Malaysia’s F1 entry:

 

Malaysia’s F1 entry:

Where Honda and now BMW are beating a hasty retreat from F1, Malaysia’s government is backing a team to compete.

It is a profligate waste of money that is a possible avenue for pilferage that reflects on the recklessness, poor judgement and priorities of those at the helm of the country.

Maybe Malaysia knows better than Honda and BMW or they are greater fools wasting the nation's resources that can be put to more productive use.

Truth is more dangerous than fiction:

It reflects false perception that will end in insanity for the person.

Truth is not dangerous except that you are fearful to protect your life here by embracing falsity to get along.

Fiction is falsity is always finally fatal because it poisons the mind to become insane.

TRUTH ITSELF IS NEVER DANGEROUS BUT SANE AND COMPLETE PEACE OF MIND, THE BUDDHA SAID TRUTH IS THE HIGHEST OF SAVORS, IT IS THE ENEMIES OF TRUTH THAT MAKE IT DANGEROUS. FICTION IS NOT ONLY ALWAYS DANGEROUS, IT IS THE PATH TO CERTAIN FUTURE INSANITY.

 

Hisham: Nordin (killed terrorist) could have been rehabilitated

People are difficult if not impossible to rehabilitate, the Buddha said you have shed your own blood greater than the four great oceans and yet people are unrepentant, deluded perceiving they are right and good when they are the opposite, harming themselves and others.

It is impossible that Hisham knows what he is talking about but driven by emotion or force (sadness in this case), he is moved to speak in useless regret, trying to stir sadness and conflict in others as to what might have been.

UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, YOU ARE WISE TO REMAIN SILENT. IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE NORDIN CAN BE REFORMED, AS THE BUDDHA SAID DIFFERENT BEINGS HAVE DIFFERENT PROPERTIES AND THERE ARE LIMITS AS TO HOW MUCH THEY CAN BE CHANGED IF POSSIBLE AND SO IF YOU ARE SPEAKING WISHFULLY OUT OF SADNESS, YOU ARE COURTING INSANITY AND CREATING KARMA FOR ADVOCATING REGRET AND DOUBT IN OTHERS AS TO WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN.

Fussiness is about force never reason:

Many people are annoyed by the fussiness of others but they don’t realize they themselves too are fussy (fastidious) in different ways and it is always suffering, robotic controlled torment that will end in insanity.

Fussiness is intolerance for things and ways things are done that deviate from a narrow even rigid perception of what is correct or good or the proper way of doing or saying something. Thus the fussy person likes to do particular things in a particular way and get upset or angry or disliking if it departs from that way, he is intolerant of others’ different ways of doing or saying things.

Thus fussiness is based on force, on attraction for a particular personal way of saying or doing something in a rigid robotic rehashed way and intolerant or dislike for ways that differ.

Insulting Islam? Please:

The answer to the question is not ‘please’ but yes or no and so it is an inappropriate reply that is cultivating false logic for yourself and others.

By saying ‘please’ you are sort of begging others, indicating your mental force is stirred to like what you disliked. Why should your mental force be stirred by the accusation. The relevant reply is whether the accusation is with merit or not.

“PLEASE” IS A STYLISH FALSE EMOTIONAL ANSWER TO A QUESTION THAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ACCEPT AS VALID WHEN IT IS FALSE.

 

Your shopping trolley knows what you want

Advertising will be delivered directly to supermarket trolleys based on a shopper's in-store behaviour and purchasing history.

Just because a chip and computers keep track of your past purchases and deliver ‘appropriate’ advertisement does not mean your trolley knows what you want.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANY TROLLEY CAN KNOW WHAT YOU WANT AND IT IS PRACTICING FALSE PERCEPTION (THAT A TROLLEY CAN KNOW) FOR THE SAKE OF EXAGGERATION THAT WILL END IN INSANITY TO SAY FALSELY TO OTHERS ‘YOUR TROLLEY KNOWS WHAT YOU WANT’.

Angry in a polite way:

Whenever a person says “please” to an accusation eg if he insulted Islam, he is indicating his anger is stirred and he is trying to be polite or pretentious to say ‘please’ when he is actually displeased.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE AVOWED MUSLIM PERSON ACCUSED OF INSULTING ISLAM CAN BE PLEASED AS HE PROFESSED BUT IT IS THE OPPOSITE, HE IS DISPLEASED OR UPSET AND THEREFORE HE IS BEING PRETENTIOUSLY POLITE OR LYING AND IT IS AN IRRATIONAL FORCE DRIVEN ANSWER. THE RATIONAL ANSWER IS EITHER YES OR NO.

What is he doing?

There is only one true view of what he is doing and if you don’t have that view, you have wrong view and the destination of wrong view is hell or the animal womb, not heaven.

He is forcing himself to wave in a way that is characteristic of him and different from others that can only be because it is impersonally rehashed again and again to meet demands of the occasion. It is the force or the emotion accompanying his forced waving that he falsely perceives as reflect his sincerity that makes him think his gesture is ‘from the bottom of his heart’.

IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE FORCE THEMSELVES TO GREET, WAVE, SMILE OR BE COURTEOUS AND THERE IS ACCOMPANYING EMOTION OR STIRRING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES THAT THEY FALSELY PERCEIVE THEY MEAN IT, IT IS HEART FELT BUT THE REASON IT IS HEART FELT IS BECAUSE IT IS FORCED AGAINST SELF, HARMING SELF TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS, IT IS BAD AND EVIL FOR SELF AND OTHERS, NOT GOOD AND SINCERE AS THE FOOL PERCEIVES.

WHAT OBAMA IS DOING IS ALWAYS REHASHED AS HE HAS ALWAYS DONE AND THEREFORE IT IS INSINCERE, ROBOTIC AND HE MUST HAVE A DISTURBED MIND BECAUSE HE IS GOING AGAINST HIMSELF TO PLEASE OTHERS.

Bank of England warns of the consequences of thrift

An attempt by British consumers to rein in spending after the harsh lessons of the recession could limit growth and therefore depress household income further, the Bank of England warns today.

The view articulated is wrong view and the destination for wrong view is hell or the animal womb.

My view: You spend because you have a need to spend, you have something useful to buy, not to spur economic growth and increase others’ household income. Saving is never a danger to the economy but spending to keep the economy hot is dangerous because spending is addictive and to spend to keep the economy growing is to encourage an irrational unsustainable attitude of spending to keep the economy on the boil.

Thus the person has an irrational worry that people will restrain their spending cooling the economy. A cooled economy may not be spectacular but it is of no danger to anyone but a hot economy is in danger of overheating and subsequent collapse and so the person is advocating harm for himself and others.

Tkl

Does ‘please’ mean ‘so incredible’?

When the person says ‘please!’ in reply to a question whether he has insulted Islam, it indicates he is so upset or his mental force stirred that he cannot believe he is accused of it or it is so incredible that he is guilty of insulting Islam.

YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT IS NOT HARMLESS (THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST SEE DANGER IN THE SLIGHTEST FAULT) THAT ‘PLEASE’ MEANS IT IS SO INCREDIBLE OR PREPOSTEROUS.

FURTHER THE CORRECT ANSWERS TO THE QUESTION IS ‘YES’, ‘NO’ OR TO REMAIN SILENT, NOT TO BE DRAWN INTO AN ARGUMENT.

 

Window dressing not reform:

All this talk about curbing bonuses on Wall Street is much hype. According to this article the issue is limiting risk by demanding institutions have higher capital reserves that will reduce their illusory profits and thus bonuses.

Thus the Fed is effete and squirming rather than hitting the problem on the head.

The Fed’s phony war on bonuses

Post a comment (4)

Posted by: Christopher Swann

Tags: Commentaries, banking, Bonuses, Federal Reserve

Any attack on bank bonuses is going to be a reliable crowd pleaser. So a Federal Reserve proposal to meddle in Wall Street pay would make a good deal of political sense.

But Fed officials are almost certainly aware that this populist flourish will do little to control risk-taking or stabilize the financial system. There are far simpler and more effective ways to clamp down on reckless bank behavior than seeking to micro-manage bank pay structures.

First, the Fed is certain to be outmatched.

In one corner you have a central bank that has been notoriously spineless on regulatory matters. The institution is crammed with officials who have traditionally seen themselves as defenders of the banking system and advocates of laissez faire.

Even some top Fed officials admit they would need a culture shift in order to take on more regulatory responsibility.

In the opposing corner you have heavy-weight Wall Street institutions with armies of lawyers dedicated to gaming the regulatory system.

There is a deeper objection to the Fed’s effort. The real problem is not the structure of bank pay but its scale.

The received wisdom remains that longer-term incentives will curb risk taking. Lock up bonuses in stock and you will tame bankers. The experience of the 2008 financial crisis screams otherwise.

In the case of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, leading bankers were major shareholders. Richard Fuld was heavily invested in Lehman stock and saw the bulk of his fortune evaporate when the firm collapsed. Ownership does not seem to lower risk.

Other proposals promoted to control recklessness — such as trying to claw back pay if bets go sour years later — look even more misguided. Such schemes would almost certainly create endless bureaucratic wrangling and possibly legal disputes.

The basic point is that government could ban bonuses outright and it would not eliminate the lure of taking risk. Ambitious executives and bankers would still be spurred on by the prospect of big leaps in base pay or other forms of compensation.

The key, then, is to curb the overall amount of risk that banks can take on. The main tool for doing this is by insisting on much larger capital reserves.

This kills two birds with one stone. Tighter capital rules will increase the stability of the financial system and limit the exposure of taxpayers in the event of failure. In addition, tighter capital rules are the most reliable way of bringing down overall bank pay.

To be fair, the U.S. Treasury also has carefully considered plans on bank capital. But it is hard to escape the conclusion that the fuss being made over bonuses is intended merely to create the illusion of action.

In the event that the banks manage to block deeper reform, the Fed and White House need to be able to claim some kind of victory. The public should not be deceived. The attack on bonuses is mere window dressing.

French folly:

Recently Air France pilots expressed their concern that faulty pitot tubes caused the fatal Air France crash but Air France and Airbus said it was a factor but not the cause.

This is voluntary and involuntary false logic.

It is voluntary because there is vested interest to deny because otherwise they would be culpable for more damages and bad image.

It is involuntary because they have serious false perception that it is possible that something is a factor but not the cause.

AIR CRASHES DO NOT OCCUR EVERYDAY AND IF SOMETHING THAT CAN CAUSE SEVERE DISRUPTION EVEN A CRASH IS KNOWN TO HAVE FAILED THAT NIGHT (NAMELY THE PITOT TUBES) THEN IT MUST BE THE CAUSE OF THE CRASH. IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANOTHER CAUSE OF A CRASH SHOULD ALSO OCCUR ON THE SAME NIGHT AS THIS CAUSE OF THE CRASH ALSO OCCURRED. THUS BECAUSE DATA CLEARLY SHOWED THE PITOT TUBES FAILED, IT MUST BE THE ONLY CAUSE OF THE CRASH. COMPUTER PROGRAMS WERE TOO AGGRESSIVELY PROGRAMMED TO TRIGGER VIOLENT CORRECTIVE RESPONSES TO (FALSE) INPUT OF STALLED AIRCRAFT AND THIS MAY HAVE CAUSED THE PLANE TO CRASH.

