Taking leave of your senses:
Quote: Mr Anwar told a crowd of about 800 people: "If you build a temple near a mosque, I'll be in favour of pulling it down. But if you pull down a 100-year-old temple, I'll say you must have taken leave of your senses."
People like to think they are such great speakers of the truth but they are trying to impress others. “You must have taken leave of your senses” is a stylish way of speaking or using colourful language aimed at impressing others, is stirring the emotion (to laugh or see it as funny) and you are therefore a slut, prostituting yourself in the name of popularity. If you can see others are slut, why can’t you see that you too are a slut, carrying others’ balls? If you think you can carry others’ balls to heaven you may be a fool.
If you let your yes be yes only or call a spade a spade, you say ‘you must be mad’ and even that is scoffing at the other person. Rightfully you say, “You are wrong to pull down an existing temple”.
I am ashamed of injustice:
Quote Anwar: I am ashamed of all the injustices.
You never hear Jesus or the Buddha saying they are ashamed of anything because being ashamed, the opposite of pride is all about the stirring of mental force to be repulsed or disliking of all injustices.
Why should your mental force be stirred by the perception of injustice. Your reason or disapproval that has nothing to do with shame should be awakened or arise.
Ask Anwar whether he finds what he said meaningful and he is likely if not certainly say “Of course” and thus he has advanced false perception that will lead to mad perception that something that is all about the stirring of mental force, namely ashamed is true, good and meaningful when it is false, bad and meaningless.
I disapprove of all injustices:
I disapprove of all injustices is a statement based on reason without emotion.
I am ashamed of all injustice is an emotional statement that is addressed to the listener’s emotion and is a statement based on force that is meaningless, false and harmful to self and others.
You think you don’t like to think?
Quote: "What a horrible thing if you suddenly realised you were a turkey in November"
What is said above is totally unnecessary and is deliberately fabricated in a way as to stir humour or emotion in the reader. The idea is that ‘turkey’ in November equal being slaughtered for Christmas and the thought of this horrible prospect is funny to perverted people.
You have to think to give birth to this idea and think to say it in a way that will sound humorous to others and as a result you are conditioning yourself to thinking that you do not realize will detain you in suffering leading around in a maze that has no way out and the only way out is above, to refuse to go around but look up and jump out of the maze.
When people look for new ways or ideas of how to cook turkey or fish, they are also thinking and conditioning themselves to thinking.
When they are fascinated by this universe and think of fabricating theories about how it originated and progressed, they too are bonding themselves to thinking that will end in heartbreak, suffering and renewed becoming.
IT IS IGNORANCE COUPLED WITH DELUSION (CONCEIT) THAT MAKES PEOPLE CLUELESSLY HOOKED TO THINKING JUST AS PEOPLE ARE HOOKED TO SMOKING OR ALCOHOL NOT REALISING THAT LIKE ALCOHOLICS THEY ARE DOOMED TO DROWN IN THE SORROWS OF THINKING THAT LEADS AROUND IN CIRCLES.
Who cares if you disapprove of injustice?
A person upon hearing that I disapprove of injustice may retort to himself or others, “Who cares if you disapprove of injustice” thinking he is making a reasoned statement and justified in what he said when he is making an emotional or force false statement that is irrelevant to the situation.
All words have agreed meaning and whenever words are strung together they convey a sum of meaning that may be true (what it is intended to be) or false (a lie or make no sense) or the words may have been hijacked by force or emotion to become merely a vehicle to transmit force or attack the other person. Just as you can use a knife to attack another, you can use words to attack another in which the meaning of the words used does not matter but it is the attack conveyed that matters to the issuer.
“Who cares if you disapprove of injustice” is always a false statement designed to attack, belittle or scoff. If you are in doubt or think it is a valid statement then you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
“WHO CARES IF YOU DISAPPROVE OF INJUSTICE” IS HYPOCRITICAL AND UNJUSTIFIED BECAUSE INSTEAD OF SAYING HE (AND NOBODY ELSE) DOES NOT CARE ABOUT MY DISAPPROVAL OF INJUSTICE (THAT MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE SHARED BY EVERYONE) HE IS ASKING A QUESTION (THAT REQUIRES AN ANSWER) THAT IMPLIES NOBODY CARES THAT I DISAPPROVE OF INJUSTICE. IF GOD CARES THEN YOU HAVE BEEN PRESUMPTUOUS AND LIABLE FOR PUNISHMENT FOR INSOLENCE.
WHAT HE MAY HAVE MEANT IS THAT MY DISAPPROVAL OF INJUSTICE CARRIES NO WEIGHT (IS POWERLESS), DOES NOT ACHIEVE ANYTHING, WILL NOT CORRECT INJUSTICE IN WHICH CASE HE DID NOT SAY WHAT HE MEANT AND HE IS AGAIN A HYPOCRITE.
