Clumsy and slick are styles of speech:
Some people are good public speakers, others are
bad and it is a matter
entirely of style not substance. There are those
who are clumsy, hesitant, disjointed and these are perceived as bad whilst
others have well honed their deliveries to appear confident, slick and
authoritative even when they are bullshitting, do not know what they are
talking about. These are considered good speakers and prized and it is a matter
of style not substance.
There is further style in the substance of
ordinary people’s speeches, they may use bombastic or flowery words to impress,
add unnecessary for show things to say to please and impress and bond with
their audiences.
THAT A PERSON’S SPEECH IS SLICK OR CLUMSY IS
EVIDENCE OF ACCOMPANYING STYLE, THEY ARE STYLES OF SPEECH. PEOPLE DO NOT SPEAK
TO STATE THE TRUTH BUT THEY SPEAK TO PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE
OTHERS, THEY SPEAK TO ENTERTAIN (AND THAT IS ALWAYS A FALSE AND MAD REASON TO
SPEAK), THEY HAVE HONED THEIR DELIVERIES TO APPEAR CONFIDENT, AUTHORITATIVE,
SLICK AND THEY ADD SPICE TO THE SUBSTANCE OF THEIR SPEECH MAKING IT FLOWERY,
FULL OF ADORNMENTS DESIGNED TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS AND BOND WITH THE AUDIENCE.
NO MATTER HOW CONFIDENT THEY PROJECT, BECAUSE THEY ARE PRACTICING DECEPTION,
THEY MUST SPEAK WITH RAISED SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEAD TO STRESS, THEY MUST
SUBDUE RESTLESSNESS AND THE TENDENCY TO LAPSE INTO DAZES, WHAT AND HOW THEY
SAID MUST BE REHASHED ACCORDING TO PLANS EVEN MANY TIMES BEFORE AND THEY HAVE
WEDDED THEMSELVES TO A ROBOTIC REHASHING TORMENTING EXISTENCE.
A PERSON OF TRUTH CANNOT BE CLUMSY OR SLICK IN
HIS SPEECH, HIS SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION NECESSARY SPEECH HAS NOT STYLE, NO
PADDING TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE.
A man of truth is neither a good nor
bad speaker, only effortless:
A man of truth who understands the situation,
understands what he says is neither a good nor bad speaker, because there is no
raised self-resistance, there is no retrieving to rehash, his speech is
effortless, smooth with pauses and hesitations.
GOOD AND BAD SPEAKERS ARE MATTERS OF STYLE NEVER
TRUTH OR SUBSTANCE. A PERSON WHO IS WITHOUT STYLE IS NEITHER A GOOD OR BAD
SPEAKER, HE SPEAKS WHAT IS NECESSARY RELEVANT TO THE TOPIC AND IT IS EFFORTLESS
BECAUSE THERE IS NO ACCOMPANYING SELF-RESISTANCE, NO REHASHING THAT CAN DISRUPT
THE FLOW.
43 M'sians were on ill-fated MAS Flight MH17
Without knowing fate had anything to do with the
crash you are speaking wrongly to say so that misleads others and that incurs
debt. Suffice to say it was downed, which is a fact. It is not an accident that
the statement referred to Malaysians which is a subconscious display of
partisanship that is never due to reason but by programming and it leads to
woe.
IF YOU THINK THE STATEMENT IS A REASONABLE
STATEMENT OF TRUTH YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
THAT THE PLANE WAS DOWNED OR CRASHED IS FACT,
THAT IT WAS ILL-FATED IS NOT AND YOU SHOULD BE CAREFUL NOT TO PRESUME.
IT REFLECTS PARTISANSHIP THAT MALAYSIANS ARE OF
SPECIFIC CONCERN TO YOU. THIS IS PROGRAMMED AND THE PERSON IS A ROBOT WITH
PROGRAMMED FALSE PERCEPTION. ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE SELF SERVING AND THAT IS
PROGRAMMED, WHENEVER SOMETHING HAPPENS THEY AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDER ITS
IMPLICATIONS TO SELF AND THOSE THEY INDENTIFY WITH.
MH17 just 1000 feet above no fly zone:
Many airlines including Air France, Qantas,
Lufthansa had rerouted from the area and it seemed it was no fly zone below
32,000 feet and MH17 was flying at 33,000 feet.
And so it may be totally unfortunate or there
may be elements of a cavalier, indifferent attitude to safety.
The Boeing
777 downed in Ukraine with the loss of 295 passengers was flying just 1,000
feet above a “no-fly” zone covering the troubled region, The Independent
has learned.
Malaysia
Airlines flight MH17 was on a routine flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur
when it crashed, apparently after being hit by a missile.
The jet was
travelling east across Ukraine along an airway designated A87. Eurocontrol, the
co-ordination centre for air-traffic control in Europe, said: “This route had
been closed by the Ukrainian authorities from ground to flight level 320
[32,000 feet] but was open at the level at which the aircraft was flying.” The
plane was flying at the lowest permitted altitude over the area, flight level
330 [33,000 feet], when it disappeared from the radar.
MH17 trying to save fuel?
European agency had warned airlines to avoid in
April.
Was MH17 flying through
warzone to save fuel? Other planes shown steering well clear of disupted area
- European Aviation and Safety
Agency warned pilots to avoid Ukraine in April
- British, European and U.S.
aircraft banned from overflying the warzone
- Airspace 'was not subject to
restrictions' according to airline industry group
- Boeing 77 was just 300 metres
above minimum
- Crash investigators will probe
the aircraft's flight plan following the disaster
- Aviation experts fear the jet
entered the warzone to save burning fuel
Was Malaysia Airlines flight
MH370 shot down too?
THE downing of a Malaysia Airlines jet over Ukraine
has led to speculation that the same carrier’s missing flight MH370 may also
have been blown out of the sky by a missile.
This
is an article written in a major newspaper and it reflects delusion that anyone
can entertain this possibility.
The
circumstances showed MH370 continued flying for hours after it disappeared, was
tracked on radar to have turned towards the Indian Ocean and it was in hourly
contact with Inmarsat’s Indian Ocean satellite and so you must be illogical to
entertain the possibility.
SUCH
STORIES SERVE TO CONFUSE OTHERS, BEFORE YOU SUGGEST SUCH SCENARIOS YOU SHOULD
BE FAMILIAR WITH MH370’S DISAPPEARANCE. IF THE PLANE WAS SHOT DOWN, HOW COME IT
FLEW FOR HOURS AND KEPT HOURLY CONTACTS WITH INMARSAT’S INDIAN OCEAN SATELLITE?
SO
MH370 WAS SHOT AND THEN IT FLEW FOR HOURS LIKE A ZOMBIE TO END IN THE MIDDLE OF
THE INDIAN OCEAN?
MAS’ slippery slide to ruin?
It is impossible if MAS had been well managed
financially that it would be in such dire financial state today and because of
its financial troubles it had to cut costs and corners like carrying as little
reserve fuel as possible and taking short cuts through war zones.
This is foolhardy, by trying to save pennies you
end up losing millions and so it is the road to hell for humans as well as companies,
is slippery and downhill.
IF MAS WAS WELL MANAGED IT WOULD NOT BE IN
FINANCIAL DIRE STRAITS WHERE IT NEEDS TO DANGEROUSLY COST CUT AND CUT CORNERS
THAT CAN BACKFIRE AND MAKE WORSE ITS ALREADY PRECARIOUS POSITION.
The Buddha on the dangers of sin:
Can you speak unbroken, lucidly, thoroughly as
the Buddha below? And you think he is a fake?
Ina Sutta: Debt
"Monks, for one who partakes of sensuality,
poverty is suffering in the world."
"Yes, lord."
"And a poor, destitute, penniless person gets into
debt. For one who partakes of sensuality, getting into debt is suffering in the
world."
"Yes, lord."
"And a poor, destitute, penniless person, having
gotten into debt, owes interest payments. For one who partakes of sensuality,
interest payment is suffering in the world."
"Yes, lord."
"And when a poor, destitute, penniless person
owing interest payments does not pay interest on time, they serve him notice.
For one who partakes of sensuality, being served notice is suffering in the
world."
"Yes, lord."
"And when a poor, destitute, penniless person,
being served notice, does not pay, they hound him. For one who partakes of
sensuality, being hounded is suffering in the world."
"Yes, lord."
"And when a poor, destitute, penniless person,
being hounded, does not pay, he is put into bondage. For one who partakes of
sensuality, bondage is suffering in the world."
"Yes, lord."
