Major and minor merits:
Minor merit result in minor rewards like being born a rich man, born a king or prince, striking a lottery, born beautiful or being born for existence for hundreds thousands even millions of years in heavenly bliss in the lower reaches of heaven.
What are minor merits? They are like helping another, giving money or food or shelter, looking after your parents, not abusing, not stealing, telling lies, idle chatter, divisive speech, not harming and killing, not having illicit sex, drinking alcohol.
ALL THE MINOR MERITS PRACTICED DOES NOT EQUAL THE FIRST MAJOR MERIT OF ABOLISHING YOUR STYLE THAT PERSECUTES OTHERS.
The Buddha said kingship over men is meagre compared to heavenly bliss and major merit results in eternities of heavenly existence.
The first major merit that gives one eternity (billions of years) in heavenly bliss is to not constantly plying others with force by a cessation of style that constantly bombard others with force prolonging, changing speed and loudness that distresses others, maintains them in a similar prison.
The second higher major merit is to stop thinking (without thinking you cannot do evil) and it gives two eternities in heaven.
Thence not to stir one’s mental force to like or dislike is an even higher merit that gives 4 eternities of heavenly bliss.
Even when they whisper they are radiating force:
I have yet to come across a man or woman who when whispering, does not stretch his or her syllables, change speed and loudness and so no matter how tender or adoringly they may whisper, they are guilty of plying deadly forces on their loved ones that leads to stress and even death.
THERE IS NO NEED TO WHISPER EXCEPT TO FALSELY EXPRESS INTIMACY OR UNRIGHTEOUSLY HIDE ONE’S SECRET CONVERSATION. WHATEVER SAID, NO MATTER HOW CARING, DOES NOT NEED TO BE WHISPERED WHICH IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS WITH YOUR MOTIVATED CARE AND EVEN HERE THE PERSON IS GUILTY OF PLYING IS DEAR ONE WITH FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT LEADS TO DEATH AS THE FINAL END POINT. ALL BEINGS HERE HAVE A HAND IN THE DEATHS OF OTHERS BECAUSE THEY ARE KILLING OTHERS WITH FORCE IN THEIR STYLE, WITH STRESSING OTHERS.
THERE IS NO JUSTIFIED WHISPERING, ALL WHISPERING IS EVIL, A MATTER OF STYLE OR TRYING TO HIDE ONE’S CONVERSATION FROM OTHERS. IF THERE IS NOTHING EVIL ABOUT ONE’S CONVERSATION WHY EXCLUDE OTHERS BY WHISPERING?
It is always evil to stir emotions in others:
Rather than harmless, meritorious or pleasurable to stir emotions (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear) in others, it is always evil with demerit to be experienced as future suffering to do so.
Thus if you consciously want to stir others to be excited, ‘jump with joy’, angry, irritated, hateful, sad, hurt, agitated or confused or fearful, you are guilty of harming others and accruing demerit to experienced as future suffering that may last even an eternity.
WANTING TO STIR EMOTIONS MEANS WANTING TO STIR FORCE THAT IS HARMFUL AND ADDICTIVE IN OTHERS AND THEREFORE THERE IS SERIOUS DEMERIT NEVER MERIT AS PEOPLE IN THIS PEOPLE PERCEIVE IN DELUSION.
Very few go to heaven:
The Buddha:
If you don’t go to heaven then there is even an eternity of torment awaiting you building up a pile of skeleton as high as a mountain.
85. Few among men are those who cross to the farther shore (the safety of heaven). The rest, the bulk of men, only run up and down the hither bank.
86. But those who act according to the perfectly taught Dhamma will cross the realm of Death, so difficult to cross.
87-88. Abandoning the dark way, let the wise man cultivate the bright path. Having gone from home to homelessness, let him yearn for that delight in detachment, so difficult to enjoy. Giving up sensual pleasures, with no attachment, let the wise man cleanse himself of defilements of the mind.
89. Those whose minds have reached full excellence in the factors of enlightenment, who, having renounced acquisitiveness (no longer possessive), rejoice in not clinging to things -- rid of cankers, glowing with wisdom, they have attained Nibbana in this very life.
BECAUSE THIS WORLD IS IN TRUTH TERRIBLE TORMENT BUT THERE IS HEAVEN AND HEAVENLY BLISS, THE TRUTH MUST BE PREACH TO MEN BUT VERY FEW ARE WISE AND GOOD ENOUGH TO WASH THEIR HANDS OFF THIS WORLD TO ESCAPE TO SAFETY AND END OF TORMENT.
Microsoft losing its marbles:
I just installed the latest version of Firefox and it is noticeably improved, neater and perhaps faster. After the recent fuss about the Microsoft explorer, I am hard pressed to say how it is improved, in some ways it is harder to handle the previous one and it refuses me to use google search directly.
The latest of Microsoft Office too has many gimmicks and features that are not superior to the last one, in some ways I preferred the older version.
And so it is that Microsoft is barking up the wrong tree, enamoured by style with a lot of gimmicks eg waving lights and bars as Excel and Word loads. I would not bet on it remaining in ascendency as the computing world passes it by.
More details about Anwar sextape scandal:
By Kim Quek
This article was actually written yesterday (Mar 24), but upon completing the article, I was stunned by the explosive news of the sudden appearance of the trio behind the sex video. Concerned that my article might have been overtaken by this sudden turn of events, I withheld its release yesterday. However, upon a review of the latest events, I find that the technical insights and rationale put forward therein are still valid and pertinent to the issue at hand. I hence present my following article with the hope that it will add to the understanding of this fast evolving drama.
There is one simple way to find out whether ‘Datuk T’s’ pornographic video showing a look-alike of Anwar Ibrahim is a hoax, and that is to go to Anwar’s face book from your own face book account and look for his entries at the time when the video was supposed to be recorded, which is 10:23pm to 10:45pm on Feb 21, 2011.
I just did that, and I found that anwar made entries on that day at 10:40pm, 10:49pm, 10:50pm, for which he received 9 comments, 17 comments, 8 comments respectively. And thereafter, he made another 7 entries, up till 11:028pm. The fact that Anwar was actually posting messages in face book at the relevant time clearly indicates that Anwar couldn’t have been doing what was indicated in the video.
As jokingly exclaimed by Anwar during the press conference on Mar 21, hours after the exposure of the video: How could he be carrying out the sex act and typing on his computer at the same time? Obviously, ‘Datuk T’ had neglected to look up Anwar’s face book before he launched his pornographic piece.
(Does not totally exclude Anwar. Maybe Anwar was not online but a proxy was, just as it is unlikely Najib does anything himself on his website)
QUESTIONABLE TIME FRAME
Purely on a technical level, another question that puzzled me was: How could so many acts be compressed into the purported duration of 22 minutes as indicated in the video? Journalists who had viewed the video said that the love-making part lasted 17 minutes. This means that within the remaining 5 minutes, the following events had to be completed:
Pre-sex act:
· Anwar look-alike (Mr. X) walked into the room with the conductor who gave instruction to the prostitute who was already waiting there. The conductor left the room.
· The couple undressed.
· Woman went into the bathroom and took a bath, which should include wiping dry with a towel (the undressing and bathroom part of the video was skipped by ‘Datuk T’, but he said the woman took a bath).
Post-sex act:
· Mr.X wiped his lower part with tissue, and went into the bathroom to clean himself, which presumably included washing and wiping dry with a towel.
· Mr. X came out from the bathroom, dressed himself and walked off the room.
It should be obvious that when one tallies up the reasonable time allowed for completing each of these events, the total will far exceed 5 minutes. This conflict of time frames further undermines the credibility of the video clip.
PLOT IMPLAUSIBLE
‘Datuk T’ said that the sex romp took place in a Spa which provides sex in Kuala Lumpur.
Will anyone believe that opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim – who has been subjected incessantly to all sorts of cruel and unjust political persecution for the past 13 years, branded as enemy number one, for which the ruling power has been desperate to see that he is politically annihilated – would even condescend to walk into a place of such disrepute at the peak hours, where he would be instantly recognized by almost everyone present there, not to mention having sex with a prostitute in the same place? Haven’t ‘Datuk T’ and the plotters behind him overstretched their imagination, if they think the people would swallow such a story?
‘Datuk T’ also claimed that Anwar sent him to the room to look for his lost watch.
If Anwar had patronized a prostitute in the room, would he be so foolish as to send someone to the room to look for his watch? Wouldn’t that stupid act amount to a virtual confession to others what misdeed he had done there? And wouldn’t that confession spell the end of his political career? Who will believe that Anwar would value the watch more than his family, his political career and the destiny of his country and his people?
Despite the indefatigable effort of the ruling power to fix Anwar all these years, has it produced an iota of evidence of his political or moral misconduct, such as corruption, abuse of power, religious or moral sins?
If Anwar has shown none of these weaknesses, why should Malaysians believe ‘Datuk T’ in preference over Anwar, when what the former has displayed so far is nothing but crass acts of character assassination that serves the evil design of his political masters?
Ezam calls for Anwar's passport to be impounded
NEWS/COMMENTARIES
Friday, 25 March 2011
Here is another fool unnecessarily putting a noose of future suffering around his neck.
It would be trouble for Anwar to have his passport impounded and so he is advocating trouble for Anwar and will himself head for trouble. If in addition his call is unwarranted, that compounds his sin and more suffering due.
If you think he is nevertheless a good man and Anwar is the bad one you are incurably deluded.
THAT SUCH A FOOL CAN BE GOOD IS IMPOSSIBLE.
Exploiting your false perception:
It is not an accident that this picture was used to front the cover of a book but it is exploiting the false perception of ordinary people that a smiling man is happy, lovely, good, trustworthy.
All this is a result of ordinary people’s false perception. It is actually controlled madness smiling thus because it is meaningless, for show and the practice of what is meaningless for show leads to madness, Mahathir or not.
THE PERSON WHO SEES HIM PRACTICING WHAT IS SILLY, MEANINGLESS THAT IS NOT HARMLESS BUT LEADS TO INSANITY SEES AND UNDERSTANDS CORRECTLY. THE PERSON WHO IS TAKEN IN TO THINK HE IS NOT SUCH A BAD GUY AFTER ALL IS DELUDED OR HAS WRONG VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
HIS SMILE IS INFECTIOUS BECAUSE THERE ARE FORCE CHANGES CONVEYED THAT STIRS THE MENTAL FORCES OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EMOTIONAL TO LIKE OR HATE HIM.
Set up independent panel to verify video, says Zaid
PETALING JAYA: Kita president Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has come forward to say that he has watched the sex video of a man resembling Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim with a foreign prostitute.
Zaid is careful to cultivate an air of neutrality but his criticism of DAP and PAS stance exposes his true sentiment that is attacking Anwar and PKR.
IT IS ACTUALLY NONE OF HIS BUSINESS TO GET INVOLVED IN THIS AFFAIR AND HIS INVOLVEMENT EXPOSES HIS TRUE NATURE AS UNSAVOURY IN LINE WITH ALL THE OTHER PIECES OF EVIDENCES AVAILABLE. HE IS A BIASED SELF SERVING MAN AND WHAT HE SAYS IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED.
Proof lies in the video, Anwar
Comment
By Joceline Tan
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's political allies must insist that the controversial sex video be sent for scientific testing if they are sincere about his political survival.
What she says is false that the proof lies in the video and even if the video is genuine she is asking for punishment because she is falsely being friendly speaking personally like she is concerned, ‘Anwar’.
