Are euro summits a waste of time?

Are euro summits a waste of time?

Not just euro summits but all summits are waste of time. Whatever a matter arising can be understood truly as such and such and it applies to everyone and if you understand the matter clearly then the solutions are clear as such and such or there are no solutions, there is no need for debate or reaching consensus and it reflects deluded humans’ obsession with rituals or rigmarole or pomposity that they need self-aggrandizing costly vexatious summits that often fail to achieve anything (they agree to disagree).

IT REFLECTS DELUSION YOU EVEN HAVE TO ASK IF EURO SUMMITS ARE A WASTE OF TIME (AND MONEY), ALL SUMMITS ARE UNNECESSARY FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT DELUDED, WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND BECAUSE WHATEVER THE MATTER ONLY HAS ONE NATURE AND THE ANSWERS ARE OBVIOUS, THERE IS NO NEED FOR RITUALISTIC POMPOUS MEETINGS TO DEBATE, CUT DEALS AND MAKE RESOLUTIONS. SO LONG AS PARTICIPANTS POSSESS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND THEY ARE SELF-SERVING, ARGUMENTATIVE, ALL THE SUMMITS IN THE WORLD CAN NEVER DELIVER THE TRUE SOLUTION EVEN IF IT EXISTS.

AND SO ANYONE WHO IS IN DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY AND THEREFORE POSES THE QUESTION WHETHER THE EURO SUMMIT ARE A WASTE OF TIME IS HEADED FOR WOE, HE HAS DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE. SUMMITS ARE A FORM OF RITUAL AND FAITH IN RITUALS, IN SUMMIT IS ANOTHER LOWER FETTER THE BUDDHA SAID LED TO FUTURE WOE.

Independent MPs: Stop making ludicrous claims

PETALING JAYA: Independent MPs slammed Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for claiming that children aged between two and 12 were in the electoral roll.

There is nothing ludicrous about those claims, they are either true or false and if you have not ascertained that they are false you are asking for painful karma.

Without stirring your emotions and others to scoff or laugh you cannot experience ludicrousness and this is a totally false understanding of the matter. The claims are either true or false, to say they are ludicrous is to un-righteously dismiss and this proves they are partisan, vested not objective.

A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING KNOWS WITH CERTAINTY THESE INDEPENDENT MPS ARE NOT SPEAKERS OF TRUTH BUT VESTED, PARTISAN AND SO THERE IS NO QUESTION OF TRUST IN THEM. 

Credit card debt churning out bankrupt graduates

KUANTAN: Many university graduates have been declared bankrupt due to heavy credit card spending and failing to settle their loans early on in their working lives.

Churning is a function of force never reason, no churning is taking place but it is said with the unconscious intention of stirring force in others.

“Credit card debt resulting in bankrupt graduates” is the proper or correct way to state the matter that does not stir emotion or mental force in others.

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER YOU CARE OR NOT, WHOEVER STIRS ANOTHER’S MENTAL FORCE EITHER THROUGH TRANSMITTING FORCE STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING (ACCELERATING) SPEED AND LOUDNESS OR THE USE OF WORDS THAT UNNECESSARILY CONVEY FORCE (EG CHURNING) IS HEAPING KARMA ON HIMSELF TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE PAIN.

Things are never the same:

Often it is not that two different versions are too similar to tell apart but it is the lack of discernment through lack of concentration that makes it difficult if not impossible for that individual to tell apart when someone with superior concentration and discernment has no trouble telling which is better.

Even at the higher end of Hi Fi equipment there is considerable audible sound differences between different equipment playing the same song.

Thus nowadays, my mind calm and attained to high concentration I can easily tell apart even without AB comparisons which version sounds better.

The computer USB version via the Cambridge Audio amplifier sounds very good on its own but it is flat or less lively with less detail compared to the Denon CD player’s USB output and the Denon CD player’s output is less musical and lacking in detail compared with Marantz’s 6004 player.

GOD IS THE HIGHEST IN POWER AND PERFECTION BUT THE BUDDHA SAID HE IS THE HIGHEST, THERE IS NO EQUAL TO HIM, ONE OF HIS TWO DEPUTIES IS CO-EQUAL IN WISDOM, ANOTHER CO-EQUAL IN SUPERNATURAL POWER, YET ANOTHER IS CO-EQUAL TO THE BUDDHA IN DISCIPLINE OR RESTRAINT. THUS THERE IS AN EVEN INFINITE RANGE IN EXCELLENCE AMONGST BEINGS, NO TWO BEINGS ARE THE SAME AND THE BUDDHA CLAIMS HE IS PERFECT IN EVERY WAY.

EVEN AMONGST EXPENSIVE HI FI EQUIPMENT, THE SOUND IS NEVER THE SAME AND A CHEAPER ALTERNATIVE MAY SOUND BETTER THAN A MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE ONE. A PERSON WITH DISCERNMENT AND CONCENTRATION CAN TELL THE MUSICAL QUALITIES OF DIFFERENT REPRODUCTIONS EASILY.

Missions are good monitor speakers:

A monitor loudspeaker has good reproductive qualities that enable it to accurately reproduce even fine details in the music fed into them.

Mission loudspeakers have always had a reputation for faithful sound reproduction and so it is that even my diminutive not too expensive table top 790SE can act as monitor speakers to allow the listener to tell apart amplifiers and CD players.

IN ORDER TO BE A MONITOR SPEAKER, A SPEAKER MUST HAVE A HIGH STANDARD OF REPRODUCTIVE CAPABILITY TO ENABLE IT TO FAITHFUL REFLECT THE QUALITIES OF DIFFERENT INPUTS.

Engelbert as I never heard before:

I have heard this Engelbert song ‘there goes my everything’ many times and yet I have never heard the background trombone on the right side regularly coming in in refrain.

EVEN AT VERY SOFT LEVELS, THE MISSION 790/CAMBRIDGE AUDIO/MARANTZ CD 6004 USB COMBO RENDERED MUSICAL DETAILS I NEVER HEARD BEFORE. IT WAS SUFFICIENT DISCRETE TO MAKE ME IDENTIFY IT AS A TROMBONE. SINGERS VOICES ARE MELLOWER NOT AS HARSH THAN I USED TO KNOW.

Upgrade your ears before you upgrade your gear:

Before you spend even tens of thousands of dollars on hi fi equipment, first upgrade your ears otherwise it may be largely lost.

As the Buddha said, for the monk whose mind is centred even a simple meal tastes like a feast, even your abode at the foot of a tree is like a palace, if your mind or concentration is not there even the most expensive hi fi equipment will sound sick.

THUS BEFORE YOU CAN HEAR CLEARLY, EFFORTLESSLY DISTINGUISH DIFFERENT MUSIC, YOU MUST LISTEN WITH CALMNESS, WITHOUT STIRRED EMOTION, STIRRED RESISTANCE, STIRRED LIKE AND DISLIKE WHICH RUINS THE ATMOSPHERE, POISONS IT.

AND SO IF YOU WISH TO HEAR HEAVENLY MUSIC, FIRST ACHIEVE THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND, NO PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNES, THE CESSATION OF THINKING, THE CESSATION OF LIKE AND DISLIKE, THE CESSATION OF PAIN AND PLEASURE.

Listening without resistance:

You may think you listen truly but it may be delusion.

There is such a thing as listening without stirred resistance and listening with automatically stirred resistance that can be variably increased or decreased but never totally absent.

EVEN WHEN A SMITTEN MAN SEES THE PRETTIEST GIRL IN HIS LIFE, HE SEES SO ALWAYS WITH RAISED SELF RESISTANCE THAT ACTS AS A BARRIER BETWEEN HIM AND WHAT HE SEES AND EVEN WHEN HE ‘THROWS ALL CAUTION TO THE WIND’ BECOME ECSTATIC AT THE SIGHT OF HIS BESOTTED ONE, THERE IS STILL SIGNIFICANT SELF RESISTANCE, MISGIVING, DOUBT, CAUTION THAT ACTS AS AN INVISIBLE BARRIER AND DETRACTS FROM HIS ENJOYMENT OF HIS ‘BEAUTY’.