"Thus, monks, poverty is suffering in the world
for one who partakes of sensuality. Getting into debt is suffering in the world
for one who partakes of sensuality. Interest payment is suffering in the world
for one who partakes of sensuality. Being served notice is suffering in the
world for one who partakes of sensuality. Being hounded is suffering in the
world for one who partakes of sensuality. Bondage is suffering in the world for
one who partakes of sensuality.
"In the same way, monks, whoever has no
conviction with regard to skillful mental qualities, no sense of conscience
with regard to skillful mental qualities, no sense of concern with regard to
skillful mental qualities, no persistence with regard to skillful mental
qualities, no discernment with regard to skillful mental qualities is, in the
discipline of a noble one, said to be poor, destitute, & penniless.
"He -- poor, destitute, & penniless, having
no conviction with regard to skillful mental qualities, no sense of
conscience...no sense of concern...no persistence...no discernment with regard
to skillful mental qualities -- engages in misconduct by way of the body, misconduct
by way of speech, misconduct by way of the mind. For him, I tell you, this is
getting into debt.
"For the purpose of concealing his bodily
misconduct, he formulates evil desires: He desires, 'May they not know about
me.' He resolves, 'May they not know about me.' He speaks, [thinking,] 'May
they not know about me.' He makes an effort with his body, [thinking,] 'May
they not know about me.' For the purpose of concealing his verbal
misconduct...For the purpose of concealing his mental misconduct, he formulates
evil desires: He desires, 'May they not know about me.' He resolves, 'May they
not know about me.' He speaks, [thinking,] 'May they not know about me.' He
makes an effort with his body, [thinking,] 'May they not know about me.' For
him, I tell you, this is interest payment.
"And then his well-behaved companions in the holy
life say about him, 'This venerable one acts in this way, behaves in this way.'
For him, I tell you, this is being served notice.
"And then, when he has gone to the wilderness, to
the foot of a tree, or to an empty dwelling, he is beset with evil, unskillful
thoughts accompanied by remorse. For him, I tell you, this is being hounded.
"He -- poor, destitute, & penniless, having
engaged in misconduct by way of the body, misconduct by way of speech, &
misconduct by way of the mind -- on the break-up of the body, after death, is
bound by the bond of hell or the bond of the animal womb. And I can imagine no
one other bond so tormenting, so painful, so obstructive to the unexcelled rest
from bondage, as the bond of hell or the bond of the animal womb."
Poverty is
called suffering in the world;
so, too, is getting into debt.
A poor person, in debt,
partaking of sensuality, suffers hardship.
Then they hound him and put him into bondage:
the painful bond for one longing to gain
sensual pleasures.
Now, anyone with no conviction
in the discipline of a noble one
-- no sense of conscience, no sense of concern --
contemplating evil actions,
doing wrong by way of body,
wrong by way of speech,
& wrong by way of the mind,
wants: 'May they not know about me.'
He creeps along in body, speech, or mind,
piling up evil actions, here & there,
again & again.
He, with evil actions, his wisdom weak,
knowing his own wrong-doing, is
a poor person, in debt.
Partaking of sensuality, he suffers hardship.
Then they hound him --
painful mental resolves born of remorse --
at home or in the wilderness.
He, with evil actions, his wisdom weak,
knowing his own wrong-doing,
goes to an animal womb or is bound in hell:
the painful bond from which the enlightened are freed.
But one with confidence, living at
home,
making gifts of his belongings,
righteously-gained, wins both goals:
advantage in the here-&-now,
& happiness in the world beyond.
The liberality of this householder piles up merit.
Now, anyone with conviction firmly
established
in the discipline of a noble one --
with a sense of conscience, a sense of concern,
discerning & restrained by virtue --
is, in the discipline of a noble one,
said to be living in ease.
Gaining a pleasure not of the flesh,
he determines on equanimity:
abandoning the five hindrances
-- persistence constantly aroused --
entering the jhanas:
unified, mindful, & wise.
Knowing this as it actually is
in the total ending of all fetters,
through everywhere not-clinging,
his mind is rightly released.
In him, Such, rightly released,
there is the knowledge, in the total ending
of the fetters of becoming:
'My release is unshakable.'
That is the highest knowledge that,
the happiness unexcelled. Sorrowless, dustless, at rest,
that is release from debt."
Malaysia plane deviated from
typical path before going down
WASHINGTON -- Before
Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 went down in Ukraine, it was following a flight path from
Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur that its pilots should have been familiar with.
In the last two weeks, the plane flew roughly the same path 14 times,
traversing the diagonal length of
Ukraine to
the Sea of Azov close to Crimea. But Thursday's route deviated slightly.
The Boeing 777 went farther north than typical (towards
danger zone). It's unclear why.
MH17 purely misfortune and accident?
Not a chance
The Buddha said you must be on guard, alert and
Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say.
The relevant European body had warned in April
to avoid the area and many carriers have re-routed to avoid the area and so you
are lackadaisical, heedless to continue overflying the area and you may have
flown heedlessly too near the 32,000 feet no fly zone and strayed too far north
into danger territory.
IT IS NOT AS IF EUROPEAN FLIGHT CONTROL BODY HAD
NOT ISSUED WARNINGS AND NO OTHER AIRLINES HAVE RE-ROUTED THEIR FLIGHTS AND SO
YOU IGNORED ADVICE AND UNDERTOOK RISKS OVERFLYING EVEN WHEN THERE WERE QUITE A
NUMBER OF PLANES AND HELICOPTERS DOWNED IN RECENT MONTHS.
Don’t you think it is bad taste to
politicize?
Quote:
But don’t you think it is in bad taste
that he used the plane tragedies and the loss of 537 lives as political
ammunition for his ‘oust Najib’ campaign? And what is Anwar going to tell his
party tonight — that the MH370 and MH17 tragedies are God’s retribution for the
sin of not ousting Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim in favour of his wife,
Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail?
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Politicizing any matter is never good but always
evil and so anyone who thinks it is sometimes bad or sometimes good taste
politicizing certain matters is deluded, heading for suffering.
WHATEVER HAPPENS IS RIGHT (CORRECT) OR WRONG (INCORRECT),
BLAMEWORTHY OR BLAMELESS, TRUE OR FALSE, TO POLITICIZE IS TO EXPLOIT AN ISSUE
FOR PERSONAL POPULARITY GAINS AND THAT IS NEVER IN GOOD TASTE NOR IS IT A
MATTER OF BAD TASTE BUT IT IS EVIL, WRONG, MAD.
AND SO HERE AS EVERYWHERE RPK IS DELUDED NOT THE
WISE PERSON HE AND FELLOW DELUDED PEOPLE LIKE TO PERCEIVE.
To politicize is to exploit and that
is controlled insanity:
Politicizing is about exploiting an arisen
matter that is of interest to potential voters with the hope of gaining
political advantage over one’s adversaries in terms of gaining popularity and
favor of voters.
POLITICIZING, PLAYING POLITICS ARE ALWAYS WRONG,
EVIL, THE INCORRECT MOTIVE OF ANY ACTION AND LEADS TO INSANITY AND PUNISHMENT.
IT IS NEVER IN GOOD TASTE TO POLITICISE ANY
ISSUE, NOR IS IT BAD TASTE BUT IT IS WRONG TO POLITICIZE ANY ISSUE.
How come they don’t understand what
they say?
People talk about politicizing and playing
politics and they insist they are able to understand and they know what is true
and false, what is good and bad yet how come they do not know that when they
talk about politicizing they are talking about exploiting an issue, being
divisive to gain political advantage and that is always unrighteous, evil
rather than in bad taste or sometimes good taste, sometimes bad taste?
WHEN I READ WHAT IS STATED, IMMEDIATELY I SENSE
IT IS WRONG, MAD, DELUDED.
Why did MAS not divert as other airlines did?
It is blameworthy not blameless if danger
warnings have been issued by relevant authorities and other airlines have diverted
their flights to avoid potential danger.
Why did MAS not divert?
If it was effortless, no trouble and did not
cost more money to divert, surely MAS would have diverted. It is because it
took effort and MAS was lackadaisical, complacent, indifferent in its duties
and responsibilities, it costs more in money (and time) and effort to divert
that MAS chose to carry on as usual.
AND SO THE WORLD MAY NOT REALIZE IT BUT MAS IS
CULPABLE EVEN THOUGH THE INSURGENTS ARE CRIMINAL.
IF YOU KNEW AN AREA WAS GANGSTER INFESTED AND
YOU COULD BYPASS THE AREA, WOULD YOU NOT WISELY CHOOSE TO BYPASS THE GANGSTER
AREA?
