Thursday, April 30, 2009

Neither perceiving nor not perceiving



Neither perceiving nor not perceiving:


The Buddha taught that there is a state of existence that is far superior in terms of bliss than perceiving and not perceiving and it accords the being who can achieve that state even many Ages in bliss.


As to what that state is, you have no idea because you have not experienced it and so you have to take it on faith in the Buddha that the state exists and it is a higher, more blissful state of the mind.


Because the Buddha knows that state and can at will attain that state and you cannot, he is higher than you and because he has taught that when no one else has taught that, he is the highest teacher as far as you are concerned. Because the Buddha said he can encompass in his mind the minds of all beings in existence and he surmise he is the highest, it may be true as he says he is the highest teacher, teacher of men and gods.


Perceiving (the little that his consciousness is attending to) and at the same time not perceiving (the infinitude like what is happening outside the room, in the streets, in the town he is, the country and the whole earth) is what all beings trapped here are doing, what they have never done, have never experienced is what the Buddha described, the state of neither perceiving nor not perceiving.


Because we are not truly separate beings but part of the universal infinitude of consciousness, everything that is happening at the same time is potentially perceivable but the selfish act of perceiving the little that we are greedily attached to and refuse to relinquish means that all else that is happening around that may extend even to the entire cosmos is not perceived. If you did not greedily perceived the little you will also not pay the heavy price of not perceiving the infinitude that is simultaneously happening that is excluded by your narrow perceiving.


Thus a person who has overcome the constraints of perceiving, he also does not ‘not perceive’, a state the Buddha says exist that is unimaginable to beings who only know perceiving the little and simultaneous not perceiving the infinitude that is happening at the same time.


For the little perception of what is on the computer screen in front of you, you must pay the very heavy price of not perceiving what else is in the room, let alone your town, let alone your country, let alone other countries and the world at this same very moment.


Just as people are unaware of the possible state of neither liking nor disliking if their mental forces are neither stirred attractively or repulsively by what is happening, they are unaware of a possible state of existence the Buddha described as higher, neither perceiving nor not perceiving.


IMF: This crisis may be worse than Great Depression:


The IMF said the US is at the epicentre of this crisis just as it was in the Depression, setting the two episodes apart from normal downturns. However, the risks are greater this time. "While the credit boom in the 1920s was largely spec­ific to the US, the boom during 2004-2007 was global, with increased leverage and risk-taking in advanced economies and many emerging economies. Levels of integration are now much higher than during the inter-war period, so US financial shocks have a larger impact," it said.


The IMF said the global financial system is still under acute stress, with output tumbling and inflation falling towards zero in key nations. "The risks of debt deflation have increased," it said.


Pause in 1930s plunge:


According to Krugman there was a pause in the 1930s plunge just like there is a slowdown in decline at the present.


Quote: Even in the Great Depression, things didn’t head straight down. There was a pause in the plunge about a year and a half in — roughly where we are now. But then came a series of bank failures on both sides of the Atlantic, combined with some disastrous policy moves as countries tried to defend the dying gold standard, and the world economy fell off another cliff.


The pace of decline may be slowing down as reported in only 5 out of 12 districts. Future sources of trouble including commercial property distress, credit card and trouble in Japan and Eastern Europe.


 


Krugman’s views about the economy today:


Here are four reasons to be cautious about the economic outlook.


1. Things are still getting worse. Industrial production just hit a 10-year low. Housing starts remain incredibly weak. Foreclosures are surging again.


The most you can say is that there are scattered signs that things are getting worse more slowly. And I do mean scattered: the latest edition of the Beige Book, the Fed’s periodic survey of business conditions, reports that “five of the twelve Districts noted a moderation in the pace of decline.” Whoopee.


2. Some of the good news isn’t convincing. The biggest positive news in recent days has come from banks, which have been announcing surprisingly good earnings. But some of those earnings reports look a little ... funny (suspicious).


Wells Fargo announced its best quarterly earnings ever. But a bank’s reported earnings depend a lot on the amount the bank sets aside to cover expected future losses on its loans. Some analysts expressed considerable doubt about Wells Fargo’s assumptions, as well as other accounting issues.


Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs announced a huge jump in profits from fourth-quarter 2008 to first-quarter 2009. But as analysts quickly noticed, Goldman changed its definition of “quarter”, so that — I kid you not — the month of December, a bad one for the bank, disappeared from this comparison.


Maybe the banks really have swung from deep losses to hefty profits in record time. But skepticism comes naturally in this age of Madoff.


Oh, and for those expecting the Treasury Department’s “stress tests” to make everything clear: the White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs, says that “you will see in a systematic and coordinated way the transparency of determining and showing to all involved some of the results of these stress tests.” No, I don’t know what that means, either.


3. There may be other shoes yet to drop. Even in the Great Depression, things didn’t head straight down. There was, in particular, a pause in the plunge about a year and a half in — roughly where we are now. But then came a series of bank failures on both sides of the Atlantic, combined with some disastrous policy moves as countries tried to defend the dying gold standard, and the world economy fell off another cliff.


Can this happen again? Well, commercial (as opposed to residential) real estate is coming apart at the seams, credit card losses are surging and nobody knows yet just how bad things will get in Japan or Eastern Europe. We probably won’t repeat the disaster of 1931, but it’s far from certain that the worst is over.


4. Even when it’s over, it won’t be over. The 2001 recession officially lasted only eight months, ending in November of that year. But unemployment kept rising for another year and a half. The same thing happened after the 1990-91 recession. And there’s every reason to believe that it will happen this time too. Don’t be surprised if unemployment keeps rising right through 2010. (even after recovery unemployment keep rising so that those unemployed may default on their mortgages)


Why? “V-shaped” recoveries, in which employment comes roaring back, take place only when there’s a lot of pent-up demand. In 1982, for example, housing was crushed by high interest rates, so when the Fed eased up, home sales surged. That’s not what’s going on this time: today, the economy is depressed, loosely speaking, because we ran up too much debt and built too many shopping malls, and nobody is in the mood for a new burst of spending.


Employment will eventually recover — it always does. But it probably won’t happen fast.



thus the Great Ascetic proclaimed.


Jesus healed without seeing & touching:


Without entering the centurion’s house to see and touching the terminally ill slave, Jesus healed him.


If seeing and touching is essential, is a requisite then it would not be possible for Jesus to do that. This suggests that seeing and touching are optional, it is the Father’s will that you shall be healed and it can be done instantly without the intervention of any procedure. As Jesus said, Thy will be done, on earth as in heaven.


Thus Christian copycats are deluded to place much if not complete faith in touching and emotional catharsis in ritualized acts of healing that may not be effective or whatever healing is psychological, make believe.


To one who understands, this is so, healing or bringing back another person back to life has nothing to do with any procedure but it is by the Will of the Father and anyone who thinks Jesus must see the person, there is something special in the touch, you must touch in a certain way to heal is deluded. Because emotional stylish people are robots, they have faith in rituals and they perceive that a ritual must be carried out to heal another person.


Sariputta understood immediately:


Sariputta one of the Buddha’s two deputies (notice the Holy Trinity with the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit) was seeking the truth and one day he saw a monk going about for alms and perceived he had the serene look of one who has found the deathless, followed him and when the time was appropriate, asked him what was the secret of his composure.


The monk said his teacher was the Buddha and when asked to explain the Buddha’s teaching, he said he was new and cannot explain fully.


Sariputta implored him to say a few words and the monk uttered these words upon which immediate understanding arose in Sariputta’s mind:


The Perfect One has told the cause
of causally arisen things
And what brings their cessation, too:
Such is the doctrine taught by the Great Monk


No effort is needed to understand, what is required is an ability to see and thus seeing you understand. People think they see but they see falsely, they see with force, with style (force changes) and substance (see what they like and refuse to see what they disliked) and because they cannot see, they cannot understand.


What the monk is saying is that things are causally arisen, is not without cause arisen and the Buddha has discovered the cause and also what brings an end to the cause.


UNDERSTANDING HAS NOTHING TO DO FORCE WHICH IS IN ANY CASE BLIND AND FAR FROM ASSISTING, THE ENTRY OF FORCE RENDERS TRUE UNDERSTANDING IMPOSSIBLE. THUS NO EFFORT IS EVER NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND, ALL THAT IS REQUIRED IS TO SEE TRULY AND THUS TRULY SEEING TO UNDERSTAND. THUS IF YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING, IT MEANS YOU ARE USING FORCE THAT IS BLIND TO UNDERSTAND AND THAT RENDERS TRUE UNDERSTANDING IMPOSSIBLE. ONLY WHEN FORCE DISAPPEARS FROM THE PICTURE IS UNDERSTANDING POSSIBLE AND BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE UNDER THE GRASP OF FORCE, THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND.


What the Buddha said may sound ho hum to you but it may not be what is said that is ho hum but your inability to understand or false understanding that makes it ho hum.


What he is saying is that there are casually arisen and non-casually arisen things, everything and every being in this world of existence is casually arisen, not without cause and that cause can be known and brought to a halt.


There is another world that is not casually arisen and that is Nibbana, the unchanging from which this world of constant deceptive change ensues and to which a being must return if he is to escape suffering.


Forgive and forget:


Headline of NYT article: Forgive and forget


It sounds nice but it is false and the person who said (in regard to Eliot Spitzer) is guilty of falsity whether she knows or not.


You do not need reason to forget but you use force to forget and forgetting is denying reality, trying to suppress reality. Whilst you should make no effort to wilfully remember, no one should be told to forget because it is distorting reality so that you selectively remember certain things and forget certain things.


IT IS MEANINGLESS AND WRONG TO ASK OTHERS TO FORGET, WHETHER SOMEONE WANTS TO FORGET IS UP TO HIM, NOT FOR YOU TO TELL AND FOR FORGETTING TO BE ACHIEVED, FORCE MUST BE USED TO WILFULLY REFUSE TO REMEMBER SOMETHING AND THAT IS HARMFUL, NEVER GOOD AS IT IS TOUTED TO BE.


IT REFLECTS PEOPLE EVEN THOSE WHO TOUT THEMSELVES AS INTELLECTUALLY SOPHISTICATED DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT, TALK NONSENSE THAT THEY TELL OTHERS TO FORGET. PEOPLE ARE NOT MASTERS OF THEIR FORGETTING, THEY CANNOT FORGET AT WILL AND SO YOUR ADVICE IS FRIVOLOUS AND IF THEY DO TRY TO FORGET AS YOU ADVICE, THEY MUST USE FORCE NEVER GENUINE REASON TO FORCEFULLY FALSELY DRIVE THE MEMORY FROM HIS MIND.


Three types of forgetting:


Jesus said every hair on your head is accounted for and the Buddha says every life you had in every eon can be recollected and so what people call forgetting is an illusion or myth.


It is true you may forget to recall something eg to switch off the lights but that is not something that has happened that you have no memory of but something you failed to do.


In this case, forgetting is something they should have done but they forgot because of distractions on their minds or force stirring in their mind (they were rushing) as a result of which they forgot to do what they should do.


There is another type of forgetting and that is something you knew in the past but has now forgotten eg you remembered the code to your safe but now you have forgotten, cannot recall the number, usually from disuse, lack of use and the fading of the memory that may be temporary (it may return) or permanent, you totally cannot the sequence anymore.


There is yet another type of forgetting in which a person wilfully suppresses memory of some usually traumatic event eg you committed some social faux pas like telling a girl you loved her and she laughed and made fool of you in the eyes of those present and you forcibly, repetitively try to drive that memory out of your mind. No matter how hard, how much force you use to forget such embarrassments, they are never forgotten but will spring up often in unguarded moments or socially inappropriate moments to haunt you.


EVEN IF YOU FORGET THE COMBINATIONS OF YOUR SAFE, IT MAY STILL LURK SOMEWHERE IN THE RECESSES OF YOUR CLUTTERED FORCE ROILED MIND AND NEVER LOST BUT THERE FOREVER IN THE UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS.


FORGETTING TO DO SOMETHING IS NOT TRUE FORGETTING, IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT HAS HAPPENED IN THE PAST THAT YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN BUT SOMETHING YOU SHOULD DO BUT FAILED TO DO AS A RESULT OF DISTRACTIONS OR FORCE STIRRING IN THEIR MINDS.


IF PEOPLE WERE CALM AND CLEAR THINKING, DO NOT PERMIT FORCE TO USE THEIR MINDS AS PLAYGROUNDS BY FASHIONING STYLE AND BEING EMOTIONAL, THEIR FORGETFULNESS MAY BE CONSIDERABLE LESS, THEY WILL REMEMBER FAR MORE THAN THEY NOW DO.


THEN THERE IS THE WILFULLY REFUSAL TO REMEMBER SOMETHING THAT IS EMBARRASSING OR TRAUMATIC AND YOU NEED FORCE TO DO THIS AND IT IS FUTILE BECAUSE THE MORE YOU TRY TO FORGET IT THE MORE IT WILL SPRING BACK TO HOUND YOU AND IT IS NEVER TOTALLY FORGOTTEN. IT IS THIS FORGETTING THAT IS REFERRED TO IN ‘FORGIVE AND FORGET’ WHICH DOES NOT HAVE THE INTENSITY OF DETERMINATION TO FORGET AS IN A TRAUMATIC OR EMBARRASSING EVENT BUT IS THE SAME FALSE ILLUSORY FORGETTING.


Natural & unnatural forgetting:


Forgetting to switch off the lights and forgetting the combinations to your safe is natural, involuntary genuine forgetting, to forget an embarrassing event or what someone did that you know is unnatural, false or contrived forgetting that is never genuine but make believe because no matter how you use force and strive to forget the memory is still there and perversely your use of force to wilfully suppress only engraves the memory more but in a repressed form.


Forgetting is a form of denial:


How can you deny what has happened? By wanting to forget something, you want to deny to yourself what has happened did not happened and that is denial and lying to yourself that will end in insanity.


If you keep trying to forget things, you are conditioning yourself to be good at forgetting that may one day prove even fatal or subject yourself to loss.


Understanding did you understand?


Being an understanding being did you understand that it is fallacious and meaningless advice to tell others to forget like it is meaningless to tell others ‘don’t worry’?


For forgetting to be genuine, it is involuntary.


The act of trying to forget something, wilfully refusing to remember something only serves to recall to mind what you strive to forget and that is self defeating or serves to reinforce the memory you try to forget.


UNLESS YOU DO NOT MEAN WHAT TO SAY TO OTHERS TO FORGET, IT IS FRIVOLOUS FOR SHOW HOLLOW ADVICE, YOU ARE TELLING OTHERS TO DO WHAT IS IMPOSSIBLE, FORGET SOMETHING THEY REMEMBER AND SO RATHER THAN TRUE AND GOOD, YOU ARE CREATING KARMA TELLING OTHERS TO DO SOMETHING THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE, TO ACTIVELY FORGET SOMETHING.


HERE AS IN MORE PLACES THAN THEY REALIZE, THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY READ BUT THEY DO NOT.


Leave it alone, not forget it:


People often speak carelessly, what they meant is not ‘forget it’ but leave it alone or take no action.


For instance, their hub cap has fallen off and they think of retracing the route to find the hubcap but their friends tell him, ‘forget it’.


THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS THUS ‘FORGET IT’ IS SPEAKING CARELESSLY, DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING, HE SHOULD SAY, ‘LEAVE IT ALONE’ OR ‘DO NOT PURSUE IT’ WHICH IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM FORGET IT. IT IS NOT A MATTER OF FORGETTING IT BUT NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT SOMETHING.


Hillsborough will never be forgotten:


This was said in relation to the commemoration of the stadium disaster in which many Liverpool fans lost their lives in the melee.


It is not possible that genuine reason will guide anyone to make such a statement but instead emotion, a proxy of force is the drive behind such a statement that is intended to falsely hype how painful or terrible the occasion is.


Because emotion is the drive behind such statements and force is blind, it is likely if not certain to be false and it is false.


WHATEVER CAN BE FORGOTTEN SHOULD NEVER BE RULED OUT AS NEVER FORGOTTEN. JUST AS YOU CAN FORGET THE COMBINATIONS TO YOUR SAFE FROM DISUSE, YOU CAN FORGET MEMORIES OF THE DISASTER. EVEN AMONGST LIVERPOOL FANS, THERE WILL BE THOSE WHO HAVE FORGOTTEN.