IN ANY CASE, ‘WHO CARES IF YOU DISAPPROVE OF INJUSTICE’ IS AN INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE (REACTION) BECAUSE I AM MERELY STATING I DISAPPROVE, I DID NOT ASK YOU OR ANYONE TO CARE FOR MY DISAPPROVAL OF INJUSTICE AND YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS IN THE NAME OF PUTTING ME DOWN TO THINK THAT ‘WHO CARES IF YOU DISAPPROVE OF INJUSTICE’ IS RELEVANT OR A REASONABLE ADDITION TO THE ISSUE.
WHETHER ‘WHO CARES IF YOU DISAPPROVE OF INJUSTICE IS BASED ON FORCE OR DERISION OR BASED ON TRUE REASON MAY BE OBJECTIVELY KNOWN AND IF IT IS BASED ON DERISION YOU MUST EXPOSE YOUR MIND TO FORCE AND THENCE PAIN, IT WILL CONDITION YOUR MIND TO FORCE THAT WILL END IN MADNESS AND DEGRADATION AND SHOULD THERE BE A GOD WHO DISAPPROVES OF INJUSTICE, HE WILL PUNISH YOU FOR NOT CARING AND TALKING BIG AS IF EVERYONE SHARES YOUR VIEW IN NOT CARING.
Thus the person who says (even gently with a smile that belies his evil intent), “Who cares if you disapprove of injustice” as if my disapproval of injustice is worthless might be smug that he is on solid ground but he is putting his head on the chopper block because it is based on force not reason to attack or belittle that subjects his mind to painful and conditioning force, his comment is inappropriate (because I never asked him to care or if he cared about my disapproval) and he is therefore practicing inappropriate responses that will end in madness, he is un-righteously asking a question that troubles others to answer and implies falsely that everyone will not care just like him.
MY DISAPPROVAL OF INJUSTICE MAY NOT CARRY ANY WEIGHT (BECAUSE IT IS NOT BASED ON FORCE OR THREATS) BUT NEITHER DOES YOUR ANGER OR HATE OF INJUSTICE THAT WILL ONLY STIR MORE DISCORD THAT MAY HARM INNOCENT BYSTANDERS WHEN NATURAL JUSTICE IS INEVITABLE. INSTEAD MY DISAPPROVAL OF INJUSTICE WILL SERVE AS AN EXAMPLE FOR OTHERS TO FOLLOW THAT THEY SHOULD CONDUCT THEMSELVES WITH JUSTICE IN WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO BECAUSE THAT IS THE ONLY WAY OUT OF SUFFERING, YOU WILL NEVER ESCAPE ACCOUNTABILITY BY YOURSELF AND BY GOD IF YOU ARE UNJUST IN YOUR ACTIONS.
Kiss me:
You hear misguided parents and adults cajole a child, “Kiss me, come on, kiss me, kiss me” thinking they are good and training the child in goodness when they are coercing the child to put on a show, go against its will or lie, to kiss or call someone ‘uncle’ just to appease others.
It is because as children, they have forced to say or do certain things, even with a certain style that initially repulsed them that people have become so well induced into the habit of appeasing or pleasing others, of going against themselves to use force and suspend their reason to say or do things that they truly did not have any wish to say or do. If you keep suspending your reason, it is finally permanently shut and the person become a robot regurgitating speech and deeds recorded in his mental jukebox in the name of impressing or pleasing others.
If a child wants to kiss you or call your name it will do so by itself. Often the request is facetious merely for the ‘thrill’ of seeing others obey your commands and if you are asking someone to kiss you when you do not desire to be kissed you are practicing controlled madness that will end in madness.
When Judas kissed Jesus it was not intended as it was to demonstrate his love or fondness but it was to tell the soldiers who Jesus was and thus here, Judas is lying with an act, he is not kissing Jesus out of love but using his kiss as a secret signal to point out Jesus to the soldiers.
Downplaying her death:
If it is true as reported that the Pakistan government is trying to downplay Ms Bhutto’s death as bumping her head whilst evading an assassin’s bullets then the over enthusiasm in downplaying her, even in death suggests that President’s Mussharraf’s government itself has vested interest in seeing her demise.
She is not blameless, she was said to be a party girl in her Oxford days and till the end she spoke with an arrogant fieriness that stirred emotions.
Bhutto died 'bumping her head'
December 29, 2007 05:13am
Article from: Agence France-Presse
Send this article: Print Email
A TOP aide to slain Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto has rejected the government's explanation of her death as a "pack of lies".
The Pakistan interior ministry said Bhutto died when she hit her head on her vehicle's sunroof as she ducked after a gun and suicide attack on a campaign rally, and that no bullets or shrapnel were found in her.
"It is baseless. It is a pack of lies,'' said Farooq Naik, Bhutto's top lawyer and a senior official in her Pakistan People's Party.
"Two bullets hit her, one in the abdomen and one in the head.
"Bhutto's personal secretary Naheed Khan and party official Makhdoom Amin Fahim were in the car and they saw what happened.
"It is an irreparable loss and they are turning it into a joke with such claims. The country is heading towards civil war.''
Exclusive: Eyewitness account of Bhutto's assassination
Interior ministry spokesman Javed Cheema said earlier that the post-mortem on the populist opposition leader found her mortal wound came when she tried to duck after the bomber attacked.
