Why people have difficulty understand...

Why people have difficulty understanding each other 

It is never ONLY the pure substance or meaning of what is spoken that people understand specifically for the occasion it was spoken but it is the stereotyped combination of style or stereotyped force stretching, changing speed and loudness plus the substance of the words spoken that people hear and recognize (which means it is retrieved or stored in their mental hard disks) that people are reacting to and because each person even within the same culture has a combination of substance and style of each word spoken that differs in terms of pronunciation or how force is used to stretch, change speed and loudness, they have difficulty understanding each other even over simple mundane matters. People often have difficulty understanding each other because different people have different ways or styles of saying exactly the same words and because the styles differ, people struggle to decipher what the other person is saying and the other person may have to say the same thing repetitively with greater emphasized force and force changes before it clicks, the listener says, “Oh!, I see what you mean”. Actually he does not see what you mean but the combination of substance and style of what you said has finally matched the substance and style of what he is programmed to accept in his mind and he deludes himself he understands when he ‘understands’ because there is an equivalent (but not the same as the speaking person’s) program in his head that corresponds to what is said to him and because there exists this program and he can make sense of the instructions or messages of this program, he kids himself he understands when it only ‘rings a bell’, what is said to him activates a program in his head and because this program exists he thinks he understands when understanding is a very different thing. Just because you can carry out the instructions of the program that exists in your head does not mean you understand things. 

Even the English amongst themselves have difficulty ‘understanding’ each other as when a Yorkshire man speaks to a Cockney because the style each speaks differs and that style is all about force and force changes, how a person uses force to prolong syllables, change speed and loudness in a characteristic way that characterizes the Cockney slang or Texas drawl or Aussie slang. 

When an Indian or Chinese or Malaysian who thinks he speaks excellent English goes to Australia, he may find he has difficulty ‘understanding’ Aussies and Aussies have difficulty understanding them and it is only after much adjustments or familiarisation or memorizing (that has nothing to do with understanding but perception and recording to retrieve from mental hard disk) that they establish a working ‘knowledge’ of English as spoken differently by the other race to enable them to communicate. 

In order to read Chinese, there is no substitute to memorizing the particular combinations of brush strokes that constitute each word and in order to develop a working knowledge of Chinese, you must memorize some hundreds or thousands of these different characters. Thus mastering the Chinese language has nothing to do with understanding but it is brute mechanical power of memorizing what each character looks like and what they represent or supposed to be. Even though the English language is built from the alphabets, it is not that different because you still have to memorize the almost infinite combinations of alphabets possible and the assigned meaning for each combination before you can ‘understand’ or have a working knowledge of English. 

THUS THE TRUTH MAY BE THAT IT IS NEVER THE SUBSTANCE ALONE OF WHAT IS SAID THAT PEOPLE UNDERSTAND BUT IT IS THE COMBINATION OF SUBSTANCE AND STYLE THAT THEY ‘UNDERSTAND’ AND BECAUSE STYLE IS JUST A MATTER HOW FORCE IS USED TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, IT IS FORCE AND FORCE CHANGES SIMULTANEOUSLY IN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SPOKEN THAT PEOPLE UNDERSTAND, AND IT IS MORE THE FORCE CHANGES THAN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID THAT IS CRUCIAL OR CARRY MORE WEIGHT.  

BECAUSE EVEN INDIVIDUALS IN THE SAME CULTURE HAS A DIFFERENT WAY OF SAYING SOMETHING OR A WORD, THEY HAVE DIFFICULTY ‘UNDERSTANDING’ EACH OTHER BECAUSE THEY MUST HEAR THE DIFFERING FORCE CHANGES IN WHAT IS SAID TO HIM AND MATCH IT TO HIS MEMORIZED SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF WHAT IS SAID AND IT IS ONLY WHEN THE DIFFERING SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF WHAT IS SAID FINDS A MATCH IN HIS PERSONAL SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF WHAT IS SAID IN HIS MENTAL HARD DISK DOES HE CLICKS OR ‘UNDERSTANDS’. THIS IS NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT MERELY A ‘RINGING OF THE BELL’ OR RECOGNITION OF WHAT IS SAID DEMANDS OF YOU. 

The reason why this is so is because people are not real or live specific to the occasion people who truly understand but they are robots in whatever and how they perceive (see, hear, smell, taste, touch), think, speak and do and robots do not understand but only do as they are told by their programs and in order to do as they are told by their programs they must receive input by others and match it against programs that exists in their minds and it is only when there is a perfect or good match to existing programs do they ‘understand’ or make sense of what you are trying to say to them (in their own ways that differs from others). 

EACH WORD A PERSON ‘UNDERSTANDS’ HAS A FIXED SUBSTANCE & STYLE OF HOW IT IS SPOKEN OR READ THAT THE PERSON HAS RECORDED INTO HIS MENTAL HARD DISK AND IT IS MORE THE CHARACTERISTIC STYLE OR HOW SYLLABLES ARE STRETCHED, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGED THAT HE RESPONDS TO THAN THE SUBSTANCE (WITHOUT FORCE CHANGES) THAT HE IS CONDUCIVE TO. WHENEVER THAT SAME WORD IS SPOKEN IN A DIFFERENT SUBSTANCE AND STYLE BY ANOTHER PERSON, WHAT THE PERSON DOES IS MATCH WHAT HE HEARS WITH WHAT HE HAS MEMORIZED IN HIS HARD DISK AND IF HE MATCHES CORRECTLY THEN HE ‘UNDERSTANDS’ YOU, IF HE MATCHES WRONGLY, THEN HE HAS MISUNDERSTOOD YOU, IF HE CANNOT FIND A MATCH, HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND YOU. 

ONLY IF THERE IS A EQUIVALENT OF WHAT YOU SAID IN THE PERSON’S MENTAL HARD DISK DOES HE ‘UNDERSTANDS’ YOU OR IS ABLE TO MAKE SENSE OF WHAT YOU SAID, IF THERE IS NO EQUIVALENT, HE STRUGGLES, UNDERSTANDS ONLY HESITANTLY OR VAGUELY OR MISUNDERSTANDS YOU. EEVN WHEN HE UNDERSTANDS IT IS NEVER EXACTLY WHAT YOU HAD IN MIND BUT IT IS HIS STYLED INTERPRETATION OF WHAT YOU HAVE IN MIND. 

YOU MAY THINK THE OTHER PERSON UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU WANTED TO SAY BUT HIS UNDERSTANDING MAY BE QUITE DIFFERENT, EVEN WHEN HE APPEARS TO CARRY OUT WHAT YOU INSTRUCTED HIM. 

Even over very simple matters, you often have to say loudly repetitively deliberately before the person who can be quite well educated will ‘understand’ what you are trying to get at because it is the force and force changes accompanying that are far more important in transmitting the message than the substance of what you said, without exaggerating the force stretching, force changing speed and loudness what you said that he is unfamiliar with does not click in his mind. 

WHENEVER PEOPLE SPEAK, THEY ARE ALWAYS SIMULTANEOUSLY TRANSMITTING FORCE CHANGES AS WELL AS THE SYLLABLES OF WHAT THEY SAY THAT CONVEYS MEANING. 

YOU MAY BE DECEIVED IF YOU THINK THE STYLE ACCOMPANYING IS BESIDES THE POINT AND THEY UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF WHAT IS SAID BECAUSE IT MAY BE THAT THE FORCE CHANGES THAT ARE MORE IMPORTANT TO COMMUNICATING WHAT IS SAID THAT THE SYLLABLES OF WHAT IS SAID AND BECAUSE THE FORCE CHANGES OR STYLE OF WHAT IS SPOKEN TO THEM BY OTHERS DIFFER FROM THEIR INDIVIDUAL STYLE RECORDED IN THEIR HARD DISKS, THEY MAY STRUGGLE TO MATCH WHAT IS SAID TO THEM WITH WHAT THEY HAVE RECORDED IN THEIR MINDS. 

Pronunciation is all about force not reason: 

If you think there is reason in pronunciation and how the same word is pronounced differently by different people is meaningful then you have false perception. 

A person’s pronunciation that differs slightly or greatly from others is a matter essentially of how he uses force to stretch his syllables, change speed and loudness within and between syllables that has nothing to do with reason, is meaningless and all about force to be heard and is a form of style. 

THUS WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT PRONUNCIATION YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT STYLE OR HOW FORCE IS USED TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. 

WHEN YOU LIKE A PERSON’S PRONUNCIATION, YOU ARE ATTRACTED TO FORCE AND FORCE CHANGES, YOU FIND WHAT IS MEANINGLESS AND BLIND (FORCE CHANGES) MEANINGFUL AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY. 

Rote understanding: 

There is such a thing call rote or rehashed stale understanding and there is such a thing called genuine or specific to that occasion understanding. 

You hear people describing a situation eg economic condition as ‘like a time bomb’ and this is a form of rote or rehashed understanding comparing the present situation with the situation of a time bomb that will explode in the future. What you are doing is not truly understanding the current situation but comparing it will or recalling a past standardized explanation ‘time bomb’ to explain or understand the situation. 

The person who truly understands the situation does not speak of time bombs but he says what is happening now is setting up for severe trouble later. 

THE DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION ‘TIME BOMB’ IS RECALLED AND CAN BE APPLIED NONSPECIFICALLY ON MANY SITUATIONS, IT IS A ROTE NONSPECIFIC UNDERSTANDING OF A SITUATION COMPARED TO SPECIFICALLY UNDERSTANDING A SITUATION AND SAYING THAT THE SITUATION WILL LEAD TO SERIOUS EVEN DISASTROUS RESULTS LATER THAT IS FRESHLY COMPOSED FOR THAT SITUATION. 

You may convince yourself you understood the situation when you described it as ‘like a time bomb’ but you may have taken snapshots of the situation, searched your mental dictionary of meanings, picked out ‘time bomb’ and plonked it onto the current situation. 