What do you understand by politics?
People are confronted by politics and
politicians regularly yet do they truly understand politics, they may be
cynical about politics but that is not a true understanding, merely a matter of
stirred force to disdain and scoff.
POLITICS IS ENTIRELY EVIL, IT IS ABOUT FIGHTING
TO GAIN POWER OR BE ELECTED ON THE FACE OF IT TO SERVE THE PEOPLE BUT IN TRUTH
FOR SELF GAIN BY PROPER OR CORRUPT MEANS. POLITICS IS ABOUT POWER, GAINING
POWER OR CONTROL AND THEN EXPLOITING THAT CONTROL FOR PERSONAL GAINS. TOWARDS
THIS END, THE TRUTH AND GOODNESS IS ALWAYS DISCARDED IN FAVOUR OF PARTISANSHIP,
CHAMPIONING POSITIONS AND SOLUTIONS THAT WOULD MATERIALLY BENEFIT A PARTICULAR
MAJOR FACTION WHOSE VOTING CLOUT WOULD PROPEL THESE POLITICIANS TO POWER AND
CONTROL OF THE COUNTRY.
WHEN THERE ARE NO ISSUES TO RAISE SENTIMENTS OR
EMOTIONS SO THAT THE MAJORITY WILL SUPPORT YOU, POLITICIANS EVEN FABRICATE OR
ENGINEER ISSUES LIKE RACE AND RELIGION TO POLARIZE THE POPULACE WHERE THERE WAS
NONE ACTUALLY.
IF A COMMUNITY WAS WISE, DISCERNING, HAVE TRUE
UNDERSTANDING, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR POLITICIANS AND POLITICS TO EXIST LET ALONE
THRIVE, IT IS BECAUSE THE POPULATION HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, ARE FOOLISH,
HAVE VESTED INTERESTS THAT THEY SEEK TO PREVAIL TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF OTHERS
THAT THEY ARE EXPLOITED BY WICKED POLITICIANS.
POLITICS IS NEVER ABOUT TRUTH AND GOODNESS BUT
IT IS ABOUT PUSHING ASIDE TRUTH AND GOODNESS IN PREFERENCE FOR MATERIAL
ADVANTAGE OF THE MAJORITY OVER THE MINORITY, IT IS ABOUT EXPLOITATION EVEN
INVENTION OF ISSUES BY EVIL POLITICIANS WHO SUPERFICIALLY WANT TO SERVE YOU BUT
ARE OUT FOR SELF GLORY AND GAIN.
PLAYING POLITICS BEING BAD OR GOOD TASTE IN
VARIOUS ISSUES IS ABOUT LIKE AND DISLIKE, THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT IS
BLIND, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL. THUS IF YOU SAY POLITICIZING IN THIS ISSUE IS
BAD TASTE, IT MEANS YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED TO DISLIKE POLITICIZING IN
THIS CASE.
BECAUSE POLITICS IN TRUTH IS ABOUT USING ISSUES
TO EXPLOIT TO GAIN POWER OR CONTROL, NO ONE OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL INVOLVE
HIMSELF IN POLITICS AND ALL POLITICIANS HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH INSANITY THAT
THEY WELL DESERVE.
Hope for the best or be complacent,
nothing will happen, expect the worse:
‘Hope for the best’ and complacency are never
based on understanding or reason but they are forms of programming that those
programmed rehash to meet a situation as it arises and they are always false,
dangerous and can lead to disaster as has happened with MH17.
Thus when faced with advice about risks
overlying the region, the foolish person can activate ‘hope for the best’ or be
complacent, ‘nothing will happen’ when he cannot be sure nothing will happen.
ONLY ROBOTS HOPE FOR THE BEST AND ASSUME, THESE
ARE FORMS OF PROGRAMMING, PROGRAMMED ACTIONS THAT ROBOTS POSSESS. THEY ARE LAZY
AND INDIFFERENT AND SO WHENEVER DEMANDS ARE MADE ON THEM TO ACT, THEY ‘HOPE FOR
THE BEST’ OR ASSUME NOTHING WILL HAPPEN WHICH OCCASIONALLY PROVES FATAL.
Never leave things to chance and expect the
worse are also rules, programming that guide people who are robots’ actions.
THOSE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING SUBSCRIBE TO NO
RULES, THEY HAVE NO PROGRAMMINGS TO TELL THEM FALSELY ‘HOPE FOR THE BEST’,
‘NOTHING WILL HAPPEN’, ‘TAKE NO CHANCES’, ‘EXPECT THE WORSE’.
RATHER THAN HOPE FOR THE BEST OR EXPECT THE
WORSE, YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE GRAVITY OF A SITUATION AND UNDERTAKE THE WISE
COURSE OF ACTION FOR THAT SITUATION.
Shares in
Malaysia Airlines closed down 11% following the crash of flight MH17 on route
from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, raising questions about the airline's future.
It is dangerous to jump to conclusions and
presume. Unless you understand Malaysian conditions you are foolish to jump to
conclusions that MAS is doomed. It may be a matter of hubris and if the
government wants it can keep MAS alive in one form or another so it is
misleading with karma attached to speak of doubt to its future.
IMF head
Christine Lagarde warns that financial markets maybe a little too upbeat given
high levels of unemployment and debt in European economies.
Financial markets today may be ruled by mindless
programmed trading and if this is so then she is addressing computer trading
that cannot understand.
It may not be so much optimism but those who run
the markets possess no true understanding and they are blinded, dominated by
greed and fear and they act according to rules and the rules dictate they push
up prices perhaps based on past performances.
UPBEAT IS A FUNCTION OF STIRRED FORCE THAT IS
BLIND AND WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING AND SO SHE IS ADDRESSING WHAT IS INSENSIBLE,
WHAT SHE SHOULD SAY IS THAT MARKET RISES (NOT OPTIMISM) IS NOT JUSTIFIED, WRONG
AND THUS DANGEROUS.
WHAT IS THE POINT OF TALKING ABOUT THE MARKETS
BEING A LITTLE TOO UPBEAT? WHAT MATTERS IS IF IT IS CORRECT OR WRONG, IF IT IS
WRONG YOU SHOULD SAY IT IS WRONG.
I say flying to an Aids conference is not a
valid or necessary reason for flying and should you perish as a result, you asked
for it travelling for an invalid reason. Aids is not something essential (to
the happiness of a person here and afterwards, it is about self-glory or making
money, a job) or blameless and so if you perish in transit you are not
blameless even if fellow deluded people think otherwise.
IN TRUTH THERE ARE VERY FEW TRUE OR NECESSARY REASONS
TO BE TRAVELLING BY PLANE AND IF YOU TRAVEL FOR FRIVOLOUS OR IRRATIONAL
REASONS, CUMULATIVELY EXACTING A SEVERE TOLL ON THE EARTH TO SUPPORT YOUR
EXCESSES YOU ARE NOT BLAMELESS AND THOSE WHO ARE BLAMEWORTHY DESERVE TO DIE AND
ANY DAY IS A VALID DAY TO DIE AS THE BUDDHA ADMONISHED, ANY DAY CAN BE YOUR
LAST DAY.
Dying and suffering is what all
ordinary people deserve:
Many do not realize that suffering and death are
not natural or inevitable, they deserve to die and suffer as a result of their
heedless abusive conduct towards themselves, others and the earth.
WHEN A PERSON DIES EVEN SUDDENLY, UNEXPECTEDLY,
EARLY, BLOWN TO BITS, BURNT TO CHARCOAL, IT CAN BE DETERMINED WHETHER HE
DESERVED OR DID NOT DESERVE TO DIE SO AND FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE WHOM THE BUDDHA
SAID HAVE SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND ARE HEADED FOR ENDLESS DEATHS WHEN
THERE IS ETERNAL LIFE IN HEAVEN, THEY CANNOT BE SAID TO HAVE DIED UNDESERVEDLY.
THE HEEDLESS ARE ALREADY LIKE THE DEAD THE BUDDHA SAID AND ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE
HEEDLESS, THEY WILL NOT BE DENIED (THEIR PLEASURES AND ACQUISITIONS).
Aids research is about fighting Aids:
Aids research is about fighting Aids and that is
always stressful and endless. First you use a knife to kill the target and the
target develop defenses to your knife and you then deploy a gun that it
develops a bullet proof vest, you can go on in an escalating battle or arms
race and it is never about reason but fighting.
