It's also worth remembering:
It's also worth remembering that, unlike the Bank of England, the Fed is officially tasked with promoting maximum employment.
“It's also worth remembering” is totally irrelevant to the matter at hand, a meaningless style of speech and controlled insanity but he thinks it is meaningful and readers are clueless.
Leave others to decide whether something is worth remembering or not. Not only is it useless, it detracts from the matter at hand and so he is practicing distraction for himself and others that conditions him to distraction that when well-conditioned is suffering never a pleasure.
WHAT HE SAID, ‘IT IS ALSO WORTH REMEMBERING’ IS NOT HARMLESS BUT DEADLY FOR HIMSELF, IS SENSELESS TO IMPRESS.
That said and from the looks of it:
Quote: That said, in spite of the history behind WebOS, it's still a fairly young operating system compared with the rapid development of Android and iOS. From the looks of it, HP has clearly spent some time polishing the software, but it will have to contend with the increasingly sophisticated demands of today's consumers.
By ‘that said’ he implies that he has reservations of what he said earlier and that is stirring conflict in himself and others. Whatever is true has no caveats, no qualifications and so it means what he said earlier is not quite true or he is not sure of himself.
From the looks of it means he is not sure. You should never speak from the looks of things but you should see or ascertain what you are saying is true and so it means he is speaking without seeing and knowing but guessing and that is the path to doubt and uncertainty that is one of three lower fetters to future woe and therefore deadly.
Driven by greed people calculate or self-serve:
Greed and calculating or self serving are two different but related things and if you think they are synonymous or interchangeable you have muddled thinking or do not truly understand. What you have is programming or vague fuzzy imprints of greed and calculating.
Greed is just an attractive stirring of a person’s mental force to want, desire, crave, be attracted to and thus stirred, his mental force drives him to think of ways or ploys or tricks to get what he wants eg money or a girl. A lot of things that people say or do that appears to be for the welfare of others is actually for show and self-serving or calculating to get on the right sides of others so that they can exploit or gain.
WITHOUT THINKING YOU CANNOT BE CALCULATING BUT ONCE A PLAN OF HOW TO BE CALCULATING IS WELL INSTALLED, IT IS JUST AUTOMATICALLY DISHED OUT BY ROTE WITH GREAT VERVE OR SLICKNESS EVEN BEYOND THAT PERSON’S RESISTANCE BUT RATHER THAN LOVELY, YOU ARE A MARKED OR DOOMED MAN, A WELL PROGRAMMED ROBOT OF THAT SPECIFIC CALCULATION. THEREAFTER, DRIVEN BY GREED HE MAY FURTHER THINK TO CALCULATE TO DEVICE NEW PROGRAMMING EG HOW TO MAKE MONEY AS A BUSINESSMAN.
There is no need for greed or calculating in heaven:
There is plenty, be it pleasures, music, nymphs or whatever your heart desires and so there is no need to be greedy and driven by greed to calculate. Thus if you will not weed out your greed and calculating, you will not go to heaven because greed and calculating is evil, harmful to self and others and if you are greedy and calculating you are evil not good and cannot go to heaven. The opposite of greed, generosity is the way to heavenly bliss, the Buddha says.
GREED AND CALCULATING OR SELF SERVING ARE CONDITIONING AND WHEN WELL DEVELOPED ARE VERY STRONG, IRRESISTIBLE AND SO IF THE PERSON WILL NOT MAKE EFFORT TO WEED THEM OUT, THEY ARE SLAVES OF GREED AND CALCULATING THAT WILL LEAD TO EVEN AN ETERNITY OF WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH.
Enlightenment is the highest release:
The Buddha said he and those who are enlightened have obtained the highest release, heavenly existence are relative releases that are not permanent, after you have exhausted your merit, you can fall from heaven even to hell. Nirvana unlike heaven is a destination of no falling away, of no change. Nirvana is changeless, unchanging.
Release is about exit from suffering and so if a person is not released he is subject to suffering.
THUS YOU ARE A FOOL IF YOU THINK YOU ARE FREE, YOU ARE SUBJECT TO SUFFERING, SUBJECT TO KARMA. IF YOU ARE NOT CAREFUL, WHAT YOU SAY OR DO WILL BESTOW YOU WITH EVEN HORRIBLE FUTURE SUFFERING THAT YOU HAVE NO CHOICE BUT SUFFER TO REPAY. A PERSON WHO IS ENLIGHTENED THROUGH KNOWLEDGE, IS FREED BY AN ABSENCE OF FERMENTATIONS OR AGITATIONS TO BE TOTALLY FREED OF ALL DEBTS AND THUS FREED TO THE HIGHEST SENSE.
Style is the source of greed:
Style is the source of all the evils like greed (covetousness), jealousy, envy, pride, hate, anger, lust which are all forms of blind, meaningless, emotions that are harmful to self and others.
It is the constant use of force to fabricate style by prolonging/stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness that is the dynamo that provides emotions like greed, anger, hate sustenance and without eliminating style there can be no meaningful exit from evil.
THE PERSON WHO TRIES TO ELIMINATE HIS GREED, LUST, HATE, PRIDE, ETC WITHOUT ELIMINATING HIS STYLE OR USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS LIKE THE FOOL TRYING TO CATCH WATER WITH A NET. ELIMINATE STYLE AND ALL EMOTIONS AND THEIR ATTENDANT EVILS DISAPPEAR LIKE FOG WITH THE RISING SUN.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE EVIL OF STYLE, ITS DESTRUCTION GIVES THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND ONE ETERNITY OR AGE IN HEAVEN. IF YOU THEN SUCCESSFULLY TRAIN YOURSELF TO STOP THINKING AT WILL THAT IS THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND TWO ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN. IF YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS NEITHER STIRRED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE WHATEVER HAPPENS THAT IS THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN AND FINALLY IF YOU TUNE OUT ALL FORCE RECEPTION TO EXPERIENCE NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE THAT IS THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
China row over synchronised goldfish magic trick
By Michael Bristow BBC News, Beijing
Chinese animal rights groups are urging TV stations not to show a magic trick of goldfish swimming in formation.
How is it when humans, females swim and dance in synchrony it is art and marvellous and when fish are trained to do so it is abuse? Even in nature, dolphins jump synchronized and ape each other.
IT REFLECTS BIZARRE PERCEPTION OF PEOPLE THAT THEY THINK SUCH TRAINING FISH TO SWIM IN TANDEM IS ABUSE WHEN TRAINING HUMANS TO DO SO TO WIN OLYMPIC MEDALS IS NOT.
Dr M said he tried to abolish ISA:
If he intended to abolish ISA and failed, the least he could do is not use it to persecute his political enemies (Anwar too was arrested under ISA during his time).
Does he mean he is not the highest authority in the land, he does not get what he wants, the Agung or his cabinet or UMNO would not let him abolish ISA?
THUS WHAT HE SAYS HAS NO CREDIBILITY AND IF YOU THINK IT IS PLAUSIBLE YOU ARE DELUDED. HE IS LOSING HIS MARBLES, MUTTERING THINGS THAT ARE INCREASINGLY BIZARRE. HE IS NOT MAD YET BUT EDGING TOWARDS IT.
How might style cause greed?
The constant incessant use of force to prolong (as in stretched syllables), change speed and loudness creates mounting insoluble renewing stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and thus suffering with no way out, the person is driven to greed to want and possess as an antidote that does not work.
A PERSON WHO IS FREE FROM THE CURSE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE IS CONTENT WITH HIMSELF AND LIFE AND SO HE IS NOT GREEDY AND CALCULATING. IT IS ONLY A PERSON WHO IS RIVEN BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT ARE THE PRODUCTS OF STYLE, THE USE OF FORCE TO CONSTANTLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHO CANNOT BE CONTENT WITH HIMSELF AND LIFE TO WANT OR BE HOOKED TO GREED.
That there can be unity in diversity is a delusion never true and if you do not know what to make of it or you agree there may be a case you do not have true understanding.
It is not possible to have unity that is true when there is a diversity of differing opinions, whatever unity is contrived, enforced, unstable and false.
UNITY IN DIVERSITY IS NOT A DREAM BUT DELUSION, THERE CAN BE NO TRUE UNITY IF THERE IS A DIVERSITY OF DIFFERING AND CONFLICTING OPINIONS. ONLY WHEN THERE IS UNITY OF VIEW AND PURPOSE, AS THE BUDDHA WITH HIS SANGHA, BRAHMA WITH HIS RETINUE IS THERE TRUE UNITY, NOT IN DIVERSITY BUT SINGULAR VIEW AND PURPOSE.
Sydney’s iconic royal botanic garden:
There is nothing iconic about Sydney’s royal botanic garden and it is the person’s wrong perception and thus understanding that makes it iconic.
IT IS PROOF THE PERSON HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT HE CAN PERCEIVE AND UNDERSTAND THE PARK AS ICONIC AND THE REASON HE CONSISTENTLY VIEWS THE PARK AS ICONIC IS BECAUSE THE WRONG UNDERSTANDING IS MEMORIZED AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY AND SO IT IS THAT PEOPLE HAVE UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS WRONG AND REHASHED FROM PROGRAMING.
HE UNDERSTANDS THE PARK AS ICONIC BUT THAT IS A FIGMENT OF HIS IMAGINATION OR DELUSION AND IT IS REHASHED SO THAT HE CONSISTENTLY VIEWS IT AS ICONIC. WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING THAT IS FALSE HAS TO BE REHASHED FROM MEMORY IF IT IS CONSISTENT.
Madoff’s Credibility Ends When His Mouth Moves: Ann Woolner
One who understands truly understands the statement is false to insult or attack. Why is that so?
You mean to say if Madoff’s mouth does not move or he remains silent he has credibility. Whether he speaks or not his credibility remains the same because it is the same person and so she is speaking falsely in danger of future suffering. Further his mouth can move to eat, do you mean when his mouth moves to eat, his ‘credibility goes out of the window’?
If Madoff’s credibility ends when his mouth moved he would not have conned so many rich people and so what she says is not guided by true reason but driven by emotion to insult or attack with deadly karma due.
Credibility is never about truth but believability:
Credibility is not about speaking the truth but speaking what can be accepted as true by those who do not know its veracity. So it does not matter whether Madoff is lying or not, credibility is about whether what he lies about is credible or acceptable as true by those who want to believe.
AND SO IT IS THAT EVEN IF WHAT MADOFF NOW SAYS IS FALSE, IT IS STILL CREDIBLE TO MANY WHO ARE EAGER TO BELIEVE AND YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY TO SAY MADOFF’S CREDIBILITY ENDS WHEN HE MOVES HIS MOUTH. WHAT HE LIES ABOUT IS STILL QUITE CREDIBLE TO MANY BUT WHETHER WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE OR FALSE IS ANOTHER MATTER AND SO SHE HAS MUDDLED THINKING.
What Modoff said is credible:
What Madoff said that bankers should know about his pyramid scheme may be a lie but it is still credible, why should what he said be incredible, impossible? Thus she is barking up the wrong tree trying to be too clever.
If you realize the avaricious nature of bankers you would find it credible that they may know but connived.
You need to speak before your credibility is assessed:
You need to speak or propose something as fact before your credibility can be assessed and so how can Madoff be assessed for his credibility when his mouth has not moved?
Thus she is muttering nonsense, does not know what she is talking about.
YOU NEED TO MOVE YOUR MOUTH, TENDER SOMETHING TO ANOTHER BEFORE YOUR CREDIBILITY CAN BE ASCERTAINED AND THEN IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT YOU SAID IS TRUE OR FALSE, IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER WHAT YOU SAID CAN BE ACCEPTED AS TRUE BY OTHERS THAT MAKES IT CREDIBLE.
US trade deficit widened by 33% in 2010
The US trade deficit ballooned in 2010 by the largest amount seen in a decade, Commerce Department figures have shown.
What this figure indicates is that there will be a terrible in the future because as sick as the American economy is today it is being propped up by imports from China that the US continues to pay with pieces of paper that may be worthless and China is manufacturing for nothing for the US.
Should the world awake from this charade, the US economy is likely to ‘plunge’ further rather than recover and China too because there is no true market for its exports because the US without printing worthless money cannot afford to import from China.
WHAT THIS FIGURE INDICATE IS THAT AS MUCH AS THE US ECONOMY IS SICK TODAY IT IS STILL BEING PROPPED UP FED BY IMPORTS FROM CHINA THAT THE US CONTINUE TO PAY FOR WITH POTENTIALLY WORTHLESS PIECES OF PAPER AND SHOULD THIS CHARADE END, IT WOULD A CINDERELLA AWAKENING FOR THE US AND THE WORLD.
Adopting others views and values:
The fact that people speak of adopting views and values is an unconscious admission that their understanding is recorded and rehashed to fit future events.
Thus people talk about adopting the views of their bosses or their rulers or their wives or husbands, their society or country they migrate to without realizing that they are admitting that de facto their understanding is recorded, fixed and rehashed to fit into future events. Although the recordings may be modified even many times, it is nevertheless recorded and rehashed from recording.
