Thursday, April 26, 2012

Are sure you are part Neanderthal?


Are sure you are part Neanderthal?
Just because science tells you that you are part Neanderthal does not mean it is infallible and so you are unnecessarily courting self-resistance (that leads to stress) and doubt and uncertainty saying you are part Neanderthal just because science tells you so.
PEOPLE ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES IF THEY THINK THEY SPEAK THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. OFTEN THEY SPEAK WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT THEY SAY IS TRUE, THEY ACCEPT HEARSAY AS FACT AND THUS THEY ARE FOOLISHLY DELIVERING THEMSELVES TO SELF RESISTANCE, STRESS AND DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY.
TRUE BUDDHIST MONKS ARE CAREFUL TO QUALIFY THEMSELVES, ‘THUS HAVE I HEARD’, THEY DO NOT SAY WHAT THEY HEARD IS TRUE.
There is deadly karma for the person who encourages others to guess to win something. You may refute, see nothing wrong but you may be wrong with deadly consequences even eternal punishment if I turn out to be right.
1)  If a person knew the tablet he would not have to guess and so your challenge is an invitation for others to adopt a position without seeing or knowing, delivering him into the arms of doubt and uncertainty and self-resistance to his own actions.
2)  Doing something (guessing) for material rewards is a false reason for doing it, you are promoting greed and doing things for invalid reasons that conditions those who accept your challenge to suffering and thus you have karma due to be repaid as future suffering.
EVEN AFTER I HAVE STATED, MANY WILL NEVERTHELESS SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH ROUTINELY ISSUING CHALLENGES TO OTHERS TO ‘GUESS AND WIN’ NOT REALIZING THEY ARE UNNECESSARILY HEAPING UPON THEMSELVES SERIOUS KARMA TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING THAT WOULD NOT OTHERWISE HAVE BEEN IF THEY DID NOT CHALLENGE OTHERS TO GUESS AND WIN.
Extremely easy to create great merit and terrible suffering:
If you think it is not easy to create great merit that leads to great future happiness and one has to do terrible deeds to create terrible karma to be experienced even for eternities in hell then you have wrong view what this universe is about and wrong view the Buddha said is the way to hell or the animal womb.
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE IT IS EXTREMELY EASY TO CREATE GREAT MERIT TO BE EXPERIENCED AS GREAT HAPPINESS FOR EVEN ETERNITIES AND IT IS LIKEWISE EXTREMELY EASY TO CREATE TERRIBLE KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS TERRIBLE EXTENDED SUFFERING AND SO THE WISE PERSON WOULD BE EXTREMELY CAUTIOUS IN HIS EVERY WORD AND DEED. JESUS SAID YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY AND THE BUDDHA SAID YOU SHOULD SEE DANGER IN THE SLIGHTEST OF FAULT; THIS IS IN LINE WITH WHAT I POSTULATE.
A MEAL GIVEN TO NOBLE ONES, ESPECIALLY THE BUDDHA BEARS GREAT FRUIT COMPARED TO THE MILLIONS GIVEN TO CHARITY OR THE IGNOBLE. GIVING TO THE TYRANT/CORRUPT POLITICIAN CAN BRING KARMA THAN MERIT. SHARING OR ASSISTING ANOTHER IN THE DHARMA OR GOSPEL IS SUPREME (NOT SUPERIOR) TO ANY MATERIAL (EG FOOD) SHARING OR ASSISTING.
JUST TELLING A LIE OR SPITTING AT SOMEONE OR CALLING HIM ‘YOU FOOL’ CAN SEND YOU TO HELL NOT FOR A DAY BUT EVEN MILLIONS OF YEARS, ISN’T THAT HORRIBLE?
AND SO IT IS, THIS IS A DANGEROUS WORLD FRAUGHT WITH HIDDEN MINES THAT CAN BLOW IN YOUR FACE AND AS THE BUDDHA SAID, YOU MUST SEE DANGER IN THE SLIGHTEST FAULT AND JESUS SAID YOU MUST BE PERFECT AS YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN IS PERFECT.
IT IS VERY EASY TO CREATE GREAT MERIT FOR YOURSELF THAT IS TO YOUR GREAT FUTURE HAPPINESS BUT EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE MISGUIDED, WHAT THEY THINK IS DOING GOOD IS ACTUALLY EVIL, BRINGS KARMA AND THEY ARE PROUD, REFUSE TO DO THE THINGS THAT ACTUALLY ACCRUE MERIT AND THEY STUBBORNLY, DEFIANTLY SAY OR DO THINGS AS THEY HAVE ALWAYS DONE BECAUSE THEY IDENTIFY WITH THEIR SINFUL CONDUCT (EG JOKING, LAUGHING, SMILING, FLATTERING OTHERS) THAT THEY THINK NOTHING, THINK IS GOOD WHEN THEY ARE HEADED FOR THE CLIFF.
This is a BBC headline.
“Iraqi cities hit by deadly blasts” is very different from “Deadly blasts in Iraqi cities”. It reflects muddled thinking and a desire to exaggerate to say the cities are hit when it is a matter of blasts occurring in Iraqi cities. The prize is even future insanity, not harmless to simply say what you want, to add flavour to what you say.
Extremely easy to create merit so why they don’t?
There are interrelated reasons why people refuse to do good that is happiness doing it and brings great extended future happiness.
1)  There is great social pressure or coercion to practice conduct or speech that are faked good and harm self and others.
2)  They are actually robots who are slaves not masters of their conduct. They are not at liberty to change the ways they always say or do which is pre-programmed and they are disinclined to re-program themselves (not good) let alone transform themselves from sinful rehashing robots to true live non-rehashing beings.
3)  They are deluded or misguided, they perceive what is bad (eg their styles, their smiles, their jovialness) is good and what is good is bad because society disapproves.
4)  They are stubborn, identify with their usual conduct and speech that brings much demerit and aver or dislike conduct that brings great merit.
5)  They cannot see what terrible suffering their conduct is accumulating for themselves, if they can see into the future and the suffering as vast as an ocean facing them, they might not be so cocky or defiant. They cannot see the future and refuse to believe what the Buddha tells them that they are headed for an ocean of suffering.

 Phone data shows romance 'driven by women'

A study of mobile phone calls suggests that women call their spouse more than any other person.
It is a false, totally unwarranted conclusion that romance is driven by women just because women call their spouse more than any other person and you are conditioning yourself to false logic and perception as well as others saying so.
Whilst women tend to call their spouses more than any other person, surely some men do the same and so it is not exclusively women who do so.
Just because they call their spouses does not mean it is about romance, there may be dependency or controlling or anxiety needs driving the calls.
SUFFICE TO SAY WOMEN TEND TO CALL THEIR SPOUSES MORE THAN OTHERS, ANYTHING MORE, THAT IT IS ROMANCE AND IT IS DRIVEN BY WOMEN IS UNWARRANTED DANGEROUS LOGIC AND PERCEPTION THAT CAN ONE DAY KILL YOU.
Opposite sex calls does not equal romance:
Just because a call is between opposite sexes does not mean it is romantic.
Romance is not something true but it is even a burden and tiresome after a while and it is unlikely if not impossible it is the basis of spousal calls. Even together most couples are not very romantic, what more that they should pine for each other like Romeo and Juliet through their phones.
If the call is to remind the spouse to pick up some shopping, that is not very romantic. If it is to tell the other you will be late or going out, that is not terribly romantic, is that? If the neurotic wife needs someone to talk to, that is not romance or is it?
IT IS SILLY THAT ROMANCE SHOULD BE THE REASON WHY WIVES CALL THEIR HUSBANDS MOST. THERE ARE MUCH MORE MUNDANE REASONS WHY WIVES WOULD WANT TO CALL THEIR HUSBANDS RATHER THAN WHISPERING ROMANTIC SWEET NOTHINGS.
Addiction may be a better candidate than romance:
All rehashed behaviour can be addictive and so if you keep calling someone, there is a strong urge to call that person not necessarily for romance but just to yak, to gossip, for something to do whilst idle.
YAKKING OR GOSSIPING IS NOT ROMANCE AND CALLING SOMEONE LIKE MANY THINGS DONE REPETITIVELY CAN BECOME ADDICTIVE SO THAT THE PERSON HAS A STRONG EVEN IRRESISTIBLE URGE TO REPEAT AND THAT IS NOT ROMANCE, IS IT?
A lesbian simply refers to a female who prefers same sex sexual relations but for emotional people whose perceptions are programmed and rehashed, false, tainted by emotions, lesbian connotes queer or bad or abnormal and so when they accuse someone of being a lesbian it is to attack and smear the person and when they deny they are lesbian it is not a simple statement of truth but they themselves may subconsciously accept lesbian is abnormal and so they are not abnormal when they deny they are lesbians.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DELUDE THEMSELVES THEY SEE TRULY, THEY SEE WITH EMOTIONAL OVERLAYS THAT FALSIFIES SERIOUSLY THEIR PERCEPTIONS. THUS LESBIAN IS OVERLAID WITH OVERTONES OF ABNORMALITY OR BAD WHEN IT IS MERELY A FEMALE WITH SAME SEX PREFERENCES.
THE ONLY WAY A PERSON CAN CONSISTENTLY ASSOCIATE OR PERCEIVE LESBIANISM AS ABNORMAL IS IF HIS UNDERSTANDING OF LESBIANISM IS PROGRAMMED (BY SELF AND SOCIETY) AND IT IS REHASHED AND SO ANYONE WHO SEES LESBIANISM AS QUEER OR WHATEVER INSTEAD OF SIMPLY A FEMALE WITH SAME SEX PREDILECTIONS IS A ROBOT WITH REHASHED, NEVER TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS HAPPENING.
This is a person who does know what he talks and is heading for insanity.
There is no such thing as emotional and non-emotional intelligence, it is a product of his false perception and need to impress others with high sounding talk.
Intelligence is simply superior programming, the intelligent person is a superior robot with more appropriate or society approved programmings in his mind that he can access better, faster and more appropriately on demand. Emotion is a useless, counter-productive stirring of one’s mental force.
EMOTIONS STIRRED ARE INIMICAL, HARMFUL TO UNDERSTANDING AND AN INTELLIGENT APPROACH TO ANY SITUATION AND SO, IF ANYTHING UNEMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE IS THE KEY TO SUCCESS.
IF YOU ARE SITTING FOR YOUR EXAM, YOU WANT TO BE CALM, UNEMOTIONAL NOT EMOTIONAL AND IF YOU THINK BEING EMOTIONALLY WORKED UP WILL MAKE YOU ‘SCORE BETTER’ YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR MAD.
THERE IS NO INTELLIGENCE IN EMOTION, IT IS MERELY A CONDITIONED BLIND, MEANINGLESS, USELESS STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT DETRACTS FROM THE TASK AT HAND.
The streets of George Town will come alive this Wesak Day with a procession featuring 39 colourful floats.
There is such a thing called Wesak Day but there is no such a thing called wesak gaiety and it does not beckon. Only a being can beckon.
IF YOU CHERISH YOUR SANITY, WISH TO KEEP YOUR SANITY YOU SHOULD BE SCRUPULOUS IN YOUR SPEECH OTHERWISE YOU MAY LOSE IT. YOU ARE NOT MAD YET BUT IF YOU KEEP TALKING NONSENSE, YOUR WISH SHALL BE FULFILLED AND YOU WILL TURN NONSENSE.
THERE IS WESAK DAY BUT THERE IS NO WESAK GAIETY AND IT IS NOT A BEING THAT CAN BECKON ANYONE EXCEPT IN YOUR DISREGARD FOR TRUTH THAT WILL END IN INSANITY AND RIGHTLY SO BECAUSE YOU HARMFULLY INFLUENCE OTHERS.
This is always an emotion driven never reason based statement because it is impossible big business never dodge taxes and therefore it is not a myth except in his delusion.
IF WHAT YOU SAY IS FALSE, YOU HAVE CREATED KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING AND SO THE PERSON WHO SAID SO HAS CREATED KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING.
IT IS EXTREMELY EASY TO CREATE KARMA TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING WITH WHAT YOU CARELESSLY OR EMOTIONALLY SAY THAT YOU IGNORE OR SCOFF AT YOUR OWN RISK.