IT IS NOT BECAUSE SHE KNOWS IT IS TRUE THAT THE PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO THAT SHE SAYS SO BUT SHE IS TRYING TO EXERT PRESSURE AND YET SHE IS BEING HYPOCRITICAL IN ADDRESSING ANWAR PERSONALLY. THERE IS NO NEED TO GET SO INTIMATE AND IT IS NEVER GENUINE BUT CONDESCENDING AND SO EVEN IF PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO SHE IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT FOR BEING A HYPOCRITE.
Zaid may have been a mole all along:
Rather than genuinely falling out with UMNO and then being disenchanted with PKR, Zaid may have been a mole all along and when he was making little head way, his political masters may have decided that an engineered split from PKR would be politically more advantageous in showing dissension in the opposition and also splintering the opposition support.
Why ‘proof lies in the video’ is false:
It may or may not be possible to prove that the video is genuine or faked through the video, it is impossible that even with a cursory viewing that she may or may not have undertaken she has no right to say proof lies in the video.
WITHOUT BEING CERTAIN ‘PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO’ SHE IS NOT ENTITLED TO SAY SO AND EVEN IF SHE HAD VIEWED THE VIDEO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FROM JUST A SINGLE HASTY VIEWING THAT SHE CAN KNOW ‘PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO’ AND THEREFORE SHE IS SPEAKING FALSELY WITH KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING IN A MATTER WHICH IS ACTUALLY NONE OF HER BUSINESS. IT IS NOT HER BUSINESS TO TELL ANWAR PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO AND BECAUSE SHE SAID SO, SHE IS ASKING FOR JUDGMENT AND PUNISHMENT. SHE HAS ADDITIONAL PUNISHMENT FOR SPEAKING SO INTIMATELY TO ANWAR.Never a true reason to expose Anwar:
Apart from a pious pronouncement of a top level police team to investigate the authorities are allowing a free for all by all and sundry, pressmen and women, politicians of all strips to have a go at Anwar on the basis of a sex tape.
THERE IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO EXPOSE ANWAR, WHAT HAPPENED IS NOT JUSTIFIED UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES (THE JUSTIFICATION IS TO DESTROY ANWAR AND WIN VOTES) AND IF YOU THINK SO YOU ARE DELUDED. THE BUDDHA SAID HE WILL ONLY SPEAK IF SOMETHING IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL TO OTHERS. IF SOMETHING IS TRUE BUT NOT BENEFICIAL HE WILL NOT SPEAK AND SO IF THIS REVELATION IS TRUE AND UNBENEFICIAL THERE IS NO REASON TO SPEAK OUT AND IF YOU DO YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN MADNESS.
WHAT IS THE REASON FOR SPEAKING OUT? AN ELECTION AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE ALL THESE UMNO OPERATIVES INCLUDING DATUK IS TRYING TO RESCUE PKR FROM SINFUL LYING ANWAR BUT THEY WANT TO ATTACK AND DESTROY ANWAR SO THAT GULLIBLE VOTERS WILL VOTE BN.
THE REASON FOR THIS EXPOSURE IS ILL WILL, TO DESTROY ANWAR AND COURT VOTERS AND THAT IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO EXPOSE ANWAR. THUS ALL THOSE WHO JOIN IN TO STAB ANWAR ARE UNRIGHTEOUS SLIPPING A NOOSE AROUND THEIR NECKS TO EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING. EVEN IF ANWAR IS A DEBAUCHER, HIS ASSAILANTS ARE HEADING FOR THE CLIFF.
Liz Taylor laid to rest at Forest Lawn:
This too is a collectively accepted delusion, she is not ‘laid to rest’ (impossible for anyone to see so) but she is buried at Forest Lawn.
‘LAID TO REST’ IS A FALSE NICETY THAT PEOPLE HAVE COME TO ACCEPT AS TRUE, SHE IS BURIED NOT LAID TO REST AND IT IS NOT SEMANTICS BUT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES TO CALL BURYING LAID TO REST.
You mean BN is a virtuous alternative?
If by exposing Anwar you are trying to save the electorates and PKR from the arms of a deceitful liar in Anwar, you mean BN is the savior, is a bastion for virtue?
WHAT IS THE POINT OF EXPOSING ANWAR AND DRAWING VOTERS BACK TO BN IF BN IS ITSELF CORRUPT? ATTACKERS AND PEOPLE ARE DELUDED THAT THE CURRENT SCANDAL IS DERIVED FROM GOODWILL BUT IT IS DRIVEN BY ILL WILL TO DESTROY ANWAR AND DISCREDIT THE OPPOSITION FOR SELF SERVING GAINS. HOW IS IT THAT THE SOURCE OF EXPOSURE IS UMNO WHICH STANDS TO GAIN FROM ANWAR’S DEMISE?
If UMNO would admit they are morally no better then what is the point of exposing this scandal? BN stands to gain from this scandal and they are the source of this scandal and so the motive is evil and even if it is true, those involved are headed for a reckoning with weeping and gnashing of teeth.
No rest for Elizabeth Taylor:
If you asked the Buddha where she has now gone to, He can tell you and it is not possible it is to a place of rest because her life of debauchery on and off screen renders that impossible and so it is false to say (without knowing it is true) that she has been laid to rest at Forest Lawn.
ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA ALL BEINGS HERE HAVE A DESTINATION AFTER THEY DEPART THAT CAN BE HELL, ANIMAL WOMB, GHOST, HUMAN FORM (RARE) OR HEAVEN. REST IS NOT WHAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE HEADING FOR BECAUSE THEY ARE HEADING FOR WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH AND SO IT IS FALSE TO SAY SHE HAS BEEN LAID TO REST THERE. SHE HAS ABANDONED HER BODY OR FORCED TO ABANDON HER BODY WHICH IS NOW LIFELESS BUT SHE HAS MOVED ON.
Tamby Chik the sinner saving the nation from sinner Anwar?
Tamby Chik himself had to step down as CM because of a sex scandal with a young Malay girl for which Guan Eng was wrongly imprisoned and so he cannot claim high moral grounds or to rescue the nation from sex maniacs like Anwar when he himself is guilty and what is the point of transferring faith in one maniac Anwar to another maniac?
THUS IT CANNOT BE HIGH MORAL GROUND AND FOR THE GOOD OF VOTERS THAT IS THE CAUSE OF THIS UPROAR BUT IT IS REVENGE, TO DESTROY ANWAR AND ENTICE VOTERS FROM ONE DEVIL TO THE ARMS OF ANOTHER DEVIL.
The pot calling the kettle black:
The persons behind the sex tape are aligned with the ruling coalition and those who stand to benefit from Anwar’s demise is the ruling coalition.
This Anwar sex scandal may make sense if the alternative to Anwar, the ruling coalition is clearly superior in terms of morality and lack of corruption compared to Anwar. If they are not superior, even worse than Anwar (eg murder of Altanturya) then the premise of this crisis is absurd, a case of the black pot calling the kettle black when the pot’s blackness disqualifies it from the moral high ground of wagging its finger. This is lost on many people even highly educated ones who see no irony or absurdity of the scandal that may all be fabricated.
THE POT CALLS THE KETTLE BLACK AND THEREFORE HEAR YE, YOU SHOULD VOTE FOR THE POT NOT THE KETTLE. DOES THAT NOT SOUND SILLY? IF IT DOES NOT YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION.
Bankrupt politics:
The black pot (UMNO) is announcing with much fanfare that the kettle (Anwar) is black and so voters should shun the black kettle and embrace the pot (that is also just as black if not blacker). But what is the point of abandoning the black kettle for the black pot? Might as well stay put and try Anwar for a change.
This is bankrupt politics, if you are black you should know it and stop asking voters to judge on the basis of blackness except that you are stupid and voters are stupid.
IF YOU YOURSELF ARE ALSO BLACK YOU SHOULD LOOK TO SELL YOURSELF TO VOTERS ON SOME OTHER POINTS LIKE MANAGEMENT SAVVY NOT BLACKNESS.
Note the timing:
It is too coincidental to be genuine that each time UMNO or ruling elite is struggling or in danger of being toppled, it should be so lucky as to be saved by an Anwar sin.
Thus in 1997, when Dr M was under pressure to quit, he should find an Anwar who is obligingly abusive of his power and a secret sodomist when all along Dr M knew but did not take issue except when the tables are turned on him. (Dr M has unwittingly admitted in retrospect that this first is fabricated when he said the first sodomy was fabricated so it is unlikely sodomy II is fabricated)
Then comes Sodomy II when Najib is under pressure from the Altanurya case and BN was in danger of being toppled by defections.
Now for the third time when elections are imminent, feckless Anwar should conveniently oblige by embroiling himself in another sex scandal.
THUS EITHER ANWAR IS A REAL JONAH OR IT IS NOT A COINCIDENCE BUT DESPERATE TIMES CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES OR FABRICATION. AS THE BUDDHA SAID THOSE WHO FEEL NO SHAME AT TELLING A LIE WILL DO ANYTHING, MURDER AND WHATEVER TO ACHIEVE THEIR AIMS.
The fabricated first make the rest likely to be fabricated:
Each time the ruling elite is under crisis, its nemesis Anwar the Jonah should so obligingly embroil himself in some personal indiscretion so as to knock him out of the political equation.
On the contrary to Dr M’s perverted false logic, the fact that the first sodomy was fabricated as he unwittingly admits makes it more likely even a certainty that the same people will do the same, fabricate again and again to get what they want.
A purveyor of truth who does not understand truth:
As a newsman or newswoman you are a reporter of news or facts and de facto conversant in what is true.
Therefore a newswoman by profession should understand what she says and therefore never professionally say something false and if she does she is guilty of misleading the masses with greater karma.
“The proof is in the tape, Anwar” is her opinion, not news and so she is straying from reporting the truth and she wants to influence the masses with her opinion that turns out to be false.
By saying ‘the proof is in the tape, Anwar’, the reporter is implying she knows the proof is in the tape. This proof can either be that the tape is genuine or faked and so she implies that just from the tape she knows whether the tape is true or false, and the answer is that in her opinion it is genuine.
What is the point of calling for investigations and examination of the tape when a reporter can know immediately after a cursory viewing ‘the proof is in the tape, Anwar’?
Therefore she is speaking falsely, it is impossible she knows that the proof is in the tape and she is speaking without understanding what she says. If she perceives she is right or true in what she says or she speaks without knowing what she says is true (she does not refrain from speaking what she is not sure is true) then she is courting insanity and will become insane.
SHE IS OFFERING HER OPINION NOT REPORTING THE NEWS WHICH IS HER DUTY AND THAT OPINION IS BASED ON FALSE OR NO UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE IT IS FALSE, SHE CANNOT IN TRUTH KNOW THAT THE PROOF IS IN THE TAPE BECAUSE IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE SHE CAN EXCLUDE THAT THE TAPE IS DOCTORED EVEN IF SHE SAW THE TAPE HERSELF.
The sin of proffering opinion as news:
“The proof is in the tape” is never the news or a factual report of what has happened but her opinion and it is false because it is impossible she knows the proof of whether the tape is genuine or doctored is in the tape itself.
IT REFLECTS THE CORRUPTION OF MODERN TIMES THAT OPINIONS AND ANALYSIS OR INTERPRETATION OF NEWS HAVE BECOME AN INTEGRAL PART AND EVEN INDUSTRY IN THE NEWS WORLD.
