No, I do not remember:

Dr M may be coached by lawyers to plead amnesia but if the truth is that he remembered quite well then because God is the Father and He has power over everyone else, He can make you forget things that are essential for your wellbeing and happiness in the future, make you have a poor memory and if that is suffering even tormenting that it is the price you pay for saying you do not remember when God knows you remembered.

If you see and say you did not see, it may be possible for you to be born blind in future existences so that you truly fulfil your statement you did not see.

Dr M takes the stand

By CHELSEA NG, CECIL FUNG and LISA GOH

KUALA LUMPUR: Former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's much awaited testimony before the V.K. Lingam video clip inquiry yesterday failed to shed much light.

He repeatedly replied “No” or “I do not remember” to various questions posed by leading officer DPP Datuk Nordin Hassan.

However, Dr Mahathir, the first former prime minister to appear before a Royal Commission of Inquiry, emphatically denied that he was influenced by anyone on the appointment of judges.

Before he took the stand, his counsel Tunku Sofiah Jewa told the inquiry that Dr Mahathir would give his full cooperation.

“Our client wishes us to say that he will answer questions put to him even if in law from our perspectives as counsel we think the questions are not relevant or within the scope of the terms of reference of this Royal Commission of Inquiry,” she added.

Copying more than you think:

Anyone who subscribes to the hype below is attached to his life and will lose it or perish when he departs. This includes the writer who enthusiastically recommends you pass the information to your dear ones.

Even if it associated with John Hopkins Hospital does not make it true. How can you know what is said is true? Did you do the research and did you see for yourself what is said is true?

If you did not see and you accept it as true then you are believing it or copying it from others without seeing or understanding it.

The wise person will refrain from believing anything and restrict himself to what he can see and know, and since he is denying himself as Jesus commands, he does not need or desire to see or know many things in this world to get along whilst he prepares for his life to come. It is a desire or drive to see or know that make fools compromise themselves and readily accept or copy information from others that may be or is false.

Can you see every person has cancer cells in the body as the writer said? If you cannot see cancer cells in yourself let alone all others you will be foolish to accept as true or believe him and he is a fool to say that because he will be judged for every careless word he says.

It is the stress that a person subjects himself to and allow others to bombard him that is the cause of diseases that includes cancer. A person who is effortlessly free from stress, restlessness and distraction has no interest in what causes cancer and what the many cures for cancer are. Can curing or preventing your cancer send you to heaven? What is the use of curing your brief life here when you are headed for eternal punishment?

THUS PEOPLE ARE COPYING OTHERS FAR MORE THAN THEY REALIZE. MUCH OF THEIR SO CALLED KNOWLEDGE ARE BELIEFS THEY COPIED FROM OTHERS AND ACCEPT AS FACTS WHEN THEY CANNOT SEE OR KNOW IT. BECAUSE COPYING REQUIRES NO REASON, ONLY EFFECTIVE PERCEPTIVE ABILITY, A MEMORY AND REGURGITATING WHAT YOU COPY, ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE SEVERELY DEFICIENT EVEN ABSENT IN TRUE LOGIC.

CANCER UPDATE FROM JOHN HOPKINS HOSPITAL , U.S.

(PLEASE READ AND FORWARD IT TO PEOPLE YOU CARE ABOUT)

Useful Information on one of the deadliest diseases of our time: CANCER

1. Every person has cancer cells in the body. These cancer cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have multiplied to a few billion. When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no more cancer cells in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable size.

2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times in a person's lifetime.

3. When the person's immune system is strong the cancer cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying and forming tumors.

4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has multiple nutritional deficiencies. These could be due to genetic, environmental, food and lifestyle factors.

5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing diet and including supplements will strengthen the immune system.

6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells in the bone marrow, gastro-intestinal tract etc, and can cause organ damage, like liver,kidneys, heart, lungs etc.

7. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs.

8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation will often reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor destruction.

9. When the body has too much toxic burden from chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb to various kinds of infections and complications.

10. Chemotherapy and radiation can cause cancer cells to mutate and become resistant and difficult to destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other sites.

11. An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the cancer cells by not feeding it with the foods it needs to multiply.

CANCER CELLS FEED ON:

a) Sugar is a cancer-feeder. By cutting off sugar it cuts off one important food supply to the cancer cells. Sugar substitutes like NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc are made with Aspartame and it is harmful. A better natural substitute would be Manuka honey or molasses but only in very small amounts. Table salt has a chemical added to make it white in color. Better alternative is Bragg's aminos or sea salt.

b) Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in the gastro-intestinal tract. Cancer feeds on mucus. By cutting off milk and substituting with unsweetened soya milk cancer cells are being starved.

c) Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish, and a little chicken rather than beef or pork. Meat also contains livestock antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites, which are all harmful, especially to people with cancer.

d) A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole grains,seeds, nuts and a little fruits help put the body into an alkaline environment. About 20% can be from cooked food including beans. Fresh vegetable juices provide live enzymes that are easily absorbed and reach down to cellular levels within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance growth of healthy cells. To obtain live enzymes for building healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice (most vegetables including bean sprouts) and eat some raw vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C).

e) Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate, which have high caffeine.Green tea is a better alternative and has cancer-fighting properties. Water - best to drink purified water, or filtered, to avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap water.

12. Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a lot of digestive enzymes. Undigested meat remaining in the intestines become putrefied and leads to more toxic buildup.

13. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By refraining from or eating less meat it frees more enzymes to attack the protein walls of cancer cells and allows the body's killer cells to destroy the cancer cells.

14. Some supplements build up the immune system (IP6, Flor-ssence, Essiac, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals, EFAs etc.) to enable the body's own killer cells to destroy cancer cells. Other supplements like vitamin E are known to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell death, the body's normal method of disposing of damaged, unwanted, or unneeded cells.

15. Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit. A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer warrior be a survivor. Anger, unforgiveness and bitterness put the body into a stressful and acidic environment. Learn to have a loving and forgiving spirit. Learn to relax and enjoy life.

16. Cancer cells cannot thrive in an oxygenated environment. Exercising daily, and deep breathing help to get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer cells.

(PLEASE FORWARD IT TO PEOPLE YOU CARE ABOUT)

1. No plastic containers in micro.

2. No water bottles in freezer.

3. No plastic wrap in microwave.

John Hopkins has recently sent this out in its newsletters. This information is being circulated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well. Dioxin chemicals causes cancer, especially breast cancer. Dioxins are highly poisonous to the cells of our bodies.

Don't freeze your plastic bottles with water in them as this releases dioxins from the plastic.

Recently, Dr. Edward Fujimoto, Wellness Program Manager at Castle Hospital, was on a TV program to explain this health hazard. He talked about dioxins and how bad they are for us.

He said that we should not be heating our food in the microwave using plastic containers.

This especially applies to foods that contain fat. He said that the combination of fat, high heat, and plastics releases dioxin into the food and ultimately into the cells of the body. Instead, he recommends using glass, such as Corning Ware, Pyrex or ceramic containers for heating food. You get the same results, only without the dioxin. So such things as TV dinners, instant ramen and soups, etc., should be removed from the container and heated in something else.

Paper isn't bad but you don't know what is in the paper. It's just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware, etc. He reminded us that a while ago some of the fast food restaurants moved away rom the foam containers to paper. The dioxin problem is one of the reasons.

Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran, is just as dangerous when placed over foods to be cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of the plastic wrap and drip into the food. Cover food with a paper towel instead.

This is an article that should be sent to anyone important in your life.

No reason to disappear:

There is seldom if ever reason to disappear but it is usually if not emotion that is the cause.

Sometimes a dear one disappear because something untoward has happened eg kidnapped but sometimes the person disappear to punish the other person, to teach them a lesson or hurt them and this is never based on reason but based on force, on hate that will end in insanity because each time you do so you are conditioning yourself to undertake things based on irrational emotion instead of reason.

Reason is never involved in disappearance because if you wish to terminate a relationship with another person you merely state your wish calmly and the other person should accept it. Anyone who pesters, does not let the other person terminate a relationship is heading for serious punishment. Should your behaviour be such that the only recourse for the other person is to disappear, then you are accruing serious karma for yourself.

IF ALL BEINGS HERE ARE REASONED BEINGS RESPECTING EACH OTHERS’ WISHES THEN THERE IS NO NEED TO ENGAGE IN EMOTIONAL CONTRIVED DISRUPTIVE ACTIONS LIKE DISAPPEARING.

