form or another.
As the Buddha alluded to, there is lust in heaven (but do not presume that heavenly lust is similar to abusive human lust) and the maidens in heaven are radiant and far exceed in beauty the maidens on earth.
What I am trying to say is that what people call making love is mechanical poking in an out that is stereotyped, each in and out stroke is a copy of the previous one and has style that differs from another’s and though they might like to believe their style is superior they are all the same.
If you truly want to make love when you have sex, you should enjoy the union by keeping the organ in there and enjoy being in her, not restlessly, meaninglessly, mindlessly, mechanically poking in and out that is little different from what animals also do. It is not men but many even very attractive women (masochistically) enjoy being poked rather than making love. You will be a big fool if you think this exonerates you of responsibility that because I say some women enjoyed being poked you are blameless poking them because you are merely giving them what they want. They will remain in this world of suffering and so will you and if that means billions of years of eternal habitations as Jesus said, so be it.
YOU CAN POKE WITH CONSTANT SANE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WITHOUT PROLONGING OR CURVING OR DIRECTION CHANGES THAT DOES NOT LEAD TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS OR DISTRACTION OR YOU CAN POKE WITH FORCEFUL CURVED PROLONGING MOTION WITH EVEN ACCELERATING ACCELERATION OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WHICH IS MUCH MORE PUNITIVE ON SELF AND THE OTHER IN TERMS OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
THEREFORE IF YOU MUST POKE, POKE AT CONSTANT SANE SPEED AND FORCE WITHOUT PROLONGING.
For your information:
People who are polite like to preface what they say with “For your information Dr Smith, blah, blah, blah”. It is totally unnecessary, only for show to impress or please to say so and if that is politeness then it is false and subjective. If a person becomes a robot regurgitating ‘for your information’ then in wanting me to be polite you want me to suffer and you yourself will suffer too.
Conveying pain:
When is politeness subjective and objective?
If by politeness you mean gentleness and by rudeness you mean harshness or forcefulness then politeness and rudeness are objective and can be clearly defined that applies to everyone.
If by politeness you mean what and how you say or do that you expect others to carry out or behavior that pleases (flattering is also pleasing) you and rudeness is the opposite then politeness and rudeness are subjective and false.
And the only way anyone can be truly gentle and therefore polite is if he does not convey force by forcefully stretching, changing speed and loudness and because I do so, anyone who accuses me of being rude is making a malicious slanderous accusation.
Poking they call love:
If you truly love the other person you should keep your private organ in the other person for as long as possible in an act of union but what people call making love is rapid, stereotyped in and out poking that is inflicting punishment on themselves and the other person.
Thus what people call making love is sating their passion and venting their aggression or urge to hurt themselves and others. If they truly love each other they should keep their organs united without motion for as long as possible and cherishing that moment for as long as possible.
Here as everywhere else ordinary people are indulging in pretense that they are making love when they are making use of each other to satisfy their lusts.
IT MAY BE TRUE YOU ARE MAKING LOVE WHEN YOU ARE HAVING INTERCOURSE WITH YOUR WIFE BUT WHETHER IT IS JUST MECHANICAL POKING ACCOMPANIED BY EMOTION RATHER THAN PHYSICAL UNION ACCOMPANIED BY LOVE OR CARE AND CONCERN AND ENJOYMENT OF EACH OTHER'S COMPANY CAN BE KNOWN BY THOSE DISCERNING OR GOD.
You can poke just as well as animals:
If you like poking then you can poke just as well as animals and there is no need for you to go to heaven for that and there may be no poking in heaven.
Mechanical movements can only achieve mechanical results and if you think your repetitive poking can achieve love for the other person you may be flirting with false perception that will end in mad perception.
PARANOIA IS ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT IS VERY REAL FOR THE PARANOID PERSON AND THE WOMAN WHO ACCUSED ME OF BEING RUDE MAY BE SUFFERING FROM ADVANCED PARANOIA IN WHICH SHE PERCEIVED MY BEHAVIOR AS RUDE, INATTENTIVE, IMPATIENT AND UNINTERESTED. IF ORDINARY PEOPLE EXAMINE THEMSELVES CAREFULLY THEY ALREADY SUFFER FROM QUITE ENTRENCHED PARANOIA OR SUSPICIOUSNESS.