THE SOLE DUTY OF A REPORTER IS TO GATHER AND PRESENT THE NEWS OR TRUTH OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND SHE SHOULD KEEP HER OPINIONS TO HERSELF BECAUSE IF IT IS FALSE OR VESTED THERE IS PENALTY TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING FOR MISLEADING THE MASSES.
DID SHE TELL READERS THIS IS HER OPINION, NOT NEWS THAT ‘THE PROOF IS IN THE TAPE’?
Talk to Anwar personally not broadcast over media:
She is addressing Anwar by saying ‘the proof is in the tape, Anwar’ and that is inappropriate. If you want to speak to Anwar, call him and address him personally, not broadcast it on the media without avenue for reply by Anwar.
HEREIN IS AGAIN KARMA, BROADCASTING PUBLICLY WHAT IS A PERSONAL MESSAGE TO ANWAR. FURTHER SHE CANNOT BE SINCERE BUT SHE IS DISINGENUOUS OR HYPOCRITICAL ADDRESSING ANWAR PERSONALLY AND HERE IS FURTHER KARMA. THUS IT IS THAT THE BUDDHA SAID ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE FORGING BOND AFTER BOND WITH SUFFERING DUE THEM THAT IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND TAKE ETERNITIES TO REPAY FOR THE WRONGS THEY HAVE DONE OTHERS.
Unfair fight:
She has access to Star to broadcast across the media what is an attacking message whilst Anwar is denied the opportunity to similarly reply using Star and so it is an unfair fight using Star to attack Anwar without giving Anwar similar access to Star.
IF YOU ENGAGE IN AN UNFAIR FIGHT YOU ARE GUILTY OF BULLYING WITH PUNISHMENT DUE.
Did Anwar ask her to tell and need her to tell him?
Did Anwar ask her to tell him that the proof lies in the tape? If Anwar did not ask her and she broadcasts that, she is guilty of illogic, of answering without being asked and that is conditioning her to what is insane and she is headed for insanity.
IF ANWAR ASKED HER WHERE IS THE PROOF, THEN SHE HAS REASON TO SAY, THE PROOF LIES IN THE TAPE, ANWAR. BECAUSE ANWAR NEVER ASKED HER THAT SHE IS BEHAVING INAPPROPRIATELY, PRESUMPTUOUSLY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
Prove it was not you in sex video, Chua tells Anwar
Here is another deluded man adding more karma for himself.
The onus is not on Anwar to prove he is not the man in the video but the onus is on his accusers to prove Anwar is the man in the video.
THE IMPLICATION IS TO FALSELY IMPLY ANWAR IS GUILTY AND SO HE MUST ABSOLVE HIMSELF. ANWAR DID NOT MAKE THE VIDEO AND SO THE ONUS IS ON THOSE WHO PUBLICIZED THE VIDEO TO PROVE IT IS ANWAR AND HERE IS A FOOL TALKING WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SPEAKS. HE IS ATTACKING ANWAR WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHAT HE SAYS.
Proof is beside the point:
Proof is not relevant to what has happened and it is only necessary if a person has vested interest in convicting Anwar of wrongdoing or you are interested in absolving yourself.
IF THIS TAPE WAS FABRICATED THOSE INVOLVED HAS DEADLY KARMA BECAUSE IT SERIOUSLY DAMAGED THE REPUTATION OF ANOTHER THAT EVEN IF HE PROVED HIMSELF INNOCENT, THE DIRT STILL STICKS IN SOME AND IT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE TO PROVE HE IS INNOCENT EVEN IF THAT IS THE CASE. A DISCERNING PERSON CAN DETECT IRREFUTABLE SIGNS THE TAPE IS DOCTORED BUT THOSE WHO ARE EMOTIONAL AND PARTISAN CAN BE DEAD SURE THE TAPE IS GENUINE.
PROVING IS ONLY NECESSARY IF YOU WANT TO UNRIGHTEOUSLY CONVICT THE PERSON BASED ON THE TAPE OR YOU ARE DESIROUS OF ABSOLVING YOURSELF. IF YOU ARE DETACHED FROM THIS WORLD, DO NOT CARE FOR YOUR REPUTATION, WHAT DOES IT MATTER IF THEY THROW ALL KINDS OF MUD AT YOU?
If you think this episode demands proof you are deluded, it has nothing to do with what happened. The culprits have done something that has deadly karma for them, even if Anwar can prove himself innocent the mud will still stick in some people’s minds. What is proof to some may not be to another.
Why Soi Lek is wrong:
What Soi Lek is saying is that if Anwar fails to prove he is not the man in the tape he is guilty and that is false.
EVEN IF ANWAR CANNOT PROVE HE IS NOT THE MAN IN THE TAPE IT IS NOT NECESSARILY TRUE HE IS GUILTY AND SO SOI LEK IS GUILTY OF BIZARRE LOGIC THAT LEADS TO INSANITY.
Proof is only necessary if you want to convict Anwar unfairly:
Proof that Anwar is not the man in the tape is only necessary if you want to convict Anwar based SOLELY on a tape whose authenticity is not certain, if you have no desire to convict Anwar there is no need for proof.
Why does Soi Lek want to convict Anwar?
It is not because he is so altruistic or concern for the welfare of voters but because he wants to exploit the tape to besmirch and discredit Anwar for selfish gains.
IF YOU ARE EAGER TO CONVICT ANOTHER TO DEMAND PROOF HE IS NOT THE MAN DEPICTED WHEN THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE TAPE IS NOT ASSURED FOR SELFISH GAIN, YOU ARE ACTING UNRIGHTEOUSLY WITH DEADLY KARMA ACCRUED.
To convict Anwar you must prove he is the man:
In order to convict Anwar police must prove the man in the tape is Anwar and that means essentially to prove that the tape is authentic not doctored.
Thus Soi Lek is talking nonsense, convicting Anwar presumptuously and demanding him to prove he is not the man.
THE ONUS IS ON ANWAR’S ACCUSERS TO PROVE THE TAPE IS AUTHENTIC NOT ON ANWAR TO PROVE HE IS NOT THE MAN AND SO SOI LEK IS TALKING NONSENSE THAT IS NEVER HARMLESS BUT LEADS TO INSANITY.
THE CRUX OF THE MATTER:
WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT SOME VESTED SCRURRILOUS PEOPLE HAS PUBLICIZED A SEX TAPE PURPORTEDLY TO BE OF ANWAR.
IF SOCIETY AND EVERYONE HAS NO INTEREST IN JUDGING ANWAR AND CONVICTING HIM OR EXPLOITING IT FOR POLITICAL MILEAGE THEN THE MATTER SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO REST AS IT IS, NAMELY A TAPE HAS SURFACED PURPORTEDLY DEPICTING ANWAR IN SEXUAL ACTS. IF POLICE OR AUTHORITIES WANT TO CONVICT ANWAR THEN THEY MUST PROVE HE IS THE MAN IN THE TAPE AND THAT MEANS ESSENTIALLY THAT THE TAPE IS AUTHENTIC. IT IS PROOF ANWAR’S ENEMIES HAVE VESTED INTEREST THAT THEY HAVE ALL ACTED IN CONCERT TO IMPLY ANWAR’S GUILT AND DEMAND HE PROVE HIMSELF INNOCENT. EVEN THIS IS PROOF HIS ENEMIES ARE SCURRILOUS, UNRIGHTEOUS, WANT TO STOMP ON A MAN LYING ON THE FLOOR.
They are all jumping in to gang rape Anwar:
It is like a feeding frenzy with everyone, the press, Soi Lek, UMNO operatives, Zaid and supposed independents to imply Anwar is guilty and must prove himself innocent.
THAT AFTER SUCH RABID IN CONCERT EXPLOITING OF THE AFFAIR TO IMPLY ANWAR IS GUILTY EVEN BEFORE IT IS PROVEN MAKES IT HIGHLY UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE ALLEGATION IS GENUINE.
THEY THINK THEIR MOTIVES ARE OPAQUE, INCONSTRUABLE TO OTHERS AND THE PUBLIC IS CLUELESS AS TO IMPETUS BEHIND THE SCANDAL BUT THE OVERZEALOUS IMPLICATION OF GUILT EXPOSES VESTED INTERESTS AND RENDERS THE SCANDAL SUSPECT.
Jesus: Let the man who has not sinned cast the first stone
Even if Anwar is guilty his adversaries, the press et al are acting unrighteously with deadly karma due in ganging up, jumping on him in chorus even when the tape has not been proven genuine.
If the tape is a fraud, they will be guilty of even greater sin condemning a man before proving he is guilty.
THUS ALL THE PEOPLE JOINING IN THE FRAY TO ATTACK ANWAR DO NOT REALIZE THE DEADLY KARMA TO BE REPAID IN FUTURE SUFFERING THEY ARE UNDERTAKING FOR THEMSELVES AS A RESULT OF IGNORANCE AND FOOLISHNESS ALLIED TO ILL WILL.
Unseemly haste to condemn Anwar:
There are those who had seen the tape who questioned its authenticity and so bearing in mind its illicitly obtained nature, the wise and fair person would withhold condemnation yet all these people are jumping in to condemn Anwar even before it has been confirmed. This is the action of a person of no integrity and so all those who have jumped into attack Anwar have no integrity.
How come Soi Lek does not defend Anwar?
How come Soi Lek and others never say, ‘hey, this has not been proven yet, there are those who have seen the tape who question its authenticity so let us wait for an expert opinion before we condemn Anwar or write him off’?
Instead they are eager to add more fuel to the fire indicating this is an vested affair.
WHERE IS THE SENSE OF FAIR PLAY?
Sex tape has discredited Anwar’s adversaries not Anwar so far:
There can only be one objective in publicly releasing the sex tape and it is to discredit Anwar. Yet on the contrary, Anwar’s reputation is so far intact but by their presumptuous rabid attacks on Anwar, his adversaries like Zaid, Ezzam, Soi Lek, Joceline Tan have definitely and permanently discredited themselves.
The purveyors of the tape, the three datuks are all people of disrepute and you would be circumspect in accepting what they want to sell you without objective proof it is a genuine article and there are dissenting voices, people who have seen the tape have said it is not Anwar.
By all jumping in to discredit Anwar, his critics have instead proven themselves to people of no integrity whilst Anwar has not been discredited pending objective proof the tape is genuine.
WHY ABANDON ANWAR WHO HAS SO FAR NOT BEEN DISCREDITED TO EMBRACE PEOPLE WHO HAVE OBJECTIVELY DISCREDITED THEMSELVES BY THEIR UNSEEMING HASTE TO STICK THE KNIFE INTO ANWAR? UNLESS THEY CHANGE (UNLIKELY) PEOPLE LIKE EZZAM, ZAID, JOCELYN TAN, SOI LEK HAVE PROVEN THEMSELVES TO BE MORALLY UNSOUND.
There is only one way to truly understand the affair so far and it is that there is ground to defend Anwar and no grounds to condemn Anwar (yet) because the purveyors are disreputable people and there are people who have viewed the tape who dispute it is Anwar. Thus all those who have jumped in to attack Anwar and demand he prove his innocence have proven themselves to those who are discerning that they are hypocrites and unethical. If you disagree or view differently you have wrong view that leads to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.
A clincher may be examining the voice of Anwar:
It is harder to fake the voice of Anwar, its tonal characteristics and the typical way Anwar speaks. Anwar’s voice if it appears on the tape can establish whether the tape is genuine or not. If in the tape Anwar is unusually silent, it is suspect. It is hard to imitate Anwar’s style of talking and the frequency spectrum of the voice can expose it is a fake. Thus if in the tape Anwar remains silent or he talks sparingly in a way that departs from the way Anwar usually talks, it must be a fake.
