Egypt court orders Mubarak freed

Egypt court orders Mubarak freed

How convenient it is that the legitimately elected government should be overturned by a military backed government and Mubarak becomes a freeman so swiftly. If he was innocent he would not have been charged and jailed and this exposes the considerable tentacles the vested and corrupt and ruthless (aka top goats) have on power not just in Egypt but throughout the world (Assad is now using poison gases on his beloved subjects). It seems the evil people have thrown all pretence of propriety to the wind to do what it takes to maintain power and control. The rulers of UK and US are no better, they are clueless and self serving and even downright evil as the relentless pursuit of Snowden who has done no wrong exposing wrongdoing by the US. That this is a recipe for stability is delusion, mankind is descending out of control into chaos and destruction for which he is entirely to blame.

Malaysia crash: Many killed as bus plunges into ravine

There are no sane reasons to go up the resort, certainly not to gamble at the resort, nor for respite from the heat and stress of urban life below nor to stage and watch shows by international entertainers and so if you die in transit it is not blameless and those who schemed to build, promote and maintain the resort have far more karma to be repaid as suffering than they ever imagine in their worst nightmares.

IF YOU GO UP THERE TO WORK, THEN THAT TOO IS EVIL AND SHOULD YOU DIE IT IS ALSO NOT BLAMELESS. IF YOU GO THERE TO GAMBLE, ENTERTAIN YOURSELF OR FOR RESPITE THEN THEY TOO ARE NOT BLAMELESS REASONS FOR VISITING.

WORK IS NOT GOOD BUT BAD AND ALL THOSE WHO EXALT WORK ARE DELUDED HEADING FOR WOE.

Fed Closer to Easing Stimulus; Timing Is Unclear

Stimulus is never the answer or cure for mankind’s considerable if not fatal economic woes, it is merely cheating by printing to keep the fire burning.

The true cure is to live within your means and pay off your considerable debts. If you start to live within your means and pay off your mountainous debts that automatically puts the economy in a recession even depression because much debt fuelled consumption would disappear.

Mankind has painted himself into a corner, it is checkmate and he is standing wobbly on a stool with a noose around his neck. He cannot balance indefinitely on the stool, if he falls asleep and fall the noose will strangle him sooner or later.

Heedless stimulus is the cause of today’s misery and your answer is more stimulus:

Alcohol is the cause of an alcoholic’s problem and your prescription is more alcohol? What kind of true understanding is that?

It was the heedless relentless stimulating by governments to boost re-election, keep the masses happy (and also fatten their pockets) by tax cuts, tax rebates, borrowing to spend on white elephants on behalf of the nation to keep the economy on the boil, unleashing and promoting credit card spending, lowering interest rates to stimulate consumption that is responsible for today’s dire conditions and your answer is more stimulus? Are you mad or a fool or both?

STIMULUS IS ALWAYS A WRONG OR DELUDED BASIS FOR ACTION. IF YOUR REASON FOR LOWERING INTEREST RATES AND RELEASING MORE MONEY IS TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY THEN THAT IS A WRONG DISASTROUS DANGEROUS BASIS FOR ACTION.

The secret to happy love and making it last

IT'S a question posed by couples for centuries - how to make love last. But if you think it's about sex and communication, think again. The secret is much simpler.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/#ixzz2cewujD31

If you think it is plausible there is a secret to happy love you do not truly understand and are gullible.

There are never secret or secrets to happy love because it would be a mindless robotic formula of what to say or do (eg sex three times a week, eat together or always call your wife from work, sleep early, etc) in which you are a slave (which is never happy) carrying out approximately or precisely to plan.

If you have to make a relationship last it means it is not a true relationship, it is held together by effort or false and not worth maintaining.

If you understand love or lust you know it is never satisfactory, it is always tainted by suffering. True happiness is never found in others, in relations but if a person has truly found happiness in himself, he is happy and not suffering then he can give happiness and love to others but his own happiness is never dependent on anything or anybody.

ALL RELATIONSHIPS ARE NEVER FULLY SATISFACTORY, WHOEVER HAS A DEPENDENCY HAS A WAVERING THE BUDDHA SAID AND TRUE HAPPINESS IS TO BE FOUND WITHIN YOU (BY CULTIVATING THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND) AND THE PERSON WHO HAS FOUND TRUE AND DEEP HAPPINESS IN HIMSELF CAN IMPART HIS HAPPINESS AND LOVE ON OTHERS. THIS IS NOT A SECRET LIKE A RECIPE THAT YOU CAN TELL OTHERS AND THEY CAN CARRY OUT LIKE A ROBOT WHICH IS NEVER HAPPY OR SATISFACTORY.

TRYING TO MAKE A RELATIONSHIP LAST IS CONTRIVED AND THAT LONGEVITY IS FALSE. IF A RELATIONSHIP IS TRULY GOOD IT WILL LAST WITHOUT YOU OR ANYBODY TRYING TO MAKE IT LAST AND IF YOU HAVE TO MAKE EFFORTS TO MAKE IT LAST THEN IT IS ARTIFICIAL, NOT WORTH LASTING.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO DO ANYTHING TO MAINTAIN A GOOD OR LOVING RELATION. IF YOU NEED TO MAINTAIN A RELATIONSHIP IT MEANS IT IS DECEPTIVE NOT TRUE AND GOOD.

Truly happy and lasting relationships are impossible:

People can remain trapped in lifelong relations putting up with each other but truly happy and truly lasting relations are impossible so long as they remain stylish emotional people.

STYLE PRECLUDES A TRULY HAPPY AND LASTING RELATION BECAUSE THE PERSON IS A REHASHING ROBOT WHO IS DELUDED AND HE OR SHE IS CONSTANTLY BOMBARDING OTHERS WITH FOR SHOW FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT STRESSES THE RECIPIENT, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED SO IT IS NEVER TRULY POSSIBLE TO HAVE A HAPPY AND LASTING RELATION WITH HIM.

Possible and impossible happy relationships:

It is impossible for two stylish and thus deluded persons to have a happy strain free relationship even if they are ‘soul mates’.

It is impossible for anyone to have a happy and lasting relationship with anyone who is stylish and thus deluded no matter how they try.

It is possible even certain that two people without style (and thus not robots or deluded) will have a happy and satisfying relation with each other without trying.

You can hug a porcupine but it is never without pain:

You can hug a porcupine and keep hugging him but it is never pleasant and always painful. So long as a person remains in style he is indiscriminately radiating others with force in his stretched syllables, changing speed and loudness that stresses others, cause restlessness and distraction, he is merely a mechanical rehashing robot and it is impossible for anyone to derive genuine happiness.

Scientists ‘95 per cent certain’ that climate change is man-made

The problem is not climate change but global warming and there is a documented inexorable increase in the atmospheric CO2 levels to levels not seen since millions of years ago and the obvious source of the soaring CO2 is mankind burning fossil fuels and destroying forests and resources and yet scientists say they are 95% certain it is man made.

THE ISSUE IS NOT CLIMATE CHANGE BUT GLOBAL WARMING AND THERE IS INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE OF RISING CO2 TO LEVELS NOT SEEN FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS AND THE OBVIOUS CULPRIT IS MANKIND AND NOTHING ELSE AND STILL SCIENTISTS SAY THEY ARE 95% SURE.