Thus when you say 12x12 is 144 it is rote understanding, you may have worked it out in the past why it is 144 but now you just regurgitated it from memory without genuinely understanding why. 

The era of cheap oil is over: 

It was said many times by many people as oil prices soared ever higher that the era of cheap oil is over and you better get used to paying more. Yet even ‘before the ink is dried’ oil has fallen to levels that make oil producers who overspent on the basis their revenues will be sustained run into serious financial trouble. 

You may shrug your shoulders and say ‘well, I was wrong’ or defiantly insist this fall in prices is just a temporary blip but there is a price in karma that is far more serious than you imagine possible for getting it wrong, for saying things you have no right to say because you did not see or know that the era of cheap oil is over but you were speculating, offering opinions based on prejudices. 

IT IS DANGEROUS TO SAY THINGS YOU DO NOT SEE OR KNOW AS TRUE BECAUSE YOU ARE PRESUMING AND PRESUMPTION ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS A DEFILEMENT OF THE MIND THAT WILL LEAD TO A DEFILED OR MAD MIND. 

Everything is very easy to understand: 

Whatever can happen or has happened can be seen and known and understood without any effort and the fact that people say they need to make an effort to understand, they find certain things difficult to understand reflects they do not understand, cannot understand. Even those things they think they understand may be their misunderstanding, they have explanations or preconceived notions in their minds that are usually if not always false or tainted by style that they can apply to the situation and thus delude themselves they understand. 

Only force and force backed programmed false logic present in the mind of a person (either directly or indirectly as like or dislike) can make something difficult (hard) or impossible to understand, genuine logic always understand something without any effort needed. 

One reason why something is difficult or impossible to understand is because it is false or nonsense (makes no sense) and the fact that people struggle to try to understand what is false or nonsense reflects they have no genuine understanding, do not understand that what they strive to understand is false or nonsense. 

Thus there are two reasons why ordinary people have difficulty understanding or do not understand and it is the ever present force is their minds that distort their perception that renders it impossible for them to truly understand and it is their preconceived notions about many things that are in truth false that makes it impossible for them to understand. 

The more effort or force they exert to try to understand the more they cannot truly understand because true understand requires a mind freed from force, from like or dislike to see things as they are, not as they like or dislike. If you perceive something with like or dislike you have already prejudged and tainted your perception so how can you truly see and therefore truly know and thus understand? 

Further emotional people with strong self identity have many preconceived notions of what things are about or how things should be and they try to fit everything happening into these preconceived notions that are often faulty if not downright deluded. If they can fit what is happening into their preconceived notions they kid themselves that they understood, often things cannot fit those preconceived notions that are faulty or false and that is why they struggle to understand or cannot reconcile what is happening with what they ‘understand’ or preconceive. 

PEOPLE SOMETIMES GET WORKED UP AND SAY THEY FIND CERTAIN THINGS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND NOT REALIZING THEY ARE ADMITTING THEY LACK GENUINE UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE A PERSON WHO HAS GENUINE UNDERSTANDING NEVER FINDS ANYTHING DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND. IF SOMETHING IS TRUE OR CAN HAPPEN, HE UNDERSTANDS IT IMMEDIATELY WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. IF SOMETHING CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD, HE SEES IT AS IT TRULY IS AS FALSE OR NONSENSE OR HE REALIZES HE HAS INSUFFICIENT DATA, DID NOT SEE OR KNOW ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND. 

Apparent styled understanding: 

Apparent means false, what appears to be but isn’t.  

Style means there is a way or method in the understanding that differs from others and is subjective and false. Whatever has style which is all about the different ways in which force is used to stretch, change speed and strength of force is meaningless and false apart from creating stress, restlessness and distraction. 

Very often people don’t understand, even those who are quite sophisticated have difficulty or inability to understand simple things said to them (eg there is constant stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in your speech and they go blank and try to change the subject matter. The reason is because they are rehashing robots and the subject of stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness is not what they are programmed to respond to and without programs telling them what to say or do they are lost, uncomfortable). On the occasions where they ‘understand’ it is a styled apparent (appears to be but is not or deceptive) rather than style free pure genuine understanding. 

In what way is an understanding styled? 

When the understanding is accompanied by an individually different stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness that are manifestations of the use of blind, meaningless force that necessitates it being rehashed rather fresh specific to the occasion, it is styled false understanding. 

People pronounce words differently from each other, even within the same dialect and family, there are discernible differences in how they pronounce words and this reflects their different perception and thus understanding of the same word. Thus the word ‘apple’ may be ‘apple’ to you but it may be ‘epal’, ‘aap-pal’, etc. What is love to you is ‘leerrfff’ or ‘luvvv’ or ‘love!!’ to others and so when you speak of ‘love’ to them it may not click, they scan their hard disks and correctly interpret you mean ‘luvv’ or ‘lerf’. Thus when they understand what you speak ‘love’ they ‘understand’ you mean ‘luv’ in their private lexicon. 

Even the substance of understanding differs significantly; different people understand ‘love’ differently. To one person love may mean care and concern for others that is not necessarily sexual or between male and female, to some it may mean sex or a relationship between male and female, to yet others love is attraction, the stirring of their mental forces attractively at the sight of the opposite sex. Yet others may understand ‘love’ as sex or intercourse, make love means make sex. Yet others understand love as something private or secretive even shameful and emotional between a boy and a girl. 

THUS YOU MAY THINK YOU UNDERSTAND ‘LOVE’ BUT YOUR UNDERSTANDING MAY DIFFER VERY MUCH FROM ANOTHER’S UNDERSTANDING OF LOVE. TO YOU LOVE IS CARE AND CONCERN FOR ANOTHER THAT IS ASEXUAL, TO ANOTHER IT MAY MEAN SEX, ATTRACTION OR LIKING, BOY GIRL RELATIONSHIP OR INTIMACY. 

IN LINE WITH THE CONSTANT PRESENCE OF STYLE IN THEIR PERCEPTIONS, THOUGHTS, SPEECH AND ACTIONS, PEOPLE HAVE A STYLE OR HOW THEY USE FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHEN THEY UNDERSTAND OR PERCEIVE EACH WORD THEY ‘UNDERSTAND’. 

IN ADDITION THE SUBSTANCE OF THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF SOMETHING MAY BE VERY DIFFERENT FROM OTHERS. ‘LOVE’ CAN MEAN A LOT OF VERY DIFFERENT THINGS TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE AND YOU MAY BE KIDDING YOURSELF THAT THE OTHER PERSON UNDERSTANDS WHAT YOU MEAN BY ‘LOVE’ OR WHAT YOU ARE TELLING HIM WHEN HE SMILES AND NODS BECAUSE HIS UNDERSTANDING MAY BE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT YOU HAVE IN MIND, AND YOUR UNDERSTANDING TOO MAY BE FALSE. 

Even a simple statement like ‘Take this there’ is understood in significantly different ways by others. Some will obediently and stiffly carry out the instruction, some will do it as if it is the greatest pleasure on earth whilst yet others will do so grudgingly or nonchalantly. 

Thus to different people, ‘take this there’ may mean ‘take this eagerly, mechanically, reluctantly or nonchalantly there’. 

STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE NEVER TRULY UNDERSTAND.  

THERE IS NO EFFORT OR TECHNIQUE OR SKILL NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND. ALL IT REQUIRES TO TRULY UNDERSTAND IS THAT THE PERSON SEES AND HEARS EVERYTHING CORRECTLY OR TRULY AS IT IS OR HAPPENS. BUT BECAUSE PEOPLE USE FORCE TO SEE, THEY LIKE AND DISLIKE EVERYTHING THEY SEE OR HEAR (THAT MEANS USING FORCE INSTEAD OF REASON AS THE RECEPTIONIST), THERE IS A REHASHED SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF HOW AND WHAT THEY SEE AND HEAR THAT MAKES THEM ROBOTS PROGRAMMED TO SEE CERTAIN THINGS IN CERTAIN WAYS, THEY ARE UNABLE TO SEE ANYTHING CLEARLY AS IT ACTUALLY IS. WITHOUT SEEING THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE, YOU CANNOT TRULY KNOW, WITHOUT TRULY KNOWING YOU CANNOT TRULY UNDERSTAND AND SO IT IS THAT ORDINARY EMOTIONAL PEOPLE CANNOT TRULY UNDERSTAND, WHAT UNDERSTANDING IS APPARENT OR DECEPTIVE STYLED (REHASHED SUBSTANCE AND STYLE) UNDERSTANDING. 

Just as computers and robots never understand anything but if you keep within the confines of what they are programmed to respond, you may be deceive that they have understanding, in the same way, human robots are much more sophisticated and versatile but in common with all robots they have no genuine understanding. 

If you watch a robot car driving itself pass all kinds of obstacles to arrive at its destination you may be deceived it has understanding when it is not so, it is mechanically carrying out what it is programmed to do. 

When you see Asimov the Honda robot apparently dancing to a tune or playing the trumpet or presenting a tray with a drink to someone, you may be deceived it has understanding but it is just going through the motions. 

For instance Asimov may be swaying to the music and its fingers moving over the keys of the trumpet but it is not actually playing and understanding the music or what it is doing, if you stop the music it may keep on playing because it has not been programmed to stop playing when the music stops. 

A human musician may think it is not a robot but he is merely a much higher order of a robot that is endowed with consciousness and feelings that fools him and observers that they have understanding when they don’t. When the musician renders his music with complex simultaneous gyrations of his body, he is actually mindlessly executing his bodily and music playing movements by rote or rehash just like a mechanical robot, sometimes he may stop mid track or change tune or adjust tune midway but that is merely stopping and switching pre-recorded programs in their minds. Because there is consciousness in the musicians and it is experiencing the audiovisual and tactile sensations of his acts and also emotionally stirred he is thinks he has understanding when he is merely experiencing the sensations of what he is robotically executing to a much higher order of sophistry compared to Asimov. 

