Thursday, July 25, 2013

The right and wrong reasons for retirement:



The right and wrong reasons for retirement:
There comes a time when those who work for a living must retire and people have many different reasons for retiring and most of them are wrong which means they do something for a wrong reason that ends in insanity and suffering.
I am too old or sick to continue is a wrong reason for retiring.
I have made enough money is a wrong reason for retirement.
I want to enjoy the rest of my life, see places, do things is a wrong reason for retirement.
I don’t need the money is a wrong reason for retiring.
It is materially advantageous to retire than continue is a wrong reason for retiring.
The correct reason for retiring is because all work is suffering that conditions the person to suffering that will not end with death but even thereafter and the wise person wants to escape from suffering now and forever.
All work is entanglement, even when the vast majority retire they are still entangled. If you retire to disentangle yourself, to minimize social contact with this deluded and troublesome world then that is a right reason to retire.
THERE IS LIFE AFTER DEATH AND FOR MOST PEOPLE IT IS BETTER IF THERE IS NO LIFE AFTER DEATH BECAUSE THEY HAVE A LOT TO ACCOUNT FOR, SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN SAYS THE BUDDHA AND WORK IS ENTANGLEMENT WITH THIS WORLD, IT IS SUFFERING AND ADDICTS TO SUFFERING AND SO THE CORRECT REASON FOR RETIREMENT IS DISENGAGEMENT, SEPARATION FROM THIS WICKED DETAINING WORLD.
The Buddha: How to see correctly
The Buddha said when a person sees (or hears or smells or tastes or touch) without arising greed, ill will or delusion, he sees/perceives correctly, as it actually is.
If something you see stirs a thought or thoughts in you and these are deluded then you see wrongly.
ONLY WHEN A PERSON PERCEIVES (SEES, HEARS, SMELLS, TASTES, TOUCH) WITHOUT ARISING GREED, HATE AND DELUSION DOES HE PERCEIVE CORRECTLY AND BECAUSE BEINGS IN THIS WORLD ALWAYS PERCEIVE WITH ARISEN GREED, HATE AND DELUSION THEY NEVER SEE CORRECTLY AND THUS NEVER UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING AND THIS IS THE PATH TO WOE AND DEATH.
The correct purpose of the Fed is not to soothe markets but do what is right for the country’s economy and finances and so if Bernanke is doing that it shows he is a fool barking up the wrong tree and the nation’s financial system is in the hands of a fool.
One may argue that soothing the markets is crucial to maintaining the (economic) wellbeing of the nation but that is delusion. The markets is not the nation, it is only one faction, the powerful wealthy faction that is only interested in grabbing more money, siphoning more money that depletes the system.
AS CHAIRMAN OF FED ONE SHOULD NEVER CONSIDER SOOTHING THE MARKET BUT CONCENTRATE ON DOING WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE ECONOMY. SOOTHING THE MARKETS IS APPEASING THOSE WHO ARE (GANGSTERS) WEALTHY AND INTERESTED IN GRABBING MORE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE REST AND SO HE IS MISGUIDED, DELUDED, LIKE THE REST AND YOU HAVE A FOOL AT THE HELM NOT GENIUS OR WISE MAN.
THUS IF YOU LOOK TO BERNANKE TO BE YOUR SAVIOUR YOU ARE LOOKING TO SOMEONE WHO WILL LEAD YOU TO RUIN.
Don’t worry the markets will collapse:
Don’t worry the markets will collapse, if there is money to be made the capitalists will be around like flies swarming around shit. If you have run out of shit (money) you should not create and supply more shit to attract the flies but you should live within the shit you can produce.
One should look after the economy and so if it is overheated, too heavily in debt, it should be reined in, cooled down rather than pour more alcohol into the punch bowl making the people more drunk and the already bulging pockets of capitalists or markets bulge even more with worthless pieces of paper you printed to keep the party going with even more disastrous, calamitous consequences down the line.
People think they talk such great sense when they are dabbling with nonsense or delusion and heading for insanity.
There is no need to have impressions and interpretations of anything. It is only something said or done that is false or the person receiving cannot see things truly that it is subject to impressions and interpretations.
The Buddha said in many places, many times that of all beings, formed and formless, many legs or no legs he is the highest, is that clear to you or do you need to form impressions and interpretations?
Thus it is only if a matter is not true, not clearly stated and therefore false or deceptive, intending to not tell the truth and not worth knowing or you have false perception, you cannot see things clearly as they actually are, you are conceited, have self identity views that you need impressions and interpretations.
WHATEVER IS THE TRUTH DOES NOT REQUIRE INTERPRETATIONS, IT IS ONLY WHAT IS DECEPTIVE AND THEREFORE NOT WORTH KNOWING THAT REQUIRES INTERPRETATIONS. WHAT IS INTERPRETED IS NOT THE TRUTH. THE TRUTH IS NOT AN INTERPRETATION. THERE IS NO NEED TO HAVE IMPRESSIONS OF SOMETHING, JUST SEE IT AS IT ACTUALLY IS AND THAT IS NOT AN IMPRESSION WHICH IS ALWAYS A FALSE DELUDED PERCEPTION OF SOMETHING.