Come home, daughter urged

Chong: Tan has lost contact with her since Dec 22.

A SINGLE mother in Penang is distraught after losing contact with her daughter, Stephanie Marie Chong Kan Ling, 20, since Dec 22 last year.

Annie Tan Guat Kim, 53, said her daughter visited her monthly after moving out of their home in Butterworth in February last year.

She said that Chong could not be reached on her cellular phone since late December.

She said Chong had moved to George Town to live closer to a private hospital where she worked as a nursing aide.

“I last spoke to her when she called me at 2am on Dec 22 last year,” she told a press conference called by the Penang MCA Youth Public Services and Complaints Bureau chief Ng Siew Khoon.

“I have been calling her on her mobile phone but she could not be reached,” said the laundry service centre owner.

Worried about her daughter’s safety, Tan called her church, friends and workplace to locate her daughter only to find out that Chong had stopped working since early December last year.

“Whatever situation you are in, please come home or call me so that I know you are alright,” she said.

She said that her former husband was suffering from cancer and wants to see his daughter.

Those with information can call Tan at 012-4994041 or the Penang MCA Public Complaints and Services Bureau at 04-2267827.

Never threw anything:

Even now the surviving victims of the tigress attack have not come clean and appear to be mounting a feeble defence of themselves. Just because you never threw anything at tigress does not exonerate you. If you think that screaming abuse or waving at tigress is ‘fair dinkum’ or good natured fun then you have serious wrong view that according to the Buddha led to hell or the animal womb. Just as humans do not like abuse or provocative behaviour, animals too can be enraged to attack.

Not only has he caused grief to himself but he got the tigress killed for no reason, caused trouble to many people including the policeman who shot the tigress thereby incurring deadly karma for himself.

I have seen cats jumping a wall five to six times its height without a run up and so even if tigers are far heavy, zookeepers may seriously underestimate the jumping prowess of cats.

BY SAYING THEY NEVER THREW ANYTHING AT THE TIGER THE VICTIM IMPLIES THEY ARE BLAMELESS HURLING VERBAL ABUSE, ANIMALS ARE STUPID AND DO NOT APPRECIATE VERBAL ABUSE AND THEY ARE FAIR GAME FOR VERBAL ABUSE. IT TURNS OUT HE IS WRONG BECAUSE ANIMALS DO APPRECIATE AND RETALIATE TO VERBAL ABUSE.

Quote: One of the three victims of San Francisco Zoo tiger attack was intoxicated and admitted yelling and waving at the animal while standing on the railing of the cat's enclosure, police said in court papers. Paul Dhaliwal told the dad of a friend who was killed that they never threw anything, according to a search warrant affidavit obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle.

As the Buddha said to a group of boys catching fish, if you fear pain then do not harm other creatures because you will not escape punishment. Even boys are not excuse karma.

Kumaraka Sutta: The Boys

A large number of boys on the road between Savatthi and Jeta's Grove were catching fish. The Blessed One saw the boys catching fish. Seeing them, he went & said to them: "Boys, do you fear pain? Do you dislike pain?"

"Yes, lord, we fear pain. "

Then, the Blessed One on that occasion exclaimed:

If you fear pain, if you dislike pain,
don't do an evil deed in open or secret.
If you're doing or will do an evil deed,
you won't escape pain:
it will catch you even as you run away.

Fight, fight, fight:

Quote: Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells in the bone marrow, gastro-intestinal tract etc, and can cause organ damage, like liver, kidneys, heart, lungs etc.

7. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs.

Poisoning by chemotherapy and destroying by radiation has nothing to do with reason but it is using force to destroy and thus mankind is obsessed with using force to treat and counter any obstacles or problem be it at a microscopic level or in everyday life.

FIGHT IS WHAT MANKIND KNOWS HOW & WHAT TO DO AND HIS STYLED OR FORCED LOGIC IS TAILORED OR DIRECTED (BY FORCE) TO DISCOVER OR DEVICE FORCE MECHANISMS TO ANSWER HIS PROBLEMS AND BECAUSE FORCE HAS NO REASON AND IS BLIND, IT WILL LEAD AROUND IN CIRCLES. YOU CAN SHAKE UP THE COLORED BITS IN A KALEIDOSCOPE AND SO LONG AS THE RANDOM DIFFERENT PATTERNS FASCINATE OR ATTRACT YOU, YOU CAN DECEIVE YOURSELF THAT THERE IS MEANING IN WHAT YOU DO OR YOUR EXISTENCE HERE BUT ALL THE SHAKING WILL GET YOU NO WHERE EXCEPT THROW UP AN INFINITE VARIETY OF PATTERNS TO TEMPORARILY THRILL YOU TO DISAPPOINT LATER.

Hard at hearing:

I have spoken to quite a few people on the phone enquiring about products and they almost invariably struggle to hear me, plead they cannot hear.

The reason is because I speak at constant speed and loudness without stretching syllables and their perceptions, in this case their hearing are tuned to people who bombard them with aggressively fluctuating speed and loudness and rampant stretching.

Just as many people like spicy or ‘hot’ food that give them a kick in the taste buds and shun bland foods, people do not hear everything but their hearing is already seriously, permanently warped to only hear speech with much even outrageous stretching, changes in speed and loudness.

YOU MAY BE KIDDING YOURSELF IF YOU THINK YOUR SEEING, HEARING, TOUCHING, TASTING AND SMELLING IS OBJECTIVE, IS NOT CORRUPTED BY LIKES AND DISLIKES, NOT SKEWED TOWARDS PERCEIVING INPUTS THAT HAVE FORCE PROLONGING, FORCE CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN PREFERENCE TO OR EVEN EXCLUSION OF INPUTS WITHOUT FORCE CHANGES.

PEOPLE SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE OR TOUCH WITH A CERTAIN STYLE THAT IS STABLE IN THEM AND DIFFERS FROM OTHERS AND THEY ONLY SEE OR HEAR THINGS THEY WANT TO HEAR OR SEE AND IGNORE AND EVEN CANNOT HEAR OR SEE THINGS THEY HATE TO SEE OR HEAR.

Thus for the sake of surviving and succeeding in this world, you are forced to adapt yourself, to adopt a style in your speech and motion so that people will accept and hypocritically admire you. By so doing you have bonded yourself to this world; to return again and again to death.

Lindsay Lohan Sent To Mortuary:

Quote: Lindsay Lohan sent to the mortuary as her drink drive punishment.

The idea is that a confrontation with macabre death would deter her from drink. This may or may not work and if it works it is using force to counter force (fear is a force to deter the force or urge or addiction to driving whilst drinking) that is an unstable standoff vulnerable to collapse. Even if the terror of death should deter her from drink driving, she will have to fight the urge that remains in her to drink and one day the urge to drink will overpower the fear of death.

THE ONLY TRUE CURE FOR LINDSAY AND ANYONE WITH ADDICTIONS IS TO WEAN THEIR MINDS OF FORCE OR EMOTIONS OR LIKES AND DISLIKES BY PAYING ATTENTION TO STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT WILL SLOWLY ATROPHY THEIR MENTAL FORCE THAT IS INSTRUMENTAL TO THEIR SUBSTANCE OF ABUSE ADDICTION.

SO LONG AS THE PERSON IS SLAVE TO MENTAL FORCE, TO LIKE AND DISLIKE, TO STYLE, THERE IS NO CURE FOR HIS VICES OR ADDICTIONS (BE IT ALCOHOL, FOOD OR SEX), HE CAN RESIST HIS URGES BUT IT IS AN UNSTABLE STANDOFF AND HE IS LIKELY TO RELAPSE.

THUS THE MORGUE VISIT PRESCRIPTION IS A FOOL’S PRESCRIPTION. EVEN IF SHE IS WEANED OF DRINK DRIVE ADDICTION THERE WILL BE OTHER BOGEYS LYING IN WAIT FOR HER SO LONG AS SHE REMAINS A SLAVE TO MENTAL FORCE.

My eyesight has improved with age:

After an almost six years’ lapse, I have been told by my optometrist that my eyesight has improved such that I do not need the more expensive high index lens in the left eye.

Usually you will expect a person’s eyesight to deteriorate with age and most will attribute blameless old age as the culprit when it may be the case that the deterioration of a person’s eyesight with age may not be inevitable but connected with the way the person uses force to abuse himself in whatever he says or does by using force to fabricate a style or constant prolonging, changing speed and strength of force and it is this constant use of force that also impacts on that person’s eyesight causing it to be poorer than it should be if he did not use force constantly and also permanently warping and degrading it.