Two killers decide to kill you on the same night?

What are the chances that two independent killers should strike and kill you on the same night?

Even if a violent storm could bring down the Airbus, if it would not have happened if the pitot tubes did not fail, then it is the pitot tubes, not the severe storm that brought it down.

 

Much work but doing nothing:

 

He is doing much work and stirring his mental force but doing nothing and that is controlled madness that will end in uncontrollable madness he and you don’t believe, cannot see.

He is exalting himself, making much of his scoring a goal and wanting to stir the mental forces of the audience to like what he did and worship him and that is stirring force, doing work for show to impress and stir others which is always controlled madness.

Without significant self identity view (I scored, wow!) a person cannot indulge in this and self identity view is one of three lower fetters to future woe, the Buddha teaches you.

 

Malaysia’s F1 entry:

 

Malaysia’s F1 entry:

Where Honda and now BMW are beating a hasty retreat from F1, Malaysia’s government is backing a team to compete.

It is a profligate waste of money that is a possible avenue for pilferage that reflects on the recklessness, poor judgement and priorities of those at the helm of the country.

Maybe Malaysia knows better than Honda and BMW or they are greater fools wasting the nation's resources that can be put to more productive use.

Truth is more dangerous than fiction:

It reflects false perception that will end in insanity for the person.

Truth is not dangerous except that you are fearful to protect your life here by embracing falsity to get along.

Fiction is falsity is always finally fatal because it poisons the mind to become insane.

TRUTH ITSELF IS NEVER DANGEROUS BUT SANE AND COMPLETE PEACE OF MIND, THE BUDDHA SAID TRUTH IS THE HIGHEST OF SAVORS, IT IS THE ENEMIES OF TRUTH THAT MAKE IT DANGEROUS. FICTION IS NOT ONLY ALWAYS DANGEROUS, IT IS THE PATH TO CERTAIN FUTURE INSANITY.

 

Hisham: Nordin (killed terrorist) could have been rehabilitated

People are difficult if not impossible to rehabilitate, the Buddha said you have shed your own blood greater than the four great oceans and yet people are unrepentant, deluded perceiving they are right and good when they are the opposite, harming themselves and others.

It is impossible that Hisham knows what he is talking about but driven by emotion or force (sadness in this case), he is moved to speak in useless regret, trying to stir sadness and conflict in others as to what might have been.

UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, YOU ARE WISE TO REMAIN SILENT. IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE NORDIN CAN BE REFORMED, AS THE BUDDHA SAID DIFFERENT BEINGS HAVE DIFFERENT PROPERTIES AND THERE ARE LIMITS AS TO HOW MUCH THEY CAN BE CHANGED IF POSSIBLE AND SO IF YOU ARE SPEAKING WISHFULLY OUT OF SADNESS, YOU ARE COURTING INSANITY AND CREATING KARMA FOR ADVOCATING REGRET AND DOUBT IN OTHERS AS TO WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN.

Fussiness is about force never reason:

Many people are annoyed by the fussiness of others but they don’t realize they themselves too are fussy (fastidious) in different ways and it is always suffering, robotic controlled torment that will end in insanity.

Fussiness is intolerance for things and ways things are done that deviate from a narrow even rigid perception of what is correct or good or the proper way of doing or saying something. Thus the fussy person likes to do particular things in a particular way and get upset or angry or disliking if it departs from that way, he is intolerant of others’ different ways of doing or saying things.

Thus fussiness is based on force, on attraction for a particular personal way of saying or doing something in a rigid robotic rehashed way and intolerant or dislike for ways that differ.

Insulting Islam? Please:

The answer to the question is not ‘please’ but yes or no and so it is an inappropriate reply that is cultivating false logic for yourself and others.

By saying ‘please’ you are sort of begging others, indicating your mental force is stirred to like what you disliked. Why should your mental force be stirred by the accusation. The relevant reply is whether the accusation is with merit or not.

“PLEASE” IS A STYLISH FALSE EMOTIONAL ANSWER TO A QUESTION THAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ACCEPT AS VALID WHEN IT IS FALSE.

 

Your shopping trolley knows what you want

Advertising will be delivered directly to supermarket trolleys based on a shopper's in-store behaviour and purchasing history.

Just because a chip and computers keep track of your past purchases and deliver ‘appropriate’ advertisement does not mean your trolley knows what you want.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANY TROLLEY CAN KNOW WHAT YOU WANT AND IT IS PRACTICING FALSE PERCEPTION (THAT A TROLLEY CAN KNOW) FOR THE SAKE OF EXAGGERATION THAT WILL END IN INSANITY TO SAY FALSELY TO OTHERS ‘YOUR TROLLEY KNOWS WHAT YOU WANT’.

Angry in a polite way:

Whenever a person says “please” to an accusation eg if he insulted Islam, he is indicating his anger is stirred and he is trying to be polite or pretentious to say ‘please’ when he is actually displeased.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE AVOWED MUSLIM PERSON ACCUSED OF INSULTING ISLAM CAN BE PLEASED AS HE PROFESSED BUT IT IS THE OPPOSITE, HE IS DISPLEASED OR UPSET AND THEREFORE HE IS BEING PRETENTIOUSLY POLITE OR LYING AND IT IS AN IRRATIONAL FORCE DRIVEN ANSWER. THE RATIONAL ANSWER IS EITHER YES OR NO.

What is he doing?

There is only one true view of what he is doing and if you don’t have that view, you have wrong view and the destination of wrong view is hell or the animal womb, not heaven.

He is forcing himself to wave in a way that is characteristic of him and different from others that can only be because it is impersonally rehashed again and again to meet demands of the occasion. It is the force or the emotion accompanying his forced waving that he falsely perceives as reflect his sincerity that makes him think his gesture is ‘from the bottom of his heart’.

IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE FORCE THEMSELVES TO GREET, WAVE, SMILE OR BE COURTEOUS AND THERE IS ACCOMPANYING EMOTION OR STIRRING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES THAT THEY FALSELY PERCEIVE THEY MEAN IT, IT IS HEART FELT BUT THE REASON IT IS HEART FELT IS BECAUSE IT IS FORCED AGAINST SELF, HARMING SELF TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS, IT IS BAD AND EVIL FOR SELF AND OTHERS, NOT GOOD AND SINCERE AS THE FOOL PERCEIVES.

WHAT OBAMA IS DOING IS ALWAYS REHASHED AS HE HAS ALWAYS DONE AND THEREFORE IT IS INSINCERE, ROBOTIC AND HE MUST HAVE A DISTURBED MIND BECAUSE HE IS GOING AGAINST HIMSELF TO PLEASE OTHERS.

Bank of England warns of the consequences of thrift

An attempt by British consumers to rein in spending after the harsh lessons of the recession could limit growth and therefore depress household income further, the Bank of England warns today.

The view articulated is wrong view and the destination for wrong view is hell or the animal womb.

My view: You spend because you have a need to spend, you have something useful to buy, not to spur economic growth and increase others’ household income. Saving is never a danger to the economy but spending to keep the economy hot is dangerous because spending is addictive and to spend to keep the economy growing is to encourage an irrational unsustainable attitude of spending to keep the economy on the boil.

Thus the person has an irrational worry that people will restrain their spending cooling the economy. A cooled economy may not be spectacular but it is of no danger to anyone but a hot economy is in danger of overheating and subsequent collapse and so the person is advocating harm for himself and others.

Tkl

Does ‘please’ mean ‘so incredible’?

When the person says ‘please!’ in reply to a question whether he has insulted Islam, it indicates he is so upset or his mental force stirred that he cannot believe he is accused of it or it is so incredible that he is guilty of insulting Islam.

YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT IS NOT HARMLESS (THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST SEE DANGER IN THE SLIGHTEST FAULT) THAT ‘PLEASE’ MEANS IT IS SO INCREDIBLE OR PREPOSTEROUS.

FURTHER THE CORRECT ANSWERS TO THE QUESTION IS ‘YES’, ‘NO’ OR TO REMAIN SILENT, NOT TO BE DRAWN INTO AN ARGUMENT.

 

Window dressing not reform:

All this talk about curbing bonuses on Wall Street is much hype. According to this article the issue is limiting risk by demanding institutions have higher capital reserves that will reduce their illusory profits and thus bonuses.

Thus the Fed is effete and squirming rather than hitting the problem on the head.

The Fed’s phony war on bonuses

Post a comment (4)

Posted by: Christopher Swann

Tags: Commentaries, banking, Bonuses, Federal Reserve

Any attack on bank bonuses is going to be a reliable crowd pleaser. So a Federal Reserve proposal to meddle in Wall Street pay would make a good deal of political sense.

But Fed officials are almost certainly aware that this populist flourish will do little to control risk-taking or stabilize the financial system. There are far simpler and more effective ways to clamp down on reckless bank behavior than seeking to micro-manage bank pay structures.

First, the Fed is certain to be outmatched.

In one corner you have a central bank that has been notoriously spineless on regulatory matters. The institution is crammed with officials who have traditionally seen themselves as defenders of the banking system and advocates of laissez faire.

Even some top Fed officials admit they would need a culture shift in order to take on more regulatory responsibility.

In the opposing corner you have heavy-weight Wall Street institutions with armies of lawyers dedicated to gaming the regulatory system.

There is a deeper objection to the Fed’s effort. The real problem is not the structure of bank pay but its scale.

The received wisdom remains that longer-term incentives will curb risk taking. Lock up bonuses in stock and you will tame bankers. The experience of the 2008 financial crisis screams otherwise.

In the case of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, leading bankers were major shareholders. Richard Fuld was heavily invested in Lehman stock and saw the bulk of his fortune evaporate when the firm collapsed. Ownership does not seem to lower risk.

Other proposals promoted to control recklessness — such as trying to claw back pay if bets go sour years later — look even more misguided. Such schemes would almost certainly create endless bureaucratic wrangling and possibly legal disputes.

The basic point is that government could ban bonuses outright and it would not eliminate the lure of taking risk. Ambitious executives and bankers would still be spurred on by the prospect of big leaps in base pay or other forms of compensation.

The key, then, is to curb the overall amount of risk that banks can take on. The main tool for doing this is by insisting on much larger capital reserves.

This kills two birds with one stone. Tighter capital rules will increase the stability of the financial system and limit the exposure of taxpayers in the event of failure. In addition, tighter capital rules are the most reliable way of bringing down overall bank pay.

To be fair, the U.S. Treasury also has carefully considered plans on bank capital. But it is hard to escape the conclusion that the fuss being made over bonuses is intended merely to create the illusion of action.

In the event that the banks manage to block deeper reform, the Fed and White House need to be able to claim some kind of victory. The public should not be deceived. The attack on bonuses is mere window dressing.

French folly:

Recently Air France pilots expressed their concern that faulty pitot tubes caused the fatal Air France crash but Air France and Airbus said it was a factor but not the cause.

This is voluntary and involuntary false logic.

It is voluntary because there is vested interest to deny because otherwise they would be culpable for more damages and bad image.

It is involuntary because they have serious false perception that it is possible that something is a factor but not the cause.

