What is understanding?
True understanding of what is said is simply seeing truly what is said.
Thus if a person understands what I said that there are constant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness then if he truly totally understood what I say (which is true) if he fully sees whatever forceful stretching, changing speed and loudness there is in his speech and others’ speech. If he can only partially see these entities then he partially understands, if he cannot see, then he totally does not understand what I say.
Why people understand falsely:
Sometimes people cannot understand what is said to them at all or what is happening but often they understand but their understanding is false.
Understanding is simply seeing.
If you see truly you understand truly, if you see falsely you understand falsely.
Because there is always added force as in staring and changing speed and strength in their seeing, they see in snapshots, there is a theme to what they see, they like and dislike what they see, they always see falsely because the force that is allied and involved in their seeing is blind and blinding apart from being harmful to self and others. As a result of always seeing falsely with associated force, they always understand not just falsely but their understandings are rehashed or rote instead of specific to the occasion.
THERE IS NOTHING MYSTERIOUS OR PROFOUND ABOUT UNDERSTANDING.
SEEING IS UNDERSTANDING.
THUS IF YOU SEE TRULY YOU UNDERSTAND TRULY.
IF YOU SEE FALSELY, SEE WITH ADDED BLIND FORCE, SEE WITH STYLE, SEE WITH LIKE AND DISLIKE, YOU UNDERSTAND FALSELY.
IF YOU CANNOT SEE SOMETHING EVEN IF IT IS PRESENT BEFORE YOUR EYES (EG STRETCHED SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED/PITCH AND LOUDNESS), YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND.
Why is Air France so eager to rule out pitot tube failure?
Officials from Air France have come out to say they think it is unlikely airspeed sensor failure was the cause of the crash.
If they knew what they say as true they would have said the sensors did not cause the crash and it is because they did not see and know air sensors did not caused the crash that they say it is possible but unlikely.
But why are they so eager to rule out sensor failure? Is it because it is true they are unlikely or is it because if they were the cause, Air France would be liable for more material and image damages?
People in this world say they are interested in the truth but they are interested in the truth if it is to their material advantage not when it would be to their detriment.
Exactly what is their motive for saying so can be known and if it is to divert attention elsewhere and ultimately wrongly blame something else, there is serious karma for those responsible.
IF PITOT TUBE FAILURE LED TO THE CRASH, THOSE WHO PROGRAMMED THE COMPUTERS HAVE KARMA. THEY PROBABLY PROGRAMMED THE COMPUTERS TOO AGRESSIVELY TO IMPRESS AT THEIR PROWESS AND THE MARVELS OF COMPUTERS AND FAILED TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION CIRCUMSTANCES THAT CAN OCCUR THAT WOULD RENDER THEIR PROGRAMMED AGGRESSIVE RESPONSES DISASTROUS.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID, ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE KARMA THAT IS LIKE AN OCEAN COMPARED TO THE FEW DROPS IN THOSE WHO ARE NOBLE, IF THE PROGRAMMING WAS TOO AGGRESSIVE OR GUNG HO AND IT CONTRIBUTED TO THE CRASH, ITS PROGRAMMERS HAVE KARMA.
RPK: Everyone is entitled to his opinions:
This statement does not reflect reality and is therefore false and RPK has wrong view.
Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say and without knowing and seeing something (your view) as true, you hold that view, you are putting your neck on the chopper block because if it is wrong view, it is hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.
If by everyone is entitled to his view, you mean everyone is entitled to put his head on the chopper board, then what you say is correct but if you think views are harmless, without everlasting consequences when it is a difference between heaven for an eternity for right view (for any matter there can only be one right view) and eternal punishment for wrong view.
FOR EVERY MATTER FOR VIEWS TO BE FORMED, THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE RIGHT VIEW. IF MY VIEW ON A MATTER IS RIGHT THEN ANY OTHER VIEWS THAT DIFFER IS WRONG AND THE DESTINATION FOR WRONG VIEW ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. BY SAYING EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO HIS VIEWS YOU ARE SANCTIONING THE RIGHT OF EVERYONE TO GO TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB AND IF THIS INCURS KARMA THAN MERIT THEN YOU ARE DELUDED TO SAY EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO HIS VIEW.
Unsolved will suit Air France fine:
Should the Air France crash remain unsolved, Air France may not be too unhappy and even quietly relieved because it will absolve them of any blame. Thus there may be pressure to turn a blind eye.
No one is a master but he is a slave of his views:
Fools are ever eager to form views on every subject under the sun, the wise refrain from having views and stick to what they see and know.
Even if you cannot define your view precisely it can be clearly defined for you by someone who is discerning and once formed it is your view that is the master or plan that you follow like a slave not master. You may remodel your view however many times you like but once remodelled that view is again your master and you are a fool to think you are a master of your view.
Thus if you clutter your mind with hundreds if not thousands of views that are often if not ALWAYS CONFLICTING, it becomes like a mad house and you are headed for confusion and insanity not heaven.
NOTWITHSTANDING THAT THE BUDDHA SAID HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB IS THE DESTINATION FOR WRONG VIEW, THE PERSON IS A SLAVE OF HIS VIEW THAT ONCE MODELLED OR REMODELLED BECOMES THE BOSS AND SO IF YOU ARE A FOOL EAGER TO FORM VIEWS ABOUT EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN IN TIME YOUR MIND BECOMES CHOCKABLOCK WITH VIEWS THAT ARE LIKELY TO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR SELF INDUCED INSANITY NOT HEAVEN OR PEACE OF MIND.
Indonesia threatens maid supply:
That a maid is subject to severe abuse is not a true or rational reason to indiscriminately turn off the supply of maids that may disadvantage those who need to find employment and so those who issue the threat or carry it out are headed for insanity for doing something for a false reason.
Such threats achieve nothing because no matter how many times you threaten, some maids will be abused so you might as well stop maids coming here instead of posturing or threatening which is mad.
If many maids are dying here for unexplained causes then you have a true reason to stop them coming here, not threaten to stop them coming here.
