Thursday, May 27, 2010

Winter leaves Mongolians a harvest of carcasses

Winter leaves Mongolians a harvest of carcasses:

Cold and drought have ravaged Mongolian grasslands, killing millions of livestock and the country’s economy.

That is a nice and false way of putting it. It is farfetched that the carcasses are a harvest.

CALLING THE CARCASSES LEFT BY A SEVERE WINTER A HARVEST LEFT BY WINTER IS COURTING MAD PERCEPTION IN THE NAME OF STYLE, SPEAKING IN A WAY YOU THINK IS IMPRESSIVE. WHEN YOU ARE WEEPING AND GNASHING YOUR TEETH YOU WON’T THINK YOU ARE VERY CLEVER.

ANYONE WHO CALLS MANY DEAD ANIMALS A HARVEST OF CARCASSES LEFT BY WINTER MUST HAVE A DISTURBED MIND BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE TRUTH BUT ADULTERATED OR TAMPERED TRUTH THAT IS CONDITIONING AND WILL END IN A AGONIZINGLY DISTURBED MIND.

Who runs Europe: The governments or the markets?

Stephanomics

Who runs Europe: The governments or the markets?

If a question is foolish or deluded, you are headed for insanity with debts for similarly influencing others.

If you are talking about running Europe then those in authorities including governments of individual countries plus the EU is responsible not the market. The market can influence policies indirectly by influencing the politicians running the countries but they don’t run the countries so why do you ask the silly question that may be invalid, is driven by emotion, refusal to accept reality to question or doubt that is not the way to sanity but insanity.

GOVERNMENTS ARE ELECTED TO RUN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES BUT THEY MAY SHIRK THEIR DUTIES AND BE INCOMPETENT. MARKETS MAY INFLUENCE THE RUNNING OF COUNTRIES BUT THEY DO NOT RUN THE COUNTRY AND SO IT IS A SILLY QUESTION TO ASK THAT IS NEVER HARMLESS BUT DEADLY, LEADS TO SUFFERING. IT IS EMOTION EG BITTERNESS OR ANGER OR RESENTMENT THAT DRIVES A PERSON TO QUESTION REALITY THUS, WHO RUNS EUROPE? THERE ARE CERTAIN MATTERS LIKE THE CURRENT ECONOMIC CRISIS THAT MAY BE BEYOND THE HANDS OF GOVERNMENTS OR MARKETS AND SO ASKING THE QUESTION IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE.

Harvard v Yale

Why do two schools have grip on Supreme Court?

If it is borne out by statistics that these two schools do dominate the Supreme Court then it is not for genuine reasons but for false reasons like reputation, connection and prejudice.

There is no true reason why Harvard or Yale should produce law graduates that are pre-eminent, any competent American university should produce similarly ‘brilliant’ lawyers and so the reasons this has come to pass is because of delusion, selection based on reputation or status, connections and prejudice.

THERE IS NO TRUE REASON WHY HARVARD OR YALE GRADUATES SHOULD DOMINATE THE SUPREME COURT. IT REFLECTS FALSE REASONS OR DELUSION. IT IS NOT BECAUSE A PERSON IS A YALE OR HARVARD ALUMNI THAT MAKES HIM MORE SUITABLE TO BECOME SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT JUDGES THEY ARE FAR FROM IMPECCABLE AND EVEN DOWNRIGHT PARTISAN.

Frivolous questions:

Questions can be objectively classified frivolous or useless or essential or meaningful and if anyone perceives a question as essential or meaningful when it is frivolous or useless, then he has false perception that is the way to insanity.

Whether governments or markets run Europe is a frivolous question, it does not matter but what matters is what is ailing the economies and whether and what anything can be done about it. Governments should not pander to markets, shirk measures just because markets are upset. German curbs on ‘naked’ shortening are correct, for the common good and even if markets plunge, it is because their short sighted selfish interests do not coincide with public interests.

It takes a status conscious person to notice that many supreme court appointees are alumni of Harvard and Yale to make much of that by asking frivolously why it should be so.

IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE ASKING YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE FOR ASKING WHETHER IT IS BASED ON REASON OR ESSENCE OR BASED ON EMOTION (EG LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS). EG YOU CAN BE DRIVEN BY ANGER (THAT IS FORCE NOT REASON) TO ASK WHO RUNS EUROPE OR YOU CAN BE DRIVEN BY LIKE (ATTRACTION) TO ASK WHY SO MANY SUPREME COURT APPOINTEES COME FROM HARVARD AND YALE.

IF YOUR QUESTION IS TRIVIAL YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.

Paris here we come:

There is only one way to truly understand that statement and it is that it is false driven by emotion to boast or beat one’s own drum. How many see anything wrong or why it is wrong? Even those who pride themselves as very intellectual cannot see it is false let alone pin why it is false.

The statement is never composed guided by true understanding but rehashed, driven by emotion. He is not the first to use such a statement but he copied from others and the motive is to stir emotion as if it is that exciting.

PARIS IS NOT A BEING LIKE JOHN OR MARY THAT YOU CAN ADDRESS ‘PARIS’ AS THE PERSON IS ADDRESSING AND SO THE PERSON IS SPEAKING FALSELY DICING WITH MAD PERCEPTION. FURTHERMORE IT IS A REHASHED AND THEREFORE FALSE STATEMENT. AGAIN IT IS NO BIG DEAL GOING TO PARIS, THERE IS DEATH AND SUFFERING IN PARIS JUST AS IT IS EVERYWHERE.

YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION IF YOU THINK 'PARIS HERE WE COME' MEANS 'WE ARE VERY EXCITED ABOUT GOING TO PARIS'.

Why my streamyx broadband was so slow:

Recently I suffered access to my wired broadband that was so slow it rendered surfing impossible for a few days with disruption of my usual routines.

I rang customer support and spoke to three different persons, they gave me a run around but could not tell me what was wrong as if it was such a mysterious or complicated problem when it was a simple problem swiftly diagnosed by the telekom technician they must have sent but without telling me.

When the technician looked at my set up he noticed the DSL light was flickering every time I tried to access the web and he immediately diagnosed a poor or corroded connection at the local WAN miniport (usually at the roadside) but because it was raining he said he could not open it as the rain may damage the equipment.

He said he would do it the next day Sunday and I actually spotted him doing it on my modem. I noticed the DSL light suddenly extinguishing at about 12 noon and then after a while it reappeared and became steady and then I could surf effortlessly. He must have disconnected and reconnected just as I was watching the modem lights.

PROBLEMS OF CONNECTION FAILURE OR VERY POOR SPEED (AS WAS MY CASE) ARE LIKELY ACTUALLY QUITE SIMPLE & QUICK TO SOLVE, THERE ARE ONLY FEW POSSIBILITIES BUT REFLECTING THEIR LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING THESE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TELEPHONISTS WERE ALL AT SEA AND LED ME ON A WILD GOOSE CHASE WITH MUCH UNNECESSARY SUFFERING AND THEN FAILED TO TELL ME THEY WERE SENDING A TECHNICIAN TO LOOK. BY A PROCESS OF SYSTEMIC EXCLUSION OF POSSIBILITIES THEY COULD HAVE COME TO A DIAGNOSIS SWIFTLY EVEN ON THE TELEPHONE. ONE TELEPHONIST DID ASK ME ABOUT THE DSL LIGHT BUT HE FAILED TO TELL ME CLEARLY THAT IF MY DSL LIGHT FLICKERS IT MEANS CONNECTION IS UNSTABLE. HE SAID FROM WHAT HE COULD SEE, I AM CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET AND SO HE CAN’T SEE WHY I CANNOT DOWNLOAD.

WHEN THE ONSITE TECHNICIAN CAME, HE IMMEDIATELY DIAGNOSED FAULT AT THE CONNECTION AT THE LOCAL WAN MINIPORT THAT REQUIRED CLEANING OR REPLACEMENT.

THUS IT MAY BE YOU THINK YOU ARE TALKING TO TRULY UNDERSTANDING PEOPLE BUT EVEN THOSE WHO ARE TRAINED IN THEIR FIELDS MAY HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THEY ARE DOING WHICH IS WHY THEY APPROACHED MY PROBLEM HAPHAZARDLY AND FAILED TO TELL ME WHAT WAS WRONG. ONE GUY EVEN RUDELY HUNG UP ON ME, FRUSTRATED WITH ME WHEN IT WAS HIS INCOMPETENCE THAT WAS THE PROBLEM.

THE REASON THE TECHNICIAN IMMEDIATELY DIAGNOSED THE PROBLEM IS NOT NECESSARILY BECAUSE HE UNDERSTOOD BUT BY EXPERIENCE OR CONDITIONING, HE IMMEDIATELY ASSOCIATED A FLICKERING DSL LIGHT WITH FAULTY CONNECTION AT WAN MINIPORT.

THUS IF YOU HAVE SLOW CONNECTION, LOOK AT THE LIGHTS ON YOUR MODEM, IF THE DSL LIGHT FLICKERS, THE CONNECTION IS FAULTY, THE ETHERNET LIGHT FLICKERS RAPIDLY WHEN THERE IS TRAFFIC FROM YOUR COMPUTER.

EVEN WHEN THE VOICE LINE IS OK, THE MORE DEMANDING BROADBAND LINE OR CONNECTION MAY BE FAULTY.

Beauty has arrived:

This is the caption of a video clip advertising the new BMW at the BBC site.

People seeing the caption see nothing wrong, they and the person responsible think it is a marvellous statement of truth and succinct when it is false and deadly, leads to torment and insanity for the composer and those who see nothing wrong.

BEAUTY IS NOT A PERSON OR OBJECT THAT CAN ARRIVE, YOU CAN SAY THE BEAUTIFUL BMW 5 HAS ARRIVED BUT YOU ARE FLIRTING WITH FALSITY AND THINKING IT EXALTING TO SAY ‘BEAUTY HAS ARRIVED’ WHEN IT IS DEADLY, LEADS TO TORMENT EVEN INSANITY FOR YOURSELF AND YOU HAVE KARMA FOR CONDITIONING OTHERS TO ACCEPT FALSITY NOT ONLY AS TRUE BUT MARVELLOUS.

BEAUTY IS INDEED IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER AND SO THE CAR MAY BE ‘RAVISHINGLY’ BEAUTIFUL TO YOU BUT TO A PERSON WHO NEITHER LIKES NOR DISLIKES, HIS MENTAL FORCE IS NOT THE LEAST STIRRED TO BE EXCITED.

How a truly understanding person solves problems:

Whenever a problem with electrical equipment like broadband access to internet occurs, there is seldom if ever any mystery involved nor is it very complicated. The cause of the problem can be pinpointed rapidly by a process of piece by piece exclusion.