AIR CRASHES DO NOT OCCUR EVERYDAY AND IF SOMETHING THAT CAN CAUSE SEVERE DISRUPTION EVEN A CRASH IS KNOWN TO HAVE FAILED THAT NIGHT (NAMELY THE PITOT TUBES) THEN IT MUST BE THE CAUSE OF THE CRASH. IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANOTHER CAUSE OF A CRASH SHOULD ALSO OCCUR ON THE SAME NIGHT AS THIS CAUSE OF THE CRASH ALSO OCCURRED. THUS BECAUSE DATA CLEARLY SHOWED THE PITOT TUBES FAILED, IT MUST BE THE ONLY CAUSE OF THE CRASH. COMPUTER PROGRAMS WERE TOO AGGRESSIVELY PROGRAMMED TO TRIGGER VIOLENT CORRECTIVE RESPONSES TO (FALSE) INPUT OF STALLED AIRCRAFT AND THIS MAY HAVE CAUSED THE PLANE TO CRASH.

Two killers decide to kill you on the same night?

What are the chances that two independent killers should strike and kill you on the same night?

Even if a violent storm could bring down the Airbus, if it would not have happened if the pitot tubes did not fail, then it is the pitot tubes, not the severe storm that brought it down.

 

Much work but doing nothing:

 

He is doing much work and stirring his mental force but doing nothing and that is controlled madness that will end in uncontrollable madness he and you don’t believe, cannot see.

He is exalting himself, making much of his scoring a goal and wanting to stir the mental forces of the audience to like what he did and worship him and that is stirring force, doing work for show to impress and stir others which is always controlled madness.

Without significant self identity view (I scored, wow!) a person cannot indulge in this and self identity view is one of three lower fetters to future woe, the Buddha teaches you.

 

The experience, stirring and abuse of...

 

The experience, stirring and abuse of force:

Life here is an unabated experience, stirring and abuse of force and for this reason it is impossible that anyone here should find existence meaningful, happy and free from suffering.

In what sense is existence here an experience of force?

To the extent that pleasure and pain are derived from force, it is force exposure when mild gives pleasure and intense gives pain, and beings here crave pleasure and avoid pain, existing here is an experience of force.

In what sense is existence here a stirring of force?

To the extent that beings here automatically stir their mental forces attractively or repulsively on contact at the senses for no other purpose than to experience the stirring of mental force in their mind, existence here is a continuous stirring of their mental forces.

In what sense is existence here an abuse of force?

To the extent that beings here automatically use force unnecessarily, for show to prolong, change speed and strength when they say or do things, existence here is a continuous abuse of their mental forces.

The Buddha said that there are things that are possible and things that are impossible.

It is impossible that any being should find his life here meaningful, happy or free from stress because existence here is about experience, stirring and abusing force that is blind, without meaning and harmful to self and others.

It is not meaning or happiness that keeps people here but it is ignorance, delusion, foolishness, stubbornness, attraction and hatred (ill will) and the fact that they are slaves and robots to force that keeps them here.

Tkl

Greenspan: It will happen again

In the interview Greenspan was quoted as saying it will happen again and if it was not the subprime crisis something else would have triggered it.

Why is it that he did not say what he meant (don’t blame me) and what he said is irrelevant to the matter at hand?

He never said, “I am blameless” but that is what he is trying to say to exonerate himself and because he never said it, he is a hypocrite.

There may be those who think what he said is relevant and by alerting us that it will happen again we must in future take steps that guard against recurrence but that is delusion, false perception.

If Greenspan is so wise as to advice us that it will happen again why was he not wise before this crisis to tell us that it will happen? Instead he was celebrating the marvels of the free market that seemed to have efficiently distributed risks when it was reckless lending without underwear, without backup for risks.

THUS ANYONE WHO THINKS GREENSPAN IS SPEAKING PLAINLY IS A FOOL, WHAT HE SAID HAS ULTERIOR MOTIVE TO TRY EXONERATE HIMSELF OF BLAME THAT IS FAR WORSE THAN IN HIS WILDEST DREAMS AND WHAT HE SAID THAT IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN IS MORE TO SAY IT IS NOT THE RESULT OF ACTIONS OR INACTIONS BUT IT WILL NATURALLY HAPPEN AGAIN. WHAT IS THE USE OF BEING WISE AFTER THE FACT? WHY DID HE NOT SAY IT WILL HAPPEN BEFORE THIS CRISIS?

Ah Bian jailed for stealing $15 million:

Former Taiwan president jailed for life for embezzling $15 million.

Name me one politician who have not taken money, even far greater amounts.

Thus it reflects hypocrisy and justice of convenience.

Yes he will be jailed for life but all those politicians who have stolen money will be jailed for an eternity in the divine scheme of things.

AH BIAN IS LIKELY TO BE GUILTY BUT THERE IS POLITICAL PERSECUTION INVOLVED. A LIFETIME JAIL SENTENCE SEEMS EXTREME BUT ETERNAL PUNISHMENT AWAITS ALL THESE POLITICIANS INCLUDING THOSE WHO TOOK MUCH LESS.

What kind of paradox is this?

Quote: The Middle East is famously a place of paradoxes, and perhaps the oddest paradox of all is this: the Dead Sea is dying.

The person does realize what he says is nonsense and he is headed for insanity.

Just because the sea is called dead does not mean it is a paradox that it is dying. That the sea is dying is a false perception of humans and the sea is not dead, it is just called ‘Dead’ sea and so there is no paradox if the Dead sea is shrinking perhaps due to drought.

Even if it is true the Middles East is famously a place of paradoxes, not a falsification by him to stir emotion, it is not relevant to the matter at hand, namely the Dead sea is shrinking and so he is practicing controlled madness in the name of impressing others.

THERE IS NO PARADOX AT ALL, THE DEAD SEA IS A NAME NOT THAT THE SEA IS ALREADY DEAD AND THEREFORE JUST LIKE ALL OTHER SEAS IT CAN SHRINK OR GROW.

Only beings can die:

There is such a thing called dying and it can be clearly defined as such and such. If you defile the meaning, you are courting mad perception.

Only whatever has life, animals and plants can die, inanimate objects like the Dead Sea cannot die because it is not a living organism.

When the life force abandons the body it is said to have died.

Just because the Dead Sea is shrinking or has vanished does not mean it is dying or dead because it can reverse and grow again. Even if it permanently vanished it does not mean it has died, it no longer exists, not dead because it was never a living being and the life force that was never in it did not vanish.

IT REFLECTS THE LAXITY AND INDIFFERENCE TO TRUTH OF THIS WORLD THAT THEY PERVERT THE MEANING OF WORDS AND THINK THEY ARE SMART, CUTE EVEN PROFOUND WHEN THEY ARE EMBRACING MADNESS, TAINTING THEMSELVES, OTHERS AND WORDS.

Why no thinking is a superior state of mind:

No thinking is a superior, purer state of a person’s mind that is unknown to ordinary emotional stylish people.

It is possible for a being to walk from his table to the door without even entertaining a thought, to drive along fully focused on the road without even a thought and far from dumb, it is a saner, clearly seeing and present state of the mind with considerably reduced suffering compared to nonstop thinking that is the curse of emotional conceited people who worship thinking.

HOW CAN A PERSON THINK AN EVIL THOUGHT WHEN HE IS NOT THINKING?

IT IS WHEN A PERSON IS THINKING, CANNOT HELP THINKING THAT EVIL THOUGHTS MUST INTRUDE OR CAN BE SOWN BY OTHERS.

ALL EVIL SPEECH AND DEEDS (STEALING, KILLING, HARMING) NEVER OCCUR SPONTANEOUSLY BUT ACCORDING TO PLANS OR MUST BE PLANNED OR THOUGHT BEFOREHAND. IF YOU CAN STOP THINKING HOW CAN YOU PLAN AND EXECUTE EVIL DEEDS AND SPEECH?

BECAUSE ALL EVIL DEEDS AND SPEECH ARE NEVER FRESH SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION BUT REHASHED FROM RECORDED PLANS, IF YOU NEVER THINK TO REGISTER PLANS FOR EVIL DEEDS AND SPEECH HOW CAN YOU PUT INTO ACTION EVIL DEEDS AND SPEECH?

THUS THE MAN WHO CAN STOP THINKING AT WILL IS A SUPERIOR MAN TO ONE WHO CANNOT, HE HAS A PLEASANT ABIDING HERE AND ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS HEADED FOR TWO EONS OF BLISS IN HEAVEN.

THUS YOU WILL BE WISE TO REIN IN OR CURTAIL YOUR THINKING, TO ELIMINATE FORCE IN YOUR THINKING THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS MOMENTUM TO KEEP THINKING.

Impossible and Possible:

It is impossible for a person who has style or stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness to stop thinking because the added force in their thinking keeps it in perpetual motion so that they can only stop thinking when they fall into deep sleep.

BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE STYLE OR STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS OF THEIR SPEECH, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO STOP THINKING, THEY ARE NOT AWARE THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO STOP THINKING AND HOW IT IS AN INCOMPARABLY WOE FREE STATE OF EXISTENCE COMPARED TO CONSTANT MADDENING THINKING.

It is possible for a person without style, who does not use force to stretch, change speed and loudness to stop thinking but that does not mean he will automatically progress to ‘no thinking’, which must be cultivated or you must train yourself to stop thinking.

IT IS IN THE NATURE OF THINGS THAT A PERSON WHO CAN SPEAK WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO THEN PROGRESS TO STOPPING THINKING BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN HE WILL DO SO. STOPPING THINKING IS THE NEXT HIGHER STATE OF MIND FOLLOWED BY NOT LIKING NOR DISLIKING FOLLOWED BY ‘NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE’.

How to truly deny yourself:

Jesus: "If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life (by regular exercise, yoga, tai chi, health foods, medicines) will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. (Saving your life must be something you do to preserve it and that means exercise, keep fit, health foods etc)

Jesus said you should deny yourself where others will not.

Where others all stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness and will not stop doing so, you deny yourself (in the process saving yourself a lot of suffering here) by stopping stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness.

Where others are constantly thinking about this and that, you deny yourself (and save yourself a lot of unnecessary suffering) by stopping thinking.

Where others are constantly liking and disliking, you deny yourself (and save yourself a lot of unnecessary suffering) by stopping liking and disliking.

Where others are constantly seeking pleasure and avoiding pain, you deny yourself (and save yourself a lot of unnecessary suffering) by stopping seeking pleasure and avoiding pain.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A MAN WHO HAS SHED ALL STYLE, STOPPED THINKING, DOES NOT LIKE NOR DISLIKE, DOES NOT SEEK PLEASURE NOR AVOID PAIN TO BE GUILTY OF NOT DENYING HIMSELF AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON WHO PARTAKES OF STYLE, THINKING, LIKING AND DISLIKING, WHO SEEKS PLEASURES AND AVOID PAIN TO BE TRULY DENYING HIMSELF.

PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD STRIVE TO SAVE THEIR LIVES HERE BY PHYSICAL MEANS LIKE REGULAR EXERCISE, HEALTH FOODS, POTIONS, ETC AND AS JESUS SAID ABOVE, IT WILL BE IN VAIN FOR THEY WILL LOSE THEIR LIVES.

NYT: Bank meltdown changes little on Wall Street:

It is no surprise but to be expected that this should be so.

The people responsible for the crisis are without conscience, otherwise what has happened would not have happened and it is to be expected that those without conscience will keep doing robotically what they have always done and that means little or no change on Wall Street.