The force of action and the force of resistance:
A being’s mind possesses two independent forces.
Whatever action undertaken by the being, be it perceiving, thinking, doing and saying is undertaken using the force of action. Without activating and using this force of action, no action can ensue.
There is another force whose sole function is to resist whatever force acting on the mind whether due to the force of action or due to external agents of force or others.
This resistance may be constant and mad or it may be rational or only as required.
If your force of action is actively doing something and your force of resistance is actively opposing it then that is always mad and it the cause of stress that can build up until there is a strong impasse, the force of resistance becomes strongly elevated and renders all actions difficult/suffering even impossible.
If your force of resistance is not constantly active, it is not active when you are saying or doing anything and it only becomes active as commanded by you to stop proceedings you are currently undertaking then there is no stress.
If you are constantly doing or saying things without knowing it is true or meaningful or knowing it is false and harmful to self, then you are training your force of resistance to act in opposition at the same time as your force of action is acting and in time this becomes conditioned, the force of resistance automatically opposes the force of action leading to stress from the clash and seizure of oppositely acting forces.
THE USE OF ONE’S FORCE OF RESISTANCE TO OPPOSE WHILST ONE’S FORCE OF ACTION IS ACTIVE IS A CONDITIONED STATE AND SO IF A PERSON KEEPS UNDERTAKING ACTIONS/SPEECH WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS, KNOWING IT IS HARMFULLY FALSE, HE CONDITIONS HIS FORCE OF RESISTANCE TO PERMANENTLY RESIST HIS FORCE OF ACTION SO THAT ALL ACTIONS IS RESISTED BY SELF LEADING TO STRESS WHICH IS THE PAINFUL EXPERIENCE THAT HAS INTENSITY AND CAN RISE VERY STRONGLY DISPROPORTIONATELY TO THE ACTION DUE TO THE CLASHING OF OPPOSITE FORCES IN ONE’S MIND.
Thus style or the use of force to prolong syllables, change speed and strength is totally unnecessary, is for show and harmful to self and this must automatically generate self-resistance even if the person perceives style as lovely, meaningful and good. And if you keep on fashioning style, you are training your mental force of resistance to keep resisting the force of action so that in time this resistance is permanent and can even rise to intense levels disproportionate to the occasion which is why some people find social interaction or sex stressful whilst others ‘do not’.
NORMALLY THE FORCE OF RESISTANCE IS NOT ACTIVE AND IT IS ONLY ACTIVE IF YOU NEED TO STOP AN ACTION YOU ARE CURRENTLY UNDERTAKING AS CHANGES IN THE SITUATION REQUIRES.
IT IS ABNORMAL TO HAVE BOTH THE FORCE OF ACTION AND THE FORCE OF RESISTANCE ACTING OPPOSITELY AT THE SAME TIME FOR THE DURATION OF AN ACTION AND IT IS THIS OPPOSITELY ACTING FORCES THAT IS THE SOURCE OF STRESS.
WHEN YOU SAY OR DO THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL, MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGFULNESS OR WILFULLY KNOWING IT IS FALSE, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL YOU ARE TRAINING YOUR FORCE OF RESISTANCE TO ACTIVATE AND OPPOSE THE FORCE OF ACTION, YOU ARE TRAINING BOTH FORCES TO ACTIVATE AT THE SAME TIME AND THIS IS THE GENESIS OF STRESS THAT BECOMES A CURSE THAT NEVER LEAVES THE PERSON LIKE HIS SHADOW NEVER LEAVES HIM.
The IMF says it has pledges for $430bn (£247bn) of the extra funds it was seeking to help economies in trouble - including just under $15bn from the UK.
The UK is itself full of debts and needing refinancing to keep going and so it is an absurdity that it is offering a loan to the IMF.
HOW CAN A PERSON FULL OF DEBT NEEDING TO REFINANCE HIS LOANS (CANNOT PAY BACK) OFFER ANOTHER LOANS? IT IS A FORM OF ABSURDITY THAT IS LOST TO MANKIND. SUCH LOANS ARE IN NAME ONLY NOT SUBSTANCE, YOU CAN PRINT AS MUCH STERLING AS YOU LIKE AND OFFER IT AS LOANS TO OTHERS AND HOPEFULLY YOUR CREDITORS WILL NOT TURN ON YOU. THIS IS A SIGN OF DESPERATION, TRYING TO MAKE ENDS MEET FOR EACH OTHER WHEN YOU YOURSELF CANNOT MAKE ENDS MEET FOR YOURSELF. THIS IS A FORM OF UNWITTING FINANCIAL HYPOCRISY AND CONTROLLED INSANITY.
Just the presence of a person triggers resistance then stress or tension:
Just the presence of a person that you do not like or is a nuisance is enough to cause tension, to cause a person’s force of resistance to become aroused and on guard leading to stress.
JUST THE PRESENCE OF ANOTHER PERSON OR BEING IN A CERTAIN PLACE CAN STIR A VULNERABLE PERSON’S FORCE OF RESISTANCE TO BECOME HEIGHTENED SO THAT HE EXPERIENCES STRESS.
WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, IF YOU ARE NOT SKILLFUL (THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST BE SKILLFUL) YOU CAN BE SUCKED IN, CONDITIONED BY OTHERS TO HEIGHTEN YOUR RESISTANCE IN THEIR PRESENCE AND IN DOING SO EXPERIENCE UNPLEASANT STRESS OR TENSION.
NO MATTER HOW NASTY A PERSON IS, IF YOUR MENTAL FORCE OF RESISTANCE IS NOT STIRRED TO RESIST, THEN THERE IS NO STRESS, NO TENSION AND THAT IS ALWAYS HAPPINESS NEVER SUFFERING.
Your fault others stress you:
If your mental force of resistance is not stirred no one and no situation can stress you, it is because you have conditioned your mental force of resistance to stir easily, to be triggered by others and things happening that you experience stress caused by others or things happening.
YOU ARE NOT BLAMELESS IF YOU POSSESS A MENTAL FORCE OF RESISTANCE THAT IS CONSTANTLY ACTIVE AND EASILY TRIGGERED TO RISE STRONGLY BY OTHERS OR EVENTS. THROUGH INDIFFERENCE OR FOOLISHNESS (JESUS SAID FOOLISHNESS IS A SIN OR DEFILEMENT) YOU HAVE PERMITTED YOUR MENTAL FORCE OF RESISTANCE TO BE CONSTANTLY ACTIVE AND EASILY TRIGGERED TO RISE STRONGLY AND THIS IS THE ONLY REASON WHY OTHERS AND THINGS STRESS YOU. THUS IF YOU CAN BE STRESSED BY OTHERS, YOU MUST SUFFER HERE AND YOU ARE HEADED EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY OF SUFFERING.
Yesterday I was at the ATM and someone spat deliberately viciously in close proximity (probably if not certainly directed at me perhaps he did not like my demeanour) and I was not stirred, not hurt or stressed but I tell you, his insolence is going to cost him dear in terms of future suffering because I did nothing to provoke him.
Grasping the truth?
Quote RPK:  Even Anwar Ibrahim, the Opposition Leader, and Najb Tun Razak, the Prime Minister, can’t seem to grasp the concept.
Even though emotional people do not realize it, the words they use give insight into the nature of their ‘understanding’. They speak of grasping the concept, grasping the truth and do not realize they are acknowledging they use force, the wrong tool to receive truth.
Only force can grasp, you need force to grasp and so when you speak of grasping a concept you are talking of force being employed to hold the concept. You truly understand the truth. Truth is not a concept and all concepts are false fabrications or models of the mind that never truly represent reality.
What people call their grasping of a concept is when they have been successfully programmed in that concept, it is recorded in them and can be reliably retrieved, when they say they know the meaning of a concept, it means they are conversant with what the concept dictates to them in terms of descriptions and actions.
WHEN PEOPLE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY RECORDED A CONCEPT IN THEIR MIND THAT THEY CAN QUITE RELIABLY RETRIEVE FROM AND ACT ACCORDING TO THAT CONCEPT OR APPLY THAT CONCEPT IN VARIOUS SITUATIONS THEY ARE CONVINCED THAT THEY UNDERSTAND WHEN THEY HAVE MERELY USE FORCE TO RECORD ACCORDING TO A PLAN THAT CONCEPT IN THEIR HEADS THAT THEY CAN THEN REFER TO AND APPLY TO FUTURE SITUATIONS.
TRUE UNDERSTANDING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GRASPING, IT IS SEEING AS IT ACTUALLY IS SOMETHING DESCRIBED OR COMMUNICATED. THUS WHERE YOU DID NOT SEE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN YOUR SPEECH, YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT IS SAID IF AFTER BEING TOLD, YOU CAN SEE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS. SO LONG AS YOU STILL CANNOT SEE STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS, YOU HAVE NOT UNDERSTOOD EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION YOU DID.
NO DISCERNING MAN SPEAK OF GRASPING THE TRUTH, HE SPEAKS OF UNDERSTANDING THE TRUTH OF A MATTER.
All concepts are false mental fabrications:
Concepts are inventions of human minds to explain things and they never totally correspond to reality. Reality or truth is to be seen directly and cannot be reduced to concepts. It is those who cannot see truth that have to fall back on concepts, they reduce reality to the concepts they invent or fabricate. This is like putting the cart before the horse. See and understand what you see as it actually is and you do not have to resort to concepts.
REFLECTING THEIR WRONG UNDERSTANDING HERE AS EVERYWHERE, EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE ATTACHED TO CONCEPTS, THEY LIKE TO REDUCE WHAT THEY SEE OR EXPERIENCE TO CONCEPTS, THEY INVENT CONCEPTS TO EXPLAIN WHAT THEY SEE WHEN YOU DO NOT NEED TO INVENT ANYTHING TO EXPLAIN WHAT YOU SEE.
IT IS BECAUSE YOU SEE AND CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SEE THAT YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO THE DEVICE OF CONCEPTS.
TRUTH IS NEVER A CONCEPT AND IF SOMETHING IS A CONCEPT, IT IS NEVER THE TRUTH.
Concepts are programmed understandings intended for rehash:
Concepts are programmed or memorized understandings that are intended to be retrieved to be applied to a variety of future occasions to explain things and guide actions. As such it is again unwitting proof people’s understanding is never fresh specific to each occasion but they rehash understandings to explain situations they meet.
CONCEPTS ARE IDEAS AND IDEAS ARE SOMETHING FORMULATED, COMMITTED TO MEMORY WITH THE INTENTION OF RETRIEVING IN THE FUTURE FOR APPLICATION.
A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING NEVER RECORDS HIS UNDERSTANDINGS THAT HE REHASHES TO EXPLAIN A SITUATION AT HAND, HE PERSONALLY, SPECIFICALLY UNDERSTAND EACH OCCASION AS IT ARISES.
A litmus test for China?
22:36 UK time, Friday, 20 April 2012
The way China's authorities will deal with the growing scandal surrounding Bo Xilai, once a rising star of the Communist Party, could be a litmus test for the country's justice system.
People think they understand and they speak great sense when they talk rubbish and are in danger of the rubbish heap of eternity.
Only deluded people talk about litmus tests which are nonsense.
What you mean is that you do not know if there is ‘fair’ justice in China, you cannot tell if it is fair or not and how China deals with this ‘high profile’ case will determine whether there is fair justice in China.
It is your delusion and not reality that you still cannot tell if there is justice in China and you do not need this case as a litmus test or proof that there is or is not justice in China.
YOU DO NOT NEED LITMUS TESTS TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS TRUE JUSTICE IN CHINA, IT IS THERE TO BE SEEN BY THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING AND IF YOU NEED SUCH LITMUS TESTS IT MEANS YOU ARE DELUDED AND YOU CAN HAVE ALL THE LITMUS TESTS IN THE WORLD AND STILL YOU ARE LOST AS TO THE NATURE OF JUSTICE IN CHINA.
LITMUS TEST DOES NOT APPLY, YOU DO NOT NEED LITMUS TESTS TO KNOW THE NATURE OF JUSTICE IN CHINA, IT IS THERE TO BE SEEN AND KNOWN FOR THE DISCERNING.