It is global warming that causes climate change:

Climate change is the result of global warming and so one should get to the heart or root of the matter global warming rather than be muddled to talk about climate change.

WHICH COMES FIRST, GLOBAL WARMING AS A RESULT OF CLIMATE CHANGE OR CLIMATE CHANGE AS A RESULT OF GLOBAL WARMING?

IF YOU AGREE THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS THE RESULT OF GLOBAL WARMING THEN YOU ARE A MUDDLED FOOL TO SPEAK OF CLIMATE CHANGE WHEN YOU SHOULD BE ADDRESSING GLOBAL WARMING.

Is climate change independent of global warming?

Everywhere in the world, especially in the Arctic you see climate change that is in the direction of warming eg earlier spring and later autumn and so climate change is consistently in the direction of warming and so climate change is unlikely unrelated if not certainly linked to global warming and it is global warming that is the culprit and you should focus on it rather than climate change which is merely a manifestation or result of global warming.

And who is warming the earth? Are there any culprits apart from mankind?

Signs that indicate Assad using chemical weapons:

Assad’s side refute allegations they are using chemical weapons but even cursory inspection by someone discerning from afar indicates chemical weapons are being used.

Apart from air borne rapidly dispersing chemical weapons, it is difficult if not impossible to explain mass dying of civilians including children without visible bullet or explosive induced injuries, some of whom have contorted bodies with arms rigidly held stretched and reported cases of foaming in the mouth.

The ideal chemical weapon is rapidly fatal to those who inhale but does not last long in the air for fear it would remain to harm your own soldiers or be captured as evidence of your crime.

IF YOU ARE DISCERNING THEN EVEN PHOTOS AND VIDEOS FROM AFAR CAN INDICATE TO YOU CHEMICAL WEAPONS ARE BEING USED.

Anyone who stirs another is asking for suffering:

Nowadays my mind has reached such calmness it is resistant to being stirred by others.

I know that being stirred even being thrilled is always suffering and not being stirred is never suffering and so, whether you realize you are stirring another or not, if you are guilty of stirring others either intentionally or not, you are asking for suffering in repayment.

A PERSON WHO IS STIRRED SUFFERS COMPARED TO THE PERSON WHO IS NOT STIRRED, THIS IS AN UNIVERSAL TRUTH.

THUS WHETHER YOU REALIZE YOU ARE STIRRING OTHERS OR NOT, WHETHER IT IS INTENTIONAL OR NOT, SO LONG AS YOU ARE GUILTY OF STIRRING OTHERS YOU ARE ASKING FOR FUTURE SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT.

AND SO IF YOU EXCITE ANOTHER, YOU RUSH OTHERS, YOU PROVOKE THEM TO BE ANGRY, UPSET, AGITATED, CONFUSED, HURT, SAD, FEARFUL, YOU MAKE OTHERS TENSED OR UNEASY, YOU ARE ASKING FOR SUFFERING.

'Very, very scary'

The doctors who risked their lives to stop the deadly Sars virus

Only people with no true understanding will speak of scary when it is a matter of ‘Very dangerous’.

It is dangerous to stir your mental force to be scared because once stirred your actions are governed by stirred blind force without understanding. If your mental force is not stirred and you understand something is extremely dangerous then you will rationally choose the right action in response of the situation.

WHAT IS THE POINT OF BEING SCARED? IT IS SUFFERING, DISTURBS THE MIND AND DRIVES YOU TO HASTY WRONG HEADED RESPONSE. THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ONLY UNDERSTANDS THE VIRUS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND TAKES STEPS TO MITIGATE.

I like to be in America:

This is the speech of a person without true understanding, the speech of a fool, a deluded person.

It is dangerous and harmful and not a matter of stirring your mental force to like or dislike to be in America but it is a matter of whether it is good or bad to be in America.

Bus driver’s uncontrollable rage caused crash:

Consumed by his rage after a near miss with a car, the insolent Genting Highland bus driver drove angrily recklessly resulting in a crash that killed many including himself, as a result he has much suffering to experience in punishment in repayment.

Anger, a form of dislike is not just suffering but it will finally destroy the person and send him to hell and eternal punishment.

As long as anger remains in a person, it is like a volcano that will blow its top killing the person.

Anger or rage cannot be controlled indefinitely, each time you get angry you are conditioning yourself stronger to anger that gets more violent and harder to subside and once triggered even if others are to blame, it becomes difficult even impossible to control driving the fool to self and others destructive behaviour that leads to much debt and suffering in repayment.

IGNORE YOUR ANGER OR RAGE AT YOUR OWN PERIL, IT IS LIKE A VOLCANO THAT IF YOU DO NOT PERMANENTLY EXTINGUISH WILL ONE DAY BLOW UP KILLING YOU AND SENDING YOU TO ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.

LIVING WITH YOUR ANGER IS LIKE SLEEPING WITH A PET VIPER, ONE DAY IT WILL BITE YOU NOT JUST FATALLY BUT SEND YOU TO HELL.

JUSTIFY YOUR ANGER, PANDER TO YOUR ANGER BUT WHEN YOUR THROAT IS CUT YOU WILL WEEP.

It is only anger but it can send you to hell and worse:

Jesus said the man who scolds his brother, you fool is in danger of the fire of hell.

Anger cannot be managed but it must be expunged or you are in dire danger.

THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST SEE DANGER IN THE SLIGHTEST FAULT, ANGER IS NOBODY’S FRIEND BUT IT IS THE DEVIL THAT WILL SEIZE YOU TO DO ALL KINDS OF THINGS THAT LEAD TO MUCH SUFFERING AND REGRET.

A man with style can never extinguish his anger:

You can never use force to destroy anger but you extinguish anger forever by never allowing your mental force to stir in anger and to do that you must not give your mental force cause to stir.

So long as a person prolongs his syllables, changes speed and loudness stirring his own self resistance and causing himself insoluble renewing stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and necessitating a rehashing robotic existence he must be angry with himself and others that he prostitutes himself to please and impress.

BEFORE YOU CAN EXTINGUISH (NOT DESTROY) YOUR ANGER YOU MUST SHED YOUR STYLE THAT STIRS ANGER IN SELF AND OTHERS BECAUSE YOU ARE CAUSING YOURSELF INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION PROSTITUTING YOURSELF TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS.

What is anger and why there is anger:

You can stir your mental force to do useful (eg sweep floor) or useless work (eg dance, make a monkey face) or without doing work (anger, lust, greed, fear, shock, agitation). Because anger is a conditioned stirring of a person’s mental force without doing work (like revving an idling car engine) triggered by what one sees or hears or smells or touches, it can be deconditioned, removed.

When you want to impress or please others with what you want to say or do, you want others to stir their mental forces on seeing or hearing what you said or did and if you want others to stir their mental force on perception without doing work you too must want your own mental force to stir without doing work at what you yourself say or do.

IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING OTHERS IS ABOUT STIRRING OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCE WITH WHAT YOU SAY OR DO AND SO IF YOU HAVE STYLE OR PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT IS INTENDED TO STIR OTHERS YOU TOO MUST BE IMPRESSED, PLEASED, INTIMIDATED BY WHAT YOU YOURSELF SAY OR DO OR YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS SIMILARLY STIRRED. AND IF YOU KEEP TRYING TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS WITH YOUR STYLE YOU KEEP CONDITIONING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO STIR ON PERCEPTION WITHOUT DOING WORK THAT IS THE GENESIS OF ANGER.

AND SO STYLE WHICH IS INTENDED TO STIR YOUR OWN AND OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BE IMPRESSED OR PLEASED IS THE FATHER OF ANGER, IF YOU STOPPED PRACTICING STYLE YOU STOP WANTING TO STIR YOUR OWN OR OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCE TO BE PLEASED OR IMPRESSED AND THAT IS THE END OF ANGER.

The use and abuse of your memory system:

Your memory system is far more powerful and faster than even the fastest computer processor and it is a purely mechanical system (devoid of meaning and understanding), it is a matter of recording in bytes what is received and then searching, retrieving and replaying or rehashing what was recorded either precisely or approximately.

It is because your memory system is so powerful and you are so senseless that you do realize you are utilizing your memory system in what and how you perceive, think, say or do.

There is use and abuse of the memory system and it is objective, cannot be disputed by anyone.

When you activate your memory system (as needed, not all the time) to recall what happened in the past or lessons you learnt in the past then that is USE of the memory system and you won’t go mad.

When your memory system is active all the time, you use it to rehash approximately or precisely whatever and however you perceive, think, speak and do then that is ABUSE of your memory system which like all mechanical systems is vulnerable to wear and tear and will finally breakdown to greater or lesser extent rendering you unable to say or do things you have said or done many times without thinking in your life.

Abuse has too components, incessant use without rest and use for unnecessary reason. It is unnecessary and deceptive to use the memory system to rehash what you want to say or do because it can be said and done freshly composed specific to the occasion and so if you depend on recall to say or do you are abusing your memory system, using it for a wrong and harmful purpose because what is rehashed never perfectly fits the situation.

IT IS BECAUSE THEIR MEMORY SYSTEM IS VERY POWERFUL AND THEY ARE SENSELESS THAT PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE ACTIVATING THEIR MEMORY SYSTEM ALL THE TIME TO SAY OR DO THINGS.

BECAUSE YOU CAN COMPOSE DIRECTLY FOR THE SITUATION YOU ARE ABUSING YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM BY USING IT TO REHASH WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY OR DO THAT IS ALSO DANGEROUS BECAUSE IT IS STANDARDIZED AND NEVER TRULY FITS THE CURRENT SITUATION. IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY REHASHING THEN THAT TOO IS ABUSE OF YOUR MEMORY BY CONSTANTLY USING IT WRONGLY.

THUS IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY ABUSING YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM BY REHASHING WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, MIGHT THE MEMORY SYSTEM NOT FAIL IN LATE LIFE AND WITH A FAULTY MEMORY SYSTEM MIGHT YOU NOT BE ABLE TO SAY OR DO THE THINGS YOU HAVE ALWAYS SAID OR DONE AND IS THIS NOT REMINISCENT OF DEMENTIA AND DON’T YOU THINK IT IS WELL DESERVED?

If you constantly abuse something, expect it to fail:

It is not necessary to trouble your memory system to say or do things as you have always done or said in the past because they can be freshly specifically composed for the occasion.

Because it unnecessary to use the memory system to speak and do things you are abusing it by doing so and if everything you say or do is by rehash then you are relentlessly, continuously abusing your memory system and so you can expect it to fail and with its failure you are crippled in your speech and actions because you need your failing memory system to say or do things as you have always done.

THUS DEMENTIA IS DESERVED PUNISHMENT AND ALL THOSE WHO REHASH, WHETHER YOU REALIZE IT OR NOT ARE HEADING FOR AN APPOINTMENT WITH DEMENTIA THAT WILL CRIPPLE YOU, MAKE YOU WEEP.

The end of the road for Apple and technology?

Carl Icahn thinks Apple is seriously undervalued, he may be right or vested (there are fast bucks to be made) or deluded.

Rather than limitless, technology is finite and hereon, major ‘killer’ innovations that will sell like hot cakes making companies like Apple lots of money may be coming to an end.

Technology is basically about data (video, music, information) interchange and communication between entities and we may have reached the end of all there is to invent, you have smartphones (better suited for voice communication) and tablets (for internet browsing, videos), what remains hereon is refinement, more and more powerful and smaller processors, better software which are not going to be major money spinners for avaricious companies like Apple.

WE MAY BE REACHING THE END OF THE ROAD IN TERMS OF INNOVATIONS THAT WILL ATTRACT MASS PURCHASES AND THIS MAY SPELL DROUGHT FOR COMPANIES LIKE APPLE WHICH MAY BE DESTINED TO FOLLOW MICROSOFT INTO THE SUNSET.

Slick rehashing is even more abusive:

No matter how many times someone rehashes a particular speech or action, still the memory system is activated each time and the slicker (faster and precise) the rehashing, the more demanding or abusive the rehashing that leads to greater wear on the memory system.

Many people speak and do things (eg cooking, typing) in a rapid, machine gun like tempo and they are thrilled they can reel it out so rapidly without thinking and precisely (a cook can chop cucumber rapidly in consistently thin slices) not realizing they are stressing or taxing their memory system even more than will wear it down more and if you watch slick rehashers later in life they become zombies whose speech and actions become Parkinsonian, slow and hesitant.

IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW MANY TIMES SOMETHING HAS BEEN REHASHED, STILL THE MEMORY SYSTEM IS CALLED INTO ACTION OR ABUSED EACH TIME IT IS REHASHED.

THE FASTER AND MORE PRECISE THE REHASH, THE MORE DEMANDING THE REHASH IS ON THE PERSON’S MEMORY SYSTEM AND SO HE WILL WEAR DOWN FASTER AND MORE SEVERELY HIS MEMORY SYSTEM.

PEOPLE MARVEL AT SLICK PRECISE REHASHING BUT IT IS A PROGRAMMED MECHANICAL ACTION DEVOID OF REASON OR MEANING, JUST FOR SHOW TO ACHIEVE MECHANICAL RESULTS WITH DIRE CONSEQUENCES NOT JUST IN A DESTROYED MEMORY SYSTEM BUT BESERK OUT OF CONTROL INAPPROPRIATE IRRESISTIBLE REHASHING.

A happy retirement is impossible for ordinary people:

If you think there are some who will enjoy a happy retirement and you hope and look forward to a happy retirement then you do not understand truly. A happy retirement is a delusion, wishful thinking for all ordinary stylish emotional people.

By the time people retire (even if they are the queen or king or Apple CEO) their minds and bodies are already seriously shot, shattered, in tatters, they are struggling to keep their feeble faculties coherent and they face a descend into dark insanity, disease and finally death.