Why yoga, tai chi, exercise and health foods will lead you to woe:

Jesus said you should not care for what you shall eat or wear and whoever will save his life here will lose it.

If you do not care what you shall eat how is it that you should care about the health properties of the foods you eat? It is a delusion that certain foods and exercises can give you good health and preserve your life here.

‘Saving your life here’ is about something you do that will preserve your life here and therefore this embraces whatever measures people take like yoga, tai chi, regular exercise, health foods, medicine, vitamins or whatever rituals practiced for the sake of longevity.

MANY EVEN THOSE WHO ARE VERY RELIGIOUS ARE OPENLY OR SECRETLY ANXIOUS TO MAINTAIN THEIR LIVES, TAKE MEASURES THAT WOULD EXTEND THEIR LIVES HERE AND ACCORDING TO WHAT JESUS SAID, THEY WILL LOSE THEIR LIVES. ONLY THOSE WHO HAVE NO CONCERNS FOR THEIR LIVES HERE, WHO ARE NOT ANXIOUS TO EXTEND THEIR LIVES HERE OR LOOK AFTER THEIR HEALTH ARE HEADING FOR HEAVEN.

If they haven’t destroyed you yet, soon they will:

Quote: A year after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, a think-tank warns that little has changed and bonus culture has returned.

If you agree that this systemic, severe near fatal financial crisis has its origins in the reckless, greedy money grabbing at all costs tactics on Wall Street then if they have not already brought the system tottering on final mayhem then because they are without conscience, they will continue doing robotically the only thing they know, that is keep stealing and cheating for their own benefit and the detriment of all others until finally the system collapses.

BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE ON WALL STREET AND RUNNING POLITICS IN AMERICA AND THE WORLD ARE WITHOUT CONSCIENCE AND DEDICATED TO THEIR OWN ADVANTAGE WITHOUT CARE FOR THE SYSTEM WHOSE ULTIMATE COLLAPSE WILL ALSO KILL THEM, YOU CAN EXPECT THAT IF THIS CRISIS IS NOT FATAL, SOON THEY WILL ENGINEER THE KILLER BLOW.

The effete Obama:

Quote: US President Obama warns bankers against complacency, saying they ignore the lessons of the financial crisis at their peril. (The crisis is not a lesson to bankers with fat bonuses in their pockets, for whom it is heads I win, tails you lose)

It is not warning against complacency that is the right medicine but using the big stick to clean out Wall Street of these dirty hands stealing money.

WHAT OBAMA IS SAYING IS AKIN TO WARNING A THIEF AGAINST COMPLACENCY WHEN HE SHOULD ARREST THE THIEF AND CHANGE THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE WITH SOMEONE HONEST.

IF OBAMA SHOULD BE PURGING BANKERS RATHER THAN WARN AGAINST COMPLACENCY THEN HE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS THAT WILL END IN HIS MADNESS.

The price for mistaking evil as good:

The reason Obama warned bankers against complacency is because he has difficulty or inability to see that bankers are a bunch of thieves not to be trusted who should be removed rather than warned against complacency that will fall on deaf ears.

IT IS BECAUSE EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE HAVE A FALSE PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE, WHAT IS BAD IS GOOD, THEY CANNOT SEE CLEARLY WHO THEIR ENEMIES ARE, THEY EMBRACE THEIR ENEMIES AS FRIENDS AS A RESULT OF WHICH THEY ARE CHEATED AND EVEN GET THEIR NECKS CUT BY PEOPLE THEY TRUST WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN KEPT AT ARMS LENGTH.

107 year old Malaysian woman considers marriage for 23rd time:

There is no reason why this information should be a newsworthy item but it is force via emotion to make much of it (wow!) or laugh at it that is the drive not reason for drawing attention to it.

Here as in many places people think it is reason but it is blind force that is the motivation of what they say or do.

WHAT PEOPLE SAY OR DO IS NOT NECESSARILY BASED ON UNDERSTANDING BUT IT CAN BE BASED ON FORCE, BASED ON LIKING, DISLIKING, POKING FUN, ATTACKING, TRYING TO STIR SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION OR FEAR. IN FACT WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO IS REHASHED AND IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE SUCCOR OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO, NOT MEANING OR UNDERSTANDING.

Why stocks are so bullish:

It is not necessarily that high stock values reflect the intrinsic worth and the health of the economy but they are high because people have put their money in investment funds that fund managers use to prop up the market.

If a sizeable proportion of people start to pull their money out of funds then fund managers may have to liquidate and that may cause stocks to slide to more realistic valuations.

FUND MANAGERS ARE A MODERN PHENOMENON AND BECAUSE THEY INVEST OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY AND ARE REWARDED FOR GAINING AND THEY CAN AT THE SAME TIME SELL THE SHARES THEY BOUGHT EARLIER AT A LOWER PRICE TO THE FUNDS THEY MANAGE AND THUS MAKE MONEY ON THE SIDELINES, THEY HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN PROPPING UP SHARES UNLESS THEY ARE FORCE TO SELL EG IF PEOPLE REDEEM. BUT PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO REDEEM BECAUSE THEY THINK SHARES IS THE PLACE TO MAKE MONEY OR THE RETURNS ARE BETTER HERE. SHOULD PANIC SET IN AND PEOPLE WANT THEIR MONEY BACK THEN THE STOCK MARKET MAY BE HEADED FOR A ROUT.

IF PEOPLE WERE INVESTING THEIR OWN MONEY IN THE SHARE MARKET THEY WOULD BE MUCH MORE CAUTIOUS AND LESS GUNGHO, IT IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE ENTRUSTED THEIR MONEY TO THE ‘EXPERTS’ AND THESE EXPERTS ARE THRASHING OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY THAT THE PILLAR OF THE STOCK MARKET SEEMS SO INVINCIBLE SO FAR.

Can China save the world?

Can the recovering Chinese economy save the world?

It is a delusion that China can save the world.

China lacks clout, it does not possess a money printing press that the world worships and so without printing its own money without backing to pay for goods from the rest of the world, it is impossible China can replace America as the locomotive of recovery.

AMERICA IS AN ANOMALY, NOT BECAUSE IT IS SO GREAT, BUT BY BULLYING, IT PAYS FOR GOODS WITH PAPER IT PRINTS THAT FOOLISH RECIPIENTS EVEN KEEP IN AMERICA FOR ITS CONTINUED USE. NOW THAT AMERICA HAS MADE A MESS OF ITSELF, UNLESS YOU CAN FIND A SUBSTITUTE WHO CAN PRINT MONEY THAT OTHERS COVET AND USE TO STASH THEIR WEALTH, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE , YOU ARE DELUDED TO THINK CHINA OR ANYONE CAN REPLACE AMERICA.

What financial crisis? Season's first mangoes fetch $40,000

You have false perception that will end in mad perception if you perceive that just because someone broke the record to offer $40,000 for the first crate of mangoes, there is no crisis.

It is never understanding that is the basis of this statement but it is force to challenge or scoff driven by dislike that is the basis.

Such bids may be rigged or out of arrogance someone can offer $40,000 even $1 million for some mangoes just to boast.

You downplay the crisis when many even rich people are driven to suicide worldwide, not realizing that a time may come when you are hit so badly you run away cowering with your tail tucked between your legs.

YOU THINK THIS CRISIS IS NOT BIG ENOUGH, DON’T TALK BIG, YOU MAY BE HIT SO BAD YOU DON’T WHAT HIT YOU.

The implication is that because someone broke the record to bid $40,000 for a crate of mangoes there is no crisis. This is false logic that he wants others to embrace and because it is false, insanity awaits him.

Recidivist burglar?

A US man has killed a recidivist burglar with a samurai sword, slicing off his left hand and severely cutting his neck after he spotted the intruder in his garage, police said.

Have you interviewed the burglar to ascertain he is recidivist? I don’t know what he means and even the Word thesaurus offers no synonyms.

This is the style in the substance of speech. Many like to use high sounding or bombastic words to impress others. Such a person is headed for insanity.

Recession is over but the pain will go on, says Bank of England

If the pain will go on, what is the point of declaring the recession is over as Bernanke & the Bank of England is so eager to do? This is a for show meaningless style not substance statement designed to impress not state the truth.

You are courting madness speaking thus because for the statement the recession is over, it should mean all danger of further decline has passed and there is robust sustainable growth present.

IT IS MEANINGLESS TO DECLARE THE RECESSION OVER WHEN YOU CONCEDE THE PAIN WILL GO ON AND YOU ARE DICING WITH INSANITY TONGUE TWISTING THUS TO PANDER TO PUBLIC OPINION.

Contraction not recession has ended:

It is the contraction not recession that has ended and even then this may be a pause in the contraction that may resume or not.

THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PAUSE OR SLOWDOWN OF CONTRACTION AND THE RECESSION HAS ENDED AND YOU ARE PRACTICING FALSITY IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING THE PUBLIC AND YOURSELF TO SAY THE RECESSION HAS ENDED.

EVEN ‘CONTRACTION HAS ENDED’ MAY BE TOO RPREMATURE A STATEMENT.

What is understanding?

 

What is understanding?

If there is such a thing called understanding, it can be clearly defined as such and such.

People in this world talk about understanding and how they understand but yet when asked to define understanding they are likely to give a definition that may be false.

Understanding means seeing clearly as it is, what is said to you, who you see, hear, even taste, touch and smell.

If you truly understood what is said to you then you must see clearly there is style present in how it is said, there is style in the substance of what is said and you understand as it clearly is the substance is false, true and makes no sense. If there are accompanying constant force changes as in force stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, you see clearly as it is, if the person is trying to impress or please you, you see and know this is his motive.

BECAUSE EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE CONFUSE STYLE WITH SUBSTANCE, THEY DO NOT PERCEIVE THE FORCE CHANGES ACCOMPANYING WHAT IS SPOKEN, THEY MISREAD THE MOTIVES OF WHAT PEOPLE SAY, THEY ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES EVEN IF THEY CONCEDE THEY SOMETIMES UNDERSTAND AND SOMETIMES DON’T BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS THAT THEY HAVE NO GENUINE UNDERSTANDING, WHAT THEY CALL THEIR UNDERSTANDING IS THEIR FALSE UNDERSTANDING, WHAT IS INVOLVED IS THAT THEY DECODE WHAT IS SAID TO THEM INTO ACTIONS AND OBJECTS AND THUS DECODED THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND, THEY SEE OR HEAR CERTAIN THINGS HAPPEN AND ARE ABLE TO RETRIEVE AND ABLE PREVIOUSLY PROGRAMMED EXPLANATIONS, THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING WHEN THEY ARE MERELY REHASHING THE SAME OLD EXPLANATIONS THAT MAY NOT OR WILL NOT TRULY EXPLAIN THE CURRENT SITUATION.

Government vs UEM collecting toll:

Anyone who thinks there is no difference between the government or UEM building the NSHW and then collecting toll is a fool.

In the case of the government even if the toll is exorbitant, it returns to the people and system because the government theoretically belongs to the people whereas with UEM collecting, the exorbitant toll falls into the hands of the few and little of it return to the system.

Even though it is said the government through Khazanah owns a controlling stake in UEM, it may not be what it appears to be eg a stripped down bankrupted company may have been returned to the government because the cronies could not handle it.

