The power of solitude
Tom Darling spent 10 days in silent meditation. He found it an extraordinary antidote to the modern world.
Comment: Solitude is just solitude or isolation from contact. If you perceive there is power or anything else in solitude you are flirting with false perception that will end in mad perception.
Solitude is just seclusion so how can that have force for it to be powerful?
THERE IS POWER IN A BATTERY BUT THERE IS NO POWER IN SOLITUDE.
It reflects the person has false understanding that solitude has strength and thus power.
THUS HERE AS IN MANY PLACES HE THINKS HE UNDERSTANDS, YOU THINK YOU UNDERSTAND BUT THE UNDERSTANDING IS FALSE AND THEREFORE HE HAS NO UNDERSTANDING.
He wants to hype how marvellous solitude is which is why he speaks of power which he subconsciously worships and finds meaningful.
A fool may forever meditate and find no peace and enlightenment but even when getting along in life, a discerning person finds more peace and meaning.
EVEN WHEN THEY MEDITATE, STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE PUTTING ON A SHOW TO IMPRESS THEMSELVES AND OTHERS, THE ADOPT POSTURES THAT HAVE STYLE OR ADDED FORCE AND STIFFNESS, THEY USE FORCE TO SUPPRESS THEIR THOUGHTS RATHER THAN LET TIME DISSIPATE THEIR THOUGHTS, THEY CONTINUE TO THINK WITH FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT RENDERS THEIR THOUGHTS IMPOSSIBLE TO STOP WHICH IS WHY THEY NEVER ACHIEVE THE SECOND MEDITATIVE TRANCE WITH CESSATION OF THINKING AS DESCRIBED BY THE BUDDHA.
Rote rules logic not true understanding:
Quote: Autopsy reports on the first 16 bodies recovered from the ocean seem finally to have put to rest the theory that the aircraft was the victim of a terrorist attack. Details of the autopsies leaked to the Brazilian press at the weekend indicate that the bodies showed no sign of burning or damage from an explosion. The bodies were recovered whole, which is also said to be unusual after a mid-air explosion. Examination by X-ray revealed no evidence that the bodies had been penetrated by shards of metal.
The 50 corpses discovered so far were recovered in two groups over 50 miles apart. This suggests to some aviation experts that the aircraft may have disintegrated, fully or partially, in mid-air.
It is false perception to say that the person has demonstrated true specific to the occasion logic to come to the conclusion that autopsy reports have put to rest the midair explosion theory.
No genuine understanding is required at all to come to that conclusion which may be wrong because if the bodies recovered are quite far from the scene of the explosion or they were protected by seats, they may not show evidence of impregnation by metal shards.
X rays evidence of metal shards equal explosion and no evidence equals no explosion is a rules logic that robots, even computers can retrieve from its repository of rules to apply to the situation to robotically come to a conclusion of what may have happened.
Such a rule needs an empirical observation that in an explosion many (but not necessarily all) bodies show evidence of embedded shards and so if there are no embedded shards or torn bodies, explosions can be ruled out.
THERE ARE MANY WHO MAY THINK THEY HAVE GENUINE UNDERSTANDING IF THEY CAN REASON THAT BECAUSE THERE WERE NO EVIDENCE THE BODIES RECOVERED WHERE SHATTERED NOR DID THEY HAVE EVIDENCE OF PENETRATION BY MENTAL SHARDS, THEY HAVE ELIMINATED EXPLOSION AS A CAUSE BUT WHAT IS INVOLVED IS JUST REHASHED LOGIC BASED ON PAST OBSERVATIONS THAT BODIES INVOLVED IN EXPLOSIONS TEND TO HAVE EMBEDDED MENTAL AND BE TORN APART WHICH IS ABOUT PERCEPTIONS, MEMORIZATION OF THE PERCEPTIONS AND RETRIEVAL OF THE MEMORIZED PERCEPTION OF ASSOCIATIONS TO REAPPLY TO THIS NEW SITUATION.
TORN BODIES AND EMBEDDED MENTAL SHARDS MEANS EXPLOSION AND NONE MEANS NO EXPLOSION IS JUST A ROTE RULES LOGIC THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENUINE UNDERSTANDING, DOES NOT REQUIRE UNDERSTANDING EVEN IF IT CORRECTLY RULED OUT AN EXPLOSION. THERE MAY BE SOME CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN IT MAY PROVE FALSE.
All about rehashed rules not true understanding:
Rehashed rules to explain things that happen has nothing to do with genuine understanding and rehashed rules explanations may be far more rampant even occur exclusively than people who are themselves robots realize whilst genuine understanding may be much rarer even absent than the same people perceive.