ALL WORK HERE NO MATTER HOW YOU SWEAR YOU ENJOY IT AND IT STIMULATES YOUR MIND OR HOW HIGHLY PAID YOU ARE, ARE DEADLY, WEAR YOUR MIND AND BODY DOWN RELENTLESSLY UNTIL AT RETIREMENT YOU ARE A SHATTERED HULK OF A MAN FACING A LOSING BATTLE AGAINST FURTHER PAINFUL DEGRADATION AND DEATH.

No wonder you are absent minded and distant:

If you are rehashing all the time even when you are thinking and perceiving then your memory system is constantly occupied and it is little wonder but to be expected that you will be forgetful, you will forget things and whenever a person is rehashing he must detach himself from reality to attend to searching, retrieving and playing back what he recorded for the situation.

IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY REHASHING YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM IS CONSTANTLY OCCUPIED AND IT IS TO BE EXPECTED YOU WILL FORGET THINGS.

IF YOU REHASH YOU MUST INTROVERT YOURSELF, DETACH YOURSELF FROM THE PRESENT TO SEARCH, RETRIEVE AND REPLAY WHAT YOU RECORDED FOR PLAYBACK OR INSERTION INTO THE PRESENT SITUATION AND SO A PERSON WHO REHASHES IS TRAINING HIMSELF TO DETACH FROM REALITY WITH DANGEROUS CONSEQUENCES.

Acquitted on technicalities not facts:

Quote: Ordering the two men to be released, the Court of Appeals ruled that gaps in the evidence had been overlooked in their trial.
These included whether the officers had access to explosives, whether they intended to kill her and whether they were even present at the murder site, Associated Press reports.

The judge is making a very serious decision based on technicalities rather than evidence and those technicalities too are on shaky not firm grounds and so he is asking for accountability.

The cops confessed they were offered $100,000 to kill her and yet no one bothered to record who offered the money, this is Malaysia boleh justice.

If they were truly innocent or not standing as scapegoats for someone very important they would not have been charged and convicted to need an overturning by appeal. If you are linked to powerful people surely you will not suffer the ignominy (why are they covering their heads with hoods?) if you are totally innocent or not standing in for someone very important.

THE COPS CANNOT BE ACQUITTED ON FACTS (THEIR AFFIDAVITS ARE DAMNING), SO THEY ACQUITTED THEM BASED ON TECHNICALITIES JUST AS A NOTORIOUS CASE OF A MAN (KATIGESU) KILLING HIS BEAUTY QUEEN SISTER IN LAW WAS ACQUITTED BECAUSE A WITNESS ADMITTED HE LIED.

The incredible becomes increasingly credible even true:

If you keep telling yourself and others what is false or make believe is true then increasingly you come to perceive what is incredible is indeed credible, can be believed, even true and that is path to descent into darkness and insanity.

It is actually more damaging to the system to acquit the cops because it is objective evidence the system is loaded, but in the desperation to fulfil a secret promise to save the cops from their plight the powerful may choose to brazenly override credibility.
PEOPLE ROUTINELY DESCRIBE WHAT HAS HAPPENED AS INCREDIBLE, EG IT IS INCREDIBLE THEY HAVE WON A LOTTERY. THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE INCREDIBLE AND THIS ACQUITTAL IS ONE OF THEM, IF YOU THINK IT IS CREDIBLE, YOU ARE FLIRTING WITH FALSE PERCEPTION AND INSANITY.

Why did the cops admit to killing her?

If they did not kill her or were not involved, why did they admit with deadly consequences to killing her? If they lied that they killed her then someone must have asked them to do so apart from offering them money to kill her as admitted. They admitted to scouting at the hotel where she stayed and there is video evidence they were there and she was taken by them from Razak’s house and so it is too convenient to dismiss them without bothering to find out who asked them to admit to the killing when they did not and who offered to pay them to kill her.

European forests near 'carbon saturation point'

This means they can no longer help remove additional CO2 that mankind pumps into the atmosphere which means from no onwards a similar amount of CO2 produced by mankind will lead to a bigger increase in atmospheric CO2.

WITH DESTRUCTION OF FORESTS GLOBALLY, WHEN FORESTS REACH THEIR SATURATION POINT IT MEANS THEY CANNOT REMOVE ANY MORE CO2 THAN WHAT THEY ARE DOING NOW SO ANY FURTHER INCREASES OF CO2 CAUSED BY MAN WILL RESULT IN EVEN HIGHER CONCENTRATIONS OF CO2 THAT MEANS DOOM WILL COME FASTER FROM NOW ON.

Sick forests can produce not remove CO2:

Not only have forests reached their limit in capacity to remove CO2 increasingly produced by mankind, sick forests can stop absorbing CO2 and even produce CO2 according to studies and so the end may come much more precipitously than you think.

DISASTER MAY ARRIVE ON AN EXPONENTIAL SCALE JUST AS HUMAN POPULATION INCREASES EXPONENTIALLY AND SO DOOM MAY COME MUCH CLOSER THAN YOU THINK.

The cops can never be acquitted by evidence:

The cops cannot be acquitted by evidence because there is no evidence they are not involved but there are plenty of objective evidence they were involved (confessions, took her from the house, went to her hotel to scout and more) and so they can only be acquitted based on technicalities that are flimsy even untenable.

If someone dies in your custody you are liable:

It is not disputed that Altanturya was last seen taken into custody by the accused and this arrest may have been illegal and even if it was legal you are accountable for what happened to her in your custody and so they should satisfactorily explain how she came to be blown up in their custody and if they cannot satisfactorily explain then they should held responsible for her death, who asked them to arrest her?

IF YOU TAKE SOMEONE INTO CUSTODY YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR WELLBEING, EVEN MORE SO IF THEY ARE ILLEGALLY ARRESTED AND SO IF ALTANTURYA DIED WHILST UNDER YOUR CUSTODY YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HER DEATH.

What kind of judges are these?

You have judges who are supposedly experts on the law, what is right and wrong, administering justice yet they have no true understanding of duties and responsibilities.

This is not a case of minor irresponsibility. Is it the duty of special bodyguards to arrest or take her into custody and if they took her into custody and she is subsequently found blown up, they very well must explain what happened to her and if they cannot satisfactorily explain they should be held liable for her death.

Do you need to be a judge to know that? Is the judge aware of that in his rulings?

Have the cops given any explanation that absolves them?

Have the cops given any explanations that absolve them of responsibility over Altanturya’s death?

Nobody, not even Najib need account for her death but because the cops took her into custody and she died in their custody, THEY ALONE must account for her fate.

YET THEY HAVE NEVER GIVEN ANY ACCOUNT THAT ABSOLVES THEM OF RESPONSIBILITY NOR HAS THE JUDGE ASKED THEM TO DO SO BEFORE ACQUITTING THEM. THIS IS INCOMPETENCE OR EVIDENCE OF VESTED MOTIVES.

Nobody but the cops must explain what happened to Altanturya:

Nobody but the cops must satisfactorily explain what happened to Altanturya because they took her into custody and she died in their custody and without them answering the question satisfactorily you are demonstrating gross ineptitude and failure to understand to acquit them.

RATHER THAN A MINOR CONSIDERATON, IT IS A CRUCIAL, FUNDAMENTAL REQUIREMENT THAT THE COPS MUST ADEQUATELY EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENED TO HER BECAUSE THEY TOOK HER INTO CUSTODY.