Thus the UEM privatisation was criminal to an extreme extent, a partially built highway was transferred together with credit to build and guarantees of success into the hands of a vested few who are then licensed to collect exorbitant toll that is a one way transfer of public wealth into the hands of the few that will largely not return to the system but even siphoned out of the country.

This same modus operandi is repeated countless times over not just locally but all over the world such that in time to come, the actual wealth in the system is in the hands of a greedy few who cannot spend enough to stimulate the economy whilst the rest are stranded with empty savings accounts that have been mobilized to be lend to be pocketed by these greedy goats whilst the foolish borrowed excessively to finance their expensive ‘ever appreciating’ houses, shares and consumer products.

IF YOU THINK THE WORLD ECONOMY HAS STABILIZED AND WILL RECOVER SOON YOU MAY BE DELUDED, WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS EMERGENCY TRANSFUSIONS OF PRINTED MONEY INTO THE SYSTEM BY GOVERNMENTS WHO ARE THEMSELVES INSOLVENT, THEIR STIMULUS SPENDING THAT IS PROPPING UP DEMAND. WITHOUT MEANINGFUL REFORM, IT IS JUST DELAYING THE EVENTUAL WORST COLLAPSE. IF MEANINGFUL REFORMS ARE MADE, IT WOULD MEAN PAIN FOR THE MASSES THAT WOULD MEAN POLITICIANS WILL BE SACKED AND SO NOTHING WILL BE DONE AND IT WILL BE ALLOWED TO FESTER UNTIL ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE.

They’re all putting a show:

You do not have to interview them or conduct any investigations, even they themselves cannot see themselves putting on a show and may insist their actions are full of meaning.

IF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SEE, THEY ARE ALL PUTTING ON A SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS HOW CHARMING, FRIENDLY AND HAPPY THEY ARE AND THAT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, FALSE AND HARMFUL.

WHOEVER YOU ARE, PRESIDENT OR PAUPER IF YOU DO THIS YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY (IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING OTHERS) THAT WILL END IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY. THE FACT THAT YOU DO N0T SEE SO PROVES THAT YOU SEE BUT DO NOT SEE AND BECAUSE YOU SEE BUT CANNOT SEE, YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND, NO MATTER HOW YOU TRY. TRYING IS ABOUT USING FORCE ACCORDING TO PLANS AND NO MATTER HOW YOU USE FORCE ACCORDING TO WHATEVER PLANS, YOU WILL NOT SEE AND UNDERSTAND AND THAT IS THE WAY TO TORMENT.

I DON’T APPRECIATE, APPROVE OR ACCEPT WHAT THEY ARE DOING WHICH IS NOT GOOD BUT EVIL, HARMFUL FOR THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.

The meaning of what they are doing can only be that they are walking somewhere perhaps to catch a helicopter.

Walking to the helicopter does not require you carry on laughing or putting a show that it is fun or you are having a good time.

Thus it is totally unnecessary to laugh or carry on whilst walking to the helicopter but it is rehashed repeatedly for show to impress others how happy you are or enjoying each others’ company.

When you are mindfully laughing you cannot be mindfully walking, when you are mindfully walking you cannot be mindfully laughing and the truth is that both walking and laughing is mindlessly rendered by rote or rehash and they are conditioning themselves to be robot that will end in tears.

The substance of a walk can be meaningful or meaningless eg it is meaningful to walk to the market to buy something and meaningless to walk for exercise or keep fit (you don't need to do that if you do not stress or harm yourself, if you harm yourself all the exercise in the world won't keep you fit).

Whatever else you do apart from striding towards your target is the style of your walk that can be arrogant, timid, anxious, rushed, wilffully deliberate. Whatever antics you perform whilst walking eg laughing and carrying on as if you are having such a wonderful time is totally unnecessary, for show and will end in madness for you, no matter who you think you are, president or the holiest man in the world.

 

The purpose of force is to stir force:

There is genuine purpose for using force and false purpose for using force.

What is genuine use of force?

You need to use force to take a pen to write or use force to pronounce the syllables & words that is the substance of your message.

What is the false use of force?

The false purpose of using force is to stir force in the mind of another person.

The force prolonging, changing speed and loudness that is universally present in beings in this world (including insects and the motions of worms) is totally unnecessary, for show or intended to stir force directly or emotions (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear) indirectly in others.

Thus no matter what the substance of what is said or done that may be true or meaningful or false or meaningless, the style or force prolonging, changing speed or loudness is consciously or unconsciously intended to stir others’ mental forces to be attracted, repulsed, agitated, sad, hurt or fearful and this is sinful because it conditions others to harmful emotions, lead to conditioning stress, restlessness and distraction in self and others and the person is practicing controlled madness because style is meaningless and leads to ultimate loss of control and uncontrollable madness.

STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHEN SPEAKING IS MEANINGLESS (AND THEREFORE IT IS CONTROLLED MADNESS, NO ONE CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND STYLE AND THE FACT THAT PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG OR PERCEIVE STYLE AS MEANINGFUL REPRESENTS SERIOUS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION), A PRODIGIOUS CUMULATIVE WASTE OF ENERGY AND TIME LEADING TO INSOLUBLE DEEPENING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE. THE PURPOSE OF USING FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS, TO STIR EMOTIONS OR LIKE (EXCITEMENT), DISLIKE (ANGER, HATE), SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION AND FEAR IN OTHERS.

NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE, IF YOU PRACTICE STYLE YOU ARE HEADED FOR TORMENT EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY. THE FACT THAT YOU ARE NOT AWARE THAT YOU USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS MEANS YOU ARE BLIND AND THERE IS NO HOPE FOR THE BLIND, THEY WILL BE LEFT BEHIND TO PERISH THENCE TO WEEP AND GNASH THEIR TEETH EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY BUILDING A PILE OF SKELETONS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN SAID THE BUDDHA.

 

Not just debtors but savers are in bi...

 

Not just debtors but savers are in big trouble:

Throughout the extended boom all over the world, those who are foolish and greedy (and there are hoards of them) have borrowed heavily and now that the world economy is in recession these borrowers are beginning to feel the squeeze and it is a noose that may strangle many of them.

You will be foolish to think that only these debtors are in trouble because the money they borrowed came from savers and now this money has been irretrievably transferred to those who sold desired assets (houses, shares, cars, goods) at big profits and so down the line, savers may be confronted with the reality that their money has been lost, recklessly lent by bankers seeking to maximize their profits.

IT IS NOT JUST DEBTORS, THOSE WHO ARE FULL OF DEBTS WHO ARE IN TROUBLE AS THIS RECESSION UNFOLDS BUT SAVERS TOO ARE IN TROUBLE BECAUSE THE MONEY BORROWED BELONGS TO SAVERS AND THIS MONEY IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF THOSE WHO SOLD GOODS AND ASSETS TO THESE FOOLISH GREEDY BORROWERS.

Write off at your own peril:

But Rebecca Jennings, a media analyst at Forrester Research says that inconsistent picture quality on computers, and the fact that a PC is not conducive to groups of people watching an event together, means we write off the box at our peril.

What has peril got to do with writing off the TV as a medium for communication?

This is not the first time it is said but it is copied from others and applied in many situations without understanding what it means. It is actually a form of scoffing at others’ differing opinion. She obviously is a fan of TV and she is scoffing with a whiff of intimidation (peril) those who hold a different view.

There is peril in holding wrong view because it is the path to insanity, hell or the animal womb and so without seeing or knowing it is true, you should neither write off TV nor be ‘bullish’ about the future of TV.

THE ENTIRE SUBJECT IS FRIVOLOUS, WHY GET HEATED UP OR EMOTIONAL DEBATING THE FUTURE OR DEMISE OF TV WHEN YOU CANNOT AND DO NOT SEE WHAT IS IN THE FUTURE. ‘WRITE OFF AT YOUR OWN PERIL’ IS A ROTE STATEMENT COPIED FROM OTHERS TO BE APPLIED TO MANY SIMILAR SITUATIONS TO SCOFF AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS THAT THERE IS FALSELY PERIL IN THEIR WRITING OFF TV.

WRITE OFF AT OUR PERIL SOUNDS NICE BUT IT IS NONSENSE AND FALSE, DESIGNED TO MOCK.

They are all going to go mad:

They are all practicing controlled insanity that will end in insanity because:

a)   What they do is robotic, a ritual at a set time with a set routine and they are conditioning themselves to be robotic such that in time they will develop an irresistible or obsessive urge to go to the gym to the same old things the same old ways.

b)   One reason they need such exercise is to let off steam and relieve stress, but this is not the antidote to stress and so they are practicing what does not work and that is insanity. The only way to cure stress is to pay attention to stop using force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness, if you don’t no matter how much exercise you do, you will get stressed and it will become worse with age. If it is your health that you are anxious to preserve by exercise then as Jesus said, which one of you by being anxious can extend your lifespan by even one cubit? It is a delusion that you can improve your fitness or health by obsessive mindless robotic exercise that may actually stress & wear your body faster. If you truly want to be fit and live longer, stop stressing yourself by being emotional and stylish that subjects your mind and body to relentless force.

c)   What useful work are they doing? If you are exercising your muscles to sweep the floor, build a house or cook a meal then you are rationally doing work. What they do is actually meaningless, does no constructive work and so they are unwittingly practicing controlled insanity that will end in insanity.

IN THE PAST I HAD A NEED TO REGULARLY GO TO A TENNIS WALL OR DRIVING RANGE TO EXERCISE AND I WOULD FEEL SOME MEASURE OF RELIEF THAT WOULD SOON BE NEGATED WHEN I RETURN TO WORK. NOW FOR YEARS I HAVE NOT PICKED UP A TENNIS RACKET OR GOLF CLUB AND YET I AM INCOMPARABLY HAPPIER AND HEALTHY THAN BEFORE.

IN THE PAST I HAD THE NEED TO SURROUND MY HOUSE AND ROOMS WITH VARIOUS PLANTS TO CHEER ME UP BUT IT WOULD NEVER DRIVE THE GLOOM THAT REGULARLY DESCENDED ON MY MIND. NOW I DON’T PLANT ANY PLANTS, DON’T KEEP ANY FISH BUT I DON’T FEEL ALONE OR DEPRESSED.

The minimum qualification for heaven:

You do not need to be able to stop all thinking, not like or dislike or attain a mental state of neither pain nor pleasure to go to heaven but the basic qualification to going to heaven for one Age or eternity is goodwill to all as to yourself.

A person of true goodwill does not radiate force or impart force on others and that means he must not have style, must not use force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness that harms himself and others with stress, restlessness and distraction.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON WITHOUT STYLE, WHO DOES NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS (THAT HAVE EQUIVALENTS IN MOTION) CAN BE A PAIN IN THE NECK OF OTHERS, CAN HARM OTHERS WITH FORCE AND A PERSON WITH SUCH MINIMUM ATTRIBUTES IS A SHEEP, IS HEADED FOR HEAVEN.

JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO STYLE, DO NOT STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS DOES NOT MEAN YOU CAN STOP THINKING WHICH IS A HIGHER ATTRIBUTE THAT ACCORDS THAT PERSON TWO EONS IN HEAVEN. IF THE PERSON CAN IN ADDITION TO NO THINKING DEVELOP NEITHER LIKING NOR DISLIKING HE IS HEADED FOR FOUR EONS IN HEAVEN AND IF HE CAN ATTAIN A MENTAL STATE WITH NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE, THAT IS 500 EONS IN HEAVEN. IF HE FURTHER OVERCOMES ALL CONSIDERATIONS OF FORM TO ACCESS THE INFINITUDE OF SPACE THAT IS 20,000 EONS, ACCESS THE INFINITUDE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND THAT IS 40,000 EONS, ACCESS NOTHINGNESS AND THAT IS 60,000 EONS, THE MAXIMUM SINGLE LIFESPAN FOR A BEING.

Puggala Sutta: Persons

"Here, bhikkhus, a certain person abides with his heart imbued with loving-kindness extending over one quarter, the second, the third, the fourth quarter, and so above, below, everywhere, and to all as to himself; he abides with his heart abundant, exalted, measureless in loving-kindness, without hostility or ill-will, extending over the all-encompassing world.

(It is impossible for a person who is constantly radiating force by stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness to have true loving kindness. Just because you have loving kindness does not mean you can stop thinking)

"He finds gratification in that, and looks to it for his well-being; steady and resolute thereon, and if he dies without losing it, he reappears among the gods of a High Divinity's retinue.

"Now the gods of a High Divinity's retinue have a life-span of one aeon. An ordinary person [who has not attained the Noble Eightfold Path] stays there for his life-span; but after he has used up the whole life-span enjoyed by those gods, he leaves it all, and [according to what his past deeds may have been] he may go down even to hell, or to an animal womb, or to the ghost realm. But one who has given ear to the Perfect One stays there [in that heaven] for his life-span, and after that he has used up the whole life span enjoyed by those gods, he eventually attains complete extinction of lust, hate and delusion in that same kind of heavenly existence.

The final divorce from force:

To be able to perceive without pain or pleasure is the final divorce from force.

To be able to say or do things without using force to prolong, change speed and strength is the first basic meaningful dissociation from force.

To be able to stop thinking is the next level of dissociation from force that provides the momentum for ceaseless thinking. Next comes not stirring your mental force to be attracted to or repulsed by whatever is happening.

After divorce from force, there remains form and divorce from form results in existence in the infinitude of space, divorce from a physical or spatial existence results in existence in the infinitude of consciousness and divorce from consciousness results in existence in the realm of activities or nothingness. With the banishment of all ignorance comes enlightenment and the being ceases to desire any form of existence anywhere.

What is a gaffe?

Quote: Black man becomes white man in Microsoft advert gaffe.

Gaffes are very real to emotional stylish people and something can only be a gaffe if the person is pretentious, devoted to appearances and niceties, things said and done to please and impress others and a gaffe is committed if the person inadvertently or by a lapse of ‘propriety’ says or does something that embarrasses or causes the make belief or pretence to be shattered exposing his true thoughts and intentions.

Thus in this case, Microsoft has inadvertently revealed its racial bias in swapping a black man with a white man in advertisements for Polish consumption. Perhaps a black man will not go down well in Poland and so Microsoft used a white man there.

‘Blackman becomes white man’ is a false way of putting it, what actually happened is that Microsoft used a white man for Polish advertisements whilst the original ad had a black man.

A GAFFE IS ONLY POSSIBLE IF YOU ARE A PRETENTIOUS PERSON WHO SAY OR DO THINGS FALSELY THAT YOU DO NOT MEAN TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS AND WHEN AS A RESULT OF AN OVERSIGHT, WHAT YOU SAID OR DID THAT YOU THOUGHT WAS PLEASING OR IMPRESSIVE TURNED OUT THE OPPOSITE, YOU FEEL EMBARRASSED, HURT OR ASHAMED AT EXPOSING YOURSELF NEGATIVELY. GAFFES ARE MEANINGLESS PREOCCUPATIONS OF PRETENTIOUS OR STATUS CONSCIOUS PEOPLE WHO ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.

EMBARRASSMENT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT IS BLAMEWORTHY SUFFERING THAT IS CONDITIONING AND WILL END IN INSANITY THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN. NOTHING EMBARRASSES ME.

‘A’ Grade for boy who reads maths books for fun:

YOU NEVER READ SOMETHING FOR FUN OR JUST FOR THE SAKE OF READING IT TO STIR ATTRACTIVE MENTAL FORCE, YOU READ SOMETHING FOR A PURPOSE, TO LEARN SOMETHING OR GET INFORMATION AND SO IF IT IS TRUE HE READS MATHS BOOKS FOR FUN, HE IS PRACTICING SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS OR JUST TO STIR OR STIMULATE MENTAL FORCE THAT WILL END IN MADNESS.

What is said and the way it is said makes it a boast, people don’t just boast about themselves, they also boast for others.

Can reading maths books be truly fun, stir your mental force attractively? The truth is nothing is fun, fun is a conditioned false make belief state of the mind just as jokes are funny is an acquired taste and so it is false or a lie to say he reads maths books for fun with the motive to boast that whereas others find maths books tough to read, he finds it ‘fun’ or enjoyable because he is so smart.

EXACTLY HOW FUN IT IS FOR HIM TO READ MATHS BOOK, WHETHER IT IS A SHOW OR LIE TO IMPRESS OTHERS CAN BE KNOWN. IT MAY BE JUST A BRAG THAT HE THINKS IS HARMLESS BUT HAS DEADLY KARMA, THAT WHEREAS YOU FIND MATHS BOOKS A CHORE OR TOO ‘SOPHISTICATED’ FOR YOU, HE FINDS IT A CINCH, A DELIGHT.

Reading for force not reason:

When you say you read for fun you are actually saying you are reading for the purpose of stirring force that is blind and without understanding.

IT IS MAD TO READ FOR FUN, TO READ TO STIR BLIND MENTAL FORCE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND AND SO IF YOU TRULY READ FOR FUN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS TO IMPRESS OTHERS AND HEADED FOR MADNESS.

YOU READ FOR UNDERSTANDING, TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS WRITTEN ASSUMING THAT IT IS MEANINGFUL AND IT REFLECTS THE PERSON AND OTHERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHEN THEY THINK IT IS OK AND UNDERSTANDABLE TO READ FOR FUN.

Sacking will strengthen MCA:

Liow was quoted as saying this.

Without considerable support Chua Soi Lek could not have been voted deputy and so this sacking is likely to open wounds at least temporarily and so what he said is against logic.

It is impossible he sees and knows what he said is true but he is speaking without knowing likely because he is siding with the MCA president.

WHEN YOU LIE, YOU ARE SPEAKING KNOWING WHAT YOU SAY IS FALSE. ANYONE WHO SPEAKS WITHOUT SEEING WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE IS SPEAKING BLINDLY AND HE MUST USE FORCE ACCORDING TO A PLAN TO SAY IT THAT IS CONDITIONING HIMSELF TO SPEAKING BLINDLY THAT WILL END IN TORMENT.

NEVER SPEAK BLINDLY WITHOUT SEEING OR KNOWING WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, IF YOU DID NOT SEE IT IS TRUE, YOU WILL BE WISE TO REMAIN SILENT, BECAUSE YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO CERTAIN FUTURE MADNESS BY SAYING SOMETHING YOU DO NOT KNOW IS TRUE. EVEN IF YOU GUESSED RIGHT THAT THE SACKING WILL STRENGTHEN MCA, BECAUSE YOU SPOKE BLINDLY, YOU GUESSED, YOU ARE COMMITTING YOURSELF TO DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT WHAT YOU SAY MIGHT BE WRONG.

Speaking blindly:

If you know what you say or do is false (eg you know you are smiling falsely) then you are lying and that is the way to certain insanity because just as you will others to believe what is false is true, you are conditioning yourself to what is false is true by saying or doing false things.

If you do not know or see what you say or do is true, then you are speaking blindly and even this is deadly because it too is courting future insanity.

WHENEVER A PERSON SPEAKS BLINDLY OR DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE (EG REGURGITATE WHAT MEDICAL TEXTS TELL HIM IS SO) HE MUST USE FORCE AND BLOT OUT TRUE REASON (WHICH WILL TELL HIM HE DOES NOT KNOW) TO SAY OR DO THAT THING BLINDLY.

THUS IF YOU DO NOT KNOW THE MEANING AND PURPOSE OF YOUR SMILE ON YOUR FACE AND YET YOU SMILE THEN YOU ARE SMILING BLINDLY AND THAT IS THE WAY TO INSANITY, DOING THINGS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING OR PURPOSE.

Thus if you saw someone stealing something and you say so, you are saying out of seeing. If you make an accusation he stole without seeing, you are speaking blindly and even if you turn out to be correct, you are conditioning yourself to speaking blindly that will end in torment for you.

The wonders of pomelo

IPOH: The Tambun pomelo, famous for its juicy and sweet flesh, is more than just a good eat – it has medicinal potential and can be used as an ingredient for aromatic oil.

If you say the above without seeing and knowing it is true then you are speaking blindly and that is as bad as lying because insanity is your final reward.

Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say and to say without seeing what you say is true is careless.

Careless does not mean mistake:

Emotional people think they are blameless if they plead carelessness for their actions because they have a false perception that careless means mistake, an accident, they were not paying attention and it was not wilfully intended and therefore they are absolved of eg causing a car accident that may be fatal.

Careless means ‘care less’, you don’t care, you are indifferent or don’t give a damn and therefore you are blameworthy for being careless not blameless.

If you are not paying attention then you shouldn’t be saying or doing something. If you say or do something without paying attention or slickly rendered by rote without attention then if that deed harms someone you are liable not blameless.

FAR MORE THAN THEY ARE AWARE, PEOPLE THINK THEY UNDERSTAND BUT THEY UNDERSTAND FALSELY THAT CARELESS MEANS MISTAKE, IT WAS AN ACCIDENT, NOT INTENDED WHEN CARELESS TRULY MEANS YOU DON’T CARE, DID NOT TAKE CARE, YOU RENDERED SOMETHING WITHOUT ATTENTION BY ROTE IMPERSONALLY BY APPROXIMATION.

Why freedom from style is the minimum requirement for heaven:

Do not underestimate the many evils of style or the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and strength and eliminating style being the key to going to heaven.

Jesus said in order for a man to go heaven, he must be born again not physically but in spirit and water. This mean there is something fundamentally or systematically wrong with men in general that must be totally reversed as if they are born again in order for them to go to heaven.

What can be fundamentally and systematically wrong with them that can be and must be eradicated to go to heaven?

Style (the use of force to stretch, change speed and strength that has equivalents in motion, thinking and even perceiving) is something that is present in all beings here, is constant, totally unnecessary and for show and always evil (harms self and others) is a prime candidate whose elimination is akin to being born again.

What are the evils of style?

Firstly it means force is constantly used that is totally unnecessary, wastes prodigious energy, is meaningless except for show to falsely impress, please, intimidate and dominate and creates insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that is also imparted on others.

Secondly the consistent, stereotyped style of a person mandates he must rehash or exist as a robot forever dishing out the same old things the same old ways that is a form of dishonesty and impersonality.

Thirdly style is the dynamo or generator of force that drives the emotions that can only be like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear. It is impossible for a person who has no style to suffer from like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear and no matter how a person with style might strive to drive out or control his sadness, hurt, agitation and fear, it is not only futile so long as he continues to sport style but these tormenting emotions are conditioning to become increasingly intense and mad with age and he is headed for insanity.

