Why People Smile

There are NO logical or understandable or beneficial reasons to smile.
The reason there cannot be any reasons or justifications or goodness in smiling is because it induces suffering not pleasure, it is addictive (like alcohol) and it cumulatively degrades that person’s mind that are also transmitted to all recipients, harming them too.
If smiling is as I say suffering (not pleasure) in that it induces suffering (stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate), it is addictive (the urge to smile becomes increasingly strong) and degrades the person’s mind (stress degrades his mind) and smiling induces the same in all recipients (stirs their mental forces to want to similarly smile and thereby be stressed, made restless and distracted), then there can be no reasons or justifications or goodness in smiling both for the sake of oneself or others.
If you insist that smiling is reasonable, pleasurable and benefits self and others, you may be right or wrong. If you are wrong, that is wrong view that according to the Buddha leads to hell or the animal womb.
Smiling has nothing to do with reason or necessity, no reason is involved in the process and in fact the absence of reason is desirable in the successful commissioning of smiling which is merely or entirely an exercise in the use of force to prolong, change speed and strength of force involving the facial muscles that is not even rendered live but it is rehashed by rote from a mental jukebox (necessitating a robotic existence) that always induces stress, restlessness and inability in the smiling person and incites all recipients’ minds to either stir in speed and strength for no reason at all except that you smiled at them or they have to force themselves or use force to resist smiling to your provocation, in both cases generating stress, restlessness and distraction in their minds too, so how can there be any understandable reason for smiling?
THERE CAN BE NO REASON FOR OR GOODNESS IN SMILING BECAUSE IT IS JUST AN EXERCISE OF FORCE INVOLVING THE FACIAL MUSCLES THAT INDUCES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN HIMSELF AND ALL RECIPIENTS WHILST CONDITIONING HIS MIND TO INCREASINGLY SMILE, BECOME STRESSED, RESTLESS AND UNABLE TO CONCENTRATE AND DEGRADES IT AND NECESSITATES HE EXISTS AS A ROBOT.
IF YOU THINK THERE ARE VALID REASONS OR TRUTHFULNESS OR BENEFIT OF SMILING WHEN THERE ARE NO REASONS, SMILING IS MERELY AN EXERCISE IN FORCE INVOLVING THE MIND AND RELEVANT FACIAL MUSCLES IN WHICH REASON IS BEST ABSENT, THE PURPOSE OF SMILING IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE, YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT IS SERIOUS THAT MAY LEAD TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. KEEP SMILING AND PROVOKING OTHERS TO SMILE BY STIRRING THEIR MENTAL FORCES AND YOU MAY END IN ANOTHER ETERNITY OF WANDERING.
People often do not realize they are smiling, so how can their smiling be conscious or guided by reason? Instead their smiling is mindlessly rendered without reason from a mental jukebox triggered by situations that usually causes them to smile (but not necessarily others).
Therefore the purposes of smiling are always manipulative and emotional and they are:
a) To express liking for another person or thing. When the person’s mental force of going against self is stirred in strength and speed in a way controlled by his force of self preservation at the sight of someone or something, the person is driven (by force that he finds hard to resist) to smile or exercise his facial muscles to express his like for the person or object. If this is the case the person usually cannot take his eyes off the liked person or object and keeps looking at it.
b) To please others. He does not like or even dislikes the other person but he smiles to deceive the other person that he likes him. This is a very common reason for smiling, to get along and fake liking for people they meet and things happening that they do not actually like or even dislike.
c) To impress others. People smile because smiling is supposed to denote happiness, prettiness or desirability, charm or sociability and they smile to make others like them or be attracted to them.
d) To deny they are hurt or unhappy. People often smile when another person says something sarcastic or hurtful to deny they are hurt and lie that they find it pleasurable. This is especially mad or conflict arousing, to smile that you are happy when you are sad or hurt.
e) To laugh at others’ misery. When people smile at jokes, they are laughing at the falsity of the joke or the suffering of people who are the brunt of the joke. This smiling is to is trivialized falsity and enjoyment of the suffering of others.
f) When they are embarrassed. To express what is embarrassing (eg farting or opened zippers) is funny.
g) To intimidate and dominate others. There are many who smile in a way to intimidate others to give way to them as some lecherous goats smile at a helpless girl at their mercy.
You have false logic that will end in mad logic if you think that smiling is to tell others you are happy because if it is the truth that smiling churns up stress, restlessness and distraction, how can something that churns out stress, restlessness and distraction that is suffering and destroys whatever happiness that was present before tell others you are happy? Further your flaunting of your ‘happiness’ is inconsiderate for those who may be grieving and find your display disagreeable.
It is again false logic and delusion to say that your smiling is to make others happy, for how can smiling that stresses, make restless and distracted others make them happy?
Exactly what is the purpose of your smile may be determined objectively by God and those who discern, even if you will not admit or cannot see it is so. If your smile is not to tell others you are happy but it is to deceive, impress (want others to like you), please (act as if you like them) or intimidate others then your smile is false and malicious.
No matter how genuine and meaningful you may think your smile is, if it is true that it is never live for the occasion but rehashed by rote from memory and stress, restlessness and the inability to concentrate always arises and that is suffering and damages your mind (like alcohol or heroin damages) and you are addicting yourself to smiling so that the urge to smile becomes increasingly compelling and mad or automatic and you are making others stressed, restless and distracted then you are courting future doom and creating karma by harming others.
Whether your smile is freshly composed or it is mindlessly rehashed from a mental jukebox recording indicating you are an unwitting robot can be determined objectively if not by you then by God or those who discern. If it is true it is mindlessly rehashed by rote then you are headed for jukebox failure or mad robotic behavior. Because it is your jukebox smiling for you, the jukebox may one day trigger smiling without your command. In fact the mental jukeboxes in most ordinary people are already triggering smiling in situations that usually elicit smiling in them without their approval (jumping the gun) presaging the final triggering of smiling that is inappropriate.
THE PURPOSES OF SMILING ARE TO DECEIVE (EG DENY YOU ARE HURT), IMPRESS (MAKE OTHERS LIKE YOU OR IMPRESS OTHERS YOU TRULY LIKE THEM), PLEASE (FAKE YOU LIKE OTHERS WHEN YOU DON’T) & INTIMIDATE.
THERE CAN BE NO REASON FOR SMILING OR GOODNESS IN SMILING BECAUSE SMILING IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN EXERCISE IN FORCE THAT IS BEST PERFORMED IN THE ABSENCE OF REASON INVOLVING THE FACIAL MUSCLES THAT APPLIES PROLONGING FORCE THAT IS ALWAYS CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH ON THE PERSON AND HIS TARGETS’ MINDS TO CREATE MUTUAL STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IS NOT ONLY SUFFERING BUT IS CONDITIONING AND CUMULATIVELY DEGRADES THAT MIND. FURTHER, SMILING IS ADDICTIVE AND IT IS NEVER ISSUED LIVE BUT BY ROTE OR REPEAT FROM MEMORY THAT NECESSITATES EXISTENCE AS A ROBOT THAT INCREASINGLY BECOMES AUTOMATED, TRIGGERED BY THE ARISE OF SITUATIONS THAT CAUSES THAT PERSON TO SMILE (EG THE APPROACH OF SOMEONE AUTOMATIACLLY TRIGGERS SMILING IN SOME) AND FUTURE MAD JUKEBOX SMILING WHEN SMILING IS TRIGGERED INAPPROPRIATELY.
Why smiling is persecuting others:
Whenever someone smiles at you, do you feel obliged to return the smile for no reason at all but just because he smiled at you? Isn’t it insane to smile, to stir the speed and strength of your mental force to drive your facial muscles just because someone smiled at you? You are practicing controlled insanity just to please the person who smiled at you and he is causing you to stress yourself by smiling at you.
People are often lying to act as if they appreciate your smile at them eg by returning your smile, it is stressful to return a smile and they are returning smiles slickly by rote insincerely or impersonally just to get along, not because they like you.
RATHER THAN BENEFITING OTHERS BY SMILING, YOU ARE PERSECUTING THEM BECAUSE YOUR SMILE EXERTS PRESSURE ON THEM TO EXERT PRESSURE ON THEIR MINDS TO SMILE JUST BECAUSE YOU SMILED TO THEM. EVEN IF THEY DID NOT SMILE THE PROLONGING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN YOUR SMILE CAN BE PERCEIVED BY THEM SO THAT THEIR MINDS ARE STIRRED AND IF THEY DO RESIST TO SMILE ON YOUR PROVOCATION THEY MUST APPLY FORCE ON THEIR MINDS TO STOP THEM SMILING.
“You are what you eat”
Anyone who subscribes to the belief that “you are what you eat” is placing paramount importance on what he eats and is going against or disobeying what Jesus said that you should not care what you shall eat or wear nor the Buddha’s exhortation that you should takes your food not playfully nor for intoxication, nor for putting on bulk, nor for beautification but simply for the survival & continuance of your body, for ending its afflictions, for the support of the holy life. If you agree that you are what you eat, you will devote attention to what you eat, be fastidious to what you eat in the name of preserving your life here, so you will care for what you shall eat that is the opposite of what Jesus advised.
Singing Is Crying & Dancing Is Insanity:
Just because you like to smile, sing and dance does not mean you are correct and the Buddha is wrong or he will modify his opinion just to please you. You may be wrong and heedless and headed for torment.
When you observe disco dropouts writhing to phantom tunes in psychiatric wards, you may realize that what the Buddha said is true and even if you indulge in moderation, you may be courting similar insanity.
5. Ruõõasuttaü- Crying
108.Bhikkhus, singing is crying in this discipline of the noble ones and dancing is insanity. Bhikkhus, it is childish to laugh too long showing your teeth. Therefore give up singing, dancing and it is suitable that you, delighting in the Teaching should laugh to a certain extent only.
6. Atittisuttaü -Not satiated
109.Bhikkhus, indulging in these three there is no satiation. What three? Indulging in dreaming, taking intoxicating drinks and sexual inter course there is no satiation. Bhikkhus, indulging in these three there is no satiation.
Very few Buddhists even at the highest rungs today adhere to the Buddha’s prescription which is why they do not experience the fruits of the religious life and they are in danger of future suffering far more forbidding than they imagine. If you have not given a try for a reasonable period what the Buddha prescribed you would be foolish and unrighteous to cast judgment and dismiss what the Buddha said that will have consequences in punishment if he is right and you are wrong:
`I prescribe, O bhikkhus, ten precepts for the novices, and the exercise of the novices in these (ten precepts), viz. abstinence from destroying life; abstinence from stealing; abstinence from impurity; abstinence from lying; abstinence from arrack and strong drink and intoxicating liquors, which cause indifference (to religion); abstinence from eating at forbidden times; abstinence from dancing, singing, music, and seeing spectacles; abstinence from garlands, scents, unguents, ornaments, and finery; abstinence from (the use of) high or broad beds; abstinence from accepting gold or silver. I prescribe, [\q 212/] O bhikkhus, these ten precepts for the novices, and the exercise of the novices in these (ten precepts).'
Why smiling is meaningless:
When something happens and you open your mouth to speak you are communicating in words what you see or think about what has happened.
When something happens and you smile, what are you conveying that has specific meaning? Or is it a case you are merely using force to exercise the muscles of your face in a cryptic way to convey something that can be interpreted in many different ways and therefore deceptive? What does a specific sequence of coordinated movements of your facial muscles convey? If you think these facial muscle movements have meaning, they are communicating some precise meaning then you may be right or have wrong perception that will end in mad perception.
All words have assigned specific meanings and all sequences of words have precise meaning that may be true or false that can be clearly defined. What is your smile trying to say that can be defined as such and such and nothing else or is it the case that your smile can mean a whole lot of different things (even described as inscrutable) like you are impressed, you want others to be impressed with you, to deny your hurt, to laugh at others’ falsity, to exert pressure on others to give in to your proposal or to please others?
YOU KNOW WHAT A CERTAIN WORD MEANS AND WHAT A SEQUENCE OF WORDS AS OCCUR IN A SENTENCE THAT IS SAID IN RELATION TO SOMETHING THAT HAS HAPPENED MEAN BUT WHAT HAS THE SEQUENCE OF FACIAL MUSCLE MOVEMENTS IN A SMILE THAT IS DISPLAYED IN RELATION TO WHAT HAS HAPPENED MEAN? IS THE SMILE A MASK BEHIND WHICH YOU HIDE TO NOT SAY THE THINGS THAT YOU TRULY THINK ABOUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED?
A smile is often a mask:
People often hide behind a smile in order not to reveal what they actually think about something that has happened; they intend to smile so that you do not know what their true feelings are.
Thus far from having specific meaning, a smile is often purposely intended to mask, to not commit oneself specifically, to conceal one’s true feelings. Therefore smiling is a form of deception that will end in insanity.
HOW CAN SOMETHING THAT IS INTENDED AS A MASK, TO CONCEAL HAVE TRUE MEANING? THEREFORE ALL SMILES ARE FALSE AND MEANINGLESS INTENDED TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE OR INTIMIDATE.
Just because you smile because you like someone does not mean it is motiveless:
Just because you truly liked someone (your mental force has been stirred attractively) does not mean you must stress yourself to smile but the reason you smile has ulterior motive that may escape you. The reason why you smiled may be because you want the other person to be similarly attracted to you because there may be selfish gains (eg she is a pretty girl with a chance of a liaison of some sort as a result of letting her know you like her).
SO DON’T THINK YOU ARE SO GOOD IF YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE SOMEONE. WHY DON’T YOU LIKE A LAME DECREPIT BEGGAR AND SMILE TO EXPRESS YOUR LIKE FOR HIM?
Pluto suffers another blow:
You have false perception that you do not realize will end in certain mad perception if you think the planet Pluto has suffered another blow merely because there is now another minor planet bigger than Pluto or you think that it was a humiliation or blow for Pluto to be ‘demoted’ from being a major planet.
What blow is there in the discovery of a bigger minor planet? Instead it is unwittingly acknowledging that you are a person of force or emotion not reason who like to use words that convey force (blow, humiliation) than meaning.
Criteria for acting:
The Buddha said that he will not speak merely because something is true but he will only speak if something is true and beneficial to the listener.
Similarly you should not smile unless smiling is something true and beneficial to others. Smiling fails on both counts.
The purposes of smiling, namely to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others are all false and therefore smiling is false. Liking another is not a reason to smile but it is liking that stirs greed or lust for selfish gains that spurs a person to smile to express his like.
Further smiling is always delivered impersonally by rote from the mental jukebox. How can something that is rehashed and faked specific for an occasion be true?
How can smiling which is merely an exercise in force involving the facial muscles that only last as long as it is on show be true?
How can smiling that stirs stress, restlessness and distraction in self and all others, be beneficial to self and others?
Therefore by nature smiling is false, all about the action of force that has nothing to do with reason and it does not benefit but harms self and others.
Exactly what are the possible purposes or intentions of smiling and a particular smile, whether it is true or false (to deceive, please, impress, intimidate) and whether it is harmful or beneficial to self and others can be determined if not by you then by God and those who discern. If it is as I state and you disagree then you have wrong view that has deadly everlasting consequences.
Semi auto & fully auto jukebox behavior:
Just as there can be two modes of automatic gearbox function, a semi auto mode wherein one selects the gears and the gearbox does the rest for you and the fully auto mode when all you do is drive and the gearbox does all the changes for you in an increasingly sophisticated way using computer chips to sense loads, driving style and road conditions, in the same way there are two modes of jukebox behavior.
There is a semi automatic jukebox mode as in a serious or complicated conversation wherein the person is paying some attention to select which options to play back from his mental jukebox that he deems is relevant to the situation and there is a fully automatic jukebox option wherein the sensors and the jukebox automatically render the seemingly appropriate verbal and behavior responses of the situation. This may occur in casual conversations when people bump into each other on the street when they will often blurt out platitudes of how you are doing, the weather and the game on Sunday without meaning any word they say or remembering what they said afterwards.
Most of the smiling that people issue are unconscious and likely to issued fully automated by their mental jukeboxes and requires no supervision.
Individuals often emit grunts, sneezes, coughs and spitting that are often automatic reactions to thoughts occurring or things they hear or see and these are forms of fully automatic jukebox behavior that they largely cannot help and are perilously approaching loss of control where jukebox behavior issues out of context to the situation.
The thrills, tribulations & dangers of jukebox behavior:
The importance in determining whether you are a jukebox operator is that in jukebox behavior you are training a mental parrot to do or say everything for you and although this arrangement may enable you to get along very well in society and the parrot will often say or do the things you usually do without your ordering, the risk that will be fulfilled is that the parrot may occasionally go on strike or say or do things you don’t really want on that occasion, it may die and you are stranded because you have never said or done things personally or it may go mad and keep saying or doing things totally out of context.
It is possible to dismiss one’s mental parrot and do or say everything personally or live specific for the occasion but this is only possible if one did not have style, one did not have the simultaneous combo of substance and the individually consistent constant prolonging, changing speed and strength of force that cannot be rendered live but necessitates the employment of a mental parrot. To get along with society you must have style and even though they suffer to even terrible levels, most people cannot be bothered to make the persistent effort to change themselves because they don’t care much for themselves and others, they desire to manipulate others and they do not realize they face certain final insanity and even another eternity of weeping and gnashing their teeth.
First you use repetitive force and not reason (reason is best absent) to force yourself to smile or say or do certain things (eg greet others ‘good morning’ or say ‘cheerio’) and in time your mental jukebox gets the hang of things and start to trigger smiles or ‘cheerios’ automatically for you when it senses the cues for smiling or ‘cheerios’ and you may be pleased with yourself how slick and appropriate your smiles and cheerios have become but there must be occasions that arouse consternation in you that you seem not to be able to stop yourself smiling or saying ‘cheerio’ when the situations arise and that is maddening or worrying. What most jukebox operators do not realize is that such appropriate automated rendering of their conduct (eg professional sportsmen hone with forceful practice their shots to ‘perfection’) is a harbinger of certain jukebox failure wherein their recorded smiles, cheerios have an autonomous urge to activate for no reason at all or inappropriately when their controls slacken (eg they are tired or harassed by situational overload) or as their minds degenerate with age or alcoholic or drug inebriation.
WHETHER YOUR SPEECH AND ACTIONS ARE FRESH, SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION OR A REHASH FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED AND IF IT IS ENAMATING FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX AND YOU THINK IT IS FRESH YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW THE NATURE OF WHAT HE IS SAYING OR DOING. IF IT IS TRUE WHAT YOU SAY OR DO (EG SMILE) COMES FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX, YOU MAY BE THRILLED HOW SLICK YOUR SMILING HAS BECOME IN REACTION TO EVENTS OCCURING BUT YOU MUST EXPERIENCE DISMAY OCCASIONALLY THAT YOU CANNOT HELP YOURSELF NOT SMILING AND IF YOU DO NOT TAKE MEASURE TO ERASE YOUR JUKEBOX RECORDINGS, YOU ARE DOOMED TO MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO EVENTS OCCURRING.
Why Smiling Is Always False:
You can use logic to examine smiling from different angles and arrive at the conclusion that smiling is always false.
By nature and purpose, smiling is always false.
It is impossible that something false or harmful can originate from something that is true but whatever that is false or harmful must originate from something that must itself be false. Thus, if all the purposes for smiling can be proven to be false or harmful then smiling itself must be false and harmful.
All the purposes of smiling namely to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others are false and harmful to self and others and therefore smiling that is designed to achieve such false and harmful purposes must itself be false. If the purpose of your smiling is to impress others eg that you are charming, attractive, sociable, happy and well adjusted then these purposes are false and manipulative and therefore the smiling that is designed to achieve this purpose too must be false. If your purpose of smiling is to please others, to make them imagine you like them when you don’t or to deceive, you smile as if you agree with what they are saying or doing when you don’t, then it is clearly deceptive or false and therefore the smile that has this purpose must itself be false. If your smile is to intimidate others, to exert unrighteous pressure on them to agree with you (eg a salesperson wants to make a sale) then that too is clearly false or malicious and therefore the smile with this purpose must be false and malicious. In the case where your smile is to express your genuine liking for another person it is not the liking per se that causes you to smile but it is your desire to manipulate the other person for selfish ends eg you are attracted to or like a pretty girl and want to bond her to you by smiling and therefore you smile because you like the person is a convenient half truth because you smile to attract her to you because you are attracted to her). Therefore even if your smile is because you genuinely like a person, its purpose is manipulative or false and harmful and the smiling to express that liking must itself be false. In any case liking a person is merely the stirring in speed and strength of your mental force in an attractive way on seeing or hearing the person that has everything to do with force and nothing to do with reason or meaning and so your smiling that is based on this stirring of the mental force must be similarly false.
It may be the truth that smiling is unadulterated pleasure and does not lead to stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate in you and your recipients but if it is the truth that smiling is not genuine pleasure but faked pleasure, it always leads to stress, restlessness and distraction then how can stress, restlessness and distraction come from something true and beneficial but instead smiling that always leads to stress, restlessness and distraction must always be false and harmful.
It may be true that there is something more in smiling but it may be the truth that smiling in all ordinary people is merely a mental recording or program with an individually characteristic substance and style combo that is triggered by stimuli that varies between individuals but is always consistent in that individual (that is different things cause different people to smile, the same things always cause the same person to smile) to activate his facial muscles in a certain way that can be only how he constantly prolongs, changes speed and strength of force of the contractions of his facial muscles. If it is true that people are often not even aware they are smiling so how can their smiling be guided by reason or fresh but instead their smiling must be done automatically in a standardized form for them by their mental jukeboxes then smiling is nothing more than an exercise in force (not reason) involving their facial muscles that is not even done live or specific for the occasion but mindlessly rehashed standardized from memory. There may be something more exalted in smiling but if it is nothing more than an automatic rehashed standardized substance and style force display powered by force not guided by reason that is meant for show to be seen, what truth or meaning can there be in such a mechanical display by force?
All ordinary people’s smiles must be rehashed by rote, cannot be produced live because they have a distinct definable style that is nothing more than how they use force to prolong, change speed and strength of force as they orchestrate their smiling. Because their smiles are never live specific for an occasion but standardized rehashed, they are fakes and insincere and therefore false, never true.
Thus ordinary people’s smiles are always false because:
a) All the purposes of their smiles, namely to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate are false and therefore the smiles that have false purposes must also be false.
b) Their smiles that always have a definable consistent style cannot be rendered live specific to each occasion but rehashed or impersonally standardized and therefore false.
c) Their smiles always induce stress, restlessness and distraction in themselves and others and therefore smiles must be false and harmful.
d) There may be or is nothing more in smiling than an exercise of the relevant facial muscles that is not even orchestrated at constant speed and strength without prolonging but orchestrated with totally unnecessary insane constant prolonging, changing of speed and strength by a mental parrot. If you think there is much more that is meaningful to smiling than an unnecessary exercise of one’s facial muscles to deceive, please, impress and intimidate others then you may have false perception that ends in mad perception.
Fabrications are a formidable bar to banishing ignorance:
The Buddha said that from ignorance as a requisite comes fabrications. Therefore in order to relatively or absolutely dispel the ignorance and acquire enlightenment one must reduce or destroy the fabrications that stand in the way.
These fabrications or activities of a person’s mind can only be his perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing things. Because people are not just fully engrossed in fabricating all the time but fabricating with forceful prolonging, changes of speed and strength of force that conditions and addicts the mind to keep fabricating, to get better at fabricating so that it is involuntary, they cannot help it, it is a mountain for them to climb if they were to push back the tide of fabricating that stands in the way to abolishing their ignorance.
Meditation that is aimed at abolishing the five hindrances (greed and preoccupations with the world, doubt and uncertainty, ill will, restlessness and sloth and torpor) is essential to reduce and finally abolish the fabrications that stand in the way of enlightenment or escape from suffering. Because most people are disinclined to meditate and in those few who do, they meditate using force or they meditate without realizing they have a style of meditating, they never experience the fruits of meditation that is the relative or absolute banishment of ignorance.
The cessation of all thoughts that occur in the second meditative state is an important step in the abolishment of fabrications because thinking is a crucial constant fabrication that detains one in ignorance. Still higher, the Buddha describes the more exalted meditative state of neither perceiving nor not perceiving that again addresses perceiving, one of the constant fabrications of the ignorant mind.
RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE ENLIGHTENMENT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO ATTAIN BECAUSE IT IS WELL GUARDED BY PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEECH AND MOTION THAT IS NOT ONLY CONSTANT BUT CONSTANTLY FORCEFULLY PROLONGING, CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH AND THEREFORE CONDITIONING THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG & ACCEPT AS FAIT ACCOMPLI WHEN IT CAN BE ABOLISHED THROUGH CORRECT MEDITATION TO REVEAL ENLIGHTENMENT. EVEN THOSE WHO MEDITATE DO SO WITH STYLE OR FORCEFUL CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT LEADS THEM AROUND IN CIRCLES GOING NOWHERE.

