Disagreeing with me:

Only the substance of your disagreement matters; your style of disagreement eg by speaking gently and softly spoken is far from meritorious but is devious or dishonest and gives the impression that I am wrong and you are right when the case may be the opposite.

The Buddha said he is the highest teacher, encompassing all the beings in existence both in heaven and on earth, he sees no one like him, he possessed supernatural powers (can make himself invisible even to God, can make a person invisible, fly through the air, walk through walls and cause people to be unable to split wooden logs but can instantly cause 500 logs to become split.

What I say is in accordance with what the true Buddha preached and by the various yardsticks he used, I am a noble person and so anyone who speaks against me, disagrees with me is de facto disagreeing with the Buddha, the One Who Thus Come, The One Who Has Gone Beyond.

"In the same way, great king. When someone has gone forth into homelessness -- no matter from what clan -- and he has abandoned five factors and is endowed with five, what is given to him bears great fruit.

" He has abandoned sensual desire...ill will...torpor & lethargy...restlessness & anxiety...uncertainty. These are the five factors he has abandoned. He is endowed with the aggregate of virtue... concentration... discernment... release... knowledge & vision of release of one beyond training. These are the five factors with which he is endowed.

(I am without ill will, sensual desire, torpor, lethargy, restlessness, doubt and anxiety that classify me as worthy of respect).

"What others call happiness, that the Noble Ones declare to be suffering. What others call suffering, that the Noble Ones have found to be happiness. See how difficult it is to understand the Dhamma! For those under the veil (of ignorance) it is obscured, for those who cannot see it is utter darkness. But for the good and the wise it is as obvious as the light for those who can see. Even though close to it, the witless who do not know the Dhamma, do not comprehend it.

"By those overcome by attachment to existence, those who drift with the stream of existence this Dhamma is not properly understood. Who other than the Noble Ones, are fit to fully understand that state, by perfect knowledge of which they realize final deliverance, free from defilements?

(What ordinary people call happiness, excitement, joking, trying to be funny, mischievous, being stylish, smiling, emotional, liking and disliking that I call suffering and what I call happiness, not smiling, not stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness others call suffering)

Bhikkhus, the arising of three things are rare in the world. What three? The arising of the Thus Gone One, worthy and rightfully enlightened is rare the world. A person who preaches the Teaching and Discipline declared by the Thus Gone One is rare in the world. A person who has gratitude and returns it, is rare in the world. Bhikkhus, the arising of these three things are rare in the world.

(There are many preachers of Buddhism but no one today or in the past, apart from contemporaries of the Buddha has elucidated what the Buddha taught in the way I have done and because no two different views are correct, if I am correct, they are all wrong. Because no one preaches from what the true Buddha taught as I have, I am indeed rare or unique in this world)

Thus when anyone speaks against me, he is also speaking against the Buddha who declared:

8. When Upaka the âjãvaka had spoken thus, the Blessed One addressed him in the following stanzas: `I have overcome all foes; I am all-wise; I am free from stains in every way; I have left everything; and have obtained emancipation by the destruction of desire. Having myself gained knowledge, whom should I call my master? I have no teacher; no one is equal to me; in the world of men and of gods no being is like me. I am the holy one in this world, I am the highest Teacher, I alone am the absolute Sambuddha; I have gained coolness (by the extinction of all passion) and have obtained Nirvàna. To found the kingdom of Truth I go to the city of the Kasis (Benares); I will beat the drum of the Immortal in the darkness of this world.'

9. (Upaka replied): `You profess then, friend, to be the holy, absolute Jina.' (25)

(The Buddha said): `Like me are all jinas who have reached extinction of the àsavas (26); I have overcome (gita me) all states of sinfulness'; therefore, Upaka, am I the Jina.'

When He had spoken thus, Upaka the âjãvaka replied: `It may be so, friend;' shook his head, took another road, and went away.

The Buddha Is Not Your Friend Or Fellow:

NO FAITH IS REQUIRED (NOR OF ANY USE) BY OTHERS THAT THE BUDDHA HAS FOUND ENLIGHTENMENT AND IS NO LONGER YOUR FRIEND BUT HIS TEACHING IS FOUNDED ON SUBSTANCE THAT MAY ESCAPE YOUR COMPREHENSION AND THE REQUISITE THAT YOU PRACTICE, IN PARTICULAR TO CALM YOUR MIND SO THAT IT CAN ATTAIN EFFORTLESSLY THE FOUR MEDITATIVE STATES THAT LEADS TO THE RELEASE OF YOUR MIND.

When the Buddha re-met the five mendicants he associated with before his enlightenment and told them not to address him as ‘friend’, they were disbelieving and he asked them if he had spoken to them in the past the way and what he now said, which indicated that something has happened, he was a transformed man. He then proceeded to teach them for the first time the path to the final and permanent end of all suffering after which the whole system of ten Thousand worlds quaked, was shaken, and trembled; and an infinite, mighty light was seen through the world, which surpassed the light that can be produced by the divine power of the deva (angels).

The Buddha said it is thirst, that leads to re-birth, accompanied by pleasure and lust, finding its delight here; and there. (this thirst is threefold), namely, thirst for pleasure, thirst for existence, thirst for prosperity. It is the cessation of thirst for pleasure, existence and prosperity that leads to the end of all becoming and suffering and towards this end, right concentration or meditation to achieve the four progressively higher meditative states is essential.

And the Blessed One, wandering from place to place, came to Benares, to the deer park Isipatana, to the place where the five bhikkhus were. And [q 92/] the five bhikkhus saw the Blessed One coming from afar; when they saw Him, they concerted with each other, saying, `Friends, there comes the samaõa Gotama, who lives in abundance, who has given up his exertions, and who has turned to an abundant life. Let us not salute him; nor rise from our seats when he approaches; nor take his bowl and his robe from his hands. But let us put there a seat; if he likes, let him sit down.'

11. But when the Blessed One gradually approached near unto those five bhikkhus, the five bhikkhus kept not their agreement. They went forth to meet the Blessed One; one took His bowl and His robe, another prepared a seat, a third one brought water for the washing of the feet, a foot-stool, and a towel (27). Then the Blessed One sat down on the seat they had prepared; and when He was seated, the Blessed One washed His feet. Now they addressed the Blessed One by His name, and with the appellation `Friend.'

12. When they spoke to Him thus, the Blessed One said to the five bhikkhus: `Do not address, O bhikkhus, the Tathàgata by His name, and with the appellation "Friend." The Tathàgata, O bhikkhus, is the Holy, Absolute Sambuddha. Give ear, O bhikkhus! The Immortal (amata) has been won (by me); I will teach you; to you I preach the Doctrine. If you walk in the way I show you, you will, ere long, have penetrated to the Truth, having yourselves known it and seen it face to face; and you [q 93/] will live in the possession of that highest goal of the holy life, for the sake of which noble youths fully give up the world and go forth into the houseless state.'

13. When He had spoken thus, the five monks said to the Blessed One: `By those observances, friend Gotama, by those practices, by those austerities, you have not been able to obtain power surpassing that of men, nor the superiority of full and holy knowledge and insight. How will you now, living in abundance, having given up your exertions, having turned to an abundant life, be able to obtain power surpassing that of men, and the superiority of full and holy knowledge and insight?'

14. When they had spoken thus, the Blessed One said to the five bhikkhus: `The Tathàgata, O bhikkhus, does not live in abundance, he has not given up exertion, he has not turned to an abundant life. The Tathàgata, O bhikkhus, is the Holy, Absolute Sambuddha. Give car, O bhikkhus; the Immortal has been won (by me); I will teach you, to you I will preach the Doctrine. If you walk in the way I show you, you will, ere long, have penetrated to the Truth, having yourselves known it and seen it face to face; and you will live in the possession of that highest goal of the holy life, for the sake of which noble youths fully give up the world and go forth into the houseless state.'

15. And the five bhikkhus said to the Blessed One a second time (as above). And the Blessed One said to the five bhikkhus a second time (as above). And the five bhikkhus said to the Blessed One a third time (as above).

16. When they had spoken thus, the Blessed One [q 94/] said to the five bhikkhus: `Do you admit, O bhikkhus, that I have never spoken to you in this way before this day?' (Unless the Buddha is mad, and no mad man speaks like this, something has changed in him)

You have never spoken so, Lord.'

The Tathàgata, O bhikkhus, is the holy, absolute Sambuddha. Give ear, O bhikkhus, &c. (as above).'

And the Blessed One was able to convince the five bhikkhus; and the five bhikkhus again (28) listened willingly to the Blessed One; they gave ear, and fixed their mind on the knowledge (which the Buddha imparted to them).

17. And the Blessed One thus addressed the five bhikkhus (29): `There are two extremes, O bhikkhus, which he who has given up the world, ought to avoid. What are these two extremes? A life given to pleasures, devoted to pleasures and lusts: this is degrading, sensual, vulgar, ignoble, and profitless; and a life given to mortification: this is painful, ignoble, and profitless. By avoiding these two extremes, O bhikkhus, the Tathàgata has gained the knowledge of the middle path which leads to insight, which leads to wisdom, which conduces to calm, to knowledge, to the Sambodhi, to Nirvàna.

18. `Which, O bhikkhus, is this middle path the knowledge of which the Tathàgata has gained, which leads to insight, which leads to wisdom which [q 95/] conduces to calm, to knowledge, to the Sambodhi, to Nirvàna? It is the holy eightfold path, namely, right belief, right aspiration, right speech, right conduct, right means of livelihood, right endeavour, right memory, right meditation. This, O bhikkhus, is the middle path the knowledge of which the Tathàgata has gained, which leads to insight, which leads to wisdom, which conduces to calm, to knowledge, to the Sambodhi, to Nirvàna.

19. `This, O bhikkhus, is the Noble Truth of Suffering: birth is suffering; decay is suffering; illness is suffering; death is suffering. Presence of objects we hate, is suffering; separation from objects we love, is suffering; not to obtain what we desire, is suffering. Briefly, the fivefold clinging to existence (30) is suffering.

20. `This, O bhikkhus, is the Noble Truth of the Cause of Suffering: thirst, that leads to re-birth, accompanied by pleasure and lust, finding its delight here; and there. (this thirst is threefold), namely, thirst for pleasure, thirst for existence, thirst for prosperity.

21. `This, O bhikkhus, is the Noble Truth of the Cessation of Suffering: (it ceases with) the complete cessation of this thirst -- a cessation which consists in the absence of every passion -- with the abandoning of this thirst, with the doing-away with it, with the deliverance from it, with the destruction of desire.

22. `This, O bhikkhus, is the Noble Truth of the Path Which Leads to the Cessation of Suffering: [q 96/] that holy eightfold path, that is to say, right belief, right aspiration, right speech, right conduct, right means of livelihood, right endeavour, right memory , right meditation.

23. `"This is the Noble Truth of Suffering." Thus, O bhikkhus, of this Doctrine, which formerly had not been heard of, have I obtained insight, knowledge, understanding, wisdom, intuition. "This Noble Truth of Suffering must be understood," thus, O bhikkhus, of this Doctrine (&c., down to intuition). "This Noble Truth of Suffering I have understood," thus, O bhikkhus, of this Doctrine (&c., down to intuition).