Further if there are shots of Anwar’s face that does not include his private parts it is suspiciously doctored. Only if there are shots with Anwar’s likeness that includes his private parts will it be genuine proof it is Anwar performing not a trick of showing a genuine Anwar eg in T shirt without his trousers off and shots with Anwar’s private parts being serviced whilst Anwar’s face is not revealed.
IF YOU WANT TO FAIRLY CONVICT ANWAR YOU MUST OBJECTIVELY PROVE IT IS HIM. WITHOUT HAVING EXCLUDED IT IS DOCTORED AND YOU CONVICT HIM YOU ARE UNRIGHTEOUS, HEADED FOR SUFFERING.
Proof that people do not understand:
What has happened, the revelation of an Anwar sex tape, can be truly understood in its entirety but reflecting their lack of true understanding, people have failed to understand truly what the sex tape scandal is about.
WHAT IS THE TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED?
IT IS THAT THE PURPOSE FOR EXPOSING THE TAPE IS TO DISCEDIT ANWAR AND RATHER THAN DISCREDIT ANWAR, THE TAPE HAS UNWITTINGLY DISCREDITED ALL ANWAR’S CRITICS SO THAT THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING CAN KNOW THEIR TRUE UNETHICAL NATURES. YOU CAN WRITE OFF PEOPLE LIKE EZZAM, ZAID, SOI LEK AND JOCELYN TAN BECAUSE THEY HAVE EXPOSED THEMSELVES AS UNETHICAL IN PROCLAIMING ANWAR IS GUILTY AND SHOULD BE DISCREDITED.
SO FAR ANWAR HAS NOT BEEN DISCREDITED BECAUSE THE PURVEYORS OF THE TAPE ARE DISREPUTABLE PEOPLE AND YOU WOULD BE A FOOL TO ACCEPT AT FACE VALUE WHAT THESE VESTED PEOPLE PRESENT. IF IT WAS KARPAL SINGH OR LIM KIT SIANG WHO IS THE MESSENGER THEN YOU WOULD GIVE IT MORE CREDENCE. FURTHER THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SEEN THE TAPE WHO DISPUTE IT IS ANWAR.
IF YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND YOU WILL BE CONFUSED BY EVENTS AND OTHERS AND THIS IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND THENCE YOU ARE HEADED FOR PERDITION NOT HEAVENLY BLISS.
HOW MANY IF ANY CAN SPEAK LIKE I DO? WHAT IS SO DIFFICULT OR EXOTIC ABOUT WHAT I SAY THAT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO SPEAK THUS? IF YOU CANNOT SPEAK LIKE THIS AND I CAN, HOW CAN YOU BE MY EQUAL?
Shot themselves in the foot:
Anwar’s adversaries and their allies in the press think they are very clever, nobody can know for sure but they have actually shot themselves in the foot rather than shot down Anwar.
Reflecting the gullible un-understanding nature of ordinary people, they are clueless. They may not like what is happening but they are not sure.
They have exposed themselves to be unethical in condemning Anwar without having conclusively proven Anwar is the man in the tape.
Not sure it is a conspiracy? You don’t understand:
This sex tape revelation is definitely a conspiracy.
If Anwar visits prostitutes it would not be de novo but he must have been doing it in the past.
The reason why sexual scandals that involve Dr M, Daim and many others including current leaders (Rais Yatim have allegations) have never come to the surface is not because they are well concealed or isolated but the full weight of the system ensures that they are concealed from the public gaze, only rumours circulate.
Thus if Anwar is a sexual pervert it must be longstanding and they would have caught him red handed long ago so why all of a sudden this tape surfaces?
IF ANWAR IS DIRTY HE MUST HAVE A HISTORY AND WITH POWERFUL ENEMIES ARRAYED AGAINST HIM HE IS UNLIKELY TO HAVE ESCAPED ENTRAPMENT FOR SO LONG AND SO FOR SUCH A TAPE TO SURFACE IS AGAINST TRUE LOGIC. THEN ONE MUST BEAR IN MIND THE PURVEYORS ARE DISREPUTABLE PEOPLE AND SOME WHO HAVE VIEWED HAVE SAID IT IS NOT ANWAR.
EVEN IF ANWAR IS DIRTY, THE EXPOSURE IS CERTAINLY TO DISCREDIT HIM AND SO IT IS A CONSPIRACY WHETHER GENUINE OR NOT AND THE UNETHICAL CONDUCT OF THOSE ARRAYED AGAINST HIM IN PRESUMPTUOUSLY CONDEMNING ANWAR CONFIRMS.
IF YOU ARE STILL IN DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY YOU DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Why didn’t police raid the premises?
IF ANWAR VISITS PROSTITUTES THEN POLICE WILL KNOW AND IT MAKES MORE SENSE WITH MORE DRAMATIC EFFECT AND WOULD TRULY CATCH ANWAR RED HANDED TO RAID THE PREMISES WITH A BEVY OF CHOSEN REPORTERS THERE TO CATCH ANWAR REDHANDED. THAT WOULD DEFINITELY KILL ANWAR. THUS IT MAKES NO SENSE FOR SUCH A VIDEO TAPE.
IT MAKES NO SENSE TO INCRIMINATE ANWAR INDIRECTLY WITH A TAPE, IF ANWAR IS AN OFFENDER POLICE SHOULD KNOW AND WHAT BETTER WAY TO FINISH HIM OFF AND CATCH HIM WITH HIS PANTS DOWN THAN BY RAIDING THE PREMISE WITH A BEVY OF PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS. ON THE OTHER HAND IF IT WAS A CONSPIRACY, NO SUCH THING HAPPENED THEN A DOCTORED TAPE IS NECESSARY.
Has Anwar turned mutant, suddenly developed a taste for prostitutes? Those who visit prostitutes tend to be serial addicted abusers and so Anwar must have been doing it for some time. For him to escape surveillance, with tongues wagging spreading rumours that would soon reach the authorities.
Information about Anwar’s sexual misconduct is valuable and soon the authorities would get to know it and the police will be on his heels rather than Tamby Chik.
UNLESS YOU BELIEVE HAS TURN MUTANT, DEVELOPED A SUDDEN TASTE FOR PROSTITUTES, IF HE HAS A HABITUAL ABUSER HE WOULD HAVE BEEN ENTRAPPED LONG AGO IN A FAR MORE CONVINCING MANNER WITH SECRET FOOTAGE OF HIM ENTERING HOTELS, CAR PARKS ETC.
Why police need to use Tamby Chik as proxy?
If Anwar is guilty of such of sexual escapades, the police need not be coy in entrapping Anwar because he can be charged and jailed for visiting prostitutes and lewd conduct. Visiting prostitutes may itself be an offence for which Anwar can be rightly charged. Why did police not raid the premise and catch Anwar red-handed and then he would be truly embarrassed and done with.
Two witnesses swear it is not Anwar:
Quote:
“I believe that the person in the tape was not Anwar . . . I am sure about that,” thundered PKR’s fiery orator Badrul Hisham Shaharin when concluding the rally before some 2,000 people who braved heavy rain.
Badrul, or better known as Chegu Bard, has seen the sex clips twice continuously in Shangri-La Hotel, Kuala Lumpur.
He was shown the tape by former Malacca Chief Minister and Risda (Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority) chairman Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik, businessman Shazryl Eskay Abdullah and another unidentified person.
Yesterday Prime Minister and Umno president Najib Tun Razak said the core question over the sex tape was whether the tape was authentic or not, because if it was genuine, a sin had been committed.
Johari’s four reasons
Earlier at the rally, Sungai Petani MP and PKR parliamentary deputy whip Johari Abdul, who had also viewed the video, insisted that the actor was definitely not Anwar.
“I can swear upon my late parents, it was not him (Anwar),” he said.
He gave four reasons to affirm his belief.
“The male actor has a belly, fair complexion, muscular and has more flesh on his bottom.
“All these are not features of Anwar,” he said.
Wan Azizah wanted to see video:
The purpose of issuing such a statement is to cast Wan Azizah and by extension in bad light and so it is driven by ill will and reflects the exploitative nature of those arrayed against Anwar that make their allegations vested.
Zaid resolve the issue quickly:
The video is not about him so why should he be so anxious to have it resolved quickly, is he that concerned for Anwar or does he want the axe to fall on Anwar quickly.
Such a person is without true honour.
THE MATTER WILL BE RESOLVE IN DUE COURSE AND TO URGE SPEED IS TO INCUR KARMA. IT IS NONE OF HIS BUSINESS EXCEPT THAT IT IS VESTED AND SO HE IS BONDING HIMSELF TO SUFFERING.
THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS ISSUE IS THAT IT EXPOSES THE HYPOCRISY OF MANY FOR THOSE WHO DISCERN. THE SCANDAL IDENTIFIES WHO THE UNSCRUPULOUS ONES ARE.
China 'to overtake US on science'
China is on course to overtake America in scientific output possibly as soon as 2013, far earlier than expected, a UK study suggests
It is impossible for anyone to know what is said is true and it is pure speculation not driven by true understanding but by emotion or interest or fascination.
Supposed if the world was to end tomorrow, then it would not happen that China will overtake the US on science.
WHAT DOES IT MATTER THAT CHINA WILL OVERTAKE US IF THE US REMAINED EXCELLENT IN SCIENCE? WHAT IS SO IMPORTANT THAT THE US MUST NOT ALLOW CHINA TO OVERTAKE IT.
THUS IT IS SILLY AND MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. SO LONG AS THE US MAINTAINS ITS EXCELLENCE IN SCIENCE THEN WHETHER CHINA OVERTAKES THE US IN SCIENCE IS OF NO RELEVANCE UNLESS YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT DOMINANCE OR STATUS. WHAT MATTERS IS WHETHER THE US CONTINUES TO BE EXCELLENT NOT PRIDE OF PLACE. YOU MEAN THE US MUST BOOST ITS SCIENTIFIC ENDEAVORS NOT BECAUSE THERE IS A NEED FOR IT BUT JUST TO MAINTAIN ITS LEAD OVER CHINA?
FURTHER IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO OBJECTIVELY OR TRULY ASCERTAIN WHETHER IT IS TRUE AND SO IT IS AN EXERCISE IN INSANITY IN PURSUIT OF BRAGGING RIGHTS.
Truly understanding, what do you make of this?
She is doing something, specifically raising her hand before her and blowing air over it that is not unique, others have done it and she is imitating or rehashing copying others and so she is a robot.
She is not doing any useful work with what she is doing (blowing kisses) but what she is doing is purely for show to impress others she is liking you.
You don’t need to blow kisses to say you like or love someone and such a gesture does not mean she likes you and so she is practicing what is meaningless that is not harmless but deadly, leads to insanity.
PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG, SEE WHAT SHE IS DOING IS ‘FUN’ OR MEANINGFUL BUT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY, DOES NO USEFUL WORK AND IS DEADLY AND LEADS TO INSANITY. THE TRUTH IS SHE CANNOT HELP IT, DRIVEN BY EMOTION, SHE HAS AN IRRESISTIBLE URGE TO DO SILLY THINGS LIKE BLOWING KISSES SHE THINKS IS MARVELLOUS, CHARMING WHEN IT IS MADNESS.
Minor merit result in minor rewards like being born a rich man, born a king or prince, striking a lottery, born beautiful or being born for existence for hundreds thousands even millions of years in heavenly bliss in the lower reaches of heaven.