Denying Yourself:
Jesus: "If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.”
Because Jesus did not specify what you should deny, he must be speaking broadly or in general.

So what is denying yourself and how do you deny yourself?

What can be denied by a person can only be what and how he can say or do.

If nobody is doing it or it is not possible to not do something (eg eating or breathing) then there is nothing to deny or it is impossible to deny with regard to that thing. If something is wholesome why should you deny yourself from doing it?

Thus denying yourself must be in relation to something that everyone or many are doing (that can only be what and how they say or do) that it is possible not to do that is sinful or harmful to self and others.

THEREFORE YOU MUST DENY YOURSELF WITH REGARD TO WHATEVER THAT OTHERS ARE DOING THAT CAN ONLY BE WHAT AND HOW YOU SAY OR DO THAT IS HARMFUL TO YOURSELF AND OTHERS THAT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU NOT TO DO.

APART FROM WHAT AND HOW YOU SAY OR DO THAT IS IN COMMON WITH THE REST HERE THAT HARMS SELF AND OTHERS, THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO DENY YOURSELF.

For example if many in this world are drinking, stealing and telling lies and they are all harmful to self and others and it is possible for you to not drink, tell lies or steal then you must deny yourself by not doing them.
Liking and disliking is what all beings in this world are doing all the time and they are unnecessary and harmful to self and others and it is possible to neither like nor dislike and so you truly deny yourself and distinguish yourself from others by not liking nor disliking. Whatever that happens can be pleasant, unpleasant or neither pleasant nor unpleasant and liking or disliking is the additional subsequent forceful mental reaction as a result of the passive feelings generated that stresses oneself and others (when you are angry with someone you dislike him that always stresses him).
Emotion (anger, hate, pride, shame, jealousy, envy, greed, lust, sadness, fear) is what people in this world are experiencing and expressing that can be refrained that is harmful to themselves and others and therefore you deny yourself by not following them to become emotional.
Style that is nothing more than the audible and visible effects of constant forceful prolonging (eg syllables), changing speed and strength of force (eg loudness) is what people in this world are practicing that can be avoided and it is stressful, restless and distracting to both self and others and therefore you deny yourself by not speaking or doing things with style or constant prolonging, changing speed and strength of force.
Smiling is what people in this world are doing that can be refrained that is not a pleasure but is always stressful, restless and distracting to self and others and therefore you deny yourself by not smiling.
IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON TO NOT LIKE NOR DISLIKE, TO BE UNEMOTIONAL, TO HAVE NO STYLE, TO NOT STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS AND TO NOT SMILE AND THESE ACTIVITIES ARE ALL HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS THAT ARE UNIVERSALLY PRACTICED HERE AND YOU DENY YOURSELF BY NOT FOLLOWING OTHERS.
How denial and carrying your cross relate:
Because beings in this world are resentful (disliking) and in truth suffering from sin, not enjoying themselves as they like themselves and others to believe and although they cannot define it, they can sense those who deny themselves are different and not suffering like they do and it implies your disapproval with their conduct, they will be seized to lash out at those who deny themselves and so you must carry your cross of persecution and follow Jesus because you do not belong to this world of deceit.