THE TRUTH IS NOT AN IMPRESSION OR INTERPRETATION, IT IS THE TRUTH.
The truth can only be understood not interpreted:
The truth or whatever is true cannot be interpreted, never requires interpretation but is to be seen as it actually is and thus understood as such and such.
Thus whatever is an interpretation is a falsification of the truth or a falsification of something seen falsely.
ANYONE WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF WHAT IS TOUTED, IMPRESSIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS OR HE ACCEPTS IT AS VALID MUST DO SO WITH RAISED SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
This is an interpretation (not the truth) of something happening and it is always false never true.
What happened is that weak PC sales depresses Microsoft’s profit and it is interpreted as weak PC market catching up with Microsoft.
Whatever is an interpretation is unnecessary and never the truth and it is a form of giving it a spin to sound impressive. No catching up is involved and you are misleading yourself and others that it is so. You think you are very clever but you are putting your head on the chopping board.
PETALING JAYA: Denying sex bloggers Alvin Tan and Vivian Lee bail on the grounds that they have a “tendency to incite the public” is tantamount to punishment, say lawyers.
As a judge you should know the law better than the layman and there is greater duty for you to act within the law and thus if the judge arbitrarily denied bail and abused his power he is foolishly asking for even worse divine punishment for abuse of the law.
JESUS SAID THOSE WHO WEAR LONG ROBES WILL RECEIVE THE GREATER CONDEMNATION AND SO GUARDIANS OF THE LAW WHO ABUSE THE LAW WILL RECEIVE GREATER CONDEMNATION.
If something is true and good, always you must abide in it, not a time for it and a time not for it.
Restraint is needed if you have a bad tendency that you restrain. If you never possess ill will, what restraint of ill will do you require and if you have ill will then all the restraint in the world does not make you truly clean.
Only those who speak and act without knowing what they speak or act is  beneficial or harmful need reflection, those who reside in truth and benevolence (as is possible) do not require reflection.
Thus your advice may be full of goodness falling on receptive ears or it may be so much empty advice falling on deaf ears. In other words what is said is platitude.
IF SOMETHING IS MEANINGFUL AND GOOD IT IS NOT A PLATITUDE, IF SOMETHING SAID OR DONE IS FOR SHOW, SOUNDS GOOD BUT NOT GOOD AND FALLS ON DEAF EARS IT IS CALLED A PLATITUDE.
Interpretations of the law?
The law does not require interpretation by anyone but it should be understood and implemented. People speak of interpretation of the law because they want to dispute the law or attack the law for nefarious purposes like escaping punishment for themselves or their clients. Thus murderers have been known to be discharged because witnesses subsequently admitted they perjured. Just because they perjured does not mean the whole case is wrong.
THERE IS NEVER A NEED TO INTERPRET THE LAW WHICH IS SPELT OUT CLEARLY, WHAT IS NEEDED IS UNDERSTANDING THE LAW AND IMPLEMENTING IT AND SO ANYONE WHO CLAMOUR FOR INTERPRETATIONS IS ASKING FOR SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT.
IT MAY BE TRUE THE LAW REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BUT IF IT IS YOUR WRONG UNDERSTANDING THEN THAT IS DELUSION AND IT IS THE PATH TO FUTURE WOE EVEN ETERNALLY.
Programming work is needed to form impressions and interpret:
Forming impressions and interpreting are never free but you need to do work to form anything and you need work to interpret.
If you never formed anything, never formed impressions you save yourself work that is always suffering.
If you never interpreted anything you also save work that is always suffering.
Not only does a person have to work to interpret or form impressions it is programming such that in time the person is programmed to interpret and form impressions of everything.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO FORM IMPRESSIONS OR INTERPRET ANYTHING, ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS UNDERSTAND WHATEVER HAPPENING WHICH IS BASED ON SEEING THINGS AS THEY ARE AND DOES NOT REQUIRE WORK EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION.
YOU ALWAYS NEED TO WORK TO FORM IMPRESSIONS OR INTERPRET AND WORK IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO SUFFER, CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO ALWAYS FORM IMPRESSIONS AND INTERPRET.
What is the work of forming impressions and interpreting?
In order to form impressions you have to take what you see, ask yourself what you see or what you think it is and then commit that to memory or impression that you may approximately or precisely record to be recalled in the future to explain things happening and that is always significant work that is suffering. The person who does not form impressions, who sees correctly and understands correctly what he sees does not have to bother with forming impressions to be recorded. He remembers what he saw but that is not the same as forming an impression and recording that impression.
Again when you interpret you have to take what you saw and work to interpret or try to explain what you saw often with reference to past experiences.