FIGHTING DOES NOT END BY FIGHTING ALONE,
FIGHTING IS NOT THE ANSWER TO SUFFERING, YOU ARE TO BLAME IF YOU CONTRACTED
AIDS AND MOST AIDS RESEARCHERS ARE IN FOR THE MONEY, FOR THE FAME OR EGOTISTIC
MOTIVES.
AIDS RESEARCH IS ABOUT USING FORCE ACCORDING TO
PLANS OR DRUGS TO FIGHT AIDS AND THE VIRUS DEVELOPING COUNTER RESISTANCE IN A
CAT AND MOUSE GAME THAT CAN BE ENDLESS.
This is said intended as praise and if it is
false, wrong, deluded there is karma not merit, suffering due in repayment.
You cannot say the Buddha or Jesus was full of
life and this world is not so wonder that one should be full of life except one
is deluded or putting on a show.
Whatever it is, full of life is not about reason
or meaningful but full of activity, interest and these are functions of stirred
force that is blind and harmful not good.
ONLY A PROGRAMMED ROBOT NOT A TRUE PERSON CAN BE
FULL OF LIFE AND THIS WORLD IS NOT SO WONDER AS ONE CAN BE TRULY FULL OF LIFE,
OFTEN IT IS A SHOW PEOPLE PUT ON TO SHOW THEY ARE ENJOYING LIFE TO THE HILT,
HAVING A GOOD TIME. EVEN IF IT IS TRUE, THERE IS A PAINFUL PRICE TO PAY FOR
YOUR ENJOYMENT OR EXCITEMENT.
This is a totally unwarranted call and it is
issued in defense of guilty parties. China is aligned with insurgents and their
Russian patrons and there is never a true reason to issue this statement except
in defense of the indefensible and this has karma to those responsible.
WHAT CHINA IS DOING IS DEFENDING, STANDING FOR
THE ‘RIGHTS’ OF THOSE WHO ARE CULPRITS AND THIS HAS KARMA.
Is this the end of MAS?
This was a question posed at an Australian
newspaper.
It is nobody’s business whether the downing of
MH17 spells the end of MAS nor can those who pose the question or those who
read answer the question truthfully and so it is a silly question that leads to
insanity.
ANYONE WHO ASKS SILLY QUESTIONS IS COURTING
INSANITY.
IT IS NONE OF ANYBODY’S BUSINESS WHETHER MH17
SPELLS THE END OF MAS, NEITHER THE POSER NOR HIS AUDIENCE CAN ANSWER THE
QUESTION IN TRUTH AND SO IT IS AN EXERCISE IN FRIVOLITY THAT HAS KARMA AND
INSANITY AS ITS FRUIT.
THE QUESTION IS NEVER BASED ON TRUE REASON OR
NEED BUT IT IS THE RESULTED OF AIMLESS STIRRED MENTAL FORCE POSING SILLY
QUESTIONS NOW HERE NOW THERE.
MH17 missile launcher secretly transported
out to Russia:
The missile was fired from a mobile platform not
a handheld device and there is a video clip showing a covered missile launcher
being carried by truck towards the Russian border after the shooting.
RUSSIA MAY BE SECRETLY SUPPLYING POTENT SURFACE
TO AIR MISSILES TO THE REBELS TO SHOOT DOWN UKRANIAN GOVERNMENT PLANES AND ONCE
THE MH17 SHOOTING OCCURRED RUSSIA MAY BE TRYING TO COVER ITS TRACKS BY TAKING
OUT THE LAUNCHER TO RUSSIA.
Some MAS crew refused to fly route:
If what is reported is accurate, MAS is more
culpable for event than apparent. If some cabin crew had been reluctant to fly
it means MAS deliberately persisted in flying over zone where other airlines
have rerouted.
Two cabin crew refused to fly
on doomed plane over war zone safety fears: Senior pilots and cabin crew
flagged concerns about flight path weeks before tragedy
- Airline staff refused to fly
over airspace deeming it too dangerous
- Two Ukrainian planes, a fighter
jet and a transport aircraft, shot down by rebels on the flight path
- BA, all US airlines, Lufthansa,
Air France and Qantas already avoid war zone in Ukraine
- Two cabin crew swapped shifts
so they would not be on the doomed Malaysian airliner downed by a missile
in eastern Ukraine, after raising concerns about the safety of flying over
the war zone.
- Other senior pilots and cabin
crew had flagged up fears about the flightpath in the weeks leading up to
the tragedy, although Malaysia Airlines last night denied ignoring crew
concerns.
- Some staff are reported to have
refused to fly over the airspace where the passenger airliner was downed
because they deemed it to be too volatile and dangerous, especially after
two Ukrainian planes, a fighter jet and a transport aircraft, were shot
down by rebels.
Politics is about exploiting masses’
selfishness ignoring truth and common good to gain power:
Politics is about gaining
power and all its trappings (fame, glory, money grabbing, gaining material
favors from patrons) appealing to and exploiting the foolish masses selfish
consideration in total disregard for truth and common goodness and so politics
is evil, sinful and all those involved in politics either as leaders or
supporters are partaking in evil heading for eternal woes and death.
Selfishness and truth,
goodness are incompatible and so you cannot pander to people’s selfishness and
still be faithful to truth and goodness and so politics is about self serving,
being selfish, playing on the selfishness, fears and greed of the masses so
that they will support you and you gain office, ostensibly to serve but in
truth to grab and plunder and abuse your powers.
THERE IS SUCH A THING
CALLED POLITICS AND IT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AND YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND IT, THING IT
IS TOO COMPLEX AND MARVELLOUS TO BE UNDERSTOOD, YOU ARE DELUDED.
POLITICS IS ABOUT
TARGETTING THE PEOPLE’S SELFISHNESS, GREED AND FEARS TO GAIN POWER OSTENSIBLY
TO SERVE BUT IN TRUTH TO GRAB, PLUNDER AND ABUSE POWER AND JUST AS SHIT ATTRACT
A LOT OF FLIES, POLITICS ATTRACT A LOT OF HANGERS ON LOOKING FOR CRUMBS DROPPED
BY THE BIG FISHES THEY FOLLOW.
Falsity is
dangerous, deadly but it is the key to success here:
Falsity in terms of lying,
faking it, putting on a show, acting is dangerous, flirting with insanity and
is deadly (and ultimately kills self and others) but it is the system of this
world and it is impossible for a person to be (materially) successful in this
world without embracing, submitting to falsity, lying, faking, acting, putting
on a show.
TO TELL ONESELF (AND
OTHERS) WHAT IS NOT TRUE (EG YOU ARE NOT GAY) WHEN IT IS TRUE (YOU ARE GAY)
STIRS CONFLICT THAT LEAD TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND SCATTERED CONCENTRATION,
MANDATES YOU MUST ACT OR FAKE AND THAT MEANS REHASHING OR BEING A ROBOT
MECHANICALLY REPLAYING FROM A SCRIPT.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS
FALSITY THAT IS FUN, HAPPY, SANE, HARMLESS. NO MATTER HOW TOUGH AND DETERMINED
YOU ARE, ANYONE WHO EMBRACES FALSITY EMBRACES TORMENT, COURTS INSANITY AND IS
HEADING FOR DEEPENING SUFFERING, DESTRUCTION OF HIS MIND AND BODY AND BECAUSE
THERE IS LIFE AFTER DEATH, HE IS HEADING FOR ETERNAL TORMENT EVEN IF HE THINKS
HE IS GOD’S FAVOURITE SON.
MANY CANNOT EVEN SEE THEIR
FALSITY, THEY ARE BLINDED AND DELUDED, THEY SEE THEIR FALSITY AS THEIR TRUTH
AND AS LONG AS THEY REMAIN THUS THEY ARE DOOMED, TO THE DEVIL’S DELIGHT.
THIS WORLD IS DOMINATED BY
THE DEVIL AND HE DOES NOT ALLOW ANYONE TO LEAVE EASILY AND MOST ARE TRAPPED,
MESMERIZED BY THE ALLURES OF MATERIAL SUCCESS BUT IN ORDER TO BE A SUCCESS HERE
YOU MUST BE GOOD AT FAKING, PUTTING ON A SHOW, TELLING LIES AND NOT SHOWING IT.
PETALING
JAYA: The passenger manifest of MH17 tells a grim tale. More than 20 families
were wiped out when the Malaysia Airlines jetliner was shot down in Ukraine.
If you think this is a statement of truth, you
are deluded and do not truly understand.
What is said is not the truth but the programmed
perception is false and intended to stir emotions and has karma.
The truth is X number of people were killed not
20 families gone in one shot which is what he deduced from the data to stir
emotion how terrible and sad it is.