KEEPING WITHIN THE CONFINES OF WHAT A HUMAN ROBOT IS PROGRAMMED TO RESPOND OR FAKE, AND THE HUMAN ROBOT HAS A MUCH HIGHER LEVEL OF SOPHISTRY THAN ASIMOV OR THE SELF PILOTING CAR, UNDISCERNING OBSERVERS MAY BE FOOLED THAT THE PERSON HAS UNDERSTANDING WHEN THE UNDERSTANDING IS DECEPTIVE STYLED REHASHED FALSE UNDERSTANDING, A COUNTERFEIT TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS TO GET WHAT THE PERSON WANTS OUT OF LIFE EG PLEASURES, POSSESSIONS, POWER. 

YOU MAY THINK YOU UNDERSTAND BUT WHAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IS THERE IS STYLE IN YOUR UNDERSTANDING OR THERE IS USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND IN ADDITION THE SUBSTANCE OF YOUR UNDERSTANDING MAY BE SERIOUSLY FLAWED AND EVEN OUTRIGHT FALSE (YOUR IDEA OR UNDERSTANDING OF 'LOVE' MAY BE VERY DIFFERENT FROM OTHERS AND BE FALSE. THERE IS SUCH A THING CALLED LOVE OR THE BUDDHA CALLED LOVING KINDNESS TO ALL AND IT MAY BE AS I DEFINE IT AS CARE AND CONCERN FOR OTHERS' WELL BEING AND IF YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF LOVE IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT I STATE, YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND). 

The nature of true understanding: 

There may be a lot of things a truly understanding person does not see or know but once it is seen or heard by him, once it is explained to him, he immediately understands because no effort or force is needed to truly understand anything, in fact the intrusion of force or effort (effort requires applying force) makes it impossible for the person to understand. 

Genuine understanding requires seeing or hearing things truly as they actually are and thus knowing one understands and so understanding is non-specific, there is nothing that a genuinely understanding person has difficulty understanding or cannot understand. He understands perfectly everything that is presented to him either as true or false or nonsense. 

False mechanical rote understanding is specific to each situation and whilst there may be analogies in other situations, the understanding is restricted to that particular situation and situations that have similarities to it. 

Thus people say they embark on a course to learn about cars or medicine or engineering to acquire knowledge and understand the subject but that is false programmed understanding that is not convertible to other areas. Just because you ‘can understand’ medicine does not mean you will understand physics or literature or history. What people call their understanding of various subjects or matters is their mechanical memorization of explanations applied to those subjects that may even be outright false or faulty and is not applicable to other areas. They must laboriously rigidly program themselves to understand each and every subject they desire to ‘understand’. 

EVEN THOUGH A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING MAY NOT HAVE SEEN OR KNOWN MANY THINGS, AS SOON AS HE IS EXPOSED TO SOMETHING HE IMMEDIATELY SEES AND UNDERSTANDS THE NATURE OF WHAT HE SEES OR HEARS AND IF SOMETHING IS EXPLAINED TO HIM, HE IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS EXPLAINED TO HIM AS TRUE, FALSE OR NONSENSE. 

IN CONTRAST, MECHANICAL UNDERSTANDING IS NOT INTERCHANGEABLE OR CONVERIBLE, MUST BE LABORIOUSLY AND RIGIDLY PROGRAMMED INTO EACH AREA OR SUBJECT THAT THE PERSON WANTS TO UNDERSTAND AND AFTER HE ‘UNDERSTANDS’ HE MERELY MECHANICALLY RETRIEVE TO SATISFY HIMSELF HE HAS UNDERSTOOD OR TO PRESENT TO OTHERS THAT HE ‘UNDERSTANDS’. 

64. Though all his life a fool associates with a wise man, he no more comprehends the Truth than a spoon tastes the flavor of the soup.  

65. Though only for a moment a discerning person associates with a wise man, quickly he comprehends the Truth, just as the tongue tastes the flavor of the soup.  

The person who is like the spoon is the person who does not understands and there are many of these in this world. 

The person who is like the tongue that immediately tastes the flavour of whatever soup that is presented to him is the person who understands and there are very few in this world but those who understand are universal in the heavenly realms. 

 

Thus even if the truly understanding person does not see himself stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and does not realize it leads to insoluble recurring stress, restlessness and distraction, as soon as he is informed, he sees and understands and puts a stop to it.

How can ordinary people even those who consider themselves very intellectual and good truly understand when they do not see and understand by themselves that there is constant unnecessary stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness of their speech that leads to tormenting stress, restlessness and distraction and even when they are told, they continue to do so?

A person who truly understands knows everything he does and so he should know he is stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and even if he does not know himself, once he is informed, straight away he understands and puts to a stop stretching, changing speed and loudness because it is totally meaningless and leads to torment.

No effort is needed to truly understand: 

No effort or the use of force is ever needed to truly understand. All you require is to see or hear clearly without using force to prolong, change speed and strength and to see or hear without liking (stirring your mental force attractively) or disliking (stirring your mental force repulsively) and thus seeing or hearing effortlessly clearly, you truly KNOW and thus knowing you TRULY UNDERSTAND. 

If you need to make an effort to understand something, you have difficulty understanding something then the resultant understanding is always false. 

Even if something is false or nonsense, the truly understanding person experiences no difficulty in understanding because he understands it as false or nonsense, what is there to be difficult to understand? 

Whenever people have difficulty understanding something, in line with their force driven nature, they summon up force and rake their mental dictionaries for possible rote explanations and in so doing they never truly understand anything because the rising of force is anathema to true understanding, renders it impossible. 

TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS UNIVERSAL, IF YOU CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND ONE THING, YOU CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND ANYTHING.  

FALSE ROTE UNDERSTANDING MUST BE PAINSTAKINGLY FORCEFULLY MEMORIZED TO BE RETRIEVED FOR EACH SITUATION AND THE PERSON HAS DIFFICULTY OR INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THINGS IN OTHER AREAS. WHAT UNDERSTANDING THAT IS NOT REGISTERED IN HIS MENTAL HARD DISK HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND AND HE MAY HIDE HIS INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND OUT OF EMBARRASSMENT. 

Why is Razak so keen to absolve Najib? 

By coming out publicly emphatically that he vouches that Najib does not know Altanturya let alone be connected to killing her, Razak is behaving in a bizarre way that cannot be explained by genuine logic. 

Why should Razak be so concerned as to stand surety for Najib so that if the public believed, Najib will be absolved of all responsibility and therefore fit to be PM? 

THE FOOL HAS CONTORTED LOGIC AND PERCEPTION AND SO HE PERCEIVES HIS ACTION AS MEANINGFUL WHEN IT IS FOOLISH (IF HE IS LYING, HIS HEAD CAN BE SPLIT INTO SEVEN PIECES AND HE CAN END IN HELL), NOT CREDIBLE BECAUSE WHY SHOULD RAZAK BE SO ANXIOUS TO ABSOLVE NAJIB EXCEPT TO CONVINCE THE PUBLIC AS TO NAJIB’S INNOCENCE SO THAT HE CAN BECOME PM? IF THAT IS THE PURPOSE THEN WHAT HE SAYS IS SUSPECT, IS POSSIBLY FALSE. IF ONE SEES HIS PERSON ONE KNOWS HE CANNOT BE TRUSTED, HE IS A LIAR NOT JUST HERE BUT MANY PLACES ELSE. 

OF ALL THE THINGS HE CAN TALK ABOUT REGARDING THE UNSOLVED MURDER OF A WOMAN WHO WAS HIS FORMER LOVER, RAZAK CHOSE REVEAL HIS PRIORITY AS DEFENDING NAJIB. IT IS ALL VERY CONVENIENT BUT MAY BE A CASE OF YOU RUBBED MY BACK NOW I RUB YOUR BACK. 

‘Najib never met Altantuya’ Stop spreading lies, says Razak 

 

KUALA LUMPUR: Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak never met Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu, says Abdul Razak Baginda.  

“I implore all of you and the public to stop spreading lies about the DPM and his wife. I know Datuk Seri Najib and Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor have never met Altantuya,” said Abdul Razak who was acquitted of abetment in Altantuya’s murder. 

“Those who have spread such lies can never produce any authentic evidence because there is none. 

“The truth is the truth and nothing can change the truth,” he told a packed press conference yesterday. 

When asked how he knew Najib was not involved, Najib’s former political analyst smiled, looked at his lawyers and then replied: “I just know.” 

Abdul Razak said he has had no contact with Najib since his release from prison and was more interested in getting his life back on track. 

He also denounced the “lies” that Altantuya was involved in certain deals, such as the submarine deal. 

 “There have been all sorts of stories and insinuations about the link between the deceased and some deals. But everyone is lazy these days and don’t check their facts. 

“The purported deal was signed in June 2002. I first met the deceased in November or December 2004. I fail to see the connection but it went on and on. These are malicious lies,” he added. 

Abdul Razak, who expressed his deepest sympathies to Altantuya’s family for their loss, said he was coming out to tell the truth because “I do not want to turn a blind eye and allow the liars to prevail.” 

“I am caught in the ‘damned-if-you-do-and-damned-if-you-don’t’ situation. But to be indifferent is to be irresponsible,” he said.  

Why Razak is lying: 

“I implore all of you and the public to stop spreading lies about the DPM and his wife. I know Datuk Seri Najib and Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor have never met Altantuya,” said Abdul Razak who was acquitted of abetment in Altantuya’s murder. 

Right or wrong, Razak is entitled to state that in his view, Najib never met Altanturya but he has no right to implore others to stop spreading lies. Why is he so anxious for others to stop spreading lies except that it will hurt his patron Najib? 