Thus I excluded fault with my computer or modem or router by trying a different computer, a different modem, with and without the router. Because they did not resolve the problem, it was not the computer, modem or router that was at fault.

Then I tried my broadband account at my home and it worked so it was nothing to do with my account but specific to my work phone line access to broadband. Thus the problem lies somewhere from my office line to the streamyx network.

Because there were no local breakdowns, traffic was normal in my area according to TM telephonist, the problem must be specific to my line or connect to the broadband service in my area.

Thus being a professional in the field and knowing the problem lies between my telephone line and streamyx network, you should know what are the likely sources of problems eg corrosion of contacts at wan mini ports that would explain why I have a problem but others do not.

THUS UNLESS YOU HAVE BIZARRE LOGIC, BY A SIMPLE PROCESS OF EXCLUSION, I HAVE ALREADY ELIMINATED POTENTIAL CAUSES IN MY COMPUTER, MODEM, ROUTER & ACCOUNT, BECAUSE THERE IS NO PROBLEM IN THE AREA, THE PROBLEM MUST BE SOMEWHERE IN MY LINE TO THE STREAMYX NETWORK AND KNOWING WHAT COULD GO WRONG, THE TECHNICIAN SHOULD HOME IN ON POSSIBLE CONNECTION PROBLEMS LIKE CORROSION AT THE WAN MINIPORT. HE SHOULD KNOW THAT POOR CONTACT AT CONNECTIONS CAN CAUSE UNSTABLE CONNECTION AND ASKED ME IF MY DSL LIGHT FLICKERS.

Playing God with the climate:

One of the potential uses which he's looking at for synthetic bacteria - sucking carbon dioxide from the atmosphere - potentially also breaks new ground in the ethics of human effects on the natural world.

Just because you tamper with the climate, in this case, seeding the oceans with bacteria that removes CO2 does not mean you are playing God or God acts in such a way.

THUS YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY, PRESUMPTUOUSLY TO EQUATE TAMPERING WITH THE CLIMATE WITH PLAYING GOD. HOW DO YOU KNOW GOD TAMPERS WITH THE CLIMATE?

A PERSON WHO GUARDS THE TRUTH AND SPEAKS TRUTHFULLY SAYS ‘TAMPERING DANGEROUSLY WITH THE CLIMATE’, HE DOES NOT SAY ‘PLAYING GOD’ WHEN HE DOES NOT KNOW IF GOD ACTS LIKE THIS.

It may be impossible for men to play God:

God can make ‘piping hot bread appear seemingly without end and make you disappear or reappear, make the dead come alive and because no man has such powers, it may be impossible for men to play God.

God may not need to mix certain chemicals and supply energy to create life but God can not just create microscopic life instantly but He can create a human robot far superior to human robots instantly.

THUS IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR MEN TO PLAY GOD BECAUSE MEN DO NOT HAVE THE POWERS OF GOD AND YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY TO SAY MEN ARE PLAYING GOD BY ARTIFICIALLY CREATING LIFE IN A LABORATORY.

What is meant by playing God:

If God does a certain thing and you can copy what He is doing you could be truly said to be playing God.

If you did not know what God did in order for life to appear on earth, you have no right and are speaking without knowing that you are playing God by mixing certain chemicals in a laboratory and supplying energy to create life.

THIS IS HOW SCIENTISTS CREATE NEW LIFE IN A LABORATORY, BY MIXING CERTAIN CHEMICALS AND SUPPLYING ENERGY.

THIS MAY OR MAY NOT BE THE WAY GOD CREATES LIFE, GOD MAY NOT NEED TO LABORIOUSLY DO THAT, IT MAY BE THAT GOD SAYS LET THERE BE LIFE AND THERE IS LIFE AND SO HOW CAN YOU EQUATE WHAT SCIENTISTS DO AS ‘PLAYING GOD’?

THE BUDDHA CAN MAKE A PERSON SITTING INVISIBLE TO ALL THOSE PRESENT, HE CAN STOP THE STRONGEST MAN FROM SPLITTING A LOG, THE DEVIL SAID THE BUDDHA CAN TURN A MOUNTAIN INTO GOLD IF HE WISHED, THE BUDDHA INSTANTLY CREATED MANY BURNING FIRES TO KEEP BATHERS AT A RIVER WARM. IF SCIENTISTS ARE UNABLE TO DO SO, HOW CAN THEY BE RIGHTFULLY SAID TO BE PLAYING GOD?

IT IS NOT WITHOUT PURPOSE THAT PEOPLE UNRIGHTEOUSLY BRING GOD INTO CONTEXT, THE PURPOSE IS TO BOAST OR EXAGGERATE THE IMPORTANCE OF WHAT MANKIND HAS ACHIEVED.

THE PURPOSE OF SPEAKING OF MEN PLAYING GOD IS NOT TO SPEAK THE TRUTH BUT TO EXAGGERATE THE IMPORTANCE OF WHAT IS BEING DONE.

JESUS SAID THAT IF YOU HAVE FAITH AS MUCH AS A MUSTARD SEED YOU CAN TELL A MOUNTAIN TO MOVE AND IT SHALL BE DONE, THUS IT IS POSSIBLE FOR MEN TO HAVE THE POWERS OF GOD. YOU CAN EXERCISE GOD LIKE POWERS BUT YOU MAY NOT PLAY GOD, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY MEN TO PLAY GOD EXCEPT IN THEIR DELUSION THEY CAN AND DO.

Is depression taken seriously?

This is a question posed by someone who does not truly understand, he and others think it is full of meaning but it is a silly question and they do not understand.

If a person does not take depression seriously, it means he downplays or dismisses or avoids depression and that means he is using force to pervert reality or his perception. People think they perceive everything but they perceive selectively in a programmed way according to their likes and dislikes. Hence they have taboo things they avoid seeing, depression may be anathema or disliked for them.

It is never genuine reason that makes people dislike depression or not take it seriously and it is very difficult if not impossible to reverse what is driven by force, the force of repulsion. Even if you could reverse the dislike, because the person has no true understanding, the only other possibility is if he is conditioned to like or be interested in depression which is just as useless. What is the point of being interested to depression if you don’t understand; you are doing things (namely constantly using force to prolong syllables, units of motion) that lead to depression and cannot do anything about it?

TAKING DEPRESSION SERIOUSLY OR LIGHTLY IS AN ADMISSION OF PERVERSION OF PERCEPTION, THE PERSON DOES NOT SEE TRULY BUT SELECTIVELY ACCORDING TO FORCE OR LIKE OR DISLIKE, NOT REASON OR UNDERSTANDING.

IT IS USELESS TAKING DEPRESSION SERIOUSLY OR LIGHTLY OR DRIVEN BY ATTRACTIVE OR REPULSIVE FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING. THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT PERVERT REALITY SEES DEPRESSION AS IT IS AS SUCH AND SUCH, ITS CAUSES AND ITS CURE.

RATHER THAN TAKING DEPRESSION SERIOUSLY, ONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT DEPRESSION IS CAUSED BY THE PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE PROLONGING INTENSELY, UNSHAKEABLY AS A RESULT OF LIFELONG PERMISSION OF HIS MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG TO STRETCH SYLLABLES TO EXPRESS STYLE AND BECAUSE DEPRESSION IS DEADLY, CONDITIONING OR ADDICTIVE, IT IS A SIGN OF FUTURE DOOM IF THE PERSON DOES NOT MAKE SUSTAINED EFFORT TO ELIMINATE ALL USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG AS IN STRETCHING SYLLABLES.

THUS THE QUESTION ‘IS DEPRESSION TAKEN SERIOUSLY’ IS A FOOLISH OR SILLY QUESTION, THERE IS NO POINT TAKING DEPRESSION SERIOUSLY IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND IMPENDING DOOM OF DEPRESSION. YOU TAKE DEPRESSION WITH ALL THE FERVOUR AND SERIOUSNESS THAT YOU WANT BUT AS LONG AS YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT DEPRESSION IS CAUSED BY THE CONSTANT USE OF MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG AND INSTITUTE THE CURE IN TRAINING TO STOP USING FORCE TO PROLONG EG SYLLABLES, YOU ARE DOOMED TO INSANITY OR MAD SADNESS (AKA DEPRESSION).

It is not about seriousness but understanding:

It is not about taking depression seriously but understanding what causes depression and what is the cure if possible.

You can take depression with all the seriousness you like, devote all the attention you like, keep obsessing about it, but so long as you do not understand the true nature of depression, it is useless vexation.

What is important is understanding what causes depression, namely the lifelong use of mental force to prolong as in stretching syllables, and what is the cure, namely training to stop stretching syllables or using force to prolong.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON WHO DOES NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES TO EXPERIENCE SADNESS THAT DESCENDS INTO DEPRESSION, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON WHO ALWAYS USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES NOT TO EXPERIENCE DEPRESSION THAT IS ADDICTIVE TO BECOME MORE INTENSE, EASILY AROUSABLE AND HARDER TO SHAKE WITH AGE.

THUS IF DEPRESSION HOLDS MASOCHISTIC FASCINATION FOR YOU, KEEP STRETCHING SYLLABLES.

Prolonging causes sadness, accelerating speed and strength causes hurt:

It is the lifelong incessant use of force to prolong as in stretching syllables that leads to sadness that descends into depression.

It is the lifelong use of force to accelerate in speed and strength or loudness when one speaks that leads to hurt or mental pain that is easily arousable to even intense levels (eg seeing your girl talk to another boy).

NOT EVEN ONE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS IS NECESSARY WHEN SPEAKING AND IT IS ONLY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE. THE PRICE FOR STYLE IS EVEN FORBIDDING BECAUSE DEPRESSION AND MAD INTENSE HURT BECKONS THE FOOLISH MAN OF STYLE.

Do what you like but you will be depressed:

So long as you keep consciously or unconsciously using mental force to stretch syllables, you will succumb to depression no matter how seriousness you take depression, how much you study it, whatever expensive medicine, yoga, tai chi, exercise or diet you take.

IT IS NOT THE LACK OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS, LACK OF EXERCISE OR YOGA OR THE DIET THAT CAUSES DEPRESSION AND SO YOU ARE BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE. THE CURE FOR DEPRESSION IS THE ELIMINATION OF THE CAUSE, BECAUSE THE CAUSE IS THE MENTAL FORCE PROLONGING, THE CURE IS STOPPING USING MENTAL FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES.

Why smiling leads to sadness:

People don’t just smile but they prolong their smiles as long as possible because it is meant to be seen to impress or please others and as a result of using force to prolong their smiles, they must experience periodic sadness that ends in depression. Jesus said woe to you who laughs for you shall weep. Smiling is the laughter without sound.