Because style or using force to stretch, change speed and strength is meaningless, only for show, the person with style is practicing controlled madness in the name of impressing and pleasing others and doomed to future insanity.

THUS STYLE IS SOMETHING ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO POSSESS, IS TOTALLY MEANINGLESS, ONLY FOR SHOW, IS EVIL BECAUSE IT NECESSITATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE, CREATES INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION & IS THE GENERATOR OF TORMENTING EMOTIONS LIKE SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION AND FEAR, IT IS THE PRIME CANDIDATE FOR WHAT NEEDS TO BE ELIMINATED FOR SOMEONE TO BE BORN AGAIN SO THAT HE CAN GO TO HEAVEN.

Style is the mother of all evil:

It is style or the constant use of force to stretch, change speed and strength that is the generator of power necessary to drive the emotions that are identified as sins by Jesus.

Anger is a sin (the man who calls his brother you fool is in danger of hell) and it is a form of dislike. Hate is dislike, laziness is dislike for work, jealousy is dislike for another because he possesses something you don’t.

Greed is attraction or like for money and material assets. Lust is like for sexual objects.

Pride, a sin is like for self, like for what and how you say, do, think and perceive with dislike or disdain for others who behave differently.

Stealing is the result of covetousness or greed, wanting what others have that is not yours.

ALL THE SINS DESCRIBED ARE EITHER FORMS OF THE VARIOUS EMOTIONS THAT CAN ONLY BE LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION & FEAR OR THEY ARE DRIVEN BY EMOTIONS (EG KILLING IS DRIVEN BY ANGER, HATE OR DISLIKE) AND ALL EMOTIONS DEPEND ON THE CONSTANT FORCE GENERATED BY FABRICATING STYLE FOR SUSTENANCE. THUS STYLE IS THE SOURCE OF ALL EMOTIONS THAT ARE THEMSELVES SINS OR THE DRIVES FOR SIN.

DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE ROLE OF STYLE IN SIN AND ITS ELIMINATION BEING THE KEY TO EXIT FROM SUFFERING AND GOING TO HEAVEN.

She is faking seeing:

Based on the positions of her eyes, the object she is looking at is to her left and upwards and that is impossible. She is looking to her left at someone or something but her eye postures says she is looking upwards and so she is faking looking.

She is a dishonest person not just here but always. She can fake she is looking at you when she isn’t, she may be lost, staring vacantly.

THE HONEST PERSON TURNS HIS HEAD TOWARDS THE TARGET OF HIS SIGHT, HE DOES NOT DISHONESTLY LOOK THROUGH THE CORNER OF HIS EYE TO FOOL OTHERS HE IS NOT LOOKING WHEN HE IS.

IT IS NOT LAZINESS OR EFFICIENCY TO GLANCE THROUGH TO SIDE OF THE EYE BUT IT IS DISHONESTY, PEOPLE WANT TO SECRETLY SEE AND PRETEND THEY ARE NOT LOOKING.

IN THIS CASE SHE IS ACTUALLY FAKING GLANCING TO THE SIDE TO SEE BECAUSE HER EYES ARE LOOKING UPWARDS. SHE IS LIKELY STARING BLANKLY BUT FAKING SHE IS LOOKING AT YOU.

SHE IS ACTUALLY GLARING, THERE IS ANGER OR HOSTILITY IN HER FACE.

FALSITY IS NOT ISOLATED BUT SYSTEMATIC AND SO UNLESS THE PERSON IS BORN AGAIN, SHORT OF ALL FALSITY AND DECEIT, HE CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN.

A challenge is a plan driven by force:

Anyone who finds challenges meaningful, who will challenge themselves (and others) to do certain things is a fool heading for insanity.

A 13 year old girl wants to sail solo around the world and it may be that she would say it is a challenge for her, she wants to prove something.

A challenge is never understandable, is never based on reason or meaning but based on force.

What you challenge yourself, eg ‘sail alone around the world’ is a plan that you carry out using force. Whatever planning you do to make it a successful are again robotic, once devised, you are a robot of those plans to ensure your challenge to sail solo is successful.

WHAT YOU CHALLENGE YOURSELF, EG ‘SAIL SOLO AROUND THE WORLD’ BECOMES A PLAN THAT YOU BECOME A ROBOT DEDICATED TO FULFILL. YOU DO NOT SAIL AROUND THE WORLD TO CHALLENGE YOURSELF BUT YOU DO SO BECAUSE YOU WANT TO SEE THE WORLD OR SOMETHING MEANINGFUL.

Tee Keat thankful for Najib’s consent:

Quote: He said he was also grateful to Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak for his consent in allowing the MCA to resolve its own internal issues.

Tee Keat may be talking like a confused man or inadvertently exposing who ‘call the shots’ in BN.

He says it is internal matters and yet he is grateful to Najib for his consent. What kind of fool is he?

SOI LEK MAY BE A DIRTY OLD MAN BUT TEE KEAT’S INTEGRITY IS SUSPECT.

Najib: Resolve crisis the soonest

It may be impossible to resolve the crisis and it may fester for a very long time and thus such talk of quick resolution may be just empty babble that is not harmless but the path to insanity.

There is a significant faction in MCA aligned to Soi Lek who will feel wounded and so there will be strain even animosity within the party that may last a very long time or even incurable.

One way to resolve the crisis is to identify all Soi Lek’s men and dismiss them too but that would make it a witch hunt because they were not guilty of sexual misdemeanour like Soi Lek but if they remain in the party, there is likely to be persistent friction.

IF YOU DO NOT WANT A CRISIS, DO NOT CREATE IT IN THE FIRST PLACE BUT NOW THAT YOU HAVE PRECIPITATED A CRISIS BY SACKING SOI LEK IT REFLECTS UNREALISTIC THINKING OR WRONG VIEW THAT YOU CAN RESOLVE THE CRISIS THE SOONEST. SUCH ADVICE IS EMPTY BABBLE.

Boy reincarnation of WW II pilot:

Some time back, a talking fish stunned unsophisticated fishmongers in NY by saying the end is near and that he was the spirit of a departed Jewish man who used to patronize the shop.

Below is story of a boy who appears to be the reincarnation of a WWII pilot shot down in action.

These stories are to be expected in line with what the Buddha taught that all animals are beings like us and you have countless past lives, have spilt your own blood greater than the 4 great oceans.

Reincarnated! Our son is a World War II pilot come back to life

By Zoe Brennan
Last updated at 1:29 AM on 29th August 2009

• Comments (0)


• Add to My Stories

 

It sounds totally beyond belief. But read the tantalising evidence from this boy's family and you may start to wonder...

The agonised screams pierced the air. 'Plane on fire! Airplane crash.' In the dark, a two-year-old boy was just visible, writhing on his bed in the grip of horror. 'He was lying there on his back, kicking and clawing at the covers like he was trying to kick his way out of a coffin,' remembers the boy's father.

'I thought, this looks like The Exorcist. I half expected his head to spin around like that little girl in the movie. But then I heard what James was saying.'

Over and over again, the tiny child screamed: 'Plane on fire! Little man can't get out.'

Vivid recollections: James Leininger, pictured aged four had nightmares about being a WWII pilot who died after his plane crashed into the ocean

For his shocked parents, these nightly scenes were traumatic.

For experts, they were baffling.

As the nightmares became more terrifying, the child started screaming the name of the 'little man' who couldn't get out of the plane. It was James - like his own name. He also talked in his dreams of 'Jack Larsen', 'Natoma' and 'Corsair'.

James Leininger's father, Bruce, was flummoxed. In a desperate attempt to find an answer to his son's troubled nights, he embarked on an obsessive three-year research project, armed only with the outbursts and names his son had been shouting in his disturbed sleep.

What he discovered astonished and perplexed him, and drove him to an extraordinary conclusion.

A lifelong Christian, it was not the answer he had sought for his son's behaviour. But he came to believe James was the reincarnation of a World War II fighter pilot; a man who had been shot down in his plane and struggled to escape as it caught fire; a hero.

Hero: Fighter pilot James Huston, who died in 1945 after his plane took a direct hit and plunged into the water

The idea seems so preposterous as to be unbelievable. Yet in their new book, Soul Survivor: The Reincarnation Of A World War II Fighter Pilot, Bruce and his wife, Andrea, lay out some compelling evidence.

It all began on May 1, 2000. James, just three weeks past his second birthday, was a happy, playful toddler living in an idyllic home in southern Louisiana. That night, his mother was woken by his screams. She held him in her arms as he thrashed around.

Soon, however, James was having five nightmares a week. Andrea was worried. Her little boy began to talk during his bad dreams, screaming about an airplane crash and writhing as if he were trapped in a burning aircraft.

At a toy shop, they admired some model planes. 'Look,' said Andrea. 'There's a bomb on the bottom.'

'That's not a bomb, Mummy,' he replied. 'That's a drop tank.' Just a toddler, he was talking like a military historian. How had he known about the gas tank used by aircraft to extend their range?

As the nightmares continued, she asked him: 'Who is the little man?'

'Me,' he answered. His father asked: 'What happened to your plane?'

James replied: 'It crashed on fire.'

'Why did your plane crash?'

'It got shot,' he said.

'Who shot your plane?'

James made a disgusted face. 'The Japanese!' he said, with indignation.

He said he knew it was the Japanese, because of 'the big red sun'. Was he describing the Japanese symbol of the rising sun, painted on their warplanes, called 'meatballs' by American pilots?

Tentatively, Andrea began to suggest reincarnation; perhaps James had lived a past life? Bruce reacted angrily. There must be a rational explanation for all this.

He questioned his son further. 'Do you remember what kind of plane the little man flew?'

'A Corsair,' replied the two-year-old without hesitation - repeating the word he shouted in his dreams.

Bruce knew this was a World War II fighter plane.

'Do you remember where your airplane took off from?' he asked.

'A boat,' said James. How did he know that these planes were launched from aircraft carriers? He asked the name of the boat.

His son replied with certainty: 'The Natoma.'

After James was in bed, Bruce researched what he had heard. A naturally sceptical man, he was amazed to find the Natoma Bay was a World War II aircraft carrier. 

James even began to don an imaginary pilot's headset when his mother strapped him into his car seat. And when Bruce ordered a book for his father's Christmas present - The Battle Of Iwo Jima - James pointed to the picture and said: 'Daddy, that's when my plane was shot down.'

Bruce, who works in the oil industry, rushed into his office, where he had a dictionary of American naval fighting ships. Natoma Bay had supported the U.S. Marines' invasion of Iwo Jima in 1945.

Bruce was mystified - what was coming out of the mouth of his two-year- old? Next, the little boy named his nightmare alter-ego's best friend. He was Jack Larsen.

'He was a pilot, too,' he said. Bruce decided that he had to find Jack Larsen to prove his point to his wife - Larsen would tell him that James had invented the whole thing, and there was no such thing as reincarnation.

He decided to go to a reunion of veterans of Natoma Bay, pretending he was writing a book.

Andrea, meanwhile, was convinced James had been reincarnated. She contacted Carol Bowman, the author of a book on reincarnation called Children's Past Lives. Bowman confirmed Andrea's views.