Thus it may be that in my case, with the considerable reduction in force acting on my mind by eschewing style, the force incarcerating my vision is significantly lifted causing an improvement of vision but there may be residual permanent warping and degradation from past lifelong subjugation of my vision to force in common with the rest.

It is possible for God who is the creator to restore a person’s vision to a pristine or perfect condition but that would require an act of God that is His discretion.

Only five strands of the senses:

The Buddha said there are the five strands of the senses, namely sight, sound, smell, taste and touch and you will be wise to restrict yourself to only those.

The actor Dustin Hoffman is said to think there are 32 senses and that is dicing with future insanity. If you use force to imagine, it is possible for you to imagine as many different senses as you want but the wise will only restrict himself to what he has no difficulty seeing, namely the five senses, anything more, trying to discover more senses is asking for madness or hallucination.

NOT ONLY ARE THERE ONLY FIVE STRANDS OF THE SENSES, THE BUDDHA TELLS YOU THE SENSES ARE FALSE, IMPERMANENT, NOT YOURS AND YOU SHOULD ABANDON THEM FOR NO FURTHER BECOMING.

What they call their reasoning:

If people pay attention when they are reasoning they may discover that they are actually consulting the many rules they have recorded in their mental jukeboxes to see which rules apply in a current situation and having successfully applied some rules to a situation that may be similar to or copied from others or different (idiosyncratic to him), he is satisfied he has reasoned when he has merely successfully applied rules to the situation or rationalize or explained what has happened according to the rules in his head.

What lazy presumptuous stylish people seldom or never do is observe the situation as completely as possible (and not in hazardous snapshots), place all the relevant data on the table and try to piece them together to tell a story specific to the occasion of what has happened. They are always falling back on old explanations for what is happening.

Thus it is that ordinary people not only see nothing wrong with their smiles, they think they are good and genuine smiling, their smiles are good for themselves and others when the truth is that smiling is a form of lying with your face to please, impress even intimidate another and even if you do not believe smiling is false or meaningless for show, it causes stress, restlessness and distraction plus sadness and feeling hurt (because there is always force prolonging in smiling that leads to sadness and acceleration in speed and strength in smiling that leads to getting hurt).

Why is the theoretically impossible for people to truly reason?

For one who sees correctly, whatever activities of stylish people, namely what and how they perceive (see, hear, smell, etc), think, speak and do are rehashed (must be rehashed because their stable style must be memorized) and they are therefore robots that in addition has consciousness, feelings and emotions. Robots can never truly reason, they may come up with an appropriate response to a situation but when faced with any situation they merely carry out from among a selection of options they were programmed with, at best they can compute what to say or do based on inputs they were instructed to monitor or look out for.

True reason is effortless seeing and understanding and if it is present in a person, it is present in all areas. Poor or absent reason is a forced or enforced state and it is the presence of blind, domineering force in a person’s mind that make him poorly or non reasoning. With the lifting of force acting on or compressing the person’s seeing, he becomes truly reasoning in all areas.

Because all ordinary people mistake style, liking & disliking, emotions, smiling and expressions as true or meaningful when they are not just for show and meaningless but gravely harmful in terms of causing stress, restlessness and distraction and lead to madness, they cannot possess true reason.

How is it possible that a person who possesses true reason can practice style, can stretch, change speed and loudness all the time and not know he is doing so let alone that they lead inexorably to stress, restlessness and distraction and if not desisted will end in madness?

THEREFORE THE FACT THAT PEOPLE CANNOT SEE THEY ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THESE ARE A CAUSE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION MEAN THEY HAVE NO TRUE REASON BUT IT IS RULES THAT GUIDE THEIR LIVES BECAUSE A PERSON WITH TRUE REASON WILL BE ABLE TO SEE AND UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING AND TO SEE AND UNDERSTAND THE NATURE OF STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS A MATTER OF FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE.

IN THEORY THEY ARE ROBOTS AND ROBOTS CANNOT TRULY REASON BECAUSE THEIR CONSTANT COMBO OF SUBSTANCE AND STYLE IN EVERYTHING THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO CANNOT BE RENDERED LIVE BUT MUST BE REHASHED AND THEY ARE THEREFORE ROBOTS.

People believe what they cannot see but cannot believe what they see:

Reflecting how perverted they are, people will readily believe what they cannot see and know as true but they cannot believe what they see and know and in addition they are cynical about things that they should know are false.

For instance, when someone strikes a lottery or something unexpected has occurred, they say they cannot believe it, the person who has won a million dollars in a lottery keep pinching himself and shaking his head that he cannot believe he has won. He saw the winning number on the newspaper match his ticket number and so it is not reason but a force driven pretence that makes him persist in not believing. No belief is necessary, you only have to see and know you have won. They speak of the unbelievable suffering of their parents at news of their cancers not realizing whatever can happen or has happened just has to be seen and known and there is no need to believe. They may become cynical if they did not embrace when they hear someone sing, “I believe for every drop of rain that falls a flower grows” but they cannot see or know that this is always false because it is impossible that every drop of rain gives rise to a flower. What about raindrops at sea, do they also give rise to a flower?

REFLECTING THEIR PERVERSITY, WHAT THEY DID NOT SEE OR KNOW THEY (UNRIGHTEOUSLY) USE FORCE TO BELIEVE OR ACCEPT AS TRUE AND WHAT THEY CAN SEE OR KNOW (EG THEY WON A LOTTERY) THEY USE FORCE TO NOT BELIEVE OR HAVE DIFFICULTY TO BELIEVE.

My mother used to practice with great conviction the belief that you should not sweep your floor in the first few days of the Chinese New Year because you are sweeping away the prosperity (such that she will have to tidy up by using a cloth to sweep rather than a broom). It is impossible for anyone to see that sweeping the floor on the first few days of New Year sweeps away prosperity but it is a belief, they use force to accept it as true and because force is conditioning, the more often and the more force you use in your belief, the stronger the belief becomes such that it is very real, hard to shake off and even immune to all reason.

Thus, a lot of things that people accept as fact, even up to the theories of relativity expounded by Einstein are beliefs not facts that they saw and know. Newton’s laws explain gravity very well, even permitting us to launch a space probe to Jupiter but according to Einstein, Newton is wrong or seriously flawed but relativity is correct. Because their minds are cluttered by many beliefs masquerading as facts or truth in many areas of their lives and it is inevitable that many of these false beliefs must contradict each other, they are so racked by confusion that they do not know what to make of it and thus paralyzed they just drift along accepting everything as fait accompli.

PEOPLE HAVE MANY BELIEFS IN MANY AREAS OF LIFE THAT THEY COPY FROM OTHERS WITHOUT SEEING OR KNOWING AS TRUE AND THE MORE FORCE THEY APPLY AND THE MORE TIMES THEY APPLY IT, THEIR BELIEFS DEVELOP A SENSE OF COMPULSION THAT SOON BECOMES IRRESISTIBLE AND BECAUSE THE MANY DIFFERENT BELIEFS THAT CLUTTER THEIR MINDS MUST GENERATE CONFLICT OR CONFUSION, THUS CONFUSED THEY BECOME SUBMISSIVE TO THEIR BELIEFS AND WHAT THEY ARE TOLD, THEY HAVE MUDDLED THINKING. THESE BELIEFS BECOME THE BREEDING GROUNDS F0R NEW RULES OR INSTRUCTIONS AS TO WHAT TO SAY AND DO AND BECAUSE THEY HAVE RULES BACKING WHAT THEY SAY OR DO, THEY BECOME DECEIVED THAT THEY HAVE TRUE REASON, TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHEN THE TRUTH IS THAT WHATEVER THEY SAY, DO, THINK AND PERCEIVE IS ACCORDING TO INSTRUCTIONS OR PROGRAMS IN THEIR MINDS.

Force not reason is the stringer:

Quote: An Indian who grew up in Hong Kong, studied in Canada, lives in England, and now calls Malaysia home, Divya Gopalan is truly a citizen of the world.
Comment: It is never reason that is the originator of this statement but it is force or emotion and the common thread in all the various locations is to boast, to stir the reader to be impressed ‘wow’.

The person is boasting and may not even be aware he is boasting. Thus if he means what he says, he should say, ‘I would like to make a boast ‘blah, blah, blah’.

If you are boasting and you are not aware you are a fool who does not know what he is doing.

