Ian Herbert: Cook's email was insensitive

Ian Herbert: Cook's email was insensitive but is hardly grounds for his dismissal The email is excruciating and insensitive but the act of writing it is something many individuals might be capable of in the private seclusion of an office. “Insensitive” is his perception and understanding of the email and it is wrong because the email was intended to hurt, to stick the knife in and there is nothing insensitive or sensitive about it. HERE YOU HAVE A ‘RESPECTED’ COLUMNIST WRITING IN A RESPECTED NEWSPAPER AND YET HE UNDERSTANDS WRONGLY AN EMAIL INTENDED TO HURT AS INSENSITIVE. IT IS OBJECTIVE WHAT THE EMAIL PORTRAYED AND IF IT WAS INTENDED TO ATTACK, TO HURT AND YOU SAY IT IS INSENSITIVE, HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE SENSITIVE AND REFRAINED FROM IT IN VIEW OF CIRCUMSTANCES THEN YOU ARE SHOWING YOU HAVE A WRONG UNDERSTANDING OR INTERPRETATION OF EVENTS HAPPENING. BY BEING SENSITIVE YOU ARE ADVOCATING HYPOCRISY, REFRAINING FROM SAYING CERTAIN NASTY THINGS NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE WRONG AND HURTFUL BUT TO ‘PITY’ THE RECIPIENT OR TO APPEAR CIVIL. THE EMAIL IS EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG, TRUE OR FALSE; SENSITIVITY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT EXCEPT IN THE PERSON’S DELUSION THAT WILL END IN INSANITY. IN OTHER WORDS, HE IS ADVOCATING HYPOCRISY, NOT CERTAIN THINGS THAT YOU WANT TO SAY JUST TO BE POLITE. YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING, YOU NEED DISCERNMENT, AN ABILITY TO SEE THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE AND IF YOU SEE THINGS CLEARLY YOU WILL UNDERSTAND THE EMAIL WAS VENOMOUS, WAS MEANT TO HURT, ATTACK AND SO IT IS BIZARRE TO CALL IT INSENSITIVE. Sensitivity is about not stirring force, not reason: Whenever people talk about being sensitive, they mean not speaking or doing things that hurt the feelings of the target person. Thus if your priority or purpose is to be sensitive, you design your speech and actions so as not to stir hurt in the other person, hurt is a function of stirred force and so a person who is sensitive speaks and does things depending on the occasion not to speak the truth but just not to stir force or hurt in the person. THUS IF YOU SPEAK ABOUT BEING SENSITIVE YOU ARE UNWITTINGLY ADMITTING THAT FORCE AND THE NON STIRRING OF FORCE (THAT IS BLIND AND MEANINGLESS) IS WHAT HAS PRIORITY OR MEANING TO YOU RATHER THAN THE TRUTH OR SUBSTANCE OF WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY. THE PERSON WHO IS PREOCCUPIED WITH SENSITIVITY IS DELUDED, HE IS FAR MORE CONCERNED WITH STIRRING AND NOT STIRRING FORCES IN OTHERS THAN IN THE SUBSTANCE OR MEANING OR TRUTH OF WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY OR DO. You should never be sensitive to the feelings of others: You often hear the advice of deluded people to be always sensitive to the feelings of others with what you say or do. This is a form of blind indiscriminate programming of others who become your robot. Rather than meritorious the fool who advices thus is heaping karma to be experienced as future suffering. YOU SHOULD NEVER BE SENSITIVE TO THE FEELINGS OF OTHERS BECAUSE THAT IS PANDERING TO FORCE. INSTEAD YOU SHOULD STRIVE TO ALWAYS SPEAK WHAT IS TRUE AND RELEVANT TO THE OCCASION, TO ONLY SAY OR DO THINGS THAT BENEFIT YOURSELF AND OTHERS. IF WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE AND TRULY BENEFICIAL TO OTHERS, IT IS NEVER YOUR FAULT THE OTHER PERSON IS HURT BUT IT IS HIS FAULT, HIS CONDITIONED FALSE PERCEPTION AND SENSITIVITY THAT MAKES HIM HURT BY WHAT IS SAID THAT IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL (EG I SAY SMILING AND JOKING IS EVIL AND MAD AND IF YOU GET HURT IT IS NOT MY FAULT BUT THE FAULT OF YOUR DELUSION). ANYONE WHO PANDERS TO THE SENSITIVITIES OF OTHERS IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT IS ADDICTIVE AND WILL END IN MADNESS. Sensitivities are about likes and dislikes: If what you say or do is to pander to the sensitivities of others it is to not upset others, not stir their dislikes for what you say or not hurt their feelings rather than mean what you say or do. IF YOU MEAN WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, IT IS NOT TO CATER TO THE SENSITIVITIES OF OTHERS, IF YOU CATER TO THE SENSITIVITIES OF OTHERS, IT IS NEVER TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS TRUE OR MEANT EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION THAT YOU CAN BOTH SERVE TRUTH AND MEANING AND YET CATER TO THE SENSITIVITIES OF OTHERS. TO CATER TO THE SENSITIVITIES OF OTHERS IS TO SPEAK AND DO THINGS WITH THE AIM OF PLEASING AND IMPRESSING THEM, AVOIDING STIRRING THEIR DISLIKE OR ANGER OR NOT HURTING THEM. YOU CANNOT MEAN WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, BUT YOU MEAN TO CATER TO THEIR SENSITIVITIES. IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS TRUE OR MEANINGFUL, IT CANNOT BE TO CATER FOR OTHERS’ SENSITIVITIES. BECAUSE LIKE, DISLIKE & HURT ARE PRODUCTS OF FORCE, YOUR ACTION THAT CATERS TO THE SENSITIVITIES OF OTHERS IS CATERING TO THE (BLIND MEANINGLESS) STIRRING OF FORCE IN OTHERS. Mobile phone users angry over having to pay extra charges PETALING JAYA: Mobile phone users are angry over having to pay a 6% service tax for prepaid lines, with many of them claiming they are being “bullied” by the telcos. Anger is the force based response to something happening and because it is based on force it is based on what is blind and dangerous. Anger is never the correct response to the event but reason or understanding is the correct response. One studies the situation and if it is unfair, wrong for the ‘telcos’ to raise charges, it is profiteering or it is their inefficiency that is raising costs, then you can request that they not raise charges, if they disagree, then since they are the service providers, there is nothing you can do except terminate your subscription or curtail your usage. Mobiles are not essential, you can live without it and since it is the right of telcos who have been granted monopolies to raise charges, it is your right to terminate your subscription or economize by cutting your likely profligate usage. YOU CAN SAVE MORE BY CUTTING USAGE THAN BY PROTESTING AND GETTING ANGRY. ANGER IS THE WRONG RESPONSE AND IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT THIS WORLD SEES NOTHING WRONG EVEN SEES IT AS CORRECT. HERE AGAIN IS EVIDENCE PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE NO PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL APPROACH A SITUATION WITH FORCE, WOULD STIR ANGER OR MENTAL FORCE THAT IS THE WRONG INSTRUMENT TO USE TO RESOLVE THE SITUATION. THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT IS RIGHT REFLECTS THE DEPTH OR INCURABILITY OF YOUR DELUSION. OK, THE TELCOS GET COWERED BY YOUR ANGER AND RESCIND THEIR INTENTION BUT THIS IS MERELY A CASE OF SUCCESSFUL BULLYING OR INTIMIDATION BY YOU OR OF FORCE TRIUMPHING OVER FORCE THAT IS TEMPORARY AND UNSTABLE. Anger not only a wrong response but asking for punishment: To be angry when faced with raised charges is not only suffering and conditioning yourself to be upset when things do not meet your desires, it is asking for punishment because it is confrontational, adversarial, intimidating. It is not the path to heaven where there is no anger, no dissent, no confrontation and that means eternal punishment. NOT ONLY IS ANGER SUFFERING AND THE INCORRECT RESPONSE TO AN ISSUE, BECAUSE IT IS CONFRONTATIONAL, FIGHTING, IT IS THE WAY TO FUTURE WOE NOT HEAVEN. THE AUTHORITIES OR POLITICIANS HAVE DEADLY KARMA CHOOSING IRRESPONSIBLE PROFITEERING INEFFICIENT COMPANIES TO RUN SERVICES BUT NOW THAT THEY HAVE BEEN APPOINTED, YOUR JUST RECOURSE IS TO ABSTAIN OR CURTAIL YOUR USAGE. Obama: U.S. stronger 10 years after September 11 attacks If you speak without knowing what you say is true then you are courting insanity and will get it. How does he see and know the US is stronger today? It is impossible the US is stronger but it is significantly weaker and so he is either deluded or speaking to boast and stir American emotion and reassure Americans unrighteously. Why is the US definitely weaker? The US today is saddled by severe even terminal economic conditions, it is weighed down by debts that threaten to drown it and there is mass insoluble unemployment that will destroy the social fabric, lead to civil unrest so how can the US be stronger? In truth the US cannot afford its defence expenditures and must curtail but there are vested interests that will resort even to assassination of the president if the defence budget is severely reduced. WHAT OBAMA SAID IS FALSE, IF ANYTHING THE US IS WEAKER TODAY AND HEADING DOWN AS A RESULT OF PROFLIGACY OF PAST PRESIDENTS AND THE REASON HE IS SAYING THAT IS SELF SERVING, TO FALSELY REASSURE AMERICANS AND THEREBY BEAT HIS OWN DRUM. France says believes the yuan is undervalued (Reuters) - French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said on Sunday he believed the Chinese currency was undervalued and would raise the issue when he visits Beijing shortly. Europe faces an economic crisis so why is he bringing up this issue if it is not because he sees this as an answer, it is blaming others and wanting others to solve problems that you created with your own folly. Why is an undervalued yuan not the cause and answer to Europe’s crisis? Even if the yuan is revalued significantly it may not boost demand for French goods in China to boost French recovery if the masses in China are too poor to afford French goods even at a devalued price. If China holds a lot of euros as it holds a lot of USD then it does not matter if the yuan is revalued but Europe will be paid nothing because it will be paid by cancelling existing debts. If China holds euros then it will use those euros to repay but these euros China holds is likely to have been recklessly lent by European banks to European consumers (eg Greece, Italy and Spain) and so France will not get anything except debt cancellation for its boosted exports as a result of revaluation. EVEN IF REVALUATION BOOSTED CHINESE DEMAND FOR FRENCH GOODS, THE FRENCH MAY NOT GET ANY PAYMENT IF CHINA ALREADY HOLDS A LOT OF EUROS THAT WILL BE RETURNED TO FINANCE THOSE PURCHASE AND THESE RETURNED EUROS MAY BE PHANTOMS BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN LENT FOOLISHLY IRRETRIEVABLY TO EUROPEAN CONSUMERS LIKE GREECE, SPAIN AND ITALY. IF THE CHINESE MASSES ARE STILL POOR THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO BUY FRENCH GOODS EVEN IF THEY ARE CHEAPENED BY DEVALUATION. IF FRANCE IS HOPING TO TAKE CHINA’S WORLD MARKET SHARE AS A RESULT OF CHINESE GOODS BEING MORE EXPENSIVE COMPARED WITH FRENCH GOODS, THAT MAY NOT MATERIALIZE IF GLOBAL DEMAND IS DOWN AS A RESULT OF DEBT OVERLOAD CRIPPLING DEMAND GLOBALLY. IF THE WORLD IS HIT BY A CRISIS, WHAT IS THE POINT OF YOUR GOODS BEING