THE MAN WHOSE MIND HAS RISEN TO THE HIGHER LEVELS HAVE SHED ALL RESISTANCE, HE SEES AND HEARS WITHOUT ANY STIRRED RESISTANCE AND SO HE SEES AND HEARS PURER AND ENJOYS MORE, MUCH MORE THAN OTHER MORTALS.

SO LONG AS THERE IS STIRRED RESISTANCE WHEN A PERSON SEES OR HEARS HE DOES NOT SEE OR HEAR TRULY BUT IT IS ADULTERATED, TAINTED.

Resolve disputes through negotiation, not war: Dr Mahathir

Disputes are neither resolved by negotiations nor war, but by renunciation, if you renounce your claims whence is there dispute. If you do not renounce your claims then there are no winners, all parties are trapped in this world headed for woe.

Negotiations means deals, compromise and that is never the truth but falsity, truth is sacrificed in the name of each getting a slice of the action, a slice of the claim and that is evil never good. The truth of whatever situation can be known and it should be abided and this does not require negotiations. You never negotiations to establish the truth of a situation and this truth is not subject to negotiations, compromise.

WAR IS EVIL BUT RATHER THAN THE OPPOSITE NEGOTIATIONS TOO IS EVIL, DISPUTES SHOULD BE RESOLVED BY RESOLVING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER AND UPHOLDING IT, THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE NEGOTIATIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED NEGOTIATIONS TO ARRIVE AT THE TRUTH OF THE SITUATION AND TO ENACT THE TRUTH. ALL PARTIES MUST ABIDE BY THE TRUTH AND THAT NEVER INVOLVES NEGOTIATIONS.

IT IS DELUSION THAT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES TO PERCEIVE NEGOTATIONS AS WONDROUS AND THE ANSWER TO DISPUTE. IN ANY DISPUTE ONLY ONE PARTY IS RIGHT OR BOTH ARE WRONG, NEVER BOTH RIGHT AND SO THE RIGHT IS UPHELD.

Negotiations are never the answer to disputes:

Negotiations are never the answer to disputes, even after settlement there remain animosity or grievances that is merely controlled threatening to flare up again.

When sides in the disputes are sheep not goats then it can be established which side is right or wrong or they are both wrong and if they are both wrong, what is right can be established and all parties should abide by what is right, what has negotiations got to do with it except in your delusion?

NEGOTIATIONS ARE NEVER THE ANSWER TO DISPUTES WHICH ARE RESOLVED BY RENUNCIATION OR ESTABLISHING WHO OR WHAT IS RIGHT AND ENACTING WHAT IS RIGHT THAT ALL PARTIES MUST ABIDE. YOU NEVER NEED NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH WHAT IS RIGHT.

Why do you have civil courts?

The rationale of a civil court is that in any dispute between parties there is a truth, a right and wrong and it is possible for a wise being, a learned judge to adjudicate and pass judgment that should be binding to all parties to the dispute and this is not negotiation but establishing what is right and true and applying it.

The Buddha said he had been ruler of the gods many times and it is the duty of the ruler of the gods to adjudicate in matters arising amongst gods and because he is always right, his judgment should be accepted by all parties.

IN THE SAME WAY, IN ALL DISPUTES BETWEEN PARTIES, IT IS NEVER NEGOTIATIONS THAT IS THE PROPER VEHICLE TO RESOLUTION BUT IT IS ESTABLISHING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER, WHO IS RIGHT AND WRONG AND UPHOLDING RIGHT AND THAT IS NEVER NEGOTIATION EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION. RESOLVING BY WAR IS RESOLVING BY CONFISCATION, BY BULLYING, BY COERCION. RESOLUTION BY NEGOTIATION IS RESOLUTION BY TRADING, BY COMPROMISE, BY BALANCE OF FORCE.

DISPUTES IN CIVIL COURTS ARE NOT SETTLED BY NEGOTIATIONS BUT BY ESTABLISHING THE TRUTH, THE RIGHT AND WRONG OF A DISPUTE.

What’s in the Running This Year?

So how do you truly understand what is stated?

If something is meaningful it is never a case of what’s in the running this year and if it is a case of ‘what’s in the running this year’ it is never a case of truth or meaning but mechanical yearly recurrence, a form of robotic rehash.

A PERSON OF TRUTH WHO UNDERSTANDS NEVER CONSIDERS WHAT IS IN THE RUNNING THIS YEAR WHICH IS NON-SPECIFIC ABOUT CATEGORIES RATHER THAN A PARTICULAR MATTER.

ONLY A PERSON NOT INTERESTED IN MEANING, ONLY FADS AND FANCIES, FLAVORS FOR THIS YEAR CONSIDERS WHAT IS IN THE RUNNING THIS YEAR AND HE IS HEADED FOR PERISHING.

In the running is about contention, fighting:

If you or something is in the running it means you are in the fray, in contention, challenging or fighting or vying for a place and that is never about meaning or truth but about force, fighting and defeating fellow contenders and hence when a person speaks about what is in the running he is never speaking about something meaningful but he is merely interested in what is winning, in defeating or beating others.

IT DOES NOT MATTER YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN BY ‘IN THE RUNNING’ OR YOU THINK IT IS FULL OF MEANING BUT BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT FORCE, FIGHTING AND CONTENDING, IT IS FOOD THAT PERISHES AND YOU TOO WILL PERISH.

You don’t write an essay to be in contention:

There are people who will do something, eg write an essay just to be in contention and that is a mad reason for doing something. You write an essay because there is a need for it, not to be in contention and so it is mad, meaningless to speak about contention, ‘in the running’.

TO BE IN THE RUNNING OR IN CONTENTION IS NEVER A VALID REASON FOR DOING SOMETHING AND SO IT IS MAD TO RUN COMPETITIONS WITH ENTRIES CONTENDING FOR A PRIZE.

Interested in running means interested in fighting and winning:

If you are interested in run for public office, whether you are DAP, PKR or UMNO, you are interested in fighting and meaning and that means suffering.

WHATEVER IS FIGHTING, IN CONTENDING IS SUFFERING AND SO IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN RUNNING FOR OFFICE IT MEANS YOU ARE INTERESTED IN FIGHTING, CHALLENGING AND WINNING AND THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND THE WAY TO EVEN ETERNAL SUFFERING. JESUS SAID DENY YOURSELF AND THE PERSON WHO RUNS IS NOT DENYING HIMSELF BUT JOINING THE FRAY.

Majority of British public wants to leave Europe

That the majority of people want to leave Europe does not mean UK should leave Europe but it is when it is the wise thing to do that the UK should leave. If it is the wise thing for UK to leave Europe why are you referring to the majority of people wanting to leave Europe?

THE RATIONALE FOR SAYING MAJORITY OF BRITISH WANTS TO LEAVE EUROPE IS TO BOLSTER THE ARGUMENT FOR LEAVING BUT THAT IS FALSE LOGIC THAT ENDS IN MAD LOGIC THAT CAN KILL YOU ONE DAY. THE TRUE REASON UK SHOULD LEAVE EUROPE IS IF IT IS THE WISE THING TO DO, NOT FOR SELFISH CALCULATING REASONS.

THE VAST MAJORITY OR PEOPLE ARE HEADING FOR ETERNAL PUNISHMENT AND THIS DOES NOT MEAN ETERNAL PUNISHMENT IS THE PREFERRED DESTINATION OR THEY ARE CORRECT IN THEIR CONDUCT.

Truth and goodness are not subject to negotiation:

Whatever is true and good are never subject to negotiations, after negotiation or modification or adjustment it is no longer the truth or good and so whatever is the product of negotiation is never the truth or good except in your delusion. And so if your position is true and good, it is not open to negotiations, bargaining, give and take. Negotiations in a dispute is about compromise, cutting deals and that is evil, false never the truth.

