Who asked you to listen to my advice:
Nice people are eager to dispense advice thinking they are doing good when they are being nice and unnecessarily risking their necks on the chopper board should their advice causes grief.
Faced with advice that has gone bad for the recipient, people might shirk responsibility by saying ‘who asked you to listen to my advice’ or if my advice is a sure fire winner, I would have undertaken it myself.
For instance hearing that my business is not good many will readily counsel a change of location not realizing that it cost money and effort to change location and it is not a guaranteed cure to poor business.
If you do not want others to listen to your advice why do you dispense it? If you give advice because you want it to be considered then should it cause the person loss or grief you have debts no matter how you insist how are you supposed to know this will happen.
If you are not certain that your advice will benefit or you cannot be certain it will not harm the other person then you should refrain from giving that advice.
Even if your advice brings material benefit, it is sustaining people in their lives here and it may incur negative karma than positive.
Only when your advice is for the benefit in spiritual wellbeing here and thereafter should you proffer it.
THUS IF YOU ARE NOT CERTAIN IF THE ADVICE WILL HARM THE PERSON, YOU SHOULD NOT GIVE IT. ONLY IF YOU ARE CERTAIN THAT THE ADVICE WHEN FOLLOWED IS TO THE BENEFIT OF THE PERSON HERE AND THEREAFTER SHOULD YOU GIVE IT.
THUS I TOO GIVE ADVICE BUT IF MY ADVICE EG STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS FOLLOWED FAITHFULLY IT WILL RESULT IN FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS AND FEELING HURT THAT IS ALWAYS A BENEFIT TO THE PERSON AND INCURS MERIT ON ME.
Goodwill & Ill Will:
The Buddha said that intention is karma and a person’s intention can either be good (goodwill) or ill (ill will).
Whatever a person thinks, speaks, does & even perceives is based on intention that can either be good or ill. If the person speaks or does something without intention he must be mad and because he is not mad (yet) he must have intention that is often concealed or contradicts his stated intention or substance of what he says or does.
Exactly what a person’s intention, be it good or ill, may be known if not by him then by those who discern and God and if you have bad intention then you are heaping karma that will result in future suffering.
Goodwill and ill will are all about force and nothing to do with genuine reason.
Ill will may be naked, without a plan and based on a will or force to harm either physically or directly (hitting or scolding someone) or by indirectly depriving others (stealing or cheating or confiscating) or kill (directly by using gun or secretly commit murder) or ill will may include a plan that is always false to carry out indirectly the wish to harm, deprive or kill others. Although you may have to reason (falsely) initially to form the plan to deprive, harm or kill another, after you have decided on a plan, it is a lifeless scheme that you must follow blindly often to the letter using force in which you are just a robot using force to fulfil that plan composed by ill will.
THUS ILL WILL IS ALL ABOUT FORCE TO DEPRIVE, HARM OR KILL AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENUINE REASON. ILL WILL MAY BE DIRECT WITHOUT A PLAN (EG KILL A PERSON IN A FIT OF RAGE) OR ILL WILL MAY BE INDIRECT, CARRRIED OUT THROUGH A PLAN THAT ALTHOUGH INITIALLY FASHIONED BY FALSE REASONING IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT ONE’S ILL WILL IN A CONCEALED WAY OR TO ASSURE SUCCESS (IN ORDER TO MURDER SOMEONE SUCCESSFUL, YOU MUST THINK OF A WAY TO KILL HIM WITHOUT HIM OR OTHERS KNOWING), ONCE DECIDED, THE PLAN BECOMES THE MASTER OR SCHEME IN WHICH THE PLANNER BECOMES A ROBOT TO CARRY OUT TO THE LETTER (USING JUST FORCE) THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE PLAN TO DEPRIVE, COMMIT HARM OR KILL.
When you have a wish to cut down a tree, scold someone or steal that is ill will and if you use counter force to stop yourself cutting that tree, scold or steal then you have goodwill or force for good. Only force can stop force and you must use force to stop your ill will and this force that stops your ill will is your goodwill. In addition, it is goodwill use force to say or do things that benefit others like setting up a shelter for the homeless and providing food for the poor. You may initially use reason that is genuine to fashion a plan on how to benefit others by building a shelter or providing food but subsequently it is the use of force to carry out that plan that is the force for good or good will.