THERE IS NO GENUINE REASON TO MAKE THE PROMISE THAT HILLSBOROUGH WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN, IT IS STIRRED EMOTION THAT MAKES ONE FOOLISHLY MAKE THE VOW THAT IT WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN. WHEN A PERSON BECOMES DEMENTED, HE FORGETS MANY THINGS AND SO IF THE PERSON WHO SPOKE IS OVERTAKEN BY DEMENTIA, HE MAY FORGET, RENDERING HIS VOW ‘NEVER FORGOTTEN’ FALSE.


What has forgetting got to do with rehabilitating someone?


Do you need to forget what someone has done to rehabilitate him, assuming it is possible to do so like you can turn off the light by pressing the switch?


Do you need to forget what Spitzer did, use high class call girls and breaking federal laws to rehabilitate him?


Forgetting in this case is pretence; it is pretending that Spitzer did not do what he did. Whoever advocates pretence, closing one eye to another’s deceit is advocating sin with karma attached.


Because forgetting what someone has done has nothing to do with rehabilitating someone and by implication she perceives it has, she has false perception, false understanding and so she may think she perceives truly but she perceives falsely.


It is likely she is rehashing mindlessly, she has heard others use ‘forgive and forget’, find it attractive, memorized it and recalled it to apply in the current situation unaware what she says is ridiculous, makes no sense.


Impossible I am a copycat:


Because no one speaks like me, it is impossible that what I say is copied, not at least from this world and so I cannot be a robot like the rest in this world whose every word and action have precedents and potentially copied to be rehashed, often without understanding the true meanings of what they say.


Forgetting as an active process:


Forgetting can be passive as when one forgets to switch off the lights or forgets the combinations of one’s safe but there is active forgetting that emotional stylish people indulge in often without awareness.


Because they say and do many things against their own wishes to please, impress, intimidate and dominate others, they have said and done many silly things or things that harm others, they are haunted by many thoughts and memories that stir hurt and shame and these painful thoughts cause them to use force to try to repel or forget and after many cycles, forgetting becomes an active, rehashed rote activity.


FORGETTING CAN BE AN ACTIVE PROCESS IN WHICH THE PERSON STIR EVEN VERY STRONG MENTAL FORCE TO TRY AND EXPEL OR SUPPRESS THOUGHTS OR EVENTS THAT ARE TOO PAINFUL OR EMBARRASSING FOR THE PERSON AND ONE IMPORTANT SIDE EFFECT OF SUCH FORCEFUL FORGETTING IS THAT THE PERSON BECOME QUITE GOOD AT FORGETTING, HE FORGETS MANY THINGS AND THIS CAN POSE DANGERS TO HIM APART FROM DISTORTION HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH REALITY.


Nowadays I do not actively forget because there are few things that I say or do which cause me shame, embarrassment or guilt that I would want to emotionally or violent expel or forget.


EVEN THE PERSON’S FORGETFULNESS, FAILURE TO REMEMBER TO TURN OFF THE LIGHTS AND HIS INABILITY TO REMEMBER THE COMBINATION OF HIS SAFE MAY NOT BE NATURAL BUT THE RESULT OF DISTRACTION, EMOTIONS ROILING HIS MIND AND THE FRUIT OF HIS FECKLESS ACTIVE PRACTICE OF FORGETTING SHAMEFUL OR SILLY THINGS THAT HAPPENED TO HIM.


Why people forget:


The Buddha and Jesus never complained of nor spoke of temporarily or permanently forgetting about things that happened in the past and so, unless they are being deceitful, conveniently omitting admission of the frailties of their memories, it suggests that forgetting is not blameless, is not without cause.


There are various causes of why people forget and they are all blameworthy. It is impossible that a mind that is not a playground of force can forget but it is to be expected that any mind that is a playground of force is forgetful because forgetting has nothing to do with reason but only force can cause a person to forget. Forgetting is a fruit of force.


There can be two sources of forgetfulness, either the registering of an event was faulty or the retrieval of that registered event is temporarily or permanent faulty or failed.


Why might registering an event be faulty or failed?


When people are significantly inebriated by stress, restlessness and distraction or their minds are roiled by strong emotions (eg excitement, anger or agitation), they may fail to register or register events faultily and what has not registered or registered faultily is expected to be not remembered.


The simultaneous substance and style combo in their speech and actions and that of everyone else around them divides their attention and a divided attention is not conducive to full registering of events that happen and thus failing to register they don’t remember.


Ordinary people never view an event in toto, they just take snapshots of whatever is happening whilst their minds are in a private world of make belief, dreaming and scheming. It is to be expected that events only viewed as snapshots instead of in totality will not register properly and is vulnerable to failure to recall.


Why might recall be faulty?


Recall might be faulty because people will or use force to suppress what they viewed for selfish, sinful reasons.


Thus because they are hurt by shameful or harmful things they have said and done and they use even intense force to repel or suppress those thoughts each time they recur and as a result of countless practices, they become good at repelling memories and an important price for that deceit or perversion of reality, selective deletion of reality, is forgetfulness, the inability to recall certain events, either temporarily due to a mental blockage or permanently.


Every time a person tells a lie he must use force to suppress the realization that it is a lie and this is a form of training yourself to forget. Initially you are aware, uncomfortably aware that what you say is not quite true and you use force to keep training yourself to forget it is not true until many cycles later you forget what you said is not quite true.


There are occasions when a person remembers something but he says he has forgotten, he failed to do something but he gives the excuse he forgot. Asked in court about his recall of an incident (as Dr M was asked about his involvement in the VK Lingam affair), he says he does not remember when he remembers. As a result of using force to insist you did not remember when you remembered, you are conditioning yourself to forget and whilst it may have temporary material advantage there is a heavy price in future suffering when you truly cannot remember or your memory is seriously impaired.


The Buddha never became demented, if you watch a person who has become demented, who has forgotten his past, who does not know what Chinese New Year is when previously she used to celebrate eagerly, then you may realize the price for forgetting is heavy even tormenting.


FORGETTING MAY NOT BE NATURAL OR TO BE EXPECTED AS PEOPLE WRONGLY BELIEVE BUT FORGETTING HAS CAUSES AND ONLY FORCE CAN CAUSE A PERSON TO FORGET. FORGETFULNESS IS SUFFERING AND SINFUL AND IS THE RESULT OF SINFUL CONDUCT. THUS ANYONE WHO ADVICES OTHERS TO FORGET IS ADVOCATING SIN AND SUFFERING AND HEAPING KARMA ON HERSELF NOT MERIT. IF YOU TELL OTHERS ‘FORGIVE AND FORGET’ YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT SHE SPEAKS AND HEAPING KARMA ON YOURSELF NOT MERIT. TO FORGET IS TO PERVERT OR SUBVERT REALITY, YOU MUST NOT ACTIVELY FORGET AND IN ANY CASE, FORGETTING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REHABILITATING SOMEONE AND YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION TO THINK IT IS CONNECTED.


To forget is to subvert reality:


If you actively try to forget something eg because it was embarrassing, you are subverting reality and thus subverted, your perception of reality becomes distorted and you are facing future insanity apart from total forgetfulness or amnesia.


ONLY FORCE CAN CAUSE YOU TO FORGET.


IT IS FORCE THAT DIVIDES YOUR ATTENTION, ROILS YOUR MIND WITH EMOTIONS, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IMPAIRS ITS ATTENTION OF AN EVENT AND THENCE FAILURE TO REGISTER.


IT IS FORCE THAT IS USED BY PEOPLE TO REPEL OR SUPPRESS WHATEVER MEMORIES THAT ARE PAINFUL AND TO REFUSE TO SEE OR FORGET WHAT THEY SAY IS NOT QUITE HONEST OR LIES.


Emotional people have many things to forget:


Emotional stylish people who say things dishonestly just to get along or for show to impress, please, intimidate or dominate others have many things to forget or want to forget.


It is not just when intensely arousing memories rouse their mental force to repel or forget but frequently even constantly, the engine of forgetting is idling or waxing and waning as they seek to forget or blot out the many forgettable things they have said and done.


Suppose you celebrate Chinese New Year or Christmas every year and it is an occasion that brings cheer to you. How would you feel if in senility, you totally forget the meaning of Chinese New Year or Christmas, it does not ring a bell in you? This is the ultimate price of forgetfulness that people do not realize they are not occasionally but frequently willing themselves.


FORGETTING IS NOT SOMETHING SOME PEOPLE DO OCCASIONALLY BUT WHAT ALL STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE DO FREQUENTLY IF NOT CONSTANTLY. IT IS NOT JUST ON THE OCCASIONS THAT PAINFUL MEMORIES REAR UP IN THEIR MINDS THAT THEY SUMMON FORCE TO DISPEL OR FORGET BUT FAR MORE FREQUENTLY THEY ARE USING FORCE OFTEN WITHOUT REALIZATION TO SUPPRESS OR FORGET THE MANY ‘FORGETTABLE’ OR DISHONEST THINGS THEY HAVE SAID AND DONE TO PLEASE, IMPRESS AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS.


BY FORGETTING THEY ARE TRYING TO BURY THEIR FACES IN THE SAND LIKE THE PROVERBIAL OSTRICH.


Forgetting is an urge:


Forgetting is an urge in emotional people, a desire to obscure and erase that is driven by force and according to a plan that is rehashed repetitively and so the forgetting person is a robot.


People think nothing of forgetting, think it is wonderful when it is like poison and a cancer that is slowly spreading to consume the fool until total amnesia is the final product and that is never a pleasure but thus amnesic you are not going to heaven but eternal punishment.


Drowning their sorrows:


People often speak of drowning their sorrows eg by drinking heavily until they are drunk.


What are they essentially trying to do by ‘drowning their sorrows’?


They are trying to use chemical things, in this case, alcohol, to drown or forget their sorrows and hereto is an occasion they are unaware that they try to tamper with reality using alcohol or trying to forget which is sinful, futile and dangerous.


People with family problems at home eg nagging wife try to drown their sorrows in hobbies, in work, in the cinema, in holidays and in extreme cases as in a fugue, they forget themselves, go elsewhere to start anew and cannot remember their pasts.


Thus forgetting is not something emotional people do sometimes but frequently often without realization and it is conditioning or addictive because it is an urge that will result in a badly shot up memory.


PEOPLE WONDER WHY IT IS THEY ARE SO FORGETFUL, THEY GET MORE FORGETFUL AS THEY AGE BUT IT IS NO SURPRISE BUT TO BE EXPECTED, BECAUSE FORGETTING IS WHAT THEY FREQUENTLY DO, THEY HAVE DONE MANY FORGETFUL THINGS, PAINFUL THINGS HAVE HAPPENED TO THEM THAT THEY CANNOT RECONCILE AND WANT TO FORGET.


Forgiving is not forgetting:


Foolish people have this false perception that unless you forget an incident, you cannot have totally forgiven the other person, in order to totally forgive another person you must forget what he did. This is false perception and another example of perception they think is true but is false.


And the forgiven person may like you to forget so that he can get chummy with you again and repeat or do worse things to you.


If forgetting is part of forgiving, then why speak of forgetting that is redundant?


You forgive the person but you do not forget but remember what he has done so that unless he has truly reformed, you are wary not to fall to his wiles again.


IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE DROWN THEIR SORROWS, FORCIBLY DRIVE OUT PAINFUL EXPERIENCES FROM THEIR MEMORIES THAT THEY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT THE SAME MISTAKES AGAIN AND AGAIN. A PERSON WHO REMEMBERS CLEARLY THE PAINFUL RESULTS OF HIS SINS (EG THE NEAR FATAL LOSSES HE SUSTAINED GAMBLING) WILL NOT RETURN TO THE GAMBLING TABLE.


THUS REMEMBERING IS MERITORIOUS AND FORGETING IS SINFUL AND FROUGHT WITH FUTURE DANGER.


Downplaying is step to forgetting:


Emotional people have a tendency to up-play or hype things they like and downplay things they dislike or is hurtful or shameful or sad to them.


Downplaying is a form of dismissing and the next step to dismissing and downplaying is forgetting and if you keep forcefully forgetting things you downplay, is it any surprise you are forgetful, your memories become poorer and poorer?


Try to forget and not to remember:


You hear people speak of trying to forget something or try not to remember something. Unless they are mad, they must be speaking of an activity of their minds that is the basis of trying to forget or not remember.


Here they are acknowledging without awareness that they actively use force to erase or banish from memory should a memory arise.


Only force can make a person forget, without exerting mental force you cannot forget and forgetting has nothing to do with genuine reason.


Each time you try to forget or not remember, you are training yourself to forget and people try not to remember or forget far more than they realize and as is the result of such frequently abusing willing not to remember or forgetting they become very good at forgetting not realizing that they are headed for a cliff of insanity of a memory that becomes dishevelled with many blank patches as a result of wilful deletions.


PEOPLE THINK NOTHING OF FORGETING, THINK IT IS GOOD TO FORGET BUT FORGETING IS A FORCE DRIVEN ADDICTION OR URGE THAT IS LIKE A CANCER OR ALCOHOLISM THAT WILL KILL THE PERSON.


THE PERSON WHO FORGETS HAS TO DO MENTAL WORK TO FORGET AND TRY TO REMEMBER. THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT TRY TO FORGET DOES NOT HAVE TO DO MENTAL WORK TO FORGET AND WORK TO STRIVE TO REMEMBER WHAT HE FORGOT.


Forgetting is simply using force to avoid seeing:


Forgetting is simply the wilful use of force to not see, refuse to see what you in truth saw or exists so that as time goes by or repetitive refusal, the person finally cannot see or does see something that happened in the past or exists.


Thus whenever you tell a lie or do something dishonest to please or impress others, in the beginning you will see it is dishonest or lying to say or do it and few people if any enjoying seeing their dishonesty or lying, it is far more comfortable to lie and not see you are lying and in any case, a lie or false act is far more convincing if you act as realistically as possible that it is true and to do that you must will yourself not to see what you say is false, a lie.


THUS THE ULTIMATE ROOT OF FORGETTING IS LYING IN SPEECH AND DEED, ANYONE WHO SPEAKS OR DOES FALSELY FOR SELFISH ENDS, TO PLEASE AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS MUST WILL HIMSELF NOT SEE WHAT HE DID OR SAID IS FALSE BUT INSTEAD WILL HIMSELF TO SEE WHAT HE SAID AND DID IS TRUE IN ORDER TO CONVINCE THE COUNTER PARTY WHAT HE SAID OR DID IS TRUE AND TO MAKE HIS LIE MORE COMFORTABLE.


IT IS THIS WILFUL REFUSAL TO SEE THAT IS BASED ON FORCE AND BECOMES AN URGE THAT CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO OTHER SITUATIONS THAT MATURES TO BECOME FORGETFULNESS, SOMETIMES HE FORGETS THINGS INVOLUNTARILY AS A RESULT OF THIS FORGETING OF HIS DECEIT BEING TRANSFERRED UNDESIRABLY TO OTHER SITUATIONS THAT HE DOES NOT WANT TO FORGET.


FORGETFULNESS IS ESSENTIALLY REFUSAL TO SEE WHAT IS TRUE, WHAT HAS HAPPENED. WHEN PEOPLE TELL A LIE THEY NOT ONLY TELL A LIE BUT THEY REFUSE TO SEE IT IS A LIE AND SLOWLY THEY FORGET IT IS A LIE AND THEY HAVE UNWITTINGLY INITIATED THEMSELVES INTO THE WEB OF FORGETFULNESS THAT DETAINS THEM AND WILL SLOWLY KILL THEM.


If you say or do something that you do not know or see is true, because someone told you to say or do it, because your professor or guru tells you it is true, not because you saw and knew it as true, you have to use force to not see that you did not see or know it is true, but you use force to accept what you heard is true and that too is the route to forgetfulness.


UNLESS YOU SEE AND KNOW SOMETHING SOMEONE TELLS YOU IS TRUE, IF YOU DON’T AND ACCEPT IT OR BELIEVE IT, YOU MUST USE FORCE TO REFUSE TO SEE YOU DID NOT SEE OR KNOW IT AS TRUE AND THAT IS ALSO ANOTHER SOURCE OF FORGETFULNESS.


A LOT OF THE THINGS PEOPLE ACCEPT AS FACTS ARE ACTUALLY BELIEFS, INFORMATION THEY ACCEPTED FROM OTHERS AS TRUE WHEN THEY DID NOT SEE AS TRUE AND NOT ONLY THAT THEY REFUSE TO SEE THAT THEY DID NOT SEE IT AS TRUE AND THAT IS A FORM OF TRAINING THEMSELVES TO FORGET.