'The common threads were there with James,' she said. 'The age the nightmares began, the remembered death. These are all consistent with children experiencing past lives.'

She advised Andrea to tell James that he was safe, and that his bad experiences were over now. Apart from his night terrors, he was an ordinary child living an ordinary life, turning three in April 2001.

He liked to play war games with his GI Joe action figures, Billy, Walter and Leon. He also liked to draw - battle scenes, with bullets, bombs and planes. He drew Wildcats and Corsairs, and named the Japanese planes Zekes or Bettys.

Pointing to one plane, he said: 'That's a Corsair. They used to get flat tyres all the time. And they always wanted to turn left when they took off.'

He would play a game of pilots, constructing a make-shift cockpit out of a toy phone and old car seat. He would call: 'Roger. Zero at six o'clock. Hit him!', then throw himself on the floor, saying: 'My plane was hit, I'm parachuting.' At an airshow, he told everyone: 'I want to be an F18 Super Hornet pilot.'

In the meantime, Bruce finally managed to find Jack Larsen - and uncovered an awful secret. It turned out Larsen's friend James Huston Jnr died when his plane was shot in the engine and caught fire, exactly as described by two-year-old James.

Bruce found Huston's name on the list of 18 men killed in action on the Natoma. The discovery finally made him ask: Could this be the man who inhabits my son's soul?

He sifted through a thousand combat mission reports to find where Huston had been killed.

Larsen told Bruce: 'James was a real good man. It was a very dangerous place. But James volunteered to go.'

He also said that it was aboard the Natoma that the first crude napalm bombs had been improvised, mixing napalm powder with petrol. 'It looked like we were making jelly,' he said.

His account brought home the full horror of battle - the flimsy planes flying to attack the Japanese. Huston was flying 'tail-end Charlie' - the last plane in - so Larsen had not seen him go down.

The veterans' association reported that James Huston's father had even attended their reunions. But the old man died in 1973, never learning any specifics of his son's death.

Next, little James unnerved his father by telling him: 'I knew you would be a good daddy, that's why I picked you.'

'Where did you find us?' asked a shaken Bruce.

'In Hawaii, at the pink hotel, on the beach,' he replied. Eerily, he described his parents' fifth wedding anniversary - five weeks before Andrea got pregnant - saying it was when he 'chose' them to bring him back into the world.

Something new emerged every day. On a map, he pointed out the exact location where James's plane went down. Asked why he called his action figures Billy, Leon and Walter, he replied: 'Because that's who met me when I got to heaven.'

Sure enough, on the list of the Natoma dead, alongside James Huston, were Billie Peeler, Leon Conner and Walter Devlin. Uncannily, photos of the men showed their hair colour matched those of their GI Joe dolls.

Finally, Bruce and Andrea located James Huston's last surviving relative - his 84-year-old sister, Anne.

She told them: 'Mom and Dad never talked about Jimmy's death, but Dad went to several reunions to see if he could get any details. He never could.'

And so they were able to tell her where her brother died. After so many years, they were even able to send her a picture of the harbour.

She responded: 'It is so much more personal than anything I have. The picture of the bay is beautiful and so peaceful. A lovely resting place.'

In return, she sent Bruce and Andrea a picture of James with his squadron - a cluster of smiling young men. In the background was a Corsair - confirming that little James had been right about the plane Huston flew.

Bruce says: 'My purpose for researching what was happening to my son was to establish that this was all a coincidence. But I was getting closer and closer to something dangerous. It was like putting my hand in a fire.'

Not long after, the family had a phone call from a veteran who had seen Huston's plane being hit. He kept his knowledge to himself for more than 50 years. He described seeing the aftermath of Huston's crash on the sea below.

'He took a direct hit on the nose. All I could see were pieces falling into the bay. We pulled out of the dive and headed for open sea. I saw the place where the fighter had hit. The rings were still expanding near a huge rock at the harbour entrance.'

Huston's plane was hit in the engine and the front exploded in a ball of flames - exactly like James's account. It explained why he always knocked the propeller off his toy planes.

Another veteran had been even closer. John Richardson explained: 'The Japs began firing at us. We formed up for the attack. A plane startled me. It was a fighter. He was firing his machine guns, strafing what was below. We were no more than 30 yards apart when the pilot deliberately turned his head and looked at me.

'I caught his eye and we connected with each other. No sooner had we connected than his plane was hit in the engine by what seemed to be a fairly large shell. There was an instantaneous flash of flames that engulfed the plane. It almost immediately disappeared below me.'

Richardson began to sob, saying: 'I have lived with that pilot's face as his eyes fixed on me every day since it happened. But I never knew who he was. I was the last guy who saw him alive. I was the last person he saw before he was killed. His face has haunted me.'

The family showed him a photograph of James Huston.

He said: 'I recognise his face. I could never forget it. As we retired from the harbour, I could see where Huston went in. He hit near a large rock right near the opening.'

Encouraged by the Leiningers, Richardson told Anne what he had seen - half a decade after her brother was lost without trace.

Poignantly, she said: 'I'm relieved to know Jimmy didn't suffer, and a little sad that my father died before he learned what happened.'

For his part, Bruce has found peace after his exhaustive search for answers. He says: 'God gives us a spirit. It lives for ever. James Huston's spirit had come back to us. Why? I'll never know. There are things that are unexplainable and unknowable.'

Meeting Huston's veteran brothers in arms, little James was disappointed, saying: 'I'm sad that everyone is so old.' Did he truly remember them as dashing young pilots?

Finally, the Leiningers gingerly broke the explosive news of the real reason behind their questions to Anne. They mapped out the story, the terrible nightmares, the vivid descriptions of battle, naming the ship and the pilots.

She told them: 'Jimmy was due home in March 1945 and I was cleaning, anticipating his arrival. I sensed that he was in the room with me. A couple of days later I got the news that Jimmy had gone missing. I was devastated.

'When my father told me the date Jimmy was lost, I realised it was the day I felt his presence. We never knew what happened to him. I want you to know that I believe the story.'

The Leiningers eventually went to drop a bouquet of flowers at Huston's ocean grave, making the long voyage to Japan.

James's nightmares continued until he was eight, but they were gentler than his early terrors - he woke sobbing softly. Whatever the truth behind the young boy's extraordinary dreams, James Huston now seems able to rest in peace.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1209795/Reincarnated-Our-son-World-War-II-pilot-come-life.html#ixzz0PXaPKZDv

 

Reincarnation is not anathema to Christianity:

There is nothing in the New Testament that says reincarnation is impossible and against Christian teaching, instead it is the delusion and obstinacy of Christians who are incurring karma on themselves to reject it flatly.

Jesus said make friends for yourselves by means of unrighteous mammon, so that when it fails they may receive you into the eternal habitations.

What do you mean by eternal habitations? Would transmigrating from one body to another body not be eternal habitations?

Jesus spoke of eternal punishment. What constitutes this eternal punishment, where do these eternally punished beings exist? Might it not be possible that the animal world, ghost, hell and human existence be part of that eternal punishment.

Neither perceiving nor not perceiving:

The Buddha spoke of a state a being can attain in which he neither perceives nor not perceive.

How might that be?

If perceiving is the Google street view of what is happening in which you only perceive what is in front of you and you can perceive everything around by rotating your body 360 degrees and not perceiving is whatever that is beyond the line of sight or horizon including objects hidden behind what you perceived that you did not and cannot perceive then the bird’s eye view from above is neither perceiving nor not perceiving.

It is not perceiving because the bird’s eye view is very different from the street view that is defined as perceiving.

It is not ‘not perceiving’ because the bird’s eye view perceives everything there is to be perceived below.

It is because foolish beings are attached to themselves, identify with their ‘unique’ individual or different perspectives that is accorded by their different street views of things that they have to severely compromise themselves. The price of perceiving individually that little piece of current reality at a specific location where you are in is that you fail to perceive the far bigger reality of what is happening everywhere else, not just outside your room but outside your house, suburb, town, country and the world and universe elsewhere.

By giving up your restrictive and one sided or partial street view, it may be possible for you to attain the state where you perceive everything but it is not perception because the view is not a street view but an encompassing bird’s eye view nor is it not perceiving because whatever is happening below is totally in your field of view, there is nothing below that you do not perceive.

Suppose the realm of perception, whatever can be perceived is two dimensional and can be represented by a sheet of paper and whoever is trapped in perception and not perceiving is trapped on this piece of paper in two dimension wherein he can perceive whatever is in front of him in 360 degrees next to him and although he can move around and change what he is perceiving he is restricted to perceiving whatever is in the vicinity of his location and he does not perceive anything outside this vicinity that is concurrently happening. The person who neither perceives nor not perceive is the man above, not trapped in the two dimensions of the paper who perceives everything there is on the paper below and so he is not ‘not perceiving’ nor is he perceiving because his encompassing bird’s eye view is different, not the same as the street view that is enmeshed within the two dimensions of the realm of perceiving and not perceiving.

THUS THE BUDDHA MAY NOT BE SPEAKING OF NONSENSE BUT IT MAY BE THAT THIS SO CALLED WONDERFUL WORLD OF SELFISHLY GREEDILY PERCEIVING THE LITTLE THAT MANDATES THAT YOU THUS FAIL TO PERCEIVE THE INFINITUDE THAT IS HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME IS ACTUALLY A SEVERE COMPROMISE OR RESTRICTION, SUFFERING RATHER THAN UNADULTERATED PLEASURE. 

ALL BEINGS TRAPPED IN SIMULTANEOUS PERCEIVING THE LITTLE AND NOT PERCEIVING THE MANY ARE TRAPPED IN A TWO DIMENSIONAL WORLD IN WHICH THEY CAN MOVE AROUND AND CHANGE THEIR VIEWS BUT THERE MAY BE A THIRD DIMENSION POSSIBLE DENIED THOSE TRAPPED IN PERCEIVING AND NOT PERCEIVING IN WHICH THE PERSON RISES ABOVE THE PLANE OF PERCEIVING AND NOT PERCEIVING AND FROM ABOVE HE PERCEIVES EVERYTHING THERE IS TO PERCEIVE IN THE REALM OF PERCEIVING AND NOT PERCEIVING BUT IT IS NOT PERCEIVING BECAUSE WHAT IS PERCEIVED FROM ABOVE IS DIFFERENT FROM THE STREET VIEW OF THOSE WHO PERCEIVE AND NOT PERCEIVE.

Bird’s eye view is not the same as the street view:

In what ways is the bird’s eye view different from the street view?

1)   The street view is a horizontal landscape view whilst the bird’s eye view is a plan view. Both are totally different from each other even though they view the same object.

2)   In the street view, there may be an object hiding behind a wall but you cannot see it but in the bird’s eye view, the object behind a wall is fully visible.

3)   What you see in the street view is what is immediately in your vicinity, whatever beyond the horizon is invisible to you, In the bird’s eye view, everything there is to see is seen.

THUS NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING IS NOT PERCEIVING BECAUSE WHAT IS SEEN FROM THE BIRD’S EYE VANTAGE IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE STREET VIEW OF PERCEIVING, IT IS NOT ‘NOT PERCEIVING’ BECAUSE THE BIRD’S EYE VIEW PERCEIVES EVERYTHING THERE IS TO BE PERCEIVED AT ANY MOMENT.