24. `"This is the Noble Truth of the Cause of Suffering." Thus, O bhikkhus, (&c.) "This Noble Truth of the Cause of Suffering must be abandoned (31). . . has been abandoned by me," thus, O bhikkhus, (&c.)

25. `"This is the Noble Truth of the Cessation of Suffering," thus, O bhikkhus, (&c.) "This Noble Truth of the Cessation of Suffering must be seen face to face . . . has been seen by me face to face," thus, O bhikkhus, (&c.)

26. `"This is the Noble Truth of the Path Which Leads to the Cessation of Suffering," thus, O bhikkhus, (&c.) "This Noble Truth of the Path Which Leads to the Cessation of Suffering must be realised . . . has been realised by me," thus, O bhikkhus, (&c.)

27. `As long, O bhikkhus, as I did not possess with perfect purity this true knowledge and insight into these Four Noble Truths, with its three [q 97/] modifications and its twelve constituent parts (32); so long, O bhikkhus, I knew that I had not yet obtained the highest, absolute Sambodhi in the world of men and gods, in Màra's and Brahmà's world, among all beings, samaõas and bràhmaõas, gods and men.

28.`But since I possessed, O bhikkhus, with perfect purity this true knowledge and insight into these four noble Truths, with its three modifications and its twelve constituent parts, then I knew, O bhikkhus, that I had obtained the highest, universal Sambodhi in the world of men and gods (&c., as in sect.27).

29. `And this knowledge and insight arose in my mind: "The emancipation of my mind cannot be lost; this is my last birth; hence I shall not be born again!"'

Thus the Blessed One spoke. The five bhikkhus were delighted, and they rejoiced at the words of the Blessed One. And when this exposition was propounded, the Venerable Konda¤¤a obtained the pure and spotless eye of the Truth (that is to say, the following knowledge): `Whatsoever is subject to the condition of origination, is subject also to the condition of cessation.'

30. And as the Blessed One had founded the kingdom of Truth (by propounding the four noble Truths), the earth-inhabiting devas shouted: `Truly the Blessed One has founded at Benares, in the deer park Isipatana, the highest kingdom of Truth, which may be opposed neither by a samaõa nor by a bràhmaõa, neither by a deva, nor by Màra, nor by Brahmà, nor by any being in the world.'

[q 98/]

Hearing the shout of the earth-inhabiting devas, the Càtumahàràjika devas (gods belonging to the world of the four divine Mahàràjas) shouted (&c., as above). Hearing the shout of the Càtumahàràjika devas, the Tàvatiüsa devas (33). . . the Yàma devas . . . the Tusita devas the Nimmànarati devas . . . the Paranimmitavasavatti devas . . . the Brahmakàyika devas shouted: `Truly the Blessed One (&c., as above).

31. Thus in that moment, in that instant, in that second the shout reached the Brahmà world; and this whole system of ten Thousand worlds quaked, was shaken, and trembled; and an infinite, mighty light was seen through the world, which surpassed the light that can be produced by the divine power of the devas.

And the Blessed One pronounced this solemn utterance: `Truly Konda¤¤a has perceived it ("a¤¤àsi"), truly Konda¤¤a has perceived it!' Hence the Venerable Konda¤¤a received the name A¤¤àtakonda¤¤a (Konda¤¤a who has perceived the Doctrine).

Pity:

Quote: I pity the Indians and Chinese who have to accept being second- and third-class citizens and cannot do anything about it.

Comment: The person who uttered this sentence and those who see nothing wrong obviously think it is said with understandable reason and meaningful when it is driven by emotion that has nothing to do with reason, is meaningless, achieves nothing except to give the person who said so a sense of superiority over the Indians and Chinese that is all in his mind and false and because he perceives it as real or true, he has serious false perception that is the to mad perception that is not the way to heaven.

When people pity another, they like to feel good about themselves (like themselves) and feel bad or hurt for those they pity (dislike or feeling hurt that may be false or hypocritical), it is all about a stirring of their mental force that is usually complex and disturbing, eg a mixture of feeling hurt and disliking of the condition of others that they pity.

I do not pity others, no matter how terrible their suffering, pity does no good, is a form of condescension or patronization and therefore sinful with karma not merit. Do something for him but don’t pity him.

If you perceive your pitying is based on reason, perfectly reasonable, is meaningful and good for yourself and others when it is based on force or emotion, a stirring of your mental force to patronize, then you may have advanced false perception that is the path to future madness.

Poverty is poison:

Quote Paul Krugman: Poverty Is Poison

“Poverty in early childhood poisons the brain.”

Comment:

Whoever speaks so is speaking carelessly and flirting with madness.

Poverty is poverty and poison is poison. If you perceive that poverty is poison or poison, you are willing yourself to perceive what is false is true.

It is not poverty that poisons but envious and jealous sinful minds that make poverty poisonous. Jesus was born into poverty, did it poison his mind?

IT IS NEVER POVERTY ITSELF THAT POISONS THE MIND BUT IT IS THE SINFUL MIND THAT PERMITS HIS CIRCUMSTANCE, HIS POVERTY TO POISON, ACTUALLY INCITE HIM TO HATE AND RESENTMENT.

Poverty can be a handicap but never poison:

Just as there is never poverty in poisons, there can never be poison in poverty. There are things poverty can be like a handicap to material success, it can lead to poor health but poverty is never poison or poisonous.

In the name of trying to impress others or un-righteously convert others to your cause, you say things that are outrageous, that stir emotion, poverty being poison certainly stirs emotions not realizing you are flirting with false perception that will end in tears for you.

Pity is faked or genuine sadness at the perceived plight of someone:

When people say they pity someone they actually are saying they feel sad for someone else or their mental force of going against self is prolonging in a way that inflicts dull pain on their minds.

Often it is faked or hypocritical pity or sadness for why should one feel sad for the plight of others unless one has vested interest in the other person or it is selfishly motivated?

Therefore pity is often hypocritical and when genuine is merely sadness felt for the plight of others that has nothing to do with reason but everything to do with force and therefore false and harmful to self and others.

hang chua118@hotmail

The connotations of pity and sorry:

In an ideal world each word has a clear meaning, stand for something that can be clearly defined but in a compromised world where people subsequent corrupt and abuse the meaning of words they come to take on additional quite different meanings.

In its original meaning, pity probably was meant to convey being sad for yourself (pity yourself) or others but pity has come to take on connotations of disdain or looking down on others.

It is unlikely that the person felt sad when he pitied the Chinese or Indian but he looked down with disdain at their plight and he must be a proud man. No proud man is going to heaven because there is no one to entertain your pride there but there are plenty of people here who will applaud you.

It is actually absurd to pity people others or yourself. Because genuine pity is feeling sad, when you say I pity him you are saying your mental force (of going against self) was stirred to prolong uncontrollably by his plight. Why should your mental force be stirred to prolong uncontrollably at someone else’ plight and what useful work is that mental force doing by so prolonging? What is there to understand by the listener on being told your mental force stirred to prolong uncontrollably? Because your mental force is not doing anything useful when it stirs to feel pity, you are practicing controlled madness whether you realize or not, admit or not that will ultimately descend to uncontrollable madness.

Do you need to feel sad or pity in order to help others? Can you not help others, even help them better in the absence of pity or sadness for them? If you think you need to feel sad or pity to help others you may be right or you may have false perception, it may actually give you a false sense of superiority pitying others.

In the same way, feeling sorry means a mixture of feeling sad (mental force prolonging) and mental or virtual hurt (mental force accelerating in speed and strength) at the occurrence of something or something you did to another that may be genuine or facile (faked). ‘Sorry’ is used interchangeably with pity, when someone says he feels sorry for another he also means he feels pity.

Feeling sorry is not an apology but if genuine, it is merely the stirring of your mental force to feel sadness and hurt at the realization of wrongdoing by you. It is self punishment or masochism. An apology is an emotion free, reason guided acknowledgement that wrong has been done and thenceforth guided by reason the person shall endeavour not to repeat.

IF YOU THINK THAT FEELING SORRY AND AN APOLOGY ARE THE SAME THEN YOU ARE UNDISCERNING. PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD USUALLY FEEL SORRY, IT IS THE HARDEST IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THING FOR THEM TO MINDFULLY SAY THEY ARE WRONG TO DO WHAT THEY DID AND CAN YOU FORGIVE THEM, THEY JUST BLURT THAT THEY ARE SORRY FOR WHAT HAPPENED AND THINK THEY HAVE ACQUITED THEMSELVES WHEN THEY HAVE NOT BECAUSE THEY HAVE MERELY SAID THEIR MENTAL FORCE STIRRED TO INFLICT SADNESS AND HURT ON THEMSELVES AT THE REALIZATION OF THEIR WRONG.

Vatican slows sainthood process:

Quote headline: Vatican slows sainthood process.

Comment: What is the worth of a saint if he does not go to heaven?

If you agree that a saint is worthless if he did not go to heaven then is it the church or its officials that elect or send people to heaven or is it God who decides who goes to heaven?

Can you and those who elect saints be sure their elected saints will go to heaven or are in heaven? If you cannot be sure, you cannot see or know those elected will go to heaven, you are flirting with doubt and uncertainty doing things that you should not do.

Why devote so much energy to choosing saints that you cannot be sure will reach heaven?

So why not leave the business of nominating saints to God and aren’t those who indulge in the pursuit foolish and risk karma if those they nominate do not correspond to those who go to heaven.

The fact that they have just slowed down the process reflects their intent on usurping God’s role. Does the church run heaven?

50-50 chance:

Barisan Nasional stands a 50-50 chance of retaining the Batu Lancang state seat in this general election.
People usually copy what they say from others because they like it or their mental forces are stirred attractively. Thus the term 50-50 chance is attractive to copy and regurgitate from their mental jukeboxes.

Did they make any survey to show it is truly fifty fifty or they are presumptuously making a guess, it could be 30-70 or 70-30?

In any case do you know the future? If you cannot, you should not speculate that is again flirting with doubt and uncertainty that is conditioning and the Buddha said is a lower fetter to future woe. Ordinary people all have serious doubt and uncertainty because they are frequently saying and doing things they have no right to say or do, they do not see or know what they say or do is true.

For want of something nice to say to others, people force themselves to say 50-50 chance when they are merely guessing, they are dicing with mad doubt and uncertainty and saying something frivolous.

I would not say BN stand a good or little chance of winning. How would I know that and it does not matter if you are denying yourself and dissociating yourself from affairs of this world as Jesus commanded.

The future is blue ray:

Quote: The next-generation DVD format war is over, and the future is Blu-ray.

Comment: It is totally unnecessary to say the future is Blu-ray which is false and said in hype.

The future will not always be blu-ray as the demise of the cassette, VHS, CD etc shows and it may be the immediate future and not everything but in the field of DVD discs that the future is blu-ray. Thus the statement is false or inaccurate and in truth totally unnecessary and it is only necessary to say the next generation format competition (not war) is over, has been decided in favour of blu-ray.

