Oswald beat conspirators to the killing of JFK?

Oswald beat conspirators to the killing of JFK?

EVEN IF YOU DENY YOU ARE A CONSPIRATOR, IF YOU ADMIT YOU WERE THERE TO FOIL A CONSPIRACY IT MEANS IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE OSWALD HAPPENED TO KILL THE PRESIDENT ON HIS OWN ON THE SAME DAY OTHERS WERE TRYING TO ALSO KILL THE PRESIDENT AND SO THE LONE ASSASSIN THEORY IS UNTENABLE AND ALSO ADMIT OSWALD IS A CIA AGENT.

IT REFLECTS ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY DO NOT ‘GET IT’ THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE TRUE IMPLICATIONS OF TOSH PLUMLEE’S REFUTATIONS. HE IS PROVIDING EVIDENCE ‘FROM THE HORSE’S MOUTH’ THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY THAT DAY (BUT HE WAS NOT PART OF IT).

Tosh Plumlee in his attempt to dissociate himself from any allegations of conspiracy to kill JFK that day, admitted he was a pilot and CIA operative, he admitted he knew Oswald and Oswald too was a CIA agent, he said he flew passengers secretly to Dallas that day and one of the passengers was Roselli a mafia hit man allegedly part of one independent team stalking JFK that day. He said his secret mission was to abort an alleged assassination attempt on JFK that day, it was a routine mission and obviously they failed.

IF YOU ARE TRYING TO DENY YOUR INVOLVEMENT IN A CONSPIRACY TO KILL JFK THAT INVOLVED THE CIA OF WHICH YOU ARE AN AGENT AND YOU ADMIT YOU SECRETLY FLEW A PLANE TO DALLAS THAT DAY (AND THERE WAS A PASSENGER NAMED ROSELLI WHO WAS A MAFIA HITMAN) AND WAS IN THE PLAZA AS A SPOTTER BUT YOUR MISSION WAS TO FOIL AN ASSASSINATION, NOT TAKE PART IN A CONSPIRACY, THEN YOU ARE ADMITTING THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY TO KILL JFK THAT DAY THAT YOU WERE TRYING TO FOIL BUT OSWALD MANAGED TO BEAT THE CONSPIRATORS TO THE TARGET?

EVEN IF YOU DENY YOU ARE A CONSPIRATOR, IF YOU ADMIT YOU WERE THERE TO FOIL A CONSPIRACY IT MEANS IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE OSWALD HAPPENED TO KILL THE PRESIDENT ON HIS OWN ON THE SAME DAY OTHERS WERE TRYING TO ALSO KILL THE PRESIDENT AND SO THE LONE ASSASSIN THEORY IS UNTENABLE AND ALSO ADMIT OSWALD IS A CIA AGENT.

ROBERT "TOSH" PLUMLEE DECLARATION

11/21/2004

For a collection of documents on Tosh Plumlee click here

The following statements contained within this paper, are my personal story. Anything in previous publications is subject to question and is or has not been, reviewed, approved, or authorized, by me. My purpose in producing this unadulterated information and statement is to clarify previous errors of fact, which have been attributed to me. Therefore, this statement supersedes all previous versions of what others have claimed, speculated, or produced in media and print form, as being my true testimony and story.

Any reproduction of this article, in whole or in part, without written permission from the author is prohibited, and will be considered as a copyright violation and subject to the penalties provided by law.

I hereby declare the following to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Dated this 21st day of November 2004.

Part 1: Background Information

My name is William Robert Plumlee, also known as 'Tosh" I am a retired commercial pilot and have worked for and with the United States Government for many years. My background follows:

I was enlisted and assigned to military specialized operations at Fort Bliss, Texas in April of 1954.(RA18389060; Recon Training Command, RTC-D8) I was associated with various Military Intelligence units of the Fourth Army based at Fort Bliss, Texas, and also the Fourth Army Reserve, located at Dallas Love Field, Dallas Texas. This service period was in the early to mid fifties and into the early sixties.

Approximately 1962 through 1963, I was assigned to Task Force W Section- C-7 tab B and D during the Cuban Project which operated at the time from the JM/WAVE station attached to Miami, Florida's 'Cuba Desk' of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). I operated as a contract "Undercover pilot" and also, at times, I was assigned to specialized Cuban operations of the CIA's "Covert Action Group" (CAG) I was engaged in many secret operations through out the early sixties.

Some years later, after brief retirement, known as 'The Farm'. I reactivated myself and became attached as an undercover operative and contract pilot for the federal government during President Reagan's "Drug War". I was attached to a secret team known as 'America-Mexico Special Operations Group' ("AMSOG"), HQ'ed Panama Southern Command. I was also a pilot and associated with the Contra Resupply Network.

I have testified four times in close door session, to various Senate and congressional investigative committees (Director FBI 1964; J Hoover; Senator Church, 1976-75; closed-door testimony, classified TS; to Congressmen Tom Downing's investigators, before the HSCA was formed; to Senator John Kerry's Committee of 1988-91 also classified " "TS Committee Sensitive" and the "Tri-State Drug Task Force", (Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico) chaired by Arizona Governor, Bruce Babbit. The cover operation contact cut out was the Phoenix Organized Crime Div. Phoenix AZ,1975-86. I worked with Senator Gary Hart and his security adviser Bill Holden, on previous intelligence matters with the NSC and the drug war with Colombia and Costa Rica. I worked UC operations with KiKi Camarena and his pilot, before they were murdered and I was a Military/DEA contract pilot, attached to Panama and Colombia, Costa Rica Investigative Task Force on Narcotics.

I have a secret classified file as defined within the National Security statutes under the name of William Robert (Tosh) Plumlee aka William H "Buck" Pearson code named "Zapata", Miami Cuba Desk, 1960-63 MI/CIA OMC-TFW7; Section C (locate Tab B & D) classified information; portions declassified Aug 1998. Associated with Operation 40 connected to the NSC and the "White House Situations Rooms briefings. I was a contract operative for the CIA, associated with Tracy Barns, Wild Bill Harvey, Frank Bender, John Martino and many others.

I have limited this paper to one particular mission that I was assigned to on November 20, 1963. I was a covert 'contract' military Intel pilot on civilian status for this secret operation. I have titled this work as: "The Flight To Dallas; A Pilots Memoirs". I have certified this copy as a declaration and personal testimony; a true account of my activities between November 20 through November 22, 1963

***

Part 2: Flight to Dallas - November 20-22, 1963

Beginning November 20, 1963, I was assigned to be a co-pilot on a top secret flight, which was attached to a Military Intelligence unit and supported by the CIA. Our mission, we were told, was to 'Abort' a pending attempt on the President's life which was to take place in Dallas. We were contracted as "cut-outs" a system used to shield a secret operation from public exposure. Our team was based out of South Florida. My pilot for this operation was Emanuel Rojas. We had flown together before. I was the co-pilot for this operation. The first leg of the flight would be from Lantana, Florida ( about five miles south of West Palm Beach) to Tampa Florida. The aircraft used for the first phase of this trip was a D-18 Twin Beach aircraft. We took-off before day break on November 21, 1963 expecting to arrive in Tampa about sunup. We were to pick up other personal at Tampa. One of these people was John Roselli, whom I knew.