He said the bomber fired at her but missed, and that her critical injury came when she hit the lever of the sunroof of the car she was in, as she waved to supporters after a campaign rally on Thursday.
"The lever struck near her right ear and fractured her skull,'' Cheema said.
"There was no bullet or metal shrapnel found in the injury.''
He said intelligence services intercepted a call from a top al-Qaeda figure for Pakistan, Baitullah Mehsud, who he said was behind the attack as well as a suicide bombing on Bhutto's homecoming rally in October that killed 139 people.
"The government is now claiming that Baitullah Mehsud is responsible,'' Naik said. "What is the evidence?''
He added: "She was taken to hospital. She was bleeding. It was a serious security lapse.''
Bhutto's death has unleashed a wave of unrest in Pakistan, with at least 33 people killed and countless buildings and vehicles torched.
Hundreds of thousands of people attended her funeral Friday.
Many mourners blamed President Pervez Musharraf, whose popularity has been plummeting, for at the least failing to protect her.
The government has said that Bhutto had been given warnings that Islamist militants were out to get her. Cheema, the interior ministry spokesman, told AFP earlier Friday that Bhutto was on an Al-Qaeda "hit list''.
Tiger taunted & father has wrong view:
It is suggested below that the three youths taunted the tigress by dangling a foot into the enclosure, the fence was less high than it should be and animals like humans can be provoked and they got what they asked for.
The father of the dead boy has wrong view (that leads to hell or the animal womb) to say that taunting or not nobody deserves to die like this. Taunt and should you die as a result of enraging the animal, you asked for it.
Cats are capable of leaping quite great heights as I discovered that this limping male cat out of my expectation could jump up a considerable wall without a run up.
US maul tiger was taunted
By Mark Ellis 28/12/2007
Related Articles
- Escaped tiger kills man in zoo
- More Top Stories
- What are you talking about? Get published
- News pictures
A tiger which killed a teenager and mauled his two friends may have been taunted by them, police said yesterday.
Carlos Sousa, 17, died after Tatiana escaped from her compound at San Francisco Zoo and went for him and two brothers, aged 19 and 23.
Police later found a shoe and blood between a gate and the the tiger's moat and believe a victim may have been dangling his leg into the enclosure.
But Carlos's dad, also called Carlos, said: "I don't think this deserves to happen to anybody, taunting or not." It emerged that the wall around the moat was 4ft lower than rules allow.
Cheap shot:
Whether the bullets actually killed her or she died evading the bullets, the fact of the matter is that shots were fired at her and she would not have died if nobody was firing at her and this attempt at splitting hairs, at painting that she was a coward dying whilst evading death is a cheap shot and if the person did not verify that there were indeed no bullets on her body, he himself may have his alleged bravery tested in the future.
Presumption:
Bush has already blamed terrorists for the assassination of Ms Bhutto whilst other governments, eg Singapore has already pointed its finger.
It is not clear who pulled the trigger. It could be that Musharraf wanted to get rid of a rival. Is he classified as a terrorist?
Thus it is presumptuous to blame terrorists and fundamentalists and anyone who does so is not man of truth but emotion and a liar.
More karma than you think:
As a result of provoking the tigress, he not only got himself killed but he got the tigress killed and caused everyone much trouble that would not have happened if he did not taunt the tigress and so the man’s karma is far greater than people perceive.
Similarly by driving recklessly people cause an accident that causes a jam affecting many people and afterwards rather than moving to the side, they argue and refuse to budge not realizing they are creating horrendous karma for themselves.
He who saves his life will lose it:
Jesus: He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.
For whoever would save his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
Unless you are a very exceptional person, your life here can only be your act here, how you fabricate style in whatever you perceive, think, speak or do to impress, please and intimidate others, your attachment to your (beautiful or handsome) body, your possessions (including ‘loved’ ones), your status, your sensory pleasures, your opinions that differ from others that are in truth delusions and petty. Because all these are false and stressful, if you find your life here, you are an empty person.
The person who finds his life is the person who is occupied with his life here, his career, his possessions, wife and children, his identity (doctor), opinions and achievements.
You will only save your life here because you find it meaningful and are attached and have no confidence that there is life after death.
In truth the vast majority of people including those who are religious are attached to their (petty) lives here, they cherish their identities, who they are, their opinions and possessions and they do not believe they will perish in delusion.
Again Jesus said you cannot go to heaven unless you are born again, which indicates as they are, people will never go to heaven and it takes a fundamental change to go to heaven.
Such a fundamental change would be if they stop liking and disliking, shed their pervasive style in everything they perceive, think, speak and do, namely the use of force to stretch, change speed and strength of force.
IT IS BECAUSE LIFE HERE IS VIRTUALLY ALL ABOUT HYPOCRISY AND BEING HARMFULLY PRETENTIOUSLY NICE NOT GOOD TO EACH OTHER AND THE LIVES OF PEOPLE HERE ARE THEREFORE FALSE AND PETTY, IF YOU WILL SAVE IT, YOU FIND YOUR LIFE HERE MEANINGFUL THEN YOU WILL LOSE YOUR LIFE.