THEREFORE WHOEVER PREACHES NEGOTIATIONS/COMROMISE IS NOT A MAN OF TRUTH BUT CONVENIENCE, CLOSING ONE EYE TO GET WHAT HE WANTS OR GET ALONG.

The Buddha: "[3] And furthermore, just as the ocean does not tolerate a dead body -- in the same way, if an individual is unprincipled, evil, unclean and suspect in his undertakings -- the community has no communion with him. Holding an immediate meeting, they banish him from the community.

Negotiation is always evil:

There is such a thing called negotiation and it can be clearly defined and understood and rather than neither good nor bad or sometimes good and sometimes bad, it is always evil, not letting your yes be yes but the more that Jesus said comes from evil.

Negotiation is about bargaining, about engaging the opposite party in compromise, giving way to get what you want. If the opposite party accedes to your demand, what is there to negotiate, he has already acceded to your demand? It is because someone stands in opposition, does not give what you desire that you engage in bargaining, negotiation to change his mind. If someone will not give you what you want then you accept it, you do not try to change his mind, you do not work to make him go against himself to countermand his previous stance.

IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE DESIROUS OF SOME OBJECT THAT SOMEONE WILL NOT GIVE YOU THAT YOU WORK TO NEGOTIATE OR BARGAIN TO MAKE HIM CHANGE HIS MIND, TO INDUCE OR ENTICE HIM TO CHANGE HIS MIND, TO GO AGAINST HIS WISHES. IT IS NOT GOOD BUT EVIL TO BE DESIROUS OF ANYTHING THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE PATH TO SUFFERING AND SO DRIVEN BY SOMETHING EVIL, COVETOUSNESS YOU DO SOMETHING EVIL, NEGOTIATE OR BARGAIN THAT WILL HEAP EVEN MORE KARMA ON YOU.

YOU DO NOT BARGAIN OR NEGOTIATE WITH GOD, WHAT HE SAYS STANDS AND YOU ARE ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT BARGAINING, NEGOTIATING OR ARGUING.

NEGOTIATION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON, MEANING, IT IS ABOUT GETTING WHAT YOU WANT THAT THE OTHER PERSON DECLINES TO GIVE BY OFFERING HIM INDUCEMENTS, ENTICEMENTS.

Negotiation is transferring the fighting to the table:

Negotiation is essentially transferring the fighting from physical to the table, it is still fighting and evil. What is needed is no fighting and true harmony and if you cannot get it then you disengage.

Negotiation may avert bloodshed but because it is a form of fighting at the table, it conditions or programs the person to fight and detains him in fighting that leads to future woe, death, destruction and suffering. What is negotiated can be abrogated and so it is unstable, subject to breakage.

Negotiation is about trying to work a compromise in the clash of covetousness:

Negotiation is about a clash of covetousness and attempting to work a compromise without resorting to physical force, to arrange a mutual giving way to a common ground acceptable to both. Covetousness is blind and irrational and knows no bounds and so, so long as there is covetousness, whatever compromise or restraint struck is unstable, subject to betrayal, rescindment.

EVEN IF YOU AND EVERYONE HERE REFUSE TO BUDGE, REFUSE TO GIVE UP YOUR COVETOUSNESS, IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO SO AND IT IS ONLY WITH A GIVING UP OF ALL CLAIMS THAT ALL TROUBLES COME TO AN END, WITHOUT GIVING UP COVETOUSNESS THERE CAN BE NO TRUE SOLUTIONS. AS THE BUDDHA SAID, TO ONE WHO SEES, THERE IS NOTHING BUT BECAUSE YOU SEE BUT DO NOT SEE, YOU SEE PLENTY, YOU ARE HEADED FOR ENDLESS WOES.  

NEGOTIATION IS NEVER THE TRUE ANSWER TO CONFLICT, IF YOU THINK IT IS THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND YOUR PERCEPTION OF NEGOTIATION AS TRUE AND MEANINGFUL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY STIRRED SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.

Foreigners stealing the limelight in Tamil dramas

TOO many foreigners are being featured in Malaysian Tamil dramas, denying locals a shot at proving themselves in showbusiness, Tamil Nesan reported.

It is impossible to steal the limelight and so you are speaking falsely that condition yourself and others to mindlessly speak falsely thus that will end in insanity for you. This is a copied rehashed style of speech because the person is not the first to speak of ‘stealing the limelight’.

J.Lo ready to rock Malaysia

Malaysia is not a being that can be rocked nor are all Malaysians rocked by her and so you are speaking nonsense that ends in insanity and the fact that you are unaware and think you speak full of sense reflects false understanding that ends in insanity.

THERE IS PROPER AND IMPROPER LANGUAGE AND IF YOU WANT TO GO TO HEAVEN OR ESCAPE ENDLESS DEATH AND SUFFERING THEN YOU HAVE TO LEARN TO SPEAK PROPERLY BECAUSE IT IS A REQUISITE FOR HEAVEN. IMPROPER LANGUAGE IS CONDITIONING OR PROGRAMMING AND BECOMES INCREASINGLY HARD TO WEAN.

U.S. declines to name China currency manipulator

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration said on Tuesday that China's currency remained "significantly undervalued," but stopped short of labelling the world's second-biggest economy a currency manipulator.

Before America brands China as a currency manipulator it should brand itself as a ‘free luncher’ because America derives considerable pecuniary advantage (without doing any work) in acting as the currency of global trade settlement and the ability to print instead of earn currency to pay for its imports.

HAVING A FREE LUNCH AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS IS A WORSE CRIME THAN CURRENCY MANIPULATION AND SO AMERICA IS CLOSING AN EYE TO THE THICK PLANK OF ITS OWN UNSAVOURINESS IN FRONT OF ITS EYES.

You have to love the Irish:

There is no such thing as ‘you have to love the Irish’ and so you are speaking falsely courting insanity and the fact that you do not realize reflects your delusion that is not the path to safety and heaven but even hell.

LEAVE IT TO OTHERS TO DECIDE WHETHER THEY WANT TO LOVE THE IRISH, THERE IS NOTHING SO SPECIAL ABOUT THE IRISH THAT EVERYONE MUST LOVE THEM.

European workers in austerity protests

European workers in austerity protests

Tens of thousands of workers stage protests and strikes across Europe against rising unemployment and austerity measures.

The choruses of social unrest and mass unemployment keep getting louder and rather than abating, it is likely to descend into anarchy, mayhem.

How has this come about and what is happening? You do not need to be an economic genius or have supernatural powers to understand how this has happened but you need discernment, the ability to see things truly as they actually are.

The mass unemployment that is rending the social fabric asunder is because they were in the past hired by capitalists to help them manufacture and sell goods to the masses to transfer wealth from the masses to the privileged few and now that the masses are full of debts or unemployed with little money more to transfer they stop hiring and started retrenching until such a time if ever when there is money to further transfer into their pockets.

Abetted by politicians (GW Bush would be one of them) who were themselves plundering the system with their businessmen cronies, bank CEOs who were themselves more than dipping their dirty hands into the honey, with rate cuts after rate cuts, the savings in the system were not only emptied but through repeated cycles of lending re-deposited money, debts many times the actual wealth of the system was created.

Thus we are now stuck in a situation where a privileged few (including companies like Apple and Microsoft) hold so much money that they cannot spend enough to stimulate the economy (further, the money spent by the rich tends to circulate to other wealthy people, seldom down to the masses eg when rich man buys Ferrari it is from rich company selling Ferrari and little of the money spent ends in the system), the masses are impoverished (their savings are actually all gone lent by reckless bankers or they are full of credit card or mortgage debts) and unemployed because the capitalists are retrenching because there are no profits only losses to be made.

CAPITALISM NEVER WORKS, IT IS NOT JUST A DEAD END SYSTEM BUT ENDS IN DISASTER FOR EVERYONE, THE MASSES AND EVEN THE WEALTHY CAPITALISTS DO NOT REALIZE THEY MAY BE SKINNED ALIVE BY THE VENGEFUL MOBS LATER (JUST ASK GADDAFI).