I had known John Roselli before this flight. I had flown Roselli and others to places like Cuba, Bimini, Galveston Texas, Las Vegas and California. He was also known to me as"Colonel Rawlston" or just "the Colonel". We (Rojas and I) were to pick up 'the Colonel' at Tampa's Congress Inn that morning. We changed aircraft at Tampa to a waiting DC-3 that was registered to 'Atlantic Richfield', and continued our trip to New Orleans, where a couple of people, who I did not know, got off and a few others got on. The Colonel stayed on board the DC-3. We continued our trip leaving New Orleans and continuing to Houston International Airport where we spent the night at the Shamrock Hilton, not far from the airport. We parked the aircraft on the Trans Texas side of the airport not far from the Texas Air National Guard and their AT6 type aircraft.

The next morning, November 22,1963, about 4:30-5 a.m., our weather briefing was not favorable for a VFR flight into Dallas's Red Bird airport. We selected Garland as an alternate in case the weather had not improved by the time we arrived near Dallas air space. We did not file a flight plan nor intended to file IFR. This would have left a record of our flight with air traffic control. We continued to Garland,in northeast Dallas instead of Redbird Airport in Oak Cliff, a suburb of Dallas. We made this decision because of possible bad weather southwest of Dallas that had not cleared as yet.

We arrived in Garland near daybreak. There had been so many threats against the President's life that we didn't have a great sense of urgency about this particular one. While waiting out the bad weather in Garland, and about thirty minutes after landing three of the passengers were picked up by car, including Roselli. (There are three documented corroborations of my presence at Garland airport that morning). After the weather had cleared sufficiently for the plane to continue via VFR flight rules to Redbird Airport in Dallas, we left Garland for the ten minute flight to Red Bird. We landed at Redbird around 9:30 or 10:30 a.m., perhaps as late as 11 a.m. where everybody got off and went their own way.

It was my impression at that time that I was flying an abort team into Dallas, comprised of John Roselli, a couple of Cubans and some people that I surmised were connected with organized crime in New Orleans. The CIA's specific information about the assassination, which their field personnel had obtained from Texas informants and international sources, was past to Military Intel units attached to the Pentagon. Some of this information, I had been told, came from the interrogations of Two Cubans who had plotted to fire on Air Force One with a bazooka on November 17 in West Palm Beach, Florida.

The pre-mission briefing was held at Loxahatchee, Florida on the evening of November 20th, but since I was not "field operational" at that time, except as a ‘contract pilot', I was not directly addressed at the briefing, other than routing and weather reports pertaining to flying the team into position. There would be no formal flight plans filed and the routing would be conducted under VFR (Visual Flight Rules) I only began to learn the full scope of the operation from my pilot Rojas and a field operative friend of mine named Sergio. Most of the details of this operation were told to me only after we had become airborne. I would learn more operational details upon reaching Redbird Airport.

I learned that it had been discussed by the abort team where to go, how to abort, and what to look for. I had not at first paid much attention to any of these details as bits and pieces unfolded. I was told that the abort team, for whom I was only the pilot at that time, would probably be looking for a minimum of 19 or 20 people that would be in the Plaza. Most of the team members felt that this was another false alarm, there had been many during the past few weeks. The detailed instructions to the team had come from Robert Bennett and Rex Beardsley, as well as another case office whose name I can not recall.

Although my specific assigned function was only a pilot. Upon arriving at Redbird Airport, Sergio asked me if I wanted to come along and see the President. I could also act as a spotter for him and his team, which, he said, were assigned to the south side of the plaza. I was told other members of the team would be patrolling the north side and the overpass. I understood we would be looking for a type of triangulation ambush. I gladly accepted Sergio's offer. It seemed like an adventure I didn't want to miss. We were driven from Red Bird Airport to a place not far from the Oak Cliff Country Club, then driven to Dealey Plaza, where we (Sergio and I) checked various areas and attempted to spot potential members of an attack team from the position on the South Knoll. The original information the team had received from sources in Texas and the CIA was an attempt was going to be made outside the Adolphus Hotel, but for reasons unknown to them, I was told ,the routing of the motorcade had been changed at the last minute to Dealey Plaza.

While on the south knoll, Sergio and I were attempting to evaluate the most logical places where shooters might be located, but everything was confused, the timing was off, team members were late getting into position. They were not where they were supposed to be and the limited radio contacts that we had with them were not working, or spotty at best. It was soon after our arrival that the motorcade arrived. When the shots rang out, I had the impression of 4 or 5 shots, with one being fired from behind and to my left on the South Knoll, near the underpass and south parking lot. While leaving via the south side of the underpass near the train tracks, Sergio and I smelled gunpowder. I never saw Roselli in Dealey Plaza that day.

We were picked up on the back side of the underpass, southwest side, by a person who had previously been at the Country Club. After driving away, and on the way back to Red Bird we stopped in the parking lot of Ed McLemore's Sportatorium, where Sergio changed out of the clothes he had muddied when he fell down the slippery west side of the railroad tracks. We stopped by the place in Oak Cliff, then returned to Redbird Airport. We waited for a few of the operatives who had been on our flight into Dallas to return. We waited as long as we could before departing without Roselli and some of the others. At approximately 2 o'clock in the afternoon, we took off from Red Bird without filing a flight plan. Our original flight out of Dallas called for us to fly to Shepard Air Force Base in Wichita Falls, Texas. But because of the assassination that routing was changed at the last minute by Rojas. We would head for Houston and back to south Florida.

On the plane, besides myself, were Rojas, Sergio, a person who I knew as Gator from the Loxahatchee camp, and two other individuals that I didn't know. Gator had identifying characteristics of an unusually large Adam's Apple and a missing finger, which had supposedly been bitten off at an alligator farm.

The people on the flight out of Dallas were very quiet. I interpreted their silence as dejection at the mission's failure to abort the assassination of the President. I believed that if these men had been the shooters or assassins themselves, they would have been very excited because they had carried it off. That's why to this day I take issue with the idea, which I have been asked to speculate on many times, that the attack on the President was in behalf of the CIA, Mafia, or Military Intelligence, and I had unknowingly flown an attack team in which had assassinated the President.

Part 3 - Conclusion

When I later learned that Oswald had been arrested as the lone assassin, I remembered having met him on a number of previous occasions which were connected with intelligence training matters, first at Illusionary Warfare Training in Nagshead, North Carolina, then in Honolulu at a radar installation and at Oahu's Wheeler Air Force Base, then in Dallas at an Oak Cliff safe house on North Beckley Street run by Alpha 66's Hernandez group, who had worked out of Miami prior to the assassination.

The post-mission debriefing was held on November 25th, my birthday, in West Palm Beach by Rex Beardsley, Bob Bennett and, I believe, Tracy Barnes. There was some discomfort or unhappiness about my having been present in the Plaza without authorization. Sergio was reprimanded for taking me along as a 'spotter'. The report was transmitted to field headquarters Miami to JM/WAVE Headquarters, and the CIA’s Miami Cuban Desk.

I regret that prior to the production of this narrative, the context and substance of my story has been changed and/or misstated by others to suit their own purposes. When I have spoken on tape, I have been asked to speculate on certain facts which were inaccurately produced as my own factual assertions. One of the most significant problems has been that my story has been tailored and changed to support the claims of others, about whom I knew nothing.

I certify this declaration to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Dated this 21st day of November, 2004

William Robert "Tosh" Plumlee, aka William H."Buck" Pearson. 

Is killing presidents a craze or fad?