MANY PEOPLE HAVE FORGOTTEN (ALSO KNOWN AS REFUSED TO SEE) THAT A LOT OF THINGS THEY HOLD DEAR TO THEIR HEARTS ARE NOT TRUTHS OR FACTS BUT BELIEFS THEY ACCEPTED FROM OTHERS WITHOUT SEEING. THUS REFUSING TO SEE, THEY HAVE CONDITIONED THEMSELVES TO FORGET THAT CAN SPREAD LIKE A CANCER TO PERMEATE OTHER AREAS.


LYING IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF FORGETFULNESS:


EVERY TIME A PERSON TELLS A LIE, NO MATTER HOW HARDCORE A LIAR HE IS, HE MUST REFUSE TO SEE WHAT HE SAID IS A LIE OTHERWISE OTHERS CAN SEE HE SEES HE IS LYING THROUGH HIS NERVOUSNESS/FIDGETTING OR DARTING EYES AND HE MUST REFUSE TO SEE IT IS A LIE TO FACILITATE HIS DELIVERY OR MAKE IT MORE CONVINCING.


WHEN YOU DO SOMETHING, TELL A LIE IN THIS CASE AND REFUSE TO SEE IT IS A LIE YOU ARE USING FORCE TO NOT SEE WHAT YOU SAW AND THAT IS FORGETING AND SO EACH TIME A PERSON TELLS A LIE OR PERPETUATE A FALSITY NOT JUST IN SPEECH BUT ACTION, HE MUST CONDITION HIMSELF NOT TO SEE AND THAT IS FORGETFULNESS.


FORGETFULNESS IS THE INEVITABLE RESULT OF LYING AND BECAUSE PEOPLE CANNOT STOP TELLING LIES, THEY NEED TO TELL LIES TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS AND OBTAIN UNRIGHTEOUS GAINS, THEY MUST SUBJECT THEMSELVES TO FORGETFULNESS THAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS LIKE A CANCER THAT WILL SPREAD AND BECOME TERMINAL. IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT PEOPLE WHO CANNOT GIVE UP LYING AND THEREFORE HAVE TO LIVE WITH FORGETFULNESS WILL SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH FORGETFULNESS AND RECOMMEND IT TO OTHERS.


Lying & forgetting all the time:


People who think they lie only some of the time are kidding themselves. Even if they are unaware they have style, because all emotional people have a constant style in their poses, motions and speech and style is false and harmful, they are perpetuating either consciously or unconsciously falsity namely their styles CONSTANTLY. The fact that you are unaware that you have style or that it is false and harmful does not absolve you but reflects the depth of your self-deceit or inability to see or forgetting.


It is impossible that anyone can see the truth of their own and other people’s styles but they forcibly falsely refuse to see their styles and others’ styles as true. And refuse to see is the act of forgetting.


Because there is style in everyone here, not occasionally, not even frequently but constantly and style is never true or meaningful or good but style is always false or meaningless and harmful (because it is all about using force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness, and force is blind, meaningless and harmful) and people cannot or refuse to see style as harmful and false, they are somnolently practicing refusal to see or forgetfulness.


THUS BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE CONSTANT STYLE IN HOW THEY SPEAK AND DO THINGS AND STYLE IS FALSE, ONLY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE, THEY ARE LYING ALL THE TIME AND BECAUSE THEY CANNOT OR REFUSE TO SEE THEY ARE LYING ALL THE TIME, THEY ARE FORGETTING OR WILLING THEMSELVES NOT TO SEE ALL THE TIME, NOT SOME TIMES.


THE PERSON WHO PERCEIVES STYLE AS CHARMING, BENEFICIAL TO SELF AND OTHERS SEES FALSELY OR REFUSES OR IS UNABLE TO SEE THE TRUTH OR FORGETS OR REFUSE THE TRUTH ABOUT STYLE.


THE PERSON WHO PERCEIVES STYLE AS MEANINGLESS FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT HARMFUL BECAUSE FORCE IS BLIND AND HARMS SEES TRULY AND DOES NOT FORGET.


Because style is about using force to stretch, change speed and loudness that is totally unnecessary except for show, nobody will knowing harm himself and he must do so without seeing or knowing he is harming himself or wilfully refusing to see that he is harming himself and that wilful refusal to see is forgetting.


PEOPLE ARE CONSTANTLY HARMING THEMSELVES BY USING FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. RATHER THAN SEEING IT, THEY SEE THEIR STYLE FALSELY AS MEANINGFUL AND GOOD AND THAT IS FALSE SEEING AND INABILITY OR REFUSAL TO SEE THEY ARE HARMING THEMSELVES AND IT IS THIS REFUSAL OR INABILITY TO SEE THEY ARE HARMING THEMSELVES THAT IS THE BASIS OF THEIR FORGETFULNESS.


World well prepared for flu pandemic:


There is no necessity to say we are well prepared but it is said falsely, without seeing or knowing to reassure the public.


If the world is as well prepared to meet the flu epidemic as it was touted to be well prepared to meet any financial crisis, then we are in for a torrid time dealing with a full blown pandemic should it come to pass.


First refuse then cannot see:


Whenever you commit a falsity or harm to self or others, you must refuse to see (deny) or be defiant by insisting to yourself that what you said or did that was false or harmful is not so and gradually more and more you cannot see it until you totally cannot see it. When you totally cannot see the falsity, you have forgotten the falsity. Because forgetting is an urge it can be transferred to other areas such that you begin to forget things you do not wish to forget and you become a forgetful person who may one day pay dearly for his forgetfulness in loss and even death.


Cats also are subject to karma:


I saw this aging nasty neighbourhood dominant male cat in serious distress this morning, it was wobbly, shaking, could barely drag himself along the five footway of my shophouse.


In the past he would demand and copulate with all the female cats he found, he had been party to ferocious fights and pursuits with other male cats, once I saw he had a deep gash in the neck that I thought would be fatal but he survived. He had the nasty habit of urinating on food and water that people left for the cats after he had partaken himself and whenever I shooed him off my premise he would urinate before he left.


His payback time may finally be coming, that he should have a pleasurable life here is not possible but as a result of his evil acts, he is facing his end maker with torment, he is visibly in distress, suffering, not in control of his faculties as I saw today.


EXACTLY HOW GOOD YOU ARE CAN BE KNOWN, IF YOU ARE DELUDING YOURSELF THAT YOU ARE GOOD WHEN YOU HAVE CONCEALED FANGS, YOU WILL NEVER ESCAPE TORMENT. WHAT SUFFERING YOU HAVE NOW IS JUST THE FIRST INSTALMENT, A WARNING OF WORST TO COME THAT YOU IGNORE AT YOUR OWN PERIL WHEN UNCONTROLLABLE TORMENT FINALLY ENGULFS YOU.


Boosting army just to boost postal vote:


It seems that with the objective of increasing the number of postal votes from 250,000 to 1 million to better ensure BN’s survival, the new defence minister plans to set up army camps in every constituency so that they can boost the number of postal votes.


If true, this is a totally reckless self serving move without concern to cost for the nation.


Why flu deaths all in Mexico:


There was an article in CBS site regarding the above but a brief scan showed no information regarding the question.


If may be that Mexicans have a genetic defect that renders them fatally vulnerable but this is unlikely.


The reason why the deaths are in Mexico is because it is the centre of the outbreak and the number of foreigners in the country is likely to be low compared to the local populace.


BECAUSE THE OUTBREAK IS IN ITS EARLY PHASE, COMPARED TO THE LOCAL POPULATION RELATIVELY FEW FOREIGNERS HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND OF THOSE FOREIGNERS INFECTED, IF THEY WERE SERIOUSLY ILL THEY WOULD HAVE DIED IN MEXICO OR BEEN UNABLE TO TRAVEL AND SO THOSE WHO TRAVELLED BACK ARE THOSE WHO HAVE SHOWN SOME RESISTANCE BUT NEVERTHELESS CAPABLE OF TRANSMITTING THE VIRUS TO THE POPULACE IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES, SOME OF WHOM MAY BECOME FATALLY INFECTED AND SO DEATHS IN OVERSEAS COUNTRIES MAY OCCUR LATER IF CONTAINMENT FAILS AND MORE PEOPLE IN OTHER COUNTRIES ARE INFECTED.


EVEN IF THE VIRUS IS 1% FATAL, OUT OF 1 MILLION PEOPLE INFECTED, 10,000 WILL DIE. IN ORDER TO SPREAD WIDELY AND KILL MANY, THE VIRUS MUST NOT BE TOO VIRULENT AND SO IF ONLY 0.1% DIE, 1,000 PER I MILLION WILL DIE.


THUS A POSSIBLE EXPLANATION WHY ALL THE DEATHS ARE IN MEXICO IS THAT IT IS IN THE EARLY STAGES OF SPREAD WITH VERY FEW FOREIGNERS INFECTED AND IF THE PERSON INFECTED WAS ABLE TO TRAVEL HOME, HE IS LIKELY TO HAVE SOME RESISTANCE AND THEREFORE RECOVER. HOWEVER IF THEY MANAGE TO SPREAD TO MANY OTHERS AT HOME, THESE MAY NOT BE SO LUCKY AND THEY MAY DIE ENMASSE.


Pretending is forgetting:


People pretend they did not see you when they saw you, they pretend by smiling that they are delighted to hear what you say when they are hurt.


By pretending you are using force to fake you did not see, did not feel what you saw or felt and that is trying to forget what happened.


People pretend they are very rich when they are very poor.


Thus every time you pretend you are training yourself to forget what you actually are and people pretend far more often than they are aware, partly because they deny to themselves they pretend.


IT IS NOT A SURPRISE PEOPLE FORGET, ARE FORGETFUL AND IT GETS WORSE WITH AGE, FORGETTING IS WHAT THEY ARE WILLING THEMSELVES FREQUENTLY.


FORGETTING IS NOT NATURAL OR BLAMELESS BUT IT IS THE PRODUCT OF SIN OR PRETENDING AND SO IF YOU PERCEIVE FORGETTING AS NATURAL OR BLAMELESS YOU PERCEIVE WRONGLY AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR YOUR UNDERSTANDING IS FALSE. HERE AS IN OTHER PLACES, YOU THINK YOU UNDERSTAND BUT YOU UNDERSTAND FALSELY THAT IS AS BAD AS NOT UNDERSTANDING.


Highway robbers in KL suburbs:


This person almost lost his life & sustained multiple fractures when his motorbike hit a lorry as he tried to evade a gang of Indian roadside robbers who were routinely stopping passing bikes and cars to rob them for petty cash.


I think there was a similar case with rape of a woman in Cheras reported in the news.


THUS IT APPEARS THAT BECAUSE OF HARD TIMES THERE ARE NOW HIGHWAYMEN ON THE ROADS OF KL WHO ARE STOPPING PEOPLE EARLY IN THE MORNING TO ROB THEM.


There he goes again:


You have heard people complain in dislike or mock liking, “There he goes again” when they hear someone ranting or do something odd that he has done many times before.


What they do not realize is that the only way a person can ‘go again’ is to rehash and if a person rehashes he is a robot.


THUS PEOPLE CAN HEAR & SEE OTHERS SAYING AND DOING THE SAME OLD THINGS AGAIN AND AGAIN BUT THEY DO NOT SEE THAT THIS CAN ONLY COME ABOUT BECAUSE THE PERSON IS REHASHING AND THAT MEANS HE IS A ROBOT. NOT JUST HERE BUT ALWAYS THAT PERSON IS A ROBOT.


AND SO IT IS THAT PEOPLE PERCEIVE BUT THEY PERCEIVE WRONGLY, THEY PERCEIVE PEOPLE REPEATING THEMSELVES IN HACKNEYED WAYS BUT THEY DO NOT PERCEIVE THAT IS PROOF THE PERSON IS A ROBOT NOT JUST THERE BUT ALWAYS.


You have understanding but it is false and rote:


Emotional stylish people have understanding but it can be examined and found to be false and rote.


The soft or gentle ways with which people speak or do things is a matter of style not substance, it is a matter of how the person uses his force of self preservation to modulate his force of going against self to fashion a way of speaking with significant stretching of syllables, speed and loudness changes that are designed to stir the recipient’s mental force to like himself or like the ‘gentle’ person.


PEOPLE PERCEIVE THE GENTLE WAYS THEY AND OTHERS SPEAK IS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL WHEN IT IS BAD (THERE IS TRANSMITTED FORCE CHANGES THAT HARMS THE RECIPIENT) AND MEANINGLESS (IT IS JUST A BLIND STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE). THUS THEY PERCEIVE AND THUS UNDERSTAND BUT THEY PERCEIVE FALSELY (WHAT IS BAD AND MEANINGLESS IS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL) AND THAT PERCEPTION THAT IS FALSE IS NOT SPECIFIC, COMPOSED FOR THE MOMENT BUT MINDLESSLY REHASHED FROM A RECORDING IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOX.


THERE IS A RECORDED PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING IN ORDINARY PEOPLE’S MENTAL JUKEBOXES THAT IS EVEN VERY ENTRENCHED AND IMMUTABLE THAT ARE TRIGGERED OR REHASHED WHENEVER THEY HEAR SOFT AND GENTLE SPEECH THAT IT IS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL. THEY DO NOT PERCEIVE FRESH SPECIFIC TO EACH OCCASION THEY HEAR SOFT GENTLE SPEECH THAT IT IS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL.


IT IS TRUE THAT PEOPLE HAVE UNDERSTANDING BUT THEIR UNDERSTANDING IS FALSE, MORE OFTEN THAN THEY REALIZE.


WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING THAT IS TRUE, EG 12 TIMES 12 IS 144 IS NOT FRESH BUT REGURGITATED FROM A COPY IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOX AND WHATEVER IS REGURGITATED IS NOT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING BUT FALSE ROBOTIC UNDERSTANDING.


Fairness Malaysian Style:


Do you notice the Malaysian government never bothered to contest Razak Baginda’s acquittal for abetting Altanturya’s murder even though he is the boyfriend (and therefore has motive to kill her) and brought the policemen into the picture whilst they dogged pursued Raja Petra Kamaruddin, they appealed against his acquittal by the courts for unlawful detention with relation to his debatable wrongdoing of defamation regarding who murdered Altanturya?


MALAYSIA’S RULING POLITICIANS MUST HAVE VERY THICK SKINS OR CATARACTS AS BIG AS THEIR EYES IF THEY THINK THEY ARE CREDIBLE AND THE PUBLIC BIG SUCKERS TO FALL FOR PLEDGES OF JUSTICE AND RULE OF THE LAW.


THE VERY DIFFERENT TREATMENTS ACCORDED RAZAK BAGINDA AS COMPARED TO RPK MAKES A MOCKERY OF ANY PRETENSE OF RULE OF THE LAW, IT IS JUST LIP SERVICE AND IF YOU CANNOT SEE THAT THOSE IN POWER ARE HYPOCRITES, YOU MUST BE A BIG FOOL.


WHATEVER IS STYLE IS FALSE AND SO IT IS THAT FAIRNESS MALAYSIAN STYLE IS ALL FOR SHOW, FALSE, EMPTY AND THOSE WHO PRACTICE IT AND THOSE WHO ACCEPT IT ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY.


Malaysian justice not inconsistent but consistently false:


Anyone who thinks Malaysian justice is inconsistent perceives falsely because it is CONSISTENT, only consistently FALSE.


IT IS FALSE WHEN IT ACQUITTED RAZAK BAGINDA OF ABETTING.


IT IS AGAIN FALSE IN PURSUING RPK REGARDING DEFAMATION AND HIS ACQUITTAL.


WHO SAYS MALAYSIAN JUSTICE IS INCONSISTENT? IT IS CONSISTENT EVEN VERY CONSISTENT LOADED FOR THOSE ALIGNED TO THE RULING ELITE AND AGAINST THOSE WHO OPPOSE.


Don’t bother to look for us, hubby told:


Many will read it and not understand that whatever is said is not sincere or based on reason but driven by emotion to spite at the opposite party.


You do not tell others to do, what others want to do is their business even if it infringes on the rights of others that will incur karma. For instance, if someone wants to stalk you, they will incur karma and you do not tell them, ‘don’t bother to stalk me’.


If a person has unemotionally clearly thinking made up her mind to end a relationship, she can say, “I do not want to see him again”.


You are stating your position “I don’t want to see you again” but by telling him not to bother, you are telling him off, trying to rub salt into the wound.


Make sure you truly do not want to be found, you are not running away to hurt him and you want to hurt him further by telling him off, ‘don’t bother to look for me’ otherwise you yourself are headed for torment and insanity for lying and wanting to hurt someone.


THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ‘I DO NOT WISH TO SEE YOU ANYMORE’ AND ‘DON’T BOTHER TO LOOK FOR ME’ WHICH IS USUALLY DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO HURT THE OTHER PERSON. WHEN PEOPLE HEAR THAT, THEY MAY EXPERIENCE HURT BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHY THEY ARE HURT, WHETHER IT IS THEIR FAULT OR THE OTHER PERSON’S FAULT. THE TRUTH IS THAT IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE OTHER PERSON TO HURT YOU BY SCOFFING AT YOUR ATTEMPT TO LOOK FOR HER.


Why it was driven out of spite:


If her disappearance was amicable, she would not have departed suddenly without leaving a forwarding address.


If the disappearance was hostile, then her resurfacing to say ‘don’t bother to look for us’ cannot be driven out of concern for him, if she had concern for him she would not have disappeared to cause him grief.


So she is either a very mixed up lady heading for mad conflict if she still harboured good and bad feelings for her husband or if she is driven by ill will, she cannot mean or is hypocritical in telling him not to bother to look for her.


NO ONE OF GENUINE REASON WILL DEPART FROM ANOTHER IN A HUFF, SUDDENLY COMPLETELY WITHOUT WARNING. IF YOU WANT TO TERMINATE A FRIENDSHIP YOU AMICABLY CALMLY TELL THE OTHER PERSON YOU WANT TO LEAVE. JUST BECAUSE YOU SEPARATE DOES NOT MEAN YOU CANNOT STILL OCCASIONALLY COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER, THERE MAY BE OUTSTANDING MATTERS THAT REQUIRE COMMUNICATION AND SO IT REFLECTS IRRATIONAL EMOTION AND A DESIRE TO PUNISH OR HURT THAT A PERSON CHILDISHLY DISAPPEAR WITHOUT TRACE TO MAKE THE OTHER PERSON WORRY. WHAT THIS PERSON DOES NOT REALIZE IS THAT SHE HERSELF IS HEADED FOR TORMENT.


Who is the sultan attacking?


Quote: These groups are allowing the end to justify the means by condoning such acts. These groups and individuals feel they are faultless and immune from any action, to the extent of disregarding the law for the sake of attaining power”.


These are very strong words but when did those (who presumably attacked him) say they are faultless and immune from any action? If they have not said so then it is false perception to perceive so that is not without consequences. It sounds impressive but it makes no sense.


The sultan did not specify who he is targeting but exactly who he has in mind can be known by those who are discerning and God and he himself should know who he is targeting.


To those who have muddled thinking they may say one cannot be sure, the sultan may not be targeting anybody specifically, he is criticizing both sides or even BN not the opposition.


To one with calm clear thinking, it can be reasoned with a good degree of certainty if not certainty who he is targeting and it is the opposition.


Why is that so?


He has recently come under attack not by the ruling coalition but those aligned to the opposition and so angered, he is hitting back at his detractors, not the ruling coalition. Further the ruling coalition is already in power and so it does not apply that they disregard the law for the sake of attaining power. If he felt UMNO was wrong, he would not have agreed to dismiss the previous MB to hand over the reins to the UMNO nominated MB.


The record of the ruling coalition in terms of fairness and obeying the law is clearly known for all to see and so is the record of the opposition. If you perceive the opposition as non law abiding and dastardly and the ruling coalition as responsible, you may be right or asking for judgment for wrong view.


WHAT IS SAID IS HIGH SOUNDING, WILL IMPRESS SOME BUT WHATEVER THE FAULTS OF THE OPPOSITION, I DO NOT THINK THEY MERIT BEING ACCUSED OF ARROGANCE, THE BN IS (OBJECTIVELY) FAR MORE ARROGANT AND PLAYS VERY DIRTY IN ELECTIONS.


Doubt and uncertainty the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe and so whoever creates doubt and uncertainty in self and others by deliberately not specifying who he is targeting and what his intent is, is fettering himself to doubt and uncertainty.


IT IS THE BN WHO HAS PATENTLY, IN MANY SITUATIONS SHOWN THAT THE END JUSTIFIES WHATEVER THE MEANS (EG ARREST UNDER ISA EVEN OF REPORTERS AND THE ALTANTURYA TRIAL WHERE NO ONE IS INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT WHO OFFERED SIRUL MONEY TO KILL AND DELETED IMMIGRATION RECORDS) AND TO ACCUSE THE OPPOSITION OF THE SAME IS ASKING FOR JUDGMENT.


The sultan is siding with BN:


Malaysia is supposed to be a constitutional monarchy and the rulers are supposed to be above the partisanship.


By speaking thus, he is painting the opposition as bad and by inference the ruling coalition as responsible.


What he should have done befitting his role as above politics is to say that the opposition is wrong to criticize him, he has done everything according to the law and they are unfair to criticize him.


By saying the opposition will use whatever means to achieve their ends, they feel they are faultless and immune from any action, to the extent of disregarding the law for the sake of attaining power, he is painting a negative picture of the opposition that if unwarranted, has divine consequences for him.


‘Attack’ the deed not person:


If someone has done you wrong, point out where he has gone wrong, do not attack his person.


Whether the sultan realized or not, he is implying that those who criticized him are unscrupulous, will do anything to usurp power and that is attacking their persons not attacking whatever they have done wrong to him.


THE FAIR MINDED PERSON DOES NOT TRADE BODY BLOWS, HE ADDRESSES WHATEVER IS WRONG. THE WAY AND WHAT THE SULTAN SAID IS A BROADSIDE AIMED AT THE INTEGRITY OF HIS DETRACTORS AND THAT IS UNJUSTIFIED AND ASKING FOR JUDGMENT.


By your words you will be condemned:


Jesus said “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter; for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned."


The sultan was wrong to deprecate his detractors as unprincipled or ruthless, he should have restricted himself to pointing out exactly where he has been wronged and it is for others to judge for themselves whether the opposition are unprincipled scoundrels or it is their detractors who are.


WITHOUT REALIZING, HE HAS COMMITTED WRONG TO DEPRECATE HIS DETRACTORS AND HE HAS NOT FULFILLED HIS ROLE AS ABOVE PARTISANSHIP.


BN never PR fits sultan’s bill:


The sultan (wrongfully) did not specify who he was referring to but rightfully only BN, in this case and many other places, fits the sultan’s description perfectly and it is farfetched if not impossible PR can be accused of the misdeeds the sultan alludes to.


And so if the sultan has in mind BN, then he is right to say so but if he was attacking BN then why did he accede to their demand to dismiss the former MB and install a BN MB that contradicts his avowed distaste for unscrupulousness?


If the sultan has PR in mind when he launched the attack, then it is not just stretching the imagination but impossible that PR could be accused of power grabbing in this and any situation you can name.


The defectors (who have grave karma far worse than they ever dreamt) had a legal contract to resign if they defected but they refused and the election commissioner conveniently ruled their signed agreement null and void. They have never declared what important matters of principle or disagreement prompted their defection and so it is likely if not certainly that their defection was engineered by foul means, corrupt inducements.


On what basis can anyone accuse PR of power grabbing when they wanted fresh elections in which the people will be the choosers, they may lose the election?


Does the engineering of defections that may be corrupt and refusal to subject yourself to the electorate’s judgment appear more like power grabbing than calling for fresh elections?


On what basis did the sultan determine that the ruling party has lost the support of the assembly? There was never a vote that confirmed the loss of support.


FACED WITH THE LIKELY POSSIBILITY THAT THE DEFECTIONS WERE ENGINEERED THROUGH FOUL MEANS AND THE EXISTENCE OF AGREEMENTS TO RESIGN THAT THE DEFECTORS RENEGED, THEN SOMEONE WHO HAS AN AVOWED DISTASTE FOR UNSCRUPULOUSNESS SHOULD OPT FOR THE MOST FAIR CHOICE, DISSOLVE THE ASSEMBLY AND ASK THE PEOPLE TO DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES WHO SHOULD RULE.


The litany of power and judicial abuses by the ruling coalition is extensive. Name me one instance where the opposition has abused power and the judiciary?


Nothing is being done in the VK Lingam affair when it clearly shows judges & judgments can be bought and judiciary appointments of the highest levels tampered with. There are many incidences of definite abuse of power and the judiciary system by the ruling coalition and so it is mad for anyone to accuse the opposition of the same.


Flu virus a survivor?


Quote: The flu virus is a survivor. It must continually evolve in order to evade its biggest threat - the immune system.


It is totally unnecessary to state that the flu virus is a survivor, it is said driven by emotion not reason in the name of hyping or making much or to impress.


Whether it is a survivor or not cannot be determined and it is irrelevant to the discussion and the reason the person said it is to boast, to make much of the virus which is the topic of his article.


EXACTLY WHETHER IT IS NECESSARY TO STATE THE FLU VIRUS IS A SURVIVOR IS OBJECTIVE, IF IT IS UNNECESSARY AND YOU THE WRITER OR READER SEES NOTHING WRONG, SEES IT AS NECESSARY, THEN YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.


HERE AGAIN, PEOPLE PERCEIVE BUT THEY PERCEIVE FALSELY THAT ‘THE FLU VIRUS IS A SURVIVOR’ IS RELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION WHEN IT IS NOT. BECAUSE THEY PERCEIVE FALSELY THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND AND WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING THEY HAVE IS FALSE OR REHASHED MECHANICAL UNDERSTANDING.


What is the point of telling me or anyone that the flu virus is a survivor except that you want to stir my mental force to be impressed?


 


Thursday, April 23, 2009

What is restlessness

What is restlessness?


There is such a thing called restlessness and it can be clearly defined.


Restlessness is always suffering even maddening and it is something that afflicts all emotional people with style no matter how natural or style free they delude themselves to be.


Restlessness always has cause and it is never blameless but the restless person is personally responsible for his own restlessness that is also imparted on all who interact with him and so he has karma persecuting others with his restless behaviour.


Restlessness is an inability to keep still, it is an urge (only blind force can urge, genuine reason has no force to urge and therefore the presence of restlessness in a person is proof that it is force not reason that is behind his actions) to keep thinking, say or do something that is never fresh specific for the occasion but mindlessly activated or rehashed from a copy that exists in his mental jukebox. Even if the restless person succeeds briefly to keep still and not talk, it is a force induced (by his force of self preservation) unstable stillness that does not last and has tension, his body may be momentarily stilled, his mind is still restlessly thinking and so it is deceptive apparent calm or stillness not the genuine effortless calm and stillness that exists but is not known by emotional people.


THE ONLY FINAL ULTIMATE CAUSE OF RESTLESSNESS IS THE USE OF FORCE TO DO WHATEVER IS UNNECESSARY. WHATEVER IS UNNECESSARY DOES NOT NEED ANY REASON OR OCCASION TO OCCUR, IT CAN OCCUR AT ANY TIME SO LONG AS THE FOOLISH BEING DESIRES OR WILLS IT TO OCCUR.


WHATEVER IS UNNECESSARY THAT CAN HAPPEN ANYTIME CAN AND WILL HAPPEN ALL THE TIME IF THE FOOLISH BEING KEEP WILLING TO ACTIVATE IT IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING, DOMINATING AND DECEIVING OTHERS. WHEN SOMETHING HAPPENS ALL THE TIME OR WANT TO HAPPEN ALL THE TIME, IT IS RESTLESSNESS THAT HAS NO CURE SO LONG AS THE PERSON KEEP SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT ARE NOT NECESSARY BUT NECESSARY TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS.


Thus the use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness that is an essential major component of a person’s style is totally unnecessary, only falsely intended to impress, please, intimidate, dominate becomes constant and consistent because of that foolish being’s will to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others. Because style is about a constant unnecessary activation of mental force to prolong, change speed and strength, this mental force has a constant urge to activate and that is mad or restless.


THE FACT THAT A PERSON’S STYLE OR HOW HE PROLONGS SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS CONSTANT NEVER INTERMITTENT IS PROOF THAT IT IS UNNECESSARY, FALSELY FOR SHOW THAT AS A RESULT OF PERSISTENT PRACTICE SOON BECOME CONSTANT BECAUSE WHAT IS UNNECESSARY NEEDS NO REASON TO OCCUR AND CAN AND WILL OCCUR CONSTANTLY IF THE FOOLISH BEING CONSTANTLY WILL IT TO HAPPEN.


IT IS BECAUSE WHATEVER PEOPLE THINK, SAY OR DO IS PRE-RECORDED IN SUBSTANCE AND STYLE IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOX AND FALSELY IMPERSONALLY REHASHED TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF THE SITUATION THAT THE PERSON IS RESTLESS, HAS AN URGE TO REHASH OR IS SOMETIMES DRIVEN HELPLESSLY TO REHASH WHAT IS RECORDED BECAUSE WHATEVER IS RECORDED IS UNNECESSARY ONLY NECESSARY FALSE AND BECAUSE YOU HAVE REHASHED WHAT IS RECORDED MANY TIMES, IT HAS AN URGE TO HAPPEN ALL THE TIME OR ON ITS OWN VOLITION AND THAT IS RESTLESSNESS.


IT IS ONLY BECAUSE A BEING DOES AND SAY THINGS THAT ARE UNNECESSARY THAT HE SUFFERS FROM RESTLESSNESS. WHATEVER IS UNNECESSARY DOES NOT NEED REASON OR OCCASION TO HAPPEN, IT CAN HAPPEN ANY TIME SO LONG AS THE FOOLISH BEING WHO THINKS HIMSELF SMART DESIRES. WHATEVER THAT IS UNNECESSARY THAT CAN HAPPEN ANYTIME CAN AND WILL HAPPEN ALL THE TIME IF THE FOOLISH BEING KEEP ACTIVATING IT AND IT IS THIS URGE FOR THE ACTION TO ACTIVATE ALL THE TIME OR ON ITS OWN VIOLITION BECAUSE IT NEEDS NO REASON TO ACTIVATE THAT IS AT THE ROOT OF HIS RESTLESSNESS THAT CAN ONLY BE CONTROLLED BUT WILL END IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND MAD VIOLENT RESTLESSNESS.


Whatever and however a person says or does anything can be examined and determined to be necessary or unnecessary and it cannot be refuted by anyone. So long as what or how you say or do something is unnecessary, you are practicing controlled restlessness that will end in mad tormenting restlessness.


The next wave of economic collapse:


Even if the world economy recovers by the end of the year (it may just bottom out and stay at the bottom or resume collapse later), jobs will continue to be lost and unemployment which is a lagging indicator will only recover many months later.


Increasingly people are losing their jobs and they will default on their housing loans and credit cards and it is the wave of defaults of people who could have serviced their debts but now cannot because they are jobless that will deal another blow to banks’ balance sheets and you are a fool to think the worse is over and it is upwards from now.


IT WAS THE SUBPRIME LOANS, LOANS MADE TO PEOPLE WHO CANNOT AFFORD, WHO WERE SPECULATING OR MARGIN TRADING TO SELL OFF LATER FOR PROFIT THAT CAUSED THE CURRENT BANKING CRISIS. THE NEXT PHASE MAY BE EVEN LARGER, OF PEOPLE WHO NOW CANNOT PAY THEIR HOUSING LOANS BECAUSE THEY ARE JOBLESS.


Wanting to impress or please is not genuine reason:


Many people will even be aware or admit that the purpose of them saying or doing something (eg ride bicycle without hands) is to impress or please others.


Sometimes people will unwittingly admit that the angry or fierce way they talk is to intimidate and dominate others.


Many are not even aware that the purpose for what they say or do is not because they mean it but just to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others.


WHY IS THE WANTING TO IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE, DOMINATE AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS NOT GENUINE BUT FALSE REASONS FOR SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING?


WHEN YOU WANT TO IMPRESS SOMEONE WITH WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, YOU WANT TO STIR THE OTHER PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY SO THAT THEY WILL BE ATTRACTED TO OR IMPRESSED BY YOU AND SO THE PURPOSE IS NOT WHAT YOU SAID OR DID BUT TO STIR MENTAL FORCE THAT IS BLIND, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL AND THEREFORE IT IS NOT A GENUINE REASON TO SAY OR DO IT.


IN THE SAME WAY, WHEN YOU WANT TO PLEASE SOMEONE WITH WHAT & HOW YOU SAY OR DO, YOU WANT TO STIR THE OTHER PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY SO THAT THEY WILL BE ATTRACTED TO THEMSELVES, LIKE THEMSELVES AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU SAID OR DID THAT FLATTERS THEM AND SO THE PURPOSE IS NOT WHAT YOU SAID OR DID BUT TO STIR MENTAL FORCE THAT IS BLIND, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL AND THEREFORE IT IS NOT A GENUINE REASON TO SAY OR DO IT.