If occasionally a maid is abused you are childish or have some other reason you will not divulge to threaten to stop maids coming. Don’t threaten, just do it. Maids have been abused in Singapore, HK and Arab countries, so which country does Indonesia want to send its maids to?
The motive is emotional not reason:
The motive for saying swiftly without thinking that you may stop the supply of maid is emotional, to lash out, to punish or retaliate and because it is based on force it is blind and mad and the person is headed for insanity.
Views are rehashed understandings:
People who think their understanding of whatever is happening is fresh specific to the occasion are kidding themselves, they perceive falsely because their many views of things are their rehashed fixed understandings of whatever happens to them in daily life.
It is not necessary for a being to have views or understandings that he keeps rehashing because the world or reality never corresponds perfectly to the views but if accurate, at best the view is a good approximation but never reality itself.
A person’s view on a matter or happening is the person’s perception or interpretation of an event and this is memorized and whenever something subsequently happens, he searches his mental jukebox for a view that best fits what is happening and he ‘understands’ what has happened according to that rigid fixed view that although it can be revised is still fixed in its revised manner.
People cannot help having views about everything that happen to them and they memorize those views or their interpretations of reality so that whatever happens to them subsequently is made sense of relation to those views which therefore de facto rehashed understandings of things.
A person who has no rehashed understandings or views of things sees clearly as they are the various components, understand what they mean in combination and he does not resort to views or understandings of the past to explain it nor does he pigeon holes what has happened into rigid false views.
IF YOU AGREE YOU HAVE VIEWS ABOUT MATTERS AND OTHERS TOO HAVE VIEWS THAT ARE DIFFERENT ON THE SAME MATTER THEN THOSE VIEWS ARE THEIR RECORDED REHASHED UNDERSTANDINGS OF THINGS THAT CAN HAPPEN THAT THEY HAVE RECORDED IN THEIR MINDS AND THEY REHASH REGULARLY TO EXPLAIN TO THEMSELVES AND OTHERS WHAT THEY THINK IS HAPPENING WHICH IS NEVER THE TRUTH OR REALITY BUT A DESCRIPTION OF REALITY THAT IS AT BEST A GOOD APPROXIMATION BUT NOT THE REAL THING.
What are opinions?
Opinions are the person’s interpretations of what has happened that is not for show to be forgotten but they remember their opinions and they rehash their opinions time and again to explain subsequent events and these rehashed opinions are rehashed understandings of events that are dangerous because they are descriptions of reality not reality itself.
It is totally unnecessary to form views or opinions of whatever is happening and to keep referring to those opinions or views to explain things subsequently, what is required is you see accurately what is now happening, understanding what is now happening and thus understanding, where is there need to fall back on opinions or views or rehash views to explain it?
IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO HAVE OPINIONS, JUST SEE THE CASE AT HAND AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IT MEANS, SEE THE NEXT CASE AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS. WHENCE IS THERE NEED TO FORM AN OPINION THAT THROUGH REPETITION IS THEN FIRMLY MEMORIZED TO BE REHASHED AGAIN AND AGAIN TO EXPLAIN THINGS.
Understand according to what you see, not remembered:
A person of genuine understanding understands according to what he is now seeing whereas the person of rote understanding understands according to what he has remembered of the past of what this present event means.
ISN’T IT ABSURD TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS NOW HAPPENING ACCORDING TO WHAT YOU REMEMBERED WHAT THIS EVENT MIGHT MEAN INSTEAD OF UNDERSTANDING ACCORDING TO WHAT YOU EXACTLY SEE IS HAPPENING?
The meaning of talking computers:
Work is advanced it seems to make computers able to ‘understand’ spoken commands eg turn on the TV, record this program for half hour and the computer will carry out or ask you for clarification like ‘which program to record?’
BECAUSE COMPUTERS NEVER UNDERSTAND ANYTHING, THE FACT THAT IT CAN ‘UNDERSTAND’ SPOKEN INSTRUCTIONS MEANS THAT NO UNDERSTANDING IS NEEDED IN THE PROCESS OF YOU SPEAKING TO THE COMPUTER AND IT CARRYING OUT CORRECTLY WHAT YOU SAID. WHAT IS REQUIRED IS THE CORRECT PERCEPTION OF YOUR SPOKEN WORDS (NOT GUARANTEED), TRANSLATING THEM INTO ACTIONS AND OBJECTS AND THEN CARRYING THEM.
THEREFORE IN THE NORMAL USAGE OF LANGUAGE, NO UNDERSTANDING IS ACTUALLY REQUIRED, ONCE THE PERSON HAS THE SOFTWARE OF ENGLISH INSTALLED IN HIS BRAIN, WHAT IS REQUIRED IS GOOD PERCEPTION TO HEAR OR SEE THE WORDS, RECOGNIZE THE ACTIONS AND OBJECTS THEY REPRESENT AND THUS CARRY OUT THE MESSAGE. IN OTHER WORDS LANGUAGE IS PRIMARILY A MATTER OF ENCODING ACTIONS AND OBJECTS INTO WRITTEN AND SPOKEN WORDS TO BE TRANSMITTED AND ONCE RECEIVED IT IS PRIMARILY A MATTER OF DECODING THE WORDS INTO ACTIONS AND OBJECTS AGAIN WITH NO UNDERSTANDING NEEDED OR INVOLVED.
NO WONDER SO MANY PEOPLE CAN READ AND WRITE BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
Stylish people have no, not some understanding:
It may that some of those reading may express indignation that I am outrageous to assert that stylish emotional people have NO, not some understanding because they perceive that whilst they may not understand everything or complicated things, surely they have some understanding of some things but what I say may be true and it is they who have a false understanding here as everywhere else they think they understand when they don’t.
There are many situations far more pervasive than they realize when they think understanding is required or involved when no understanding is required and involved and so they misunderstand there as they misunderstand or don’t understand elsewhere.
Further what they say or is said to them always have accompanying force changes in force prolonging, changing speed and strength of force that cannot be understood because they are about blind meaningless force activity that they are not even aware are present or severely underestimate their presence.
