At last Strauss showing the class he has:= o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Quote: At last Strauss (England batsman) is showing the class he has.
The person himself and those who read think they understand what is said but they are deluding themselves because what is said is meaningless, is about emotion, stirring emotion and that is without understanding and about stirring blind harmful force.
The person is talking about converting his previous disappointment or dislike (repulsive stirring of his mental force) at Strauss’ cricketing performance to approval, he is impressed or excited or thrilled by Strauss’ latest batting performance.
And what is this class he is talking about? When people speak of class, they are talking of style or how a cricketer deals with a ball or hits a ball. Thus this class he is talking about is Strauss’ style and that is about how he uses force to prolong, change speed, direction and strength when he bats.
Further there is nothing to understand in cricket or batting which is a rote activity in which the batsman is merely rehashing his strokes as faithfully as possible from innumerable past practices. If cricket and all sports is about how a sportsman rehashes his strokes that has a characteristic consistent style that differs from others, it is impossible for anyone to understand cricket, it is only possible for anyone watching to be attracted to what and how a batsman hits the ball.
A PERSON CAN ONLY BE ATTRACTED TO CRICKET, LIKE HOW A BATSMAN HITS THE BALL IN HIS CONSISTENT STYLE THAT DIFFERS FROM OTHERS IN WHICH HE IS MERELY REHASHING ROBOTICALLY, NO ONE CAN UNDERSTAND CRICKET OR CRICKETING ACTIONS.
WHEN THE WRITER IS TALKING ABOUT STRAUSS’ STYLE HE IS TALKING ABOUT HOW STRAUSS USES FORCE TO FABRICATE HIS BATTING STYLE THAT CHARACTERIZES HIS BATTING AND HE IS THEREFORE TALKING ABOUT FORCE THAT HAS NOTHING THAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD BY ANYONE EXCEPT THOSE WHO HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT THE MANIFESTATIONS OF FORCE IS MEANINGFUL.
IN TALKING ABOUT AT LAST, STRAUSS IS SHOWING THE CLASS HE HAS, HE IS AGAIN TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING THAT IS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING, THE CONVERSION OF HIS PREVIOUS DISAPPOINTMENT (DISLIKE) AT STRAUSS’ PERFORMANCE TO HIS NOW DELIGHT OR LIKE FOR STRAUSS’ BATTING.
THUS WHAT WAS SAID WAS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING, HE IS TALKING ABOUT FORCE (DISAPPOINTMENT TO LIKE), FORCE (CLASS IS STYLE IS HOW STRAUSS USES FORCE) AND FORCE (CRICKET IS ALL ABOUT ROBOTIC REHASHING THAT HAS NOTHING TO BE UNDERSTOOD BUT FORCE CHANGES ACCORDING TO PLAN TO BE LIKED OR DISLIKED).
JUST AS HERE PEOPLE THINK THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID BUT THEY DON’T IT MAY BE THAT THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND IN MANY PLACES BUT IS THEIR FALSE NOT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING.
Who is the new chief justice:
TO THE ORDINARY PEOPLE, ZAKI IS JUST ANOTHER APPOINTMENT BUT THE TRUTH MAY BE HE IS AN UNSUITABLE CANDIDATE BASED ON HIS PERSONAL LIFE AND CONNECTIONS WITH BUSINESS AND HE MAY HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY GROOMED AND PUT IN PLACE BY BADAWI TO BECOME CJ ABOVE MORE LEGALLY QUALIFIED CANDIDATES.
Badawi spoke about reform and preached an independent judiciary but in the Attorney General and now the new chief justice, he has put in place puppets who will do his bidding or rubber stamp what he decides.
Therefore Badawi is a hypocrite who does do what he preaches and far from good, he is like a man with an iron fist under a velvet glove dedicated to preserving his own self interest whilst avowing the public interest.
According to the article below (that pours unnecessary emotional scorn) Zaki is an UMNO lawyer who sits on the boards of many UMNO companies and therefore not suitable to be CJ. Privately he secretly married a very young wife in Thailand and soon after divorced her and he burnt the marriage certificate to hide it from his wife.
Zaki was nominated to the bench earlier in preparation for his ultimate appointment as CJ above more senior and eligible judges.
THUS TO THE ORDINARY PEOPLE, ZAKI IS JUST ANOTHER APPOINTMENT BUT THE TRUTH MAY BE HE IS AN UNSUITABLE CANDIDATE BASED ON HIS PERSONAL LIFE AND CONNECTIONS WITH BUSINESS AND HE MAY HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY GROOMED AND PUT IN PLACE BY BADAWI TO BECOME CJ ABOVE MORE LEGALLY QUALIFIED CANDIDATES.
BADAWI MAY BE FAR MORE DECEPTIVE AND EVIL THAN PEOPLE THINK. HE IS NICE BUT NICE IS NOT GOOD BUT CLOAKED EVIL.
If Zaki is morally unfit to serve in Umno’s disciplinary board, how could he be considered morally fit to be a federal court judge, not to mention his lightning elevation to the No.2 position, and anticipated imminent rise to the top job in the judiciary?
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Martin Jalleh
The Palace of Justice has a new “prince” – Zaki Tun Azmi. He was promptly sworn in as Chief Justice (CJ) soon after the Conference of Rulers went through the procedural motions.
His Lordship had leap-frogged from the legal profession into the Federal Court last September. Two months later he was proclaimed Court of Appeal (CoA) president. Now (almost a year later) he is proudly perched on the highest post in the judiciary.
Zaki’s political “parachuting” has no precedent. But be not perturbed. Did not the PM promise (especially after his party had quickened his passage into the sunset) that he would produce profound changes in the judiciary?
