The only cause of sadness & feeling hurt:
You might tout medical causes of sadness (eg depressed neurotransmitters) but it may be or is the truth that there can only be sadness if a person consciously or unconsciously constantly uses his mental force of going against himself to prolong whatever syllables or musical notes or units of motion in the name of style or to intimidate others that must be controlled by his force of self preservation (whatever is prolonged will not stop by itself but can only be stopped by an opposite force, the force of self preservation so that the next syllable or unit of motion can begin) and if you constantly prolong, the urge becomes automatic and irresistible and should the force of self preservation fail to curb this urge to prolong then sadness starts to stir and may then grip the mind in a vice that if not shaken off, descends into deep dark depression.
ALL USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG EG SYLLABLES MUST BE CURTAILED BY THE OPPOSITE FORCE OF SELF PERSERVATION IN ORDER FOR THE NEXT SYLLABLE TO BEGIN AND IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY PROLONGING, AT TIMES THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION MUST BE OVERWHELMED SO THAT THE PROLONGING IS UNRESISTED WITH THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE OF SADNESS THAT MAY GRIP THAT MIND IN A VICE TO DESCEND INTO DEPRESSION.
THUS IF YOU DO NOT ENJOY SADNESS, DO NOT LIKE DEPRESSION THEN YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION ABOVE ALL ELSE NOT TO STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES. IF YOU THINK YOU DO NOT STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES AND I CAN SHOW YOU EVEN BLATANT STRETCHING THEN YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT SEE OR KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING.
In the same way feeling hurt by what has happened or is said or done to you is only caused by your constant use of mental force to accelerate in speed and strength of force (loudness) in what you say or do to appear or sound eager or friendly or excited. This use of force to accelerate in speed and loudness must be resisted and brought to a halt by the opposing force of self preservation and whenever this fails, the person’s consciousness is exposed to the naked application of force accelerating in speed and strength that is always sharp and painful.
SO SHOW YOUR EAGERNESS AND FRIENDLINESS AND EXCITEMENT BUT YOU WILL NEVER ESCAPE FEELING HURT BY WHAT OTHERS SAY OR DO BECAUSE FEELING HURT IS LIKE A SHADOW THAT NEVER LEAVES THE USE OF FORCE TO CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
An accelerating car if not stopped will slam into a wall:
If you agree that a car accelerating in speed and engine force will not stop by itself but brakes must be applied, even slammed to stop it from slamming into a wall, in the same way if you use force to accelerate in speed and loudness through a stretched syllable, you must use opposite force (the force of self preservation) to bring it to a halt so that you can begin to fabricate the next syllable.
If the force of self preservation for some reason (eg exhaustion) fails to stop or resist the force of going against self accelerating in speed and strength, then this unopposed force hits your consciousness like the un-braked car slamming into a wall and that is sharply painful as is feeling hurt sharply painful.
Uncontrolled force prolonging is dull or indolent and so it is that sadness is dull and indolent pain.
Why people feel hurt:
Genuine feeling hurt is never voluntary but involuntary, beyond the control of stylish or emotional or liking and disliking people.
No matter how they try to avoid and refuse or will themselves not to get hurt by whatever happens, people with style or like and dislike must get hurt and they only fake by smiling that they are not hurt but even find it enjoyable that only stirs conflict and even greater hurt.
There will be things happening (eg discovering you failed your exam) or something someone ‘innocuously’ said or do that will stir even sharp hurt in the stylish or emotional person that will not occur in someone who is without style or unemotional.
THE REASON PEOPLE GET HURT IS BECAUSE, AS A RESULT OF LIFELONG CONSTANT PRACTICE, IT IS THE URGE OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES OF GOING AGAINST SELF TO ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH EVEN TO VIOLENT LEVELS IN REACTION TO WHATEVER IS HAPPENING, WHATEVER THEY HEAR OR SEE AND IN THE USUAL STATE THIS IS RESISTED AND SUCCESSFULLY BROUGHT TO A HALT BY THE OVERWORKED FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION. ON THOSE OCCASIONS WHERE THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION FAILS TO ADEQUATELY RESIST THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF ACELERATING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH, THE PERSON MUST EXPERIENCE HURT THAT IS PROPORTIONATE TO HOW VIOLENTLY ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF WAS ON THAT OCCASION AND HOW POORLY THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION WAS IN SHIELDING THE CONSCIOUSNESS AND OPPOSING THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF.
IN THE SAME WAY BECAUSE PROLONGING IS MEANIGLESS, FOR SHOW, IT CAN OCCUR ANYTIME AND OCCURS ALL THE TIME IN STYLISH PEOPLE, THE URGE TO PROLONG IS IRRESISTIBLE OR CONSTANT AND ONLY CONSTANTLY BEING PEGGED BACK BY THE OVERWORKED FORCE OF SELF PERSERVATION AND ON OCCASIONS WHEN THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION INADEQUATELY OR FAILED TO RESIST THE URGE TO PROLONG, THE PERSON EXPERIENCES SADNESS GROWING THAT CAN GAIN IN STRENGTH UNTIL IT SEIZES THE PERSON AND IS HARD TO SHAKE OFF (DEPRESSION).