Gaddafi had knife stuck up his anus:

Apparently amongst the atrocities meted to Muammar Kaddafi before he was finally killed, a knife was stuck up his anus.

Kaddafi is not blameless, he was guilty of similar brutalities and routinely had young girls kidnapped to service his voracious sexual appetite.

WHEN YOU STICK A KNIFE UP SOMEONE’S ANUS YOU MAY LAUGH, DERIVE PLEASURE BUT WHEN A KNIFE IS STUCK UP YOUR ANUS YOU MAY WEEP. THAT IS JUST ONE INSTALLMENT, EVEN ETERNITIES IN HELL MAY AWAIT GADDAFI.

Wealth has been transferred even many times:

Not only has the wealth of the system been transferred from the many to the few, it may have been transferred even many times, the same million you think you have is also the same million many others think they have as a result of the mad cycles of lending money deposited in banks. Because the debt in the system is now many times the actual wealth, it has become crippling, even the death knell of the system.

THE PROLONGED BOOM THAT JUST ENDED WAS A FRENZY OF TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM TO THE FEW, NOT JUST ONCE BUT EVEN MANY TIMES SUCH THAT THE DEBTS IN THE SYSTEM ARE UNSERVICEABLE AND LOOM AS THE DEATH KNELL, MANY ARE GOING TO FIND OUT THE PAINFUL WAY THAT THE MILLIONS THEY THINK THEY HAVE ARE NOT THERE AT ALL, THE BANKERS HAVE LENT IT OUT EVEN MANY TIMES OVER.

Smoker in chief

The man whose creation (machine rolled cigarettes) caused 100 million deaths

There are many who will argue that if they did not invent cigarettes others would so why blame them for killing others. If Einstein did not invent or pave the way for the atomic bomb, others would.

This is foolish false logic. Because you invented cigarettes you are responsible for killing millions and not another.

Because Einstein’s theories paved the way for atomic bombs, he and not others are to blame. Einstein’s theories and work are unnecessary and necessary for personal deluded reasons (eg to intellectually challenge himself if not to make a name for himself) and as a result of his work, he contributed to the creation of the atomic bomb.

YES, IF YOU DID NOT DO IT (INVENT CIGARETTES) OTHERS WOULD BUT BECAUSE YOU INVENTED IT AND IT CAUSED MUCH MISERY AND DEATH, YOU AND NO ONE ELSE ARE TO BLAME AND WILL REPAY IN SUFFERING.

Anyone who stirs another asks for suffering:

This is the truth and if you are interested in avoiding suffering, you do not wish to suffer then you better pay attention so as to NEVER stir the mental force of another because if you do, you are creating debt for yourself to be repaid in suffering.

Thus the person who gives another a ‘dirty’ look that disturbs the other person is guilty of stirring him no matter how he may insist he did not mean it. The man who is very polite, very eager to please others, who say things in such contrived soft spoken ‘gentleness’ that is intended to stir the recipient to be pleased is also guilty of wanting to stir mental force that incurs debt not merit except in your delusion it is meritorious.

ANYONE WHO SMILES AT ANOTHER IS GUILTY OF TRYING TO STIR THE MENTAL FORCE OF THE RECIPIENT TO LIKE AND HE IS ASKING FOR SUFFERING NOT HAPPINESS.

WITHOUT YOURSELF WIELDING FORCE EG USING FORCE TO SMILE OR FABRICATE A NASTY LOOK, YOU CANNOT STIR ANOTHER’S MENTAL FORCE AND THAT TOO IS SUFFERING AND CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO USE FORCE UNNECESSARILY. BECAUSE STIRRED FORCE IS SUFFERING YOU ARE GUILTY OF MAKING ANOTHER SUFFER IF FOR WHATEVER REASON YOU SUCCEEDED IN STIRRING HIS MENTAL FORCE TO BE THRILLED OR ANGERED BY WHAT YOU SAY OR DO.

TO HAVE ONE’S MENTAL FORCE STIRRED IS ALWAYS SUFFERING NEVER TRUE HAPPINESS AND IN STIRRING ANOTHER’S MENTAL FORCE YOU ARE NOT ONLY IMPARTING SUFFERING ON HIM BUT CONDITIONING HIM TO BE STIRRED THAT HE MAY NEVER DECONDITION HIMSELF EVEN FOR MANY ETERNITIES AND SO YOU HAVE SERIOUS DEBT IN YOUR HANDS.

TO BE STIRRED IS A CONDITIONED STATE OF MIND AND SO WHEN YOU STIR ANOTHER YOU ARE ALSO TRAINING HIM TO BE STIRRED AND BECAUSE THAT IS EVEN ENDLESS TORMENT YOU HAVE DEBT IN YOUR HANDS NEVER MERIT.

Obama ready for deal to avoid fiscal cliff

If something is the right or correct thing to do it is not a deal and if something is deal it is never the correct thing to do and so it is mankind is engaging in horse trading for vested self interest at the expense of the common good, they will not do what is good for everyone but what is good for themselves and this is a guarantee that it will finally end in disaster when untreated problems become too big, cancerous.

IF YOU THINK A DEAL CAN BE THE CORRECT OR RIGHT THING TO DO, YOU ARE DELUDED. THE CORRECT THING TO DO IS NEVER A DEAL TO SATISFY OPPOSITE SIDES.

Sony selling $1.9B of convertible bonds to expand

If even a company like Sony cannot get by without borrowing money, it indicates that many companies are dependent on debt (credit or financing is a nice or sanitizing term) in order to continue doing business.

NOT ONLY ARE GOVERNMENTS AND THE MASSES INSOLVENT AND DEPENDENT ON BORROWING TO SURVIVE, EVEN MANY COMPANIES NEED TO BORROW AND IN THE CLIMATE OF CREDIT DROUGHT, MANY EVEN WELL KNOWN NAMES MAY FAIL TO OBTAIN CREDIT OR FINANCING AND YOU BUST OR BELLY UP WITH REPERCUSSIONS ON OTHER COMPANIES AND INCREASE FURTHER UNEMPLOYMENT.

Bernanke: Banks hurting housing

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says the overly stringent lending requirements of banks are hurting the US housing recovery.

This is a deluded man talking nonsense. The money banks lend belong to depositors, is held in trust and it behoves on banks to be stringent even meticulously scrupulously stringent in who they lend to and so he is preaching laxity that is unbecoming for someone who oversees the banking industry.

BERNANKE MUST GET IT RIGHT. EVEN IF HE IS ANXIOUS TO SEE THE ECONOMY BOOM AGAIN, IT IS NOT LAX LENDING THAT SHOULD BE THE FOUNDATION BUT SOUND RESPONSIBLE LENDING. THE MONEY BANKS LEND DO NOT BELONG TO BANKS BUT DEPOSITORS AND IT IS HELD IN TRUST AND SO IT IS THE DUTY OF BANKS TO BE CAREFUL, SCRUPULOUS IN HOW THEY LEND THAT MONEY LEST THEY LOSE MONEY HELD IN TRUST BY THEM. IT IS BECAUSE BANKS HAVE BEEN EXTREMELY LAXED, UNSCRUPULOUS THAT THIS CRISIS HAS COME ABOUT AND HE IS TALKING NONSENSE SEEKING RECOVERY THROUGH BANK LENDING LAXITY.

Bernanke is finding excuses, trying to deflect blame:

It may be because he feels effete, ineffective and he needs to find excuses for his poor performance and deflect blame from himself to others that Bernanke resorts to such silly statements that have serious consequences in terms of future suffering for him.

What if banks are still not stringent enough?

Bernanke thinks overly stringent requirements are stifling recovery. Whether current bank requirements are overly stringent or even still lax is objective not subjective and cannot be disputed.

SUPPOSE EVEN TODAY BANKS ARE LAX IN THEIR LENDING AND YOU LAMENT THEIR STRINGENTNESS THEN YOU ARE GUILTY OF FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION.