Further all smiles are rehashed and the person is a robot dishing out stereotyped smiles again and again, sometimes more appropriate, sometimes odd and she is headed for robot failure or mad smiling.

PEOPLE NEVER JUST SMILE BUT THEY PROLONG THEIR SMILES TO GREATER OR LESSER EXTENT BECAUSE IT IS MEANT TO BE SEEN AND IT IS THIS PROLONGED UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE THAT CAUSES SADNESS THENCE DEPRESSION.

Nothing is fair game:

Bryant's Australia

Should politicians' private lives be fair game?

This is the question of a fool. Nothing is fair game unless you want your head on karma’s chopping board.

By ‘fair game’ he is speaking of subject to attack, whether it is OK to pick on politicians’ private lives or attack them.

Attacking is about ill will and that is a fetter to future woe according to the Buddha.

What politicians do in private lives that are wrong should not be covered but be exposed.

Fair game implies prying into and exposing the private lives of politicians to discredit or poke fun at them and that is about ill will that will end in perdition for the person who thinks it is fair game. Nevertheless whatever shenanigans of politicians when coming to the public attention should be censured as wrong, not tolerated or defended.

ANYONE WHO SPEAKS OF ANYTHING BEING FAIR GAME IS A FOOL WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND BECAUSE NOTHING IS EVER FAIR GAME EXCEPT IF YOU WANT YOUR HEAD CHOPPED BY KARMA.

Fair game is robot speak:

Only a person who is a rehashing robot will speak in terms of things being fair or not fair game.

A person who is not a robot treat events as they occur on a case by case basis and that is not about games that is fair or not fair.

“Fair game” is a nonspecific programming that can be applied on situations occurring to determine whether it is fair game and thence go ahead or not fair game and thence desist.

THUS BY SPEAKING IN TERM OF FAIR OR NOT FAIR GAME YOU ARE UNWITTINGLY ACKNOWLEDGING YOU ARE A ROBOT BEHAVING ACCORDING TO RULES OR INSTRUCTIONS WHETHER SOMETHING IS FAIR OR NOT FAIR GAME.

Why fair game is robot speak:

A person who truly understands does not speak in terms of fair game or not, the consideration does not arise in his mind. When a situation arises, he understands the nature of what has happened and acts accordingly. If it has come to his knowledge something about the private life of a politician that may be of interest to the public, that exposes the wrongdoing of a politician, then it is not a consideration of fair game but if he decides the matter is pertinent to public interest, he speaks about it.

By contrast, a person who is a robot does not know what to do, he has a set of rules that determines for him what is fair game and therefore go ahead and attack or not fair game and therefore stop.

Different people have different ideas of what is fair game, what is fair game for one person is not fair game for another and so fair game is a programming that differs from person to person and is false.

However when an issue in the private life of a politician comes to his knowledge, it is not a matter of whether it is fair game or not but it is a matter of whether the issue is of concern for the public (eg he is a pedophile) and if he determines it is important the public knows about it, he dwells about it.

IT IS NOT A MATTER OF WHATEVER HAPPENS IN THE PRIVATE LIVES OF POLITICIANS IS FAIR GAME BECAUSE THEY ARE PUBLIC FIGURES BUT IT IS A MATTER OF WHAT ISSUE IN THE PRIVATE LIVES OF THE POLITICIANS ARE OF RELEVANCE TO THE PUBLIC AND THEREFORE BROUGHT TO PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE.

Depression is a mind seized by force:

IF YOU USE FORCE MEANINGFULLY WITH PURPOSE, THEN FORCE CAN ONLY ACTIVATE WHEN THERE IS OCCASION OR MEANING OR PURPOSE TO ACTIVATE. WHEN THERE IS NO OCCASION OR NEED FOR IT TO ACTIVATE, IT WILL NOT ACTIVATE. HOWEVER, IF YOU USE FORCE INDISCRIMINATELY, YOU USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS THEN BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO ACTIVATE FORCE TO STRETCH WITHOUT MEANING OR OCCASION NEEDED AND SO IF YOU KEEP WILLING YOURSELF TO STIR FORCE FOR SHOW MEANINGLESS THEN IN TIME YOUR MENTAL FORCE HAS A TENDENCY TO STIR AND PROLONG AUTOMATICALLY ALL THE TIME WITHOUT PURPOSE NEEDED AND THAT IS SADNESS IF THE STIRRED FORCE IS FLUCTUANT AND DEPRESSION IF THE STIRRED FORCE GRIPS INTENSELY WITHOUT FLUCTUATION.

IT IS THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION ACTING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION THAT ENDS THE GRIP OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF WHEN IT IS PROLONGING AS WHEN IT STRETCHES SYLLABLES. IF THE FOOLISH PERSON INCESSANTLY USES FORCE INDISCRIMINATELY TO PROLONG, THERE MAY BE GREAT AUTOMATISM OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF TO ACTIVATE TO GRIP THE MIND WHILST THE OVERWORKED FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION ACTING TO LOOSEN THE GRIP MAY GIVE UP THROUGH OVERWORK SUCH THAT THE PERSON IS LEFT MORIBUND, HIS FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF ALLOWED UNFETTERED TO RHYTHMICALLY PROLONG IN A WAXING WANING MANNER UNCONTROLLED AND THAT IS SADNESS. WHEN THIS GRIP IS INTENSE AND DOES NOT FLUCTUATE, IT BECOMES DEPRESSION.

 

Sadness is a mind gripped by force that is fluctuating in intensity whereas depression is when the mind is gripped by significant intense force that does not fluctuate.

What is the aetiology for sadness and depression?

The wise person exposes his mind as minimally as possible only when necessary whilst the fool is eager to stir and use force in his mind.

Whenever force is used or stirred in the mind as when using force to stretch syllables to impress others how charming you are, it (the force of going against self) grips the mind causing incremental pain that is only evident after a significant period of exposure just a person gets drunk only after substantial alcohol intake, not at once. It is the force of self preservation acting in the opposite direction away from the consciousness that lifts the grip of force that is prolonging and when the person again uses force to stretch the next syllable his force of going against self again grips his mind until its grip is prised loose by force of self preservation.

You may see that with relentless cycles of gripping the mind in the name of stretching syllables, the force of self preservation may develop strong automatism to grip the mind and the force of self preservation that is overworked prising its grip on the mind may occasionally give up or fail and when this happens, the mind is beset by sadness with the force of going against self allowed almost free reign to grip the mind in a waxing waning manner so that the person experiences sadness.

IT IS THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION ACTING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION THAT ENDS THE GRIP OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF WHEN IT IS PROLONGING AS WHEN IT STRETCHES SYLLABLES. IF THE FOOLISH PERSON INCESSANTLY USES FORCE INDISCRIMINATELY TO PROLONG, THERE MAY BE GREAT AUTOMATISM OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF TO ACTIVATE TO GRIP THE MIND WHILST THE OVERWORKED FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION ACTING TO LOOSEN THE GRIP MAY GIVE UP THROUGH OVERWORK SUCH THAT THE PERSON IS LEFT MORIBUND, HIS FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF ALLOWED UNFETTERED TO RHYTHMICALLY PROLONG IN A WAXING WANING MANNER UNCONTROLLED AND THAT IS SADNESS. WHEN THIS GRIP IS INTENSE AND DOES NOT FLUCTUATE, IT BECOMES DEPRESSION.

IF YOU USE FORCE MEANINGFULLY THEN FORCE CAN ONLY ACTIVATE WHEN THERE IS OCCASION OR MEANING TO ACTIVATE. WHEN THERE IS NO OCCASION FOR IT TO ACTIVATE, IT WILL NOT ACTIVATE. IF YOU USE FORCE INDISCRIMINATELY, USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES TO IMPRESS OTHERS THEN BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO ACTIVATE FORCE WITHOUT MEANING NEEDED AND SO IF YOU KEEP WILLING YOURSELF TO STIR FORCE FOR SHOW MEANINGLESS FORCE TENDS TO ARISE WITHOUT NEED FOR MEANING AND THAT MEANS MAD PROLONGING OR SADNESS.

Seeing with force:

They are both not just seeing but seeing with eagerness or attractive stirring of their mental forces such that they even lean forwards. Often it is faked for show to impress others.

It is totally useless and unnecessary to add force or attraction to what you see, force is the wrong tool to use to see and they are creating stress, restlessness and distraction for themselves doing so. Often in spite of such attractive stirring of their mental forces, their minds are elsewhere, they are not absorbing what they see.

FORCE THAT IS BLIND IS NOT THE TOOL TO USE TO SEE AND YET THESE PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO IMPRESS OTHERS THAT THEY ARE SEEING WITH INTEREST OR ATTRACTION  BY ADDING FORCE TO THEIR SEEING THAT ACTUALLY DETRACTS FROM SEEING APART FROM CREATING STRESS & RESTLESSNESS. BECAUSE WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS USELESS THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS (IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING OTHERS) THAT WILL END IN MADNESS FOR THEM.

The three knowledge man:

Enlightenment is not an arbitrary assignment, the Buddha spoke of the three knowledge man and anyone possessed of these three knowledges is enlightened.

The three knowledges are 1) knowledge of all your past lives, 2) knowledge of the passing away and arising of beings & 3) knowledge of the way to the end of all suffering.

There is suffering for all beings trapped in existence and there is a way to the total end of all suffering but it is well hidden and all beings trapped in existence do not know the complete way to the final complete end of suffering and whoever knows that way is fully awakened, enlightened.

IF YOU ARE SUFFERING AND YOU DO NOT KNOW THE WAY OUT OF YOUR SUFFERING, YOU ARE NOT ENLIGHTENED. IF YOU DO NOT KNOW YOUR PAST LIVES, DO NOT KNOW THE ARISING AND PASSING AWAY OF BEINGS, YOU ARE NOT ENLIGHTENED.

NO ONE HAS TAUGHT YOU THIS APART FROM THE BUDDHA AND EVEN TODAY FEW IF ANY BUDDHISTS SPEAK OF THIS, KNOW THIS OR UNDERSTAND.

Apple now bigger than Microsoft:

It may be akin to David growing in size to surpass Goliath.

Microsoft derived its success not on merit but by a combination of arm twisting its business partners to squeeze out competitors & issuing shares to buy new products (eg internet explorer and Office suite), not innovativeness. Whilst Apple (and Google) has gone on to successfully launch many new products like iPod, iPhone and iPad, Microsoft has failed in many new ventures, is trying to squeeze money from clients by overcharging and being stingy. Even its products today like Windows 7 is far from perfect, has silly features that are not only for show but is actually counterproductive.