Litmus tests are dangerous:
If by litmus test you mean Bo is fully brought to account then you are deluded. There may be favouritism in China and Bo may be in the bad books and the full might of the law may be brought down on him not because China passed the litmus test but because Bo is not a favoured one.
IT IS DANGEROUS TO RELY ON INDIVIDUAL CASES AS LITMUS TESTS OF JUSTICE IN CHINA, THAT BO IS PROSECUTED TO THE HILT MAY NOT REFLECT THERE IS JUSTICE IN THE SYSTEM BUT VENGEANCE BY HIS ENEMIES IN POWER.
MAO’S FORMER COMRADES LIKE LIU SHIAO CHI WERE HUMILIATED AND SENT FOR HARD LABOUR, THIS DOES NOT MEAN MAO PASSED THE LITMUS TEST FOR JUSTICE IN CHINA.
Satan does not die like you:
Satan of Mara or the Devil sins, just like you and he is the Father of evil, he suffers, even terribly but he does not die like you, he remains the Father of evil for the duration of the Age.
According to the Buddha each eon has its Devil and he is always male not female. Moggalana, one of the Buddha’s deputies was said to be the Devil of one Age and he is the equal highest in supernatural powers with the Buddha.
The Devil has supernatural powers and has access to the minds of beings and he pursues everyone even divine beings trying to create mischief, lead others astray into difficulties and death. The Buddha spoke of the King of Death, and the Devil is the king of death who tenaciously pursues everyone trying to deceive them and lead them to death. The Buddha said he has gone to where the king of death cannot find him but for all beings who exist, even at the highest levels, the King of death will find them, pursue them and try to do mischief.
WHEREAS YOU SIN AND DIE REPEATEDLY BUILDING A PILE OF SKELETONS AS HIGH AS THE MOUNTAIN, THE KING OF DEATH WHO HOLDS EVERYONE IN SWAY, DOES NOT DIE AT LEAST FOR THE DURATION OF THE AGE WHERE HE IS KING AND SO HE GOES ALONG DOING MISCHIEF, HEAPING HORRENDOUS KARMA TO BE REPAID BY SUFFERING FOR HIMSELF. BUT HE IS FOOLISH, WEAK IN WISDOM AND RIVEN BY EMOTIONS DRIVEN TO HARM AND DECEIVE OTHERS.
EVEN IF YOU WANT TO LEAVE THIS WORLD OF DEATH, OTHERS AND THE DEVIL WILL NOT LET YOU GO SO EASILY AND SO IF YOU ARE LACKADAISICAL, HOOKED ON SENSUAL DELIGHTS AND DELUDED, YOU HAVE NO HOPE OF ESCAPE, THE DEVIL WILL DEFEAT YOU WITH HIS HANDS DOWN, YOU ARE EASY MEAT FOR THE DEVIL.
Death has a king:
The Buddha called the Devil the king of death and so death has a king, is not without a king.
If you think death is a natural course of events, it is blameless, there is no king of death then you are ignorant and deluded because death has a king and he is powerful and has supernatural powers and he presides over his domain and sees to it that everyone ends up dead. Death is the final sentence of those who exist under the spell of the Devil, he pursues everyone trying to bind them to death and suffering.
THUS YOU ARE NOT BLAMELESS IF YOU DO NOT KNOW IF DEATH HAS A KING OR YOU THINK DEATH IS AN UNAVOIDABLE FACT OF LIFE. THE BUDDHA SAID THERE IS THE DEATHLESS STATE AND IT CAN BE ATTAINED AND IF YOU REMAIN INDIFFERENT THEN YOU ARE EASY MEAT FOR THE DEVIL, THE DEVIL WILL DELIVER YOU TO DEATH WITHOUT TRYING.
Then, on realizing the significance of that, the Blessed One exclaimed:
Tied down by what's dear & alluring,
heavenly beings, most people,
worn out with misery,
fall under the sway of the King of Death.
But those who, day & night,
heedfully abandon what's dear,
dig up misery by the root --
Death's bait so hard to overcome.
With steady body, with steady awareness,
whether standing, sitting, or lying down,
a monk determined on mindfulness
gains one distinction after another.
Having gained one distinction after another,
he goes where the King of Death can't see.
"Rouse yourself! Sit up! Resolutely train yourself to attain peace. Do not let the king of death, seeing you are careless, lead you astray and dominate you.
Where the king of death can’t see:
Having gained one distinction after another,
he goes where the King of Death can't see.
There are realms where the formless Devil can see and where he can see he can find you and pursue you.
There is a realm where the Devil cannot see, is out of bounds to the Devil and this is where there is peace and the end of all suffering.
THE DEVIL IS FORMLESS LIKE THE BRAHMAS BUT HE CAN ASSUME FORMS TO CREATE MISCHIEF. THE DEVIL AND HIS ANGELS CAN ASSUME HUMAN FORMS BUT THEY HAVE NO SHADOWS AND SO THE DISCERNING CAN TELL BY THE ABSENCE OF SHADOWS THE PERSON BEFORE HIM IS A DEVIL.
Winning over pay critics is a wrong reason for doing something that leads to insanity. You do something because it is true and beneficial or good, not to win over pay critics which means it is to appease or please others, it is for show, not truly meant.
WITHOUT REALIZING PEOPLE ARE ADMITTING THEY DO THINGS TO PLEASE OTHERS, IF YOU IMPROVE YOUR WAGE STRUCTURE TO WIN OVER CRITICS IT MEANS IT IS DONE TO PLEASE OTHERS, NOT BECAUSE IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. THIS IS A HYPOCRITICAL WORLD THAT IS FOR SHOW, NOT TRULY MEANT.
It doesn’t feel like:
It doesn't feel like a year has passed since we reviewed the original ASUS Transformer and its innovative keyboard dock, but indeed time flies, and quite a bit has happened since then. 
It is emotion (force) never true reason that is the basis for people to talk of ‘it doesn’t feel like a year’ and the purpose is to exaggerate as if time flies quickly.
Suffice to say ‘a year has passed’, it doesn’t feel like is the subjective (not objective) nonsense or falsity intended to stir that comes from evil and you are heading for evil or suffering.
WHETHER YOU FEEL LIKE OR NOT, IT IS OBJECTIVELY A YEAR SO WHY SPEAK OF SUBJECTIVE FEELING? IT IS PROOF THAT FEELINGS OR EMOTIONS ARE FALSE, SUBJECTIVE THAT IT DOES NOT FEEL LIKE A YEAR WHEN IT IS OBJECTIVELY A YEAR. THERE IS NO NEED TO BRING YOUR FEELINGS THAT ARE FALSE, UNRELIABLE AND FICKLE INTO THE PICTURE AND YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY TO STIR OTHERS THAT WILL END IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.
Cut off your feelings and get on with it:
It is a form of beating around the bush and prolonging talking about your feelings, about ‘it does not feel like’ which is about a meaningless blind stirring of mental force or contact with force that will end in torment.
FEELING IS ABOUT CONTACT WITH FORCE, EMOTION IS ABOUT STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE AND BOTH ARE MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL AND SO WHEN YOU SPEAK OF ‘IT DOES NOT FEEL LIKE’ YOU ARE BRINGING UP THE SUBJECT OF CONTACT WITH FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND MEANINGLESS. FURTHER IT IS A DIVERSION AND BEATING AROUND THE BUSH, A FORM OF PROLONGING THAT LEADS TO SADNESS AND THENCE EVEN SUICIDAL DEPRESSION.
Being fed nonsense leads to stress:
If you do not know what to make of ‘it does not feel like a year’ or you (falsely) accept it as valid or true, then you must stir self-resistance to reading it that is the source of stress that also conditions your mental force to resist whatever is presented to you, whether by others or self.
WHOEVER HEARS ‘IT DOES NOT FEEL LIKE A YEAR’ AND DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT (WHETHER IT IS MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS) OR HE ACCEPTS IT AS VALID MUST STIR SELF-RESISTANCE WHICH LEADS TO STRESS AND HE IS ALSO TRAINING HIMSELF TO STIR SELF RESISTANCE THAT IN TIME BECOME AUTOMATIC TO EVERYTHING OCCURRING AND THAT IS TERRIBLY STRESSFUL. AND HENCE NO MATTER HOW YOU WORSHIP AND SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS WORLD, BECAUSE YOU ARE BOMBARDED BY NONSENSE AND FALSITY FROM OTHERS YOU MUST BE HOUNDED BY STRESS THAT REACHES HOMICIDAL SUICIDAL PROPORTIONS.
A PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS KNOWS HE IS BEING DISHED NONSENSE WITH ‘IT DOES NOT FEEL LIKE’ AND HE IS NOT DISTURBED OR STIRRED.
IN HEAVEN PEOPLE DO NOT PLY OTHERS WITH SUCH NONSENSE AND SO THERE IS NO STRESS IN HEAVEN AND THAT CANNOT BE BAD.
A year is not something you feel:
A year is not something you feel but it is something you measure or see and so anyone who speaks about feeling a year is talking absurdity that ends in insanity for him and he has debt encouraging others to likewise feel.
A YEAR IS NEVER SOMETHING YOU FEEL BUT IT IS SOMETHING YOU MEASURE AND SEE AND SO IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY SAYING IT DOES NOT FEEL LIKE A YEAR. IN WHAT WAY WOULD IT FEEL LIKE A YEAR? ARE YOU MAD?
I tell you what you can feel:
You can feel sick, you can feel the heat, you can feel a girl’s touch but you cannot feel like it is not a year except in your false perception.
IT IS EVIDENCE OF PEOPLE’S FALSE PERCEPTION, THAT THEY PERCEIVE FALSELY, WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT IT FEELING NOT LIKE A YEAR.
“I feel great?”
Anyone who talks about feeling great is deluded and headed for insanity.
Greatness is not what you feel but it is what you either are or are not. As Jesus said, whoever will be the greatest in heaven shall be the servant to the rest. The Buddha said his deputies are the greatest deputies anyone can have.
GREATNESS IS NEVER WHAT YOU FEEL BUT WHAT YOU ARE OR ARE NOT AND IT CANNOT BE DISPUTED, WHOEVER IS HIGHER IN CONDUCT AND KNOWLEDGE IS HIGHER OR GREATER.
IF BY GREAT YOU MEAN YOU FEEL FINE THEN YOU DO NOT SAY WHAT YOU MEAN BECAUSE FEELING FINE IS NOT FEELING GREAT, HOWEVER ‘GREAT’ YOUR FINE FEELING IS, THERE ARE LIMITS TO IT. THE LOT OF STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE CANNOT BE VERY FINE AND SO THEY ARE SPEAKING FALSELY MISLEADING OTHERS SAYING THEY ‘FEEL GREAT’.
What you call fine is lousy by divine beings:
What you call feeling fine is lousy by heavenly beings’ standards and what heavenly beings call feeling fine, you have never tasted before and have not a clue it is possible.
YOU THINK YOU FEEL FINE BUT YOU MAY BE A BIG FOOL BECAUSE IT IS LOUSY BY HEAVENLY STANDARDS.
So you think you understand this statement and it is true or has elements of truth?
It is difficult if not impossible to exclude other factors that may prove skeptics wrong and so it is dangerous to ascribe to earnings and Fed the credit of proving sceptics wrong.
WHAT SCEPTICS CLAIM CAN BE DETERMINED OR TRULY UNDERSTOOD TO BE RIGHT OR WRONG, DOES NOT NEED EARNINGS OR FED TO PROVE WRONG AND THE FED OR EARNINGS NEVER PROVE SCEPTICS WRONG. IT IS AN ADMISSION OF LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION THAT YOU NEED EARNINGS AND THE FED TO PROVE SCEPTICS WRONG. THUS THE FED CAN PRINT A LOT OF MONEY THAT SUPPORTS THE ECONOMY ARTIFICIALLY BY CHEATING AND IT DOES NOT PROVE SCEPTICS WRONG.
AND SO THE STATEMENT IS FALSE, NONSENSE.
Litmus test is a false understanding:
To speak of the Bo case as a litmus test for justice in China is a wrong understanding of events, it is non-existent and a concoction of his mind.
The Chinese authorities did not designate the case as a litmus test and you are jumping to presumptuous unwarranted conclusions to perceive it as a litmus test.