THUS GOOD WILL IS THE USE OF FORCE WITH OR WITHOUT A PLAN IN ORDER NOT TO DEPRIVE, HARM OR KILL OTHERS AND IN ADDITION TO USE FORCE WITH OR WITHOUT A PLAN TO BENEFIT OTHERS LIKE PROVIDING SHELTER AND FOOD TO THE DEPRIVED.
ONLY A NOBLE OR ENLIGHTENED PERSON HAS NO INTENTION. BECAUSE HE HAS NO MENTAL FORCE OR EMOTION OR LIKE OR DISLIKE TO DEPRIVE, HARM OR KILL OTHERS, HE DOES NOT NEED ANY FORCE OR GOODWILL TO STOP THIS EVIL TENDENCY THAT IS NONEXISTENT IN HIM, HE MAY SAY OR DO THINGS THAT HE KNOWS BENEFIT OTHERS BUT HE HAS NO DESIRE OR MOTIVATION OR FORCE TO DO SO, HE JUST DOES IT.
Thus the person who asked me the question “Why are you so rude” is driven by an intention that is ill (that she may have so well denied that she thinks she is devoid of ill will) to attack me and challenge me to a verbal fight (argument) based on a plan that she must have carried out many times before in which she attacks indirectly in a disguised way as if she is interested in knowing from me the reasons why I am so rude.
BECAUSE RESTLESSNESS, BEING DISTRACTED, SAD OR EXCITED IS SUFFERING, IF YOU SAY OR DO THINGS THAT MAKE OTHERS RESTLESS, DISTRACTED, SAD OR EXCITED, YOU HAVE ILL WILL, YOUR URGE TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT RESULT IN OTHERS BEING RESTLESS, DISTRACTED, SAD OR EXCITED IS ILL NOT GOOD.
Fooled by a plan’s reasoning:
Because plans may be complex and have rationale in it (that is usually based on false logic) to achieve objectives (eg make more money) the foolish person is fooled to think he is reasoning and he has reason or true logic.
Although reason that is usually false goes into formulating a plan, once the plan is formulated, it is a merely a set of instruction in which the person who subscribes is merely a robot using force to carry out the instructions according to the plan that may be in his head, on a piece of paper given to him or spoken to him by another.
BECAUSE WHAT PEOPLE SPEAK AND DO IS ACCORDING TO PLANS THAT THEY MAY NOT EVEN BE AWARE EXIST IN THEIR MINDS AND THESE PLANS CAN BE SOPHISTICATED OR COMPLEX AND HAVE A LOGIC (THAT MAY BE PROVEN FALSE), THEY BELIEVE THEY ARE SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS WITH GENUINE REASONING WHEN THEY ARE MERELY ROBOTS USING FORCE TO CARRY OUT THE INSTRUCTIONS DESCRIBED BY THEIR PLANS.
Thus the murder of Altanturya was carried with force according to a plan driven by ill will or force to harm, deprive and kill. The mastermind wanted to kill her and entertained various plans to get rid of her in a way that would not implicate him (he thinks in delusion) and once the plan has been toyed around and finalized, he merely executes the plan using force according what the plan says and it is not reason but force or ill will based on a plan that caused the murder.
Suggestion is advice:
Whenever you make suggestions in any topic of conversation you are giving advice.
No matter how frivolous or non binding you think your suggestions or advice, you must want it to be considered and if the other person were to take up your suggestion (eg start a new business or look for another job) and it was to cause him loss or suffering, you have karma you did not realize you created for yourself by frivolously suggesting to the other person.
Suggestions seldom come out of genuine reason but the person has many opinions on matters occurring and suggestions come out of an urge to offer opinions and remedies that is driven by force and after lifelong practice the person has an irresistible urge to offer suggestions even in matters in which he has no expertise.
THUS THE WISE PERSON WILL USE THE FORCE OF GOODWILL TO REFRAIN FROM OFFERING SUGGESTIONS UNLESS HE SEES AND KNOWS THEY ARE CLEARLY BENEFICIAL, NOT IN A MATERIAL BUT IN A SPIRITUAL SENSE FOR THE HAPPINESS OF THE PERSON NOW AND THEREAFTER.
Sadomasochism is based on ill will:
There are many who have a perversion to desire pain being inflicted on them, they find it sexually gratifying and this is based on ill will towards self and inviting others to punish them or practice ill will on them with karma not merit.