What are minor merits? They are like helping another, giving money or food or shelter, looking after your parents, not abusing, not stealing, telling lies, idle chatter, divisive speech, not harming and killing, not having illicit sex, drinking alcohol.
ALL THE MINOR MERITS PRACTICED DOES NOT EQUAL THE FIRST MAJOR MERIT OF ABOLISHING YOUR STYLE THAT PERSECUTES OTHERS.
The Buddha said kingship over men is meagre compared to heavenly bliss and major merit results in eternities of heavenly existence.
The first major merit that gives one eternity (billions of years) in heavenly bliss is to not constantly plying others with force by a cessation of style that constantly bombard others with force prolonging, changing speed and loudness that distresses others, maintains them in a similar prison.
The second higher major merit is to stop thinking (without thinking you cannot do evil) and it gives two eternities in heaven.
Thence not to stir one’s mental force to like or dislike is an even higher merit that gives 4 eternities of heavenly bliss.
Even when they whisper they are radiating force:
I have yet to come across a man or woman who when whispering, does not stretch his or her syllables, change speed and loudness and so no matter how tender or adoringly they may whisper, they are guilty of plying deadly forces on their loved ones that leads to stress and even death.
THERE IS NO NEED TO WHISPER EXCEPT TO FALSELY EXPRESS INTIMACY OR UNRIGHTEOUSLY HIDE ONE’S SECRET CONVERSATION. WHATEVER SAID, NO MATTER HOW CARING, DOES NOT NEED TO BE WHISPERED WHICH IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS WITH YOUR MOTIVATED CARE AND EVEN HERE THE PERSON IS GUILTY OF PLYING IS DEAR ONE WITH FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT LEADS TO DEATH AS THE FINAL END POINT. ALL BEINGS HERE HAVE A HAND IN THE DEATHS OF OTHERS BECAUSE THEY ARE KILLING OTHERS WITH FORCE IN THEIR STYLE, WITH STRESSING OTHERS.
THERE IS NO JUSTIFIED WHISPERING, ALL WHISPERING IS EVIL, A MATTER OF STYLE OR TRYING TO HIDE ONE’S CONVERSATION FROM OTHERS. IF THERE IS NOTHING EVIL ABOUT ONE’S CONVERSATION WHY EXCLUDE OTHERS BY WHISPERING?
It is always evil to stir emotions in others:
Rather than harmless, meritorious or pleasurable to stir emotions (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear) in others, it is always evil with demerit to be experienced as future suffering to do so.
Thus if you consciously want to stir others to be excited, ‘jump with joy’, angry, irritated, hateful, sad, hurt, agitated or confused or fearful, you are guilty of harming others and accruing demerit to experienced as future suffering that may last even an eternity.
WANTING TO STIR EMOTIONS MEANS WANTING TO STIR FORCE THAT IS HARMFUL AND ADDICTIVE IN OTHERS AND THEREFORE THERE IS SERIOUS DEMERIT NEVER MERIT AS PEOPLE IN THIS PEOPLE PERCEIVE IN DELUSION.
Very few go to heaven:
The Buddha:
If you don’t go to heaven then there is even an eternity of torment awaiting you building up a pile of skeleton as high as a mountain.
85. Few among men are those who cross to the farther shore (the safety of heaven). The rest, the bulk of men, only run up and down the hither bank.
86. But those who act according to the perfectly taught Dhamma will cross the realm of Death, so difficult to cross.
87-88. Abandoning the dark way, let the wise man cultivate the bright path. Having gone from home to homelessness, let him yearn for that delight in detachment, so difficult to enjoy. Giving up sensual pleasures, with no attachment, let the wise man cleanse himself of defilements of the mind.
89. Those whose minds have reached full excellence in the factors of enlightenment, who, having renounced acquisitiveness (no longer possessive), rejoice in not clinging to things -- rid of cankers, glowing with wisdom, they have attained Nibbana in this very life.
BECAUSE THIS WORLD IS IN TRUTH TERRIBLE TORMENT BUT THERE IS HEAVEN AND HEAVENLY BLISS, THE TRUTH MUST BE PREACH TO MEN BUT VERY FEW ARE WISE AND GOOD ENOUGH TO WASH THEIR HANDS OFF THIS WORLD TO ESCAPE TO SAFETY AND END OF TORMENT.
Microsoft losing its marbles:
I just installed the latest version of Firefox and it is noticeably improved, neater and perhaps faster. After the recent fuss about the Microsoft explorer, I am hard pressed to say how it is improved, in some ways it is harder to handle the previous one and it refuses me to use google search directly.
The latest of Microsoft Office too has many gimmicks and features that are not superior to the last one, in some ways I preferred the older version.
And so it is that Microsoft is barking up the wrong tree, enamoured by style with a lot of gimmicks eg waving lights and bars as Excel and Word loads. I would not bet on it remaining in ascendency as the computing world passes it by.
More details about Anwar sextape scandal:
By Kim Quek
This article was actually written yesterday (Mar 24), but upon completing the article, I was stunned by the explosive news of the sudden appearance of the trio behind the sex video. Concerned that my article might have been overtaken by this sudden turn of events, I withheld its release yesterday. However, upon a review of the latest events, I find that the technical insights and rationale put forward therein are still valid and pertinent to the issue at hand. I hence present my following article with the hope that it will add to the understanding of this fast evolving drama.
There is one simple way to find out whether ‘Datuk T’s’ pornographic video showing a look-alike of Anwar Ibrahim is a hoax, and that is to go to Anwar’s face book from your own face book account and look for his entries at the time when the video was supposed to be recorded, which is 10:23pm to 10:45pm on Feb 21, 2011.
I just did that, and I found that anwar made entries on that day at 10:40pm, 10:49pm, 10:50pm, for which he received 9 comments, 17 comments, 8 comments respectively. And thereafter, he made another 7 entries, up till 11:028pm. The fact that Anwar was actually posting messages in face book at the relevant time clearly indicates that Anwar couldn’t have been doing what was indicated in the video.
As jokingly exclaimed by Anwar during the press conference on Mar 21, hours after the exposure of the video: How could he be carrying out the sex act and typing on his computer at the same time? Obviously, ‘Datuk T’ had neglected to look up Anwar’s face book before he launched his pornographic piece.
(Does not totally exclude Anwar. Maybe Anwar was not online but a proxy was, just as it is unlikely Najib does anything himself on his website)
QUESTIONABLE TIME FRAME
Purely on a technical level, another question that puzzled me was: How could so many acts be compressed into the purported duration of 22 minutes as indicated in the video? Journalists who had viewed the video said that the love-making part lasted 17 minutes. This means that within the remaining 5 minutes, the following events had to be completed:
Pre-sex act:
· Anwar look-alike (Mr. X) walked into the room with the conductor who gave instruction to the prostitute who was already waiting there. The conductor left the room.
· The couple undressed.
· Woman went into the bathroom and took a bath, which should include wiping dry with a towel (the undressing and bathroom part of the video was skipped by ‘Datuk T’, but he said the woman took a bath).
Post-sex act:
· Mr.X wiped his lower part with tissue, and went into the bathroom to clean himself, which presumably included washing and wiping dry with a towel.
· Mr. X came out from the bathroom, dressed himself and walked off the room.
It should be obvious that when one tallies up the reasonable time allowed for completing each of these events, the total will far exceed 5 minutes. This conflict of time frames further undermines the credibility of the video clip.
PLOT IMPLAUSIBLE
‘Datuk T’ said that the sex romp took place in a Spa which provides sex in Kuala Lumpur.
Will anyone believe that opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim – who has been subjected incessantly to all sorts of cruel and unjust political persecution for the past 13 years, branded as enemy number one, for which the ruling power has been desperate to see that he is politically annihilated – would even condescend to walk into a place of such disrepute at the peak hours, where he would be instantly recognized by almost everyone present there, not to mention having sex with a prostitute in the same place? Haven’t ‘Datuk T’ and the plotters behind him overstretched their imagination, if they think the people would swallow such a story?
‘Datuk T’ also claimed that Anwar sent him to the room to look for his lost watch.
If Anwar had patronized a prostitute in the room, would he be so foolish as to send someone to the room to look for his watch? Wouldn’t that stupid act amount to a virtual confession to others what misdeed he had done there? And wouldn’t that confession spell the end of his political career? Who will believe that Anwar would value the watch more than his family, his political career and the destiny of his country and his people?
Despite the indefatigable effort of the ruling power to fix Anwar all these years, has it produced an iota of evidence of his political or moral misconduct, such as corruption, abuse of power, religious or moral sins?
If Anwar has shown none of these weaknesses, why should Malaysians believe ‘Datuk T’ in preference over Anwar, when what the former has displayed so far is nothing but crass acts of character assassination that serves the evil design of his political masters?
Ezam calls for Anwar's passport to be impounded
NEWS/COMMENTARIES
Friday, 25 March 2011
| (Bernama) - Former Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Youth chief Senator Ezam Mohd Nor today urged the authorities to impound Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's passport to prevent the Opposition leader from continuing to tarnish Malaysia's image abroad. |
Here is another fool unnecessarily putting a noose of future suffering around his neck.
It would be trouble for Anwar to have his passport impounded and so he is advocating trouble for Anwar and will himself head for trouble. If in addition his call is unwarranted, that compounds his sin and more suffering due.
If you think he is nevertheless a good man and Anwar is the bad one you are incurably deluded.
THAT SUCH A FOOL CAN BE GOOD IS IMPOSSIBLE.
Exploiting your false perception:
It is not an accident that this picture was used to front the cover of a book but it is exploiting the false perception of ordinary people that a smiling man is happy, lovely, good, trustworthy.
All this is a result of ordinary people’s false perception. It is actually controlled madness smiling thus because it is meaningless, for show and the practice of what is meaningless for show leads to madness, Mahathir or not.
THE PERSON WHO SEES HIM PRACTICING WHAT IS SILLY, MEANINGLESS THAT IS NOT HARMLESS BUT LEADS TO INSANITY SEES AND UNDERSTANDS CORRECTLY. THE PERSON WHO IS TAKEN IN TO THINK HE IS NOT SUCH A BAD GUY AFTER ALL IS DELUDED OR HAS WRONG VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
HIS SMILE IS INFECTIOUS BECAUSE THERE ARE FORCE CHANGES CONVEYED THAT STIRS THE MENTAL FORCES OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EMOTIONAL TO LIKE OR HATE HIM.
Set up independent panel to verify video, says Zaid
PETALING JAYA: Kita president Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has come forward to say that he has watched the sex video of a man resembling Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim with a foreign prostitute.
Zaid is careful to cultivate an air of neutrality but his criticism of DAP and PAS stance exposes his true sentiment that is attacking Anwar and PKR.
IT IS ACTUALLY NONE OF HIS BUSINESS TO GET INVOLVED IN THIS AFFAIR AND HIS INVOLVEMENT EXPOSES HIS TRUE NATURE AS UNSAVOURY IN LINE WITH ALL THE OTHER PIECES OF EVIDENCES AVAILABLE. HE IS A BIASED SELF SERVING MAN AND WHAT HE SAYS IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED.
Proof lies in the video, Anwar
Comment
By Joceline Tan
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's political allies must insist that the controversial sex video be sent for scientific testing if they are sincere about his political survival.
What she says is false that the proof lies in the video and even if the video is genuine she is asking for punishment because she is falsely being friendly speaking personally like she is concerned, ‘Anwar’.