If what I say is true and no one else has said this, the whoever is the counsellor Jesus described must say this in order to benefit you. If I have already said it where no one else has said this then I would have superseded him.
I may not be the counsellor but Jesus said the counsellor is the Holy Spirit and whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.
Whoever speaks against what I say above is speaking against something that no one has ever said to him and if that is the only way out of hellish torment then you will not forgiven but will be left to languish in your suffering you think is heaven.
Taking A Swipe At God:
Quote Economist Obituary: Moreover, his (Maharishi) message was entirely laudable. (If it is not laudable but censurable then he is deluded) He did not promote a cult or even a mainstream religion preaching original sin, purgatory and the likelihood of eternal damnation. He just wanted to end poverty, teach people how to achieve personal fulfilment and help them to discover “Heaven on Earth in this generation”. And yogic flying, of course (it is mischief and advanced false logic to link yogic flying with what he said previously. If the Maharishi is faked and failure, what he taught did not achieve what he said it would then you have wrong view to portray that he was at least partially successful) .
Comment: If he did not perceive his sins as relatively minor or does not deserves eternal damnation he would not have said so and it reflects many even well educated ones who like to think of themselves as intellectually sophisticated see little or no wrong with their own conduct and the conduct of others.
If your existence here is dependent on the deaths of many creatures to sustain, cannot be sustained without animals dying to feed you and these creatures turn out to be just as valid as you who craves to exist then if it is possible for you to be also born as creatures like them then it may be your turn even for another eternity to born as animals to sustain and satisfy the cravings of others.
If you severely underestimate your sins, apart from the frequent or sporadic acts of cruelty in words and deeds to others and animals you have poisoned and hurt others with your delusions, with your constant forceful style that stress, make restless, distract, make sad and hurt others, then even if your perception is that you have done little wrong but in truth you have done much grave harm to others that may take even an eternity to repay.
If the earth cannot sustain ill willed beings existing as humans and humans can only be permitted to exist when the Age is coming to a close and every animal you see from the smallest insects is a valid being awaiting its turn to be born a human so that the human state is as the Buddha said, a state that is very hard to gain, then if you have wasted your opportunity when you existed as a human then the next opportunity for you to be born a human again may be another or even several Ages later.
THE HUMAN STATE WITH WHICH YOU ARE NOW ENDOWED WITH IS NOT YOUR RIGHT BUT AN EVEN EXTREMELY RARE PRIVILEGE WITH ALL THE ANIMALS YOU SEE AROUND JOSTLING TO GET THEIR CHANCE TO BE HUMAN AND SO IF YOU SEE LITTLE SIN IN YOU WHEN THERE IS PLENTY AND CONSTANT IN THE WAY YOU PERSECUTE OTHERS WITH YOUR DELUSIONS, STYLE AND EMOTIONS, THEN YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE YOUR DEBTS DUE, IT DOES NOT MATTER THAT YOU THINK IT IS UNFAIR AND ABSURD THAT THERE SHOULD BE ETERNAL PUNISHMENT BUT IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO EXIST AFTER DEATH AS IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO EXIST NOW, THEN YOU SHALL GO INTO ETERNAL PUNISHMENT, WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, HOWEVER YOU WANT TO ARGUE WITH YOURSELF OR OTHERS.
You don’t deserve eternal punishment?
You may perceive you have done nothing or little wrong to deserve eternal punishment, God is nasty to threaten you with that but if death is just an abiding illusion to the ignorant, you have already existed for virtually countless eons each with virtually countless years and it is possible for all beings to exist even forever after they die just as it is possible for you to exist now and the way you exist now can be undertaken just as well as animals, there is no need for you to exist as human with the way you exist, the earth cannot cope with human existence so that humans are only permitted to appear on earth at the end of the Age (humans appeared in Africa 55,000 years ago), beings with ill will and delusion are far more recalcitrant or immune to reform then it will be your lot to go into eternal punishment, weeping and gnashing your teeth and building a pile of skeletons that the Buddha said is as high as a mountain.
Just as many animals must die to sustain you as a human and exist like a lord here, in future it will be your turn to die and suffer to sustain animals who have become humans in their lordly arrogant ungrateful existences.
If every smile, every expression on your face and laughter, every stretch of your syllable, change in speed and loudness that is your style is not wonderful as it is faked to be but persecutes others with stress, restlessness and distraction that kills them and pushes them to the brink of suicide and homicide then you have grave debts to repay.