IT IS LIKELY IF NOT CERTAINLY THAT BANKS ARE STILL LENDING QUITE LAXLY (BUT COMPELLED BY THE DEARTH OF MONEY TO RATION LENDING) AND SO HE IS SPEAKING WITH FALSE PERCEPTION.

So much printed money and still not enough to go around?

Considering the billions of money printed by governments throughout the world there should be enough money to go around lending and so what is happening?

The reason is because of the massive discrepancy between debt and wealth in the system. Supposed, wealthy as the system is but the debt is even many times greater than that wealth then if many borrowers have defaulted, cannot service their debts then despite massive money printing, it only manages to partially offset that massive debt hole and so there is still not enough money to go around for profligate lending.

THE FACT THAT AFTER MASSIVE MONEY PRINTING THERE IS STILL A SHORTAGE OF CREDIT INDICATES THE MAGNITUDE OF THE DEBT PROBLEM THAT DWARFS EVEN THE MASSIVE PRINTING WHICH IS ONLY SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE A TRICKLE OF CREDIT. FOR A FULL GUSH OF CREDIT, CENTRAL BANKS MAY HAVE TO PRINT EVEN MORE FURIOUSLY BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE DEBT BURDEN OR ALBATROSS PINNING DOWN THE SYSTEM.

Lending should never be the backbone of recovery:

Lending should never be allowed to play a big role or looked upon to lead the way to recovery because it means the recovery is driven by debt or borrowing that is dangerous if not fatal because there is possibility that fuelled by borrowed money, living on borrowed money the economy will temporarily recover but this debt must be repaid and may run into trouble and disaster down the line.

THOSE WHO RUN THE ECONOMY SHOULD NOT LOOK TO LENDING OR DEBT CREATION TO HELP THE ECONOMY TO RECOVERY BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE A RECOVERY BUILT ON DEBT THAT MUST BE REPAID AND IF THE BORROWED MONEY IS USED FOR CONSUMPTION (BUYING HOUSES IS FOR CONSUMPTION) IT IS LIKELY TO DEFAULT.

If debt is not a crucial issue why talk about it?

If lending which is a nice word for debt is not a crucial ingredient for recovery why is Bernanke dwelling on it? It is because lending or debt fuelled recovery (that must be repaid later and the mountain of existing debt keeps piling up) is crucial that Bernanke is dwelling on it.

LIKE AN ALCOHOLIC LOOKING FOR MORE ALCOHOL, MANKIND IS LOOKING FOR MORE DEBT TO FUEL A RECOVERY SO THAT THE MOUNTAIN OF DEBT EXISTING IS ADDED ON UNTIL IT TOPPLES AND CRUSHES EVERYONE.

Would Bernanke advocate the same for his money?

Would Bernanke instruct his bankers to be more lax with lending his money or would he instruct them to be extremely careful so as to make money lending it but ensure it is not lost.

PEOPLE BECOME BLASÉ ABOUT LENDING AS IF LENDING IS LIKE DISPENSING WATER BUT IF IT WAS THEIR MONEY THAT WAS LENT THEY WOULD INSTRUCT GREAT CARE BUT IF IT WAS OTHERS’ MONEY LENT THEN STIMULATING THE ECONOMY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE SAFETY OF DEPOSITORS’ MONEY.

BANKERS DO NOT NEED ANY ENCOURAGEMENT TO BE LAX AND YOU ARE A FOOL IF YOU THINK THEY NEED YOUR ENCOURAGEMENT.

Petraeus regrets: I really screwed up

If you have any aspirations of going to heaven, of avoiding endless death and suffering you must never screw up. The Buddha said even if a milling crowd caused you to spill a drop from the pot brimful balanced on your head, straightaway your head will be cut and that is not the way to heaven.

YES HE HAS SCREWED UP BUT HE UNDERESTIMATED THE MAGNITUDE. HE HAS SCREWED UP NOT JUST LOSING HIS JOB AND REPUTATION BUT EVEN ETERNALLY.

THAT MEANS TO SAY HE DID WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT HE WAS DOING, NOT KNOWING THE RISKS AND DANGERS AND SO HE IS ADMITTING HE IS A MAN WHO DOES THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING THAT MUST STIR RESISTANCE AND IS THE WAY TO ENDLESS STRESS.

CAN YOU IMAGINE THE BUDDHA OR JESUS SAYING, ‘I REALLY SCREWED UP’? THOSE WHO ARE WISE DO NOT MAKE MISTAKES.

Only robots can screw up:

Only actions according to plans in which the person is robotically carrying out can be screwed up, either because of poor execution or the plan did not fit with a particular scenario.

Thus is Petraeus’ case, he planned either carelessly or meticulously to conduct the affair and yet escape scrutiny but he screwed up, made mistakes that exposed his affair and with it loss of his job and whatever else eg shame.

ACTIONS ACCORDING TO PLANS NEVER TRULY FIT A SCENARIO AND FAULTS IN THE EXECUTION OR CIRCUMSTANCES MAY CAUSE IT TO UNRAVEL AND THUS THE PERSON ‘SCREWED UP’.

ONLY ROBOTS WHOSE ACTIONS ARE ACCORDING TO PLANS THAT NEVER TRULY FIT AND SUFFER FROM FAULTS IN EXECUTION ARE PRONE TO GOOF OR SCREW UP.

Impossible for man of truth to screw up:

If a person only says or does things he knows is true, he does not say or do things he does not know is true or knows is false and he always says and does after truly understanding the situation it is impossible for him to screw up what he is saying or doing because his speech and actions are always true and always after true understanding of the situation.

SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT ARE TRUE AND THEREFORE FRESHLY SPECIFICALLY COMPOSED FOR A SITUATION AFTER CORRECT OR TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION CANNOT SCREW UP, IT IS ALWAYS CORRECT. IT IS ONLY FALSE REHASHED NON-SPECIFIC FOR A VARIETY OF SITUATION SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT NEVER TRULY FIT THAT CAN SUFFER FLAWS OF EXECUTION OR NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT SPECIFICS OF A PARTICULAR SITUATION THAT CAN SCREW UP.

A global economy built on the quicksand of debt:

The global economy exists and can be understood exactly what it actually is by those who understand, who see things clearly as they actually are and the global economy can be succinctly described as build principally on the quicksand of debt that looks deceptively stable but step on it and it swallows you and no one can save you.

IF IT IS TRUE AS I DEPICT THAT THE WORLD CAPITALIST ECONOMY IS LIKE A QUICKSAND BUILT ON THE SANDS OF DEBT AND IT HAS BECOME MONSTROUS, RAPIDLY UNCONTROLLABLE THEN IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT IT WILL ULTIMATELY COLLAPSE SUCKING THE ENTIRE EDIFICE, THE ENTIRE ECONOMY BRINGING RUIN, CHAOS AND SUFFERING TO THOSE ENMESHED.

DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE ROLE AND EXTENT OF DEBT IN MODERN FINANCE, IT MAY FAR EXCEED THE ESTIMATION OF DELUDED MEN WHO ARE DOOMED TO SUFFER FROM THE MONSTER OR FRANKENSTEIN OF DEBT THEY HAVE CREATED.

Briton becomes first Western Tibetan Buddhist monk to die from self-immolation

There is no merit but there is demerit self immolating for whatever cause and it reflects delusion and partisanship doing so.

The Buddha said his dharma is well taught and anyone who says what is not taught is taught is asking for karma.

The Buddha never taught anyone to self-immolate and if you call yourself a Buddhist monk and you immolate you are setting a bad example. Instead the Buddha taught disengagement, non involvement in the affairs of this world which is not heeded by the monk.

IF YOU CALL YOURSELF A BUDDHIST MONK THEN YOU ARE GUILTY OF MISREPRESENTING THE BUDDHA IF YOUR BEHAVIOR OR SPEECH CONTRADICTS WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT. IN DELUSION YOU GO EVEN TO HELL.