IT IS NOT BECAUSE SHE KNOWS IT IS TRUE THAT THE PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO THAT SHE SAYS SO BUT SHE IS TRYING TO EXERT PRESSURE AND YET SHE IS BEING HYPOCRITICAL IN ADDRESSING ANWAR PERSONALLY. THERE IS NO NEED TO GET SO INTIMATE AND IT IS NEVER GENUINE BUT CONDESCENDING AND SO EVEN IF PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO SHE IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT FOR BEING A HYPOCRITE.
Zaid may have been a mole all along:
Rather than genuinely falling out with UMNO and then being disenchanted with PKR, Zaid may have been a mole all along and when he was making little head way, his political masters may have decided that an engineered split from PKR would be politically more advantageous in showing dissension in the opposition and also splintering the opposition support.
Why ‘proof lies in the video’ is false:
It may or may not be possible to prove that the video is genuine or faked through the video, it is impossible that even with a cursory viewing that she may or may not have undertaken she has no right to say proof lies in the video.
WITHOUT BEING CERTAIN ‘PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO’ SHE IS NOT ENTITLED TO SAY SO AND EVEN IF SHE HAD VIEWED THE VIDEO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FROM JUST A SINGLE HASTY VIEWING THAT SHE CAN KNOW ‘PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO’ AND THEREFORE SHE IS SPEAKING FALSELY WITH KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING IN A MATTER WHICH IS ACTUALLY NONE OF HER BUSINESS. IT IS NOT HER BUSINESS TO TELL ANWAR PROOF LIES IN THE VIDEO AND BECAUSE SHE SAID SO, SHE IS ASKING FOR JUDGMENT AND PUNISHMENT. SHE HAS ADDITIONAL PUNISHMENT FOR SPEAKING SO INTIMATELY TO ANWAR.Never a true reason to expose Anwar:
Apart from a pious pronouncement of a top level police team to investigate the authorities are allowing a free for all by all and sundry, pressmen and women, politicians of all strips to have a go at Anwar on the basis of a sex tape.
THERE IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO EXPOSE ANWAR, WHAT HAPPENED IS NOT JUSTIFIED UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES (THE JUSTIFICATION IS TO DESTROY ANWAR AND WIN VOTES) AND IF YOU THINK SO YOU ARE DELUDED. THE BUDDHA SAID HE WILL ONLY SPEAK IF SOMETHING IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL TO OTHERS. IF SOMETHING IS TRUE BUT NOT BENEFICIAL HE WILL NOT SPEAK AND SO IF THIS REVELATION IS TRUE AND UNBENEFICIAL THERE IS NO REASON TO SPEAK OUT AND IF YOU DO YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN MADNESS.
WHAT IS THE REASON FOR SPEAKING OUT? AN ELECTION AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE ALL THESE UMNO OPERATIVES INCLUDING DATUK IS TRYING TO RESCUE PKR FROM SINFUL LYING ANWAR BUT THEY WANT TO ATTACK AND DESTROY ANWAR SO THAT GULLIBLE VOTERS WILL VOTE BN.
THE REASON FOR THIS EXPOSURE IS ILL WILL, TO DESTROY ANWAR AND COURT VOTERS AND THAT IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO EXPOSE ANWAR. THUS ALL THOSE WHO JOIN IN TO STAB ANWAR ARE UNRIGHTEOUS SLIPPING A NOOSE AROUND THEIR NECKS TO EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING. EVEN IF ANWAR IS A DEBAUCHER, HIS ASSAILANTS ARE HEADING FOR THE CLIFF.
Liz Taylor laid to rest at Forest Lawn:
This too is a collectively accepted delusion, she is not ‘laid to rest’ (impossible for anyone to see so) but she is buried at Forest Lawn.
‘LAID TO REST’ IS A FALSE NICETY THAT PEOPLE HAVE COME TO ACCEPT AS TRUE, SHE IS BURIED NOT LAID TO REST AND IT IS NOT SEMANTICS BUT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES TO CALL BURYING LAID TO REST.
You mean BN is a virtuous alternative?
If by exposing Anwar you are trying to save the electorates and PKR from the arms of a deceitful liar in Anwar, you mean BN is the savior, is a bastion for virtue?
WHAT IS THE POINT OF EXPOSING ANWAR AND DRAWING VOTERS BACK TO BN IF BN IS ITSELF CORRUPT? ATTACKERS AND PEOPLE ARE DELUDED THAT THE CURRENT SCANDAL IS DERIVED FROM GOODWILL BUT IT IS DRIVEN BY ILL WILL TO DESTROY ANWAR AND DISCREDIT THE OPPOSITION FOR SELF SERVING GAINS. HOW IS IT THAT THE SOURCE OF EXPOSURE IS UMNO WHICH STANDS TO GAIN FROM ANWAR’S DEMISE?
If UMNO would admit they are morally no better then what is the point of exposing this scandal? BN stands to gain from this scandal and they are the source of this scandal and so the motive is evil and even if it is true, those involved are headed for a reckoning with weeping and gnashing of teeth.
No rest for Elizabeth Taylor:
If you asked the Buddha where she has now gone to, He can tell you and it is not possible it is to a place of rest because her life of debauchery on and off screen renders that impossible and so it is false to say (without knowing it is true) that she has been laid to rest at Forest Lawn.
ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA ALL BEINGS HERE HAVE A DESTINATION AFTER THEY DEPART THAT CAN BE HELL, ANIMAL WOMB, GHOST, HUMAN FORM (RARE) OR HEAVEN. REST IS NOT WHAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE HEADING FOR BECAUSE THEY ARE HEADING FOR WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH AND SO IT IS FALSE TO SAY SHE HAS BEEN LAID TO REST THERE. SHE HAS ABANDONED HER BODY OR FORCED TO ABANDON HER BODY WHICH IS NOW LIFELESS BUT SHE HAS MOVED ON.
Tamby Chik the sinner saving the nation from sinner Anwar?
Tamby Chik himself had to step down as CM because of a sex scandal with a young Malay girl for which Guan Eng was wrongly imprisoned and so he cannot claim high moral grounds or to rescue the nation from sex maniacs like Anwar when he himself is guilty and what is the point of transferring faith in one maniac Anwar to another maniac?
THUS IT CANNOT BE HIGH MORAL GROUND AND FOR THE GOOD OF VOTERS THAT IS THE CAUSE OF THIS UPROAR BUT IT IS REVENGE, TO DESTROY ANWAR AND ENTICE VOTERS FROM ONE DEVIL TO THE ARMS OF ANOTHER DEVIL.
The pot calling the kettle black:
The persons behind the sex tape are aligned with the ruling coalition and those who stand to benefit from Anwar’s demise is the ruling coalition.
This Anwar sex scandal may make sense if the alternative to Anwar, the ruling coalition is clearly superior in terms of morality and lack of corruption compared to Anwar. If they are not superior, even worse than Anwar (eg murder of Altanturya) then the premise of this crisis is absurd, a case of the black pot calling the kettle black when the pot’s blackness disqualifies it from the moral high ground of wagging its finger. This is lost on many people even highly educated ones who see no irony or absurdity of the scandal that may all be fabricated.
THE POT CALLS THE KETTLE BLACK AND THEREFORE HEAR YE, YOU SHOULD VOTE FOR THE POT NOT THE KETTLE. DOES THAT NOT SOUND SILLY? IF IT DOES NOT YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION.
Bankrupt politics:
The black pot (UMNO) is announcing with much fanfare that the kettle (Anwar) is black and so voters should shun the black kettle and embrace the pot (that is also just as black if not blacker). But what is the point of abandoning the black kettle for the black pot? Might as well stay put and try Anwar for a change.
This is bankrupt politics, if you are black you should know it and stop asking voters to judge on the basis of blackness except that you are stupid and voters are stupid.
IF YOU YOURSELF ARE ALSO BLACK YOU SHOULD LOOK TO SELL YOURSELF TO VOTERS ON SOME OTHER POINTS LIKE MANAGEMENT SAVVY NOT BLACKNESS.
Note the timing:
It is too coincidental to be genuine that each time UMNO or ruling elite is struggling or in danger of being toppled, it should be so lucky as to be saved by an Anwar sin.
Thus in 1997, when Dr M was under pressure to quit, he should find an Anwar who is obligingly abusive of his power and a secret sodomist when all along Dr M knew but did not take issue except when the tables are turned on him. (Dr M has unwittingly admitted in retrospect that this first is fabricated when he said the first sodomy was fabricated so it is unlikely sodomy II is fabricated)
Then comes Sodomy II when Najib is under pressure from the Altanurya case and BN was in danger of being toppled by defections.
Now for the third time when elections are imminent, feckless Anwar should conveniently oblige by embroiling himself in another sex scandal.
THUS EITHER ANWAR IS A REAL JONAH OR IT IS NOT A COINCIDENCE BUT DESPERATE TIMES CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES OR FABRICATION. AS THE BUDDHA SAID THOSE WHO FEEL NO SHAME AT TELLING A LIE WILL DO ANYTHING, MURDER AND WHATEVER TO ACHIEVE THEIR AIMS.
The fabricated first make the rest likely to be fabricated:
Each time the ruling elite is under crisis, its nemesis Anwar the Jonah should so obligingly embroil himself in some personal indiscretion so as to knock him out of the political equation.
On the contrary to Dr M’s perverted false logic, the fact that the first sodomy was fabricated as he unwittingly admits makes it more likely even a certainty that the same people will do the same, fabricate again and again to get what they want.
A purveyor of truth who does not understand truth:
As a newsman or newswoman you are a reporter of news or facts and de facto conversant in what is true.
Therefore a newswoman by profession should understand what she says and therefore never professionally say something false and if she does she is guilty of misleading the masses with greater karma.
“The proof is in the tape, Anwar” is her opinion, not news and so she is straying from reporting the truth and she wants to influence the masses with her opinion that turns out to be false.
By saying ‘the proof is in the tape, Anwar’, the reporter is implying she knows the proof is in the tape. This proof can either be that the tape is genuine or faked and so she implies that just from the tape she knows whether the tape is true or false, and the answer is that in her opinion it is genuine.
What is the point of calling for investigations and examination of the tape when a reporter can know immediately after a cursory viewing ‘the proof is in the tape, Anwar’?
Therefore she is speaking falsely, it is impossible she knows that the proof is in the tape and she is speaking without understanding what she says. If she perceives she is right or true in what she says or she speaks without knowing what she says is true (she does not refrain from speaking what she is not sure is true) then she is courting insanity and will become insane.
SHE IS OFFERING HER OPINION NOT REPORTING THE NEWS WHICH IS HER DUTY AND THAT OPINION IS BASED ON FALSE OR NO UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE IT IS FALSE, SHE CANNOT IN TRUTH KNOW THAT THE PROOF IS IN THE TAPE BECAUSE IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE SHE CAN EXCLUDE THAT THE TAPE IS DOCTORED EVEN IF SHE SAW THE TAPE HERSELF.
The sin of proffering opinion as news:
“The proof is in the tape” is never the news or a factual report of what has happened but her opinion and it is false because it is impossible she knows the proof of whether the tape is genuine or doctored is in the tape itself.
IT REFLECTS THE CORRUPTION OF MODERN TIMES THAT OPINIONS AND ANALYSIS OR INTERPRETATION OF NEWS HAVE BECOME AN INTEGRAL PART AND EVEN INDUSTRY IN THE NEWS WORLD.