THE BO CASE IS THE BO CASE THAT’S ALL, TO VIEW IT AS A LITMUS TEST IS TO JUMP TO UNWARRANTED CONCLUSIONS, SEEING TOO MUCH TO THE CASE THAT IS NEVER HARMLESS BUT DEADLY, CONDITIONS YOU TO PERCEIVE MORE THAN THERE IS AND YOU HAVE KARMA TRYING TO CONDITION OTHERS TO THE SAME. IF THE CHINESE AUTHORITIES ANNOUNCED IT AS A LITMUS TEST THEN YOU ARE RIGHT TO SAY SO.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD SEE FALSELY AND UNDERSTAND FALSELY, THEY CAN SEE A CASE AS A LITMUS TEST WHEN IT IS NONEXISTENT.
IMF urges eurozone to make bold reforms
Only a person without true understanding will speak of bold reforms.
Boldness has nothing to do with the situation. What is needed is correct or true changes.
IT IS CORRECT REFORMS THAT ARE NEEDED NEVER BOLD REFORMS. YOU NEED FORCE TO BE BOLD AND IT AGAIN REFLECTS HUMANS WORSHIP FORCE AND REASON WITH FORCE NOT TRUE SEEING.
MANKIND HAS NO CHANCE, THOSE ENTRUSTED WITH SAVING ITS ECONOMIC BACON ARE DELUDED, CLUELESS, BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE MAKING IT WORSE.
The TV is the TV, not idiot box and you are not at liberty to call the TV anything you like unless you want to court insanity and thence eternal punishment.
The purpose for calling it idiot box is to attack, to be derisive and whoever attacks has ill will that is one of three lower fetters to future woe, says the Buddha and so he is headed for future woe.
Courting others is never about truth and meaning, it is about saying or doing things to please others so that they will support you.
If what you say or do is true and meaningful, it is not to court others, if what you say or do is to court others, it is never true or meaningful except in your delusion. It is a self-serving man who will court others, he serves you to serve himself.
A SELF SERVING MAN WHO COURTS OTHERS IS NOT GOOD FOR ANYONE, NOT EVEN HIMSELF (BECAUSE HE IS ENSLAVING HIMSELF AND HEAPING FUTURE WOE ON HIMSELF) AND SO IT REFLECTS MUTUALLY SHARED DELUSIONS THAT PEOPLE VOTE FOR SELF SERVING MEN.
A robust economy depends on a healthy banking system.
The dead cannot be living and so you are speaking falsely generating conflict in self and others calling the living dead and the dead living.
The Buddha said the heedless are already like the dead, he did not say they are the living dead.
THE HEEDLESS ARE LIKE THE DEAD IS NOT THE SAME AS ‘THE LIVING DEAD’ WHICH IS FALSE, SAYING WHAT IS DEAD LIVES. WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS THAT THOSE WHO ARE HEEDLESS ARE LIKE THE DEAD, THEY ARE NOT THE LIVING DEAD.

Heedfulness is the path to the Deathless. Heedlessness is the path to death. The heedful die not. The heedless are as if dead already.
Anyone who appeals to voters is heaping karma for himself to be experienced as future suffering. Suffice you present yourself, your case, your platform and then it is up to voters to choose on their own free will without influence or appeal which candidate to vote.
BY ISSUING APPEALS, YOU ARE OVERSTEPPING THE BOUNDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, YOU NEED FORCE NEVER REASON TO APPEAL, APPEAL IS BASED ON USING MENTAL FORCE TO STIR MENTAL FORCE AMONGST VOTERS TO BACK YOU AGAINST YOUR OPPONENTS AND EVEN IF YOU WIN, YOUR NECK IS ON THE CHOPPING BOARD NOT ONCE BUT EVEN MANY TIMES FOR YOUR SIN.
Bee Gees star Robin Gibb, who woke from a coma at the weekend, has been laughing and joking and wants to get out of hospital, his family say.
Beating the odds is never a statement of facts but it is designed to beat the drum or boast and that has karma.
You could say he is recovering, improving but beat the odds is never what happened except in your false understanding to make much of the event as if it is so miraculous or lovely. If it was so lovely he would not be flirting with death and skinny as a skeleton.
THERE IS NOTHING TO CROW ABOUT, BEATING THE ODDS, HE IS STILL VERY SICK, WITH THE SHADOW OF DEATH LURKING CLOSE AND SKINNY AS A SKELETON AND SO YOU ARE NOT DESCRIBING REALITY ACCURATELY TALKING ABOUT BEATING THE ODDS WHICH IS TO MAKE MUCH ABOUT THE RECOVERY.
KUALA LUMPUR: Several non-governmental organisations have urged parliamentarians to propose a law that allows impeachment of leaders.
There are many allegations of corruption and sexual misconduct levelled against ruling politicians and just because they have not been charged or convicted does not mean they are innocent.
In the same way, there have been many allegations especially sexual misconduct levelled against Anwar but that does not mean they are not scurrilous, attempts at political assassination and Anwar has not been convicted (at least reasonably by a fair judicial system). Anwar spent six years in prison because of abuse of power based on the allegation he influenced the police to try to suppress allegations of sexual misconduct against him.
THUS THIS CALL FOR ANWAR TO STEP DOWN HAS NO MERIT AND IF IT IS MOTIVATED FOR SELF GAIN, NOT FOR THE NATION’S OR ANWAR’S SAKE BUT FOR YOUR SAKE OR THOSE YOU ARE ALIGNED WITH, THERE IS DEADLY KARMA. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO ASSUME OTHER POLITICIANS ARE CLEAN JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN CHARGED. ‘A MAN IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY’ IS A FALSE RULE, ‘A MAN IS NOT INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN SO’ AND SO YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO PRESUME THE SYSTEM IS CLEAN AND ANWAR IS MORALLY UNFIT FOR THE SYSTEM.
IF THE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT AND YOU ARE TRYING TO EXCLUDE ANWAR ON THE BASIS HE IS MORALLY NOT FIT, YOU ARE ASKING FOR TERRIBLE KARMA. IF YOU ASSUME THE SYSTEM IS CLEAN WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS CLEAN YOU ARE ASKING FOR JUDGMENT. THUS ALL THESE PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE PRESENTING THEMSELVES FOR THE SLAUGHTER IN THE FUTURE.
Anwar spent six years in prison for abuse of power:
Anwar spent six years in prison for abuse of power as deputy PM. And what is the abuse of power?
There were allegations of sexual misconduct against him and the chief of CID or Special Branch came to see him in his office regarding those allegations and it is alleged that Anwar tried to use his powers to suppress those allegations.
The allegation of sodomy is another story and was based on the (uncorroborated) testimony of Azizah’s driver, Azizan who stated in court three times Anwar did not sodomize him and yet the judge deem fit to convict Anwar nevertheless. The condo was not even completed on the dates tendered for the act of sodomy on the initial police report.
IF YOU TALK ABOUT ABUSE OF POWER, OTHER POLITICIANS ARE GUILTY OF FAR GREATER ABUSE OF POWER. PUTRA JAYA WAS BUILT USING BILLIONS OF RINGGIT WITHOUT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE AND APPROVAL. RIGHTFULLY IT HAS TO BE TABLED IN PARLIAMENT, DEBATED, PASSED AND THEN PROCEEDED TO BUILDING.
Najib did not abuse his power:
Anwar was jailed for six years for power abuse without evidence tendered, it is said senior police officers met him at his office and Anwar is alleged to abuse his powers asking police to cover up those allegations.
Najib acknowledge he sent an SMS to his friend Razak Baginda but denied abuse of power. The SMS asked Razak to stay cool, Najib will be meeting the IGP and all is not lost.
WHETHER THERE IS ABUSE OF POWER OR NOT IS OBJECTIVE, IS NOT UP TO ANYONE TO INTERPRET OR TWIST TO SAY IT IS NOT OR IS.
THUS IF ANWAR ABUSED HIS POWERS AND DESERVED SIX YEARS JAIL FOR THAT THEN LET THE MINISTER WHO HAS NOT ABUSED HIS POWERS CAST THE FIRST STONE AT ANWAR AND JAIL HIM. 

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Using and stirring force:


Using and stirring force:
Force is not an inevitable, permanent fixture of a mind, it can be stopped and that is always happiness compared with when force is present in a mind. Ordinary people have never experienced this state with the absence of force because their mental force never stops, only idles like an engine or ticking heart.
THE MIND WHEN FORCE HAS STOPPED IS ALWAYS HAPPIER COMPARED WITH THE MIND WHERE FORCE IS ACTIVE, HOWEVER MILDLY.
There are two different categories of force activation; using force to do (useful) work that does not lead to woe and stirring force (something seen and heard stirs one’s mental force) which is always suffering compared with being not stirred and leads to even an eternity of woe.
Whenever work that may be meaningful or meaningless needs to be done, force must be activated. Thus you need to activate or use force if you want to speak or lift an object. This work may be useful or useless, for show. Thus stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, singing and dancing requires the use of force to do work but that work is useless, for show to please and impress others and because it is useless, it stirs resistance that must be overcome and leads to suffering and insanity.
The stirring in prolonging, changing speed and strength of one’s mental force as a result of something seen, heard or smelt, touched or tasted is something totally useless and meaningless and so it is suffering that is conditioning and leads to future suffering not release from suffering.
THE REASON WHY SOMETHING HEARD OR SEEN STIRS A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IS BECAUSE THERE IS FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE SOUNDS (SPEECH) HEARD OR SIGHTS (HOW SOMEONE IS DANCING) SEEN. THE PURPOSE OF STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS TO TRANSMIT THESE FORCE CHANGES WITH THE INTENTION TO STIR THE RECIPIENT, WHO IS FOOLISHLY DULY STIRRED.
ANOTHER REASON WHY A PERSON IS STIRRED IS BECAUSE OF CONDITIONING, EG HE SEES A DEAD BODY AND HIS MENTAL FORCE IS CONDITIONED TO BE STIRRED TO BE REPULSED.
ONLY WHEN A PERSON IS A MASTER OF HIS OWN MENTAL FORCE, HIS MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED BY ANYTHING HAPPENING AND HE ONLY ACTIVATES FORCE TO ACCOMPLISH MEANINGFUL WORK IS HE SAFE, NOT SUFFERING HERE AND HEADED FOR SAFETY EVEN FOR MANY ETERNITIES.
THE PERSON WHOSE MENTAL FORCE CAN BE STIRRED BY THINGS SEEN OR HEARD, WHO IN ADDITION USES FORCE TO DO WORK THAT IS MEANINGLESS OR FALSE (FASHIONING STYLE, SINGING, DANCING, MAKING MONEY, SAYING THINGS TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS) SUFFERS HERE AND IS HEADED EVEN FOR ETERNITIES OF SUFFERING.
Grumbling is about being upset or not liking and that is the wrong force based response. Shareholder disapproval or objection is the reason based response.
Here again is evidence people in this world has no true understanding, otherwise they would not speak of grumbling when the correct reason or truth based consideration is objection or disapproval.
GRUMBLING IS NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH OBJECTION OR DISAPPROVAL, GRUMBLING IS EMOTIONAL, COMPLAINING WHILST OBJECTION OR DISAPPROVAL IS A STATEMENT OF WRONG. HOW IS IT THAT A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING SPEAKS OF GRUMBLING AND NOT OBJECTION?
Rules logic is not an understanding:
Rules logic are programs that you call up to help you decide what is the correct thing to do or make sense or decide what is happening.
This is never true understanding of a situation which is seeing clearly totally what is happening as it actually is, how is it that you can then refer to recorded rules logic to help you make sense of what is happening?
A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING DOES NOT NEED RULES LOGIC AND NEVER RESORTS TO RULES LOGIC TO HELP HIM MAKE SENSE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING. ‘NEVER SAY NEVER’ IS A RULES LOGIC THAT IS OFTEN REHASHED TO HELP A PERSON MAKE SENSE OF A SITUATION. A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING DOES NOT NEED TO CONSULT TO SUCH RULES LOGIC.