Thus if you are or want to be a crony of Dr M you must learn to adopt his values or views and that means your values or views are memorized and replayed from memory.
GOD HAS A VIEW OF THINGS (WHAT IS EXALTED BY MEN IS AN ABOMINATION IN THE SIGHT OR VIEW OF GOD) AND TO GO TO HEAVEN YOUR VIEWS MUST CORRESPOND OR BE IN HARMONY WITH GOD’S. TO PEOPLE ACCUSTOMED TO COPYING, THEY THINK THEY MUST FIND OUT WHAT GOD’S VIEWS ARE, MEMORIZE THEM AND REHASH THEM FOR GOD’S SAKE. THAT IS WRONG UNDERSTANDING. GOD’S VIEW IS NOT MEMORIZED AND REHASHED FROM RECORDING. ALWAYS GOD SEES TRULY AND THUS UNDERSTAND TRULY AND THIS VIEW IS A FRESH SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION VIEW THAT IS NOT REPLAYED FROM RECORDED UNDERSTANDING. THUS IN ORDER FOR YOUR VIEW TO CORRESPOND WITH GOD’S, YOU DON’T MAKE SECRETIVE EFFORTS TO FIND OUT WHAT GOD’S VIEWS ARE AND ADOPT (ADOPTING IS ABOUT REMEMBERING AND REHASHING) THEM BUT YOU MUST LEARN TO SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE AND ONCE YOU SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE, YOUR VIEWS AUTOMATICALLY CORRESPOND TO GOD’S AND HEAVENLY BEINGS’ VIEWS OR UNDERSTANDING.
IF YOU ADMIT YOU ADOPT OTHERS’ VIEWS, YOUR FATHER OR MOTHER’S VIEWS YOU ARE ADMITTING YOUR VIEWS OR UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS IS RECORDED OR MEMORIZED AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY NOT FRESH SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION. RECORDED REHASHED VIEWS OR UNDERSTANDINGS ARE NEVER TRUE BUT FAKED MECHANICAL GENERALIZED UNDERSTANDINGS.
Fixed views:
People berate others for having fixed views not realizing that the only way a person’s view can be fixed is that it is not genuine but recorded and rehashed from recording to fit the occasion and this is never true understanding of the current situation.
THE VIEWS OF A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS NEVER FIXED NOR IS IT FICKLE OR INCONSISTENT BUT IT IS CONSISTENT OR PRECISE BECAUSE THE NATURE OF EVENTS NEVER CHANGE, EG WHATEVER IS EVIL IS ALWAYS EVIL AND SO THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ALWAYS SEES THE EVENT AS EVIL NOT SOMETIMES EVIL AND SOMETIMES GOOD OR NEITHER GOOD NOR BAD. THE PERSON ALWAYS SEES THE SAME EVENT THE SAME WAY NOT BECAUSE HIS UNDERSTANDING IS FIXED AND REHASHED BUT THAT IS THE WAY IT ALWAYS HAPPENS, EVIL IS EVIL NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES IT HAPPENS AND SO THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ALWAYS SEES IT AS EVIL, WHAT IS INCREDIBLE IS ALWAYS INCREDIBLE AND SO THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ALWAYS SEES IT AS INCREDIBLE, NOT SOMETIMES CREDIBLE AND SOMETIMES INCREDIBLE.
Fickle views:
It is impossible for a person of true understanding to have fickle views because there can only be one true understanding of an event and that is never fickle, sometimes good, sometimes bad.
There are different reasons why people without true understanding can have fickle views on a matter. One is that there are rival recorded views that he can apply to the situation and sometimes he applies view A, sometimes view B, sometimes view Z. His view of an occasion may be influenced by emotions, by favouritism, eg if it is his son or wife who does wrong, it is not wrong but if it is someone else’s son it is bad.
No difficulty understanding:
The person of true understanding has no difficulty understanding anything said to him, anything he experiences.
It does not matter what is said is true, false or makes no sense, credible or incredible, the person with true understanding always comes to the correct understanding that it is true, false, nonsense, plausible or implausible.
This is because true understanding has nothing to do with force, you need to use force in your understanding, need to strain yourself because you don’t understand before you can have difficulty understanding something. It is (immediately) clear to one who is discerning what is said is true or false, nonsense, credible or incredible. It is only to one who is not discerning, who has no true understanding that what is said is not clear, he struggles or have difficulty understanding it.
What Dr M meant but did not say:
What Dr M meant when he said he wanted to abolish the ISA but the police refused was that the ISA is bad, he is good because he wanted to abolish it but blame the police because they refused to agree.
If the ISA was good why abolish it and so by saying he wanted to abolish it Dr M is tacitly admitting that the ISA is a bad law. He wanted to absolve blame for preserving the ISA by blaming the police for refusing to permit.
It is not so much the ISA was a bad law but it has been crassly abused to persecute political enemies who are not a danger to the country but to the ruling elite.
A lot of people think they mean what they say and say what they mean but more often than they realize, they never said what they meant, never meant what they said.
THE ISA WAS INTENDED TO ARREST WITHOUT DETENTION PEOPLE WHO ARE A DANGER TO THE SECURITY OF THE NATION AND IF THIS WAS REASONABLY APPLIED FEW IF ANY OF THOSE ARRESTED WOULD HAVE BEEN MERITED. THUS IT IS NOT SO MUCH THAT THE ISA IS A BAD LAW AS ITS GROSS ABUSE TO DEFEND THE RULING ELITE.
WHAT IS THE POINT OF TELLING OTHERS WHAT YOU WANTED TO DO THAT WAS GOOD BUT FAILED TO DO EXCEPT TO PROVIDE AN EXCUSE FOR NOT DOING IT, A CAUSE FOR REGRET OR LAYING BLAME ELSEWHERE? HE IS PROVIDING AN EXCUSE FOR NOT DOING WHAT WAS RIGHT AND BLAMING OTHERS THAT IF FALSE INCURS KARMA ON HIM.
THERE IS NO POINT TELLING OTHERS WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE DONE. SINCE YOU DID NOT DO IT WHEN YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE IT, YOU ARE LIABLE FOR KARMA FOR DERELICTION OF DUTY, FOR NOT DOING WHAT WAS RIGHT, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU WANTED TO DO BUT DID NOT.
Always self-serving or calculating:
Consciously or unconsciously what the calculating person says is always self-serving or calculating and so what Dr M said is not because it is true but to self-serve to paint himself truly or falsely as good (wanted to abolish bad ISA) and deflect blame elsewhere (blame police).
A lot of what is said or done that is calculating or self-serving no longer requires plans or thinking because there are already existing self-serving plans in the head of the greedy calculating person that have even strong urge to activate.
YOU ONLY NEED TO THINK TO CALCULATE A PLAN OF WHAT IS SELF SERVING TO SAY OR DO IN A PARTICULAR SET OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND ONCE THIS PLAN IS WELL MEMORIZED AND APPLIED MANY TIMES, YOU DO NOT NEED TO THINK FURTHER OR ANYMORE, IT IS NOW A MATTER OF SELECTING OR ACTIVATING THE PLAN TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS SELF SERVING OR IN ADVANCED CIRCUMSTANCES, NO SELECTION IS NEEDED BECAUSE THERE IS GREAT URGE FOR THAT PLAN TO ACTIVATE ITSELF AND THIS IS THE PENULTIMATE STEP TO MAD SELF CALCULATING THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE OR BIZARRE.
Why calculating becomes constant:
When frequently done, calculating or self-serving becomes constant or automatic because self-serving is robotic plan that is habituating, addictive like smoking or drinking or gambling or sex, the more frequent you calculate the better and more urge to do so in the future until it becomes constant or irresistible and the calculating fool is doomed for insanity and tormented, cannot help calculating.
The implication of the US trade deficit:
China is now the world’s second largest economy and without the US purchasing goods with pieces of paper it prints that actually has no backing because the US is ‘full of debts’ and may already be bankrupt (cannot fulfil those debts), China’s economy will be significantly affected, and the US consumption of these Chinese imports paid for by pieces of paper that have no backing will not have happened, seriously affecting the US economy.
CHINA IS SECOND, US FIRST IN TERMS OF ECONOMIC SIZES AND SO IF A LOT OF THEIR ECONOMIES DEPEND ON EXPORTING TO THE US AND IMPORTING FROM CHINA FOR PIECES OF PAPER THE US PRINTS THAT HAS NO CURRENT BACKING BECAUSE THE US IS FULL OF DEBTS, THEN IT IS AN OSTRICH HEAD IN THE SAND SCENARIO THAT WHEN IT FINALLY UNRAVELS WILL END IN TEARS FOR CHINA, THE US AND THE WORLD NEVER HAPPILY EVER AFTER.
NO MATTER HOW PAINFUL, THE US SHOULD STOP PAYING FOR GOODS WITH PIECES OF PAPER IT PRINTS THAT STORES MORE AND MORE TROUBLE FOR THE FUTURE AND START TO LIVE WITHIN ITS MEANS WHICH MEANS EVEN MORE BELT TIGHTENING. THIS MEANS CHINA’S ECONOMY TOO WILL SLUMP.
HOW COME NONE OF THE WORLD’S GENIUSES AND SAVVY ECONOMISTS REALIZE THIS?
Why people can never mean what they say:
So long as there is style in what a person says, he cannot mean what he says, cannot say what he means.
Because what he says has style or force changes that are meant to stir the recipient’s emotions to like (excited, thrilled, ‘happy’, funny), dislike (anger, hate, disgusted), be sad, hurt (sarcastic), confused or fearful, he wants others to be impressed, pleased, intimidated or dominated by what he says, he cannot mean what he says unless he says, “I intend to impress, please, intimidate or dominate you, I want to stir your emotions to like, dislike, be sad, hurt, fearful or agitated.
BECAUSE WHATEVER STYLISH PEOPLE SAY HAVE ACCOMPANYING FORCE CHANGES THAT IS INTENDED TO STIR LISTENERS TO LIKE, DISLIKE, BE SAD, HURT, AGITATED OR FEARFUL, THEY WANT TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE, UNLESS THEY STATE THIS, THEY CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY. RATHER THAN SECONDARY, THE INTENTION TO STIR EMOTIONS, TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE IS PRIMARY AND THE SUBSTANCE OF THE OCCASION IS SECONDARY AND SO EMOTIONAL PEOPLE CAN NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN BECAUSE IN ORDER TO DO SO THEY MUST STATE THEY WANT TO STIR YOUR EMOTIONS OR WANT TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE YOU.
Emotional people can never mean what they say because the accompanying style which they find more meaningful than the substance of the occasion which may itself be meaningless, is meaningless, the force prolonging, changing speed and loudness of what they say is meaningless and so they can never mean what they say.
THE STYLE OR FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS OF WHAT THEY SAY IS MEANINGLESS, THERE IS NEVER MEANING IN FORCE ACTING, THE EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION, FEAR) CONVEYED IN THE STYLE OF WHAT IS SAID IS MEANINGLESS AND SO THEY CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY THAT HAS ACCOMPANYING STYLE AND EMOTIONS THAT ARE MEANINGLESS.
Often the substance of what they say is meaningless eg deafening silence or niceties like ‘it’s a nice day’ or false (a lie). Always the style or force changes that they find meaningful, the emotions accompanying that they find meaningful are meaningless that they can never mean.
THUS I CAN SAY WITHOUT FEAR OF FALSITY THAT EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN, NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY WANT TO STIR YOUR EMOTIONS, WANT TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE YOU WHEN THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT TO DO, THEY CAN NEVER MEAN THE STYLE OR EMOTIONS OR FORCE CHANGES IN THEIR SPEECH THAT ARE MEANINGLESS.
YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG BUT IT IS A TORMENTING MEANINGLESS EXISTENCE TO NEVER SAY WHAT YOU MEAN, MEAN WHAT YOU SAY. ONLY THE PERSON WHO ALWAYS SAYS WHAT HE MEANS, MEANS WHAT HE SAYS HAS A MEANINGFUL JOYFUL EXISTENCE.
In heaven they always say what they mean:
In heaven they always say what they mean, mean what they say and there can be no misunderstandings, no misgivings. Why is that so?
Because there is no EVIL style in heaven.
THE PERSON WITHOUT STYLE ALWAYS MEANS WHAT HE SAYS BECAUSE THERE IS NO INTENTION OR MEANING TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE YOU THAT HE MUST INFORM YOU TO MEAN WHAT HE SAYS, THERE IS NO ACCOMPANYING EMOTION IN WHAT HE SAYS THAT HE MUST INFORM YOU IN ORDER TO MEAN WHAT HE SAYS.
THE PERSON WITHOUT STYLE ALWAYS SAYS WHAT HE MEANS BECAUSE THERE IS NO MEANINGLESS ACCOMPANYING STYLE OR EMOTION OR FORCE CHANGES THAT HE CANNOT MEAN AND SO EVERYTHING HE SAYS MINUS THE ABSENT MEANINGLESS STYLE IS FULLY MEANT.