THE FUTURE IS BLU-RAY IS A STATEMENT DESIGNED TO IMPRESS ‘WOW’ AND IT IS FALSE BECAUSE THE FUTURE IS NOT BLU-RAY. WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT BLU RAY HAS WON THE COMPETITION AGAINST THE OTHER FORMAT. YOU HAVE FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION IF YOU THINK THAT BLU RAY WINNING THE COMPETITON MEANS THE FUTURE IS BLU RAY.

Doing things the hard way:

The person with style, who always uses force to stretch syllables, changes speed and loudness when he speaks is the person who likes to do things the hard way, like the man who prefers to breathe through a paper bag when he can breathe freely the open air.

Where a person with style must use force to stretch, change speed and loudness that consumes prodigious cumulative energy, creates insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction, is the source of his sadness and feeling hurt and necessitates he exists as a robot rehashing his individual brand of style by memory, the person without style exist live specific for each moment, does not waste energy to create stress, restlessness and distraction by not using force to stretch, change speed and loudness.

Thus anyone who objectively can be demonstrated to have style has strict limits as to how wise he can be because only a fool will do something unnecessary (fabricate style) that wastes energy, creates stress, restlessness and distraction and necessitates he exists as a robot.

AND IN REALITY THERE IS LITTLE IF MUCH GENUINE REASON IN STYLISH PEOPLE BECAUSE WHATEVER THEY WANT TO PERCEIVE, SAY OR DO CAN BE COPIED WITHOUT REASONING OR UNDERSTANDING FROM OTHERS, IT IS NOT TRUE REASON THAT GUIDES THEIR ACTIONS BUT IT IS FORCE THROUGH THEIR URGES, LIKES AND DISLIKES AND EMOTIONS THAT MAY BE ACCOMPANIED BY JUSTIFICATIONS OR EXCUSES OR RATIONALIZATIONS THAT DRIVE THEIR ACTIONS THAT ARE NEVER FRESH SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION BUT ALL REHASHED BY MEMORY OR BY ROTE (THEY ARE MINDLESS ROBOTS). WHAT PEOPLE CALL THEIR REASONING IS LARGELY THEIR RULES REASONING OR PROGRAMMED REASONING JUST LIKE HUMANOID ROBOTS ARE INSTRUCTED BY THEIR PROGRAMS AS TO HOW TO COPE AND RESPOND TO SITUATIONS THAT MAY ARISE AND THEY CANNOT RESPOND IN WAYS THAT THEIR PROGRAMS DO NOT INSTRUCT THEM AND IF YOU WANT TO CHANGE THEM, YOU MUST REPROGRAM THEM INSTEAD OF THEM LISTENING, UNDERSTANDING AND INSTITUTING CHANGE.

And why do people do things the hard way?

It is not without purpose that people do things the hard way constantly using UNNECCESSARY force to stretch, change speed and loudness. The purposes of expressing style are to deceive others, to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others for selfish unrighteous gains that are so well forcefully denied that they now cannot see their deceit or desire to impress or please but they believe they are being themselves and good to others and themselves.

There is relentless pressure exerted not just by humans but by animals whose audiovisual output always contain forceful prolonging, changing speed and strength of force to induce similar force changes in their minds and coupled with their foolish, indifferent and ill willed nature, having been blinded by the distraction created by their constant style, they mindlessly express style.

Even those who are supposed to be quite intelligent have difficulty if not inability to see themselves constantly stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and how these consume energy to create stress, restlessness and distraction and thus distracted, they continue mindlessly to express style that keeps them mesmerized in suffering.

EVEN THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE VERY INTELLIGENT HAVE DIFFICULTY IF NOT INABILITY TO SEE THEMSELVES STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS NOR DO THEY CARE VERY MUCH, THEY ARE MORE CONCERNED WITH AFFAIRS OF THE WORLD AND GETTING ALONG WITH OTHERS THAT NECESSITATE THEY LUBRICATE THEIR TRANSACTIONS WITH CHARMING PLEASING IMPRESSING STYLE. WHAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT IT IS THIS VERY STYLE THAT IS CONDITIONING THEMSELVES EVER STRONGLY TO SUFFERING AND THEY ARE DOOMED TO MAD STRESS, MAD RESTLESSNESS, MAD DISTRACTION (DAZE), MAD VIOLENCE, MAD EMOTIONS, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR (UTTERING PHRASES OUT OF CONTEXT, URGE TO SAY OR DO CERTAIN THINGS THEY HAVE ALWAYS DONE), MAD PERCEPTION & MAD LOGIC AND THIS IS NOT THE PATHWAY TO HEAVEN OR SAFETY BUT EVEN TO ETERNAL PERDITION.

Anyway:

Quote: Anyway, I do not want to depress you more than necessary. These are just some of the seat-tussle problems plaguing the opposition.

Comment: If you mean what you say and it is important then you cannot prefix it with ‘anyway’ that implies that it does not matter, you don’t care (anyway will do).

Take away the anyway and what is conveyed does not lose any meaning. “I do not want to depress you more than necessary” loses no meaning by subtracting ‘anyway’.

THUS YOU ARE SPEAKING WHAT IS MEANINGLESS AND UNNECESSARY BY ADDING ‘ANYWAY’ AND THOUGH YOU DISBELIEVE, YOU ARE FLIRTING WITH FUTURE MAD PERCEPTION THAT YOUR ‘ANYWAY’ IS MEANINGFUL AND NECESSARY WHEN IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY. IF YOU TRULY DO NOT CARE, THEN WHAT YOU SAY SUBSEQUENTLY IS FRIVOLOUS, NOT WORTH HEARING AND A LIE.

IN REALITY, 'ANYWAY' IS A HABITUAL OR AUTOMATIC, MINDLESS ADDITION TO SOME PEOPLE'S SPEECH AND THEY ARE ROBOTS REHASHING WITHOUT REALIZING WHAT THEY ARE REHASHING.

Razak kicks door & cries:

Apparently in response to news his father whispered to him, Razak became emotional and violent. A person who is emotional, violent and crying is suffering no matter how wealthy or famous he is and is conditioning himself yet further to suffering each time he lashes out and cries. If such news can upset him, wait until he gets to eternal perdition.

NO NOBLE PERSON CAN KICK A DOOR AND CRY. IF YOU THINK HE CAN, YOU ARE DISAGREEING WITH THE BUDDHA AND HAS WRONG VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA TELLS YOU IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. THE FACT THAT HE KICKED THE DOOR INDICATES HIS SINFUL NATURE.

Abdul Razak kicks and hits door at murder trial

SHAH ALAM: Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, who is being tried for abetting two policemen in murdering Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu, lost his cool on the 90th day yesterday.

He had a dissatisfied look when his father Datuk Abdullah Malim Baginda whispered something to him before the hearing began at about 9.30am.

After the proceedings were adjourned for lunch, however, the 48-year-old political analyst, surprised all those present in the High Court when he suddenly kicked and banged the door with his hands.

He was also seen crying before his lawyer Wong Kian Kheong and mother calmed him down.

No Win Situation:

In response to news his father whispered to him, Razak became emotionally incontinent to lash out kicking the door and crying.

Ordinary people are driven by force and only using their forces of self preservation to control their force of going against self that regularly under self or other provocation threaten to run out of control.

Each time a person lashes out or cries he is conditioning himself further to exercising his mental force and warping his mind that will end in total loss of control and madness.

If he does not, he is bottling it up like a volcano that will one day explode and destroy.

So what is a man to do in this predicament?

The only way out is to pay attention to stop stretching syllables, stop changing speed and loudness that will gradually deprive his force of going against self of strength needed to lash out. Without a strong force of going against self fabricating the style or stretching, changing speed and loudness, the person is deprived of force needed to lash out at a door and cry.

A person can have an urge to kill, steal, tell lies and rape and he can use his force of self preservation to stop his expression of his urge to kill, steal, tell lies and rape in an effortful endeavour that will sometimes be successful and sometimes fail. However if a person does not use force to stretch, change speed and loudness, he has no force needed to kill, steal, tell lies and rape and so he is effortlessly and unfailingly be able to not kill, steal, tell lies or rape.

SO LONG AS A PERSON CONSORTS WITH MENTAL FORCE, WITH LIKES AND DISLIKES, WITH EMOTIONS, THERE IS NO END TO HIS SUFFERING, HE CAN ONLY STIVE SOMETIMES TO REIN IN HIS SINFUL IMPULSES BUT ULTIMATELY HE WILL SUCCUMB TO TEMPTATION.

The Use & Abuse Of ‘Anyway’:

It is correct to say that ‘anyway you stretch your syllables, change speed and loudness’ you must suffer from stress, restlessness and distraction and experience sadness and feeling hurt by things happening that may differ from others (what words and deeds hurt you may not hurt others) because anyway you stretch, change speed or loudness, you must apply force on your mind that would not occur if you did not and this application of force to prolong when constant result in sadness as a result of loss of control and feeling hurt when the acceleration in speed and strength is sometimes unshielded by your force of self preservation and the constant application of changing force is the recipe for stress, restlessness and distraction.

It is incorrect or false to say, “Anyway, you do what you like” because it implies you are indifferent when you are not, otherwise you will not say so. If it does not matter what he did, why tell him about it? No loss of meaning is sustained by dropping the ‘anyway’ that instead creates conflict in yourself and others.

Low sang is a ritual:

Food can fill your stomachs but to believe that eating certain foods (raw fish mixed with all sorts of garnishments) on certain days (New Year) in certain ways (using chopsticks to collectively mix them up) can bring you prosperity is a delusion and ritual.

If you believe that by merely eating raw fish in a certain way you will become prosperous in the New Year then you are flirting with false perception that will end in mad perception.

People copy others in how they low sang and that is a ritual that the Buddha said is a fetter to future woe, not prosperity.

You won’t practice ‘low sang’ if you did not believe it, at least grudgingly but because your practice is not based on reasoning or knowing, however grudging, with increasing practice you increasingly perceive low sang as meaningful (how can you, such a great and intelligent man practice something meaningless!!!) and imperceptibly you sink into greater forced perception of what you did not see as true (low sang) is true or effective.

THE PEOPLE ABOVE ARE NOT JUST GETTING TOGETHER TO EAT BUT THEY ARE COLLECTIVELY PRACTICING A RITUAL WITH THE BELIEF (SOMETHING THEY CANNOT SEE AS TRUE BUT THEY ACCEPT AS TRUE) THAT IT WILL BRING THEM PROSPERITY AND THEY ARE LEADING EACH OTHER TO DELUSION AND WOE THAT MAY LAST AN ETERNITY.

Heady aroma & mouth watering:

Quote: The heady whiff of spices and sauces.

Reason cannot make an aroma heady but only mental force, intoxicated mental force can make it heady.

Reason cannot make your mouth water but it is attraction, sensuality or powerful attraction that can make it water.

The person who wrote the article is a man of this world and those who appreciates what and how he writes are cohorts and I say they will perish when they pass away.