BECAUSE THERE IS CONSTANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN WHAT YOU SAY OR HEAR OTHERS SAY, IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAY OR WHAT YOU HEAR YOU MUST FULLY SEE AND UNDERSTAND THESE FORCE ACCOMPANIMENTS THAT ARE NOT INCIDENTAL, LESS MEANINGFUL BUT OFTEN MORE MEANINGFUL THAN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID THAT MAY BE FALSE OR MAKES NO SENSE. IT MAY BE POSSIBLE THEY CAN HEAR SOME BUT THEY NEVER HEAR COMPLETELY ALL THE ACCOMPANYING STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THEIR SPEECH AND OTHERS THEY HEAR AND THEREFORE THEY NEVER FULLY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY SAY OR HEAR WHICH IS IN ANY CASE MEANINGLESS BECAUSE FORCE IS BLIND AND HAS NO MEANING AND IF YOU THINK FORCE CAN OR HAS MEANING IT REFLECTS THE DEPTH OF YOUR DELUSION.
Not only has what is said conveyed significant force changes, they also have conveyed emotions (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation or fear) that about blind meaningless force that are intended to stir the emotions of readers or listeners and further listeners never listen or read without emotions, but they always read or listen with accompanying emotions that are false and meaningless that render whatever understanding they have tainted even false.
PEOPLE DON’T JUST SPEAK OR WRITE SOMETHING, THEY SPEAK AND WRITE WITH ACCOMPANYING EMOTIONS THAT THEY WANT TO TRANSMIT TO OTHERS THAT ARE ABOUT BLIND MEANINGLESS FORCE THAT RENDERS WHATEVER THEY SAY OR WRITE TAINTED BY BLIND MEANINGLESS FALSE OR INCOMPREHENSIBLE.
PEOPLE DON’T JUST HEAR OR READ SOMETHING, THEY HEAR OR READ WITH ACCOMPANYING EMOTIONS THAT ARE ABOUT BLIND MEANINGLESS FORCE THAT THEY PROJECT INTO WHAT THEY READ OR HEAR WHETHER REAL OR IMAGINED THAT RENDERS WHATEVER THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THEY READ OR HEAR TAINTED BY BLIND FALSE OR MISUNDERSTANDINGS.
You may think you understand this statement, “Man ran over by car” but you may be deceived. This statement is a description of an event and no understanding is ever needed to construct or receive it. All is required is proficiency in encoding the event into words to be transmitted to others who then decode the words they receive to get a picture or description of the event with no understanding required or involved and if you think understanding is necessary and involved, you may be right or have false understanding here again as in everywhere else.
THERE ARE MANY THINGS YOU READ THAT ACTUALLY FALL INTO THE CATEGORY OF ‘MAN HIT BY CAR’ THAT ARE ACTUALLY JUST DESCRIPTIONS IN THIS CASE OF AN EVENT THAT REQUIRES NO UNDERSTANDING TO COMPOSE AND NO UNDERSTANDING TO PERCEIVE OR GET A PICTURE OF WHAT IS TRANSMITTED.
Further, “Man ran over by car” is said with accompanying style or force changes in prolonging syllables, changing speed and loudness that is not apparent when read than when spoken that are not incidentals but fully intended and because these force changes are meaningless, cannot be understood, it corrupts the entire message and render it not fully understandable. “Man ran over by car” is further said with emotions like agitation or sadness or even like as if it is interesting or ‘wow’ and that too corrupts and renders the message not fully comprehensible even if understanding is required.
Even if “Man ran over by car” is not said with emotion or style, it is heard or read by all stylish emotional people with style and emotion that taints and renders what they read or hear seriously compromised in truth.
Whilst a large part of language (including those pertaining to science, medicine and law) that actually do not require understanding because they are merely descriptive and requires coding and decoding there are higher functions of language that requires understanding. Why do people ‘mug’ or ‘swot’ for exams? They repeatedly study to securely encode by rote medical or law information so that they can rehash it in the exam hall with understanding not involved nor required.
FURTHER THEIR UNDERSTANDINGS OF THINGS ARE REHASHED, STANDARDIZED NOT FOR A SPECIFIC OCCASION BUT GENERALIZED FOR A CATEGORY OF OCCASIONS AND WHATEVER UNDERSTANDINGS THAT ARE REHASHED NOT FRESH FOR THE OCCASION ARE FALSE UNDERSTANDINGS. PEOPLE FORM VIEWS OR UNDERSTANDINGS OR INTEPRETATIONS OF EVENTS OCCURING AND THEY MEMORIZE TO REHASH THOSE VIEWS OR OPINIONS OR UNDERSTANDINGS REPEATEDLY SUBSEQUENTLY IN ORDER TO ‘UNDERSTAND’ BY ROTE EVENTS THAT HAPPEN.
What are spoken and written things that require understanding?
If something is spoken to you that you cannot see, you need true specific to the occasion understanding to understand it and the understanding may be totally absent, partial or full.
Thus if you are totally unaware even if you are doing it, that there are constant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness then you need true, specific to the occasion seeing to pay attention and examine your speech and that of others to detect the presence of prolonging, changing speed and loudness and even if you pay attention you may significantly underestimate or cannot see ‘subtle’ stretching, speed and loudness changes. There are pitch changes (more shrill or bass) as people stretch their syllables and these are speed changes caused in accelerating or decelerating exhalations during vocalization.
THUS YOU NEED TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION, NOT REHASHED UNDERSTANDING TO UNDERSTAND THE STATEMENT THAT THERE ARE CONSTANT FORCE STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN YOUR SPEECH BECAUSE YOU NEED TO FRESHLY SEE AND THEREFORE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE FORCE CHANGES IN YOUR SPEECH THAT ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS.
THE PERSON WHO SEES IN ITS ENTIRETY ALL THE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN HIS SPEECH IS THE PERSON WHO FULLY UNDERSTANDS WHAT I SAY.
THE PERSON WHO SEES IN ITS ENTIRETY ALL THE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN HIS SPEECH IS THE PERSON WHO FULLY UNDERSTANDS WHAT I SAY.