IT IS LIKELY MICROSOFT WILL LOSE MORE GROUND TO THE LIKES OF APPLE AND GOOGLE.

Should America lead the world?

This is a false question arising from false perception.

America does not lead the world nor was it appointed. You could say Hitler led Germany and the Axis but America was never elected leader of the world nor does it lead the world and so whoever asked the question is dicing with mad perception. America dominates the world, throws its weight around and arm twists others to get things its way as far as possible but that does not constitute leading the world. Hence whoever asked that question has false perception that ends in mad perception.

AMERICA DOMINATES THE WORLD, DOES NOT LEAD THE WORLD. CERTAINLY RUSSIA DOES NOT LOOK TO AMERICA AS ITS LEADER SO ISN’T IT FOOLISH TO SAY AMERICA LEADS THE WORLD?

 


Thursday, May 20, 2010

Microsoft losing browser battle

Microsoft losing browser battle:

“Microsoft losing browser battle” is a way of putting it that necessitates him and others reading perceiving an event in a certain way that if false is conditioning himself and others to false perception that ends in mad perception.

The truth may be ‘Microsoft is losing share in browser market’, the battle is a concoction of a mind prone to use force and attracted by force and so if that is case, it is false perception that you want to impart with karma on others by alluding to browser battle.

YOU THINK NOTHING, YOU THINK IT IS A MATTER OF SEMANTICS BUT YOU MAY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION HERE AS EVERYWHERE BECAUSE WHAT IS AT STAKE IS THE PERSON’S FUTURE WOE.

UK Election winner doomed:

Or so says American economist David Hale, who says King confided this with him over lunch last week.
To be precise, he said: “I saw the Governor of the Bank of England last week when I was in London and he told me whoever wins this election will be out of power for a whole generation because of how tough the fiscal austerity will have to be.” Ouch.

All along, governments all over the world have been pandering the electorates avoiding painful necessary belt tightening with the purpose of courting popularity and staying in power but the national debts have grown to monstrous sizes so that any belt tightening must be severe with backlash on the ruling party.

His and my view:

Levin’s view: Senator Carl Levin, the committee’s chairman, described the bank and its Wall Street peers yesterday as “self-interested promoters of risky and complex financial schemes that helped trigger the crisis”.

My view: Goldman Sachs is run by ruthless cheats who, faced with massive losses of their mortgage portfolios, frantically criminally sloughed off these increasingly worthless mortgages they held in twisted camouflaged or disguised schemes sanctioned by rating agencies at face value without any discounts.

THE TWO VIEWS ABOVE ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT. IF I AM CORRECT, LEVIN’S (EMOTION TAINTED) VIEW IS WRONG. THOSE ARE NOT RISKY COMPLEX FINANCIAL SCHEMES BUT TWISTED CAMOUFLAGED SHIT DISGUISED OR TOUTED AS FOOD. RATHER THAN BEING JUST RISKY, THEY ARE DESIGNED TO BLOW UP IN THE FACES OF ITS BUYERS.

Club Med countries owe more than €7 trillion

More than €7 trillion has been lent to Club Med states, banks and homeowners in the belief that it cannot happen. EMU shut the warning signals, disguising risk.

THE ABOVE INDICATES THE MAGNITUDE OF THE DANGER OF COLLAPSE OF THESE CLUB MED COUNTRIES (GREECE, SPAIN, PORTUGAL, ITALY).

Goldman Sachs guilty of fraud that is jailable:

Objectively by self admission and evidence, Goldman Sachs is guilty of fraud and that is an offence with a jail sentence. Thus Warren Buffett is sanctioning fraud and it reflects mankind’s lack of true understanding that there is such a fuss and many think what Goldman Sachs did may be legitimate.

If you sell goods that has much less value than you tout or does not work you are guilty of fraud and so if you are a peddler of stuff as Goldman is, the onus is on you to know the nature of what you sell lest you run the risk of being charged for fraud, not on the customer to be savvy in determining the nature of what he is buying as Goldman Sachs perversely argued.

Surely Goldman Sachs would not sell gold for the price of shit and so why should it think it is right to sell shit for the price of gold as it has done?

ANYONE IN BUSINESS SHOULD BE AWARE OF LAWS ON FRAUD SO AS NOT TO RUN FOUL OF THEM AND WHAT GOLDMAN SACHS HAS DONE IS CLEARLY SIMPLY FRAUD.

THE INSTRUMENTS IT SOLD ARE NOT RISKY AS ALLEGED BUT FRAUDULENT, THE APPARENT COMPLEXITY IS TO MASK THE FRAUD.

US$ trillions of debts coming due in next 3 years:

Those who think we have negotiated the treacherous rapids may be complacent. According to the comments below trillion dollars worth of debt are due over the next three years and there is potential for another financial crisis of mega proportions:

Quote: That fear is heightened by trillions of dollars of bank and corporate debt coming due over the next three years, threatening to push interest rates higher as borrowers scramble for funds.

"If you were to look at what the stock market is doing, you would assume we are in some sort of bull market," said Gary Kelly, head of research at Tradition Asiel Securities in New York. "That's not being echoed from the credit perspective."

A world living heavily even unsustainably on credit:

Understanding truly, what is the implication that trillions of dollars of bank and corporate debts are due over the next three years?

This means the world is living seriously beyond its means, on borrowed money to the tune of trillions of dollars on the expectation that future income will cover those debts. This is a dangerous presumption and indicates the world is seriously if not fatally overstretched in terms of debts.

IF THE WORLD HAD THE MONEY IT WOULD NOT NEED TO BORROW AND SO THE FACT THAT TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF DEBT ARE DUE IN THREE YEARS INDICATES DANGEROUS EVEN FATAL DEPENDENCY ON DEBT. EVEN BEFORE THEY ARE DUE, THE WORLD IS IN TROUBLE NOW, WHAT MORE WHEN THEY ARE DUE?

Why another financial collapse may be inevitable:

You do not need to be a finance expert but you need true understanding based on objectively available data to predict a major global financial collapse is looming. Even if you are a finance expert, the obvious conclusions may escape you if you have no true understanding.

 

The reason why another financial collapse is looming is because trillions of bank and corporate debts (denominated in bonds) are due (principals have to be repaid) in the next three years and the nature of the key instrument of debt, the bond that allows the issuer to pay interest (coupon) at specified intervals and the full sum at maturity. Thus the bond issuer only has to service interest at intervals but the crunch comes at maturity when he must return the principal. It is because of bonds maturing and companies like Lehman Bros being unable to repay the principle, Greece’s bonds worth a $100 billion coming mature soon and it cannot repay the principal nor find borrowers to roll over the debts that it is in such strife.

It is said that trillions of dollars worth of bank and corporate debts (bonds) are coming due in the next three years and trillions have been lent to the ‘Club Med’ countries which are now in grave financial trouble.

Quote: A bond is a debt security, in which the authorized issuer owes the holders a debt and, depending on the terms of the bond, is obliged to pay interest (the coupon) and/or to repay the principal at a later date, termed maturity. A bond is a formal contract to repay borrowed money with interest at fixed intervals.

It was said that Lehman’s collapse was because it could not fulfil its debt obligations that have matured and that triggered a financial collapse averted only by the Federal Reserve intervening to pump a lot of printed money (without asset backing) to shore up the system.

 

The reason why Greece is in trouble now is because about a $100 billion of its debts in bonds are due and it has no money to pay or redeem those bonds and it is having difficulty if not impossibility rolling over or issuing new bonds to cover those maturing because lenders are reluctant to extend further credit. 

 

Bonds allow borrowers the luxury of borrowing vast sums of money whilst paying periodic interest payments with the principal due at maturity. It is this exemption from paying the principal in the interim of the duration of the bond that is the potential killer because when maturity arrives and the borrower has spent everything and saved nothing, he cannot pay the principal and therefore defaults.

IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT EVERYONE OF THOSE TRILLIONS OF BONDS COMING DUE IS BACKED BY THE ABILITY OF THE BORROWERS TO REPAY THE PRINCIPALS OWED, MANY OF THESE BONDS MAY HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO COVER BONDS THAT WERE UNPAYABLE AND SO IT IS LIKELY A LARGE PROPORTION OF BONDS MATURING OVER THE NEXT THREE YEARS THAT AMOUNT TO TRILLIONS WILL BE DEFAULTED AND THAT MEANS A FINANCIAL CRISIS OF MEGA PROPORTIONS.

THE INSTRUMENT OF DEBT, THE BOND REQUIRES PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL ONLY AT MATURITY. IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT CERTAINLY IMPOSSIBLE THAT ALL THESE BOND ISSUERS CAN REPAY THEIR PRINCIPALS AT MATURITY AND SO SYSTEM THREATENING DEFAULT MAY BE LOOMING.

Bonds are ticking time bombs:

Bonds are ticking time bombs, at maturity the borrower must return the principal and there trillions worth of bonds due for redeeming over the next few years. What are the chances a significant even systemically fatal proportion will default knowing the nature of the borrowers and the precedents set recently?

Default was the cause of the last & next crash:

Default was the cause of the near fatal global crash. Default will cause the next crash.

Lehman’s default was the trigger to the last system threatening crash.

Default of what?

Default of debts or the inability to repay debts.

What is the underlying problem of the current Greece crisis? It is the maturing of billions of dollars of bonds and Greece’s inability to repay them.

And trillions in corporate and bank debt are due over the next three years. What is the chance of another massive default? Very likely if not certainly.

IT LOOKS LIKE THE BIRDS ARE FINALLY COMING BACK TO ROOST. THE DEBTS ARE COMING BACK TO HAUNT BORROWERS.

What are the chances?

Default was the cause of Lehman’s demise that threatened to crash the world financial system.

The threat of default is the cause of the current Greece crisis.

Trillions in corporate and bank debts are due over the next three years.

What are the chances of a default that will shake or even collapse the system?

If you were a rational man and judging from portents and knowing mankind’s feckless reckless nature, you would say it is very likely if not certainly.

Remember Goldman Sachs’ dirty trading trick?

Apparently Goldman Sachs’ computers are superfast and can execute a trade faster than others and when it detects a buy or sell order, it can snatch that order from you in the process making a gain however miniscule.

GOLDMAN SACHS IS NOT INTERESTED IN THE STOCK YOU BUY OR SELL, IT JUST WANTS TO JUMP AHEAD OF YOU TO BUY OR SELL IT SO THAT IT CAN DEPRIVE OTHERS OF MATERIAL ADVANTAGE. THIS IS A FORM OF ELECTRONIC BANDITRY OR ROBBERY AND IT REFLECTS THE RUTHLESS AND UNETHICAL NATURE OF GOLDMAN SACHS WHO ARE AT THE FOREFRONT AND REVERED BANKING GIANT. WITH SUCH LEADERS OF FINANCE, IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT MANY OF THE BONDS ISSUED THAT ARE NOW COMING DUE MAY BE CROOKED AND WE MAY BE IN FOR A TORRID TIME.