WHATEVER THE TRUTH THERE IS IN EXISTENCE IS EMBODIED OR REPRESENTED BY JESUS (THE BUDDHA IS ON THE SAME PATH BUT HE IS AS HE SAID, EVEN HIGHER AND IF YOU QUESTION THAT WITHOUT KNOWING OR SEEING, YOU ARE ASKING FOR TROUBLE) AND THUS IF YOU WILL FIND YOUR LIFE OTHER THAN HIM, YOU WILL FIND LIFE IN FALSITY AND FOOD THAT PERISHES AND WILL THEREFORE HEAD FOR FALSITY AND PERISH.
Benazir fingers Musharraf:
According to report, Benazir Bhutto emailed Wolf Blitzer of CNN saying that Musharraf has motive to kill her and should she die, the email should be made public.
Is Musharraf classified as an extremist or Taleban or Al Qaeda?
Thus it is presumptuous, a defilement of the mind to blame these for her murder when it is not confirmed who did it.
Rumour mills working overtime:
Can you see rumours zipping around, rumours fuelled by cheap cell phone calls and rumour mills working overtime?
If you cannot, then they are not just fabrications of the writer’s imagination or false intended to impress but they are reproduced from memory usually copied from others because they sound impressive to people who worship style.
Rumours may circulate around that has no connotations of speed but to perceive rumours zipping around at rapid speed is flirting with fantasy that will end with loss of contact with reality and madness.
There are grain and steel mills but there are no rumour mills, the term rumour mills working overtime is a hackneyed phrase that he copied from others and regurgitated by rote from his mental jukebox and he is thus a robot not just here but everywhere.
A person who likes to speak in hackneyed terms, in clichés is not worth listening to and so it is that perusing what he wrote, I find little I can trust as information devoid of hype on his part.
If you yourself is a showman or showgirl then it is not surprising that you will be attracted to the way he expresses things.
Bhutto Conspiracy Theories Fill the Air
By Simon Robinson/Lahore
If you believe the rumors that zip around (very impressive but can you or he see the rumours zipping?) Pakistan in the aftermath of one of the country's depressingly (why should he be depressed and want others to share his depression? It is totally unnecessarily to speak of depression and it is to exaggerate and be emotional) regular outbreaks of violence, it's all America's fault. Or India's. Or Israel's. Or it's those Afghan-based militia who keep sneaking across the border. Fueled (assisted or facilitated would be more based on reason and not so colourful) by cheap cell phone calls and the rise of 24-hour television news channels, gossip about who is to blame for Pakistan's woes runs from the reasonable to the ridiculous.
In the 24 hours since a lone attacker assassinated former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, the rumor mill has again been working overtime (can you see rumour mills and them working overtime?). In Karachi, amid reports of rioting and sabotage, stories circulated that the city's water supply had been poisoned and people were afraid to drink it. There were also the conflicting accounts of how Bhutto died — from bullet wounds or from a bomb blast that followed or from fracturing her skull against her car's sun-roof as the assailant blew himself up. In the confusion of reports, many Pakistanis are pointing the finger of blame at President Pervez Musharraf and his allies in Washington.
There is no evidence to suggest that Musharraf or Pakistan's security forces were connected to the attack (He seems eager to absolve Musharraf and the US). On jihadi websites, al-Qaeda claimed the assassination was their work and intelligence officials in both Pakistan and the U.S. agree that Islamic extremists from al-Qaeda or the Taliban were probably responsible for the devastating attack (It is not devastating except in the perverted perception of his mind, anyone who can be devastated is headed for devastation himself). But as Musharraf's popularity has slipped badly, moderate and religious Pakistanis alike have begun to blame him for the increasing chaos in their country — and to trace every incident directly to his rule and his high-profile allies. "This assassination was fabricated by the present government," says Liaqat Baloch, a senior official in Jamaat-e-Islami, one of Pakistan's main Islamic parties. "It is part of the American strategy to scare people that Pakistan is falling apart."
At a time when Pakistan does indeed seem to be falling apart, it may seem absurd and even pointless to repeat such allegations. But the sentiments provide a powerful insight into how angry Pakistanis are at their President and how mistrustful they are of the U.S. At the least, says retired Lieutenant General Hamid Gul, the former director general of Pakistani intelligence organization Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), "it's very convenient for the security forces to call it a suicide bomber because they can cover up the possibility someone else was behind the attack." Gul, who has become a harsh critic of Musharraf over the past year, believes America is partly responsible for its current predicament. "If America continues to act selfishly and unwisely, well, there is hardly any good that has come out [of their help] either for the U.S. or Pakistan, and this will continue."
[As ISI chief, Gul helped run the Afghan mujahideen as a force to counter and eventually defeat the Soviet Union in the 1980s; later he helped establish the Taliban in Afghanistan. He also organized the guerrillas fighting the Indian army in the sections of Kashmir held by New Delhi.]