CHEAPER THAN CHINESE GOODS AS A RESULT OF REVALUATION WHEN DEMAND WILL BE DOWN ANYWAY? What revaluation can & cannot achieve: Beset by debt problems and a floundering economy, France has joined the US chorus to want China to revalue. What can revaluation achieve? In bilateral trade between Europe and China, it will make Chinese goods more expensive possibly (but not necessarily) reducing demand for Chinese goods whilst European goods will be cheaper in China possibly but not necessarily increasing demand for European goods. In terms of world trade, Chinese goods will become more expensive and possibly but not necessarily less attractive whilst European goods will become comparatively cheaper and possibly more attractive. Thus in the global marketplace, France is attempting to steal or confiscate part of China’s market share by forcing the yuan up. However in today’s world, those nations with savings like China & Germany may have lost their savings because these savings have been lent out (eg China’s holdings in US treasuries have been squandered by the US government and no longer there except in printing more paper and Germany’s may have been lent by banks to countries like Greece and irretrievably lost) and so the world is running on empty tank rather than the many severely indebted countries and the many saving surplus countries like China and Germany running to the rescue like Lone Ranger. IN A WORLD RUNNING ON EMPTY TANK, WHERE THE SAVERS HAVE IN REALITY LOST THEIR MONEY BY FOOLISHLY LENDING TO THE INDEBTED COUNTRIES, WHERE DEMAND IS DEPRESSED GLOBALLY, WHERE IS THE US AND FRANCE GOING TO FIND INCREASED EXPORTS TO REDRESS THEIR TRADE IMBALANCES AND DEBTS? IF THE US AND FRANCE WRESTS AWAY PART OF CHINA’S MARKET SHARE THROUGH REVALUATION, IT WILL DEPRESS THE CHINESE ECONOMY AND DEMAND SO THAT TOO MAY IMPACT ON FRANCE’S AND US’ EXPORTS TO CHINA. DESPITE REVALUATION YOU STILL HAVE TO REPAY YOUR DEBTS AND WHILST YOU ARE REPAYING YOUR DEBTS, YOU GET NOTHING FOR YOUR ENDEAVOURS, JUST CANCELLATION OF THOSE DEBTS AND SO THIS WILL STILL DEPRESS YOUR ECONOMY BECAUSE YOU WILL GET NOTHING FOR YOUR ENDEAVOURS. THUS THE WISE PERSON WOULD NEVER INDEBT HIMSELF TO OTHERS BECAUSE IT MEANS BORROWING FROM THE FUTURE TO SPEND AND CONSUME TODAY SO THAT WHEN TOMORROW COMES YOU MAY HAVE NOTHING TO SPEND BECAUSE IT HAS ALREADY BEEN SPENT YESTERDAY. AND SO DEVALUATION OR NOT, YOU STILL HAVE TO REPAY YOUR DEBTS (OR KEEP POSTPONING, DIGGING A BIGGER AND BIGGER HOLE) AND WHILST YOU REPAY, YOUR LIFESTYLE MUST BE CRIMPED AND DEPRESSED. China’s yuan is not the cause and cure for the world’s problems: Because China’s cheap yuan is not the cause of the world’s economic and financial crisis, revaluation is never the cure and those who clamour are deluded, barking up the wrong tree. What are the causes of the world’s economic crisis? It is the reckless bankers, Wall Street’s in particular (eg Goldman Sachs) who have fashioned mad derivatives they said have permanently cancelled out risks, have efficiently distributed risks that have spawned the financial excesses of colossal proportions. The wealth of the world has been inexorably transferred from the masses to the few (rich individuals and multinationals like Apple, Exxon) so that now there is an unstable imbalance between too few who own too much wealth and too many whose wealth and savings in banks have been recklessly squandered by bankers and who have foolishly undertaken too much debt (credit card and mortgages). Because everyone puts their money in banks, the money has been recycled, lent to be collected to be re-deposited to be lent again in many cycles so that a single million can spawn many millions of debt so that the economy boomed whilst the party was going on but with time as the leverage becomes too great it must collapse in a mountain of debt. Speculators have cornered the commodity, currency and share markets, driving prices up that it harms the economy. Eg oil and gold prices have been driven up to levels that affects the economy by speculators whose presence push up prices. In their pursuit of maximal profits many Western companies have shifted to China to produce cheaply to export to America and this means more Americans will be jobless because the jobs have been transferred overseas. Not satisfied, rich Americans through lobbying, have made tax cuts that means less revenue for governments, they evade tax by various means so the society becomes increasingly impoverished dependent on borrowings to survive. THUS CAPITALISM IS A DEAD END LIMITED LIFESPAN SYSTEM OPEN TO ABUSE AND A TIME HAS COME WHEN TOO MUCH MONEY HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED BY HOOK AND CROOK FROM THE HANDS OF THE MANY TO THE FEW, THE BANKING SYSTEM WHERE EVERYONE PUTS HIS MONEY HAS MEANT MANY MULTIPLES OF DEBT ARE CREATED FOR THE EXISTING WEALTH, THE BANKERS HAVE MADE A MESS OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM, SPECULATORS ARE ALLOWED TO CREATE HAVOC WITH COMMODITY AND EVEN CURRENCY MARKETS AND GREEDY WESTERN COMPANIES HAVE ABANDONED THEIR CUSTOMER BASE BY MANUFACTURING OVERSEAS TO SELL EXPENSIVELY DEPRIVING THE CONSUMING COUNTRIES OF EMPLOYMENT. An illusion of wealth built on debt: The conspicuous display of wealth you see everywhere in the world is apparent than real, it is built on debt, the people have not paid for it yet but are in the process of repaying and is likely to be ambushed whilst repaying. Building those houses, airports and roads are quite cheap but repaying them is expensive even exorbitant so that the buyers will end up being unable to pay because the profit margins are exorbitant. THE GULLIBLE ARE IMPRESSED BY THE MATERIAL PROGRESS AND SIGNS OF WEALTH THEY SEE AROUND BUT THE DISCERNING SEE A NOOSE OF CRIPPLING DEBT THAT WILL ULTIMATELY KILL EVERYONE. WHAT YOU SEE AROUND IS NOT MASSIVE WEALTH BUT MASSIVE DEBT AND THIS CANNOT GO ON FOREVER. The Star - turning 40 in style It is possible to turn 40 but it is impossible to turn 40 in style except in the delusion of the fool or to boast or brag that will end in his insanity. Even if it is possible to turn 40 in style, style is not about substance but show, about impressing others and so it is meaningless to turn 40 in style except in your delusion it is meaningful that will also end in insanity. TURNING 40 IN STYLE IS NEVER SAID IN TRUTH BUT IN FALSITY TO MAKE MUCH OR BOAST AND THAT WILL END IN INSANITY WHOEVER YOU ARE AND IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A SENSELESS STATEMENT THEN YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU READ. Highest happiness does not depend on anything or anyone: The Buddha said that what others call happiness that the noble ones have found is suffering and so there is actually no happiness to be found externally dependent on the acquisition or enjoyment of objects, sensations or persons. Happiness obtained through sensate enjoyment (eg tasty food, perfumes, touch, ‘beautiful’ sight or sounds), through acquisitions of objects (wives, children, money, assets), dependency on others (friends, girl or boy, child) is actually suffering and it is the delusion and perversion of the foolish smitten and tormented person that these are pleasures when they are always suffering because they are enjoyed with stirred force or dependent on the reception of force (gentle force gives pleasure). Instead when a person is wisely secluded, TRULY freed of all external and internal entanglements (eg thoughts, fantasies, restlessness) then the mental state of his mind is automatically happy without any qualifications or conditions. The Buddha said ‘good is cessation’ and so the more you stop the happier you become. Your happiness does not depend on anything, you do not need heaven or anything to be happy, whatever the highest and purest happiness is to be found within you when it is shorn of all defilements and desires and shines luminous like the sun. Thus the person who has TRULY stopped stretching all his syllables, stopped changing speed and loudness will enjoy a measure of true happiness denied those who stretch their syllables, change speed or loudness no matter how holy or virtuous they think they are. The person who has TRULY fully conscious stopped all thinking enjoys a higher happiness than the person who cannot stop thinking or who has stopped stretching his syllables. The person who has TRULY stopped stirring his mental force to like or dislike whatever is happening enjoys a higher happiness than the person who cannot stop liking or disliking, who can stop thinking, who can stop stretching his syllables. The person who has TRULY stopped feeling pain and pleasure enjoys a higher happiness than the person who cannot stop feeling pain or pleasure. ANYONE WHO REFUSES TO SEEK HAPPINESS WITHIN HIM BUT SEEKS HAPPINESS EXTERNALLY IN OTHERS (PRETTY GIRL, PRETTY CAR), IN SENSORY EXPERIENCES (GREAT HOLIDAY VENUES), OBJECTS (MONEY, ROLEX WATCH, BEAUTIFUL HOUSE) IS A BIG FOOL WHO THINKS HE SEEKS HAPPINESS BUT HE SEEKS TORMENT AND HEARTBREAK. THIS I KNOW THROUGH PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, THERE IS NO GREATER SELF ASSURED HAPPINESS THAN THE STATE OF THE MIND INDEPENDENT OF ALL OTHERS AND ALL OBJECTS, ROOTED IN THE CESSATION FIRST OF STYLE THEN THINKING THEN LIKING AND DISLIKING AND FINALLY THE CESSATION OF ALL FEELINGS OF PAIN AND PLEASURE. IF YOU THINK YOU NEED A CERTAIN PERSON OR OBJECT OR PLACE TO BE HAPPY THEN YOU ARE DELUDED, HEADED FOR SUFFERING. What or who do you need to stop style, thinking, liking and disliking? Whatever the material possessions and sensate enjoyment of someone who possesses style (stretches syllables, changes speed and loudness) his happiness is far below the happiness of one who has shed his style because he is no longer a robot, is not beset by maddening insoluble stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate. Do you need any object or person to stop stretching your syllables? Whatever the wealth, fame, status, happiness of someone who cannot stop thinking, the happiness of one who can stop thinking is incomparably higher. Do you need anything or anyone to stop thinking? Whatever the pleasures and happiness of one who likes and dislikes, the happiness of one whose mental force is not stirred to like or dislike is higher. Do you need anything or anyone to stop stirring your mental force to like or dislike? RPK: Not cheating just bending the rules: It is a reflection of his advanced false perception and people’s lack of true understanding that they think such a nonsensical statement is valid. If rules are bent it is cheating, if you use enough force to will to see something as true, soon you begin to perceive it is true that bending the rules is not cheating. IF YOU GO BY THE RULES, APPLY THE RULES YOU ARE NOT CHEATING. IF YOU BEND THE RULES THEN THAT IS CHEATING EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION YOU DO NOT REALIZE WILL END IN INSANITY