THE SOLE DUTY OF A REPORTER IS TO GATHER AND PRESENT THE NEWS OR TRUTH OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND SHE SHOULD KEEP HER OPINIONS TO HERSELF BECAUSE IF IT IS FALSE OR VESTED THERE IS PENALTY TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING FOR MISLEADING THE MASSES.
DID SHE TELL READERS THIS IS HER OPINION, NOT NEWS THAT ‘THE PROOF IS IN THE TAPE’?
Talk to Anwar personally not broadcast over media:
She is addressing Anwar by saying ‘the proof is in the tape, Anwar’ and that is inappropriate. If you want to speak to Anwar, call him and address him personally, not broadcast it on the media without avenue for reply by Anwar.
HEREIN IS AGAIN KARMA, BROADCASTING PUBLICLY WHAT IS A PERSONAL MESSAGE TO ANWAR. FURTHER SHE CANNOT BE SINCERE BUT SHE IS DISINGENUOUS OR HYPOCRITICAL ADDRESSING ANWAR PERSONALLY AND HERE IS FURTHER KARMA. THUS IT IS THAT THE BUDDHA SAID ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE FORGING BOND AFTER BOND WITH SUFFERING DUE THEM THAT IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND TAKE ETERNITIES TO REPAY FOR THE WRONGS THEY HAVE DONE OTHERS.
Unfair fight:
She has access to Star to broadcast across the media what is an attacking message whilst Anwar is denied the opportunity to similarly reply using Star and so it is an unfair fight using Star to attack Anwar without giving Anwar similar access to Star.
IF YOU ENGAGE IN AN UNFAIR FIGHT YOU ARE GUILTY OF BULLYING WITH PUNISHMENT DUE.
Did Anwar ask her to tell and need her to tell him?
Did Anwar ask her to tell him that the proof lies in the tape? If Anwar did not ask her and she broadcasts that, she is guilty of illogic, of answering without being asked and that is conditioning her to what is insane and she is headed for insanity.
IF ANWAR ASKED HER WHERE IS THE PROOF, THEN SHE HAS REASON TO SAY, THE PROOF LIES IN THE TAPE, ANWAR. BECAUSE ANWAR NEVER ASKED HER THAT SHE IS BEHAVING INAPPROPRIATELY, PRESUMPTUOUSLY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
Prove it was not you in sex video, Chua tells Anwar
Here is another deluded man adding more karma for himself.
The onus is not on Anwar to prove he is not the man in the video but the onus is on his accusers to prove Anwar is the man in the video.
THE IMPLICATION IS TO FALSELY IMPLY ANWAR IS GUILTY AND SO HE MUST ABSOLVE HIMSELF. ANWAR DID NOT MAKE THE VIDEO AND SO THE ONUS IS ON THOSE WHO PUBLICIZED THE VIDEO TO PROVE IT IS ANWAR AND HERE IS A FOOL TALKING WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SPEAKS. HE IS ATTACKING ANWAR WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHAT HE SAYS.
Proof is beside the point:
Proof is not relevant to what has happened and it is only necessary if a person has vested interest in convicting Anwar of wrongdoing or you are interested in absolving yourself.
IF THIS TAPE WAS FABRICATED THOSE INVOLVED HAS DEADLY KARMA BECAUSE IT SERIOUSLY DAMAGED THE REPUTATION OF ANOTHER THAT EVEN IF HE PROVED HIMSELF INNOCENT, THE DIRT STILL STICKS IN SOME AND IT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE TO PROVE HE IS INNOCENT EVEN IF THAT IS THE CASE. A DISCERNING PERSON CAN DETECT IRREFUTABLE SIGNS THE TAPE IS DOCTORED BUT THOSE WHO ARE EMOTIONAL AND PARTISAN CAN BE DEAD SURE THE TAPE IS GENUINE.
PROVING IS ONLY NECESSARY IF YOU WANT TO UNRIGHTEOUSLY CONVICT THE PERSON BASED ON THE TAPE OR YOU ARE DESIROUS OF ABSOLVING YOURSELF. IF YOU ARE DETACHED FROM THIS WORLD, DO NOT CARE FOR YOUR REPUTATION, WHAT DOES IT MATTER IF THEY THROW ALL KINDS OF MUD AT YOU?
If you think this episode demands proof you are deluded, it has nothing to do with what happened. The culprits have done something that has deadly karma for them, even if Anwar can prove himself innocent the mud will still stick in some people’s minds. What is proof to some may not be to another.
Why Soi Lek is wrong:
What Soi Lek is saying is that if Anwar fails to prove he is not the man in the tape he is guilty and that is false.
EVEN IF ANWAR CANNOT PROVE HE IS NOT THE MAN IN THE TAPE IT IS NOT NECESSARILY TRUE HE IS GUILTY AND SO SOI LEK IS GUILTY OF BIZARRE LOGIC THAT LEADS TO INSANITY.
Proof is only necessary if you want to convict Anwar unfairly:
Proof that Anwar is not the man in the tape is only necessary if you want to convict Anwar based SOLELY on a tape whose authenticity is not certain, if you have no desire to convict Anwar there is no need for proof.
Why does Soi Lek want to convict Anwar?
It is not because he is so altruistic or concern for the welfare of voters but because he wants to exploit the tape to besmirch and discredit Anwar for selfish gains.
IF YOU ARE EAGER TO CONVICT ANOTHER TO DEMAND PROOF HE IS NOT THE MAN DEPICTED WHEN THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE TAPE IS NOT ASSURED FOR SELFISH GAIN, YOU ARE ACTING UNRIGHTEOUSLY WITH DEADLY KARMA ACCRUED.
To convict Anwar you must prove he is the man:
In order to convict Anwar police must prove the man in the tape is Anwar and that means essentially to prove that the tape is authentic not doctored.
Thus Soi Lek is talking nonsense, convicting Anwar presumptuously and demanding him to prove he is not the man.
THE ONUS IS ON ANWAR’S ACCUSERS TO PROVE THE TAPE IS AUTHENTIC NOT ON ANWAR TO PROVE HE IS NOT THE MAN AND SO SOI LEK IS TALKING NONSENSE THAT IS NEVER HARMLESS BUT LEADS TO INSANITY.
THE CRUX OF THE MATTER:
WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT SOME VESTED SCRURRILOUS PEOPLE HAS PUBLICIZED A SEX TAPE PURPORTEDLY TO BE OF ANWAR.
IF SOCIETY AND EVERYONE HAS NO INTEREST IN JUDGING ANWAR AND CONVICTING HIM OR EXPLOITING IT FOR POLITICAL MILEAGE THEN THE MATTER SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO REST AS IT IS, NAMELY A TAPE HAS SURFACED PURPORTEDLY DEPICTING ANWAR IN SEXUAL ACTS. IF POLICE OR AUTHORITIES WANT TO CONVICT ANWAR THEN THEY MUST PROVE HE IS THE MAN IN THE TAPE AND THAT MEANS ESSENTIALLY THAT THE TAPE IS AUTHENTIC. IT IS PROOF ANWAR’S ENEMIES HAVE VESTED INTEREST THAT THEY HAVE ALL ACTED IN CONCERT TO IMPLY ANWAR’S GUILT AND DEMAND HE PROVE HIMSELF INNOCENT. EVEN THIS IS PROOF HIS ENEMIES ARE SCURRILOUS, UNRIGHTEOUS, WANT TO STOMP ON A MAN LYING ON THE FLOOR.
They are all jumping in to gang rape Anwar:
It is like a feeding frenzy with everyone, the press, Soi Lek, UMNO operatives, Zaid and supposed independents to imply Anwar is guilty and must prove himself innocent.
THAT AFTER SUCH RABID IN CONCERT EXPLOITING OF THE AFFAIR TO IMPLY ANWAR IS GUILTY EVEN BEFORE IT IS PROVEN MAKES IT HIGHLY UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE ALLEGATION IS GENUINE.
THEY THINK THEIR MOTIVES ARE OPAQUE, INCONSTRUABLE TO OTHERS AND THE PUBLIC IS CLUELESS AS TO IMPETUS BEHIND THE SCANDAL BUT THE OVERZEALOUS IMPLICATION OF GUILT EXPOSES VESTED INTERESTS AND RENDERS THE SCANDAL SUSPECT.
Jesus: Let the man who has not sinned cast the first stone
Even if Anwar is guilty his adversaries, the press et al are acting unrighteously with deadly karma due in ganging up, jumping on him in chorus even when the tape has not been proven genuine.
If the tape is a fraud, they will be guilty of even greater sin condemning a man before proving he is guilty.
THUS ALL THE PEOPLE JOINING IN THE FRAY TO ATTACK ANWAR DO NOT REALIZE THE DEADLY KARMA TO BE REPAID IN FUTURE SUFFERING THEY ARE UNDERTAKING FOR THEMSELVES AS A RESULT OF IGNORANCE AND FOOLISHNESS ALLIED TO ILL WILL.
Unseemly haste to condemn Anwar:
There are those who had seen the tape who questioned its authenticity and so bearing in mind its illicitly obtained nature, the wise and fair person would withhold condemnation yet all these people are jumping in to condemn Anwar even before it has been confirmed. This is the action of a person of no integrity and so all those who have jumped into attack Anwar have no integrity.
How come Soi Lek does not defend Anwar?
How come Soi Lek and others never say, ‘hey, this has not been proven yet, there are those who have seen the tape who question its authenticity so let us wait for an expert opinion before we condemn Anwar or write him off’?
Instead they are eager to add more fuel to the fire indicating this is an vested affair.
WHERE IS THE SENSE OF FAIR PLAY?
Sex tape has discredited Anwar’s adversaries not Anwar so far:
There can only be one objective in publicly releasing the sex tape and it is to discredit Anwar. Yet on the contrary, Anwar’s reputation is so far intact but by their presumptuous rabid attacks on Anwar, his adversaries like Zaid, Ezzam, Soi Lek, Joceline Tan have definitely and permanently discredited themselves.
The purveyors of the tape, the three datuks are all people of disrepute and you would be circumspect in accepting what they want to sell you without objective proof it is a genuine article and there are dissenting voices, people who have seen the tape have said it is not Anwar.
By all jumping in to discredit Anwar, his critics have instead proven themselves to people of no integrity whilst Anwar has not been discredited pending objective proof the tape is genuine.
WHY ABANDON ANWAR WHO HAS SO FAR NOT BEEN DISCREDITED TO EMBRACE PEOPLE WHO HAVE OBJECTIVELY DISCREDITED THEMSELVES BY THEIR UNSEEMING HASTE TO STICK THE KNIFE INTO ANWAR? UNLESS THEY CHANGE (UNLIKELY) PEOPLE LIKE EZZAM, ZAID, JOCELYN TAN, SOI LEK HAVE PROVEN THEMSELVES TO BE MORALLY UNSOUND.
There is only one way to truly understand the affair so far and it is that there is ground to defend Anwar and no grounds to condemn Anwar (yet) because the purveyors are disreputable people and there are people who have viewed the tape who dispute it is Anwar. Thus all those who have jumped in to attack Anwar and demand he prove his innocence have proven themselves to those who are discerning that they are hypocrites and unethical. If you disagree or view differently you have wrong view that leads to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.