With such mistrust, rumors thrive. On the streets of Lahore Friday afternoon, many blamed Musharraf and the U.S. rather than Islamic extremists for Bhutto's demise. White-haired Mohamed Sharif, 61, who runs a sidewalk barber's shop using a rusty old metal table and a worn mirror, says the "rumor is that America is involved in this with Musharraf's help." A passerby butts in with his agreement: "America and the government are in the same direction, they are allies," says Sabir Hussain. "If the government is doing this it is on the order of America."
Lahore is a stronghold of opposition leader and former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, and is home to plenty of Bhutto supporters as well. In a place that's so heavily anti-Musharraf, innuendo seems to feed on itself. On the city's main street, lined with policemen holding batons and wearing anti-riot gear, two teenagers out for a walk say they have also heard about a possible government connection to the attack but cannot offer any evidence to back up the claims. "My mother told me not to talk about this topic on my mobile or telephone because the government may tape it," says Hafiz Jamshaid, 18, a computer science student at a local college.
Across town, in a park in the tony neighborhood known as Defense Housing Authority, or DFA, four business associates discussed Pakistan's future after their regular afternoon walk. "People are afraid to air their opinions but as far as I know America sent Benazir and later killed her with the help of Pervez Musharraf," says M.A. Mohamed, who runs a car parts company. "I can confirm this idea." His friend and colleague Talat Mumtaz interjects: "No, no. no, America likes Benazir. Why would they kill her? You're being ridiculous."
"No one knows what are the facts," complains Constable Jafar Hamid, proudly showing off his English as he guards a McDonald's outlet, closed against possible rioting. So where do all the rumors come from? "We don't believe in one thing, we don't think like a nation," he says. "Everybody has his own opinion and that is part of the problem." With reporting by Khuda Yar Khan/Islamabad
Joking is trivializing falsity and enjoying it:
If what is said or done is the truth it would not be called a joke but the truth.
Thus joking consists of trivializing falsity and finding it fun or laughing at the misfortune or sufferings of others.
Thus rather than meritorious, joking is not just appreciating falsity but finding it ‘fun’, rather than empathizing with the sufferings of others, you find their suffering ‘fun’.
Thus you are a fool if you think you will be rewarded for your jokes when you will be punished.
The man who is regularly joking, always trying to see the funny side of thing is the man who has found his life here and will lose it.
So the only excuse for you to make is that your joking and appreciation of joking is ‘sedate’, in moderation and wholesome (you only appreciate ‘clean’ jokes), you are only putting on a show or lying that you appreciate jokes just to get along.
Right for the wrong reasons:
You can be right for the wrong reasons and rather than mitigating, it is self deception and still wrong view.
For example the Malaysian foreign minister referred to the riots and murder of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan as the reason why Malaysia is intolerant of demonstrations here.
He is right that demonstrations are dangerous but his motive or reason is wrong. If the masses stay obedient then the ruling party will be assured perpetuity in its rule and whatever shenanigans it may perpetrate behind the scenes and so he may be exploiting the situation to justify his unjust actions.
Again there will be those who are also critical of the pope, in particular what he said about the environment but it may not be based on impartial appraisal of what he says and does but because they do not like him or the Catholic church.
YOU MUST BE RIGHT FOR THE RIGHT REASONS BECAUSE IF YOU ARE RIGHT FOR THE WRONG REASONS IT MEANS YOU ARE A DECEPTIVE MAN WITH ULTERIOR OR FALSE MOTIVES. BEING RIGHT FOR THE WRONG REASON MAY BE NO BETTER THAN BEING WRONG AND MAY BE EVEN WORSE BECAUSE YOU DECEIVE OTHERS.
Bizarre logic:
Quote: The assassination of former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto shortly after she held a political rally showed why Malaysia was against street demonstrations, said Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar.
It is impossible that Benazir was killed in the heat of the moment as a result of stirred passions but it was pre planned because the person carried a gun and strapped himself with a bomb and they would have attempted to kill her even if there was no rally.
The minister is suggesting that the emotional provocations of the rally caused the killing.
THUS BECAUSE HIS REASONING IS BIZARRE HE HAS PROVEN HIMSELF TO BE AN OPPORTUNIST TRYING TO CAPITALIZE ON SOMETHING THAT HAS HAPPENED.
THE FACT THAT HE CAN UTTER THIS BIZARRE STATEMENT INDICATES HE HAS ADVANCED FALSE LOGIC THAT WILL END IN MAD LOGIC.
A suave Taliban?
Even in the name of camouflage it is unlikely that a Taliban or Al Qaeda operative will wear western clothes and sunglasses that they have sworn hatred for but it is in keeping with a careless plot using a westernized intelligence operative who forgot to don costumes more in line with a Muslim fundamentalist, not realizing that his image could be captured on photos that the assassin is caught in clothes that suggest his paymasters.