Why it is sarcastic calling a fool great:
Even though people hear and speak of others being great fools and see nothing wrong, they must be stirred emotionally because there is subconscious conflict and it is false and sarcastic to call a fool great.
There are big fools but never great fools because greatness denotes respectability and superiority whilst bigness merely indicates the size or magnitude of the fool. Therefore the person who describes a fool as great cannot mean what he says but he is sarcastic. Again here as everywhere else people think they mean what they say when they cannot mean what they say that a fool is great.
Jesus said the Holy Spirit will teach you in that hour what you ought to say. Am I not teaching you here as in many other places what you ought and ought not say that no one else can and will?
I admit that I too have labeled a fool ‘great’ and it is wrong and sarcastic for me to do so. The difference is I can awaken to my deceit whilst ordinary people see nothing wrong and even think they are perfectly right to say so. All words have clearly definable meanings and it reflects perversion that a word such as ‘great’ has taken on secondary meanings like ‘big’. Great and big are two very different things and if you think they are interchangeable you have poor discernment and will become confused and conflicted.
UNLESS YOU ENJOY ENTERTAINING SUBCONSCIOUS CONFLICT AND ALSO PERSECUTING OTHERS, YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO CALL A FOOL BIG RATHER THAN GREAT.
Normally when a person asks another ‘why are you so rude’ it is meant as a joke as when a lover chides the other in a moment of intimacy “why are you so rude?” when she likes what is being done to her or when a parent or teacher who is domineering browbeats a child she knows she has power over, “why are you so rude” as if to reprimand the child. This patient cannot be joking neither am I a child beholden to her that she can browbeat and the fact that she dares to challenge me thus indicates she knows I am someone whose behavior she does not like (that is not based on reason but emotion or dislike) that in her estimation she can get away confronting me. Would she dare say the same thing to Mike Tyson or the prime minister or her boss? Therefore the fact that she can ask me that reflects she knows I am bully-able and therefore cannot be that rude.
You think I am so rude, wait until the occasion as it may be possible for you to experience when you are stranded alone with a brute who can rape and tear you apart and see who is truly so rude.
It was reported that a man who had his arm trapped in a rocky crevice in a remote area without access to assistance was forced to use a knife to cut it off at the elbow in order to free himself so there are many avenues for suffering in this world that you should be careful not to bequeath yourself.
When someone asks you ‘why are you so rude’ she must have a concept of a manner of behaving that differs from the way I behaved that she thinks I should adopt obviously because she thinks it is superior or good. If that behavior you think is superior or good that you want me to adopt is instead bad, leads to torment and actually persecutes others, fate may give you opportunities over and over again to practice in future lives the politeness you so wished to preach to others.
For instance, this drug sales representative who did not do so in the past and may have undergone a sales training (or copying) course will utter “Thank Dr X for ordering YSP’s ecconazine cream, for your information Dr X, YSP’s ecconazine cream is manufactured under the strictest conditions, and when I order another medication he again thanks me and launches himself off into another blurb.
The above behavior may be considered polite and desirable which is why people train others to speak thus but if such behavior is stressful and robotic and means the person becomes a robot rendering by rote prerecorded behavior and he will end up with mad robotic behavior then in desiring others to behave thus you may have opportunities in future lives to behave like a robot of polite behavior.
YOU WANT ME TO BEHAVE IN A POLITE WAY ACCORDING TO YOUR TASTE. IF THAT POLITENESS LEADS TO TORMENT AND DEATH THEN YOU SHALL HAVE A TASTE OF IT YOURSELF EVEN OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
A sharp tongue:
There are many in this world who have developed a very sharp tongue especially with the lifting of consciousness constraints permitting them to be more direct in their attacks on others and it is their urge to attack others that they have harnessed or controlled with much finesse with their forces of self preservation that enable them to attack you with relative or apparent calm, “Why are you so rude?” as if it is an objective unemotional fact and they relish seeing other people squirm at their assault with a velvet lined gloved fist.