Study many murdered bodies and discovering the patterns of injury that indicate murder and what type of weapons used is just a matter of good perception, accurately identifying the injuries sustained and collating them with the weapons used, memorizing the connection that this weapon tend to cause this injury and then faced with a fresh murder in which you are trying to work out what happened, you merely search your mental jukebox to remember or match the injuries you now see with the past weapon-injury associations to work out what is the likely cause of death.
In the same way, studying about the signs and symptoms of a disease and what its investigations and treatments are does not require understanding, it requires good perceptions of the signs and symptoms associated with a certain disease, memorizing them and when confronted with an unknown disease to search one’s mental library to come up with the correct answer which is about brute computing powers and nothing to do with understanding.
JUST BECAUSE A PERSON CAN EXAMINE THINGS HAPPENING TO DETECT FEATURES THAT HE CAN THEN MATCH WITH A LIBRARY OF CAUSES OF THOSE FEATURES OCCURRING TOGETHER AND THUS DIAGNOSE THE CAUSE OF THE FEATURE DOES NOT MEAN THE PERSON HAS GENUINE LOGIC BECAUSE IT IS AN ENTIRELY MECHANICAL PROCESS OF PERCEPTIONS OF FEATURES, MEMORIZING THE FEATURES AND WHAT THEY IMPLY IS THEIR CAUSE AND THEN TO MATCH SITUATIONS TO THOSE MEMORIZED ASSOCIATIONS TO OBTAIN A CONCLUSION WHICH IS WHY COMPUTERS CAN OUTPLAY HUMANS AT CHESS, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENUINE UNDERSTANDING.
Rules logic is dangerous:
Rules logic is faked rehashed logic that is dangerous because the person does not understand the situation at all, he or she is only applying rules that tell him or her what to do that are never a perfect fit (at best an approximate fit) but others ‘understand or appreciate them and tell them it is OK or logical.
Cannie Ong, a trained computer analyst working in the US paid for her lack of genuine understanding with her life because she had three very good opportunities to escape the fiend who abducted and finally raped and murdered her when the car was stopped by policemen and he had to change a flat tyre with people at the bus stand offering help.
Her false logic told her to do nothing perhaps because he threatened to stab her straightaway or she refused to abandon her own car.
Genuine logic will tell her that if he will stab her if she ran away, he would stab her if she remained and she better took the risk and run when there are others especially policemen around to protect her.
Even if she was frozen with fear as to be helpless, that too is mad logic to be frozen into inactivation by mental force or fear.
THUS IN NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES SHE HAS ALL THE RULES THAT TELLS HER WHAT TO SAY OR DO WHEN SUCH AND SUCH HAPPEN BUT WHEN SOMETHING OUT OF THE ORDINARY HAPPENS THAT DEMAND SHE TAKE ACTIONS SHE NEVER TOOK BEFORE, SHE IS LOST, DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO BECAUSE THERE ARE NO RULES TO TELL HER WHAT TO DO AND SHE IS LIKE A LITTLE GIRL WAITING TO BE TOLD.
No understanding is needed to be a good mechanic:
When a customer complains about some car symptoms eg sounds the wheel or engine makes, the mechanic merely refers to his memory as to what those sounds or symptoms may mean in terms of mechanical faults and thus guided he inspects the relevant parts for fault or malfunction and based on his experience or library of what a healthy or worn part looks like he may diagnose the problem and based on his memory of how to repair or change the part, he does the job.
No understanding is required throughout, all is required is memory of what each complain may mean in terms of part damaged that directs him to inspect those parts to then confirm the fault based on his memory of what a worn out part look like and then to repair based on his memory of how to do so.
The difference between the good and bad mechanic is that the bad mechanic diagnoses faultily, what is obvious escapes him and he thinks of bizarre causes of the problem, when he examines the part, he does not see a damaged part and when he repairs, he does a sloppy job out of it.
THUS IF YOU THINK THAT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING IS REQUISITE IN BEING A GOOD MECHANIC OR EVEN DOCTOR WHEN IT IS NOT INVOLVED, YOU MAY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT IS AS GOOD AS NO UNDERSTANDING YOURSELF TOO.
RPK: I’m disappointed in you, Anwar:
No man of genuine reason who understands what he is saying will say what is said above because it is not only meaningless, stirs emotions but is harmful to self and others.
You may not know what you mean by ‘disappointment’ but whenever someone says he is disappointed it means his mental force is stirred to be angry and agitated or upset or in a confused manner.
Not only is the stirring of force blind or meaningless, it causes suffering to self that you want others to share by communicating your disappointment. Further because disappointment is based on force it is conditioning such that it gets more easily aroused to more intense levels that get harder to shake off and will end in torment.