APART FROM TELLING A DELIBERATE LIE OR SAYING SOMETHING THAT IS NONSENSE, A STYLE FREE PERSON CANNOT SAY WHAT HE DOES NOT MEAN BECAUSE THERE IS NO MEANINGLESS STYLE AND EMOTION IN WHAT HE SAYS TO DISQUALIFY HIM.
Disqualified by his style:
Do not underestimate the fundamental evil of style or the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness.
It is style that disqualifies a person from ever saying what he means (because he must say he intends to impress or please you, intend to stir your emotions in order to say what he means), and meaning what he says (he cannot mean the meaningless style and emotion accompanying what he says).
FURTHER STYLE NECESSITATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE BECAUSE THE CONSISTENT SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO CANNOT BE RENDERED FRESH BUT MUST BE REGURGITATED FROM MEMORY.
Whatever is rehashed is never meant:
Whatever is rehashed from a standardised recording that is meant for a variety of situations is never meant, it is a fake, counterfeit. Only something that is freshly composed for an occasion is truly meant.
THUS IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER YOU KNOW YOU ARE REHASHING OR NOT, HOW SINCERE YOU THINK YOUR WORDS ARE, SO LONG AS WHAT YOU SAY IS REHASHED, IT IS A FAKE OF THE REAL THING AND YOU CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT YOU SAY.
PEOPLE CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY ON TWO COUNTS:
She cannot mean it:
She cannot mean what she is doing because what she is doing is not only showing you something (that is itself meaningless) but she is doing it with a smile as if she is liking it or it is fun. Because liking or fun is all about a meaningless stirring of mental force, she cannot mean the expression of meaningless stirred mental force that accompanies what she is doing that is also not fresh specific to the occasion but a rote or rehashed action (this is how she always holds to show objects that differs from others).
IT IS NEVER MEANINGFUL OR HAPPY EXISTENT THUS BUT IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING TO BE A ROBOT WITH A SUBSTANCE AND (MEANINGLESS) STYLE COMBO THAT CAN NEVER BE MEANT.
Gadhafi's son warns of civil war in Libya
Exactly what he has in mind can be known and what he said may not be what he meant which is, “opposition back off and let me rule or I will use force to crush you”.
IF HE MEANS TO THREATEN OPPOSITION TO BACK OFF AND LET THE STATUS QUO EXIST HE DID NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAID. HERE AS IN MANY PLACES PEOPLE NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN.Reading from a piece of paper:
You see people reading from a piece of paper or prompter, be they prime ministers, newsreaders, students, teachers or what nots and they see nothing wrong when it is deadly.
Often the speeches they read are prepared for them but it does not matter who you are (king or prime minister) or you prepared the speech yourself, by reading from a paper you are training yourself to mechanically, robotically rehash that have dire consequences in terms of insanity and future suffering.
CAN YOU IMAGINE JESUS OR THE BUDDHA READING FROM A PIECE OF PAPER? IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO DO SO, READING FROM A PIECE OF PAPER IS FOR FOOLISH PEOPLE WHO HAVE MOTIVE AND DESIRE TO SAY CERTAIN THINGS WITHOUT SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE OCCASION.
ALWAYS WHEN A PERSON READS FROM A PIECE OF PAPER HE IS ACTING MECHANICALLY, LIKE A ROBOT CONVERTING THE WRITTEN SPEECH INTO SOUNDS THAT IS NEVER HARMLESS BUT CONDITIONING ONESELF TO BE A REHASHING ROBOT.
People see others reading from a piece of paper and they fail to understand the true nature of what they see namely a robot mechanically rehashing from the paper that conditions them to become robots which is never a pleasure but tormenting.
Depending on a piece of paper:
If you can deliver your speech without need for the piece of paper that has your speech written, you are mad to do so. It is because you cannot deliver the speech without the piece of paper, you depend on the piece of paper that you have a piece of paper.
If you depend on a piece of paper in order to speak, you are insecure, if something happens that disrupts access to the piece of paper, you are in strife. Further the piece of paper is your boss that tells you what to say, not you the boss of the piece of paper.
Many people think routinely what they want to say when they meet another or when they are called to deliver a speech and this is planning that is memorized, with or without a piece of paper, often with the aid of mnemonics and when the occasion finally comes to deliver, they refer to this mental recording to render their speeches.
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER IT IS A PIECE OF PAPER OR A MENTAL RECORDING THAT YOU DEPEND ON FOR YOUR SPEECH, IF YOU DO SO, IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND YOU ARE INSECURE, SHOULD ANYTHING DISRUPT THE FLOW FROM THE MENTAL OR PHYSICAL PIECE OF PAPER YOU ARE IN STRIFE.
AND SO IF YOU ARE REHASHING ALL THE TIME FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX IN YOUR MIND, YOU ARE NOT THE BOSS BUT A MECHANICAL SLAVE OF THAT JUKEBOX AND WHEN IT SUFFERS GLITCHES AND WILL ULTIMATELY FAIL, YOU ARE DOOMED TO SUFFER MAD JUKEBOX SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR. MAD JUKEBOX SPEECH OR ACTIONS ARE ACTIONS AND SPEECHES THAT ARE STEREOTYPED THAT THE PERSON HAS ENACTED MANY TIMES BEFORE THAT HAVE GREAT AUTOMATISM AND IS NOW REHASHED INAPPROPRIATELY (AND THEREFORE MAD) THAT THE PERSON CANNOT STOP, HAS NO CONTROL OVER.
YOU MAY THINK YOU ARE NOT A ROBOT BUT A MARVELLOUS FULLY UNDERSTANDING PERSON BUT IF IT IS TRUE WHAT YOU SAY AND DO IS REHASHED FROM RECORDINGS IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX YOU HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH MAD ROBOTIC BEHAVIOUR AND THAT IS NEVER PLEASANT BUT EVEN TERRIBLE TORMENT.
If you can be stirred you are a slave:
If your mental force can be stirred by others you are a lowly slave not high master of yourself.
Thus if you can be provoked by others to be angry, no matter how righteous your anger you falsely perceive is, you are a slave in danger of suffering, of being sucked in to defend or attack.
If you can be provoked to be excited, greedy, lustful you are a lowly slave not master of yourself you delude yourself.
If you can be moved to sadness or be hurt or fearful, you are again a slave of others and things happening, not a lofty master of yourself.
IF YOU ARE STIRRED BY THINGS HAPPENING, BY OTHERS AND YOU DO NOT KNOW, YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING AND THAT TOO IS LOWLY. IF YOU ARE AWARE YOU CAN BE STIRRED BY OTHERS AND EVENTS THEN YOU ARE A SLAVE AT THE MERCY OF OTHERS AND EVENTS AND THAT TOO IS SUFFERING NEVER THE PLEASURE IT IS TOUTED TO BE.
Seeing and understanding rushing:
Most people have no difficulty seeing someone as rushing, in a hurry but you are making a big mistake if you think that because they can identify rushing when they see it, therefore they understand and have understanding.
BEING ABLE TO RECOGNIZE ‘RUSHING’ HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH UNDERSTANDING, IT IS ABOUT PERCEPTION, MEMORIZING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PERCEPTION THAT CONSTITUTES RUSHING AND REHASHING IN WORDS WHEN THE SAME SETS OF PERCEPTION RECUR.
You truly understand rushing when you see the nature of rushing and that is not so much the speed with which something is done but the accelerating speed and strength of force with which it is said and done. Rushing is a programmed way of saying and doing things that is partly for show because it is deemed superior (impress your boss how good an employee you are, impress others what an important and expert you are at your work) and partly conditioned, he is slave of his rushing that is driven by greed. It is impossible the person is doing something mindfully, specifically for the occasion when he rushes but rushing is always the accelerating rendition by rote of something said or done that the person has recorded how to do or say in the past.
TO BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY RUSHING WHEN IT OCCURS IS NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT JUST PROGRAMMING, YOU ARE PROGRAMMED TO RECOGNIZE RUSHING.
TO TRULY UNDERSTAND RUSHING YOU MUST SEE ITS NATURE AS IT TRULY IS, IT IS THE ACCELERATING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE RENDITION OF REHASHED SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT ARE PARTLY TO IMPRESS OTHERS AND PARTLY INVOLUNTARY, CONDITIONED. RUSHING IS ALWAYS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, STRESSFUL (WASTES ENERGY, RESTLESS AND DAZING) AND SO IT MUST BE CONTROLLED BUT SLOWLY OR RAPIDLY, INCITED BY OTHERS, THE PERSON SOON LOSES CONTROL TO BE INDUCTED INTO RUSHING OR RAPIDLY STEP UP THE TEMPO OF RUSHING UNTIL IT REACHES EVEN UNBEARABLE MAD INTENSITY. RUSHING IS DEADLY, A SIGN OF GREED AND IF NOT ELIMINATED BUT JUST CONTROLLED, IS A WALKING TIME BOMB THAT WILL KILL THE RUSHING FOOL.
The means becomes an end that will end in madness:
People in this world see nothing wrong, they applaud such feats as marvels when it is controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity for participants and those who appreciate.
If you need to cross a river and you improvise using two bamboo sticks then you won’t go mad. But if you copy others and it becomes a sports and you even do calisthenics whilst balancing on the bamboo pole then you have strayed from the meaningful, using two bamboos to cross a river into what is meaningless, treating the means to cross as an art, an end in itself.
WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS ACCORDING TO A PLAN COPIED FROM OTHERS THAT IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS HOW GOOD THEY ARE. THEY PRACTICE AND PRACTICE TO PROGRAM THEMSELVES BETTER AND IN THE PROCESS CONVERTED THEMSELVES INTO ROBOTS DEDICATED TO THE MEANS THAT HAS BECOME IN DELUSION, AN END IN ITSELF. THERE IS NEVER ANY TRUE MEANING IN WHAT THEY ARE DOING WHICH IS FOR SHOW AND SO THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY FOR SHOW THAT THEY AND YOU DO NOT BELIEVE, WILL END IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY LATER WHEN THEIR MINDS DEGENERATE.
I DON’T APPLAUD SUCH FEATS, IF YOU DO, YOU MAY HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB, NOT HEAVEN.
Why it is controlled insanity:
Seldom if not never is there a need to cross a river astride a bamboo pole using another bamboo pole for balance. Surely there are much safer and quicker ways across like a boat than risk drowning. And so the purpose for the pursuit is not crossing the river but the challenge of staying upright, to show to others how skilful you are or for rewards like a first prize. These are never genuine reasons for doing something, even if you are paid $1 million first prize that is not a true reason for crossing thus but it an inducement or bribe to do so.
BECAUSE THERE IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO RESORT TO SUCH A HAZARDOUS WAY TO CROSS A RIVER AND ITS PURPOSE IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, ONLY DELUDED PEOPLE CAN PRACTICE SUCH SPORT THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.
Gadhafi's vow: Will fight to 'last drop of blood'
Saying is easy, doing it may be another thing and if you were made to fight to the last drop of blood, then rather than heroic and glorious it may be terrible torment and physical suffering for you as well as your adversaries.
It is never reason that makes someone say thus but it is bravado, emotion or stirred mental force. What people do not realize is that their wish may be granted, there is God and there is life even many lives after death in which your emotional or force driven blind vow will be put to the test and you have to fight to the last drop of blood even many times.
THE WISE PERSON KNOWING HIS WORDS MAY BE PUT TO THE TEST AND IT WOULD BE TERRIBLE SUFFERING WILL ABSTAIN FROM SUCH BRAVADO THAT IS UNNECESSARILY HEAPING FUTURE SUFFERING ON ONESELF.
Make sure he does not run away:
If you say you will fight to the last drop of blood, you better make sure you don’t run away.
Often if not always, people speak heroically thus because they perceive they will prevail, they have the upper hand or are more powerful and it is the last drop of subordinates’ blood that they spill, not their own, at the first sign of danger, they flee the country with their precious life.
WHAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT THEY CAN BE BORN AS FIGHTING ANIMALS EG FIGHTING COCKS, FISH, BULLS WHERE THEY WILL TRULY HAVE TO FIGHT TO THEIR LAST DROPS OF BLOOD AND IF THAT IS TERRIBLE SUFFERING THEN THAT IS WHAT YOU VOWED THAT MUST BE FULFILLED, EG FIGHTING AS DOGS UNTIL YOU DIE.
Moran murder case 'overwhelming'
2:18pm Case against Judy Moran for execution of her brother-in-law is very strong, says prosecution.
Leave it to the jury or others to decide whether the case is overwhelming or not, it is unrighteous wanting jurors to convict with karma attached not truthful and meritorious to say so.
YOY HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY THE CASE FOR HER MURDERING IS SUCH AND SUCH, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY IT IS OVERWHELMING OR VERY STRONG WHICH IS INTENDED TO INFLUENCE THE JURY UNFAIRLY IN FAVOUR OF YOU AND SO YOU ARE HEAPING KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING SAYING SO.
Obtaining heavenly sensual bliss:
Bhikkhus, how does a god live with a godess?