Indeed, before he packs his bags and participates fully in Umno's early retirement plan for him, Pak Lak would prove to the whole of Bolehland that he still has the penchant to produce the very opposite of what he initially promises. (There is no need to speak of boleh-land which he copied from others and is therefore a robot and it is intended to be mocking that is never the way to heaven but woe)
In April this year, at a Malaysian Bar Council dinner where he paid tribute to former Lord President Salleh Abas and four former Supreme Court judges all of whom were sacked in 1988 by Dr M, Pak Lah had promised the setting up of a Judicial Appointments Commission to help the PM choose judges.
Pak Lah had also very proudly declared then that such a step was to “renew the people’s trust in the judiciary” and to “make the process of nominating, appointing and promoting judges more transparent and representative”.
In his perfect closing the PM pleaded poignantly, pointedly and so passionately: “Let us move on…The rakyat wants movement and progress, not continuing strife… Let us write this proud and new chapter together!”
5 months later, the PM picked out a Umno lawyer from the Bar, parked him in the Court of Appeal for a while, so as to place him at the pinnacle of the judiciary at the opportune time!
The PM’s preference of the most junior judge in the Federal Court to take the place of the outgoing CJ implied that it was the government’s perception that there were no senior serving Federal Court judges qualified for or worthy of the job.
Many had predicted Zaki’s promotion to CJ. When the latter was made CoA president, Lim Kit Siang (who was then the opposition leader in parliament) called the appointment “a prelude” to Zaki becoming “Umno's Chief Justice”.
Can anyone be more accurate than Raja Petra?: “Imagine having two Umno men at the top of the judicial hierarchy, one as AG and the other as CJ. You will be able to literally get away with murder (as if they are not already getting away with it).”
Zaki was a key player in Umno. He was chairman of the party’s election committee, deputy chairman of its disciplinary board of appeal, party legal advisor, etc. As Umno’s legal man, he was involved with “the party’s myriad scandalous financial misadventures that were bailed out by the government (of Dr M)".
“Apart from acting as Umno’s nominee, Zaki also has held directorship in scores of major companies… Even if he has the superhuman capability to totally severe his umbilical cord to the ruling party and his commercial interests to eliminate conflict of interests, there is still the insurmountable problem of public perception.”
Kim Quek had also questioned Zaki’s “moral integrity arising from his controversial marriage and divorce from his second wife Nor Hayati Yahaya”, who was half his age and whom he married in a ceremony conducted by a kadi from Thailand in a textile shop in Perlis in March 2005.
“They separated three months later. In the messy divorce that ensued, it was revealed that Zaki burned the original marriage certificate to hide the marriage from his first wife. Further, the marriage was ruled by the Syarah court as illegal.
Badawi more like Mugabe than you think:
It is not farfetched to say that Malaysia and Zimbabwee share more in common than people concede.
Mugabe has denied there is a cholera epidemic and instead accused the West of spreading malicious lies about him.
In Malaysia too, everything has been engineered to keep the ruling coalition in power, the AG & Chief Justice are both UMNO cronies and the IGP is reputed to be a crime kingpin himself if not the kingpin.
There is large scale unsustainable plunder of the country’s wealth and resources by the politicians and their cronies at the expense of the nation and because it is unsustainable, a day of reckoning will come and may have come.
BADAWI IS NOT MUGABE BUT HE AND MALAYSIAN POLITICIANS MAY NOT BE THAT FAR BEHIND AS YOU MIGHT FALSELY PERCEIVE.
What you must understand:
If you truly understand what is being said, you must understand that when the person said that ‘at last Strauss is showing the class he has’ he is merely speaking about force that is blind and without meaning and thus what he said is meaningless. He is saying now he likes what he disliked previously (Strauss’ batting performance), when he speaks of Strauss’ class, he is speaking of Strauss’ cricketing style which is all about force, force changes in speed, strength and direction in his strokes, his stances and how he treats the cricket ball with his bat that has nothing to do with reason but is all about force.
Being a good cricketer or any other sport is about being a good robot, you need to practice and practice until you can reproduce shots without thinking, it is about doing something (hitting the ball) according to a plan in your mental jukebox. Thus anyone fascinated (attracted to) with cricket is fascinated with robotics or the blind meaningless rehash of strokes and stances that is meaningless, for show to impress self and others how wonderful or attractively stirring the mental force the strokes and stances are.
BECAUSE PEOPLE NEVER UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY ABOVE, THEY UNDERSTAND THAT CRICKET AND CRICKET CLASS IS MEANINGFUL AND UNDERSTANDABLE, THEY HAVE FALSE UNDERSTANDING WHICH IS WORSE THAN NO UNDERSTANDING FOR IT DECEIVES THE PERSON HE UNDERSTANDS WHEN HE DOES NOT.
Badawi more mad and wicked than you think:
What Badawi said below reflects his advanced madness and wickedness.
How can the Pakatan Rakyat government be blamed for the mishap when it has only been in government recently, the previous BN government was responsible for all the approvals?
Thus Badawi is wicked in ticking off the opposition government over the mishap and he has advanced false logic to think he has a case to castigate the opposition.
FAR FROM GOOD, BADAWI IS A MAN WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT, TALKS NONSENSE, IS UNFAIR OR WICKED IN LOOKING FOR OPPORTUNITIES TO DENIGRATE THE OPPOSITION WHEN THERE IS PLENTY WRONG IN THE BN GOVERNMENT ITSELF.
Don’t blame others for mishaps, Pak Lah tells Selangor govt
JAKARTA: Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has hit out at the Selangor Government for apparently trying to wash its hands of the Bukit Antarabangsa landslide tragedy.
The Prime Minister said the Pakatan Rakyat government should accept responsibility and correct any mistakes or weaknesses which have occurred.
“This is not the way to govern – taking credit only for the good things and blaming others for the mishaps.
“As the new state administration, they should improve on all aspects and take things in their stride,” he told the Malaysian media here when commenting on claims by Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim that a total of 99 risky hillside projects were approved by the previous government.