Every time you make someone angry you have conditioned him to anger that he may never get out of for a long, long time and should his anger make him suffer and even get him into fights that kills him then by just getting a person angry with the way you speak, you have far grave debts than you imagine due you. Thus Jesus said that even the man who calls his brother ‘you fool’ is in danger of the fire of hell because if he becomes angry, you have initiated into the path that leads to hellish anger that he may never get out for many lifetimes.
Will Indians Fall For The Charms Of Mills & Boon Novels?
Headline: Will Indians Fall For The Romantic Charms Of Mills & Boon Novels?
Comment: Every question demands an answer and work and so a person should ask another person questions that are essential.
Whether Indians will fall for the romantic charms of certain novels are frivolous matters that cannot be determined with certainty. Not every Indian will fall for it and even those who fall for it are indulging in false fantasy that is conditioning them to future suffering and so to ask the question implies it is OK or good to fall for the romantic charms of those novels when it is to succumb to fantasy and falsity.
Thus the person who asks the question has advanced false perception that what he asked is meaningful and it is good or at least OK to fall for the romantic charms of Mills & Boon novels when it is flirting with future false perception to fall for the charms of Mills & Boon novels.
If something is frivolous, not worthy of consideration eg whether Indians will fall for the charms, and you think it is worthy of consideration then you are courting future mad perception of what is frivolous is essential. Such a person will also treat what is essential is frivolous.
Asking the wrong foolish question:
One asking rightfully asks, “Will many or how many Indians will fall for the charms of Mills & Boon novels?”
It is wrong to ask whether Indians will fall because not all Indians will fall and therefore the answer is clearly “No”.
Fong makes surprise turnaround:
By going back of her announcement that she will stand down, she has converted herself into a liar.
Her announcement not to stand was emotional (not based on reason but driven by force) and now she is going back on herself in a emotional way that creates conflict in her that will end in a very disturbed mind in the future you and she does not believe.
The Buddha said to Ananda several times that as a person who has perfected his virtues, if he wished he could live to the close of the Age. Ananda did not understand and ask the Buddha to stay and so when later the Buddha declared he will pass away three months thence, Ananda implored him to change his mind to which the Buddha said, it is impossible for the Buddha to go back on his words (because it would convert him into a liar).
AND SO IT IS THAT IF YOU ARE WISE YOU WILL THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU COMMIT YOURSELF AND ONCE YOU HAVE COMMITTED YOURSELF TO A DECISION YOU MUST NOT TURN BACK OTHERWISE YOU WILL BE PUNISHED NOT APPLAUDED.
| Fong makes surprise turnaround |
| Posted by kasee |
| Saturday, 23 February 2008 |
| IPOH: In a surprising turnaround, incumbent Batu Gajah MP Fong Po Kuan has announced a change of heart – she will defend her seat in the general election. Five days after her Sunday shocker that she would be withdrawing from the contest, Fong said the outpouring of support from her constituents had convinced her that she should not drop out of the race. “Their immense support touched me deeply and brought about the thought that I must not fail them. “It made me realise it was not a wise decision,” she told a packed press conference at the Ipoh Timor DAP operations centre here yesterday. |
It is force driving not true reason guiding:
Although people may dispute, think I am outrageous, I may be correct to say that it is never true or genuine reason (as opposed to rule or programmed reasoning) that guides and determine the views, deeds and speech of people with style or constantly forceful stretching of syllables, changes or speed and loudness but it is mental force directly as aggressiveness or indirectly as like and dislike, sadness, feeling hurt that directly drives (force can only drive) or indirectly drives through programmed or rigid false rules logic what people to perceive, think, speak and do certain things in certain individually characteristic ways.
Because they perceive and find their meaningless style, their liking and disliking and emotions meaningful, they therefore perceive what and how they perceive, think, speak and do meaningful.
In addition because they are endowed with programmed logic, instructions written by themselves and by others of what is true and false, what to say or do (culture and traditions are programmed logic), they think they have genuine reasoning when their programmed reasoning is fixed, they cannot think and perceive what is not programmed in their minds and in order to perceive and think differently they must painstakingly (use force to) reprogram themselves.
IF YOU HAVE PROGRAMMED LOGIC LIKE COMPUTERS HAVE PROGRAMMED LOGIC OR INSTRUCTIONS TELLING IT WHAT TO DO IN VARIOUS SITUATIONS, YOU MAY DECEIVE YOURSELF THAT YOU HAVE GENUINE REASON, BUT JUST AS COMPUTERS CANNOT REASON IN WAYS THAT THEY ARE NOT PROGRAMMED WITH, IN ORDER TO MAKE THEM REASON IN NEW WAYS YOU MUST REPROGRAM THEM, IN THE SAME WAY, PEOPLE WITH PROGRAMMED OR RULED LOGIC MAY THINK THEY ARE PERFECTLY REASONING, WHEN THEY CAN ONLY REASON ACCORDING TO WHAT THEIR MENTAL PROGRAMS TELL THEM.