Here, bhikkhus the husband abstains from destroying living things, taking the not given, misbehaving in sexual desires, telling lies, taking intoxicant and brewd drinks, is virtuous without evil thoughts of miserliness and selfishness and abides not scolding and abusing recluses and Brahmins. The wife too abstains from destroying living things, taking the not given, misbehaving in sexual desires, telling lies, taking intoxicant and brewd drinks, is virtuous without evil thoughts of miserliness and selfishness and abides not scolding and abusing recluses and Brahmins. Bhikkhus, thus a god lives with a godess.
Bhikkhus, these are the four kinds of living together.
Both are unvirtuous, greedy and abusive, a dead husband living with a dead wife.
An unvirtuous greedy abusive husband lives wi th a virtuous, generous wife not envying,
That's a godess living with a dead male. A generous husband too lives not envying
With an unvirtuous, greedy, abusive wife; that's a god with a dead female
If both husband and wife are generous restrained and live a righteous life
Pleasant to each other it's for an abundance of good, they live together.
Seeing both are virtuous, their enemies will be unhappy
They will lead a happy life here and enjoy heavenly sensual bliss after death. .
Careful who you praise:
If someone is evil and should not be praised and you praise him because you are deluded or to appease him, then you are heaping karma on yourself, not merit. Again if someone deserves to be praised and you deprecate that too will be for your demerit.
Without a thorough consideration and scrutiny praises that which should not be praised Without a thorough consideration and scrutiny depreciates that which should be appreciated. Without a thorough consideration and scrutiny, becomes pleased in which confidence should not be established. Without a thorough consideration and scrutiny becomes displeased in which confidence should be established. Endowed with these four things as though led and lain is in hell.
Endowed with four things as though led and lain is in heaven. What four?
Thoroughly considering and scrutinizing praises that which should be praised Thoroughly considering and scrutinizing depreciates that which should be depreciated. Thoroughly considering and scrutinizing, becomes pleased in which confidence should be established. Thoroughly considering and scrutinizing becomes displeased in which confidence should not be established. Endowed with these four things as though led and lain is in heaven.
Praising Dr M:
RPK has praised Dr M many times, even kissed his hand and said he agreed with some of the things Dr M espoused. Jesus said no good fruit can out of a bad tree and so if you think there is good and bad in everyone you may be right or deluded and firm in your delusion you meet your destiny, if that be woe, so be it.
Rejecting the Buddha:
You may say you are a Christian and don’t need and don’t believe in the Buddha and therefore you reject him. Without careful consideration, finding out who the Buddha is and what he said and did and you dismiss him as irrelevant that too will be to your demerit and future suffering.
Before you dismiss the Buddha make sure you find out who he is and thus knowing dismiss him otherwise you are a fool putting a noose around your neck Christian or not. You think God is on your side against the Buddha, but without God speaking to you that is a presumption that according to the Buddha is a defilement of your mind.
THE BUDDHA SAID HE IS NOT WORTHY OF CRITICISM, PERFECT IN EVERY WAY AND WORSHIP OF THE HIGHEST GIVES THE HIGHEST REWARDS AND SO REJECTION OF THE HIGHEST HAS PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES FOR YOU NOT THE BUDDHA.
The true reason for rejecting the Buddha:
That you are a Christian and Buddhism is alien to Christianity is not a true or valid reason for rejecting Buddhism. The valid or sane reason is if Buddhism is proved or seen as false & harmful.
BECAUSE REJECTING BUDDHISM BECAUSE IT IS ALIEN TO CHRISTIANITY IS THE WRONG REASON FOR REJECTION, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
A PERSON IS NOT GOOD BECAUSE HE IS YOUR FATHER OR BROTHER OR SON OR SAME RACE BUT HE IS GOOD ONLY BECAUSE HE IS GOOD AND SO IF YOU DEFEND SOMEONE JUST BECAUSE HE IS YOUR BROTHER THEN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
Fwd: Precious 10 Words
There is nothing precious about any words, it is just a word and it is the delusion and false perception of a person that he wants to inculcate in others that makes him say so.
Words have meaning that are assigned to it and ideally there is singular not plural meanings, the reason words have come to take on additional meanings is not because of the wondrous nature but the defiling nature of men that they deem it desirable, ‘enigmatic’ that a word can have multiple meanings. If a word has just one assigned meaning then there can be no confusion. It is the corruption (not development) of a word that it has come to take multiple meanings that becomes a source of mischief or word play by deluded men.
THUS IF YOU ARE DRAWN OR SUCKED INTO BY HIM TO FIND OUT WHAT THOSE WORDS ARE, YOU ARE GULLIBLE AND IN DANGER OF BEING DECEIVED BY OTHERS WITH EVEN DEADLY CONSEQUENCES, WITHOUT INVESTIGATING, I KNOW IT IS A LOAD OF RUBBISH, A WASTE OF TIME AND A MATTER OF DELUSION NOT SUBSTANCE.
A message but not words can be precious:
A message conveyed by words can be precious but never some words being precious and others worthless. Words are words which are like workhorses to convey assigned meaning, there is nothing precious about some words and hum drum about others, it is your advanced false perception that will end in your insanity that makes you perceive so.
Thus if I say that there is constant stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in the speech of others that is the cause of a person’s insoluble, renewing stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and necessitates a robotic rehashing existence and is the source of the person’s troubling emotions that can only be like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear then if these words are understood by you and you made effort to scrub off all stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness to experience a previously unattainable release from stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and this is the key to one eternity of heavenly existence, then the message I conveyed with those words is very precious because it released you from your stress and enabled you to go to heaven.
Again the Buddha described the second higher state of mind as a state of fully conscious cessation of all thinking, one pointed unified mind that is pleasant in abiding here and gives two eternities in heaven. If this is true and you succeeded in stopping thinking then the message conveyed in words (not the words themselves) is very precious.
WHEN HE TALKED ABOUT THE WORDS BEING PRECIOUS, HE IS LIKELY TO BE TALKING ABOUT THE EMOTIONS STIRRED BY THOSE WORDS AND BECAUSE EMOTIONS ARE ABOUT THE BLIND HARMFUL STIRRING OF FORCE, NOT ONLY IS HE DELUDED TO PERCEIVE WORDS AS PRECIOUS WHEN THEY ARE MERELY TOOLS TO CONVEY MEANING, HE IS DELUDED THAT STIRRED EMOTION OR FORCE IS PRECIOUS WHEN IT IS EVIL.
It is not a sin to be beautiful but:
It is not a sin to be born beautiful or handsome, it is a person’s karma that he or she is born handsome/beautiful or ugly but it is a sin to attend to it, exploit, advertise, augment and use it for seduction that incurs karma to be experienced as future suffering.
Thus a lot of vain women aware of their beauty, show their flesh in order to attract (stir the mental forces attractively of) others, they wear clothes and make up to augment their beauty and they become robots obsessed with their plans to beautify and flaunt themselves.
PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE MASTERS OF THEIR ENDEAVOURS TO ADVERTISE AND EXPLOIT THEIR BEAUTY BUT THEY ARE SLAVES OF PROGRAMS THEY HAVE WRITTEN FOR THEMSELVES HOW TO DO SO AND WILL END IN INSANITY OR TORMENT FOR THEM.
IT IS THEIR KARMA THAT THEY ARE BORN BEAUTIFUL BUT AS A RESULTS OF THEIR SINS EXPLOITING THEIR BEAUTY THEY ARE HEADED FOR WOE, EVEN ENDLESS WOES. WHAT GREAT FOOLS.
The difference between true and false understanding:
True understanding is something you either have or don’t, it cannot be cultivated or trained or conditioned because it is a matter of seeing things truly as they actually are.
If you do not see things as they actually are (because your mirror of sight is warped by force, by style in your seeing, by programming in your seeing, by like and dislike in your seeing) then no matter what, unless these are abrogated, you cannot see truly and therefore cannot truly understand.
TRUE AND FALSE UNDERSTANDING CAN NEVER CO-EXIST IN THE SAME PERSON, IT IS EITHER OF THE POSSIBILITIES.
TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS ALL OR NONE, IF YOU CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND SOMETHING YOU CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND ANYTHING PRESENTED TO YOU. A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING MAY NOT KNOW MANY THINGS BUT AS SOON AS HE SEES SOMETHING OR IS TOLD SOMETHING, HE IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTANDS AS IT ACTUALLY IS. TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS NEVER RECORDED AND REHASHED TO FIT THE OCCASION BUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING HAPPENS EACH TIME THE PERSON SEES.
BECAUSE FALSE UNDERSTANDING IS RECORDED AND REHASHED FROM RECORDING, IT IS HARD EVEN IMPOSSIBLE TO SHAKE OFF. WHEN AN OCCASION ARISES THAT TRIGGERS OFF THAT FALSE UNDERSTANDING IT IS AUTOMATICALLY TRIGGERED AND THAT IS HOW HE ALWAYS SEES AND UNDERSTANDS THAT SITUATION.
EMOTIONAL PEOPLE NEVER TRULY UNDERSTAND ANYTHING, THEY HAVE MANY MEMORIZED UNDERSTANDINGS OR MEANINGS OF THINGS THEY SEE AND HEAR AND THEY ARE FOREVER RELIVING THOSE RECORDED MEANINGS. INTELLIGENT PEOPLE HAVE MORE RECORDED MEANINGS AND CAPACITY TO RECORD MORE AND MODIFY MORE OF THOSE MEANINGS BUT THEY ARE MERELY SUPERIOR ROBOTS COMPARED TO THEIR STUPID COUSINS.
A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING NEVER HAS DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING, WHATEVER IS PRESENTED TO HIM HE EFFORTLESSLY IMMEDIATELY SEES IT AS EITHER TRUE OR FALSE, HARMFUL (EVIL) OR BENEFICIAL (GOOD).
The incomparable benefits of true understanding:
Only the person who possesses true understanding has a pleasant sane existence, the person with false understanding has a woeful existence because he does not truly understand anything.
You need true understanding to go to heaven where there is no one to persecute and make you suffer. Without true understanding you are detained here where try as you may, others will hound you and there is danger lurking everywhere.
EVERYTHING HE SEES OR HEARS HE EFFORTLESSLY UNDERSTANDS AS TRUE OR FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE, HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL, WHAT IS THERE TO SUFFER? IT THE MAN OF FALSE UNDERSTANDING WHO SEES STYLE AS SUBSTANCE AND SUBSTANCE AS STYLE, CANNOT TELL WHAT IS TRUE OR FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE, GOOD OR BAD WHO IS TORMENTED AND IN DANGER OF HARM BY OTHERS.
WHETHER YOU HAVE TRUE OR FALSE OR NO UNDERSTANDING IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED BY ANYONE, IS NOT AN ALLEGATION I CAN LEVEL AT ANYONE. IF YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTANDING, YOU MUST HAVE A WOEFUL EXISTENCE HERE AND YOU HAVE SUFFERING A VAST AS AN OCEAN OF WHICH YOU CANNOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT.
Style precludes true understanding:
The existence of style or the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness precludes or renders impossible true understanding.
THUS IT IS THE ABROGATION OF STYLE AND NOTHING ELSE THAT AUTOMATICALLY CONFERS TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO THE NOW STYLE FREE PERSON.
STYLE IS THE CAUSE OF NO UNDERSTANDING AND ITS DESTRUCTION, THE CURE FOR NO UNDERSTANDING.
Whatever is rehashed does not require any understanding because what is rehashed is already predetermined and what remains is selection and rendering as faithfully as possible from memory. Thus because everything, what he thinks, speaks and does is rehashed, there is a total lack of need for understanding and so even if you have true understanding to begin with, it dies of disuse as a result of a stylish existence.
True understanding is inimical to style:
True understanding is not only totally unnecessary for a stylish existence but its presence is an hindrance, renders uncomfortable even untenable a rehashing stylish existence.
Why is that?
ANYONE WHO HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL IMMEDIATELY WHAT HE IS DOING, USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE OTHERS, TO STIR EMOTION IN SELF AND OTHERS IS INSANE, CREATES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN SELF AND OTHERS, CONVERTS HIMSELF INTO A MINDLESS REHASHING ROBOT SUCH THAT IT IS A NO BRAINER THAT HE SHOULD PUT A STOP TO HIS CRAZY INSANE MEANINGLESS FOR SHOW STRESSFUL STYLE.
THUS NOT ONLY IS TRUE UNDERSTANDING NOT NEEDED FOR STYLE, ITS PRESENCE RENDERS STYLE UNCOMFORTABLE TO DISH OUT IF NOT OUTRIGHT INSANE, SUICIDAL.
DISHING OUT STYLE IS ACTUALLY CUTTING ONE’S OWN THROAT, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL CUT HIS OWN THROAT AND PRACTICE WHAT IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE.
It's also worth remembering that, unlike the Bank of England, the Fed is officially tasked with promoting maximum employment.
“It's also worth remembering” is totally irrelevant to the matter at hand, a meaningless style of speech and controlled insanity but he thinks it is meaningful and readers are clueless.
