Meaning & Purpose

Meaning & Purpose:
Meaning must be distinguished from purpose. Something can have both meaning and purpose and something can have purpose but no meaning.
Style has purposes and it is to either singularly or multi-purposely deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others but it never has meaning.
What meaning can there be in style if it is always present and always intended to either singularly or multiply not specifically deceive, impress, intimidate and dominate and is repeated endlessly often mindlessly without awareness and satiation with the same thing said or done (eg keep speaking about his car to boast) and many other different things said and done (eg speaking about his car, wife, children and house to boast)? For something to have true meaning it must be specific and not transferrable to other things, otherwise you are flirting with confusion and insanity with the loss of control of the confusion over the meaning of your style and deeds.
What meaning can there be in something (style) that is merely the products of the use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness? Such changes in force cannot have any meaning, cannot convey specific meaning, it is merely a display of force that is not everlasting but ends with the display and is merely intended to stir the speed and strength of the mental force of the recipient so that he is similarly deceived, impressed, pleased, intimidated and dominated as the perpetrator himself must experience a share.
No one can mean his style because you cannot mean the constant prolonging, changing of speed and loudness in your speech and they never tell you that the purpose of their accompanying style in a particular occasion is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate you. Because they never declare the purpose of their accompanying style and never declare the true purpose of the substance of what they say or do that may be not what it is at face value but to similarly also deceive (tell a lie), impress (tell you about their Mercedes), please (to flatter you), intimidate (make you fearful) or dominate (make you submit), they are hypocrites who never mean what they say or do and never say or do what they mean.
If the intention of the style you say or do things and even the substance of what you say or do is actually to deceive or impress or please or intimidate or dominate and you never state this to your recipient, aren’t you a hypocrite? If you are not ashamed of your purpose to say things falsely impress or please others, why don’t you acknowledge it, declare it?
The presence of style in any person’s poses, speech and motion cannot be denied and it is an objective diagnosis.
As long as there is a presence of the (artificial, unnecessary) use of force to prolong, change direction (twisted posture or motion), speed and strength of force that can be known by God and those who discern even if you deny or cannot see present in you and others, there is style.
THEREFORE STYLE THAT IS ALWAYS PRESENT IN ALL BEINGS HERE IN THIS WORLD AND CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DIAGNOSED AND IS MERELY THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE DIRECTION (WHERE POSSIBLE IN MOTION), SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE HAS PURPOSE AND IT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE BUT IT (STYLE) NEVER HAS MEANING THAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE IT IS ALL ABOUT THE USE OF FORCE TARGETTED AT THE RECIPIENT’S MENTAL FORCE INTENDING TO MAKE IT RESONATE SYMPATHETICALLY. OFTEN EVEN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO HAS NO MEANING BUT IS INTENDED WITHOUT STATING TO ALSO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE. ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE (WHEN YOU SPEAK ANGRILY, THE ANGRY WAY YOU SPEAK IS THE STYLE) IS A HYPOCRITE WHO DOES NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAYS OR SAYS WHAT HE MEANS BECAUSE HE NEVER TELLS YOU HE WANTS TO INTIMIDATE YOU AS THE OCCASION MAY BE.
When you speak or do things angrily, sadly, humorously, gently, eagerly or excitedly, that angry, sad, humorous, gentle, eager or excited way you say or do it is your style for that occasion that although it has similarities, differs from others and it is not just then that you have style but always there is style in you and all beings in this world that is often subconsciously intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate and is so well denied that they now accept their style and cannot see there is style that is not free but requires energy and force to fabricate.
If you are constantly using force to prolong, change speed and loudness and you are totally unaware you do so, aren’t you a great fool who does not know what he is doing (prolonging, changing speed and loudness) especially when this is the infallible source to your stress, restlessness and distraction?
Because style is constant in the postures, motion and speech of all ordinary people and it is the inalienable source of insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction they must suffer from, style is intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate, anyone who is not conscious he has style and he intends to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate is a great fool who does not know what he is saying or doing and does not know he is setting himself up for mad perception, mad logic, mad emotions, mad rote behavior, mad violence, mad stress, restlessness and distraction that will end in everlasting perdition not heaven.
Not worthy of Jesus:
Jesus spoke about people being worthy of him.
Anyone who has style that constantly unnecessarily stresses, make restless and distracts himself and all others who come into contact with him cannot be worthy of Jesus except in his delusion that he nevertheless is.
If you are not worthy of Jesus you must wander alone in your stylish ‘individual’ way even for another eternity.
Defining Meaning & Purpose:
All words have meaning.
Words like ‘must’, ‘the’, ‘sure’, ‘never’, etc have specific meaning that can be understood and be used to convey specific messages to others.
Purpose is merely the intention of whatever you say or do and that can include your style of your speech or action or your pose.
Even though you are often unaware (so well denied or accustomed is it), there must be some purpose in your appreciable style otherwise you are mad. The purpose of their style which they never state or declare to themselves and others is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others.
DO YOU EVER DECLARE TO OTHERS THAT THE PURPOSE OF WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SAY IS TO IMPRESS YOU OR PLEASE YOU WHICHEVER THE CASE MAY BE. IF YOU ARE INTENDING TO IMPRESS AND YOU DID NOT DECLARE IT, AREN’T YOU A HYPOCRITE WHO NEVER SAY WHAT HE MEANS, NEVER SAYS “I MEAN TO IMPRESS WITH HOW AND EVEN WHAT I SAY”.
Even the president has to please others:

Whoever you are it cannot be that you enjoy having to turn around to smile and wave to say goodbye before you board the plane but it is all orchestrated as he and his wife has done so many times before in remarkably similar fashion and it is intended to please others.
You can deny that you are not pleasing others, you are genuinely wishing others goodbye but the truth if you are forcing yourself can be objectively known. The fact that you cannot see that you are pleasing others, you think you are genuine reflects how false your perception that will end in mad perception will be.
It is always a urge and a ritual to turn around to wave and say goodbye that becomes increasingly maddening with frequent forcing and will end in mad urge to wave, smile and say goodbye.
Does Bush tell you “I intend to please you by turning around to smile and wave?” or does he believe with emotion that he really means to wave and say goodbye?
Increasingly Human Like Robots:

Recently I saw a robot clad in the form of a boy rolling about restlessly on a mat just like little boys do. The above is a picture of a robot that seems to express surprise or being ‘stunned’.
It is not possible that a robot knows what it is doing but it is merely expressing what it has been programmed to express that may appear to be appropriate to the situation at hand so that it appears alive but there is no life nor consciousness in it, it is all a fake or deception.
RATHER THAN INDICATING THAT LIFE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A COLLECTION OF BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES THAT A MERE ROBOT WITH SOPHISTICATED COMPUTING POWER AND ACTUATORS CAN MIMICK AND THEREFORE LIFE HAS NO EVERLASTING MEANING OR CONSEQUENCES IN TERMS OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND LIFE AFTER DEATH WHAT SUCH INCREASINGLY LIFE-LIKE ROBOTS ARE TELLING US IS THAT HUMANS ARE NO MORE THAN SOPHISTICATED ROBOTS WHOSE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF SPEECH CAN BE PRODUCED WITHOUT NEED FOR CONSCIOUSNESS OR AWARENESS BY MINDLESS REGURGITATION FROM A FAR MORE SOPHISTICATED MENTAL JUKEBOX WITH THE DIFFERENCE THAT IN HUMANS THERE IS CONSCIOUSNESS THAT MERELY ACTS AS AN OBSERVER, EXPERIENCER AND INSTRUCTOR WHO NEVER CARRIES OUT LIVE SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION SPEECH OR ACTION. IN OTHER WORDS, SUCH ‘WONDROUS’ ROBOTS SHOW THAT YOU NEED NOT BE A HUMAN TO DO WHAT MOST PEOPLE USUALLY OR ALWAYS DO OR SAY, A PREPROGRAMMED ROBOT THAT HAS A CAPACITY TO PERCEIVE IN SIGHT AND SOUND RELEVANT DATA (EG PRESENCE OF OBSTRUCTIONS) AND HAVE PROGRAMS THAT TELL IT WHAT TO DO OR SAY WHEN THEY DETECT CERTAIN PATTERNS OF CUES CAN ACTIVATE ACTUATORS THAT CARRY OUT THE INSTRUCTIONS IN A WAY THAT DECEIVE OBSERVERS TO THINK IT IS A LIVE INTELLIGENT SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION RESPONSE WHEN IT IS A STANDARD MINDLESS LIFELESS INFLEXIBLE RESPONSE.
True and false logic:
It is false logic (that will end in mad logic) if you think because robots can imitate the actions of humans, there is no everlasting meaning to life, there is no life after death and life is just the result entirely of biochemical processes because you are not justified to conclude thus because there is a critical difference between humans and robots in that humans have consciousness, robots never have consciousness.
It is true logic to instead conclude that the increasingly ‘uncannily’ human like robots indicate that the origin or source of the substance and style speech, motion and postures of humans can be similarly preprogrammed or reproduced from memory to fit the current situation, humans are faking it, faking they are behaving specific to the occasion when they are rehashing stale from memory the same old things they say or do to meet demands of the situations and they feel stumped or flustered when they meet a situation they have not met before like a girl who has learnt only how to flirt but not to perform in bed and she cannot perform in bed if there is no program in her mind to tell her how to do so. Rather than the person’s consciousness being the mindful perceiver and initiator of speech and actions specific to the occasion, in ordinary people their consciousness is merely an observer, a conniver that approves of what is going on and it merely acts as the disc jockey as to what track to play for the occasion.
Can robots experience pain?
If I chop your hand off, do you experience excruciating pain that may cause you to become hysterical and faint?
If you chop off a robot’s hand, does it experience pain?
You can program a robot to imitate but can a robot truly experience pain?
You can program a robot to fake it is experiencing anger, hate, disgust, lust or greed but can you program it to experience anger, hate, lust or greed as you can?
Therefore there may be crucial differences between beings and robots and you are not justified to say because robots behave increasing like humans, life is nothing more than the result of biochemistry.
However, you are entitled to conclude that humans may be behaving like robots because robots can do the same things human do.
The right & wrong conclusions:
Although robots with increasingly sophisticated sensors, programs of what it should activate when it detects certain patterns in its sensors and actuators that can carry out sophisticated tasks that are remarkably human like, it is false logic to conclude that it means that existence as a being can be explained entirely by scientific laws. The reason is because beings have awareness that robots never have, beings can feel pain and emotions where robots cannot.
What you can conclude in the face of increasingly sophisticated robots is that it does not take human beings to say or do the things in the same styles ordinary people usually do, a robot can do the same thing with the same style and therefore all the people you see around may be merely overrated disc jockeys who are faking they are present and instead they are constantly rehashing the substance and style of what they want to say or do that is prerecorded standard and passed on deceitfully as live specific to the occasion.
BECAUSE ROBOTS CAN INCREASINGLY DO THE THINGS HUMANS DO AND ROBOTS HAVE NO CONSCIOUSNESS, IT SUGGESTS THAT ‘MARVELLOUS’ HUMAN SPEECH AND ACTION MAY ALSO BE SIMILARLY ROBOTIC, REACTIVATIONS OF OLD RECORDINGS THAT ARE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO THE SITUATION AT HAND BUT OTHERS MAY FIND WANTING. UNDER MOST CIRCUMSTANCES THIS CLEVER REHASHED FAKES MAY ESCAPE DETECTION BUT IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS WHEN THE ROBOTIC PERSON IS TIRED, STRESSED OR DISTRACTED, HE MAY CUE IN SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT ARE CLEARLY ODD BUT ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO ARE THEMSELVES ROBOTS NEVER REALIZE IS BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE’S SPEECH AND ACTIONS ARE ALWAYS CLEVER FAKES, CLEVER REHASHES OF STANDARD RECORDINGS OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO.
All About Force:
Style which is universally present constantly in beings in this world is all about force and nothing to do with reason; style is nothing more than the audible or visible results of using force to stretch or prolong, change direction, speed and strength of force and the purpose of style (to impress, please, dominate and intimidate) are similarly all about stirring the mental force of the target.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in speed and strength in way that makes him attracted to you as a result of what you say or do, he likes you or is impressed by you.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in speed and strength in way that makes him attracted to what you say or did that flatters him, he is pleased or likes what you say or do to him.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in a way by the (angry) way you say or did it that makes him fearful, he is intimidated by your style.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in a way by the forceful way you say or did it that makes him submissive, he is dominated by your style.
THUS STYLE THAT IS EVIDENT IN THE POSTURES, MOTION AND SPEECH IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE AUDIO AND VISUAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE USE OF FORCE BY THAT PERSON AND THIS CAN BE DEFINED AS THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE DIRECTION (WHERE POSSIBLE), SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND THE INTENTION OF STYLE THAT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS TOO ARE SIMILARLY NOTHING MORE THAN A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IN THE RECIPIENT TO LIKE, DISLIKE OR BE FEARFUL THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MEANING.
WHETHER A PERSON HAS STYLE OR NOT IS NOT A SUBJECTIVE BUT AN OBJECTIVE DIAGNOSIS. AS LONG AS THERE IS PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE POSES, MOTION AND SPEECH OF THAT PERSON, HE HAS STYLE AND MUST BE BEHAVING BY ROTE, BY REHASH FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PRODUCE HIS BRAND OF STYLE SO CONSISTENTLY EACH TIME IF IT WAS FRESHLY COMPOSED ANEW EACH TIME.
THE FACT THAT YOU ARE UNSURE IF THERE IS STYLE IN YOU AND OTHERS OR YOU CANNOT SEE STYLE IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS WHEN IT IS PRESENT REFLECTS A LACK OF DISCERNMENT OR ABILITY TO SEE THINGS AS THEY ARE ACTUALLY PRESENT AND IT IS MORE AGONIZING TO BEHAVE IN A WAY WITH STYLE THAT CAUSES INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND BE UNABLE TO SEE YOURSELF DOING SO AND THEREFORE NOT SEE A WAY OUT OF YOUR PREDICAMENT. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO EXTRICATE YOURSELF FROM SUFFERING IF YOU CANNOT SEE HOW YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR SUFFERING.
ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE, WHETHER HE CAN SEE OR NOT, MUST BE BEHAVING BY ROTE AS A ROBOT FAKING LIVE OR GENUINE BEHAVIOR AND HE IS IN DANGER OF MAD STRESS, MAD RESTLESSNESS, MAD DISTRACTION, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD PERCEPTION, MAD LOGIC, MAD EMOTIONS & MAD VIOLENCE THAT CAN ARISE SUDDENLY OUT OF PROPORTION TO PROVOCATION.
For one who sees rightly, all ordinary people have styles and they are therefore functioning as robots faking live speech and motion when their speech and motion are all regurgitated from memory from a mental jukebox that is far superior to any robot humans can device at the moment.
If you are a man of style you are a man of force that has nothing to do with reason and therefore you are not a man of reason but an irrational man of force suffering now, ever conditioning yourself to suffering that will end in loss of control and the weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Courting Insanity:

Whether you are putting on a show to please and impress others is never something I accuse someone and he can refute but it can be objectively determined.
I say that even though he may not be aware, the Dalai Lama is forcing himself to do the things he is doing (smiling and acting interested or friendly) in the name of pleasing others and the others in the picture too are forcing themselves to act friendly, never genuinely friendly.
If you insist they are being themselves, being genuine then you may be right or you have no eye for the truth and if that means suffering now and later, then this is your lot.
The Dalai Lama is using force to force himself to smile and be nice generating conflict in himself that can only be controlled but becomes increasingly malignant with age (mental degradation from abuse) and will lapse into insanity of some form just as Mother Theresa too had bouts of insanity in her latter years for which she was subject to exorcism.
WHOEVER YOU ARE, THIS IS AN UNIVERSAL LAW, IF YOU MUST HAVE STYLE (AS ALL ABOVE MANIFEST), YOU MUST EXIST AS A ROBOT DISHING OUT FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX THAN A LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION PERSON, YOU MUST BE CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, YOU MUST EXPERIENCE REGULAR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) THAT YOU CAN NOW STILL PUSH BACK BUT WILL LATER ENGULF YOU BEYOND YOUR CAPACITY TO SHRUG OFF TO BECOME MAD WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, MAD PERCEPTION, MAD LOGIC, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD EMOTIONS AND MAD VIOLENCE.
(What the Dalai Lama is doing is called lying to himself and others that is neither good for himself or others and the fact that he and you cannot see it makes it even worse.)
Everyone will get what he wants:
Everyone will get what he wants. The problem is that people think they want happiness and peace but in truth they want forcefulness, like and dislike, emotions and style that is a surefire recipe for stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate in themselves and their victims, those who interact with them.
THUS IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY WILLING YOURSELF TO BE STRESSED, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED BY THE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN DIRECTION, SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN YOUR PERCEPTIONS, THOUGHTS, SPEECH AND MOTION THEN YOUR DESIRE WILL BE GRANTED AND YOU WILL GET ALL THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION YOUR HEART DESIRES FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY.
IS IT POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHOSE CONDUCT INDUCES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THOSE WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH HIM, EVEN IF HE DENIES IT OR INSIST IT IS GOOD FOR HIM AND OTHERS TO GO TO HEAVEN THAT WILL NOT BE HEAVEN IF IT IS FULL OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AS IT IS HERE?
YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT:
Quote Headline: I owe it to good diet, says senior“You are what you eat. I only eat when I am hungry and stop before I am full.Comment: If you attribute your good health or longevity to your good diet when there may be other factors, you are presumptuous and flirting with false perception that will end in mad perception. A wise person only makes conclusions that he is certain. How can he be certain his good health or longevity is due to his good diet? What is a good diet to one expert is a bad diet to another and by preoccupying with your diet you are not heeding Jesus in not caring what you shall eat. By speaking publicly he is encouraging others to follow suit and if it leads them astray he is creating karma for himself.
You are certainly not what you eat, which is a sweeping statement to exaggerate the importance of food but what you eat will affect you mental and physical health. More important than food, what you will, say and do, the style (eg aggressive way) you do them determines your suffering now, when you age and pass away.
IF WHAT AND HOW YOU POSE, SAY AND DO THINGS ARE MORE IMPORTANT DETERMINANTS OF YOUR BODILY AND MENTAL HEALTH AND FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING AND YOU TELL OTHERS WHAT YOU EAT IS PARAMOUNT, IS THE ANSWER TO GOOD HEALTH THEN YOU ARE LEADING OTHERS ASTRAY. CAN AN EVIL MAN WHO IS ALWAYS ANGRY AND HATEFUL ASSURE LONG LIFE AND FREEDOM FROM DISEASE BY FASTIDIOUSLY WATCHING HIS DIET?
HOW DO YOU DETERMINE OBJECTIVELY WHEN YOU ARE HUNGRY AND WHEN TO STOP EATING BEFORE YOU ARE FULL?
ONLY EATING WHEN YOU ARE HUNGRY AND TO STOP EATING BEFORE FULL IS A FORM OF FAITH IN PRECEPTS AND RITUALS THAT HE IS FOOLISHLY ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO IMITATE (COPY) NOT EMULATE.
How I only make statements that I am certain of:
I say with certainty that stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness is the cause of the stress, restlessness and distraction that regularly beset all ordinary people (and will lead to insanity apart from poor health) because I can detect their presences in the speech of all ordinary people and I effortlessly experience freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction when I conscientiously practice not using force to stretch, change speed and loudness. If I were to imitate the ways people stretch, change speed and loudness I experience rising stress, restlessness and distraction.
Therefore I am certain that stretching, changing speed and loudness leads to stress, restlessness and distraction.
In his case, how can he prove that his good diet is responsible for his good health and longevity?
(If you think you do not stretch syllables, change speed and loudness but you suffer from regular stress, restlessness and distraction or cannot concentrate, let me demonstrate the presence of constant not frequent stretching, changes of speed and loudness in your speech.)
Dalai Lama Warns Tibetan Culture Will Be Wiped Out:
It is unlikely if not impossible that the Dalai Lama does not experience emotional stirring when he speaks on the subject and therefore he has identity views with the Tibetan cause that may be partly because of his nationality and perhaps partly to please others because as the leader of Tibetans in exile he must be seen to be saying certain things.
Tibetan culture may perish but then this world too will perish as the dinosaurs did in the past, and far sooner than people concede, as described by Jesus and most people will perish too when they die, so what is the fuss about Tibetans perishing?
IT IS A VERIFIABLE CERTAINTY THAT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS PRESENT IN THE SPEECH OF ALL PEOPLE HERE (INCLUDING THE DALAI LAMA AND POPE) IS THE CAUSE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT BESET THEM THAT DRIVES THEM TO IRRATIONAL AND DESTRUCTIVE ACTS. SO WHY HAVEN’T ANY OF THE RELIGIOUS LEADERS AWAKEN TO THEIR OWN FOLLIES AND POINT IT OUT TO OTHERS THE CAUSE OF THEIR SUFFERING THAT WILL MEANINGFULLY REDUCE THE ENDEMIC GLOBAL STRESS THAT WILL THEN TRANSLATE TO LESS VIOLENCE AND MORE TOLERANCE?

Neither Perceiving Nor Not Perceiving

The Buddha spoke of the sphere or realm of neither perceiving nor not perceiving that is likely difficult for doubting or incredulous emotional minds to make sense of.
Just as positive always coexists with negative and if positive does not exist, negative also does not exist, if it is possible for a physical state to occur wherein there is nothing positive, then negative also does not or cannot exist in that state, in the same way if perceiving is committing one to certain perceptions it necessitates one neglects or not perceive other coexisting perceptions, then if it is possible for a more fundamental state of existence wherein one does not perceive anything at all then not perceiving anything at all also does not exists in that state.
Just as it is impossible to only like without disliking, a person who likes must also dislike but it is possible to both neither like and dislike because liking and disliking are not mandatory conditions of existence but they are optional coexisting conditions of existence that are constantly often unwittingly exercised by beings in this world wherein the person's mental force is constantly stirring in speed and strength; liking is merely the stirring in speed and strength of one's mental force of going against self under the control of one's force of self preservation and dislike is the stirring in speed and strength of one's force of going against self out of control by one's force of self preservation, in the same way it is impossible to perceive some things without at the same time not perceive other things but it is possible to neither perceive some things and not perceive other things because perceiving and not perceiving are not mandatory conditions of existence but they are optional concomitant conditions of existence constantly exercised by beings in this world wherein the act of perceiving some things necessitate the non perception of other things and there is a more fundamental state of existence wherein one neither perceives and therefore also not perceive that beings trapped in the lower realms have never known or imagine is possible, that cannot be adequately understood because it is more fundamental than thinking or reasoning or precedes thinking. Just as however you describe the taste of water in many ways but it cannot compare with the person tasting it himself, in the same way, the realm of neither perceiving nor not perceiving eludes adequate description because it is more fundamental or precedes the thought processes.

AT LEAST WHEN THEY ARE CONSCIOUS, BEINGS HERE ARE ALWAYS PERCEIVING SOME THINGS TO THE EXCLUSION OF OTHER THINGS, THEY HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED THE STATE WHEREIN THEY ARE CONSCIOUS BUT NOT PERCEIVING ANYTHING AT ALL AND THEREFORE NOT EXCLUDING THE PERCEPTION OF OTHER THINGS AT ALL.

THUS PERCEIVING AND NON PERCEIVING ARE LIKE TWINS OR LIKE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE THAT COEXIST. AS SOON AS YOU PERCEIVE, YOU HAVE COMMITTED YOURSELF AND YOU MUST ALSO NOT PERCEIVE OTHER THINGS BUT THERE IS A MORE FUNDAMENTAL STATE OF EXISTENCE WHICH ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS MORE SATISFACTORY WHEREIN ONE DOES NOT PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE.

ORDINARY PEOPLE DO NOT JUST CONSTANTLY THINK BUT THEY CONSTANTLY THINK WITH FORCEFUL PROLONGATION OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE NOT REALIZING THAT (THOUGH NEVER SEEN IN THIS WORLD) IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST BY MERELY SEEING OR HEARING TO EITHER DO OR NOT DO WITHOUT NEED FOR THINKING WHICH IS OFTEN FRIVOLOUS AND UNRELATED OR DISTRACT FROM THE TASK AT HAND AND UNDERMINES RATHER THAN ENHANCE SAVORING THE MOMENT. JUST AS THEY ARE UNAWARE IT IS MORE BLISSFUL TO EXIST JUST PERCEIVING TO DO OR NOT DO WITHOUT THINKING, THEY DO NOT REALIZE THERE IS A SUPERIOR STATE OF EXISTENCE POSSIBLE WHERE ONE NEITHER PERCEIVES NOR NOT PERCEIVES.

JUST AS BOTH LIKING AND DISLIKING EXERT FORCE THAT IS CONSTANTLY CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH ON THE MIND TO CREATE INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND NOT TO LIKE NOR DISLIKE THAT APPLIES NO FORCE IS A SUPERIOR STATE OF THE MIND, IN THE SAME WAY, PERCEIVING COMMITS AND RESTRICTS THE CONSCIOUSNESS AND NOT TO PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE IS A SUPERIOR UNRESTRICTED STATE OF THE MIND.

TO NEITHER PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE CANNOT OCCUR WHEN ONE IS ENGAGED WITH THE EXTERNAL WORLD THAT COMPELS ONE PERCEIVE CERTAIN THINGS AND THEREFORE NOT PERCEIVE OTHER THINGS AND IT CAN ONLY OCCUR IN THE UPPER REACHES OF THE MEDITATION. IF THE MEDITATIVE STATE OF NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NON-PERCEIVING EXISTS AND IS A FAR SUPERIOR AND EVERLASTING STATE OF EXISTENCE THAN MUNDANE EXISTENCE HERE, THEN WHOEVER DECLINES TO MEDITATE OR DEPRECATES MEDITATION DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DEPRIVING HIMSELF AND WILL REGRET AFTERWARDS AS THE BUDDHA SAID.
Emotions, Moods & Fear:
People are often not even aware they are expressing like or dislike let alone they are aware they are constantly experiencing like or dislike. For instance when they complain about the noise, they are expressing dislike that they are experiencing. Thus they severely underestimate the liking and disliking; often distracted they are unaware they are disliking or liking especially when their liking and disliking are of milder intensities. Just as they are unaware that their liking and disliking are constant and alternating, they are unaware that their liking and disliking are the results of the only two possible mutually exclusive ways with which their mental forces of going against self can stir in speed and strength, namely under or out of control of their forces of self preservation.

It is possible to exist without liking nor disliking because it is possible to exist without stirring one's mental force of going against self. If one's mental force does not stir in speed and strength to whatever is happening then one neither likes nor dislikes.

When you are experiencing excitement, thrilled, delighted, greed, lust, envy, pride, eagerness you are experiencing liking.