FOR YOU. AND YOU HAVE KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS SUFFERING FOR TRYING TO CONVERT OTHERS TO YOUR PERVERTED PERCEPTION. Um, ah, er, as I was saying What is the meaning of such expressed awkwardness or uncertainty? If a person truly understood a situation he is going to speak about, he cannot be guilty of such hesitancy or uncertainty or mulling about what he is going to say. It is only because a person hasn’t understood a situation and yet he is desirous and eager to speak and what he speaks is rehashed, he cannot make up his mind which of many alternatives to select that he is wracked by such hesitancy. ONLY A PERSON WHO IS EAGER TO SPEAK BEFORE HE HAS TRULY UNDERSTOOD THE SITUATION, WHOSE SPEECH IS REHASHED FROM OPTIONS RECORDED CAN OPEN HIS MOUTH TO SPEAK AND THEN BE BESET BY HESITANCY. A PERSON WHO SPEAKS HAVING TRULY UNDERSTOOD THE SITUATION AND KNOWING WHAT HE WANTS TO SPEAK THAT IS NOT REHASHED CANNOT SPEAK THUS. HE MAY HAVE LOST TRACK OF WHAT HE WANTED TO SAY BECAUSE HE IS EASILY DISTRACTABLE AND HAS LOST TRACK OF THE PLAYBACK OF THE RECORDING. Tax hike on hold: Is it possible the telcos decided to raise charges without informing the government? If the authorities were aware, why did it acquiesce only to intervene now to block the move to raise service tax? It may be that the public furore caused the government to change its mind or it may be an elaborate exercise to show the government has the interest of the citizens at heart and so you should be grateful. Rules cannot be bent, only not applied: Rules can never be bent or broken because they are not physical objects, rulers can be bent or broken but never rules that are either applied or selectively not applied in which case it is cheating or being unfair. TO BE FAIR, RULES MUST BE APPLIED TO EVERYONE AND IF THEY ARE SELECTIVELY APPLIED TO SOME AND NOT APPLIED TO OTHERS BECAUSE OF VESTED INTERESTS THEN IT IS SIMPLY A CASE OF UNFAIRNESS OR CHEATING. TO SPEAK OF RULES BEING BENT IS TO SPEAK FALSELY, A FORM OF EUPHEMISM TO SANITIZE EVIL, RULES CAN BE WAIVED OR NOT APPLIED, THEY CANNOT BE BENT. RULES ARE FORMULATED AND ENFORCED TO GOVERN PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS, THOSE WHO ARE NOT ROBOTS, WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS TRUE AND FALSE, GOOD AND BAD DO NOT NEED RULES TO CONFORM TO OR OBEY. 46 million Americans living in poverty: The number of Americans living in poverty rose to 46.2 million last year - nearly one in six people - according to the US Census Bureau's annual report. Capitalism is a cruel game with increasing number of people falling on the wayside rather than win-win for everyone. IT IS A LIE THAT CAPITALISM IS THE BEST WAY OF RUNNING AN ECONOMY. WITH THE PROGRESS OF TIME, MORE AND MORE WEALTH GETS SEQUESTERED IN THE HANDS OF A FEW RICH INDIVIDUALS AND BIG COMPANIES (MICROSOFT HAS CASH RESERVES OF 55 BILLION, APPLE 80 BILLION) WHILST THE MAJORITY GETS EMACIATED, POORER AND POORER UNTIL A CRITICAL IMBALANCE IS REACHED WHERE THE MASSES ARE TOO POOR TO SPEND TO KEEP THE ECONOMY HEALTHY WHILST THE (FILTHILY) RICH CANNOT SPEND ENOUGH EVEN IF THEY WANTED TO KEEP THE ECONOMY HUMMING. IT IS NOT AN IRONY THAT EVEN IN AMERICA THE BASTION OF CAPITALISM AND WEALTH, SO MANY LIVE IN POVERTY BUT IT IS THE INEVITABLE FULLY UNDERSTANDABLE RESULT OF EVIL CAPITALISM. AS A SONG GOES, THE THING THAT MAKES YOU RICH MAKES ME POOR. There are no ironies: There are no ironies in life and anyone who speaks of ironies is speaking falsely, does not truly understand. Everything that happens has cause and what has cause is fully understandable and what is understandable is never ironical or contradictory except in the false, force based emotional understanding of the person. Thus it is never an irony that so many and increasing numbers of people are living in poverty in the land of the plenty or affluent but it is precisely to be expected from the nature of the system of everyone grabbing as much as he can that wealth increasingly is sequestered in the hands of the few and multinationals and the masses who are actually prostitutes working for the few rich pimps, become increasingly poor. ANYONE WHO SPEAKS OF IRONIES IS SPEAKING FALSELY, BETRAYS HIS LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING, EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AND WHAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD IS NEVER IRONICAL EXCEPT IN YOUR ABIDING DELUSION. What is an irony? An irony is a stirring of a person’s mental force to be disturbed or uneasy at the perception of an apparent (never true) contradiction. A contradiction results when one set of ‘facts’ disagree or contradict with another set of ‘facts’. If two sets of facts disagree, either both are wrong or one is wrong and the other right, never both right so whence the contradiction? BECAUSE IN ANY SITUATION ONLY ONE STIPULATION CAN OCCUR AND IF IT OCCURS, ANY STIPULATION TO THE CONTRARY OR THAT IS DIFFERENT IS WRONG, WHERE CAN THERE BE CONTRADICTION EXCEPT IN THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE FOOL OF WHAT IS ACTUALLY BELIEFS AS FACTS OR TRUTH. CONSEQUENT OF THE FOOLISH ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRADICTORY VERSIONS OF WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED, THE FOOL’S EMOTION IS STIRRED TO BE DISTURBED OR UNEASY AND HE EXPERIENCES IRONY. 'Did she really think that?': Jackie O's grandchildren 'absolutely horrified' by her antiquated views on women “Horrified” is their understanding of Jackie Onassis’ views, if it is not their overriding understanding, why is it mentioned exclusively? To be horrified means to have your mental force stirred to be disgusted or angry or upset which are all fancy terms for ‘dislike’. Because dislike is merely a blind meaningless harmful repulsive stirring of a person’s mental force, their prime understanding of Jackie’s views on women are a repulsive stirring of force, their understanding is a stirring of blind meaningless force. Here is proof people do not have true or reasoned based understanding but their understanding is to stir blind meaningless force that is the wrong understanding that can one day endanger and even kill the fool.

A season to spread cheer
SENIOR citizens Chew Gaik Sim, 81, Nordin Cik Teh, 77, and M. P. Kaliammah, 65, were beaming with joy after receiving food aid worth RM50 and RM10 duit raya each in conjunction with Hari Raya and National Day.
This is a thoroughly deluded statement in many ways and if you do not know what to make of it, you think it is good then you do not understand or understand falsely.
Just because there are festivities around does not make it a season which by definition is a division of the year, marked by changes in weather, ecology, and hours of daylight.
You don’t ask others to spread cheer, which is demeritorious not meritorious because you want others to be a robot to do as you tell them. In any case cheer is not good but it is doing or saying things that HARMFULLY stir mental force in each other to like or be excited.
JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE FESTIVITIES PRESENT DOES NOT MAKE IT A SEASON.
YOU DON’T TELL OTHERS WHAT TO DO, TELL THEM TO SPREAD CHEER WHICH IF THEY LISTENED TO YOU, THEY BECOME YOUR ROBOTS.
CHEER IS NOT GOOD BUT IT IS ACTUALLY FABRICATED TO BE PLEASE AND IMPRESS EACH OTHER, TO STIR ONE’S OWN AND OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BE EXCITED BY PROCEEDINGS THAT IS EVIL NOT GOOD.
IF YOU MUST HAVE CHEER, HEAVEN MAY NOT BE THE PLACE FOR YOU BUT EVEN ETERNAL WOE IS THE PLACE FOR YOU.
THUS IF I AM CORRECT THEN ANYONE WHO DOES NOT VIEW THUS HAVE WRONG VIEW, DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND.
IT IS WRONG, BAD NEVER GOOD TO TELL OTHERS THIS IS A SEASON TO SPREAD CHEER. UNLESS WHAT YOU TELL OTHERS TO DO IS TRULY GOOD, YOU ARE ASKING FOR SUFFERING TELLING OTHERS WHAT TO DO, TO SPREAD CHEER.
Fate cannot be denied:
These two persons were swept away but survived from the same beach during the tsunami in which seven died. Today they were swept away to perish and it is said the boy behaved unusually in the run up suggesting that he had a premonition of impending death:
Quote: The two were swept away at the same place where seven people lost their lives during the Dec 26 tsunami in 2004. “The water was just knee-deep. But all of a sudden, the four of us were washed over by strong waves. My son was swept out to the sea and my younger brother went after him. He said his son's behaviour had been very different over the past few days, adding that the boy had been kissing him on the cheek and hugging him.
“I don't know why. Maybe he knew his time was up,” he said.
False associations to stir emotion:
The streets may be empty during the Hari Raya period but the scene at many restaurants tells a different story.

What is relevant is that restaurants are doing good business, that the streets are empty is a false fabricated association designed to stir emotional poignancy or conflict or contradiction that streets are empty but restaurants are full.
BECAUSE IT IS A FALSE ASSOCIATION, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY IN THE NAME OF STIRRING OTHERS’ EMOTIONS. THERE IS NO NEED TO BRING EMPTY STREETS IN TALKING ABOUT FULL RESTAURANTS, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE ASSOCIATION WITH INSANITY THE FINAL OUTCOME FOR YOU.
A programmed style of speech:
To speak that the streets may be empty but many restaurants tell a different story is a programmed format of speaking copied from others.
THERE IS A COMMON STYLE OF SPEAKING THAT IS AIMED AT STIRRING EMOTIONAL CONTRADICTION OR CONTRAST OR ‘WOW’ THAT GOES LIKE THIS: WHEREAS ‘A’ IS ‘X’ ‘B’ IS THE OPPOSITE. THERE IS NO NEED TO CONTRAST, IF YOU WANT YOU CAN FIND CONTRASTS OR OPPOSITES EVERYWHERE, THEY ARE NOT RELATED TO EACH OTHER AND YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS TO FALSELY PERCEIVE IRONY OR CONTRAST EVERYWHERE TO STIR ‘WOW’ IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS.
THE PURPOSE IS TO STIR ‘WOW’, THE STREETS MAY BE EMPTY BUT ‘WOW’ THE RESTAURANTS ARE A DIFFERENT STORY, ‘HO, HO, HO’.
Not just Anwar’s DNA but his sperm DNA needed:
In order to obtain a conviction of Anwar based solely on forensic evidence (no video or audio evidence), the prosecution must establish that Anwar’s sperm not just his DNA was found in Saiful’s rectum.
After three days before Saiful presented himself for examination and another two to three days when the samples were (incompetently) left at room temperature, you would expect DNA degradation according to expert testimony but ‘miraculously’ the DNA was pristine suggesting it was not genuine.
THUS THE FACT THAT THE DNA SAMPLES WERE PRISTINE NOT DEGRADED SUGGESTS THEY WERE NOT GENUINE BECAUSE IN KEEPING WITH CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH THE SAMPLES WERE SAID TO HAVE BEEN OBTAINED YOU WOULD EXPECT DEGRADATION.