Leave others to decide whether something is worth remembering or not. Not only is it useless, it detracts from the matter at hand and so he is practicing distraction for himself and others that conditions him to distraction that when well-conditioned is suffering never a pleasure.
WHAT HE SAID, ‘IT IS ALSO WORTH REMEMBERING’ IS NOT HARMLESS BUT DEADLY FOR HIMSELF, IS SENSELESS TO IMPRESS.
That said and from the looks of it:
Quote: That said, in spite of the history behind WebOS, it's still a fairly young operating system compared with the rapid development of Android and iOS. From the looks of it, HP has clearly spent some time polishing the software, but it will have to contend with the increasingly sophisticated demands of today's consumers.
By ‘that said’ he implies that he has reservations of what he said earlier and that is stirring conflict in himself and others. Whatever is true has no caveats, no qualifications and so it means what he said earlier is not quite true or he is not sure of himself.
From the looks of it means he is not sure. You should never speak from the looks of things but you should see or ascertain what you are saying is true and so it means he is speaking without seeing and knowing but guessing and that is the path to doubt and uncertainty that is one of three lower fetters to future woe and therefore deadly.
Driven by greed people calculate or self-serve:
Greed and calculating or self serving are two different but related things and if you think they are synonymous or interchangeable you have muddled thinking or do not truly understand. What you have is programming or vague fuzzy imprints of greed and calculating.
Greed is just an attractive stirring of a person’s mental force to want, desire, crave, be attracted to and thus stirred, his mental force drives him to think of ways or ploys or tricks to get what he wants eg money or a girl. A lot of things that people say or do that appears to be for the welfare of others is actually for show and self-serving or calculating to get on the right sides of others so that they can exploit or gain.
WITHOUT THINKING YOU CANNOT BE CALCULATING BUT ONCE A PLAN OF HOW TO BE CALCULATING IS WELL INSTALLED, IT IS JUST AUTOMATICALLY DISHED OUT BY ROTE WITH GREAT VERVE OR SLICKNESS EVEN BEYOND THAT PERSON’S RESISTANCE BUT RATHER THAN LOVELY, YOU ARE A MARKED OR DOOMED MAN, A WELL PROGRAMMED ROBOT OF THAT SPECIFIC CALCULATION. THEREAFTER, DRIVEN BY GREED HE MAY FURTHER THINK TO CALCULATE TO DEVICE NEW PROGRAMMING EG HOW TO MAKE MONEY AS A BUSINESSMAN.
There is no need for greed or calculating in heaven:
There is plenty, be it pleasures, music, nymphs or whatever your heart desires and so there is no need to be greedy and driven by greed to calculate. Thus if you will not weed out your greed and calculating, you will not go to heaven because greed and calculating is evil, harmful to self and others and if you are greedy and calculating you are evil not good and cannot go to heaven. The opposite of greed, generosity is the way to heavenly bliss, the Buddha says.
GREED AND CALCULATING OR SELF SERVING ARE CONDITIONING AND WHEN WELL DEVELOPED ARE VERY STRONG, IRRESISTIBLE AND SO IF THE PERSON WILL NOT MAKE EFFORT TO WEED THEM OUT, THEY ARE SLAVES OF GREED AND CALCULATING THAT WILL LEAD TO EVEN AN ETERNITY OF WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH.
Enlightenment is the highest release:
The Buddha said he and those who are enlightened have obtained the highest release, heavenly existence are relative releases that are not permanent, after you have exhausted your merit, you can fall from heaven even to hell. Nirvana unlike heaven is a destination of no falling away, of no change. Nirvana is changeless, unchanging.
Release is about exit from suffering and so if a person is not released he is subject to suffering.
THUS YOU ARE A FOOL IF YOU THINK YOU ARE FREE, YOU ARE SUBJECT TO SUFFERING, SUBJECT TO KARMA. IF YOU ARE NOT CAREFUL, WHAT YOU SAY OR DO WILL BESTOW YOU WITH EVEN HORRIBLE FUTURE SUFFERING THAT YOU HAVE NO CHOICE BUT SUFFER TO REPAY. A PERSON WHO IS ENLIGHTENED THROUGH KNOWLEDGE, IS FREED BY AN ABSENCE OF FERMENTATIONS OR AGITATIONS TO BE TOTALLY FREED OF ALL DEBTS AND THUS FREED TO THE HIGHEST SENSE.
Style is the source of greed:
Style is the source of all the evils like greed (covetousness), jealousy, envy, pride, hate, anger, lust which are all forms of blind, meaningless, emotions that are harmful to self and others.
It is the constant use of force to fabricate style by prolonging/stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness that is the dynamo that provides emotions like greed, anger, hate sustenance and without eliminating style there can be no meaningful exit from evil.
THE PERSON WHO TRIES TO ELIMINATE HIS GREED, LUST, HATE, PRIDE, ETC WITHOUT ELIMINATING HIS STYLE OR USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS LIKE THE FOOL TRYING TO CATCH WATER WITH A NET. ELIMINATE STYLE AND ALL EMOTIONS AND THEIR ATTENDANT EVILS DISAPPEAR LIKE FOG WITH THE RISING SUN.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE EVIL OF STYLE, ITS DESTRUCTION GIVES THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND ONE ETERNITY OR AGE IN HEAVEN. IF YOU THEN SUCCESSFULLY TRAIN YOURSELF TO STOP THINKING AT WILL THAT IS THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND TWO ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN. IF YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS NEITHER STIRRED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE WHATEVER HAPPENS THAT IS THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN AND FINALLY IF YOU TUNE OUT ALL FORCE RECEPTION TO EXPERIENCE NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE THAT IS THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
China row over synchronised goldfish magic trick
By Michael Bristow BBC News, Beijing
Chinese animal rights groups are urging TV stations not to show a magic trick of goldfish swimming in formation.
How is it when humans, females swim and dance in synchrony it is art and marvellous and when fish are trained to do so it is abuse? Even in nature, dolphins jump synchronized and ape each other.
IT REFLECTS BIZARRE PERCEPTION OF PEOPLE THAT THEY THINK SUCH TRAINING FISH TO SWIM IN TANDEM IS ABUSE WHEN TRAINING HUMANS TO DO SO TO WIN OLYMPIC MEDALS IS NOT.
Dr M said he tried to abolish ISA:
If he intended to abolish ISA and failed, the least he could do is not use it to persecute his political enemies (Anwar too was arrested under ISA during his time).
Does he mean he is not the highest authority in the land, he does not get what he wants, the Agung or his cabinet or UMNO would not let him abolish ISA?
THUS WHAT HE SAYS HAS NO CREDIBILITY AND IF YOU THINK IT IS PLAUSIBLE YOU ARE DELUDED. HE IS LOSING HIS MARBLES, MUTTERING THINGS THAT ARE INCREASINGLY BIZARRE. HE IS NOT MAD YET BUT EDGING TOWARDS IT.
How might style cause greed?
The constant incessant use of force to prolong (as in stretched syllables), change speed and loudness creates mounting insoluble renewing stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and thus suffering with no way out, the person is driven to greed to want and possess as an antidote that does not work.
A PERSON WHO IS FREE FROM THE CURSE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE IS CONTENT WITH HIMSELF AND LIFE AND SO HE IS NOT GREEDY AND CALCULATING. IT IS ONLY A PERSON WHO IS RIVEN BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT ARE THE PRODUCTS OF STYLE, THE USE OF FORCE TO CONSTANTLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHO CANNOT BE CONTENT WITH HIMSELF AND LIFE TO WANT OR BE HOOKED TO GREED.
| Unity in diversity still a dream NEWS/COMMENTARIES |
That there can be unity in diversity is a delusion never true and if you do not know what to make of it or you agree there may be a case you do not have true understanding.
It is not possible to have unity that is true when there is a diversity of differing opinions, whatever unity is contrived, enforced, unstable and false.
UNITY IN DIVERSITY IS NOT A DREAM BUT DELUSION, THERE CAN BE NO TRUE UNITY IF THERE IS A DIVERSITY OF DIFFERING AND CONFLICTING OPINIONS. ONLY WHEN THERE IS UNITY OF VIEW AND PURPOSE, AS THE BUDDHA WITH HIS SANGHA, BRAHMA WITH HIS RETINUE IS THERE TRUE UNITY, NOT IN DIVERSITY BUT SINGULAR VIEW AND PURPOSE.
Sydney’s iconic royal botanic garden:
There is nothing iconic about Sydney’s royal botanic garden and it is the person’s wrong perception and thus understanding that makes it iconic.
IT IS PROOF THE PERSON HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT HE CAN PERCEIVE AND UNDERSTAND THE PARK AS ICONIC AND THE REASON HE CONSISTENTLY VIEWS THE PARK AS ICONIC IS BECAUSE THE WRONG UNDERSTANDING IS MEMORIZED AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY AND SO IT IS THAT PEOPLE HAVE UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS WRONG AND REHASHED FROM PROGRAMING.
HE UNDERSTANDS THE PARK AS ICONIC BUT THAT IS A FIGMENT OF HIS IMAGINATION OR DELUSION AND IT IS REHASHED SO THAT HE CONSISTENTLY VIEWS IT AS ICONIC. WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING THAT IS FALSE HAS TO BE REHASHED FROM MEMORY IF IT IS CONSISTENT.
Madoff’s Credibility Ends When His Mouth Moves: Ann Woolner
One who understands truly understands the statement is false to insult or attack. Why is that so?
You mean to say if Madoff’s mouth does not move or he remains silent he has credibility. Whether he speaks or not his credibility remains the same because it is the same person and so she is speaking falsely in danger of future suffering. Further his mouth can move to eat, do you mean when his mouth moves to eat, his ‘credibility goes out of the window’?
If Madoff’s credibility ends when his mouth moved he would not have conned so many rich people and so what she says is not guided by true reason but driven by emotion to insult or attack with deadly karma due.
Credibility is never about truth but believability:
Credibility is not about speaking the truth but speaking what can be accepted as true by those who do not know its veracity. So it does not matter whether Madoff is lying or not, credibility is about whether what he lies about is credible or acceptable as true by those who want to believe.
AND SO IT IS THAT EVEN IF WHAT MADOFF NOW SAYS IS FALSE, IT IS STILL CREDIBLE TO MANY WHO ARE EAGER TO BELIEVE AND YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY TO SAY MADOFF’S CREDIBILITY ENDS WHEN HE MOVES HIS MOUTH. WHAT HE LIES ABOUT IS STILL QUITE CREDIBLE TO MANY BUT WHETHER WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE OR FALSE IS ANOTHER MATTER AND SO SHE HAS MUDDLED THINKING.
What Modoff said is credible:
What Madoff said that bankers should know about his pyramid scheme may be a lie but it is still credible, why should what he said be incredible, impossible? Thus she is barking up the wrong tree trying to be too clever.
If you realize the avaricious nature of bankers you would find it credible that they may know but connived.
You need to speak before your credibility is assessed:
You need to speak or propose something as fact before your credibility can be assessed and so how can Madoff be assessed for his credibility when his mouth has not moved?
Thus she is muttering nonsense, does not know what she is talking about.
YOU NEED TO MOVE YOUR MOUTH, TENDER SOMETHING TO ANOTHER BEFORE YOUR CREDIBILITY CAN BE ASCERTAINED AND THEN IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT YOU SAID IS TRUE OR FALSE, IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER WHAT YOU SAID CAN BE ACCEPTED AS TRUE BY OTHERS THAT MAKES IT CREDIBLE.
US trade deficit widened by 33% in 2010
The US trade deficit ballooned in 2010 by the largest amount seen in a decade, Commerce Department figures have shown.
What this figure indicates is that there will be a terrible in the future because as sick as the American economy is today it is being propped up by imports from China that the US continues to pay with pieces of paper that may be worthless and China is manufacturing for nothing for the US.
Should the world awake from this charade, the US economy is likely to ‘plunge’ further rather than recover and China too because there is no true market for its exports because the US without printing worthless money cannot afford to import from China.
WHAT THIS FIGURE INDICATE IS THAT AS MUCH AS THE US ECONOMY IS SICK TODAY IT IS STILL BEING PROPPED UP FED BY IMPORTS FROM CHINA THAT THE US CONTINUE TO PAY FOR WITH POTENTIALLY WORTHLESS PIECES OF PAPER AND SHOULD THIS CHARADE END, IT WOULD A CINDERELLA AWAKENING FOR THE US AND THE WORLD.
Adopting others views and values:
The fact that people speak of adopting views and values is an unconscious admission that their understanding is recorded and rehashed to fit future events.
Thus people talk about adopting the views of their bosses or their rulers or their wives or husbands, their society or country they migrate to without realizing that they are admitting that de facto their understanding is recorded, fixed and rehashed to fit into future events. Although the recordings may be modified even many times, it is nevertheless recorded and rehashed from recording.
Thus if you are or want to be a crony of Dr M you must learn to adopt his values or views and that means your values or views are memorized and replayed from memory.