Dizzying 30-minute plunge

After nearly 1,000-point freefall, index manages to end the trading day off 347. 

People speak as if it is true when it is false. It was a 30 minute plunge but there was nothing dizzying or exhilarating about the plunge or surge except in the stirred mental force or emotion of the deluded.

YOU CAN SAY RIGHTFULLY THAT THE 30 MINUTE PLUNGE WAS DIZZYING TO YOU BUT TO SAY THE PLUNGE ITSELF IS DIZZYING IS FALSE. IF MY MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED ON WITNESSING THE PLUNGE, IT IS NOT THE PLUNGE BUT YOUR MIND THAT WAS DIZZIED.

Luxury on wheels:

Stirred by emotion, a proxy of mental force, not guided by truth or understanding a person is moved to embrace false perception and falsely call a vehicle luxury on wheels.

No matter how luxurious a car (eg Rolls Royce or Bentley) it is still a car with wheels never luxury on wheels except in your and the accepting public false perception that they do not believe will end in uncontrollable mad perception.

LUXURY IS NOT AN ENTITY THAT CAN BE CARRIED ON WHEELS. IT IS THE SUBCONSCIOUS FLIRTATION WITH FALSITY THAT MAKES SUCH FALSE STATEMENTS LIKE ‘LUXURY ON WHEELS’ SO ATTRACTIVE OR PREFERABLE TO EMOTIONAL PEOPLE.

Copied rehashed understanding:

Not everyone understands (falsely) as you do that ‘luxury on wheels’ means ‘a very luxurious car’ like the Mercedes, children and others new to the English language may find it odd because it literally means luxury resting on wheels not a very luxurious car.

That ‘luxury on wheels’ means ‘a very luxurious car’ is a rehashed false understanding, people have come to understand and accept that ‘A’ means ‘B’ and that can only come about by memorizing and rehashing from memory and so that is false rehashed understanding.

Further he was not the first to use that and so it was a false understanding that he copied from others to rehash to impress.

LUXURY ON WHEELS IS COPIED FROM OTHERS WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING OR WITH FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT IT MEANS ‘A VERY LUXURIOUS CAR’ AND SO IT IS A REHASHED FALSE UNDESTANDING. PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE THEY ALREADY HAVE ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION BECAUSE THEY PERCEIVE ‘LUXURY ON WHEELS’ IS A STATEMENT OF TRUTH WHEN IT IS A ROTE FALSE STATEMENT.

A MERCEDES IS A VERY LUXURIOUS CAR REFLECTS REALITY BUT TO CALL IT LUXURY ON WHEELS IS TO FLIRT WITH FALSE PERCEPTION.

Goldman Sachs to review its standards:

This is always a hypocritical statement to appease the ‘markets’ or customers not sincere.

What standards does Goldman Sachs have that need review? It is driven by greed to grab even at all costs. If in truth Goldman Sachs has not standards, no ethics then what standards are there to review.

A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE IS DOING DOES NOT NEED STANDARDS WHICH ARE FIXED RULES YOU WRITE AND REFER TO, TO GUIDE YOUR ACTIONS IN WHICH YOU ARE A SLAVE OR ROBOT TO THOSE STANDARDS. IF THEN YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE DOING, YOU ARE ONLY OBEYING STANDARDS, THAT IS ALWAYS MECHANICAL, BLIND AND HYPOCRITICAL.

A PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS DOES NOT DO OR SAY ANYTHING THAT HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND AND UNDERSTANDING WHATEVER HE IS DOING, HE KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING IS MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS, BENEFICIAL TO SELF AND THENCE OTHERS OR HARMFUL AND GUIDED BY SUCH TRUE UNDERSTANDING HE EITHER DOES OR DOES NOT DO IT.

TO ADMIT YOU HAVE STANDARDS IS TO ADMIT YOU ARE A BLIND ROBOT WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND AND NEED TO REFER TO STANDARDS TO COMMAND WHAT YOU SHOULD DO OR NOT DO.

Rosmah’s appearance on NYT:

Rosmah ad placed on govt’s behalf

NEWS/COMMENTARIES


Tuesday, 11 May 2010 Combat

E-mailPrintPDF

Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!MySpace!Yahoo!Twitter!LinkedIn! 

A recent two-page spread in the New York Times, costing thousands of US dollars and featuring the prime minister's wife, was placed on behalf of the Malaysian government.

Written by Koh Lay Chin, The Nut Graph

A recent two-page spread in the New York Times, costing thousands of US dollars and featuring the prime minister's wife, was placed on behalf of the Malaysian government.

In an e-mail response to questions from The Nut Graph, the New York Times said: "The advertisement was placed by an ad agency on behalf of the Malaysian government."

The response from New York Times executive director of community affairs and media relations, Diane McNulty, reveals that the ad was not placed by private individuals, as suggested by the last line in the ad's congratulatory message.

10052010-RosmahAd550

McNulty, however, declined to disclose how much the ad cost, saying the company never discusses the cost of an individual ad as there are many variables and rates involved. These include the kind of schedule the ad purchaser has with the company, as well as the advertising category it falls within.

However, research on previous full-page ads taken out in the New York Times suggests that the cost of such advertisements ranges from US$180,000 to US$230,000. This amounts to between RM580,000 and RM740,000 for a one-page ad.

A two-page colour spread such as the one featuring Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor is expected to cost far more.

"Friends and family"

The ad was placed on 16 April 2010, on the last day of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's visit to the US, to congratulate Rosmah on her being conferred a little-known International Peace and Harmony Award.

The ad welcomed Rosmah as Malaysia's "First Lady" to New York, and carried the message: "In recognition of your effort to promote peace, harmony and understanding among the people of Malaysia and your courageous acts in making a difference to the lives of people and children around the world. Malaysia is proud of you."

It was signed off: "Best wishes from family and friends in USA and Malaysia."

The ad did not name the Business Council for International Understanding, the outfit that gave Rosmah the award.

Against a backdrop of controversies surrounding the hiring of media relations firm Apco Worldwide Sdn Bhd, and Rosmah's alleged interference in government matters, the two-page ad has stirred up gossip and blog postings about who paid for it.

It has also been noted that while Rosmah was prominently featured in the ad in a respected and established newspaper, US media coverage of Najib's visit and meeting with President Barack Obama was scant.

Sultan snubs Zaid:

There is no suggestion the Sultan snubbed Zaid although this may be the case. The truth may be the sultan declined to meet Zaid, that is not the same as snub except in your perverted perception.

WITHOUT ASCERTAINING IT IS TRUE THE SULTAN SNUBBED ZAID YOU ARE COURTING INSANITY AND INCURRING KARMA MISREPRESENTING THE SULTAN BY SPEAKING OF SNUBBED WHEN IT MAY ONLY BE THE SULTAN DECLINED TO MEET ZAID.

THUS EMOTIONAL PEOPLE SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE SUFFERING DUE THEM THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND AS LONG AS AN ETERNITY FOR THEIR SINS.

The sin of tempting or enticing:

There are many variations of the above advertisement that tempts you to visit a fair in order to get a chance to win an iPad.

The true reason for visiting some place is because you have something meaningful to do, not to win an iPad and you are encouraging others to visit for false reasons or mad reasons. Further, the chances of winning are slim and so you are encouraging others to gamble or hope that may be dashed.

IF PEOPLE WANT TO DO SOMETHING, THEY DO NOT NEED INDUCEMENTS FROM YOU THAT ARE FALSE REASONS THAT WILL END IN MADNESS AND YOU HAVE KARMA NOT MERIT FOR INDUCING OTHERS. FURTHER, IT IS A RISK, THE CHANCES OF WINNING ARE SLIM AND SO YOU ARE SINFULLY ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO TAKE LONG ODDS OR GAMBLE OR ‘TRY HIS LUCK’.

The nature of temptation:

Temptation is about stirring another (via stirring his mental force attractively) to do something for you, for ulterior motive.

For instance the purpose of tempting someone with a chance to win an iPad is so that more people will visit your booth at the fair and you always do so by addressing the person’s mental force to be attracted overriding his true reason to accede to your temptation.

Thus women dress provocatively, speak and do things provocatively (with force prolonging, changing speed and strength) to stir the lust of men (or stir their mental forces attractively) so that they will throw caution to the wind and become captives of their wiles.

YOU NEED FORCE TO INDUCE OR TEMPT, YOU MUST PLY THE TARGET PERSON WITH FORCE, WITH FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH TO STIR HIS MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY SO THAT HE WILL THROW HIS INHIBITIONS AND SENSES ASIDE AND SUCCUMB TO YOUR TEMPTATIONS.

TEMPTING SOMEONE IS TRAINING SOMEONE TO DO SOMETHING FOR THE FALSE REASONS THAT WILL END IN INSANITY AND SO THE TEMPTOR HAS SERIOUS KARMA.

Heading for fish stock extinction:

'Profound' decline in fish stocks shown in UK records

Fish (Callum Roberts)Landings into UK ports in the 19th Century were four times higher than today

Over-fishing means UK trawlers have to work 17 times as hard for the same fish catch as 120 years ago, a study shows.

Fish harvests were four times higher than today with its greater technological efficiency. And human population is growing even exponentially. Extrapolating, a time will come when dwindling fish will fail to feed rising human population and thence famine.

HUMANS CONSUME WITHOUT CONSCIENCE OR CONCERN FOR THE EARTH AND OTHER SPECIES. IN THE END, ITS HEAD MAY BE ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK.

Good to be bad, bad to be good:

Quote: We understand why European governments are not demanding that the banks share the burden. Rescheduling Greece’s debt, or that of other governments, could weaken the balance sheets of European banks and make financial markets more unstable.

That’s the reason the Obama administration went so light on American banks. Still, Europe may not be able to solve its problems without bringing the bankers in to pay their share.

IT IS NEVER GOOD TO BE BAD BUT BAD TO BE BAD AND YOU NEVER DO BAD TO DO GOOD, YOU ALWAYS DO GOOD TO BE GOOD.

THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR ANYONE OR OBAMA TO BE ‘SO LIGHT’ OR LENIENT ON AMERICAN BANKS, IT SHIFTS THE BURDEN TO OTHERS (EG THE PUBLIC) IN THE NAME OF EXPEDIENCY EG MAKING SYSYEM MORE STABLE. WHETHER IT ACTUALLY DOES THAT OR DELAY AND MAKE WORSE THE FUTURE RECKONING CAN BE DETERMINED AND IT MAY BE THE LATTER THAT MAY BE THE TRUTH.