THE PERSON WHO PARTIALLY SEES THE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN HIS SPEECH IS THE PERSON WHO PARTIALLY UNDERSTANDS WHAT I SAY.
THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT SEE THE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN HIS SPEECH IS THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTANDS WHAT I SAY NO MATTER HOW HE MAY INSIST HE UNDERSTANDS WHAT I AM SAYING BUT IT IS RUBBISH.
***
LANGUAGE IS PRIMARILY A TOOL OF CODING AND DECODING THAT REQUIRES NO UNDERSTANDING TO ENCODE OR DECODE. UNDERSTANDING IS A HIGHER FUNCTION OF LANGUAGE THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE SELDOM OR NEVER ACCESS.
A LOT OF THINGS SAID ARE MERELY DESCRIPTIONS THAT MERELY REQUIRE ENCODING TO SAY AND DECODING BY RECIPIENTS TO GET A PICTURE WHAT IS ENCODED AND THEREFORE CARRY OUT WHAT IS COMMUNICATED IN WHICH UNDERSTANDING OR SEEING THE TRUTH OF WHAT IS HAPPENING IS NOT REQUIRED NOR IS IT PRESENT.
WHATEVER IS SAID OR HEARD BY EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE ACCOMPANIED BY FORCE CHANGES (STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS) THAT ARE NOT INCIDENTAL BUT AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE MEANING OF WHAT THEY SAID AND BECAUSE THESE ARE BLIND MEANINGLESS FORCE CHANGES THAT CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD, WHAT THEY SAY CANNOT BE FULLY UNDERSTOOD EXCEPT AS FALSE OR MEANINGLESS.
IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAY OR HEAR YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THERE ARE ACCOMPANYING FORCE CHANGES THAT ARE MEANINGLESS, FALSE AND HARMFUL BUT BECAUSE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND SUCH FORCE CHANGES AS MEANINGFUL AND BENEFICIAL THEY HAVE FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO.
FURTHER WHAT PEOPLE SAY HAS ACCOMPANYING EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION OR FEAR) THAT THEY WANT TO TRANSMIT AND THESE ARE ABOUT BLIND MEANINGLESS FORCE, THESE EMOTIONS RENDER WHAT THEY SAY OR IS HEARD FALSE AND MEANINGLESS.
NO ONE CAN UNDERSTAND EMOTIONS AND SO BECAUSE WHAT PEOPLE SAY IS ACCOMPANIED BY EMOTIONS, IT IS ACCOMPANIED BY WHAT CANNOT BE TRULY UNDERSTOOD.
STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ALWAYS READ OR HEAR WHAT IS SPOKEN TO THEM WITH EMOTION EVEN WHEN WHAT IS SPOKEN TO THEM HAS NO ACOMPANYING FORCE CHANGES AND THAT IS READING OR HEARING WITH ADDED BLIND MEANINGLESS FORCE THAT RENDERS YOUR UNDERSTANDING FALSE.
IF YOU READ OR HEAR WITH EMOTION, YOU READ OR HEAR WITH FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND MEANINGLESS THAT RENDERS THE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS READ OR HEARD TAINTED IF NOT FALSE.
FURTHER PEOPLE’S UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS ARE REHASHED NONSPECIFIC, THEY HAVE VIEWS OR OPINIONS OF WHATEVER THEY EXPERIENCE THAT ARE THEIR UNDERSTANDINGS OF WHAT IS HAPPENING THAT THEY MEMORIZE AND REHASH AGAIN AND AGAIN TO EXPLAIN SUBSEQUENT EVENTS.
As Jesus said:
This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand. With them indeed is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah which says: 'You shall indeed hear but never understand, and you shall indeed see but never perceive. For this people's heart has grown dull, and their ears are heavy of hearing, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should perceive with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and turn for me to heal them.' But blessed are your eyes, for they see, and your ears, for they hear. 17 Truly, I say to you, many prophets and righteous men longed to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it.
The Buddha: "What others call happiness that the Noble Ones declare to be suffering. What others call suffering that the Noble Ones have found to be happiness. See how difficult it is to understand the Dhamma. For those under the veil (of ignorance) it is obscured, for those who cannot see (if you cannot see you cannot understand)it is utter darkness. But for the good and the wise it is as obvious as the light for those who can see. Even though close to it, the witless who do not know the Dhamma, do not comprehend it.
It's hard to see the unaffected,
for the truth isn't easily seen.
Craving is pierced in one who knows;
For one who sees, there is nothing.
Cannot be truly understood and using force to understand:
Whatever emotional stylish people say or do cannot be truly understood but can only be falsely understood or truly understood as false because they always have accompanying false changes (style and emotion) that are blind that cannot be understood except as false.
Because people understand what others say that have accompanying style and emotions as true or beneficial, their understanding is always false. Further they cannot see the force changes accompanying others’ speech they cannot fully understand what others say.
TO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU PEOPLE SAY YOU MUST HEAR THE EMOTIONS ACCOMPANYING, HEAR THE FORCE CHANGES ACCOMPANYING THAT ARE FALSE AND MEANINGLESS AND IN ADDITION YOU MUST UNERRINGLY DISCERN WHAT PEOPLE SAY AS TRUE, FALSE OR MAKES NO SENSE. BECAUSE PEOPLE CANNOT TELL WHAT IS FALSE IS FALSE, THEY ACCEPT NONSENSE AS TRUTH, THEY ALSO CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT PEOPLE SAY.
People are perversely using force that is blind to understand what they hear or read because they hear and read with emotions, with like and dislike and that is using force to receive what they read or hear and that is crazy because force is blind cannot understand.
PEOPLE READ WITH EMOTIONS, PRIMARILY LIKE AND DISLIKE AND THAT IS USING FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND DOES NOT UNDERSTAND TO RECEIVE OR UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY HEAR OR READ WHICH IS WHY THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
What it takes to truly understand:
In order to truly understand, a person must truly understand the substance and style of whatever is spoken or written, must not use force to understand what he reads or hears.