Looking back to look ahead:
It is not reality that is contradictory but it is the way deceitful people who delight in mischief like to phrase what they want to say that makes what is impossible appear possible.
It seems such a paradox that one should look back to look ahead but the person wanted to convey is reviewing the past to guide one’s actions for the future.
If you think that looking back to look ahead is the same as consulting the lessons of the past to guide one’s future course, you may right or you have false perception that you deliberately cultivate to impress others that will end in mad perception.
IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO LOOK BACK TO LOOK AHEAD BUT YOU LOOK AHEAD TO LOOK AHEAD AND IT REFLECTS A MISCHIEVOUS PERVERSIVE NATURE TO TWIST THINGS AROUND SO AS TO PRESENT AS SCENARIO THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE OR OUTRAGEOUS IS POSSIBLE. WHAT HE MEANT IS USING HISTORY AS A GUIDE TO FUTURE ACTIONS. YOU THINK IT IS FUNNY. WAIT UNTIL YOU GET MAD TO SEE IF IT IS STILL FUNNY.
Not trying to outrage your (false) modesty:
IT MAY BE TRUE YOU ARE MAKING LOVE WHEN YOU ARE HAVING INTERCOURSE WITH YOUR WIFE BUT WHETHER IT IS JUST MECHANICAL POKING ACCOMPANIED BY EMOTION RATHER THAN PHYSICAL UNION ACCOMPANIED BY LOVE OR CARE AND CONCERN AND ENJOYMENT OF EACH OTHER'S COMPANY CAN BE KNOWN BY THOSE DISCERNING OR GOD.
When I dwelt on the topic of sex it is not to be outrageous but it has relevance to most if not all ordinary people because no matter how coy or aloof they might pretend they are, they are fascinated by and usually practice sex in one form or another.
As the Buddha alluded to, there is lust in heaven (but do not presume that heavenly lust is similar to abusive human lust) and the maidens in heaven are radiant and far exceed in beauty the maidens on earth.
What I am trying to say is that what people call making love is mechanical poking in an out that is stereotyped, each in and out stroke is a copy of the previous one and has style that differs from another’s and though they might like to believe their style is superior they are all the same.
If you truly want to make love when you have sex, you should enjoy the union by keeping the organ in there and enjoy being in her, not restlessly, meaninglessly, mindlessly, mechanically poking in and out that is little different from what animals also do. It is not men but many even very attractive women (masochistically) enjoy being poked rather than making love. You will be a big fool if you think this exonerates you of responsibility that because I say some women enjoyed being poked you are blameless poking them because you are merely giving them what they want. They will remain in this world of suffering and so will you and if that means billions of years of eternal habitations as Jesus said, so be it.
YOU CAN POKE WITH CONSTANT SANE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WITHOUT PROLONGING OR CURVING OR DIRECTION CHANGES THAT DOES NOT LEAD TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS OR DISTRACTION OR YOU CAN POKE WITH FORCEFUL CURVED PROLONGING MOTION WITH EVEN ACCELERATING ACCELERATION OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WHICH IS MUCH MORE PUNITIVE ON SELF AND THE OTHER IN TERMS OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
THEREFORE IF YOU MUST POKE, POKE AT CONSTANT SANE SPEED AND FORCE WITHOUT PROLONGING.
For your information:
People who are polite like to preface what they say with “For your information Dr Smith, blah, blah, blah”. It is totally unnecessary, only for show to impress or please to say so and if that is politeness then it is false and subjective. If a person becomes a robot regurgitating ‘for your information’ then in wanting me to be polite you want me to suffer and you yourself will suffer too.
Conveying pain:
Whether intentional or not, faked or genuine, by screwing up his face as if distressed, he is transmitting force or pain to onlookers that cause them to become similarly distressed or they have to use force in order to be unruffled. There is no reason why others should become distressed just because he is distressed and therefore every time you express with your face or body you are stirring the force in others that persecutes them and conditions them to madness because there is no reason why others should stir to be angry, excited, stunned or sad just because you are angry, excited, stunned or sad.
THUS THE WISE PERSON WILL LEARN TO SHED ALL EXPRESSIONS FOR NO PERSECUTING OTHERS.