A clincher may be examining the voice of Anwar:
It is harder to fake the voice of Anwar, its tonal characteristics and the typical way Anwar speaks. Anwar’s voice if it appears on the tape can establish whether the tape is genuine or not. If in the tape Anwar is unusually silent, it is suspect. It is hard to imitate Anwar’s style of talking and the frequency spectrum of the voice can expose it is a fake. Thus if in the tape Anwar remains silent or he talks sparingly in a way that departs from the way Anwar usually talks, it must be a fake.
Further if there are shots of Anwar’s face that does not include his private parts it is suspiciously doctored. Only if there are shots with Anwar’s likeness that includes his private parts will it be genuine proof it is Anwar performing not a trick of showing a genuine Anwar eg in T shirt without his trousers off and shots with Anwar’s private parts being serviced whilst Anwar’s face is not revealed.
IF YOU WANT TO FAIRLY CONVICT ANWAR YOU MUST OBJECTIVELY PROVE IT IS HIM. WITHOUT HAVING EXCLUDED IT IS DOCTORED AND YOU CONVICT HIM YOU ARE UNRIGHTEOUS, HEADED FOR SUFFERING.
Proof that people do not understand:
What has happened, the revelation of an Anwar sex tape, can be truly understood in its entirety but reflecting their lack of true understanding, people have failed to understand truly what the sex tape scandal is about.
WHAT IS THE TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED?
IT IS THAT THE PURPOSE FOR EXPOSING THE TAPE IS TO DISCEDIT ANWAR AND RATHER THAN DISCREDIT ANWAR, THE TAPE HAS UNWITTINGLY DISCREDITED ALL ANWAR’S CRITICS SO THAT THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING CAN KNOW THEIR TRUE UNETHICAL NATURES. YOU CAN WRITE OFF PEOPLE LIKE EZZAM, ZAID, SOI LEK AND JOCELYN TAN BECAUSE THEY HAVE EXPOSED THEMSELVES AS UNETHICAL IN PROCLAIMING ANWAR IS GUILTY AND SHOULD BE DISCREDITED.
SO FAR ANWAR HAS NOT BEEN DISCREDITED BECAUSE THE PURVEYORS OF THE TAPE ARE DISREPUTABLE PEOPLE AND YOU WOULD BE A FOOL TO ACCEPT AT FACE VALUE WHAT THESE VESTED PEOPLE PRESENT. IF IT WAS KARPAL SINGH OR LIM KIT SIANG WHO IS THE MESSENGER THEN YOU WOULD GIVE IT MORE CREDENCE. FURTHER THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SEEN THE TAPE WHO DISPUTE IT IS ANWAR.
IF YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND YOU WILL BE CONFUSED BY EVENTS AND OTHERS AND THIS IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND THENCE YOU ARE HEADED FOR PERDITION NOT HEAVENLY BLISS.
HOW MANY IF ANY CAN SPEAK LIKE I DO? WHAT IS SO DIFFICULT OR EXOTIC ABOUT WHAT I SAY THAT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO SPEAK THUS? IF YOU CANNOT SPEAK LIKE THIS AND I CAN, HOW CAN YOU BE MY EQUAL?
Shot themselves in the foot:
Anwar’s adversaries and their allies in the press think they are very clever, nobody can know for sure but they have actually shot themselves in the foot rather than shot down Anwar.
Reflecting the gullible un-understanding nature of ordinary people, they are clueless. They may not like what is happening but they are not sure.
They have exposed themselves to be unethical in condemning Anwar without having conclusively proven Anwar is the man in the tape.
Not sure it is a conspiracy? You don’t understand:
This sex tape revelation is definitely a conspiracy.
If Anwar visits prostitutes it would not be de novo but he must have been doing it in the past.
The reason why sexual scandals that involve Dr M, Daim and many others including current leaders (Rais Yatim have allegations) have never come to the surface is not because they are well concealed or isolated but the full weight of the system ensures that they are concealed from the public gaze, only rumours circulate.
Thus if Anwar is a sexual pervert it must be longstanding and they would have caught him red handed long ago so why all of a sudden this tape surfaces?
IF ANWAR IS DIRTY HE MUST HAVE A HISTORY AND WITH POWERFUL ENEMIES ARRAYED AGAINST HIM HE IS UNLIKELY TO HAVE ESCAPED ENTRAPMENT FOR SO LONG AND SO FOR SUCH A TAPE TO SURFACE IS AGAINST TRUE LOGIC. THEN ONE MUST BEAR IN MIND THE PURVEYORS ARE DISREPUTABLE PEOPLE AND SOME WHO HAVE VIEWED HAVE SAID IT IS NOT ANWAR.
EVEN IF ANWAR IS DIRTY, THE EXPOSURE IS CERTAINLY TO DISCREDIT HIM AND SO IT IS A CONSPIRACY WHETHER GENUINE OR NOT AND THE UNETHICAL CONDUCT OF THOSE ARRAYED AGAINST HIM IN PRESUMPTUOUSLY CONDEMNING ANWAR CONFIRMS.
IF YOU ARE STILL IN DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY YOU DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Why didn’t police raid the premises?
IF ANWAR VISITS PROSTITUTES THEN POLICE WILL KNOW AND IT MAKES MORE SENSE WITH MORE DRAMATIC EFFECT AND WOULD TRULY CATCH ANWAR RED HANDED TO RAID THE PREMISES WITH A BEVY OF CHOSEN REPORTERS THERE TO CATCH ANWAR REDHANDED. THAT WOULD DEFINITELY KILL ANWAR. THUS IT MAKES NO SENSE FOR SUCH A VIDEO TAPE.
IT MAKES NO SENSE TO INCRIMINATE ANWAR INDIRECTLY WITH A TAPE, IF ANWAR IS AN OFFENDER POLICE SHOULD KNOW AND WHAT BETTER WAY TO FINISH HIM OFF AND CATCH HIM WITH HIS PANTS DOWN THAN BY RAIDING THE PREMISE WITH A BEVY OF PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS. ON THE OTHER HAND IF IT WAS A CONSPIRACY, NO SUCH THING HAPPENED THEN A DOCTORED TAPE IS NECESSARY.
Has Anwar turned mutant, suddenly developed a taste for prostitutes? Those who visit prostitutes tend to be serial addicted abusers and so Anwar must have been doing it for some time. For him to escape surveillance, with tongues wagging spreading rumours that would soon reach the authorities.
Information about Anwar’s sexual misconduct is valuable and soon the authorities would get to know it and the police will be on his heels rather than Tamby Chik.
UNLESS YOU BELIEVE HAS TURN MUTANT, DEVELOPED A SUDDEN TASTE FOR PROSTITUTES, IF HE HAS A HABITUAL ABUSER HE WOULD HAVE BEEN ENTRAPPED LONG AGO IN A FAR MORE CONVINCING MANNER WITH SECRET FOOTAGE OF HIM ENTERING HOTELS, CAR PARKS ETC.
Why police need to use Tamby Chik as proxy?
If Anwar is guilty of such of sexual escapades, the police need not be coy in entrapping Anwar because he can be charged and jailed for visiting prostitutes and lewd conduct. Visiting prostitutes may itself be an offence for which Anwar can be rightly charged. Why did police not raid the premise and catch Anwar red-handed and then he would be truly embarrassed and done with.
Two witnesses swear it is not Anwar:
Quote:
“I believe that the person in the tape was not Anwar . . . I am sure about that,” thundered PKR’s fiery orator Badrul Hisham Shaharin when concluding the rally before some 2,000 people who braved heavy rain.
Badrul, or better known as Chegu Bard, has seen the sex clips twice continuously in Shangri-La Hotel, Kuala Lumpur.
He was shown the tape by former Malacca Chief Minister and Risda (Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority) chairman Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik, businessman Shazryl Eskay Abdullah and another unidentified person.
Yesterday Prime Minister and Umno president Najib Tun Razak said the core question over the sex tape was whether the tape was authentic or not, because if it was genuine, a sin had been committed.
Johari’s four reasons
Earlier at the rally, Sungai Petani MP and PKR parliamentary deputy whip Johari Abdul, who had also viewed the video, insisted that the actor was definitely not Anwar.
“I can swear upon my late parents, it was not him (Anwar),” he said.
He gave four reasons to affirm his belief.
“The male actor has a belly, fair complexion, muscular and has more flesh on his bottom.
“All these are not features of Anwar,” he said.
Wan Azizah wanted to see video:
The purpose of issuing such a statement is to cast Wan Azizah and by extension in bad light and so it is driven by ill will and reflects the exploitative nature of those arrayed against Anwar that make their allegations vested.
Zaid resolve the issue quickly:
The video is not about him so why should he be so anxious to have it resolved quickly, is he that concerned for Anwar or does he want the axe to fall on Anwar quickly.
Such a person is without true honour.
THE MATTER WILL BE RESOLVE IN DUE COURSE AND TO URGE SPEED IS TO INCUR KARMA. IT IS NONE OF HIS BUSINESS EXCEPT THAT IT IS VESTED AND SO HE IS BONDING HIMSELF TO SUFFERING.
THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS ISSUE IS THAT IT EXPOSES THE HYPOCRISY OF MANY FOR THOSE WHO DISCERN. THE SCANDAL IDENTIFIES WHO THE UNSCRUPULOUS ONES ARE.
China 'to overtake US on science'
China is on course to overtake America in scientific output possibly as soon as 2013, far earlier than expected, a UK study suggests
It is impossible for anyone to know what is said is true and it is pure speculation not driven by true understanding but by emotion or interest or fascination.
Supposed if the world was to end tomorrow, then it would not happen that China will overtake the US on science.
WHAT DOES IT MATTER THAT CHINA WILL OVERTAKE US IF THE US REMAINED EXCELLENT IN SCIENCE? WHAT IS SO IMPORTANT THAT THE US MUST NOT ALLOW CHINA TO OVERTAKE IT.
THUS IT IS SILLY AND MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. SO LONG AS THE US MAINTAINS ITS EXCELLENCE IN SCIENCE THEN WHETHER CHINA OVERTAKES THE US IN SCIENCE IS OF NO RELEVANCE UNLESS YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT DOMINANCE OR STATUS. WHAT MATTERS IS WHETHER THE US CONTINUES TO BE EXCELLENT NOT PRIDE OF PLACE. YOU MEAN THE US MUST BOOST ITS SCIENTIFIC ENDEAVORS NOT BECAUSE THERE IS A NEED FOR IT BUT JUST TO MAINTAIN ITS LEAD OVER CHINA?
FURTHER IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO OBJECTIVELY OR TRULY ASCERTAIN WHETHER IT IS TRUE AND SO IT IS AN EXERCISE IN INSANITY IN PURSUIT OF BRAGGING RIGHTS.
Truly understanding, what do you make of this?
She is doing something, specifically raising her hand before her and blowing air over it that is not unique, others have done it and she is imitating or rehashing copying others and so she is a robot.
She is not doing any useful work with what she is doing (blowing kisses) but what she is doing is purely for show to impress others she is liking you.
You don’t need to blow kisses to say you like or love someone and such a gesture does not mean she likes you and so she is practicing what is meaningless that is not harmless but deadly, leads to insanity.
PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG, SEE WHAT SHE IS DOING IS ‘FUN’ OR MEANINGFUL BUT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY, DOES NO USEFUL WORK AND IS DEADLY AND LEADS TO INSANITY. THE TRUTH IS SHE CANNOT HELP IT, DRIVEN BY EMOTION, SHE HAS AN IRRESISTIBLE URGE TO DO SILLY THINGS LIKE BLOWING KISSES SHE THINKS IS MARVELLOUS, CHARMING WHEN IT IS MADNESS.