Abdullah said there was no need for him to teach the present administration how to do their work as they should be fully aware of what was good for the people.
On the Kuala Terengganu by-election, Abdullah said Umno leaders should not be campaigning for themselves but use the time to help the Barisan Nasional candidate.
“We must bear in mind that if our candidate loses, it will affect our party’s image.
“I hope those vying for posts (in the Umno polls) will not use the by-election for personal gains,” he said.
People fondly expect this to be a short sharp crisis and that good times will coming rolling by, hopefully not too long down the road but they may be deluded because this may be a prolonged and severe crisis that may be far worse than they expect.
When you say ‘recovery’ you mean return to the previous state of ‘good health’.
But if the past state was not good health but gross abuse, reckless consumption of other people’s (savers’) money, you cannot recover to the previous state of crass abuse, the money that was previously there has been spent and no longer there and so what recovery are you talking about?
The only entity who has been bailing out mankind all this while is the earth and it has been plundered to the verge of collapse in terms of forestry, fisheries, agriculture (plant and animal farming) and resources (oil) and may not ride to mankind’s rescue this time and it reflects mankind does not understand when it speaks of recovery when there can be no recovery if the previous state is not a healthy productive one but a sick abusive consumptive one.
Return to living WAY beyond your means?
If the previous economic boom was living beyond your means using borrowed money that you cannot possibly return, do you think you are mad to talk of returning to the previous state of living way beyond your means using borrowed money that is now longer there, no longer eagerly extended to you?
IF MANKIND HAS IN RECENT YEARS BEEN LIVING WAY BEYOND ITS MEANS FUELED BY RECKLESS LENDING, CAN YOU HOPE FOR A QUICK RECOVERY TO THE GOOD OLD DAYS OF LIVING WAY BEYOND YOUR MEANS?
IF YOU BELIEVE YOU CANNOT RETURN TO THE DAYS OF LIVING BEYOND YOUR MEANS THEN YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND THERE CAN BE NO RECOVERY.
Daly hurls camera at tree:
It may be just an inanimate camera but there is deadly karma in its abuse and you are conditioning yourself to explosive anger that will end in loss of control and insane anger.
Daly was irritated or angered by this spectator constantly pointing his camera even inches away as he lined up for his shot and things boiled over when he was taking a drop for a bad shot in a bad round that he may blame it on this camera toting spectator, he confiscated the camera and smashed it against a tree. It is a foolish act that incurs serious karma apart from conditioning himself even stronger to anger.
Putting on a show more important than seeing the truth:
Seeing and knowing the truth is totally unnecessary for survival and success in this world but what is far more important is learning how to fake, pretend, put on a show, saying and doing things that pleases, impresses and intimidates others. So long as you copy what others are saying or doing even if you do not understand what you say or do or you falsely understand what they say or do, so long as what you say or do are not too dangerous or out of touch with reality as to endanger you, most of time you will survive to ripe old age although sometimes you may succumb prematurely. You will suffer even to tormenting levels at times stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate, sadness and hurt but you will get along in life, get your share of sensate pleasures, successes and acquisitions.
SEEING AND KNOWING THE TRUTH IS NEVER A REQUISITE FOR SURVIVING IN THIS WORLD ALTHOUGH DICING WITH FALSITY IS RISKING DEATH LIKE PUTTING YOUR HAND ON THE CHOPPER BOARD AND MAKING SURE YOU WITHDRAW BEFORE THE CHOPPER LANDS. WHAT IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT IS THE ABILITY TO FAKE, TO PUT ON A SHOW, TO TELL LIES AND SAY AND DO THINGS DISHONESTLY TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS AND GET WHAT YOU WANT.
YOU NEED A MODICUM OF TRUTH TO SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD BUT YOU CAN APPROACH TRUTH INDIRECTLY THROUGH RULES OR PROGRAMMED REASONING THAT MAY BE COPIED FROM OTHERS.
How to survive and get there:
A computer or robot understands nothing yet a robot car can now be programmed to reach its destination safely most of the time baring some unforeseen circumstance that it has not been programmed to deal with.
In the same way if a human robot has been programmed or immunised sufficiently so that he can cope with most situations he is likely to meet in life (it is impossible for a human robot to be well programmed for everything and so it is there are human robots who are a great success in public or working life but a great failure in personal or family life), then so long as what he says or does is not too virulent or fatally dangerous, by and large he will cope quite well with life and survive to old age barring unforeseen circumstances. His perceptions and beliefs may be false or deluded, his reason or logic similarly faulty or false but so long as he avoid doing or saying silly fatal things it is likely he will survive long in this world.
TOWARDS SURVIVING IN THIS WORLD, A KNOWLEDGE OF AND SPEAKING THE TRUTH WILL MAKE YOU UNPOPULAR AND EVEN ENDANGER YOUR LIFE BUT THE ABILITY TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS WHICH MEANS FALSELY PANDERING TO OTHERS BY FALSELY SAYING AND DOING THINGS THAT ARE NOT INTENDED FOR TRUTH BUT TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT. PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DON’T LIKE TO HEAR AND SEE GENUINE TRUTH, THEY LIKE TO SEE OR HEAR FAKED OR MAKE BELIEVE TRUTH.
JUST AS A ROBOT CAR THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING CAN BE PROGRAMED TO DRIVE ITSELF SAFELY TO ITS DESTINATION A HUMAN ROBOT CAN BE PROGRAMMED BY HIMSELF AND OTHERS TO SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING, WITHOUT SEEING AND KNOWING WHAT IS TRUE AND FALSE.
Rote rules understanding:
Although stylish emotional people would like (attracted) to believe they are made of better stuff, they are not capable of true specific to the occasion total understanding of what is said, done or happening but they are only capable of partial rote (rehashed) rules or instructional understanding. Once they have been programmed by what is said or done to them, they understand, if they have not been successfully programmed by what is said or done to them, they do not understand.