Is killing US presidents a craze such that every time the president appears publicly he is sticking his neck out or is it a relative rarity?

If it is a relative rarity, what are the chances that a crackpot like Oswald should attempt to kill the president and succeed at the same time as there is credible information of an attempt to kill the president serious enough to fly a team to Dallas to foil?

Does that make sense to you or does it not acknowledge there was a conspiracy on that day and it is unlikely Oswald himself a CIA agent and not a crackpot was responsible?

IF YOU CONCEDE ATTEMPTS ON PRESIDENTS’ LIVES ARE RELATIVE RARITIES THEN IT IS ABSURD THAT OSWALD, HIMSELF ACKNOWLEDGED TO BE A CIA AGENT NOT CRACKPOT SHOULD ALONE KILL THE PRESIDENT AT THE SAME TIME AS A CONSPIRACY TO KILL THE PRESIDENT SERIOUS ENOUGH TO WARRANT FLYING A TEAM IN TO FOIL WAS CONCURRENT.
 

Why Tosh Plumlee’s explanation is false:

If you are on secret mission to assassinate the president then it is understandable it should be cloaked in secrecy and no flight plans are filed but if you are on a heroic mission to save the president then surely there is no need for secrecy but you should alert the president’s security and even publicize it so that the public can help spot and scare off assassins or you might even as a precaution order a cancellation or alteration of the route, it is not difficult to see the route down Elm Street is an assassin’s haven.

IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE THAT A MISSION TO HEROICALLY SAVE THE PRESIDENT SHOULD BE SHROUDED IN SECRECY SO THAT NOBODY KNOWS. IF YOUR OBJECTIVE IS TO WARD OFF ASSASSINS THEN JUST THEIR AWARENESS THEY HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED MAY SCARE THEM OFF.

HERE IS TRUE LOGIC FOR YOU:

IF A PERSON WHO IS A CIA OPERATIVE AND SUSPECT ADMITS HIS PRESENCE AT THE ASSASSINATION SITE BUT HIS EXPLANATION IS UNTENABLE THEN HIS PRESENCE MUST BE SINISTER. EVEN IF OSWALD KILLED THE PRESIDENT THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY TO KILL JFK AND OSWALD BEAT THEM TO THE GUN.

The magic bullet:

The magic bullet:

In their (preposterous) haste to convince the public of a lone assassin, the Warren Commission contended that there were only 3 shots (when there were at least 7 shots), and there was a magic bullet that wreaked multiple harm.

J. Edgar Hoover (FBI chief at Warren Commission): All three (shots were) at the President and we have them. Two of the shots fired at the President were splintered but they had characteristics on them so that our ballistics expert was able to prove that they were fired by this gun… The President – he was hit by the first and third. The second shot hit the Governor. The third shot is a complete bullet and that rolled out of the President’s head. It tore a large part of the President’s head off and, in trying to massage his heart at the hospital on the way to the hospital, they apparently loosened that and it fell off onto the stretcher. And we recovered that… And we have the gun here also.

According to the Single Bullet Theory, a three-centimeter (1.2″)-long copper-jacketed lead-core 6.5-millimeter rifle bullet fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository passed through President Kennedy’s neck and Governor Connally’s chest and wrist and embedded itself in the Governor’s thigh. If so, this bullet traversed 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a necktie knot, removed 4 inches of rib, and shattered a radius bone. The bullet was found on a gurney in the corridor at the Parkland Memorial Hospital, in Dallas, after the assassination. The Warren Commission found that this gurney was the one that had borne Governor Connally. This bullet became a key Commission exhibit, identified as CE 399. Its copper jacket was completely intact. While the bullet’s nose appeared normal, the tail was compressed laterally on one side.

(THE BULLET FOUND IN THE TROLLEY WAS A PLANT BECAUSE IT SEEMS A BULLET WAS STILL LODGED IN CONNOLLY’S LEG AND SO COULD NOT HAVE BEEN FOUND ON THE TROLLEY. THIS IS AMERICA, THEY CHEAT AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO WIN)

To complicate matters, a bystander who could not be ignored, James Tague was hit by flying concrete from a stray bullet hitting the kerb near the underpass and so if there were only three shots, only two of shots account for the president’s death and so the magic bullet hypothesis was proposed in which:

But since the predetermined conclusion of the Commission was to convict Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin, the Commission desperately clings to Specter’s single bullet theory. This THEORY asserts that one bullet emerged in almost undamaged condition, traversing through Kennedy’s neck, without hitting any bone, then piercing Connally’s torso, then shattering his wristbone and ending up in his thigh, thus causing a total of SEVEN wounds.

In reality JFK was shot in once in the back and  two times in the head (simultaneously from the back and from the front). Connally was shot in the back, in his wrist and in his leg. These wounds already account for 6 shots. With one documented miss admitted by the Warren Commission, it makes at least 7 shots. More than three shots makes more than one assassin. Thus a conspiracy in which Lee Oswald did most likely fire no shots at all. 

Coming back to haunt you:

It may not be an accident that both Bushes (and Carter) the only living presidents left failed to attend a ceremony to remember JFK. If they, especially the father were very much involved in the killing was to attend, it would prick his conscience to face the grave of the fellow president they schemed to kill.

THE FRUITS OF EVIL DEEDS ARE FAR MORE UNPALATABLE THAN FOOLS REALIZE. FATE WILL ARRANGE FOR YOU TO CONFRONT YOUR EVIL DEEDS THAT YOU HIDE FROM THE PUBLIC.

THOSE WHO SCHEMED TO HAVE THE PRESIDENT KILLED BECOME PRESIDENTS THEMSELVES AND IT WOULD BE GALLING, A PRETENSE TOO MUCH IF THEY WERE TO HYPOCRITICALLY ATTEND AT THE GRAVE OF THE MAN THEY WERE INSTRUMENTAL IN GETTING KILLED UNKNOWN TO THE WORLD.

EVIL DEEDS ALWAYS COME BACK TO HAUNT THEIR PERPETRATORS AND IT IS NOT FUN BEING HAUNTED NO MATTER HOW EVIL OR DIEHARD YOU ARE.

As a mark of respect Bush should have attended:

Even though they are Republicans, as a mark of respect for a fellow president killed in the line of duty, both Bushes should have attended but it would be too much for them to pretend to respect the man they despised and were instrumental in assassinating.

You would expect Bush & son not to attend:

If Bush snr was very much involved at the heart of the plot that saw JFK killed you would not expect him to turn up to pay respects to the man he schemed to kill nor would you expect his son who should at least know what was going on to turn up to respect the man he schemed and killed.

Nixon owed very much to the power and money of his mentor Prescott Bush to become a congressman and then VP and he was very much beholden to the Bushes and he appears to know beforehand the plot to kill JFK.

The Buddha: "These are the three governing principles."

There is in the cosmos
no secret place
for one who has done an evil deed.

Your own self knows, my good man,
whether you are true or false.
You underestimate the fine witness
that is yourself, you with evil
in yourself that then you hide.

The devas (angels) & Tathagatas see the fool
who goes about out of pitch in the cosmos.

Thus you should go about
self-governed, mindful;
governed by the cosmos, masterful,
absorbed in jhana;
governed by the Dhamma,
acting in line with the Dhamma.

The sage who makes an effort in truth doesn't fall back.

Whoever through striving
-- overpowering Mara, conquering the Ender --
touches the stopping of birth,
is Such, a knower of the cosmos, wise,
a sage unfashioned by anything at all.