Understanding the substance of what is spoken or written:
There is substance and there is style in the substance of what is written or said and the person who truly understands must understand this is style in the substance and this is substance. “Hey or well” in “Hey or well, I did this” is the style in the substance of the speech just as fourscore and ten years ago is a stylish way of saying ‘50 years or whatever it means’.
Apart from separating the false style in the substance, the person must be able to tell unfailing what is true, false or makes no sense (yabadabadoo makes no sense) in the substance of what he hears or reads.
Understanding the style of what is spoken or written:
If there is style, the truly understanding person understands, there is style present. If there is no style, the truly understanding person understands, there is no style present.
He fully detects all style or use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness and understands them as meaningless and harmful to self and others.
Understanding the emotion of what is spoken or written:
Often people are not just expressing emotion, they are expressing they like what they disliked eg they smile and say ‘never mind’ or ‘its ok’ as if they liked what they disliked. And so a truly understanding person must know fully the emotions of what he hears or reads.
Understanding without style or emotion:
In order to understand truly you must read or listen without style or without your mental force stirring in speed and strength, you must not like or dislike what you read or hear or you must not use force as your receptionist to what you read or hear. If you do, you are using force that is blind and does not understand to understand.
Often the style is giveaway to person’s intentions:
Do not underestimate the importance of understanding the style of what and how something is said to you.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO CONCEAL A PERSON’S TRUE INTENTIONS IN SAYING SOMETHING BUT HIS MALICIOUS INTENTS ARE CLEARLY DISCERNIBLE IN HOW HE SAID (EG CONFIDENT OR NERVOUS SMILE, FULL OF TENSION OR CONFLICT OR RESTLESS) AND THE WORDS HE CHOOSES TO SAY IT.
BECAUSE A DISCERNING PERSON DISCERNS CLEARLY THE EMOTIONS ACCOMPANYING WHAT IS SAID, HE HAS A GOOD IDEA WHAT THE PERSON’S MOTIVES ARE AND IS UNLIKELY TO BE CHEATED.
Understanding style is crucial and people understand style falsely.
A true understanding is style is not an option or unimportant but it is crucial because often the giveaway for a person’s true intentions that belies what he states is in his style, in how he says it, the emotions that accompany and the words he uses.
It may be that there will be those who may acknowledge I pay attention to style and I agree style is important in assessing the motives of others but they have a false not true understanding because they themselves possess style always and the reason they possess style is because they perceive style that is meaningless and harmful is meaningful and beneficial.
THE ONLY REASON WHY A PERSON DISPLAYS STYLE IN WHAT HE SAYS (EG GENTLE MELODIOUS WAY OF SPEAKING, SMILING WHILST HE SPEAKS) IS BECAUSE HE FALSELY PERCEIVES STYLE IS MEANINGFUL AND BENEFICIAL WHEN IT IS ALWAYS FALSE AND HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND THUS THE PERSON WHO ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE UNDERSTANDS THAT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT STYLE IS IMPORTANT, AS IMPORTANT AS THE MESSAGE WHILST HE HIMSELF PRACTICES STYLE HAS FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF STYLE.
IN OTHER WORDS, HE IS A HYPOCRITE. HE CAN SEE OTHERS’ STYLE AS EVIL AND MEANINGLESS BUT HE CANNOT SEE HE HIMSELF HAS STYLE AND IT IS SIMILARLY EVIL AND MEANINGLESS.
The plant that pretends to be ill
(The Buddha said he was a tree spirit and there are spirits in bushes. What the plant is doing is called trickery or deception and that is why it is a plant and not an angel in heaven. Thus if you like to deceive others, to be a plant may be your future lot not for once but even another eternity and you can wage your constant battle of survival against marauding animals and insects rather than existing in heavenly bliss without death for an eternity)
Matt Walker |
A leaf damaged by mining moths (left) compared to one faking it (right).
A plant that pretends to be ill has been found growing in the rainforests of Ecuador.
The plants feigns sickness to stop it being attacked by insect pests known as mining moths, which would otherwise eat its healthy leaves.
It is the first known example of a plant that mimics being ill, and could also explain a common pattern seen on plant leaves known as variegation.
The discovery is published in the journal Evolutionary Ecology.
Variegation is familiar to gardeners and affects many species of plant. Variegated plants have different coloured patterns on the leaf surface, produced by a variety of causes.
One of the most common is when cells in the leaf lose chlorophyll and their ability to photosynthesise, appearing white.
In theory, plants with variegated leaves should be at a disadvantage, because of this restricted ability to photosynthesise.
But a chance discovery by a team of botanists suggests this may not be true after all. Instead, some variegated plants may be mimicking illness to avoid being eaten, putting themselves at an advantage.
The fact that there are both plain green and variegated leaves in the population indicates to me that both are useful in the long-term success of the species Botanist Sigrid Liede-Schumann |
Sigrid Liede-Schumann and colleagues Ulf Soltau and Stefan Dotterl of the University of Bayreuth in Germany were studying understory plants in the forest of southern Ecuador, when they noticed that the plain green leaves of a plant known as Caladium steudneriifolium were far more frequently damaged by mining moths than those of variegated leaves of the same species nearby.
Mining moths lay larvae into the leaves, and the caterpillars then munch through the leaf surface, leaving a white trail of damage behind.
"The similarity of the variegation patterns with the criss-cross munching traces of the larvae led to the idea that maybe they deter the mining moth from laying its eggs," says Liede-Schumann.
To test the idea, the researchers used white correction fluid to mimic the appearance of variegation on hundreds of healthy leaves.
After three months, they then counted the number of leaves affected by the mining moth caterpillars, comparing green leaves, variegated leaves and those painted white to appear variegated.
A mining moth caterpillar leaves a trail of damage. |
"The results were the same," says Liede-Schumann. "Visibly variegated leaves were significantly less frequently damaged by mining moth larvae than plain green ones."
While moths infested almost 8% of green leaves, they infested 1.6% of variegated ones and just 0.4% of those painted to look like they were variegated.
"I was quite surprised," says Liede-Schumann.