Even when it is possible to reason so, it is unlikely if not impossible for ordinary people to think that DAP’s Ms Fong has converted herself into a liar by reneging on her earlier emotional pledge not to stand as a candidate. It is because ordinary people’s reasoning are programmed in accordance with society that they all perceive nothing wrong with her action when she has created emotional conflict in herself by first emotionally declaring her decision not to contest and now emotionally declaring her desire to contest.
Through Dispassion He Is Released:
The Buddha said that through dispassion a person is released that implies that the person is bonded by passion to existence which is always suffering or unsatisfactory and not the unalloyed pleasure that some may tout.
Thus though you might fail to grasp the significance of what the Buddha said, you think what the Buddha said is ho hum, if you are disenchanted with existence, if existence regularly confront you with experiences of mental and physical torment that severely test the limits of your tolerance, ‘drive you nuts’, then what the Buddha is telling you is that there is no release from suffering except through dispassion or the dissociation with passion which is about mental force, like and dislike and the totally unnecessary use of mental force that is in truth constant to stretch, change speed and strength of force in the name of style to deceive, please, impress, intimidate and dominate others.
EVEN IF YOU AND ALL YOUR FELLOW COHORTS IGNORE WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID, WHAT HE SAID MAY BE OF CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE TO ALL BEINGS WHO EXIST BECAUSE IT MAY BE THE TRUTH THAT IT IS PASSION THAT BONDS THEM TO EXISTENCE, NOW HERE NOW THERE, AND IT IS SUFFERING (YOU HAVE SHED YOUR OWN BLOOD GREATER THAN THE FOUR GREAT OCEANS), THEN HE IS TELLING YOU THAT THERE IS A WAY OUT OF YOUR PREDICAMENT AND IT IS SIMPLY WORKING TO DISSOCIATE YOURSELF FROM PASSION OR MENTAL FORCE.
People have sought an escape from their mental and physical sufferings in many ways, pharaohs even built giant pyramids that face the un-setting Pole Star so that they may depart at death on a flight to eternal life at the Pole Star that never sets and which all stars seem to revolve around.
People meditate to ‘break through’ in order to discover secrets that would liberate their suffering minds, people perform various secret, sexual, religious rituals to escape their sufferings, they take to drink, smoke hallucinogenic drugs, think endlessly (thinking that through thinking they may find emancipation), they seek health foods, tai chi, yoga and whatever you might imagine to seek an answer to their oppressive suffering in mind and body and here we have the Buddha telling you the one & ONLY way truly permanently out of your suffering: THROUGH DISPASSION YOU ARE RELEASED.
GREED, COVETOUSNESS, LUST, ENVY, ANGER, HATE, PRIDE, SHAME ARE ALL FORMS OF PASSION AND THROUGH DISPASSION IS A PERSON RELEASED.
The five lower fetters that bind beings to the lower impure realms (animal, hell, ghost) that include human life and they are self identity views (you never use true reason but you use force, attraction for what you identify as yourself and repulsion for what you do not identify with), faith in rituals and rules (it is never reason that is behind rules and rituals but is force driving a plan of what to say or do), doubt and uncertainty (doubt and uncertainty is about force churning up a mind, never true reason), ill will (ill will is simply forcefulness, the use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness is quintessential ill will) and sensuality (attraction for smell, taste, touch, sight and sound and the use of force to stretch, change speed and strength when tasting, smelling, touching, seeing and hearing).
The five higher fetters that bind beings to existence in the heavens are the attachment to forms, to the formless, conceit (basking in the glory of one’s blissful reason full existence), restlessness (desire for change) and ignorance (not knowing the exact nature of one’s being and the nature of existence).
Different ways of reasoning:
For any event occurring different people may arrive at different conclusions that partly reflect the different ways with which people reason that is consistent in them (they always reason in the same way to come to the same conclusions) and differs from others.
Because no two different ways of reasoning that arrives at different conclusions can be true, only one is correct or true or all of the different ways are false, it indicates that people’s reasoning can be false and they may all be false.
THE FACT THAT THE PERSON ALWAYS REASONS IN THE SAME WAY TO ARRIVE AT THE SAME CONCLUSIONS SUGGESTS THAT THERE ARE RULES IN THEIR MINDS THAT THEY APPLY TO THE SITUATION.
WHEN PEOPLE WORK OUT WHAT HAPPENED OR REASON, THEY ARE CONSULTING AND APPLYING RULES THEY HAVE STORED IN THE MIND THAT IS CONSISTENT IN THEM BUT DIFFERS FROM OTHERS WHICH IS WHY THEY ALWAYS COME TO THE SAME CONCLUSION THAT DIFFERS FROM ANOTHER WHO APPLIES HIS OWN INDIVIDUAL RULES THAT DIFFER THAT NOT SURPRISINGLY ARRIVES AT A DIFFERENT CONCLUSION.