Similarly many derive perverted pleasure out of punishing others and they enjoy punishing others during sexual gratification in various forms.
THUS SADOMASOCHISM IS BASED ON ILL WILL AND DERIVING PLEASURE OUT OF ILL WILL TO SELF AND OTHERS.
All evil is premeditated:
Nobody commits an evil or crime without premeditation, without planning what and how he will go about committing that evil.
There may already be a pre-existing plan that he has used many times before that may fool some people to think it is spontaneous, without premeditation or planning what and how to do. For example someone might fly into a rage and attack another and this may be deemed not premeditated but it is not so. Without physically or mentally having entertained or fantasized how to fly into a rage and attack someone it is impossible that FOR THE FIRST TIME someone can attack another with such slick violent acceleration and deceleration of force.
THUS ALL EVIL MUST BE PRE-PLANNED OR PREMEDITATED AS TO HOW AND WHAT TO DO AND THEN CARRIED OUT ACCORDING TO THAT PLAN. WITHOUT HAVING PLANNED OR THOUGHT ABOUT IT, NO ONE CAN COMMIT EVIL LIKE THEFT, ROBBERY, KILLING OR HARMING ANOTHER. BECAUSE EVIL MUST ENSUE FROM A PLAN THE PERSON IS MERELY A ROBOT USING FORCE TO CARRY OUT THE PLAN THAT EITHER HE OR SOMEONE HAS PLANTED IN HIM.
MP: Anwar Power Crazy:
This statement is never made specific for the occasion guided by reason but is based on dislike aimed at attacking Anwar that slanders him and slander can send you to hell.
Anwar may aspire to be PM but his actions so far do not indicate someone who is power crazy; someone who will do anything by hook or crook to become PM.
IT IS UNLIKELY THE FIRST TIME HE HAS LABELLED SOMEONE HE DOES NOT LIKE AS POWER CRAZY BUT IT IS LIKELY A FAVORITE LABEL THAT HE COPIED FROM OTHERS AND RETRIEVES FROM HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX TO ATTACK OR SMEAR OTHERS. WHAT HE SAID IS DRIVEN OUT OF ILL WILL AND HAS A PLAN IN HIS HEAD FROM WHICH HE EXECUTED FROM.
IF YOU DENY YOURSELF, YOU ARE NOT INTIMATELY INVOLVED WITH AFFAIRS IN THIS WORLD WHAT DOES IT MATTER IF ANWAR IS POWER CRAZY? IF HE IS, HE MUST SUFFER AND BE HEADED FOR PERDITION AND SO WHY DO YOU BEGRUDGE HIS POWER CRAZINESS? INSTEAD IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE RESENTFUL, HAVE YOUR OWN VESTED INTERESTS AND YOU ARE DRIVEN BY ILL WILL TO ATTACK THAT YOU SAY SO.
God exists and He can take action against you:
Can you make God disappear?
If you cannot, you have no power over God, remember that God may or does exist and He has power over you and can punish you.
Just because He has not punished you and all evil doers so far does not mean that in the future He will not do so and that the punishment will be quite palatable, it may be even be truly unimaginably tormenting and everlasting, as the Buddha said.
You cannot imagine how tormenting hell or the animal womb is because you have not reached there yet but the Buddha knows and he said he cannot think of anything more tormenting than hell or the animal womb.
GOD HAS NOT TAKEN ACTION, NOT PUNISHED YOU AND ALL EVIL DOERS YET BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN HE WILL NOT DO SO IN THE FUTURE. REMEMBER JESUS SAID YOU SHOULD FEAR HIM WHO CAN DESTROY YOUR SOUL IN HELL. THE SUFFERING THAT CAN BE INFLICTED ON YOU MAY BE TRULY UNIMAGINABLE, YOU CANNOT IMAGINE THE CONDITIONS IN HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT REACHED THERE YET JUST AS THE LIBERATION OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS AS A RESULT OF CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES BOTH AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS WAS UNIMAGINABLE BEFORE THEY HAPPENED.
Nothing but the best:
When someone says ‘nothing but the best’ he is contradicting himself that leads to doubt and uncertainty that is one of three lower fetters to future woe according to the Buddha. He said nothing and then he goes against himself to say ‘but the best’.
The person who speaks in truth without deception says, “Only the best”.