No reason to stare:

All ordinary or stylish people stare, often involuntarily or automatically without realization. Staring is always false, unnecessary and harmful to self and others and they are practicing controlled madness that will descend into uncontrolled madness or mad daze.

All you need is see, you do not need to use force to see and use force to prolong your seeing that reflects lust or greed, dislike or hate or to intimidate others.

As I got into my car, I noticed this manual labourer a few shops away staring at me. What he wants to see about me can be seen in a glance without staring or prolonging but he may be in a daze or dislike something he saw (maybe me), or trying to intimidate. Some goats think they lose face if they avert their gaze elsewhere.

Using force to see, let alone to prolong one’s gaze on something is stressful, restless and distracting and thus anyone who stares is practicing controlled madness in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating or dominating others that they do not realize will end in insanity.

When they should pay attention to observe something in entirety, they lazily just take snapshots. When they can see something with just a brief glance they perversely choose to use force to prolong their gaze. How wise and reasoning can a person who stares be? Thus anyone who stares, and that includes even those who are supposed to be very intellectual must have serious limitations to their reasoning or wisdom, otherwise they would not stare.

In the same way people find it meaningful to frown, act puzzled or surprised, pop out their eyes when they speak when these expressions are not just meaningless but stressful and they are practicing controlled madness that they again foolishly do not realize will lead to madness.

WHETHER A PERSON IS STARING AS OPPOSED TO JUST PASSIVELY SEEING IS OBJECTIVE, MAY BE KNOWN BY GOD AND THOSE WHO DISCERN IF NOT BY YOU.

IF YOU ARE STARING AND YOU DO NOT REALIZE THEN YOU ARE A PERSON WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING AND YOU MUST BE DOING IT AUTOMATICALLY AND THUS YOU ARE A ROBOT STARING ACCORDING TO INSTRUCTIONS WRITTEN IN YOUR MENTAL CPU.

NO MAN OF TRUE (NOT FAKED) REASON WILL STARE BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS, WHAT IS REQUIRED IS THAT YOU USE YOUR EYES TO SEE, NOT USE FORCE TO SEE WITH FORCE IN A PROLONGED WAY THAT APPLIES FORCE TO THE MIND AND EYES CAUSING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.

BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE STARE OFTEN WITHOUT AWARENESS THEY MUST BE ROBOTS AND NOT MEN OF TRUE REASON.

IT MAY REFLECT THE INTENSE MENTAL FORCES ACTING ON THEIR INTRAOCULAR LENSES THAT PEOPLE ARE SERIOUSLY SHORTSIGHTED THAT THEY NEED POWERFUL LENSES TO CORRECT THEIR SHORTSIGHTEDNESS THAT INCREASES WITH AGE.

Permuting & cobbling:

Whatever people with style want to perceive, think, speak, do, pose or express is never live specific for each occasion but always pre-recorded and rehashed whole or by cobbling parts of different recordings or according to mental rules or instructions telling them how they must interpret and respond to things happening or if they cannot interpret or respond they become puzzled and frozen in inaction or ignore or switch topic to something they are familiar.

Anything new that they incorporate in their behaviour is memorized, copied from others, from animals or nature which is why they need repeated exposure to securely memorize them into their mental jukebox and they are prone to forget how and what to do or say it.

Whatever behaviour in how and what they perceive, think, speak, do and express are like pieces in a kaleidoscope that they shake and generate permutations or variations that are dependent on the pieces present in the kaleidoscope, they may introduce new pieces and remove some old pieces but it is essentially playing with the pieces in the kaleidoscope, juggling to come up with seemingly novel behaviours but are just recombinations of the same pieces.

The person who has no style has no kaleidoscope that he depends completely for his behaviour but he sees and hears as much of a situation as he can (as opposed to taking hasty snapshots), understands what the situation is about and composes an answer in behaviour to that situation or if he does not understand the situation, he refrains from composing a presumptuous answer.

It is actually a prison, tormenting to exist as a robot, always doing and saying things with a certain style that differs from others rehashing from a recorded mental plan of how and what to say and do that frequently drive them to the limits of their sanity and they become even homicidal or suicidal.

All beings in the lower realms crave existence yet by their styled behaviour they are isolated from the reality they desire to exist in, isolated in their private little make believe worlds, taking occasional snapshots of what is happening around them to respond by rote from their mental jukeboxes and never in any other ways that is not recorded or instructed in their mental jukeboxes. If they wish to behave in a different way, like Marilyn Monroe then they must painstakingly memorize or copy how she behaved before they can behave like her.

You may enjoy interacting with robots but very soon the enjoyment wears thin as the person keeps dishing up the same old things in the same old ways and people are actually putting up with each other.

EVEN COUPLES WHO INSIST THEY ARE ‘MADLY’ IN LOVE, FATHERS AND SONS WHO CLAIM THEY DEARLY LOVE EACH OTHER MUST GET SICK AND TIRED OF EACH OTHER AT TIMES BECAUSE THEY ARE REHASHING THE SAME OLD THINGS IN THE SAME OLD WAYS TO EACH OTHER AND FURTHER THEY ARE BOMBARDED BY THE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE (THAT CONSTITUTE THE PERSON’S STYLE) THAT INDUCES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MUST DRIVE THEM TO THE LIMITS OF ENDURANCE FOR THE BEHAVIOR OF THE OTHER PERSON.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR PEOPLE WITH STYLE TO TRULY LOVE EACH OTHER (AND EVEN THEMSELVES) BECAUSE THEIR LOVED ONES ARE CONSTANTLY REHASHING THE SAME OLD THINGS THE SAME OLD WAYS AND BOMBARDING THEM WITH FORCE THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACTING. THE CONSTANT CONTROLLED PROLONGING LEADS TO SADNESS THAT DESCENDS TO DEPRESSION AND THE ACCELERATIONS IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS LEADS TO FEELING HURT (EVEN BY THEIR DEAREST ONES).

Why chimp beat even human memory expert:

The chimpanzee was pitted against a human memory champion who is supposed to be able to remember the order of a pack of shuffled cards in 30 seconds and it beat the man by three times.

The test is a test of copying what you see and then retrieving it.

Intelligence is basically about being a superior robot or computer in memorizing more better and retrieving what you memorized that is relevant to the setting at hand, at least according to society’s dictates.

Even though the chimpanzee has a constant divisive substance and style in whatever it vocalize or does like its human counterparts, it does not do two things at once like humans invariably do and thus its inherent state of distraction is superior to humans, further animals are less self conscious compared to humans who are anxious not to make a fool of themselves or have performance anxiety and so provided the chimp has a capacity to memorize that is on par with humans, its default lack of distraction in not doing more than one thing at a time compared with the human tendency to do more than one thing at a time may explain its superiority in the test.

Look at the man grinning and although his eyes is looking at you he is in a daze, seeing but actually seeing, he is seeing and smiling at you at the same time ending doing neither because his emotionally stirred mind is elsewhere in a private world and his simultaneous seeing and smiling is faked for show.

I'm the chimpion! Ape trounces the best of the human world in memory competition

by FIONA MACRAE - More by this author » Last updated at 00:23am on 25th January 2008

Comments

When scientists found out that chimps had better memories than students, there were unkind comments about the calibre of the human competition they faced.

But now an ape has gone one better, trouncing British memory champion Ben Pridmore.

Ayumu, a seven-year-old male brought up in captivity in Japan, did three times as well as Mr Pridmore at a computer game which involved remembering the position of numbers on a screen.

And that's no mean feat - the 30-year-old accountant from Derby is capable of memorising the order of a shuffled pack of cards in under 30 seconds.

Both chimp and man watched a computer screen on which five numbers flashed up at various positions before being obscured by white squares.

They then had to touch the squares in order of the numbers they concealed, from lowest to highest. When the numbers were shown for just a fifth of a second - the blink of an eye - Ayumu got it right almost 90 per cent of the time.

His human opponent scored a rather less impressive 33 per cent, Channel Five programme Extraordinary Animals will reveal.

Mr Pridmore, who spends his evenings memorising 400-digit numbers, ruefully acknowledged that he had met his match.

Ben Pridmore can memorise the order of a pack of cards in 30 seconds - but was beaten by a chimp

"I'd rather not be seen on TV doing worse than a chimpanzee in a memory-test," he said. "I'll never live it down!"

The TV tests follow scientific experiments which pitted Ayumu, along with several other young chimps, against a group of university students.

Ayumu was the clear champion, doing twice as well as the humans.

It is thought that young chimps are blessed with photographic memories, allowing them to remember patterns and sequences with amazing accuracy.

Professor Tetsuro Matsuzawa, the Kyoto University researcher behind both sets of experiments, said: "People still believe that humans are superior to chimpanzees in any domain of intelligence.

"That is the prejudice of the people.

"Chimpanzees can be clever in a specific task in comparison to humans."

Practice makes perfect:

No matter how good John McEnroe is at tennis, any ‘journeyman’ tennis professional may be be able to beat him comfortably when he was just starting to play tennis and in any matter of robotics as this test of memory is, the person or chimpanzee who has been at it many times before is at advantage even over a human who is a novice.

Just as professional golfers need to keep hitting balls until they can do it well without thinking, you have to keep practicing what the chimpanzee does until you become very good at it.

Why is it that the human memory champ is said to have spent his evenings memorizing 400 digit numbers? The reason he keeps doing that is because his superior memorizing skill is not natural but the result of brutal relentless obsessive practice that is necessary in order for him to impress others with his memory. Thus the fact the chimp has been doing the test many times before and the human champion was probably doing it as a novice may be part of the reason why he lost, even though he has vast memorizing skills in other areas, it may not be transferrable.

PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT AND PRACTICE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR UNDERSTANDING BUT THE REPEATED USE OF FORCE TO MEMORIZE OR BURN INTO MEMORY EVER MORE PERFECTLY THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF WHAT YOU DESIRE TO REPRODUCE TO IMPRESS OTHERS.

The rationale behind subprime loans:

To blame ignorance for people taking on subprime loans may be too convenient.

The seduction of subprime loans lies in the fact that for years if not decade, house prices have been rising at levels that outstrip loan interest considerations and the expectation was that prices will rise forever and in this climate it does not matter what interest you paid, it did not matter if interest rates were more punitive two years down the line because if anything happened, you just sell it off, paid the interest and pocketed the difference as profit.

The problem is that house prices start to fall and the option of selling off was taken away.

There are rumours China’s banks are also hit by subprime losses that matches the Western counterparts and this will add to market woes.

Further the insurers of these subprime loans are being downgraded and may default and if so it would add to banks’ woes. As house prices fell, more people will be hit and be even unable to service their loans bringing more distressed properties into the market further depressing prices. Americans are seriously in debt in other areas like credit cards and these too can add further strains to banks.

Pot calling kettle black:

The west rattled their fingers at Asians for lax lending and hubris in the wake of the 1997 East Asian crisis but what happened with subprime mess showed that American politicians, the Fed and august American banks too were emperors with no clothes who were at least not any better.

Other people’s money:

The subprime mess is a case of recklessness with other people’s money.

Borrowers were not putting their money upfront but borrowed other people’s money to speculate.