She believes that the plant essentially fakes being ill, producing variegated leaves that mimic those that have already been damaged by mining moth larvae. That deters the moths from laying any further larvae on the leaves, as the insects assume the previous caterpillars have already eaten most of the leaves' nutrients.
"The fact that there are both plain green and variegated leaves in the population indicates to me that both are useful in the long-term success of the species," says Liede-Schumann.
The reduction in a variegated leaf's ability to photosynthesise is likely to be more than offset by the benefits of not being eaten, the researchers believe, suggesting that variegation survives in wild plants because it confers a selective advantage.
As the Boston Globe struggles, confusion prevailed:
This is a headline in the ‘august’ NYT, can you see what is wrong or do you understand what is said is meaningless?
What is being said is that as Boston Globe struggles an agitated stirring of mental force prevailed because confusion is an emotion that involves a person’s mental force stirring in a disorganized way. What meaning can that be and of what use is it to stir your mental force to be confused in response to the Boston Globe’s travails?
THIS IS A TOTALLY MEANINGLESS AND SILLY STATEMENT TO MAKE AND YET A ‘RESPECTABLE’ NEWSPAPER LIKE NYT SEES NOTHING WRONG. WHAT MEANING IS THERE AND OF WHAT USE IS IT TO STIR MENTAL FORCE IN A DISORGANIZED WAY IN RESPONSE TO BOSTON GLOBE’S STRUGGLES?
Whence the confusion?
If you used calm clear reasoning to collect and examine all the facts of the case of Boston Globe struggling and then use calm reason to see if there can be a solution where is there need for stirring emotional confusion? If there are no solutions, you can stir all the confusion and it will not do anyone one bit of good but instead it is always suffering to be confused, will undermine the seeing of a solution that may be there and further conditions yourself to confusion that will end in INSANE CONFUSION you cannot believe will come to pass.
KOTA BARU: PAS spiritual leader Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat said he was willing to forgive Umno if it apologised for “stabbing PAS in the back” 40 years ago.
Even if UMNO apologized that is not the criteria for forgiveness but UMNO must ask PAS for forgiveness and even if you forgive someone, you are a fool to close your eyes to embrace him because he can still stab you in your back as he embraced you even after he asked your forgiveness.
FORGIVING ANOTHER DOES NOT MEAN YOU FORGET WHAT HE DID AND FORGET THAT HE CAN DO THE SAME TO YOU, IT JUST MEANS YOU DO NOT WANT REPAYMENT FOR HIS DEBT.
AS JESUS SAID, A BAD TREE CANNOT BEAR GOOD FRUIT AND SO LONG AS IT REMAINS A BAD TREE YOU ARE A FOOL TO TRUST THE BAD TREE EVEN IF IT ASKS YOUR FORGIVENESS WHICH MAY BE A PLOY TO MANIPULATE YOU.
Jesus implies understanding is the essential requisite for heaven:
For those who understand, what Jesus said below makes it is clear that it is understanding rather than blind faith that is the requisite to going to heaven.
This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand. With them indeed is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah which says: 'You shall indeed hear but never understand, and you shall indeed see but never perceive. For this people's heart has grown dull, and their ears are heavy of hearing, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should perceive with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and turn for me to heal them.' But blessed are your eyes, for they see, and your ears, for they hear. Truly, I say to you, many prophets and righteous men longed to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it.
Although Jesus said that those who believed in him shall have eternal life, he said the one who obeys what he commands is the one who loves him. You need true understanding to truly obey what Jesus commanded. If you falsely obey what Jesus commanded you are a hypocrite or lip service believer.
You cannot see who Jesus is and if there is heaven and so you must believe or have faith, use force to believe but your belief must be based on understanding what and why you do what you do.
Again when his disciples began to complain about forgetting to bring bread, he chided them for still being without understanding, being hypocritical like the Pharisees for not practicing what they preached about denying themselves and discontent like Herod for wanting what they do not have.
So you understand what is forgiveness?
For emotional people forgiveness stirs emotions and they may perceive forgiveness as embracing forgetting what the person has done and becoming good friends again apart from foregoing any claims for compensation for the wrong done to them. Even when they forgive, because they are not masters of themselves, they may go back against their words in heated moments to demand payment despite earlier avowal of forgiveness.
THE PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS FORGIVENESS UNDERSTANDS THAT IT IS AN EMOTION FREE FULLY COMPREHENDING RELINQUISHMENT OF CLAIMS FOR COMPENSATION FOR THE WRONG THE FORGIVEN PERSON HAS DONE TO HIM AND THIS DOES NOT MEAN HE FORGETS WHAT HAS HAPPENED NOR THAT THEY MUST PAT EACH OTHERS’ BACKS AND BECOME GOOD FRIENDS AGAIN.
Keeping stirred force on hold:
She is doing work with her muscles and stirring mental force but no meaningful work is being done and it is pretentious or faking it and will end in insanity for whoever who does what she is doing. It is called controlled madness for the purpose of impressing others she foolishly does not realize is leading her to certain future torment.
SHE IS KEEPING HER STIRRED MENTAL FORCE ON HOLD IN AN ELEVATED LEVEL JUST AS SHE IS PROLONGING OR SUSTAINING HER EXPRESSION OF FACE, EYES, GAPING MOUTH AND CURLED FINGER. SHE IS DOING WORK BUT NOTHING MEANINGFUL IS DONE AND THAT IS CONTROLLED MADNESS.
THE SANE PERSON WOULD NOT UNNECESSARILY STIR HIS MENTAL FORCE LET ALONE KEEP HIS STIRRED FORCE ON HOLD THUS.
How many strikers does Manchester City need?
Comment: The person is asking a question not because he needs an answer from you but he already has an answer that is not negotiable but instead he is hinting that Manchester City has too many strikers that he wants to guide you to make yourself.
If he meant what he said, he would say “Manchester City has too many strikers”, his question is insincere or not meant, it is not that he needs your answer but he is hinting which is a sin according to Buddhist teaching.
Further his question is not based on truth and reason but driven by blind force. Driven by dislike of Manchester City’s array of strikers, it is blind force in the form of dislike that is the drive not true reason or understanding that is the source of his question.