What Understanding Is Required:
WHATEVER PEOPLE PERCEIVE, THINK, POSE, SAY OR DO COMES FROM PLANS OR COMPUTER INSTRUCTIONS OR PROGRAMS IN THEIR HEADS AND WHAT UNDERSTANDING THEY REQUIRE IS WHAT EACH WORD IN THE INSTRUCTION OR PLAN MEANS AND WHAT THEY COLLECTIVELY MEAN WHEN STRUNG TOGETHER AND THUS UNDERSTANDING, TO CARRY OUT AS A ROBOT WHAT THOSE COMMANDS ORDER. ANYTHING ABOVE THAT IS NOT NECESSARY TO SURVIVE WELL AND OFTEN TOTALLY ABSENT EVEN IN PEOPLE OF FAIRLY SOPHISTICATED INTELLECT AND HIGH PLACES.
So long as you are able to understand the meaning of each word and the collective meaning when these words are strung together, you are in the business of obeying or carrying out the order that those words either composed by yourself or planted by others mean.
Different people have different levels of understanding, some know more words and thus they are capable of understanding and obeying more complex multiple rules whilst those with more elementary intelligence understand far fewer words and only understand simple rules.
THUS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS NEEDED TO SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD, YOU ONLY NEED TO UNDERSTAND WORDS, PARTICULARLY BASIC WORDS AND WHAT THEY MEAN WHEN STRUNG TOGETHER AND THUS UNDERSTANDING, CARRYING OUT THE INSTRUCTIONS THEY CONVEY AND YOU ARE IN BUSINESS BEING A ROBOT OR ACTOR WHO SAYS AND DOES THINGS IN THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF WHAT THOSE WORDS YOU UNDERSTAND SAY YOU MUST SAY OR DON’T SAY, DO OR DON’T DO IN SUCH AND SUCH A SITUATION.
A diamond's cut makes up about half its value, says expert
What is said may be true but it is based on human evaluation that may be deluded and therefore false. For societies or people that do not worship diamonds or are not interested in diamonds, then the statement is meaningless or false.
The statement contains words that add up to covey meaning or a collective message but this message is a plan that those who are greedy or material minded will remember or register in their minds and then it becomes a rule or plan that will control them rather they control that rule or plan.
Thus when occasions that are relevant arise, this rule or order that ‘a diamond’s cut makes up half its value’ may come into that person’s mind and that person will obey it. Rather than him being the master, he is the slave who cannot help this message ‘a diamond’s cut makes up half its value’ arising in him and cannot stop himself obeying and believing this rule.
A DIAMOND’S CUT MAKES UP HALF ITS VALUE IS A RULE THAT THOSE WHO ARE INTERESTED (MATERIALLY MINDED) REGISTER IN THEIR HEADS AND THEREAFTER THEY CANNOT HELP THE RULE ARISING AND INFLUENCING THEIR ACTIONS AND THEY ARE FOOLS IF THEY THINK THEY ARE MASTER OF THIS RULE BECAUSE IT IS THE RULE THAT ENSLAVES THEM.
OUTSPOKEN Muslim cleric Taj al-Din al-Hilali says in a new book that Christian women should wear the veil because the Bible says so.
Why is the newspaper giving publicity to what he said?
Objectively the paper is just telling you what Hilali said but it is unlikely that this is so and the likely intention is to quote what he said so that it will stir public scorn and hate (forms of dislike for him). It is unlikely if not impossible the paper approved what he said but the reason they bothered to air what he said is to make him a target of further vilification.
Thus whoever is responsible did not mean what he said because if he meant want he said, he should say I want to stir your indignation by telling you what Hilali said. There is grave karma there because if he becomes a victim of hate, you have a part in it.
Paul Krugman Gets It Seriously Wrong:
When you are supposed to be a professional and expert in your field people tend to foolishly lend weight or defer to your opinion but such so called experts, even those who believe they are reasonable and honest, can get quite simple things very wrong and as a result misleading others with karma.
Paul Krugman (?Economic Professor at Princeton) dismissed speculation by investors who have no interest in the commodities they are investing or speculating in as an important factor in the current price rises in oil and food citing a lack of inventories as his reason.
You do not need additional inventories to drive up prices but on the contrary, a diminishing inventory with more people with money chasing it will drive price for that commodity ‘sky high’.