IN CRIMINAL RAPE OR HOMICIDE CASES, DEGRADED DNA (EG HAIR AND BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENS THAT MATCHES THE SUSPECT CAN BE USED TO CONVICT THE PERSON BUT IN THIS CASE, IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER ANWAR SODOMIZED SAIFUL OR NOT, IF HE DID, THEN ANWAR’S SPERM SHOULD BE FOUND IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM AND YOU MUST PROVE THE ANWAR DNA FOUND CAME FROM HIS SPERM CELLS WHICH WOULD BE EXPECTED TO HAVE DEGRADED BECAUSE OF THE DELAYED PRESENTATION AND MISHANDLING OF THE SPECIMENS.
THUS FOR ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, HERE IS AGAIN EVIDENCE OF THE FABRICATED NATURE OF THE CASE.
Where did they get Anwar’s fresh sperm?
Anwar’s fresh sperm could have been obtained whilst he was in a lock-up from his underwear during his arrest or they could have paid a maid to steal Anwar’s underwear repetitively until they got one with Anwar’s fresh sperm.
The central issue in the Anwar Saiful case:
In order to convict Anwar fairly of sodomizing Saiful based solely on forensic evidence, the prosecution must prove sperm containing Anwar’s DNA was found in Saiful’s rectum.
The complication or specificity of this case is that Saiful presented three days late for examination and it was admitted specimens obtained was left in a cabinet at room temperature for a few days and in such circumstances it would be expected the sperm specimen from Anwar would show degradation rather than the pristine sample that was presented to court.
BECAUSE SAIFUL PRESENTED LATE AND THE SPECIMEN WAS INCOMPETENTLY HANDLED, IN ORDER FOR THE SPECIMEN TO BE GENUINE IT MUST SHOW DEGRADATION THAT IT APPARENTLY DID NOT SHOW.
Prosecution’s extraordinary faith in Saiful & his rectum:
Why has the system or ruling elite demonstrated such extraordinary unwavering faith in Saiful’s story and absolute certainty his rectum contained Anwar’s sperm?
If Saiful’s allegations of sodomy are fraudulent, designed to destroy Anwar politically then it is understandable why the authorities have stuck to Saiful and supported him at great lengths through thick and thin to get his case heard and completed to a final verdict.
If the case is genuine, Saiful was indeed sodomized by Anwar and seeking justice, the authorities are completely neutral, disinterested, it is impossible that they should know with CERTAINTY Saiful is telling the truth, not making up something that may not have occurred.
IT IS EXTRAORDINARY EVEN INCREDIBLE THAT IF SAIFUL’S ALLEGATIONS ARE TRUE THAT THE PROSECUTION WHO CANNOT KNOW IT TRULY HAPPENED, HAS SUCH UNWAVERING FAITH IN SAIFUL’S STORY.
It looks likely if not certainly that conviction will based solely on forensic evidence, specifically the establishment that Anwar’s DNA was extracted from Saiful’s rectum.
If the case is fraudulent and the prosecutors can implant illegally obtained DNA from Anwar when he was arrested (eg his buccal cell DNA from his toothbrush), then they can be absolutely certain of obtaining a conviction.
If this case is genuine, how can the authorities be so confident or certain that the DNA extracted from Saiful’s rectum can be traced to Anwar? The authorities even tried to pass a law making it mandatory for Anwar to give DNA so either they do not know Anwar’s DNA profile or it is a sham to get DNA to be implanted.
WITHOUT KNOWING ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE (BECAUSE THEY WANTED ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE FOR MATCHING), HOW CAN THEY BE SO CERTAIN THAT THE DNA THEY GOT FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR, ESPECIALLY WHEN IF IT IS GENUINE, NOT A PLOT THEY CANNOT KNOW IF SAIFUL IS NOT MAKING UP THE SODOMY ALLEGATION? NOT BEING CERTAIN, HOW COULD THEY HAVE COME TO THIS ADVANCED STATE OF PROSECUTION BASED ON SAIFUL’S ALLEGATION AND SUSPICION THE DNA THEY FOUND IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM IS ANWAR’S?
IF ON THE OTHER HAND THIS IS A PLOT TO DESTROY ANWAR, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF SAIFUL’S SODOMY DID NOT OCCUR, IT WAS INTENDED TO BE FAKED, THE DNA FOUND OR IMPLANTED INTO SAIFUL’S RECTUM WILL BELONG TO ANWAR, BY HOOK OR BY CROOK.
IT IS INCREDIBLE OR IMPOSSIBLE THAT IF THE CASE IS GENUINE THE AUTHORITIES COULD PURSUE THE CASE SO CONFIDENTLY WHEN THEY CANNOT BE CERTAIN THE DNA IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR, THEY DO NOT EVEN HAVE ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE FOR REFERENCE SO HOW CAN THEY KNOW THE DNA IN SAIFUL IS ANWAR’S. WITHOUT KNOWING WITH CERTAINTY THE DNA IS ANWAR’S THEY ARE TAKING GREAT RISKS TO BRING THE CASE TO COURT SOLELY BASED ON FORENSIC CONVICTION.
The difference between Sodomy I & II:
Anwar was jailed for six years not for sodomy but abuse of power I think, the Azizan sodomy trial was a sideshow that smeared Anwar, it was based on the uncorroborated evidence of Azizan, Anwar’s wife’s driver and no DNA was involved and so it is likely prosecutors did not have DNA samples for reference leftover from the first sodomy trial which is why they even enacted new legislation to force Anwar to give samples for DNA.
THUS IT CAN BE ASSUMED QUITE SAFELY THE AUTHORITIES DID NOT HAVE SAMPLES OF ANWAR’S DNA FOR MATCHING APART FROM THAT OBTAINED FROM HIS TOOTHBRUSH OR PERSONAL EFFECTS IN THE RECENT CASE THAT THEY KNOW WITH CERTAINTY CAME FROM ANWAR THAT COULD BE PLANTED. AND SO WITHOUT ANWAR DNA AS REFERENCE, HOW COULD THEY BE SO SURE TO PROSECUTE THE CASE BASED ON DNA THEY OBTAINED FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM THAT THEY CANNOT KNOW FOR SURE CAME FROM ANWAR?
IT IS NOT JUST A MATTER OF SHOWING ANWAR’S DNA WAS PRESENT IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM BUT IT MUST BE DNA FROM ANWAR’S SPERM, NOT BUCCAL MUCOSA (ANWAR COULD NOT HAVE PERFORMED ORAL SEX ON SAIFUL’S INNER SANCTUM OR RECTUM). IT APPEARS THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO TELL IF THE DNA CAME FROM SPERM OR OTHER SOURCES AND IT WAS NOT SHOWN THE DNA CAME FROM ANWAR’S SPERM.
FURTHER IN THEIR HASTE TO IRREFUTABLY INCRIMINATE ANWAR, THE PROSECUTION PRESENTED PRISTINE DNA AS EVIDENCE WHEN ACCORDING TO EXPERT TESTIMONY, THE DNA IS EXPECTED TO SHOW DEGRADATION BASED ON THE HISTORY OF LATE PRESENTATION AND BEING LEFT IN A DRAWER.
THUS THE FOOL THINKS PRISTINE DNA WOULD PROVE THEIR CASE INCONTROVERTIBLY BECAUSE IT BELONGED TO ANWAR BUT THEY SHOULD HAVE LET THE DNA DENATURE IN KEEPING WITH SAIFUL’S DELAY PRESENTATION.
IT CAN BE REASONED WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY, NOT PROBABILITY THAT THE SODOMY CASE AGAINST ANWAR IS FRADULENT BASED ON INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AND IT REFLECTS PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY THINK IT CANNOT BE KNOWN, ANWAR MAY BE GUILTY OR THEY EMOTIONALLY CONCLUDE IT IS A CONSPIRACY WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHY IT IS A CONSPIRACY.
IF THIS CASE IS GENUINE THEN THE PROSECUTION HAS SHOWN EXTRAORDINARY UNWAVERING FAITH THAT WHAT SAIFUL TOLD THEM THAT THEY CANNOT BE CERTAIN IS TRUE, IS TRUE AND THE DNA FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE NO REFERENCE DNA WITH WHICH TO MATCH.
IF THIS CASE IS A FRAUD AIMED AT DESTROYING ANWAR THEN IT IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND WHY THEY WOULD BE SO DOGGED OR UNWAVERING IN THEIR PROSECTION OF ANWAR.
THERE ARE NEVER PERFECT CRIMES, THERE ARE TELLING SIGNS THAT TELL THE DISCERNING WHAT IS THE TRUTH.
Anwar still hasn’t given DNA sample:
Anwar still hasn’t given his DNA as sample so how did the authorities know so confidently the DNA they allegedly extracted from Saiful’s rectum came from Anwar? If you say they got secret reference based on his toothbrush, then that is chicanery and it is dangerous to assume the DNA from the toothbrush must be Anwar’s.
ONLY WHEN A CERTIFIED SCRUPULOUSLY OBTAINED SPECIMEN DNA IS OBTAINED FROM ANWAR CAN YOU FAIRLY CONVICT ANWAR OF SODOMY. IT IS DANGEROUS AND PRESUMPTUOUS TO CONVICT ANWAR BASED ON DNA THAT WAS TAKEN WITHOUT CONSENT FROM HIS TOOTHBRUSH.
IF YOU TOOK A SPECIMEN IN FRONT OF WITNESSES THEN YOU CAN BE CERTAIN THE DNA CAME FROM ANWAR, IF YOU STOLE IT FROM ANWAR’S TOOTHBRUSH HOW CAN YOU BE CERTAIN IT IS NOT SPURIOUS AND YOU CANNOT USE IT AS A REFERENCE TO CONVICT ANWAR.
Adelaide abominable, holds no allure for me:
I spent more than a decade in Adelaide and now it is possible to listen to Adelaide radio stations via the internet. There are changes and there are things that never changed.
Listening to 5DN station now called Cruise Adelaide, I am reminded (without sentiment) the many years I spent in Adelaide and it was not fun but suffering even to terrible levels.
Listening to the advertisements and the ways disc jockeys speak reminds me how impersonal faked as personal, supercilious for show life is in Adelaide and like the man who has vomited out his food will not eat it again, there is no way Adelaide will hold any allure to me, nor do I prefer KL.
THIS IS A THOROUGHLY SICK WORLD AND RATHER THAN WONDERFUL LIFE IS IN THE WEST AND AUSTRALIA, IT IS ROTTEN, SICKENING, HEARTLESS, COLD AND CUT THROAT AND SO ANYONE TO WHOM THIS WORLD HOLDS ALLURES BE IT AUSTRALIA, UK, SINGAPORE OR WHAT NOT, WILL SUFFER HERE AND HEAD FOR TERRIBLE EXTENDED EVEN ETERNAL SUFFERING. ONLY SOMEONE WHO HAS ABANDONED THIS WORLD, TO WHOM THIS WORLD HOLDS NO ALLURE, IS SICK OF THIS WORLD IS HEADED FOR HEAVEN.
US debt turns nightmare suddenly:
Suddenly the US’ debt levels turned nightmarish for various reasons.