FORMING IMPRESSIONS AND INTERPRETING IS SOMETHING A BEING HAS TO DO, IT DOES NOT OCCUR WITHOUT WORK AND THE WORK IS NOT NEGLIGIBLE AND SO IT IS UNDERTAKING UNNECESSARY SUFFERING THAT IS CONDITIONING, CONDITIONS THE PERSON TO ALWAYS FORM IMPRESSIONS AND INTERPRET.
IF YOU DON’T FORM IMPRESSIONS OR DON’T INTERPRET YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO WORK AND THAT IS NEVER SUFFERING BUT RELEASE FROM SUFFERING.
An impression is a visual or written snapshot:
A person with true understanding never take snapshots or impressions of things happening, he pays attention to the entirety of things happening and understands entirely what is happening and that is not a snapshot.
A person who does not realize he is a rehashing robot always take snapshots of what is happening and based on those snapshots he forms impressions that are inaccurate or false as to what is happening.
WHEN PEOPLE TALK ABOUT IMPRESSIONS THEY ARE UNWITTINGLY ACKNOWLEDGING THEY ARE ROBOTS WHO NEVER SEE THE ENTIRETY OF THINGS HAPPENING, THEY TAKE SNAPSHOTS AND THOSE SNAPSHOTS PLUS THEIR VERBAL OR THOUGHT INTERPRETATIONS ARE THEIR IMPRESSIONS OF SOMETHING HAPPENING, OF SOMEONE THEY SEE.
Forever left behind:
Time waits for no man and if you are forever forming impressions and interpreting things then things are passing you by whilst you make impressions and interpret and you are left behind in your make believe world of impressions and interpretations whereas the person who does not form impressions or interpret remain in tandem, in touch with reality.
Is Kate due today?
It is actually a frivolous question, there is no big deal and if you pose a question that others cannot answer in truth then you are asking others to trouble themselves to answer a question that is not answerable by truth that has demerit to be experienced as future suffering even insanity and you are a fool to think nothing even good asking the foolish question.
Only falsity can be interpreted, truth can only be explained:
Only what is false can be interpreted, what is true can only be explained, truth that is interpreted becomes false.
Truth requires no interpretation, it can only be seen and understood and whatever truth subjected to interpretations no longer is the truth.
What is false cannot be truly explained; it can only be found to be false or interpreted in many different ways because it is false.
Thus ‘deafening silence’ cannot be explained, it can be dismissed as false or interpreted in many different ways why silence is deafening.
Whatever is true, ‘silence can never deafen’ does not require interpretation, it can only be explained why silence cannot deafen.
THUS ANYONE WHO DELVES IN INTERPRETATION IS DELVING IN FALSITY, DELUSION NOT TRUTH. EITHER THE MATTER HE IS DWELLING ON IS FALSE OR NONSENSE OR IF IT IS TRUE, HE HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND NOT UNDERSTANDING HE RESORTS TO INTERPRETING THE MATTER HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND.
THE PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTAND NEVER INTERPRETS BECAUSE HE SEES WHAT IS TRUE AS TRUE THAT REQUIRES NO INTERPRETATION AND WHAT HE SEES THAT IS FALSE HE SEES AS FALSE SO WHAT IS THERE TO INTERPRET?
WHENEVER MONKS DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID, THEY APPROACH DESIGNATED ELDERS NOT FOR AN INTERPRETATION OF WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID BUT AN EXPLANATION OF WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID.
The truth about Singapore:
“Singapore is world’s third richest country, Forbes March 30, 2012;
 “One in six Singapore householders are millionaires: Boston Consulting.”
 “Yet another wealth report has put tiny Singapore as the wealthiest nation in the world by GDP per capita, beating out Norway, USA, Hong Kong and Switzerland: Wall Street Journal.” – Aug 15, 2012.
37% of residents here, including the ultra-rich, are foreigners.
Many of the millionaires and billionaires mentioned were not Singapore citizens.
The average Singaporean earns barely enough to pay off housing and raising a family.
The extreme wealth was only half the truth since it left out the high level of household debts, especially for housing, children’s university education, parental healthcare costs among others.
The riches is only half the story; the other half is mortgages and debt.
Singapore s household debt – at 75% of the GDP last year (up from 38% in 2000) – was worse than Hong Kong’s 61%.
The biggest cause is the craze for property which spiralled over the past five years.
This amount of leverage could very possibly see banks succumbing as well, should a majority of their loans default,” said a commentator.
Debt per adult in Singapore is nearly US$40,000. However it is doubtful if it includes people’s large housing loans (US 40,000 may be underestimation).
As individuals prosper, so does people’s debts with the help of low interests, particularly among the well-educated young. (Low interest rates are criminal not good, encourage people to get into debts, should interest rates rise later many are left with a noose around their necks)
Official figures show that there were 65,804 loan sharking cases in the last four and a half years – or about 1,200 cases a month.
The government is getting worried about the rising level of personal loans – judging from the following measures to curb borrowings.
On July 1, the central bank introduced rules to cap a property (of all types) buyer’s monthly payments at 60% of his income.
This was to reduce the chances of buyers being caught out by a rise in interest rates.