IN HIS EAGERNESS TO ABSOLVE HIS PATRON, RAZAK EXPOSES THAT HE IS NOT SPEAKING IMPARTIALLY BUT SPEAKING PARTIALLY PROMOTING NAJIB. IF HE IS PARTIAL TO NAJIB THEN WHAT HE SAID IS LIKELY IF NOT CERTAINLY FALSE. AND IF YOU LOOK AT HIS FACE AND HAVE AN EYE FOR TRUTH, YOU KNOW HE IS NOT A MAN YOU CAN TRUST. 

Razak is foolishly creating serious karma for himself: 

It does not matter whether what Razak says is true or false but he is creating serious karma for himself. 

No matter how many times he or anyone says Najib does not know Altanturya, people cannot see and know it is true and so it is sinful to want others to believe or accept according to a plan what they cannot see or know is true that Najib does not know Altanturya. 

He has a right to say this is what he believes but he has no right to insist others believe him as has happened. 

EVEN IF IT IS TRUE, YOU CANNOT FORCE OTHERS TO BELIEVE WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, IT IS UP TO THEM TO DECIDE AND SO BY ASKING OTHERS TO USE FORCE TO BELIEVE YOU, YOU ARE SINNING, SETTING OTHERS ON THE PATH OF BLIND FAITH THAT WILL END IN TORMENT. 

Through the evidence produced in court and his affidavit, it is likely if not certain Razak at least abetted in the commission of the crime and so his acquittal is a miscarriage of justice and rather than logically concentrating on matters regarding him, he seems overly anxious to tout Najib’s innocence. 

Do you see him using force to prolong? 

 

This is Ballesteros well past his prime before his brain tumour was diagnosed. 

Knowing what you see, do you see he is using force to prolong his gaze and bodily pose according to a plan he has rehashed many times before that has some similarities and differences from others and it is this constant use of force to prolong that will lapse into uncontrollable sadness and even depression from which he must suffer? 

What he is doing is in truth totally unnecessary, only for show freezing (aka using force to prolong according to a plan) his body and gaze in a look to reflect perhaps admiration or anxiety for his shot. 

ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE USING FORCE TO PROLONG ALL THE TIME WITHOUT KNOWING, THEY PROLONG THEIR SYLLABLES, PROLONG UNITS OF THEIR MOTION, PROLONG THEIR GAZES, LINGER ON THE PARK BENCH AS THEY RUMINATE AND IT IS THIS OFTEN UNCONSCIOUS USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG THAT ENDS IN SADNESS AND DEPRESSION. 

Why Razak is lying amended: 

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO COMMIT A WRONG FOR A RIGHT BUT SOMEONE ALWAYS COMMITS A WRONG FOR ANOTHER WRONG. IF YOU THINK IT IS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO COMMIT A WRONG FOR A RIGHT, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA SAID LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. 

Razak committed a wrong in speaking publicly that Najib did not know Altanturya and unrighteously wanting the public to believe what they cannot see is true, Najib did not know Altanturya as true. 

Thus if he committed a wrong, he must have committed it for another wrong, he told a lie that Najib did not know Altanturya, it is impossible he committed a wrong wanting others to believe what they cannot see as true for something true, Najib truly did not know Altanturya. 

IT MAY BE POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO COMMIT A WRONG FOR A RIGHT BUT IF IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO COMMIT A WRONG FOR A RIGHT AND A WRONG IS ALWAYS COMMITTED FOR ANOTHER WRONG, THEN IN WRONGLY WANTING THE PUBLIC TO BELIEVE NAJIB DID NOT KNOW ALTANTURYA, RAZAK MUST HAVE COMMITTED IT FOR ANOTHER WRONG, HE LIED THAT NAJIB DID NOT KNOW ALTANTURYA. 

Razak, a bad tree cannot bear good fruit: 

Jesus said a bad tree can never bear good fruit and you can know a tree by its fruits, which means to say if you agree a fruit is bad, the tree it came from must also be bad. 

Thus in many places including unrighteously wanting others to believe what they can never see as true, Najib did not know Altanturya, Razak is demonstrating that he is a bad tree and according to Jesus, a bad tree can never bear good fruit and therefore his plea to trust him, Najib did not know Altanturya must also be bad fruit, a lie. 

THUS WRONG CAN BE COMMITTED FOR ANOTHER WRONG, A RIGHT CAN BE COMMITTED FOR A WRONG (AS WHEN SOMEONE REPENTS AND DOES THE RIGHT THING) BUT A WRONG CAN NEVER BE COMMITTED FOR A RIGHT, RAZAK’S WRONG IN WANTING THE PUBLIC TO BELIEVE WHAT THEY CAN NEVER SEE AS TRUE IS A WRONG COMMITTED FOR ANOTHER WRONG, THE LIE THAT NAJIB DID NOT KNOW ALTANTURYA. 

There is actually no need for such hysterics, it is unlikely to do any good but will even harm their causes but it reflects the perverse perception and logic of sinful people, their poor judgment, they think what is unnecessary and deleterious to them, rousing the public to believe them by swearing will do good. And such people like Najib and Razak to advise him are going to lead this country; the country is not in safe but dangerous hands. 

Why a bad tree can never bear good fruit: 

All beings have a nature and unless transformed the nature remains the same. As Jesus said, there are sons of light and sons of dark and until you convert yourself from dark to light (very few do), you remain a son of dark and the son of dark has an evil or harmful nature and out of this harmful nature can never come good or good fruit because good fruit is anathema to a bad nature, people of bad nature have an implacable hatred for truth and righteousness, they are tormented and want to hurt others, which never come from reason but an urge that with incessant honing becomes an implacable rapidly automatic urge to harm, deceive, defile and kill others. 

Many may come to the conclusion that Razak is lying but they do it out of suspicion, dislike for Razak and they are never certain of what they decide, they harbour doubt and uncertainty that perhaps this time, just this time Razak may be telling the truth Najib did not know Altanturya. 

Because suspicion, dislike for Razak, prejudice is based on force, is blind, it is force not reason that by guessing or chance made the correct decision for them, in another occasion, their suspicion or dislike may make the wrong decision for them. 

THUS PEOPLE WHO MAY CORRECTLY DECIDE RAZAK IS TELLING A LIE MAY DELUDE THEMSELVES THEY HAVE GENUINE REASON BUT THEY ARE LUCKY, IT IS THEIR FORCE DRIVEN SUSPICION AND DISLIKE THAT BY CHANCE CORRECTLY MADE THE RIGHT DECISION NOT GENUINE REASON AND THEY ARE IN DANGER OF MAKING WRONG DECISIONS IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE THEY LACK GENUINE REASON. 

Name me one person who speaks like me. No pope or Dalai Lama talks like me.  

A stupid man can never be clever: 

Unless the person is faking stupidity (and there are those who feign stupid to manipulate others) a stupid man is stupid in everything he does, cannot help being stupid. If he is clever he is not called stupid and it is precisely because he is stupid that he is called stupid. 

A truly wise man can never be deceived or cheated by anyone if he can be cheated by others he is not wise but a fool. Hence if you can be cheated by others you are a fool, not wise as you may like to think. 

In the same way, an evil man is evil in everything he does, the evil nature is implacable and hates truth and good. The true and good do not hate the bad and evil but the bad and evil always hates, cannot tolerate genuine truth and good and so how can any genuine truth and good come out of a evil man? 

Force will never permit good and truth: 

There are never two masters in the minds of people, it is either force or genuine reason. If a person has genuine reason he will never permit force to dwell in his mind let alone run riot as when people get angry or excited. If a person has no genuine reason it is force that is their masters and force is blind and dangerous or harmful to self or others and no one whose mind is the playground of force can receive genuine truth and goodness and it always serves out falsity, deception and evil and so no good fruit can ever come out of a mind that is dominated by force. Anyone who likes and dislikes, who is emotional, who smiles is a man whose mind is a playground of force and no genuine good can ever come out of it. 

The truly good will not do evil: 

The truly good will not do bad because they see and know all evil is not only suffering to self and the recipient but bonding, it conditions the person to become increasingly involuntarily automatically evil and that is a tormenting state of mind. 

THUS THE TRUE AND GOOD WILL NOT HATE THE EVIL, WILL NOT COMMIT EVIL BECAUSE THEY SEE AND KNOW IT IS SUFFERING AND BONDING, SO NO BAD CAN COME FROM THE TRULY GOOD WHILST THE EVIL WILL HATE THE GOOD AND WHATEVER IS TRUE AND GOOD AND BECAUSE THEY HATE TRUTH AND GOOD HOW CAN ANY TRUTH AND GOOD COME OUT OF THEM? THEY HAVE BURNT THEIR BRIDGES WITH TRUTH AND GOOD, SWORN THEMSELVES AS ENEMIES TO TRUTH AND GOOD, SO HOW CAN ANY GOOD COME OF THEM? HENCE NO GOOD FRUIT CAN EVER COME OUT OF THE EVIL. 

Secretively fearful: 

 

This is an expression of secretive fearfulness. Secretiveness is another word for dishonest and so this is dishonest hidden fearfulness, looking through the corner of his eyes and biting his nails as a sign of tension or worry. 

His expression in face and hand is an expression of the forces roiling his mind, never the reason occupying his mind. 

Thus all expressions are expressions of force, they are activities of the facial muscles that serve no useful work, it is not productive, only for show in this case involuntarily and if you practice what is unnecessary, facial muscles activating for show, you are practicing controlled madness that will end in uncontrolled madness unless you put a stop to it. 

HE IS EXPRESSING HIMSELF INVOLUNTARILY AND TRYING TO HIDE FROM OTHERS AND THAT IS A FORM OF DECEPTION OR LYING. 

THUS SMILE ON, YOU HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH FUTURE MADNESS BECAUSE THE SMILING IS REHASHED (YOU ARE ROBOT HEADING FOR ROBOT FAILURE) AND YOU ARE MAKING YOUR FACIAL MUSCLES DO USELESS WORK (THAT WILL END IN MAD RESTLESSNESS). 