THIS IS A FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION THAT MANY PRACTICE SOMNOLENTLY AND SEE NOTHING WRONG, YOU DO SOMETHING BAD (BE LENIENT OR DON’T BRING TO ACCOUNTABILITY OR PUNISH) IN THE NAME OF PROTECTING THE SYSTEM, SOMETHING THAT MAY NOT BE TRUE.

Thus if you share the sentiment stated, you agree, you may have perverted perception and logic that will end in madness.

Charge contradiction indicates incompetent fabrication:

Quote: The High Court here ruled Wednesday that there was no contradiction on the part of Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan over evidence that the sodomy incident had occurred without his consent.

Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah said earlier that the Attorney-General had discretion to frame a lesser charge, although there was strong evidence against the person.

IF YOU CHARGE SOMEONE FOR A SERIOUS CRIME IT MUST BE THE TRUTH AND SO IF IT WAS NOT CONSENSUAL, YOUR CHARGE OF CONSENSUAL SODOMY IS FALSE.

IT IS A LAME EXCUSE TO CLAIM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS THE DISCRETION TO FRAME A LESSER CHARGE WHEN THERE IS STRONG EVIDENCE OF THE FORMER. WHY WOULD THE AG FRAME A LESSER CHARGE WHEN THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGE ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE?

ON THE OTHER HAND IF THIS WAS A CONCOCTION IN HASTE, THEN IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE THAT THEY ARBITRARILY CHARGED ANWAR WITH CONSENSUAL SODOMY AND THEN ON THE HEAT OF THE MOMENT SAIFUL CLAIMS IT WAS NOT CONSENSUAL TO UPHOLD HIS ‘HONOR’.

Seeing through Saiful:

It is because people’s view of others is tainted by emotions that they cannot truly see through a person when it is possible to see so.

Watching Saiful’s demeanour in court, I see he is faking it trying to present a false image of acceptability.

SAIFUL’S APPEARANCE DEPICTS SOMEONE WITH SOMETHING TO HIDE BEHIND APPARENT IMPASSIVITY, DOES NOT LOOK LIKE SOMEONE WHO WAS SODOMIZED AND PASSIONATELY LOOKING FOR REVENGE.

IF YOU LOOK AT SAIFUL AND DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF HIM AND HIS ALLEGATION, YOU ARE A PERSON WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING. NO MATTER HOW ANYONE MIGHT TRY TO HIDE HIS TRUE FEELINGS AND THINKING, IT IS VISIBLE IN HIS APPEARANCE AND CONDUCT.

HE HAS ADMITTED SEEING NAJIB BEFORE HIS LAST SODOMY TO DISCUSS HIS 'PLIGHT' AND SURELY IF IT WAS TRUE THE POLICE WOULD HAVE BEEN INCOMPETENT NOT TO SET UP A TRAP FOR ANWAR TO OBTAIN INCRIMINATING AUDIOVISUAL EVIDENCE AND MADE SURE SAIFUL WAS EXAMINED BY THE BEST FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST AFTER HIS ACT RATHER THAN SHOP AROUND ON FOOT FOR ONE.

Why Anwar sodomy case is a conspiracy:

First it was denied Najib met Saiful and then it was admitted they met at his home. Saiful has admitted in court that he saw Najib before his last act with Anwar because he was troubled.

Thus if it was genuine, Najib and therefore the police would have been alerted to what is going on to have set up a trap to obtain irrefutable evidence of the act.

If the police have squandered their ‘golden opportunity’ to nail Anwar for good by obtaining irrefutable audiovisual evidence then the only recourse for decent people is to let Anwar off the hook since a person is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. By persisting to prosecute Anwar despite missing a golden opportunity to nail him through incompetence, it reflects that the pursuit is not reasoned but obsessive, to frame and convict Anwar.

IF SAIFUL DID NOT, AS ADMITTED, MET WITH NAJIB AND DISCUSSED THE SUBJECT BEFOREHAND, IT MAY BE UNDERSTANDABLE TO PROSECUTE ANWAR FOR THE OFFENCE WITHOUT IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE BUT BECAUSE SAIFUL MET NAJIB BEFOREHAND, IT IS PREPOSTEROUS OR REFLECTS GROSS POLICE INCOMPETENCE THEY DID NOT SET A TRAP TO NAIL ANWAR.

Saiful even spoke to IGP about his problem:

According to Saiful he even spoke to Musa the IGP about his problem with Anwar before his last act with Anwar.

Thus police knew what was going on and it reflects gross incompetence that they could not collect irrefutable evidence of the deed.

Quote: When asked, Saiful admitted to contacting Inspector General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan via telephone on the morning of June 25, 2008 to "complain about [his] problem".

Saiful met several figures before police report, court told

NEWS/COMMENTARIES


Wednesday, 12 May 2010 Super Admin

E-mailPrintPDF

Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!MySpace!Yahoo!Twitter!LinkedIn! 

Written by Chua Sue-Ann, The Edge  

The sodomy trial of opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim on Wednesday, May 12, heard that complainant Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan had made contact with several figures, including Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Inspector General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan, before lodging a police report against Anwar days later.

Anwar's lead counsel Karpal Singh on Wednesday continued cross-examining Saiful after the court declined to grant a stay of proceedings pending an appeal.

Anwar is expected to file his notice of appeal at the Court of Appeal this afternoon to appeal against the High Court's earlier decision to not grant him access to Saiful's witness statements.

When asked, Saiful reiterated that he met Najib at the latter's Taman Duta residence at about 8pm on June 24, 2008 to complain about his "problems".

According to Saiful, he was brought to Najib's house by Najib's former special officer Khairil Anas Jusoh and met the then-deputy prime minister for about 20 minutes.

Saiful, who is the prosecution's first witness, told the court that Najib did not give him any advice on what to do, and said Najib appeared "skeptical" when told about Saiful's "problem".

Questioned by Karpal, Saiful said he did not meet with Najib's wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor and only saw the latter as he was leaving Najib's house.

To another question, Saiful said former national athlete Datuk Dr Mumtaz Jaafar was not at Najib's house when Saiful visited.

Mumtaz is believed to be a close associate of Rosmah, but the former's links to the case is yet to be made clear.

Saiful said he first met special officer Khairil sometime in December 2007 or January 2008 to obtain a letter of support for Saiful's application for a MARA education loan to pursue a pilot training programme in Kota Bharu, Kelantan.

Saiful had earlier dropped out of his engineering course in UiTM after apparently receiving poor grades due to his involvement in student council activities.

'No statement taken'

According to Saiful, after he met with Najib, he had received a call from a senior police officer Senior Assistant Commissioner of Police (SAC) II (who was then Assistant Commissioner of Police) Datuk Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof and they met a room in Melia Hotel here.

Saiful said Rodwan did not record any statement from him during the meeting, and scheduled another meeting at the Concorde Hotel here the next day on June 25, 2008.

Rodwan, however, cancelled the June 25 meeting ahead of time and both men did not meet again, Saiful told the court.

When asked, Saiful admitted to contacting Inspector General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan via telephone on the morning of June 25, 2008 to "complain about [his] problem".

Saiful's testimony prompted loud murmurs in court when he maintained that he "had been severely wronged by Anwar (memang banyak dianiyai oleh Anwar)".

"I wanted to tell him (Musa) that I had been sodomised several times inside and outside the country by Anwar but after less than a minute (of conversation) he hung up and told me not to contact him again. Maybe he thought it was a prank call," Saiful said.

When asked, Saiful said he obtained Musa's telephone number when he was at Najib's house on June 24, 2008.

The 24-year-old claimed he had saved Musa's number in his mobile phone after overhearing the number when Najib apparently asked his aides for the number.

Saiful, who was Anwar's aide for several months in 2008, said he first confided in his uncle Tuah Mohd Halim about the alleged sodomy on June 26, 2008.

Saiful had lodged a police report and performed a medical examination on June 28, 2008, accusing Anwar of sodomising him.

Saiful, in his police report, claimed that June 26, 2008 was "the last time" he was sodomised by Anwar, the date on which the trial and charge is focused on.

Karpal then asked the court to adjourn proceedings until Mumtaz and Ezam can be brought to court for Saiful to identify, prompting disagreement from Solicitor-General II Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden who said that prosecutors needed some time to arrange for that.

Karpal then said the proceedings could wait for Mumtaz and Ezam to appear, asking "What's the hurry (to go on with the trial)?"

To that, Saiful retorted, "It's been two years", referring to the time since he lodged a police report on June 28, 2008 alleging sodomy by his former employer.

Tuah and Mohd Rodwan were produced in court today for identification.

When asked, Saiful said his friend Rahimi Osman had brought him to meet with former PKR Youth Chief Ezam Mohd Noor around midnight between June 27, 2008 and June 28, 2008.

Saiful said that he, Rahimi, Tuah and Ezam met in Bandar Tasik Puteri, Rawang.

Saiful had earlier testified that he was roped in to Anwar's office shortly before the general elections in March 2008 by his close friend Rahimi, who was then working for the PKR adviser.

Saiful proves his dishonesty:

In his (emotional) haste to distance Najib from events, Saiful unnecessarily incriminates himself as capable of lying by saying Najib was initially sceptical about his claims of sodomy by Anwar.

Why should Najib be sceptical, he should be delighted because here was a golden opportunity to destroy his nemesis? Thus it is unlikely if not impossible Najib would be initially sceptical but it is likely, no matter how preposterous, his interest would be aroused. By thus proving himself capable of lying, it casts his status as an accuser as unreliable.

Quote: Saiful, who is the prosecution's first witness, told the court that Najib did not give him any advice on what to do, and said Najib appeared "skeptical" when told about Saiful's "problem".

IF NAJIB HELD ANWAR IN HIGH ESTEEM, ANWAR WAS HIS HERO HE MAY BE INCREDULOUS ABOUT THE ALLEGATION BUT IF ANWAR IS A SWORN ENEMY, SUCH NEWS WOULD AROUSE INTEREST RATHER THAN SCEPTICISM.

THE PURPOSE OF SAIFUL SAYING THUS IS TO FOOLISHLY GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT NAJIB WAS NEUTRAL, HAD NO INTEREST TO SEE ANWAR BEING CONVICTED BUT IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND USELESS TO SAY SO AND IT ONLY PROVES HE IS DISHONEST.

Totally unnecessary and useless:

It reflects foolishness or naivety on the part of Saiful to tender that Najib was initially sceptical about the allegation, only those who are partisan or naïve would believe that given the adversarial relationship between Anwar and Najib that Najib would be disinterested in such allegations.