IF THIS WORLD HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING HOW COME THIS IS AMISS TO EVERYONE, INCLUDING JUDGES?

Never a merited acquittal:

No need to get upset or be in doubt and uncertainty whether the cop acquittals were correct or merited, they were incorrect and so what motives might there be?

To give a semblance of a legitimate acquittal the cops should have at least been asked to give an excuse why Altanturya died in their custody eg they fell asleep and she ran away and somehow she got blown to pieces.

IF YOU ARE IN DOUBT AND UNCERTAIN WHETHER THE ACQUITTAL IS CORRECT YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND THE CASE. IT IS NEVER JUSTIFIED WITHOUT THE COPS EXPLAINING WHAT HAPPENED TO HER THAT EXONERATED THEM. IF I PASS YOU MY IPHONE AND IT WAS DAMAGED, YOU MUST EXPLAIN HOW IT BECAME DAMAGED.

Nazri will always be Nazri

This is always a false (an opinion not fact) and totally unnecessary statement to say that has karma to be repaid as suffering.

Nobody stays the same forever and you can become stricken against your wishes (eg get a stroke) and that means things can change.

If by that you mean he should be accepted or excused then you are asking for karma. If someone’s conduct is censurable you don’t ask others to accept it.

NOTHING IN EXISTENCE REMAIN THE SAME FOREVER, PEOPLE CHANGE EVEN THOUGH THEY REMAIN GOATS AND WHATEVER BEHAVIOUR THAT IS WRONG IS NOT TO BE ACCEPTED.

WHAT IS SAID IS ALWAYS AN OPINION NEVER THE TRUTH AND THAT IS LAPSING INTO FALSITY, DELUSION THAT LEADS TO WOE NEVER HAPPINESS.

On The Beat

A crazy kind of love

This too is an opinion never the truth and opinions which are forms of delusion lead to future woe.

True love is never crazy but rational and happy. Because true love is always happy for both parties, never has sadness or suffering it is never crazy and so you have false perception to call what is crazy ‘love’.

TRUE LOVE IS ALWAYS HAPPY, WITHOUT CONFLICT, NEVER HAVE SUFFERING OR CRAZINESS AND SO YOU PERCEIVE AND UNDERSTAND WRONGLY LOVE AS POSSIBLY CRAZY AND THAT IS DELUSION ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO THE LOWER REALMS.

IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT LOVE IS YOU SHOULD NOT TALK ABOUT IT. SINCE YOU TALK ABOUT IT, IT IMPLIES YOU KNOW WHAT LOVE IS AND IF YOU ARE WRONG AND MISLEAD OTHERS THERE IS A PRIZE IN SUFFERING.

IF LOVE IS NEVER CRAZY YOU ARE MISLEADING OTHERS WITH KARMA ATTACHED.

As I said, the law is an ass

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

The law is the law and it should be treated solemnly. It is not the law that is the ass but it is the people administering it who tamper with laws, who interpret laws even absurdly to self advantage who are responsible for giving justice a bad name.

THE LAW IS THE LAW AND IT IS NOT AN ASS, IT IS THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF APPLYING THE LAW THAT HAVE PERVERTED ITS INTERPRETATION.

IF IT IS LAWMAKERS OR ADMINISTRATORS WHO ARE ASSES THEN YOU ARE SPEAKING CARELESSLY WITH KARMA ATTACHED FOR TELLING OTHERS THE LAW IS AN ASS. THE LAW IS CLEAR, IT IS PEOPLE, LAWYERS, JUDGES, POLITICIANS WHO CAN BE ASSES.

Raising more questions than answers:

This is a Star headline in relation to the acquittal of the cops.

The implication is that matters are puzzling, stirs (more) questions, doubt and uncertainty when it is a wrong understanding, the incorrect conclusion to developments.

There is nothing conflicting in developments all along, they can be perfectly correctly understood by one who is discerning, and in him no more questions need to be raised, what is happening is quite clear and so you are evasive, pretentious and wrong to say it raises more questions than answers that mislead others with karma not merit.

THERE IS NO NEED TO RAISE ANY QUESTIONS AT ALL, NO NEED FOR RETRIALS OR WHATEVER, WHAT IS HAPPENING CAN BE CORRECTLY UNDERSTOOD AND IT DOES NOT RAISE MORE QUESTIONS.

The answer is obvious vs raising more questions:

Supposed the correct understanding of a situation is that the answer is obvious and you say it raises more questions than answer then you have a false understanding and you are guilty of misleading others with karma attached.

Until you end craving there is no end to endless suffering:

The vast majority of people, even those who think they are good or holy, seek suffering and it is only when suffering overwhelms them, they struggle to control their suffering that they seek an escape too late to be tortured and killed painfully by their suffering.

Suffering always has cause that can be seen, eliminated not permitted to arise again and so long as a person has not thoroughly seen the cause of suffering, eliminated it completely and not permit it to arise again in him, he is in danger of relapse, of falling back into the arms of suffering to the delight of the king of death, the Devil.

AND SO IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU ARE THE MOST ARDENT CHRISTIAN OR ATHEIST OR WHATEVER IF YOU ARE BESET BY SUFFERING, IT NEVER REMAINS THE SAME BUT THE NATURAL COURSE OF SUFFERING IS TO DETERIORATE WITH AGE, TO SEIZE YOU EVEN MORE PAINFULLY AND FINALLY KILL YOU PAINFULLY AND SUFFERING IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN (BECAUSE YOU ARE TO BLAME FOR YOUR SUFFERING) BUT TO EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY OF SUFFERING WITHOUT AN ESCAPE.

IT IS ONLY WHEN A BEING HAS BECOME WISE, HE IS ABLE TO SEE THE SOURCE OF HIS SUFFERING (PRIMARILY CRAVING OR THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO WANT), RECOGNIZE ITS ARISING EVEN WHEN FEEBLE, PUT A STOP TO IT AND VIGILANTLY NEVER LET IT TO ARISE LET ALONE GROW IS HE SAFE FROM SUFFERING AND DEATH.

THE BUDDHA SAID THERE IS DANGER EVEN IN THE SLIGHTEST OF FAULT AND SO THE PERSON WHO ALLOWS HIS CRAVING TO ARISE AND GROW IS IN DANGER OF FALLING INTO SUFFERING THAT CONSUMES HIM, REACHES TERRIBLE LEVELS AND LASTS EVEN AS IF FOREVER, HE DISAPPEARS WITHOUT TRACE INTO THE DARKNESS OF SUFFERING WHERE HE GRAPPLES AND STRUGGLES AND IT MAY TAKE ETERNITIES BEFORE HE COMES INTO CONTACT WITH SOMEONE WHO CAN SHOW HIM THE WAY OUT OF SUFFERING.

FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE, EVEN WHEN THE WAY OUT OF SUFFERING IS POINTED OUT TO THEM THEY ARE CLUELESS OR MISUNDERSTAND, BY THEMSELVES THEY ARE DOOMED TO FOREVER SUFFER AND IT IS AN EXTREME RARITY TO MEET WITH ENLIGHTENED ONES WHO CAN POINT THE WAY OUT OF SUFFERING FOR THEM.