(Jesus said the counselor will take from is his and make it known to you. No one in the past has interpreted what Jesus said as I have above and in many places and even today when conditions are identical for everyone there is no one who says the things that I say. Thus if what I say is true and beneficial, whoever is the counselor Jesus describes must also say so and if I have said so, I will have superseded him or proven Jesus said is wrong that only the counselor can do so)
Speaking Style:
People never say plainly “I love you” but they always speak with their individual variation of stretching syllables changing speed and loudness eg “aAIIEeee llLEERFF yYYOOUUuu!!!” that differentiate (not distinguish) them relatively (not absolutely because there are similarities in different styles) by style (not substance or meaning or truth) from others.

Do you agree any reader will have to make much more effort to decipher a written “aAIIEeee llLEERFF yYYOOUUuu!!!” than a plainly written “I love you”, in other words “aAIIEeee llLEERFF yYYOOUUuu!!!” is much more distracting or confusing than “I love you”? Similarly wouldn't a spoken “aAIIEeee llLEERFF yYYOOUUuu!!!” be more distracting or confusing than a plainly written “I love you”?

Do you agree that you must make much more effort consuming much more energy to ctreate stress for yourself if you have to write “aAIIEeee llLEERFF yYYOOUUuu!!!” than a plainly written “I love you”? If it is so meaningful to say “aAIIEeee llLEERFF yYYOOUUuu!!!” than a plain “I love you”, why don't you similarly write with all your syllables stretched, with alphabets that are varying in size (corresponding to loudness differences) and spacing between (depicting speed changes)? If it is much more effort to write “aAIIEeee llLEERFF yYYOOUUuu!!!” is it not similarly more effort to say “aAIIEeee llLEERFF yYYOOUUuu!!!”? If it is so why do you persist? Is it because it is deemed impressive and you are trying to impress the person addressed by stylishly stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness?
There must be many permutations how you can stretch syllables, change speed and loudness in the words “I love you” eg:
“Aiee . ...lluuvvv yyoOOoo ... ho, ho, ho!”
“ Iiii ... Iiiii ... Lleeerrffff ..YYYuuuiii!! hee hee hee!”
“Aaiiee (sigh) lleerrff uuu”.
Do you agree all the many different versions essentially say “I love you?” Does all the dramatic stretching, changing speed and loudness add any extra meaning to what is said or does it detract from the substance and is intended to deceive, impress or please the person addressed?
ALL STYLE OR ALL STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN SAYING THINGS IS NOT UNAVOIDABLE BUT IT HAS BEEN SO STRONGLY CONDITIONED IN THEM SUCH THAT THEY NOW LARGELY CANNOT HELP IT, STYLE IS ALWAYS FALSE, CONSUMES PRODIGIOUS ENERGY TO CREATE MOUNTING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THEMSELVES AND LISTENERS AND IS INTENDED PRINCIPLALLY TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS.

If there is always style that may be subtle and blatant in how you and others say things and you cannot perceive it, you are a fool who does see what you and others are doing.
Quote: Poor Pluto is not even the largest minor planet.
Comment: What is said is condescending (hypocritical), in jest never genuine sympathy for Pluto. You have false perception if you think Pluto is a being that is grieving over its continuing demotion in status.
Quote Rev Billy Graham whose wife died recently: She had a great reception in heaven.
Comment: Unless he was in heaven to see the reception or had been reliably told this is so, he has no right to say so that wants others to entertain what cannot be verified as having happened. It may be wistful thinking, driven by emotion belief that this must be so or deliberate reckless lying. Unless you want to court future mad perception that what did not happen has happened, you must not speak of things you did not see or know has happened as if they did happen.
Mutually Exclusive:
If you are thinking, it is impossible for you to at the same time to not think. If you are not only thinking all the time when you are conscious and even when you are sleeping and thinking is restrictive than liberating then you may not know what it is like to be conscious and not think and how it is an incomparably superior and more direct or unrestricted way of existing.
You think God and higher beings in heaven think all the time like you do but it may be your thinking that you do not realize is constant that detains you in the lower more restrictive and unpleasant realms.
Similarly if you are perceiving selfishly, emotionally or forcefully all the time the little of what is happening around you and it means you must not perceive the infinitely greater that is simultaneously happening in the universe, then you have not experienced that state of existence you do not realize is possible and incomparably superior wherein you do not perceive selfishly all the time the little around you and do not forfeit by not perceiving the infinite many that is happening at the same time.
Thus the foolish person mired totally in his private world of constant thinking often about frivolous matters and constant perceiving the little and not perceiving the infinitude does not know what he is missing, thinks he is enjoying himself and the way he exists is the only possible and natural way to exist when it is false or deluded, severely restrictive and suffering.
The wise person who has faith and is not skeptical applies himself to attain no thinking by training himself conscientiously to slow down the speed of his thinking and reducing the force he applies in his thinking. He trains to stop stretching his syllables, changing speed and loudness when he thinks that will lead to less momentum in his thinking that will finally achieve a state wherein he can see, hear, smell, taste and touch without thinking and think only when he wants or is necessary. After achieving this exalted incomparably pleasant way to exist he further applies himself in meditation to attain the state of neither perceiving nor not perceiving.
How the devil did you get the cut on your nose, Freddie?
Usually people say “How the devil did you get the cut on your nose, Freddie?” with a mischievous smile or laughter and they are being falsely nice not truly good to you. If you deny yourself you let your yes be yes only ask sincerely “How did you get the cut on your nose”. If you think the devil has something to do with it or it is such a surprising or wonderful thing to have a cut on your nose you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
What Is The Purpose Of Your Smile?
Most ordinary people smile a lot. What is the purpose of your and others’ smiles?
If you are smiling frequently and you do not know or are not quite sure what your smiles are for, you must be a person with muddled thinking who does not know what he is doing.
Unless you are mad or a mindless robot who has been programmed to smile meaninglessly on cue, the purpose of your smiling can only be either to stir the mental force, liking or disliking or emotions of the recipient or communicate specific meaning.
If your smile is to convey specific meaning as what I write here is conveying, the meaning of your particular smile must be definable, such and such is the meaning of my smile on this occasion. If you cannot clearly define the meaning of your particular smile, the smile cannot be intended to convey specific meaning but instead it is intended to stir the recipient’s mental force to like or dislike. The purposes of smiling are to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate and all these are forms of wanting to stir the recipient’s mental force. When the recipient is impressed, he likes you or his mental force is stirred in a way that attracts him to you. When he is pleased by your smile, his mental force is stirred to like himself as a result of your smiling at him. When he is intimidated by your smile to give way to you, he is stirred in fear to accede to you. You can only dominate with force and it is the force in your smile that dominates the recipient.
It is impossible that you are frequently communicating specific meaning by smiling but instead you are putting on a show trying to stir the emotions of the target often to distract him from the false substance of what you want to say or do to him that he might otherwise object if he was not distracted.
How can smiling which is merely a standardized rehashed orchestrated motion of the facial muscles that have forceful prolonging, changes in speed and strength of force not similarly stir the mental forces of observers to similarly prolong, change speed and strength of force? How can smiling which is merely the standardized forceful stirring of the facial muscles convey specific or definable meaning as each word and sentence said has definable meaning even if it is false?
IF THE PURPOSE OF YOUR SMILE IS TO STIR OTHERS’ THE MENTAL FORCE AND YOU THINK IT IS TO COMMUNICATE SPECIFIC MEANING, IT IS MEANINGFUL THAT BENEFITS YOURSELF AND OTHERS THEN YOU ARE A DELUDED FOOL WHO DOES THINGS (SMILING) WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT HE IS DOING.
If your smile for a particular occasion is to deceive others that you agree with what they are saying or doing when you don’t, to deceive them that you like them when you don’t, to impress others how charming or attractive or confident or happy you are, to exert psychological pressure on them or intimidate them to accede to your desires (eg buy things from you) or to deny your hurt at what is said or has happened and you do not know it, you think you are being true and good to yourself and others, aren’t you a great fool who does things like smiling without knowing its purpose?
If you are aware of your intentions when you smile and they correspond with the reasons I list above, are these true reasons or are they manipulative, deceptive, emotional, false and harmful to self and others?

Admitting He Is A Robot:
A person only says he disagrees with me, he smiles because he likes someone because he reasons or perceives what he says is true and good that he wants to recommend to others not realizing that instead he is acknowledging he is an unwitting robot.
A robot is a lifeless piece of machinery that has been programmed by its programmers to detect the presence of certain cues in its environment and then initiate a stereotyped or standardized rigid response to the presence of those cues for which it has no choice unless it is reprogrammed but because the response may appear sophisticated and apt for the situation, it may fool an undiscerning observer to think the robot is marvelous or alive.
Similarly the person who says he smiles because he likes someone is acknowledging that he is a robot who has programmed himself to smile whenever he likes someone or detect attractive properties in the person he sees or hears.
If on occasions you smile but on other occasions you do not smile when you liked someone you are issuing a misleading or false or careless statement that you smile when you like someone that implies smiling is an automatic response or reaction to liking someone.
If on occasions you do not smile when you like someone, it means that liking someone is not the reason for smiling or smiling is not mandatory as a result of experiencing like for somebody and therefore liking is a convenient excuse for your smiling and there may be or there is an interceding cause between your liking and your smiling like an urge or desire to manipulate the person you like for example wanting the girl to know you like her so that hopefully she will like you too so that she may give you things or do things for you that will please you.
THEREFORE IT IS NOT LIKING THAT IS PER SE THE REASON FOR YOU SMILING AT SOMEONE YOU LIKE OR YOUR AUDIOVISUAL SENSORS DETECT AS ATTRACTIVE BUT IT IS A DESIRE TO TANGO WITH THE OTHER PERSON, TO MAKE HIM OR HER ATTRACTED TO YOU FOR SELFISH PURPOSES THAT IS THE CAUSE OF YOUR SMILING.
However if you keep practicing smiling when you liked someone then in time instead of having to force yourself to smile when you like someone, you become increasingly forced by habit or conditioning to smile whenever you like somebody and because you now cannot help yourself smiling whenever you like someone, so slick has smiling when liking someone become, you identify yourself with smiling and liking as wholesome and either ignore or cannot see that they both lead to certain stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate afterwards.
IF WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE THAT YOU ALWAYS SMILE WHEN YOU LIKE SOMEONE YOU ARE UNWITTINGLY ADMITTING THAT YOU ARE A ROBOT WHO HAS NO CHOICE BUT ALWAYS TRIGGERS SMILING THAT HE CANNOT HELP BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN PROGRAMMED IN HIM WHENEVER HE LIKES SOMEONE OR HIS AUDIOVISUAL SENSORS DETECT ATTRACTIVE QUALITIES IN THE PERCEIVED PERSON.
IF IT IS TRUE THAT YOU DO NOT ALWAYS SMILE WHENEVER YOU LIKE SOMEONE, THEN YOU HAVE SPOKEN CARELESSLY AND MISLED ME TO SAY YOU SMILE WHEN YOU LIKE SOMEONE AS IF LIKING IS THE CAUSE OF SMILING WHEN IT IS A CONVENIENT EXCUSE FOR SMILING AND INSTEAD THE TRUE CAUSE FOR SMILING WHEN YOU LIKE SOMEONE IS THE SUBSEQUENT DESIRE TO MANIPULATE THE OTHER PERSON. BECAUSE YOU FIND THAT PERSON ATTRACTIVE, YOU WANT TO BOND THAT PERSON TO YOU, YOU WANT TO GET SOMETHING FROM THAT PERSON, YOU SMILE TO ENGAGE HIM OR HER. BECAUSE THERE IS FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE CONVEYED IN YOUR SMILING, YOUR SMILE IS A POWERFUL ATTRACTOR TO THE VULNERABLE OR FOOLISH TARGET TO STIR HIS OR HER MENTAL FORCE TO BECOME SIMILARLY ATTRACTED TO YOU BECAUSE SHE LIKES YOU OR TO PLEASE YOU. THUS YOU ARE DELUDING YOURSELF IF YOU THINK YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE SOMEONE, IT IS A DESIRE TO MANIPULATE THE PERSON YOU LIKED THAT CAUSED YOU TO SMILE. HOWEVER IT IS IN THE NATURE OF THINGS THAT ARE FREQUENTLY FORCEFULLY PRACTICED WITHOUT TRUE REASON THAT THEY BECOME AUTOMATIC, YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX CAN JUMP THE GUN, IT KNOWS WHAT TO DO WITHOUT YOU TELLING IT SO AND IT TRIGGERS SMILING AUTOMATICALLY FOR YOU WHENEVER IT SENSES LIKING IS STIRRED AND THOUGH YOU MAY IDENTIFY WITH SMILING WHENEVER YOU LIKE AND BE THRILLED THAT YOU ALWAYS SMILE WHEN YOU LIKE, YOU ARE NOW A SLAVE OF YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX WHO DOES NOT REALIZE HE IS AT THE MERCY OF HIS JUKEBOX AND DOOMED TO MAD ROTE SMILING WHEN THE JUKEBOX ULTIMATELY BECOMES CORRUPTED BY OLD AGE THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN TO SOMEONE WHO NEVER USES A MENTAL JUKEBOX TO ISSUE HIS BEHAVIOR BUT FORMULATES HIS BEHAVIOR LIVE SPECIFIC FOR EACH OCCASION.
Common Excuses For Smiling:
Common excuses for smiling that the deluded believe are genuine are they smile because they are happy, friendly or like someone.