Whether you realize you are boasting or not, if you are boasting, you are stirring emotional force in yourself when you write it and you desire to stir readers’ mental forces. You have to apply mental force on your mind to desire and so even if subconsciously you want to impress the reader (aka boasting) you must subject your mind to force that leads to stress, restlessness and distraction.

Finding the meaningless meaningful:

Even though they likely are not aware they are constantly stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness, they must find them meaningful; they must find style meaningful otherwise they will not keep doing it.

And because style or constant use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness is meaningless, is just a display of blind force that is stressful, restless and distraction, they are headed for final madness for perceiving what is meaningless is meaningful because the only way they find style meaningful must be through force, it is forced controlled meaning rather than effortless force free reasoned meaning that will end with loss of control and madness.

And no person of true reason, capable of true reasoning will find style, will find stressful constant stretching, changing speed and loudness meaningful. Because ordinary people find style meaningful, they cannot have true reason.

No man of true reason:

It is impossible for a man of true reason to not know what he is doing because he will not do something unless he sees or knows or understands what he is doing.

If you do or say something you must have a reason for saying or doing it. If you don’t, you must be mad or a fool who does not know what he is doing. If you are doing it (constantly using force to stretch, change speed and loudness) and you don’t realize you are doing it, you must be a fool who does not know what he is doing it.

Because ordinary people do not know they are constantly stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness even when they are the only sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that torment them, they do not know what they are doing and are therefore no men of true reason.

No man of true reason will appreciate jokes because jokes are false and laughing at the misfortune of others. Because ordinary people appreciate jokes, find things funny when they are never by themselves funny but it is their false perception that makes something happening funny, they cannot have true reason.

No man of true reason will appreciate smiling, using the muscles of the face and hands to express, style and because ordinary people appreciate smiling, expressions and style, they cannot be men of true reason.

YOU CANNOT SAY THE DIAGNOSIS OF NO REASON IS BASED ON AN ISOLATED DEFICIENCY BUT IT IS SYSTEMIC IN NOT KNOWING WHAT THEY ARE DOING ALL THE TIME (STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS), IN APPRECIATING FALSE JOKES, EXPRESSIONS (SMILING) AND STYLE.

Tongue Twisting:

Quote: It looks like me and it sounds like me, Datuk V.K Lingam told the Royal Commission of Inquiry, but denied that it was former Chief Justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim on the other side of the line.

If it was not him talking then by saying ‘looks like me and it sounds like me’ he is denying or trying very hard not to admit it was him and if it wasn’t him, how does he know it wasn’t Justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim on the other side of the line? He was asked by the recorder at the end of the tape who he was speaking to and if I remember correctly, he said Fairuz. Thus it is untenable or a lie to say it wasn’t him.

He has aged considerably, his vitality is waning, he is in a considerable daze and his smile is mindlessly automatically rendered and he is a robot doomed to future suffering that the Buddha said is as vast as an ocean and as long as an eternity for which his wealth and sensate enjoyment now is scant reward.

What he is expressing with his rote smile is faked not genuine liking to deceive and impress others with his affability and enjoying himself.

Not OK To Act In A Show:

(She is not truly doing what she is doing but faking it because it is expected of her or her part in the show)

Unless you want to face certain future madness, you should not act even in a show.

What she is doing is false, she is faking it or acting for a show. Even so, because you have to use force to act, it is conditioning. No person who is herself not already an accomplished actress can act with aplomb in a show and it is always that she is faking in a show, acting as if what she is doing is true when it is not, on top of her usual constant daily acting in her life.

Like all somnolent actors around (anyone with style, with stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness is an actor), she does realize she has an appointment with madness: mad rote behaviour, mad violence, mad emotions, mad stress, mad restlessness, mad distraction, mad perception and mad logic.

It is their mental force that is the big boss:

It is their mental force directly or indirectly through their likes and dislikes and their derivatives the emotions that is the big force driving whatever they want to say or do or pose that is pre-recorded in their vast mental jukebox and what they merely do is hurriedly or leisurely select a pre-recorded sequence they think is appropriate, press the ‘play’ button and it is then automatically rendered for them and if they discovered they have miscued, they hit the ‘stop’ button to change track, sometimes in failure if their emotions backing what they say or do is too strong to stop.

They are kidding themselves if they think they are capable of genuine reason, of genuinely appraising what is presented to them to come up with a specific to the occasion response. It is because they are incapable of anything spontaneous, when faced with a situation in which they have no recorded response or explanation they are at sea, try to look away or switch topic of conversation.

Faked paying attention:

She is forcing herself to look towards her opponent, smile as if appreciative or respectful but it is all insincere, for show because she was coached by others to do so or it is deemed the proper thing to do so. Left alone, unencumbered by expectations or social etiquette, she may even stand up and walk away or let out a big yawn to express what she really feels about her opponent’s speech.

Because she is forcing herself to act civilized and appreciative, there must be personal resistance and hostility to herself and others and she is like a volcano or electric capacitor storing up deadly charge that must one day be discharged explosively to her and others’ deadly detriment.

Her whole life is an act and all people with style including her opponent above are in the same boat, doomed, heading for insanity.

Not By Chance:

It is highly unlikely if not impossible that by chance a woman seeking a lost father she never saw could go to another strange country looking for work in the hope of finding her father and end up working for him without knowing and subsequently to be reunited when she left mementos that the father immediately recognized.

What this episode tell, as in so many other anecdotes in life is that this not a life is not just a physical process based purely on scientific rules but there is a spirit side that science cannot explain, there is more to life than just science. As Jesus said, thy will be done, in heaven as on earth and if God chooses to reunite lost relatives then it is not difficult at all but simple for God to arrange. If God does not want you to reunite then you can walk pass each other without uniting.

Maid finds boss is missing father

Tran Thi Kham did not know about her father till her wedding day

A Vietnamese woman who travelled to Taiwan to find the father she had never met, ended up working for him without knowing it.

Tran Thi Kham, 40, did not discover the truth until after leaving her employer.

Their reunion only came about because she mistakenly left some keepsakes at his home, which he had given to her mother more than 40 years before.

Tsai Han-chao, 77, said he could not help crying when he found out he had a daughter he never knew about.

"Life's ups and downs are just like television drama. How could I have ever dreamed that she is my daughter? I couldn't stop crying when we were finally united," he told Taiwan's TVBS cable news channel.

This is incredible and really touching to see the father and daughter get together Ku Ker-ya, Taiwanese policeman

Ms Tran had travelled to Taiwan a few years earlier to search for her father.

Her only clues were a gold ring and a photograph of him as a young man.

He had given the mementoes to a Vietnamese woman he had fallen in love with in Hong Kong in 1967. She had returned to her home country to care for her mother and he later returned to Taiwan.

The woman gave birth to Tran Thi Kham, but died two years later. The child was brought up by her aunt - whom she thought was her mother until the day of her wedding, at age 21.

On that day, her aunt revealed the true story and passed on the ring and the photo.

Emotional reunion

Much later, after bringing up her own children, Ms Tran decided to search out her father in Taiwan.

She took a job with a man in the capital, Taipei, caring for his ailing wife.

When the wife died, seven months later, Ms Tran moved on to other employment on the Taiwanese island of Kinmen.

But she realised she had left the prized possessions behind and enlisted the help of Kinmen police.

They contacted Mr Tsai and asked him to search for her things. Police described him as "stunned" to come across the keepsakes he had given his lover so long before.

He flew immediately to Kinmen, where his daughter was newly employed, for an emotional reunion.

"This is incredible and really touching to see the father and daughter get together after all these years," said Kinmen policeman, Ku Ker-ya.

The Buddha can tell you immediately where someone has gone to:

It is recorded many times in the Buddhist scriptures that monks tell the Buddha so and so has passed away, where is he now and the Buddha came up with an answer immediately where he has been born and so it is possible for someone with super knowledge and faculties of seeing to tell where each person is after he dies and where he is currently in and if it is possible for the Buddha to do so, it must be possible for God to tell you where your lost father that you have never seen is and thus secretly guide you to him if God wanted.

Nice or nasty:

Whenever stylish people say or do something to others they are always either nice or nasty that is not being true but being false, that is always stressful, restless and distracting to self and others.

Being nice or nasty is never a subjective diagnosis but it is an objective, clearly defined ‘such and such’ is niceness or nastiness, such and such is not nice nor nasty.

A person is nice in what he says or does to another if there is an accompanying style that is essentially how he stretches, changes speed and strength of force that is intended to impress or please the other person or stir his mental force in a liking fashion.