A Grave Strategic Error:

Op-Ed: Israel’s Shortsighted Assassination

Israel’s decision to kill Ahmed al-Jabari was a grave and irresponsible strategic error.

It is not that it is a grave strategic error that it should not have been done but it is wrong to take life for the karma it bestows and the antagonism it stirs in your adversaries that it should not be carried out.

Thus in the person’s opinion, even if he wanted to assassinate him, for strategic reasons he should not. This is wrong view, wrong understanding and so he has wrong understanding not just here but everywhere that ends in eternal woe.

IT IS NOT BECAUSE IT IS A GRAVE STRATEGIC ERROR THAT THE ASSASINATION SHOULD NOT BE CARRIED OUT BUT IT IS BECAUSE IT IS WRONG, EVIL THAT IT SHOULD NOT BE CARRIED OUT.

Apple $700 and you:

You may say you don’t own Apple stock and have nothing to do with Apple and so it does not matter that Apple was once valued at $700 per share (and now down to $450) but you have wrong understanding because it matters very much to everyone whose wealth is stored in the same currency as Apple is traded.

In the same way, you may say you don’t own gold or property and so it does not matter if gold or property is overvalued even stratospherically but you have wrong understanding.

Because Apple, gold and property can be exchanged for the currency you hold, if their prices are driven excessively high by speculation it is a legally sanctioned way of unrighteously seizing a larger share of the common pool of value in the system. Thus the person who sold Apple shares at $700 can buy more goods with the money than the person who sold Apple now at $450 and if its actual worth is more like $200 then owners of Apple shares are short changing the (clueless, permissive) system which has to give more dollars in exchange for each Apple share.

BECAUSE SHARES (EG APPLE), GOLD AND PROPERTY ARE PRICED IN COMMON CURRENCY THEN IF THE ARTICLE’S PRICE HAS BEEN DRIVEN UP UNREALISTICALLY IT IS A METHOD OF WRESTING MORE OF THE COMMON WEALTH DENOMINATED IN CURRENCY FROM THE SYSTEM AND SUCH PRICE RISES SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO OCCUR FREELY.

IN THE SAME WAY, OIL USED TO BE PRICED AT USD 25 PER BARREL AND NOW IS MORE THAN USD100 PER BARREL, THIS IS A FORM OF EVIL SOMETHING FOR NOTHING TRANSFER OF WEALTH THAT DELUDED REGULATORS SEE NOTHING WRONG, SEE AS PERFECTLY NATURAL.

Let’s go back to what this nation was supposed to be

THE birth of this nation as the Federation of Malaya more than half a century ago was a moment of unparalleled joy. This came from the advent of the country as a sovereign nation and everything that it represented.

Only robots can make such statements and only robots find such statements appealing.

Even if it is possible to go back, to do so means you have a plan of what it was like then and you want to approximately or precisely implement and hence you want to live or behave according to a revived old plan or you are a robot who wants to reprogram yourself and the nation back to the old ways.

THOSE WHO ARE NOT ROBOTS DO NOT LIVE ACCORDING TO A PLAN BUT ACCORDING TO WHAT THE CURRENT SITUATION IS AND WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG TO DO. THOSE WHO ARE ROBOTS MUST INEVITABLY BECOME DISILLUSIONED BY THE CURRENT SITUATION AND IN DELUSION THEY PINE FOR THE PAST WHICH WHEN THEY GET THERE TURNS OUT NOT AS PLEASANT AS THEY DREAMT.

IF YOUR ADVICE ‘LETS GO BACK’ IS FRIVOLOUS, EMPTY AND WON’T WORK, THERE IS A PRICE IN SUFFERING FOR ADVOCATING NONSENSE.

Almost unforgivable:

Indecent composure

Fleshy failings almost forgivable.

If you understand what you say or do, you must not speak something that is objectively false.

Everything is forgivable, nothing is unforgivable it is false to speak of something being ‘unforgivable’ what more ‘almost unforgivable’.

IT IS UP TO A PERSON TO FORGIVE WHATEVER WRONG IS DONE TO HIM AND SO EVERYTHING IS FORGIVABLE SO LONG AS HE BEARS NO GRUDGES AND IT IS A FUNCTION OF THE VINDICTIVENESS, VENGEFULNESS OF A PERSON THAT HE FINDS SOMETHING UNFORGIVABLE. IT IS DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE OR HYPOCRITICAL FOR PEOPLE WITH ILL WILL TO FORGIVE OTHERS, OFTEN THEY FORGIVE WITH VESTED INTERESTS. THEY ARE UNFORGIVING PEOPLE WHO FAKE THEIR DIFFICULT TO GIVE FORGIVENESS AND WHICH IS WHY THEY FIND MANY THINGS ‘ALMOST’ UNFORGIVABLE BECAUSE THEY EXPECT VERY MUCH FROM OTHERS (BUT VERY LITTLE FROM THEMSELVES).

NOTHING IS UNFORGIVABLE, EVERYTHING IS FORGIVABLE AND SO ANYONE WHO SAYS SOMETHING IS UNFORGIVABLE IS SPEAKING FALSELY AND DOES HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HE SAID.

Roger Bootle

Getting the right measure of gloom and doom

This is the musings of a deluded man who is acknowledging he does not see reality truly but what he sees is fabricated.

If there is gloom and doom present then you should see it clearly as they actually are, not the right measure of gloom and doom which is fabricated, seeing and admitting what you want to see and admit which is a perverted or distorted view of reality that is dangerous and lead to disaster.

REALITY IS NOT ABOUT GETTING THE RIGHT MEASURE OF GLOOM AND DOOM BUT SEEING AS IT ACTUALLY IS WHAT THE GLOOM AND DOOM PRESENT IS. IT IS NOT FOR HIM OR ANYONE TO SEE THE RIGHT MEASURE OF GLOOM AND DOOM AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE RIGHT MEASURE OF GLOOM AND DOOM TO SEE.

Why you must resist and be stressed by what you hear:

It does matter how melodious you think what you hear is, how good or benevolent what you hear is, so long as there is prolonging of syllables or notes, changing speed and loudness within and between syllables/notes then it automatically stirs resistance in the listener even if he is completely mesmerised (eg by the seductive female speech) which must lead to stress and conditions him to stir resistance to everything he hears, sees, smells, tastes and touch.

SO LONG AS THERE OBJECTIVELY IS PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE SPEECH OR MUSIC IT MUST AUTOMATICALLY STIR RESISTANCE IN THE LISTENER EVEN IF HE IS (DELUDED TO BE) COMPLETELY MESMERIZED BY SPEECH AND HE MUST BECOME STRESSED AND IT CONDITIONS TO RAISE SELF-RESISTANCE TO EVERYTHING HE HEARS, SEES, SMELLS, TASTES AND TOUCHED. HIS SEL-RESISTANCE IS AUTOMATICALLY STIRRED BY WHATEVER TOUCHES HIM, EVEN IF IT IS THE MOST SENSUAL CARRESS OF THE MOST DESIRABLE GIRL.

WHY IS THAT SO?

THIS IS BECAUSE FORCE FORCING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS A BOMBARDMENT OF FORCE THAT IS HARMFUL AND MEANINGLESS THAT MUST STIR RESISTANCE EVEN IF YOU THINK IT LOVELY AND FULL OF MEANING.

AND STIRRED RESISTANCE IS CONDITIONING SO THAT THE PERSON STIRS RESISTANCE TO EVERYTHING HE SEES, HEARS, TOUCHED, SMELT OR TASTED.

You have never heard sounds without prolonging, speed and loudness changes:

Even when it is possible to speak or sing or play music without prolonging syllables, changing speed and loudness, people in this world have never tasted it and such speech and music are incomparably exquisite, does not stir self-resistance, does not leave an aftertaste of stress.

EVEN IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO SPEAK AND SING WITHOUT PROLONGING NOTES/SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IT IS NEVER HEARD IN THIS WORLD EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION YOU HAVE.