YOU MAY DISAGREE WITH WHAT I SAY BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. DISAPPOINTMENT IS JUST A MAD STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO EXPERIENCE DISLIKE AND UPSET THAT IS ALWAYS NOT ONLY SUFFERING BUT CONDITIONING AND EXERTS PRESSURE ON OTHERS TO BE SIMILARLY DISAPPOINTED.
Wrong or bad never disappointing:
Whatever Anwar said can be objectively proven that applies to everyone as true or false, right or wrong, good or bad but never disappointing or thrilling which is not only a truly absurd response but suffering and conditioning.
IT IS BECAUSE SOCIETY CONDITIONS OR BRAINWASHES YOU TO PERCEIVE DISAPPOINTMENT AS A NATURAL AND RATIONAL RESPONSE TO SOMETHING HAPPENING THAT YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG OR EVEN THINK IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE THAT SOMEONE IS DISAPPOINTED.
AFTER LIFELONG PRACTICE THE PERSON CANNOT HELP BEING DISAPPOINTED BY THINGS HAPPENING AND THUS CANNOT HELPING, HE PERCEIVES IT IS NATURAL AND TRUE WHEN IT IS CONDITIONED AND WILL LEAD TO LOSS OF CONTROL AND MAD DISAPPOINTMENT (GO BESERK WITH DISAPPOINTMENT TO BE DESTRUCTIVE).
Disappointment reflects self identity views:
Only a person of strong self identity views will deem it meaningful to speak of his disappointment when objectively something happening can only be true or false, good or bad, right or wrong.
Self identity views according to the Buddha is one of three lower fetters to future woe.
IF YOU DON’T UPHOLD YOURSELF WHAT IS THERE TO SPEAK ABOUT YOUR DISAPPOINTMENT? YOU NEED A PERSON, AN EMOTIONAL SELF IMPORTANT PERSON TO EXPERIENCE DISAPPOINTMENT AT SOMETHING THAT DISPLEASES HIM.
Classifying:
The irresistible urge not tendency of stylish emotional people as a result of brainwashing by society and conditioning themselves is to classify everything that happens to them into pigeonholes or categories and not only is this a perversion or distortion of reality but they become slaves of these classifications which are plans or schemes that dictate what the person who is a robot should perceive, say and do.
Thus whenever something is happening, if it is something straightforward the person assumes what has happened is according to one of his classifications, if it is more complicated the person searches for a classification to be rehashed to explain what is happening. If there are no classifications in his jukebox that can explain then the person is at loss, he has to seek external classifications to explain or he tries to cobble from various classifications in his mind to explain what he cannot explain.
THE BOTTOMLINE IS THAT THE PERSON HAS CLASSIFICATIONS OR EXPLANATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS THINGS (INDEED HE THINKS HE CAN EXPLAIN EVERYTHING WITH HIS INSTALLED CLASSIFICATIONS) THAT CAN HAPPEN TO HIM WHICH ARE NEVER NATURAL BUT PERVERSIONS OF REALITY AND RIGID AND WHENEVER ANYTHING HAPPENS TO HIM, HE EXPLAINS THEM BY REHASHING HIS CLASSIFICATIONS EN BLOC TO EXPLAIN.
BY CONTRAST THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT CLASSIFY AND REHASH TO EXPLAIN SEES THINGS CURRENTLY HAPPENING AS THEY TRULY ARE AND BY ADDING THE SEPARATE ELEMENTS OF WHAT IS HAPPENING THAT HE TRULY SEES, HE COMES TO A SPECIFIC TO THAT OCCASION UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS HAPPENING.
THUS STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE MAY THINK THEY HAVE GENUINE UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS HAPPENING BUT THEY HAVE REHASHED CLASSIFICATIONS OR UNDERSTANDINGS OF WHAT IS HAPPENING THAT MAY BE FALSE, SERIOUSLY FLAWED OR RELATIVELY TRUE. ANY EXPLANATIONS THAT ARE REHASHED CANNOT BE ABSOLUTELY TRUE BUT RELATIVELY TRUE AT BEST.
US headed for depression:
Quote: The economy "is obviously heading toward a depression," despite the government's efforts to dodge one, said Prechter.
U.S. likely to lose AAA rating: Prechter
Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:17pm EDT
By John Parry
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Technical analyst Robert Prechter on Monday said he sees the United States losing its top AAA credit rating by the end of 2010, as he stuck by a deeply bearish outlook on the U.S. economy and stock market.