A person is nasty in what he says or does to another if there is an accompanying style that is essentially how he stretches, changes speed and strength of force that is intended to attack, dominate or intimidate the other person or that stir his mental force in a liking fashion.

A PERSON WHO SPEAKS OR DOES THINGS WITHOUT ANY STYLE, WITHOUT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE (LOUDNESS) CANNOT BE NICE OR NASTY BUT HE IS BEING TRUE TO HIMSELF AND OTHERS.

ALL NICENESS OR NASTINESS IS FALSE, MEANINGLESS, ONLY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE AND BECAUSE PEOPLE PERCEIVE NICENESS AND NASTINESS AS MEANINGFUL WHEN THEY ARE STRESSFUL, THEY ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY NOT SAFETY AFTER THEY DIE.

Nasty in a nice way or nice in a nasty way:

The way people speak and do things can be examined and classified into four ways: Nice or nasty, nice in a nasty way and nasty in a nice way.

A person is nice in a nasty way when he is irritated or angry or disliking but obliges, eg in a huff he says, “Here! This is how you do so, you idiot!” He is being nice to help someone but in a nasty way.

A person is nasty in a nice way if he is sarcastic (you are so clever!) or he laughs or make a joke of what he says is nasty.

What stylish people are incapable of is being neither nice nor nasty.

It is impossible to be nice or nasty without stretching syllables or units of motion or changing speed and strength of force (loudness) and so the very style that is always constantly present in stylish people renders them always nice or nasty or nice in a nasty way and nasty in a nice way.

Being nice is about expressing liking to impress or please others.

Being nasty is about expressing disliking to make others suffer.

Bush tells others to confront Iran:

Quote headline: President Bush calls on allies to confront Iran "before it's too late"

Comment: Mr Bush is a fool who does not realize he is constantly heaping new actually needless karma on himself.

If you want to confront Iran which is about aggression whether you think it is justified or not, do it yourself and don’t ask or encourage others to do so as this is additional karma for instigation.

Because others do not like Bush perhaps because of his look, his speech and actions or the nation he represents, they think they have reason just like me when their dislike is all about force and not reason.

Because what I say appear to attack Bush or cast him in negative light they think I am also attacking Bush like them when I am merely stating Bush is a fool without dislike and what I say is based on reason.

Quote: Chrysler plans to drive a herd of cattle through the centre of Detroit on Sunday to launch its new pickup truck.

Comment: What is done is a gimmick, for show to be seen to attract attention that has nothing to do with reason but everything to do with force because stirring attraction is all about stirring force in others.

A lot of work, expense and time have to be spent to organize and carry out this stunt and accidents may occur causing death to people or cattle and the persons involved are going to go insane because it is meaningless and they think it is meaningful and they cause a lot of trouble to people and animals.

Camouflaged intention:

It may be that the reason Bush urges quick action on Iran is not because the matter is indeed urgent but because he knows he is leaving office in a year’s time and he likes to preside over an attack on Iran.

In that case he told a lie because he should tell listeners that he would like action against Iran soon because otherwise I would have left office.

What he said implies that Iran is an urgent or pressing threat that must be addressed soon, not because he is leaving office soon.

THUS IT IS MAKE BELIEF BY MANY PEOPLE WHEN THEY THINK THEY SAY WHAT THEY MEAN AND MEAN WHAT THEY SAY. THEY ALWAYS GO BY A ROUNDABOUT WAY TO GET WHAT THEY WANT.

Microsoft’s absurdity:

Like most deluded entities, Microsoft crave adulation and dislike criticisms but with its Vista it has seriously bungled in many ways that I did not think they were capable of.

For instance, programs like HP printer is regularly trying to access the internet and the sign will flash for me to grant permission and whilst this happens, the screen dims considerably and everything is suspended so that if I am recording a TV program, it is lost due to the suspension or afterwards the TV hangs.

REQUESTS FOR SECURITY CLEARANCE COME REGULARLY AS SOFTWARE TRY TO ACCESS INTERNET, ETC AND SURELY YOU CANNOT DESIGN A SECURITY MEASURE THAT SUSPENDS ALL ACTIVITIES WHILST PERMISSION IS GRANTED. WHAT PURPOSE DOES IT SERVE TO DIM THE SCREEN THAT IS DISCONCERTING?

The obsession with softer pale colours meant that I have made mistake and have to make special effort to scrutinize the files I mark to copy in Windows Explorer because the difference between marked and unmarked files are hard to differentiate.

With Window XP it is no problem telling the files I earmark for copying and those I did not.

In the same way, on Excel, I cannot tell which cell amongst a row of cells I marked in which I am on so that I have made mistake entering data in the wrong cell.

The translucent borders on programs are just a gimmick designed to be attractive that I find totally unnecessary just as the accelerating bar as a file is copied and the endlessly rotating icon that depicts the file being copied.

YOU WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT A BIG CORPORATION LIKE MICROSOFT WOULD HAVE SOME COMMON SENSE BECAUSE THE FLAWS I POINT OUT ARE GLARING, THEY ARE SERIOUS AND YET MICROSOFT DEEMS IT OK TO PASS IT TO ITS CUSTOMERS.

Not A True Picture:

This picture is likely processed or touched up to falsely present her as more attractive than she in truth is. She is also posing or presenting herself or trying to project an image by posing and that is false. She is staring and is actually in a substantial daze detached from reality. She is seeing (looking at the person) but not seeing (her mind is somewhere else thinking) and that is lying.

She is projecting force not reason with her face with her stare and tensed or braced musculature and because force is meaningless and not understandable, by projecting force she is projecting falsity.

THUS THE PICTURE OF HER IS FALSE IN MANY WAYS; IT IS TOUCHED UP TO MAKE HER MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN SHE ACTUALLY IS (NO BLEMISHES), SHE IS PROJECTING FORCE THAT IS ILL WILL AND MEANINGLESS AND SHE IS LYING BY APPEARING TO LOOK AT YOU WHEN SHE IS LOOKING BLANKLY.

THUS IF YOU THINK IT IS A TRUE PICTURE OF HER, YOU ARE UNDISCERNING AND HAVE BEEN DECEIVED.

She is a robot:

This is not the first time nor the last time that she will posture herself such that is to use the muscles of her body, limbs and face to express something vague and emotional that can be interpreted in many ways like ‘wow!’ or ‘hey’. What is the meaning of hey or wow? It is merely a significant stirring of her mental force to experience liking that she wants you to join in, thereby stressing yourself as she stresses herself. It is impossible for the stereotyped coordinated pose with head turned to one side, eyes slyly looking out of the corners, a smile, hands outstretched in the same fashion to be spontaneously generated almost exactly the same but it must be rehashed from memory perhaps in imitation of others she has seen doing it that she admires. Whenever a situation arises that may call for adopting this pose she may search for and press the play button so that her mental jukebox will play back to impress the audience of her charm or confidence. She is using force to project force. There is no useful work like cooking or washing that she is doing and her motions and poses are merely for show to impress and that is practicing something meaningless that will end in madness.

Whatever meaning or message that she wants to convey can best be conveyed with words far better without risk of misunderstanding than the movements and poses of her body.

She is an actress and robot and because she desires to impress and please others, she devotes much force and effort to hone her acting skills not realizing she is headed for future torment that is even greater than the torment that must currently beset her mind periodically.

THERE ARE NO PART TIME OR CONSCIOUS ROBOTS. A ROBOT IS A ROBOT IN EVERYTHING SHE PERCEIVES, THINKS, SPEAKS AND DOES AND MOST IF NOT ROBOTS ARE SOMONLENT THAT THEY ARE ROBOTS BUT INSTEAD THEY THINK THEY ARE SUCH GENUINE, SPONTANEOUS BEINGS.

The only way to stop being a robot:

Human robots are completely immersed in their being a robot, beset by stress, restlessness and distraction plus sadness and feeling hurt that they merely struggle to preserve an even keel doomed to ultimately fall from their tightropes to torment and the abyss. They are unaware there is an alternative incomparably happier saner way to exist called being a style free live specific to the occasion person.

The only way to exit being a robot is to pay PERSISTENT attention to detect the presence of stretching, changing speed and loudness in your speech that has equivalents in your motion and perceiving and then having recognized them to make persistent effort to efface or stop yourself from stretching, changing speed and loudness that will progressively reduce the stress, restlessness and distraction that beset and detain you so that you can exit your style that must be reproduced by rote and thus style free, you are no longer a robot.

THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO EXIT BEING A ROBOT EXCEPT TO SHED YOUR FALSE STRESSFUL STYLE AND THAT MEANS PAY ATTENTION TO RECOGNIZE STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND MAKING PERSISTENT EFFORT TO ELIMINATE THEM

Why is Bill Gates so anxious?

He is rich, powerful and famous and so he should be the most happy and confident man on earth.

You can see fear, anxiety, worry and even panic written on his face.

Because nobody is the master of his fears, anxiety or worries but they are slaves merely struggling to suppress and control them, he is walking on a tightrope with ultimate loss of control as the inevitable outcome.

It is possible to erase all fear, anxiety, worry from one’s mind even if you and everyone else cannot do it and it is to eliminate all mental force from your activities and that means no style, no use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness.

Very soon his tenure as the wealthiest man will be over and then it may be a case of whatever he has will be taken away from him and he will have nothing.

Why people’s behaviour is sometimes inappropriate:

Even the most partisan observer may admit that sometimes people’s behaviour are odd or inappropriate to the occasion as when someone bursts out in tears at the mention of something or on speaking.

Why is it that sometimes people’s behaviour in what they say or do may be inappropriate?

Whatever speech or deed that is not specific to the occasion or live, is inappropriate and whatever style there is in a speech or deed (eg angry or sad or excited way of saying or doing something) is inappropriate.

Because ordinary people always have style, are regurgitating what they say or do from their mental jukeboxes, their speech and actions are always inappropriate but people have advanced false perception that it is appropriate and only in situations of gross incongruity do they perceive it as inappropriate.

You may insist her behaviour above is genuine, meaningful or understandable and specific to the occasion but I say she is acting, lying with her body and never genuine but aimed at impressing or pleasing others as if what has happened is ‘wow’ or ‘hey!’!

Because it is for show to please and impress, it is not appropriate to any situation and she must learn or copy from others what are the ‘appropriate’ situations to trigger this pre recorded stylish behaviour and in an effort (based on emotion or enthusiasm) to outdo herself, she may even start to express such gestures in ‘iffy’ situations where it might not be quite apt to spread her arms thus. Further there is an increasingly irresistible urge to trigger this arm spreading ‘wow!’ or ‘hey!’ in all situations such that increasingly she cannot help herself doing so once the thought occurs in her mind to do so.

Thus she runs the risk of embarrassing herself when subsequently to expressing ‘hey!’ she thinks perhaps she should not have done so or it was overdone or odd and she starts to have self recriminations or doubts and think she made a fool of herself.

IT IS PRECISELY BECAUSE HER ACT IN SPREADING HER ARMS OUT IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS THAT IT CAN OCCUR AT ANYTIME TRIGGERED FROM MEMORY BY HER WISH AND IN HER ENTHUSIASM TO FIND MORE OCCASIONS TO EXERCISE HER NEWFOUND ACT SHE MIGHT TRIGGER IT ON OCCASIONS WHEN IT IS NOT QUITE APPROPRIATE THAT SHE IS VULNERABLE TO INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOUR. FURTHER BECAUSE IT IS A SEPARATE RECORDED ACT TAGGED ON TO A SITUATION ARISING, IT CAN OCCUR INDEPENDENTLY BY ITSELF AND BECAUSE IT BECOMES COMPELLING WITH FREQUENT PRACTICE, THERE IS AN INCREASING MADDENING URGE TO EXPRESS IT JUST BY THE THOUGHT OF IT. BECAUSE IT IS NOT SPECIFIC TO THE SITUATION BUT ARTIFICIALLY CONTRIVED SHE MUST ENTERTAIN DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY ABOUT WHEN TO AND WHEN NOT TO EXPRESS ‘HEY!’ THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE.

IN THE SAME WAY, PEOPLE SAY OR DO MANY THINGS WITH A CONSISTENT STYLE THAT THEY DO NOT INTEND OR ARE INAPPROPRIATE BUT MERELY TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS SUCH THAT ON CERTAIN OCCASIONS THEIR JUDGMENT MAY FAIL THEM AND THEY UTTER OR DO IT INAPPROPRIATELY (EG KISS A GIRL WHO DOES NOT APPRECIATE) AND THERE IS A MAD STRONG URGE TO SAY OR DO IT JUST FOR THE SAKE OF SAYING OR DOING IT.

Only a robot is capable of inappropriate actions:

If you saw or heard live everything (not in hasty snapshots) what the situation is and your speech and action is live, freshly composed to be specific to the occasion, how can you be guilty of inappropriate speech or actions unless you are mad? And a live, specific to the occasion style free person cannot be mad because his mind is not slave to mental force, is not beset by stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness or feeling hurt.

If the live person has not heard or seen everything that is necessary for him to speak or take action, he does not take action (presumptuously) and so how can he be guilty of inappropriate actions or speech?

It is only because people are stylish and whatever they say or do are pre-recorded and rehashed to fit a situation, to con themselves and others that they are genuine when they are going through the motions to please and impress others that their speech and actions can and must on occasions be inappropriate to a situation.

A GENUINE LIVE STYLE FREE PERSON SEES AND HEARS EVERYTHING NECESSARY (NOT IN SNAPSHOTS) FOR HIM TO SPEAK OR ACT SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION OR HE DOES NOT SPEAK OR ACT SO HOW CAN HE BE GUILTY OF INAPPROPRIATE SPEECH OR ACTS? A GENUINE LIVE PERSON CANNOT BE MAD BECAUSE HE IS NOT ASSAILED BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND SO HIS SPEECH AND ACTIONS BASED ON WHAT HE HEARD OR SAW COMPLETELY (NOT IN SNAPSHOTS) MUST ALWAYS BE APPROPRIATE.

THUS IF YOU ARE CAPABLE OF AND GUILTY OF INAPPROPRIATE SPEECH OR ACTIONS (EG GREETINGS OR SMILING), YOU MUST BE A ROBOT REHASHING GENERALLY BY ROTE TO FIT THE SITUATION APPROXIMATELY.

Nice in a nasty way:

He is smiling to be nice (give the impression he is liking it or liking you) but you can see aggression and nastiness that belies his smile.

The purpose of his smile is to be nice or say he falsely likes you or what is happening but the way he smiles is nasty, he can scarcely conceal his aggression and dislike.

The opposite is when someone is sarcastic. His intention then is to be nasty but the way he goes about it is nice, to fake that he likes you or what is happening.

CAUGHT OUT:

ONLY LIES OR FALSITY THAT ARE FAKED AS TRUTH CAN BE CAUGHT OUT, WHAT IS TRUE CANNOT BE CAUGHT OUT BECAUSE IT IS THE TRUTH.

ONLY SPEECH & ACTIONS THAT ARE STANDARDIZED & REHASHED, NOT INTENDED PARTICULARLY FOR AN OCCASION BUT INTENDED TO BE DISHED OUT FOR A VARIETY OF SITUATIONS (PERHAPS BECAUSE IT IS DEEMED STYLISH OR IMPRESSIVE) IN A ‘CLEVER’ DECEPTION TO FOOL OTHERS THAT IT IS GENUINE WHEN IT IS A FAKE IS CAPABLE OF BEING CAUGHT OUT OR INAPPROPRIATE AT TIMES.

IF A RESPONSIBLE GENUINE PERSON DOES NOT UNDERSTAND A SITUATION OR HAS NOT SEEN OR HEARD ENOUGH OF A SITUATION TO MAKE A RESPONSE IN SPEECH OR ACTION, HE DOES NOT SPEAK OR ACT, SO HOW CAN HE SPEAK OR ACT INAPPROPRIATELY UNLESS HE IS MAD? HE CANNOT BE MAD BECAUSE HIS MIND IS FREE FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, HE IS NOT STRUGGLING TO FIND AND INTIATE THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX.

BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO BE MAD AND HE IS NOT RECKLESS AND WILL NOT SPEAK OR ACT UNLESS HE UNDERSTANDS THE SITUATION, SAW AND HEARD ENOUGH TO SPEAK OR ACT, THE LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION PERSON CANNOT BE GUILTY OF INAPPROPRIATE SPEECH OR ACTION AND THUS ANYONE WHO IS LEFT WITH QUALMS ABOUT THE APPROPRIATENESS OF WHAT HE JUST SAID OR DID MUST BE A SOMNOLENT ROBOT.