GOD HAS A VIEW OF THINGS (WHAT IS EXALTED BY MEN IS AN ABOMINATION IN THE SIGHT OR VIEW OF GOD) AND TO GO TO HEAVEN YOUR VIEWS MUST CORRESPOND OR BE IN HARMONY WITH GOD’S. TO PEOPLE ACCUSTOMED TO COPYING, THEY THINK THEY MUST FIND OUT WHAT GOD’S VIEWS ARE, MEMORIZE THEM AND REHASH THEM FOR GOD’S SAKE. THAT IS WRONG UNDERSTANDING. GOD’S VIEW IS NOT MEMORIZED AND REHASHED FROM RECORDING. ALWAYS GOD SEES TRULY AND THUS UNDERSTAND TRULY AND THIS VIEW IS A FRESH SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION VIEW THAT IS NOT REPLAYED FROM RECORDED UNDERSTANDING. THUS IN ORDER FOR YOUR VIEW TO CORRESPOND WITH GOD’S, YOU DON’T MAKE SECRETIVE EFFORTS TO FIND OUT WHAT GOD’S VIEWS ARE AND ADOPT (ADOPTING IS ABOUT REMEMBERING AND REHASHING) THEM BUT YOU MUST LEARN TO SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE AND ONCE YOU SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE, YOUR VIEWS AUTOMATICALLY CORRESPOND TO GOD’S AND HEAVENLY BEINGS’ VIEWS OR UNDERSTANDING.
IF YOU ADMIT YOU ADOPT OTHERS’ VIEWS, YOUR FATHER OR MOTHER’S VIEWS YOU ARE ADMITTING YOUR VIEWS OR UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS IS RECORDED OR MEMORIZED AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY NOT FRESH SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION. RECORDED REHASHED VIEWS OR UNDERSTANDINGS ARE NEVER TRUE BUT FAKED MECHANICAL GENERALIZED UNDERSTANDINGS.
Fixed views:
People berate others for having fixed views not realizing that the only way a person’s view can be fixed is that it is not genuine but recorded and rehashed from recording to fit the occasion and this is never true understanding of the current situation.
THE VIEWS OF A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS NEVER FIXED NOR IS IT FICKLE OR INCONSISTENT BUT IT IS CONSISTENT OR PRECISE BECAUSE THE NATURE OF EVENTS NEVER CHANGE, EG WHATEVER IS EVIL IS ALWAYS EVIL AND SO THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ALWAYS SEES THE EVENT AS EVIL NOT SOMETIMES EVIL AND SOMETIMES GOOD OR NEITHER GOOD NOR BAD. THE PERSON ALWAYS SEES THE SAME EVENT THE SAME WAY NOT BECAUSE HIS UNDERSTANDING IS FIXED AND REHASHED BUT THAT IS THE WAY IT ALWAYS HAPPENS, EVIL IS EVIL NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES IT HAPPENS AND SO THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ALWAYS SEES IT AS EVIL, WHAT IS INCREDIBLE IS ALWAYS INCREDIBLE AND SO THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ALWAYS SEES IT AS INCREDIBLE, NOT SOMETIMES CREDIBLE AND SOMETIMES INCREDIBLE.
Fickle views:
It is impossible for a person of true understanding to have fickle views because there can only be one true understanding of an event and that is never fickle, sometimes good, sometimes bad.
There are different reasons why people without true understanding can have fickle views on a matter. One is that there are rival recorded views that he can apply to the situation and sometimes he applies view A, sometimes view B, sometimes view Z. His view of an occasion may be influenced by emotions, by favouritism, eg if it is his son or wife who does wrong, it is not wrong but if it is someone else’s son it is bad.
No difficulty understanding:
The person of true understanding has no difficulty understanding anything said to him, anything he experiences.
It does not matter what is said is true, false or makes no sense, credible or incredible, the person with true understanding always comes to the correct understanding that it is true, false, nonsense, plausible or implausible.
This is because true understanding has nothing to do with force, you need to use force in your understanding, need to strain yourself because you don’t understand before you can have difficulty understanding something. It is (immediately) clear to one who is discerning what is said is true or false, nonsense, credible or incredible. It is only to one who is not discerning, who has no true understanding that what is said is not clear, he struggles or have difficulty understanding it.
What Dr M meant but did not say:
What Dr M meant when he said he wanted to abolish the ISA but the police refused was that the ISA is bad, he is good because he wanted to abolish it but blame the police because they refused to agree.
If the ISA was good why abolish it and so by saying he wanted to abolish it Dr M is tacitly admitting that the ISA is a bad law. He wanted to absolve blame for preserving the ISA by blaming the police for refusing to permit.
It is not so much the ISA was a bad law but it has been crassly abused to persecute political enemies who are not a danger to the country but to the ruling elite.
A lot of people think they mean what they say and say what they mean but more often than they realize, they never said what they meant, never meant what they said.
THE ISA WAS INTENDED TO ARREST WITHOUT DETENTION PEOPLE WHO ARE A DANGER TO THE SECURITY OF THE NATION AND IF THIS WAS REASONABLY APPLIED FEW IF ANY OF THOSE ARRESTED WOULD HAVE BEEN MERITED. THUS IT IS NOT SO MUCH THAT THE ISA IS A BAD LAW AS ITS GROSS ABUSE TO DEFEND THE RULING ELITE.
WHAT IS THE POINT OF TELLING OTHERS WHAT YOU WANTED TO DO THAT WAS GOOD BUT FAILED TO DO EXCEPT TO PROVIDE AN EXCUSE FOR NOT DOING IT, A CAUSE FOR REGRET OR LAYING BLAME ELSEWHERE? HE IS PROVIDING AN EXCUSE FOR NOT DOING WHAT WAS RIGHT AND BLAMING OTHERS THAT IF FALSE INCURS KARMA ON HIM.
THERE IS NO POINT TELLING OTHERS WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE DONE. SINCE YOU DID NOT DO IT WHEN YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE IT, YOU ARE LIABLE FOR KARMA FOR DERELICTION OF DUTY, FOR NOT DOING WHAT WAS RIGHT, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU WANTED TO DO BUT DID NOT.
Always self-serving or calculating:
Consciously or unconsciously what the calculating person says is always self-serving or calculating and so what Dr M said is not because it is true but to self-serve to paint himself truly or falsely as good (wanted to abolish bad ISA) and deflect blame elsewhere (blame police).
A lot of what is said or done that is calculating or self-serving no longer requires plans or thinking because there are already existing self-serving plans in the head of the greedy calculating person that have even strong urge to activate.
YOU ONLY NEED TO THINK TO CALCULATE A PLAN OF WHAT IS SELF SERVING TO SAY OR DO IN A PARTICULAR SET OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND ONCE THIS PLAN IS WELL MEMORIZED AND APPLIED MANY TIMES, YOU DO NOT NEED TO THINK FURTHER OR ANYMORE, IT IS NOW A MATTER OF SELECTING OR ACTIVATING THE PLAN TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS SELF SERVING OR IN ADVANCED CIRCUMSTANCES, NO SELECTION IS NEEDED BECAUSE THERE IS GREAT URGE FOR THAT PLAN TO ACTIVATE ITSELF AND THIS IS THE PENULTIMATE STEP TO MAD SELF CALCULATING THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE OR BIZARRE.
Why calculating becomes constant:
When frequently done, calculating or self-serving becomes constant or automatic because self-serving is robotic plan that is habituating, addictive like smoking or drinking or gambling or sex, the more frequent you calculate the better and more urge to do so in the future until it becomes constant or irresistible and the calculating fool is doomed for insanity and tormented, cannot help calculating.
The implication of the US trade deficit:
China is now the world’s second largest economy and without the US purchasing goods with pieces of paper it prints that actually has no backing because the US is ‘full of debts’ and may already be bankrupt (cannot fulfil those debts), China’s economy will be significantly affected, and the US consumption of these Chinese imports paid for by pieces of paper that have no backing will not have happened, seriously affecting the US economy.
CHINA IS SECOND, US FIRST IN TERMS OF ECONOMIC SIZES AND SO IF A LOT OF THEIR ECONOMIES DEPEND ON EXPORTING TO THE US AND IMPORTING FROM CHINA FOR PIECES OF PAPER THE US PRINTS THAT HAS NO CURRENT BACKING BECAUSE THE US IS FULL OF DEBTS, THEN IT IS AN OSTRICH HEAD IN THE SAND SCENARIO THAT WHEN IT FINALLY UNRAVELS WILL END IN TEARS FOR CHINA, THE US AND THE WORLD NEVER HAPPILY EVER AFTER.
NO MATTER HOW PAINFUL, THE US SHOULD STOP PAYING FOR GOODS WITH PIECES OF PAPER IT PRINTS THAT STORES MORE AND MORE TROUBLE FOR THE FUTURE AND START TO LIVE WITHIN ITS MEANS WHICH MEANS EVEN MORE BELT TIGHTENING. THIS MEANS CHINA’S ECONOMY TOO WILL SLUMP.
HOW COME NONE OF THE WORLD’S GENIUSES AND SAVVY ECONOMISTS REALIZE THIS?
Why people can never mean what they say:
So long as there is style in what a person says, he cannot mean what he says, cannot say what he means.
Because what he says has style or force changes that are meant to stir the recipient’s emotions to like (excited, thrilled, ‘happy’, funny), dislike (anger, hate, disgusted), be sad, hurt (sarcastic), confused or fearful, he wants others to be impressed, pleased, intimidated or dominated by what he says, he cannot mean what he says unless he says, “I intend to impress, please, intimidate or dominate you, I want to stir your emotions to like, dislike, be sad, hurt, fearful or agitated.
BECAUSE WHATEVER STYLISH PEOPLE SAY HAVE ACCOMPANYING FORCE CHANGES THAT IS INTENDED TO STIR LISTENERS TO LIKE, DISLIKE, BE SAD, HURT, AGITATED OR FEARFUL, THEY WANT TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE, UNLESS THEY STATE THIS, THEY CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY. RATHER THAN SECONDARY, THE INTENTION TO STIR EMOTIONS, TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE IS PRIMARY AND THE SUBSTANCE OF THE OCCASION IS SECONDARY AND SO EMOTIONAL PEOPLE CAN NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN BECAUSE IN ORDER TO DO SO THEY MUST STATE THEY WANT TO STIR YOUR EMOTIONS OR WANT TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE YOU.
Emotional people can never mean what they say because the accompanying style which they find more meaningful than the substance of the occasion which may itself be meaningless, is meaningless, the force prolonging, changing speed and loudness of what they say is meaningless and so they can never mean what they say.
THE STYLE OR FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS OF WHAT THEY SAY IS MEANINGLESS, THERE IS NEVER MEANING IN FORCE ACTING, THE EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION, FEAR) CONVEYED IN THE STYLE OF WHAT IS SAID IS MEANINGLESS AND SO THEY CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY THAT HAS ACCOMPANYING STYLE AND EMOTIONS THAT ARE MEANINGLESS.
Often the substance of what they say is meaningless eg deafening silence or niceties like ‘it’s a nice day’ or false (a lie). Always the style or force changes that they find meaningful, the emotions accompanying that they find meaningful are meaningless that they can never mean.
THUS I CAN SAY WITHOUT FEAR OF FALSITY THAT EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN, NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY WANT TO STIR YOUR EMOTIONS, WANT TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE YOU WHEN THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT TO DO, THEY CAN NEVER MEAN THE STYLE OR EMOTIONS OR FORCE CHANGES IN THEIR SPEECH THAT ARE MEANINGLESS.
YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG BUT IT IS A TORMENTING MEANINGLESS EXISTENCE TO NEVER SAY WHAT YOU MEAN, MEAN WHAT YOU SAY. ONLY THE PERSON WHO ALWAYS SAYS WHAT HE MEANS, MEANS WHAT HE SAYS HAS A MEANINGFUL JOYFUL EXISTENCE.
In heaven they always say what they mean:
In heaven they always say what they mean, mean what they say and there can be no misunderstandings, no misgivings. Why is that so?
Because there is no EVIL style in heaven.
THE PERSON WITHOUT STYLE ALWAYS MEANS WHAT HE SAYS BECAUSE THERE IS NO INTENTION OR MEANING TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE YOU THAT HE MUST INFORM YOU TO MEAN WHAT HE SAYS, THERE IS NO ACCOMPANYING EMOTION IN WHAT HE SAYS THAT HE MUST INFORM YOU IN ORDER TO MEAN WHAT HE SAYS.
THE PERSON WITHOUT STYLE ALWAYS SAYS WHAT HE MEANS BECAUSE THERE IS NO MEANINGLESS ACCOMPANYING STYLE OR EMOTION OR FORCE CHANGES THAT HE CANNOT MEAN AND SO EVERYTHING HE SAYS MINUS THE ABSENT MEANINGLESS STYLE IS FULLY MEANT.
APART FROM TELLING A DELIBERATE LIE OR SAYING SOMETHING THAT IS NONSENSE, A STYLE FREE PERSON CANNOT SAY WHAT HE DOES NOT MEAN BECAUSE THERE IS NO MEANINGLESS STYLE AND EMOTION IN WHAT HE SAYS TO DISQUALIFY HIM.