For instance if in the past only 100 people are investing in a stock and they only willing to pay $10 for that stock, if there is speculative frenzy, people think the stock will rise to $100 because of rumours of development in that stock and more people come in to buy the stock, they can push the stock up to $50 or even more even though there is no substance in that rumour.
SHARP PRICE RISES DUE TO SPECULATIVE INTEREST OR THE COMING IN OF MORE PEOPLE WITH MONEY TO BUY THAT COMMMODITY BUT WHO HAVE NO USE FOR THE COMMODITY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INVENTORIES WHATEVER THAT MIGHT MEAN. MORE PEOPLE CHASING AFTER THE SAME COMMODITY, ESPECIALLY IF THERE IS LIMITED OR DWINDLING AMOUNTS OF THAT COMMODITY, WILL DRIVE UP THE PRICE OF THAT COMMODITY & IT IS ONLY IF THERE IS A RESERVE OF THAT COMMODITY THAT CAN BE MOBILIZED TO QUELL THIS ADDITIONAL SPECULATIVE DEMAND THAT WILL STOP PRICES RISING. FOR INSTANCE WHEN MALAYSIA TRIED TO CORNER THE TIN MARKET, THEY FOOLISHLY DID NOT REALIZE THE US HAD A LARGE STRATEGIC TIN STOCK THAT IT UNLOADED TO DAMPEN THE RISE IN TIN PRICES. SINCE YOU ARE FOOLISH TO WANT TO PAY MORE FOR THE TIN, YOU CAN HAVE ALL THE TIN THAT I HAVE IN MY STOCKPILE.
THUS IT IS THE PRESENCE OF ADEQUATE OR ‘LIMITLESS’ SURPLUS STOCKS THAT CAN BE RELEASED INTO THE MARKET THAT CAN DAMPEN PRICE RISES DUE TO SPECULATION OR DEFEAT SPECULATORS. THE PRESENCE OF A TIGHT MARKET WHERE THERE IS NO SURPLUS IS THE RIPE CONDITION FOR SPECULATORS WHO HAVE NO INTEREST EG IN RICE TO COME IN, CHASE THE COMMODITY RAMPING UP THE PRICE THAT EVERYONE MUST PAY AND THEN EXIT WITH A HANDSOME PROFIT.
THUS WHAT IS PAUL KRUGMAN TALKING ABOUT WHEN HE ASKED ABOUT WHERE IS THE INVENTORY THAT IS NEEDED FOR SPECULATORS TO BE A FACTOR IN THE CURRENT PRICE RISES? DOES HE MEAN THAT HE CANNOT SEE SPECULATORS HOARDING THE COMMODITIES CONCERNE OR IS HE SAYING THAT THE CURRENT TIGHT SUPPLY OF OIL AND RICE MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR SPECULATORS TO COME IN AND CREATE ARTIFICIAL OR UNNATURAL GREATER DEMAND THAT THEN INEVITABLY CAUSES PRICES TO RISE?
IS IT POSSIBLE FOR KRUGMAN TO CHECK OR HAS HE ACTUALLY CHECKED THAT ALL CURRENT BUYERS ON THE RICE AND OIL MARKET ARE IN NEED OF RICE AND OIL, NOT IN IT FOR THE RIDE, THEY DO NOT HOLD SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF RICE AND OIL SO AS TO CAUSE PRICES IN A TIGHT MARKET TO JUMP SHARPLY WAY BEYOND WHAT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IF THEY WERE NOT IN THE MARKET?
IN MY VIEW, IN THIS CLIMATE OF SHORTAGES OF THE VARIOUS COMMODITIES WITH ROBUST DEMAND AND SUPPLY REACHING SATURATION OR EVEN DECLINING, SPECULATORS PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN RAMPING UP PRICES WAY BEYOND WHAT IT WOULD NATURALLY BE. THESE ARTIFICIALLY HIGH PRICES CANNOT BE SUSTAINED AND PRICES WILL FALL BACK ONLY IF IN THE FUTURE SUPPLY EXCEEDS DEMAND AND SPECULATORS QUIT THE MARKET BECAUSE THERE IS NO LONGER A KILLING TO BE HAD. SO LONG AS SPECULATORS REMAIN IN THE MARKET BECAUSE THERE IS MONEY TO BE MADE, PRICES WILL REMAIN HIGHER THAN IF THEY WERE ABSENT IN THE MARKET. IN THE CASE OF OIL, SUPPOSED THE NATURAL PRICE RISE WITHOUT SPECULATORS IS TO $50 PER BARREL, SUPPLIERS USED TO GETTING $100 FOR THEIR OIL AND KNOWING THAT THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLY OF OIL MAY NOW BALK AT SELLING AT $50 AND THUS PRICES WILL NEVER FALL BACK TO WHAT IT WOULD BE WITHOUT SPECULATORS AND SPECULATORS HAVE GRAVE KARMA FOR CAUSING OTHERS TO HAVE TO PAY WAY ABOVE WHAT THEY HAVE THAT WILL CAUSE THE POOR TO SUFFER THE MOST.