IF IT IS TRUE THEY ARE CONSULTING AND APPLYING RULES IN THEIR MINDS, IT MEANS THEY CAN ONLY MAKE CONCLUSIONS THAT THEIR MENTAL RULES DETERMINE, WHAT CONCLUSIONS IS OUTSIDE THOSE RULES THEY CANNOT MAKE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT POSSESS THE RULES THAT WILL PERMIT THEM TO MAKE THOSE CONCLUSIONS. BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONALLY ATTACHED TO THEIR RULES, THEY PERCEIVE THEIR RULES ARE CORRECT, THEY ARE HARD TO CHANGE, IT IS HARD TO SHAKE PEOPLE OFF THEIR DELUSIONS.
IF YOU THINK EVERYONE THINK IN THE SAME WAY YOU ARE A FOOL. PEOPLE THINK IN DIFFERENT WAYS AND NO TWO DIFFERENT WAYS ARE CORRECT BUT EITHER ONE OR NONE OF THE DIFFERENT WAYS ARE CORRECT. THUS BECAUSE PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT WAYS OF THINKING, THEY MUST HAVE FALSE OR DIFFERENT PROGRAMMED THINKING THAT IS HARD TO CHANGE.
Why it must be programmed logic:
Why is it that ordinary or stylish people cannot have genuine logic but their logic must be programmed or according to rules written in their minds by themselves and others?
The reason is because whatever and however they perceive, think, speak and do have a style that is consistent in them and differs from others that cannot be rendered live but must be rehashed and they are therefore robots always rehashing what and how they perceive, think, speak and do.
And just as robots humanoid or otherwise cannot think for themselves, whatever robots speak and do are according to programs or rules written for them, telling them what to say or do, without the programs telling them what to say or do they cannot say or do, in the same way you would expect and it is the case that ordinary stylish robotic people must reason according to programs in their minds instructing them how to handle and make sense of whatever is happening to them.
If you say so what it is programmed logic, you do not understand the implications. Programmed logic means the person is entirely dependent on a set of software instructions in their minds telling them how to interpret things happening and this software in them differs from others and unless the software is rewritten they cannot interpret things differently and even when it is rewritten they again can only interpret things in the rewritten way.
In contrast the person with genuine reason sees things clearly and understands things clearly as it is and based on what he sees and understands clearly, he draws specific conclusions and initiate specific actions in speech and deed that is specific for this occasion.
Chosen out of this world:
Jesus spoke of those chosen out of this world.
So long as the person is content in existing as a voyeur and disc jockey presiding over a robotic jukebox dishing out whatever and however he perceives, thinks, speaks and does according to a set of programs or instructions or rules telling his robot what to do and how to interpret or make sense of things, then nothing can be done for him even he is driven through torment to suicide and homicide because that person is existing in a private false delusional world that he insists is true, good for himself and others.
IT MAY BE BECAUSE ALL STYLISH PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY SOPHISTICATED BIOLOGICAL ROBOTS AND THEY ARE QUITE HAPPY TO FUNCTION THIS WAY AND HOSTILE TO CHANGE EVEN THOUGH IT IS TORMENTING AND LEADS INEXORABLY TO LOSS OF CONTROL AND INSANITY, THEY MUST BE PERMITTED TO WALLOW IN THEIR MIRE AND PERSECUTE OTHERS AND IT IS ONLY THE FEW WHO MAY BE THOUGHT TO SEE AND UNDERSTAND WHO WILL MAKE THE EFFORT TO CONVERT THEMSELVES FROM ROBOTS TO GENUINELY SEE AND UNDERSTANDING PEOPLE NOT ROBOTS.
Programmed Logic:
There is such a thing called programmed logic and genuine logic and the two are distinct and cannot be confused with each other.
Programmed logic is rigid not negotiable, rehashed and does not understand whilst genuine logic is flexible and takes into consideration variations of the circumstances, is fresh, specific for each occasion and there is understanding of what is meant.
When Windows Vista starts up it is likely it always starts in the same sequence with which it was programmed or ordered to, even when it may be possible to vary some steps in the sequence and once you type in the correct password it always displays “Welcome” not because the computer or Vista understands what it is saying but it has been programmed or ordered by its programmer to do so. It is unlikely if not impossible that the computer or Vista understands what it is saying (“welcome”) and the fact that there some who do not realize they have advanced false perception are in doubt (they think, why not, maybe there is life or intelligence in the computer and it does understand what it is saying, “welcome”) but it displays ‘welcome’ because it has been programmed without itself understanding ‘welcome’ to display it and it will always display it without fail, it cannot choose to sometimes display ‘welcome’ and sometimes not, even though it should be possible to do so.
Thus the casual and gullible observer may be fooled to think the computer has true logic, is a thinking entity and it is issuing an sincere intended ‘welcome’ each time it starts up when it is impersonal, devoid of understanding and according to rigid instructions written by its programmer to give the appearance that it is alive and welcoming you.