In February, it imposed limits on bank loans for motor vehicle purchases, capping certain loans at 50-60% of purchase price.
Seven months ago, the central bank proposed rules to encourage responsible use of credit card and unsecured credit rules aimed at discouraging people to get into greater debt.
Amidst our growing wealth, why are so many Singaporeans falling into debt?
The accumulation generally starts young from university graduates whose starting salary is about S$2,710 (RM6,811). Not all is attributed to a lavish lifestyle.
A money website recently painted a picture of a newly-wedded couple, working graduates, with a combined salary of S$8,000 (RM20,106), who are lucky enough to buy a new Housing Development Board (HDB) three-room flat for S$350,000 (RM879,500).
This is a normal start to two or three decades of debt repayment, not to mention a list of smaller items like the wedding costs, a ring and most likely a medium-size car costing around S$120,000 (RM301,606).
One of the changes in Singapore is the widening inequality between the rich and poor, even without considering foreigners in our midst.
Decades of prosperity and rising property values have helped many of the middle-class to upgrade, their riches rising substantially.
Others have dropped into the poverty class. The city’s dilemma is the widening gap between the rich and poor, technically computed as Gini coefficient.
On OECD measurement, Singa-pore’s Gini coefficient of 0.478 last year was the widest in the world.
This makes it confusing to judge articles about extreme wealth and increasing poverty, since both are true.
To put things into perspective, there are signs of prosperity among the upper class in certain areas.
In central places often used by the upper middle class, restaurants are packed and branded goods fly off the shelves. (There are two sets of Singaporeans, those who have and those who have not, those who are in demand are few but those not in demand struggle)
State TV still runs frequent advertisements about Singapore being a happy place with dancing crowds of all ages and races prancing around (Much like Malaysia where state media is full of promotion of Malaysia Boleh and so Singapore’s government is SIMILAR not different from Malaysia’s).
Not everyone agrees.
An English-language newspaper wrote: “Singaporeans are among the world’s wealthiest, but they are not necessarily a happy lot.”
What has this got to do with the case? If it has nothing to do with the case and you think it is relevant you are courting insanity and will get it.
IT IS NOT A MATTER OF TRAYVON COULD HAVE BEEN OBAMA BUT IS THE KILLING WRONG AND THE KILLER GUILTY. YOU HAVE A SILLY PRESIDENT WITHOUT TRUE LOGIC.
Explain versus interpret:
When you explain something, you make clear something to another who is unable to visualize as it is what is said.
When you interpret you are attempting to view or make sense something you did not understand in terms of something else, a false understanding you recorded in your mental jukebox.
EXPLAINING AND INTERPRETING ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS THAT ARE NOT TO BE CONFUSED. WHATEVER IS TRUE CAN BE EXPLAINED TO THOSE WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND, WHAT IS FALSE CANNOT BE TRULY UNDERSTOOD AND SO IT MUST BE INTERPRETED INTO SOMETHING ELSE.
An interpreter is a converter:
When someone works as a French interpreter he essentially converts another language into French and so interpreting is mechanical, about converting A into B, when you interpret something you did not know or understand either because you do not possess true understanding or the matter is false, you are essentially converting the matter into something you have a ready programmed false understanding that you can rehash to ‘explain’ what is happening.
Interpreting is totally unnecessary, false and suffering, you need to do work to interpret, it is trying to explain something false or you cannot understand in terms of another which you have a recorded rehashable understanding.
Interpreting is something programmed in the person and he is ‘forever’ interpreting things rather than understanding things and it is suffering and lapsing into falsity. A person who does not interpret does not suffer and he is constantly in touch with reality unlike the interpreting person who must momentarily suspend contact with reality to interpret what is happening.
Anyone who entraps another, whether you are police or whatever is guilty of sin heading for even eternal woe.
You are deluded if you think God sets traps for you. It is the Devil who entraps and there is never good entrapment, all entrapment is evil, partaking of evil that ends in eternal woe for you.
Only robots interpret:
Interpreting is what robots do all the time in lieu of or substitute of understanding things as they actually happen. When something happens, robots always referring to the library of mental recordings of what it could be and interpret what happened in terms of those recordings and if he cannot find one, he Googles or find one recorded understanding in the internet.
A PERSON WHO DOES NOT REALIZE HE IS A ROBOT IS ALWAYS INTERPRETING THINGS HAPPENING INSTEAD OF SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING, HE HAS A LIBRARY OF READYMADE EXPLANATIONS THAT HE MAY PERIODICALLY ADD TO, TO WHICH HE REFERS TO, TO EXPLAIN WHAT IS HAPPENING.
He is advocating trust and foolishly putting his head on the chopping board not once but even many times without knowing.
Leave others to decide for themselves who they will trust because it is dangerous and blind to trust others and if you tell others to trust and they end up in loss, suffering or death you have blood on your hands to be repaid as suffering.