THERE IS NOTHING GRIM ABOUT THE TALE, BAD THINGS
CAN HAPPEN IN THIS WORLD AND IN HELL AND IF YOU WISH TO AVOID THEM YOU BETTER
TRAIN YOURSELF IN TRUTH AND GOODNESS.
20 FAMILES GONE IN ONE SHOT IS HIS CONCLUSION
AND IT IS PROGRAMMED AND A FALSE UNDERSTANDING. IT IS NOT FAMILIES THAT ARE ‘WIPED
OUT’ BUT IT IS INDIVIDUALS THAT WERE KILLED AND WHAT IS SAID IS A FABRICATION
TO MAKE MORE THAN THERE IS, HOW SAD IT IS.
PEOPLE SEE DIFFERENT THINGS IN THE SAME PICTURE
AND WHAT THEY SEE IS NOT NATURAL BUT ACCORDING TO HOW THEY HAVE PROGRAMMED
THEMSELVES FOR EXAMPLE THE CALCULATING PERSON IS ALWAYS THINKING ‘WHAT IS THERE
IN IT FOR ME TO WIN OR LOSE?’ THERE ARE FAR MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO CONCLUDE
THAN 20 FAMILIES GONE.
IT WAS NOT FAMILIES THAT WERE KILLED BUT
INDIVIDUALS WHO PERISHED.
IF YOU WANT TO MAKE OTHERS SAID, YOU WANT TO
STIR EMOTIONS OR FORCE THAT IS EVIL AND SO YOU HAVE DEBT TO BE REPAID AS
SUFFERING.
Wong Chun Wai
This is always a nicety, impossible to achieve
and not necessarily good.
If you stand together championing what is evil
or meaningless or false, for show then it is not good, notwithstanding it is a
worthless statement because it is impossible that Malaysia can stand together except
it will fall on deaf ears or lip service. The leaders may want Malaysia to
unite behind them but if it is under Anwar, it would be over their dead bodies
and so the unity has serious evil caveats.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR BEINGS HERE TO UNITE IN
TRUTH AND GOODNESS AND SO IT IS UNITY IN SHOW, HYPOCRISY, PRETENSE, EVIL,
EXPEDIENCY, LIP SERVICE AND THAT IS POINTLESS. IF YOU THINK IT IS NEVERTHELESS
USEFUL THEN THAT IS WRONG VIEW AND THE BUDDHA SAID WRONG VIEW IS THE WAY TO
HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
Unity of convenience or truth?
It is not just in adversity that you should
unite, that is the unity of convenience and expediency but always you should be
united in truth and goodness.
CALLS FOR UNITY IN ADVERSITY ARE HOLLOW,
HYPOCRITICAL, WHEN TIMES ARE BAD YOU UNITE WHEN TIMES ARE GOOD, IT IS BYE, BYE.
YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG BUT THAT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE DELUDED BECAUSE IT HAS DEADLY
PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES FOR ITS PRACTITIONERS BECAUSE IT LEADS TO ETERNAL
SUFFERING.
It is foolish and wrong to demand because it
risks provoking antagonism. What is meaningful is to request full access.
There are those who would curry favor by asking
in a fawning or appeasing way and that is wrong and mad too.
IT IS WRONG AND MAD TO DEMAND OR BE SUPPLICATING
BUT ONE REQUESTS ACCESS AND IT IS UP TO THE OTHER TO ACCEDE. DEMANDING HAS
ACCOMPANYING FORCE OR THREAT AND RISK PROVOKING ANTAGONISM. AND SO YOU ARE
FURTHER INFLAMMING THE SITUATION WITH KARMA NOT MERIT ATTACHED.
Perth’s new stadium will be better
than Adelaide’s Oval:
Only a deluded man will say this and only
deluded people will see nothing wrong.
The purpose of Perth’s new stadium is never to
be better than Adelaide’s but to be functional, because it is necessary or
meaningful to be what it is, if this is so, why are you making comparisons it
will be better except you are mad, do not truly understand.
THE PURPOSE OF PERTH’S NEW STADIUM (IF INDEED IT
IS NECESSARY OR MEANINGFUL, NOT EXTRAVAGANT) IS NEVER TO BE BETTER THAN
ADELAIDE’S OVAL SO ARE YOU MAD TO MAKE COMPARISONS LIKE MY BREAST IS BIGGER
THAN YOUR BREAST? IT IS ABOUT ONE UPMANSHIP WHICH IS NOT BASED ON REASON BUT PROGRAMMING
TO STIR MENTAL FORCE.
SO WHAT IT IS BETTER? BETTER IN WHAT? IF IT IS
BETTER IN WHAT IS SENSELESS, PROFLIGATE, WHAT IS THE POINT EXCEPT YOU ARE A
FOOL?
WHAT IS SAID IS TO STIR ENVY AND JEALOUSY.
Just as an aside or curiosity?
People may counter that they say Perth’s new
stadium is better just as an aside or out of curiosity or interest and they
think they are correct when it is controlled insanity that ends in
uncontrollable insanity.
YOU NEVER SAY SOMETHING OR THINK ABOUT SOMETHING
EG PERTH’S STADIUM BETTER THAN ADELAIDE JUST IN THE PASSING, AS AN ASIDE OR OUT
OF CURIOSITY, THEY ARE NOT VALID REASONS AND CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT IS
PROGRAMMED AND YOU ARE A ROBOT HEADING FOR DISASTER.
By the way? It is a lie:
When people say ‘by the way’, it is deceitful,
they are guilty of falsity with karma attached.
What is said by the way is always motivated,
intended in a obtuse manner, ‘by the way’ is a programmed rehashed style in the
substance of the speech to disguise the intentions of the deceitful person that
incurs karma never merit.
Can you imagine the Buddha or Jesus saying ‘I
made too many mistakes’? They do not say that not because they make mistakes
but are too proud to admit but they never make mistakes, it is impossible the
Buddha or Jesus can make mistakes.
You are not right but you are wrong to make
mistakes and whatever has wrong has suffering due later in repayment.
The reason you made mistakes is because you
gambled, you acted or did without knowing or by gambling and when it failed it
is called a mistake.
The person who resides in truth does not say or
do things he does not understand or know is true and so he cannot make mistakes
and if you acknowledge you make mistakes you are acknowledging your falsity or
risk taking or doing things without knowing that not only leads to painful
recrimination but leads to woe not safety and happiness.
The Buddha: One mistake and you are
dead
The Buddha said if you spilt just one drop of
oil from a pot brimful of oil on your head that you carry through a crowd
excited by the singing dancing queen, your head will be chopped off by a man
following behind.
EVEN IF SOMEONE PUSHED YOU AND YOU SPILT ONE
DROP OF OIL BALANCED IN A POTFUL ON YOUR HEAD, YOU LOSE YOUR HEAD ACCORDING TO
THE BUDDHA. SO THE WISE MAN WILL PAY FULL ATTENTION TO THE POT AND IF YOU ARE
PAYING FULL ATTENTION TO THE POT YOU CANNOT BE EYING THE PRETTY GIRL OR
HANDSOME MAN OR VOLUPTUOUS FOOD.
Affirmation of my understanding about
USD reserve currency:
I am not even a student of economics but even
long ago I correctly perceived the gross unrighteous advantages to the US of wielding
the world’s reserve currency and currency of trade. What he says reflects what
I said longer ago.
The dollar's 70-year dominance
is coming to an end
Within a decade, greenback's could be replaced as the
world's reserve currency
5:30PM BST
19 Jul 2014
In early
July 1944, delegates from 44 countries gathered at the Mount Washington Hotel
in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. A three-week summit took place, at which a new
system was agreed to regulate the international monetary and financial order
after the Second World War.
The US was
already the world’s commercial powerhouse, having eclipsed the British Empire
several decades earlier. America was also on course to be among the victors of
“Europe’s conflict”, even though its economy was largely unscathed by war. As
such, Bretton Woods was US-dominated and produced a settlement largely on US
terms.
Seventy
years ago this week, that fateful summit ended. Its close marked the moment the
dollar’s unquestionable supremacy was secured. Since then, global commerce has
been conducted largely in dollars and leading economies have held the greenback
as their primary reserve currency.
The same
system remains intact today, with the lion’s share of commercial settlements
worldwide still clearing the US banking system – even if the parties involved
have nothing to do with the States.
The dollar’s
hegemony continues to be cemented, meanwhile, by the operations of the International
Monetary Fund and World Bank. Founded at Bretton Woods, they’re both Washington
based, of course, and controlled by America, despite some Francophone
window-dressing.