Quote Krugman: The first is that it’s mainly speculation — that investors, looking for high returns at a time of low interest rates, have piled into commodity futures, driving up prices. On this view, someday soon the bubble will burst and high resource prices will go the way of Pets.com. (Not necessarily so, it is false logic to jump to this conclusion because if there is a persistent shortage of oil and food and people need these items, then additional speculative demand will not cause prices to collapse but sustained. It is only when a previously undiscovered significant new supply of rice or oil comes on line will the speculative bubble burst. Bubbles burst if the prices paid for the share is way too high above fundamentals and this cannot be sustained indefinitely. If oil and rice are in demand and we are in a tight supply situation then the coming in of speculative interest can drive up prices and sustain it because producers may get use to high prices and balk at selling when prices fall,)
The second view is that soaring resource prices do, in fact, have a basis in fundamentals — especially rapidly growing demand from newly meat-eating, car-driving Chinese — but that given time we’ll drill more wells, plant more acres, and increased supply will push prices right back down again.
The third view is that the era of cheap resources is over for good — that we’re running out of oil, running out of land to expand food production and generally running out of planet to exploit.
I find myself somewhere between the second and third views.
There are some very smart people — not least, George Soros (the ‘not least’ is unnecessary and reflects pretentiousness or condescension and status consciousness) — who believe that we’re in a commodities bubble (although Mr. Soros says that the bubble is still in its “growth phase”). My problem with this view, however, is this: Where are the inventories? (Very dramatic or acting, he is asking a confronting or attacking question but he has got his sums wrong and this will deceive the naive. What does he mean by inventories? Does he mean he cannot see inventories held by speculators that cause the prices to rise? Just as it is possible for me to go out and buy a stock, oil or rice future even though I have no interest in them and thereby artificially boost demand for it by an infinitesimal amount that can be amplified if many join in, in the same way if you look at the oil futures being held, surely a significant proportion are held by speculators or call it hedge funds if you like)
The nature of beings in this world:
Depending on their intellectual abilities, people may reason but their reasoning is always tainted by aggressiveness, emotions that are derived from like and dislike, sadness, hurt and fear. Their processes of reasoning may be defective and thus the results of their logic may be or are always defective, tainted by an ever present style and whatever conclusions they may derive from their defective reasoning is then committed to memory to be retrieved to be applied to situations that may arise in the future in which they are merely robots carrying out the programmed products of reasoning by themselves and others that they have stored in the minds.
The Buddha said this is the impure realm of ill will and heaven or the pure realm is the world of genuine goodwill and reason.
Thus the underlying basis of beings in this world, even those who are supposed to be very intellectual and spiritual is not genuine reason and goodwill but forcefulness and its derivatives and false rules or programmed rigid rehashed not genuine reason.
The motivations of emotional ordinary people are naked force as aggressiveness (attacking), like and dislike, sadness, feeling hurt and fear. Because programmed rehashed ruled reason is basically a plan that once fixed become the master to which the subscriber merely supplies force with no questions asked to activate it, it is actually a surrogate or proxy of force not genuine reason.
Thus what motivate men are:
a) Their naked forcefulness. They say or do things either intentionally or without realization not because they mean it but as a vehicle to attack others. To say Anwar is power crazy without basis is to use the words and the meaning they convey to attack. People do things to prove their ability to endure or obstruct and this is toughness and stubbornness that are facets of their forcefulness. Professional sportsmen are all very attacking or aggressive people.
b) All the emotions people describe apart from sadness, feeling hurt and fear can be traced to either like or dislike which is like the reversible supply of electrical current to an electromagnet in their minds so as to generate attraction or repulsion to whatever impinges their consciousness. Thus anger, hate, disgust, disdain, irritation, jealousy are forms of dislike and excitement, joy, eagerness, marvel, thrill are forms of like.