Caught in the act: assassin shooting Bhutto
By Omar Waraich in Karachi
Published: 31 December 2007
Dramatic new photographs taken seconds before the murder of Benazir Bhutto cast serious doubt on the Pakistan government's official account of the death of the former prime minister. The three photographs – first published by Pakistan's Dawn News – appear to reveal Ms Bhutto's assassin advancing towards her vehicle, drawing out a pistol, and firing it at close range as the handful of security personnel duck for cover.
The government says that she was killed by a lone attacker as she left an election rally in the city of Rawalpindi. Citing medical reports, it says she was killed when a blast set off by a suicide bomber smashed her head into a lever on the sunroof of her bullet-proof vehicle as she ducked down. Bhutto's opposition PPP party has dismissed the Interior Ministry's account as lies.
In the latest images, the suspected assassin is shown to be a young man of Pakistani origin in his early twenties. He is clean-shaven, wearing sunglasses, and dressed in black tie and waistcoat.
In the first photograph, he is captured looking towards the camera with another man – suspected to be a suicide bomber – standing behind him with a scarf across his face. The second photograph shows the suspected assassin raising his pistol in the direction of Ms Bhutto's vehicle.
The final image shows Ms Bhutto's supporters and security personnel lowering their heads in reaction to the gun shots. Ms Bhutto has dropped back down into the car. And the suspected suicide bomber is yet to detonate his device. According to experts, the photographs – taken by an amateur – appear to confirm the PPP's version of events. Ms Bhutto's party has said that she died after being shot in the head and the neck, just before a suicide bomber killed himself and at least 20 PPP supporters.
Javed Iqbal Cheema, a spokesman for the Ministry of Interior, has claimed that Ms Bhutto had died after slamming her head against the sunroof after climbing out to wave at crowds while leaving an election rally in Rawalpindi.
Sherry Rehman, the PPP's information secretary, dismissed Mr Cheema's account as "dangerous nonsense". Ms Rehman was in the car when Ms Bhutto died and when her body was bathed before burial.
"She has a bullet wound at the back of her head on the left side. It came out the other [side]," said Ms Rehman, who was injured when she was thrown out of the car by the blast. "That was a very large wound, and she bled profusely through that. She was even bleeding while we were bathing her for the burial. The government is now trying to say she concussed herself, which is ludicrous."
Yesterday, Asif Zardari, Ms Bhutto's husband, demanded that the United Nations and the British Government be allowed to lead an investigation into her murder. President Musharraf is considering calls for an international, independent inquiry.
The more likely scenario:
It is more likely the case of an intelligence operative who foolishly forgot to don a Taliban disguise thinking he and all the evidence will be blown to bits or he rather liked to ‘go out in style’ (meaning in sunglasses and trench coat) than the case of a meticulous Taliban who even planned to the last detail of disguising himself as an intelligence operator.
Therefore the fact that the assassin was caught in picture wearing western clothes and sunglasses that would be anathema for any self respecting Taliban implies that it may be somebody less radical or fundamentalist but nevertheless desperate to get rid of her that wanted Benazir dead.
Can the Taliban order the fire brigade to hose the scene?
Neither the Taliban nor Al Qaeda can order the fire brigade to hose the scene but someone in the government can do so and so unless the hosing is a thoughtless act or ‘accident’, the fact that it happens indicates the plot to kill Benazir must originate from the government.
Mental & physical hurts:
There are only two kinds of hurts or pains, physical and mental.
Physical pain or hurt is due to physical contact with objects transmitting force that is not necessarily mechanical (punch) but can be radiant (hot sun or ‘bitter cold’) or chemical (burning acid).
Mental or virtual pain is solely dependent on the fact that all ordinary people (but not necessarily all people or the Buddha) possess mental force that can be stirred helplessly by others to self inflict pain and it is precisely because people know that they can provoke others to self inflict pain that they say or do certain things in certain ways they know will hurt others and may hide their pleasures at knowing the other person will be thus hurt. However whoever must say or do things in certain ways that hurt others must himself also be hurt because he must apply the same forceful prolonging, accelerating changes of speed and strength that will hurt his own mind but he summons his considerable force of self preservation to dampen or suppress the hurt not realizing that the hurt he generates in himself in order to hurt others is only under control that will ultimately slip from his control either acutely in a panic or in old age degeneration and he is headed for terrible torment.
Vindictive and hurtful people know only too well WHAT they can say or do and HOW they can say or do will hurt others and the combination of what and how they say or do that can hurt others must be painstakingly acquired, perfected by regular practice until it becomes so slick it needs no thinking or paying attention except to press the ‘start’ button.
For example what they say that they know can hurt others is to ask many questions especially of a personal nature that would embarrass the other person to answer and they relish seeing others squirm trying to answer. Because their intention is not to know the answers to the questions they ask but to make others suffer, they must use force to fake genuine interest and use force to suppress their delight at others’ suffering (use force to lie to themselves and others).
How they say or do things that can hurt others can only be the way with which they use excessive force to prolong, change speed or strength eg to speak in an angry or hypocritically concerned way that belies the intent of what they say that is intended to hurt and confuse the recipient that what is said is hurtful but the way it is said is friendly.