You do not smile because you are happy, friendly or like someone but TO SHOW that you are happy, friendly or like someone.

Why do you need to show or to be seen you are happy, friendly or you like someone?
You want to show or to be seen you are happy because you want to impress others, make them jealous or envious or you are insecure and want others to see you are happy when you are not quite happy. The very show that you are happy requires effort and the use of force that creates stress, restlessness and distraction that rapidly deflates the happiness that it is supposed to show and no matter how you deny to others and yourself you must be ashamed of yourself for putting on a show and wanting others to know you are happy when you can never be certain they appreciate. In other words by wanting others to appreciate your happiness you are making yourself dependent on the opinions of others.
THEREFORE THE TRUE REASON YOU SMILE IS NOT BECAUSE YOU ARE HAPPY BUT TO SHOW OTHERS YOU ARE HAPPY THAT USUALLY HAVE MOTIVES LIKE WANTING OTHERS TO ADMIRE YOU, BE JEALOUS OR ENVIOUS AND THE VERY SHOWING OFF YOUR HAPPINESS CREATES STRESS THAT KILLS THAT HAPPINESS AND MAKES YOU DEPENDENT ON OTHERS.
Friendliness that is displayed by a smile is never genuine but for show and always hypocritical. Genuine friendliness is not how you say or do something with a smile and musical prolonging and changes in speed and strength of force that actually stresses yourself and the recipient but WHAT you say or do WITHOUT the simultaneous transmission of forceful changes that truly does not harm others.
People do not smile because they are friendly but they want others to see that they are friendly because they want others to trust them and their smiling to be friendly has motive to take others into their confidence. If you have no selfish designs on others why do you want them to trust you are friendly? Just do or say what you want that is truly friendly to them and whether they accept or not is their right that is not for you to insist.
THEREFORE IF YOU SAY YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU ARE FRIENDLY THEN YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE WHOSE FRIENDLINESS IS FOR SHOW THAT IS ACTUALLY NOT GENTLE OR FRIENDLY BECAUSE THERE IS TRANSMISSION OF FORCEFUL CHANGES AND PROLONGING IN HIS SMILE AND GENTLE WAY. YOU ARE TRULY GENTLE OR FRIENDLY IF THERE IS NO FORCE TRANSMISSION IN THE STYLE OF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT DOES NOT HARM OTHERS. BY SMILING, YOU WANT OTHERS TO BELIEVE THAT SMILING IS FRIENDLINESS. BECAUSE THE GULLIBLE ACCEPT SMILING AS FRIENDLY THEY GET CONNED TO TRUST EVIL PEOPLE AND YOU HAVE A SHARE OF KARMA FOR WANTING OTHERS TO ASSOCIATE SMILING WITH FRIENDLINESS.
Unless you have become a smiling robot, liking someone is never the reason why they smile but they smile because they want to manipulate or want something out the person they like.

THEREFORE IF YOU THINK THAT YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU ARE HAPPY, FRIENDLY OR LIKE SOMEONE YOU ARE INDULGING IN MAKE BELIEF, SELF DECEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION BECAUSE THESE ARE EXCUSES FOR MOTIVES THAT ARE MORE UNSAVORY.
An invitation to like:
Whenever people smile, whether they know it or not, it is to invite (with force) the other person to like what is happening or they are proposing to them and if others refuse to be drawn in, they must stressfully fake they like.
Because the recipient has no compelling reason to like what you are proposing to them, what is advantageous to you may not be to him, you are exerting unfair pressure not meritorious smiling when you propose something or speak.
A smile is pure style:
Whereas a word or sentence spoken has meaning that may be true or false and in beings of this world a style that is always false and harmful, a smile is pure style without true meaning or it is a meaningless orchestrated movement of the person’s facial muscles purely for show to be seen.
(You may call the particular sequence of contraction of particular facial or cheek muscles the substance of your smile and the prolonging of their contraction, changes in speed and strength of force that is typical of you but differs in others as your style of smile that can range from being sheepish to a grin but this is the plan or substance of your smile that has no universally assigned inviolable meaning. Has this sequence of contraction of the different facial muscles the same assigned meaning as the alphabets as ‘i, n, v, o, l, v, e, d’ are in the word ‘involved’?)
Whereas any word even ‘a’ (which mean one or single) has discrete assigned meaning that can be understood and invariably a style (eg stretched to ‘aAYYee’ with objectively demonstrable speed and loudness changes), a smile has no assigned meaning ‘such and such’ is the meaning of ‘smile’ but it is merely a meaningless visual display of the motion of one’s facial muscles orchestrated by force never reason which is often absent because the person who smiles is not even aware he is smiling.
Can you say that ‘smile’ means ‘like’ or ‘friendly’ or ‘happy’ or whatever meaning you can think of? People associate smiling with ‘liking’, ‘being friendly’ or ‘happy’ but this is not the meaning of smiling. In any case, the associated meanings of smiling like ‘like’ is not about reason but force or attractive force towards an object, ‘friendly’ that is in a smile is about style or the way you do or say things with a smile not what you do or say and ‘happy’ that is denoted by a smile is emotional, actually restless excitement or ‘joy’ that truly satisfying hangover free serenity.
It is the sequential collection of different sounds in speech and the characters in a written word that have assigned common meaning that gives a word its audible or visual meaning and these are absent in a smile which is merely a collection of movements of the facial muscles that can be interpreted to mean many different things. You think a girl is smiling at you because she likes you but she may be smiling to fake she likes you or because she wants something from you. Smiling is a form of saying nothing whilst saying something that can mean anything or a form of deception or lying.
In other words there may be no officially assigned meaning to a smile, there is no universal agreement that when I or any person smiles, I mean such and such. It is up to you to interpret what my smile means and up to mean to choose what my intention or meaning is when I smile or it is deceptive or dishonest.

Just as there is nothing more to speech style than the unnecessary use of force to prolong one’s syllables, change speed and loudness within and between syllables and this creates insoluble recurring stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and mandates you exist as a robot rehashing stale the same combination of substance and style of what you want to say, it is meaningless and for show to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others that is conditioning and degrades your mind so that you are headed for insanity (mad stress, mad restlessness, mad distraction, mad rote speech, mad violence, mad emotions, mad logic and mad perception), in the same way, there is nothing more to a smile than the unnecessary use of mental force to orchestrate in a stereotyped or characteristic way with prolonging, changes in speed and strength of force the motion of the muscles of your face that creates insoluble recurring stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and mandates you exist as a robot rehashing stale the same combination of substance and style of your smile, it is meaningless and for show to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others and it is conditioning and degrades your mind so that you are headed for insanity (mad stress, mad restlessness, mad distraction, mad rote speech, mad violence, mad emotions, mad logic and mad perception), if you think there is something wonderful or good or true about smiling you have false perception that will end in mad perception.

A SMILE IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN ORCHESTRATED SEQUENTIAL RECURRING CONTRACTIONS OF THE MUSCLES OF ONE’S FACE WITH INDIVIDUALLY CHARACTERISTIC PROLONGATION IN THE USE OF FORCE, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT NECESSITATES ITS MEMORIZATION AND REPRODUCTION BY ROTE THAT HAS NO MEANING BUT INTENDED FOR SHOW TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS IN THE PROCESS CREATING MOUNTING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT IS CONDITIONING AND DEGRADES YOUR MIND AND THOSE AT THE RECEIVING END OF YOUR SMILE. IF YOU THINK THERE IS SOMETHING EVEN INDEFINABLY WONDERFUL, TRUE OR GOOD ABOUT A SMILE THEN YOU MAY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION. YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT CANNOT ACCORD WITH THE FATHER’S VIEW AND THE DESTINATION OF WRONG VIEW IS HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
A SMILE CANNOT MEAN HAPPINESS BECAUSE YOU CAN BE HAPPY, EVEN MUCH HAPPIER FOR A LONGER PERIOD WITHOUT SMILING BECAUSE THE SMILING STIRS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT RAPIDLY KILLS THAT HAPPINESS. THEREFORE A SMILE IS INTENDED TO FALSELY SHOW HAPPINESS AND IS INIMICAL TO TRUE HAPPINESS.
A SMILE CANNOT MEAN LIKING BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE TO LIKE OR BE ATTRACTED TO AN OBJECT WITHOUT SMILING AND THEREFORE A SMILE IS INTENDED TO SHOW LIKING THAT HAS MOTIVE TO MANIPULATE.
A SMILE CANNOT MEAN FRIENDLINESS, IS NEVER FRIENDLINESS BECAUSE TRUE FRIENDLINESS IS WHAT YOU DO OR SAY THAT DOES NOT HARM BUT BENEFITS THEM. DOING OR SAYING SOMETHING WITH A SMILE IS HOW YOU DO OR SAY SOMETHING THAT IS JUST A FOR SHOW WAY OF BEING FRIENDLY THAT BELIES ITS INTENTION BECAUSE THE SMILE HAD FORCE CHANGES THAT STIR THE UNEASE OF THE RECIPIENT WHO FEELS OBLIGED TO YOU.

IF SMILING AND STYLE IN SPEECH AND MOTION ARE NOT JUST UNIVERSALLY PRESENT BUT PRESENT CONSTANTLY IN ALL BEINGS HERE AND THEY ARE THE ONLY SOURCES OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT REGULARLY ASSAIL YOU AND FORCEFUL SMILING AND STYLE ARE THE INSTRUMENTS WITH WHICH YOU PERSECUTE ALL OTHERS AND THEREFORE SIN, THEN WHOEVER WHO IS THE COUNSELLOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST SAY WHAT I SAY IF HE IS TO BE TO YOUR ADVANTAGE TO COME AND CONVINCE YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT. IF IT IS POSSIBLE NOT TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND IT IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE EFFORTLESS FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSEOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST ALSO POINT THIS OUT.
IF I HAVE DONE SO, I WOULD HAVE RENDERED HIM OBSOLETE OR WHAT JESUS SAID AS FALSE THAT ONLY THE COUNSELLOR CAN DO SO.
IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR (PREVIOUSLY INCONCEIVABLE) CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES TO OCCUR AND THERE HAVE BEEN CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS THAT WERE IN TRUTH TRIGGERED BY ME THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELLOR MUST DO SO TO BENEFIT YOU.
What meaning does a smile has?
The collection of alphabets or consonants and vowels in a word eg t, r, u, t, h in truth conveys a specific agreed meaning that can be understood by those conversant with the English language.
What specific agreed meaning that can be understood does the (repetitive) sequence of contraction of individual muscles of the face have?
If you agree there is no universal convention that the sequence of contraction of facial muscles that constitute a smile means a particular thing then a smile is merely for show, to be seen (otherwise why smile?) with the purposes that are emotional to express like, to deceive (that you are enjoying something when you are hurt), impress, please, intimidate (a lecherous brute smiling at a girl) and dominate (force others to agree as when a salesperson smile to sell).
THE DEFINABLE SEQUENCE OF MOVEMENTS OF THE FACIAL MUSCLES INVOLVED IN MAKING A SMILE DOES NOT SPELL OUT A DISCRETE MEANING. IT MERELY HAS PURPOSES THAT ARE EMOTIONAL OR FORCEFUL, NAMELY TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE.
THUS IF YOU ARE A REGULAR SMILER AND IT IS A MEANINGLESS ACTIVITY THAT HAS DECEPTIVE, MANIPULATIVE PURPOSES, YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY NOT REALIZING THAT YOU WILL LOSE CONTROL OF YOUR DECEIT AND END UP MAD. SMILING IS THE LITTLE BROTHER OF LAUGHTER, SMILING IS LAUGHING MINUS THE SOUNDTRACK AND THEREFORE AS JESUS SAID, WOE TO YOU WHO LAUGHS, FOR YOU SHALL WEEP.