Bankers were not lending their own money and not even their banks’ money but money they borrowed from the money market and they then parcelled off the loans as securities that rating agencies closed one eye to rate.

In the same way fund managers dominate the share markets and they are investing other people’s money, not their own which is why share prices are so resistant to falls nowadays.

There are reports that people investing heavily in the stock markets in Australia and East Asia were shaken badly by market falls and it is fools’ gold to equate their wealth to the share prices of the stocks they hold. Wealth based on share or gold prices are illusory and any moment it can be wiped out or decimated.

Not live:

You could say a newsreader reading the news presented for her to read or someone reading the Bible or Shakespeare cannot be speaking by rote but it is live, specific for the occasion but you would be undiscerning.

The person always reads the news according to her style that is always consistently the same and differs from others and she is not reading live fully comprehending and intending every word she said but what she read is regurgitated from what she sees with her eyes, her mind may be elsewhere and she only understands what she is reading in bits and pieces.

For instance, she may read “The president announced that Suharto is dead” but her mind only absorbs the message, “Suharto dead” which is quite different from “The president announced that Suharto is dead” if you are devoted to truth. If you are an approximate man or robot used to rehashing or not quite committed to truth, then the “Suharto is dead” and “the president announced that Suharto is dead” are ‘for all intent and purposes’ the same and you defiantly or with force uphold this view.

Thus all robots always speak and do things according to a plan that is not necessarily in their heads but may be on a piece of paper in front of them. They just reel it off often without knowing or understanding what they are reading which is why when asked later, they fail to tell you what they just read.

The substance and style combo cannot be rendered live:

Whatever that is spoken or done with style (constantly forceful prolonging of syllables or units of motion, changes in speed and strength of force) cannot be rendered live but must be rendered by rehash based on memory of how to say that word or do that sequence of motion with simultaneous stretching, changing speed and strength. If there is no pre-recorded plan for that word or action, the stylish person is flustered, stumped and must painstakingly record or encode that new word or action into his jukebox.

The reason why simultaneous (at the same time) substance and style cannot be rendered live is because no one can pay attention to two things at the same time, if you pay attention to fabricate the prolonging, changing speed and loudness you cannot pay attention to the substance of what you are saying and vice versa and so that combo must be memorized to be rendered already synthesized.

Paul McCartney has made recordings where he is playing all the instruments on the track. It is physically impossible for him to play the piano and guitar at the same time but it is possible for a soundtrack or copy or combined rehash to do so.

Thus because the newsreader always read with an individual style or way of stretching, changing speed and loudness, she must be rehashing, instead of from a mental jukebox, it is from the text in front of her.

YOU MAY INSIST THAT THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO CAN BE RENDERED LIVE, FRESH FOR THE OCCASION BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT OR IT IS TRUE.

THUS IF THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO CANNOT BE RENDERED LIVE FULLY UNDERSTANDING AND SEEING, ANYONE WHO MANIFEST STYLE, ANYONE WHO MANIFEST STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS MUST BE A ROBOT REHASHING FROM MEMORY OR A PHYSICAL TEMPLATE LIKE A WRITTEN PAGE.

BECAUSE THE ROBOTIC STATE IS TORMENTING AND THE NON ROBOTIC STATE IS INCOMPARABLY RELEASING, NO ONE WHO HAS EXPERIENCED THE NON ROBOTIC STATE WILL DALLY WITH THE ROBOTIC STATE AND THUS THE ROBOTIC STATE IS NEVER PARTIME BUT IT IS FULL TIME OFTEN IF NOT ALWAYS WITHOUT THAT FOOLISH ROBOT’S AWARENESS THAT HE IS ACTUALLY A ROBOT AND NOT AS WONDERFULLY SPONTANEOUS AND SPECIFIC AS HE THINKS.

PEOPLE MISTAKE LIVELINESS WITH GENUINENESS BUT IT IS THE VERY LIVELY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT MAKES THE PERSON A LIFELESS ROBOT.

A RECORDING IN PAPER AND MIND:

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN READING THE NEWS FROM A PIECE OF PAPER AND SPEAKING OFF THE CUFF IS THAT IN THE FORMER THE RECORDING IS ON A PIECE OF PAPER COMPOSED BY SOMEONE ELSE WHILST IN THE LATTER, THE RECORDING IS IN THE MIND COMPOSED BY YOU. BOTH ARE STILL RECORDINGS.

FOR THE NEWSREADING TO BE LIVE, IT MUST BE FRESHLY COMPOSED BY YOUR MIND FULLY UNDERSTANDING AND MEANING OR INTENDING EVERY WORD YOU SPEAK SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION.

A NEWSREADER READS STRICTLY ACCORDING TO WHAT SHE SEES ON THE PAPER THAT SHE OBEYS WITHOUT QUESTION, SHE MAY NOT AGREE WITH WHAT SHE READS BUT SHE NEVERTHELESS READS IT INDICATING SHE IS A MINDLESS ROBOT.

Skies dim for British Astronomers:

BBC headline: skies dim for British astronomers.

Comment: This statement is mischievous and false. It is impossible that the skies have dimmed for British astronomers as the statement implies because the skies are the same as before. Just because their funding has been cut so that they have reduced access to telescopes elsewhere does not mean the skies have dimmed. If you want to perceive thus and you want others to share your perception then if it leads to mad perception then you have karma for leading others to harm.

People have a lax attitude to truth, what they think they are speaking or hearing the truth is in truth no truth.

At The Heart Of Restlessness & Conflict:

Just as a galaxy has a massive black hole at its centre whose prodigious gravity is responsible for all the stars trapped in that galaxy rotating around it like water swirls around and into the drain hole of a sink, in the same way, a being’s constant use of force to fabricate his style or to prolong, change speed and strength of force is the heart of that being’s restlessness and conflict that he must experience.

Just as without removing the black hole at the centre of the galaxy there is no escape or freedom of the stars trapped in orbit around that black hole, without removing style there is no escape from restlessness and conflict for that being even though an escape exists.

Why is it that the use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness causes insoluble conflict that then like a wildfire or cancer spread to all areas of that person’s activities (perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing?

The reason why the use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness is at the heart of conflict is because when you use force for example to prolong a syllable, you want it to continue longer than it should in the name of impressing, pleasing, dominating or intimidating others. Force once generated will not stop by itself but it must expend itself or be stopped by an opposite force. Even reason cannot stop generated force because force is blind and will not listen to reason and reason has no force to stop force, it can only order an opposing force to rise to stop that force. Thus in order for the person who prolongs his syllables to move along and fabricate his next syllable so that he can communicate what he wants to say to another, he must counter or put to a premature stop his previous urge to prolong and thus the person who uses force to prolong must also use opposite force to curtail that prolonging in order for him to move on to the next syllable, next word and sentence.

By contrast, a person who does not prolong or stretch his syllables has no need to use opposite force to stop that prolonging in order to move on and he avoids all the difficulties or trouble of having to set up shop to prolong and then to close shop to move to the next syllable that he again sets shop to prolong, etc.

Thus the person who stretches his syllables is in constant conflict even agony as to when to continue stretching, when to stop and move on and this is usually resolved automatically mindlessly by recording how much he prolongs to his mental jukebox that then automatically replays how much prolonging he desires for him. Now instead of himself speaking it is the parrot in his jukebox speaking for him and though this might please him, he is ceding his authority to a mental jukebox that may not always obey him and can become corrupted to go mad.

In the same way a person who is constantly changing speed and loudness as part of his fabricated style has to constantly grapple with when to stop the changing speed and loudness to move on to the next syllable or word and this constant conflict of when to continue and when to stop or move on remains even if the style is automatically rendered by his mental jukebox and it is the only source that is insoluble of the conflict and even agony that must hound that stylish person.

EVERY TIME A PERSON DECIDES TO PROLONG (A SYLLABLE) HE MUST ALSO DECIDE WHEN TO CURTAIL IT AND IF THIS KEEPS REPEATING WITH EVERY SYLLABLE, HE HAS AGONIZING RAPIDLY OCCURRING CONFLICT THAT DEMANDS ACTIONS.

IF A PERSON NEVER USED FORCE TO PROLONG ANY SYLLABLE HE DOES NOT HAVE TO MAKE DECISION AS TO WHEN TO CURTAIL THE PROLONGING ACCORDING TO THE DEMANDS OF A SITUATION AND HE IS NOT FACED BY CONFLICTING DEMANDS OF STYLE AND MOVING ON.

It is not so much the constant changing in speed and loudness that is the cause of restlessness but it is the use of force to fabricate stretching, changing speed and loudness that is actually meaningless and unnecessary but necessary for false reasons or for show to impress others that because it is the use force, must be controlled by an opposing force that inevitably must be subject to loss of control first intermittently but then increasingly more frequent to descend finally into total loss of control or uncontrollable restlessness. Panic is intense uncontrollable restlessness.

You have to use force to stretch, change speed and loudness to fabricate your style and because it is totally unnecessary or meaningless or not understandable, it is only intended for show, this is de facto practicing controlled restlessness or controlled unnecessary changes that not surprisingly with constant heedless practice will result in episodic and then final total loss of control and call it what you like but it is mad restlessness.

FORCE CAN ONLY BE CONTROLLED OR STOPPED BY OPPOSITE FORCE. IF YOU USE FORCE TO DO SOMETHING, EG STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED OR STRENGTH THEN YOU MUST APPLY AN OPPOSITE FORCE TO CONTROL ITS EXTENT, SPEED AND RISE IN STRENGTH AND PUT THAT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO HALT IN ORDER TO MOVE ON TO THE NEXT SYLLABLE OR WORD.

BECAUSE STYLE IS CONSTANT; PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IS CONSTANT IN ALL THE ACTIVITIES OF THE MIND, THERE IS A CONSTANT CONFLICT BETWEEN THE URGE TO USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING OR PLEASING OTHERS AND THE URGE THAT IS NEEDED TO STOP THAT IS NECESSARY TO MOVE ON TO THE NEXT SYLLABLE, THERE IS AN URGE TO CONSTANTLY USE FORCE THAT MUST BE CONTROLLED AND WHEN CONTROL IS INEVITABLY LOST INTERMITTENTLY BECAUSE OF AGING OR THE URGE TO CHANGE IS TOO COMPELLING OR STRONG, THE PERSON LAPSES INTO RESTLESSNESS BECAUSE THE URGE TO USE FORCE IS NOW UNCONTROLLED OR UNCONTROLLABLE.

THE RESTLESS PERSON CANNOT KEEP STILL BUT MUST KEEP THINKING, SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING, ANYTHING, NOT BECAUSE IT IS APPROPRIATE OR NECESSARY BUT HE CANNOT HELP IT. THIS IS THE FRUIT OF THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE (THE PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF) TO FABRICATE STYLE, TO FABRICATE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS IN TRUTH TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND MEANINGLESS (ONLY MEANINGFUL IN THE ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION OF STYLISH PEOPLE IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING) THAT MUST ALWAYS BE CONTROLLED BY THE OVERWORKED FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION THAT INEVITABLY IS SUBJECT TO LOSS OF CONTROL WITH EXHAUSTION OR DEGENERATION COUPLED WITH AN INCREASINGLY VIRULENT FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF SO THAT THE STYLISH PERSON IS DOOMED TO DESCEND INTO RESTLESSNESS, EVEN INTENSE AGONIZING RESTLESSNESS.

DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE IMPORTANCE OF PAYING ATTENTION TO DETECT THE PRESENCE OF STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS PRESENT IN THE VOCALIZATIONS OF ALL BEINGS HERE AND TO MAKE PERSISTENT EFFORT TO ERADICATE THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE THE KEYS TO THE CONFLICT, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION PLUS ATTENDANT SADNESS AND FEELING HURT THAT MUST BESET ALL STYLISH PEOPLE WHO MUST IN ADDITION EXIST AS REHASHING MINDLESS ROBOTS WHO DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE DOOMED TO BECOME MAD AND THENCE EVEN AN ETERNITY OF PERDITION BECKONS.

Even today despite changes after changes visible on the demeanour of people, even those who have heard what I say continue to stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness (what more that by themselves they would discover the root to their stress, restlessness and distraction). It reflects how difficult it is to escape suffering when an escape is possible. Part of the reason is that people have difficulty seeing completely or they seriously underestimate the extent of stretching, changing speed and loudness present in their speech and the forceful styles always present in the audiovisual outputs of others is a powerful enforcer of style in them.

NO ONE HAS EVER SAID THIS BEFORE, I CANNOT HAVE COPIED IT FROM ANYONE AND THE COUNSELOR WHOM JESUS DESCRIBED MUST ALSO SAY THIS IF HE IS TO TEACH YOU EVERYTHING AND TO YOUR ADVANTAGE TO COME.

THE REASON WHY NO ONE ELSE HAS SAID WHAT I HAVE SAID EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO SAY SO IS BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE WHOSE MINDS ARE RULED BY FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND THUS BLINDED THEY CANNOT SEE AND THEREFORE SAY WHAT I SAY.

IT IS THIS THAT TRULY OR GENUINELY DISTINGUISHES ME FROM ALL OTHERS IN THAT I HAVE SAID SO MANY THINGS THAT THEY CANNOT SAY EVEN IF THEY WANTED WHILST IT IS FALSE MEANINGLESS FORCE BASED STYLE THAT DIFFERENTIATES ORDINARY PEOPLE, THEY STRIVE TO FALSELY DIFFERENTIATE THEMSELVES FROM OTHERS BY STYLE THAN BY REASON (MORE DISCERNING, WISE, CONCENTRATED AND EQUANIMOUS).

The mad world of style:

Because force is blind, it listens to nothing but will only negated by opposite force, once generated it must be allowed to expend itself or you must use a force acting in the opposite direction to arrest it just like you must apply brake force to counter engine force propelling the car if you want the car to stop.

Thus if you have business to attend to, then you must use opposite force to put to a premature end the force that you first generated in order to stretch that syllable and herein lies the heart of conflict that must hound the stylish person with no solution in sight and loss of control and mad conflict the inevitable end: Because he cannot allow the force he generated stretching his syllable to continue till it dissipates by itself but he has pressing demands like fabricating the next syllable coming up, he must summon opposite force to stop the stretching in its track so that he can begin stretching the next syllable and this is a constant meeting or clashing of opposite forces that is at the heart of the conflict that he must constantly experience and try to control that with inevitable loss of control will descend to mad conflict.

THIS IS THE MAD WORLD OF STYLE, YOU MUST UNNECESSARILY GENERATE FORCE TO STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLE AND THEN BECAUSE YOU MUST MOVE ON TO THE NEXT SYLLABLE, YOU MUST GENERATE OPPOSITE FORCE TO CANCEL OUT THE ORIGINAL STRETCHING FORCE SO THAT YOU CAN BEGIN TO ENUNCIATE AND STRETCH THE NEXT SYLLABLE. THIS FORCEFUL START FORCEFUL STOP SEQUENCE IS NEVER A PLEASURE BUT BRUTALLY PUNISHING AND GENERATES FORCEFUL CLASHING OF FORCES (AKA CONFLICT) THAT CAN BECOME UNBEARABLE AT TIMES.

Lust they call love:

She is not pushing herself with reason but pushing herself with force towards him. There is conflict as she turns her head away even as she pushes her body tight against him.

This is an embrace of force or passion that is going against self which is why even as she pushes herself strongly towards him, she is pulling her head away and looking away as if not to see her deceit and going against self.

He is kissing her with eyes closed because subconsciously he too is aware of the deceit and he is participating of the deceit of which both are to blame with eyes closed.

In true love she will embrace him without the head twisted away, without looking away but looking at him.

It is 'irresistible' sexual desire or sexual gratification that needs to be satisfied that pushes her towards him and yet in her desire there is something holding her back.

Existence is Empty & Karma Must Be Exhausted:

If you understand what the Buddha said, existence even in heaven and however many eons it may last (60,000 at most) is unsatisfactory and empty and incomparable to the total end to all existing, coming and going in what he called nirvana that is unchanging and the only truth.

Whatever karma you created must be exhausted. If you do good, you may go to heaven but having exhausted your lifespan there that may last tens of thousands of years or up to one Age, you return to the lower realms depending on what your previous karma was.

If you have done evil then that will have to be repaid with pain and you will not be released until you repaid (as Jesus said) every single cent.

AND ORDINARY PEOPLE SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE DEBT DUE TO THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE DELUDED AND THINK THEY ARE DOING GOOD WHEN THEY ARE DOING BAD THAT WILL ACCRUE THEM PAIN, THEY THINK THEIR EAGERNESS DENOTES THEIR FRIENDLINESS AND GOODNESS WHEN IT STIRS OTHERS CAUSING THEM TO BE RESTLESS OR UNEASY WITH DEBTS IN PAIN NOT REWARD IN BLISS.

Still foolish or ignorant beings are attached to their senses, to their desires and intellect, their false beliefs they perceive as facts or truths and they go on wandering from life to life through countless eons lasting countless years.

Thus in order to escape or minimize your suffering it is wise to develop your discernment, your ability to see things clearly as they are, not as you like or dislike them as others encourage you to do because unless you see clearly as it is that there is style in everyone and it is about how they use force to stretch, change speed and loudness and how this is never good but evil or false, stresses themselves as others, you are going to continue to pile ever more karma for yourself to be experienced as pain not bliss.

More woe on the way:

If bond insurers are downgraded, as is likely banks will lose another $143 billion on top of the $100 billion they have reported and they may have to take out their begging bowls again to the sovereign funds of Asian and Arab countries to shore up their capital in order to stay solvent.

Banks 'may need an extra $143bn'

Banks may need to raise as much as $143bn (£77bn) to weather the credit crisis, Barclays Capital reports.

They say the banks will need extra money if bond insurers, who insure the products at the centre of the sub-prime crisis, lose their top credit ratings.

If their credit ratings are cut, it could make it harder for them to pay out, leading to banks reporting bigger losses on sub-prime debt.

The world's largest banks have already admitted losing more than $100bn from mortgage bonds gone bad.

$820bn at risk

Analysts at Barclays Capital said banks own $820bn of securities guaranteed by bond insurers.

Bond insurers, such as Ambac Financial Group and MBIA, have suffered billions of dollars of write-downs in recent months and are expected to sustain more, after insuring debt hit by the sub-prime mortgage crisis.

Investor fears

Many investors fear the insurers have too little capital given their obligations, and worry that a cut in their credit rating would make it more expensive for them to borrow money.

Who are the winners in the subprime mess?

For every loser there must be a winner or winners to take the money from the loser and so if banks have lost so much, who are the winners?

Ultimately it is those who dabbled in property, bought and sold like commodities that is not unlike share trading and property developers who made much more profit than they otherwise would have if there was no overinflated property prices.

On the sidelines there are many feeding on commissions like real estate agents, government taxation, bond insurers & raters, bankers whose gains are by no means insignificant.

If you made money on the stock exchange and property market, don’t gloat because if you are gambling or speculating it is only because of people like you that the market is hotter or higher than it otherwise would be and you have karmic debt to be repaid for the miseries even suicide or homicide of everyone else who lost so that you may gain.

YOU CANNOT ARGUE WITH GOD. IF YOUR WINNINGS SPECULATING IN PROPERTY AS IN STOCKS IS GAMBLING THE PAIN IN REPAYMENT WILL BE FAR WORSE THAN WHATEVER EPHEMERAL PLEASURES YOU MAY DERIVE FROM IT.

Hitting it off, thanks to the algorithms of love:

Quote New York Times Headline: Hitting it off, thanks to the algorithms of love.

It sounds impressive (stirs the reader’s mental force in an attractive way) but it is nonsense and the person has not a clue what he is talking about.

Hitting it off has nothing to do with love but everything to do with attraction that has everything to do with force and nothing to do with reason or meaning. To perceive there is a complex formula that governs love is a delusion, that you can reduce love to a complex mathematical formula that will explain love and determine whether you will hit off with another person is wrong view that is the way to hell or the animal womb.

WHAT IS IN THE HEADLINE SOUNDS IMPRESSIVE, ‘WOW! ALGORITHMS OF LOVE’ BUT IT IS SO MUCH NONSENSE OR MAKES NO SENSE, TRYING TO PERCEIVE WHAT IS THAT ISN’T. IT IS ACTUALLY A FORM OF BOASTING, OF BEATING THE DRUM THAT YOU KNOW WHEN YOU KNOW NOT.

Lingam foolishly implicates himself:

VK Lingam demonstrated advanced false logic and poor judgment in saying that the lawyer for the Bar Counsel had sought him to broker his appointment to the court of appeal.

In so doing, he is admitting he is into the business of brokering appointments of law officials or he is known to have this illegal capacity and thus he is acknowledging that suggestions he brokered the appointments of the top judges is not without basis.

His intention in saying what he said is probably to irrationally smear one of his detractors not realizing it incriminates himself as in the business of illegal appointments.

Lazar: It’s an outrageous lie

KUALA LUMPUR: Lawyer Robert Lazar has dismissed as “an outrageous lie” an allegation that he had sought to be a Court of Appeal judge through Datuk V.K. Lingam.

Lazar, who is a partner at Shearn, Delamore & Co, said Lingam was out to embarrass him with the false allegation and divert the heat of the inquiry.

“I understand that the incident took place in early 2000. At that time I was 43 years old and had been in the legal practice for 20 years, and had absolutely no reason to abandon my legal career to seek judicial office.

“The matter never arose at all,” he told the Royal Commission of Inquiry.

Lingam had dropped a bombshell at the inquiry on Monday, when he claimed Lazar had asked him to broker his appointment directly to the Court of Appeal.

Another counsel for the Bar, Yeo Yang Poh asked Lazar if he had gone out for drinks with Lingam after a court case.

“I never had a drink with Lingam after a court case or at any other time,” he said.

At this juncture Commission chairman Tan Sri Haidar Mohd Noor said: “Soft drinks?”