The
advantages this system bestows on the US are enormous. “Reserve currency status”
generates huge demand for dollars from governments and companies around the
world, as they’re needed for reserves and trade. This has allowed successive
American administrations to spend far more, year-in year-out, than is raised in
tax and export revenue.
By the early
Seventies, US economic dominance was so assured that even after President Nixon
reneged on the dollar’s previously unshakeable convertibility into gold,
amounting to a massive default, dollar demand kept growing.
So America
doesn’t worry about balance of payments crises, as it can pay for imports in
dollars the Federal Reserve can just print. And Washington keeps spending
willy-nilly, as the world buys ever more Treasuries on the strength of
regulatory imperative and the vast liquidity and size of the market for US
sovereign debt.
It is this
“exorbitant privilege” – as French statesman Valéry Giscard d’Estaing once
sourly observed – that has been the bedrock of America’s post-war hegemony. It
is the status of the dollar, above all, that’s allowed Washington to get its
way, putting the financial squeeze on recalcitrant countries via the IMF while
funding foreign wars. To understand politics and power it pays to follow the
money. And for the past 70 years, the dollar has ruled the roost.
This won’t
change anytime soon. Something just took place, though, which illustrates that
dollar reserve currency status won’t last forever and could be seriously
diluted. Last week, seven decades on from Bretton Woods, the governments of
Brazil, Russia, India and China led a conference in the Brazilian city of
Fortaleza to mark the establishment of a new development bank that, whatever
diplomatic niceties are put on it, is intent on competing with the IMF and
World Bank.
It’s long
been obvious the BRICs are coming. The total annual output of these four
economies has spiralled in recent years, to an astonishing $29.6 trillion
(£17.3 trillion) last year on a PPP-basis adjusted for living costs. That’s
within spitting distance of the $34.2 trillion generated by the US and European
Union combined.
America’s
GDP, incidentally, was $16.8 trillion on World Bank numbers, and China’s was
$16.2 trillion – within a whisker of knocking the US off its perch. The balance
of global economic power is on a knife-edge. Tomorrow is almost today.
Consider
also that the BRICs collectively hold sway over 50pc of global currency
reserves, rising to almost three-quarters if you take the emerging markets as a
whole. The G7 nations between them control only 20pc – and less than 8pc if you
exclude Japan.
Based on
such balance sheets, we’re now seeing institutional change. The new BRICs
Development Bank, modelled on the IMF, will have a $100bn currency reserve
available to lend around the world, giving distressed debtor nations an
alternative to the “Washington consensus”.
For a long
time, the BRICs have been paying in to the IMF, yet been denied additional
influence over what happens to the money. Belgium has more votes than Brazil,
Canada more than China.
The
institutions governing the global economy have failed to keep pace with
reality. Modest reforms giving the large emerging markets more power, agreed
with much fanfare in 2007 and again in 2010, have been stalled by Washington
lawmakers. The BRICs have now called time, setting up their own, rival
institution based in Shanghai.
The key to
the dollar’s future is petrocurrency status – whether it’s used for trading oil
and other leading commodities. Here, too, change is afoot. China’s voracious
energy appetite and America’s increased focus on domestic production mean the
days of dollar-priced energy look numbered.
Beijing has
struck numerous agreements with Brazil and India that bypass the dollar. China
and Russia have also set up rouble-yuan swaps pushing America’s currency out of
the picture. But if Beijing and Moscow – the word’s largest energy importer and
producer respectively – drop dollar energy pricing, America’s reserve currency
status could unravel.
That would
undermine the US Treasury market and seriously complicate Washington’s ability
to finance its vast and still fast-growing $17.5 trillion of
dollar-denominated debt.
In May,
Beijing and Moscow signed a huge multi-decade gas supply contract, to sit
alongside a similar oil deal agreed in 2009. No one knows what share of this
energy trade will be on a yuan-rouble basis – and the two governments aren’t
saying. This question, seemingly inane, is among the most important diplomatic
issues of our time.
At the
moment, although Russia’s export partners do sometimes settle in roubles, most
Sino-Russian trade is still in dollars. But the combination of this new gas
deal, and western sanctions on Russia – has seen Moscow and Beijing step up
bilateral efforts to facilitate large-scale non-dollar settlement.
With western
anti-Russia sanctions likely to be tightened again after the tragic shooting of
a Malaysian passenger plane over Ukrainian airspace, Beijing’s response will be
closely scrutinised. I, for one, expect the Chinese to say little until it’s
clearly established who grounded the plane and why.
Although the
dollar’s reserve status won’t end overnight, the global payments system is now
moving inexorably towards that outcome. The US currency accounted for just 33pc
of all foreign exchange holdings in 2013, on IMF numbers, down from 55pc in
2001.
Within a
decade or so, a “reserve currency basket” may emerge, with central banks
storing wealth in a mix of dollars, yuan, rupee, reals and roubles, as well as
precious metals. Perhaps some kind of synthetic bundle of the world’s leading
currencies will be developed, with emphasis placed, after years of western
money-printing, on assets backed by commodities and other tangibles.
I also
believe central banks may include cyber-currencies (such as bitcoin) in their
reserves. If you think that’s mad, consider that mankind has long sought
scarcity – be it with shells, stones or metallic elements – to store wealth.
Now the money-printing taboo has been broken by yet another generation, it
makes sense to use complex computer algorithms to ensure that only a certain
amount of a particular currency unit can ever exist.
The dollar’s
status is a big question. Judging the outcome is more akin to star-gazing than
scientific economics. But the establishment of this BRIC Development bank,
timed to coincide with the anniversary of Bretton Woods, is an audacious and
significant move. The world’s emerging giants now have thumbscrews on the West.
The USD hegemony is whopping perpetual
free lunch for USA:
Because many nations, criminals stash their
wealth in USD, the USD is the currency of settlement for all trade even if it
does not involve the US, it is a whopping perpetual interest free lunch for the
USA and should you take away this free lunch, Uncle Sam will be much thinner,
hungrier and the world will be realistically much poorer than it pretends to be
with USD hegemony.
US FINANCIAL HEGEMONY WITH THE USD ALLOWS THE US
AND THE WORLD TO LIVE WAY BEYOND ITS MEANS (AND THE EARTH TO SUPPORT), IF IT
WAS TAKEN AWAY, IT WOULD BE LIKE PULLING A RUG FROM BENEATH THE US (AND THE
WORLD).
Rather than merit, giving in this
world bears karma:
Unless the gift is essential, sustains the life
of the person here or leads/assists him out of this world to safety and
happiness, if your gift is unessential, in surfeit (excess), designed to bond
him to you (manipulative) and bonds the receiver to this world and
acquisitiveness then the giving even has karma to be experienced as suffering
rather than merit to be experienced as happiness later.
Thus only if the recipient is poverty stricken
in danger of starvation is your gift of food meritorious, if the recipient is
well nourished, your gift of food hamper, chocolates, Brands’ essence of
chicken is unessential, will not save him from famine but rather it maintains
him in a deceitful manipulative relationship with you, conditions him to greed
(want gifts) and attachment to material objects.
THUS ONLY IF A GIFT OF FOOD, SHELTER (EG GIVE
HOUSE TO YOUR SON VS GIVE HOUSE TO DESTITUTE), MONEY, APPARELS (FASHION T SHIRT
FOR FRIEND VERSUS SHIRT FOR BEGGAR), GADGETS (CARS, TABLETS, SMARTPHONES) ARE
ESSENTIAL TO SUSTAIN A PERSON’S LIFE HERE IS IT MERITORIOUS, IF THE GIFT IS NOT
NEEDED, DOES NOT SAVE HIM FROM FAMINE BUT RATHER IS TO BOND HIM TO YOU AND
ENCOURAGE HIM TO BE ACQUISITIVE AND ATTACHED TO THIS WORLD, IT IS EVEN KARMA
INCURRING.
SIMILARLY ASSISTANCE IN WORLDLY MATTERS EG TO
PASS EXAMS, HOW TO COURT GIRLS, HOW TO COOK CURRY IS KARMA INCURRING, ONLY
ASSISTANCE TO RESULTS IN TRUE HAPPINESS HERE AND HELPS THE PERSON ESCAPE THIS
WORLD AFTER DEATH IS MERITORIOUS.