In order to program someone you need a plan and force to ram it into the person. Thus in order to make an emotional man understand, you must have a plan and apply force often repetitively until it ‘sticks’, it is imprinted into his jukebox that he can retrieve and utilize to carry out what he ‘understood’ you wanted.
Thus I may say ‘AasStTWw’ to people who are robots and they will have different incomplete understanding of what I said ‘AasStTWw’.
One person will only understand partially thus: ‘A sS TWw’ and no matter how you try to make him understand, ‘A sS TWw’ is the only way he can understand or perceive what you said whilst another person will always perceive what I said as ‘ asSt Ww’ but never ‘A sS TWw’.
Even if the person perceived the entirety of what I said ‘AasStTWw’ it is tainted because he perceived or understood it as ‘aassttww’ instead of the ‘AasStTWw’ I actually said.
UNLESS SOMETHING SAID OR DONE CAN BE MEMORIZED AND RETRIEVED FROM MEMORY TO BE REAPPLIED IN THE FUTURE, THE STYLISH EMOTIONAL PERSON CANNOT UNDERSTAND, AS SOON AS SOMETHING SAID OR HAPPENED HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY MEMORIZED OR EMBEDDED IN THE PERSON’S MENTAL HARD DISK, HE HAS ‘UNDERSTOOD’ OR BEEN PROGRAMMED.
THE DIFFERENCE IN THE PERSON OF GENUINE UNDERSTANDING IS THAT HE UNDERSTANDS THINGS SAID OR HAPPENING ON EACH OCCASION, HE PAYS ATTENTION AND UNDERSTAND EACH WORD SPOKEN TO HIM AND UNDERSTANDS WHAT ALL THE WORDS SPOKEN TO HIM COLLECTIVELY MEAN AND THUS TRULY UNDERSTANDS HE KNOWS WHAT TO DO OR SO THAT HE COMPOSES BY HIMSELF UNLIKE THE PERSON OF ROTE UNDERSTANDING WHO RETRIEVES WHAT HE UNDERSTOOD OR MEMORIZED TO APPLY OR ACT ACCORDING TO THAT INSTRUCTIONAL UNDERSTANDING TO SAY OR DO SOMETHING ACCORDING TO HIS REHASHED ‘UNDERSTANDING’.
Thus if I tell you there are constant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness in your speech then if you truly understood you will immediately hear the stretching, changing speed and loudness and if you understood what is stretching, changing speed and loudness you will also understand what is not stretching, changing speed and loudness and if you understand what is NOT stretching, changing speed and loudness you will be able to thus speak without stretching, changing speed and loudness, especially it is the KEY to a permanent effortless, free (no need to pay) freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction.
THUS EITHER PEOPLE, EVEN VERY EDUCATED ONES UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY BUT THEY ARE POWERLESS TO STOP THEMSELVES FROM STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS (IN OTHER WORDS THEY ARE SLAVES OR ROBOTS OF MENTAL FORCE) OR THEY DO NOT HEAR THEMSELVES STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS OR THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND BECAUSE NOT HEARING THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND.
Lip stick:
= v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
Lipstick generally serves no function, it is supposed to be attractive, to augment the person’s attractiveness and that is about stirring the observer’s mental force to become attracted or liking.
To befuddled ordinary people, applying lipstick to attract men is meaningful, reason to apply but that is false meaning because it is meant to stir mental force (attraction) that is blind and meaningless.
Because you insist it is meaningful even after I tell you it is meaningless, if what I say is true, you have advanced false perception of what is meaningless is meaningful and the destination of that is mad perception and this never bliss.
No matter how meaningful a girl may insists her application of lipstick, it is meaningless, serves no purpose except to attract, she has to force herself to do so because others do so, because it is a ritual and obsession that compels her to do so Because she is doing something that is meaningless, she will go mad.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO UNDERSTAND THE REASON FOR PUTTING LIPSTICK BUT THEY ALWAYS USE FORCE TO APPLY LIPSTICK ACCORDING TO A PLAN BECAUSE OTHERS ARE DOING IT, BECAUSE THEY WANT TO ATTRACT MEN (STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES ATTRACTIVELY THAT IS ALL ABOUT FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND MEANINGLESS) OR IT IS A RITUAL THAT THEY HAVE BECOME SLAVES OF.
A smile of distrust:
This is not a smile to please or impress others but it is a smile to express reservations or suspiciousness or rejection or doubt.
You need force never genuine reason to be reserved, suspicious or doubt.
If a person sees and understands the nature of the person facing him, the truth or falsity of what is said to him and he is honest, what is there to doubt or be suspicious?
IT IS BECAUSE A PERSON CANNOT SEE WHAT HE IS FACING, CANNOT TELL THE TRUTH OR FALSITY OF WHAT IS SAID OR DONE TO HIM OR HE IS DISHONEST THAT HE HAS TO USE FORCE TO SMILE ACCORDING TO A PLAN THAT HE HAS ACTIVATED SO MANY TIMES BEFORE (THEREFORE HE IS A ROBOT) TO FAKE THAT HE LIKED WHAT HE DID NOT LIKE, DID NOT TRUST.
How can you not understand?
If you can understand, you truly understand, how can you fail to see and therefore understand what you are doing all the time that is the source of all your woes namely stress, restless, distraction, sadness and hurt?
USING FORCE TO PROLONG (EG STRETCH SYLLABLES), CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HAVE PARALLELS IN THOUGHT AND MOTION IS WHAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE DOING ALL THE TIME. THEY HEAR THE EFFECTS OF PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS, LIKE OR DISLIKE IT BUT THEY DO NOT KNOW, DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS MINDLESS, MEANINGLESS FORCE CHANGES THAT THEY ARE HEARING AND APPRECIATING AND HOW THEY ARE THE ONLY INEVITABLE SOURCES OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, SADNESS AND HURT THEY REGULARLY EXPERIENCE OFTEN TO DIFFICULT TO CONTROL LEVELS.