IT IS NEVER HAPPINESS OR EXIT FROM SUFFERING AND DEATH THAT THE VAST MAJORITY EVEN THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE GOOD AND WISE SEEK, THEY ARE DELUDED AND IT IS SUFFERING AND DEATH THAT THEY SEEK, THEY ARE HOPELESSLY TRAPPED BY THE DELIGHTED KING OF DEATH. THE KING OF DEATH SUFFERS BUT HE DOES NOT DIE THROUGHOUT THE AGE AND SO HE DELIGHTS IN LEADING ASTRAY, CAUSING GRIEF AND DEATH TO ALL THOSE UNDER SPELL, THAT HE HAS ACCESS TO NOT REALIZING THAT HIS REIGN TOO WILL COME TO AN END AND THEN IT IS TERRIBLE SUFFERING AND DEATH FOR HIM TOO.

The lifespan of Satan is one eternity:

Humans have a lifespan that is not fixed and lasts about a 100 years, beings in heaven have fixed lifespans ranging from one eternity (age) for those who have reached the first higher state of mind (not stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness) to 60,000 eternities for those who has reached the highest concentration, the sphere of nothingness, neither perceiving nor not perceiving).

Beings in hell too have variable lifespans and those who have shown ill will to enlightened ones can find themselves in the deepest and most terrible of hells for even thousands of eternities.

THE LIFESPAN OF SATAN IS ONE ETERNITY. HE IS THE MOST EVIL AND POWERFUL ONE AMONGST THE EVIL. BECAUSE HE DOES NOT DIE, ONLY SUFFERS, HE DELIGHTS IN CAUSING SUFFERING AND DEATH TO OTHERS NOT REALIZING HIS LIFESPAN WILL COME TO AN END AND THENCE HE WILL FIND HIMSELF IN HELL IN REPAYMENT. ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL WILL TAKE OVER AS DEVIL IN THE NEXT AGE AND NOBODY REMAINS EVIL FOREVER, MOGGALANA, ONE OF THE BUDDHA’S TWO DEPUTIES WAS THE DEVIL IN ONE AGE.

By yourself you can never escape suffering:

By yourself you can never escape suffering even when it is possible because you are hooked on suffering, seek suffering, permissive of suffering and lack the concentration necessary to glean the path out of suffering as there actually is.

Even the Buddha’s future deputies, Sariputta and Moggalana, themselves lofty beings who became disenchanted with life and were seeking an escape through various gurus could not find the way out themselves and they needed the instructions of the Buddha to guide them out of suffering permanently.

BEINGS ARE NEVER EQUAL, THE BUDDHA WAS NO ORDINARY BEING, HE SAID HE HAD BEEN RULER OF THE GODS MANY TIMES, HE WAS THE HOLDER OF POWER FOR SEVEN AGES AND HE WAS BORN FROM HEAVEN TO DO BATTLE WITH SUFFERING AND DEATH AND PREVAIL, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE WOULD FAIL TO CONQUER DEATH AND SUFFERING AND IT IS ONLY WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND CARRYING OUT THE TEACHING HE DECLARED THAT A BEING CAN ESCAPE DEATH AND SUFFERING THAT IS SO HARD TO ESCAPE.

Everyone in this world is proffering you suffering:

There are those who toss suffering brutally in your face (eg they spit at the sight of you), there are those even intimate ones who disguise their proffering of suffering as sweet poison and until a person fully recognizes what is proffered is sugar laced poison, is not good as recommended and he refuses to accept or embrace it is he safe from falling into suffering.

THIS IS A WORLD WHERE EVERYONE IS PROFFERING OTHERS SUFFERING AND DEATH EITHER DIRECTLY OR DISGUISED THAT THOSE WHO ARE GULLIBLE AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND ACCEPT GRATEFULLY AND SO SUCCUMB TO BE POISONED AND DIE.

What’s so great about the Buddha, what has he done for you?

The foolish insolent man may be moved to question what is so great about the Buddha that he is indispensable to your salvation.

It is the Buddha and nobody else who tells you it is possible to stop thinking and that is the only way out of suffering for those who cannot stop thinking and it gives a lifespan of 2 eternities in heavenly bliss.

It is the Buddha and nobody else who tells you it is possible not to stir one’s mental force to like and dislike and that is the only incomparable way out of suffering for those seized to like and dislike and it is the key to four eternities in heaven.

He tells you it is possible to stop feeling pain and pleasure, access the realm of infinite space, infinite consciousness, nothingness, neither perceiving nor perceiving and even beyond, nibbana.

ANYONE WHO QUESTIONS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE BUDDHA IS A FOOL. UNLESS YOU CAN STOP THINKING, LIKING AND DISLIKING, STOP FEELING PAIN AND PLEASURE YOU ARE A TRAPPED MAN DOOMED TO EVEN PERPETUAL SUFFERING AND DEATH AND THE ONLY ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING LIES IN WHAT THE BUDDHA DECLARED, START STOPPING THINKING, STOP LIKING AND DISLIKING, TURN AWAY FROM PAIN AND PLEASURE.

I know what the Buddha teaches is true:

Nowadays I can stop thinking, I don’t like or dislike and even pleasure and pain is distant to me.

I know that compared to thinking, the stopping of thinking is incomparable release from suffering.

Compared to liking and disliking, not to like and dislike is incomparable release from suffering.

Compared with feeling the hurt when someone spit at you, not to feel pain or hurt when spat at is incomparable release from suffering.

I KNOW WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT IS TRUE, YOU CAN TRAIN YOURSELF TO STOP THINKING, STOP LIKING AND DISLIKING, STOP FEELING PAIN AND PLEASURE AND RATHER THAN DEPRIVATION THEY ARE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE FROM SUFFERING HERE AND IF WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT IS TRUE EVEN THE WAY TO 2, 4, 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS.

PM: Respect and protect women:

It is not because you are a woman or child or high born that you deserve respect and protection but it is because a person is worthy of worship (not respect) and protection that it should be so.

Respect and protect women is a nonspecific across board statement that people who rehash are fond of making and it is a form of rule that you obey to become mechanical robots or it falls on deaf ears who pay lip service attention to.

Women may be thrilled to hear that:

Some women may be thrilled to hear calls to respect and protect them and so it may be a statement to pander to women rather than speak the truth or what is feasible.

Thus it may be simply a politically motivated statement directed at women.

THUS IT MAY BE A FORCE (PLEASING) TO FORCE (THRILLED) STATEMENT RATHER THAN MEANING TO MEANING STATEMENT.

Karpal Singh failed in his duty:

Karpal Singh is a veteran lawyer holding a watching brief for Altanturya’s family and so he should have pointed out rightly even if it would have fallen on deaf ears that the two cops arrested her and she was subsequently found dead and so they are directly or indirectly involved in her death and should not be acquitted without satisfactory explanation that absolved them.

Here again is evidence ordinary people even very qualified and experienced and well versed in the case do not have insight into a matter, cannot point out a glaring miscarriage of justice.