THE FACT THAT RULES LOGIC EXISTS IN ABUNDANCE IN THIS WORLD, PEOPLE ARE USING RULES LOGIC TO EXPLAIN THINGS IS EVIDENCE PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD EVEN VERY INTELLECTUAL ONES DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
RULES LOGIC IS SOMETHING YOU RECORD AND RETRIEVE TO HELP YOU MAKE SENSE OF WHAT IS BEFORE YOU. EVERYTHING HAPPENING IS SENSIBLE TO A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE CAN UNDERSTAND AS IT ACTUALLY IS THAT IT IS TRUE, FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE AND DOES NOT HAVE TO FALL BACK ON RULES LOGIC TO GUIDE HIM.
ONLY THE BLIND NEED A WALKING STICK (RULES LOGIC) THOSE WHO ARE NOT BLIND DOES NOT NEED A WALKING STICK (RULES LOGIC).
What is good for markets/capitalists may not be good for you:
Quote: We’re now in the crazy situation where, as far as asset markets are concerned, bad news is good news. Why? Because worrying payroll gain numbers mean Ben Bernanke has a better excuse to crank up his virtual printing press once more – money that’s meant to boost bank lending, of course, so helping the broader economy, but which the banks prefer just to park in speculative “momentum bets”.

The interests of markets or Wall Street or capitalists do not necessarily coincide with the masses.
Authorities’ options to respond to economic downturns may be crude and self-defeating, counterproductive than useless.
The Fed is not flushed with savings but it is printing worthless money that it hopes will flow into the economy to stimulate the economy but the banks prefer to make speculative bets with it eg on the commodity even currency markets where they can make better profits often at the expense of the people eg high oil prices or extreme currency movements gives profits that is at the expense of consumers and the economy.
THE TOOLS THE FED HAVE TO TREAT THE AILING ECONOMY ARE CRUDE. IT IS CHEATING TO PRINT MONEY IT DOES NOT HAVE BUT ALL THIS HAMFISTED PRINTING OF WORTHLESS MONEY MAY END UP HARMING THE ECONOMY BECAUSE THE BANKS PREFER TO USE THE MONEY FOR SPECULATIVE PURPOSES THAT DOES NOT STIMULATE THE ECONOMY BUT MAY BE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE ECONOMY.
Self stress proves two opposing mental forces:
Just as it is only possible to drive with the handbrakes on if the force of propulsion (engine) is separate from the braking system, it is only possible to resistance one’s own actions to create stress if there are two SEPARATE OPPOSING mental forces in a person’s mind. If there was only a single mental force without an opposing mental force, it is not possible, IMPOSSIBLE for a person to resist his own speech and actions to cause self-stress. The sole purpose of a person’s force of self-preservation is to oppose or resist a person’s other force that is the drive of all his actions. Whenever the person’s actions in speech and deed is inimical, harmful to that person and he proceeds, then the force of self-preservation must act to resist and bring to a stop that action in lieu of his true reason or wisdom which would have told him not to do or say in the first place.
WITHOUT THE PRESENCE OF TWO OPPOSITE MENTAL FORCES IN A PERSON’S MIND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON’S OWN ACTIONS TO CAUSE HIM STRESS WHICH IS THE RESULT OF HIS OWN RESISTANCE TO HIS OWN ACTIONS. THUS THE FACT THAT A PERSON CAN CAUSE HIMSELF STRESS WITH HIS OWN ACTIONS IS EVIDENCE THERE ARE TWO OPPOSITE FORCES PRESENT IN HIS MIND.
THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE FORCE OF SELF-PRESERVATION IS TO OPPOSE THE ACTIONS OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT IS THE DRIVE TO ALL THE PERSON’S ACTIONS & EMOTIONS. THERE IS NO OTHER PURPOSE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE FORCE OF SELF-PRESERVATION EXCEPT OPPOSE THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF.
IF WHAT THE PERSON SAYS AND DOES IS MEANINGFUL, BENEFICIAL OR DOES NOT HARM OR ENDANGER SELF, THERE IS NO REASON FOR THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO INTERCEDE TO OPPOSE AND TRY TO STOP THAT ACTION.
BECAUSE THE PERSON LACKS WISDOM THAT WOULD ALWAYS ADVOCATE AGAINST ALL HARMFUL AND FALSE ACTIONS, HE HAS TO DEPEND ON BLIND FORCE, DEPEND ON A FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO RESIST, CONTROL OR CHAPERONE AND BRING TO AN END ALL ACTIVITIES THAT ARE HARMFUL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. TRUE WISDOM WILL NEVER COUNSEL ACTS THAT ARE SILLY/MEANINGLESS (EG DANCING, SINGING, FASHIONING STYLE) OR HARMFUL (EG STEAL OR LIE AND RISK BEING CAUGHT AND BEATEN) AND ONE WITH TRUE WISDOM DOES NOT NEED TO DEPEND ON A BLIND FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO SURVIVE.
THUS MY POSTULATION THAT THERE ARE TWO OPPOSING MENTAL FORCES, NOT JUST ONE IN THE MINDS OF BEINGS IS NOT WITHOUT BASIS, WITHOUT EVIDENCE. THE FACT THAT YOU CAN STRESS YOURSELF IS EVIDENCE THERE ARE TWO OPPOSING FORCES.
Truisms? You are deluded:
Such sayings below strike a chord in the hearts (stirs emotions) only of those without true understanding.
He may think he is very clever or wise but he is just lamenting, decrying, embarking a list of so called achievements or improvements or advancements and shooting them down one by one. This is never based on true understanding but it is an emotional pursuit to stir irony or conflict in self and others and that has karma to be experienced as future suffering, not wisdom and merit.
It is not an accident that he has a long list of dualities (eg life easier, time less) but it is a form of rote repetition by searching for and fabricating them and it is never based on true reason but based on emotion to stir irony (contradiction) in self and others.
The things he list as good (life is easier) is not necessarily good and the things he lists as bad (less time) is not necessarily bad and so his ironies may be deluded, based on false premises. Life is not necessarily easier today nor is time always less.
THE BASIS OF HIS LITANY OF IRONY IS NEVER WISDOM BUT IT IS EMOTION, A DESIRE TO STIR EMOTION OR IRONY IN SELF AND OTHERS AND IMPRESS OTHERS AS IF HE IS VERY WISE WHEN IT IS A CASE OF A FOOL WHO THINKS HIMSELF WISE. IT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT HE HAS COMPILED SUCH A LONG LIST WHICH IS BASICALLY REPETITION OF THE SAME RULE THAT GOES SOMETHING LIKE THIS MAY BE GOOD TODAY BUT IT IS NEGATED BY SOMETHING BAD.
AND WHAT IS HIS SOLUTIONS TO THE IRONIES HE STIRS? HE THERE IS A LIST OF ‘DOS’ OR COMMANDS THAT ARE PROGRAMMING OTHERS TO OBEY HIM AND ARE NOT THE ANSWERS. HE TELLS YOU TO ENJOY YOUR FOND FOODS WHICH IS BAD, LEADS TO RETURN HERE EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY. THE BUDDHA AND JESUS NEVER TELLS YOU TO ENJOY YOUR FOND FOODS. JESUS SAID YOU SHALL NOT CARE FOR WHAT YOU SHALL EAT SO HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO ENJOY YOUR FOND FOODS?
生活越來越方便,但是時間卻越來越少。
Life is easier, but time, less and less.
我們的學位越來越高,常識卻越來越少。
Our education level is higher and higher, but common sense, less and less.
知識越來越多,判斷力卻越來越差。
Knowledge is getting more and more, but judgement becomes worse and worse.

我們有更多的專家,但是也有更多的問題。
We have more professionals, but there are more and more problems.

醫藥越來越好,但健康越來越少。
Medicine has improved greatly, but health is becoming worse and worse.

我們花費太多,歡笑太少。
We expend a lot, but enjoy life very little.
車開得太快,火氣上來也更快。
We drive cars very fast, but temper bursts out faster.
睡得太晚,閱讀太少,電視看得太多,而且禱告太少。
Sleep very late, read very little, view too much TV and pray very little.
我們所擁有的資產倍增,但是價值卻遞減。
Our fortune is doubled, but value reduced.
我們說得太多,但是愛心太少,且謊話連篇。
We talk a lot, but love very little and lies abound.
我們學習如何經營生活,但沒有建造生命。
We learn how to lead a life, but we careless creating life.
我們在生命中加增歲月,卻沒有在歲月中增長生命。
We extend our life span, but never increase life in our days.
我們有越來越高的建築,但也有越來越低的 EQ
We have taller and taller buildings, but less and less EQ.
有更寬廣的高速公路,但有更狹窄的視野。
We have wider high speed motorways, but have narrower viewpoints.
我們花費得更多,但擁有的更少。
We spend a great deal, but own very little.
我們買得更多,但享受得更少。
We buy more, but enjoy less.
我們可以登陸月球回來。但是卻無法拜訪對街的鄰居。
We travel to the moon and back, but never stir to visit our neighbors.
我們可以征服外太空。但是卻無法掌控內心世界。
We conquer the outer space, but have no clue as to how to control our prejudice.
我們可以分裂原子核,但是卻無法挪去心中的偏見。
We can dissect atoms, but are unable to remove our biased thinking.
我們更多書寫,卻更少學習。
We write more, but learn little.
更多計畫,卻更少成就。
More schemes, but little success.
我們學會忙碌,但學不會等候。
We learn how to busy ourselves, but never learn how to wait.
我們的收入更高了,但道德更低了。
Our income has risen, but morality, declined.
我們生產更多電腦,掌握更多資訊,
We produce more and more computers, control more information,
複製更多拷貝,但我們的溝通卻更貧乏。
Multiply more and more copies, but our communications with others very lacking.
我們的數量提高了,品質卻降低了
We produce more, but quality deteriorates.
這是快速食品充斥卻消化不良的時代。
This is the year when fast food is aplenty and digestion failing.
高大的身軀與低劣的性格並存的時代。
Huge physique with lowly temperament coexisting era.
更多休閒卻更少歡樂。
Lots of rest, but little enjoyment.
更多食物卻更少營養。
More food, less nutrition.
更多雙收入家庭,但更高的離婚率。
More family income, more divorce cases.
更多千萬豪宅,但 卻更多破碎的家庭。
Many more millionaires, but more broken families.
我建議,在今天這樣的世代,
I propose. In such an era,
你不要保留任何事情到特殊的場合才做,
You do not keep what you want to do till a specific time to do,
因為你活著的每一天都是特殊場合。
Because the day you are alive and kicking is the specific occasion you should do.
勤加閱讀,追求知識,
Read more and obtain more knowledge.
坐在你家的前廊上欣賞自然美景,
Sit in your front veranda and enjoy the beauty of nature.
無需汲汲營營於生活需要。
Do not have to worry about life's essential needs.
多花時間與家人及好友在一起,
Spend more time with your friends and families,
享受喜歡的食物,
Enjoy your fond food.
到你喜愛的地方去遊覽。
Travel to places you like to visit.
生命不只是為了存活,
Life does not depend on maintaining one's existence.
而是一連串愉快事件組成的的鏈條。
It consists of many happy occasions chained together.
將你的水晶高腳杯拿出來,
Bring out your crystal champagne glass,
不要將妳最好的香水存起來,
Never keep your best perfume on the shelf.
任何時候你想要用的時候就用它吧。
Any time you want to use it, do so.
把「有一天」「將來的某一天」從你的字典中刪除。
Remove "one day" "some day in the future" from your dictionary.

現在就去寫那一封
Go now to write that letter
你曾經想過要等到「有一天」才來寫的信。
The letter you want to write one day.
讓我們現在就告訴我們的家人我們多愛他們。
Let us now tell our family that we love them very much.
不要將會帶給你歡笑及喜樂的任何事情拖延到未來。
Do not postpone telling them your happiness and love till one day.
每一天,每一小時,每一分鐘都是特別的,
Every day, every hour and every minute is all very special,
而且你不知道那是否是你的最後一刻。
Also, you do not know if it is your last minute of life.
如果你太忙以致於無法將這封信傳給你所愛的人,
If you are too busy and unable to forward this email to people you love,
你告訴自己說,「等到有一天」我再傳。
You tell yourself "Wait till one day" I shall forward.