“I never had a drink with Lingam whether a hard drink or a soft drink,” he replied.

Lazar also told Yeo there were three reasons that he could think of why Lingam had made the accusation.

“Firstly he is out to discredit and embarrass me. Secondly, it is an attempt to disqualify me from representing the Malaysian Bar in the proceedings, which I will not succumb to, and finally Lingam is trying to divert the matter.

“His claim is obviously an entertaining disruption at my cost”, he added.

Lingam’s counsel R. Thayalan asked Lazar if he had had a drink or coffee with Lingam at the Sing Nam Restaurant near the Sultan Abdul Samad building, where he had asked if he could be appointed as a Court of Appeal judge.

“I don’t agree, I never had a drink with Lingam and never had such a conversation,” he added.

All expressions are false & harmful to self:

She is expressing involuntarily something that she must have done countless times often without awareness and that must be by rote or automatic memory and therefore robotic.

Her eyes are half closed and actually vacant, lost in a private world, her head raised slightly, her teeth bared and she is expressing something others can only surmise and may dispute, a mixture of anger, defiance, haughtiness and aggression. All these are about emotions, thus expressions are all about expressing emotions not reason or something understandable.

Anger, defiance, haughtiness and aggression are not the qualities for going to heaven and so she is not a candidate for heaven. If you question ‘how do you know?’ without you yourself knowing that what I say is wrong then you are speaking unrighteously.

Apart from expressing emotions there is another frequently seen motion visible on stylish people’s faces and heads when they speak. They are even violent jerks or twists of their heads and regular raising of eyebrows, regular movements of their hands that coincide with speed and loudness changes of their speech and reflect the significant even violent force and speed changes constantly occurring in their speech.

Anyone who expresses himself is going mad because such expressions are meaningless, the muscles are not doing useful work like cooking or writing or eating but you are exercising your muscles for show or practicing controlled madness that will end in uncontrolled madness. Further expressions apply force on the mind that gives rise to conditioning or addicting stress, restlessness and distraction that will end in mad easily aroused stress, restlessness and distraction.

Rudd is deeply aware:

Australian PM Rudd: I am deeply aware of mortgage pain:

Comment: Awareness has no force, you are either aware or not, there is no keenness or depth or wellness (well aware). Thus it reflects advanced false perception by many who think they are very reasonable people that they perceive there is depth or keenness or wellness in awareness of something. This is controlled madness designed to impress listeners of their concern that is totally unnecessary and only necessary for show that they do not realize will end in uncontrolled future mad perception.

If you hear voices in your head telling you to die and then you commit suicide then that is mad perception of a fatal nature. It is impossible for an unemotional style free man to hear voices in his head that he must obey.

It is the force in their minds that is the master of what they want to perceive, think, say or do that is always rehashed either from a mental hard disk or from a piece of paper (as when a newsreader reads or you read the papers). Even ordinarily it is their force not true reason that is the origin of their actions in speech and motion but because there an apparent congruity between what they say or do and the situation at hand they kid themselves it is their reason and no matter how they kid themselves and others, there are regular situations where they have the irresistible urge to say or do certain things that seem unstoppable and is even bizarre that then may indicate to them that they are not in control of themselves but is their mental force, like and dislike or hurt that is the puppeteer.

Playing dirty:

West Ham lost 1-0 to Wigan one of the teams desperately struggling for survival and the losing manager ‘blasted’ the state of the pitch that was rough or not conducive to playing football.

The intention by a less skilful team is to sabotage the better team, to gain unfair advantage.

This is why Davis cup home teams choose a surface eg clay better suited to them than their opponents who may prefer grass.

Again recently the Russians played England on an artificial pitch that they further sabotaged by spraying water to make it freeze and slippery that is not good for a more skilful team.

THIS IS CALLED CHEATING OR UNFAIR ADVANTAGE AND WHOEVER IS RESPONSIBLE AND CONNIVE HAS GRAVE PUNISHMENT IN FUTURE SUFFERING THAT WILL MAKE THEIR VICTORIES SEEM HOLLOW.

Stick to what you see and know:

Do you see or know that you are aware of the plight of mortgagees?

If you know or see you are aware then you are righteous to say you are aware of the plight of mortgagees.

Do you see or know that there is depth in awareness of the plight of mortgagees?

If you do not see or know, you are not sure then you have no right to say you are deeply aware of the plight of mortgagees that is to falsely convey your concern for them (even if you are very concerned for their plight, must you falsify to convey your concern?) unless you want to mislead others that there is depth in awareness (a false perception) and flirt with false perception yourself that you do not believe will end in tears (mad perception) for you.

THIS IS HOW A PERSON IS SCRUPULOUS, HE ONLY SAYS OR DOES THINGS HE KNOWS OR SEES IS TRUE AND WHAT HE IS NOT CERTAIN, HE REFRAINS. THE BUDDHA GOES EVEN FURTHER AND SAYS HE WILL ONLY SPEAK WHEN SOMETHING IS NOT JUST TRUE BUT BENEFICIAL TO THE LISTENER. (Even if perceives you as handsome if it does not benefit you he will not say you are handsome)

Test drive new Proton Saga:

People think they know what is true and false in what they and others say or do but they may seriously overestimate their capacity to distinguish truth and falsity.

If you approach the dealer who put up this sign on various points on nearby roads that you want to test drive the new Proton but out of curiosity, you have no interest in buying the car, it is quite likely he may not be pleased and may find some excuse not to permit you to test drive like there is no car available, etc.

THUS HE DID NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAID, WHAT HE MEANT IS THAT HE WANTS YOU TO TEST DRIVE SO THAT YOU WILL BUY A PROTON FROM HIM, NOT TEST DRIVE THE PROTON. TAKEN AT HIS WORD YOU MUST BE ALLOWED TO TEST DRIVE THE PROTON WITHOUT ANY EXPECTATIONS BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT HE REQUESTED ANYONE, ‘TEST DRIVE A PROTON’. SUPPOSE YOU WERE A PENNILESS BEGGAR AND YOU WANTED TO TEST DRIVE THE PROTON, IT IS UNLIKELY HE WILL ACCEDE.

THUS ON THIS OCCASION THE PERSON PUTTING UP THE SIGN THINKS HE HAS SPOKEN THE TRUTH AND THOSE ON THE SIDELINES MAY SEE NOTHING FALSE ABOUT THAT BUT HIS MOTIVE IS NOT A DESIRE TO SEE YOU TEST DRIVE BUT TO SEE YOU BUY A PROTON NOT FROM ANYONE ELSE BUT HIM.

Only one escape:

To one who discerns, by their demeanours and behaviour, everyone, good and bad, animal or human has changed in a way that reflects that their resident suffering or load of suffering has reduced in a significant way but because they have refused to give up their styles or their constant use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness and they have conditioned themselves seriously to stress, restlessness and distraction, they are now capable of suddenly becoming seized by serious mad hurt, sadness, stress, restlessness and distraction often beyond their control as a result of even minor things happening like what someone said that they do not realize are warnings of future total mad hurt, sadness, stress, restlessness and distraction that is not the way to heaven but another eternity of weeping and gnashing of their teeth.

EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE STILL SUFFERING, THEY HAVE ALL EXPERIENCED PARTIAL ALLEVIATION OF THEIR SUFFERING OR A CHANGE IN THE QUALITIES OF THEIR MENTAL AND PYHSICAL SUFFERINGS THAT WOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED WITHOUT EXTRAORDINARY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES BOTH IN RECENT YEARS AND AFTER 1977 (THAT WAS TRIGGERED BY ME AND TO WHICH NO ONE HAS EXPRESSED GRATEFULNESS)

JUST AS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEY COULD IMAGINE THE UNPRECEDENTED CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES ARE POSSIBLE BEFORE THEY OCCURRED, THEY CANNOT IMAGINE THE INCOMPARABLY BLISSFUL EXISTENCE OF ONE WHOSE MIND IS FREE OF ALL SUFFERING, FREE OF ALL FORCE, FREED FROM CONSTANT FORCEFUL THINKING, CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE.

AND FOR ONE WHOSE MIND IS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF FORCE, WHO ARE EMOTIONAL AND STYLISH, WHO ALWAYS, AUTOMATICALLY ROBOTICALLY USE FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN WHATEVER THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO, THAT IS SUFFERING AND BONDAGE TO SUFFERING THAT IS CONDITIONING AND THE ONLY ESCAPE OR RELEASE FROM SUFFERING IS TO LIBERATE ONE’S MIND FROM FORCE, FROM THE CONSTANT ROBOTIC USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE; THERE IS NO OTHER ESCAPE, NO OTHER LIBERATION OF THE MIND LIKE TAKING DRUGS, HEALTH FOODS, YOGA OR TAICHI OR SURGERY.

Thus if objectively there is constant forceful stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in your speech, the only escape is to pay attention to eliminate all stretching, changing speed and loudness. If you don’t you must suffer from being hurt, sadness, stress, restlessness and distraction that is also conditioning so that they are easily triggered and harder to shake off and will end in weeping and gnashing of your teeth, even for another eternity.

If you are constantly thinking not because you are a master of your thoughts but there is added force is stretching, changing speed and loudness that has momentum that is hard to stop, then the only escape is to learn to stop thinking but not using force to stretch, change speed and loudness when you think, there is no other way. If you don’t, you are headed for a pit of mad dark uncontrollable thoughts, not a heaven of thinking.

If you are constantly perceiving some things and not perceiving many things then the only escape is to neither perceive nor not perceive that the Buddha said is possible and an incomparable state of existence compared to constant perceiving and not perceiving.

NO ONE HAS EVER TAUGHT YOU HOW TO ESCAPE THINKING INTO CESSATION OF THINKING, PERCEIVING AND NOT PERCEIVING TO NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR PERCEIVING AND IF THE BUDDHA IS THE ONE TO DO SO AND NO ONE ELSE HAS SINCE TAUGHT YOU SO, HE IS THE HIGHEST TEACHER AS FAR AS YOU ARE CONCERNED AND YOU REBUKE HIM AT YOUR OWN RISK AND YOU ARE A FOOL IF YOU THINK GOD IS ON YOUR SIDE.

Sinfully good:

Quote headline: Sinfully good. Nothing quite makes one's day better than a piece of your favourite chocolate cake.
Comment: Whatever is sinful cannot be good but bad and suffering and so to say sin is good is to either not know what you are talking about (talking nonsense) or trying to be mischievous, to arouse others’ perplexity that sin can be good. The karma is deadly and to say it as if it is fun is to trivialize it, to think sin is pleasurable that will end in torment.

You are forcefully stirring conflict in yourself and others by saying something that is sinful is good and by constantly saying contradictory things, you are conditioning yourself to conflict or tension that will end in agony.

Woe to you laughs (in this case laugh at the contradiction that sin is good) for you shall weep.

That statement is false because there may be many things that makes another person’s day better than a piece of his or her favourite chocolate cake.

Speak for yourself and don’t speak for others that you have not interviewed to say they agree for you to speak for them.

Whatever is good cannot be sinful:

The agreed meaning of good is that something is beneficial to a person, bad is harmful to a person.