TRUST IS THE OPPOSITE OF SUSPICION AND TRUST IS NOT A DECISION YOU MAKE FOR OTHERS BUT IT IS FOR OTHERS TO MAKE AT THEIR OWN PERIL. THOSE WHO SEE DO NOT TRUST, THEY SEE THE NATURES OF THOSE THEY DEAL WITH AND THERE IS NO QUESTION OF TRUSTING OR BEING SUSPICIOUS. FOR THOSE WHO CANNOT SEE AND MUST TRUST OR BE SUSPICIOUS YOU DON’T TELL OTHERS TO TRUST, DELIVER THEMSELVES TO BE TRICKED BY OTHERS UNLESS YOU WANT TO BE DELIVERED TO THE CHOPPING BOARD YOURSELF.
WHY IS HE SO KEEN TO MOVE FORWARD? YOU DO NOT HAVE TO MOVE FORWARD AND IF THERE ARE SERIOUS ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED, YOU DO NOT TELL OTHERS TO SWEEP IT UNDER THE CARPET, SET IT ASIDE AND TRUST BUT WITHOUT RESOLUTION OF THOSE ISSUES THERE CANNOT BE GENUINE TRUST, ONLY TRUST IN THE NAME OF GETTING WHAT YOU WANT.
Trust and suspicion are functions of force never reason:
Trust and distrust (suspicion) are functions of force and programming and so anyone who truly understands would not speak of either, it is those who are deluded, who do not have true understanding who speak of trust and distrust which are not good but evil.
This is a world (entirely) of hypocrisy, people are faking it, not good as they tout themselves and so it is dangerous to trust anyone here.
Trust is about using force to open yourself, expose yourself or your secrets (eg how much in the bank and what is the password) to another based on hearsay or recommendations of others that he is reliable or faulty yardsticks of trustworthiness that you subject him to (eg he did not steal the watch you left in his presence).
You never order yourself to trust another just because others say so or he did not steal in the past (passed the test), that is a form of programmed action in which you the trusting person is a robot but you see the person as he actually is, as is actually possible and thus knowing him you know he is a danger or not. A person of integrity does not mix with people of no integrity, he only interacts with people of no integrity minimally, at a distance as necessary.
THE BUDDHA SAID HE IS WORTHY OF WORSHIP, OF GIFTS, VERY FEW IN THIS WORLD ARE WORTHY OF WORSHIP AND THEREFORE NOT TO BE TRUSTED EXCEPT IF YOU ARE BLIND OR A FOOL.
TRUST AND DISTRUST ARE PROGRAMMED ACTIONS DRIVEN BY FORCE AND WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING. A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING NEITHER TRUSTS NOR DISTRUSTS OTHERS, HE KNOWS THE TRUE NATURES OF OTHERS THAT ARE ALL THERE TO BE SEEN BY THOSE WHO SEE THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE.
IF YOU CAN SEE THE PERSON IS BAD, WHAT IS THERE TO TRUST? IT IS WHEN YOU CANNOT SEE IF THE PERSON IS GOOD OR BAD BUT FOR SELFISH GREEDY REASONS YOU WANT TO ACCEPT HIM THAT YOU TRUST HIM.
Trust and distrust are programs:
Trust and distrust is something you order yourself to do with regard to a person or object that is indiscriminate, not specific to an occasion, not a case by case basis.
ONLY THOSE WHO ARE ROBOTS TRUST AND DISTRUST OTHERS AND TRUST AND DISTRUSTS ARE PROGRAMS, INSTRUCTIONS THAT YOU ACTIVATE AND CARRY OUT SO THAT ONCE YOU IDENTIFY THE PERSON AND CONFIRM HE IS TRUSTED BY YOU, YOU LOWER YOUR GUARD, ACCEPT HIM AND EXPOSE YOURSELF TO HIM AND ACCEPT WHAT HE TELLS YOU ARE TRUE AND GOOD FOR YOU.
RATHER THAN GOOD THIS IS ALWAYS EVIL, DANGEROUS AND CONDITIONS YOU TO BE A ROBOT.
Trust is an action that is programmed:
You talk about trust and you hear others speak of trust but do you understand what trust is?
Trust is an action undertaken by a person essentially to accept another, to lower one’s guard in relation to that person and open one’s secrets to him.
Because trust is not a case by case basis, not specific to the occasion action it must be a programmed blind indiscriminate action and anyone who trusts is an unwitting robot.
TRUST IS A NONSPECIFIC, GENERAL ACTION AND ONLY ROBOTS TRUST.
From butt man to family man: Scott Disick relaxes at pool with swimsuit-clad Kourtney Kardashian the morning after judging 'Miss BumBum' contest
What is said conforms to a very common format, is a false copied style of speech. The format goes like this ‘from X to Z, blah, blah, blah’.
Just because he is relaxing at the pool does not mean he was gone from butt man to family man and it is a false spurious association that is never harmless but leads to future insanity and suffering. The purpose is to stir emotions, make others laugh and that is evil rather than good.