那請你相信我 "等到有一天" 你或許沒有機會傳了。
In that case, please believe me "Wait till one day" you will never have any opportunity to do so.
Self-resistance is conditioned:
Self-resistance is not inevitable or natural but it is conditioned and it can be eliminated and with it, the person is delivered from the curse of stress.
Stress that is caused by self-resistance is not an inevitable accompaniment of existence but it is conditioned so well it is automatic because of the foolish being’s grim will to undertake actions that harm himself and so must be resisted or controlled. With the cessation of all conduct that is inimical, harms his own being, the person has no reason to resist his own actions and this cessation of resistance is the cessation of stress.
THE REASON WHY A PERSON HAS TO RESIST HIS OWN ACTIONS/SPEECH IS BECAUSE THEY ARE HARMFUL TO SELF AND THEY ARE HARMFUL TO SELF BECAUSE THEY ARE SAID AND DONE KNOWING IT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL OR DONE/SAID WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL. SO WELL TRAINED IS A PERSON BY HIMSELF AND OTHERS TO DO OR SAY THINGS KNOWING IT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL, WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR BENEFICIAL THAT SELF-RESISTANCE AUTOMATICALLY ACCOMPANIES ALL HIS ACTIONS SO THAT HE IS CURSED BY STRESS.
IF A PERSON STOPS SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT ARE FALSE OR HARMFUL, STOP SAYING OR DOING WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR BENEFICIAL, HIS SELF-RESISTANCE IS AUTOMATICALLY SILENCED AND WITH IT, HE IS FREED FROM THE CURSE OF STRESS.
You can never run away from stress but you can kill stress:
Stress is standard for everyone, it is unpleasant even extremely unpleasant, like a noose around the neck and no matter how good (holy) you think you are or recalcitrantly evil you are, stress is the standard tormenting unpleasant curse of your existence.
You can never run away from your stress because it is caused by resistance that is internal and accompanies whatever actions you take. You can take holidays in the most wonderful tropical paradise island, escape all social contacts, take the most expensive medicines in the world, seek the wisest philosophers mankind can offer, make as many prayers as you like per day but so long as there is falsity, harmfulness and nonsensicality in your speech and conduct, you must generate self-resistance and with it stress must haunt you like your shadow that never leaves you.
YOU CAN NEVER RUN AWAY FROM STRESS AND STRESS IS NEVER A WONDERFUL OR TOLERABLE BEDFELLOW NO MATTER HOW TOUGH YOU ARE BUT IT IS LIKE A NOOSE THAT REGULARLY TIGHTENS AND NEEDS TO BE LOOSENED. BUT I DO SAY THAT WITHOUT GOING TO THE ENDS OF THE WORLD AND WITHIN THIS SIX FOOT BODY IS THE CAUSE AND CURE FOR STRESS. SO LONG AS A PERSON STOPS ROUSING SELF-RESISTANCE TO WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES, SO LONG WILL STRESS EFFORTLESSLY VANISH LIKE A NOOSE LIFTED FROM YOUR NECK.
THERE IS ONLY ONE FREE PERMANENT CURE FOR STRESS AND YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PAY THROUGH YOUR NOSE OR GO TO THE ENDS OF THE EARTH TO OBTAIN. JUST STOP DOING OR SAYING THINGS THAT HARM YOURSELF, STOP SAYING OR DOING THINGS YOU KNOW ARE FALSE OR HARMFUL, STOP DOING OR SAYING THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING THEY ARE TRUE OR BENEFICIAL OR MEANINGFUL.
Green until the day I die:
Quote: BOB Brown has quit as Greens leader and will leave the Senate, but promises: "I'll be a Green until the day I die".
It is not a wise but a foolish statement. People think it is good to be green.
You are not green, yellow or red, you are you and it is a form of false self-identity to think you are green that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe not heaven.
PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH SEEING THEMSELVES AS GREEN OR RED OR LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE. THAT IS A FALSE IDENTIFICATION, IS A FORM OF SELF-IDENTITY THAT THE BUDDHA SAYS IS A FETTER TO FUTURE WOE.
Why even eating is stressful:
Eating is not good but bad, food is a bait and ultimately kills you. The Buddha advocates moderation in food, he only takes one meal a day only in the morning, he does not eat at night.
RELATIVELY FOOD IS GOOD FOR YOU IN THAT IT SUSTAINS YOU HERE BUT ULTIMATELY FOOD KILLS BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT CHEMICAL REACTIONS OR BATTLES THAT WILL KILL YOU.
THUS ULTIMATELY EATING IS BAD AND TO BE INDULGED ESSENTIALLY, MINIMALLY AND SO IF YOU LIKE TO EAT, YOU HAVE A BIG APPETITE THEN WHAT YOU DO IS BAD FOR YOU NO MATTER HOW YOU DELUDEDLY PERCEIVE IT AS GOOD AND BECAUSE YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING BAD, IF YOU HABITUALLY EAT A LOT IT MUST GENERATE SELF-RESISTANCE ND THUS STRESS.
PEOPLE WHO EAT WITH GREED SENSUALLY MUST EAT WITH RESISTANCE AND THAT CAUSES STRESS TO THEM BECAUSE EATING IS DOING IS SOMETHING BAD THAT MUST GENERATE SELF-RESISTANCE.
Styled eating for the wrong reasons leads to stress:
So long as there is style in your eating, there is falsity in your eating that leads to stress. If you eat for the wrong reasons (eg for adornment, pleasure, to build up your sexy body) it must cause stress in your eating.
Rushing is a style of eating and it leads to stress. Some people are very slow and fussy in their eating ritual and that too causes stress. Slurping is a style of eating with unnecessary force changes and prolonging and that too causes stress. Different people have different styles of eating, different styles of holding and moving forks and knives and these too cause stress when eating.
IF YOU EAT WITH STYLE FOR WRONG REASONS THAT TOO CAUSES SELF-RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS COMPARED TO STYLE FREE EATING FOR THE CORRECT REASONS. IT IS NOT EATING THAT IS ITSELF STRESSFUL BUT IT IS THE FALSE STYLE AND FALSE REASONS FOR EATING THAT GIVES EATING A BAD NAME.
Why smiling, laughing, joking must stress:
Smiling, laughing, joking are not free but work must be done to smile, laugh and joke and they are meaningless and even harmful to yourself let alone others.
IT IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE REFUTED THAT SMILING, LAUGHING AND JOKING ARE FALSE, MEANINGLESS, FOR SHOW TO STIR EVIL EMOTIONS IN SELF AND OTHERS AND BECAUSE THEY ARE EVIL THEY MUST GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE AND THUS STRESS EVEN IF YOU ARE DELUDED TO PERCEIVE THEM AS GOOD.
How to truly understand eating:
So you think you understand what eating is all about? You may be right or misguided that you understand when you don’t here as elsewhere.
Here is how I understand eating and if your view differs then if I am right you do not understand eating.
Eating is not blameless but blameworthy, animals and plants have to be destroyed to feed you or they have to produce or work (lay eggs) to feed you. There is no eating in heaven and so if you like to eat, cannot live without eating, heaven is not for you.
Eating is to be indulged minimally without style for the right reason which is just to keep your life going here.
NOT ONLY IS EATING ULTIMATELY HARMFUL, WORK HAS TO BE DONE TO EAT AND FOOD IS A CHEMICAL OR FORCE REACTION THAT ULTIMATELY DEGRADES YOU JUST AS YOU DEGRADE THE FOOD, THERE IS A STYLE IN HOW PEOPLE EAT (RUSHING, ELABORATE, FUSSY, FULL OF RITUALS OR PROTOCOLS THAT MUST BE FOLLOWED) THAT IS FALSE AND REHASHED THAT MUST GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE AND THUS STRESS, THEY EAT FOR WRONG REASONS (FOR PLEASURE OR FUN, TO FATTEN THEMSELVES, BECAUSE THEY ARE STRESSED OR RESTLESS) THAT MUST ALSO GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE THAT AGAIN LEADS TO STRESS.
Time to put euro out of its misery:

How do you understand the statement? It is delusional.
It was never the euro that was the cause of the problem and killing the euro will never solve the problem which goes much deeper than that.
It was crass mismanagement, lack of understanding of economic realities and pandering to debt or credit driven prosperity that is the cause and as long as you do not reform (much easier said than done), no destruction of the euro or whatever will deliver you from your woe, the euro is just a scapegoat.
THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS GOES DEEPER AND MORE FUNDAMENTAL THAN THE ILL CONCEIVED EURO AND ITS DISMANTLING IS NOT THE CURE. MANKIND HAS TOTALLY NO UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT GOOD ECONOMIC AND FINACIAL HUSBANDRY IS AND UNLESS IT GETS A MASSIVE INFUSION OF THAT NOTHING DONE WILL HELP. ONE USEFUL STEP IS TO GO AFTER SPECULATORS WHO ARE DRIVING COMMODITY PRICES TOO HIGH AT THE EXPENSE OF THE ECONOMY. STOP SHORT SELLING AND OIL BUYING WITHOUT USE. DISMANTLING DANGEROUS DERIVATIVES IF IT DOES CAUSE A SYSTEMIC CRASH WOULD BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN DISMANTLING THE EURO.
The dangers and evil of social networking sites:
Facebook is at the forefront and there are many social networking sites on the internet.
How to understand such social networking sites?
They are evil and dangerous in this world of predators and they are started by opportunistic avaricious people out to make money and fame for themselves. Posting a site with a picture of yourself might pander to the narcissistic tendencies of the gullible but it is an invitation to be targeted by criminals and sexual predators and so there is serious karma for those promoting such social networking sites which are not good but avenues for much evil including people to self identify and broadcast themselves on the web.
Mark Zuckenberg looks like a clone of Steve Jobs, his persona when he makes a presentation on stage is a variation on the theme of Steve Jobs and so they are all copycats, probably Steve Jobs imitated someone else and then CEOs deem it fashionable to adopt a certain geeky style, whatever that means.
THERE MAY BE ONLY ONE WAY TO UNDERSTAND SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES AND IT IS THAT THEY ARE DANGEROUS IN A WORLD OF CRIMINALS. THEY PANDER TO PEOPLE’S NARCISSISTIC TENDENCIES, PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THEIR FOUNDERS TO MAKE A LOT OF MONEY AND BY PROVIDING A PHOTO, INFORMATION AND A CHANNEL FOR COMMUNICATION TO THE PUBLIC, IT IS A DANGER TO THE GULLIBLE TO BECOME VICTIMS OF CRIME. THOSE RUNNING THESE SITES ARE FAR FROM INNOCENT, THEY SOLICIT AND ENTICE YOU TO LOOSEN YOUR INHIBITIONS AND EXPOSE YOURSELF TO ATTRACT ATTENTION OF OTHERS.
IF MY VIEW IS CORRECT ALL THESE FOUNDERS OF SUCH SITES HAVE TERRIBLE KARMA.
Social networking is against the Buddha’s teaching:
The Buddha said his teaching is for those who are disentangled not entangled.
Social networking promotes entanglement and is thus against the Buddha’s teaching.
Anuruddha Sutta:To Anuruddha
In seclusion, this line of thinking arose in Ven. Anuruddha's awareness: "This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not self-aggrandizing. This Dhamma is for one who is content, not is discontent. This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not entangled. This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not lazy. This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not confused. This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not uncentered. This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not whose discernment is weak."
Then the Blessed One, realizing with his awareness the line of thinking in Ven. Anuruddha's awareness disappeared from among the Bhaggas, and re-appeared right in front of Ven. Anuruddha. The Blessed One said to him, "Good, Anuruddha. It's good that you think these thoughts of a great person.' Now then, Anuruddha, think the eighth thought of a great person: 'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys & delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.'
"Anuruddha, when you think these eight thoughts, then -- whenever you want -- quite withdrawn from sensuality, unskillful qualities, you will enter & remain in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. When you think these eight thoughts, then -- whenever you want -- with the stilling of directed thought and evaluation, you will enter & remain in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought & evaluation -- internal assurance...with the fading of rapture, you will remain in equanimity, mindful & alert, physically sensitive to pleasure. You will enter & remain in the third jhana, 'Equanimous and mindful, he has a pleasurable abiding.' When you think these eight thoughts of a great person, then -- whenever you want -- with the abandoning of pleasure & pain, you will enter & remain in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither-pleasure-nor-pain.