The scale of cover up implies very big fishes involved:

The scale of the cover up of JFK’s assassination involving the commitment of powerful figures like FBI boss, disappearance of evidence, planting of evidence and tampering (apparently the version of the Zapruder film given to FBI had damaged frames) implies the conspiracy reaches the highest ranks of politicians who have powerful friends in high places they can pull strings to lie on their behalf and tamper with evidence and so those ultimately at the heart of the assassination must be big fish, sensational if exposed.

Warren Commission was America’s Teoh Beng Huat Inquest:

Even 50 years before Malaysia’s Teoh Beng Huat royal commission whitewashed his murder, America had done the same in the Warren Commission involving no less than the assassination of its president.

Who says America is morally better than Malaysia and Malaysia is worse than America in the rule of the law? It may be a delusion, a wrong understanding here as everywhere people think they know, they understand correctly.

Who Won the Latest Round in Apple vs. Samsung Feud?

The truth of the matter is who is right and who is wrong, never who won’t and it is never an accident people are interested in who won and not who is right.

In truth, Apple is wrong to sue Samsung and Samsung is wrong in copying Apple yet do people understand this? Anyone who is interested in who won is calculating, interested in gain and loss and this is not harmless but it is the path to eternal suffering and death.

THOSE WHO ARE INTERESTED IN WHO WON HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING, ARE DELUDED AND HEADED FOR WOE AND ENDLESS DEATH. THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS WHO IS RIGHT AND WRONG AND BOTH ARE WRONG.

BOTH ARE HEADING FOR WOE SO HOW CAN SAMSUNG OR APPLE OR BOTH WIN? THEY BOTH LOST. IN ANY FIGHT, BOTH SIDES ARE HEADING FOR HELL, SO YOU ARE DELUDED TO ASK WHO WON?

Why JFK assassination conspiracy theories thrive

Only a deluded person without true understanding barking up the wrong tree would be interested to find out why conspiracy theories thrive.

The person with true understanding focuses on whether there is evidence there is a conspiracy and cover-up. If there is evidence of a cover-up there must be a conspiracy.

THE RELEVANT QUESTION IS WHETHER THERE IS EVIDENCE OF A CONSPIRACY OR COVER UP, NEVER WHY CONSPIRACY THEORIES THRIVE, ONLY A DELUDED PERSON WILL WASTE HIS AND OTHERS TIME ANSWERING THAT IRRELEVANT QUESTION THAT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.

Credible bystander account fatal shot came from grassy knoll:

People still dispute and insist Oswald did it alone, however apart from the Zapruder film (that had frames damaged by authorities), there are credible close at hand evidence the fatal shot came from the front, from that grassy knoll.

WITHOUT KNOWING NO ONE CAN DISMISS THE SHOT CAME FROM THE GRASSY KNOLL AND THERE IS KARMA TO BE REPAID BY SUFFERING FOR SPEAKING WITHOUT KNOWING.

Family just yards from JFK assassination remain haunted by memory - but were never called to give evidence

11 Nov 2013 00:00

They were so close that they saw the bullet shatter the President's skull - it's odd that they were never called to testify

For 50 years the piercing cries of Jackie Kennedy have never left Bill Newman. As her husband lay collapsed in her lap fatally wounded, America’s First Lady screamed desperately: “Oh my God. No. They’ve shot Jack”.

Standing just 10 feet away, Bill could not have heard her words any clearer.

Along with his wife Gayle and their two toddlers, the young family were within yards of becoming casualties themselves when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated on November 22 1963.

They dived for cover as one of the shots, which Bill still believes was fired from the grassy knoll, rang out.

He says: “I have never been drawn to the conspiracy theories but I believe one of the bullets was fired from above our heads.

“I remember seeing the bullet impact on the President and his skull shatter.

“It was a horrific sight and one that will never leave me.”

But, despite being so close, bizarrely they were never called to give evidence to the Warren Commission set up to determine who had really killed JFK.

Bill says: “I’ve always found it a little strange why we were not called to testify.

“We were some of the closest people to the President at the time and I remember seeing everything so graphically and hearing the fatal shot.

“It was the visual impact that made me think the shot came down over our heads on the grassy knoll.

“We were so close to them. I remember Mrs Kennedy crying out ‘Oh my God. No. They’ve shot Jack’, as she turned around.

“I thought she was trying to get out of the car but on reflection, I believe that she was actually picking up a fragment of her husband’s skull.

“As we lay on the ground I banged my fist in to the ground saying to Gayle ‘Some son of a b***h has just shot the President’.

“We lay there for two to three minutes before thinking it was safe to get up.”

On the morning the Newmans had driven to Dallas’s Love Field airport to watch the Kennedys step off Air Force One.

As Bill held his eldest son against the chicken wire fence America’s first couple drove to within feet of the excited crowd. But because Gayle and Clifton were still too far away, they agreed they would head downtown for a second chance to see the President on his historic visit.

 “We got there with a few minutes to spare,” explains Gayle. “Bill had hold of Clifton and I had Billy.

“We could see the motorcade approaching and began leaning forward so the boys could see. I remember waving to my uncle Steve as he was a police outrider at the head of the convoy.

“As the President came close all of sudden three shots rang out. I was absolutely terrified because of my children.”

Following the first two shots the couple, then both 22, froze but as the third and fatal one came, Bill screamed for the family to get down. As they stood on the north side of Dealey Plaza they both dropped to the ground, shielding the boys as they did.

“The picture of us covering the kids on the ground created a lot of interest in our story,” says Bill. “Some people have embellished it over the years but we try to keep it straight and pure.”

Surely couple cannot get the direction wrong:
Animals like cats can pinpoint the direction of even very quiet sounds and the ability is not exclusive to animals but present also in humans.

The couple was so close to the scene and the grassy knoll was just behind them so they must BOTH be so confused to mistaken a shot that came much further in front of them from the Texas School depository with a shot that is much closer right behind them.

AND SO UNLESS THEY ARE INEBRIATED, THEIR OBSERVATION THAT THE SHOT RANG OUT JUST BEHIND THEM FROM THE GRASSY KNOLL IS TO BE TAKEN WITH CREDANCE.

WHO BETTER TO TELL WHERE THE FATAL SHOT CAME FROM THAN THE COUPLE WHO WERE FEETS AWAY FROM THE PRESIDENT WITH THE GRASSY KNOLL JUST BEHIND THEM AND THE BOOK DIRECTORY THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION MUCH FARTHER AWAY?

A difference of 180 degrees:

You may make a mistake in sound direction between two sources at an angle of say 30 degrees apart but what are chances of you making a mistake between two sources 180 degrees apart?

WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF TWO PERSONS MAKING MISTAKE OF DIRECTION OF TWO POTENTIAL SOURCES OF SOUND 180 DEGREES APART, ONE JUST BEHIND THEM AND THE OTHER MUCH FURTHER 180 DEGREES APART?

NO WONDER THE WARREN COMMISSION DECLINED TO INTERVIEW THEM, THEIR OBJECTIVE IS TO WHITEWASH NOT ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH THERE WERE MULTIPLE GUNMEN.