Cholera outbreak strikes Zimbabwee: 

Cholera a germ can strike a person but an outbreak cannot strike a country which is not a being that can be struck down. Similarly an outbreak is not cholera that is a germ that can strike someone. 

The BBC is supposed to be a bastion of proper English but it is debased by the people it indifferently employs. 

SUCH LANGUAGE IS NOT HARMLESS BUT IT REFLECTS AN ARROGANT, AGGRESSIVE DISREGARD OF REALITY THAT WILL END IN INSANITY FOR THAT PERSON AND FORCES OTHERS TO ACCEPT WHAT IS ABSURD AS TRUE. 

 

Finding peace under the waves 

Under the sea, Jasmine Ho finds peace and solace. The 32-year-old brand manager from Kuching, Sarawak, has been an avid scuba diver for the past five years ago, after a friend suggested diving when she was all excited about snorkelling. 

This is delusion because under the waves there lurk danger too, a tsunami can sweep you to death apart from sharks and so to say you find solace under the waves is to mislead others. 

The Buddha said that nowhere in the world will you find peace and solace but with the remainder-less renunciation of all possessions, if you have truly abandoned everything, your mind will be released and for a released mind, anywhere on earth, not just under waves is peace and solace. 

If your mind is troubled nowhere on earth will you find peace and solace, if your mind is untroubled, there is peace and solace even in the most crowded street. 

Full of style not no style: 

 

There is full of false meaningless style in his static poise and he is radiating force, stand offish, quietly arrogant and self adulating in the posture of his seating and facial expression. His leg is crossed away to cut off the person he is facing and you need force to cut others off not reason. 

This is a stylish false man not a man of genuine reason and you trust him at your own risk and you may even pay for it with your life. 

Tkl 

Is democracy set on a course in China? 

It is a ploy in journalism to ask readers questions to attract an answer and thereby draw in the person to read. 

A question requires an answer and thus troubles the person and so you should only ask a question if you do not know the answer and want the other person to answer it. If there are no true answers or the true answer is not essential or trivial then you are practicing controlled madness that will end in uncontrolled madness for you. 

There is no true answer for the question posed, no one can truly know if democracy is set on a course in China, your guess is as bad (not good) as mine because even if a person guessed correctly he was gambling and it cultivates an attitude of guessing, and so this is ALWAYS A FRIVOLOUS FALSE QUESTION. 

Unless you can see as true that democracy is set or is not set on a course in China, there is no true answer for that question and to ask a question where there is no possible true question is to dice with insanity. 

Further it does not matter either way, it is a question of little relevance and there are far more important things to occupy one’s attention and by seeing the essential in the unessential you are heading for insanity. 

 

Vatican forgives Beatles for saying they were bigger than Jesus: 

In order for someone to be forgiven, they must apologize and ask for forgiveness. If the Beatles have not asked for forgiveness then it is absurd or silly to forgive.  

The Beatles’ insolence was not committed against the church but against Jesus and so it may be presumptuous for the church to forgive a wrong against Jesus, not the church. 

The Beatles may be more popular than Jesus: 

You may be presumptuous that Jesus will be offended by the Beatles’ statement that they are more popular or it is false. 

Because the vast majority of human beings are sons of darkness, it is not surprising that the Beatles being sons of darkness themselves will be more popular than Jesus. As Jesus said, the world will love its own kind (goats) but it will hate those who are sheep. Again Jesus said that the world cannot receive the counsellor because it neither sees nor knows him that would imply he will not be popular. 

THIS WORLD HATES GENUINE (AS OPPOSED TO MAKE BELIEVE) TRUTH AND GOODNESS SO HOW CAN A PERSON WHO REPRESENTS GENUINE TRUTH AND GOODNESS BE GENUINELY POPULAR. THERE ARE MANY CHRISTIANS IN THIS WORLD BUT THEY ARE ONLY NOMINALLY CHRISTIANS BECAUSE THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND AND SO JESUS’ POPULARITY AMONGST NON GENUINE CHRISTIANS MAY NOT COUNT FOR MUCH. 

THE BEATLES MADE THE STATEMENT OUT OF CONCEIT AND ARROGANCE, IT WAS COMPLETELY UNCALLED FOR, THEIR PUNISHMENT MAY NOT BE ABOUT SPEAKING SOMETHING FALSE BUT POPULARITY AMONGST SINNERS IS NOT SOMETHING TO GLOAT ABOUT BECAUSE IT IS ACTUALLY A CURSE, A MUTUAL EMBRACE OF TORMENT THAT IS THE PATH TO EVEN ETERNAL PERDITION. 

Yoga haram: 

Yoga like tai chi is a form of rituals and because followers conduct memorized routines of the various exercises, they are robots conditioning themselves to be robots that will end in mad robotic failure. The Buddha said faith in rituals is one of three lower fetters to future woe and so those who practice yoga even yoga meditation and tai chi are headed for woe. 

The Fatwa council banned yoga for the wrong reason because it disliked or hated a Hindu practice not because they understood why it is harmful. Further by issuing a ban, it makes those who obeyed robots who follow the rule blindly just because they are told to do so. 

The stunned look: 

 

She appears agitated, her eyes express being stunned or seized by intense rising force. Her hand is also raised to help ram through what she wants to say. 

She has an expression with her face and body but this is not an expression that is for show to please, impress, intimidate or dominate but it is an expression of the rising resistance in her to what she is about to say (eg mental block by the force of self preservation) and her force of going against self is rising rapidly in speed and strength to ram through what she wants to say with great effort because of self resistance. Such resistance is usually irrational and idiosyncratic, typical of her but not others just as taboos are typical of some but not others. 

THIS IS AN EXPRESSION THAT INDICATES THE EXTRA FORCE NEEDED TO RAM THROUGH SPEECH THAT HAS MUCH RESISTANCE IN HER MIND, IT IS A REFLECTION OF THE RISING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN WHAT SHE IS SAYING AND NO MATTER HOW GOOD YOU MIGHT THINK YOU ARE, IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND CONTROLLED MADNESS (NOT THAT SHE CAN HELP IT) AND AS LONG AS ANYONE SPORT THIS EXPRESSION WHEN SPEAKING HE OR SHE IS SUFFERING FROM SERIOUS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND IS HEADED FOR WOE BECAUSE APART FROM SUFFERING IT IS ALSO CONDITIONING THAT WILL END IN TORMENT. 

A meaningless style of speech: 

"Justin, you have to realise, we live for this. We live for these kinds of crises."

Comment: “You have to realize” is a totally meaningless style of speech and anyone who perceives it as meaningful or is not sure has false perception that will end in mad perception. The purpose of saying it is to condescend or be patronizing. Say you relish these kinds of crisis, don’t speak for others and the person who said it is a deluded man not without consequences and if you trust him you trust a deluded man. 

Popularity is about force not reason: 

When a person wants to be popular, he wants others to be attracted to him, wants others’ mental force to be stirred attractively by his presence and in order to be popular he must court others, must say and do things not because he truly wants to say or do it, but will appear attractive to others, will please and impress others. 

Because wanting to be popular is wanting others to stressfully stir their mental forces attractively at you and this is nothing meaningful but is just a blind stirring of force and you go about being popular by saying and doing things dishonestly to impress and please others, it is all about sin not virtue being popular and you may have perverted perception if you think Jesus or God will be miffed that it is said the Beatles are more popular than Jesus. 

You may be deluded if you think Jesus courts popularity and wants to be more popular than the Beatles or anyone else. He did not come to be popular but with a sword to separate the sheep from the goats.   

IT IS FALSE TO SAY THE BEATLES ARE MORE POPULAR THAN JESUS. THE BEATLES ARE POPULAR AND DESIRE POPULARITY. JESUS IS NOT A CANDIDATE IN THE POPULARITY STAKES AND THEREFORE THERE IS NO MEANINGFUL COMPARISON AND THE FACT THAT PEOPLE GET OFFENDED REFLECTS THEY HAVE A PERVERTED PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS SINFUL, ‘COURTING POPULARITY’ IS EXALTED. AS JESUS SAID, WHAT IS EXALTED BY MEN (POPULARITY) IS AN ABOMINATION IN THE SIGHT OF GOD. IF GOD WANTED TO BE POPULAR HE WOULD SPEAK WITH A BOOMING VOICE FROM THE SKY EVERYDAY AND PERFORM ALL KINDS OF MIRACLES EVERYDAY TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS YOU. 

Armed or equipped with a camera: 

Emotional people have a propensity not just to use excessive unnecessary force in their speech and actions but they also have a propensity to use words that unnecessarily convey force or aggression as when they prefer to say ‘armed with a camera’ instead of the correct, ‘equipped with a camera’ 

Japanese companies ‘slash’ production again reflects that propensity. Japanese companies never slash production; production is not an entity that can be slashed but Japanese companies greatly reduces production. 

Old fashioned? 

Cash or credit? For more Americans, who have already maxed out their credit cards or are just trying to manage their spending better in the tough economy, the answer is increasingly the old-fashioned one. 

It is never an accident but it is intended, the person likes to jazz up whatever he says, beating around the bush what can be said in fewer words. 

There is nothing old or new fashioned about using cash and what has its fashion got to do with the subject at hand that can be said let your yes be yes only thus: Many Americans who have reached their credit card limits or want to manage their spending better have been increasingly reverting to using cash. 

What is said is nice and intended to stir readers’ mental force to like it or like the style with which it was put that is never pleasant but a pain to negotiate in order to surmise what he wanted to say amidst all the background noise.  

Two kinds of understanding: 

Understanding means making sense or comprehending a situation arising or what someone said or did. The importance of truly understanding is that if you failed to understand the truth of what happened or is said, you misunderstood it as something other than it actually was you are at risk of loss and harm even death. 