Thus in the same way you may perceive the smiles and greetings, the casual or serious dialogue by stylish emotional people that appear appropriate to the situation to be live, specific to the occasion and fully intended and understood by the issuer but such greetings and dialogues may be fixed, rehashed without understanding or if he understood what he is saying, is not specific but only generally applied to the occasion at hand.
People in this world are opinionated, they are eager or greedy to have views on various topics and they try to make sense of things happening even though they have insufficient facts or the facts they have are not facts but assumptions and beliefs and thus they arrive at conclusions that may differ from others based on reasoning processes that also differ from others but is fixed or rigid in them (they always reason in a certain way that is different from others).
Instead of painstakingly gathering the facts of the case that is available and carefully separating hearsay or unreliable facts and then piecing them together to tell a story, they usually feed whatever facts and hearsay they have into their reasoning process that is fixed, warped by their likes and dislikes that then churn out a conclusion that can actually be predicted quite well if you know the person well enough.
THE MODERN COMPUTER MAY GIVE YOU AN INCREASINGLY REALISTIC ILLUSION OF IT BEING INTELLIGENT OR UNDERSTANDING WHEN IT WELCOMES YOU, ASKS YOU TO WAIT, ISSUES DIALOGUE BOXES THAT ASKS YOU RELEVANT QUESTIONS BUT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE COMPUTER UNDERSTANDS WHAT IT IS DOING, IT ALWAYS DOES WHAT IT DOES ACCORDING TO INSTRUCTIONS ITS PROGRAMMER WROTE, IT CANNOT SOMETIMES NOT WELCOME YOU, IT CANNOT BEHAVE OR ISSUE DIALOGUE BOXES THAT ITS PROGRAMMER DID NOT WRITE, EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO SO.
EMOTIONAL PEOPLE’S REASONING PROCESS IS NOT OPEN OR FLEXIBLE TAKING INTO SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS OF EACH OCCASION BUT THEY ARE FIXED, SHAPED BY THEIR LIKES AND DISLIKES (FORCEFUL ATTRACTION AND REPULSION THAT IS ALL ABOUT FORCE, NOTHING ABOUT REASON) THAT ALWAYS ARRIVE AT CONCLUSIONS THAT DIFFER FROM OTHERS BUT IS CONSISTENT OR PREDICTABLE IN THEM.
AND SO IT MAY BE THE CASE THAT STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE HAVE LITTLE OR NO GENUINE TRUE REASON, THE PLAN OF WHATEVER THEY WANT TO SAY OR DO CAN BE COPIED FROM OTHERS AND EXIST AS A COPY IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES AND ALL THEY DO IS SELECT THE HOPEFULLY CORRECT SEQUENCE TO PLAY, APPLY FORCE TO POWER OR ACTIVATE THE SEQUENCE AND THEY ARE IN BUSINESS TO INTERACT WITH OTHERS, TO GET ALONG TO SAY AND DO THINGS IN THE NAME OF DECEPTION, PLEASING, IMPRESSING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS.
WHATEVER IDEAS, SPEECH AND DEED STYLISH PEOPLE WANT TO UNDERTAKE ARE NEVER FRESHLY SYNTHESIZED FOR THE OCCASION BUT EXIST AS PLANS MEMORIZED IN THEIR MINDS AND ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS DRIVEN BY AGGRESSION, LIKE OR DISLIKE, TO USE FORCE EVEN TO VIOLENT LEVELS TO ACTIVATE THE DESIRED PLAN SO THAT IT CAN BE REGURGITATED TO ITS AUDIENCE.
IT MAY BE THE CASE NO GENUINE REASON AT ALL IS REQUIRED TO FUNCTION OR SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD, EVEN AT THE LEVEL OF TOP SCIENTIST, COMPANY CEO OR PRESIDENT OF THE USA, ALL YOU NEED IS GOOD PERCEPTIONS (SEEING AND HEARING), A GOOD COPYING APPARATUS, RECORDED PLANS OF ALL THE IDEAS, BELIEFS, SPEECH AND DEED YOU WANT TO EXPRESS AND THE DETERMINATION, LIKE AND DISLIKE OR URGE TO SUPPLY POWER OR FORCE TO THESE PLANS TO CARRY THEM OUT.
IF EINSTEIN HAS GENUINE REASON AND IS DISCERNING, SEEING THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE, SINCE HE IS SO SMART AS TO DISCOVER RELATIVITY, HE SHOULD HAVE NO DIFFICULTY SEEING RIGHT UNDER HIS NOSE ALL THE TIME, AS THERE IS (THAT I CAN DEMONSTRATE FOR YOU IF YOU QUESTION) THAT THERE IS CONSTANT (UNNECESSARY AND REMEDIABLE) FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN HIS AND EVERYONE’S SPEECH AND THAT THIS IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS AND FEELING HURT THAT THEY MUST ALL SUFFER FROM?