HERE AS IN MANY PLACES HE AND OTHERS THINK HIS QUESTION IS BASED ON REASON OR UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS BASED ON FORCE THAT IS BLIND, IN THIS CASE IT IS DISLIKE OF WHAT HE SEES THAT DRIVES HIM TO ASK THE QUESTION.
HE IS EXPRESSING A VIEW BASED ON HIS EMOTION DRIVEN ‘UNDERSTANDING’ OF THE SITUATION AND THIS VIEW IS MEMORIZED TO BE REHASHED IN THE FUTURE TO ‘EXPLAIN’ OR UNDERSTAND THINGS HAPPENING. IN FACT THIS VIEW ABOVE MAY BE A REHASH OF A SIMILAR SENTIMENT OR OPINION TO DEPRECATE (EG SOUR GRAPES OR CRITICIZE FOR THE SAKE OF DISLIKE) WHICH HE HAS REHASHED MANY TIMES BEFORE AND THEREFORE HIS UNDERSTAKING FOR THIS SITUATION IS NOT FRESH SPECIFIC FOR THE SITUATION BUT REHASHED.
Thus a person who truly understands what he reads here must understand that the question is false, insincere not based on genuine reason but based on force or dislike and the matter is totally without merit, there are far more important matters to devote his attention and he thinks what is unessential is essential and that is the path to future insanity.
Rehashing an understanding:
Whenever stylish emotional people see something happening, they are too lazy, impatient or harassed to examine the situation to understand it specifically but they resort to hastily rehashing a previously formed view or explanation or understanding of the situation and so their understandings of whatever is happening forever remains as stipulated by those views or understanding.
If they do not already have a view that can be applied to the situation, they become puzzled, distressed and they struggle to form a view of what they are experiencing not based on genuine understanding but based on their aroused like or dislike and they memorize that view or understanding so that they can retrieve it to explain things happening in the future.
The person of genuine understanding does not instinctively fall back on views when faced with something but he uses genuine reason to discern as it is what is happening and based on what he truly sees, he understands truly specific for that occasion what the happening was about. He may remember the occasion and what he meant but he does not remember it by rote to be rehashed by rote en bloc to explain lazily and presumptuously future events.
The fact that:
"The fact that this is a non-invasive test is also a big bonus.”
Many people have the propensity to use ‘the fact that’ and it is a rigid rehashed style of speech that the person is attracted to because he deems it impressive or authoritative.
If you always speak the truth then whatever you say is true and therefore you need not say it is a fact.
“the test’s non-invasiveness is a big advantage” is a style free statement.
If you observe people carefully, you may realize people have favourite phrases like ‘the fact that blah, blah, blah’ and the only way this comes about is that it is rehashed and they copied it without understanding from others because one with genuine understanding knows there is no reason to keep saying ‘the fact that’.
By saying 'the fact that' they are unrighteously wanting to accept what they say as true when it may not be fact. Makes sure what you say is fact is truly fact otherwise you are dicing with future insanity perceiving what you did not know as fact is fact.
Inappropriately rehashed:
A test based on urine is plainly non-invasive beyond dispute unless you are mad and so you do not have to tell others that it is a fact, all you need is to mention it or bring its non-invasiveness to others’ attention.
IT IS ONLY BECAUSE ‘THE FACT THAT’ IS REHASHED NOT SPECIFICALLY COMPOSED FOR THIS OCCASION THAT IT IS REHASHED IN THE WRONG CONTEXT THAT SHOWS TO THE DISCERNING THAT IT IS MINDLESSLY REHASHED.
THERE ARE SITUATIONS WHEN IT MAY BE APPROPRIATE TO POINT OUT TO OTHERS SOMETHING IS A FACT. BUT IN THIS CASE, THAT THE URINE TEST IS NON-INVASIVE IS PLAIN FOR ALL TO SEE AND SO YOU NEED NOT TELL OTHERS IT IS A FACT BUT YOU JUST BRING ITS NON-INVASIVESNESS TO OTHERS’ ATTENTION.
BECAUSE YOU PERCEIVE IT AS UNDERSTANDABLE TO TELL OTHERS WHAT IS OBVIOUS, A TEST’S NON-INVASIVENESS IS A FACT YOU ARE DICING WITH FUTURE MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION.
You can rehash and in most situations you may kid others that it is live, specific to the occasion but sometimes what is rehashed standardized does not fit the situation and it tells the discerning what is said is rehashed mindlessly.
Mad head tilting:
If something you want to see eg words on wall that are tilted requires you to tilt your head to see it, you won’t go mad. If you are tilting your head to look cute, to express desire or longing then you are going to go mad because your tilting of your head is unnecessary only for show to impress or please.
There is a smile and it is false to be nice and called lying with the face.
IF A SMILE IS FALSE, MEANINGLESS, REHASHED ACCORDING TO A PLAN, IS LYING WITH YOUR FACE AND STIRS EMOTION OR FORCE AND YOU PERCEIVE IT AS GENUINE & GOOD THEN IF I AM CORRECT YOU SEE FALSELY AND THEREFORE CANNOT UNDERSTAND.
SHE IS NOT INNOCENT BUT MISCHIEVOUS AND A TEMPTRESS IN HER OWN RIGHT. SHE IS FOOLISH TO HAVE PARTICIPATED IN THE DEMONSTRATIONS WHICH IS NOT DENYING YOURSELF AS JESUS COMMANDED AND SHE LOST HER LIFE AS A RESULT.
WORK HAS TO BE DONE TO TILT ONE’S HEAD AND IT IS INHERENTLY UNSTABLE AND MORE STRESSFUL THAN THE GRAVITY NEUTRAL HEAD VERTICAL. AND SO IF YOU TILT YOUR HEAD IT MUST BE FOR SOME PURPOSEFUL WORK LIKE LOOKING UNDER A CAR FROM THE SOURCE OF A SOUND. IF YOU TILT YOUR HEAD TO EXPRESS DESIRE OR LIKING OR APPEAR TEMPTING, YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING OTHERS.