Meaning & Purpose

Meaning & Purpose:
Meaning must be distinguished from purpose. Something can have both meaning and purpose and something can have purpose but no meaning.
Style has purposes and it is to either singularly or multi-purposely deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others but it never has meaning.
What meaning can there be in style if it is always present and always intended to either singularly or multiply not specifically deceive, impress, intimidate and dominate and is repeated endlessly often mindlessly without awareness and satiation with the same thing said or done (eg keep speaking about his car to boast) and many other different things said and done (eg speaking about his car, wife, children and house to boast)? For something to have true meaning it must be specific and not transferrable to other things, otherwise you are flirting with confusion and insanity with the loss of control of the confusion over the meaning of your style and deeds.
What meaning can there be in something (style) that is merely the products of the use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness? Such changes in force cannot have any meaning, cannot convey specific meaning, it is merely a display of force that is not everlasting but ends with the display and is merely intended to stir the speed and strength of the mental force of the recipient so that he is similarly deceived, impressed, pleased, intimidated and dominated as the perpetrator himself must experience a share.
No one can mean his style because you cannot mean the constant prolonging, changing of speed and loudness in your speech and they never tell you that the purpose of their accompanying style in a particular occasion is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate you. Because they never declare the purpose of their accompanying style and never declare the true purpose of the substance of what they say or do that may be not what it is at face value but to similarly also deceive (tell a lie), impress (tell you about their Mercedes), please (to flatter you), intimidate (make you fearful) or dominate (make you submit), they are hypocrites who never mean what they say or do and never say or do what they mean.
If the intention of the style you say or do things and even the substance of what you say or do is actually to deceive or impress or please or intimidate or dominate and you never state this to your recipient, aren’t you a hypocrite? If you are not ashamed of your purpose to say things falsely impress or please others, why don’t you acknowledge it, declare it?
The presence of style in any person’s poses, speech and motion cannot be denied and it is an objective diagnosis.
As long as there is a presence of the (artificial, unnecessary) use of force to prolong, change direction (twisted posture or motion), speed and strength of force that can be known by God and those who discern even if you deny or cannot see present in you and others, there is style.
THEREFORE STYLE THAT IS ALWAYS PRESENT IN ALL BEINGS HERE IN THIS WORLD AND CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DIAGNOSED AND IS MERELY THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE DIRECTION (WHERE POSSIBLE IN MOTION), SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE HAS PURPOSE AND IT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE BUT IT (STYLE) NEVER HAS MEANING THAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE IT IS ALL ABOUT THE USE OF FORCE TARGETTED AT THE RECIPIENT’S MENTAL FORCE INTENDING TO MAKE IT RESONATE SYMPATHETICALLY. OFTEN EVEN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO HAS NO MEANING BUT IS INTENDED WITHOUT STATING TO ALSO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE. ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE (WHEN YOU SPEAK ANGRILY, THE ANGRY WAY YOU SPEAK IS THE STYLE) IS A HYPOCRITE WHO DOES NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAYS OR SAYS WHAT HE MEANS BECAUSE HE NEVER TELLS YOU HE WANTS TO INTIMIDATE YOU AS THE OCCASION MAY BE.
When you speak or do things angrily, sadly, humorously, gently, eagerly or excitedly, that angry, sad, humorous, gentle, eager or excited way you say or do it is your style for that occasion that although it has similarities, differs from others and it is not just then that you have style but always there is style in you and all beings in this world that is often subconsciously intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate and is so well denied that they now accept their style and cannot see there is style that is not free but requires energy and force to fabricate.
If you are constantly using force to prolong, change speed and loudness and you are totally unaware you do so, aren’t you a great fool who does not know what he is doing (prolonging, changing speed and loudness) especially when this is the infallible source to your stress, restlessness and distraction?
Because style is constant in the postures, motion and speech of all ordinary people and it is the inalienable source of insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction they must suffer from, style is intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate, anyone who is not conscious he has style and he intends to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate is a great fool who does not know what he is saying or doing and does not know he is setting himself up for mad perception, mad logic, mad emotions, mad rote behavior, mad violence, mad stress, restlessness and distraction that will end in everlasting perdition not heaven.
Not worthy of Jesus:
Jesus spoke about people being worthy of him.
Anyone who has style that constantly unnecessarily stresses, make restless and distracts himself and all others who come into contact with him cannot be worthy of Jesus except in his delusion that he nevertheless is.
If you are not worthy of Jesus you must wander alone in your stylish ‘individual’ way even for another eternity.
Defining Meaning & Purpose:
All words have meaning.
Words like ‘must’, ‘the’, ‘sure’, ‘never’, etc have specific meaning that can be understood and be used to convey specific messages to others.
Purpose is merely the intention of whatever you say or do and that can include your style of your speech or action or your pose.
Even though you are often unaware (so well denied or accustomed is it), there must be some purpose in your appreciable style otherwise you are mad. The purpose of their style which they never state or declare to themselves and others is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others.
DO YOU EVER DECLARE TO OTHERS THAT THE PURPOSE OF WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SAY IS TO IMPRESS YOU OR PLEASE YOU WHICHEVER THE CASE MAY BE. IF YOU ARE INTENDING TO IMPRESS AND YOU DID NOT DECLARE IT, AREN’T YOU A HYPOCRITE WHO NEVER SAY WHAT HE MEANS, NEVER SAYS “I MEAN TO IMPRESS WITH HOW AND EVEN WHAT I SAY”.
Even the president has to please others:

Whoever you are it cannot be that you enjoy having to turn around to smile and wave to say goodbye before you board the plane but it is all orchestrated as he and his wife has done so many times before in remarkably similar fashion and it is intended to please others.
You can deny that you are not pleasing others, you are genuinely wishing others goodbye but the truth if you are forcing yourself can be objectively known. The fact that you cannot see that you are pleasing others, you think you are genuine reflects how false your perception that will end in mad perception will be.
It is always a urge and a ritual to turn around to wave and say goodbye that becomes increasingly maddening with frequent forcing and will end in mad urge to wave, smile and say goodbye.
Does Bush tell you “I intend to please you by turning around to smile and wave?” or does he believe with emotion that he really means to wave and say goodbye?
Increasingly Human Like Robots:

Recently I saw a robot clad in the form of a boy rolling about restlessly on a mat just like little boys do. The above is a picture of a robot that seems to express surprise or being ‘stunned’.
It is not possible that a robot knows what it is doing but it is merely expressing what it has been programmed to express that may appear to be appropriate to the situation at hand so that it appears alive but there is no life nor consciousness in it, it is all a fake or deception.
RATHER THAN INDICATING THAT LIFE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A COLLECTION OF BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES THAT A MERE ROBOT WITH SOPHISTICATED COMPUTING POWER AND ACTUATORS CAN MIMICK AND THEREFORE LIFE HAS NO EVERLASTING MEANING OR CONSEQUENCES IN TERMS OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND LIFE AFTER DEATH WHAT SUCH INCREASINGLY LIFE-LIKE ROBOTS ARE TELLING US IS THAT HUMANS ARE NO MORE THAN SOPHISTICATED ROBOTS WHOSE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF SPEECH CAN BE PRODUCED WITHOUT NEED FOR CONSCIOUSNESS OR AWARENESS BY MINDLESS REGURGITATION FROM A FAR MORE SOPHISTICATED MENTAL JUKEBOX WITH THE DIFFERENCE THAT IN HUMANS THERE IS CONSCIOUSNESS THAT MERELY ACTS AS AN OBSERVER, EXPERIENCER AND INSTRUCTOR WHO NEVER CARRIES OUT LIVE SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION SPEECH OR ACTION. IN OTHER WORDS, SUCH ‘WONDROUS’ ROBOTS SHOW THAT YOU NEED NOT BE A HUMAN TO DO WHAT MOST PEOPLE USUALLY OR ALWAYS DO OR SAY, A PREPROGRAMMED ROBOT THAT HAS A CAPACITY TO PERCEIVE IN SIGHT AND SOUND RELEVANT DATA (EG PRESENCE OF OBSTRUCTIONS) AND HAVE PROGRAMS THAT TELL IT WHAT TO DO OR SAY WHEN THEY DETECT CERTAIN PATTERNS OF CUES CAN ACTIVATE ACTUATORS THAT CARRY OUT THE INSTRUCTIONS IN A WAY THAT DECEIVE OBSERVERS TO THINK IT IS A LIVE INTELLIGENT SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION RESPONSE WHEN IT IS A STANDARD MINDLESS LIFELESS INFLEXIBLE RESPONSE.
True and false logic:
It is false logic (that will end in mad logic) if you think because robots can imitate the actions of humans, there is no everlasting meaning to life, there is no life after death and life is just the result entirely of biochemical processes because you are not justified to conclude thus because there is a critical difference between humans and robots in that humans have consciousness, robots never have consciousness.
It is true logic to instead conclude that the increasingly ‘uncannily’ human like robots indicate that the origin or source of the substance and style speech, motion and postures of humans can be similarly preprogrammed or reproduced from memory to fit the current situation, humans are faking it, faking they are behaving specific to the occasion when they are rehashing stale from memory the same old things they say or do to meet demands of the situations and they feel stumped or flustered when they meet a situation they have not met before like a girl who has learnt only how to flirt but not to perform in bed and she cannot perform in bed if there is no program in her mind to tell her how to do so. Rather than the person’s consciousness being the mindful perceiver and initiator of speech and actions specific to the occasion, in ordinary people their consciousness is merely an observer, a conniver that approves of what is going on and it merely acts as the disc jockey as to what track to play for the occasion.
Can robots experience pain?
If I chop your hand off, do you experience excruciating pain that may cause you to become hysterical and faint?
If you chop off a robot’s hand, does it experience pain?
You can program a robot to imitate but can a robot truly experience pain?
You can program a robot to fake it is experiencing anger, hate, disgust, lust or greed but can you program it to experience anger, hate, lust or greed as you can?
Therefore there may be crucial differences between beings and robots and you are not justified to say because robots behave increasing like humans, life is nothing more than the result of biochemistry.
However, you are entitled to conclude that humans may be behaving like robots because robots can do the same things human do.
The right & wrong conclusions:
Although robots with increasingly sophisticated sensors, programs of what it should activate when it detects certain patterns in its sensors and actuators that can carry out sophisticated tasks that are remarkably human like, it is false logic to conclude that it means that existence as a being can be explained entirely by scientific laws. The reason is because beings have awareness that robots never have, beings can feel pain and emotions where robots cannot.
What you can conclude in the face of increasingly sophisticated robots is that it does not take human beings to say or do the things in the same styles ordinary people usually do, a robot can do the same thing with the same style and therefore all the people you see around may be merely overrated disc jockeys who are faking they are present and instead they are constantly rehashing the substance and style of what they want to say or do that is prerecorded standard and passed on deceitfully as live specific to the occasion.
BECAUSE ROBOTS CAN INCREASINGLY DO THE THINGS HUMANS DO AND ROBOTS HAVE NO CONSCIOUSNESS, IT SUGGESTS THAT ‘MARVELLOUS’ HUMAN SPEECH AND ACTION MAY ALSO BE SIMILARLY ROBOTIC, REACTIVATIONS OF OLD RECORDINGS THAT ARE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO THE SITUATION AT HAND BUT OTHERS MAY FIND WANTING. UNDER MOST CIRCUMSTANCES THIS CLEVER REHASHED FAKES MAY ESCAPE DETECTION BUT IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS WHEN THE ROBOTIC PERSON IS TIRED, STRESSED OR DISTRACTED, HE MAY CUE IN SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT ARE CLEARLY ODD BUT ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO ARE THEMSELVES ROBOTS NEVER REALIZE IS BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE’S SPEECH AND ACTIONS ARE ALWAYS CLEVER FAKES, CLEVER REHASHES OF STANDARD RECORDINGS OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO.
All About Force:
Style which is universally present constantly in beings in this world is all about force and nothing to do with reason; style is nothing more than the audible or visible results of using force to stretch or prolong, change direction, speed and strength of force and the purpose of style (to impress, please, dominate and intimidate) are similarly all about stirring the mental force of the target.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in speed and strength in way that makes him attracted to you as a result of what you say or do, he likes you or is impressed by you.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in speed and strength in way that makes him attracted to what you say or did that flatters him, he is pleased or likes what you say or do to him.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in a way by the (angry) way you say or did it that makes him fearful, he is intimidated by your style.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in a way by the forceful way you say or did it that makes him submissive, he is dominated by your style.
THUS STYLE THAT IS EVIDENT IN THE POSTURES, MOTION AND SPEECH IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE AUDIO AND VISUAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE USE OF FORCE BY THAT PERSON AND THIS CAN BE DEFINED AS THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE DIRECTION (WHERE POSSIBLE), SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND THE INTENTION OF STYLE THAT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS TOO ARE SIMILARLY NOTHING MORE THAN A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IN THE RECIPIENT TO LIKE, DISLIKE OR BE FEARFUL THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MEANING.
WHETHER A PERSON HAS STYLE OR NOT IS NOT A SUBJECTIVE BUT AN OBJECTIVE DIAGNOSIS. AS LONG AS THERE IS PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE POSES, MOTION AND SPEECH OF THAT PERSON, HE HAS STYLE AND MUST BE BEHAVING BY ROTE, BY REHASH FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PRODUCE HIS BRAND OF STYLE SO CONSISTENTLY EACH TIME IF IT WAS FRESHLY COMPOSED ANEW EACH TIME.
THE FACT THAT YOU ARE UNSURE IF THERE IS STYLE IN YOU AND OTHERS OR YOU CANNOT SEE STYLE IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS WHEN IT IS PRESENT REFLECTS A LACK OF DISCERNMENT OR ABILITY TO SEE THINGS AS THEY ARE ACTUALLY PRESENT AND IT IS MORE AGONIZING TO BEHAVE IN A WAY WITH STYLE THAT CAUSES INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND BE UNABLE TO SEE YOURSELF DOING SO AND THEREFORE NOT SEE A WAY OUT OF YOUR PREDICAMENT. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO EXTRICATE YOURSELF FROM SUFFERING IF YOU CANNOT SEE HOW YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR SUFFERING.
ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE, WHETHER HE CAN SEE OR NOT, MUST BE BEHAVING BY ROTE AS A ROBOT FAKING LIVE OR GENUINE BEHAVIOR AND HE IS IN DANGER OF MAD STRESS, MAD RESTLESSNESS, MAD DISTRACTION, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD PERCEPTION, MAD LOGIC, MAD EMOTIONS & MAD VIOLENCE THAT CAN ARISE SUDDENLY OUT OF PROPORTION TO PROVOCATION.
For one who sees rightly, all ordinary people have styles and they are therefore functioning as robots faking live speech and motion when their speech and motion are all regurgitated from memory from a mental jukebox that is far superior to any robot humans can device at the moment.
If you are a man of style you are a man of force that has nothing to do with reason and therefore you are not a man of reason but an irrational man of force suffering now, ever conditioning yourself to suffering that will end in loss of control and the weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Courting Insanity:

Whether you are putting on a show to please and impress others is never something I accuse someone and he can refute but it can be objectively determined.
I say that even though he may not be aware, the Dalai Lama is forcing himself to do the things he is doing (smiling and acting interested or friendly) in the name of pleasing others and the others in the picture too are forcing themselves to act friendly, never genuinely friendly.
If you insist they are being themselves, being genuine then you may be right or you have no eye for the truth and if that means suffering now and later, then this is your lot.
The Dalai Lama is using force to force himself to smile and be nice generating conflict in himself that can only be controlled but becomes increasingly malignant with age (mental degradation from abuse) and will lapse into insanity of some form just as Mother Theresa too had bouts of insanity in her latter years for which she was subject to exorcism.
WHOEVER YOU ARE, THIS IS AN UNIVERSAL LAW, IF YOU MUST HAVE STYLE (AS ALL ABOVE MANIFEST), YOU MUST EXIST AS A ROBOT DISHING OUT FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX THAN A LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION PERSON, YOU MUST BE CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, YOU MUST EXPERIENCE REGULAR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) THAT YOU CAN NOW STILL PUSH BACK BUT WILL LATER ENGULF YOU BEYOND YOUR CAPACITY TO SHRUG OFF TO BECOME MAD WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, MAD PERCEPTION, MAD LOGIC, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD EMOTIONS AND MAD VIOLENCE.
(What the Dalai Lama is doing is called lying to himself and others that is neither good for himself or others and the fact that he and you cannot see it makes it even worse.)
Everyone will get what he wants:
Everyone will get what he wants. The problem is that people think they want happiness and peace but in truth they want forcefulness, like and dislike, emotions and style that is a surefire recipe for stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate in themselves and their victims, those who interact with them.
THUS IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY WILLING YOURSELF TO BE STRESSED, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED BY THE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN DIRECTION, SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN YOUR PERCEPTIONS, THOUGHTS, SPEECH AND MOTION THEN YOUR DESIRE WILL BE GRANTED AND YOU WILL GET ALL THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION YOUR HEART DESIRES FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY.
IS IT POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHOSE CONDUCT INDUCES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THOSE WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH HIM, EVEN IF HE DENIES IT OR INSIST IT IS GOOD FOR HIM AND OTHERS TO GO TO HEAVEN THAT WILL NOT BE HEAVEN IF IT IS FULL OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AS IT IS HERE?
YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT:
Quote Headline: I owe it to good diet, says senior“You are what you eat. I only eat when I am hungry and stop before I am full.Comment: If you attribute your good health or longevity to your good diet when there may be other factors, you are presumptuous and flirting with false perception that will end in mad perception. A wise person only makes conclusions that he is certain. How can he be certain his good health or longevity is due to his good diet? What is a good diet to one expert is a bad diet to another and by preoccupying with your diet you are not heeding Jesus in not caring what you shall eat. By speaking publicly he is encouraging others to follow suit and if it leads them astray he is creating karma for himself.
You are certainly not what you eat, which is a sweeping statement to exaggerate the importance of food but what you eat will affect you mental and physical health. More important than food, what you will, say and do, the style (eg aggressive way) you do them determines your suffering now, when you age and pass away.
IF WHAT AND HOW YOU POSE, SAY AND DO THINGS ARE MORE IMPORTANT DETERMINANTS OF YOUR BODILY AND MENTAL HEALTH AND FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING AND YOU TELL OTHERS WHAT YOU EAT IS PARAMOUNT, IS THE ANSWER TO GOOD HEALTH THEN YOU ARE LEADING OTHERS ASTRAY. CAN AN EVIL MAN WHO IS ALWAYS ANGRY AND HATEFUL ASSURE LONG LIFE AND FREEDOM FROM DISEASE BY FASTIDIOUSLY WATCHING HIS DIET?
HOW DO YOU DETERMINE OBJECTIVELY WHEN YOU ARE HUNGRY AND WHEN TO STOP EATING BEFORE YOU ARE FULL?
ONLY EATING WHEN YOU ARE HUNGRY AND TO STOP EATING BEFORE FULL IS A FORM OF FAITH IN PRECEPTS AND RITUALS THAT HE IS FOOLISHLY ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO IMITATE (COPY) NOT EMULATE.
How I only make statements that I am certain of:
I say with certainty that stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness is the cause of the stress, restlessness and distraction that regularly beset all ordinary people (and will lead to insanity apart from poor health) because I can detect their presences in the speech of all ordinary people and I effortlessly experience freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction when I conscientiously practice not using force to stretch, change speed and loudness. If I were to imitate the ways people stretch, change speed and loudness I experience rising stress, restlessness and distraction.
Therefore I am certain that stretching, changing speed and loudness leads to stress, restlessness and distraction.
In his case, how can he prove that his good diet is responsible for his good health and longevity?
(If you think you do not stretch syllables, change speed and loudness but you suffer from regular stress, restlessness and distraction or cannot concentrate, let me demonstrate the presence of constant not frequent stretching, changes of speed and loudness in your speech.)
Dalai Lama Warns Tibetan Culture Will Be Wiped Out:
It is unlikely if not impossible that the Dalai Lama does not experience emotional stirring when he speaks on the subject and therefore he has identity views with the Tibetan cause that may be partly because of his nationality and perhaps partly to please others because as the leader of Tibetans in exile he must be seen to be saying certain things.
Tibetan culture may perish but then this world too will perish as the dinosaurs did in the past, and far sooner than people concede, as described by Jesus and most people will perish too when they die, so what is the fuss about Tibetans perishing?
IT IS A VERIFIABLE CERTAINTY THAT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS PRESENT IN THE SPEECH OF ALL PEOPLE HERE (INCLUDING THE DALAI LAMA AND POPE) IS THE CAUSE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT BESET THEM THAT DRIVES THEM TO IRRATIONAL AND DESTRUCTIVE ACTS. SO WHY HAVEN’T ANY OF THE RELIGIOUS LEADERS AWAKEN TO THEIR OWN FOLLIES AND POINT IT OUT TO OTHERS THE CAUSE OF THEIR SUFFERING THAT WILL MEANINGFULLY REDUCE THE ENDEMIC GLOBAL STRESS THAT WILL THEN TRANSLATE TO LESS VIOLENCE AND MORE TOLERANCE?

Neither Perceiving Nor Not Perceiving

The Buddha spoke of the sphere or realm of neither perceiving nor not perceiving that is likely difficult for doubting or incredulous emotional minds to make sense of.
Just as positive always coexists with negative and if positive does not exist, negative also does not exist, if it is possible for a physical state to occur wherein there is nothing positive, then negative also does not or cannot exist in that state, in the same way if perceiving is committing one to certain perceptions it necessitates one neglects or not perceive other coexisting perceptions, then if it is possible for a more fundamental state of existence wherein one does not perceive anything at all then not perceiving anything at all also does not exists in that state.
Just as it is impossible to only like without disliking, a person who likes must also dislike but it is possible to both neither like and dislike because liking and disliking are not mandatory conditions of existence but they are optional coexisting conditions of existence that are constantly often unwittingly exercised by beings in this world wherein the person's mental force is constantly stirring in speed and strength; liking is merely the stirring in speed and strength of one's mental force of going against self under the control of one's force of self preservation and dislike is the stirring in speed and strength of one's force of going against self out of control by one's force of self preservation, in the same way it is impossible to perceive some things without at the same time not perceive other things but it is possible to neither perceive some things and not perceive other things because perceiving and not perceiving are not mandatory conditions of existence but they are optional concomitant conditions of existence constantly exercised by beings in this world wherein the act of perceiving some things necessitate the non perception of other things and there is a more fundamental state of existence wherein one neither perceives and therefore also not perceive that beings trapped in the lower realms have never known or imagine is possible, that cannot be adequately understood because it is more fundamental than thinking or reasoning or precedes thinking. Just as however you describe the taste of water in many ways but it cannot compare with the person tasting it himself, in the same way, the realm of neither perceiving nor not perceiving eludes adequate description because it is more fundamental or precedes the thought processes.

AT LEAST WHEN THEY ARE CONSCIOUS, BEINGS HERE ARE ALWAYS PERCEIVING SOME THINGS TO THE EXCLUSION OF OTHER THINGS, THEY HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED THE STATE WHEREIN THEY ARE CONSCIOUS BUT NOT PERCEIVING ANYTHING AT ALL AND THEREFORE NOT EXCLUDING THE PERCEPTION OF OTHER THINGS AT ALL.

THUS PERCEIVING AND NON PERCEIVING ARE LIKE TWINS OR LIKE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE THAT COEXIST. AS SOON AS YOU PERCEIVE, YOU HAVE COMMITTED YOURSELF AND YOU MUST ALSO NOT PERCEIVE OTHER THINGS BUT THERE IS A MORE FUNDAMENTAL STATE OF EXISTENCE WHICH ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS MORE SATISFACTORY WHEREIN ONE DOES NOT PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE.

ORDINARY PEOPLE DO NOT JUST CONSTANTLY THINK BUT THEY CONSTANTLY THINK WITH FORCEFUL PROLONGATION OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE NOT REALIZING THAT (THOUGH NEVER SEEN IN THIS WORLD) IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST BY MERELY SEEING OR HEARING TO EITHER DO OR NOT DO WITHOUT NEED FOR THINKING WHICH IS OFTEN FRIVOLOUS AND UNRELATED OR DISTRACT FROM THE TASK AT HAND AND UNDERMINES RATHER THAN ENHANCE SAVORING THE MOMENT. JUST AS THEY ARE UNAWARE IT IS MORE BLISSFUL TO EXIST JUST PERCEIVING TO DO OR NOT DO WITHOUT THINKING, THEY DO NOT REALIZE THERE IS A SUPERIOR STATE OF EXISTENCE POSSIBLE WHERE ONE NEITHER PERCEIVES NOR NOT PERCEIVES.

JUST AS BOTH LIKING AND DISLIKING EXERT FORCE THAT IS CONSTANTLY CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH ON THE MIND TO CREATE INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND NOT TO LIKE NOR DISLIKE THAT APPLIES NO FORCE IS A SUPERIOR STATE OF THE MIND, IN THE SAME WAY, PERCEIVING COMMITS AND RESTRICTS THE CONSCIOUSNESS AND NOT TO PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE IS A SUPERIOR UNRESTRICTED STATE OF THE MIND.

TO NEITHER PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE CANNOT OCCUR WHEN ONE IS ENGAGED WITH THE EXTERNAL WORLD THAT COMPELS ONE PERCEIVE CERTAIN THINGS AND THEREFORE NOT PERCEIVE OTHER THINGS AND IT CAN ONLY OCCUR IN THE UPPER REACHES OF THE MEDITATION. IF THE MEDITATIVE STATE OF NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NON-PERCEIVING EXISTS AND IS A FAR SUPERIOR AND EVERLASTING STATE OF EXISTENCE THAN MUNDANE EXISTENCE HERE, THEN WHOEVER DECLINES TO MEDITATE OR DEPRECATES MEDITATION DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DEPRIVING HIMSELF AND WILL REGRET AFTERWARDS AS THE BUDDHA SAID.
Emotions, Moods & Fear:
People are often not even aware they are expressing like or dislike let alone they are aware they are constantly experiencing like or dislike. For instance when they complain about the noise, they are expressing dislike that they are experiencing. Thus they severely underestimate the liking and disliking; often distracted they are unaware they are disliking or liking especially when their liking and disliking are of milder intensities. Just as they are unaware that their liking and disliking are constant and alternating, they are unaware that their liking and disliking are the results of the only two possible mutually exclusive ways with which their mental forces of going against self can stir in speed and strength, namely under or out of control of their forces of self preservation.

It is possible to exist without liking nor disliking because it is possible to exist without stirring one's mental force of going against self. If one's mental force does not stir in speed and strength to whatever is happening then one neither likes nor dislikes.

When you are experiencing excitement, thrilled, delighted, greed, lust, envy, pride, eagerness you are experiencing liking.

When you are experiencing disappointment, disgust, irritation, anger, hate, jealousy, sadness or shame you are experiencing dislike.
All the emotions are derived from like and dislike and is nothing more than like or dislike dressed up in fancy clothes for the occasion. For instance greed is like for money or material possessions whilst lust is like for sexual objects. Envy is like for someone as a result of his characteristics like wealth or handsomeness or charm whilst jealousy is dislike for the same person for the same reasons. Pride is like for self. Excitement or thrill is like for something happening. Hate is merely anger focused on a target that is diffused or not well focused.
FEAR is the only emotion that is perpetrated by the force of self preservation. Because all the being’s usual activities are driven by his force of going against self in the name of self interest, should a situation arises that threatens, his force of going against self deserts him or rapidly diminish in strength permitting his now unopposed force of self preservation to rise rapidly in speed and strength to pull the being away from activities that harms him or puts him at risk. Thus fear always pulls the being away or withdraws whilst his force of going against self normally drives him to perceive, think, say or do things that actually harms him, stresses him in the name of deceiving, impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others.
Moods (eg ebullient, sad, uncertain or foul or bad moods) are merely false conditioned prolonged stable emotional states and anyone vulnerable to moods is an emotional person who not only suffers as a result but is conditioning or warping and degrading his mind in the process.
(The Buddha said the person who preaches from the teachings and discipline declared by him is rare. Name me one person in the past or today who has preached as I have from the teaching and discipline declared by the Buddha. I may be unique in preaching from the teaching and discipline declared by the Buddha.)
Why It Is Necessary To Meditate:
It is impossible for something that is necessary or meaningful to occur all the time but what is necessary or meaningful needs reason to occur and can only occur some of the time when there is reason for it to occur.
It is impossible that it is necessary for people to do and say things and think all the time because if their thinking, speaking and motion is necessary or meaningful they need reason to occur and therefore cannot happen all the time. Because it is not possible that you should need to think, speak and do things all the time, it is possible for them to set aside some time each day to meditate or familiarize themselves with not thinking, not speaking and doing things that is not possible in the course of the day because the constant forceful prolonging, changes in speed and strength of force in their perceiving, thinking, speak and doing together with the incessant bombardment of the same by others prevent them from experiencing genuine rest of their bodies, speech and thoughts.
Meditation is essentially setting aside some time each day to isolate oneself from the harmful influences of others, to allow one’s body and mind some much needed rest and if one is consummate it may lead to even a cessation of thought and even higher.
If you cannot stay still, not speak and think for any extended periods of time when alone by yourself what more should you expect you can remain calm and unperturbed when challenged by others in daily life?
If you don’t meditate you are heading for madness:
If people pay attention to their minds and bodies, they are ceaselessly thinking in a forceful prolonging, changing speed and loudness manner and their bodies are always active either fidgeting or shaking their legs or drumming their fingers or twirling something, they often speak or mutter or grunt involuntarily or cough.
Thus if they do not devote some time each day to address this conditioning ceaseless activities of their minds, bodies and speech, they are heading for loss of control and madness. With continued conditioning to ceaseless activities their urge to do so become more intense and harder to negate.
SO YOU THINK YOU ARE CAPABLE OF STILLNESS OF BODY, SPEECH AND THOUGHT IN DAILY LIFE? THAT MAY TRUE OR YOU ARE KIDDING YOURSELF. OBSERVE YOURSELF FOR MEANINGLESS MOVEMENTS & ACTIVITIES (SHUFFLING FEET WHEN TALKING TO ANOTHER, TURN YOUR HEAD AND BODY EVERY NOW AND THEN, SHAKING LEG, TAPPING FINGERS, TWIRLING LOCK OF HAIR, BREAKING OUT IN SPEECH BY YOURSELF, GRUMBLING TO YOURSELF APART FROM THE CONSTANT STREAM OF THOUGHTS THAT ARE OFTEN FRIVOLOUS) AND YOU MAY REALIZE YOU ARE RESTLESS OR WITHOUT REST NOT RESTFUL OR FULL OF REST.
She Likes You?