Prechter, known for predicting the 1987 stock market crash, joins a growing coterie of market heavyweights in forecasting the United States will lose its top credit rating as the government issues trillions of dollars in debt to fund efforts to bail out the economy.
Fears about the long-term vulnerability of the prized U.S. credit rating came to the fore after Standard & Poor's in May lowered its outlook on Britain, threatening the UK's top AAA rating. That move raised fears that the United States could face a similar risk, with the hefty amounts of government debt issued in both countries to pay for financial rescues causing budget deficits to swell.
Prechter, speaking at the Reuters Investment Outlook Summit in New York, said he sees investors' confidence in an economic rebound fading, a trend that will drag the S&P 500 stock index .SPX well below the March 6 intraday low of 666.79 by the end of this year or early next.
"There will be a leg down in stock prices, and it will affect all other areas," including corporate bonds and commodities, said Prechter, who is executive officer at research company Elliott Wave International, based in Gainesville, Georgia.
Prechter, who is known for his bearish views, has repeatedly forecast a steep decline in stocks this year, even as the stock market has rebounded from 12-year lows set in March as optimism about an economic recovery has risen.
Despite the government and Federal Reserve's massive rescues for financial companies and securities markets, Prechter expects credit markets to clam up again as they did in the first phase of the global financial crisis and for the U.S. economy to sink into a depression.
Although U.S. banks' recently passed government "stress tests" that assessed the adequacy of their capital levels to absorb losses and have been able to raise some capital in debt and equity markets, "the banking sector is in severe trouble," as more loans turn bad, he said.
The economy "is obviously heading toward a depression," despite the government's efforts to dodge one, said Prechter.
Spending is easy, repaying is difficult:
The implication of rising credit card defaults is that a quick recovery of the economy is unlikely if not impossible.
It is easy for anyone to spend large sums of borrowed money especially if lenders lending other people’s money are lax but it is difficult even impossible to repay if you become jobless.
Even if lenders write off the bad debts, they have to recoup the losses and that takes time even if you are a big company and surely you are not going to lend profligately as before nor is there money in the flushed banks ‘dying to be lent’.
THUS EVEN IF BANKS WRITE OFF THEIR LOSSES, THEY WILL HAVE TO REPAIR THEIR LOSSES, THEY WILL TIGHTEN THEIR LENDING FOR A WHILE, BORROWERS COWERING FROM OVERBORROWING WILL HAVE A LESS APPETITE FOR MORE DEBT AND THERE IS NO MONEY IN THE BANK TO LEND (SHORT OF PRINTING THAT DILUTES MONEY). THUS THOSE WHO ENVISAGE A SWIFT RECOVERY ARE FOOLS WHO DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY SEE.
With karma, you can go to hell even for calling your brother ‘you fool’ or the Brahmin who sacrificed a goat had to be sacrificed as a goat 500 times. Even so with money, it is easy to spend as it is easy to scold someone, but it is difficult to repay as it is difficult to be burnt in hell even for hundreds of thousands of years for spitting at a Buddha.
Air France crash due to mad rote logic?
You may marvel at how wondrous computerised flying by computers or robotic flying is but it is not without even potentially fatal hazards because machines or computers do not understand what is going on.
It seems as a result of faulty speed sensors icing up wrongly indicating plane stalling when it is flying as usual, the onboard computers may have responded automatically by boosting engine power at the same time as violently swinging control flaps to maximum lift to avoid plane falling. There is a bar that limits how much the flap can swing but this may have been broken so that the flap swung out of range causing the tail assembly to snap off and without the tail and control of the aircraft it became uncontrollable and crashed.
A computer only does as it is told and not otherwise and it does not understand anything it does. So when sensors report zero speed, it automatically boosted engine power and set flaps at maximum lift but if the plane is actually flying at high speed then setting the flaps at maximum lift may subject the flap controllers to severe strain that may exceed its limit causing it to snap so that the plane loses all control and is doomed.
WHETHER A PERSON OR PLANE’S LOGIC IS GENUINE, FULLY UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IT IS DOING OR ROBOTIC, REHASHED AS PROGRAMMED CAN BE KNOWN. IF IT IS ROBOTIC, THERE IS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS BEING DONE AND AS CANNY A FAKE OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ROBOTIC REHASHED LOGIC MAY BE, IT IS A FAKE AND CAN BE FOUND OUT IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES WITH EVEN FATAL RESULTS.
True person to person intercourse?
You may think when two persons are speaking, it is a genuine real time intercourse or dialogue but you may have false perception and understanding because the truth is it is two persons speaking past each other, rehashing at each other and even if they smile and nod as if they fully understand and appreciate each other, they are in their own little private worlds and faking it.