In general but not in specific the cops can be innocent:

It is because ordinary people do not have true logic, they only deal in generalities rather than specifics of a case that they can be in doubt and uncertainty whether the cops are indeed wrongly convicted or they cannot tell why they smell a rat.

To a person with true understanding, the facts of the case in the public domain render it impossible the cops are wrongly charged.

What are the specifics of the case that render it impossible they were wrongly charged?

This is a simple not complicated case and it involves their own cops and ruling elite not members of the public and people who are not the ruling elite. If it was a complicated case (it is not clear to the police what happened), it does not involve police personnel of some high standing and the ruling elite it is possible police could have made a mistake charging them or they could have done so out of malice, just to solve the case.

This is a simple case because it involved police personnel who took her into custody that night and she died that night and so the police would have known what happened that night, it is not as if it is a case where police are called to explain a random death by explosion where ‘anything is possible’.

THE COPS SHOULD KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO HER THAT NIGHT AND IF THE TWO COPS DID NOT KILL HER THEY SHOULD KNOW WHO DID SO AND SO THE POLICE DO NOT NEED TO BE GREAT SHERLOCK HOLMES TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED THAT NIGHT.

IT IS UNTHINKABLE THAT THE POLICE CAN MALICIOUSLY OR KNOWINGLY WRONGFULLY CHARGE ONE OF ITS OWN KIND THAT ALSO BESMIRCHES ITS OWN IMAGE IN THE PUBLIC AND SERIOUSLY TARNISHED THE REPUTATION OF THE RULING ELITE, CAUSING SO MUCH TROUBLE FOR THEM IF THE TWO COPS WERE IN TRUTH INNOCENT UNLESS THEY WERE CHARGED TO DEFLECT BLAME FROM SOMEONE VERY IMPORTANT.

IF THE TWO COPS WERE INNOCENT OR THERE IS SIGNIFICANT DOUBT THEY WERE INVOLVED, IT IS UNTHINKABLE THE POLICE AND THEIR BOSSES WOULD ALLOW THEM TO BE CHARGED LET ALONE CONVICTED OF THE CRIME IN THE PROCESS BESMIRCHING THEIR OWN NAMES AND THAT OF THE RULING ELITE AND THE FACT THAT THEY BENT OVER THEIR BACKS TO (WRONGLY) SECURE THEIR ACQUITTAL SHOWS THEY WERE INITIALLY SACRIFICED TO DEFLECT GUILT FROM SOMEONE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THEM.

IF THE CASE INVOLVED CHARGING ORDINARY PEOPLE RATHER THAN (ELITE) COPS, IT WOULD NOT SMEAR THE REPUTATIONS OF IMPORTANT PEOPLE AND THE POLICE DID NOT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED, IT IS POSSIBLE THE POLICE CAN SHODDILY OR MALICIOUSLY CHARGED THE PERSON WITH THE CRIME.

FURTHER BECAUSE THE TWO COPS ARRESTED HER THAT NIGHT, SHE WAS NO LONGER FREE AND WHAT HAPPENED TO HER CAN BE BLAMED ON THEM AND THEY MUST PROVIDE A REASONABLE EXPLANATION WHY SHE ENDED UP DEAD THAT NIGHT.

A PERSON WITH CALM CLEAR THINKING WHO LOOKS INTO THE SPECIFICS OF THE CASE CAN REASON WITHOUT DOUBT WHY THE COPS CANNOT BE INNOCENT. THE DAMAGE HAD BEEN DONE BY FOOLISH DISCLOSURES OF THOSE INVOLVED AND THE REASON THE CASE CAME TO PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE MAY BE BECAUSE BADAWI WAS THEN POLICE MINISTER AND HE WAS UNDER PRESSURE TO RESIGN AND THIS WAS HIS WAY OF GETTING BACK AT THOSE WHO WANT TO OUST HIM.

Who in power will smear himself with shit that is not his?

Goats will not hesitate to smear anyone else with shit but who in power would smear himself with shit for fun or otherwise that he did not produce? If you think it is possible that self serving people can smear themselves with shit that they are not to blame for, did not produce, then it is possible the cops were wrongly charged. And so if they smear themselves with shit there must be a purpose or motive.

A Humble Submission

Syahredzan Johan

Better to let 10 guilty men go free

That humble submission will cause him much grief and pain in repayment.

“Better to let 10 guilty men go free” is a totally unnecessary and false rule and only people who do not truly understand and are robots will subscribe to rules concocted by themselves or others.

If a person is guilty he deserves punishment, it is never better to let them go free. If you understand the matter in hand you will come to a conclusion whether they are guilty or innocent and thus you do not need to refer to a blind rule, better let 10 guilty men go free which implies taking a position without seeing and knowing that is dangerous and has debt.

THE COPS TOOK HER INTO CUSTODY THAT NIGHT AND SHE DIED THAT NIGHT SO DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HER DEATH AND THEY HAVE OFFERED NO EXPLANATION WHY THEY ARE NOT TO BLAME BUT THEY HAVE CONFESSED CREDIBLY TO THEIR GUILT. THEY SAID THEY WERE SCAPEGOATS FOR OTHERS WHO WERE NOT BROUGHT TO COURT WHICH IMPLIES THEY KNOW WHO DID IT AND SO THEY ARE OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE BY NOT NAMING THEM. AND SO THERE IS NO NEED TO RELY ON BLIND RULES, ‘BETTER LET 10 GUILTY MEN GO FREE’ WHICH IS ALWAYS WRONG AND UNNECESSARY NOT JUST IN THIS CASE AND ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT.

IF A PERSON DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF THIS SUBMISSION HE MUST BE POISONED, STRESSED. ONLY A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS IT IS DELUSION IS NOT POISONED.

Never not better let guilty men go free:

Jesus said you will not be let out of prison until you have paid the last cent, even the man who calls his brother you fool is in danger of the fire of hell and so the natural order is never let guilty men go free rather than better let 10 guilty men go free, whose champion will be the Devil not God. If you confess and ask for forgiveness (which goats will never do) then you will be forgiven but without confessing and asking for forgiveness and it being given, you will never be let free.

UNLESS A PERSON CONFESSES AND ASKS FOR FORGIVENESS AND IT IS GIVEN, HE IS GUILTY OF HIS CRIME AND LIABLE FOR REPAYMENT IN SUFFERING AND SO ‘BETTER LET 10 GUILTY MEN FREE’ IS AGAINST THE NATURAL JUSTICE OR KARMA OF EXISTENCE.

NEVER LET ONE GUILTY MAN GO FREE WHAT MORE THAT IT IS BETTER LET TEN GUILTY MAN GO FREE.

Partners in crime not scapegoats:

After the trial the cops issued a statement that they were scapegoats for persons who were never brought to court which implies they knew who killed her and if you know who killed her and refuse to divulge you are a partner in crime, in obstructing justice and so they are declaring their guilt unwittingly and thus there is no question they were innocent.

Bizarre logic ends in insanity:

Just because it is wrong or bad to jail an innocent man does not mean it is better to let 10 guilty men go free, the connection is never true or natural but fabricated not without motive but with the motive of trying to influence public opinion to favour acquittal of the cops.