Why JFK was shot from front and there was a cover up:

A bullet entry (small, cleaner) and exit (big, messy) wound in the head is easy to distinguish and so any competent forensic pathologist can tell whether the shot came from the front and therefore it was fired from the grassy knoll and Oswald could not have been responsible. According to an embalmer of JFK at the funeral home there was a large gaping wound at the back of the head (exit) and small wound on right temple (entry) which would indicate a shot from the grassy knoll.

Many years later someone petitioned for JFK’s body to be exhumed for examination but he died inexplicably before he succeeded.

The couple near the car thought Jackie climbed up the boot to fetch her husband’s skull fragment and so this means he was shot from the front as depicted by the Zapruder film.

SURELY THOSE WHO DID THE AUTOPSY KNEW THE BULLET ENTERED FROM THE FRONT AND THEREFORE OSWALD COULD NOT HAVE DONE IT AND THUS THERE IS A DELIBERATE COVER UP THAT MUST REACH THE HIGHEST LEVELS FOR IT TO BE AUTHORIZED.

Conspiracy and concerted cover up a virtual certainty:

For one with true understanding, based on the facts available in the public domain, a conspiracy and coordinated cover up reaching the highest levels is the inevitable conclusion and the matter can be settled by an exhumation of his body or inspection of autopsy photos of JFK’s head wounds. If Oswald did it then why haven’t the authorities revealed autopsy photos to independent experts to confirm the president was indeed shot from the back and so Oswald likely did it?

SURELY AUTHORITIES CAN PUT ALL CONSPIRACY ALLEGATIONS TO REST BY REVEALING AUTOPSY PHOTOS SHOWING JFK’S BULLET WOUNDS. WHY HAVE THEY NOT DONE SO?

Oswald incredibly good shot or incredibly lucky:

Using his crummy rifle from the remote sixth floor Oswald with just three bullets managed to put one bullet fatally through the president’s skull and another created a hole in his back.

According to the embalmer, apart from the entry and exit skull wounds, there was a wound in the back.

Transcription

Thomas Evan Robinson
Personal contact info deleted to protect Mr. Robinson's privacy

May 26, 1992 (Phone)

Wounds:

Large gaping hole in back of head.
patched by placing piece of rubber.....over it.
Thinks skull full of Plaster of Paris.

Smaller wound in right temple.
Crescent shped, flapped down (3")

(approx 2) Small sharpnel wounds in face.
Packed with wax.

Wound in back (5 to six inches) below shoulder.
To the right of the back bone.

Adrenlin gland and brain removed.

Other organs removed and then put back.

No swelling or discoloration to face.
(Died instantly)

Dr. Berkley (family physician) came in an ask.....
"How much longer???"
He (Robinson) was told (funeral director)
"Take your time."

Is in favor of exhuming body.....to settle once and....for all.
(Robinson quote) "Good pathologists would know exactly"

Prodigy is new world chess champion

Norwegian chess prodigy Magnus Carlsen, 22, becomes the world champion, beating title holder Viswanathan Anand of India.

You do not need true understanding to be a chess champion, even an IBM computer can beat a world chess champion but instead chess demands brutal memorization of past moves and computation at the same time keeping the lid on your emotions whilst you seek to beat and not get beaten by your adversary on the other side.

ANYONE WHO MARVELS AT CHESS AND WORSHIPS CHESS PRODIGIES IS DELUDED, DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND. THE CRITICAL INGREDIENTS OF BEING A GOOD CHESS PLAYER IS OBSESSIVE PRACTICE, REMEMBERING PAST MOVES AND WHERE THEY END AND THE ABILITY TO RETRIEVE THE RELEVANT OR CORRECT SETS OF MOVES FOR A CURRENT SITUATION. COMPUTERS HAVE NO UNDERSTANDING BUT BRUTAL MEMORIZATION AND COMPUTING AND THEY HAVE BEATEN OR DRAWN WITH WORLD CHESS CHAMPIONS.

CHESS IS A DELUSIONAL GAME, A BATTLE OF WITS WITH ALMOST INFINITE PERMUTATIONS (BUT FEWER PERMUTATIONS THAT WORK IN WINNING THE GAME FOR YOU), IT IS ABOUT FIGHTING AND WINNING AND NOT GET BEATEN BY YOUR ENEMY, OF SUPPRESSING YOUR EMOTIONS IN FAVOUR OF COLD CALCULATED OR PERMUTATED OR COMPUTED PROGRAMMED LOGIC TO DEFEAT YOUR ENEMY.

Chess is about rehashing and appeals only to robots:

Everything has a nature that can be understood and so if there is such a thing called chess, it has a nature or truth that can be understood and if you do not understand the true nature of chess, you do not possess true understanding.

CHESS FASCINATES ROBOTS, IS AN OBSESSION OF ROBOTS, THEY PRIZE CHESS AND ITS TOP EXPONENTS BECAUSE CHESS IS A FEAT IN BRUTAL MEMORIZATION AND APPROPRIATE RETRIEVAL FROM MEMORY TO BE APPLIED TO A CURRENT SITUATION TO ENABLE YOU TO BEAT YOUR OPPONENT.

WHILST THERE ARE A VAST POSSIBILITIES OF MOVES ON A CHESS BOARD IN RESPONSE TO MOVES OF YOUR OPPONENTS, IN REALITY MANY OF THOSE MOVES ARE NOT VIABLE AND SO YOU MUST REMEMBER ONLY THOSE VIABLE MOVES AND AS THE GAME DRAWS TOWARDS THE END WITH FEW REMAINING PIECES, THE OPTIONS RAPIDLY DWINDLE AND CHESS IS A GAME (NOT REALITY) ENTIRELY ABOUT MEMORIZING POSSIBLE MOVES AND CORRECTLY REHASHING AND APPLYING THOSE MOVES TO THE CURRENT SITUATION AND TO PEOPLE WHO DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE CONSTANT ROBOTS REHASHING ALL THE TIME, THE GAME OF CHESS MUST HAVE UNCONSCIOUS APPEAL BECAUSE IT EPITOMIZES THE REHASHING THEY DO ALL THE TIME.

SIMILARLY PLAYING A PIANO IS ABOUT BRUTE MEMORIZATION AND PERFECT REHASH AND APPEALS TO ROBOTS, NOT NON-ROBOTS.

CHESS IS ONLY POSSIBLE BECAUSE HUMANS HAVE POWERFUL MEMORY AND RECALL FROM THAT MEMORY, INCAPACITATE THE CHESS MASTER’S MEMORY AND HE IS CRIPPLED.

WITHOUT MEMORIZATION AND REHASHING FROM MEMORY YOU CANNOT PLAY CHESS WELL.

Nuclear ambitions?

Obama urged to take action after Newsnight Saudi Arabia report

People talk about ambitions but do they understand what is meant by ambition?

Ambition is about greed, stirred mental force to want to acquire something you do not have.

AMBITION IS A FANCY WORD FOR GREED, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MEANING BUT IT IS ABOUT STIRRED MENTAL FORCE TO BE ACQUISITIVE AND SO IF YOU HAVE AMBITION TO BE A GYNECOLOGIST, YOU HAVE GREED TO BE A GYNECOLOGIST POSSIBLY BECAUSE YOU ARE OBSESSED WITH FEMALE PRIVATE PARTS.

Can your doctor be your Facebook friend too?

A friend is a friend and so you are mad or deluded to speak about Facebook friend as if Facebook has something to do with true friendship.