A person’s understanding of something may be genuine, specific for that occasion or it may be false in which case it is always rehashed, cobbled from pre-existing explanations in that person’s mental hard disk to explain what has happened that may not match any of the explanations stored. 

A person who genuinely understands assesses each situation that arise, every word of what is said or read, understands the meaning of each word individually and what they collectively try to convey and depending on what they collectively convey, he understands what is said or done is false, makes no sense or true. If he has insufficient data, he searches for more data specific to this occasion and if he has insufficient data, he refrains from committing himself. 

A person with false or faked understanding has a repository of explanations that may be vast or small depending on his intellectual ability and this library of explanations may be inaccurate or defective or even totally false or deluded. Whenever something occurs, he reads or sees something that is often if not always in snapshots, never in totality, he immediately automatically greets what he reads or sees with like or dislike that has nothing to do with understanding but is just the attractive or repulsive stirring of his mental force and thus seriously tainted by like and dislike, he never seeks to understand what each word mean and what they collectively mean but collecting those snapshots, he consults his library of explanations and having satisfied he has found one or more matches in his library he assures himself he has understood when he is deceiving himself, he is lazily rehashing old explanations that may be faulty or deluded to explain what is currently happening and thus deceived he understood when he did not, he is at risk of being conned or losing his life. 

For instance the ruled rehashed understanding (that police in NT subscribed to) is that a lone gunman could have killed Falconio, drove his vehicle some km away to dump it but the specific to the occasion understanding is that it is impossible because the lone gunman cannot drive his and the couple’s vehicle at the same time and if he were to dump the vehicle some kilometres away, he would have to dangerously leave his vehicle at the scene and walk back in the pitch darkness, something that does not make sense. 

IT IS A DANGEROUS SELF AND OTHER DECEPTION TO THINK YOU HAVE GENUINELY UNDERSTOOD SOMETHING SAID OR HAPPENING IF YOU HAVE TAKEN SNAPSHOTS ACCOMPANIED BY LIKE AND DISLIKE THAT PREJUDICE YOUR DECISIONS, CONSULTED YOUR MENTAL LIBRARY, FOUND A MATCHING EXPLANATION AND THUS UNDERSTOOD WHAT IS SAID OR HAS HAPPENED. IN MOST SITUATIONS YOU MAY BE ABLE TO GET AWAY WITH IT, IT DOES NOT MATTER CRITICALLY IF YOU DID NOT TRULY UNDERSTOOD, YOU REHASHED YOUR UNDERSTANDING OR YOUR UNDERSTANDING WAS ACTUALLY FALSE BUT THERE WILL BE SITUATIONS WHERE YOU WILL BE FOUND OUT, WHERE YOU MAY EVEN PAY WITH YOUR LIFE FOR YOUR FAKED SELF AND OTHER DECEIVING REHASHED STANDARDIZED UNDERSTANDING. 

There is actually quite a lot of evidence that ordinary people’s understanding is rehashed not genuine case by case understanding. 

Often you can say or explain something fairly simple to people who are even quite intelligent and they fail to understand, you have to say it a few times before they understand for various reasons, eg they are distracted, they have preconceived notions that is a barrier to their understanding. The reason their pre-existing notions are a barrier is because as you talk to him, he is referring to his mental explanations, not examining each word you say and what they collectively mean and because his mental experiences are at variance to what you say and he is deluded his mental references are impeccable, he struggles or cannot understand you. 

Often I have something in mind when I explain it to another person, even a very well educated one and I can see by his reactions that he misunderstood me, I mean one thing and he understood it falsely as another. My explanations are very clear and the reason why they misunderstood is because whenever they are spoken to, they refer to their mental jukebox or ‘big boss’ for explanations and because their explanations do not include the meaning that I am trying to convey, they are befuddled, they can only interpret as best as they can according to the deluded programmed understandings in their mental hard disks. 

ORDINARY PEOPLE, EVEN FAIRLY INTELLIGENT ONES HAVE DIFFICULTY AND ARE EVEN UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY BECAUSE THEY HAVE NEVER HEARD THE THINGS I HAVE SAID TO THEM (AND THEREFORE ARE UNLIKELY TO HAVE FORMED ROTE EXPLANATIONS TO WHAT I SAY) AND UNDERSTANDING WHAT I SAY EG THERE ARE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THEIR SPEECH THAT IS THE CAUSE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION THEY MUST SUFFER INSOLUBLY FROM REQUIRES THEM TO UNDERSTAND EACH WORD OF WHAT I SAY SEPARATELY AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THESE WORDS ALL MEAN COLLECTIVELY AND BECAUSE THEY HAVE NEVER DONE SO BEFORE, THEY ALWAYS LAZILY HEARD IN SNAPSHOTS TO THEM CONSULT THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES FOR HACKNEYED ‘SAME OLD’ EXPLANATIONS, THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY. 

PEOPLE ARE IN TRUTH ROBOTS AND IN ORDER FOR THEM TO UNDERSTAND SOMETHING NEW, THEY MUST BE REPROGRAMMED TO UNDERSTAND THIS NEW THING. WHAT I SPEAK IS NOT SOMETHING YOU CAN REPROGRAM THEM TO UNDERSTAND WHICH WOULD ONLY CHANGE THEM FROM ONE ROBOT TO ANOTHER ROBOT BUT IT REQUIRES THEM TO DROP PROGRAMMED UNDERSTANDING TO DIP THEIR TOES INTO THE WATERS OF REALITY, TO BE FULLY ATTENTIVE TO THE PRESENT MOMENT, UNDERSTAND EACH WORD I SAY AND UNDERSTAND WHAT ALL THE WORDS COLLECTIVELY MEAN. 

I don’t understand you: 

You hear people telling others, “I don’t understand you” and they see nothing wrong, see they are right or true to say that when it signifies they have no genuine understanding. 

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WITH UNDERSTANDING TO SAY “I DON’T UNDERSTAND YOU” BECAUSE WHATEVER IS SAID TO THEM, WHETHER TRUE, FALSE OR NONSENSE, VERY SIMPLE OR COMPLICATED, THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING UNDERSTANDS IT AS IT IS AS TRUE, FALSE OR NONSENSE. 

YOU DON’T HEAR THE BUDDHA SAY, “I DON’T UNDERSTAND YOU” BUT EVERYTHING SAID TO THE BUDDHA IS UNDERSTOOD BY HIM AS TRUE, FALSE OR NONSENSE AND SO ANYONE WHO SAYS “I DON’T UNDERSTAND YOU” IS ADMITTING HE IS A MAN OF NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE IS A REHASHER AND ONE REASON HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IS THAT WHAT YOU SAY DOES NOT MATCH HIS (DELUDED) RECORDINGS IN HIS HARD DISK.  

Condemned to forever reliving the same old meanings: 

If it is true you are lazily rehashing your understanding of things happening then you may delude yourself you are genuinely understanding, you are capable of truly understanding things happening and your understanding of things is marvellous but if it is rehashed you are in truth condemned to forever living again and again the same old meanings. You may add more new meanings or explanations as you grow old but a person who in truth rehashes his explanations or understandings of whatever is happening or said or done to him is condemned forever to relive the same old meanings the same old way and rather than unadulterated pleasure and meaningful, it is meaningless, false and can become tormenting or exasperating like playing the same tape again and again and nothing else. 

Tales of Malaysian fiscal recklessness and plunder 

 

Spending Like Nobody's Business (it is a false statement to mock, “Profligate spending” may be more apt)

 

Posted by admin

Tuesday, 25 November 2008 09:16

By LIM SUE GOAN, Sin Chew Daily  The political atmosphere within the country has somewhat been toned down of late, not so much because the nation is waiting eagerly for the new prime minister to take office next March, but because under the current gloomy economic situation, the government has almost halted the pace for adjustments and rectifications. (There is not much relevance if any to the topic and so she is beating around the bush probably being sarcastic)  And the sad thing is (she is trying to stir sadness which is totally inappropriate), under such gruesome (what is so gruesome about the economic climate?) external economic climate, our leaders have remained largely indifferent to the recent disclosures of some fiscal irregularities. And this is what we call real crisis (it is not an accident politicians are indifferent but they themselves are very much involved in corruption and so it is false to raise emotional consternation in readers) .  Among the unusual incidents is the disclosure of the RM20 million cumulative loss from the tourism ministry's subsidiary Pempena's investments in five companies.  Pempena's former executive chairman Kee Phaik Cheen said she left behind RM50 million for the company between 2004 and 2006. Then why has the company's finance taken such a drastic turn within only two years? What actions has the tourism ministry taken and who should be held responsible? If this is a "human error," then who should be dealt with? By whom have the investment plans been approved? Have the vetting procedures conformed to professional assessment as well as the required proceedings?  In addition, there are ten MPs reported to have spent nearly RM10 million on open house activities last year, or almost a million ringgit for each of them to entertain the voters and the public. Even if the ACA is not going to poke a finger into this incident, the prime minister's department must also launch the necessary investigations.  If no actions have been taken to check such activities, the national coffers will be dried up in a matter of time.  The Opposition has also disclosed that 20 senior government servants draw monthly salaries of RM14,000 each, but are sitting idly in the office waiting for the government to allocate jobs to them! This shows that we have a serious overstaffing problem in the country's public sector.  Besides, the government has also been excessively generous in dishing out subsidies and commissions to GLCs. For example, the government has given Pos Malaysia a commission as much as RM16 million for only a few months of work on the petrol cash rebate programme. No businesses could have come this lucrative!  Meanwhile, Maybank spent 4.3 times higher than the face value in its acquisition of Bank Internasional Indonesia (BII), and the government has not issued any instruction or guideline to control our banks' investments overseas.  These instances once again prove that the government has been grossly imprudent when it comes to managing expenditures. In the end, what is being squandered is the hard earned money of Malaysian taxpayers.  Given the existing global financial crisis, if we allow ourselves to go on with such an indiscreet way of spending taxpayers' money, who else can come to our rescue? (Translated by DOMINIC LOH)

Razak’s telling reply: 

How Did Razak Know?  