The US spent or printed billions even a trillion to bailout the banks after the Lehman collapse and this overnight boosted like a rocket the US debt.
Together with debt comes interest payments that add to the debt plus a recession means falling GDP means less ability to repay the debt that remains the same or rising.
Through hubris, America launched itself into two very expensive wars that it could not afford and are totally unnecessary in Iraq and Afghanistan and for this George Bush has big karma.
A lot (>50%) of US expenses cannot be cut, a big part that can be cut is security or defence but there is great delusion and opposition to big cuts here and so the US is faced with difficult choices in trying to make ends meet that increasingly cannot meet.
Migrate to heaven not Australia:
The person who seeks happiness and security by migrating to Australia or whatever is always deluded and headed for woe even after he dies, not heaven.
The person who has given up his life here, has no interests in migrating anywhere, instead devotes his time to migrating to heaven is the wise man who is happy or content here and will be blissfully eternally happy after he passes away.
The first fundamental step out of suffering:
The smiling beaming faces, the clean cut smartly dressed looks are deceptions, always for show masks that hide serious deadly suffering that will end in some form of insanity, disease or suffering that leads to another eternity of perdition.
ALL BEINGS HERE WHO DISPLAY STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS (AND THIS MEANS EVERYONE HERE) ARE ROBOTS (NOT REAL LIVE TRUE BEINGS) GRIPPED BY SERIOUS DEADLY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT THEY ARE MERELY CONTROLLING AND WILL END IN INSANITY.
WITHOUT PAYING ATTENTION TO SUCCESSFULLY ELIMINATE ALL FOR SHOW USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THE BEING CANNOT ACHIEVE ANY MEANINGFUL PERMANENT ESCAPE FROM WOE.
WITH THE SUCCESSFUL ELIMINATION OF THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, HE HAS ATTAINED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND, ESCAPED THE PRISON OF BEING A ROBOT, EFFORTLESSLY FREED HIMSELF FROM THE SCOURGE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, HAS ATTAINED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND IS HEADED FOR ONE ETERNITY OR AGE IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
THE NEXT FUNDAMENTAL HIGHER STEP OUT OF SUFFERING IS TO ATTAIN THE CESSATION OF THINKING TO EXPERIENCE A UNIFIED MIND FREED FROM THE DISTRACTION OF THINKING AND IT IS A HIGHER HAPPINESS AND GIVES 2 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
THE THIRD STEP IS TO ATTAIN NEITHER STIRRING OF ONE’S MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE ANYTHING HAPPENING IN THIS WORLD.
Smartly dressed is purely for show:
Different people have different perceptions of what smartly dressed means and unless you are blind or totally undiscerning you cannot see yourself and others being smartly dressed.
People dress in ways they think is smart or impressive. Because they think it is smart, they think also that others will think it is smart and be similarly impressed.
PEOPLE DRESS EXPENSIVELY WITH A LARGE WARDROBE OR COLLECTION OF ‘ATTRACTIVE’ DRESSES (WITH ACCESSORIES LIKE WATCHES, RINGS, CUFFS, TIES, SHOES, PERFUMES AND WHATNOTS) BECAUSE THEY ARE IMPRESSED BY THE WAYS THEY DRESS AND THEY THINK OTHERS WILL BE SIMILARLY IMPRESSED.
THUS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SMART DRESSING IS FOR SHOW, TO IMPRESS OTHERS HOW STYLISH OR TRENDY OR RICH OR RESPECTABLE THEY ARE.
BECAUSE THIS IS NOT A TRUE REASON FOR DRESSING, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY AND ALL THOSE WHO ARE OBSESSED WITH BEING SMARTLY DRESSED, TO WHOM SMART DRESSING IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS ARE HIGHLY VALUED AND PAID ATTENTION TO ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY BECAUSE BEING SMARTLY DRESSED AND WORSHIPPING IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY.
THE TRUE PURPOSE FOR DRESS IS TO PROTECT YOU FROM THE ELEMENTS AND KEEP YOUR MODESTY.
Making statements with your clothes:
There are people who want to make statements with their dressing, want to project meaning with what and how they dress and this too is controlled insanity.
Thus Steve Jobs has his trademark turtle neck sweater and jeans that he is attached to, identifies with and finds meaningful when it is mad and he is deluded because the true purpose of dress is to protect you not to project your values and personality.
A crisis of confidence?
Quote: "What we are effectively going through is a crisis of confidence," said Tom Porcelli, an economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
This is a dumb thing to say and here you have someone touted as expert saying something stupid.
This is not a crisis of confidence but it is difficult economic conditions resulting in serious decline in confidence. If we are going through a crisis of confidence then by restoring confidence, by making everyone confident, the economy is restored. What about the severe personal and national debt burdens, are they the results of the crisis of confidence or is it the other way, severe personal and national debt burdens depressing demand and therefore hurting confidence.
THIS IS NOT A CRISIS OF CONFIDENCE, IT IS FAR WORSE THAN THAT, LOW CONFIDENCE MAY BE A SYMPTOM OF THE ECONOMIC CANCER RATHER THAN THE CAUSE. WHAT KIND OF EXPERT IS THIS?
The absolute irrefutable top priority for all beings:
There is only one absolute top priority for all beings to achieve that cannot be disputed or refuted by anyone.
What is this absolute top priority that cannot be refuted?
The identification and elimination without remainder of style, of all use of force to prolong (eg syllables), change speed and strength of force (loudness).
The purpose for existence of all beings even if they are deluded and wicked is to be happy and avoid all forms of suffering, to prolong their lives as long as possible and if eternal life is possible, nobody wants to perish but they want to live forever.
Without first abolishing style, abolishing all stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you cannot attain the first higher state of mind that comes with it one eternity or Age in heavenly bliss. Without first achieving the first higher state of mind you cannot progress to achieve the second higher state (cessation of thinking), the third higher state (neither stirring mental force to like or dislike anything) and thence the fourth highest state of mind (neither pain nor pleasure) that give respectively 2, 4, 500 eternities in heavenly bliss.
THUS THE ABOLITION OF STYLE IS THE KEY TO 1 ETERNITY IN HEAVEN, KEY TO THE SECOND HIGHER STATE (CESSATION OF THINKING) AND 2 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN, THE THIRD HIGHER STATE (NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE) AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN AND FINALLY THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE.
WHATEVER THE HAPPINESS OF A BEING WHO PRACTICES STYLE, IT CANNOT MATCH THE HAPPINESS OF ONE WHO HAS SHED STYLE, WHO NO LONGER USES FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE HE NO LONGER REHASHES, IS NO LONGER A ROBOT, HE IS EFFORTLESSLY FREED FROM THE TORMENT OF RELENTLESS RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE.
EVEN IF THERE IS NO LIFE AFTER DEATH, NO HEAVEN AND HELL, EVEN IF STYLE IS TRUE AND MEANINGFUL, NOT TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE INCOMPARABLY HAPPIER AND SANER MODE OF EXISTENCE AND THE PERSON AVOIDS CERTAIN INSANITY FROM SENILE DEGRADATION OF THE MIND THAT IS THE LOT OF THOSE WHO PRACTICE STYLE.
IF WHAT I SAY IS CORRECT THEN I HAVE DISCOVERED AND TAUGHT THE HIGHEST ELIXIR OR KEY TO HAPPINESS, ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING AND EVEN ETERNAL HEAVENLY LIFE.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE OF ELIMINATING STYLE OR USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, IT MAY BE ABSOLUTELY IMPORTANT IF HAPPINESS, AVOIDING SUFFERING AND ETERNAL LIFE IS IMPORTANT TO YOU.
If happiness, not suffering and eternal life is important to you:
If you seek happiness, want to avoid any suffering and want eternal life if possible then you have only one choice, one recourse and that is to pay attention to identify and eliminate all style, all use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness because it is the key to freedom from stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate, freedom from being a rehashing robot and is the key to one eternity in heaven, key to the higher states of mind that gives even more than one eternity in heaven.
Anyone who is enjoying himself, happy, experiencing no suffering does not want to die, end his present happiness and so it is that he wishes his blissful state to continue forever, in eternity.
It is only someone who is suffering unbearably who wants to die, hang himself or put a bullet in his own head. Thus someone freed of style is happy, content in himself and not suffering and he does not wish to die and wants eternal life if it is possible and it is possible, even for up to 60,000 Ages or eternities according to the Buddha.
The new Bill Gates: Google's Larry Page
People are presented with this statement and they do not really understand what it means.
What it means is that people’s understanding are false and rehashed.
Bill Gates is Bill Gates and Larry Page is Larry Page, there is no need to depict Larry Page as Bill Gates nor is that ever true.
People have recorded understandings of everything they come into contact with and they consciously or unconsciously try to see what is happening currently in terms of those recorded understanding which is wrong and dangerous.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND LARRY PAGE AS HE ACTUALLY IS INSTEAD OF IMAGINING HIM AS THE BILL GATES OF THE PAST, THERE IS NO NEED TO DO WORK TO RECALL BILL GATES NOR IT IS TRUE TO PICTURE LARRY PAGE AS BILL GATES. NOT ONLY DOES IT SERVE NO PURPOSE, IT IS DANGEROUS TO PROGRAM YOURSELF TO SEE LARRY PAGE AS THE NEW BILL GATES.
Skeptical by both nature and training
"Scientists, skeptical by both nature and training, always urge a dose of caution when looking at any one event as evidence of climate change," he said in his opening statement.
People see nothing wrong with the statement that scientists are sceptical by nature and training when it is unwitting admission scientists are robots without true understanding.
Anyone with genuine understanding is NEVER sceptical nor gullible, readily embracing everything ‘thrown at them’.
Scepticism by training means it is programmed in them and so if scepticism is trained in scientists it is a programmed attitude and scientists are robots with fixed attitudes without true understanding.
SCEPTICISM IS NEVER ABOUT MEANING BUT IT IS ABOUT FORCE, A FLAT INDISCRIMINATE RECEPTION OF WHATEVER IS PRESENTED WITH SUSPICION OR REJECTION THAT MUST BE OVERCOME. WHY DOES ANYONE NEED TO BE SCEPTICAL IF HE HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE CAN SEE AS IT ACTUALLY IS WHAT IS PRESENTED TO HIM IS TRUE OR FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE? THUS IF SCIENTISTS ARE BY NATURE SCEPTICAL IT MEANS THEY ARE BLIND WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING ROBOTS, THEY ARE REJECTING PEOPLE.
PEOPLE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND NEVER NEED TO BE SCEPTICAL NOR BLINDLY GULLIBLY ACCEPTING ANYTHING, SCEPTICISM IS A PROGRAMMING, A PROGRAMMED ATTITUDE OF REJECTION AND SO IT IS AN ADMISSION SCIENTISTS HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, ARE BLIND WITH A PROGRAMMED SCEPTICISM.

Absurdity and callosity of Strauss Kahn case dismissal:
Strauss Kahn through his lawyers acknowledged there was sexual contact but insists it was consensual.
Surely it is not the business of prosecutors to prejudge the case that on the basis the plaintiff is of suspect integrity the case is not viable.