If you understand what is true friendship you will not pose the question. A true friend is another being who loves you, who does not use you for manipulative reasons, who assists you, provide you with a source of happiness and care and so what has this friendship got to do with being a doctor or patient which are not about truth but roles. A doctor or patient is a role or act that people who do not realize they are robots undertake and they are false and artificial and so if you treat what is false and role playing as valid basis for existence then you are deluded and it does not matter whether a doctor can or cannot be your friend.

IF YOU ARE A ROBOT WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING, YOU SUBSCRIBE TO THE ARTIFICIAL ROLES OF DOCTOR AND PATIENT THEN IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER A DOCTOR CAN OR CANNOT BE YOUR FACEBOOK FRIEND AND YOU ARE DELUDED TO THINK IT MATTERS.

TRUE FRIENDSHP IS ABOUT LOVE AND CARING, NOT MANIPULATIVE AND HARMING THE OTHER PERSON AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FACEBOOK OR BEING A DOCTOR OR PATIENT AND YOU ARE DELUDED TO THINK IT MATTERS.

AND SO THE QUESTION IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING AND THE FACT THAT YOU TAKE IT IN ALL SERIOUSNESS REFLECTS DELUSION THAT WILL END IN INSANITY FOR YOU.

If a friendship is false, nothing matters:

Friendships in this world, for one who discerns, are based on falsity, using or exploiting one another for material and sensate gains, based on lust (emotions) not reason or true love and for such fraudulent friendships it does not matter whether a person is a doctor or patient, in Facebook or not and it reflects delusion that has deadly consequences for you that you think it pertinent.

If a friendship is true, it does not matter if the person is your doctor or patient, Facebook or not Facebook.

People in this world don’t need nor want true friends:

This is a world of people who are robots, putting on a show, hiding behind masks, faking it and if you are an act you do not need true friends nor are true friends any true use for you, hiding behind an invisible barricade you built.

PEOPLE WHO ARE ACTORS, ROBOTS, PUTTING ON A SHOW ARE HIDING BEHIND AN INVISIBLE BARRICADE AND SO LONG AS THAT INVISIBLE IMPENETRABLE BARRICADE IS NOT DISMANTLED BY HIM, HE IS OUT OF BOUNDS FROM OTHERS, TRUE FRIENDS ARE USELESS TO HIM. WHAT PEOPLE CALL TRUE FRIENDS ARE FRIENDS WHO CAN BAIL THEM OUT OF DANGEROUS SITUATIONS, ASSIST THEM IN THEIR MATERIAL AND SENSATE DAILY NEEDS, DO CHORES FOR THEM AND REHASH TO THEM THINGS THEY LIKE TO HEAR AND SEEN DONE TO THEM.

EXACTLY WHAT YOU HAVE IN MIND BY ‘TRUE FRIEND’ CAN BE KNOWN. YOU MAY THINK YOU KNOW WHAT A TRUE FRIEND IS BUT YOU MAY BE DELUDED, WHAT YOU CALL A TRUE FRIEND IS A TRUE CRONY WHO CAN BAIL YOU OUT OF TROUBLE YOU SOMETIMES FOOLISHLY GET YOURSELF IN AND AFTER BEING BAILED OUT, YOU REVERT TO YOUR USUAL SINFUL MANIPULATIVE WAYS.

A fake or hollow man does not need friends, nor are they any use:

Anyone who is a fake, putting on a façade is hollow inside and although he feels lonely, he does not need true friends nor are they of any use so long as he remains hollow.

ANYONE WHO REHASHES IS A ROBOT AND A ROBOT IS A MECHANICAL PRODUCT DEVOID OF MEANING OR TRUE PURPOSE AND LONELY AS THEY MAY BE, SUFFER TERRIBLY AS THEY MAY, THEY DO NOT NEED TRUE FRIENDS NOR ARE TRUE FRIENDS ANY USE OR MEANING TO THEM. WHAT THEY NEED ARE FELLOW ACCOMPLICES TO ACCOMPLISH THEIR PLUNDER OF THE WORLD, TO BAIL THEM OUT WHEN THEY GET INTO TROUBLE AND SUPPLY THEM WITH SENSATE AND MATERIAL NEEDS.

Insight Down South

Regaining public trust

It is not good but evil to want to regain public trust which after obtained, you exploit to abuse them. What you need is to do what is true and good to those who elected you, that does not require regaining their trust.

You want their trust so that they will re-elect you and not throw you out in the next election and so that this evil and has karma.

The duty of an elected government is to do what is true and good for the people who elected them and then it is up to them to renew your tenure.

AND SO ONLY A DELUDED MAN WILL SPEAK OF REGAINING THE PUBLIC’S TRUST, IT IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE THAT ENDS IN INSANITY FOR YOU.

IT IS A WASTE OF TIME FINDING OUT WHAT A DELUDED MAN HAS TO SAY AND SO I DO NOT READ SUCH ARTICLES NOWADAYS AND SUFFER LESS STRESS AS A RESULT.

[Opinion] Instead Of Fingerprint Scanners & Curved Screens, Bring Back The QWERTY Keyboard!

Anyone who is wise has expunged all opinions because they are false and evil and he sticks only to the truth, to what he sees and knows is true.

OPINIONS ARE NEVER HARMLESS BUT THEY ARE SUFFERING AND THE WAY TO EVEN ETERNAL SUFFERING, NO ONE WHO HAS OPINIONS, IS OPINIONATED CAN GO TO HEAVEN.

OPINIONS ARE WHAT ALL PEOPLE HAVE AND ARE PROUD OF AND THEY ARE EVIL, SUFFERING NOW AND ENDLESS SUFFERING LATER.

THE WISE PERSON WORKS URGENTLY TO SCRUB ALL OPINIONS FROM HIS MIND.

I don’t want to hear opinions, I want to hear the truth:

Just as I do not appreciate opinions in myself I do not welcome others’ opinions, I want the facts, the truth or nothing and so nowadays when someone plies me with his opinion I know it is time to separate.

Welcoming opinions is welcoming poison:

If someone is proffering you his opinion and you do not know whether it is fact or opinion, then you are a fool who does not know what he hears and it does not matter how avid you are to welcome others’ opinions, they are poison and will poison you and that is the way to suffering and death.

NOWADAYS I DO NOT WELCOME OTHERS’ OPINIONS, HOWEVER EXPERT THEY ARE, OPINIONS ARE STOPPED AT MY DOORSTEP AND NOT ALLOWED ENTRY, LEST THEY POISON.

IF YOU THINK OPINIONS ARE NOURISHING FOOD, YOU CHERISH OTHERS’ OPINIONS (EG THAT YOU ARE SO PRETTY OR HANDSOME) THEN YOU ARE A FOOL, DELUDED AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO SAFETY.

Bush may be the spider in the conspiracy web:

Those who have spent much money and time over the years trying to unravel the truth about JFK’s assassination allude to Bush snr being the spider in the web of conspiracy and like most dastardly, cowardly people working in the shadows he wants to escape accountability and so he insulated himself with layers of intermediaries so that no individual along the chain who spilled the beans can point the finger at the heart of the conspiracy.

Many have been accused and are involved, the Chicago mafia and Cuban CIA operatives linked to the failed Bay of Pigs invasion supplied the hitmen, there were many independent assassination teams that day and they did not know of the others’ involvement. Although LBJ was Democrat he was a rich and apparently corrupt Texas oilman (like the Bushes), Nixon is vested and he was present in Dallas that day on the pretext of a Pepsi Cola carnival.