WHEN YOU WANT TO INTIMIDATE SOMEONE, YOU SPEAK IN A FIERCE WAY TO STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO BE FEARFUL OF YOU AND SO THE PURPOSE IS TO STIR MENTAL FORCE, NOT THE MEANING OF WHAT YOU SAID THAT MAY BE FALSE OR NONSENSE.


THUS IF WHAT YOU SAID OR DID IS TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS, IT IS FALSE PURPOSE, IT IS STIRRING BLIND MEANINGLESS FORCE AND BECAUSE IT IS PURPOSELESS OR UNNECESSARY, IT CAN HAPPEN ANYTIME AND WHAT CAN HAPPEN ANYTIME CAN HAPPEN ALL THE TIME IF YOU KEEP WANTING IT TO HAPPEN.


IN ANOTHER WAY, PLEASING OR IMPRESSING OTHERS IS NOT A TRUE REASON FOR SOMETHING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE IT IS NONSPECIFIC, YOU CAN SAY OR DO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS WITH THE SAME PURPOSE OF PLEASING AND IMPRESSING OTHERS, WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE IS ACTUALLY STANDARDIZED, REHASHED REPEATEDLY FOR THE SAME PURPOSE OF PLEASING AND IMPRESSING OTHERS.


IT IS NOT NECESSARY OR MEANINGLESS TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS BECAUSE PLEASING AND IMPRESSING OTHERS IS ABOUT WANTING TO STIR THE MENTAL FORCES OF OTHERS TO BE ATTRACTED TO YOU OR THEMSELVES (PLEASED).


 


What is necessary and unnecessary:


WHATEVER IS NECESSARY CANNOT HAPPEN ALL THE TIME BECAUSE IT NEEDS REASON TO HAPPEN AND ONLY WHEN THE REASON FOR IT TO HAPPEN IS PRESENT CAN WHAT IS NECESSARY HAPPEN.


WHATEVER IS UNNECESSARY DOES NOT NEED REASON TO HAPPEN, IT ONLY NEEDS THE FOOLISH PERSON’S DESIRE OR URGE OR FORCE TO ACTIVATE.


WHATEVER IS UNNECESSARY DOES NOT NEED REASON TO HAPPEN & SO IT CAN HAPPEN AT ANY TIME. WHATEVER CAN HAPPEN ANYTIME CAN HAPPEN ALL THE TIME IF THE FOOLISH BEING KEEPS ON MAKING IT HAPPEN, IN TIME TO COME IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME OR THERE IS AN URGE TO MAKE IT HAPPEN ALL THE TIME THAT IS HARD TO RESIST, THAT KEEPS HOUNDING THE PERSON NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES HE RESISTS AND HE IS FEARFUL OF LOSS OF CONTROL AND MAD CONSTANT ACTIVATION. THIS IS RESTLESSNESS AND IT CAN REACH HOMICIDAL OR SUICIDAL PROPORTIONS.


Hey, cutie:


Many people routinely address females, “Hey cutie or sweetie” or ‘lang lui’ (pretty girl).


Even if the girl is very pretty there is no reason to say it except to please the girl (not without selfish motive but because you want a favour from her or want her to like you).


WHETHER THERE IS A GENUINE REASON TO TELL A GIRL ‘HEY, CUTIE’ OR IT IS JUST TO PLEASE HER (STIR HER MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY TO LIKE HERSELF) SO THAT SHE WILL ALSO LIKE YOU OR YOU NEED HER TO DO SOMETHING FOR YOU CANNOT BE DISPUTED, IF THERE IS NO GENUINE REASON, YOU ARE PRACTICING WHAT IS UNNECESSARY THAT WILL LEAD TO RESTLESSNESS THAT WILL FINALLY ESCAPE YOUR CONTROL INTO MAD RESTLESSNESS.


Unscrupulous Goldman Sachs:


Apparently Goldman Sachs conveniently excluded results for Dec, a particularly bad month for it in order to arrive at the record profits. If it will do that to boost its profit figure it is likely that the good results for the other months have caveats that they did not tell the public.


Quote: Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs announced a huge jump in profits from fourth-quarter 2008 to first-quarter 2009. But as analysts quickly noticed, Goldman changed its definition of “quarter” (in response to a change in its legal status), so that — I kid you not — the month of December, which happened to be a bad one for the bank, disappeared from this comparison.


I don’t want to go overboard here. Maybe the banks really have swung from deep losses to hefty profits in record time. But skepticism comes naturally in this age of Madoff.


You are responsible for using force:


UNLESS HE IS INEBRIATED BY EXCESSIVE STRESS AND DISTRACTION OR THERE IS EMOTIONAL OVERLOAD, THE STYLISH PERSON NORMALLY CONTROLS AND DETERMINES THE AMOUNT OF FORCE HE SUPPLIES TO HIS CURRENTLY ACTIVATED PROGRAM, HE WILFULLY DETERMINES HOW MUCH HE STRETCHES A SYLLABLE, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS EVEN IF HE IS UNAWARE HE IS DOING SO AND SO, WHETHER HE REALIZES OR NOT, HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR USING FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. BECAUSE HE PERSONALLY AUTHORIZED AND SUPERVISED THE USE OF FORCE (TO STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS), HE WILL BE PUNISHED IF THAT USE OF FORCE IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, MEANINGLESS AND HARMS OTHERS EVEN AS IT HARMS HIS OWN MIND. THE USE OF FORCE AND THE METERING OF THAT USE OF FORCE IS A MAJOR FUNCTION THAT HE IS PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE WHO REHASH, HE DOES NOT GENUINELY REASONS. BECAUSE USING AND MODULATING THAT USE OF FORCE IS A MAJOR FUNCTION FOR YOU, YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WHATEVER HARM IT CAUSED OTHERS.


YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WHATEVER FORCE YOU USE AND NOT ONLY ARE STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE USING FORCE ALL THE TIME, THEY ACTIVELY DETERMINE OR CONTROL THAT USE OF FORCE; THE USE AND MODULATION OF FORCE IS A MAJOR FUNCTION FOR THEM.


Because everything they think, say or do, even how and what they perceive (see and hear) is in truth pre-programmed and they are merely rehashing it, what they can only do is selecting and changing the currently running programs and supply force that they can vary in strength, speed and duration to power those selected programs. If the programs being currently activated are well used or slick, they can swiftly switch between programs to appear as if they are spontaneous or live not robots but the very fact that what is said or done is so slick is not an indication of live performance but rehash that with many cycles of repeats have become so slick or without need for attention.


When they are relatively less stressed and distracted, they can personally vary the amount of force they supply to power those activated programs or their forces of self preservation can be summoned to increase resistance but when they are beset by rising stress and distraction, their capacity to fine tune the force they supply to activate their programs deteriorate. Sometimes their emotions (eg anger or hurt) are stirred too strongly so that the amount of force fed to the activated programs are too much that they stutter, they find it hard to say or do what they usually have no difficulty had there not been emotional or force overload roiling his mind.


WHEN THEY ARE RELATIVELY LESS STRESSED, DISTRACTED OR EMOTIONAL, AN IMPORTANT FUNCTION AND ABILITY OF THE BEING IS THE SUPPLY OF VARIABLE FORCE TO THE ACTIVATED PROGRAM. HE CAN ACTUALLY DETERMINE OR MEASURE THE PRECISE AMOUNT OF FORCE, HOW MUCH TO STRETCH A SYLLABLE, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. IN ADDITION HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION CAN BE SUMMONED TO RESIST OR SUPPLY BRAKES SUCH THAT IF NECESSARY HE BRINGS THE ACTIVATED PROGRAM TO AN ABRUPT HALT.


WHEN THEY ARE QUITE STRESSED, DISTRACTED OR EMOTIONAL, HIS ABILITY TO CONTROL THE SUPPLY OF FORCE TO THE ACTIVATED PROGRAMS BECOME IMPAIRED AND IS DISCERNIBLE BY THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING. SOMETIMES WHEN THE ANGER OR HURT STIRRED IS TOO STRONG, THE PERSON STRUGGLES OR IS UNABLE TO SAY WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY (ACTUALLY REHASH).


Before the stylish person can say or do something, he must first record it and then play it back even when he is recording just as a three head cassette recorder can play back what it is currently recording.


WITHOUT FIRST RECORDING AND THEN PLAYING BACK FROM THAT RECORDING, STYLISH PEOPLE CANNOT FUNCTION, SAY OR DO SOMETHING NEW THAT THEY ARE LEARNING (ACTUALLY COPYING). BECAUSE THE FIRST RECORDINGS ARE FALTERING AND THEY ARE SELF CONSCIOUS, WHEN THE PERSON IS FIRST LEARNING OR COPYING TO DO SOMETHING NEW (ACT LIKE A DOCTOR OR FATHER), HE IS VISIBLY HESITANT OR COG LIKE IN HIS SPEECH OR MOTION.


FROM THE PROGRAMS ALREADY RECORDED, A ROBOTIC BENG CAN SYNTHESIZE BY RE-COMBINING BITS AND PIECES OF DIFFERENT PROGRAMS TO PRODUCE NEW PROGRAMS THAT ARE ACTUALLY ONLY A POTPOURRI OF OLD PROGRAMS.


What stylish emotional people can NEVER do, much as they might like to kid themselves they can, is, with calm clear thinking and open receptive mind collect relevant data in a current situation and based on those relevant data, compose a relevant conclusion or reply in speech or action without resorting to rehashing.


THE SPONTANEOUS, GENUINE LIVE PERSON HAS NO COPY OF WHAT HE IS SAYING OR DOING IN A MENTAL JUKEBOX, WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES IS SPECIFICALLY COMPOSED FOR THE SITUATION AT HAND.


NO MATTER HOW YOU CANNOT SEE OR INSIST YOU ARE A LIVE PERSON, IF THERE EXIST A SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COPY OF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX, YOU ARE A ROBOT AND REHASHING.


To supply force to whatever programs they are rehashing is an important or major function of human robots and towards this end, when they are less stressed and distracted they can with the help of their resistive force of self preservation, meter the amount of force fed into their currently active programs. It is only when they are beset by rising stress, restlessness or the emotion roiling their mind is too strong that they are then less in control or helpless.


Incessant abuser and conductor of force:


Anyone who is emotional and stylish who thinks he only sometimes uses force or abuses the use of force in what he says or does is kidding himself because the truth is that he is an incessant abuser or user of force that is totally meaningless and unnecessary but necessary for show to please, impress, intimidate and dominate others by fabricating his constant style or force prolonging, changing speed and strength.


NOT ONLY IS HE CONSTANTLY ABUSING FORCE, USING FORCE UNNECESSARILY TO FABRICATE STYLE, HE IS THE CONSTANT CONDUCTOR OR ORCHESTRATOR OF HOW MUCH FORCE HE USES, HOW MUCH FORCE HE INVESTS INTO PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS. IT IS ONLY WHEN HE IS SEIZED BY STRESS, DISTRACTION OR EMOTION HAS BEEN STIRRED TOO STRONGLY DOES HE LOST CONTROL OF THE METERING OF FORCE AND HE BECOME THE HELPLESS SLAVE OF FORCE, BECOMES DICTATED BY FORCE THAT HE HAS NOW TEMPORARILY LOST CONTROL.


Smiling and nodding:


Often people appear attentive to what others are saying because they want to please others. For example, they smile and nod at every utterance, saying ‘yes, yes, yes’ or ‘good, good, good’ because they want to please the other person, they want to stir the other person’s mental force attractively to like himself and thus pleased, he may be more agreeable to what you want him to do.


PLEASING OTHERS EG SMILING AND NODDING AT EVERY UTTERANCE AS IF YOU ARE IN TOTAL AGREEMENT AND IMPRESSED IS INTENDED TO PLEASE THE OTHER PERSON, MAKE HIM LIKE HIMSELF OR STIR HIS MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY AT HIMSELF USUALLY IF NOT ALWAYS WITH SELFISH MOTIVE, YOU HAVE SELFISH DESIGNS ON THE PERSON YOU WANT TO PLEASE.


You don’t show concern for others:


Even Najib or his handlers may admit that his forays into Chinese Petaling Street and Sikh temples is to SHOW concern or rapport for the people.


You don’t SHOW concern for people, you have and do things that have concern for people at heart.


By saying it is to show concern you are admitting that it is just for show, to impress rather than achieve the objective of being concerned for the people.


SUCH VISITS ARE SYMBOLIC, FOR SHOW, IS RELATIVELY CHEAP AND DOES NOT ACHIEVE ANYTHING MEANINGFUL. IF YOU HAVE TRUE CONCERN FOR OTHERS, IT IS NOT FOR SHOW BUT REFLECTED IN WHATEVER YOU SAY OR DO THAT AFFECTS THEM.


Tsvangirai crash not an accident:


After the crash, Tsvangirai came out to vouch that the crash was an accident not attempted homicide. Without seeing and knowing what he said is true, he is a foolish man saying it, if you are faced with your potential murderer and you deem him innocent, you are a danger to yourself or he has vested interest to absolve Mugabe.


By his looks, Tsvangirai is not a very intelligent man and he was foolish, with karma due for being too hasty to dismiss his crash as an accident.


Tsvangirai crash cause questioned


Early reports from an investigation by Zimbabwe's MDC suggest that a car crash which killed PM Morgan Tsvangirai's wife may not have been accidental.


Senior MDC officials told the BBC that investigators were questioning the cause of the March crash, in which Mr Tsvangirai was injured.


At first, Mr Tsvangirai said he thought the crash had been an accident.


The MDC, formerly in opposition, entered a power-sharing agreement with President Robert Mugabe in February.


But the evidence which has so far come to light in the MDC investigation leads senior MDC officials to believe that the whole affair was highly questionable, says the BBC's John Simpson, who has been in Zimbabwe.


The car carrying Mr Tsvangirai and his wife was hit by a lorry on a main road south of Harare.


US embassy officials say the lorry belonged to a partner organisation of the US government aid agency USAID.


Mr Tsvangirai's car was accompanied by two cars provided by the government, and driven by men from Zimbabwe's Central Intelligence Organisation, which is loyal to President Mugabe. One car led the way, the other followed Mr Tsvangirai.


The MDC sources say the lorry involved in the crash sideswiped Mr Tsvangirai's car, hitting the rear offside.


The car veered across the road and landed in the bush on the far side, upside down. Mrs Tsvangirai was thrown out and killed, and her husband was injured.


The MDC stands to gain hugely in political terms, our correspondent says, if it can prove that it was all a deliberate attempt to kill Mr Tsvangirai soon after he had entered the power-sharing agreement, something which Mr Mugabe's Zanu-PF party seems to regard as a potential threat to its position.


But the MDC officials pointed out that the apparently deliberate deaths of senior politicians who have been seen as a threat to the Zanu-PF leadership are nothing new.


At least two have died in highly suspicious road accidents in the past.


Here is another opportunity for the BN to wrest back an opposition seat and so why is Najib suddenly so cost conscious?


Whilst it is likely to be partly to impress the public as to his scrupulousness, it may also reflect that he has no appetite for humiliation, if the BN is beaten again, it will reflect on his leadership.


IF THE DREAD FOR ANOTHER LOSS AT THE HANDS OF THE OPPOSITION IS THE REASON FOR HIM SAYING IT, THEN HE DID NOT SAY WHAT HE MEANT.


IF THE GOVERNMENT IS CONCERNED ABOUT DRAINAGE OF RESOURCES, THERE ARE SO MANY AREAS THAT CAN BE CUT BACK LIKE THE FAT COMMISSIONS ACCORDED FOR ARMS PURCHASES.


Najib: By-elections draining resources


By WANI MUTHIAH


 


KLANG: Too much effort and resources are being wasted by holding by-elections when the nation should be concentrating on strengthening its economy, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said.


“It is different if an elected representative dies but resignations are political decisions which can also be regarded as a political ploy,” he said.


Speaking at a press conference after opening the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysias (ACCCIM) 63rd annual general meeting, he said the people resent by-elections that were held deliberately.


He was commenting on the impending Penanti state assembly by-election in Penang which fell vacant following the resignation of the deputy chief minister I Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin.


Cupcakes:


There is nothing special or trendy about cupcakes; it is just a word that denotes a cake made in a cup or paper receptacle that looks like a cup.


Yet if you hear the way people use the words, it implies it is something special, they are very knowledgeable if they can speak of or know what a cupcake is.