Only a person who cannot hear themselves using force to prolong, change speed and loudness (although they can hear the charming and annoying effects of doing so) and therefore does not understand can do so.
I know people even those I have pointed out many times cannot hear themselves using force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness and therefore not hearing they do not understand and they have no genuine understanding.
No one enjoys stress:
No one, not EVEN THE TOUGHEST MEANEST UNREPENTANT GOAT who from suffer never enjoys stress that can at times be exasperating like a noose around the necks stressed people that keep tightening and threatening to strangle them alive and what they can only do is periodically loosening its grip for it to keep retightening.
AND STRESS IS NOT SOMETHING NATURAL OR MYSTERIOUS BUT IT HAS ONLY ONE CAUSE AND CURE AND IT IS THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. BECAUSE STRESS IS DIFFICULT TO BEAR, DRIVES THE STRESSED PERSON UP THE WALL AT TIMES, IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE GOAT TO SEE THAT HE IS CAUSING HIS OWN STRESS BY USING FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS HE WILL NOT DO SO.
IT IS PRECISELY BECAUSE ALL STRESSED PEOPLE CANNOT SEE AND THEREFORE CANNOT UNDERSTAND HOW THEY ARE CREATING STRESS FOR THEMSELVES AND OTHERS BY CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT THEY DO SO. THUS ANYONE WHO IS REGULARLY STRESSED DOES NOT SEE AND DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, HAS NO GENUINE UNDERSTANDING.
Of what use is your genuine understanding?
Of what use is your genuine understanding, if present, if you cannot see and understand such a simple or fundamental thing like how you are constantly using force to prolong, change speed and loudness that is crucially important because it is the source of the stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and hurt that will kill you and drive you mad?
WHAT IS THE POINT OF ANY GENUINE UNDERSTANDING IN YOU WHEN YOU CANNOT GENUINELY SEE AND UNDERSTAND HOW YOU ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THIS WILL LEAD TO TORMENT AND DEATH? THEREFORE IF A PERSON CANNOT SEE AND UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THERE IS NO POINT IN GENUINE UNDERSTANDING BEING PRESENT IN HIM AND BECAUSE THERE IS NO POINT, IT (GENUINE UNDERSTANDING) DOES NOT EXIST IN STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE.
If a person cannot understand:
If a person after being told cannot see and therefore understand that there is constant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness in his and everybody else’s speech and how these lead to stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and hurt, there is no use having genuine understanding in him, it is impossible that he genuinely understands elsewhere and so he has no genuine specific live understanding only rote rehashed programmed functional understanding.
How phobias and obsessions develop:
Initially you may do something because there is reason to do so but if at the same time you also like or disliked or feared what you did it, in time the reason withers and the like or dislike and fear grows like a cancer to seize you to do it and because force is blind, it is dangerous and irrational.
For instance initially you go to the supermarket because you have a reason or necessity, you need to get some items but if at the same time you also liked shopping at the supermarket (so many times, bright light, so many people, you think it is impressive or chic to shop at the supermarket) or disliked (the chore of going there, finding a parking space, walking around, jostling with crowds, the noise or bustle) or feared it (afraid of meeting people you know and having to socialize) then in time to come the reason for shopping becomes displaced by the emotion (like, dislike, fear) of shopping that is dangerous because force is blind and irrational.
Thus a person who develops a like or obsession for shopping will go for the sake of going, will buy a lot of things on whim that he may not need until it becomes so strong he is addicted and cannot help it and he may waste a lot of his money and time.
A person who disliked shopping would suffer more when shopping because he has to do it grudgingly, dislikingly.
A person who is fearful of shopping because of dread of meeting social contacts may in time develop a phobia for supermarkets that he is ashamed of such that he dares not step into a supermarket or at peak hours.
THUS EVEN IF YOU HAD REASON TO DO A CERTAIN THING IN THE FIRST PLACE IF AT THE SAME TIME YOU ALSO LIKED, DISLIKED OR FEARED DOING IT, IN TIME TO COME THE FORCE OR EMOTION BECOME ASCENDANT AND THE BLIND, DANGEROUS DRIVE FOR THAT ACTIVITY.
ALL EMOTIONAL, STYLISH LIKING AND DISLIKING PEOPLE MUST HAVE CERTAIN OBSESSIONS, PHOBIAS OR THINKS HE HATES TO DO.
NOT ONLY DOES LIKE, DISLIKE AND FEAR REPLACE REASON FOR THE THINGS THEY DO, BECAUSE FORCE IS CONDITIONING AND CAN SPREAD TO OTHER AREAS, IN TIME TO COME, LIKE AND DISLIKE AND FEAR BECOME THE PRIME MOTIVATOR OR ARBITER OF WHAT THEY DO AND THAT IS NEVER A PLEASURE BUT TORMENTING, IS BLIND AND DANGEROUS BECAUSE IT IS NOT BASED ON UNDERSTANDING ANYMORE.
More fraud to come?
Wealthy (greedy) investors wanting to make more money from their money became victims of a fraudster and there may be more such cases to come that will undermine further the feeble confidence or trust in the financial market and so far worse may be yet to come as the can of worms of global high finance is finally opened.
Bernie Madoff's alleged $50bn fraud may be just a foretaste of what's to come
First come the losses and the stupidities committed by bankers working for their own self-interest.
By Rob Cox, breakingviews.com
Last Updated: 5:47PM GMT 12 Dec 2008
Then come the rogue traders, who are unable to 'fess up on market bets gone wrong. The last to arrive is the "bezzle".
That was economist JK Galbraith's word for the outright frauds built up when markets are good. These can be kept hidden for as long as the lies hold up. But the truth will out.
The first big outing in the current financial crisis is an alleged scam that may cost investors as much as $50bn. It was committed, according to a US criminal indictment, by a highly respected member of the financial community, a one-time Nasdaq executive and a legendary trader in New York.