THE PURPOSE IS TO IMPRESS THE PUBLIC THAT NAJIB IS ABOVE THE FRAY, NEUTRAL BUT IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND USELESS, IT WILL NOT WORK BUT ONLY GOES TO INDICATE SAIFUL IS DISHONEST.

Jesus says Saiful will be dishonest in much:

Jesus: "He who is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and he who is dishonest in a very little is dishonest also in much. 11 If then you have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will entrust to you the true riches (heaven)?

Thus if Saiful has demonstrated his unnecessary and useless dishonesty in distancing Najib from the case, he will also be dishonest in the much, the limitless much.

Blogged

Derailing and undermining the basis of the case?

On Tuesday his lawyers, who have lost a series of legal manoeuvres to derail the trial, tried to undermine the basis of the case by pointing out he was charged with a consensual act while Saiful claimed he was assaulted.

Many think they understand what they say but they do not and they would be judged for every careless they speak.

Anwar is not trying to undermine the basis of the case but render false the basis of the case.

There is a difference between undermining and rendering false or wrong.

Again Anwar is not trying to derail the case except in the reporter’s false perception or understanding but Anwar is trying to stop or dismiss the trial because it is a conspiracy.

Again there is a meaningful difference between derailing and seeking dismissal of the trial.

If you think there is no difference between derailing and dismissing the trial you have false perception you do not believe will end in mad perception.

Saiful rinsing his anus:

The best way to keep evidence is not to rinse your anus but to present your anus to the nearest expert forensic pathologist. Surely the police who were in touch should know this and tell Saiful to quit rinsing and see a doctor immediately?

Quote: Karpal: Did you wash your anus after the incident?

Saiful: I rinsed it.

Karpal: Why didn't you wash it?

Saiful: I wanted to keep the evidence.

The lawyer also asked why Saiful did not file a police report on the day of the incident or the next day, to which the complainant said: “I was afraid it would affect my future.”

After having seen the deputy PM and speaking to the IGP Saiful thinks he is credible in saying he did not make a report immediately after the sodomy because he was afraid it would affect his future.

If he truly wanted to preserve his evidence he would have seen a doctor immediately to be examined and evidence extracted.

SAIFUL HAS ADMITTED THAT PRESERVING EVIDENCE OCCURRED TO HIM AND SO IN CONJUCTION WITH HIGH LEVEL POLICE CONNECTIONS, WHY WAS HE ALLOWED TO LINGER FOR DAYS BEFORE HE SHOPPED AROUND FOR ANY DOCTOR WHO MAY BOTCH THE FORENSIC EXAMINATION WHEN HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN BY POLICE TO THE BEST FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST IN TOWN AND PROCESSED IMMEDIATELY.

TO THOSE WITH FALSE UNDERSTANDING, THEY ARE IN DOUBT AS TO WHETHER SODOMY ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE BUT BASED ON WHAT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BY SAIFUL, THE INCONSISTENCIES, A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING CAN CONCLUDE THAT SODOMY DID NOT ACTUALLY TAKE PLACE.

Still quantitatively easing:

Recently the EU announced the setting of a €1 trillion reserve fund to avert default by Mediterranean countries. This is money that is virtually created that has no asset backing or a nice word for printing worthless money to cover debts you cannot afford to pay.

It is again another example of mankind’s perverted logic of doing bad (printing money without asset backing) to do good (bail out economies in trouble) but rather than achieving its target it will postpone and make worse the outcome.

Quantitative easing is a misnomer or speaking falsely because it is not making easy the amount of money but it is cheating, printing worthless pieces of paper that has no backing penalizing holders of the currency.

Silly Saiful:

In his haste to assure the court that his evidence is valid he is only exposing himself as suspect.

What is the difference between rinsing and washing his anus? How does rinsing his anus protect the evidence and washing not? The crucial factor is immediacy of seeking medical documentation of his sodomy.

If he has actually been sodomized what does it matter whether he washed or did not wash his anus or he cannot remember (a safer option) and surely he knows the judge will be there to uphold him and deny Karpal Singh?

WHAT SAIFUL IS DOING IS NEGATING THE PERCEIVED ATTACK BY KARPAL THAT BECAUSE HE WASHED HIS ANUS AFTER THE ACT, ALL EVIDENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN WASHED AWAY. BECAUSE HE RINSED BUT DID NOT WASHED HIS ANUS, IN HIS SIMPLE MIND, IT DEBUNKS KARPAL’S IMPLIED ASSERTION. NO MATTER HOW GENTLE THE RINSING, IT WILL STILL WASH AWAY THE EVIDENCE AND IF SAIFUL IS SO CONCERNED ABOUT LOSING EVIDENCE HE SHOULD HAVE SEEKED MEDICAL ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY. SEEING THAT NAJIB AND THE IGP HAS BEEN INFORMED, THEY SHOULD HAVE SENT HIM IMMEDIATELY TO A EXPERT DOCTOR RATHER THAN HIM SHOPPING AROUND ON FOOT FIRST TO TAWARKAL AND THEN PUSRAWI FOR A CURSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATION.

Why Saiful is a false witness:

What a witness at a trial states defines him either as a true or false witness and it is objective, discernible by those who truly understand whilst those with false or no understanding are clueless or deceived.

Why is Saiful, by his own words, a false witness?

A true witness states what has happened, does not justify his actions or what has happened and has no motive to influence the judge or jury or want a conviction which is the job for the judge or jury.

A false witness states more than what has happened or it is fabricated (did not happen as stated), justifies his actions or what has happened and has a motive that can be detected to influence the judge or jury or want a conviction which is not his job but the job for the judge or jury.

In testifying that he did not wash his anus but rinsed it (which may be fabricated, did not happen) because he wanted to preserve the evidence, he is implying that the evidence is therefore preserved and valid to obtain a conviction.

A true witness, when questioned, states what actually happened, he rinsed his anus, he does not justify his action as to preserve the evidence.

IF SODOMY ACTUALLY OCCURRED, IT CANNOT BE TRULY REFUTED AND SO SAIFUL DOES NOT HAVE TO JUSTIFY HIS EVIDENCE, HIS EVIDENCE WILL SPEAK FOR ITSELF. SO WHY IS SAIFUL JUSTIFYING HIMSELF THAT HIS EVIDENCE IS TRUE BECAUSE HE DID NOT WASH HIS ANUS AND SO THE EVIDENCE REMAINED AND IS VALID?

DOES HIS CASE REST SOLELY ON ANAL EVIDENCE?

IT IS NOT DIFFICULT TO DISCERN THAT THE RULING ELITE WILL DO ANYTHING TO CONVICT ANWAR OF SODOMY AND THUS, WHEN THE POLICE FORCE UP TO THE IGP WAS ALERTED BEFORE THE LAST ACT, WHY DID THEY NOT SET AN AUDIOVISUAL TRAP CATCHING ANWAR IN THE ACT? THEN NOT ONLY WILL THEY KILL OFF ANWAR POLITICALLY BUT MAKE HIM A LAUGHING STOCK.

THE REASON WHY SAIFUL PRESENTED TO DOCTORS TWO DAYS LATER MAY BE BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT THEY COULD FIND ANOTHER DATE WITH A BETTER FIT BUT DECIDED THE PASSED DATE WAS THE BEST THEY COULD GET.

DAP: We have gained ground

What is the use or purpose of telling others you have gained ground?

If there is no useful purpose except falsely to boast or reassure yourself, you are practicing controlled insanity that will end in uncontrollable insanity.

Time will tell whether you have gained ground or not and there is no use dwelling on the matter that may give a false expectation.

WHETHER YOU HAVE GAINED GROUND OR NOT IS NOT AN ESSENTIAL OR USEFUL MATTER EXCEPT FOR THOSE WHO ARE GREEDY FOR GAINS. YOU DO NOT DO OR SAY THINGS TO GAIN GROUND OR POPULARITY BUT YOU DO OR SAY THINGS BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGFUL OR BENEFICIAL TO SELF AND OTHERS. THUS IT IS SILLY TO PREOCCUPY WITH GAINING GROUND.

YOU NEVER SAY OR DO THINGS TO GAIN GROUND, THAT IS A FALSE PURPOSE FOR SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT MAKE YOU A HYPOCRITE.

JUST AS YOU DO NOT SAY OR DO THINGS TO GAIN GROUND, WHETHER YOU HAVE GAINED GROUND OR NOT IS NOT A MATTER THAT SHOULD ARISE IN YOUR MIND LET ALONE BROADCAST TO BOAST.

Why regaining ground is hypocrisy and madness:

If you talk of having regained ground, you must be conscious of what you said and did that you did not say or do in the past that you perceived has regained ground for you.

TO SAY AND DO THINGS NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE MEANT AS THEY ARE BUT TO REGAIN GROUND IS HYPOCRISY.

SAYING OR DOING THINGS TO REGAIN GROUND IS A FALSE REASON FOR DOING OR SAYING THINGS AND THAT MEANS CONTROLLED INSANITY IN THE NAME OF GAINS THAT WILL END IN MADNESS THAT YOU FOOLISHLY IGNORE.

FURTHER GAINING GROUND IS ABOUT ENGAGING IN BATTLE OR COMPETITION AND THAT IS FIGHTING OR BATTLING ‘FOR THE HEARTS OF VOTERS' THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT PERDITION.

All is fair in war & love:

This is a false and rote statement coined by someone and adopted by many who do not understand its meaning and dish it out because it sounds attractive.

In love and war as in anything, there is right and wrong, not all is fair in love and war and so the person is advocating evil, that in war and love anything is justified, even stealing, confiscating and killing.

ANYONE WHO SEES NOTHING WRONG WITH THE STATEMENT, AGREES WITH IT IS DELUDED BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS THAT NOT ALL IS FAIR IN WAR AND LOVE.

The essence of the Greece bailout:

Apparently, because no one would buy Greek bonds, the EU is buying up those loans and issuing bonds that are rated ‘AAA’ to the same amount to the markets in lieu of those Greek bonds.

You may think that that is a brilliant solution but it means the EU is stuck with those Greek bonds that are likely to be worthless if Greece cannot pay or worth not much. Furthermore the EU now owes lenders the new bonds issued instead that must be repaid sometime in the future and if the EU did not have the money, it increases its debt burden and may potentially render it insolvent.

IT WAS DENIED THAT THE GREECE BAILOUT DID NOT PRINT MONEY BUT IN EFFECT, IT IS, THE EU IS BUYING THE USELESS GREECE BONDS AND ISSUING NEW EU BONDS TO THE SAME VALUE RATED ‘AAA’ AND SOLD TO THE MARKET THAT MEANS IT IS BORROWING MONEY FROM THE MARKET TO REPLACE THE MONEY IT LOST BUYING THE WORTHLESS GREEK BONDS.