If what you say does not make sense, confuses and lead others into falsity you are heading for insanity and suffering in repayment.

IT MAY BE WONDERFUL LOGIC BETTER TO FREE 10 GUILTY MEN THAN JAIL ONE INNOCENT MAN BUT IF IT IS FALSE, YOU WILL GO MAD.

YOU MUST EXERCISE CARE NOT TO JAIL AN INNOCENT MAN BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS BETTER TO LET 10 GUILTY MEN GO FREE.

RATHER THAN GETTING MORE AND MORE RATIONAL TODAY, MODERN MAN HAS BECOME MORE WARPED IN HIS PERCEPTION AND REASONING, HE THINKS HIS ANUS IS HIS MOUTH.

True logic dictates that the cops are guilty:

CAN YOU IMAGINE IF THE COPS WERE INNOCENT AND THEREFORE THEIR SUPERIORS ARE ALSO INNOCENT THEY WOULD VOLUNTARILY TAKE THE BLAME AND SUFFER THE SERIOUS BAD PUBLICITY WHEN SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE COPS AND THEIR SUPERIORS ACTUALLY KILLED HER? EVEN IF THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR A MISDEED THEY DENY RESPONSIBILITY AND TRY TO BLAME IT ON SOMEONE ELSE, WHAT MORE THEY WILL ALLOW THEMSELVES TO BE BLAMED AND TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR A MURDER COMMITTED BY OTHERS.

THUS THE FACT THAT THESE TWO COPS WERE CHARGED AND CONVICTED IS IRREFUTABLE ADMISSION OF GUILT AND ANYONE WHO IS STILL IN DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY, THINK MAYBE THEY AND THEIR SUPERIORS ARE NOT INVOLVED HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING.

Even if you and everyone have forgotten the train of events, it started with the three cops (plus woman cop) taking Altanturya away that night and she ended up dead that night and so the obvious thing for police to do is question the cops as to what happened and they would have told them what happened and so it is straightforward (not prone to error) for police to know if the cops did or did not do it and what happened that night.

Even if the police has rabid animosity towards these two cops and wanted to frame them (that is, they are innocent), the system will not allow it because of the terrible bad publicity to high officials linked to these erstwhile cops.

This is a self serving world in which there must be material gains or motive for a person to do something and the only reason the system permitted the cops to charged is because they are involved, are guilty and the negative publicity is preferable to an even bigger disaster, the exposure and conviction of high officials involved in the case.

IF THE COPS ARE INNOCENT IT MEANS THEY AND THEIR BOSSES ARE NOT INVOLVED IN HER DEATH AND THERE IS NO WAY THEY OR THE SYSTEM WILL ACCEPT BLAME THAT IS NOT DUE WITH ITS TERRIBLE BAD PUBLICITY FOR SOMETHING THEY NEVER DID.

IT IS ONLY IF THE COPS ARE GUILTY (SOMETHING THE POLICE CAN EASILY ASCERTAIN BECAUSE THE COPS WOULD KNOW WHAT THEY DID) AND THEIR CHARGING AND CONVICTION WOULD DEFLECT BLAME FROM SOMEONE MORE VALUABLE THAT THEY WOULD BE RELUCTANTLY BROUGHT TO JUSTICE DESPITE THE CONSIDERABLE BAD PUBLICITY.

Unheard of:

Unless a person is mad, it is unheard of for someone to voluntarily admit guilt for something he did not do except to protect another person eg a person would admit murder he never did to protect his brother.

And so if the cops are innocent, they would never allow themselves to take responsibility for the murder they never committed nor will the ruling elite allow themselves to take the blame and bad publicity for something they never committed unless it is to deflect responsibility.

So Aunty, So What?

June HL Wong

People do not realize they are putting their heads on the chopping board saying something they think is cute or friendly when it is vile, foul.

If you know something is wrong or false, you say it is wrong or false, not ‘so what’. You are challenging someone, deprecating somebody which belies your courteous address of ‘aunty’.

YOU MAY THINK YOU ARE CUTE AND FRIENDLY BUT YOU ARE GUILTY OF CHALLENGING OR ATTACKING OTHERS, DERIDING WHAT THEY SAY AND THE FACT THAT YOU COUCH IT IN FRIENDLY TONES ‘AUNTIE’ COMPOUNDS THE KARMA NOT NEGATES IT.

ANYONE WHO CHALLENGES ANOTHER IS ASKING FOR SUFFERING, IF YOU ARE CHALLENGING ANOTHER AND YOU DO NOT KNOW IT YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE DOES AND THAT IS THE PATH TO HELL NOT HEAVEN. YOU THINK YOU ARE PRETTY AND YOUR SMILE IS SWEET, KARMA CAN WIPE OFF THAT SWEET SMILE AND SPARKLING TEETH.

Only a robot can say that:

So aunty, so what is never a specific to the occasion freshly composed statement but it is a copied, recorded and rehashed statement designed for rehash on a variety of similar occasions and so the person is always a robot and that is a tormenting existence and it leads to robot failure and insanity.

If you do not know what to make of the statement or you accept it as valid you must stir resistance that leads to stress and conditions you to resist that detains you in the prison of stress and so anyone who says ‘so auntie, so what’ is creating serious karma for herself that she ignores to her eternal regret.

Why Altanturya is a very special lady:

Altanturya is a foreigner, not resident here and so she would have few if any other lovers here who want to knock her off. If she was a promiscuous local ‘beauty’ then there may be ‘limitless’ possibilities of potential assassins who can be blamed.

Who did her companions say she came here to see? She was admitted by Razak to make a scene at Razak Baginda’s office in Jln Ampang and also at his house shouting abuse and so it is obvious who might have motive to exterminate her. According to Razak’s affidavit to court, the police supt seconded to solve his problem with Altanturya said he can arrange to ‘take care of her permanently’ but he kindly told them not to harm her.

Thus who would be the likely source of malice to her, what are the chances others in Malaysia want her dead at the same time?

The cops may indeed be scapegoats:

If the cops did not kill her, someone else did, then they may be telling the truth they are scapegoats.

There are credible rumours that an army couple trained in handling C4 explosives and someone’s wife was present at the scene of her death in remote uncomfortable environment with buzzing mosquitos and what nots (snakes?) in the early hours of the morning. She may be there as a passive observer or she may have taken part in sending off Altanturya in which case the cops may be right to say they are scapegoats.

The ruling elite framed themselves for a crime they did not do?

Because of the bad publicity arising from the case, if the cops were innocent it means the ruling elite have voluntarily shot themselves in the foot, framed themselves, assumed guilt for a crime they never committed. You must be out of your mind if you think it is plausible.  

Altanturya received threats and made a police report:

Balasubramaniam a former policeman turned private investigator under the employ of Razak Baginda visited the girls at their hotel and he told them Razak knew powerful people who could harm them and they should leave but they refused to listen and he ended up befriending them and even staying overnight with them and I think Altanturya made a police report.

And so there were threats made to her life by known people and she made a report and she was subsequently killed, who are the likely culprits? She should know who wants to kill her and if she died subsequently the key suspects must be those she named.

And so there is a consistent thread of evidence pointing to her killers, it is not just scattered strands.