When you are experiencing disappointment, disgust, irritation, anger, hate, jealousy, sadness or shame you are experiencing dislike.
All the emotions are derived from like and dislike and is nothing more than like or dislike dressed up in fancy clothes for the occasion. For instance greed is like for money or material possessions whilst lust is like for sexual objects. Envy is like for someone as a result of his characteristics like wealth or handsomeness or charm whilst jealousy is dislike for the same person for the same reasons. Pride is like for self. Excitement or thrill is like for something happening. Hate is merely anger focused on a target that is diffused or not well focused.
FEAR is the only emotion that is perpetrated by the force of self preservation. Because all the being’s usual activities are driven by his force of going against self in the name of self interest, should a situation arises that threatens, his force of going against self deserts him or rapidly diminish in strength permitting his now unopposed force of self preservation to rise rapidly in speed and strength to pull the being away from activities that harms him or puts him at risk. Thus fear always pulls the being away or withdraws whilst his force of going against self normally drives him to perceive, think, say or do things that actually harms him, stresses him in the name of deceiving, impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others.
Moods (eg ebullient, sad, uncertain or foul or bad moods) are merely false conditioned prolonged stable emotional states and anyone vulnerable to moods is an emotional person who not only suffers as a result but is conditioning or warping and degrading his mind in the process.
(The Buddha said the person who preaches from the teachings and discipline declared by him is rare. Name me one person in the past or today who has preached as I have from the teaching and discipline declared by the Buddha. I may be unique in preaching from the teaching and discipline declared by the Buddha.)
Why It Is Necessary To Meditate:
It is impossible for something that is necessary or meaningful to occur all the time but what is necessary or meaningful needs reason to occur and can only occur some of the time when there is reason for it to occur.
It is impossible that it is necessary for people to do and say things and think all the time because if their thinking, speaking and motion is necessary or meaningful they need reason to occur and therefore cannot happen all the time. Because it is not possible that you should need to think, speak and do things all the time, it is possible for them to set aside some time each day to meditate or familiarize themselves with not thinking, not speaking and doing things that is not possible in the course of the day because the constant forceful prolonging, changes in speed and strength of force in their perceiving, thinking, speak and doing together with the incessant bombardment of the same by others prevent them from experiencing genuine rest of their bodies, speech and thoughts.
Meditation is essentially setting aside some time each day to isolate oneself from the harmful influences of others, to allow one’s body and mind some much needed rest and if one is consummate it may lead to even a cessation of thought and even higher.
If you cannot stay still, not speak and think for any extended periods of time when alone by yourself what more should you expect you can remain calm and unperturbed when challenged by others in daily life?
If you don’t meditate you are heading for madness:
If people pay attention to their minds and bodies, they are ceaselessly thinking in a forceful prolonging, changing speed and loudness manner and their bodies are always active either fidgeting or shaking their legs or drumming their fingers or twirling something, they often speak or mutter or grunt involuntarily or cough.
Thus if they do not devote some time each day to address this conditioning ceaseless activities of their minds, bodies and speech, they are heading for loss of control and madness. With continued conditioning to ceaseless activities their urge to do so become more intense and harder to negate.
SO YOU THINK YOU ARE CAPABLE OF STILLNESS OF BODY, SPEECH AND THOUGHT IN DAILY LIFE? THAT MAY TRUE OR YOU ARE KIDDING YOURSELF. OBSERVE YOURSELF FOR MEANINGLESS MOVEMENTS & ACTIVITIES (SHUFFLING FEET WHEN TALKING TO ANOTHER, TURN YOUR HEAD AND BODY EVERY NOW AND THEN, SHAKING LEG, TAPPING FINGERS, TWIRLING LOCK OF HAIR, BREAKING OUT IN SPEECH BY YOURSELF, GRUMBLING TO YOURSELF APART FROM THE CONSTANT STREAM OF THOUGHTS THAT ARE OFTEN FRIVOLOUS) AND YOU MAY REALIZE YOU ARE RESTLESS OR WITHOUT REST NOT RESTFUL OR FULL OF REST.
She Likes You?

You may be a great fool if you think she likes you because she is smiling in a dazed manner that is a rehash of the way she usually smiles that differs from others to please you or impress you and she is actually suffering even to tormenting levels that she conceals from others. You can make a case she is close to tears in her smile. Her eyes are vacant or lost in a daze and she is headed for loss of control and madness.
IF SOMEONE IS SMILING TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS YOU AND YOU THINK SHE LIKES YOU, ISN’T THAT A BIG MISTAKE? IF YOU ARE SMILING TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS AND YOU THINK YOU LIKE OTHERS, AREN’T YOU MAKING A GREAT MISTAKE, DECEIVING YOURSELF?
How To Tell If Someone Is Smiling Because He Likes You:
If you like to like and like others to like you, it is important that you are able to tell whether someone is smiling because she genuinely likes you or she is smiling because she is trying to please you (fake that she likes you) or impress you (wants you to like her) not least for the reason that it can be a waste of effort and embarrassing to show your hand or declare your liking for her and find out she is not interested in you.

A person who likes someone or something must be focusing her attention on that person or thing and just as it is impossible for a person to focus on more than one object at a time, it is impossible for a person to like or be attracted to more than one person at a time.
Therefore if a person is smiling because she likes you her eyes (and face) must be focused on you (pupils even dilated) as she smiles to you. If her eyes and face are directed elsewhere whilst she is smiling it is unlikely if not impossible that she is smiling because she likes you but instead she is putting on a show to please or impress or both.
Her eyes above are not focused and appear as if in a daze, scattered and therefore she is putting on a show, not liking you or anyone.
A Smile Of Mischief:

If you think she is smiling because she likes you, you may be making a grave mistake or barking up the wrong tree. This is a smile of mischief to provoke you to join in.
Thus people smile for many reasons, sometimes even madly for no reason at all because they have a sudden urge to smile. They also smile to deny, when someone or something hurts them, they smile to deny they are hurt.
In the case below she is likely smiling to both please others and impress them and that is practicing conflict because no matter how she represses or denies, she is vaguely she is trying to both please and impress and that is trying to do two things at once that is confusing and lead to conflict not just in her but her audience who have to contend with uncertainty as to her intent in smiling.

When a girl likes a diamond ring or dress, she will frequently look at it at all angles and smile and make restless movements of her body fondling the ring or dress.
When a man likes a girl, he will keep looking at a photo of her and smile and perhaps even draw a deep breath.
When a man likes his new car he will look at his car often and he may approach his car the first thing in the morning and inspect every nook and cranny.
THEREFORE WHEN A PERSON IS SMILING AT YOU BECAUSE SHE LIKES YOU, SHE MUST BE LOOKING AT YOU NOT LOOKING ELSEWHERE OR NOWHERE IN PARTICULAR WHILST SHE IS SMILING AND THERE MAY BE RESTLESS MOVEMENTS OF HER BODY TO SUGGEST ATTRACTION. IF SHE IS LOOKING ELSEWHERE WHILST SHE IS SMILING SHE CANNOT BE VERY INTERESTED IN YOU.
BECAUSE PEOPLE SMILE FOR MANY REASONS APART FROM LIKING, THEY SMILE IN MISCHIEF OR APPRECIATION OF FALSITY, TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS, TO DENY THEY ARE HURT, NO ONE HAS A RIGHT TO CENSURE ME FOR CRITICIZING SMILING.
Perceiving Is A Handicap Not Advantage:
Ordinary people have the wrong view or delusion that perceiving in sight, sound, smell, taste and touch is desirable and an advantage when it is actually a compromise, a severe restriction whose disadvantages far outweigh its advantages.
At any moment, what you are perceiving in sight, sound, touch, smell and taste compared to what you are not perceiving but is simultaneously happening not just in your immediate surrounds but neighborhood, city, country and this earth is like a mere drop compared to the ocean.
Therefore rather than a vista, perceiving is a handicap, restrictive, it means that at any moment in return for the pittance or few drops you perceive, what you do not perceive is like an ocean. Thus if it is possible for you exist in a realm where you do not perceive nor not perceive, something that beings trapped in this world & trapped in constant perception have never imagined is possible let alone experienced (but the Buddha tells you it is possible and is superior to perceiving), rather than empty boring vacuity, it may be an incomparably superior and therefore higher realm to exist.
Existing in constant perceiving that also necessitate constant not perceiving many other things possible can be compared to existing in a flat two dimensional world like that of a table top. Beings trapped in this two dimensional world are free to move about in the surface of the table, can see 360 degrees in all directions but cannot elevate or lower themselves to see from above or below the plane of the table. They can only see their immediate surrounds but not what lies further afield in all directions. Therefore their perception is serious restricted. What they do not realize is that it is possible to rise above or descend below the plane of the table so that they get a very different and total view of all that is present and happening in the table.
Suppose there is a sphere or realm that can be accessed through the higher reaches of meditation where one neither perceives nor not perceive as the Buddha described and it is thus possible for that being to see all that is on the table at any given moment rather than being restricted to seeing what is in his immediate surrounds as he moves along on the plane of the table, isn’t this what we may term as ‘neither perceiving nor not perceiving’ not boring or empty but incomparably superior than perceiving and not perceiving?
And the view from on top of the table is never the same as the view within the table where you only see the side of an object that faces you and you have to go around to see the other sides of that object but viewing on top you can see all sides of that same object.
COMPARED TO NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING, PERCEIVING THE LITTLE AND SIMULTANEOUSLY ALSO NOT PERCEIVING THE VAST MAJORITY POTENTIALLY PERCEIVABLE MAY BE A SEVERE HANDICAP THAN ADVANTAGE THAT FOOLS TRAPPED IN THE LOWER REALMS FIND SO CAPTIVATING. IN ORDER THAT YOU PERCEIVE THE FEW THINGS THAT YOU DESIRE TO PERCEIVE, YOU MUST SACRIFICE IN NOT PERCEIVING THE MANY OTHER THINGS EXISTING THAT CAN BE PERCEIVED.
WHAT YOU SEE FROM ABOVE THE PLANE OF THE TABLE IS NOT THE SAME BUT SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT YOU SEE WITHIN THE PLANE OF THE TABLE. WHEREAS FROM ABOVE YOU SEE A MAP OF ALL THAT LIES ON THE TABLE, ON THE TABLE YOU SEE ONLY THE LEADING EDGES OF OBJECTS AT VARYING DISTANCE FROM YOU. THEREFORE IF SEEING WITHIN THE TABLE THAT CAN ONLY BE FACING EDGES OF OBJECTS AT VARYING DISTANCE FROM YOU IS CALLED PERCEIVING AND NOT PERCEIVING THEN SEEING FROM ABOVE THAT IS SEEING A MAP OF EVERYTHING THAT LIES ON THE TABLE CAN BE CALLED NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING.
BY IMMERSING YOURSELF IN THE AFFAIRS OF THIS WORLD AND REFUSING TO DEVOTE SOME TIME TO MEDITATE TO FIRST SANITIZE YOUR MIND OF SINS, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND CULTIVATE CONCENTRATION AND EQUANIMITY (NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE) YOU ARE DEPRIVING YOURSELF OF THE INCOMPARABLE BLISS OF EXISTING FIRST WITHOUT THE CURSE OF CONSTANT THOUGHT PROGRESSING TO EXISTING WITHOUT THE CURSE OF CONSTANT PERCEIVING AND NOT PERCEIVING THENCE TO THE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE OF NO-THINGNESS. WOULD YOU NOT FALL INTO DEEP REGRET IF SUCH SUPERIOR STATES OF EXISTENCE ARE POSSIBLE AND YOU MISSED OUT ALL BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO MEDITATE OR ARE PREJUDICED AGAINST MEDITATION? WHAT REASONS HAVE YOU AGAINST MEDITATION WHEN YOU HAVE NOT GIVEN IT A REASONABLE TRIAL? IF YOU HAVE NOT YOU ARE UNRIGHTEOUS AND PREJUDICED, A QUALITY THAT DOES NOT LEAD TO HEAVEN BUT SUFFERING.
Neither perceiving nor not perceiving:
If ‘perceiving’ is seeing what is happening around you and ‘not perceiving’ is not seeing what is happening not just around you but everywhere else far beyond you and ‘neither perceiving nor not perceiving’ is seeing everything that is happening not just in the vicinity but far beyond from an elevated perch, then both ‘perceiving and not perceiving’ and ‘neither perceiving nor not perceiving’ exist and the latter is incomparably superior.
Where Have All The Fish Gone?
It reflects mankind’s pretense and denial that they are not alarmed by scientific and anecdotal reports of the progressive decline in fish stocks not just in Malaysia but all over the world.
Fishermen in Malaysia have reported dwindling catches of fishes that are not as big as they used to be.
Do you think this decline will stabilize and all will be well or there will be a sudden spontaneous recovery in fish stocks or do you think the decline in fish stocks is the result of mankind’s heedless excessive plunder of the sea that will lead to not just extinction and famine but because the fish are there not just as food for mankind but as important links in the food chain, a collapse of the food chain and destabilizing of the ecosystem and mass extinction of many other species?
Thus mankind who thinks he is a wonderful husband may be sowing the seeds of mass extinction that will end in his own doom.
Jesus said at the close of the Age there will be famine, earthquakes in many places and nation will rise against nation. We may be approaching the point where the earth can no longer sustain life and there will be suffering never before seen since the foundation of the earth:
Where have the fishes gone?
By LOONG MENG YEE, EDDIE CHUA and NIK KHUSAIRI IBRAHIM
KUALA SELANGOR: Fisherman Koh Har Tiong loved the sea for various reasons – the fresh breeze and its vastness. He also loved it for the bountiful fish it provided.
That was 10 years ago.
Now, he is thankful if he can get 10 barrels of fish each time he goes out to sea, a far cry from the 30 barrels he used to haul in then.
And the blue seawater has now turned murky, grey, smelly and lifeless.
Not only is there less fish to catch, even the fish in his net are smaller.
Local freshwater and marine fish expert Prof Mohd Azmi Ambak said that in the last 50 years, some 20 species of freshwater fish had become extinct.
Local fishermen, he said, were finding it hard to catch once common and abundant species such as the red and golden snapper.
“Freshwater species such as seluang jalur emas, lias puteh, keli hutan and keli limbat as well as marine fish such as the telakai (short fin eel), ikan lelauh minyak (seven finger threadfin) and terubuk bengkalis can no longer be found in local rivers and seas,” he said.
Koh agreed that some fish had become rare and were no longer seen.
“An example is the lai liew har (mantis prawn). A decade ago, it was considered an inferior type of seafood and nobody bought them.
Why It Is Possible To Be All Seeing & Knowing:
As the Buddha said, there are things that are possible and things that are impossible and it may be in the nature of things that when their minds become pure, they can see and know all.
It is because it is possible for all beings to become awakened (his deputy, Moggalana was the Satan of one Age), when their minds become pure and concentrated they can know and see all. Just as all sons have resemblances with their fathers, similarly there must be similarities between the Father and all other beings that are either sons of light or darkness. Therefore just as the Father is all seeing and all knowing it is possible for all beings to become all seeing and knowing even if there will not be able to attain that for many life times.
Thus by selfishly perceiving the little of importance to you, you forfeit the perceiving of the infinitely many that is possible for any given moment you could have otherwise perceived had you not been detained in your narrow selfish perceptions.
Therefore if you did not selfishly perceive the little that you are so enthralled with and accept as fait accompli, you will not forfeit the perception of the infinitely many that is possible for any given moment.
Thus there may be a sphere or realm wherein one neither perceives nor not perceive that is higher than the realm wherein one always perceives the drop when conscious and not perceive the ocean of which that drop is a mere part of.
ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA, THE REALM OF THE CESSATION OF ALL PERCEPTIONS AND FEELINGS IS THE HIGHEST IN BLISS.
"Now, if someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure and joy that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is this pleasure? Here, quite secluded from sensual desires, secluded from unwholesome states of mind, a monk enters upon and abides in the first meditative absorption (jhana), which is accompanied by thought conception and discursive thinking and has in it joy and pleasure born of seclusion. This is the other kind of pleasure which surpasses that (sense) pleasure and is more sublime.
"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is that pleasure? Here, with the stilling of thought conception and discursive thinking...a monk enters upon and abides in the second meditative absorption...in the sphere of the infinity of space...of the infinity of consciousness ...of no-thingness...of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.
"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is this pleasure? Here, by completely surmounting the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, a monk enters upon and abides in the cessation of perception and feeling. This is the other kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime.[3]
A Cute Kitten:

Although not overt, there is an expression on the kitten’s face, not no expression. If she had no expressions she would not be a kitten but an angel.
There is a mild forceful stare of apprehension (fear) but she is not resisting or struggling that is an expression of dislike or excited as when animals rush to food being served, an expression of like.
It is my hand holding it and if you are discerning, you will realize that each person holds an object with a stereotypical posture that often can be used to identify the person if you know him well. There is no style to show off, no excessive force in my grasp.
Notice this kitten is well formed, pretty with no blemishes on her face, the symmetry of the patterns on her coat and all her legs are white. She is the only offspring of a cat that is very protective of her and very attached to me and may be an incarnation of my departed sister (the cat not the kitten). There is another female cat that may be my mother because it is unusually attached to me apart from many other signs. Very few people go to heaven according to the Buddha and I can see a lot of people including my departed sister and mother have serious conduct defects that tells me is not the path to heaven. Even the man who calls his brother you fool is in danger of hell according to Jesus and you must be perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect. Most people will be deluding themselves if they think they are perfect as their Father in heaven is.
According to the Buddha, how pretty you are depends on your karma that is not to say that a lot of pretty girls are good. Many girls that are called pretty are ugly to me and they have artificially enhanced their ‘beauty’ to seduce others so that they are headed for decline.
"Master Gotama, what is the reason, what is the condition, why inferiority and superiority are met with among human beings, among mankind? For one meets with short-lived and long-lived people, sick and healthy people, ugly and handsome people, insignificant and influential people, poor and rich people, low-born and high-born people, stupid and wise people. What is the reason, what is the condition, why superiority and inferiority are met with among human beings, among mankind?"
3. "Student, beings are owners of kammas, heirs of kammas, they have kammas as their progenitor, kammas as their kin, kammas as their homing-place. It is kammas that differentiate beings according to inferiority and superiority."
4. "I do not understand the detailed meaning of Master Gotama's utterance spoken in brief without expounding the detailed meaning. It would be good if Master Gotama taught me the Dhamma so that I might understand the detailed meaning of Master Gotama's utterance spoken in brief without expounding the detailed meaning."
"Then listen, student, and heed well what I shall say."
"Even so, Master Gotama," Subha the student replied. The Blessed One said this:
5. "Here, student, some woman or man is a killer of living beings, murderous, bloody-handed, given to blows and violence, merciless to all living beings. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation, in an unhappy destination, in perdition, in hell. If, on the dissolution of the body, after death, instead of his reappearing in a state of deprivation, in an unhappy destination, in perdition, in hell, he comes to the human state, he is short-lived wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to short life, that is to say, to be a killer of living beings, murderous, bloody-handed, given to blows and violence, merciless to all living beings.
6. "But here some woman or man, having abandoned the killing of living beings, abstains from killing living beings, lays aside the rod and lays aside the knife, is considerate and merciful and dwells compassionate for the welfare of all living beings. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination, in the heavenly world. If, on the dissolution of the body, after death, instead of his reappearing in a happy destination, in the heavenly world, he comes to the human state, he is long-lived wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to long life, that is to say, to have abandoned the killing of living beings, to abstain from killing living beings, to lay aside the rod and lay aside the knife, to be considerate and merciful, and to dwell compassionate for the welfare of all living beings.
7. "Here, student, some woman or man is one who harms beings with his hands or with clods or with sticks or with knives. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is sickly wherever he is born. This is the way that leads to sickness, that is to say, to be one who harms beings with one's hands or with clods or with sticks or with knives.
8. "But here some woman or man is not one who harms beings with his hands, or with clods, or with sticks, or with knives. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is healthy wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to health, that is to say, not to be one who harms beings with his hands or with clods or with sticks or with knives.
9. "Here, student, some woman or man is angry, much given to rage; even when little is said, he is furious, angry, ill-disposed, resentful, he shows ill-temper, hate and surliness. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is ugly wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to ugliness, that is to say, to be furious, angry, ill-disposed, resentful, and to show ill-temper, hate and surliness.
10. "But here some woman or man is not angry or much given to rage; even when much is said, he is not furious, angry, ill-disposed, resentful, nor does he show ill-temper, hate or surliness. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is beautiful wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to beauty, that is to say, not to be angry or given to much rage; even when much is said, not to be furious, angry, ill-disposed or resentful, or to show ill-temper, hate or surliness.
11. "Here, student, some woman or man is envious; he envies, begrudges and harbors envy about others' gains, honor, veneration, respect, salutations and offerings. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is insignificant wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to insignificance, that is to say, to be envious, to envy, begrudge, and harbor envy about others' gain, honor, veneration, respect, salutations and offerings.
12. "But here some woman or man is not envious, he does not envy, begrudge or harbor envy about others' gain, honor, veneration, respect, salutations and offerings. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is influential wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to influence, that is to say, not to be envious, not to envy, begrudge or harbor envy about others' gain, honor, veneration, respect, salutations and offerings.
13. "Here, student, some woman or man is not a giver of food, drink, cloth, sandals, garlands, perfumes, unguents, bed, roof and lighting to monks or brahmins. Due to having performed and completed such kamma, on the dissolution of the body, after death he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is poor wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to poverty, that is to say, not to be a giver of food, drink, cloth, sandals, garlands, perfumes, unguents, bed, roof and lighting to monks and brahmins.
14. "But here some woman or man is a giver of food, drink, cloth, sandals, perfumes, unguents, bed, roof and lighting to monks and brahmins. Due to having performed and completed such kamma, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is rich wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to riches, that is to say, to be a giver of food, drink, cloth, sandals, garlands, perfumes, unguents, bed, roof and lighting to monks and brahmins.
15. "Here, student, some woman or man is obdurate and haughty; he does not pay homage to whom he should pay homage, or rise up for whom he should rise up, or give a seat to whom he should give a seat, or make way for whom he should make way, or worship him who should be worshipped, or respect him who should be respected, or revere him who should be revered, or honor him who should be honored. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he is low-born wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to low birth, that is to say, to be obdurate and haughty, not to pay homage to whom he should pay homage, nor rise up for..., nor give a seat to..., nor make way for..., nor worship..., nor respect..., nor revere..., nor honor him who should be honored.
16. "But here some woman or man is not obdurate or haughty; he pays homage to whom he should pay homage, rises up for whom he should rise up, gives a seat to whom he should give a seat, makes way for whom he should make way, worships him who should be worshipped, respects him who should be respected, reveres him who should be revered, honors him who should be honored. Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is high-born wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to high birth, that is to say, not to be obdurate or haughty, to pay homage to whom he should pay homage, to rise up for..., to give a seat to..., to make way for..., to worship...respect...revere...honor him who should be honored.
17. "Here, student, some woman or man when visiting a monk or brahmin, does not ask: 'What is wholesome, venerable sir? What is unwholesome? What is blamable? What is blameless? What should be cultivated? What should not be cultivated? What, by my doing it, will be long for my harm and suffering? Or what, by my doing it, will be long for my welfare and happiness?' Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a state of deprivation...If instead he comes to the human state, he will be stupid wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to stupidity, that is to say, when visiting a monk or brahmin, not to ask: 'What is profitable?...Or what, by my doing it, will be long for my welfare and happiness?'
18. "But here some woman or man when visiting a monk or brahmin, asks: 'What is profitable, venerable sir?...Or what, by my doing it, will be long for my welfare and happiness?' Due to having performed and completed such kammas, on the dissolution of the body, after death, he reappears in a happy destination...If instead he comes to the human state, he is wise wherever he is reborn. This is the way that leads to wisdom, that is to say, when visiting a monk or brahmin, to ask: 'What is profitable, venerable sir?...Or what, by my doing it, will be long for my welfare and happiness?'
19. "So, student, the way that leads to short life makes people short-lived, the way that leads to long life makes people long-lived; the way that leads to sickness makes people sick, the way that leads to health makes people healthy; the way that leads to ugliness makes people ugly, the way that leads to beauty makes people beautiful; the way that leads to insignificance makes people insignificant, the way that leads to influence makes people influential; the way that leads to poverty makes people poor, the way that leads to riches makes people rich; the way that leads to low birth makes people low-born, the way that leads to high birth makes people high-born; the way that leads to stupidity makes people stupid, the way that leads to wisdom makes people wise.
20. "Beings are owners of kammas, student, heirs of kammas, they have kammas as their progenitor, kammas as their kin, kammas as their homing-place. It is kammas that differentiate beings according to inferiority and superiority."
Never No Expression:
There is always an expression on the faces of ordinary people, never no expression. People are forcefully impassive, they use force that is evident in their stare and braced facial muscles when they are impassive whenever they are not expressing like (thrilled, excited, eager, smiling) or dislike (frown, grimace, glare).
Until they die when they usually become incontinent of urine, their faces never become flaccid or expressionless.
Expressions on their faces are part involuntary (automatic and unconscious) and part voluntary. Sometimes their smiles are purposely, sometimes involuntary.
Why are people’s faces always expressing?
The reason is because expressions are in truth unnecessary, only necessary for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others and whatever is unnecessary can happen any time because it does not need reason to happen and whatever can happen anytime can happen every time or all the time. And so it is that ordinary people are frequently forcing themselves to express themselves such that expressions which are unnecessary and can happen anytime now happens all the time.

Natural & Unnatural Beauty:
UNNATURAL BEAUTY IS BEAUTY THAT IS THE RESULT OF EFFORTS BY THE PERSON TO BEAUTIFY HIMSELF AND NATURAL BEAUTY IS WHAT IS UNADORNED BEAUTY.
Does the kitten above put make up, groom or perm her hair, put ribbons on it, apply lipstick or powder on it? If you agree it did not then her beauty is natural.
Do human females, even little girls put make up, groom or perm their hair, put ribbons, ear rings, necklaces and apply lipstick and powder on their faces? Do they learn to cavort or walk with sexy swaying of their hips and adopt seductive curvatures of their bodies? If you agree they do and these are fabricated or adopted then it is unnatural or artificial or faked beauty that is sinful and leads to future decline and woe.
Does the form and posture of my hand look ugly? Do I take skincare or eat health food to preserve my youth? Do I manicure my nails and apply varnish? Therefore even without any thought let alone action of enhancing my physical beauty, it is naturally attractive.
The Buddha said that the angels in heaven far exceed the beauty of human females, make human beauties look like monkeys with cauterized faces. So if you are attracted to beauty, heaven is the place to see the prettiest maidens.
Attachment to form and the formless of which the appreciation of beauty is a facet is a higher fetter to existence shared by beings here that is tainted by emotional possessiveness and not tainted by possessiveness in heavenly beings.
Ignorance, restlessness, conceit, attachment to form and the formless are higher fetters binding beings to continued existence whilst the lower fetters, self identity views, faith in rites and precepts, doubt and uncertainty, ill will and sensuality (emotional lust for forms, sounds, smells, tastes and touch) are the lower fetters binding one to the impure realms.
Jesus: "Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you shall eat or what you shall drink, nor about your body, what you shall put on (most ordinary people may be lying to themselves if they think they do not worry about their lives, etc. They do and that is not obeying Jesus with serious implications. This is not an option. If you are preoccupied with preserving your lives here you will be detained here in animal existence). Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? And which of you by being anxious can add one cubit to his span of life (anxiety is always suffering, emotional and conditioning and it is no use but harmful to worry about anything, not just your life because worrying has nothing to do with reality, serves no purpose but a conditioned state of your mind that leads to woe. Anyone who says that worry spurs you to find solutions is deluded. You mean you cannot find a solution, you are not better equipped to find a solution by being calm and clearly thinking, the opposite of worry?)? And why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin; yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is alive and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you, O men of little faith (the man of little faith is the man full of doubt and uncertainty as to what is true and false)? Therefore do not be anxious, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' (By complaining about their lack of bread on the boat, the disciples were not behaving according to what Jesus preached) For the Gentiles seek all these things; and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well.

"Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Let the day's own trouble be sufficient for the day.
If you were not anxious for your life here (and therefore in danger of perishing) you would not be concerned about doing blood tests, taking health food, avoiding unhealthy foods, putting make up, keep fit by obsessive exercising, wear fancy clothes and shoes, looking for the best places for the best foods.
It is actually a burden and additional suffering to be preoccupied with your life here and the reason why it is difficult for people to desist is because it is emotional and driven by force not passively by reason. Because after lifelong practice, there is considerable force and emotion backing their self preserving actions and they are indifferent, see nothing wrong or danger of perishing after they die, they are lackadaisical not to make the effort to efface ort scrub off the force or emotion or habit energy behind their irrational self preserving actions.
If it was reason that was behind their self preserving rituals, then it can be remedied instantly by the provision of knowledge where previously they had none because reason has no force, only emotion has force that is not conducive to reason and what is reasonable can be stopped instantly since there is no force or urge behind it that prevents it being stopped by the provision of knowledge.
ALL SINFUL CONDUCT THAT INCLUDES ANXIOUSNESS FOR ONE’S LIFE HERE AND ACTIONS TAKEN TO PRESERVE THEIR LIVES HERE THAT DIFFER FROM INDIVIDUAL TO INDIVIDUAL ARE NOT GUIDED BY FORCE FREE REASON BUT CONDUCTED MINDLESSLY BY ROTE BACKED BY FORCE, EMOTION AND HABIT ENERGY THAT IS DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO ERASE BECAUSE THE FOOLISH PERSON LACKS CONVICTION AND PERSISTENCE THAT IS NECESSARY TO BRING ABOUT A CHANGE IN HIS HABITS. HE THINKS HE WILL BE FINE, HE WILL ESCAPE SUFFERING WHEN HE AGES AND DIES.

How Many Times Do You Want To Impress Others?

A major purpose of posing, doing and saying things with style is to impress others.

If wanting to impress others is meaningful, surely posing or doing or saying something once or a few times suffices to impress others to get the message across?

Surely it is maddening, meaningless & endless to keep posing, saying and doing the same and many other very different things with the same purpose of impressing others?

Because impressing others takes energy and is stressful, restless and distracting, this endless insatiable pursuit of impressing others is like chasing after a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow that does not exist or much ado about nothing.

Because impressing others is forceful, driven by force than reason, it is addictive or mindlessly conditioning and the more times one has posed, said or done things to impress others the more one urges to impress in a mindless, irrational pursuit that will end with inevitable loss of control in uncontrollable torment.

Therefore posing, saying or doing things with style to impress others is not a reason, is not reasonable but emotional or forceful or derived from force and mad.

In the same way, posing, doing and saying things with style is to please, intimidate or dominate others (often without awareness he is doing so because of past denials) are not reasons or based on reason but based on emotions or force and irrational. If wanting to please, intimidate and dominate others is meaningful, a single time (or at most a few times) suffices to get the message across. Surely it is maddening, meaningless, with no end to keep posing, saying and doing the same thing and many other very different things just to keep pleasing, intimidating and dominating others? Because pleasing, intimidating, dominating others is forceful, driven by force than reason, they are addictive and the more times one has posed, said or done things to please, intimidate and dominate others the more one urges to repeat in a mindless, irrational pursuit that will end with inevitable loss of control in uncontrollable torment.

THEREFORE POSING, SAYING, DOING THINGS WITH STYLE TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE & INTIMIDATE OTHERS IS NOT A REASON, IS NOT REASONABLE BUT AN EMOTION OR CRAVING BASED ON FORCE AND IRRATIONAL THAT MANY DO NOT BELIEVE WILL END WITH LOSS OF CONTROL IN TORMENT.

AS THE BUDDHA SAID THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE POSSIBLE AND THINGS THAT ARE IMPOSSIBLE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS, THAT IS EVERYTHING ABOUT FORCE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON (STYLE) TO HAVE MEANINGFUL PURPOSES AND SO IT IS THAT THE PURPOSES OF STYLE THAT ARE TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE, DOMINATE AND INTIMIDATE ARE IRRATIONAL, EMOTIONAL & INSATIABLE. STYLE IS MEANINGLESS BECAUSE IT IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN INDIVIDUAL'S CONSISTENT BRAND THAT HAS TO BE MEMORISED TO BE REHASHED OF HOW HE PROLONGS HIS USE OF FORCE, CHANGES SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WITHIN AND BETWEEN FUNDAMENTAL UNITS OF SPEECH OR MOTION THAT FALSELY DIFFERENTIATES HIM BY FORCE NOT TRULY DISTINGUISHES HIM BY REASON FROM OTHERS.
THE FACT THAT YOU NEVERTHELESS SEE STYLE AS MEANINGFUL REFLECTS ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END SIMILARLY IN MAD PERCEPTION THAT SHIT IS FOOD (STYLE IS GOOD) AND FOOD (STYLE IS HARMFUL) IS SHIT.

SO YOU THINK THAT ONLY OTHERS HAVE STYLE, YOU ARE WONDERFULLY STYLE FREE? THE ANGER WITH WHICH YOU SAY THINGS THAT HAVE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FROM OTHERS IS THE STYLE THAT YOU EXPRESS ON THAT OCCASION TO INTIMIDATE OTHERS, THE GENTLE WAY WITH WHICH YOU SAY SOMETHING IS YOUR STYLE ON THAT OCCASION THAT HAS SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FROM OTHERS THAT YOU USE TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS AS TO YOUR FRIENDLINESS.

WHEN A PERSON SPEAKS IN A GENTLE WAY TO SAY, “I DISAGREE WITH YOU, I SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE SOMEONE”, THE STYLE IS TO FALSELY IMPRESS ME WITH HIS FRIENDLINESS OR LACK OF ILL WILL. SHORN OF THIS FALSE STYLE HIS MESSAGE IS HOSTILE, HE IS CHALLENGING ME. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU WANT TO IMPRESS ME AND OTHERS WITH YOUR FABRICATED GENTLENESS THAT IS BASED ON STYLE, HOW YOU SAY OR DO SOMETHING THAN SUBSTANCE (NOT KILLING, NOT HARMING, NOT SARCASTIC, NOT FORCEFUL OR EMOTIONAL OR LIKING NOR DISLIKING)? MESMERIZED BY YOUR ADDICTION TO STYLE AND FIRMLY BELIEVING AND PERCEIVING IT AS GOOD WHEN IT IS ONLY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS WITH YOUR FRIENDLINESS, YOU ARE HEADED FOR ULTIMATE LOSS OF CONTROL AND MADNESS. TRUE GENTLESSNESS IS NEVER BASED ON HOW YOU SAY OR DO THINGS (STYLE) BUT WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT DOES NOT HARM OR HURT OTHERS BUT TRULY BENEFITS OTHERS.
WHAT IS SO INTRINSICALLY GENTLE OR FRIENDLY ABOUT “I DISAGREE WITH YOU; I SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE SOMEBODY”? IF THERE IS NOTHING INTRINSICALLY GENTLE OR FRIENDLY THEN YOUR FRIENDLINESS OR GENTLENESS MUST BASED ENTIRELY ON YOUR STYLE OR WAY YOU SAID IT THAT ACTUALLY BELIES YOUR INTENT TO OPPOSE ME, CREATING CONFLICT IN YOURSELF AND ME. YOUR STYLE ALWAYS COUNTS AGAINST YOU, NEVER FOR YOU AND IT IS THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT YOU SAY THAT WILL (AS JESUS SAID) JUSTIFY YOU IF IT IS TRUE AND CONDEMN YOU IF IT IS FALSE.
Not only is the gentle style false but the substance of what is said can be examined and proven false and therefore what is said is based on false premises to rebuke me accompanied by a false gentle style.
Just because your smiles are always white as lilies does not mean others' smiles are similarly so and I am wrong to criticize others' smiles as your disagreement suggests. You are actually vouching that all others' smiles are similarly white as lilies and so back off, stop criticizing smiling.
If you want to tell me why you smile you should tell me all the motivations behind your smiles. Don't tell me you never smile to hide your dislike for someone, you never smiled because you are embarrassed, you are smiling not at the falsity but the truth of a joke, you never smile to exert pressure on others?
If smiling is merely an exercise of force of the muscles of your face that is meaningless, only for show and liking is nothing more than the meaningless stirring in speed and strength of force of your mental force of going against self controlled by the force of self preservation then you are saying you lied with your facial muscles because your mental force stirred in speed and strength.

BECAUSE STYLE IS FORCEFUL, IT IS A POTENT ATTRACTOR OF ATTENTION WHENEVER IT IS PRESENT THAT DRAWS ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE PUNY FORCE-FREE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID OR DONE AND SO IF YOUR INTENTION IN SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING IS TO DECEIVE OR MANIPULATE OTHERS TO ACCEDE TO YOUR WISHES, IT IS CRUCIAL THAT YOU HAVE AN ACCOMPANYING STYLE TO DISTRACT OTHERS SO THAT THEY FAIL TO EXAMINE THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO CAREFULLY OR WITH UNDIVIDED ATTENTION. IF YOU TRULY MEAN EVERYTHING YOU SAY OR DO, YOU WANT OTHERS TO DEVOTE THEIR UNDIVIDED ATTENTION TO IT, WHY DISTRACT ATTENTION FROM IT BY PRESENTING A POWERFUL DISTRACTOR, STYLE, BASED ON FORCE? THEREFORE STYLE IS INTENDED FOR DECEPTION NEVER WHOLESOME OR AUGMENTARY.
**
IF WHAT I SAY ABOVE AS IN MANY OTHER DIFFERENT THINGS I SAID ARE TRUE, BENEFICIAL AND CRITICALLY IMPORTANT AND NOBODY HAS EVER SAID THEM, THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST SAY SO AND IF I HAVE SAID SO I WILL HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM AND PROVEN WHAT JESUS SAID AS FALSE THAT ONLY THE COUNSELOR CAN DO SO.
IF A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE HAS OCCURRED AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS AND THEY HAVE BENEFITED EVERYONE THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR MUST ALSO CAUSE THIS CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IF HE IS TO BENEFIT YOU. IF I HAVE DONE SO, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO DO SO AGAIN AND I WOULD HAVE SUPERSEDED THE COUNSELOR.
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor (like Jesus was a counselor, a person who came), to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive (Jesus says the world that may include you cannot receive or accept or welcome the counselor) neither sees (can recognize) him nor knows (have knowledge, can work out or have been told) him; you know (Jesus did not say you can recognize him but you can work out who he is or know him) him, for he dwells with you (if the counselor is a counselor in your mind and you still need Jesus to tell you he dwells with you he must be a hard to detect or false counselor. If the counselor is someone who dwells physically with you and you do not realize then Jesus is merely informing you that he will be dwelling in your midst), and will be in you. "These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (The counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things (he will cover a broad range of subjects), and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you (if the church has brought you remembrance of what Jesus taught, it would be redundant for the counselor to come).But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (If consciousness changes are possible and it alleviates suffering then whoever is the counselor must also cause consciousness to change)And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. (When the counselor comes, it will be time for mankind to be judged)"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. (Did a consciousness change in recent years enable you to bear what you could not previously? Only a previously unimaginable consciousness change can make you bear what you could not bear then just as you could not bear a consciousness change is possible before it happened and I was the trigger of the change after 1977 as I am on the sidelines of changes today) When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority (if he does not appear as someone speaking on his own authority why should Jesus inform you so?), but whatever he hears he will speak (if the counselor knows everything, he will not need to hear and then speak) and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you (have I not taken from what is Jesus’ and the Buddha’s and declared to you in a way that no man has ever done? Jesus said let your yes be yes only, anything more comes from evil. I have demonstrated in many ways how people including those who call themselves good never let their yes be yes only but emotionally do and say much more that comes from evil). All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
Jesus referred to the counselor as the Holy Spirit and he said whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.
Jesus: Therefore I tell you, every (not some) sin and blasphemy will (not may) be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against (blasphemes) the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against (blasphemes) the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
If someone spells out precisely in many ways where no one else has done so the only sources of the woes that afflict you (namely your constant use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness) and you speak against him then if you are suffering you shall be permitted to go your own way and whatever harm you have done others shall be accounted for.
The Buddha referred in one place to the All Powerful One having two sons one of whom he called Tissa that may be Jesus who is called Yeshua in Aramaic and Isa in Arabic:
Subrahma and Paramatta Brahma,together with sons of the Powerful One,Sanankumara and Tissa:They too have come to the forest meeting.Great Brahma (the Father), who stands over 1,000 Brahma worlds,who arose there spontaneously, effulgent:Prestigious is he, with a terrifying body.And ten brahma sovereigns, each the lord of his own realm -- and in their midst has comeHarita Brahma surrounded by his retinue."
If you don’t believe style is meaningful, how come you are still stylish?
If you do not believe style is meaningful, how come there is still style in yours and everybody’s speech, motion and postures that I can demonstrate objectively?
Because there is still style, you must find it meaningful or have an irresistible attraction for style or you are its helpless slave than master, you cannot help being stylish even if you did not want to be stylish. A large part of style is subconscious, people aren’t aware there is unnatural fabricated style in the ‘quiet’ way they go about, they are unaware there is significant forceful prolonging, changes of speed and strength of force even when they are relatively sedate and composed.
Nobody loves (reason based concern for) style but they all forcefully like style, are attracted to style and because force is blind, reflexive, they are instantly automatically mindless attracted to style and it would take effacement, paying persistent attention to painstaking identify and eliminate forceful prolonging, changing speed and strength of force before one finally is released from the tormenting prison of style that leads to the execution chamber.
Impressing Others Is An Urge:
You want to impress, please, dominate or intimidate others, you never reason to impress, please, dominate or intimidate others. Reason will never recommend that you impress, please, intimidate or dominate others because they are stressful, restless and without end.
Therefore impressing, pleasing, dominating and intimidating others come from a want or desire or urge and they are all emotions or emotional drives that are senseless, cannot be satisfied but instead reinforcing so that the urge to impress, please, intimidate, dominate becomes easier to arise to more intense levels that become increasingly hard to shake off with practice and will end in loss of control or insanity.
THEREFORE THE PURPOSES OF STYLE, NAMELY TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, DOMINATE OR INTIMIDATE ARE ALL WANTS OR URGES THAT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH MENTAL FORCE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MINDFUL UNDERSTANDING THE NECESSITY FOR.
Pleasing Others:
There are many things people say or do and styles with which they say or do things (often without awareness) not because they truly want to say or do so but to falsely or hypocritically to please others.
People may say things to flatter others, bow courteously or submissively not because they truly desire to do so but just to please them.
Shyness is the way with which you say or do things and therefore a style and it is never natural but is the way you behave or say things or a style that you learn or is conditioned by others to please others because others (eg parents) like you to behave in a way dependent on them. People can speak and do things in a fearful way not because they are fearful but to please others that they are subordinate.
Being an extrovert or introvert or taciturn or morose or gregarious are all about styles and how you say or do things not about substance. Thus for those who see, this is a world of stylish humans and creatures.
(You too can learn to speak and do things shyly by copying the behavior of shy people and although initially you may have to pay attention to fabricate shyness, if you persist, shyness becomes second nature to you and you start to identify with shyness, you develop false self identity view that the Buddha said led to future states of woe that you are by nature shy and shy is good)
People fabricate friendliness in their speech or motions partly to impress others and partly to please others because they perceive it is expected of them or there are rewards for behaving in this way that pleases others.
School children may remain quiet or well behaved not because they want to, not because they know the reasons why they should behave themselves but to please their teachers for fear of punishment.
If you are doing or saying something to please others, you are adopting a certain style to please others then you are not a sincere person but putting on a show and a hypocrite.
Sometimes husbands ask their spouses how they are feeling and act concerned or caring not because they truly want to but to please their spouses or to get rewards like sexual favors.
The behavior that people are aware in which they want to please others may be like the tip of the iceberg compared to the totality of all their behavior in which they want to please others. It is not natural or healthy to be unaware of the real purpose of your behavior that is to please others but it reflects extended forceful denial and their behavior to please others are mindlessly copied from others without knowing why.
Styles to please others must be distinguished from styles to impress. Pleasing and impressing are two different things. You boast either openly or in a camouflaged way to impress others not please them.
IT IS NOT COMPULSORY OR UNAVOIDABLE THAT YOU SHOULD SAY OR DO THINGS OR ADOPT A STYLE (EG SHY) TO PLEASE OTHERS, IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO DISCARD SUCH BEHAVIOR AND BE A FREE MAN.
SAYING OR DOING THINGS JUST TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS OR SAYING OR DOING THINGS WITH AN ADDED STYLE THAT IS MEANT TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE IS THE ESSENCE OF HYPOCRISY WHICH IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT RUIN AND MANY DO NOT REALIZE THEY FACE RUIN EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY.
THE PURPOSES (NOT REASONS FOR STYLE BECAUSE STYLE NEVER HAS REASON) OF STYLE ARE TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS. THESE ARE ALL URGES OR DESIRES NOT REASONS OR RATIONAL SPECIFIC DEEDS. BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL DESIRES BASED ON MENTAL FORCE, THEY CAN NEVER BE SATISFIED BUT THE PERSON KEEP DOING IT, KEEP GET BETTER AT DOING IT THAT BECAUSE IT IS TORMENTING, WILL END IN TRAGEDY.
(If what I say above is true and beneficial and nobody has said it to you then whoever is the counselor Jesus described must also say so and if I have already done so, I will have superseded him. I know I am not foolish saying the things I say because I know nobody has said them)