SUCH MUSIC IS PEACEFUL AND LOVELY COMPARED TO THE POLLUTION PEOPLE CALL SPEECH AND MUSIC IN THIS WORLD.

IN THE SAME WAY NO MATTER HOW TENDER THE TOUCH OF A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN, BECAUSE THERE IS NATIVE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THAT TOUCH IT MUST AUTOMATICALLY STIR RESISTANCE IN THE TOUCHED PERSON THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS HIM TO RESIST WHAT TOUCHES HIM.

Even complex multi-layered changes of speed and loudness:

Not only are there speed and loudness changes in the speech and singing of people in this world no matter how good and true they think they are, there are even complex multi-layered even at the same time speeding up and slowing down in the speech and singing that deluded people are charmed and think wondrous with it is poisonous.

PEOPLE OFTEN RUSH THROUGH IN ACCELERATING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THROUGH A SYLLABLE THEY DELAYED AND THERE ARE SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES WITHIN AND BETWEEN SYLLABLES OR NOTES THAT THEY STRETCH AND THIS CACOPHONY IS HEARD AS MARVELLOUS BY DELUDED PEOPLE WITH PERVERTED PERCEPTION.

AND REFLECTING THAT THEY HEAR BUT THEY DO NOT HEAR, THEY ARE AWARE OF THE SOUND EFFECTS OF THESE CHANGES BUT THEY ARE UNAWARE THEY ARE CONSTANTLY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS. THEY HEAR THE SOUNDS EFFECTS OF THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND DEEM THEM MEANINGFUL AND LOVELY BUT THEY DO NOT HEAR THEMSELVES PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.

Barack Obama hails Burma journey

It is not the journey that should be hailed or saluted but what useful or beneficial purpose it was undertaken for and what useful results it achieved.

If it is what beneficial purpose and results that you are hailing then Obama should hail the achievements of the journey not the journey itself. That it is ground breaking is not a true but false purpose.

WHAT IS NEEDED IS A FACTUAL STATEMENT OF THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE JOURNEY, HAILING IS TO STIR ONE’S AND OTHERS EMOTIONS TO BE IMPRESSED BY THE JOURNEY THAT IS A FORM OF BEATING ONE’S DRUM THAT BECAUSE IT IS SENSELESS, LEADS TO INSANITY.

THAT IT IS HISTORIC IS NOT A MEANINGFUL ACHIEVEMENT OF THE VISIT. THERE IS NO NEED TO HAIL THE JOURNEY THAT HAS THE SENSELESS PURPOSE OF STIRRING EMOTIONS BUT WHAT IS NEEDED IS A MINDFUL AWARENESS AND STATEMENT OF WHAT GOOD CAME OUT OF THE JOURNEY. IF YOU THINK THIS IS THE SAME AS HAILING THE TRIP THEN YOU HAVE ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION.

If a person does not know what to make of the hailing of the journey or he sees nothing wrong but thinks it is sensible then he must do so with stirred resistance that trains him to be stressed. Only the person who perceives it as nonsense, beating one’s own and falsely misleading others sees correctly and therefore does not stir self-resistance.

Only a being can be saluted:

It is not the journey that should be hailed but what was achieved and even that does not need hailing but merely defined and stated clearly.

Only beings can be saluted or hailed. It is said the Buddha was hailed, saluted by many deities even brahmas who bowed to the Buddha thrice and circled the Buddha three times with the right side facing the Buddha before departing.

ONLY BEINGS CAN BE HAILED OR SALUTED FOR WHAT BENEFIT THEY BRING TO OTHER BEINGS AND VERY FEW BEINGS DESERVE TO BE HAILED, NOT CAESAR OR MOST WORLDLY POTENTATES. IF YOU THINK A JOURNEY CAN BE HAILED OR SALUTED YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR YOU HAVE SERIOUS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.

THOSE WHO SEE NOTHING WRONG WHEN JOURNEYS ARE HAILED DO NOT UNDERSTAND TRULY.

Why it is mad to salute a car:

Much as you love (actually like) your Mercedes or Ferrari, it is mad to salute or hail it because it cannot appreciate your salutation. When you hail or salute someone you are expressing your appreciation or gratefulness to a being who can receive or accept it and so it is not mad.

YOU MAY SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH SALUTING YOUR BELOVED CAR BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE RIGHT BUT YOU HAVE ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION. WHEN YOU SALUTE OR HAIL YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING TO AN OBJECT OR TARGET WHO CAN APPRECIATE. A CAR OR INANIMATE OBJECT CANNOT APPRECIATE YOUR SALUTES AND YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME PRACTICING WHAT IS USELESS HAILING IT.

Hailing for show:

Often if not always when a person hails his car or a journey it is not for the appreciation of the car or the journey but for show to others or witnesses to show how much they ‘love’ their cars or how important the journey is.

YOUR CAR CANNOT APPRECIATE YOUR HAILING AND SO YOU MUST BE MAD HAILING IT OR IS THE HAILING FOR SHOW, FOR THE CONSUMPTION OF OTHERS TO SHOW HOW MUCH YOU ‘LOVE’ YOUR CAR AND THEREFORE THEY SHOULD EG BUY IT FROM YOU?

It is dangerous to hail:

Fools are eager to hail or salute ‘everything under the sun’ but it is an exercise good for egos but deadly in terms of future suffering because if what you hail is bad not good or it is frivolous (eg ‘marvellous’ Ferrari) then you are headed for suffering in repayment.

BEFORE YOU JUMP TO HAIL THIS AND THAT, MAKE SURE WHAT YOU HAIL IS WHOLESOME, WORTHY OF PRAISE OTHERWISE YOU ARE HEAPING KARMA TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING.

HAILING IS NOT GOOD OR FUN BUT DEADLY DANGEROUS BUSINESS IN BESTOWING DEBT.

·  Soros Buying Gold as Record Prices Seen on Stimulus: Commodities

You may think Soros is a clever man full of understanding but he may be a programmed robot acting irrationally according to programs.

It is not as if he is so poor desperately needing more money but he is driven restlessly by greed to protect the value of his assets and seek gain from opportunities presenting and driven by such programs to seek maximal gains for his assets or protect his assets against loss and seeing that stimulus or money printing exercises will debase the value of currency he is driven by programmed logic to move into gold. His action that may drive a trend as herd instinct kicks in may harm the system, destabilize the system further and so it may be selfish, bad for the common good that in the end includes him.

You think that is very clever and the actions of a man of understanding but it may be short sighted driven by self gain and protection without understanding and like blind Samson he may pull down the pillars so that the edifice topples and crushes all including him, what is so truly understanding about that?

Soros is an inveterate opportunist and mad capitalist:

The man who thinks Soros is a clever successful rich man full of understanding has wrong view.

The man who thinks Soros is an inveterate opportunist scanning the changing economic scenario for avenues for potential gains and losses to avoid, a mad capitalist who is not satisfied with the fortune he has amassed but is driven to continue acquiring has right view of who Soros is.

THE BUDDHA SAID ANYONE WHO MAKES ACQUISITIONS IN THIS WORLD IS A FOOL HEADING FOR WOE THAT MAY BE AS VAST AS AN OCEAN. MANY ARE HEEDLESS AND WOULD NOT LISTEN OR TURN AND SOROS MAY BE OR IS ONE OF THESE AND SUCH A MAN CANNOT BE CLEVER OR FULL OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS.

Soros is gambling with his money and the system:

What Soros is doing moving into gold is to make a bet and just as he can win he can also lose even badly. If he wins, the money is made not without victims but from victims who may be fellow speculators or the system.

WHEN OIL SPECULATORS TAKE UP POSITIONS IN THE OIL MARKET THAT DRIVE UP OIL PRICES SO THAT THEY MAKE PROFIT, THE MONEY THEY MAKE COMES FROM THE SYSTEM, IT IS THE CONSUMER AND ECONOMY THAT HAS TO FOOT THE BILL FOR HIGHER PETROL PRICES AND SO IF WHAT SOROS IS DUE IS BETTING, SPECULATING THAT GOLD WILL GO UP HE MAY GUESS RIGHT AND MAKE MONEY BUT THIS MONEY IS UNRIGHTEOUS DISPOSSESSING OTHERS.