Copycat tours:

Bush Middle East tour appears to be on an early stage of a series of farewell tours that may be copying what Japanese prime minister Kozuimi & Blair did before they left. Copying is not based on reason but seeing what others do, liking it and then doing or saying it yourself often if not always without knowing why you should say or do it or because it is deemed stylish or impressive or emotional. Thus people in high places are more foolish and keeping up with the Jones than ordinary people might perceive.

Bare-chested star’s Superman stunt leaves Malaysia unimpressed:

This statement is false because Malaysia is not a being who can be impressed, he did not interview many Malaysians to ascertain if it was true and therefore he is speaking unrighteously on behalf of Malaysians.

Being impressed is a matter of having your mental force stirred attractively that is meaningless and does not last and so to make much of being impressed or not is a fool’s pursuit.

Well & As Well:

Quote Paul Krugman: On both Wednesday and Thursday, the price of oil briefly hit $100 a barrel. The new record made headlines, as well it should have. But what does it mean, aside from the obvious point that the economy is under extra pressure?

Well, one thing it means is that we’re having the wrong discussion about foreign policy.

Comment: “As well it should have” is actually unnecessary and only serves to divert attention to the writer’s opinion or approval that he wants to impart on you or influence you. Whether the new record made headlines or not does not matter but it is merely necessary to state it made headlines, ‘as well it might be’ is to add your personal approval that is irrelevant and reflects self identity views.

The fact that we are having a wrong discussion of foreign policy is not well or not good, not the ‘well’ that he wants you to believe.

THUS A LOT OF PEOPLE LIKE TO THINK THEY SPEAK GREAT SENSE WHEN THEY MAY BE SPEAKING NONSENSE AND CONTRADICTING THEMSELVES.

If you read Paul Krugman you will notice he likes to use 'well' that is a habit or ensues from rote and he is a robot.

What is so well about it making headlines?

What is so intrinsically good or bad about oil prices reaching a record high making the headlines?

Does it matter that it made the headlines?

Will people take notice and if they do, what actions can they take to address the matter?

THUS IF IT DOES NOT MAKE MUCH OR ANY DIFFERENCE WHETHER NEWS OF RECORD OIL PRICES MADE THE HEADLINES (INSTEAD OF JUST MENTIONED), WHAT ARE YOU OR ANYBODY GOING TO DO ABOUT IT, THEN BY SAYING IT IS WELL OR GOOD THAT IT MADE THE HEADLINE YOU ARE MAKING A MOUNTAIN OUT OF A MOLEHILL AND YOU HAVE (UNWITTING) FALSE PERCEPTION THAT IS THE PRELUDE TO MAD PERCEPTION THAT SOMETHING FALSE IS TRUE.

He is talking about his liking:

When Krugman said ‘as well it might be’ that record oil prices made the headline, he is actually speaking about his liking for what happened that he wants to share with you.

Liking has nothing to do with meaning or understanding, but it is merely an attractive stirring of his mental force at something happening and if you think that ‘as well it may be’ is communicating meaning or something to be understood when it is conveying his liking that has nothing to do with meaning but everything to do with force that he wants to share with you, then you have false perception that will end in mad perception.

Oil prices have been hovering near $100 per barrel so the mere breach is not unexpected or breaks drastic new ground, so what is the big deal?

Subjective & Objective Parts Of Speech:

You can classify what people say and separate them into the essential objective part that may be true or false (a lie or nonsense) and the subjective or personal or style part that is always false, to stir emotion or liking and disliking and the more that is not letting your yes be yes only and comes from evil.

One should stick to the objective part of speech and refrain from having subjective parts of speech that reflect self identity views (a fetter to future woe), is false and incites emotions and is not letting your yes be yes only but saying more that comes from evil.

Thus the statement “The new record made headlines, as well it should have” comprises the factual component ‘the new record made headlines’ and the opinion or emotional commentary component that is always false “as well it should have”.

If you let your yes be yes only as Jesus commanded, you only say ‘the new record made headlines, anything more, ‘as well it should have’ comes from evil not good.

“As well it should have” is to express his approval. Because there is nothing intrinsically good or true that the new record made headlines, this component of the statement must express not just his liking, but his liking in a concealed way. He cannot say he liked it because it might not go down well with some people chaffing under the strain of oil prices that seem spiralling upwards out of control, but he may like prices spiralling upwards out of control because it proves he is correct, is in line with what his expertise predicts and so it is that many people who do not realize they are deceitful, who never say what they mean, that indirectly he is saying he liked the new record making the headlines by saying, as well it should have.

Again, “But unfortunately, based on the feedback that I have received, I observed that Malaysians were unable to do that” has a fact or objective component that may not be true, “based on the feedback that I have received, I observed that Malaysians were unable to do that” and an opinion or subjective or emotional component, “unfortunately” that is always false, did not occur because there is nothing fortunate or unfortunate about Malaysians being unable to do that.

Whatever said that is intended to stir the emotion of the reader is the subjective false part of speech, Thus the use of ‘unfortunate’ is intended to stir sadness or sympathy whilst ‘as well it should have been’ is to stir emotional indignation or forceful righteousness when there is nothing correct or incorrect about record prices making the headlines.

A MAN OF TRUTH WILL ONLY GIVE A FACTUAL ACCOUNT OF WHATEVER HAS HAPPENED WHILST A FALSE EMOTIONAL STYLISH MAN MUST ALWAYS ADD IN HIS OPINIONS, MUST REFER TO HIS INEVITABLE LIKES AND DISLIKES TO WHAT HAPPENED THAT ARE ALWAYS FALSE AND EXERTS PRESSURES ON OTHERS TO BE SIMILARLY FALSE.

You have no right to be stylish:

If you asked even those who think they are right minded and wise whether it is anybody’s right to be stylish in his postures, motion and speech, it is likely if not certainly that they will say everyone has the right to have his own style.

This is not surprising because they themselves possess style and they consciously or unconsciously admire style; they are impressed by and attached to their own ‘different’ poses, ways of doing and saying things that they perceive as meaningful when it is meaningless, it is just the way they use force to prolong, change speed, strength of force and direction for show.

Not only do they have a tolerant even indulgent attitude towards style, they are vague about the nature of style and they severely underestimate the presence of style in themselves and others. They do not realize the angry or softly undulating ‘gentle’ way they sometimes speak too is style that is for show.

It is not because I say you have no right to have style or God says you have no right that it is so but it is so for reasons that are fully understandable and applies to everyone.

It reflects people’s serious wrong view (that the Buddha said led to hell or the animal womb) that they think surely it is my and anybody’s right if he wishes to adopt stylish postures, speak and do things with style to ‘express’ himself.

It is only because of significant false self identity views that again the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe that a being deems it is his right to express himself with style that is never based on any understandable reason but it is based on emotion, an insatiable need to impress, intimidate or please others.

No one has a right to have style in his postures, speech and motion because his style that is using force to forcefully prolonging, changing speed and even direction where possible within and between his syllables and units of motion causes perceivers’ mental forces to similarly resonate to prolong, change speed and strength.

No one can say it is none of your business that I like to have style in what I pose, move or say just as no one has a right to wave a knife or machine gun menacingly in his hand whenever he interacts with others.

THUS YOU ARE EMOTIONAL AND IRRATIONAL (WHAT YOU SAID IS NEVER BASED ON REASON) IF YOU SAY IT IS NONE OF OTHERS’ BUSINESS IF I WANT TO BE STYLISH.

Even if you insist it is your right to exhibit style, you are a fool who does not know what is good for you because your constant prolonging, changing speed, strength and even direction stresses, make restless and distracts your own mind that is always suffering; style mandates that you have to exist as a robot because style or your individual consistent way of using force to prolong, change speed, strength and direction must be memorized to be rehashed and your mind is being slowly increasingly warped that will end in madness. Further, if there is God and He will punish evil doers, because you have hurt not benefited others, you will be judged and punished even consigned to eternal punishment where you will weep and gnash your teeth.

Thus whoever is guilty of style, of using force to prolong, change speed or strength of force in whatever he says or does is guilty of persecuting others, of inducing others to similarly use force that not only stresses, make restless and distracts them but conditions them increasingly to use force to stretch, change speed and strength in way that is increasingly compelling so that he may not just be able to get out of his predicament but if left alone by itself he is doomed to lose control to become madly stressed, restless and distracted.