Bush in his high level secret involvement with the CIA and Nixon as vice president oversaw the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion that they blamed on JFK for withdrawing support. Dulles who was CIA director and linked to Bush was dismissed and he (was in the Warren Commission together with Gerald Ford a Bush crony) too may have a stake.

The Mafia mob that had connections with the CIA was involved. It is said that Nixon lost to JFK to the surprise of his mentor Prescott Bush because the Mafia rigged the elections in two key states, Illinois and Virginia to swing the narrow election to JFK.

Investigators who came too close or those involved who started talking died inexplicably but the reasons why the person who provided the fatal shot was still around may be because of the very insulation to prevent accountability which meant nobody knew all those who were involved and with the passage of time and the aging and senility of the chief protagonist, George Bush, his grip on the lid and ruthlessness began to loosen.

There were different independent teams stalking JFK that day, it seems the original plan was to carry out in Chicago but this was switched to Dallas and the Texas School Book Depository is owned by a Bush company (if the snipers in the building was not Oswald but came from outside, how did they set up shop at the windows without the owner leaving the premises open to their entry?)

The person who fired the third fatal shot, James Files was a former Army and CIA operative who acted as driver, bodyguard and hitman for another Mafia hitman Nicoletti who apparently fired the shot that hit JFK’s throat from the Dal Tex building. Another team that did not include Oswald shot from the Book depository.

James Files was told to do a job in Dallas and he got his gear together and drove to Dallas where he met Oswald, another CIA operative who familiarized him with Dallas in case he had to escape in a hurry and must know his escape routes.

His boss Nicoletti was subsequently killed gangland style and James himself was kidnapped, tortured brutally (electric cattle prod stuck up his anus) and dumped by the highway but he survived and he was serving time in a jail for attempted murder of two policemen.

Oswald was set up to be the fall guy and he was supposed to have been killed by a CIA operative to silence him but somehow he was arrested alive and Jack Ruby, a mafia operative was given the onerous task of silencing him.

JAMES FILES SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEAD IF THE MAFIA KIDNAPPERS FINISHED HIM OFF PROPERLY AND THE REASON HE WAS AROUND TO SPILL THE BEANS MAY BE BECAUSE OF THE COMPLICATED WEB OF DECEIT WHEREIN NOBODY KNEW EXACTLY ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE TOP MAN FROM PROSECUTION AND WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME AND GRIP ON MATTERS, IT WAS INEVITABLE SOMEONE WAS MISSED WHO COULD SPILL THE BEANS.

PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE VERY CLEVER, THEY CAN DEVELOP A COMPLICATED FAIL SAFE SYSTEM THAT MEANS THEY ESCAPE ACCOUNTABILITY BUT THE VERY COMPLEXITY MEANS THEY CANNOT KEEP TRACK OF EVERYTHING ALL THE TIME AND LEAVE THEMSELVES EXPOSED.

AND SO IT MAY BE, BEHIND THAT SMILING FACE OF BUSH LIES A RUTHLESS MAN WITH DEEP SHARP FANGS AND CUNNING.

A victim of your own web of deceit:

People especially those at the pinnacle, think they are very shrewd, they want to commit crime even murder but not be held to account, not be known but the very nature of such cloaks or webs of deception is that they are self defeating, unwieldy and you yourself walking the tightrope will fall victim to its deception.

Thus at the centre of your web of deception you may assign individuals A, B, C, D to carry out the crime you want accomplished, only you know A, B, C, D are involved, A does not know B, C and D are involved. In turn A, B, C and D delegate their tasks to subordinates eg A to 1,2,3, B to 4,5, 6 and D to 7,8,9.

Thus in this scheme, 8 who killed Kennedy knows D is involved but he does not know about 1-6 or A, B, C nor the top man.

But then you as top man too does not know directly who 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 are and so unless you are going to exterminate them all to cover up there is a risk that one or some of them will spill the beans and through the spilled beans, an investigator may pick up the scent that ultimately leads to you at the hidden heart of the web.

Teams of snipers and spotters:

It seems on that day there were independent teams of snipers stationed at various vantage points and there were also spotters, whose jobs were to look out or act as eyes for snipers.

The detour down Elm Street seems designed with snipers in mind and whoever arranged the route the president took must be complicit.

How ambitious Prescott Bush started:

Prescott got to where he was by first marrying a rich man’s daughter and thereafter his wheeling and dealing and connections with government started to snowball and he was very much pulling strings behind the scenes. Similarly LBJ married a rich man’s daughter if I remember correctly.

It may not be an accident the Bushes are involved with CIA because there is economically valuable information that comes with spying that can be avenue for corrupt gains.

NIXON WAS A PROXY FOR THE BUSHES, OWED HIS ASCENT TO THE BUSHES AND AS VICE PRESIDENT, HE OVERSAW THE CUBAN INVASION TOGETHER WITH DULLES THE CIA DIRECTOR AND BUSH THE ORGANIZER BEHIND THE SCENES JUST AS BUSH THE VP OVERSAW THE IRAN CONTRA AFFAIR. THUS OF THE THREE, NIXON, BUSH AND DULLES, BUSH MAY BE THE ONE HANDS ON WITH THE DISASTROUS BAY OF PIGS INVASION.

WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT AMBITION YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT GREED, A VERY AMBITIOUS MAN IS A VERY GREEDY MAN AND HE WILL DO ANYTHING TO GET WHAT HE WANTS.

Battersea project financing secured

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian consortium of S P Setia Bhd, Sime Darby Property and the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) which is undertaking the Battersea Power Station redevelopment project in London has secured £790.2mil (RM4bil) in financing.

This is an example of a wrong and dangerous approach to economic matters that deluded people see nothing wrong, see is right.

It means the developers do not have the money, need to borrow to finance and this is only necessary because they want to make money faster than they could without finance and banks are willing to lend people or depositors money in the name of making money that has considerable danger in terms of loss by default either the developers or foolish buyers.

IT IS DANGEROUS/RISKY TO PROVIDE FINANCE TO DEVELOP PROPERTY AND IT IS NEEDED BECAUSE DEVELOPERS GREEDILY WANT TO MAKE MONEY QUICK AND BANKERS WANT TO MAKE MONEY QUICK TOO AND REGULATORS AND PEOPLE ARE DELUDED, THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG WHEN IT IS DANGEROUS.

IN TRUTH THE PROJECTS ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND SHOULD NOT BE FINANCED AND SUCH RISK TAKING INEVITABLE LEAD TO LOSSES THAT ARE PASSED ON TO THE SYSTEM BY POLITICIANS.

An unsustainable boom built on debt:

Whilst the developers are building the project, they create employment and profit for many different sectors like property agents, mortgage lenders, furnishing, construction, etc but when the project is completed these jobs cease and those who have benefited from this boom or similar booms elsewhere to borrow to finance their property purchase may become jobless and end up insolvent.

SUCH PROPERTY PROJECTS ARE IN TRUTH UNNECESSARY AND DANGEROUS TO FINANCE. WHILST THEY ARE BEING BUILT AND WEALTH TRANSFERRED TO DEVELOPERS, MANY JOBS ARE CREATED AND MANY INDUSTRIES MAY BENEFIT BUT ONCE CONSTRUCTION HAS ENDED, THOSE WHO BOUGHT ARE FACED WITH REPAYING THEIR PURCHASES AND IF THEY BECOME JOBLESS, IT WILL BE DISASTROUS.