"Now, when you think these eight thoughts and become a person who can attain at will, these four jhanas then your robe of cast-off rags will seem just like the clothes chest of a householder, full of clothes of many colors. As you live contented, it will serve for your delight, comfortable abiding, non-agitation, & for alighting on Unbinding.
" your meal of almsfood will seem like the rice of a householder served with a variety of sauces & seasonings...your dwelling at the foot of a tree will seem like the gabled mansion of a householder, your bed on a spread of grass will seem like the couch of a householder .
Then, the Blessed One disappeared and reappeared among the Bhaggas. He sat down and addressed the monks: "Monks, I will teach you the eight thoughts of a great person. "
"'This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not self-aggrandizing.' There is the case where a monk, being modest, does not want it to be known that 'He is modest.' Being content, he does not want it to be known that 'He is content.' Being reclusive, he does not want it to be known that 'He is reclusive.' His mindfulness being established, he does not want it to be known that 'His mindfulness is established.' Being endowed with discernment, he does not want it to be known that 'He is endowed with discernment.' Enjoying non-complication, he does not want it to be known that 'He is enjoying non-complication.'
"'This Dhamma is for one who is content, not for one who is discontent.' There is the case where a monk is content with any old robe cloth at all, any old almsfood, any old lodging, any old medicinal requisites at all.
"'This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not entangled.' There is the case where a monk, when living in seclusion, is visited by monks, nuns, lay men, kings. With his mind bent on seclusion, he converses with them only as much is necessary.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not is lazy.' There is the case where a monk keeps his persistence aroused for abandoning unskillful mental qualities and taking on skillful mental qualities. He is steadfast, solid in his effort.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not confused.' There is the case where a monk is mindful, remembering even things that were done & said long ago.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not for one whose mind is uncentered.' There is the case where a monk, quite withdrawn from sensuality, unskillful mental qualities, enters & remains in the first jhana. With the stilling of directed thought & evaluation, he enters & remains in the second jhana. With the fading of rapture he remains in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure. He enters & remains in the third jhana.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain he enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness.
"'This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not for one whose discernment is weak.' There is the case where a monk is endowed with discernment of arising & passing away -- leading to the right ending of stress.
"'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys & delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.' There is the case where a monk's mind grows confident, firm in the cessation of complication.
Facebook popularity by crook:
Facebook can boast of millions of users but it may not be a true measure of its popularity. In order to access sites within Facebook eg Samsung or whatever, you must log in or create a new account which I refused and so I have never entered Facebook although in the past I wanted to have a look.
I REFUSE TO SET UP A FACEBOOK ACCOUNT JUST TO ACCESS THE SITE AND IT IS A STRONG ARM TACTIC TO GARNER MORE MEMBERS TO COMPEL VISITORS TO CREATE AN ACCOUNT. RECENTLY I PARTIALLY CREATED AN ACCOUNT FOR ANOTHER NETWORKING SITE AND I HAVE BEEN HARRASSED BY EMAILS ASKING ME TO PLACE A PHOTO, TELLING A GIRL IN A FOREIGN LAND WANTS TO KNOW ME AND HOW AM I DOING IN MY TOWN. THIS IS EVIL.
Why calories count:
This is a false statement and whoever counts calories is headed for eternal suffering.
How many calories are in the food you take is of no importance, does not count unless you are attached to or obsessed with your petty life here that you will finally lose and perish.
In order for calories to count you must program yourself to become adept at estimating the calories in the foods that you usually take, to juggle the amounts of the food so that you remain within the ‘ideal’ calorie intake. Thus when well programmed you see all food in terms of how much calories and that is false perception.
IN ORDER FOR CALORIES TO COUNT YOU MUST BE PROGRAMMED AS A ROBOT TO ALWAYS COUNT CALORIES WHEN YOU EAT AND YOU HAVE TO SEE CALORIES IN ALL THE FOOD YOU EAT AND THAT IS FALSE PERCEPTION. RATHER THAN SEEING FOOD YOU SEE CALORIES.
BETTER YOU DIE OF OBESITY AND UNHEALTHY FOOD THAN YOU BECOME A FREAK PROGRAMMED TO SEE CALORIES IN ALL THE FOOD YOU EAT AND TRYING TO MAINTAIN A PARTICULAR CALORIE INTAKE.
CALORIES COUNT ONLY IF YOU WANT TO GO MAD AND SUFFER.
Heavenly messengers:
Death, disease and degeneration are not natural but are built into this world as heavenly messengers that something is seriously wrong with existence here, according to the Buddha. Thus whoever has found his life here, celebrates his life here, upholds existence here is defying heavenly messengers and headed for woe not safety.
ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA, DEATH, DISEASE AND DEGENERATION ARE CELESTIAL MESSENGERS, BUILT INTO THIS WORLD (GOD CAN BRING YOU BACK TO LIFE, CURE YOUR BLINDNESS IF HE WANTS) AS WARNING THAT ALL IS NOT WELL IN THIS WORLD AND YOU SHOULD ABANDON IT. ANYONE WHO SEES NOTHING WRONG WITH DEATH, DISEASE AND DEGENERATION WILL HEAD FOR MORE DEATH, DISEASE AND DEGENERATION BUILDING A PILE OF SKELETONS THE BUDDHA SAID IS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN.
Money makes the world go round:
He is not the first nor will he be the last to say that and the only way for the statement to be repeatedly proffered it must be rehashed and it is false.
Without knowing what you say is true you are courting doubt and uncertainty and self-resistance (that leads to stress) saying so.
Money may be a very important commodity in this world but it is not possible for anyone to see money making the world go round and so it is said without seeing to exaggerate the importance of money.
MONEY MAY BE VERY IMPORTANT IN THIS WORLD BUT IT IS NOT VALUED BY EVERYONE AND IT DOES NOT MAKE THE WORLD ROUND WHICH IS A FABRICATION TO FALSELY EXAGGERATE THE IMPORTANCE OF MONEY.
FURTHER IT IS COPIED FROM OTHERS AND THE PERSON IS REHASHING AND THEREFORE A SOMNOLENT ROBOT.
Say it and stress is your companion:
Saying “Money makes the world go round” is saying without knowing it is true (to exaggerate) and that is the path to certain stress.
Why is that so?
Whenever a person says anything he did not see as true, he must rouse self-resistance saying it and this conditioning, he is training himself to speak with self-resistance that is the cause of stress.
STRESS IS CAUSED BY SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS WITH SELF-RESISTANCE ACCOMPANYING.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO KNOW HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH SAYING ‘MONEY MAKES THE WORLD GO ROUND’ AND SO HE IS SPEAKING WITHOUT KNOWING THAT IS ACCOMPANIED BY SELF RESISTANCE THAT IS CONDITIONING SO THE HIS DEFAULT WAY OF SPEAKING IS WITH SELF-RESISTANCE THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRESS.
Are you talking about the earth or world?
If by world you are talking about the earth then it is not money but the earth’s rotation that has nothing to do with money that makes it goes round.
If you are not talking about the earth then the world does not go round and you speaking falsely saying the world goes round powered by money.
THE WORLD DOES NOT GO ROUND, THE EARTH GOES ROUND. IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE WORLD THEN IT DOES NOT GO ROUND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY SAYING IT GOES ROUND DRIVEN BY MONEY. IF BY WORLD YOU MEAN THE EARTH THEN IT IS NOT MONEY BUT THE EARTH’S ROTATION THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MONEY THAT MAKES IT GO ROUND.
THIS IS MUDDLED SPEECH TALKING ABOUT THE WORLD WHEN YOU MEAN EARTH AND VICE VERSA THAT IS DEADLY, LEADS TO INSANITY.
They can cure human diseases - if saved from a deadly fungus
It is not because frogs can cure human diseases that they matter and if they don’t cure they don’t matter.
Such statements come from wrong perception of reality, is teaching others to be self-serving or calculating and so it has deadly karma.
People think they are very good teaching others such ‘facts’ but they are heaping deadly karma to be repaid as future suffering.
IT IS SELF SERVING TO SAY FROGS MATTER BECAUSE THEY CAN CURE HUMAN DISEASES AND IT IS NOT HARMLESS BUT IT LEADS TO INSANITY AND THERE IS KARMA TEACHING OTHERS TO BE CALCULATING.
Mad Obama:
CARTAGENA, Colombia (AP) - President Barack Obama, speaking for the first time about allegations that Secret Service agents hired prostitutes, said Sunday that "of course I'll be angry" if those accusations are proven true by an investigation.
‘Of course, I’ll be angry’ says Obama.
Sometimes people substitute ‘mad at you’ for ‘angry at you’ and so it is they think they are meaningful and good being angry at wrongdoing when they are headed for future insanity.
What is the substance of the matter is that it is wrong conduct and should be censured even punished, if you think that is synonymous with being angry or upset you may be right or you have advanced false perception.
TO BE ANGRY IS THE WRONG FORCE BASED UNDERSTANDING AND RESPONSE TO AN EVENT, THE CORRECT RESPONSE IS TO UNDERSTAND THE AGENTS’ CONDUCTS WAS WRONG OR BAD AND THEY SHOULD BE REPRIMANDED EVEN PUNISHED. ‘OF COURSE’ IS SELF JUSTIFICATION OF A TOTALLY MEANINGLESS BLIND FORCE RESPONSE, ‘ANGER’. THE CONSEQUENCES ARE SERIOUS, YOU ARE DICING WITH FUTURE INSANITY.
A dangerous exercise of false logic:
Just because glaciers are getting bigger does not warrant the logical conclusion that there is no global warming. In fact it may be in line with global warming because more precipitation due to global warming may cause those glaciers to grow than shrink.
THERE IS NO NEED AND IT IS DANGEROUS FALSE LOGIC TO CONCLUDE THAT JUST BECAUSE CERTAIN GLACIERS ARE GROWING MEANS THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING. IT GOES TO SHOW EVEN WELL EDUCATED PEOPLE SUFFER FROM FALSE LOGIC THAT MAY ONE DAY KILL THEM AND OTHERS.
PEOPLE THINK THEY HAVE GREAT LOGIC BUT THEY MAY HAVE SERIOUSLY FLAWED LOGIC THAT IS A HAZARD TO THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.
Allegations that US Secret Service agents consorted with prostitutes in Colombia have "let the boss down", says the US military's top officer.
Why should anyone be embarrassed except that they put up a false image of respectability about themselves that has been exposed as fraudulent.
A person does not project an image of himself and so even if you maintain your squeakily clean image you are guilty of sin, guilty of putting up and maintaining a false image of respectability.
WITHOUT PRESENTING AN IMAGE OF RESPECTABILITY OF YOURSELF YOU CANNOT BE EMBARRASSED (SHAMED, HURT) WHEN SOMETHING EXPOSES ITS FALSE NATURE. ONLY PRETENTIOUS PEOPLE CAN BE EMBARRASSED AND EMBARRASSMENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SUBSTANCE AND IT IS ALL ABOUT THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO BE HURT/SHAMED BY EXPOSURE.
EVEN IF YOU METICULOUSLY MAINTAIN YOUR IMAGE YOU ARE LIVING IN FALSITY AND SIN PROJECTING AN IMAGE OF YOURSELF EG AS JOVIAL, RESPECTABLE, GOOD NATURED OR GUNG HO.
What is embarrassment?
Embarrassment is hurt or pain caused by the stirring one one’s mental force to significant strength as to cause pain triggered by an event that exposes one’s true nature that is at variance to the publicly broadcast image and it usually leads to agitation, an emotion caused by the disorganised stirring in speed and strength of one’s mental force.
EMBARRASSMENT IS MEANINGLESS AND THEREFORE CONTROLLED INSANITY, AN AFFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL PRETENTIOUS PEOPLE. IT IS SIMPLY HURT OR PAIN CAUSED BY THE SIGNIFICANT RISING IN STRENGTH OF ONE’S MENTAL FORCE THAT LEADS TO AGITATION OR CONFUSION (AS ONE STRUGGLES TO APPLY DAMAGE CONTROL) WHEN AN EVENT EXPOSES SOMETHING UNSAVOURY THAT IS AT VARIANCE TO THE IMAGE ONE PROJECTS.