Whatever is TRULY good cannot be sinful or evil and whatever is sinful cannot be good. Thus unless what you call sinfully good, a favourite chocolate cake is not truly but falsely good (you are lying that it is good), you are speaking nonsense to call it sinfully good. Thus if you agree the cake is good then you should not falsely label it as sinful, if you agree it is not good but sinful then you should not call it good. This is muddled thinking and tongue twisting that will end in agony.

Call it smiling or laughing:

The difference between a smile and laughter is that the latter is accompanied by sound of a prolonging, even violently changing speed and loudness nature that exposes the laughing person’s mind to force (and is transmitted to all who see and hear) not just for the duration of the laugh but afterwards it takes some time to calm down and each time you laugh (or smile) you develop an urge to do so that becomes increasingly compelling and because you cannot help yourself smiling or laughing you are a fool to think it is natural and good just as the smoker or alcoholic thinks his smoking or drinking is natural and good when there was a time in the past when he did not smoke or drank.

Anyone who exposes his mind to force, to force prolonging, changing speed and strength especially when it is unnecessary, only necessary for show to impress others how happy or enjoying yourself or confident socially you are is a fool dicing with future madness, is exposing his mind to stress, restlessness and distraction that will end in agony and far from meritorious, he has debt for subjecting others to force transmitted in his smile or laugh.

What I say above may be wrong but if it is right, then you have wrong view to disagree and the destination of wrong view according to the Buddha is hell or the animal womb. How come no human guru teaches you that wrong view, doubt and uncertainty, faith in rites and rules are fetters to future woe?

How come no other guru teaches you that smiling and laughter is the path to ruin not happiness?

Reason is never needed to smile or laugh:

Reason is never involved in smiling or laughing and if you think reason is involved you may be right or have wrong view, do not know what you are talking about.

Each person’s smile or laugh is standardized or typical of him but differs from others in definable ways (a grin is a smile with violent acceleration in speed and strength whilst a shy smile has slow speed and strength changes) that can only come about if the smile or laugh is rehashed from a pre-recorded plan of how to smile or laugh as the person always does. It is never reason that triggers the smile or laugh but it is the recognition (a perception as in seeing or hearing that is not reason) of situations occurring that are cues to smiling and laughing in that person that triggers mindlessly smiling or laughing in that person.

IN OTHER WORDS, A PERSON’S SMILE OR LAUGH DOES NOT ISSUE FRESH LIVE, SPECIFIC FOR AN OCCASION BUT IT IS REHASHED FROM A MENTAL PLAN OR RECORDING IN RESPONSE TO THE OCCURENCE OF CERTAIN SITUATIONS (A PERCEPTION NOT REASONING) THAT USUALLY TRIGGER SMILING OR LAUGHING IN HIM. IT IS A KNEE JERK REFLEX OF STIMULUS LEADING TO SMILING OR LAUGHING THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF HIGHER CEREBRAL FUNCTIONS.

You need force, never reason, to activate the muscles of the face to take up postures and sequences of motions that will express your trademark smile or laughter and this force that activates the facial muscles also have its equivalent in the mind.

NO AMOUNT OF REASON (REASON NEVER HAS FORCE) WILL ACTIVATE THE FACIAL MUSCLES TO PRODUCE YOUR GORGEOUS SMILE BUT ONLY FORCE THAT ALSO MUST IMPACT ON YOUR MIND TO CAUSE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, MUST BE USED TO ACTIVATE THE FACIAL MUSCLES TO PRODUCE YOUR SMILE AND THE FACIAL MUSCLES ARE NOT DOING ANY USEFUL WORK LIKE WRITING A LETTER OR SWEEPING THE FLOOR BUT DOING SOMETHING THAT IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS (CONTROLLED NONSENSE THAT WILL END IN UNCONTROLLED NONSENSE) AND WHAT TRIGGERS THE SMILE THAT IS A REHASH OF A PREEXISTING PLAN IN THE MIND IS THE RECOGNITION OR PERCEPTION (NOT REASONING) OF THE OCCURENCE OF SITUATIONS THAT USUALLY CAUSES YOU TO SMILE OR LAUGH.

IF YOU THINK REASON IS SOMEHOW INVOLVED IN SMILING AND LAUGHING, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND LOGIC OR YOU ARE EMOTIONALLY UPHOLDING YOUR POSITION IN EMOTIONAL DEFIANCE WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT OR UPHOLDING.

What useful work are you doing when you smile?

People frequently smile for various reasons like when they like someone, they are embarrassed, they appreciate or tell a joke, they fake they like someone when they don’t, they even smile to intimidate others.

But are these true or valid reasons from smiling (and laughing)?

When you use any muscles the only true reasons are to do useful work with the muscles or use them to communicate.

When you use the vocal apparatus to produce the various syllables that when strung together produce words and sentences, you are doing useful work communicating with another, provided that what you say has not meaningless style or it is not nonsense that is designed to please, impress, intimidate and dominate others.

When you use your arms and body muscles to sweep the floor you are similarly doing useful work that will result in true fruit, a clean floor. What useful work are your facial muscles doing when it smiles or laughs?

Smiling and laughing cannot communicate reason but they communicate emotions or likes and dislikes and faked like and meant to be seen or for show. If something is meaningful or true it cannot be called for show and it is only when something is false, pretentious or dishonest that it is called for show.

Thus smiling and laughing does no meaningful work like cooking or communicating meaning but they are for show, to impress, please, intimidate and dominate or deceive, to communicate force, force changes, likes and faked likes.

THUS IF ALL YOUR LIFE YOU ARE SMILING AND SMILING IS FOR SHOW, MEANINGLESS, CONTROLLED NONSENSE (MAKES NO SENSE) YOU HAVE BEEN PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS YOUR WHOLE LIFE AND IS IT ANY SURPRISE THAT YOU SHOULD BECOME MORE AND MORE MAD WITH AGE AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR PERDITION NOT HEAVEN?

Smiling is only to express liking and faked liking:

When it boils down to the essence, smiling and laughter is to express liking or faked liking (when the person disliked or is not liking).

When a person smiles at a joke he is expressing true or faked liking.

When a person is hurt, he may smile to hide his hurt and that is a form of faked liking for what has happened or said.

When you smile to express friendliness, you are smiling to express liking for the other person and here too it is expressing liking.

Thus apart from expressing liking and faked liking (to please others) there are no other purposes for smiling.

THUS THE PURPOSE OF SMILING IS TO EXPRESS GENUINE OR FAKED LIKING. DO NOT CONGRATULATE YOURSELF THAT THERE IS TRUE PURPOSE FOR YOUR SMILES BECAUSE GENUINE OR FAKED LIKING IS JUST A GENUINE OR FAKED ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE AT THE COMPANY OF SOMEONE OR AT WHAT HAS HAPPENED THAT IS ALL ABOUT FORCE STIRRING AND NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR UNDERSTANDING.

PEOPLE SMILE ALL THE TIME THEY SPEAK OR SING. IF SMILING IS MEANINGFUL THEN ONE MOMENT’S SMILE WHILST SPEAKING AND SINGING SUFFICES AND IT REFLECTS THAT THE SMILING IS MEANINGLESS AND FOR SHOW THAT IT MUST BE PROLONGED AS LONG AS COMFORTABLE TO BE SEEN BY OTHERS WHILST YOU SING OR SPEAK.

IF YOUR SMILE IS MEANINGFUL, JUST AN INSTANT’S SMILE SUFFICES TO CONVEY WHATEVER MEANING (NONE) THERE IS IN IT. YOU DON’T HAVE TO SAY ‘I, I, I, I, I’ REPEATEDLY, JUST A SINGLE ‘I’ SUFFICES TO CONVEY WHAT ‘I’ MEANS, SO ONE SECOND’S SMILE SUFFICES TO CONVEY WHAT THE SMILE MEANS.

WHATEVER MEANING THERE IS IN SMILES (NONE) THE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT ACCOMPANIES IT IS ALWAYS FALSE, ALL ABOUT USING FORCE THAT HARMS SELF AND OTHERS AND THEREFORE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE’S SMILES THAT ALWAYS HAVE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE ARE TAINTED BY UNNECESSARY FORCE.

Communicating a stirring of his mental force:

People never just smile (without prolonging, changing speed and strength of force) but they always smile with a style, with additional use of force to prolong, change speed and strength that is consistent in them and differ from others, they are communicating to others that genuinely or faked, their mental forces have been stirred in a way that makes them attracted to the person they are smiling at or what has happened.

Because the genuine or faked stirring of their mental force is all about force that is blind and has no reason, they are communicating the stirring of force that is meaningless or practicing controlled insanity that they do not believe will end in uncontrollable insanity even when they are regularly troubled by their insane behaviour that is beyond their control.

IF YOUR SMILE CONVEYS FAKED LIKING, YOU ARE LYING WITH YOUR FACE MUSCLES, IF YOUR SMILE CONVEYS GENUINE LIKING, IT MERELY RADIATES FORCE THAT HARMS YOURSELF AND OTHERS.

THUS A SMILE IS PURELY USING FORCE TO EXERCISE THE MUSCLES OF YOUR FACE ACCORDING TO A PRE-RECORDED PLAN OF HOW TO DO IT (WHICH MUSCLES TO ACTIVATE IN WHAT SEQUENCE AND WHAT CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH) THAT IS INTENDED TO COMMUNICATE LIKING OR AN ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT MAY BE GENUINE OR FAKED.

A person who loves cannot like and a person who likes cannot love:

Because all ordinary people like they cannot love and a person who loves cannot like.

In order to love you must have total goodwill to others and that means you must not harm them with force. Anyone who likes (who must also dislike and hate is a form of focussed dislike), who has style in whatever he perceives, thinks, speaks and does is radiating force in his prolonging, changing speed and strength of force that harms himself and others and therefore has constant ill will that precludes him from genuinely loving except in his abiding delusion that he can and does love.

In addition to goodwill or the total absence of force in his transactions with others and his loved one that necessitates he must not use force to stretch, change speed and strength of force, love is the passive or force free effortless experience of pleasantness that can vary from extremely pleasurable to mild pleasure in the presence of the loved person and a reasoned desire to do or say things that will make the loved person happy or experience pleasantness.

A person who is forceful, who likes and dislikes, who manifest style cannot be loved because he is like a porcupine or durian fruit that has thorns that will stab and inflict pain on anyone attempting to embrace it. If a person has style or likes and dislikes is radiating force at you through his stretching, changing speed and loudness, it is impossible to love him because he is hurting you and everyone who approaches him.

When you like someone, your mental force has stirred attractively that applies force on your mind and is radiated to him causing him stress and that automatically precludes love and thus a person who likes cannot love because there is a dagger of force in his hand that harms the person he desires to love.

IF LOVE AND LIKE BOTH EXIST THEN THEY CAN BE CLEARLY DEFINED AS SUCH AND SUCH. YOU MAY BE RIGHT YOU KNOW WHAT LOVE IS BUT YOU MAY HAVE MISTAKEN HARMFUL PASSION (LUST) & POSSESSIVENESS AS LOVE.