JUST AS A PERSON’S EXPRESSION IS CONTAGIOUS, IF THERE WERE TO APPEAR IN THIS WORLD A PERSON WHO CAN BE EFFORTLESSLY TRULY UNSTRESSED, NOT RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED WHERE THERE WAS NONE IN THE PAST, OTHERS CAN PERCEIVE IT AND EXPERIENCE THE ABSENCE OF FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN HIS DEMEANOR, SPEECH AND MOTION AND THUS THEMSELVES ALSO CHANGE.
To Be fair:
It is the trend in recent years, possibly aping or copying the Americans, to liberally sprinkle ‘to be fair’ or ‘to be sure’ in one’s speech.
Just make sure that what you say is fair or sure or is the truth about an issue and there is no need to tell others ‘to be fair or sure’.
In any issue in which you can present an opinion as to what happened or the truth or truths behind it, there can only be one way of how it happened although how it happened may be very complicated with many causes.
If there are potentially many different causes or factors and you cannot or do not know all of them then you should not present yourself as if you know all of them and then add an afterthought ‘to be sure or fair’ but you should acknowledge from the beginning that what you are presenting are some of the factors that may be relevant to the issue at hand, not present what you say as if they are the truths and then make sure or be fair here are some other dissenting views.
If you know the truth of what an issue is about and you speak the truth of the issue then there is no need to concede to other differing views but if you do not know the truth of what an issue is about then you should not speak about it for fear of misleading yourself and others or you should speak about it without pretending that you are an expert in it.
The intention for saying to be sure or fair may not actually be what is stated to be sure or fair but it is to falsely present that the person is a scrupulous operator who has considered everything there is to consider and you should therefore trust his opinion is true.
By acknowledging there are caveats or dissenting opinions you are already acknowledging that what you said previously did not take into account everything, may not be entirely true.
What makes you think that after the concession you make in order to be sure or fair, you are now fair or sure, there are no further undisclosed or unknown factors?
Thus ‘to be fair or sure’ is unnecessary for show. One should make sure what one says is fair or sure and if one does not know the truth about an issue one should refrain from speaking or make it clear that it is your opinion not a fact.
IF YOU ARE FAIR OR SURE IN WHAT YOU STATE THEN THERE IS NO NEED TO SAY SO BUT IF YOU SAY SO, YOU ADMIT YOU MAY NOT BE TOTALLY SURE OR FAIR IN WHAT YOU SAY THAT YOU NEVERTHELESS WANT TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO ACCEPT AS FAIR OR SURE.
PRESENT FAIRLY THE CAVEATS OR OTHER DISSENTING OPINIONS IN THE VIEW YOU FIRST FORMULATED AND YOU THEN DO NOT HAVE TO WASTE OTHER PEOPLE’S TIME AND ENERGY TO BE SURE OR FAIR.
When you say ‘as a consumer one should be careful in one’s borrowings’ do you mean you do not have to be careful in borrowing if you were a businessman, student for student loan, investor or a property owner?
Just inform me, don’t waste your time and my time saying, for your information because it is pretentious and often sarcastic.
Many phrases and things people say that they find very meaningful eg ‘honestly speaking’, ‘really’ are unnecessary or acknowledge their deceitfulness and they do not realize they are headed for mad perception and logic.
Seriously funny:
Quote: Seriously funny.
What is said implies that some funniness is faked not truly funny (therefore people can lie that they find something funny) but fakery is relative rather than absolute because all funniness is conditioned or faked. What is hilariously funny to an Australian may not be funny at all to an Asian.
Funny is never even truly funny let alone seriously funny. When the urge to perceive something happening or said as funny is very strong so that it is irresistible or involuntary the fool thinks it is seriously funny.
Funny is stirring the speed and strength of the person’s mental force and to a person who has not experienced the bliss of a complete absence of mental force in the mind it is perceived as pleasurable, to a person who has tasted the difference funny is always suffering compared with the absence of mental force.
Thus the person who thinks that some things may be seriously funny has false perception that will end in mad perception and that is not the way to heaven but hell.