WHAT IS THE POINT OF HAVING COURT CASES WHEN PROSECUTORS CAN DECIDE TO DROP CASES JUST BECAUSE THE PLAINTIFF DOES NOT MEET STRICT FIDELITY CRITERIA?
THE ACCUSED HAS ACKNOWLEDGED SEXUAL CONTACT BUT CLAIM IT IS CONSENSUAL. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE POINTS FAR MORE TO ASSAULT THAN CONSENSUAL AND SO IT SHOULD BE THE COURT’S ROLE TO ACQUIT STRAUSS KAHN.
THIS IS A CASE OF BLATANT ESCAPE FROM JUSTICE BY THE PRIVILEDGED; SHE MAY HAVE BEEN PRIVATELY BRIBED.
IN A MICROCOSM IT REFLECTS HUMANKIND IS VERY SICK, IMMORAL AND ALL THESE WILL LEAD TO TOTAL SYSTEM COLLAPSE AND MAYHEM. FINANCIALLY, ECONOMICALLY AND ECOLOGICALLY MANKIND WILL DRIVE THE EARTH TO COLLAPSE.
An excuse never reason not to prosecute Strauss Kahn:
Strauss Kahn has not even bothered to deny sexual contact.
It is always an excuse never a true reason not to prosecute because the plaintiff is not a reliable witness.
Her past record is not reason to prove she is lying in this case.
The defence has to prove she is lying in this case to dismiss her allegations.
WITHOUT HEARING HER ALLEGATIONS AND THEIR MERITS, NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO SUMMARILY DISMISS HER COMPLAINT AS FALSE BECAUSE SHE IS UNRELIABLE.
YOU HAVE TO HEAR HER STORY AND THEN SHOW IN WHAT WAYS SHE IS FALSE.
TO SAY HER PAST RECORDS CONDEMNS HER CREDIBILITY IS TO EXHIBIT FALSE LOGIC OR FALSE LOGIC FOR A PURPOSE OR IN OTHER WORDS IT IS AN EXCUSE NOT TRUE REASON NOT TO PROSECUTE.
What about Strauss Kahn’s reputation?
If you want to talk about the maid’s seedy reputation you should also consider Strauss Kahn’s reputation.
There is ample anecdotal evidence he is not just a serial insatiable seducer but he is given to sexual violence, he has been described as being like a chimpanzee in rut, has some reputation for rough sex with prostitutes and so if anything they are both equally matched to cancel each other out and the case should be heard.
THAT THERE WAS SEXUAL CONTACT IS NOT DISPUTED. WHAT IS DISPUTED IS WHETHER IT IS CONSENSUAL AS STRAUSS KAHN CLAIMED OR IT WAS CRIMINAL AS THE MAID CLAIMED.
IF YOU ARE TO GO BY REPUTATION, STRAUSS KAHN IS EVEN WORSE, HE HAS A REPUTATION AS AN INCORRIGIBLE SEXUAL PHILANDERER THAT WOULD MORE THAN OFFSET WHATEVER SEEDY REPUTATION THE MAID HAS SO WHY SHOULD PROSECUTORS BECOME JUDGE IN DISMISSING THE CASE?
Excuses is practicing lethal false logic:
People think nothing about proffering excuses but they have wrong understanding here as everywhere they think they truly understand.
Giving excuses whatever it is, is training yourself to ascribe false reasons for things happening that is deadly, will kill you one day because soon these false reasons for things happening will seize you and you will do the wrong things because you believe the wrong reasons or excuses behind doing it.
CITING THE MAID’S SEEDY PAST AS REASON HER CASE IS UNTENABLE IS A WRONG REASON OR EXCUSE FOR NOT PROSECUTING. IF YOU KEEP GIVING EXCUSES (EG YOU CANNOT COME BECAUSE YOU WERE SICK WHEN YOU DID NOT LIKE THE PERSON) YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF (AND OTHERS) TO REASON WRONGLY, TO PERCEIVE WHAT IS NOT THE REASON IS THE REASON AND THIS HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES, WILL KILL YOU ONE DAY.
EXCUSES ARE WRONG UNDERSTANDINGS IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING OTHERS AND THAT IS TRAINING YOURSELF TO UNDERSTAND FALSELY AND IT IS NOT A SURPRISE PEOPLE WHO PROFFER EXCUSES NEVER HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING. EXCUSES METAMORPHOSIZE TO BECOME DELUSIONS AND THEY PERCEIVE THEIR DELUSIONS AS TRUTH.
Steve Jobs, cut down in his prime deservedly:
Steve Jobs was born in 1955 and so he is still very young but stricken by cancer needing liver transplant that suggests he has not much left in life.
Looking back at his looks and behaviour through the ages, he is cocky or arrogant and can be very nasty, his achievements are actually overblown and rather than reflecting the vicissitudes of life, what has happened to him befits karma, he is deluded and has serious deadly karma attached to his being.
Self-hurt not falsity causes lashing out:
By lashing out is meant the habitual explosive spitting, coughing and grunts that are NEVER due to physical need to spit, cough or grunt but it is ALWAYS a form of lashing out or attacking that has escaped self control or it is the harbouring of thoughts to harm others.
LASHING OUT MAY BE PHYSICALLY EXPRESSED AS GRUNTS, SPITTING, COUGHING OR DOING THINGS THAT MAKE OTHERS SUFFER OR IT MAY BE MENTAL, HARBOURING THOUGHTS OF HARMING OR KILLING OTHERS.
ALL stylish emotional people must harbour ill will, an urge to attack or hurt others or lash out because they are constantly using force to go against themselves to put on shows to deceive, please, impress and intimidate others that also subjects themselves to force that hurts them and this causes resentment that must be vented by an urge to attack others that must either be well suppressed (as in those who are cuckolded) or it leads to habitual lashing out in the form of spitting, grunts or coughing.
Some people conceal or bottle up their hostility so well they are not even aware but there are those who struggle to restrain their irresistible to lash out eg by emitting explosive grunts or coughs.
ALL EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE MUST HARBOUR ILL WILL OR DESIRE TO ATTACK AND HARM OTHERS BECAUSE THEY ARE CONSTANTLY USING FORCE FALSELY TO FABRICATE STYLE (PROLONGING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS) THAT HARMS EVEN KILLS THEMSELVES WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT MUST INEVITABLY LEAD TO RESENTMENT, HATRED THAT MUST BE VENTED AGAINST OTHERS THEY STRIVE TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OR IT MUST BE REPRESSED SO WELL THAT SOME ARE LIKE EUNUCHS UNAWARE OF THEIR ILL WILL OR WISH TO HURT OTHERS EVEN WHEN IT IS PRESENT AND HIDDEN IN A VELVET LINED GLOVE. THESE PEOPLE SPECIALISES IN KILLING OTHERS SOFTLY, OF ADMINISTERING SWEET SOFT POISON TO OTHERS.
It is not being aware that what one says or does is false that is the cause of this resentment or hostility, often people even those who are supposedly quite intelligent are unaware of the falsity of what they say or do, so how can the awareness of falsity be the source of their recurrent explosive lashing outs as in grunts and coughs?
Instead it is the self-hurt that a person who is guilty of falsity whether he is aware or not that is the source of inner conflict and tension that must either be so well mind-bendingly suppressed or it is a conditioned irresistible urge to lash out or retaliate result in regular emission of spitting or explosive coughs or grunts.
IT IS NEVER THE AWARENESS OF THE FALSITY OF WHAT ONE SAYS OR DOES THAT GIVES RISE TO THE URGE TO LASH OUT AT OTHERS, OFTEN PEOPLE ARE UNAWARE WHAT THEY SAY IS FALSE BUT IT IS THE SUFFERING AS A RESULT OF THEIR FALSITY THAT THEY MUST SURELY EXPERIENCE THAT DRIVES THEM TO LASH OUT THAT LEADS TO MORE SUFFERINGS THAT LEADS TO MORE LASHING OUT THAT WILL END IN INSANE VIOLENCE EITHER SUICIDAL OR HOMICIDAL.
THE FASHIONING OF STYLE WHETHER CONSCIOUS OR UNAWARE COMES WITH A HEAVY PRICE OF SELF SUFFERING AND IT IS THIS INSOLUBLE CONSTANTLY RENEWING SUFFERING THAT FEEDS AN URGE TO LASH OUT AT OTHERS OR ILL WILL THAT IS ONE OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS THE BUDDHA SAID LED TO THIS WORLD.
A life devoid of understanding, full of suffering they call happiness:
If they knew what they say or do is false or harmful to self and others, they would have true understanding and it is because they do not have true understanding that they are unaware what they say or do is false, does not make sense and leads to terrible self-harm that leads to self and other hate.
WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING PEOPLE HAVE IN THIS WORLD IS RUDIMENTARY IF NOT NON-EXISTENT, IF THEY HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING THEY WILL KNOW WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS NOT JUST FALSE BUT INFLICTS TERRIBLE SELF RENEWING INSOLUBLE SUFFERING UPON THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.
WHAT PEOPLE HERE CALL HAPPINESS THAT THE NOBLE ONES HAVE FOUND IS SUFFERING, SO SAID THE BUDDHA AND SO EVEN THEIR HAPPINESS IS SUFFERING AND THEY ARE DELUDED OR HAVE WRONG OR NO UNDERSTANDING EVEN REGARDING HAPPINESS.
AND SO IT IS THAT PEOPLE HERE LIVE COMPLETELY UNDER THE SPELL OF FORCE THAT RUNS THEIR LIVES; THEY ARE DUMB NOT CLEVER AS THEY THINK. IT IS FORCE THAT THEY APPRECIATE, THEY FIND THE FORCE CHANGES (PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH) FULL OF MEANING, IT IS FORCE THAT THEY ENJOY (PLEASURE AND EXCITEMENT ARE PRODUCTS OF FORCE) AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR RUIN EVEN INSANITY AND THEN ETERNAL TORMENT.
A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL KNOW IF WHAT HE SAID IS FALSE AND BECAUSE PEOPLE SAY MANY THINGS THAT CAN BE SHOWN TO BE FALSE AND THEY DO NOT KNOW IT, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THEY HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Rehashing overrules understanding:
Even if a person has true understanding, rehashing overrules or overrides it because rehashing is according to a recorded plan in his head and whatever is recorded is fixed, does not require understanding, merely retrieval and playback according to what is recorded. You can keep modifying these recordings but once modified it is again fixed and the dictator of what you say or do in which you are the robot executing it.
People’s false understandings are consistent even stereotyped and the only way for a false understanding to be stereotyped is if it is recorded and rehashed from recording.
IF YOU ARE REHASHING WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, IT IS FIXED, ACCORDING TO A PLAN IN YOUR HEAD SO WHAT IS THERE TO UNDERSTAND? WHAT IS THERE FOR A TV NEWSREADER TO UNDERSTAND? WHAT HE IS SAYING IS FIXED FOR HIM AND HE MERELY CONVERTS WRITING TO SPEECH AND SO EVEN IF HE HAD UNDERSTANDING, IT IS BRUSHED ASIDE IN FAVOUR OF MINDLESS MECHANICAL RENDERING.
BECAUSE PEOPLE’S FALSE UNDERSTANDINGS ARE CONSISTENT IN THEM, THESE UNDERSTANDINGS MUST BE RECORDED AND REHASHED JUST AS WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS ALWAYS REHASHED.