PEOPLE SPEAK PAST EACH OTHER NOT PERSONALLY AT EACH OTHER, THEY ACT IN AN ANIMATED WAY AS IF THEY ARE WITH YOU WHEN THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAY (PARTLY BECAUSE IT IS FALSE OR NONSENSE AND THEREFORE NOT UNDERSTANDABLE AND PARTLY BECAUSE THEY ARE STRESSED AND IN A DAZE THAT LIMITS OR PRECLUDES UNDERSTANDING). THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY BUT THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT I SAY IS WAY OFF WHAT I MEANT.
AS SIMPLE AND CLEAR AS WHAT I SAY IS, I KNOW FROM THE RESPONSES OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EVEN WELL EDUCATED THAT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY, THEY ACT AS IF THEY UNDERSTAND BUT THEY MISUNDERSTAND OR MISINTERPRET WHAT I SAY.
Pilots may be just better robots:
Supposed it was a computer programming error that caused the fatal Air France crash and if the pilot was at the helm he would have corrected it, it does not necessarily mean human pilots are not robots but it may mean that human pilots are superior robots.
Faced with conflicting signals from the plane’s sensors, the pilot may correctly conclude the speed sensors are faulty because he can hear the engines roaring, he is not losing altitude as the altimeter shows and even out of the gloom, he may be discern clouds whizzing by.
IF A PILOT HAD AVERTED THE CRASH IF IT WAS CAUSED BY INAPPROPRIATE COMPUTER RESPONSE, IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN HUMANS ARE NOT ROBOTS BUT IT MAY MEAN HUMANS ARE ROBOTS THAT ARE MORE SOPHISTICATED, ABLE TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT CONFLICTING INPUTS TO CONCLUDE CORRECTLY WHAT THE SITUATION IS WHERE THE COMPUTER CONCLUDES WRONGLY.
Protocol is about rehashing:
Protocol is a plan that is rehashed in which the actors are briefed by their aides about the protocols and to which they follow rigidly as far as their memories or success of programming will allow and they subsequently become robots of protocol.
YOU THINK NOTHING ABOUT THIS BUT IT IS DEADLY BECAUSE IN ORDER TO FOLLOW PROTOCOL, YOU MUST FOLLOW A PLAN AND THEREFORE BECOME A SLAVE OR ROBOT OF THE PLAN NOT JUST THERE BUT IT CONDITIONS YOU INCREASINGLY AS A ROBOT THAT WILL END IN MAD ROBOT FAILURE FOR YOU. THIS IS JUST ONE OF THE GREAT PRICE TO PAY FOR YOUR LUST TO BE PRESIDENT.
Banking regulation 'not to blame'
Chancellor Alistair Darling is to announce he does not plan fundamental reform of the way UK banks are regulated.
Alistair Darling is not a honest man without vested interests as recent revelations of fraudulent claims for expenses as MP showed. What he said may not be the truth but vested, to absolve the government of blame and shirk actions that may not be popular with banks who have influence over him.
Krugman has said that Margaret Thatcher’s Big Bang financial reforms (liberalization) together with Reaganomics are the aetiologies to today’s financial mess and it does not take much genuine reasoning to say the liberalization or freeing from rules whilst boosted lending and thus the economy also sowed the seeds of today’s calamities and therefore the lack of banking regulation had an important part to play or blame.
EXACTLY HOW MUCH BANKING REGULATION OR ITS LACK OF HAD TO DO WITH THIS CRISIS CAN BE OBJECTIVELY KNOWN AND CANNOT BE REFUTED BY ANYONE. WITHOUT KNOWING, YOU SHOULD NOT COMMIT YOURSELF TO SAY IT IS NOT TO BLAME THAT MISLEADS OTHERS, IF YOU WILLFULLY MISLEAD, YOU KNOW IT IS TO BLAME BUT YOU WANT TO ABSOLVE YOURSELF OF RESPONSIBILITY AND USE IT AS AN EXCUSE NOT TO INTRODUCE NEW RULES, YOU ARE LYING AND HEADED FOR PUNISHMENT FAR WORSE THAN YOU EVER DREAMT POSSIBLE LIKE AN ETERNITY OF WEEPING AND GNASHING YOUR TEETH.
KUALA LUMPUR: PAS has welcomed Umno president Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s statement that the party was sincere in having unity talks but maintains it does not aim to form a unity government.
It is controlled madness or a lie to say PAS only keen on talks not unity.
What is the use of all the trouble of meeting and talking about unity when you are truly not interested? You must be mad or is it a lie, like a girl tempted by a boy’s flattery, you want to hear more and soon without realization you have fallen into his trap.