You may be a great fool if you think she likes you because she is smiling in a dazed manner that is a rehash of the way she usually smiles that differs from others to please you or impress you and she is actually suffering even to tormenting levels that she conceals from others. You can make a case she is close to tears in her smile. Her eyes are vacant or lost in a daze and she is headed for loss of control and madness.
IF SOMEONE IS SMILING TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS YOU AND YOU THINK SHE LIKES YOU, ISN’T THAT A BIG MISTAKE? IF YOU ARE SMILING TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS AND YOU THINK YOU LIKE OTHERS, AREN’T YOU MAKING A GREAT MISTAKE, DECEIVING YOURSELF?
How To Tell If Someone Is Smiling Because He Likes You:
If you like to like and like others to like you, it is important that you are able to tell whether someone is smiling because she genuinely likes you or she is smiling because she is trying to please you (fake that she likes you) or impress you (wants you to like her) not least for the reason that it can be a waste of effort and embarrassing to show your hand or declare your liking for her and find out she is not interested in you.

A person who likes someone or something must be focusing her attention on that person or thing and just as it is impossible for a person to focus on more than one object at a time, it is impossible for a person to like or be attracted to more than one person at a time.
Therefore if a person is smiling because she likes you her eyes (and face) must be focused on you (pupils even dilated) as she smiles to you. If her eyes and face are directed elsewhere whilst she is smiling it is unlikely if not impossible that she is smiling because she likes you but instead she is putting on a show to please or impress or both.
Her eyes above are not focused and appear as if in a daze, scattered and therefore she is putting on a show, not liking you or anyone.
A Smile Of Mischief:

If you think she is smiling because she likes you, you may be making a grave mistake or barking up the wrong tree. This is a smile of mischief to provoke you to join in.
Thus people smile for many reasons, sometimes even madly for no reason at all because they have a sudden urge to smile. They also smile to deny, when someone or something hurts them, they smile to deny they are hurt.
In the case below she is likely smiling to both please others and impress them and that is practicing conflict because no matter how she represses or denies, she is vaguely she is trying to both please and impress and that is trying to do two things at once that is confusing and lead to conflict not just in her but her audience who have to contend with uncertainty as to her intent in smiling.

When a girl likes a diamond ring or dress, she will frequently look at it at all angles and smile and make restless movements of her body fondling the ring or dress.
When a man likes a girl, he will keep looking at a photo of her and smile and perhaps even draw a deep breath.
When a man likes his new car he will look at his car often and he may approach his car the first thing in the morning and inspect every nook and cranny.
THEREFORE WHEN A PERSON IS SMILING AT YOU BECAUSE SHE LIKES YOU, SHE MUST BE LOOKING AT YOU NOT LOOKING ELSEWHERE OR NOWHERE IN PARTICULAR WHILST SHE IS SMILING AND THERE MAY BE RESTLESS MOVEMENTS OF HER BODY TO SUGGEST ATTRACTION. IF SHE IS LOOKING ELSEWHERE WHILST SHE IS SMILING SHE CANNOT BE VERY INTERESTED IN YOU.
BECAUSE PEOPLE SMILE FOR MANY REASONS APART FROM LIKING, THEY SMILE IN MISCHIEF OR APPRECIATION OF FALSITY, TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS, TO DENY THEY ARE HURT, NO ONE HAS A RIGHT TO CENSURE ME FOR CRITICIZING SMILING.
Perceiving Is A Handicap Not Advantage:
Ordinary people have the wrong view or delusion that perceiving in sight, sound, smell, taste and touch is desirable and an advantage when it is actually a compromise, a severe restriction whose disadvantages far outweigh its advantages.
At any moment, what you are perceiving in sight, sound, touch, smell and taste compared to what you are not perceiving but is simultaneously happening not just in your immediate surrounds but neighborhood, city, country and this earth is like a mere drop compared to the ocean.
Therefore rather than a vista, perceiving is a handicap, restrictive, it means that at any moment in return for the pittance or few drops you perceive, what you do not perceive is like an ocean. Thus if it is possible for you exist in a realm where you do not perceive nor not perceive, something that beings trapped in this world & trapped in constant perception have never imagined is possible let alone experienced (but the Buddha tells you it is possible and is superior to perceiving), rather than empty boring vacuity, it may be an incomparably superior and therefore higher realm to exist.
Existing in constant perceiving that also necessitate constant not perceiving many other things possible can be compared to existing in a flat two dimensional world like that of a table top. Beings trapped in this two dimensional world are free to move about in the surface of the table, can see 360 degrees in all directions but cannot elevate or lower themselves to see from above or below the plane of the table. They can only see their immediate surrounds but not what lies further afield in all directions. Therefore their perception is serious restricted. What they do not realize is that it is possible to rise above or descend below the plane of the table so that they get a very different and total view of all that is present and happening in the table.
Suppose there is a sphere or realm that can be accessed through the higher reaches of meditation where one neither perceives nor not perceive as the Buddha described and it is thus possible for that being to see all that is on the table at any given moment rather than being restricted to seeing what is in his immediate surrounds as he moves along on the plane of the table, isn’t this what we may term as ‘neither perceiving nor not perceiving’ not boring or empty but incomparably superior than perceiving and not perceiving?
And the view from on top of the table is never the same as the view within the table where you only see the side of an object that faces you and you have to go around to see the other sides of that object but viewing on top you can see all sides of that same object.
COMPARED TO NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING, PERCEIVING THE LITTLE AND SIMULTANEOUSLY ALSO NOT PERCEIVING THE VAST MAJORITY POTENTIALLY PERCEIVABLE MAY BE A SEVERE HANDICAP THAN ADVANTAGE THAT FOOLS TRAPPED IN THE LOWER REALMS FIND SO CAPTIVATING. IN ORDER THAT YOU PERCEIVE THE FEW THINGS THAT YOU DESIRE TO PERCEIVE, YOU MUST SACRIFICE IN NOT PERCEIVING THE MANY OTHER THINGS EXISTING THAT CAN BE PERCEIVED.
WHAT YOU SEE FROM ABOVE THE PLANE OF THE TABLE IS NOT THE SAME BUT SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT YOU SEE WITHIN THE PLANE OF THE TABLE. WHEREAS FROM ABOVE YOU SEE A MAP OF ALL THAT LIES ON THE TABLE, ON THE TABLE YOU SEE ONLY THE LEADING EDGES OF OBJECTS AT VARYING DISTANCE FROM YOU. THEREFORE IF SEEING WITHIN THE TABLE THAT CAN ONLY BE FACING EDGES OF OBJECTS AT VARYING DISTANCE FROM YOU IS CALLED PERCEIVING AND NOT PERCEIVING THEN SEEING FROM ABOVE THAT IS SEEING A MAP OF EVERYTHING THAT LIES ON THE TABLE CAN BE CALLED NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING.
BY IMMERSING YOURSELF IN THE AFFAIRS OF THIS WORLD AND REFUSING TO DEVOTE SOME TIME TO MEDITATE TO FIRST SANITIZE YOUR MIND OF SINS, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND CULTIVATE CONCENTRATION AND EQUANIMITY (NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE) YOU ARE DEPRIVING YOURSELF OF THE INCOMPARABLE BLISS OF EXISTING FIRST WITHOUT THE CURSE OF CONSTANT THOUGHT PROGRESSING TO EXISTING WITHOUT THE CURSE OF CONSTANT PERCEIVING AND NOT PERCEIVING THENCE TO THE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE OF NO-THINGNESS. WOULD YOU NOT FALL INTO DEEP REGRET IF SUCH SUPERIOR STATES OF EXISTENCE ARE POSSIBLE AND YOU MISSED OUT ALL BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO MEDITATE OR ARE PREJUDICED AGAINST MEDITATION? WHAT REASONS HAVE YOU AGAINST MEDITATION WHEN YOU HAVE NOT GIVEN IT A REASONABLE TRIAL? IF YOU HAVE NOT YOU ARE UNRIGHTEOUS AND PREJUDICED, A QUALITY THAT DOES NOT LEAD TO HEAVEN BUT SUFFERING.
Neither perceiving nor not perceiving:
If ‘perceiving’ is seeing what is happening around you and ‘not perceiving’ is not seeing what is happening not just around you but everywhere else far beyond you and ‘neither perceiving nor not perceiving’ is seeing everything that is happening not just in the vicinity but far beyond from an elevated perch, then both ‘perceiving and not perceiving’ and ‘neither perceiving nor not perceiving’ exist and the latter is incomparably superior.
Where Have All The Fish Gone?
It reflects mankind’s pretense and denial that they are not alarmed by scientific and anecdotal reports of the progressive decline in fish stocks not just in Malaysia but all over the world.
Fishermen in Malaysia have reported dwindling catches of fishes that are not as big as they used to be.
Do you think this decline will stabilize and all will be well or there will be a sudden spontaneous recovery in fish stocks or do you think the decline in fish stocks is the result of mankind’s heedless excessive plunder of the sea that will lead to not just extinction and famine but because the fish are there not just as food for mankind but as important links in the food chain, a collapse of the food chain and destabilizing of the ecosystem and mass extinction of many other species?
Thus mankind who thinks he is a wonderful husband may be sowing the seeds of mass extinction that will end in his own doom.
Jesus said at the close of the Age there will be famine, earthquakes in many places and nation will rise against nation. We may be approaching the point where the earth can no longer sustain life and there will be suffering never before seen since the foundation of the earth:
Where have the fishes gone?
By LOONG MENG YEE, EDDIE CHUA and NIK KHUSAIRI IBRAHIM
KUALA SELANGOR: Fisherman Koh Har Tiong loved the sea for various reasons – the fresh breeze and its vastness. He also loved it for the bountiful fish it provided.
That was 10 years ago.
Now, he is thankful if he can get 10 barrels of fish each time he goes out to sea, a far cry from the 30 barrels he used to haul in then.
And the blue seawater has now turned murky, grey, smelly and lifeless.
Not only is there less fish to catch, even the fish in his net are smaller.
Local freshwater and marine fish expert Prof Mohd Azmi Ambak said that in the last 50 years, some 20 species of freshwater fish had become extinct.
Local fishermen, he said, were finding it hard to catch once common and abundant species such as the red and golden snapper.
“Freshwater species such as seluang jalur emas, lias puteh, keli hutan and keli limbat as well as marine fish such as the telakai (short fin eel), ikan lelauh minyak (seven finger threadfin) and terubuk bengkalis can no longer be found in local rivers and seas,” he said.
Koh agreed that some fish had become rare and were no longer seen.
“An example is the lai liew har (mantis prawn). A decade ago, it was considered an inferior type of seafood and nobody bought them.
Why It Is Possible To Be All Seeing & Knowing:
As the Buddha said, there are things that are possible and things that are impossible and it may be in the nature of things that when their minds become pure, they can see and know all.
It is because it is possible for all beings to become awakened (his deputy, Moggalana was the Satan of one Age), when their minds become pure and concentrated they can know and see all. Just as all sons have resemblances with their fathers, similarly there must be similarities between the Father and all other beings that are either sons of light or darkness. Therefore just as the Father is all seeing and all knowing it is possible for all beings to become all seeing and knowing even if there will not be able to attain that for many life times.
Thus by selfishly perceiving the little of importance to you, you forfeit the perceiving of the infinitely many that is possible for any given moment you could have otherwise perceived had you not been detained in your narrow selfish perceptions.
Therefore if you did not selfishly perceive the little that you are so enthralled with and accept as fait accompli, you will not forfeit the perception of the infinitely many that is possible for any given moment.
Thus there may be a sphere or realm wherein one neither perceives nor not perceive that is higher than the realm wherein one always perceives the drop when conscious and not perceive the ocean of which that drop is a mere part of.
ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA, THE REALM OF THE CESSATION OF ALL PERCEPTIONS AND FEELINGS IS THE HIGHEST IN BLISS.
"Now, if someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure and joy that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is this pleasure? Here, quite secluded from sensual desires, secluded from unwholesome states of mind, a monk enters upon and abides in the first meditative absorption (jhana), which is accompanied by thought conception and discursive thinking and has in it joy and pleasure born of seclusion. This is the other kind of pleasure which surpasses that (sense) pleasure and is more sublime.
"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is that pleasure? Here, with the stilling of thought conception and discursive thinking...a monk enters upon and abides in the second meditative absorption...in the sphere of the infinity of space...of the infinity of consciousness ...of no-thingness...of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.
"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is this pleasure? Here, by completely surmounting the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, a monk enters upon and abides in the cessation of perception and feeling. This is the other kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime.[3]
A Cute Kitten:

Although not overt, there is an expression on the kitten’s face, not no expression. If she had no expressions she would not be a kitten but an angel.
There is a mild forceful stare of apprehension (fear) but she is not resisting or struggling that is an expression of dislike or excited as when animals rush to food being served, an expression of like.
It is my hand holding it and if you are discerning, you will realize that each person holds an object with a stereotypical posture that often can be used to identify the person if you know him well. There is no style to show off, no excessive force in my grasp.
Notice this kitten is well formed, pretty with no blemishes on her face, the symmetry of the patterns on her coat and all her legs are white. She is the only offspring of a cat that is very protective of her and very attached to me and may be an incarnation of my departed sister (the cat not the kitten). There is another female cat that may be my mother because it is unusually attached to me apart from many other signs. Very few people go to heaven according to the Buddha and I can see a lot of people including my departed sister and mother have serious conduct defects that tells me is not the path to heaven. Even the man who calls his brother you fool is in danger of hell according to Jesus and you must be perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect. Most people will be deluding themselves if they think they are perfect as their Father in heaven is.
According to the Buddha, how pretty you are depends on your karma that is not to say that a lot of pretty girls are good. Many girls that are called pretty are ugly to me and they have artificially enhanced their ‘beauty’ to seduce others so that they are headed for decline.
"Master Gotama, what is the reason, what is the condition, why inferiority and superiority are met with among human beings, among mankind? For one meets with short-lived and long-lived people, sick and healthy people, ugly and handsome people, insignificant and influential people, poor and rich people, low-born and high-born people, stupid and wise people. What is the reason, what is the condition, why superiority and inferiority are met with among human beings, among mankind?"
3. "Student, beings are owners of kammas, heirs of kammas, they have kammas as their progenitor, kammas as their kin, kammas as their homing-place. It is kammas that differentiate beings according to inferiority and superiority."
4. "I do not understand the detailed meaning of Master Gotama's utterance spoken in brief without expounding the detailed meaning. It would be good if Master Gotama taught me the Dhamma so that I might understand the detailed meaning of Master Gotama's utterance spoken in brief without expounding the detailed meaning."
"Then listen, student, and heed well what I shall say."
"Even so, Master Gotama," Subha the student replied. The Blessed One said this:
5. "Here, student, some woman or man is a killer of living beings, murderous, bloody-handed, given to blows and violence, merciless to all living beings. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation, in an unhappy destination, in perdition, in hell. If, on the dissolution of the body, after death, instead of his reappearing in a state of deprivation, in an unhappy destination, in perdition, in hell, he comes to the human state, he is short-lived wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to short life, that is to say, to be a killer of living beings, murderous, bloody-handed, given to blows and violence, merciless to all living beings.
6. "But here some woman or man, having abandoned the killing of living beings, abstains from killing living beings, lays aside the rod and lays aside the knife, is considerate and merciful and dwells compassionate for the welfare of all living beings. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination, in the heavenly world. If, on the dissolution of the body, after death, instead of his reappearing in a happy destination, in the heavenly world, he comes to the human state, he is long-lived wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to long life, that is to say, to have abandoned the killing of living beings, to abstain from killing living beings, to lay aside the rod and lay aside the knife, to be considerate and merciful, and to dwell compassionate for the welfare of all living beings.
7. "Here, student, some woman or man is one who harms beings with his hands or with clods or with sticks or with knives. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is sickly wherever he is born. This is the way that leads to sickness, that is to say, to be one who harms beings with one's hands or with clods or with sticks or with knives.
8. "But here some woman or man is not one who harms beings with his hands, or with clods, or with sticks, or with knives. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is healthy wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to health, that is to say, not to be one who harms beings with his hands or with clods or with sticks or with knives.
9. "Here, student, some woman or man is angry, much given to rage; even when little is said, he is furious, angry, ill-disposed, resentful, he shows ill-temper, hate and surliness. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is ugly wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to ugliness, that is to say, to be furious, angry, ill-disposed, resentful, and to show ill-temper, hate and surliness.
10. "But here some woman or man is not angry or much given to rage; even when much is said, he is not furious, angry, ill-disposed, resentful, nor does he show ill-temper, hate or surliness. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is beautiful wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to beauty, that is to say, not to be angry or given to much rage; even when much is said, not to be furious, angry, ill-disposed or resentful, or to show ill-temper, hate or surliness.
11. "Here, student, some woman or man is envious; he envies, begrudges and harbors envy about others' gains, honor, veneration, respect, salutations and offerings. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is insignificant wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to insignificance, that is to say, to be envious, to envy, begrudge, and harbor envy about others' gain, honor, veneration, respect, salutations and offerings.
12. "But here some woman or man is not envious, he does not envy, begrudge or harbor envy about others' gain, honor, veneration, respect, salutations and offerings. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is influential wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to influence, that is to say, not to be envious, not to envy, begrudge or harbor envy about others' gain, honor, veneration, respect, salutations and offerings.
13. "Here, student, some woman or man is not a giver of food, drink, cloth, sandals, garlands, perfumes, unguents, bed, roof and lighting to monks or brahmins. Due to having performed and completed such kamma, on the dissolution of the body, after death he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is poor wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to poverty, that is to say, not to be a giver of food, drink, cloth, sandals, garlands, perfumes, unguents, bed, roof and lighting to monks and brahmins.
14. "But here some woman or man is a giver of food, drink, cloth, sandals, perfumes, unguents, bed, roof and lighting to monks and brahmins. Due to having performed and completed such kamma, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is rich wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to riches, that is to say, to be a giver of food, drink, cloth, sandals, garlands, perfumes, unguents, bed, roof and lighting to monks and brahmins.
15. "Here, student, some woman or man is obdurate and haughty; he does not pay homage to whom he should pay homage, or rise up for whom he should rise up, or give a seat to whom he should give a seat, or make way for whom he should make way, or worship him who should be worshipped, or respect him who should be respected, or revere him who should be revered, or honor him who should be honored. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is low-born wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to low birth, that is to say, to be obdurate and haughty, not to pay homage to whom he should pay homage, nor rise up for..., nor give a seat to..., nor make way for..., nor worship..., nor respect..., nor revere..., nor honor him who should be honored.
16. "But here some woman or man is not obdurate or haughty; he pays homage to whom he should pay homage, rises up for whom he should rise up, gives a seat to whom he should give a seat, makes way for whom he should make way, worships him who should be worshipped, respects him who should be respected, reveres him who should be revered, honors him who should be honored. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is high-born wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to high birth, that is to say, not to be obdurate or haughty, to pay homage to whom he should pay homage, to rise up for..., to give a seat to..., to make way for..., to worship...respect...revere...honor him who should be honored.
17. "Here, student, some woman or man when visiting a monk or brahmin, does not ask: 'What is wholesome, venerable sir? What is unwholesome? What is blamable? What is blameless? What should be cultivated? What should not be cultivated? What, by my doing it, will be long for my harm and suffering? Or what, by my doing it, will be long for my welfare and happiness?' Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he will be stupid wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to stupidity, that is to say, when visiting a monk or brahmin, not to ask: 'What is profitable?...Or what, by my doing it, will be long for my welfare and happiness?'
18. "But here some woman or man when visiting a monk or brahmin, asks: 'What is profitable, venerable sir?...Or what, by my doing it, will be long for my welfare and happiness?' Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is wise wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to wisdom, that is to say, when visiting a monk or brahmin, to ask: 'What is profitable, venerable sir?...Or what, by my doing it, will be long for my welfare and happiness?'
19. "So, student, the way that leads to short life makes people short-lived, the way that leads to long life makes people long-lived; the way that leads to sickness makes people sick, the way that leads to health makes people healthy; the way that leads to ugliness makes people ugly, the way that leads to beauty makes people beautiful; the way that leads to insignificance makes people insignificant, the way that leads to influence makes people influential; the way that leads to poverty makes people poor, the way that leads to riches makes people rich; the way that leads to low birth makes people low-born, the way that leads to high birth makes people high-born; the way that leads to stupidity makes people stupid, the way that leads to wisdom makes people wise.
20. "Beings are owners of kammas, student, heirs of kammas, they have kammas as their progenitor, kammas as their kin, kammas as their homing-place. It is kammas that differentiate beings according to inferiority and superiority."
Never No Expression:
There is always an expression on the faces of ordinary people, never no expression. People are forcefully impassive, they use force that is evident in their stare and braced facial muscles when they are impassive whenever they are not expressing like (thrilled, excited, eager, smiling) or dislike (frown, grimace, glare).
Until they die when they usually become incontinent of urine, their faces never become flaccid or expressionless.
Expressions on their faces are part involuntary (automatic and unconscious) and part voluntary. Sometimes their smiles are purposely, sometimes involuntary.
Why are people’s faces always expressing?
The reason is because expressions are in truth unnecessary, only necessary for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others and whatever is unnecessary can happen any time because it does not need reason to happen and whatever can happen anytime can happen every time or all the time. And so it is that ordinary people are frequently forcing themselves to express themselves such that expressions which are unnecessary and can happen anytime now happens all the time.

Natural & Unnatural Beauty:
UNNATURAL BEAUTY IS BEAUTY THAT IS THE RESULT OF EFFORTS BY THE PERSON TO BEAUTIFY HIMSELF AND NATURAL BEAUTY IS WHAT IS UNADORNED BEAUTY.
Does the kitten above put make up, groom or perm her hair, put ribbons on it, apply lipstick or powder on it? If you agree it did not then her beauty is natural.
Do human females, even little girls put make up, groom or perm their hair, put ribbons, ear rings, necklaces and apply lipstick and powder on their faces? Do they learn to cavort or walk with sexy swaying of their hips and adopt seductive curvatures of their bodies? If you agree they do and these are fabricated or adopted then it is unnatural or artificial or faked beauty that is sinful and leads to future decline and woe.
Does the form and posture of my hand look ugly? Do I take skincare or eat health food to preserve my youth? Do I manicure my nails and apply varnish? Therefore even without any thought let alone action of enhancing my physical beauty, it is naturally attractive.
The Buddha said that the angels in heaven far exceed the beauty of human females, make human beauties look like monkeys with cauterized faces. So if you are attracted to beauty, heaven is the place to see the prettiest maidens.
Attachment to form and the formless of which the appreciation of beauty is a facet is a higher fetter to existence shared by beings here that is tainted by emotional possessiveness and not tainted by possessiveness in heavenly beings.
Ignorance, restlessness, conceit, attachment to form and the formless are higher fetters binding beings to continued existence whilst the lower fetters, self identity views, faith in rites and precepts, doubt and uncertainty, ill will and sensuality (emotional lust for forms, sounds, smells, tastes and touch) are the lower fetters binding one to the impure realms.
Jesus: "Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you shall eat or what you shall drink, nor about your body, what you shall put on (most ordinary people may be lying to themselves if they think they do not worry about their lives, etc. They do and that is not obeying Jesus with serious implications. This is not an option. If you are preoccupied with preserving your lives here you will be detained here in animal existence). Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? And which of you by being anxious can add one cubit to his span of life (anxiety is always suffering, emotional and conditioning and it is no use but harmful to worry about anything, not just your life because worrying has nothing to do with reality, serves no purpose but a conditioned state of your mind that leads to woe. Anyone who says that worry spurs you to find solutions is deluded. You mean you cannot find a solution, you are not better equipped to find a solution by being calm and clearly thinking, the opposite of worry?)? And why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin; yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is alive and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you, O men of little faith (the man of little faith is the man full of doubt and uncertainty as to what is true and false)? Therefore do not be anxious, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' (By complaining about their lack of bread on the boat, the disciples were not behaving according to what Jesus preached) For the Gentiles seek all these things; and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well.

"Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Let the day's own trouble be sufficient for the day.
If you were not anxious for your life here (and therefore in danger of perishing) you would not be concerned about doing blood tests, taking health food, avoiding unhealthy foods, putting make up, keep fit by obsessive exercising, wear fancy clothes and shoes, looking for the best places for the best foods.
It is actually a burden and additional suffering to be preoccupied with your life here and the reason why it is difficult for people to desist is because it is emotional and driven by force not passively by reason. Because after lifelong practice, there is considerable force and emotion backing their self preserving actions and they are indifferent, see nothing wrong or danger of perishing after they die, they are lackadaisical not to make the effort to efface ort scrub off the force or emotion or habit energy behind their irrational self preserving actions.
If it was reason that was behind their self preserving rituals, then it can be remedied instantly by the provision of knowledge where previously they had none because reason has no force, only emotion has force that is not conducive to reason and what is reasonable can be stopped instantly since there is no force or urge behind it that prevents it being stopped by the provision of knowledge.
ALL SINFUL CONDUCT THAT INCLUDES ANXIOUSNESS FOR ONE’S LIFE HERE AND ACTIONS TAKEN TO PRESERVE THEIR LIVES HERE THAT DIFFER FROM INDIVIDUAL TO INDIVIDUAL ARE NOT GUIDED BY FORCE FREE REASON BUT CONDUCTED MINDLESSLY BY ROTE BACKED BY FORCE, EMOTION AND HABIT ENERGY THAT IS DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO ERASE BECAUSE THE FOOLISH PERSON LACKS CONVICTION AND PERSISTENCE THAT IS NECESSARY TO BRING ABOUT A CHANGE IN HIS HABITS. HE THINKS HE WILL BE FINE, HE WILL ESCAPE SUFFERING WHEN HE AGES AND DIES.