FROM BUTTMAN TO FAMILY MAN IS UNNECESSARY, A FALSE ASSOCIATION AND SAID TO STIR EMOTIONS, TO MAKE OTHERS SMILE OR LAUGH AND THAT IS EVIL NEVER GOOD. IT IS A FORMAT OF SPEAKING THAT IS COPIED FROM OTHERS AND SO THE PERSON IS A REHASHING ROBOT.
Why trust is praised, exalted in this world:
It is not because trust is a good thing that it is valued in this world but it is the opposite.
If you want to exploit another, want to reap material advantage from another, want to sell something for profit to another then you desire trust, you praise trust, you want someone eg a pretty girl to trust you but not another.
If you desire no gains from others (as is possible even though it is absent in this world) why would you want anyone to trust you? There is no need to trust me, just see and understand what I say or do as true or false, good or bad, insightful or useless.
TRUST IS BECAUSE OF EVIL DESIGNS AND NOT GOOD, YOU NEED TRUST IF YOU WANT TO MANIPULATE OTHERS.
The financial reports of the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) show 144 officials were paid off because they were given permanent contracts despite the authority winding down in 2014
In view of the parlous UK public finance it could not afford to stage the Olympics and should not have staged it because it served no useful function, only to boast or show off. Whatever economic benefit is little compared to the expenses and benefit those who already have, not those who are downtrodden and not just here but if you examined a nation’s finance you can many wasteful deluded parallels.
Few countries in the world can truly afford to stage the Olympics and yet they are all lining up to stage. Not even Japan if you realize their parlous public financial position can afford to stack more debt on top of its mountain of debts.
THE BUDDHA SAID DROP BY DROP IS THE PITCHER FILLED AND THESE DROPS (OLYMPIC EXTRAVAGANCE) ARE BIG DROPS.
Uneasy peace and rocking the boat:

Sunday, 21 July 2013
http://www.malaysia-today.net/images/stories/barred/blog_item_no_holds.jpg
The younger generation, those born long after the 1950s, need to understand this. And they need to understand plus respect both the letter and the spirit of what our Founding Fathers (or founding grandfathers for many of us) tried to achieve and did to a great extent achieve. You have to be very careful about ‘rocking the boat’ lest we trigger what the British and our grandfathers tried very hard to avoid.

Whatever peace built on truth and goodness is never uneasy and so if the peace is uneasy there is tension and it is false and hypocritical.
It is not good to preach not rocking the boat, if your peace or harmony can be rocked, it means it is not true, not stable, make believe, for show and in advocating not rocking the boat you are preaching keeping up and maintaining the sham and that is demeritorious not meritorious.
IT IS NOT THAT YOU SHOULD ROCK THE BOAT OR STIR ANIMOSITY, THAT HAS KARMA TOO BUT YOU SHOULD DIVORCE YOURSELF, DISSOCIATE YOURSELF FROM THE PRETENSE OR MAKE BELIEVE TO KEEP THE SHOW GOING.
Malaysia’s household debt and damper on growth:
The household debt in Malaysia, which stands at about 83% of gross domestic product (GDP), is higher than many other countries in the region like the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Hong Kong and Japan. If not prevented, it could put a damper on the country’s 5%-6% projected GDP growth this year.
It reflects how sick or perverse people are, there are far graver concerns about rising household debts and the first thing that comes into their minds is that it will dampen national growth.
THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE HAVE NO CONCERNS FOR OTHERS, ONLY WHAT IS IN IT FOR THEM OR THEIR NATIONS. RISING HOUSEHOLD DEBTS CAN DESTROY FAMILIES AND LEAD TO SUICIDES AND ALL HE IS CONCERNED IS DENTING NATIONAL GROWTH. WHY MUST THE NATION ALWAYS GROW AND NOT REMAIN STEADY? IT IS RISKY NOT WITHOUT RISK PURSUING GROWTH.
SINGAPORE’S HOUSEHOLD DEBT IS SAID TO BE BAD BUT MALAYSIA’S IS WORSE.
THE Friends of Batu Caves Coalition says political will is needed to preserve the Batu Caves reserve and its eco-system, which is in danger of extinction.
Whatever is a matter of politics or political will is never a matter of truth or goodness but give and take, for material gains, for popularity and gaining power and so it is not a matter for discussion except if you want to return here again and again to have your throats cut shedding your own blood the Buddha said is greater than the four great oceans.
IF IT IS A MATTER OF POLITICAL WILL IT IS NOT A MATTER FOR PAYING ATTENTION AND SO YOU ARE PRACTICING WRONG ATTENTION WHICH LEADS TO EVEN ETERNAL WOE. THE BUDDHA TAUGHT THAT TO ESCAPE ETERNAL SUFFERING, THERE ARE THINGS YOU MUST PAY ATTENTION TO (BODILY AND MENTAL SUFFERING RISING) AND THINGS YOU MUST IGNORE. IF YOU HAVE WRONG ATTENTION, THAT IS NOT THE PATH TO HAPPINESS BUT SUFFERING.