IF IT IS TRUE PAS IS ONLY KEEN ON TALKS NOT UNITY THEN THESE PAS LEADERS ARE A VERY MIXED UP LOT WHO DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND WILL END UP MAD.
WHAT IS SAID IS ABSURD, IS AN EXCUSE AND MANY ARE GUILTY OF THE SAME ILLOGIC THEMSELVES AND IT IS NOT HARMLESS BUT REFLECTS AND CONDITIONS FURTHER THE PERSON’S MUDDLED MIND THAT WILL END IN MADNESS.
Always faked:
Even if it was the most delicious morsel being passed it is no reason to not only stir one’s mental force to be excited but express that thrill with facial expressions of excitement or laughter.
STIRRING AND EXPRESSING EXCITEMENT AT AN ACT OF PASSING A PIECE OF FOOD IS A TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE UNNECESSARY ACT THAT IS DESIGNED TO FAKE FOR SHOW HOW FUN IT NEVER TRULY IS AND SO BOTH ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY. AFTER MANY CYCLES OF FAKING, THE URGE TO GET EXCITED AND SHOW IT TO IMPRESS OTHERS BECOME IRRESISTIBLE AND THE PERSON IS HEADED FOR INSANITY.
Dust flying in?
Quote: The windows have to be closed to keep the dust from flying in.
Comment: Can he or you see the dust flying in? Why can’t the dust float in?
The correct word is ‘to keep the dust out’.
IT IS NOT A MATTER OF POOR COMMAND OF ENGLISH BUT ‘FLYING IN’ IS THE USUAL OR REHASHED STYLE OF EXPRESSION THAT HE FAVOURS BECAUSE IT SOUNDS MORE DRAMATIC. HE COPIED FLYING IN FROM OTHERS AND IT IS REHASHED FREQUENTLY TO SOUND IMPRESSIVE.
IT IS LIKELY IF NOT CERTAINLY THAT DUST FLOATS IN RATHER THAN FLY IN ON ITS OWN, IT MAY BE BLOWN IN BUT THAT IS NOT FLYING AND SO HE IS FLIRTING WITH FALSE PERCEPTION OR HE SEES FALSELY TO SAY DUST FLIES IN. BECAUSE HE SEES FALSELY HE CANNOT UNDERSTAND TRULY.
People think they see and see truly but they see falsely, they see dust flying in when dust can only float or be blown in and thus falsely seeing they understand falsely or have NO understanding.
What is disappointment?
When a person says he is disappointed, as when RPK said he was disappointed with Anwar, what does he mean?
In order to be disappointed, you must have expectations of others or yourself and when your expectation is dashed, you become disappointed or your mental force is (involuntarily, helplessly) stirred in different ways depending on the circumstances.
When a person’s expectations are dashed, he may become emotional upset (angry or disliking), sad (mental force prolonging madly), hurt (his mental force of going against self accelerating in speed and strength unshielded by his force of self preservation to cause mental pain) or agitated (mental force stirring in a disorganized fashion) or a combination or rapid switching back and forth of above.
THUS DISAPPOINTMENT IS SIMPLY THE DASHING OF A PERSON’S EXPECTATIONS THAT LEADS TO EMOTIONAL ANGER, SADNESS, HURT OR AGITATION EITHER SINGULARLY OR IN COMBINATION BACK AND FORTH EG ALTERNATELY ANGRY AND HURT. DISAPPOINTMENT IS CONDITIONING TO BECOME INCREASINGLY INTENSE AND HARD TO SHAKE OFF AND WILL END IN MAD DISAPPOINTMENT EG GO BESERK TO DESTROY WHEN DISAPPOINTED WITH FAILED EXAM.
Further when you tell someone you are disappointed with him, you want him to behave according to your expectations of him and so you consciously or unconsciously want him to be a robot living up to your expectations, beholden to you. Thus you are not meritorious but creating karma for yourself to have expectations of others that you want others to live up to.
Automatism & rules as substitutes to understanding:
In order to survive and prosper in this world, a being has to take actions in speech and deed that are not necessarily true but sanctioned by society, perceived as true even if they are deluded, that are not fatal or injurious to self but calculated for self gain that obviously encompasses survival.
The only true basis for speech and action is genuine understanding of the true nature of what is happening or perceived and thus genuinely understanding what is happening, to tailor a specific to that occasion response in speech or action.
If one cannot see or understand things happening (because one perceives falsely with force, with a substance and style combo, with like and dislike) then one has to resort to second best that will get you by but is potentially fatal because it is blind and faked understanding and this is automatism or rules logic.