Disqualified by his style:
Do not underestimate the fundamental evil of style or the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness.
It is style that disqualifies a person from ever saying what he means (because he must say he intends to impress or please you, intend to stir your emotions in order to say what he means), and meaning what he says (he cannot mean the meaningless style and emotion accompanying what he says).
FURTHER STYLE NECESSITATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE BECAUSE THE CONSISTENT SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO CANNOT BE RENDERED FRESH BUT MUST BE REGURGITATED FROM MEMORY.
Whatever is rehashed is never meant:
Whatever is rehashed from a standardised recording that is meant for a variety of situations is never meant, it is a fake, counterfeit. Only something that is freshly composed for an occasion is truly meant.
THUS IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER YOU KNOW YOU ARE REHASHING OR NOT, HOW SINCERE YOU THINK YOUR WORDS ARE, SO LONG AS WHAT YOU SAY IS REHASHED, IT IS A FAKE OF THE REAL THING AND YOU CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT YOU SAY.
PEOPLE CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY ON TWO COUNTS:
- WHAT THEY SAY IS REHASHED AND THAT IS FAKED TRUE.
- WHAT THEY SAY HAS A STYLE THAT IS MEANT TO IMPRESS, PLEASE OR STIR EMOTIONS AND BECAUSE THESE ARE MEANINGLESS FORCE STIRRING, THEY CANNOT MEAN WHAT IS MEANINGLESS AND SO CAN NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY.
She cannot mean it:
She cannot mean what she is doing because what she is doing is not only showing you something (that is itself meaningless) but she is doing it with a smile as if she is liking it or it is fun. Because liking or fun is all about a meaningless stirring of mental force, she cannot mean the expression of meaningless stirred mental force that accompanies what she is doing that is also not fresh specific to the occasion but a rote or rehashed action (this is how she always holds to show objects that differs from others).
IT IS NEVER MEANINGFUL OR HAPPY EXISTENT THUS BUT IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING TO BE A ROBOT WITH A SUBSTANCE AND (MEANINGLESS) STYLE COMBO THAT CAN NEVER BE MEANT.
Gadhafi's son warns of civil war in Libya
Exactly what he has in mind can be known and what he said may not be what he meant which is, “opposition back off and let me rule or I will use force to crush you”.
IF HE MEANS TO THREATEN OPPOSITION TO BACK OFF AND LET THE STATUS QUO EXIST HE DID NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAID. HERE AS IN MANY PLACES PEOPLE NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN.Reading from a piece of paper:
You see people reading from a piece of paper or prompter, be they prime ministers, newsreaders, students, teachers or what nots and they see nothing wrong when it is deadly.
Often the speeches they read are prepared for them but it does not matter who you are (king or prime minister) or you prepared the speech yourself, by reading from a paper you are training yourself to mechanically, robotically rehash that have dire consequences in terms of insanity and future suffering.
CAN YOU IMAGINE JESUS OR THE BUDDHA READING FROM A PIECE OF PAPER? IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO DO SO, READING FROM A PIECE OF PAPER IS FOR FOOLISH PEOPLE WHO HAVE MOTIVE AND DESIRE TO SAY CERTAIN THINGS WITHOUT SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE OCCASION.
ALWAYS WHEN A PERSON READS FROM A PIECE OF PAPER HE IS ACTING MECHANICALLY, LIKE A ROBOT CONVERTING THE WRITTEN SPEECH INTO SOUNDS THAT IS NEVER HARMLESS BUT CONDITIONING ONESELF TO BE A REHASHING ROBOT.
People see others reading from a piece of paper and they fail to understand the true nature of what they see namely a robot mechanically rehashing from the paper that conditions them to become robots which is never a pleasure but tormenting.
Depending on a piece of paper:
If you can deliver your speech without need for the piece of paper that has your speech written, you are mad to do so. It is because you cannot deliver the speech without the piece of paper, you depend on the piece of paper that you have a piece of paper.
If you depend on a piece of paper in order to speak, you are insecure, if something happens that disrupts access to the piece of paper, you are in strife. Further the piece of paper is your boss that tells you what to say, not you the boss of the piece of paper.
Many people think routinely what they want to say when they meet another or when they are called to deliver a speech and this is planning that is memorized, with or without a piece of paper, often with the aid of mnemonics and when the occasion finally comes to deliver, they refer to this mental recording to render their speeches.
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER IT IS A PIECE OF PAPER OR A MENTAL RECORDING THAT YOU DEPEND ON FOR YOUR SPEECH, IF YOU DO SO, IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND YOU ARE INSECURE, SHOULD ANYTHING DISRUPT THE FLOW FROM THE MENTAL OR PHYSICAL PIECE OF PAPER YOU ARE IN STRIFE.
AND SO IF YOU ARE REHASHING ALL THE TIME FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX IN YOUR MIND, YOU ARE NOT THE BOSS BUT A MECHANICAL SLAVE OF THAT JUKEBOX AND WHEN IT SUFFERS GLITCHES AND WILL ULTIMATELY FAIL, YOU ARE DOOMED TO SUFFER MAD JUKEBOX SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR. MAD JUKEBOX SPEECH OR ACTIONS ARE ACTIONS AND SPEECHES THAT ARE STEREOTYPED THAT THE PERSON HAS ENACTED MANY TIMES BEFORE THAT HAVE GREAT AUTOMATISM AND IS NOW REHASHED INAPPROPRIATELY (AND THEREFORE MAD) THAT THE PERSON CANNOT STOP, HAS NO CONTROL OVER.
YOU MAY THINK YOU ARE NOT A ROBOT BUT A MARVELLOUS FULLY UNDERSTANDING PERSON BUT IF IT IS TRUE WHAT YOU SAY AND DO IS REHASHED FROM RECORDINGS IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX YOU HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH MAD ROBOTIC BEHAVIOUR AND THAT IS NEVER PLEASANT BUT EVEN TERRIBLE TORMENT.
If you can be stirred you are a slave:
If your mental force can be stirred by others you are a lowly slave not high master of yourself.
Thus if you can be provoked by others to be angry, no matter how righteous your anger you falsely perceive is, you are a slave in danger of suffering, of being sucked in to defend or attack.
If you can be provoked to be excited, greedy, lustful you are a lowly slave not master of yourself you delude yourself.
If you can be moved to sadness or be hurt or fearful, you are again a slave of others and things happening, not a lofty master of yourself.
IF YOU ARE STIRRED BY THINGS HAPPENING, BY OTHERS AND YOU DO NOT KNOW, YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING AND THAT TOO IS LOWLY. IF YOU ARE AWARE YOU CAN BE STIRRED BY OTHERS AND EVENTS THEN YOU ARE A SLAVE AT THE MERCY OF OTHERS AND EVENTS AND THAT TOO IS SUFFERING NEVER THE PLEASURE IT IS TOUTED TO BE.
Seeing and understanding rushing:
Most people have no difficulty seeing someone as rushing, in a hurry but you are making a big mistake if you think that because they can identify rushing when they see it, therefore they understand and have understanding.
BEING ABLE TO RECOGNIZE ‘RUSHING’ HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH UNDERSTANDING, IT IS ABOUT PERCEPTION, MEMORIZING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PERCEPTION THAT CONSTITUTES RUSHING AND REHASHING IN WORDS WHEN THE SAME SETS OF PERCEPTION RECUR.
You truly understand rushing when you see the nature of rushing and that is not so much the speed with which something is done but the accelerating speed and strength of force with which it is said and done. Rushing is a programmed way of saying and doing things that is partly for show because it is deemed superior (impress your boss how good an employee you are, impress others what an important and expert you are at your work) and partly conditioned, he is slave of his rushing that is driven by greed. It is impossible the person is doing something mindfully, specifically for the occasion when he rushes but rushing is always the accelerating rendition by rote of something said or done that the person has recorded how to do or say in the past.
TO BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY RUSHING WHEN IT OCCURS IS NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT JUST PROGRAMMING, YOU ARE PROGRAMMED TO RECOGNIZE RUSHING.
TO TRULY UNDERSTAND RUSHING YOU MUST SEE ITS NATURE AS IT TRULY IS, IT IS THE ACCELERATING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE RENDITION OF REHASHED SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT ARE PARTLY TO IMPRESS OTHERS AND PARTLY INVOLUNTARY, CONDITIONED. RUSHING IS ALWAYS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, STRESSFUL (WASTES ENERGY, RESTLESS AND DAZING) AND SO IT MUST BE CONTROLLED BUT SLOWLY OR RAPIDLY, INCITED BY OTHERS, THE PERSON SOON LOSES CONTROL TO BE INDUCTED INTO RUSHING OR RAPIDLY STEP UP THE TEMPO OF RUSHING UNTIL IT REACHES EVEN UNBEARABLE MAD INTENSITY. RUSHING IS DEADLY, A SIGN OF GREED AND IF NOT ELIMINATED BUT JUST CONTROLLED, IS A WALKING TIME BOMB THAT WILL KILL THE RUSHING FOOL.
The means becomes an end that will end in madness:
People in this world see nothing wrong, they applaud such feats as marvels when it is controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity for participants and those who appreciate.
If you need to cross a river and you improvise using two bamboo sticks then you won’t go mad. But if you copy others and it becomes a sports and you even do calisthenics whilst balancing on the bamboo pole then you have strayed from the meaningful, using two bamboos to cross a river into what is meaningless, treating the means to cross as an art, an end in itself.
WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS ACCORDING TO A PLAN COPIED FROM OTHERS THAT IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS HOW GOOD THEY ARE. THEY PRACTICE AND PRACTICE TO PROGRAM THEMSELVES BETTER AND IN THE PROCESS CONVERTED THEMSELVES INTO ROBOTS DEDICATED TO THE MEANS THAT HAS BECOME IN DELUSION, AN END IN ITSELF. THERE IS NEVER ANY TRUE MEANING IN WHAT THEY ARE DOING WHICH IS FOR SHOW AND SO THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY FOR SHOW THAT THEY AND YOU DO NOT BELIEVE, WILL END IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY LATER WHEN THEIR MINDS DEGENERATE.
I DON’T APPLAUD SUCH FEATS, IF YOU DO, YOU MAY HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB, NOT HEAVEN.
Why it is controlled insanity:
Seldom if not never is there a need to cross a river astride a bamboo pole using another bamboo pole for balance. Surely there are much safer and quicker ways across like a boat than risk drowning. And so the purpose for the pursuit is not crossing the river but the challenge of staying upright, to show to others how skilful you are or for rewards like a first prize. These are never genuine reasons for doing something, even if you are paid $1 million first prize that is not a true reason for crossing thus but it an inducement or bribe to do so.
BECAUSE THERE IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO RESORT TO SUCH A HAZARDOUS WAY TO CROSS A RIVER AND ITS PURPOSE IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, ONLY DELUDED PEOPLE CAN PRACTICE SUCH SPORT THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.
Gadhafi's vow: Will fight to 'last drop of blood'
Saying is easy, doing it may be another thing and if you were made to fight to the last drop of blood, then rather than heroic and glorious it may be terrible torment and physical suffering for you as well as your adversaries.
It is never reason that makes someone say thus but it is bravado, emotion or stirred mental force. What people do not realize is that their wish may be granted, there is God and there is life even many lives after death in which your emotional or force driven blind vow will be put to the test and you have to fight to the last drop of blood even many times.
THE WISE PERSON KNOWING HIS WORDS MAY BE PUT TO THE TEST AND IT WOULD BE TERRIBLE SUFFERING WILL ABSTAIN FROM SUCH BRAVADO THAT IS UNNECESSARILY HEAPING FUTURE SUFFERING ON ONESELF.
Make sure he does not run away:
If you say you will fight to the last drop of blood, you better make sure you don’t run away.
Often if not always, people speak heroically thus because they perceive they will prevail, they have the upper hand or are more powerful and it is the last drop of subordinates’ blood that they spill, not their own, at the first sign of danger, they flee the country with their precious life.
WHAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT THEY CAN BE BORN AS FIGHTING ANIMALS EG FIGHTING COCKS, FISH, BULLS WHERE THEY WILL TRULY HAVE TO FIGHT TO THEIR LAST DROPS OF BLOOD AND IF THAT IS TERRIBLE SUFFERING THEN THAT IS WHAT YOU VOWED THAT MUST BE FULFILLED, EG FIGHTING AS DOGS UNTIL YOU DIE.
Moran murder case 'overwhelming'
2:18pm Case against Judy Moran for execution of her brother-in-law is very strong, says prosecution.
Leave it to the jury or others to decide whether the case is overwhelming or not, it is unrighteous wanting jurors to convict with karma attached not truthful and meritorious to say so.
YOY HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY THE CASE FOR HER MURDERING IS SUCH AND SUCH, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY IT IS OVERWHELMING OR VERY STRONG WHICH IS INTENDED TO INFLUENCE THE JURY UNFAIRLY IN FAVOUR OF YOU AND SO YOU ARE HEAPING KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING SAYING SO.