PRESERVING THE BATU CAVES IS NOT, SHOULD NOT BE A MATTER OF POLITICAL WILL BUT DOING WHAT IS RIGHT OR CORRECT AND SO HE IS GUILTY OF WRONG VIEW THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE PATH TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WORLD.
Death on the roller coaster:
Apparently a child fell to her death riding a roller coaster with a strap that was not properly applied. Those who recommend others ride roller coasters, those who make a living off it are asking for karma to be repaid by suffering.
There are never true reasons for roller coasters which have become even more extreme today compared with the past. The purpose of roller coasters is to stir emotions, primarily terror and this exposes riders to extreme danger especially if they have not strapped themselves in properly.
A few decades ago I had a ride in one and it was a sensation of terror being yanked around in sharp turns which must be even worse today.
ROLLER COASTERS ARE CRIMINAL, IT REFLECTS DELUSION OF HUMANS THAT THEY SEEK A RIDE AND THOSE WHO ORGANIZE THEM HAVE DEBT IN REPAYMENT.
Lending rates should play little or no part in a sound economy and if lending rates are crucial, watched closely and responded to by market it reflects the economy is living precariously, too dependent on debt to prosper and if the debt is spent on consumption, on speculation, on fruitless or unproductive expenditure it is a SUREFIRE indication of final, ultimate collapse, the longer the excesses have been allowed to fester the worse the outcome and mankind in its delusion is trying to rekindle the excessive consumption of the past they do not realize is like flogging the dead horse.
FOR THOSE WHO DISCERN, SEE THINGS AS IT ACTUALLY IS, THE HORSE IS DEAD AND THERE IS NO USE FLOGGING IT BUT TO THE DELUDED THE HORSE IS STILL VERY MUCH ALIVE, LETS FLOG IT MORE.
Learn to accept what cannot be changed:
This is mad advice.
Whatever has happened does not require a person’s acceptance or non acceptance and both are associated with suffering. The acceptance that you learnt is never genuine or true but forced, conditioned and attended by disturbance.
A person who truly neither likes nor dislike has reached the stage where his mind is not perturbed by anything happening and he truly accepts whatever is happening, it is not learnt or conditioned or programmed.
WHATEVER ACCEPTANCE YOU LEARNT IS NEVER TRUE, IT IS CONTRIVED, FORCED AND COMES WITH EFFORT AND SUFFERING.
A PERSON WHOSE MIND HAS REACHED THE THIRD HIGHER STATE NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE IS NOT PERTURBED BY ANYTHING HAPPENING AND THERE IS NO QUESTION OF HIM ACCEPTING OR NOT ACCEPTING WHAT IS HAPPENING. WHEN HE GETS ALMS, THAT IS FINE, WHEN HE GETS NO ALMS THAT TOO IS FINE.
If something can be changed you don’t accept?
In other words if something bad happens but it can be changed you don’t accept it, you only learn to accept what you cannot change?
This is fantasy, impossible in practice, delusion.
IT IS DELUSION, IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON TO ACCEPT ONLY THINGS THAT CANNOT BE CHANGED AND NOT ACCEPT WHAT CAN BE CHANGE AS IMPLIED BY THE ADVICE.
Why no one can cherry pick acceptance:
It is impossible for a person to cherry pick things he will accept and not accept, he will accept unpalatable things that cannot be changed and not accept unpalatable things that can be changed.
You talk about acceptance but do you understand the nature of ‘acceptance’?
Acceptance is a fancy word for ‘like’, it is ‘like’ in disguise and like is merely a blind meaningless harmful stirring of force that is indiscriminate, once programmed to dislike certain things the person cannot help disliking it, he is a slave not master of his dislike or not accepting.
NOT ACCEPTING IS DISLIKE IN DISGUISE AND THAT IS A PROGRAMMED STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE, WHATEVER IS GAINED IS LIKED OR ACCEPTED, WHATEVER IS LOST IS DISLIKED OR NOT ACCEPTED. FOR GREEDY ACQUISITIVE PEOPLE ALL LOSSES IRRESPECTIVE OF CHANGEABILITY IS DISLIKED, NOT ACCEPTED AND YOU ARE DELUDED AND COURTING INSANITY IF YOU THINK YOU CAN CHOOSE AND TRAIN YOURSELF TO NOT ACCEPT THINGS THAT ARE LOSSES BUT CHANGEABLE AND ACCEPT THINGS THAT ARE LOSSES BUT UNCHANGEABLE.
ACCEPTANCE IS A FUNCTION OF FORCE NEVER REASON AND SO IT IS BLIND, INDISCRIMINATE AND YOU ARE NOT A MASTER BUT SLAVE OF YOUR ACCEPTING OR NOT ACCEPTING ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY ADDITIONAL SUFFERING NOT THE WONDER OR MEANINGFULNESS IT IS MADE OUT TO BE.

Japan warns UK about leaving EU

Once you have joined some organization you should never go back on your commitment and leave, it is always wrong and has karma to be repaid as suffering.