THIS IS A FORM OF FALSE PERCEPTION, TO MAKE MUCH OR THINK IT IS SPECIAL OR TRENDY IN SOMETHING LIKE ‘CUPCAKE’ WHICH SIMPLY MEANS A CAKE MADE IN A CUP LIKE RECEPTACLE.


EVEN IF THERE IS SOMETHING TRENDY OR SPECIAL, IT IS MERELY A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY TO MAKE IT TRENDY AND SPECIAL AND SO IT IS MEANINGLESS OR MAD.


A mesmerising concert:


If it is true then you are speaking of force not reason.


Only force can mesmerize and when a person is mesmerized, he is in a daze, detached from the present.


THUS YOU ARE NOT GOOD IF YOU ARE MESMERIZED BUT YOU ARE INDULGING IN A FORCE INDUCED DAZE AND HEADED FOR A PERMANENT DAZE AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN.


ANIMALS TOO CAN BE MESMERIZED, LIKE COBRAS CAN BE MESMERIZED BY MUSIC AND SO IT IS NO BIG DEAL BEING MESMERIZED, YOU CAN EXIST AS AN ANIMAL IF YOU LIKE TO BE MESMERIZED.


Clinton admits Cuban Policy failed:


In order to have a policy you must define it, define what your attitude towards Cuba is (eg destabilize or isolate Castro) and what you, the US should do or the steps to implement.


After you have formulated the policy, even if you sometimes do not follow it, it is the plan or master and you become the slave of that policy which dictates what you should do and so you are a robot of the policy not master.


If you think that God has a policy or many policies just like you and everyone here, you may be right or deluded.


IT MAY BE THAT GOD NEVER HAS ANY POLICIES AND IT IS NOT ‘ANYTHING GOES’ BUT GOD SEES AND KNOWS EVERYTHING AND DEPENDING ON WHAT HE SEES AND KNOWS HE DOES, HE DOES NOT FALL BACK OR REFER TO POLICIES TO GUIDE HIS ACTIONS.


Whatever is forceful records:


Notwithstanding the consistent or stereotyped substance and style combo of each person’s speech and action cannot be produced live but must be memorized and rehashed again and again so that it becomes more and more slick, whatever speech or action has added force is conditioning or recording. You need force to record not reason just as a tape recorder needs electricity or power to record, without power it cannot record, in the same way if any speech has added force in force prolonging, changing speed and loudness, it can and will record each time it is undertaken and whatever can and will record has a tendency to be replayed and so speech and actions with additional force that is for show has a tendency to be recorded or conditioning to be rehashed in the future.


Just as a tune or song with force prolonging, changing speed and loudness has a tendency to recur in your mind, it can keep playing in your mind even if you try to stop it, in the same way, whatever you say or do that has prolonging, changing speed and loudness has a tendency to be memorized to be replayed and whatever you see or hear others say or do that have force changes similarly has a tendency to be memorized in you to act as a template for you to copy.


Whatever can be said or done is a plan:


Whatever can be said or done is essentially a plan that you do not even have to understand to copy.


What is a plan can be memorized especially if it is said or done with added force as when there is added style or force prolonging syllables or units of action, speed and strength of force so that the tendency is to recycle it rather than compose anew for each arising occasion. Thus if you keep saying or doing things with added force stretching, changing speed and strength the tendency is to condition yourself more and more faithfully to it so that it is produced with increasing slickness that lulls the fool himself and undiscerning observers that it is genuine because it is so forceful and slick.


The worst of the great depression is over:


If it was God saying it, then you know that it is true but it is impossible that these US officials see and know it is true but they are guessing perhaps based on certain signs and not without vested interests.


UNLESS YOU KNOW SOMETHING IS TRUE, THE WORST IS OVER YOU SHOULD NOT SAY IT.


EVEN IF YOU GUESSED RIGHT AND IT IS OVER, IT WILL CONDITION YOU TO GUESS MORE, TO PERCEIVE YOU CAN SEE AND KNOW WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE AND KNOW BUT MERELY GUESSED CORRECTLY.


IF YOU GUESSED WRONG, THEN IT WILL CREATE DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY IN YOU THAT IS CONDITIONING AND THE WAY TO PERDITION THAT WHAT YOU THINK YOU KNOW WAS WRONG OR YOU DID NOT KNOW.


Najib madder than I think:


For someone who is PM of Malaysia, Najib is exhibiting logic that is madder than I think.


It is preposterous to think Pakatan Rakyat will engineer a re-election in a seat they already hold risking loss just to waste public money and beat BN for the sake of beating them.


Anwar lauds possibility of BN absence


 


KUANTAN: PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim welcomes the possibility of Barisan Nasional not contesting the Penanti by-election.


He said there were reasons behind the development to call for a by-election following the resignation of PKR’s Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin.


“We will ensure that the candidate who will contest the by-election is someone who is able to assist the Chief Minister in helping the cause of the Malays and other races in Penang,” Anwar said after opening Pahang PKR’s new headquarters in Beserah here yesterday.


On claims by Fairus that he was framed, Anwar said Fairus told him he had been under pressure at that time but gave his word that he would remain committed to the party.


To a question, Anwar said it was unfair to associate Fairus’ case to that of Bukit Lanjan assemblyman Eli-zabeth Wong who withdrew her resignation as assemblyman.


Don’t even think of it:


You regularly hear people say to others: Don’t even think of it or don’t even say it.


That statement is not based on reason or understandable but it is driven by emotion and false.


You cannot stop others from thinking about anything or saying anything. You can rightfully say something is right or wrong. Even the person himself cannot help himself thinking or saying something and so your message is worthless, cannot be undertaken.


Five dead after Polish driver’s U turn on M1


Whilst conditions can be confusing at night, even if the driver was not inebriated, he must be confused (if he did not do a deliberately illegal U turn on a highway) to drive down the wrong side of a highway.


WITHOUT BEING CONFUSED OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT HE CANNOT DRIVE DOWN THE WRONG SIDE. NO ONE IS EXCUSED BECAUSE HE IS CONFUSED AND SO EVEN THOUGH HE GOT HIMSELF KILLED, HIS CONFUSED ACTIONS CAUSED THE DEATHS OF OTHERS AND HE HAS KARMA DUE FOR KILLING OTHERS.


CONFUSION IS NEVER BLAMELESS AND ONE MUST CULTIVATE A CALM CLEARLY THINKING MIND AT ALL TIMES. SHOULD YOU CAUSE HARM TO OTHERS AS A RESULT OF BEING CONFUSED, YOU HAVE KARMA NOT BLAMELESSNESS.


THUS IT IS SAID BY THE BUDDHA THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE KARMA AS VAST AS AN OCEAN.


Who the fcuk is running the country?


Quote blogger: Now, tell me, who the fcuk is running the country, the racist (Dr M) or Najib?


Some people think they are smart to alter the word so that they imply it without saying it. You know what you mean and you will be punished for being obscene. Further the question is false because he knows the answer to the question and so it is not the answer of the question he is interested in but his question is to convey his hostility or anger.


HERE AS EVERYWHERE IT IS NOT REASON THAT IS THE GUIDE OF WHAT PEOPLE SAY BUT IT IS FORCE, STIRRED EMOTION OR DISLIKE OR HOSTILITY THAT DROVE HIM TO ASK THE FALSE QUESTION TO WHICH HE KNOWS THE ANSWER.


EVERY OCCASION ARISING IS AN OCCASION FOR EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS THAT CAN ONLY BE LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION OR FEAR AND IT IS THESE EMOTIONS AND NOT GENUINE REASON THAT DRIVES PEOPLE’S RESPONSES TO THE OCCASIONS. WHATEVER REASON THAT ACCOMPANIES IS FALSE, REHASHED RULES REASONING.


Even those who are emotional but they think they are mild mannered and good are driven by their emotions, emotions always attend whatever they experience and emotions or force not genuine reason is the drive of what they say or do that may be true or false or make no sense but always has accompanying emotion.


WHATEVER PEOPLE EXPERIENCE, THEIR EMOTIONS ARE ALWAYS STIRRED.


THEIR STIRRED EMOTION IS THE BASIS OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IN RESPONSE TO WHAT HAPPENED.


WHAT THEY SAY OR DO ALWAYS HAS ACCOMPANYING EMOTION (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION OR FEAR). APART FROM THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO THAT MAY BE TRUE, FALSE OR NONSENSE, THEY ALSO WANT TO TRANSMIT THEIR EMOTION.


BECAUSE THERE IS ACCOMPANYING EMOTION TO WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO, IT IS LIKELY IF NOT CERTAINLY THAT THESE SAME EMOTIONS ARE THE SOURCE OR BASIS OF WHAT THEY SAID OR DID, NOT GENUINE REASON. WHATEVER REASONS THEY GIVE FOR SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING ARE EXCUSES.


Not just a passenger:


Everything ordinary people speak, no matter how softly or gently or slowly, can be examined and found to have accompanying emotion. That accompanying emotion may be to like, dislike, feel sad, hurt, agitated or fearful about the subject in question or it may be to impress, please, intimidate or dominate the other person.


This accompanying emotion for the subject or the person addressed is NEVER just a passenger that happens to hitch a ride on what is said or done, but it is the basis or source of what is said or done and because emotions are proxies of mental force, therefore mental force and not genuine reason is the basis or motivator of what people say or do.


FORCE THROUGH THE EMOTIONS IS THE DRIVE, NOT GENUINE REASON THE GUIDE OF WHATEVER PEOPLE SAY OR DO IN RESPONSE TO SOMETHING HAPPENING.


Taxes, have you paid your fair share?


This question posed on CBS website is never genuine and guided by reason but force.


It is nobody else’s business whether others have paid their tax or not and so his question is not based on reason but based on jealousy and resentment, he wants to prod others’ guilty conscience to make them pay because he has paid and resents others not paying.


IT IS RESENTMENT WHICH IS A FORM OF DISLIKE (REPULSIVE STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE) THAT DRIVES HIM TO ASK THE QUESTION WHICH IS OF NO CONCERN FOR HIM EXCEPT FOR RESENTMENT (DISLIKE). BECAUSE HE FINDS HIS QUESTION MEANINGFUL AND HE THINKS IT IS REASON THAT IS THE BASIS OF HIS QUESTION, HE HAS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.


 


Bank loss fears hit shares:


Only last week the stock markets soared when banking giants like Goldman Sachs and Citibank reported better than expected profits and now it is plumbing the depths.


It proves that the markets and its players are not guided by reason but driven by greed to rush in at the first indication of potential gain and to swiftly exit by fear at the first indication of losses.


THUS MARKETS THAT REFLECT PLAYERS WHO DRIVE THEM ARE IRRATIONAL, NOT GUIDED BY GENUINE REASON BUT DRIVEN BY FORCE, THE BALANCE BETWEEN GREED AND FEAR AND BECAUSE FORCE IS BLIND AND HARMFUL, IT IS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER SOONER OR LATER.


In good times, the big banks that people respect were tampering with results, were using whatever ploys they could to boost profits even if they were unsustainable and lead to future problems and you are fool if you think in bad times they will reform and behave themselves.


Thus it is that even in bad times, the same goats that run banks like Goldman Sachs are doing whatever they can within and outside the rules to falsely report misleadingly unsustainable good results so that their share prices rise and they are rewarded. Goldman Sachs conveniently excluded accounts for Dec, a particularly bad month for them thereby artificially boosting their quarterly results, Citibank made a one off profit selling its credit card assets in Brazil.


Quote: Bank of America’s net income had soared to $4.2bn in the first three months of 2009 from $1.2bn a year earlier, beating analysts' expectations but these results were inflated by its purchases of Merrill Lynch, which added $3.7bn in net income, and Countrywide, which boosted its mortgage arm.


THE BANKS AND GLOBAL FINANCE ARE NOT IN GOOD HANDS BUT IN RUTHLESS, UNSCRUPULOUS HANDS, NOT ONLY IS FIRST PRIORITY THEIR SELF PRESERVATION AND GAINS, THEY DON’T GIVE MUCH OF A DAMN WHAT HAPPENS TO THE MONEY UNDER THEIR CARE EXCEPT FOR FEAR OF PROSECUTION.


Bank loss fears hit global shares


US and European shares have fallen sharply after the biggest bank in the US reported a big increase in the amount it needed to cover bad debt.


The update, from Bank of America (BOA), reignited worries over the stability of the banking sector and future losses that banks may face, observers said.


The Dow Jones index dropped 3.6% and the Nasdaq lost 3.5%. European markets also saw a sell-off.


Banks were the big losers, with BOA down 24.3% and Citigroup 18% lower.


It was the first day of trading since weekend comments by President Barack Obama that the economy remained under strain, while his top economic adviser tempered hopes for a speedy recovery.








The reality is all the banks reported lower earnings than what they did a year ago


Fred Dickson
Market strategist


Observers say investors are also worried that some institutions may need to raise additional capital to cope with future losses, a move that would potentially dilute the stakes of shareholders.


Inflated


Bank of America said it had set aside $13.4bn (£9.2bn) to cover credit losses in the first three months of 2009 from the $8.5bn figure given in the fourth quarter of last year.


This overshadowed figures showing its net income had soared to $4.2bn in the first three months of 2009 from $1.2bn a year earlier, beating analysts' expectations.


These results were inflated by its purchases of Merrill Lynch, which added $3.7bn in net income, and Countrywide, which boosted its mortgage arm.


Meanwhile, shares of Citigroup were hit after Goldman Sachs analysts said credit losses at the bank had continued to grow rapidly.


"When I took a look at the big banks, you saw a nice big positive earnings surprise, but I really questioned the quality of the earnings," said Fred Dickson, market strategist at Oregon-based DA Davidson & Co.


"The reality is all the banks reported lower earnings than what they did a year ago."


London's FTSE 100 indexes closed down 2.5%, while Germany and France's key index both closed about 4% lower.


Get you into and out of trouble?


There are many vested entrenched interests in Wall Street and the political system in America.


Although there are changes of guards in some of the banks and companies this is more cosmetic than genuine, the new faces belong to the same old school of rampaging capitalists.


THUS IN ESSENCE, THE SAME PEOPLE WHO GOT THE BANKS AND EVERYONE INTO THIS MESS IS EXPECTED TO DELIVER THE BANKS AND THE ECONOMY OUT OF TROUBLE.


THIS IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY AND THUS THE WORLD WILL MUDDLE THROUGH AS ROME BURNS AND EVEN WORSE WILL COME TO PASS AS THE CANCER SPREADS.


IF YOU THINK THE SAME PEOPLE WHO GOT YOU INTO TROUBLE CAN DELIVER YOU OUT OF TROUBLE, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. JESUS SAID A BAD TREE CANNOT BEAR GOOD FRUIT AND SO THE TREE THAT BORE THE BAD FRUITS THAT LED TO THE CURRENT CRISIS CANNOT BEAR GOOD FRUITS THAT DELIVER THE WORLD OUT OF TROUBLE.


Even geniuses may not deliver the world:


If the current financial situation is like a chess board checkmate, even the finest chess grandmaster cannot uncheck a checkmate and so even the most scrupulous and discerning banker cannot deliver the financial system out of its terminal state.


IF IT IS FINANCIAL CHECKMATE THEN EVEN THE MOST DISCERNING SCRUPULOUS FINANCIAL MIND CANNOT DELIVER THE SYSTEM LET ALONE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO GOT THE SYSTEM IN A MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE.


EVEN IF A DISCERNING, SCRUPULOUS FINANCIAL GENIUS WAS IN THE HELM, IF THE SYSTEM IS ROTTEN, THE SYSTEM IS RUN BY CORRUPT, RECKLESS PEOPLE WHO WILL RESIST CHANGE, THERE IS LITTLE IF ANYTHING HE CAN DO.


IT MAY BE THE EARTH THAT HAS BAILED OUT MANKIND MANY TIMES IN THE PAST AND THE EARTH MAY NOW BE SERIOUSLY SICK FROM ABUSE TO COME TO MANKIND'S RESCUE AGAIN.


No effort is needed to understand:


No effort is ever needed to genuinely understand anything, genuine understanding is something you either have or don’t and it involves simply seeing and thus seeing to know and understand. If after seeing (when it is pointed out to you), you still cannot see it (eg that there are constant stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness), then you cannot understand, do not understand.


You need force, to apply force to make an effort and so if your understanding is effortful, full of effort, it is not true understanding but a forced or programmed or recorded understanding that needs to be repeatedly hammered into your mind so that it can be recalled to applied as precisely as it was desired to be recorded.