A powerful provocateur & conditioner:

No matter how soft or loud, how slow or fast a person speaks, there is a constant simultaneous transmission of force to others in his style or how he consciously or unconsciously uses force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness that is a powerful even irresistible provocateur to the other person to similarly use his mental force to prolong, change speed and loudness that causes stress, restlessness and distraction to inexorably arise and once stress, restlessness and distraction are well established in that recipient’s mind, they seize him to mandatorily mindlessly prolong, change speed and loudness like a mad carousel that once you get on it, it spins faster and faster and filled with fear you dare not jump off and you do not know there is a switch to slow the carousel down until it is safe to get off.

A PERSON WHO HAS STYLE, WHO CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY USES FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS COMMITTING A GRAVE SIN BECAUSE HE IS PROVOKING THE MENTAL FORCE OF ALL THOSE WHO PERCEIVE TO RESONATE, TO SIMILARLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT NOT ONLY STRESSES, DISTRACTS AND MAKES THEM RESTLESS BUT CONDITIONS THEM TO DO SO THAT THEY MAY NEVER SHAKE OFF FOR EVEN MANY ETERNITIES TO COME JUST LIKE AN ALCOHOLIC MAY NEVER WEAN HIMSELF OFF ALCOHOL.

STYLE IS BAD FOR SELF AND OTHERS BECAUSE IT INVOLVES THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE THAT CAUSES PAINFUL STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN SELF AND OTHERS AND NECESSITATE YOU EXIST AS A ROBOT REHASHING YOUR CONSISTENT DIFFERENT STYLE, IT CONDITIONS YOUR MIND INCREASINGLY TO FORCE CHANGES AND THE APPLICATION OF FORCE DEGRADES OR CORRODES YOUR MIND THAT WILL END IN DISINTEGRATION OR MADNESS.

What is the meaning of ‘....’?

When you say ‘I ... love you ...’, ‘I’, ‘love’ and ‘you’ all have understandable meaning but what is the meaning of ‘...’? If it has no meaning that can be understood it must be for show to impress or to express emotion. If the ‘...’ is to express lingering, you did not say you are or want to linger in what you say and therefore you did not say what you meant (to linger).

Whether you are aware you are doing so or not, you must use force and expend energy to type the repetitive dots to express your lingering and if it is stressful and meaningless then you have stressed yourself doing so and in doing something that is unnecessary and meaningless you are conditioning yourself in a controlled fashion to sometime meaningless that with loss of control will end in madness.

In the same way, whether you are aware or not that you are stretching syllables, changing speed or loudness, you must use force to do so that stresses yourself and expend energy that is wasted and you are conditioning yourself with ever more strength to keep doing so that will end in loss of control and madness.

The fact that you cannot see yourself stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness does not exonerate you but you must have copied what you do from others without understanding and you are a fool who does not know or see what he is doing that is of fundamental importance because it mandates you exist as a robot instead of a live specific to the occasion person and you must suffer needless stress, restlessness and distraction that is always universally tormenting.

Menacing others with a dagger:

The man with style in his speech and motion is like a man gesticulating with a dagger in his hand when interacting with others and these gesticulations vary from violently accelerating levels when he is excited or angry to less violent but still accelerating and decelerating when he is sedate or ‘gentle’.

Just as no one has a right to menace others with a dagger even if he did not physically stab someone, no one has a right to express styles that impact with force on others.

If you insist you have a right (you can only insist with force not reason) then if it is true your style is all about using force and transmitting force to others then if it hurts yourself as it hurt others and if it mean a robotic existence rehashing and being isolated from the reality that you so crave to exist in then this is your lot, you have nobody to blame for your woes and should there be punishment by God for harming others, then that too is your lot for being deluded that you have a right to be stylish and your style benefits yourself and others.

Hillary, Iron My Shirt:

It is a cruel taunt by males for Hillary to iron their shirts that will have serious even everlasting repercussions for them (how about weeping and gnashing your teeth for an eternity or billions of years?)

Hillary cannot like the taunting and so she is lying to herself and others laughing at the taunting that will hurt her and set her up for intense mental conflict and depression.

Despite their acted faked civility, many in the West are chauvinists in terms of sex and race.

Taunting others is not just sinful but they are not saying what they mean (women stay at home) but hinting. If you think ‘iron my shirt’ equals ‘women stay at home’ you have serious false perception that will end in mad perception.

Hey Hillary, iron my shirt will ya?

By staff writers

January 08, 2008 12:21pm

SCREAMING male protesters told US presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton to "iron my shirt" at a rally in the all-important primary state of New Hampshire.

Senator Clinton, running to become the US's first female president, laughed off the protest suggesting a woman's place is doing laundry and not running the country.

"Ah, the remnants of sexism - alive and well," Senator Clinton said to applause, the Associated Press reported.

The two men were removed from the auditorium after raising a pair of signs that said, "Iron my shirt!" They also shouted the slogan.

"Can we turn the lights on? It's awfully dark," Senator Clinton said, signalling for police to come forward and take the men away.

The crowd burst into applause, and some began shouting, "Iron my shirt!" as the two were taken outside.

"As I think has been abundantly demonstrated, I am also running to break through the highest and hardest glass ceiling," she said.

Senator Clinton later joked about the incident during question time.

"If there's anyone left in the auditorium who wants to learn how to iron a shirt, I'll talk about that," she said.

Senator Clinton came second in Iowa's caucuses last week and faces a tough challenge for the Democratic primary vote in New Hampshire against rival Barack Obama.

Right But Wrong:

In a sense doctors may be right to advocate statins to lower cholesterol for all diabetic patients but ultimately it is deluded.

These statins and diabetic medications are not without side effects but their side effects known and unknown may be just as serious as their desired effects and so long as a person desires to maintain a stressful styled lifestyle with constant like and dislike, constant use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness, so long must he suffer stress that leads to diabetes, stress that leads to overeating that leads to diabetes and so long will need all these medications with potentially even fatal side effects.

You have not experience the effortless freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction that the absence of the use of force to fabricate style brings so how do you know it will not dramatically improve even cure your diabetes so that you will not need diabetic medications let alone statins?

THUS IF IT IS TRUE THAT FREEDOM FROM STRESS THAT COMES FROM NOT USING FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WILL SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE YOUR DIABETES MORE THAN EXPENSIVE DRUGS AND YOU PURSUE DRUG TREATMENTS AND EVEN ADVOCATE STATINS, YOU ARE DELUDED, BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE. DISEASE MAY NOT BE BLAMELESS BUT REFLECTS THE WAY YOU ABUSE YOUR BODY AND ALLOW OTHERS TO ABUSE YOUR BODY.

Statins for all diabetics urged

People with diabetes should receive cholesterol-busting drugs regardless of whether they have signs of heart disease, UK researchers say.

Statins cut the risk of heart attack, stroke and death in diabetic people even in those with low cholesterol levels, analysis of 14 trials shows.

It means hundreds of thousands more people could benefit from treatment, the Lancet report said.

There are 2.5 million people diagnosed with diabetes in the UK.

Many more do not realise they have the condition and statins are "underused" in people with diabetes the researchers said.

Guidance from the National Institute of Clinical and Health Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales issued in 2006 estimated around 3.3 million people are eligible for treatment with statins.

This includes people with diabetes who have a 20% risk of developing cardiovascular disease in the next 10 years.

Benefits

A team of researchers at Oxford University reviewed studies of more than 90,000 people - 19,000 with diabetes - and found that many more would benefit from statins than previously realised.

They found that standard daily treatment with statins would prevent about one third of heart attacks and strokes in people with diabetes.

The benefits were seen regardless of age, sex and whether patients were already showing signs of cardiovascular disease.

What we're saying is statins are clearly effective in every type of person with diabetes Professor Colin Baigent

After five years, 42 fewer people with diabetes had major problems, such as heart attacks or stroke, for every 1,000 treated with statins.

The only exceptions for treatment should be those with exceptionally low risk, such as children or those who cannot take the drugs for other reasons, such as pregnant women.

Study leader Professor Colin Baigent said there had been some debate about whether statins would have the same benefits in people with diabetes as those with heart disease in general.

"People with diabetes are a clearly defined group of people at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

"What we're saying is statins are clearly effective in every type of person with diabetes."

Diabetes UK estimates 60% of all diabetics currently receive statins. That would mean the vast majority of the remaining 40% could also benefit from these drugs, according to the researchers.

However, Douglas Smallwood, chief executive of Diabetes UK, recommended statins for people with diabetes over the age of 40 or diabetics younger than 40 with another risk factor.

"Diabetes UK also strongly recommends that good diabetes management should rely not only on medication, but also on a healthy lifestyle and diet," he added.