UNTIL THEY GO MAD, NO MAN IN HIS RIGHT MIND WILL KNOWINGLY, SEEINGLY KILL HIMSELF AND IT IS BECAUSE THEY CANNOT SEE AND KNOW THAT THE STYLISH WAY THEY SPEAK AND DO THINGS ARE KILLING THEM SLOWLY THROUGH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, THEY HAVE ENTRUSTED THEIR MENTAL PARROT, THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES TO CARRY OUT WHATEVER AND HOWEVER THEY WANT TO PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO, AND THIS MENTAL PARROT THEY TRUST WILL WITHOUT FAIL TURN TRAITOR OR MALIGNANT, WILL IN THE END SEIZE THEM WITH MADNESS AND KILL THEM PAINFULLY.
A HUMAN ROBOT IS A SELF SUSTAINING BEING BUT HE EXISTS WALLED OFF, ISOLATED IN HIS OWN PRIVATE REALITY THAT THOUGH SHARING SOME TRAITS, DIFFERS FROM OTHERS, HE HAS HIS OWN SETS OF BELIEFS AND HIS OWN IDIOSYNCRATIC PROCESS OF REASONING THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE OR SERIOUSLY FLAWED THAT DIFFERS FROM OTHERS BUT IS COPIED MODIFIED OR UNMODIFIED FROM OTHERS, AND WHATEVER AND HOWEVER HE PERCEIVES, THINKS, SPEAKS AND DOES IS NEVER FRESH SPECIFIC FOR EACH OCCASION BUT BY SELECTING AND ISSUING FROM PLANS IN HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX.
YOU DON’T NEED LIVE GENUINE LOGIC TO SURVIVE IN THIS WORLD, ALL YOU NEED IS TRIED AND TESTED (BY OTHERS) PROGRAMMED OR PRE-DETERMINED LOGIC TELLING YOU WHAT TO SAY OR DO IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND HOW TO MAKE SENSE OF VARIOUS THINGS HAPPENING. EVEN IF THE SENSE YOU MAKE OF THINGS ARE FALSE, PROVIDED THEY ARE NOT FATAL FALSITIES, YOU ARE MERELY DELUDED AND THERE IS NOTHING THAT SAYS A DELUDED MAN CANNOT SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD. HOWEVER, ALTHOUGH HE MAY SURVIVE WELL, HIS DELUSIONS WILL ULTIMATELY DRIVE HIM MAD AND BECAUSE DELUSIONS ARE WRONG VIEW, HE IS HEADED FOR HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
Converting herself into a person of no integrity:
No matter how complex and even unknown to her, the reasons or motivations for Batu Gajah MP Fong Po Kuan to announce her decision not to contest and then likewise announce her change of mind may be known, if not by you or her then by God and those who discern.
If the reasons for announcing her withdrawal as candidate were emotional, false (eg to lash out) then her announcement of withdrawal was ill advised or foolish and even so, if you have foolishly announced your withdrawal you must fulfil it and not renege on it because you will then become a person of no integrity.
They like what they say or do:
People do not necessarily do or say something because there is genuine reason to say or do it but they say or do it because they like to say or do it. Because like is all about force, about the attractive stirring of their mental forces to say or do it, they are on those occasions saying or doing things based on force not reason.
UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO MAD, YOU MUST SAY OR DO SOMETHING BECAUSE YOU MEAN IT, YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING OR DOING AND YOU MEAN IT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SITUATION, YOU MUST NOT SAY OR DO THINGS JUST BECAUSE YOU LIKE TO SAY OR DO IT.
Appreciating rhythm and tempo is appreciating force changes:
Music and what is said or done (eg the wagging of the backsides in some African or Hawaiian dances) is rhythmic only because there are appreciable recurring patterns in the use of force to prolong, change speed and strength of force. Without this pattern of repetitive use of force to prolong, change speed and strength there cannot be rhythm or tempo to the music or frantic dance.
Thus people are kidding themselves if they think they do not appreciate or find meaningful force changes. It is deeply or with strong force ingrained in them to appreciate and find meaningful forceful prolonging, forceful changing speed, direction and strength.
Anyone who says that there is no music without prolonging notes, changing speed and loudness is a fool.
You can prolong a note sensibly (not outrageously long just for show) without accelerating in speed and loudness through the note as it is always done in this world.
WHY IS IT THAT THE PITCH (FREQUENCY OR SPEED) AND LOUDNESS ALWAYS ACCELERATE OR DECELERATE WHEN THE SINGER OR MUSICIAN STRETCHES HIS NOTE WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE THE STRETCHING AND MAINTAIN THE PITCH AND LOUDNESS?
WHY IS THAT THE SPEED AND LOUDNESS OF THE NEXT NOTE ALWAYS DIFFER FROM THE SPEED AND LOUDNESS OF THE PREVIOUS NOTE WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ADJACENT NOTES?