Whereas physical pain lasts as long as the physical application of force, mental pain can be regenerated almost indefinitely if the person keeps revisiting the hurtful words or deeds and it conditions the person to hurt and thus the person who say or does hurtful things is not only guilty of inflicting pain but conditioning the person to mental pain that he may never get out and the karma is therefore far graver than he imagines.
IT IS EVEN MORE WICKED TO SAY HURTFUL THINGS IN A FRIENDLY MANNER (STYLE) THAT CONFUSES THE GULLIBLE TO THINK YOU ARE BEING FRIENDLY WHEN YOU WANT TO HURT COMPARED TO THE PERSON WHO MAKES NO BONES ABOUT WANTING TO HURT YOU WITH HIS WORDS. THUS ANYONE WHO THINKS HIS FRIENDLY MANNER OF SPEECH MEANS HE HAS NO INTENTION OF HURTING IS A DELUDED FOOL PUTTING A NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK HE THINKS IS A LAUREL.
The Buddha said he is unshaken by whatever happening like a rocky mountain is unmoved. He can either be faking it, hurt but lying that he is not (as ordinary people can suppress expressions of their hurt with force) or he is genuinely unhurt like water does not stick to a lotus flower.
The reason the Buddha is genuinely not hurt unlike ordinary people is because he has practiced to uproot his mental force that is now extinct and therefore cannot be stirred by others to self hurt himself and rather than boredom and suffering, joyful is the man who has no mental force that can be hijacked by others to hurt himself.
Family values promote world peace:
The pope is quoted as saying that family values are key to world peace, in his New Year's Day Mass.
This is a dangerous, false statement to make that promotes false perception in yourself and gullible people.
There can be no peace so long as people including those who possess family values have ill will that is the source of their likes and dislikes and emotions. So long as a person has likes and dislikes, is emotional, there can be no peace with himself or any other persons.
There are many different family values, even gangsters subscribe to family values so does that mean that the family values of these gangsters are a key to world peace?
You will be judged for every careless word you say and the wise person will not make sweeping statements that may sound emotionally gratifying but you cannot be sure is true.
CAN YOU BE SURE THAT FAMILY VALUES IS A KEY TO WORLD PEACE, IF EVERYONE ADOPTED FAMILY VALUES, THERE WILL BE WORLD PEACE?
Cause and cure:
If A is the only cause of B then true logic tells you that the only cure for B is the elimination of A and nothing else.
Thus if the constant use of force to prolong is the only cause of sadness that leads to depression then the only cure of sadness is to stop using force to prolong your syllables and units of motion, anything else (eg meditation, tai chi, yoga, prayers) is false and fruitless vexation that leads to insanity.
If the constant use of force to accelerate in speed and loudness is the only cause of feeling hurt at what others say or do then the only cure of feeling hurt is to stop using force to change speed and loudness of your syllables and units of motion, anything else (eg meditation, tai chi, yoga, prayers, faking you are not hurt when you are, suppressing your hurt) is false and fruitless vexation that leads to insanity.
If the stress, restlessness and distraction that you experience is due to the use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness in your speech and motion then the only cure for stress, restlessness and distraction is to stop using force to stretch, change speed and loudness. Anything else is fruitless vexations that lead to insanity because it is delusion.
All beings must dislike stress:
BECAUSE THERE IS ONLY ONE CAUSE OF STRESS AND IT IS THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT NECESSITATES YOUR POSSESSION OF MENTAL FORCE THAT CAN BE STIRRED BY OTHERS’ BEHAVIOR, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN CURE STRESS BY TM MEDITATION, TAI CHI, EXERCISE, HEALTH FOODS, DRUGS, PRAYERS, YOGA, TAI CHI OR WHATEVER ELSE YOU MIGHT NOMINATE, YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND DELUSION THAT WILL END IN MADNESS, HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. IF YOU ARGUE THAT YOU ARE NOT TRYING TO CURE BUT MERELY CONTAIN OR MANAGE STRESS, YOU ARE A FOOL BECAUSE STRESS IS CONDITIONING (PAY ATTENTION AND YOU MIGHT OBSERVE STRESS SUDDENLY RISING SHARPLY IN YOU AND THIS IS DISPROPORTIONATE INCIPIENT MAD STRESS) AND BY FOOLISHLY TRYING TO MANAGE STRESS, YOU ARE FURTHER CONDITIONING OR ADDICTING YOURSELF TO STRESS THAT FURTHER WARPS AND DEGRADES YOUR MIND.
It is their wickedness and toughness (capacity to absorb the self and others’ infliction of pain without flinching or withdrawing) abetted by their foolishness and denial that cause beings trapped here to heedlessly use unnecessary force in whatever they perceive, think, speak or do and as a result of this use of force together with relentless constant extrinsic force bombardment ensuing from the audiovisual output of others, they must experience rising stress, restlessness and distraction that they must regularly release by withdrawal, substance abuse (alcohol, smoke, drugs) or sleep.