THUS EMBARRASSMENT IS A COMPOUND OF TRIGGERED SELF HURT OR PAIN LEADING TO EMOTIONAL AGITATION OR CONFUSION THAT DRIVES THE PERSON TO RESTLESSLY SEEK TO DAMAGE CONTROL, EG FIND EXCUSES.
Shame is a feeling not emotion:
Shame is an unpleasant feeling caused by self-generated force as a result of something happening.
Feelings arise from contact with force with mild force giving pleasant feelings and strong force giving pain. This force contacted may be generated externally or internally by self. When a person is shamed, his own mental force rises to sufficient strength as to cause pain or hurt to be felt by him and this is the essence of the shame that usually gives rise to emotions like sadness, anger, agitation.
SHAME IS SIMPLY SELF-GENERATED PAIN BUT IT IS OFTEN ACCOMPANIED RAPIDLY BY EMOTIONS LIKE SADNESS, ANGER (AT SELF AND OTHERS) AND AGITATION.
The truth about the euro?
Pundits line up everywhere to castigate the euro when it may not be the euro but it is derivatives that is responsible for the mess and so they are heading for insanity.
It is derivatives, an American invention or hocus pocus, that gives the false impression that loans are somehow guaranteed and so you should have no fears lending that may be at the heart of the euro crisis, not the euro itself. Without assurances about the safety of their money, banks would be more judicious in their lending but since their money is supposed to be safe, has been insured, who cares, lend to any idiot who walks through the door.
IT MAY NOT BE THE EURO THAT IS AT FAULT AND IF IT IS AT FAULT, THE USD IS EVEN WORSE BECAUSE IT PERMITTED THE US TO BUILD UP MOUNTAINOUS DEBTS WITHOUT EARNING THE MONEY, BY JUST PRINTING, IT IS A MASSIVE FREE LOAN TO THE US WHEN PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD CONVERT THEIR ASSETS INTO USD AND IT IS USED AS A CURRENCY OF SETTLEMENT BY COUNTRIES INDEPENDENT OF THE US.
AT THE HEART OF THE TERRIBLE DEBT CRISIS MAY BE THE EVIL DERIVATIVES CONCOCTED BY AMERICAN FINANCIAL ‘WIZARDS’ OR WITCHES.
IF WHAT I SAY IS CORRECT THEN THESE SO CALLED PUNDITS ARE DELUDED, DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING.
Playing politics:
Quote: Anwar merely playing politics.
‘Playing politics’ is a non-specific statement that can be retrieved to be applied to many situations, he is not the first to say this and so the only way it can come about is that it was memorized and rehashed from memory.
You can play football or the violin but you cannot play politics except in your advanced false perception you can and so it copied falsity that ends in insanity. Anwar trying to exploit the issue for political gains is the correct statement and it is different from playing politics which is a vague general statement to blanket apply to many situations where one may not understand what is going on.
‘PLAYING POLITICS’ IS A SLOGAN, A CATCH PHRASE THAT IS IDEAL FOR RECORDING AND PLAYBACK WITH WIDE CURRENCY AND MAY HIDE A PERSON’S LACK OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS HAPPENING. IT MAY SOUND NICE TO PEOPLE WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND.
It is not a matter of playing politics:
Playing politics is not a correct answer so the person has an appointment with mad logic and perception.
What is relevant is whether Anwar is correct or wrong, his proposal is beneficial or harmful. By implication he is admitting that Anwar’s proposal has merit but he is insincere, will not implement it but is using it as a false promise to entice voters. In this case he is speaking unrighteously doubting or questioning Anwar.
NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO DOUBT OR QUESTION ANWAR’S WILL TO FULFILL WHAT HE PROMISED, UNTIL ANWAR HAS RENEGED ON HIS PROMISES YOU CANNOT CRITICISE OR DISPARAGE HIM AND SO IF BY SAYING ‘PLAYING POLITICS’ YOU MEAN ANWAR’S PROPOSALS ARE GOOD BUT HE HAS NO INTENTION OF UNDERTAKING IT, YOU ARE ASKING FOR KARMA DOUBTING ANWAR.
PLAYING POLITICS IS THE INCORRECT ANSWER, WHAT MATTERS IS IF ANWAR’S PROPOSAL IS RIGHT OR WRONG AND IF IT IS RIGHT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO QUESTION HIS RESOLVE TO FULFILL IT.
UK is surviving on interest only mortgages:
35% of UK mortgages are currently interest only, people only pay interest and nothing on principal owed and so this is delaying or postponing a reckoning with default when the day comes for them to pay principal in addition or if interest rates start to soar eg to protect the sterling.
Quote: Of the 11.2million mortgages in Britain, 35 per cent are on interest-only deals.
Andrea Leadsom, a Conservative member of the Treasury Select Committee, said: “People are switching to interest-only because it gives them smaller outgoings now, but it is storing up problems for the future.”
WITHOUT INTEREST ONLY MORTGAGES UK WOULD HAVE DESCENDED INTO DEPRESSION AND WHEN THE TIME COMES TO PAYING PRINCIPAL IT IS LIKELY TO CREATE MASS INSOLVENCY AND DRAG THE ECONOMY EVEN LOWER.
Public concern, political support, commercial imperatives... sound familiar?
There is no need to see shale gas in terms of GM crops but it reflects emotional people’s understanding of a current situation is not true, fresh specific to the occasion that they refer to some past event, see similarities and see the current situation in terms of the past event. What is needed is to examine the current shale gas situation and understand as it actually is, whatever similarity with GM is irrelevant and serves to distract. People fall back on past situations to see the current situation in terms of that past situation and it is a guide for them to rehash past solutions to apply to the present.
THERE IS NEVER A NEED OR RELEVANCE TO SEE SHALE GAS AS THE NEW GM, IT IS NEVER SO AND IT REFLECTS PEOPLE’S UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS HAPPENING ARE NEVER TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION BUT THEY HAVE RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS THAT THEY REFER TO AND REHASH TO EXPLAIN CURRENT EVENTS AND ALSO APPLY PAST SOLUTIONS TO THE PRESENT. UNDERSTAND THE SHALE GAS SITUATION AS IT TRULY IS, WHENCE THE NEED TO COMPARE IT WITH GM? IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE BLIND, CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE SHALE GAS SITUATION THAT YOU ARE ‘FOREVER’ REFERRING TO RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS TO TRY AND EXPLAIN THE CURRENT SITUATION.
IT IS MAD TO SEE SOMETHING (SHALE GAS) IN TERMS OF ANOTHER (GM CROPS), YOU SEE SOMETHING IN ITS OWN TERMS. NOT ONLY HAS WORK OR THINKING TO BE DONE TO SEE SOMETHING IN TERMS OF ANOTHER, IT NEVER QUITE FITS EXCEPT APPROXIMATELY.
SO, TRULY UNDERSTANDING, DID YOU UNDERSTAND LIKE I EXPRESS ABOVE?
People think they talk great sense and they are maverick, unconventional and clever but they talk nonsense and those who hear who do not understand think maybe they have a case.
It is not about changing the system. The system, whatever it is, parliamentary system or the constitution is fine, does not require change, it is the gross abuses of the system perpetrated by politicians entrusted by voters that is responsible for the mess and the need for change. Thus it is not the system that needs change except in your delusion, it is those entrusted to carry out the system who need to change and so he is talking nonsense headed for nonsense (aka insanity).
HE IS TALKING NONSENSE AND HEADED FOR NONSENSE. THE SYSTEM IS FINE, IT IS THE ABUSE OF THE SYSTEM BY RULING POLITICIANS (EG ELECTORAL GERRYMANDER EVEN FRAUD, ABUSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT, THE MEDIA) THAT IS THE CAUSE OF THE MESS THAT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED. BECAUSE HE IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE, HE IS TALKING WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHAT HE SAYS AND THAT IS THE PATH TO INSANITY.
WHAT HE SAID CAN ONLY BE UNDERSTOOD ONE WAY: IT IS FALSE. IF YOU THINK HE MAY HAVE A CASE, WHO KNOWS THEN YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND.
Change the corrupt policeman or the police system?
Is it the police system that is rotten or the personnel that is rotten or corrupted? Do you change the police system just because corruption is endemic and do you think that with corruption still in place, changing the system is the answer? Supposed you replace the police from top to bottom with people of integrity, would that solve the corruption problem?
In the same way, is it the judiciary system that needs to be change or the practice of ruling politicians influencing court decisions behind the scene and judges being corrupt? What use would it be to change the judiciary system if judges remain corrupt?
The sin of running errands for others:
It is specifically instructed by the Buddha that his monks should not run errands for others, thus if you buy medicines for your patients you are running errands. If someone asks you to pass a message to another, or meet another on his behalf you are running errands.
When you run errand in return for material gains, you become a mercenary and a slave and being a slave and mercenary is never the path to heaven.
THUS PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE DELUDED. THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG EVEN GOOD IN RUNNING ERRANDS FOR OTHERS WHEN IT MEANS ENSLAVING YOURSELF, BEING A ROBOT FOR OTHERS. EVEN MONKS RUN ERRANDS FOR OTHERS.
People may disagree but they do not understand:
People may disagree with the statement ‘it is not about BN or PR, it is about changing the system’ but they never truly understand the statement.
THERE IS NO NEED TO DISPUTE THE STATEMENT. IT IS OBJECTIVELY TRUTHFULLY WRONG AND THE PERSON IS DELUDED.
DO YOU OR PEOPLE REALIZE THIS? IF YOU DON’T THEN YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID TO YOU.
WHATEVER THE FAULTS OF THE SYSTEM, IT IS FAR LESS IN NEED OF CHANGE THAN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH RUNNING THE SYSTEM AND SO YOU ARE BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE WANTING TO CHANGE THE SYSTEM INSTEAD OF THE PERSONNEL RUNNING THE SYSTEM. WHATEVER THE FAULTS OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM, THE CORRUPTION AND INCOMPETENCE OF THE PERSONNEL FAR OUTWEIGH AND SO YOU SHOULD DIRECT YOUR EFFORT AT CHANGE (IF THAT IS WHAT YOU WANT AND THOSE CHANGES ARE FOR THE GOOD OF THE PEOPLE) AT THE PERSONNEL THAN SYSTEM.
YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS PROPOSED NOR IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO TELL IF HE IS CORRECT OR NOT, A DISCERNING PERSON CAN TELL HE HAS NO CASE THAT THE SYSTEM NEEDS CHANGE. THE PERSONNEL OR PEOPLE RUNNING THE SHOW ARE IN NEED OF CHANGE FAR MORE THAN THE SYSTEM AND THIS CANNOT BE DISPUTED NOR DO YOU NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO KNOW THAT.
I am part Neanderthal - and so might you be
Whether you are part Neanderthal or not, you are still you and so it is always an irrelevant issue and the purpose of saying that is to stir emotions as if it is that great or interesting or wonderful being Neanderthal. It is not an accident he spoke on personal terms (I & you) rather than in terms of humanity but it is to stir emotion eg ‘wow’.
WHETHER WE ARE PART NEANDERTHAL OR NOT IS A NON-ISSUE, THERE ARE MORE PRESSING ISSUE FOR A PERSON TO CONSIDER AND SO HE IS WASTING HIS AND OTHERS’ TIME AND HEADED FOR INSANITY MAKING A MOUNTAIN OUT OF A MOLE HILL. WHETHER HE OR YOU IS A NEANDERTHAL DOES NOT MATTER, YOU ARE STILL YOU. WHAT MATTERS IS THE FALSITY AND HARMFULNESS THAT YOU ARE CONSTANTLY PERPETRATING CAUSING PRESENT SUFFERING AND HEAPING FUTURE SUFFERING FOR YOU.
WHETHER A TOPIC IS WORTHY OF MENTION AND EXACTLY FOR WHAT PURPOSE IT IS BROACHED IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED, IF IT IS NOT WORTHY OF MENTION OR IT IS BROACHED FOR EMOTIONAL MOTIVES THAT BELIES ITS APPARENT OR NOMINAL VALUE, YOU ARE COURTING FUTURE INSANITY.