THE BUDDHA SAID A GIFT TO AN EVIL MAN CAN HAVE
SERIOUS NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOU. NOT ALL GIVING OR ASSISTING IS
AUTOMATICALLY MERITORIOUS. IT IS NOT HOW MUCH OR EXPENSIVE YOU GIVE BUT WHETHER
THE GIFT IS ESSENTIAL IN SUSTAINING THE PERSON HERE (HE IS IN NEED OF THE GIFT)
OR ASSIST HIM TO DEPART THIS WORLD TO HEAVEN AND BEYOND.
THE BUDDHA DESCRIBED SIX CONDITIONS THAT MARK
THE HIGHEST GIVING AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE VALUE OR MILLIONS OF THE
GIFT. IF THE GIVER IS DELIGHTED WITHOUT REGRET BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER GIVING
AND THE RECIPIENT IS NOT DELUDED, GREEDY OR HAS ILL WILL, THIS IS THE HIGHEST
GIVING WITH THE HIGHEST MERIT.
THE VAST MAJORITY OF GIVING SEEN IN THIS WORLD
IS UNESSENTIAL, THE RECIPIENT IS NOT IN NEED OF THE GIFT, IT IS FOR SHOW, TO
BOND AND MANIPULATE AND LEADS THE RECIPIENT TO COVETOUSNESS AND ATTACHMENT TO
THIS WORLD.
The supreme gift vs highest giving:
The two are not synonymous to those who
understand.
The Buddha said of the two, a material gift and
a gift of the dharma, the gift of the dharma is supreme.
A material gift will sustain you for a while
here and then you suffer and die. A gift of the dharma (which by yourself you
will never discover) if understood and put into practice leads to the Deathless
(heaven and beyond) and out of suffering and death that is as vast as an ocean
and long as eternities.
BY THEMSELVES BEINGS ARE HOPELESSLY TRAPPED HERE
HEADING FOR ENDLESS SUFFERING AND DEATH AND A GIFT OF THE DHARMA THAT IS
SUPREME ENABLES HIM TO ESCAPE THIS ENDLESS TORMENT AND DEATH TO SAFETY AND THEREFORE
IT IS SUPREME COMPARED TO ANY MATERIAL GIFT (ALTHOUGH YOU MAY PREFER A FERRARI
OR MANSION).
IN CONTRAST THE HIGHEST GIVING IS WHEN SIX
CONDITIONS ARE FULFILLED, THE GIVER IS GLAD BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER GIVING AND
THE RECIPIENT IS WITHOUT DELUSION, ILL WILL OR GREED.
IF THE RECIPIENT IS WELL ENDOWED, NOT IN NEED OF
MATERIAL THINGS THEN THE GIVING IS HYPOCRITICAL, FOR SHOW, MANIPULATIVE AND
SERVES TO BOND THE RECIPIENT TO THIS WORLD AND INCURS KARMA THAN MERIT.
WHAT IS GIVEN TO THE BUDDHA GIVES THE HIGHEST
MERIT.
THE BUDDHA SAID THERE ARE TWO MEALS GIVEN TO HIM
THAT GIVES THE HIGHEST MERIT, THE LAST ONE GIVEN TO THE BUDDHA BEFORE HIS
ENLIGHTENMENT AND THE ONE GIVEN BEFORE HE PASSED AWAY.
Only a deluded man can say that and only those
without understanding will accept the statement.
Blunders do not exist, they are delusions. If
what Putin did was good it would not be called a blunder, it is because it is
bad and he ‘shot himself in the foot’ that it is called a blunder. Does that
mean that if it was successful but bad it is not a blunder?
SOMETHING DONE IS EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG, NEVER A
BLUNDER WHICH IMPLIES SOMETHING BAD THAT FAILED WITH NEGATIVE FALLOUT FOR THE
PERPETRATOR.
THUS THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING IS 10 WRONGS BY
PUTIN NEVER BLUNDERS. YOU MEAN IF HE GOT AWAY WITH IT, IT IS NOT A BLUNDER, IT
IS GOOD OR CORRECT?
THE TRUTH OR REALITY IS NOT ABOUT BLUNDERS BUT
RIGHT OR WRONG, TRUE OR FALSE.
THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS OF BLUNDERS HAS A WRONG
UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY AND THIS IS NEVER OK BUT IT LEADS TO SUFFERING.
BLUNDERS DON’T EXIST, THEY ARE PRODUCTS OF THE
FALSE PERCEPTION OF DELUDED PEOPLE.
Blunder is wrong view:
The person who subscribes to blunders has wrong
view, to him, there is no good or bad or good and bad does not matter, what
matters is if something succeeds or it fails (disastrously).
THE PERSON WHO SUBSCRIBES TO BLUNDERS IS NOT
CONCERNED ABOUT THE GOOD OR BAD, TRUTH OR FALSITY OF SOMETHING, WHAT MATTERS IS
IF IT SUCCEEDS OR IT IS A DISASTER (BLUNDER) FOR THE PERPETRATOR.
BLUNDER IS WRONG VIEW AND WRONG VIEW HAS TWO
DESTINATIONS, HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA. WHAT MATTERS IS
THE CORRECTNESS OF THE DEED, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF IT SUCCEEDS OR FAILS.
Hitler’s brilliance and blunders?
By a combination of luck, surprise and ruthless,
Hitler’s blitzkrieg through the Ardennes forest is considered a feat of genius,
it does not matter if it was evil and the disasters Hitler brought upon himself
in the Russian invasion were termed blunders.
THUS BLUNDERS BETRAYS A PERSON COLOR BLIND TO
THE GOOD AND BAD OF ACTIONS, WHAT MATTERS TO HIM IF IT WAS A STROKE OF GENIUS
IN THAT IT WAS BRILLIANTLY SUCCESSFUL OR IT BROUGHT DISASTER UPON SELF AND IS
THEN CALLED A BLUNDER.
It is always wrong and deceitful to seek to
rebuild trust but what you should do is to conduct yourself scrupulously, to
have the welfare of passengers foremost in your mind, rebuilding trust is
something you must do and it is always for show to impress the public of your
wholesomeness that is not genuine.
IF YOUR WHOLESOMENESS IS GENUINE YOU DO NOT HAVE
TO DO THINGS TO APPEAR WHOLESOME, IF YOU HAVE TO REBUILD TRUST, TO CREATE AN
IMAGE OF WHOLESOME THEN THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE, DECEITFUL AND YOU BAD RATHER THAN
GOOD THAT YOU SEEK TO IMPRESS OTHERS.
YOU NEVER SEEK TO REBUILD TRUST BUT YOU CONDUCT
YOURSELF RESPONSIBLY WITH THE WELFARE OF PASSENGERS AT HEART.
In the name of staving off economic collapse,
central bankers have been printing money furiously to buy bonds owned by the
rich that would otherwise be worthless thereby bailing them out, returning to
them money they otherwise would have lost and making the system assume those
potentially worthless bonds. Now the rich gratefully collect their returned
money and promptly seek higher returns by lending insured with derivatives to
emerging markets potentially causing even worse debt crises down the line.
WHAT KIND OF UNDERSTANDING WORLD DOES THIS KIND
OF THING?
Blair lies about his fortune:
In a rare comment on his
personal finances, Mr Blair suggested he was worth less than £20million,
despite the family owning property worth at least £30million.
Maybe Blair thinks he can pull wool over the
eyes of the public but his false statement exposes he may a hardcore liar or
going mad.
UNLESS HE IS GOING MAD OR HE IS A STRAIGHT FACED
LIAR (LIKELY A MIXTURE OF BOTH), SURELY HE KNOWS HIS FORTUNE IS CLOSER THE £100million
ALLEGED THAN £20million HE CONTENDS.
Life is not about successes and
failures (disappointments) but correctness:
There is such a thing called what is correct and
what is wrong and you seldom hear people being concerned about them but they
talk with pride about their (material) successes/achievements and their
failures, regrets, disappointments or blunders and that is a wrong
understanding of what life is about that has consequences in terms of future
suffering.
SUCCESSES, ACHIEVEMENTS ARE FRUITS THAT PERISH
AND CORECTNESS, TRUTH AND GOODNESS ARE FRUITS THAT DO NOT PERISH.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR
SUCCESSES AND ACHIEVEMENTS, LAMENT THEIR FAILURES, DISAPPOINTMENTS AND BLUNDERS
AND THIS IS AN INCORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF THE PURPOSE OR AIMS OR GOALS OF LIFE
THAT LEADS TO MORE SUFFERING AFTER DEATH.
Success is acquisition, blunder is
loss:
Success is about acquisition and blunder is
about loss, failed acquisition and the Buddha taught whoever makes an
acquisition in this world is heading for woe.