THUS ORDINARY STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE’S UNDERSTANDING IS NOT GENUINE BUT EFFORTFUL FORCED OR PROGRAMMED MEMORIZED UNDERSTANDING THAT IS SUBSEQUENTLY RETRIEVED AND APPLIED AS ACCURATELY AND RIGIDLY AS POSSIBLE IN FUTURE OCCASIONS.


If you find it difficult to understand something, you struggle and forget then either what you try to understand is false or nonsense (makes no sense eg poetry and philosophy) or your understanding is forced, you are struggling to program yourself to ‘understand’ the thing presented to you.


IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE’S UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS IS NEVER GENUINE BUT FORCED OR PROGRAMMED UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY OFTEN STRUGGLE TO UNDERSTAND NEW THINGS WHERE THEY CANNOT RETRIEVE OLD PROGRAMMED UNDERSTANDING OR EXPLANATIONS TO EXPLAIN THE NEW SITUATION.


A PERSON WHO POSSESS TRUE UNDERSTANDING IMMEDIATELY SEES AND KNOWS AND THUS UNDERSTANDING AS SOON AS SOMETHING IS POINTED OUT TO HIM OR BROUGHT TO HIS UNDERSTANDING.


THUS IF YOU HAVE NOT DISCOVERED STRETCHED SYLLABLES, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES IN YOUR SPEECH, IF IT IS TRUE THEY ARE CONSTANTLY PRESENT, THEN IF YOU HAVE GENUINE UNDERSTANDING, AS SOON AS SOMEONE POINTS IT OUT TO YOU, YOU IMMEDIATELY, WITHOUT EFFORT OR FORCE SEE STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS FACT NOT FICTION.


AND IF I TELL YOU THAT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS LEADS TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THEN THE SIMPLEST THING TO DO, ASSUMING YOU ARE A MASTER OF YOURSELF IS TO TRY TO BOTH STRETCH AND NOT STRETCH, CHANGE AND NOT CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO SEE IF THEY MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF SUBSEQUENT STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.


NO EFFORT IS EVER NEEDED TO GENUINELY UNDERSTAND SOMETHING, AS SOON AS SOMETHING IS BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION, PROVIDED YOU ARE NOT BLIND, YOU SHOULD SEE IT AND THUS SEEING YOU UNDERSTANDING. IF AFTER SEEING YOU CANNOT SEE IT, YOU ARE BLIND TO IT AND HOW CAN SOMEONE WHO IS BLIND TO SOMETHING UNDERSTAND?


THUS IF YOU STRUGGLE TO UNDERSTAND THINGS, YOU FIND IT SUCH A EFFORT TO UNDERSTAND NEW THINGS, YOU CANNOT TELL WHETHER SOMETHING IS TRUE OR FALSE, THEN YOU DO NOT HAVE GENUINE UNDERSTANDING BUT YOUR UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON FORCE, ON PROGRAMMING AND REHASHING AS FAITHFULLY AS IT WAS RECORDED OR MEMORIZED.


Force precludes understanding:


Not only is force inimical (harmful) to understanding but the presence or addition of force to any understanding renders it a forced, conditioning memorized to be rehashed false understanding.


It is impossible for anyone to understand anything without first seeing it. After you see something (eg that there is constant stretching of syllables), you know it and understand that there is constant stretching of syllables that is totally unnecessary because you or I can speak without any stretching.


THUS UNDERSTANDING REQUIRES FIRST SEEING SOMETHING AND THEN YOU KNOW AND UNDERSTAND. NOWHERE IS FORCE REQUIRED TO UNDERSTAND AND SO IF YOU USE FORCE TO UNDERSTAND, YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING CRAZY, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL, WASTING ENERGY. NOT ONLY THAT, THE ADDITION OF FORCE TO THAT KNOWING RENDERS IT FORCED OR CONDITIONING OR MEMORIZING TO BE AUTOMATICALLY REHASHED IN THE FUTURE. WHATEVER IS REHASHED IS NEVER GENUINE BUT ROTE, MECHANICAL AND IMPERSONAL AND YOU HAVE CONVERTED YOURSELF INTO A ROBOT OF UNDERSTANDING.


 


IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND SOMETHING YOU MUST FIRST SEE IT OR BE ABLE TO SEE IT. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO SEE SOMETHING, DID NOT SEE IT THEN ANY UNDERSTANDING MUST BE FALSE OR FAKED (PRETENDED). NO FORCE IS REQUIRED TO SEE OR KNOW AND THEREFORE TRUE UNDERSTANDING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FORCE. INSTEAD THE ADDITION OF FORCE IN SEEING AND EFFORT MADE TO UNDERSTAND RENDERS THAT UNDERSTANDING FALSE AND CONDITIONING OR PROGRAMMED.


THUS THE WISE PERSON WILL NOT MAKE ANY EFFORT TO UNDERSTAND THINGS HE DID NOT SEE, WHICH OTHERS TELL HIM IS TRUE BUT HE DID NOT PERSONALLY SEE. MANY THINGS THAT SCIENCE AND MEDICINE TELLS YOU ARE TRUE ARE NOT SEEN AND KNOWN BY YOU AND YET IN THEIR HASTE TO BE A SUCCESSFUL DOCTOR OR SCIENTISTS, THEY EAGERLY OR USE FORCE TO EMBRACE WHAT THEY ARE TOLD OR INDOCTRINATED AS TRUE SUCH THAT IN TIME THEY BECOME TOTALLY DELUDED, THEY PERCEIVE WITH SUCH INTENSITY WHAT IS FALSE, WHAT THEY DID NOT SEE BUT WERE JUST TOLD BY PEOPLE THEY RESPECT AS TRUE, ACCORDING TO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.


People always perceive with force:


When you stare at something you are using force to see and prolong your gaze on something that is longer than necessary to see it.


When you sniff you are using force to smell with accelerating speed and strength.


When people hear something soft, they prick their ears, they add force to their hearing in an attempt to hear better.


When they cannot see something clearly they again screw up their eyes and eyebrow to use force to see more clearly.


YOU THINK IT IS CORRECT THAT ONE SHOULD PRICK ONE’S EARS OR SCREW UP ONE’S EYES TO USE MORE FORCE IF WHAT ONE WANTS TO HEAR IS SOFT OR DIM BUT IT IS DELUDED, NO AMOUNT OF FORCE ADDED WILL MAKE YOU SEE BETTER, WHAT IS NEED IS TO PAY GREATER ATTENTION TO THE SOURCE OF THE SOUND OR SIGHT.


Not just when they stare or screw their eyes or prick their ears are they adding force to their seeing and hearing but always emotional people perceive with added force and thus their perceiving have added force, is forced perceiving. Because force is blind and blinding, their perceiving eg seeing and hearing is thus rendered blind by the added force and thus not seeing because it is forced seeing, they do not know what they see and do not truly understand but falsely or misunderstand what they see.


IF YOU THINK THAT PEOPLE DO NOT SEE WITH FORCE, THEY DO NOT ADD FORCE TO THEIR SEEING, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR ARE UNDISCERNING. ALWAYS THERE IS ADDED UNNECESSARY FORCE TO THEIR SEEING, THERE IS A WAY OR STYLE TO HOW THEY SEE AND WHAT THEY SEE TOO IS PROGRAMMED, THEY ARE PROGRAMMED TO SEE CERTAIN THINGS THEY LIKE TO SEE AND AVOID SEEING THINGS THEY DON’T LIKE TO SEE AND AS A RESULT THEY NEVER SEE ANYTHING TRULY AND NOT SEEING ANYTHING TRULY, THEY NEVER TRULY UNDERSTAND.


In order to understand you must see:


In order for a person to understand he must see.


Seeing is the single requisite without which a person cannot understand, you cannot truly understand something without seeing it.


As simple as it is to understand, people cannot understand because they do not see.


They do not see because there is always added force that is blind that obstructs and impairs their seeing.


There is added force in their seeing because there is a substance and style of their seeing.


There is a style in the way people see that is characteristic in them that differs from others and it is a matter of how they use force to prolong (eg stare), change speed and strength (jerky or darting look) whenever they see something.


There is a substance in what they see in the sense that they will themselves to see what they like and avoid seeing things they disliked, as a result of which they do not see things as they actually are but as they like or dislike to see them.


The person who does not see with force has no substance of what he sees, because he neither likes nor dislikes what he sees (his mental force is not stirred attractively or repulsively) he sees everything as it is, not as he liked or disliked it and thus seeing, he knows and understands.


AN UNEMOTIONAL, STYLE FREE MAN DOES NOT SEE WITH FORCE, DOES NOT ADD FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH WHEN HE SEES, HE DOES NOT LIKE OR DISLIKE WHAT HE SEES AND THEREFORE SEES EVERYTHING, NOT WHAT HE LIKE TO SEE AND NOT SEE AND THUS HE TRULY SEES THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE AND THUS SEEING HE TRULY SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION NOT ROTE REHASHED PROGRAMMED UNDERSTAND.


AN EMOTIONAL, STYLE-FUL MAN ALWAYS SEES WITH FORCE, ADDS FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH WHEN HE SEES, HE LIKES OR DISLIKES WHAT HE SEES AND THEREFORE DOES NOT SEES EVERYTHING IMPARTIALLY, HE SEES WHAT HE LIKE TO SEE AND DO NOT SEE WHAT HE DISLIKES AND THUS HE NEVER TRULY SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE AND THUS NOT SEEING TRULY SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION HE ONLY ROTE REHASHED PROGRAMMED UNDERSTANDS.


How can you understand what force tells you to see?


If you agree that you see things you like to see and avoid seeing things you don’t like to see then in effect you are admitting that it is your mental force through attractive and repulsive stirring that is ‘calling the shots’ the conductor to what you see and don’t see.


Because force is blind and harmful, as a result of liking and disliking dictating what you see and don’t see, it is mental force that is the drive and not genuine reason the guide to what you see.


AS A RESULT OF FORCE THROUGH LIKING AND DISLIKING DETERMINING WHAT YOU SEE AND DON’T SEE, IS IT ANY SURPRISE YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND? INSTEAD IT IS TO BE EXPECTED AND A CERTAINTY THAT PEOPLE WHO LIKE AND DISLIKE (WHICH ARE NEVER PART TIME), CANNOT UNDERSTAND.


False perception is constant:


IT IS TRUE ORDINARY PEOPLE CAN SEE AND HEAR BUT THEY SEE AND HEAR FALSELY, NOT SOME OF THE TIME BUT ALL THE TIME. IT IS A DELUSION THAT WHAT THEY SEE AND HEAR IS AS IT IS OR THEY SEE AND HEAR TRULY.


Perceiving (seeing and hearing) falsely is never part time or intermittent but it is full time and there is ample evidence for that for those who cannot see as truth that it is.


If you cannot see or hear there is style in the way people say or do things then you have false perception because there is style ALWAYS in how people say or do things.


The truth is ordinary people can perceive the styles in others’ speech that they find charming or attractive or unpleasant or disagreeable but what they are perceiving is not style but force prolonging, changing speed and strength.


The person who perceives constant force perceiving, changing speed and strength not style is the person who perceives truly as it is actually present, the person who perceives style but not force prolonging, changing speed and strength is the person who perceives falsely and because ordinary people perceive style that attracts and repels them but they do perceive force prolonging, changing speed and strength, they perceive falsely.


In addition, they perceive everything as likeable, dislikeable, saddening, hurtful, agitating or fearful.


IN TRUTH THERE IS NOTHING LIKEABLE, DISLIKEABLE, SADDENING, HURTFUL, AGITATING OR FEARFUL IN WHATEVER THEY PERCEIVE, IT IS THEIR PERCEPTION THAT IS FALSE THAT MAKES IT SO.


It is like and dislike not genuine open reason that determines what people see and hear and because like and dislike are proxies of force that is blind, blind force cannot direct them to see truly but only falsely and so it is they perceive and like style but they do not perceive force changes.


UNDERSTANDING IS JUST A MATTER OF SEEING AND THUS KNOWING BUT BECAUSE EMOTIONAL PEOPLE NEVER SEE TRULY, THEY SEE WITH STYLE (FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH), THEY SEE SELECTIVELY WHAT THEY LIKE OR DISLIKE (WHAT THEIR MENTAL FORCE TELLS THEM) THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND.


UNDERSTANDING IS A SIMPLE MATTER THAT REQUIRES NO EFFORT BUT PEOPLE ARE NOT SIMPLE PEOPLE, THEY ARE COMPLICATED PEOPLE WHO WORSHIP COMPLICATION, THE MORE THEY STRIVE TO SEE THE TRUTH, THE MORE THEY CANNOT SEE THE TRUTH BECAUSE THE STRIVING IS BASED ON FORCE AND AS SOON AS FORCE IS ACTIVATED, ENTERS THE PICTURE, GENUINE UNDERSTANDING EXITS THE SCENE.


Resist the VC trap:


Reuter columnist: Resist the VC (venture capital) trap.


If she understood what she said is false or inappropriate, she would not have said it. So, understanding, what is wrong with what she said?


What she is trying to tell people is that the venture capital route to solving capital market troubles should be avoided or rejected.


You need force to resist and what you require is not resistance but rejection of the option or solution.


What she is trying to do is stirring force in readers with what she is saying, the occasion is an occasion for her to stir force in herself and others.


The person who does not want to stir force says, “Avoid or reject the VC option”. Resistance requires force and ‘trap’ may be a falsification to exaggerate how bad VC is.


WHETHER SHE IS AWARE OR NOT, THE WAY SHE PUTS IT INCITES FORCE IN HERSELF AND OTHERS, IT IS FALSE BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS TO STIR FORCE IN WHAT SHOULD BE A MATTER FOR REASONING OR UNDERSTANDING.


AVOIDING OR REJECTING ARE THE CORRECT WORDS TO USE, RESISTING IS INAPPROPRIATE.


 


The Sun is the dimmest it has been for nearly a century.


(Everything that happens has a cause, so why is the sun behaving unusually quiet, is it portent of something major developing?)


There are no sunspots, very few solar flares - and our nearest star is the quietest it has been for a very long time.


The observations are baffling astronomers, who are due to study new pictures of the Sun, taken from space, at the UK National Astronomy Meeting.


The Sun normally undergoes an 11-year cycle of activity. At its peak, it has a tumultuous boiling atmosphere that spits out flares and planet-sized chunks of super-hot gas. This is followed by a calmer period.


Last year, it was expected that it would have been hotting up after a quiet spell. But instead it hit a 50-year year low in solar wind pressure, a 55-year low in radio emissions, and a 100-year low in sunspot activity.


According to Prof Louise Hara of University College London, it is unclear why this is happening or when the Sun is likely to become more active again.


"There's no sign of us coming out of it yet," she told BBC News.


"At the moment, there are scientific papers coming out suggesting that we'll be going into a normal period of activity soon.


"Others are suggesting we'll be going into another minimum period - this is a big scientific debate at the moment."




In the mid-17th Century, a quiet spell - known as the Maunder Minimum - lasted 70 years, and led to a "mini ice-age".


This has resulted in some people suggesting that a similar cooling might offset the impact of climate change.


According to Prof Mike Lockwood of Southampton University, this view is too simplistic.


"I wish the Sun was coming to our aid but, unfortunately, the data shows that is not the case," he said.


Prof Lockwood was one of the first researchers to show that the Sun's activity has been gradually decreasing since 1985, yet overall global temperatures have continued to rise.


"If you look carefully at the observations, it's pretty clear that the underlying level of the Sun peaked at about 1985 and what we are seeing is a continuation of a downward trend (in solar activity) that's been going on for a couple of decades.


"If the Sun's dimming were to have a cooling effect, we'd have seen it by now."


'Middle ground'


Evidence from tree trunks and ice cores suggest that the Sun is calming down after an unusually high point in its activity.


Professor Lockwood believes that as well as the Sun's 11-year cycle, there is an underlying solar oscillation lasting hundreds of years.


He suggests that 1985 marked the "grand maximum" in this long-term cycle and the Maunder Minimum marked its low point.


"We are re-entering the middle ground after a period which has seen the Sun in its top 10% of activity," said Professor Lockwood.


"We would expect it to be more than a hundred years before we get down to the levels of the Maunder Minimum."


He added that the current slight dimming of the Sun is not going to reverse the rise in global temperatures caused by the burning of fossil fuels.


"What we are seeing is consistent with a global temperature rise, not that the Sun is coming to our aid."


Data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows global average temperatures have risen by about 0.7C since the beginning of the 20th Century.


And the IPCC projects that the world will continue to warm, with temperatures expected to rise between 1.8C and 4C by the end of the century.