YOU CAN MAKE MONEY TWO WAYS, BY WORKING YOURSELF, THROUGH SWEAT OR YOU CAN MAKE MONEY THE EASY WAY, USING YOUR MONEY TO MAKE MONEY OR SPECULATE IN SHARE, PROPERTY AND COMMODITY MARKETS.

SOROS IS A GAMBLER AND THERE IS NOTHING GOOD OR UNDERSTANDING ABOUT THAT BECAUSE IT LEADS TO GREAT KARMIC DEBTS.

Church of England rejects women bishops

If it is true women are not fit to be bishops then it should not be by voting but by seeing it as so or by merit, women are indeed not fit to be bishops.

The Buddha said it is impossible for the Father, the Buddha and the Devil to be female, they are always male, brahmas or formless beings higher than angels are always male and the Father has sons not daughters. The ruler of the Gods is always male.

This apparent sexual bias is not the result of voting, not the result of discrimination but out of truth, the way it truthfully is. However on earth women are not allowed to take certain positions because of sexual discrimination, domination and subjective reasons.

IT IS NOT BY VOTING THAT YOU DECIDE IF WOMEN SHOULD BE BISHOPS BUT IT IS BY FACT OR TRUTH IF THEY ARE FIT TO BE BISHOPS. WHAT BISHOPS HERE DO ARE NOT WHOLESOME, THEY ARE MISGUIDED AND WHAT THEY DO OR SAY ARE FALSE AND SO THEY DO NOT HAVE THE PURITY OF TRUTH AS TO PRECLUDE WOMEN.

THE FATHER IN HEAVEN IS HIGHEST BECAUSE HE IS THE MOST POWERFUL, HE SEES AND KNOWS EVERYTHING, NOT BY FORCE OR DOMINATION.

Speculators and corruption hasten the destruction of capitalism:

Capitalism may be like beings here with beginning and ultimate death but the existence of speculators and corrupt rulers/politicians hasten its destruction.

There are big and small speculators and corrupters and in recent years they have grown in epidemic proportions, explosively and this will hasten considerably the demise of the system.

When speculators, be they in shares, property, currency, commodities (oil, gold) make money it is at the expense of others, ultimately the system, it is a form of rapid transfer of wealth from the system into the hands of the few without work done.

In the same way, corrupt politicians and their cronies transfer even prodigious amounts of wealth (think Suharto) from the system into their hands and this hasten the destruction of the system when too much wealth resides in the hands of the dirty or corrupt and the system is depleted.

Soros (a speculator, all investors are speculators) made billions betting the UK pound will devalue, the money he made came from UK people and fools like Malaysia’s central bank who were betting the opposite ways using the people’s money (Malaysia was said to have lost many billions speculating with their people’s money on the currency exchanges).

INVESTOR IS A NICE NAME FOR SPECULATING AND IT IS THE EXPLOSION OF SPECULATION AND CORRUPT POLITICIANS THAT HASTEN THE DEMISE AND DESCENT INTO SOCIAL ANARCHY OF ALL CAPITALIST SYSTEM. SOROS IS A MAJOR CATALYST BECAUSE HE IS BIG TIME SPECULATOR OR PLUNDERER OR PIRATE OF THE SYSTEM. PEOPLE LIKE EGYPT’S MUBARRAK AND MUAMMAR GADAFFI HAS SIGNIFICANTLY PLUNDERED THE WEALTH OF THE NATION.

Sharks of the capitalist system:

Investors (aka speculators) and the corrupt are like the sharks of the capitalist system, they plunder the wealth of the system and concentrate it permanently in the hands of the few elite or privileged ones and thenceforth very little of the money returns to the masses below but it tends to circulate amongst the elite at the top.

Just as sharks must be controlled for the survival of the system, speculators and the corrupt must be controlled but instead in recent years like weed they have overgrown the system, the system is fatally infested by speculators and corrupt politicians of all stripes.

Chua: Think of nation’s future

SEGAMAT: It is the future of the country that matters most, not that of any political party in the upcoming general election, said MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek.

If you have not secured your own future, you are doomed to eternal suffering and death, how can you truly think about the future of the nation? Thus it is delusion for anyone who has not saved himself to think of saving his wife, his children let alone his nation.

BEFORE YOU SAVE OTHERS, SAVE YOURSELF. IF YOU HAVEN’T SAVED YOURSELF YOU ARE DELUDED TO THINK ABOUT THE NATION’S FUTURE, YOUR WIVES AND CHILDREN’S FUTURES.

Speculation is about quick even instant wealth transfer without work:

Speculation is usually accompanied by insider knowledge and it tantamount to a quick even instantaneous transfer of wealth from the system into the hands of the few with no work done at all.

Thus all you have to do is grab an asset and push its price up by hoarding or spread news that its worth is much more to suck in fellow greedy people and you have a recipe for a swift even instant transfer of ‘fabulous’ wealth from the many to the few.

SPECULATION IS ABOUT PLACING BETS AND USUALLY THOSE BETS ARE LOADED, LOADED TO WIN NOT LOSE. WHAT YOU DO IS HOARD AN ASSET AND THEN PUSH UP ITS PRICE BY MANIPULATION OR SPREADING NEWS THAT ITS WORTH IS MUCH MORE ENTICING THE MASSES TO BE SUCKED IN TO PART THEIR MONEY TO YOU.

THUS ALL SPECULATION OR INVESTMENT IS EVIL, IT IS DESIGNED TO TRANSFER WEALTH FROM OTHERS TO YOU SWIFTLY EVEN INSTANTLY WITHOUT WORK DONE AND COLLECTIVELY SPECULATION HAS THE EFFECT OF TRANSFERRING WEALTH FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW AND IT TENDS IF NOT ALWAYS REMAIN SEQUESTRATED IN THESE PRIVILEGED FEW.

God is the assigner:

The Buddha said God or the Father is the assigner and thus who becomes the ruler of the gods, the Four Great Kings, etc is assigned by God. Jesus said ‘Thy will be done, in heaven as on earth’. This implies everything has God’s will, is God’s will.

"When this was said, the Great Brahma said, 'I, monk, am Brahma, the Great Brahma, the All-Seeing, All-Powerful, the Maker, Creator, Father of All That Have Been and Shall Be.'

Surplus and deficit nations:

Quote: Surplus (Germany, China, Japan) and deficit (US, Greece, UK) countries remain locked in unresolved conflict, creating a downward spiral in demand that denies deficit countries the markets they need to recover and surplus countries the deficit spenders required to feed their industries. The necessary, relative adjustment in prices remains but a distant dream.

Anyone who thinks the problem is a matter of the imbalance between surplus and deficit nations that can be redressed by a simple rebalancing is deluded. The problem is far more intractable and deeper than simply an imbalance between surplus and deficit nations. The surplus of nations like China and Germany exists in name only, they have been invested, lent out and lost permanently and those deficit nations cannot repay and so the world is running on empty tank. It is precisely because debtor nations cannot pay that this crisis has come about and if these nations that include the US were to work or produce to repay their mountainous debts the people work as slaves who get nothing except bare sustenance until they repaid their debts and this cannot stimulate the economy.

IT MAY BE TRUE THERE ARE SURPLUS AND DEFICIT NATIONS BUT IT MAY BE DELUSION BECAUSE THE SAVINGS OF SURPLUS NATIONS HAVE BEEN SQAUNDERED BY DEFICIT NATIONS WHO CANNOT REPAY AND CAN ONLY WORK TO REPAY IN WHICH THEY WILL GET NOTHING BACK EXCEPT DEBT CANCELLING AND SO THEY CANNOT BOOM WHILST THEY SLOG TO REPAY.