And it is a reflection of how recalcitrant & foolish beings are, how ensnaring this world of the senses is, how well beings in the lower realms detain each other in suffering that the Buddha said there have already been countless eons lasting virtually countless years, you have shed blood greater than the four great oceans from having your head cut as animals and humans, you will build a pile of skeleton as high as a mountain over each eon.
Although some may like to think they are different, all beings here from insects to animals to humans are basically the same in that there is always a style present in them that is consistent in them but differs from others in how they use force to stretch, change direction, speed and strength of force and it is this constant use of force that is unnecessary but necessary for show to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others that is the root to the insoluble renewing stress, restlessness and distraction they must all suffer from and mandates that they must exist as robots constantly rehashing whatever they want to say or do or perceive or think from a mental jukebox rather than fabricating live specific for each occasion.
No matter how wicked or tough a being (capacity to absorb abuse or pain), all beings here must dislike (hate, angry, resent) the stress, restlessness and distraction that beset them as a result of their false stylish behaviour because stress, restlessness and distraction are painful, conditioning (addictive) and are slowly killing them even if they cannot see it is so. It is not surprising that beings who are constantly using force to fabricate their styles in speech and motion will also use force to dislike or hate or be angry with the stress, restlessness and distraction that hounds them and as a result of using force to dislike they are further conditioning themselves to the use of force.
The use of force to fabricate style that leads to stress that leads to use of force to dislike is like a mad carousel that keeps getting faster and faster with time so that it gets harder and harder to get off without killing yourself by being flung off violently so that once a person is inducted onto the mad carousel of force, he is doomed to suffering and death to come back again and again to the same.
The only way to get out of this torment and madness is to look for the machine room of this mad carousel to apply the brakes to slowly bring your personal mad carousel to come to a stop and then calmly get out of it, never to return.
IT IS POSSIBLE NOT TO USE FORCE TO DISLIKE ARISEN STRESS OR TO NOT USE FORCE TO (FOOLISHLY) ATTEMPT TO DRIVE OUT THIS STRESS BY DISENGAGING ONESELF TO ALLOW THE ARISEN MENTAL FORCE TO SLOWLY DISSIPATE SUCH THAT IN THE FUTURE YOU ARE SO SKILLFUL YOU DO NOT EVEN ALLOW MENTAL FORCE TO RISE BUT IT IS A TEMPTATION TOO HARD TO RESIST FOR FOOLISH TOUGH GOATS THAT FACED WITH MOUNTING STRESS, THEY MUST DISLIKE IT AND ATTEMPT TO DRIVE IT OUT WHEN WHAT THEY ACHIEVE IS SUPPRESSION THAT WITH AN INEVITABLE WEAKENING OF THEIR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION WILL RESULT IN A REBOUND OF STRESS WITH A VENGEANCE THAT MAKES THE PREVIOUS STRESS ‘A CAKE WALK’.
TO BEINGS INURED TO USING FORCE TO FABRICATE STYLE (THE ANGRY, SAD, EAGER OR GENTLE WAY YOU SPEAK IS STYLE THAT REQUIRES USE OF FORCE) IN WHATEVER THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO, IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT THEY WILL ALSO USE FORCE TO DISLIKE OR HATE THEIR RISING STRESS AND THEY WILL FOOLISHLY TRY TO USE FORCE TO DRIVE OUT THE STRESS THAT AT BEST SUPPRESSES OR POSTPONE IT TO A LATER EVEN WORSE RECKONING.
THE KEY TO GETTING OUT OF THIS MADNESS THAT WILL END IN TRAGEDY IS TO PAY ATTENTION TO NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES (I .... LOVE YOU ... IS PROLONGING THE PAUSES), CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT WILL PREVENT STRESS RISING. WITHOUT STRESS RISING WHY SHOULD YOU DISLIKE OR HATE STRESS OR USE FORCE TO FOOLISHLY ATTEMPT TO DRIVE OUT THE STRESS?
NO ONE CAN USE FORCE TO DRIVE OUT ARISEN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION. WHAT THEY ACHIEVE IS TEMPORARY SUPPRESSION AND POSTPONING THE RECKONING. THE ONLY WAY TO GET OUT OF STRESS IS TO STOP STOKING THE FIRES THAT CHURN OUT STRESS BY NOT USING FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND ALLOWING ARISEN FORCE TO SLOWLY DISSIPATE.
THE ONLY CAUSE OF STRESS IS THE BEING’S FOOLISH USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE TO MANUFACTURE STYLE THAT NECESSITATES THEY MUST HAVE RESIDENT MENTAL FORCE THAT CAN BE STIRRED TO BE STRESSED BY THE TRANSMISSION OF FORCE IN THE AUDIOVISUAL OUTPUTS OF OTHER BEINGS. BECAUSE THE ONLY CAUSE OF THEIR STRESS IS THEIR UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE, THE ONLY CURE IS THE CESSATION OF THIS USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH. THERE IS NO OTHER RECOURSE OR CURE AND IF YOU THINK THE ANSWER IS TO USE FORCE TO DRIVE OUT THIS ARISEN STRESS, YOU ARE A FOOL BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE AND HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