QUOTE: It was interesting to observe that when Razak was asked how he knew that Najib never met Altantuya, Razak was stunned and speechless for a moment, before he found his composure to emphatically utter: “I know …. I know”, without explaining how he knew.   

Comment: It may be that in his haste to exonerate Najib, Razak did not do his homework well, did not rehearse his answers to potentially embarrassing questions and when those type of questions surfaced in a public press conference, he was caught with his pants down, without pre-rehearsed robotic answer, robots are helpless and so what he uttered, “I know, I know” is a mad answer. 

The reporter did not want to know if Razak knows but he or she wanted to know ‘how’ or in what ways did Razak know and so Razak’s answer is a flustered inappropriate or mad reply. 

A person who is telling the truth will not be stunned or flustered but will explain that he knows because he knows Najib very well and he never mentioned her, Altanturya never told him she knew Najib or he is with Najib a lot of the time and never saw them together. 

IT IS BECAUSE NAJIB OR ALTANTURYA NEVER TOLD RAZAK SO, RAZAK EVEN KNEW NAJIB KNEW ALTANTURYA AND HE HAS NOT REHEARSED HIS REPLY BEFORE HAND THAT HE IS STUNNED, SPEECHLESS. 

Why Razak was stunned: 

Razak was stunned by a simple question how he knew because he is not mad yet, he know inside Najib knows Altanturya but because he had not entertained the question and prepared an answer for that, in the glare of publicity, he became self conscious he was exposing himself and this caused a rapid rise of intense emotion, of fear he has dropped his pants or panic. 

THEREFORE IT IS LIKELY OR CERTAINLY RAZAK WAS TELLING A LIE.  

Kim Quek who wrote the piece, said it was interesting and then passed on without realizing the actual significance of what happened. He merely moved on commenting: Stacked against this simple answer of “I know, I know” is of course a mountain of facts and events that point to the contrary of Razak’s claim of innocence.  

All lies and evil are according to plans: 

Nobody commits evil or lies spontaneously without plans but all lies and evil deeds or sins are according to plans in which the person only acts as disc jockeys selecting the plan and then supplying power even formidable excessive power to ram it through against self and external resistance. When the plan has been repeatedly carried out with intense force, it can even become automatic; it will activate itself when certain cues are present and the person then becomes a total slave of the plan or lie. 

When caught without a plan in committing an evil or lie the person becomes flustered because he must quickly come up with a plan of what to do or say without which he cannot tell a lie or do evil. 

THUS ALL EVIL AND LIES ARE PREMEDITATED OR ACCORDING TO PLANS IN WHICH THE PERSON IS MERELY ACTING AS DISK JOCKEY AND ROBOT OF THE PLAN, THE PERSON MUST THINK BEFORE TO DECIDE WHAT TO SAY OR DO AND IF HE HAS NOT DONE SO EARLIER AND FACED WITH A PRESSING SITUATION (AS RAZAK WAS) HE BECOMES ALL AT SEA, PANICKY. WITH REPEATED PRACTICE THE PERSON DOES NOT EVEN HAVE TO ACT AS DISK JOCKEY BUT THE PLAN OR LIE OR EVIL WILL AUTOMATICALLY EXECUTE ITSELF. 

THUS ANYONE WHO SAYS ‘HE HAS NO REASON TO LIE’ IS SPEAKING FALSELY BECAUSE LYING NEEDS NO REASON AND IT CAN BECOME MINDLESSLY AUTOMATED NEEDING NO REASON OR MOTIVE. 

You know and don’t know? 

It is impossible for someone to know something and not know the reason why he knows and so the fact that Razak cannot come up straightaway with the answers why or how he knows Najib does not know Altanturya is an indication he is lying. 

If a person knows something is true he will straightaway come up with the reasons why he knows like Altanturya never told him about Najib, Najib never mentioned Altanturya and he has never seen her with him, etc. 

Robots even highly sophisticated or intellectual ones must be told what to do or say either by themselves or others, if there are no plans in their heads telling them what to say or do, they are befuddled and fearful of fabricating extemporaneously or off the cuff what to say or do. 

ROBOTS MUST BE TOLD BY THEMSELVES OR OTHERS WHAT TO DO OR SAY BEFORE HAND BEFORE THEY CAN SAY OR DO IT AND BECAUSE RAZAK HAS NOT TOLD HIMSELF WHAT TO SAY TO THE QUESTION HOW HE KNEW, HE IS DUMBFOUNDED AND THIS INDICATES HE IS LYING. 

Chess is about brute force not understanding: 

If you think chess is about understanding and genius you have false perception that will end in mad perception because chess has nothing to do with understanding but following rules, brute memorizations of viable moves, avoiding fatal moves and brute or force driven raw computing power in which human minds grappling with emotions are inferior to supercomputers.  

Human grandmasters are at a disadvantage playing chess with supercomputers because they are vulnerable to irrational emotions, they get angry or upset if they make a mistake or the supercomputer surprise them with a move whereas the supercomputer only does what it is told efficiently without questions asked or stirring emotions that can lead to crazy moves. The reason why chess masters still beat supercomputers may be because their programming is still not quite perfect. 

Chess is a game that like all games, have rules eg knights move in “L” shaped units, bishops diagonally, castles longitudinally and the queen both ways. You must memorize those rules and work within those rules and that has nothing to do with understanding but just memorizing and retrieving to apply. In order to play well, you must practice and practice obsessively so that you memorize all the possible viable opening, mid and endgame moves and what moves end fatally just as footballers and golfers practice and practice until their shots are second nature. 

Without single minded obsessive study with the purpose of memorizing of games played in the past by self and fellow grandmasters, how they progressed and ended, a chess master cannot be what he is, an expert capable of beating amateurs who have not studied or memorized the possible moves of the game as well as him. 

Similarly solving Rubick’s cube even with eyes closed is about memorization of the only sequence of changes that will solve it. If an expert solver was thrown a random cube whilst blindfolded it is unlikely he can solve it but after initially seeing the cube to mark the starting point, he can close his eyes and reel out even better the only sequence of twists and turns that will result in a solved cube. Thus solving the Rubick cube is not a sign of genius as foolish people without understanding conclude but it is all about rote robotic memorization until it is so slick the person can perform the sequence of twists and turns blind. 

In the same way, mathematical feats like reeling out complex multiplications and the value of ‘pi’ to many decimal places are not acts of great understanding but exceptional feats of raw power, memorization and computing. 

JUST AS HUMANS MISUNDERSTAND THAT CHESS AND SOLVING RUBICK’S CUBE ARE ACTS OF GREAT GENIUS OR UNDERSTANDING WHEN IT REQUIRES NO UNDERSTANDING, MERELY PERCEPTION, MEMORIZATION AND RAW COMPUTING POWER WITHIN THE RULES PRESCRIBED BY CHESS OR THE CUBE, IT IS ALL ABOUT MECHANICAL ROBOTICS, IN THE SAME WAY A LOT OF IF NOT THE ENTIRETY OF MANKIND’S SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ACHIEVEMENTS MAY NOT BE ABOUT GREAT UNDERSTANDING BUT COPYING FROM NATURE (THAT REQUIRES GOOD PERCEPTION, MEMORIZATION AND REHASH TO APPLY TO NEW SITUATIONS). 

Ordinary people from very intelligent to the more stupid are wowed, impressed by feats of solving Rubick’s cube or chess grandmasters and that is not about reason or understanding because being ‘wowed’ or impressed is all about the blind, meaningless stirring of their mental forces to be attracted or like what they see. Do they understand that this is what happens when they are ‘wowed’? 

SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE IS NOT ABOUT SUPERIOR UNDERSTANDING BUT SUPERIOR (BRUTE) MEMORIZATION OF A BIGGER MENTAL LIBRARY OF ‘FACTS’ THAT MAY BE FLAWED EVEN DELUDED, SUPERIOR RETRIEVAL AND APPLICATION OF THOSE ‘FACTS’ TO SITUATIONS AT HAND ACCORDING TO THE TASTES AND DICTATES OF  SOCIETY.  

A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS MUST UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS DOING OR SAYING ALL THE TIME AS TRUE, FALSE OR NONSENSE. EVEN THOSE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE VERY INTELLECTUAL DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THE THINGS THEY SAY ARE FALSE OR MAKE NO SENSE. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WITH GOOD UNDERSTANDING NOT TO UNDERSTAND THERE IS CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITHIN AND BETWEEN STRETCHED SYLLABLES AND THAT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY MUST SUFFER FROM AND IMPART ON ALL WHO HAVE THE MISFORTUNE TO INTERACT WITH THEM. BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS ALL THE TIME AND THEY CANNOT SEE IT EVEN AFTER I POINT IT OUT TO THEM, THEY THINK IT IS NATURAL EVEN BENEFICIAL TO SELF AND OTHERS, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THEY HAVE GENUINE UNDERSTANDING BUT WHAT UNDERSTANDING THEY HAVE IS FALSE, REHASHED RULES OR PROGRAMMED UNDERSTANDING. 

An intelligent person is merely a superior robot: 

An intelligent person is merely a superior robot with a much bigger pool of knowledge stored in his mental hard disk that he can retrieve more aptly and faster to apply to a situation compared to a lesser intelligent person. 

This intelligence has nothing to do with understanding but is all about mechanical force driven good perception (accurate perceiving by sight and sound what is happening in the world) leading to good memorization or recording into one’s mental hard disk, good search and retrieval of the required information to be applied that sophisticated computers are nowadays increasingly able to simulate. 

Even from a very early age, doting proud parents nurture or train consciously and unconsciously their little son to be intelligent often with a carrot and stick approach. Forcing a child to read or study, helping it read is part of the training to be intelligent by acquiring knowledge or database to be stored in its mind. 