IF YOU THINK REHASHING REQUIRES TRUE UNDERSTANDING, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION HERE AS EVERYWHERE ELSE BECAUSE EVEN IF THE PERSON HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING, IT IS BRUSHED ASIDE WHEN A PERSON REHASHES AND BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE REHASHING ALL THE TIME, THEIR TRUE UNDERSTANDING IF PRESENT IS PERMANENTLY BRUSHED ASIDE, ATROPHIED OR DEAD.
Steve Jobs’ deadly false logic:
"Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important thing I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life," he (Steve Jobs) said.
What is said reflects wrong logic and delusion and reflecting their common delusion and false logic people see nothing wrong when it has deadly consequences.
The right logic to the awareness that you will be dead soon is, as the Buddha taught, to abandon your life of striving and suffering here and seek peace.
Steve Job’s logic is that since I will be dead soon, I should grab as much as possible, squeeze as much out of life as possible in terms of achievement, fame and material success.
THE CORRECT LOGIC TO REMEMBERING YOU WILL DEAD SOON AND THERE IS SO MUCH SUFFERING IS TO ABANDON YOUR LIFE AND SEEK AN ANSWER TO YOUR SUFFERING NOT PLUNGE IN AND GRAB AS MUCH AS QUICK AS YOU CAN AS DELUDED STEVE JOBS AND THE HOARDS HERE HAVE REASONED.
The Buddha:
6. There are those who do not realize that one day we all must die. But those who do realize this settle their quarrels.
Steve Jobs: Unfortunately the day has arrived:
There is nothing fortunate or unfortunate about any day, it is false perception by him and his audience to see nothing wrong when it is deadly wrong because it leads to woe.
IT IS POSSIBLE NOT TO VIEW THE DAY AS UNFORTUNATE AND IF YOU MUST VIEW IT AS UNFORTUNATE IT MEANS YOUR MIND IS OPEN TO SORROW.
IT IS ONLY BECAUSE A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED AGAINST HIS WILL TO FEEL SAD THAT THE DAY IS UNFORTUNATE, IF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED, AS I CAN ATTEST MYSELF, HE DOES NOT FEEL ANY SADNESS AND WITHOUT FEELING ANY SADNESS, NO DAY IS UNFORTUNATE TO HIM, HE HAS GONE BEYOND SORROW AND THAT IS NEVER TERRIBLE BUT AN INCOMPARABLE RELEASE FROM SUFFERING.
ANYONE WHO PERCEIVES A DAY AS UNFORTUNATE HAS WRONG PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING NOT JUST HERE BUT EVERYWHERE HE THINKS HE UNDERSTANDS TRULY AND HE IS HEADED FOR WOE THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN.
Obama warns of 'historic' storm
President Obama warns that Hurricane Irene, threatening tens of millions of people as it closes in on the US east coast, could be a "historic" storm.
Everything that happens becomes history so what is he talking about. He is emotionally trying to emphasise the seriousness of the storm but he does not truly understand the words that he uses.
WHAT HE IS WARNING ABOUT IS A STORM OF ‘UNPRECEDENTED SCALE NOT A HISTPORIC STORM. A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE SAYS AND HE WILL KNOW IT IS NOT A HISTORIC STORM BUT A STORM OF UNPRECEDENTED SCALE OR DANGER.
The nice and the nasty man:
What is the difference between the nice and the nasty man or girl?
The nice person speaks and acts as if he likes you, he likes everything he says or does or he dislikes in a liking manner, only when he ‘loses his cool’ will he turn nasty, dislike in a disliking manner rather than dislike in a liking manner.
By contrast the nasty man speaks and acts as if everything also he dislikes or likes in a disliking manner, only in exceptional circumstances when he is really pleased does he lets his guard and scowl down and demonstrate his like in a liking manner.
Being nice or nasty is a programmed indiscriminate attitude and the person is trapped in his niceness or nastiness and it is a form of controlled insanity that will end in uncontrollable terrible insanity.
A lot of the expressed liking of the nice guy is faked and even if they are genuine it is about a meaningless, stressful stirring of his mental force that is not doing any useful work.
THE NICE PERSON SPEAKS AND ACTS AS IF HE LIKES YOU OR EVERYTHING HE SAYS OR DOES OR HE RELUCTANTLY DISLIKES IN A LIKING MANNER CERTAIN THINGS. EVEN IF HIS LIKING IS TRUE, IT IS AN INAPPROPRIATE USELESS HARMFUL STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE THAT HE WANTS TO SHARE WITH YOU AND WANTS HIS RECIPIENT TO BE STIRRED TOO. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CAN TRULY LIKE EVERYTHING AS HE EXPRESSED AND SO A LOT OF IT IS FAKED TO GET ALONG AND PLEASE OTHERS, IT IS A CULTIVATED ATTITUDE, AN INDISCRIMINATE FOR SHOW FRONT AND HE IS HEADED FOR INSANITY, MENTAL TORMENT.
SIMILARLY THERE ARE MANY WHO SPORT A PERMANENT NASTY SCOWL AND IT IS SIMILARLY AN INSANE ATTITUDE, CONDITIONED STATE OF MIND AND EXPRESSION.
Bad sleep ups blood pressure risk
Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say and the Buddha said there is proper and improper behaviour, proper and improper speech.
Bad sleep ups blood pressure risk is improper disrespectful speech without determining what is said is correct.
One speaking properly may say, “Poor sleep is associated with high blood pressure”. Bad sleep cannot up blood pressure risk, it may raise high pressure but not high pressure risk, risk is not something you can physically raise or up. Without knowing poor sleep causes high blood pressure you can say it does so, all you can say is poor sleep is associated with high blood pressure.
WHAT IS SPOKEN DOES NOT MAKE SENSE EXCEPT TO THOSE WHO ARE THEMSELVES SENSELESS, POOR SLEEP MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH PRESSURE BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT ‘UPS’ (RAISES NOT UPS) BLOOD PRESSURE, WITHOUT KNOWING POOR SLEEP RAISES BLOOD PRESSURE ONE CANNOT SAY IT IS SO. IT MAY BE STRESS THAT CAUSES POOR SLEEP THAT ALSO CAUSES HIGH PRESSURE, SO BOTH POOR SLEEP AND HIGH PRESSURE ARE PRODUCTS OF STRESS, NOT HIGH PRESSURE THE PRODUCT OF POOR SLEEP AS IMPLIED.
You cannot raise or lower risk:
You cannot truly raise or lower risk, risk is not something you can raise or lower except in the false understanding of humans here as everywhere they think they understand.
Risk is not something that exists but it is fabrication of those who do not truly know the exact nature of something and yet want to assign probability of it happening. Risks is about chance and reality is not about chance, it is either the cause or it is not, it either occurred or it did not, what has risk got to do with it?
Thus the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness leads definitely to rising stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate, it is never a risk to rising stress, restlessness and distraction.
People talk about risk because they do not know what is the cause, what is stated is not the cause because there are other factors that are involved.
IF SOMETHING IS THE SUREFIRE CAUSE OF ANOTHER THING, WHY CALL IT A RISK WHEN IT IS THE CAUSE OF THAT OTHER THING? IT IS ONLY BECAUSE YOU DO NOT KNOW IT IS THE CAUSE, IT MAY SOMETIMES NOT CAUSE OR THERE MAY BE OTHER CAUSES THAT YOU SPEAK OF RISK WHICH IS SPEAKING WITHOUT CERTAINTY THAT IS LAPSING INTO FALSITY. THUS IT IS EVIL AND FALSE TO SPEAK OF ‘RISKS’, EITHER SOMETHING IS THE CAUSE OR NOT THE CAUSE, NEVER THE RISK.
YOU CAN RAISE THE RISK OF SOMETHING AND STILL IT MAY NOT OCCUR, YOU CAN LOWER THE RISK OF SOMETHING AND STILL IT MAY OCCUR, SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF TALKING ABOUT IT, TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING ‘IFFY’? THE MAN OF TRUTH DEALS WITH CERTAINTIES NOT RISKS OR DEGREES OF POSSIBILITIES.
WITHOUT SEEING THE NATURE OF SOMETHING TRULY, HOW CAN YOU CORRECTLY QUANTIFY THE AMOUNT OF RISK YOU RAISED OR LOWERED IN SPEAKING OF ‘UPS THE RISK’?
IT IS IMPROPER TO SPEAK OF ‘UPS’ THE RISK. ‘RAISES’ OR INCREASES IS THE PROPER WORD TO USE.  
Hell is a certainty not risk for emotional people:
Insanity, suffering and hell are certainties for stylish emotional people, not a risk.
Unless they truly turn and are healed, they are not at risk for suffering, insanity and being thrown into the furnace (of hell), it is a certainty and so anyone who speaks of ‘risks’ is speaking without knowing, speaking falsely with demerit not merit attached.

Mirzan, San Miguel and Esso Malaysia:
Mahathir Mohamad on the one hand is using Ibrahim Ali to stoke up the Malay sentiments' anti-drinking, anti-everything for his return to power, while on the other using his son Mirzan to buy Esso Malaysia using San Miguel's beer drinking money.
By JO & M.Nathan
I am so utterly disgusted with the BN government for its inability to engage Esso Malaysia for the rakyat. I am further disgusted with the hypocrisy of Mahathir Mohamad on the one hand using Ibrahim Ali to stoke up the Malay sentiments' anti-drinking, anti-everything for his return to power, while on the other using his son Mirzan to buy Esso Malaysia using San Miguel's beer drinking money. Worse still, he is exploiting the tax incentives reserved for us the rakyat, the unimportant Malaysians.
If you remember, Mirzan surfaced as a director of Petron, San Miguel's beer company as the parent. Now he is using his brotherly influence on Muhkriz as the Minister of MITI to get the FIC approval and whatever else needed, for a deal which no decent government would ever allow.
Yesterday, the Domestic Trade Minister Sabri even said Malaysia cannot do anything about it. What a statement. The point is these Ministers are put there to safeguard our interests, not to spend time mixing with singers and artists so that his son Dafi can cut another album or so. Ministers need to protect the welfare of the rakyat especially when 80% of Esso customers are Muslim and do not want to have to change their lifestyle or travel another 25 km to pump petrol at another station that is halal, just to line Mirzan's pocket. For Mirzan everything can, for us unimportant Malaysians everything cannot.
Back to Mahathir, how can we the rakyat even think of allowing this Mahathir-Mirzan-Muhkriz beer for subsidy petrol scandal to occur? In the internet, so many people are complaining that even the minority shareholders are up in arms and considering a class action suit against Exxon-Mobil for the utmost disregard for minority shareholders.
We expect Exxon-Mobil to uphold the highest and most stringent standard of professionalism and integrity, whether it is in the USA or in another third world country such as Malaysia. But obviously our BN government doesnt seem to think that is important. It seems to think that what is good for Mirzan must be good for Muhkriz, and therefore it is good to rip off all of us normal Malaysians, and we must just swallow.