Automatism is a direct, standard, fixed knee jerk reaction to something that is perceived eg see food and hungry equals eat. See male approach, “Hello sir!!!!”, see female approach, “Hello, madam!!!”. Hear loud frightening sound means run. But there are situations eg with heavy traffic where running may mean being knocked down by a car and thus a frightened cat may indiscriminately run into the path of a car and be killed.
No understanding is involved in automatism, only good perception of what is the trigger of the action, eg “Hello, madam!!!” which is recorded in his jukebox and well worn in usage it is often automatically rendered even without his selection. This automatism has survival value because being perceived as pleasant, he is employed.
In more complicated situations, rules are required to enable the person who has no genuine understanding of what exactly is happening to initiate a response that is not necessarily true or appropriate but is approved and rewarded by society and is usually not fatal (but can be fatal in some circumstances).
The basis of rules logic is that if you perceive A, B, C & D, you do or say this, if you perceive A, D, X & Y you do or say that. If you perceive X, Y & Z that you have not come across before, you have no programmed course of action, you are lost, do not know what to say or do or you try to cover up by muttering or saying something nonspecific like “I’ll have to think about it” or smile sheepishly as if you understood when you do not.
No understanding is involved in rules logic, merely perception or detect of triggers present whose combinations when present, tells the robot that they mean the selection of response A or C. What is rehashed is not specifically composed for the occasion but standardized, old hat rehashed many times before.
Thus the person who is a robot is not perceiving objectively but perceiving to look for clues or signals to trigger pre-recorded responses and his responses are standard and fixed in him but differs from another.
Thus the kitten that runs away from an approaching car runs away because she sees her mother doing so or it is big and makes noises that frighten her. She does not know why she is running away which is why when proffered a meal, she does not run away when a car wheel arrives because she does not understand the true danger of a car is that it can knock you down.
Humans know that a car can knock you down, but it is not necessarily true understanding but may reflect programming. For instance you can hammer into a child this program and then ask the programmed child who will regurgitate emphatically stereotypically when asked, “Why is a car dangerous?” that “A car is dangerous because it can knock you down!”
A LOT OF SITUATIONS IN DAILY LIFE ARE NOT IMMEDIATELY LIFE THREATENING IN WHICH FALSE PROGRAMMED REACTIONS WILL BE FATAL EG WHETHER YOU FALSELY DECLINE TO GO TO UK TO PLAY FOOTBALL BECAUSE YOU DON’T LIKE ITS WEATHER IS NOT GOING TO KILL YOU. YOU MAY DEPRIVE YOURSELF OF MORE MONEY WORKING IN UK BUT IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOUR DECISION IS BASED ON BLIND FORCE, NAMELY DISLIKING).
IT IS NOT A MATTER OF WHETHER A REACTION IS TRUE OR APPROPRIATE THAT IS THE MATTER, BUT OFTEN IF NOT ALWAYS IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER THE ACTION IS APPROVED BY SOCIETY, ACCEPTED AS TRUE BY SOCIETY EVEN IF IT IS DELUDED AND IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN PROGRAMMED RESPONSES ARE NOT IMMEDIATELY FATAL, CAN ONLY BE FATAL IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS APPROVAL BY SOCIETY, PROGRAMMED RULES LOGIC WORKS FINE AND FOOL THE PERSON WHO IS A ROBOT AND OTHERS THAT THEY ARE DEALING WITH AN UNDERSTANDING PERSON WHEN THEY ARE DEALING WITH A ROBOT WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
There are two types of rules, one type is to determine what actions in speech and deed the person takes in response to things happening. Another type governs what and how he perceives this world and himself. The stylish emotional person has many beliefs and perceives the world as such and such that is rigid in him even not negotiable that differs from others and this is usually if not always false or deluded. They have ideas or perceptions of what things are or should be, they have many beliefs that they uphold even if they themselves perceive contradictions.
THE PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT HAS NO PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS OF WHAT AND HOW THINGS SHOULD BE. ON EACH OCCASION HE SEES, HE SEES TRULY SOMETHING HAPPENING AS IT IS, NOT AS HE LIKES OR DISLIKES IT AND THUS SEEING AND UNDERSTANDING HE HAS A TRUE PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AND THIS WORLD. BECAUSE EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE SEE WITH FORCE, WITH SUBSTANCE AND STYLE, IN SNAPSHOTS WITH LIKING AND DISLIKING, THEY SEE A FALSE FORCE BASED PERCEPTION OF THE WORLD WHICH IS THEIR FALSE REFERENCE TO WHATEVER THEY COME INTO CONTACT. THUS THE PERSON WITH NO GENUINE UNDERSTANDING SEES IN SNAPSHOTS TO DETECT CERTAIN FEATURES AND ONCE DETECTED, HE PRESUMPTUOUSLY EXPLAINS WHAT HE SAW OR HEARD ACCORDING TO THE VARIOUS SCENARIOS RECORDED IN HIS JUKEBOX.