Buddhist drug detox ritual calls for group vomiting:
This is a ritual with the vomiting symbolizing the vomiting of the desire or addiction to drugs. What has group vomiting got to do with detoxifying yourself? If you believe it is efficacious you have false perception and logic that will end in mad perception and logic.
If people want to vomit they will do so. Instead by organizing grouped vomiting you are forcing them to vomit against their wills when they have no desire to vomit or you are training them to act or put on a show.
It reflects that many who call themselves Buddhists, even their leaders do not understand what they claim to represent, faith in rites is deadly because it is one of three lower fetters to future states of woe.
What Is A Ritual?
A ritual is something you perform with your body or speech that is intended to achieve a target that it is impossible to achieve.
If you believe that by inducing vomiting in yourself you can cure yourself of drug addiction that is faith in a ritual that can sometimes be efficacious, because if you believe in it and you stop yourself taking drugs you can believe that it is your vomiting and not simultaneous determination to stop taking drugs that was responsible for curing you. You are now deluded, seeing a connection where there is none that induced vomiting can cure drug addiction.
If you believe that bathing in the Ganges at a certain spot on a certain day can wash away your sins and it cannot then it is faith in rituals that leads to perdition.
If you believe certain chants and prayers and death ceremonies can sent a person to heaven that too is faith in rituals.
Nothing else, whatever prayers or items of diets or medicines or exercise or shrines or ways you behave can ameliorate your suffering here and send you heaven except genuine virtuous conduct (letting your yes be yes only, obeying what Jesus commanded or not killing, telling lies with mouth and body, not stealing, not taking intoxicants, not coveting, idle chattering and tale bearing and illicit sexual activities.
The Buddha can make people disappear:
Just as God can make you disappear (He has power over you), the Buddha too can make people disappear or invisible as related in the incident below where a householder was unable to see his missing son who had sought refuge with the Buddha seated next to the Buddha because the Buddha willed it so perhaps so that he will not be too emotional as to be incapable of being instructed.
Thus my missing VCD and this software CD that ended up sitting at the top of a pile of CDs that I searched many times just earlier may have been rendered invisible to me just as God can, according to the Buddha make things disappear.
No one has reason or cause to rubbish the account below because how would you know it is false? If you rubbish the Buddha as you rubbish Jesus, you may be called to account that will be far greater than you imagine possible if you are wrong.
8. And the Blessed One saw the seññþi, the householder, coming from afar. On seeing him, He thought: `What if I were to effect such an exercise of miraculous power, that the seññþi, the householder, sitting here, should not see Yasa, the noble youth, who is sitting here also.' And the Blessed One effected such an exercise of His miraculous power.
9. And the seññþi, the householder, went to the place where the Blessed One was; having approached Him, he said to the Blessed One: `Pray, Lord, has the Blessed One seen Yasa, the noble youth?'
`Well, householder, sit down. Perhaps, sitting here, you may see Yasa, the noble youth, sitting here also.' [\q 106/] (The Buddha did not tell a lie that he had not seen the youth or he is not around. What he said did not deceive the householder)
And the seññþi the householder, who thought: ,indeed, sitting here I shall see Yasa, the noble youth sitting here also !' became glad and joyful, and having respectfully saluted the Blessed One, he sat down near Him.
10. When the seññþi, the householder, was sitting near Him, the Blessed One preached to him in due course; that is to say, He talked about the merits obtained by alms-giving (&c., as at end of sect.5). And the seññþi, the householder, having seen the Truth, having mastered the Truth, having penetrated the Truth, having overcome uncertainty, having dispelled all doubts, having gained full knowledge, dependent on nobody else for the knowledge of the Doctrine of the Teacher, said to the Blessed One: `Glorious, Lord ! Glorious, Lord! Just as if one should set up, Lord, what had been overturned, or should reveal what had been hidden, or should point out the way to one who had lost his way, or should bring a lamp into the darkness, in order that those who had eyes might see visible things, thus has the Blessed One preached the Doctrine in many ways. I take my refuge, Lord, in the Blessed One, and in the Dhamma, and in the fraternity of bhikkhus; may the Blessed One receive me from this day forth while my life lasts as a disciple who has taken his refuge in Him.'
This was the first person in the world who became a lay-disciple by the formula of the holy triad.
11. And Yasa, the noble youth, while instruction was administered (by the Buddha) to his father, contemplated the stage of knowledge which he had seen with his mind and understood; and his mind became free from attachment to the world, and was [\q 107/] released from the àsavas. Then the Blessed One thought: `Yasa, the noble youth, while instruction was administered to his father, has contemplated the stage of knowledge which he had seen with his mind and understood; and his mind has become free from attachment to the world, and has become released from the àsavas. It is impossible that Yasa, the noble youth, should return to the world and enjoy pleasures, as he did before, when he lived in his house. What if I were now to put an end to that exertion of my miraculous power.' And the Blessed One put an end to that exertion of His miraculous power.
12. Then the seññþi, the householder, saw Yasa, the noble youth, sitting there. On seeing him he said to Yasa, the noble youth: `My son Yasa, your mother is absorbed in lamentation and grief; restore your mother to life.'
13. Then Yasa, the noble youth, looked at the Blessed One. And the Blessed One said to the seññþi, the householder:, `What do you think then, O householder? That Yasa has (first) won only an imperfect (47) degree of knowledge and insight into the Truth, as you have yourself? Or that rather he was contemplating the stage of knowledge which he had seen with his mind and understood; and that his mind has thus become free from attachment to the world, and has become released from the àsavas? Now would it then be possible, O householder, that Yasa should return to the world and enjoy pleasures as he did before, when he lived in his house?' `Not so, Lord.' [\q 108/]
`Yasa, the noble youth, O householder, had (first) won, like yourself, an imperfect degree of knowledge and insight into the Truth. But when he was contemplating the stage of knowledge which he had seen, with his mind and understood, his mind has become free from attachment to the world, and has become released from the àsavas. It is impossible, O householder, that Yasa, the noble youth, should return to the world and enjoy pleasures as he did before, when he lived in his house.'
14. `It is all gain, Lord, to Yasa, the noble youth, it is high bliss, Lord, for Yasa, the noble youth, that the mind of Yasa, the noble youth, has become free from attachment to the world, and has become released from the àsavas. Might, Lord, the Blessed One consent to take His meal with me today together with Yasa, the noble youth, as His attendant?'
The Blessed One expressed His consent by remaining silent. Then the seññþi, the householder, when he understood that the Blessed One had accepted his invitation, rose from his seat, respectfully saluted the Blessed One, and passing round Him with his right side towards Him, departed thence.
15. And Yasa, the noble youth, soon after the seññþi, the householder, was gone, said to the Blessed One: `Lord, let me receive the pabbajjà and upasampadà ordinations from the Blessed One.'
`Come, O bhikkhu,' said the Blessed One, `Well taught is the Doctrine; lead a holy life for the sake of the complete extinction of suffering.'
Thus this Venerable person received the upasampadà ordination. At that time there were seven arahats in the world.
Absolute Abstention From Sex, Stealing, Killing & Lying:
There are great fruits from a virtuous life and the reason why people never reap those fruits is because they have never practiced true abstention that the Buddha lists below:
You must not have sex with humans or animals.
You must not take even a blade of grass that is not given to you.
You must not intentionally kill even a worm or ant.
You must not tell lies, make claims that are not true.
The Buddha spoke of seeing danger in the slightest fault and the price for laxity may be far greater than you can imagine possible.
1. At that time the bhikkhus, after having conferred the upasampadà ordination on a certain bhikkhu, left him alone and went away. Afterwards, as he went alone (to the àràma), he met on the way his former wife. She said to him: `Have you now embraced the religious life?' (He replied): `Yes, I have embraced the religious life.' `It is difficult for persons who have embraced religious fife, to obtain sexual intercourse; come, let us have intercourse.' He practised intercourse with her, and in consequence, came late (to the àràma). The bhikkhus said: `How is it, friend, that you are so late?'
2. Then that bhikkhu told the whole matter to the bhikkhus. The bhikkhus told it to the Blessed One. [\q 235/]
`I prescribe, O bhikkhus, that you give a companion to a newly-ordained bhikkhu, and that you tell him the four interdictions:
`"A bhikkhu who has received the upasampadà ordination, ought to abstain from all sexual intercourse even with an animal. A bhikkhu who practises sexual intercourse is no samaõa and no follower of the Sakyaputta. As a man whose head is cut off, cannot live any longer with his trunk alone, thus a bhikkhu who practises sexual intercourse is no samaõa and no follower of the Sakyaputta. Abstain from doing so as long as your life lasts.
3. `"A bhikkhu who has received the upasampadà ordination, ought to abstain from taking what is not given to him and from theft, even of a blade of grass. A bhikkhu who takes what is not given to him, or steals it, if it is a pàda (i.e. a quarter of a kàrshàpana), or of the value of a pàda, or worth more than a pàda, is no samaõa, and no follower of the Sakyaputta. As a sear leaf loosed from its stalk cannot become green again, thus a bhikkhu who takes, &c. abstain from doing so as long your life lasts.
4. `"A bhikkhu who has received the upasampadà ordination, ought not intentionally to destroy the life of any being down to a worm or an ant. A bhikkhu who intentionally kills a human being, down to procuring abortion, is no samaõa and no follower of the Sakyaputta. As a great stone which is broken in two, cannot be reunited, thus a bhikkhu who intentionally, &c. abstain from doing so as long as your life lasts.
5. `"A bhikkhu who has received the upasampadà ordination, ought not to attribute to [\q 236/] himself any superhuman condition and not to say even: `I find delight in sojourning in an empty place.' A bhikkhu who with bad intention and out of covetousness attributes to himself a superhuman condition, which he has not, and which he is not possessed of, a state of jhàna (mystic meditation),or one of the vimokkhas (182), or one of the samàdhis (states of self-concentration), or one of the samàpattis (the attainment of the four jhànas and four of the eight vimokkhas), or one of the paths, (of sanctification), or one of the fruits thereof, is no samaõa and no follower of the Sakyaputta. As a palm tree of which the top sprout has been cut off cannot grow again, thus a bhikkhu who with bad intention, &c. abstain from doing so as long as your life lasts."'
Force Has Direction:
In the dimensionless or spatial-less world of the mind only two forces are possible, one acting forward or in one direction to power all activities and another acting in the opposite to control and stop those activities because force will not listen to reason and must be controlled and neutralized or stopped by another force.
There are no third or fourth forces in mind because there are no dimensions in the mind to permit their existence.
Because speech has no dimensions, does not occur in a three dimensional world, direction change is impossible in speech.
Apart from duration, speed and strength that are variable, force too has direction that can only be opposites in the two dimensioned world of speech or the dimensionless world of the mind.
In a three dimensional world like this, force has an infinite array of possible directions in the 360 degrees of a compass in one plane with an infinite number of such planes that make up a globe.
Just as there are an infinite numbers of radii possible in a globe, there are infinite number of directions force can take in a three dimensional world.
Because there is an infinite number of directions force can take in a three dimensional world, direction is exploited ‘to the ‘hilt’ in motion to manifest style by curving motion where straight line motion will do, by prolonging along the line of the motion and by rotating whirling motion around the axis of the motion. Many people’s signatures have outrageous number of whorls that are unnecessary but to impress at great cost in ink and energy used.
However in the dimensionless world of speech or mental force, force can only be directed in two directions namely forwards or backwards. For instance the attractive force that is in like that is turned inwards is experienced as pride and the same like turned outwards is experienced as desire, lust, greed and envy. The repulsive force that is dislike turned inwards is experienced as sadness or self hate and outwards as hate, anger, jealousy.
Similarly there can only be two forces in the dimensionless mental world. One force driving forwards that is the source of all the beings activities that because it hurts the person, is called the force of going against self and the only other possible that must be necessary to oppose, modulate and bring to a halt that force called the force of self preservation. Force will not listen to reason or anything but force once activated will exhaust itself, be renewed or must be controlled or neutralized by another opposite force and thus in the dimensionless mental world, there can only be two forces, the force of going against self that must be opposed by an opposite force of self preservation because force is dangerous and cannot be permitted to run wild but must be controlled and neutralized by another opposite force.
BECAUSE THE MIND IS NOT THREE DIMENSIONAL, THERE CAN ONLY BE TWO MENTAL FORCES, ONE THAT IS THE DRIVE OF ALL ACTIVITIES THAT HARMS THE MIND AND THEREFORE CALLED THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF AND ANOTHER THAT IS NECESSARY TO CONTROL AND NEUTRALIZE IT TEMPORARILY CALLED THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION BECAUSE FORCE NEVER LISTENS TO REASON AND CAN ONLY BE NEUTRALIZED FOR A PARTICULAR INSTANCE.
The Difference Between Pleasing & Impressing Others:
When you say or do something with style to please someone you want that something you said or did with style to make him like himself or his current situation.
When you say or do something with style to impress someone you want that something you said or did with style to make him like you.
Thus both pleasing and impressing is about making someone experience ‘like’ or making others like (stir their mental forces, not make them reason or love) but the target differs in that impressing is about making someone like you and pleasing is about making the target like himself.