You may say that part of intelligence is ‘nature’, the person’s genetic endowment but that has nothing to do with understanding even if genes do play apart, which is not a foregone conclusion that you might assume. If genes do cause intelligence, it is merely programming in this case by your inherited DNA that causes you to be more intelligence and this DNA programming has nothing to do with understanding. 

Without fail, I have seen even the top scientists speak forcefully, emotionally (something that is totally meaningless, unnecessary and lead to stress for themselves and others) and what they say are scattered with inaccuracies and things that are even false or make no sense and yet they do not realize it or understand that what they say are false, emotional or make no sense. 

THUS IF THE TOP SCIENTISTS WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE VERY INTELLIGENT (AT LEAST IN THEIR OWN FIELDS) SPEAK EMOTIONALLY OR FORCEFULLY WITH SUBSTANCE THAT CAN BE PROVEN FALSE OR NONSENSICAL WITHOUT AWARENESS THEY DO SO AND THEY ARE NOT AWARE OR UNDERSTAND THAT THE FORCEFUL WAY THEY SPEAK IS NOT ONLY TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND MEANINGLESS BUT CAUSES AND CONDITIONS THEM INCREASINGLY TO TORMENTING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, HOW IS POSSIBLE THAT TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS A REQUISITE AND COMPONENT OF INTELLIGENCE? 

IF GENUINE UNDERSTANDING IS A REQUISITE OF INTELLIGENCE THEN ALL THE INTELLIGENT ONES ESPECIALLY TOP SCIENTISTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE DOING ALL THE TIME, NAMELY STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITHIN AND BETWEEN STRETCHED SYLLABLES AND HOW THESE ARE THE SOURCES OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS AND HURT THEY MUST ALL SUFFER FROM THAT IS INCREASINGLY CONDITIONING THEM AND WILL END IN UNCONTROLLABLE TORMENT. EVEN IF THEY DID NOT UNDERSTAND BY THEMSELVES THEN SURELY AFTER I HAVE INFORMED THEM THEY SHOULD IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTAND, YET EVEN THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE VERY INTELLIGENT CONTINUE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AS IF THEY CANNOT HELP IT (THEY ARE SLAVES OF STYLE) OR THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND, IT DOES NOT RING A BELL IN THEIR MINDS. 

How come you did not understand? 

If you are very intelligent and genuine understanding is a component of intelligence, how come you do not understand that there is constant forceful stretching of your syllables, changing of speed and loudness within and between your stretched syllables and how these are all meaningless, just for show to impress and please, is driven by blind force that causes insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction apart from sadness and hurt and also conditions you more to them that will end in uncontrollable stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and hurt? 

It may be that understanding about your constant unnecessary use of force to fabricate style is unimportant, is irrelevant, despite not understanding so you nevertheless have great understanding of things and understanding is an important component of intelligence or it may be you are deluded that you can be intelligent and understanding when you don’t understand that the way you are speaking is mad, is constantly using force that harms yourself and others. 

They perceive but don’t understand: 

Ordinary people including the very dumb ones have no difficulty perceiving the different ways people speak and do things, they even admire (are attracted to) or are annoyed by other people’s styles but they do not understand that what they perceiving, liking and disliking is the effects of force prolonging, changing speed and strength. 

Ordinary people can hear the styles in their own speech, they are even attached to, perceive it as wonderful and good but they do not understand that this style of theirs that they so prize is nothing more than how they use force in a stereotyped or rehashed robotic way to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness let alone that they understand it is this style that leads to the insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that they must all suffer from. 

THUS ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE NO DIFFICULTY PERCEIVING THE STYLES PRESENT IN THEIR OWN AND OTHERS’ SPEECH, THEY ARE EVEN ATTRACTED TO AND REPELLED BY STYLES BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT WHAT THEY ARE PERCEIVING IS SIMPLY FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH, HOW THESE ARE MEANINGLESS, JUST FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE WITH THE TERRIBLE MANDATORY PRICE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT INEXORABLY CONDITION THEM FURTHER AND WILL LEAD TO INSANITY. 

It is impossible for a person who truly understands not to understand that this style that is present in the speech of everyone in this world is simply a matter of using force to prolong, change speed and loudness and it is meaningless, for show and leads to conditioning terrible stress, restlessness and distraction. 

Yoga is doing without understanding: 

 

 

 

 

People do yoga without understanding what they do because if they understood, they will realize is just a ritual without meaning material or spiritual and because it is meaningless you are practicing controlled madness that will end in uncontrollable madness. 

What is the purpose of putting yourself in this awkward posture from which you can grievously fall or break some bone? Do you get cooked food or a clean floor that comes with cooking and sweeping? 

It is purposeless, for show to impress others with your prowess and contortions you can achieve, if you cannot perceive the spiritual benefits, you are imagining the spiritual benefits or mistaking the bodily gratifications from a diversion from your worldly woes then you are courting mad perception willing yourself to perceive there are spiritual benefits, yoga will cleanse your soul, etc. 

YOGA IS DOING SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING IT IS SO OR FALSELY UNDERSTANDING THAT IT WILL CLEANSE OR DISCIPLINE YOUR SOUL OR WHATEVER YOU LIKE TO PRECEIVE. 

JUST AS ITS ADHERENTS PRACTICE WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING OR FALSELY UNDERSTANDING WHAT THEY PRACTICE, EVERYWHERE ELSE PEOPLE PERCEIVE (SEE OR HEAR) WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING OR FALSELY UNDERSTANDING WHAT THEY SEE AND HEAR, THEY SAY OR DO WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING OR FALSELY UNDERSTANDING WHAT THEY SAY AND DO. 

FALSE UNDERSTANDING IS AS GOOD OR EVEN WORSE THAN NO UNDERSTANDING AND THEREFORE BEINGS IN THIS WORLD HAVE NO GENUINE UNDERSTANDING. 

What is the meaning of your beautiful smile?
If your elegant smile is rehashed by rote not specifically composed for each occasion, it serves no function, no food is being cooked or floor swept by your facial muscles but it is to impress or please others, don’t you think your perception that it is meaningful and beneficial is false or you are doing something meaningless whenever you smile that will end with your insanity? 

If your smile and that of everyone here is rehashed then you are a robot and will end in mad rote or robotic behaviour or smiling. 

If your smiling serves no useful purpose, it is just for show then you are practicing what is meaningless that will end in madness. 

THUS BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE SMILE TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS, EVEN INTIMIDATE OTHERS, THEY ARE PRACTICING WHAT IS ROBOTIC, MEANINGLESS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THEY ARE DOING SO AND JUST AS THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND HERE, THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND EVERYWHERE ELSE OR WHAT THEY CALL THEIR UNDERSTANDING IS THEIR FALSE PROGRAMMED UNDERSTANDING. 

This too is a ritual: 

 

You do not have to go to a mosque, stand impassively and close your eyes to communicate with God and if what you do is meaningless, rehashed many times before, and you do not achieve any communion with God except in your imagination then you are practicing controlled madness. 

Why it is a ritual: 

 

Practitioners of rituals believe there is efficacy in a certain way of doing things that they copy without understanding from others. 

This man always folds his hands across his abdomen thus when he prays thinking it is the proper way to do so. 

Whenever he prays it is likely he is rehashing what he copied from others how to stand, where to stand, how to look or close the eyes and what verses to rehash. 

Its purpose is to communicate with God or cleanse the soul but if it does not do that then it is false, does not achieve what it is said to achieve. 

This not one of the virtues the Buddha described which are no killing, stealing, lying, gossip or tale bearing, right livelihood, no illicit sex which are the ways to the heavens. 

THE HALLMARKS OF A RITUAL IS THAT IT HAS A STANDARD FORMAT EG FOLD HANDS ACROSS ABDOMEN, CLOSE EYES, SAY CERTAIN VERSES AND IT DOES NOT ACHIEVE THE PURPOSE IT IS INTENDED TO ACHIEVE. 

Chess is simply a game of war: 

Despite all the hype, chess is simply a board game of war between two sides in which the aim is simply to device whatever means there is within the stipulated rules to capture the opposition’s king. 

There is never genuine reason in war, only strategies of attack, destroy as many of the enemy’s set pieces, use diversionary tactics where possible to open up the opponent and then capture his king. 

CHESS IS A GAME OF WAR ON A BOARD. 

THERE IS NOTHING TO UNDERSTAND OR REASON ABOUT WAR. IT IS JUST EXTERMINATE OR BE EXTERMINATED AND TO FIGHT A WAR WHETHER PHYSICALLY OR ON A BOARD, YOU NEED STRATEGIES, DECOYS OR DECEPTIONS, SACRIFICES TO MAKE OPPONENTS FALL INTO A TRAP AND AN ABILITY TO SEE THE OPPONENT’S SET TRAPS AND NOT FALL INTO IT. 

HUMANS WORSHIP CHESS AND MAKE MUCH OF IT WHEN IT IS JUST A GAME OF WAR IN WHICH ANYONE WHO WISHES TO BE PROFICIENT AND GAIN THE EMOTIONAL SATISFACTION OF DEFEATING THEIR OPPONENTS AND BE WORSHIPPED AS THE VICTOR MUST LEARN THE ROPES AND LEARN THEM WELL AND THAT MEANS OBSESSIVE PRACTICING, STUDYING AND MEMORIZING ALL THE POSSIBLE PLOYS AND MOVES. THE SUPERIOR CHESS PLAYER IS THE ONE WHO HAS A SUPERIOR REPERTOIRE OF THE POSSIBLE MOVES IN CHESS, THE ABILITY TO QUICKLY RETRIEVE THE MOST APPROPRIATE MOVE FOR A SITUATION AND REMEMBER THE SEQUENCE OF MOVEMENTS THAT WILL LEAD TO THE CHECKMATE OF THE OPPONENT.