Shot in her heart as she wanted:
Quote: Makan said: 'I tried to dissuade her from going out in the streets because I'd seen in my work as a journalist that, unfortunately, there are a lot of merciless behaviours.
'But she said that our attendance would be worthwhile even if a bullet hits my heart.
'Unfortunately, that is how she died, a bullet hit her heart and her lung, and maybe five or six minutes later, she died.
Jesus said you will judged for every careless word you say and many people emotionally say things that they may bitterly regret later or have to pay dearly as in this case. Since you say it is worthwhile even if a bullet hit your heart, your words may be put to the test.
THUS IF YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR YOU, YOU WILL MIND WHAT YOU SAY LEST YOU MAY HAVE TO FULFIL IT PAINFULLY.
Since you volunteered to die:
Even though there are hoards of rioters, they are afraid to die and since you volunteer to die by saying it is worthwhile attending even if a bullet hits your heart, you will have first go or priority to be sacrificed for your cause.
DON’T TEMPT FAITH, MAKE SURE YOU DON’T MIND DOING WHAT YOU SAY YOU DON’T MIND.
IT IS NOT A CASE OF GOD OR FATE BEING NASTY. SOMEONE HAS TO DIE WITH SOLDIERS FIRING AND SINCE YOU STEPPED FORWARD TO VOLUNTEER, FATE HAS ACCEPTED YOUR OFFER AND SPARE OTHERS WHO ARE RELUCTANT OF THEIR HEARTBREAK.
All fair & square:
Jesus said every hair on your head is numbered or accounted for, not a sparrow will fall or die without the Father’s permission and so nothing that happens can happen without God’s knowledge or approval, so whether you mean it or not, if you say it is worth dying to attend the protest then if others do not want to die, then even if you think you are special and too pretty or good to die, since you volunteered to die and someone has to receive the bullets soldiers are firing, then you shall be the one to stop the bullets.
YOU THINK YOU ARE SPECIAL BUT A PERSON IS TRULY SPECIAL IF HE IS TRUE AND GOOD NOT ATTRACTIVE, CHARMING AND NICE AND SO IF IN TRUTH OR OBJECTIVELY THERE IS NOTHING SPECIAL ABOUT YOU COMPARED TO FELLOW PROTESTERS THEN SINCE YOU FOOLISHLY VOLUNTEERED TO DIE, WHY NOT LET YOU DIE FIRST?
Something for nothing:
Quote headline: Something for nothing.
This was said in relation to national healthcare financing crisis in the US possibly to attack its proponents as ridiculously wanting something for nothing or a free lunch when it may be the case that health professionals and their cohorts the insurance companies are charging exorbitantly and ordering expensive unnecessary tests, procedures and medicines that raise costs unnecessarily.
“Something for nothing” is a view, someone’s assessment or understanding of a situation that may be false or true that he is likely to memorize to rehash to apply to new situations and thus it is a form of rote understanding.
Few if anything are truly free.
Even gifts are usually given with stated or even unstated conditions or motives and therefore not truly free, something for nothing.
Even if you win a lottery it is not something for nothing because you have to buy a ticket in order to win and the prize is something for something, the ticket you bought.
Even if you steal or rob someone it is not something for nothing because you have to do work and expose yourself to danger to steal or rob apart from incurring inescapable karma.
Even if you found $50 on the road it is not something for nothing because you have to be there to pick it up, it is taking what is not given that belongs to someone that the Buddha tells you is sin and there may be karma for that no matter how you insist is not there, is there.
‘SOMETHING FOR NOTHING’ IS THE AUTHOR’S OPINION OR VIEW OR UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION ABOUT US HEALTHCARE FINANCES WHICH HE FORMULATED OR REHASHED FROM MEMORY, WILL REMEMBER AND REHASH FOR FUTURE SIMILAR SITUATIONS AND IT MAY BE WRONG BECAUSE THE SITUATION MAY BE MORE THAT THERE ARE EXCESSES AND ABUSES BY INSURANCE COMPANIES AND DOCTORS THAT ‘BUMP UP COSTS’ THAT IF PROPERLY ADDRESSED WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE COSTS FOR ALL BUT AT THE EXPENSE OF THE INSURANCE AND MEDICAL FAT CATS.
What’s so exciting about donating your organs?
The implication of their smiles is that they are happy or enjoy donating their organs.
WHY SHOULD ANYONE LIKE OR DISLIKE OR FEEL PROUD (LIKING) DONATING THEIR ORGANS? DONATING YOUR ORGANS IS SOMETHING YOU MINDFULLY, SOLEMNLY MAKE, THERE IS NO NEED TO GENERATE PUBLICITY OR BE INDUCED BY OTHERS TO BEAT THE DRUM OF DONATING.
WHAT THEY ARE DOING (A PHOTO OP) IS ACTUALLY MEANINGLESS AND THEREFORE THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS THAT WILL END IN MADNESS EVEN IF THEY WERE RELUCTANTLY RECRUITED TO POSE FOR THE CAMERA. YOU DON’T NEED TO SMILE AND POSE WITH YOUR CARD TO DONATE YOUR ORGANS, WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS MEANINGLESS, FOR SHOW AND THAT IS THE PATH TO INSANITY.
YOU DON’T EVEN NEED TO DISPLAY THE CARD IN UNISON THAT IS ARTIFICIALLY STAGED, LET ALONE DISPLAY IT WITH A SMILE OR LIKING. BECAUSE WHAT IS DONE, DISPLAYING AND SMILING IS MEANINGLESS, ANYONE WHO DOES SO IS HEADED FOR MADNESS.
‘Such and such’ not ‘something for nothing’:
Rather than you seeing in snapshots the situation about the US healthcare funding crisis and then rehashing an old view or understanding or formulating an understanding ‘something for nothing’ that no matter how accurate is only an approximate fit, the person who understands truly will examine the situation carefully and ascertain it is such and such, not ‘something for nothing’.
By saying the US healthcare funding crisis is such and such you are specifically understanding the crisis as it is, not classifying it according to tailor made rehashed understandings.