Money never sleeps:

The purpose is not to speak the truth but to boast how wonderful money is.

Of course money never sleeps because money is not a being that needs sleep.

In a sense what is said is true because money is not a being that needs sleep but that is not what is mean, the person does not mean what he says which is that money is constantly restlessly looking for returns and that is false.

WHOEVER SAYS MONEY NEVER SLEEPS OR SEES NOTHING WRONG BUT ACQUIESCE WITH IT IS HEADED FOR INSANITY.

Karpal says Najib committed jailable election offence:

Either Najib is ignorant of the law or arrogant or both, according to Karpal Singh, Najib broke election laws by offering a deal to voters to vote for the BN candidate and he will write a cheque for $5 million after the results for community work.

Style means no heaven:

All beings here, including insects and worms can be demonstrated to possess style; there is constant automatic prolonging, changing speed and strength of force that is totally unnecessary and suffering in their motion and vocalizations.

STYLE IS THE WAY OF THIS WORLD, STYLE IS NOT ONLY TOTALLY UNNECESSARY (ONLY NECESSARY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE), IT MEANS THE BEING MUST BE A MINDLESS REHASHING ROBOT WHO MUST BE BESET BY INSOLUBLE CONSTANTLY RENEWED STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE AND THAT MEANS NO SERENITY OF MIND AND BODY THAT IS THE REQUISITE TO ONE ETERNITY OR AGE IN HEAVENLY EXISTENCE. FURTHER A PERSON WITH STYLE RADIATES FORCE ON OTHERS WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH THEM, CAUSING OTHERS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND THAT MEANS THEY HAVE DEBTS NOT MERIT TO BE REPAID BY EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY OF WEEPING AND GNASHING OF THE TEETH.

The Buddha said it is delusion, greed and hate that detain beings in this world.

You have to be deluded to have style because stylish beings perceive their style as meaningful, beneficial to self and others when it is always meaningless, for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate and it is harmful to self and others.

You have to be greedy to have style because you must find style in yourself and others attractive and greed is due to a meaningless attractive stirring of the person’s mental force.

You have to hate or have ill will to have style because your style is creating tormenting insoluble renewing stress, restlessness and distraction that makes you hate yourself and others no matter how you may insist you love yourself and others.

STYLE IS PRESENT IN ALL BEINGS IN THIS WORLD AND THEREFORE STYLE OR CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IS THE WAY OF THIS WORLD.

IT IS POSSIBLE TO SPEAK AND MOVE WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE BUT IT IS NEVER SEEN IN THIS WORLD WHICH INDICATES IT MUST BE THE WAY OF ANOTHER WORLD OR HEAVEN BECAUSE IT IS PEACE AND BLISS OF MIND AND BODY.

FURTHER, IF THE PERSON CAN DEVELOP NO THINKING, CAN SKILFULLY STOP THINKING AT WILL, HE IS HEADED FOR TWO ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN, IF HIS MENTAL FORCE IS NEITHER STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY TO LIKE NOR REPULSIVELY TO DISLIKE, THAT IS FOUR ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN. IF HE CAN TUNE HIS CONSCIOUSNESS TO NOT EXPERIENCE FORCE, TO EXPERIENCE NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE, THAT IS THE HIGHEST STATE AND 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN AWAITS HIM, ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.

If you have style (stretched syllables, changes in speed and loudness) and you do not know then you are a fool who does not know what he does and foolishness is not the way to heaven.

If you can see you have style but perceive it as meaningful, wonderful and beneficial to yourself and others when it is meaningless and harmful then you are deluded and that is wrong view that the Buddha said leads to hell or the animal womb.

RIM chuffed to be in top 5:

RIM (maker of Blackberry) is chuffed means it is thrilled or extremely pleased or proud about the achievement.

People perceive ‘chuffed’ as full of meaning, they memorize and use the word because it is high sounding but it is merely about a meaningless, stressful attractive stirring of the person’s mental force.

IF A PERSON UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE MEANS BY BEING CHUFFED HE WILL UNDERSTAND THAT IT MEANS HIS MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY THAT HAS NO MEANING BECAUSE IT IS A BLIND STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT DOES NO USEFUL WORK AND LEADS TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE).

YOU ARE CHUFFED BUT WHEN YOU INEVITABLY FALL INTO WOE WHEN YOUR MIND IS FINALLY DESTROYED BY THE CONSTANTLY UNNECESSARILY STIRRED MENTAL FORCE, YOU WILL WEEP.

Flossing may save your life:

This is a statement issued out of delusion and anyone who is interested to learn more is similarly deluded.

ANY LIFE THAT CAN BE SAVED BY FLOSSING IS NOT WORTH SAVING. THE ONLY WAY TO TRULY SAVE YOUR LIFE IS BY PRACTICING VIRTUE NAMELY NOT STEALING, HARMING AND KILLING, NOT TELLING LIES, SPEAKING DIVISIVELY OR FRIVOLOUSLY.

BECAUSE LIFE HERE IS SUFFERING, MEANINGLESS OR FALSE, ANYONE WHO WANTS TO PRESERVE HIS LIFE BY FLOSSING OR WHATEVER MEANS WILL RETURN TO THIS WORLD, WILL LOSE HIS LIFE AND RETURN FOR MORE SUFFERING.

Why style means no heaven:

All beings in heaven have true understanding and there are no suckers in heaven to appreciate your ‘wondrous’ style, no suckers to fake so well they appreciate your style that causes stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate.

THERE IS NO ONE IN HEAVEN TO APPRECIATE STYLE BECAUSE STYLE IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, MEANINGLESS AND STRESSFUL, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTING TO RECEIVE. SO STYLE IS NOT WELCOMED IN HEAVEN BECAUSE IT IS EVIL AND IF YOU MUST HAVE STYLE, THIS IS THE WORLD DESIGNED FOR YOU.

Don’t let boys be boys:

People see nothing wrong or they are not sure whether it is correct or not when it is false and the person, thinking he or she is very clever has serious false perception that will end in madness.

Boys means the male gender but the second ‘boys’ does not mean the male gender but the traits associated with males or boys like toughness, recklessness, foolhardiness or whatever you might care to associate with being a boy.

‘BOY’ MEANS A YOUTH OF THE MALE GENDER, THAT’S ALL, TO IMPLY THAT BOYS MEAN OTHER THINGS LIKE NAUGHTINESS, IRRESPONSIBILITY, ETC IS TO CONDITION YOURSELF TO FALSE PERCEPTION THAT BOYS MEAN NAUGHTINESS ETC THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.

THUS IF YOU LIKE TO SPEAK THUS AND THINK IT IS CUTE OR CHARMING, ‘DON’T LET BOYS BE BOYS’ THEN YOU ARE HEADED FOR WOE NOT HEAVEN.

‘DON’T LET BOYS BE RECKLESS OR GET AWAY WITH IT’ IS A STATEMENT OF TRUTH WITHOUT MISCHIEF, ‘DON’T LET BOYS BE BOYS’ IS TRYING TO BE TOO CLEVER OR MISCHIEVOUS.

Germany’s short selling ban is short on common sense:

You should speak what you understand as true.

Whoever says so is speaking wrongly with deadly karma due.

All short selling is evil, you should only sell if you own the shares, not borrow to sell to aggravate the fall that harms those who are true owners who want to sell.

TO SELL EVEN WITHOUT BORROWED SHARES, NAMELY ‘NAKED’ SHORT SELLING IS EVEN MORE EVIL OR RECKLESS THAN SHORT SELLING USING BORROWED SHARES AND SO GERMANY’S BAN OF NAKED SHORT SELLING IS NOT ONLY CORRECT BUT FALLS SHORT. ALL SHORT SELLING SHOULD BE BANNED IN A SOCIETY THAT ESPOUSES VIRTUE.

Put a Lesbian on Supreme Court Even If Kagan Isn’t: Ann Woolner

The person is deluded and those who see nothing wrong are similarly deluded.

The true criterion for election to the Supreme Court is if the person is fully qualified and experienced legally, is fair and competent to do the job.

Whether a person is a lesbian or not does not confer any advantage and so is a false reason for selecting someone for the job.

IT IS NOT WHETHER A PERSON IS LESBIAN OR NOT THAT SHOULD BE A CRITERION FOR SELECTING HER, IT IS HER COMPETENCE AND FAIRNESS. THUS THE PERSON WHO SUGGESTS THAT AND THOSE WHO SEE NOTHING WRONG ARE DELUDED.

True considerations for a supreme court judge:

True criteria for selection to become a supreme court judge are qualifications in terms of expertise of legal matters, experience and fairness or impartiality.

False considerations are many like whether the person is of a certain race (eg Hispanic or white), sex (male), sexual orientation (lesbian), age, rightwing or leftwing, etc.

Because mankind see nothing wrong, see it is correct and necessary to have a balance eg between rightwing and leftwing appointments to protect vested interests, they have wrong perception and logic that is never harmless but conditioning leading to final mad perception and logic.

IF YOU ARE MUDDLED, YOU PERCEIVE TRUE CONSIDERATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT AS FALSE OR UNNECESSARY AND FALSE CONSIDERATIONS (EG RIGHT OR LEFTWING) AS NECESSARY OR TRUE, YOU ARE HEADED FOR WOE, EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY.

ONLY THE PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS WHAT CONSIDERATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT ARE TRUE AND REFERS ONLY TO THEM IS HEADED FOR SAFETY AWAY FROM SUFFERING.

Google and privacy: What crisis?

People are bombarded by similar inappropriate idiotic statements and such is their acceptance they see nothing wrong when it is bizarre and false.

Just because there have been past issues of invasion of privacy by Google street view and recent ‘uproar’ about it was secretly gathering of wi-fi information does not mean there is a crisis except in his false exaggerating perception.

Further he is not asking a genuine question that requires an answer from the audience, he is being incredulous or doubting or rubbishing or dismissive in asking ‘what crisis’?

IT IS FAR FETCHED AND THEREFORE PRACTICING DANGEROUS FALSE PERCEPTION TO THINK THAT THERE IS A CRISIS JUST BECAUSE GOOGLE HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SOME PRIVACY COMPLAINTS IN RECENT YEARS.

FURTHER HE IS NOT ASKING A GENUINE QUESTION BUT BEING INCREDULOUS OR DOUBTING OR DISMISSIVE IN ASKING ‘WHAT CRISIS’. IT IS A FORM OF ATTACKING USING WORDS AND ILL WILL IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT WOE.