Obtaining heavenly sensual bliss:
Bhikkhus, how does a god live with a godess?
Here, bhikkhus the husband abstains from destroying living things, taking the not given, misbehaving in sexual desires, telling lies, taking intoxicant and brewd drinks, is virtuous without evil thoughts of miserliness and selfishness and abides not scolding and abusing recluses and Brahmins. The wife too abstains from destroying living things, taking the not given, misbehaving in sexual desires, telling lies, taking intoxicant and brewd drinks, is virtuous without evil thoughts of miserliness and selfishness and abides not scolding and abusing recluses and Brahmins. Bhikkhus, thus a god lives with a godess.
Bhikkhus, these are the four kinds of living together.
Both are unvirtuous, greedy and abusive, a dead husband living with a dead wife.
An unvirtuous greedy abusive husband lives wi th a virtuous, generous wife not envying,
That's a godess living with a dead male. A generous husband too lives not envying
With an unvirtuous, greedy, abusive wife; that's a god with a dead female
If both husband and wife are generous restrained and live a righteous life
Pleasant to each other it's for an abundance of good, they live together.
Seeing both are virtuous, their enemies will be unhappy
They will lead a happy life here and enjoy heavenly sensual bliss after death. .
Careful who you praise:
If someone is evil and should not be praised and you praise him because you are deluded or to appease him, then you are heaping karma on yourself, not merit. Again if someone deserves to be praised and you deprecate that too will be for your demerit.
3. Avaõõà rahasuttaü - Suitable to be blamed.
009.03. Endowed with four things as though led and lain is in hell. What four?Without a thorough consideration and scrutiny praises that which should not be praised Without a thorough consideration and scrutiny depreciates that which should be appreciated. Without a thorough consideration and scrutiny, becomes pleased in which confidence should not be established. Without a thorough consideration and scrutiny becomes displeased in which confidence should be established. Endowed with these four things as though led and lain is in hell.
Endowed with four things as though led and lain is in heaven. What four?
Thoroughly considering and scrutinizing praises that which should be praised Thoroughly considering and scrutinizing depreciates that which should be depreciated. Thoroughly considering and scrutinizing, becomes pleased in which confidence should be established. Thoroughly considering and scrutinizing becomes displeased in which confidence should not be established. Endowed with these four things as though led and lain is in heaven.
Praising Dr M:
RPK has praised Dr M many times, even kissed his hand and said he agreed with some of the things Dr M espoused. Jesus said no good fruit can out of a bad tree and so if you think there is good and bad in everyone you may be right or deluded and firm in your delusion you meet your destiny, if that be woe, so be it.
Rejecting the Buddha:
You may say you are a Christian and don’t need and don’t believe in the Buddha and therefore you reject him. Without careful consideration, finding out who the Buddha is and what he said and did and you dismiss him as irrelevant that too will be to your demerit and future suffering.
Before you dismiss the Buddha make sure you find out who he is and thus knowing dismiss him otherwise you are a fool putting a noose around your neck Christian or not. You think God is on your side against the Buddha, but without God speaking to you that is a presumption that according to the Buddha is a defilement of your mind.
THE BUDDHA SAID HE IS NOT WORTHY OF CRITICISM, PERFECT IN EVERY WAY AND WORSHIP OF THE HIGHEST GIVES THE HIGHEST REWARDS AND SO REJECTION OF THE HIGHEST HAS PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES FOR YOU NOT THE BUDDHA.
The true reason for rejecting the Buddha:
That you are a Christian and Buddhism is alien to Christianity is not a true or valid reason for rejecting Buddhism. The valid or sane reason is if Buddhism is proved or seen as false & harmful.
BECAUSE REJECTING BUDDHISM BECAUSE IT IS ALIEN TO CHRISTIANITY IS THE WRONG REASON FOR REJECTION, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
A PERSON IS NOT GOOD BECAUSE HE IS YOUR FATHER OR BROTHER OR SON OR SAME RACE BUT HE IS GOOD ONLY BECAUSE HE IS GOOD AND SO IF YOU DEFEND SOMEONE JUST BECAUSE HE IS YOUR BROTHER THEN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
Fwd: Precious 10 Words
There is nothing precious about any words, it is just a word and it is the delusion and false perception of a person that he wants to inculcate in others that makes him say so.
Words have meaning that are assigned to it and ideally there is singular not plural meanings, the reason words have come to take on additional meanings is not because of the wondrous nature but the defiling nature of men that they deem it desirable, ‘enigmatic’ that a word can have multiple meanings. If a word has just one assigned meaning then there can be no confusion. It is the corruption (not development) of a word that it has come to take multiple meanings that becomes a source of mischief or word play by deluded men.
THUS IF YOU ARE DRAWN OR SUCKED INTO BY HIM TO FIND OUT WHAT THOSE WORDS ARE, YOU ARE GULLIBLE AND IN DANGER OF BEING DECEIVED BY OTHERS WITH EVEN DEADLY CONSEQUENCES, WITHOUT INVESTIGATING, I KNOW IT IS A LOAD OF RUBBISH, A WASTE OF TIME AND A MATTER OF DELUSION NOT SUBSTANCE.
A message but not words can be precious:
A message conveyed by words can be precious but never some words being precious and others worthless. Words are words which are like workhorses to convey assigned meaning, there is nothing precious about some words and hum drum about others, it is your advanced false perception that will end in your insanity that makes you perceive so.
Thus if I say that there is constant stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in the speech of others that is the cause of a person’s insoluble, renewing stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and necessitates a robotic rehashing existence and is the source of the person’s troubling emotions that can only be like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear then if these words are understood by you and you made effort to scrub off all stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness to experience a previously unattainable release from stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and this is the key to one eternity of heavenly existence, then the message I conveyed with those words is very precious because it released you from your stress and enabled you to go to heaven.
Again the Buddha described the second higher state of mind as a state of fully conscious cessation of all thinking, one pointed unified mind that is pleasant in abiding here and gives two eternities in heaven. If this is true and you succeeded in stopping thinking then the message conveyed in words (not the words themselves) is very precious.
WHEN HE TALKED ABOUT THE WORDS BEING PRECIOUS, HE IS LIKELY TO BE TALKING ABOUT THE EMOTIONS STIRRED BY THOSE WORDS AND BECAUSE EMOTIONS ARE ABOUT THE BLIND HARMFUL STIRRING OF FORCE, NOT ONLY IS HE DELUDED TO PERCEIVE WORDS AS PRECIOUS WHEN THEY ARE MERELY TOOLS TO CONVEY MEANING, HE IS DELUDED THAT STIRRED EMOTION OR FORCE IS PRECIOUS WHEN IT IS EVIL.
It is not a sin to be beautiful but:
It is not a sin to be born beautiful or handsome, it is a person’s karma that he or she is born handsome/beautiful or ugly but it is a sin to attend to it, exploit, advertise, augment and use it for seduction that incurs karma to be experienced as future suffering.
Thus a lot of vain women aware of their beauty, show their flesh in order to attract (stir the mental forces attractively of) others, they wear clothes and make up to augment their beauty and they become robots obsessed with their plans to beautify and flaunt themselves.
PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE MASTERS OF THEIR ENDEAVOURS TO ADVERTISE AND EXPLOIT THEIR BEAUTY BUT THEY ARE SLAVES OF PROGRAMS THEY HAVE WRITTEN FOR THEMSELVES HOW TO DO SO AND WILL END IN INSANITY OR TORMENT FOR THEM.
IT IS THEIR KARMA THAT THEY ARE BORN BEAUTIFUL BUT AS A RESULTS OF THEIR SINS EXPLOITING THEIR BEAUTY THEY ARE HEADED FOR WOE, EVEN ENDLESS WOES. WHAT GREAT FOOLS.
The difference between true and false understanding:
True understanding is something you either have or don’t, it cannot be cultivated or trained or conditioned because it is a matter of seeing things truly as they actually are.
If you do not see things as they actually are (because your mirror of sight is warped by force, by style in your seeing, by programming in your seeing, by like and dislike in your seeing) then no matter what, unless these are abrogated, you cannot see truly and therefore cannot truly understand.
TRUE AND FALSE UNDERSTANDING CAN NEVER CO-EXIST IN THE SAME PERSON, IT IS EITHER OF THE POSSIBILITIES.
TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS ALL OR NONE, IF YOU CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND SOMETHING YOU CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND ANYTHING PRESENTED TO YOU. A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING MAY NOT KNOW MANY THINGS BUT AS SOON AS HE SEES SOMETHING OR IS TOLD SOMETHING, HE IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTANDS AS IT ACTUALLY IS. TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS NEVER RECORDED AND REHASHED TO FIT THE OCCASION BUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING HAPPENS EACH TIME THE PERSON SEES.
BECAUSE FALSE UNDERSTANDING IS RECORDED AND REHASHED FROM RECORDING, IT IS HARD EVEN IMPOSSIBLE TO SHAKE OFF. WHEN AN OCCASION ARISES THAT TRIGGERS OFF THAT FALSE UNDERSTANDING IT IS AUTOMATICALLY TRIGGERED AND THAT IS HOW HE ALWAYS SEES AND UNDERSTANDS THAT SITUATION.
EMOTIONAL PEOPLE NEVER TRULY UNDERSTAND ANYTHING, THEY HAVE MANY MEMORIZED UNDERSTANDINGS OR MEANINGS OF THINGS THEY SEE AND HEAR AND THEY ARE FOREVER RELIVING THOSE RECORDED MEANINGS. INTELLIGENT PEOPLE HAVE MORE RECORDED MEANINGS AND CAPACITY TO RECORD MORE AND MODIFY MORE OF THOSE MEANINGS BUT THEY ARE MERELY SUPERIOR ROBOTS COMPARED TO THEIR STUPID COUSINS.
A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING NEVER HAS DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING, WHATEVER IS PRESENTED TO HIM HE EFFORTLESSLY IMMEDIATELY SEES IT AS EITHER TRUE OR FALSE, HARMFUL (EVIL) OR BENEFICIAL (GOOD).
The incomparable benefits of true understanding:
Only the person who possesses true understanding has a pleasant sane existence, the person with false understanding has a woeful existence because he does not truly understand anything.
You need true understanding to go to heaven where there is no one to persecute and make you suffer. Without true understanding you are detained here where try as you may, others will hound you and there is danger lurking everywhere.
EVERYTHING HE SEES OR HEARS HE EFFORTLESSLY UNDERSTANDS AS TRUE OR FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE, HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL, WHAT IS THERE TO SUFFER? IT THE MAN OF FALSE UNDERSTANDING WHO SEES STYLE AS SUBSTANCE AND SUBSTANCE AS STYLE, CANNOT TELL WHAT IS TRUE OR FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE, GOOD OR BAD WHO IS TORMENTED AND IN DANGER OF HARM BY OTHERS.
WHETHER YOU HAVE TRUE OR FALSE OR NO UNDERSTANDING IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED BY ANYONE, IS NOT AN ALLEGATION I CAN LEVEL AT ANYONE. IF YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTANDING, YOU MUST HAVE A WOEFUL EXISTENCE HERE AND YOU HAVE SUFFERING A VAST AS AN OCEAN OF WHICH YOU CANNOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT.
Style precludes true understanding:
The existence of style or the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness precludes or renders impossible true understanding.
THUS IT IS THE ABROGATION OF STYLE AND NOTHING ELSE THAT AUTOMATICALLY CONFERS TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO THE NOW STYLE FREE PERSON.
STYLE IS THE CAUSE OF NO UNDERSTANDING AND ITS DESTRUCTION, THE CURE FOR NO UNDERSTANDING.
Whatever is rehashed does not require any understanding because what is rehashed is already predetermined and what remains is selection and rendering as faithfully as possible from memory. Thus because everything, what he thinks, speaks and does is rehashed, there is a total lack of need for understanding and so even if you have true understanding to begin with, it dies of disuse as a result of a stylish existence.
True understanding is inimical to style:
True understanding is not only totally unnecessary for a stylish existence but its presence is an hindrance, renders uncomfortable even untenable a rehashing stylish existence.
Why is that?
ANYONE WHO HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL IMMEDIATELY WHAT HE IS DOING, USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE OTHERS, TO STIR EMOTION IN SELF AND OTHERS IS INSANE, CREATES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN SELF AND OTHERS, CONVERTS HIMSELF INTO A MINDLESS REHASHING ROBOT SUCH THAT IT IS A NO BRAINER THAT HE SHOULD PUT A STOP TO HIS CRAZY INSANE MEANINGLESS FOR SHOW STRESSFUL STYLE.
THUS NOT ONLY IS TRUE UNDERSTANDING NOT NEEDED FOR STYLE, ITS PRESENCE RENDERS STYLE UNCOMFORTABLE TO DISH OUT IF NOT OUTRIGHT INSANE, SUICIDAL.
DISHING OUT STYLE IS ACTUALLY CUTTING ONE’S OWN THROAT, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL CUT HIS OWN THROAT AND PRACTICE WHAT IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE.