It is impossible for stylish emotional people in whom what and how they perceive, let alone what and how they think, speak and do are always rehashed to have genuine understanding but they must have no understanding and what understanding they have is false rote automatism or rules understanding and rehashing.
There are rules that govern their perceptions or how and what they view this world, how they interpret what they perceive and categorize what they perceive into fixed rigid scenarios and there are rules that govern what they say or do when they perceive certain cues present.
Speaking without understanding:
If you understand what you say (as you insist surely you do) then you must be able to tell me what is this disappointment, liking, disliking, sadness, hurt, confusion, fear that you keep referring to.
If you cannot define them and you keep talking about them then you are a person who does not understand what he says and that is no understanding as I say.
IT IS NOT THE DASHING OF EXPECTATION THAT CONSTITUTES DISAPPOINTMENT BECAUSE DASHING OF EXPECTATION IS JUST DASHING OF EXPECTATION BUT IT IS THE ADDITIONAL EMOTIONAL OR MENTAL FORCE REACTION OF ANGER/SADNESS/HURT OR AGITATION EITHER SINGULARLY OR IN COMBINATION THAT CONSTITUTES DISAPPOINTMENT.
PEOPLE ARE FREQUENTLY TALKING ABOUT LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, CONFUSION, FEAR, DOUBT, UNCERTAINTY, LOVE & HATE WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO DEFINE EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT BECAUSE THEY DO NOT KNOW THE NATURE OF LIKE, DISLIKE, ETC. IF YOU TALK WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT YOU TALK ABOUT, YOU ARE A PERSON WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE SAYS, NOT JUST HERE WHERE YOU THINK YOU UNDERSTAND WHEN YOU DON’T BUT EVERYWHERE ELSE YOU THINK YOU UNDERSTAND BUT YOU ARE DELUDED BECAUSE IT IS NOT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING BUT REHASHED RULES LOGIC AND AUTOMATISM THAT GOVERNS WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT IS REHASHED.
Carter distressed by Gaza visit:
Considering that God sees and knows everything, God must be extremely distressed always by the things He sees. Therefore it is impossible that anything seen can cause God distress and distress is false and harmful to self and others and yet people in this world perceive distress as good or understandable.
Anything that can happen in Gaza eg destruction can be bad, even extremely bad and that is it, what is there to be distressed or stir your mental force to be sad ore even repulsed or disliking?
ANYONE WHO PERCEIVES WHAT HE SAW IN GAZA AS DISTRESSING HAS FALSE PERCEPTION AND AS A RESULT OF FALSELY PERCEIVING HE CANNOT TRULY KNOW AND TRULY UNDERSTAND.
THE BUDDHA CAN CUT OFF ALL CONTACT, LET ALONE PLEASANT AND UNPLEASANT FEELINGS (PASSIVE FORCE FREE SENSATIONS), LET ALONE EMOTIONS OF DISTRESS OR THRILL (BLIND HARMFUL USELESS STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE). WHATEVER CAN BE CUT OFF IS FALSE AND THEREFORE PEOPLE ARE DELVING IN FALSITY BEING STIRRED TO BE DISTRESSED.
Why the counsellor will physically come:
It cannot be disputed that Jesus referred in John’s gospel that God will give men another counsellor and He will come sometime in the future (but when He comes). What can be disputed is whether the counsellor will come physically as the Buddha and Jesus came or He will come in spirit or into the minds of men.
Notwithstanding that the Buddha and Jesus had to come personally to teach the world and therefore it is unlikely if not impossible the Holy Spirit can come without coming in the minds of people and in many places, Jesus quite clearly implied the counsellor will come in person, the passage that ‘he dwells with you and shall be in you (Jesus said elsewhere that He is in his Father and those in heaven are as one) is an indication that the counsellor will dwell or live amongst men and by teaching others, he or his truth shall then be in you.
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor (like Jesus was a counselor who came), to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you and will be in you.
"These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (The counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things (he will cover a broad range of subjects), and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.
But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning.
But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you.
And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. (When the counselor comes, it will be time for mankind to be judged)
"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now (it is a consciousness change that enables you to understand what you could not understand previously and I was the unacknowledged trigger of the consciousness change after 1977 as in recent years). When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth (the Buddha too is part of the truth); for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak (if the counselor knows everything, he will not need to hear and then speak) and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