Bernard Madoff is accused of orchestrating a multi-year fraud in which generous returns were manufactured for sophisticated investors. The technique was the usual Ponzi scheme. Old investors were paid off by the new funds lured into to Madoff's art-laden New York headquarters.
Losses of $50bn would probably make Madoff the biggest single fraudster in history. But in fairness, such an accomplishment shouldn't come as a great surprise. In Galbraith's model of a speculative cycle, good times spawn the excess and corruption which eventually bring them to end. The last good times were especially profitable, fertilising the ground for especially large frauds.
But the first frauds to be discovered are usually the not the largest. Madoff's alleged billions could only be a foretaste of what receding markets will eventually expose.
Bernanke’s dangerous logic:
The current Fed Chairman Bernanke is apparently a keen student of depression economics who also examined Japan’s ‘loss decade’ after the bursting of the Nikkei & property bubble of the 1980s.
He perceived that the sudden severance of credit lines was the greatest mistake of the Great Depression and so his antidote is to open the credit floodgates at all cost to keep the economy going and if the governments like the US and UK are full of debts they could use their prerogative to print money, print, print and print until the economy recovers.
This is a dangerous logic & playing with fire because just as it is not right for you and me to sign checks to pay debts when you know you have no money in the bank, surely it is not right for governments who have no money to print money and just because they own the currency printing presses does not give them right to do so which may have unforeseen consequences like undermining and devaluing the currency until it is worthless.
MUCH AS THEY MIGHT LIKE TO MAKE IT, THERE IS NO FINESSE IN BERNANKE’S APPROACH TO THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS. THERE IS A SEVERE CREDIT CRUNCH AND PERCEIVING THE CAUSE OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION AS THE COLLAPSE OF CREDIT, BERNANKE’S PRESCRIPTION IS SIMPLE, PRINT, PRINT AND PRINT UNTIL YOU BEAT BACK THE DEPRESSION.
IF THE PAST WAS A CREDIT ABUSE OF A MEGA SCALE AND YOU HAVE CREATED A BIG HOLE TOO BIG TO COVER, NOTHING YOU CAN DO BY PRINTING WILL REVERSE THE HARM DONE AND ITS PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES.
PRINTING MONEY MAY AMELORIATE THE EFFECTS BUT IT MAY NOT BE MUCH AND TO THINK IT IS A PANACEA MAY BE DELUSION AND THE FOLLY OF THE LOGIC REFLECTS THE QUALITY OF MEN WHO RUN HUMAN AFFAIRS NOT JUST IN POLITICS AND FINANCE BUT EVEN ITS SCIENCES. TIMES MAY BE DESPERATE BUT BERNANKE HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO STUDY HIS ACTIONS, HE HAD BEEN A STUDENT OF DEPRESSION ECONOMICS FOR YEARS.
What printing money can achieve:
In so far as humans are emotional and tend to overshoot in withdrawing credit through fear, the supply of credit by governments will mitigate this effect.
To the extent that the drying up of credit would negatively affect the running of viable businesses the printing of money will also mitigate.
But it will be dangerous for government to spend, embark on construction projects just to provide demand and employment.
If a bulk of the problem is because of abuses of credit and plunder of the system such that a lot of the money savers think they have in banks are irretrievably lost, many have debts that will take them years if ever to repay, then we cannot return to ‘the good old days’ of binging and blind unfettered extension of credit.
IF A LOT OF PAST ECONOMY WAS ABUSIVE CONSUMPTION BASED ON BORROWED MONEY, WE CAN NEVER RETURN TO THAT STATE AND IF NOT RETURNING MEANS A COLLAPSE IN DEMAND, NO AMOUNT OF PRINTING WILL DO MORE THAN CUSHION THE COLLAPSE. TO EXPECT PRINTING TO RETURN THE ECONOMY TO ITS PREVIOUS ‘HEALTH’ IS FOLLY.
IF PRINTING MONEY IS LIKE PAPERING OVER THE CRACKS AND YOU THINK IT IS THE CURE FOR THE FINANCIAL CRISIS YOU HAVE FALSE LOGIC, EVEN PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN INSANITY FOR YOU.
What is the purpose of money?
Why print money and make it hard if not impossible to forge with various security measures?
The purpose of printing money is to provide a very easily portable or mobile universally accepted vehicle of value that anyone in its possession can use to buy or sell goods. Thus the piece of paper represents value and so if you abuse that value by indiscriminately printing money without backing it with assets or your assets remain the same then the worth of your money will be increasingly diminished.
THUS UNLESS YOUR NEW MONEY IS BACKED BY NEW ASSETS YOU SHOULD NOT PRINT MORE MONEY AS THAT WOULD BE CHEATING AND ROBBING VALUE FROM EXISTING HOLDERS OF THAT CURRENCY AND SO IT IS THAT BY PRINTING THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD ARE CHEATING, PULLING A RABBIT OUT OF THE HAT TO DECEIVE THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.
IF YOU ARGUE THAT DESPERATE TIMES REQUIRE DESPERATE MEASURES YOU ARE A FOOL BECAUSE DESPERATE TIMES REQUIRE CALM CLEAR THINKING AND WELL REASONED CALM MEASURES. YOU NEED FORCE NEVER REASON TO PRINT MONEY, ANY FOOL CAN PRINT MONEY IF HE HAS THE PRESSES AND ELECTICITY OR FORCE TO DO SO.
Blues won’t be held to ransom:
Kenyon (Chelsea chief executive): Blues won’t be held to ransom.
He is warning off those who will raise the asking price just because it is rich Chelsea that is interested in a player.
Warning is about force, threatening and that has nothing to do with reason. Thus what is spoken is not based on reason but based on blind force. If it was based on reason it would be that Chelsea will only pay the market rate. There is no warning here, it is merely a statement of intent.