It is a delusion that pleasing others is the result of selflessness because pleasing others is seldom selfless but usually if not always self serving to get what you want from others that may be so well denied that the nice person is blind to his motives.
When you say things to flatter others in terms of physical attributes (wealth or handsome) or intelligence or witticism or sociability you want to please others.
People often say and do things in a nice way that is only so because of forceful stretching, changes of speed and loudness that sounds musical or melodious in order to please you so that you can give them what they want and that is manipulating others not being good.
For instance when a boy is courting a girl, he will do and say everything that he knows she likes to hear and seen done to her, not because he wants to or believes what he is doing but to convince her to marry him. When children want their parents to buy them something or want money, they will usually shed their nasty or abrasive behavior to become obedient or submissive to get what they want. Subjects say pleasing or nice things to their rulers or dictators not because they believe in what they say or do (bow) but to keep their heads and escape punishment. If customers without their patronage of your shop you will be punished and hence many shopkeepers say things to please their customers and cultivate their friendship not because they believe what they say or do but to please customers with the motive that they continue to patronize him.
THEREFORE SAYING OR DOING THINGS TO PLEASE OTHERS OR TO BE NICE TO THEM IS SELDOM IF EVER SELF SACRIFICING AS DELUDED NICE PEOPLE LIKE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE BUT IT IS MOTIVATED SELFISHLY TO GET WHAT THEY WANT OR AVOID PUNISHMENT AND THIS IS DEBT INCURRING MANIPULATION OF OTHERS NOT MERITORIOUS.
When you want people to respect you or find you attractive in terms of physical attributes (wealth or handsome) or intelligence or witticism or sociability, you want to impress others.
When a person speaks with excitement it may be to impress or please others. If you are conveying you are excited by what someone tells you he has done, you want to please him, make him like himself for doing something wonderful but when you speak excitedly about what you have done, you want to falsely exert pressure on him to appreciate or like what you have done that may be no big deal.
Even though people are striving to please and impress others all the time, they are often not even aware they are doing so (partly because of automatism and partly because of denial because it is shameful) let alone that they understand the nature of this impressing and pleasing that they are conducting and this means their behavior is not based on reason but copied without understanding from others.
When what you say or do with style is intended to intimidate others, you want them to be fearful of you, and you do so with an angry voice that can only be because there is violent prolonging use of force to stretch syllables, violent acceleration of speed and strength of force within and between syllables or units of motion.
When what you say or do with style is intended to dominate others, you speak or do things with added force so that the voice and how you do things is loud and powerful. Even if you are truly a strong person if you display more power than is necessary for the situation, you are putting on a show to dominate others.
Another important purpose of style is purely to deceive others. When you are trying to sell a get rich scheme to another, you speak with enthusiasm and dramatic conviction that it is a sure winner to deceive others to take part. When you tell a lie, you use force and deliberation with dramatic facial expressions as if remembering it happening to convince the person that what you say is true and he should trust you.
Fabricated and genuine gentleness:
You cannot be gentler than speaking or doing things with minimal force that is constant in speed and strength. There is no style in this gentleness.
Gentleness that is fabricated is about using unnecessary extra force to prolong the fundamental units of speech or motion, change speed and strength of force in a ‘melodious’ way that perverted people find attractive and pleasurable when it stirs restlessness (uneasiness) that they must control to ‘enjoy’ it. For instance when someone caresses you in a nice way, you want to squirm but you force yourself (using force) to stay still to enjoy that pleasure because you lust after that girl who is caressing you in a fabricated way.
Gentleness that is the style of touch or speech can be compared with driving a car slowly with the accelerator and brakes simultaneously active in a venture that is unnecessary and stressful. Don’t you think it would suffice to drive with the accelerator alone rather than also applying the brakes that would necessitate the use of excessive propulsive force with forward motion the net result of propulsive force greater than retarding force present?
YOU CANNOT BE WHITER THAN WHITE. SIMILARLY YOU CANNOT BE GENTLER THAN USING MINIMAL NECESSARY FORCE AT CONSTANT SPEED AND STRENGTH TO SAY OR DO THINGS. PERVERTS BELIEVE THEY CAN BE WHITER THAN WHITE AND USE FORCE TO PROLONG THEIR UNITS OF SPEECH OR UNITS OF TOUCHING MOTION, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT ACTUALLY STRESSES THEMSELVES AND THEIR RECIPIENTS WHO MUST GALVANIZE THEMSELVES TO WITHSTAND THE EXCESSIVE FORCE TRANSMITTED TO ENJOY THE ‘FEMININE’ TOUCH FROM OTHERS THAT THEY SO CRAVE. PEOPLE FEEL ‘TCIKLISH’ OR SQUIRM WHEN CARESSED BECAUSE THEY CAN EXPERIENCE THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH PRESENT EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT AWARE OF THEIR NATURES AND THESE FORCEFUL PROLONGING AND CHANGES EXERT A POWERFUL REFLEX TO SQUIRM OR BE ‘TICKLISH’.
The Difference Between Yoga & Meditation:
Yoga is putting your body through contortions that you have faith that it will cure your mental and physical ailments. Even when they sit crossed legged, yogins are obsessed with the style or particular proper way to sit that they think will be healing. It is a form of faith in rituals that leads to future states of woe.
Meditation when properly done is merely secluding your person from external distractions and bringing mindfulness or attention to the fore to examine your mental state (moods, stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate), what and how you are thinking with constant stretching, changing speed and strength of force) and to use your force of self preservation to dispel emotions, like and dislike that have arisen, to slow down your thoughts and finally arrest them if possible, as you finally will if you practice correctly long enough. There is no particular posture that is conductive but there must be some discipline like sitting upright rather than slumped. Meditation is not sleeping although you may lapse into sleep because sleep according to the Buddha is about torpor or scattering of your mind to dream and one should endeavor with meditation to remain alert mindfully aware of what is happening in your mind and your surroundings.
Meditation is for the purpose of eradicating the five hindrances as described by the Buddha namely greed and worries regarding the world, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty and sloth and torpor.
By secluding oneself and sitting in a disciplined posture, one summons mindfulness to set aside greed and concern for the world, drive out thoughts of ill will, dispel restlessness, doubt and uncertainty ad laziness (idleness) and sleepiness. One prefers to be alert than sleep. One learns to cultivate alertness than sleepiness or drowsiness.
Two sources of restlessness that must afflict ordinary people:
If you constantly use force (and force must be used if you stretch syllables or units of motion, change speed or loudness or strength of force), with time force automatically activates itself and rather than you forcing yourself to activate force, you are struggling to mobilize your force of self preservation to suppress the activation of force that can be stressful to your mind and body. The constant mindless urge to activate force is itself restlessness and can only be controlled if it is not permanently exterminated and what is controlled is doomed for final total loss of control or madness.
Because a major use of force is to constantly forcefully change speed and loudness (accelerate and decelerate in speed and strength) that is in truth meaningless or unnecessary except for show to impress, please, intimidate or dominate, this constant forceful change of speed and strength of force is itself tending to become automatic or self perpetuating that must be countered or modulated by one’s mental force of self preservation and with inevitable momentary losses of control the person becomes seized by restlessness or meaningless speech or motion that he does not realize are harbingers of future total loss of control or mad restlessness.
The Buddha never told a lie:
When asked by the householder whether the Buddha had seen his son, the Buddha who knew the son was sitting there but invisible did not tell a lie to say he has not seen his son or his son did not come but he told the householder that if he sat there patiently, he might see his son.
THEREFORE THE BUDDHA IS SKILFUL, CONFRONTED BY A SITUATION WHERE MOST FOOLISH PEOPLE MIGHT RESORT TO A LIE OFTEN WITHOUT REALIZING THEY DID, THE BUDDHA SKILLFULLY OBVIATED A LIE BY SAYING SITTING HERE YOU MAY SEE YOUR SON.
Curved Motion Is Constant Direction Change Plus Prolonging:
When you describe a curved motion between A & B where an economical straight line motion will do, you are stretching or prolonging your motion in the name of style to impress others.
A motion is curved only because there are gradual constant direction changes that never come free but force must be used to constantly correct direction and so a curved motion is not just prolonging a motion unnecessarily but using force to constantly change direction because beings in this world worship curved motion as desirable when it is stressful and not letting your yes be yes only.
Just because you and your cohorts idolize curved motions as in dancing and curved motions of their fingers, hands and arms of the conductor of an orchestra does not mean beings in heaven share your perversion.
FORCE MUST BE USED TO CHANGE DIRECTION AND IF YOU LIKE TO EXPRESS CURVED MOTIONS YOU MUST USE FORCE TO CHANGE DIRECTION AS YOU MUST TO PROLONG YOUR TRACK TO THE TARGET. YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE NOT REASON WHO LIKES TO USE FORCE UNNECESSARILY FOR SHOW.
Style Is All About Using Force To Tamper:
Style is all about mobilizing whatever facility available in force to tamper with reality.
Because force has direction, duration, strength and speed, these are all utilized by beings in this world of suffering to fashion their different brands of style that falsely differentiates themselves whilst persecuting themselves and others by creating mutual stress, restlessness and distraction.
Beings here utilize duration in force by prolonging the duration of their use of force in powering a syllable or unit of motion to stretch it that is perceived in perversion as charming.
Where direction change is possible in motion that occur in three dimensions, being use the available direction change to fashion curved or whorled movements.
Beings here utilize strength of force and speed of force to fashion their particular style of how they change speed and strength of force within and between units of speech or motion.
Style is all about using force never reason to fashion changes that are to be seen to deceive, impress, please (so as to get what you want), intimidate and dominate in the process creating insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that further conditions your mind that is heading for loss of control and insanity.
Style Is Never Learnt But Always Copied:
Learning requires you understand why you should have style. Because there is no meaning in style, it is all about the use of force to fashion your individual brand of direction, speed and strength of force changes and your brand of prolongation of force, there is nothing in style that can be learnt, that can be understood why it is meaningful or necessary and therefore style is always copied from others either completely or by cobbling pieces of different people’s styles.
Not only are their styles copied but the substance of what they say or do is also copied in the same way, the way they reason too is copied with such force that they believe their reasoning and perception is true when it is false or deluded.
LEARNING REQUIRES YOU UNDERSTAND WHY YOU DO OR SAY SOMETHING. CAN YOU UNDERSTAND WHY YOU MUST SAY OR DO SOMETHING WITH STYLE? PEOPLE NEVER HAVE REASONS FOR THEIR STYLES, THEY JUST LIKE AND DISLIKE THEIRS’ AND OTHERS’ STYLES. STYLE IS ALL ABOUT LIKING AND DISLIKING WHICH IS ALL ABOUT STIRRING THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES.
The Purpose Of Meditation:
The Buddha said meditate now Cunda, don’t afterwards regret. You think you can decline to meditate and not regret, not realizing you are pitting yourself against the Buddha. If cultivating meditation is a blissful existence here and even greater bliss as you age and you are headed even for 60,000 eons, each lasting billions of years in heavenly existence then you may rue in regret if you end up transmigrating in eternal habitations as Jesus said and not necessarily as humans, building up a pile of skeletons that is as high as a mountain according to the Buddha.
There is nothing fanciful or artful or mysterious or methodical in meditation and the purpose of meditation is to address the five hindrances that the Buddha described as obstructing wisdom and detains one in suffering and once these five hindrances have been addressed, ‘the sky is the limit’ and depending on how you have cultivated non-thinking, concentration and equanimity, bliss that is higher than the pleasures of the flesh and increasingly sublime is available that leads when well practiced even to 60,000 eons in bliss.
The five hindrances are greed and concerns or preoccupations for the world, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty, ill will and sloth and torpor.
By secluding yourself from the corrupting influences from others, you permit yourself a breather that permits your greed and concerns or preoccupations for affairs of the world to fade away temporarily.
You cannot be restless in body or speech if you are remaining still and silent and what remains is restlessness of thought that you can devote your full attention to unravel.
Once a person has experienced rapture that comes from seclusion his previously strong doubts and uncertainty start to weaken. In the same way a person who is free from suffering becomes imbued by goodwill, his ill will loses drive.
Sloth is laziness. Sitting upright disciplined and alert is an antidote to sloth or laziness or idleness. Torpor is actually sleepiness. Contrary to ordinary people’s perception that sleep is good and healthy, the Buddha prescribed minimal sleep. Sleep is descending into drowsiness and dreaming and confusion and the meditating person is not sleeping even if in his early career there is a tendency to lapse into sleep. Meditation is cultivating alertness to a person’s mind and body and even when he falls into sleep he falls into sleep mindfully and remain in sleep minimally.
I have been asked by people how to meditate as if there are secret ingredients to meditation because people are ritualistic actors who believe there must be particular ways of doing things. One requisite is that you never use force. People use force to force themselves to concentrate and that is counterproductive. No amount of stirring of an agitated beaker of cloudy water will make it settle but you must resist the temptation to intervene and allow the swirling water to settle permitting the colloid particles to precipitate by themselves.