DO YOU MEAN THAT IF YOU DID NOT CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITHIN AND BETWEEN NOTES THERE IS NO MUSIC? ON THE CONTRARY THERE IS MUSIC AND IT IS MUCH MORE PLEASANT, DOES NOT STRESS, MAKE RESTLESS OR DISTRACT THE MUSICIAN AND THE LISTENER.
Anwar reinvents himself again
Anwar Ibrahim changed his image from a Muslim youth leader to a Malay nationalist. Now, he has reinvented himself agaiBy projecting himself as a populist leader who embraces the multi-racial politics. But can Anwar’s new attempt win over the voters.?
Though the person may see nothing wrong, by accusing Anwar of reinventing himself without asking Anwar whether it is true he is reinventing himself, he is slandering Anwar (grave karma), exposing his predilection or like and dislike (dislike Anwar).
Reinventing suggest the person is without integrity, changes with the wind, is a chameleon and so if it paints Anwar in bad light you have serious karma due to you.
WHETHER ANWAR IS REINVENTING HIMSELF AND JUST BEING HIMSELF IS A FIGMENT OF THE WRITER’S IMAGINATION, IS NOT WRITTEN IN BLACK AND WHITE AND HE IS FLIRTING WITH MAD PERCEPTION BY PERCEIVING ANWAR IS REINVENTING HIMSELF WHEN ANWAR DID NOT SAY SO AND THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, ONLY SUSPICIONS BY THE WRITER HE IS REINVENTING.
HOW COME NO ORDINARY PEOPLE SPEAK LIKE THIS EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO SO? EVEN IF WHAT I SAY IS FALSE, THERE IS SO MUCH DIFFERENT FALSITY IN THIS WORLD, HOW COME NO ONE IS FALSE LIKE ME? OR IS WHAT I SAY THE TRUTH THAT THIS WORLD CANNOT RECEIVE FOR IT NEITHER SEES NOR KNOWS IT? TO THOSE WHO ARE FOOLISH THEY ARE IN DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY AS TO THE GOOD OR ILL WILL OF THE WRITER, TO ONE WHO SEES, IT IS AS CLEAR AS DAYLIGHT HE IS NASTY IN A WAY HE THINKS IS BEING NEUTRAL OR OBJECTIVE.
Nasty in a nice way:
Writing about Anwar reinventing himself without firm evidence is called being nasty in a nice way that fools some to think they should give him the benefit of the doubt or think he is honest when he has predilections that he will not directly tell you.
YOU WILL BE PUNISHED (BY GOD) FOR BEING NASTY.
YOU WILL BE PUNISHED EVEN MORE FOR BEING NASTY IN A NICE WAY BECAUSE YOU ARE THEN A HYPOCRITE, A DECEIVER OF OTHERS ON TOP OF BEING NASTY. SO IF YOU WANT TO BE NASTY, SHOW YOUR FANGS, DON’T HIDE THEM BECAUSE GOD SEES YOUR CONCEALED FANGS AND THE PUNISHMENT IS EVEN MORE PAINFUL, YOU BROOD OF VIPERS.
Understanding is not necessary to do or say things:
Windows Vista always displays the ‘welcome’ word when you type in the correct password. If it is possible to engage in a dialogue with the computer so that you ask it what it meant by ‘welcome’, it may not be able to supply an answer unless its programmer has told it to reply that ‘welcome means an invitation to use it’ and then it will always supply this explanation even though other explanations are possible.
Its display of ‘welcome’ that is appropriate at the beginning of the session and its programmed explanation that ‘welcome’ means ‘you are invited to use it’ may fool the gullible to perceive the computer is alive and understands what it says when it says ‘welcome’ and ‘welcome’ means ‘you are invited to use it’ but it is unlikely if not impossible that the computer understands why it should display welcome and what welcome means.
In the same way ordinary people speak of many things like I like this and that, I hate or dislike this and that, they speak of love, of emotions, feeling sad and hurt, they speak of style but if you were to ask them to explain the nature of the like, dislike, love and style they are regularly talking about, they will be unlikely to give a true explanation of what these things are.
The only way they can talk of like and dislike and style as if they are experts and not understand the natures of like, dislike and style is because they just copied or aped others using them in the contexts they were used without understanding what it is they are talking about and in this situation they are behaving exactly like computers that are a specialized form of robot or in other words, humans can behave just like robots.
Just as ATM machines or computers can be programmed to accept cash deposits in a way that screens out counterfeits, know the nomination of the notes presented and tote the value of cash deposited and yet the machine does not know what money is or its values, in the same way you can lead a highly sophisticated life here without actually understanding what it is you are doing and saying and why you say or do it. You may be saying or doing it just because you like it or for the selfish motives that underlie them, not because you understand the meaning of what you say or do. Thus people do not realize the absurdity of them saying, “I really cannot sleep” that implies they sometimes can tell lies that they cannot sleep. You either can or cannot sleep, the ‘really’ is absurd or meaningless and only serves to admit that you can sometimes tell lies.