If a player was to come along that Chelsea is covetous for, then it is likely they can be held to ransom, they will pay what it takes to get that player and so what he said may be a lie that Chelsea will not be held to ransom.
Blues is not Chelsea and thus anyone who likes to substitute the proper names with something that they perceive is an equivalent when it is not is courting mad perception that ‘Blues’ means Chelsea.
THUS THE STATEMENT 'BLUES WILL NOT BE HELD TO RANSOM' IS A STATEMENT OF FORCE, A THREAT, NOT A STATEMENT OF TRUTH, IT MAY BE FALSE BECAUSE CHELSEA CAN BE HELD TO RANSOM IF A PLAYER THEY COVET COMES ALONG. ANYONE WHO USES BLUES TO DEPICT CHELSEA IS COURTING MAD PERCEPTION.
A conman:
He was a former Nasdaq chairman and ran the hedge fund that defrauded investors of billions.
Foolish people looking at him may be taken in to perceive he is friendly and trustworthy when it is an act usually with motive to manipulate others.
His friendliness is an act, never genuine and consists of sporting a ready wisp of a smile, being soft spoken even deferential and never showing anger that is always there hidden behind the façade.
Such readiness to smile, soft spoken-ness and deference is rehashed, rendered repeatedly according to plans that are well memorized and well repeated that it is automatic even involuntary, he now cannot help it and he is therefore a mindless robot never a genuine live specific to the occasion person.
PEOPLE WHO APPRECIATE STYLE OR CHARM, ARE TAKEN IN BY HIS EXPRESSIONS AND MANNERS WHEN THEY ARE ALL REHASHED SHOW OR AN ACT USUALLY IF NOT ALWAYS WITH MALICIOUS MOTIVE AND SO THEY ARE TAKEN ABACK WHEN HE BARES HIS FANGS TO CON THEM BUT FOR ONE WHO SEES, HE IS AN ACTOR, A FAKE, HIS GOODNESS IS ACTED NOT GENUINE GOODNESS AND IT IS NOT A SURPRISE HE TURNS OUT TO BE A ROGUE.
Like to receive Email:
There is reason to receive Email and there is like and dislike to receive Email.
There are many who develop an increasingly intense like to receive Emails, they are thrilled to receive mail and become disappointed or disliking if they do not receive any mail.
There are those who hate receiving Email and get annoyed if there is mail arriving in particular from certain individuals they loathe or from companies like HP or Dell or Apple soliciting business.
There is reason to receive Email, you neither like nor dislike receiving emails or emails from particular entities and you treat each email on its merit and that is rational approach to mail.
THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO DISLIKE RECEIVING EMAILS OR RECEIVING EMAILS FROM CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS NOR IS THERE REASON TO LIKE RECEIVING EMAILS. IF YOU DO SO, YOU ARE NOT ONLY STRESSING YOURSELF BY LIKING AND DISLIKING BUT IT IS CONDITIONING SO THAT YOUR LIKING AND DSILIKING FOR EMAIL BECOMES MORE INTENSE AND YOU HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THEM AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR LOSS OF CONTROL AND INSANITY.
LIKING AND DISLIKING IS BLIND AND TRANSFERABLE, WITH INCREASING PRACTICE LIKING AND DISLIKING CAN BE AROUSED TO GREAT INTENSITY AND THIS CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO NEW OBJECTS OR SITUATIONS SUCH THAT THEY TOO AROUSE INTENSE LIKE AND DISLIKE WHERE THEY PREVIOUSLY DID NOT AND THIS PERSON IS ON THE PATH TO MAD LIKE AND DISLIKE.
Bush brushes off shoe attack:
Only force can brush off the shoe attack or dismiss it or play down its significance, genuine reason can never brush off the shoe attack and so you should not brush off or play down anything that happened to you but mindfully realize its full significance or meaning.
Exactly what happened and why the reporter threw the shoe can be known and as Bush, you should understand why or what the true reason is for the reporter to throw the shoe rather than brush it off or give an excuse eg that it is understandable given the frustration in Iraq to the situation the country for which I, Bush am not to blame but it just happens to be so. The actual reason for the throwing may be that there is a lot of hatred for Bush because he is perceived as the cause of so much hardship and death in Iraq.
YOU CAN BRUSH OFF SOMETHING EMBARASSING OR SHAMEFUL BY DENIAL (REFUSING TO ACKNOWLEDGE IT OR FORGET IT), DOWNPLAYING IT OR PROFFERING EXCUSE AND THEY ARE ALL FORMS OF LYING TO SELF AND OTHERS THAT WILL END IN MADNESS FOR THE PERSON. ONLY FORCE CAN DENY OR BRUSH OFF, GENUINE REASON KNOWS SOMETHING HAS HAPPENED. THUS YOU NEED TO USE MENTAL FORCE TO BRUSH OFF OR DENY NOT REALIZING YOU ARE COURTING INSANITY AND CONFLICT.
Hypocrisy & criminality of officials:
When you are a hypocrite, you do not do the things you say you do.
Ministers, officials (eg police, fire dept) make statements of swift investigation and actions whenever something happens when nothing may be done, it is just lip service. They give an impression of competence and diligence when they actually do not know what is going on and even do what is criminal instead.
There is credible allegation by this man who lost his young wife in the recent Ampang landslide that as he frantically dug to reach his wife and had reached her hand, arriving officials just threw him a shovel to help him dig. Apparently the next day this man found police personnel drinking his expensive wine and even had the gall to ask if he still wanted his wine collection. His safety box was broken into and expensive items stolen.
The police officer had the temerity to tick off the press for making unsubstantiated allegations and should have checked with him before publishing.
In the Johore floods a few years back, rescuers arriving in boats demanded bribes to evacuate people and left an old lady to drown because she could not offer a bribe.