Showing Off Is Enslaving To Others:
No matter how you may deny you are a show off, how it is meaningful and enjoyable instead of stressful or restless, showing off is losing your independence to become dependent on others.
If in truth you show off, you must want to be seen or heard, you must do and say things in a way that you perceive as desirable that you want others to notice and that is enslaving yourself, tailoring your actions and speech to be seen and heard rather truly as you mean.
If you are a show off, you must be self conscious because you want to be seen or heard, you are anxious that you be seen or heard favorably and because you are conscious you will put on a show. Thus anyone who puts on a show whether he is aware or not must be self conscious and as a result of being self conscious he must put on a show in a vicious positive feedback loop that is tormenting and will end in insanity.
Anyone whose style is intended to impress, please, intimidate or dominate must be conscious of himself and being thus self conscious he has an urge to put on a show. He is no longer independent but like a calf, has a tether on his neck that is held by others.
NO MATTER HOW PEOPLE WHO ACT OR PUT ON A SHOW MAY STRIVE TO EXERT THEIR INDEPENDENCE OR BELIEVE THEY ARE INDEPENDENT, THEY ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES AND ENGAGED IN A VAIN PURSUIT THAT ONLY BRING GREATER VEXATIONS AND EVEN INSANITY BECAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN BE AND ARE INDEPENDENT WHEN YOU ARE ALWAYS COURTING OTHERS’ OPINIONS AND TRYING TO IMPRESS OTHERS IS INSANE. ANYONE WHO IS ALWAYS PUTTING ON A SHOW IS IN TRUTH A SHAMELESS SLUT PROSTITUTING HIMSELF TO OTHERS AND THAT IS THE REASON THEY ARE ALL VERY SENSITIVE TO SLIGHTS OR TOUCHY WHERE THEIR PRIDE ARE CONCERNED.
IT IS MAD AND CULTIVATING INSOLUBLE (FORCEFUL) CONFLICT THAT WILL END IN INSANITY TO THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL TO ASSERT YOUR INDEPENDENCE THROUGH VARIOUS ACTIONS OR BELIEFS WHEN YOU ARE CONSTANTLY BEHOLDEN TO OTHERS THROUGH YOUR CONSTANT STYLE THAT IS CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY AIMED AT IMPRESSING & PLEASING OTHERS.
FURTHER, PUTTING ON A SHOW ENTAILS CONSTANTLY REHASHING STANDARDIZED FROM MEMORY TO FAKE LIVE FOR THE OCCASION AND THAT IS ANOTHER ENSLAVEMENT TO A ROBOTIC EXISTENCE WHEREIN ONE IS MERELY A DISC JOCKEY DECIDING WHICH TUNE IN ONE’S MENTAL JUKEBOX TO PLAY FOR THE OCCASION.
Because adopting style is all about prolonging the use force and using force to change direction, speed and strength of force that is intended for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate, there is no justification to use force and no meaning in putting on a show, there is nothing to understand why you should adopt a style and therefore all styles are copied or forcefully conditioned from others without need for understanding or learning.
When a person dances there are constant often violent direction changes in direction of all his or her body parts, the flaying of the head, neck, torso, limbs, hands and feet involved mindless constant forceful direction changes that are meaningless (you shut your mind or reason and just do it copying others) and only intended for show to impress observers and the opposite sex how stylish or attractive and adept you are.
If you think such constant forceful direction changes as depicted in dancing are meaningful you may be courting madness as disco dropouts gyrating in mental wards may attest how tormenting it can be. Many females and males who are reluctant to dance or inhibited often feel compelled to similarly dance just to prove themselves and join in and once they do so, they may become hooked because others encourage them and the forceful changes in dancing is conditioning or addicting just like alcohol, smoking and gambling.
THUS DANCING IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS AND INVOLVE USING FORCE TO CONSTANTLY PROLONG MOVEMENTS, CHANGE DIRECTION, SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND A DAZE AFTERWARDS. TRY DANCING ALONE BY YOURSELF WITHOUT ANY MUSIC AND SEE IF DANCING PER SE DOES SO.
Why everything is so difficult:
It is impossible for people who have style, who are constantly prolonging, changing speed and loudness not to find life difficult, it seems to take so much effort for them to say and do even simple things because they are doing and saying things the hard way with energy sapping forceful prolonging, changes of speed and loudness.
THEREFORE THE FACT THAT YOU FIND IT SUCH AN EFFORT TO SAY OR DO EVEN SIMPLE THINGS (ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR FAKED ENTHUSIASM WANES) IS AN INDICATION THAT THERE IS ACCOMPANYING FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT MAKES SAYING AND DOING THINGS UNNECESSARILY MUCH MORE DEMANDING.
ALTHOUGH IT IS STILL SUFFERING EXISTING TODAY, LIFE WAS EVEN CONSIDERABLY TOUGHER IN THE DAYS BEFORE THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AFTER 1977 AND BEFORE THE FURTHER CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS AND THUS IN THE USUAL COURSE, LIFE IN THE LOWER REALMS THAT INCLUDE HUMAN EXISTENCE IS VERY TOUGH AND REGULARLY PUSHES PEOPLE TO THE BRINK OF MADNESS, HOMICIDE OR SUICIDE AND SO IF YOU DO NOT USE THIS GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO EXTRICATE YOURSELF FROM THIS INSANE WORLD, YOU MAY RUE IN ETERNAL REGRET AT YOUR HEEDLESS FOLLY.
The Trojan Horse:
Nobody likes to be attacked by others but if you have to be attacked, would you prefer a frontal assault at the city gates that you can see and prepare to defend yourself or would you prefer your enemy to present you with a Trojan Horse that you think is a marvelous present when it is a vehicle for hidden troops that will attack you when you are asleep once it is in the bowels of your fortress?
Therefore, rather than meritorious, those people who attack others with a gentle manner may be even more evil than those who are overtly nasty, like a wolf in sheepskin is even more evil than a plain wolf because everyone knows its intent and can be wary at its approach.
THERE ARE MANY WHO HAVE LEARNT TO KILL OTHERS SOFTLY, SAY NASTY THINGS WITH SUCH GENTLE MANNER THAT YOU FEEL OBLIGED TO ACCEPT GRATEFULLY AND FEEL GUILTY YOU ARE AT FAULT WHEN HE IS DISHING SHIT THAT HE WANTS TO TRICK YOU TO ACCEPT AS FOOD. THEY ARE OFTEN DELUDED TO BELIEVE THEY ARE DOING GOOD TO OTHERS AND THEMSELVES WHEN IT IS THE OPPOSITE. FAR FROM MERITORIOUS THEY ARE ACCRUING DEADLY KARMA.
NOT TO SEE HOW YOU HURT YOURSELF IS EVEN MORE AGONIZING:
NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY DENY OR CANNOT SEE YOU ARE PUTTING ON A SHOW TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE OTHERS, IF YOU DO SO, YOU MUST EXPERIENCE CONFLICT AND A DISTURBED MIND AND THE FACT THAT YOU CANNOT SEE HOW YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR DISTURBED MIND MAKES IT EVEN MORE AGONIZING THAT WILL END IN INSANITY BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE YOURSELF HURTING YOURSELF.
THE FOOL WHO KNOWS HE IS HURTING HIMSELF AND OTHERS BUT CANNOT HELP IT IS WISE SO MUCH BUT GREAT IS THE FOOL WHO THINKS HE IS BENEFITING HIMSELF AND OTHERS WHEN IT IS THE OPPOSITE.
Meditation Is Not Incompatible With Christianity:
Meditation as taught by the Buddha means regularly secluding yourself for extended periods to summon mindfulness to the fore to dispel the five hindrances namely greed and preoccupations with the world, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty and sloth and torpor.
Jesus said: But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.
Is shutting yourself in a room to pray secluding yourself as in Buddhist meditation or communion with the world? And when you pray, should you pray for greed and preoccupation with worldly affairs, restlessness, ill will, doubt and uncertainty or should you pray to be released from greed and preoccupation with the world, release from tormenting restlessness, pray for faith that Jesus said is the opposite of doubt and uncertainty (he rebuked Peter who began to sink, saying why did he doubt, man of little faith) and pray to be imbued with goodwill than hate and anger?
When you pray in private, should they be infrequent and as brief as you can or should you engage in frequent extended prayers? If your prayer sessions are regular and extended, might they not be comparable to the meditative sessions described by the Buddha?
How can you be guilty of sin when you can turn off all thinking at will with the second meditative trance? If your body is withdrawn from this world, you are silent and even your thoughts are stilled but you are fully aware, how can you commit any sin in mind, body or speech?
Jesus said you should deny yourself, carry your cross and go with him.
Are you denying yourself if you are fully involved with the affairs of this world and do not set apart some time to seclude yourself to meditate to free yourself from greed and concerns for the world or are you truly denying yourself if you set aside frequent protracted periods when you seclude yourself to dispel greed and concerns for the world, ill will, instill faith by displaying doubt and uncertainty and restlessness?
Is this a world of restless men who are tormented or men at peace with themselves? If you yourself are afflicted by restlessness are you a man of this world or a man apart from this world? Therefore is meditating to dispel restlessness denying yourself as Jesus advocated or not denying yourself as the world does not deny itself by tormenting themselves and others with restlessness?
Doubt and uncertainty whose dispelling is one of the purpose of meditation is the opposite of faith that Jesus advocated (he rebuked Peter who began to sink by asking why he doubted, man of little faith). This dispelling doubt and uncertainty which is one of the purposes of meditation is to instill faith that is in line with Christianity.
Is dispelling ill will to be replaced by goodwill, another purpose of meditation compatible or incompatible with Christianity?
Sloth is laziness. Because the usual condition of ordinary people is sinful, sloth or laziness is indifference to let things be as they are that is permitting the continuation of sin and the banishment of laziness is to instill one with a sense of urgency to address one’s present suffering condition. You can be diligent with affairs of the world to increase your material wealth or you can be diligent in spiritual matters that is what the Buddha is advocating that will lead to self awakening and the deathless.
Sleep that is beyond the minimum required to sustain one is a luxury that the Buddha censures and rather than devotion to sleep or torpor with its descent into drowsiness and dreaming or fabricating, one should be alert and train to descend into sleep in an orderly or mindful manner. The Buddha does not sleep in a haphazard or disarrayed manner but it is said the Buddha mindfully falls into sleep.
Restless Means No Rest:
Restless means rest-less or no rest and the opposite of restless is restful or full of rest.
Which do you prefer, no rest or full of rest?
Jesus said my peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you. Do you think Jesus’ peace is restless or restful? If you think it is full of rest then meditation must be wholesome if one of its purposes is to dispel restlessness.
In theory meditation must be efficacious in dispelling restlessness because if you can sit still without movement that is restfulness of the body, if you can remain silent that is restfulness of speech and if you can still your thoughts as the Buddha tells you is possible with attainment of the second meditative trance, you have attain restfulness of thought.
In practice meditation is efficacious because I know that my restlessness in motion, speech and thought as a result of regular meditation and attentive elimination of stretching, speed and loudness changes is today a pale shadow of the past.
In the same way meditation is efficacious in dispelling greed and preoccupation with affairs of the world because seclusion removes the corrupting influences of others.
A mind and body increasingly imbued by serenity increases in faith and goodwill that dispels doubts and uncertainty and ill will.
A calm clear thinking mind has less inclination to sleep and becomes more vigilant and motivated to seek that is an antidote for sloth or laziness.
THUS MEDITATION IS EFFICACIOUS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE IN DISPELLING GREED AND PREOCCUPATION WITH THE WORLD, ILL WILL, RESTLESSNESS, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY AND SLOTH (LAZINESS OR INDIFFERENCE) AND TORPOR (DROWSINESS AND SLEEPINESS) AND ANYONE WHO SPEAKS AGAINST MEDITATION AND THEREFORE RECOMMENDS OTHERS AVOID IT MAY BE EMOTIONALLY WALKING ON THIN ICE ASKING FOR JUDGMENT.