I wonder why the goverment has not hauled up Esso staff Mr Stafford T. Kelly who made several announcements on the manner in which he felt Exxon-Mobil divested San Miguel. The funny thing is, his valuation exercise was done in a highly irregular manner leaving us minority shareholders to question what is actually behind this deal, and who in Exxon-Mobil is benefitting personally from this deal?
First, everyone knows that the assets in Esso Malaysia are part of a listed company and thus require close scrutiny. It is precisely because of this we are shocked that Mr Stafford told the reporters that the decision to sell the Esso assets (at USD280 million valuation for the whole 100%) cheaper than the Mobil equivalent (at USD 400 million) have been sanctioned and approved by the Government of Malaysia tacitly.
One only has to examine whether the sales of the assets are mutually exclusive. Judging from the newspaper report, it is a packaged deal and not mutually exclusive. It is then very curious that the sales of the assets are cross-subsidized using the unlisted ones in Mobil to be subsidized by the listed Esso shares in Malaysia.
This is against the law but Mr Stafford knows the Mahathir children will follow the footsteps of the father to cheat all Malaysians. Since he has taken care of Mirzan (where do you think the difference of USD 400 and 280 million went?) he does not have to worry who he steps on. That is why the Bursa is so quiet even though this is clearly criminal. 
Second, it is obvious Mr Stafford has botched up the entire bidding and valuation exercise when he can announce to the world (and all of Malaysia) that the deal to his preferred partner San Miguel is final even before the Malaysian authorities have a chance to consider the Foreign Investment Committee ruling. Obviously he knows something we don’t.
He must know that it will just be Mukhriz telling his puppet Minister Mustapha to sign on the dotted line. Strangely, he is trying to rush something which needs due process, and behaving so arrogantly as if EXXON is more important than the interests of the rakyat under the BN government. If this is the case, I urge all Malaysians to vote them out this PRU-13.
Third, Mr Stafford goes on to say that the tax incentives benefitted from Malaysia for the Esso refinery will be passed to San Miguel (read as pass on to San Mirzan or maybe one or two more of Mahathir's children since he is after all THE ADVISOR to Petronas) simply because he says so - on the reasoning that San Miguel is going to invest some money into rehabilitating the refinery.
Come on, give us a break. We dont need Mirzan to use his ill gotten money as equity and then borrow to the hilt from the local banks and enjoy the subsidy by trying to say as though San Miguel is doing us, the rakyat, a favor. And then use the profits to fund Ibrahim Ali and make the non-Muslims look bad. Shame on you.
Let me remind you that we only have to ask the question in open court - where did the tax benefits given by the Malaysian government to Esso Malaysia finally accrue to? It will become obvious that this will lead to a bigger scandal than BP’s Gulf of Mexico burst oil-wells.
No American or French journalists take lightly individuals or corporations who evade tax. Also, Mr Stafford has no feel on whats on the ground as it is not about how much who is going to invest in the refinery as it is an afterthought (not to mention that it has been picked up as an attempt by Exxon to try to openly bribe the authorities as if Malaysia is so starved of Foreign Direct Investment). By jove, this will go to court, and Mahathir and the children after PRU-13 can hide behind a cage as they give their statements.
Fourth, the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act (FCPA) specifically prohibits any employee from concealing information from the tender committee be it in the form of shredding or disposing of evidence which would clearly show that the entire tender exercise was skewed to favor San Miguel. This is evident in the inability of EXXON-MOBIL to explain how a single executive like Mr Stafford was allowed to make such decisions which contravenes not only the laws of good ethical corporate governance, but also the follow up cover up and announcements of trying to justify his pick of the winner by saying that San Miguel will then invest heavily in the refinery. Who cares? A simple check on the phone numbers most called by the San Miguel local team will reveal and clearly show the trail to the EXXON-Mobil nest and of course to Mirzan and his 012345678 special number.
The same fate that bestowed Mubarrak and Gaddafi is awaiting Mahathir. And it would be silly of Mr Stafford to count on that rather than on good clean corporate governance which is what Exxon-Mobil has been built upon. For us simple Malaysians, I think we should stand up and say that if after all these years of benefitting from our subsidy as a foreign company in Malaysia, the least you can do if you want to exit is to do so graciously, and not so bloody arrogantly, not caring for the minority shareholders, and in the process, make a mockery of our government.
I used to be a long-time BN supporter. No more because I can see that this is not a government that will protect the interests of us the rakyat. Even as I read how the Muslim dealers have protested against this, everything is falling on deaf ears.
Esso Malaysia is supposed to be a blue-chip company, not material for a future B-grade movie with San Miguel booze starring Mr Stafford and Mirzan, tax evasion, shredding of evidence amid growing protests and boycotts in a country which is predominantly Muslim. Not to mention all of us minority shareholders will lose from the General Offer since we are getting a far lower valuation and subsidizing Mobil, and amortizing the big bucks which Mirzan wants to extract from us the unimportant Malaysians.
Doc: Papaya leaves can cure dengue
If he knows with certainty papaya leaves cure dengue, why does he qualify it with ‘can’? It is only because he is not sure, he is jumping to unwarranted conclusions that he qualifies it with ‘can’. Without doing exhaustive research ensuring what you said is true, you are foolishly jumping to conclusion touting something that he likely has vested interests that has deadly karma not merit.
PAPAYA LEAVES CAN AND IT ALSO CANNOT CURE DENGUE, SO IT IS NOT A MATTER OF CERTAINTY, YOU HAVE TO SIGN PROPABILITY AND BLAME OTHER FACTORS EG OLD AGE OR SEX OR WHATEVER WHENEVER IT DOES NOT CURE OR DELIVER. THIS IS LAPSING INTO COMPLICATIONS THAT LEADS TO INSANITY AND SO THERE IS A PLACE IN INSANITY FOR HIM AND THOSE FOOLISH ENOUGH TO EMBRACE HIS GOSPEL.
WHATEVER THE SUFFERING OF A PERSON IS DUE TO KARMA, IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO SUFFER WHETHER DENGUE OR WHATEVER MAKE SURE YOU DO NOT CREATE DEBT FOR YOURSELF, DO NOT DEPEND ON PAPAYA LEAVES. AS THE BUDDHA SAID, POISONS AND WEAPONS CANNOT TOUCH THE MAN WITH IMPECCABLE VIRTUES, WHAT MORE DENGUE?
Living effortlessly freely:
Even in this world it is possible for a person to live effortlessly, freely and it is incomparably happy.
When a person’s mental force is not stirred to be attracted to, repulsed by, to be sad, hurt, confused or fearful to things happening, his mind is not distracted by ever present thoughts, he does not use for show stress generating force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness, he is truly said to be living effortlessly, freely unencumbered and happy without qualifications.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED OR TASTED FOR MYSELF THE QUIET INCOMPARABLE JOY OF LIVING EFFORTLESSLY FREELY BY ATTAINING THE STATE OF MIND OF BEING NOT STIRRED BY THINGS HAPPENING, NOT DISTRACTED BY CONSTANT SPURIOUS THINKING AND BEING FREE FROM THE SLAVERY AND STRESS OF A ROBOTIC STYLISH FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH EXISTENCE.
A PERSON WHO HAS ACHIEVED THIS STATE DOES NOT DESIRE TO RETURN TO THE PAST WOEFUL STATES AND HE IS TRULY RELEASED FROM THE TERRIBLE TORMENTS OF THIS WORLD.
YOU MAY THINK YOU ARE A MASTER OF YOURSELF, LIVING EFFORTLESSLY FREELY BUT SO LONG AS YOU MANIFEST STYLE, CANNOT STOP THINKING OR ARE STIRRED BY THINGS HAPPENING, YOU ARE DELUDING YOURSELF, HEADING FOR WOE NOT SAFETY.
How Jobs made Apple great
It is never reason that makes someone write such an article and it is emotion (force) and vested interests that makes him do so and if you do not understand, you will be sold the con or propaganda.
Those who are interested in the Apple story will already know what Jobs achievements for Apple are and do not need to be reminded.
It is those who do not know, whom he wants to falsely convert by such totally unnecessary making much hagiography that is his target audience.
If what Jobs achieved is not great, it is crass exploitive commercialism that made the masses hysterical about what are essentially stylish media appliances then you are heaping karma singing his praises.
THE PERSON WHO THINKS APPLE IS GREAT AND JOBS MADE IT GREAT HAS A FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY, IT IS ALL ABOUT CRASS EXPLOITATIVE COMMERCIALISM AND YOU ARE TRYING TO BRAINWASH THE PUBLIC DWELLING ON SUCH SUBJECTS. THERE IS NO NEED TO TELL OTHERS HOW JOBS MADE APPLE GREAT, IT IS A FALSE FABRICATED MATTER WITH INSANITY THE PRIZE FOR THE FOOL. WHAT IS SAID IS A FORM OF PROGRAMMING, THOSE WHO READ MUST REMEMBER WHAT IS SAID AND BECOME PROGRAMMED IN ‘HOW JOBS MADE APPLE GREAT’ AND YOU HAVE DEBT NOT MERIT PROGRAMMING OTHERS.
What HP resurrecting tablet suggests:
The fact that HP could sell a tablet priced at $500 for $100 is an indication of the profit margin for such corporations that include Apple.
The fact that they have decided to ‘resurrect’ by manufacturing another batch to meet demand is CONFIRMATION that such fat profit margins are true.
IF SELLING THE TABLET AT $100 IS AT A LOSS, HP WOULD BE ACTING SUICIDALLY TO RESURRECT MANUFACTURE AT A LOSS.
Ignorance & false perception is always suffering:
Whatever you see and hear can be known to be meaningful or meaningless (for show to impress or please others) and if you cannot tell whether what you see or hear is true or false (for show, not meant) or you perceive what is false, for show is meaningful or true then that is always suffering never of a minor nature but deadly serious suffering.
If you cannot tell what you see or hear is true or false, you see what is false is true, you cannot truly understand.
THUS ANYONE WHO CANNOT TELL WHETHER WHAT HE SEES OR HEAR IS TRUE OR FALSE, WHO SEE WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE DOES NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Thus if you hear people speaking melodiously, ‘sweetly’ with rampant stretched syllables, changes of speed and loudness, you see singers swaying gently repetitively sideways, you see people clapping vociferously and you do not know whether what you see is true or not, you see it as true or meaningful when it is meaningless, then you do not know what you see or you see falsely and that is always suffering.
THERE ARE MANY THINGS ON DISPLAY IN THIS WORLD THAT ARE OBJECTIVELY FALSE OR MEANINGLESS OR FOR SHOW.
IF YOU CANNOT TELL THEY ARE FALSE OR FOR SHOW, ARE MEANINGLESS OR YOU THINK THEY ARE TRUE AND MEANINGFUL THEN THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING NEVER MILDLY BUT DEADLY AND TERRIBLY.
NOT TO BE ABLE TO TELL WHAT YOU SEE OR HEAR IS FALSE OR MEANINGLESS OR TO SEE WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE IS ALWAYS SERIOUS SUFFERING AND THE PATH TO FUTURE TERRIBLE SUFFERING.
IF YOU CANNOT TELL WHAT IS FALSE IS FALSE, WHAT IS MEANINGLESS IS MEANINGLESS THEN YOU DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO SEE THUS BUT YOU NEED TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO SEE THUS.