FOR ONE WHO SEES, THE DEMEANOR AND WAY THEY SPEAK EXPOSES OFFICIALS AS HYPOCRITES WHO MAKE EMPTY IMPRESSIVE PROMISES OF SWIFT INVESTIGATION AND ACTIONS. WHAT THIS REPORT INDICATES IS THAT THIS IMPRESSION IS NOT JUST TRUE BUT OFFICIALS CAN BE CALLOUS, IGNORE PEOPLE IN TROUBLE AND EVEN LOOT THEIR HOUSES.
How not to brush off shoe attack:
No matter how jovially you try to put it, it is courting future insanity brushing off or dismissing the shoe attack. If you think the incident is funny it is even worse because you think a shoe thrown at you in aggression and insult is fun and that is sick and you will become sick in due course.
THE CORRECT APPROACH IS TO BE FULLY AWARE THE INCIDENT OCCURRED, SOMEONE THREW A SHOE AT YOU IN ANGER AND THEREFORE HE WAS ANGERED BY YOU. YOU MAY CONJECTURE WHY HE SHOULD BE SO ANGRY WITH YOU BUT IT MAY NOT BE WISE TO PRESUME YOUR CONJECTURE MUST BE CORRECT. YOU DO NOT TRY TO FORGET OR BRUSH OFF OR OFFER EXCUSES FOR THE SHOE THROWING BUT YOU MAKE NO EFFORT TO REPRESS OR DWELL ON THE INCIDENT WHEN A SHOE WAS THROWN AT YOU.
IT IS SINFUL WITH KARMA INCURRED TO THROW A SHOE AT ANYONE AND IT IS NEVER GENUINE REASON BUT FORCE OR EMOTION THAT DRIVES THAT. THE PLAN TO THROW SHOES EXISTS IN HIS MIND (MAY NOT EXIST IN OTHERS) AND HE WAS MERELY SUPPLYING FORCE TO ROBOTICALLY THROW THE SHOE. FAR WORSE THAN SHOES WILL BE THROWN AT BUSH AND HIS CABAL OF OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IRAQ MESS (CHENEY, RUMSFELD).
Here we go again:
You hear Badawi lauding the passing of new laws (feather in the cap of the BN government) designed to improve performance in judiciary appointments and combat corruption.
YOU DON’T NEED NEW LAWS TO BE FAIR AND HONEST BUT NO MATTER HOW MANY NEW LAWS YOU ENACT, IF IT IS JUST FOR SHOW YOU WILL ACHIEVE NOTHING.
IF BADAWI BELIEVES IT IS A FEATHER IN THE BN’S CAP WHEN IT IS HOLLOW FOR SHOW SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING, HE IS COURTING MADNESS.
Abdullah: Move a feather in the cap of Barisan Government
KUALA LUMPUR: The passing of the bills to set up the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) will rid any misconception on the integrity of the two institutions.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ab- dullah Ahmad Badawi said the move was a feather in the cap of the Barisan Nasional Government.
“The passing of the two important bills in Parliament to instil confidence in the country’s important institutions is a reflection of the Barisan Government’s strength,” he said.
He said this was because the Government’s efforts to improve the judiciary and the Anti-Corruption Agency through the introduction of new legislation had been successfully implemented without having to make amendments to the Federal Constitution.
The Judicial Appointments Com- mission Bill and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Bill were passed in the Dewan Rakyat after several days of debate.
“But we had taken a good approach in getting the two bills passed although there was talk that this could not be done because the Barisan had less than two-thirds strength in Parliament.
“People were asking how the Barisan could do this without having the needed strength in the House.
“This is because the Government is committed to eradicating corruption.
“The new law will give the ACA stronger capabilities through tougher regulations, while its enforcement personnel will be significantly in- creased.
“God willing, we will prove that we are able to rid the problem of corruption,” Abdullah said at the Parliament lobby in a live interview telecast over TV1 last night.
On the JAC, Abdullah said the new regulation related to the judicial system and the appointment of judges would help to ensure that the appointments would be carried out in an open and fair manner.
“The confidence of the people in the judiciary and the efforts to fight corruption will increase.
“This will give us a better edge in international competitiveness, in which more investors will be attracted to come here because they know corruption cases will be minimised and they are confident with our judicial system too.
“Previously, there was negative perceptions of these two institutions and we aim to eradicate such perceptions,” he added.
Laws cost money:
Laws are not free and it costs money to draft and gazette and even copies made.
Hence if you have a penchant for enacting new laws that are for show, you do not apply the laws or it is not applicable to the ruling elite then you are asking for punishment. Anyone who is a hypocrite suffers because no matter how he insists what he is doing is meaningful, deep inside he knows he is a bull shitter and later there is judgment and punishment by God who sees in secret.
YOU DON'T NEED LAWS TO TELL YOU TO BE FAIR, TRUTHFUL AND GOOD AND IF YOU NEED LAWS TO DO SO, IT IS HYPOCRITICAL, FOR FEAR OF PUNISHMENT RATHER THAN BECAUSE YOU KNOW AND SEE WHAT THE LAW SAYS IS TRUE AND GOOD.
Why Badawi is courting insanity:
If Badawi believed as he said that the passing of the two bills, the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) will rid any misconception on the integrity of the two institutions, thenceforth these two institutions should be accepted with unquestioned impeccable credentials then he must be very naive or mad because just as dictators can tamper with the system now, they can similarly tamper with judicial appointments and the working of the ACA by exerting behind the scenes pressure on those on the committees and so the new laws achieve nothing.
If he himself has doubts about the efficacy of the law then he is lying in going overboard (feather in the BN’s cap) about the passing of the laws.
NO MATTER WHAT LAWS ARE ENACTED AND INDEPENDENT COMMITTEES SET UP TO APPOINT JUDGE AND SUPERVISE THE ACA, IT IS ALL FOR SHOW, CAN BE CIRCUMVENTED BY A DETERMINED DICTATOR.