No-one knows how the centuries-long waxing and waning of the Sun works. However, astronomers now have space telescopes studying the Sun in detail.


According to Prof Richard Harrison of the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, this current quiet period gives astronomers a unique opportunity.


"This is very exciting because as astronomers we've never seen anything like this before in our lifetimes," he said.


"We have spacecraft up there to study the Sun in phenomenal detail. With these telescopes we can study this minimum of activity in a way that we could not have done so in the past."


DAP & PKR hurl accusations at each other over Fairuz:


Whether he admits or not, this Star headline is false and poking fire with serious karma for the person responsible. It is divisive that according to the Buddha can send you to hell. He is trying to divide PKR & DAP and the public from DAP & PKR.


It is impossible that anyone can see DAP & PKR hurling accusations, you need force to hurl and he is trying to stir readers’ mental forces to be incensed.


A case may be made that DAP & PKR counter accuse each other but it is false and an exaggeration to say they hurl accusations at each other. The motive is to stir and divide and that is deadly karma for him.


A force dispenser than planner:


Unless ordinary stylish people are too inebriated by stress and distraction, they play a major role in deciding how much force to add to whatever they say or do and because whatever they say or do is rehashed from pre-existing plans in their mental jukebox, they play no part in planning or mapping out what they are going to say or do.


THUS EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE PLAY LITTLE OR NO ROLE IN PLANNING WHAT THEY SAY OR DO WHICH ARE MERELY REHASHED, USUALLY THEIR MAJOR ROLE OR FUNCTION IS TO SUPPLY FORCE TO POWER WHAT THEY WANT TO SAY OR DO, THEY DETERMINE HOW MUCH FORCE TO PUT INTO WHAT THEY SAY OR DO AND ALTHOUGH THEY MAY NOT BE AWARE THEY DO SO, THEY ARE TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE AMOUNT OF FORCE THAT ACCOMPANIES WHAT THEY SAY OR DO THAT ARE REHASHED.


BECAUSE DISPENSING FORCE, HOW MUCH FORCE TO DISPENSE IS THEIR MAJOR FUNCTION, THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WHATEVER SUFFERING THEIR DISPENSED FORCE CAUSES OTHERS.


YOU MAY THINK YOU ARE A THOUGHTFUL MAN OF GREAT REASON WITH SPEECH AND ACTION SPECIFICALLY TAILORED FOR EACH OCCASION BUT WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS LARGELY FIXED, REHASHED FOR THE OCCASION AND INSTEAD, YOUR PRIME FUNCTION IS AS A DISPENSER OF FORCE, YOUR ROLE CONSISTS MAINLY IN DECIDING HOW MUCH FORCE TO ADD, HOW MUCH PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO UNDERTAKE. THUS THE PERSON DECIDES WHETHER TO SAY ‘OOHH, I LIKE YOU’ OR ‘OOOOHHHH, I LIKE YOU’.


Saying something sadly, excitedly or mischievously:


You can say something eg “I love you” full of passion or lust, sadly, jovially or mischievously and the difference between these different ways is a matter of how force is differently applied in each case.


THUS THE FACT THAT EMOTIONAL PEOPLE CAN SAY THE SAME THING WITH DIFFERENT EMOTIONS (EG ANGRILY OR SADLY OR JOVIALLY OR GENTLY) AND DIFFERENT EMOTIONS IS A MATTER OF HOW FORCE IS DISPENSED DIFFERENTLY IS PROOF THAT THEY ARE VERY ACTIVE IN DISPENSING FORCE, THEIR MAJOR FUNCTION IS ACTUALLY IN SUPPLYING THE AMOUNT OF FORCE TO WHATEVER SUBSTRATE OF ACTION OR SPEECH AND VARYING HOW MUCH PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH.


THE GENTLENESS OF EMOTIONAL PEOPLE IS JUST A MATTER OF HOW THEY DISPENSE FORCE IN A MODULATED WAY WITH MUSICAL VARIATION OF SPEED (PITCH) AND LOUDNESS THAT IS INTENDED TO PLEASE THE LISTENER. WHEN THE LISTENER'S MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY TO LIKE THEMSELVES OR BE FLATTERED, HIS GENTLE STYLE IS SUCCESSFUL.


You must be proficient to play the piano:


Without being proficient or conversant with playing the piano you cannot play tunes on it.


In the same way without being proficient, an expert in dispensing & modulating force like playing a musical instrument, you cannot speak and act the same speech and action with different emotions like liking, disliking, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear. It takes someone who is good at dispensing and modulating force to say or do the same thing with different emotions.


Because ordinary people are fully capable of expressing whatever they say or do with different emotions, they are all proficient even experts at dispensing and modulating the force they dispense that is required in order to say or do the same thing with different emotions.


THUS IT IS THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE GOOD AT DISPENSING AND MODULATING FORCE WITH WHATEVER THEY SAY AND DO THAT ARE ACCORDING TO REHASHED PLANS, THE DISPENSING AND MODULATING OF FORCE IS A PRINCIPAL FUNCTION OF THEIR BEING.


Proficient in force, deficient in reason:


Thus it is that ordinary stylish emotional people are proficient in force, they are very good at dispensing and modulating the force they dispense to produce the different emotions that accompany whatever they say or do but they are deficient even totally lacking in genuine reason or understanding the precise nature of what they say or do.


Playing force like a guitar:


Ordinary stylish emotional people can play with force, fashion with force like the professional guitarist can strum his guitar with great variation to produce different music.


THIS IS WHAT EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE GOOD AT, USING AND DISPENSING FORCE WITH GREAT MODULATION OR CONTROL TO PRODUCE THE DIFFERENT EMOTIONS THAT ACCOMPANY WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO.


ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE CAN PLAY WITH FORCE LIKE A PROFESSIONAL GUITARIST CAN PLAY WITH HIS GUITAR AND THIS IS WHAT THEIR LIVES IN ESSENCE IS ABOUT, PLAYING WITH FORCE LIKE A GUITARIST PLAY WITH A GUITAR.


Play with and played by force:


Force is like a spider web that once entered is hard almost impossible to exit and you are waiting to be killed.


Thus, first you play with force, you are thrilled (mental force stirred attractively) by your successes or what you can achieve in worldly gains by exercising force but increasingly force seizes you, conditions you such that you are now its slave or force plays with you like a cat with a mouse under its paw.


When their mental force or emotions are stirred to too strong levels, the person is no longer controlling his force but his intensely stirred force is driving him to do or say whatever is rehashed or comes to mind. Alternatively when the stress, restlessness and distraction that is stirred by the constant use of force becomes too strong, their modulation of force deteriorates and the dispensing of force becomes inconsistent and incoherent.


Just as alcohol is addictive and destroys your mind, force when chronically used, as is the case with ordinary people, is addictive so that the urge to use force is compelling, hard to resist and force also warps or deforms the mind and thus distorted anything that issues from it, including its logic is warped or crooked and he largely cannot help his crooked logic and delusions. You can take half hearted measures to wean yourself off force but as soon as your persistence diminishes, force rebounds to reassert its control.


Only the person who has totally weaned himself off force, who no longer has any urge to be stylish or to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness has successfully exited force’s web.


WHAT PEOPLE'S LIVES HERE REVOLVES AROUND IS PLAYING WITH FORCE, VARYING THE AMOUNT OF FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND BEING PLAYED BY FORCE WHICH IS WHY THEY HAVE GREAT DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING OR CANNOT UNDERSTAND.


 


US acknowledges downturn faults


What Geithner says is confirmation of what I say that the US is largely responsible for the excesses that led to the current economic crisis. It was the US who invented the hocus pocus derivative instruments to hedge bets, they invented and expanded many forms of credit including credit card, they abused the US dollar as a reserve currency to spend way beyond their actual wealth, in effect having a free lunch at the expense of foolish countries like China, they pioneered investing in developing countries that sucked the local populace into stock market and property investments that boosted their economies.


WITHOUT AMERICAN SHENANIGANS THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A GLOBAL BOOM, THE GLOBAL BOOM WAS BASED ON US EXCESSES, CHEATING AND PROFLIGATE CONSUMPTION, NOT TRUE PRODUCTIVITY OR PROGRESS AND NOW THAT THIS HAS COLLAPSED, THERE IS NO GOING BACK AND IF THERE IS NO GOING BACK THERE IS NO RECOVERY AND SO THE WORLD IS FACED WITH A PROTRACTED DECLINE OR BUST. ONCE DECEITFUL OR CHEATING BASIS OF YOUR MIRACLE ECONOMY IS FOUND OUT, ONCE PEOPLE REALIZE YOUR COFFERS ARE ACTUALLY EMPTY NOT FULL AS TOUTED, HOW CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE PRETENSE YOUR COFFERS ARE FULL? IF YOU CANNOT GO BACK AND THERE WAS NO SUSTAINABLE BASIS TO THE PAST BOOM, IT MEANS FUTURE PROTRACTED ECONOMIC WOE, OF PICKING UP THE PIECES AND TRYING TO PUT THE USEFUL PIECES BACK TOGETHER. SO THERE IS NO WAY BACK AND THAT MEANS CHRONIC ECONOMIC PAIN.


The US carries a "substantial" share of the blame for the current economic crisis, Timothy Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary, has said.


But he said the world must work together to ease the crisis, with more balanced economic growth called for.


"Extraordinary policy responses" are needed to resolve the crisis, he said, as this was not a normal recession.


The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned global credit crunch losses could reach $4 trillion (£2.75tn).


"We bear a substantial share of the responsibility for what has happened," Mr Geithner said.


"We must set ourselves on a path so that one country, or group of countries, does not consume in excess while another set of countries produces in excess," he said.


Stressing that this was not a normal recession, he added: "Instead, it is an abrupt correction of financial successes that has overwhelmed economies' and markets' self-correcting mechanisms, and so can only be ended by extraordinary policy responses."


Mr Geithner was speaking in Washington ahead of a meeting of G7 finance ministers.


The IMF - which forecast that the global economy will slow by 1.3% this year - has said that even if urgent action is taken to clean up the banking system, the process will be "slow and painful", delaying economic recovery.


Financial successes?


Stressing that this was not a normal recession, he (Geithner) added: "Instead, it is an abrupt correction of financial successes that has overwhelmed economies' and markets' self-correcting mechanisms, and so can only be ended by extraordinary policy responses."


Geithner is courting madness by calling it correction of financial ‘successes’ when it is financial ‘excesses’.


True successes never need correction, it is illusory or false successes that need and will be corrected.


As Geithner said, this is not a normal recession, it is a crisis that may be beyond repair, those in the know of how great the mess is may not have come clean.


Mr Goh:


The purpose of addressing someone “Mr Goh” is to draw his attention to you, because you want to communicate something to him. Any other purposes is false and if your ‘Mr Goh’ has other intended purposes, you are practicing controlled madness that will end in madness.


Listen to the way people address others, even strangers they do not know, they speak as if they like you very much (or perversely dislike you) by stretching syllables and changing speed and loudness thus, “Miiisstteerrrr GooOOOHHH??”


The purpose of saying ‘Mr Goh’ with such style is to convey truly or falsely they like you so that you will be pleased and so the manner it was said was intended to please the addressee, to stir his mental force attractively to be pleased with himself because you, the pretty girl liked him.


Here, as in everywhere else, the occasion (to call someone to your attention) is an occasion to stir mental force, in this case to express your liking for him that may not be genuine and even if it is genuine it is mad because what is meaning of stirring your mental force to be attracted to him, in order to please him.


WHATEVER HAPPENS TO PEOPLE IS AN OCCASION FOR THEM TO STIR MENTAL FORCE IN THEMSELVES TO MOSTLY LIKE OR DISLIKE BUT SOMETIMES ALSO TO STIR SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION OR FEAR.


WHENEVER THEY SAY OR DO SOMETHING, THERE IS ALWAYS EMOTIONAL ACCOMPANYING BAGGAGE, THE OCCASION TO CALL YOU TO HIS OR HER ATTENTION “MR GOH” IS USED TO CONVEY HIS OR HER LIKE FOR YOU SO THAT YOU ARE PLEASED OR TO PLEASE YOU. EVEN IF YOUR LIKE FOR THE PERSON IS GENUINE, IT IS MAD TO CONVEY LIKE BY HOW YOU SAY “MR GOH” BECAUSE LIKE IS JUST AN ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE THAT IS BLIND, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL.


PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD INSIST THEY ARE BEING GOOD AND THEY ARE DOING SOMETHING MEANINGFUL WHEN THEY ADDRESS OTHERS WITH SUCH TENDERNESS OR AS IF THEY GENUINELY LIKE THE PERSON BUT THEY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS TO SAY "MR GOH" AS IF YOU LIKE HIM BECAUSE YOU ARE CONVEYING YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY BY HIM. WHAT IS THE USE OF STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY WHEN IT IS A BLIND ACTIVATION OF FORCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND WASTES ENERGY?


Say you like me, don’t hint:


There can only be one genuine purpose in addressing a person by his name and that is to attract his attention. To call his name with accompanying like is a false purpose and you are practicing controlled madness to please him.


If you want to convey you truly like him, tell him straight, “Mr Goh, I like you or my mental force is stirred attractively by you”.


Why won’t you say you like me? Is it because you are bashful? Being bashful is just an excuse, not genuine reason. The truth is the liking conveyed in the way people address each other is insincere, is rehashed standardized automatically. Even if you genuinely like the person, to say “Mr Goh” in a liking manner is courting madness because there can only be one true purpose to saying “Mr Goh” and that is to attract his attention. To simultaneously convey you like him is to say “Mr Goh” with a false purpose and that is controlled madness no matter how relevant you insist your conveyed liking is. You truly convey your liking by telling the other person, “I like you” and even then it is meaningless to tell the other person he stirs your mental force attractively. You must be mad to stir your mental force attractively at the sight of anything when it is meaningless, wastes energy and creates stress, restlessness and distraction.


All style is false:


The purpose of style or the stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness that have equivalents in postures and motion is to please, impress, intimidate or dominate others by stirring emotions because you please someone by stirring his mental force to like himself because you speak as if you like him (he is thrilled or pleased you liked him), when he is impressed, his mental force is stirred to like or marvel at you, when the person is intimidated, he is fearful and gives in to you.


The only genuine purpose for saying or doing something is what is said or done, not to convey like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation or fear or to please, impress, intimidate or dominate others and so to say or do something to please, impress, intimidate and dominate others is to convey false purposes in what you say and do and that is controlled madness that will end in uncontrolled madness.


THUS THE ONLY GENUINE PURPOSE FOR SAYING “MR GOH” IS TO ATTRACT HIS ATTENTION. TO SAY IT WITH LIKING OR IN A WAY THAT TRANSMITS LIKING TO HIM SO THAT HE WILL BE PLEASED WITH YOU IS TO ASCRIBE FALSE PURPOSE TO SAYING “MR GOH”.


A humble centurion with concern for his slave:


Jesus healed the sick servant of a Centurion because he marvelled at his concern and care for his slave and his humility, even though he was one who ordered people around and must be pleased, he said he was not worthy of Jesus entering his house.


All sickness and death of a person is not blameless, the person deserves to suffer and die, God can even reverse death, but you must be worthy for your death to be reversed.


UNLIKE THIS CENTURION PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD, EVEN THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD ARE SELF CENTERED, THINK TOO HIGHLY OF THEMSELVES AND HAVE LITTLE OR NO GENUINE CONCERN FOR OTHERS.


GENUINE NOT HYPOCRITICAL HUMILITY AND CARE AND CONCERN FOR OTHERS ARE QUALITIES EXALTED BY GOD.


After he had ended all his sayings in the hearing of the people he entered Caperna-um. 2 Now a centurion had a slave who was dear * to him, who was sick and at the point of death. 3 When he heard of Jesus, he sent to him elders of the Jews, asking him to come and heal his slave. 4 And when they came to Jesus, they besought him earnestly, saying, "He is worthy to have you do this for him, 5*  for he loves our nation, and he built us our synagogue." 6 And Jesus went with them. When he was not far from the house, the centurion sent friends to him, saying to him, "Lord, do not trouble yourself, for I am not worthy to have you come under my roof; 7 therefore I did not presume to come to you. But say the word, and let my servant be healed. 8 For I am a man set under authority, with soldiers under me: and I say to one, 'Go,' and he goes; and to another, 'Come,' and he comes; and to my slave, 'Do this,' and he does it." 9 When Jesus heard this he marveled at him, and turned and said to the multitude that followed him, "I tell you, not even in Israel have I found such faith." 10 And when those who had been sent returned to the house, they found the slave well.