When a person pursues success he is pursuing
acquisition that the Buddha says leads to suffering not happiness and failure
or disappointment or blunder is the unsuccessful acquisition or loss and that
too is suffering and leads to suffering.
Therefore what I says accords with what the
Buddha taught, seeking success and suffering blunders or setbacks are
delusional and lead to woe.
Whatever Putin did was never a blunder
but wrong and a disaster:
Whatever Putin did that was termed a blunder or
mistake or miscalculation is wrong and liable to bring disaster to himself and
others and so anyone who perceived what Putin did as a blunder or mistake or
miscalculation has a false perception and understanding of reality.
If what Putin intended to do was true, good,
wholesome it cannot result in disaster for himself and others and it is only if
what he did was evil, wrong, covetous that it could turn into a blunder,
mistake or miscalculation, instead of the glory or acquisition he envisioned,
it has backfired as disaster for himself and others.
A blunder or mistake or miscalculation does not
take into consideration the wrong or harm of the action, it is all about
objectives, plans to achieve those objectives that turned out faulty, a mistake
or miscalculations, it is even an excuse to shift the blame from the person to
mistakes, miscalculations.
THERE IS EVIL AND THERE IS RIGHT AND WRONG BUT
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A BLUNDER, IT IS A (CONDITIONED OR PROGRAMMED)
CONCOCTION OR FABRICATION OF DELUDED REHASHING MINDS TO EXPLAIN THINGS THEY SEE
AND BECAUSE THEY ARE A FALSE PERCEPTION, THOSE WHO SUBSCRIBE TO BLUNDERS ARE
HEADED FOR INSANITY AND WOE.
THIS WORLD ACCEPTS BLUNDERS, MISTAKES,
MISCALCULATIONS AS VALID, TRUE NOT BECAUSE IT IS TRUE BUT BECAUSE IT IS A
MUTUALLY SHARED CONDITIONED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT SERVES TO TRAP ALL THOSE WHO
SUBSCRIBE TO FUTURE WOE AND ENDLESS DEATHS.
If you can see how severely sick society is, how
sick doctors and psychiatrists themselves are and you can see that those with
schizophrenia may be unable to cope with the controlled conflicting insanity,
pretense or hypocrisy that society imposes on all its denizens, you won’t be
looking to genes as the cause and cure for schizophrenia.
It is because scientists are grossly deluded,
blind to their own shit, to society’s shit that they look to scapegoats to
explain schizophrenia and they announce with great delusion and ‘excitement’ a
‘breakthrough’, large gene found when it is barking up the wrong tree and will
end in madness even schizophrenia as punishment for these very same scientists.
Tarnishing Putin’s image:
Whether MH17
disaster can tarnish Putin's reputation
An image is never the truth about a person but
it is a recorded fixed but modifiable picture of the person (eg clever, evil,
debonair, charming, resourceful, witty) in the minds of those who are rehashing
robots that is always wrong and dangerous.
If something is a fixed, rigid impression of a
person, it is not an image but the truth and if it is an image it is false and
why would anyone who is not deluded bother with whether Putin’s (false) image
is tarnished or untarnished? What is the point of an untarnished image that is
false or incorrect of Putin’s?
THE PERSON OF TRUTH WHO UNDERSTANDS DOES NOT
SUBSCRIBE TO REPUTATIONS, IT IS THE TRUTH OR FALSITY, GOOD OR BAD OF WHAT A
PERSON DOES AND SAYS THAT MATTERS. HE DOES NOT BOTHER TO STORE IMAGES OF OTHERS
IN HIS MIND WHICH IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND INSANE NOR DOES HE BOTHER TO REMEMBER
THE REPUTATIONS OF OTHERS WHICH AGAIN INVOLVES WORK AND IS SUFFERING.
THUS ANYONE WHO IS CONCERNED ABOUT REPUTATIONS
AND IMAGES IS DELUDED AND REFLECTING HIS SICKNESS HE IS BOTHERED WITH TARNISHED
AND UNTARNISHED REPUTATIONS OR FALSITIES.
IT IS POINTLESS HARBOURING UNTARNISHED
REPUTATIONS OR IMAGES OF PUTIN, WHAT MATTERS IS SEEING AND UNDERSTANDING HIM
CORRECTLY AS HE ACTUALLY IS AND IT IS ACTUALLY POSSIBLE TO DO.
Only those who are putting on a show
are conscious of images:
If a person is true, is not putting on a show,
there is no image of himself that he is projecting and he cannot be concerned
about images of himself or reputations to safeguard.
It is only a person who is not true, is putting
on a show to deceive others how clever, trustworthy or authoritative he is, who
would bother about his image and reputation that he seeks to preserve and
cultivate in others.
What is the point of an untarnished
falsity?
Reputations and images of a person are false,
never the truth about the person so what is the point of having an untarnished
reputation or image of the person except that you are deluded, do not truly
understand?
PUTIN CAN BE SEEN TRULY AS GOOD OR EVIL AND IF
WHAT YOU SEE IS TRUE THAT TRUTH CANNOT BE TARNISHED. IT IS IF WHAT YOU SEE OF
PUTIN IS NOT TRUE AND IT IS THEN FIXED OR RECORDED IN YOUR MIND AND REPEATEDLY
REHASHED THAT SOMETHING NEW HAPPENING CAN TARNISH IT.
IF WHAT YOU SEE OF PUTIN IS THE TRUTH, ACCURATE
IT CANNOT BE TARNISHED, IT IS IF WHAT YOU SEE OF PUTIN IS FALSE, UNREALISTIC,
RECORDED AND FIXED IN YOUR MIND THAT IT CAN BE TARNISHED.
Jakarta
Governor Joko Widodo has been declared the winner of Indonesia's
hotly-contested presidential election.
Ex-general Prabowo Subianto looks like a
brute and Widodo is the better choice of the two. Looks like elections are
freer in Indonesia than some ASEAN countries who like to pretend they are more
sophisticated or developed. In Thailand the judiciary can dismiss a ruling
government.
Israelis as evil as Russians:
There is a video showing a Palestinian youth
with phone to head surveying the wreck of his house for his family and suddenly
he falls and dies after succumbing to an Israeli sniper.
MANY LIKE TO PRETEND THEY ARE MORE CIVILIZED AND
STAND FOR GOOD BUT THE SO CALLED GOOD GUYS ARE FAR FROM GOOD AND MANKIND IS
JUST A MASS OF ROTTEN GOATS AT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS AND MANY INCLUDING THOSE
WHO THINK THEY ARE QUITE GOOD AND PIOUS DO NOT REALIZE THEY HAVE AGONY TO FACE
AFTER THEY DEPART.
Even if this is true it does not make it more
understandable or excusable, the culprits including those Russians who supplied
the rebels with missiles are culpable and if MAS did not reroute their flights
when they should have, when crew have expressed concern are liable too.
All this condemning the shooting down and minute
silence are wrong, for show and lead to suffering for those outraged and paying
silence.
There is no such thing as mistakes, there
is right and wrong:
There is no such thing as a mistake but if you
shot down the plane you have done wrong and there are reparations to be made.
You may be asking for more punishment deflecting
responsibility by claiming mistake.
YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU
SAY WHAT MORE MISTAKES THAT COSTS OTHERS DEATH AND GRIEF SO YOU ARE DELUDED AND
MAD TO CONSIDER IT A MISTAKE.
WHETHER IT WAS A MISTAKE OR NOT DOES NOT MATTER,
IF YOU THINK IT IS RELEVANT AND IT IS NOT THEN YOU ARE DELUDED, DO NOT
CORRECTLY UNDERSTAND THAT HAS CONSEQUENCES IN FUTURE SUFFERING.
You are firing deadly missile not toy
pistol so what mistake are you talking about?
You are firing a deadly missile at a target that
can kill many people so you very well better make sure you know what you are
firing at, if you don’t you will pay dearly for your recklessness.
EVEN AIMING A TOY PISTOL PLAYFULLY AT SOMEONE
HAS DEADLY KARMA MORE THAN YOU REALIZE.
I WOULD NOT HOLD A PISTOL TO GET A FEEL, TO HOLD
A WEAPON IS ITSELF KARMA INCURRING.
A MISSILE CAN HAVE DEADLY DEVASTATING
CONSEQUENCES SO YOU HAVE TO EXERCISE GREAT CAUTION BEFORE YOU FIRE AND IF YOU
DON’T THE PUNISHMENT IS JUST AS SEVERE AS INTENTIONALLY BRINGING DOWN AN
AIRLINE.