Similarly once Greece has been accepted in the EU, it should not be expelled but however unpalatable, Greece should be assisted and rehabilitated, that is the right course of action.
IT IS NOT BECAUSE THERE ARE SERIOUS MATERIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR BRITAIN IF IT LEAVES THE EU BUT IT IS BECAUSE IT IS WRONG, BREAKING A COMMITMENT JUST BECAUSE IT IS NOW A BANE THAN BOON BEING IN THE EU. 
GOING BACK ON YOUR WORD OR COMMITMENT HAS SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES IN SUFFERING DUE THAT YOU IGNORE AND DO NOT REALIZE TO YOUR FUTURE SORROW.
Accept your cancer? You got to be kidding:
Cancer is something that can befall a person and which cannot be changed.
So how many people, including the person advocating accepting what cannot be changed will accept his cancer?
Emotional people will become upset, angry and fight to the last when faced with cancer they cannot change rather than accept and go without a fight.
NOT ACCEPTING IS ABOUT FIGHTING WHAT IS DISLIKED OR A LOSS AND EVEN THOUGH CANCER IS IRREVERSIBLE, IT IS AN IMPOSSIBLE NOT TALL ORDER FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE ATTACHED TO THEIR LIVES HERE TO ACCEPT, NOT FIGHT WHAT IS IRREVERSIBLE.
We couldn't be happier
Wills' joy after Kate has boy
That statement is always spoken in delusion not truth.
There is no need to say that and it is not said knowing it is true there is no greater happiness possible for them but to falsely exaggerate how big the joy of the birth of a son.
UNLESS THE COUPLE CAN SEE THERE IS NO GREATER HAPPINESS POSSIBLE FOR THEM THEY ARE SPEAKING FOOLISHLY WITH SUFFERING DUE. ONLY IF YOU CAN SEE AND YOU SEE NO GREATER HAPPINESS CAN YOU SAY THAT TRULY. IF YOU CAN FOR SURE THERE IS NO GREATER HAPPINESS AND YOU SAY THERE IS NO GREATER HAPPINESS YOU MUST DO SO WITH RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND YOU ARE GUILTY OF SPEAKING FALSELY WITH KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING.
EVEN IF THEY DO NOT ACHIEVE IT FOR THEMSELVES THIS LIFETIME, THERE IS FAR GREATER INCOMPARABLE HAPPINESS IN THE FIRST, SECOND, THIR AND FOURTH HIGHER STATES OF MIND.
ONLY IF YOU CAN SEE AND YOU SEE NO GREATER HAPPINESS ARE YOU ENTITLED TO SAY YOU CANNOT BE HAPPIER OTHERWISE YOU ARE INVITING SUFFERING NEEDLESSLY.
Nibbana is the highest happiness:
Nibbana, the laying down of the heavy burden, the end of all birth and death, the destination of no falling away is the highest happiness.
The formless existence of brahmas confers much higher happiness than the formed existence of angels in heaven and the higher your concentration or state of mind the higher your happiness and the highest state is neither perceiving nor not perceiving wherein you are All Seeing, All Knowing.
FOOLS MAKE MUCH OF THE LITTLE FLEETING HAPPINESS THEY FIND HERE THAT IS LIKE A FLICKERING LIGHT COMPARED TO THE INCANDESCENT SUN HAPPINESS IN THE HIGHEST REACHES OF HEAVEN AND NIBBANA.
Malaysian household vs government debt:
Malaysian household debt was recently declared as 80+%, worse than Singapore’s 77% (also bad). This is separate from government debt which 55% for 2012.
What about Malaysian companies debt as percentage of GDP?
It looks like profligacy all round, everyone is living in debt, beyond his means and hoping nothing will crash.
Worry is the wrong force based understanding, rising household debt is a danger is the correct or reason based understanding.
Why should it worry anyone and of what use is it to worry or raise fear even panic for rising debt? What is relevant is that you understand the dangers posed by rising debt and take the correct actions to rectify it.
THAT RISING DEBT IS A WORRY AND A DANGER ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS NOT TO BE CONFUSED ONE WITH ANOTHER AND IT REFLECTS MUDDLED THINKING IF YOU THINK THEY ARE SYNONYMOUS. WORRY IS ABOUT STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO BE AGITATED, FEARFUL AND CONFUSED.
How UK is reviving its economy:
Property is at the centre of the past crash globally and you would think UK has learnt its lesson but no, it is trying to revive the bubble.
Not that the UK government is cash rich but it is heavily in debt and yet it proposes to spend £16 billion to subsidize mortgage payments. Instead of paying a deposit of 20% before you can qualify to buy a house, you pay a deposit of 5% and the government will pay the rest interest free for 5 years in order to enable more people to buy houses and hopefully pull the housing industry out of its slump. This is reverting to the bad dangerous excesses and debt incurring practices of the past.
Reports say 30% of those mortgages in the US that were restructured favourable to enable mortgagees to service their loans have now started to fail again.