Mental and physical scars never heal but consolidate and finally kills:

Throughout their lives here, all beings are subject to assaults, minor and major, mental (eg hurt, grief, anguish) and physical (sprain ankle jogging, cuts and bruises).

It does not matter whether the injury or suffering is mental or physical, minor or major, they all have residues, scars, they never totally heal and these residual injuries consolidate with age and overwhelms the fool who thinks all will be fine. Further mental or emotional suffering tends to increase with age, through conditioning, sadness and depression become easier to arise to stronger levels that get more difficult to shake off and might drive the depressed fool to suicide.

The wise person who understands the nature of suffering whether mental or physical, minor or major will minimize his exposure to things that cause suffering (eg avoid anger, avoid exercise that leads to injury and wear and tear, only conscientiously do minimal work) so that he has as comfortable an existence here, he would quit this world by following that exist out of this world of torment and death.

This pathway out of suffering begins with the establishment of the first higher state of mind (no use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness) that gives one Age in heaven, the second higher state, no thinking that gives 2 Ages in heaven, progressing to neither like nor dislike with four Ages in heaven and neither pain nor pleasure that gives 500 ages.

ALL SUFFERING WHETHER MENTAL OR PHYSICAL, MINOR OR MAJOR NEVER TOTALLY HEALS BUT THEY PROGRESSIVELY WORSEN WITH AGE, ESPECIALLY EMOTIONAL TRAUMA THAT BECOMES EASIER AND MORE INTENSELY STIRRED WITH AGE AND SO THE WISE PERSON WILL AVOID ACTIVITIES THAT LEAD TO SUFFERING, WILL ESTABLISH THE PATH OUT OF THE HELL OF THIS WORLD NAMELY THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND, NO STYLE, NO THINKING, NO LIKE OR DISLIKE, NO PAIN OR PLEASURE.

Turning inwards for true happiness:

Increasingly I am disenchanted, disinterested in the external world which is a source of stress, suffering that destroys the mind and body and I am turning inwards for solace, peace and deep free happiness.

WHATEVER HAPPINESS ANYONE CAN FIND EXTERNALLY IS ACTUALLY SUFFERING, SHALLOW, INSECURE AND DESTROYS OR WEARS DOWN HIS MIND AND BODY AND SO THE WISE PERSON LEARNS TO DISSOCIATE WITH THE EXTERNAL WORLD AND TURN INWARDS FOR A HAPPINESS THAT IS FREE, DEEPER, SATISFYING. HE ELEVATES HIS CONCENTRATION UP THE FOUR HIGHER STATES OF MIND THAT ARE THE ONLY ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING OF EXISTING IN THIS WORLD. THE HIGHER YOUR CONCENTRATION, THE HAPPIER YOU BECOME AND YOU KNOW YOU ARE SAFE FROM DANGERS AFTER YOU PASS AWAY.

US bombers challenge China air zone

Whilst China is wrong, acquisitive to declare the air zone, the US is provocative, challenging to do so and that has karma and if through some miscalculation it leads to conflict the US has very much to blame.

The US has no business to be at the doorsteps of China just as China or Russia would have no business to be at the doorsteps of New York and so this act by the US has serious karma for those responsible, if it leads to conflict they are very much to blame.

THAT THE US IS ALIGNED TO ALLIES, KOREA AND JAPAN TO CHALLENGE IS NOT A VALID REASON TO ACT, TO INTIMIDATE CHINA OR SHOW WHO IS THE BOSS TOO ARE WRONG REASONS AND SO THOSE IN CHARGE IN THE US ARE NOT GOOD OR RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE DOMINEERING AND PROVOCATIVE AND SOONER OR LATER IT WOULD LEAD TO CONFLICT.

The US is a bully:

Whether the US is a bully or gangster is objective, cannot be refuted and if it is a bully and you do not think so then you have wrong view that is the way to hell or the animal womb.

If the US was a weakling, do you think it would dare fly two bombers into China’s air zone? And so it is only because the US thinks it is all powerful, can get away with it, can rub China’s nose that it does so. Not just here but everywhere the US is a bully, the glutton who pays for goods from the world by money it prints that it cannot back up.

You scratch my back and I scratch your back

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

It is never in truth and goodness a case that you scratch my back I scratch your back but you do what is correct and good and I do what is correct and good and because it is wrong he is deluded, incurring karma for advocating what is wrong for others.

He is not the first to say that and so it is copied and rehashed and he is a somnolent robot who does not understand what he speaks that is copied and rehashed.

You scratch my back and I scratch your back is advocating self serving, mutual material benefit, doing things without considering whether it is right or wrong.

IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO REPAY IN SUFFERING YOU SHOULD NEVER SCRATCH ANOTHER’S BACK NOR PERMIT OTHERS TO SCRATCH YOUR BACK WHATEVER YOUR SCRATCHING DENOTES.

Jack Ruby admitted he was ordered to kill Oswald:

I have an interest in this case since 1988. It started with a british documentary airing on dutch television, where I saw a film fragment of Jack Ruby saying to the press that powerful people were behind this (JFK) murder, and that they would do anything not to let the truth come to the surface. He clearly hinted that he had been forced to kill Lee Harvey Oswald.

The true reason for Watergate:

It seems Watergate by seven CIA operatives (who were involved in JFK's assassination) was not about wiretapping but to obtain files incriminating those involved in JFK’s assassination and they had to be covered.

Quote: Watergate has never been investigated because Ford gave Nixon a presidential pardon. Nixon had made sure to replace Spiro Agnew by Ford as his Vice President. And as you recall, Ford was also a Warren Commission member. The official story is that the Watergate burglars broke in to place some bugs. But that is not believed by everyone. You don't need 7 men to place a bug and those burglars were all CIA men tracing back to Dealey Plaza. E. Howard Hunt worked together with David Atlee Phillips and it has been proven he was in Dallas that day. Just like Frank Sturgis. His real name was Frank Fiorini and he was a lieutenant for Giancana. Martinez, Gonzalez and Barker were also operation 40 members, anti Castro Cuban exiles like Posada and Rodriguez. There seems to be a connection between Watergate and Dallas and lots of researchers think the Watergate break in had nothing to do with listening devices but was done to steal incriminating documents files exposing the conspiracy of the JFK assassination. Unfortunately this remains speculation since the case was closed by Ford and his pardon.

Prescott Bush was angry with JFK:

Prescott Bush, the father of the two Bushes, a senator himself wrote in a letter to the wife of Allan Dulles whom JFK dismissed as CIA director as result of the Bay of Pigs, expressed his anger and blamed Kennedy for the Bay of Pigs and so you have a motive for revenge that involved the Bushes, Nixon as VP and protégé of Prescott, was nominal head of the Cuban venture, Allen Dulles as CIA director was part of the triumvirate but the person who run the Cuban plot was likely George Bush and so he too would have cause for revenge on JFK.

The Bushes apparently like the Kennedys are the rich of New England, they had a mansion in Kennebunkport and so the Bushes and Kennedys may be bitter rivals even enemies.

Prescott to Dulles’ wife: "He (Allan Dulles) tried to make a pleasant evening of it, but I was rather sick of heart, and angry too, for it was the Kennedy's that brought about the fiasco. And here they were making Allen to be the goat, which he wasn't and did not deserve. I have never forgiven them."