THUS THE WISE PERSON WILL LEARN TO SHED ALL EXPRESSIONS FOR NO PERSECUTING OTHERS.
JUST AS A PERSON’S EXPRESSION IS CONTAGIOUS, IF THERE WERE TO APPEAR IN THIS WORLD A PERSON WHO CAN BE EFFORTLESSLY TRULY UNSTRESSED, NOT RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED WHERE THERE WAS NONE IN THE PAST, OTHERS CAN PERCEIVE IT AND EXPERIENCE THE ABSENCE OF FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN HIS DEMEANOR, SPEECH AND MOTION AND THUS THEMSELVES ALSO CHANGE.
To Be fair:
It is the trend in recent years, possibly aping or copying the Americans, to liberally sprinkle ‘to be fair’ or ‘to be sure’ in one’s speech.
Just make sure that what you say is fair or sure or is the truth about an issue and there is no need to tell others ‘to be fair or sure’.
In any issue in which you can present an opinion as to what happened or the truth or truths behind it, there can only be one way of how it happened although how it happened may be very complicated with many causes.
If there are potentially many different causes or factors and you cannot or do not know all of them then you should not present yourself as if you know all of them and then add an afterthought ‘to be sure or fair’ but you should acknowledge from the beginning that what you are presenting are some of the factors that may be relevant to the issue at hand, not present what you say as if they are the truths and then make sure or be fair here are some other dissenting views.
If you know the truth of what an issue is about and you speak the truth of the issue then there is no need to concede to other differing views but if you do not know the truth of what an issue is about then you should not speak about it for fear of misleading yourself and others or you should speak about it without pretending that you are an expert in it.
The intention for saying to be sure or fair may not actually be what is stated to be sure or fair but it is to falsely present that the person is a scrupulous operator who has considered everything there is to consider and you should therefore trust his opinion is true.
By acknowledging there are caveats or dissenting opinions you are already acknowledging that what you said previously did not take into account everything, may not be entirely true.
What makes you think that after the concession you make in order to be sure or fair, you are now fair or sure, there are no further undisclosed or unknown factors?
Thus ‘to be fair or sure’ is unnecessary for show. One should make sure what one says is fair or sure and if one does not know the truth about an issue one should refrain from speaking or make it clear that it is your opinion not a fact.
IF YOU ARE FAIR OR SURE IN WHAT YOU STATE THEN THERE IS NO NEED TO SAY SO BUT IF YOU SAY SO, YOU ADMIT YOU MAY NOT BE TOTALLY SURE OR FAIR IN WHAT YOU SAY THAT YOU NEVERTHELESS WANT TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO ACCEPT AS FAIR OR SURE.
PRESENT FAIRLY THE CAVEATS OR OTHER DISSENTING OPINIONS IN THE VIEW YOU FIRST FORMULATED AND YOU THEN DO NOT HAVE TO WASTE OTHER PEOPLE’S TIME AND ENERGY TO BE SURE OR FAIR.
When you say ‘as a consumer one should be careful in one’s borrowings’ do you mean you do not have to be careful in borrowing if you were a businessman, student for student loan, investor or a property owner?
Just inform me, don’t waste your time and my time saying, for your information because it is pretentious and often sarcastic.
Many phrases and things people say that they find very meaningful eg ‘honestly speaking’, ‘really’ are unnecessary or acknowledge their deceitfulness and they do not realize they are headed for mad perception and logic.
Seriously funny:
Quote: Seriously funny.
What is said implies that some funniness is faked not truly funny (therefore people can lie that they find something funny) but fakery is relative rather than absolute because all funniness is conditioned or faked. What is hilariously funny to an Australian may not be funny at all to an Asian.
Funny is never even truly funny let alone seriously funny. When the urge to perceive something happening or said as funny is very strong so that it is irresistible or involuntary the fool thinks it is seriously funny.
Funny is stirring the speed and strength of the person’s mental force and to a person who has not experienced the bliss of a complete absence of mental force in the mind it is perceived as pleasurable, to a person who has tasted the difference funny is always suffering compared with the absence of mental force.
Thus the person who thinks that some things may be seriously funny has false perception that will end in mad perception and that is not the way to heaven but hell.