c) Sadness can be genuine or faked just as like and dislike can be faked or genuine. You say or do things with accentuated prolonging to fake sadness and in genuine sadness, the mental force is prolonging in an uncontrollable useless fashion. People prolong or stretch their syllables to fabricate style but in sadness, their mental force is not prolonging to fabricate style but temporarily gone mad.
d) Feeling hurt is the mental pain as a result of something happening caused by the naked impact of the acceleration in speed and strength of the person’s force of going against self that is normally shielded by his force of self preservation. Thus disappointment of an exam result is not dislike but feeling hurt just as you may feel hurt if the girl you desire marries another man and it is caused by the acceleration in speed and strength of force impacting on his consciousness unshielded by his force of self preservation.
e) It is a person’s force of going against self that is the drive in whatever he does or says and in a situation causing fear, his force of self preservation suddenly plunges in speed and strength leaving his normally active opposing force of self preservation ascendant pulling the fearful person away from what he was saying or doing. Fear is the consciousness experience of a sudden plunge in speed and strength of his force of going against self coupled by a sudden unopposed rise in strength of his force of self preservation.
f) Apart from these above that is the motivations for whatever people perceive, think, say or do, it is their rote rules or programmed reasoning that are actually proxies of force that motivate people’s behaviour. Ruled reasoning is based on a plan that may be copied from others without question or it may be formulated by that person but once formulated, it is the plan or rule that is the dictator and the person is merely a robot who uses force to carry out what the plan dictates.
Thus you may meticulously plan the murder of someone but once formulated, the plan becomes the master and you the slave to carry out that murder plan and you are a robot not live reasoning person.
For instance they may forcefully or emotionally or liking and disliking reason that blee is blah and blah is tee and thus reasoned they consign it to memory and in future situations they are emotionally attached to the ‘fact’ as they see that blee is blah and blah is tee which can be examined objectively and proven to wrong.
THUS IT IS FORCE THAT IS BASIS EVERYTHING THAT BEINGS IN THIS WORLD UNDERTAKE. BEINGS IN THIS WORLD ARE ALL ABOUT FORCE AND FORCED FALSE, REHASHED RULED REASONING.
THEIR REASONING IS TAINTED BY EMOTION AND WHATEVER FLAWED CONCLUSIONS THAT THEY MAY DERIVE FROM THEIR REASONING IS THEN MEMORIZED TO BE REHASHED IN FUTURE SITUATIONS IN WHICH THESE STORED PRODUCTS OF THEIR REASONING OR OTHERS’ REASONING BECOME THE MASTERS AND THEY ARE MERE ROBOTS USING FORCE TO REALIZE THESE PROGRAMS.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE BASIS OF THEIR EVER PRESENT STYLE OR USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN WHATEVER AND HOWEVER THEY PERCEIVE (SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE AND TOUCH), THINK, SPEAK AND SAY.
IT IS FORCE DIRECTLY AS AGGRESSIVENESS OR TO ATTACK THAT IS THE BASIS OF WHAT THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SAY OR DO TO ATTACK, INTIMIDATE, DOMINATE AND CONQUER.
IT IS FORCE INDIRECTLY AS LIKE AND DISLIKE (AND EMOTIONS DERIVED FROM THEM), SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR THAT MOTIVATES WHAT PEOPLE SAY OR DO.
TRUE REASON NEVER HAS FORCE AND BECAUSE THERE IS ALWAYS ADDITIONAL ATTENDING FORCE IN PEOPLE’S REASONING THAT ALWAYS HAS OBJECTIVELY DEMONSTRABLE STYLE AND ACCOMPANYING EMOTION (LIKE OR DISLIKE), THEIR REASONING IS SERIOUSLY TARNISHED JUST AS A FLY IN AN OINTMENT RENDERS THAT OINTMENT TAINTED.
Where is the inventory?
You have advanced false logic and perception if you think asking ‘where is the inventory’ is the appropriate answer to why speculators are not the cause of the recent oil and rice price rises. It is an evasive even haughty answer turning around to ask you a question instead of telling you “I think speculators are not the cause because blah, blah, blah.” Many people try to impress others that they are very clever by asking you to work out yourself why speculators are not responsible by asking you instead ‘where is the inventory’ without telling you exactly what they mean and how inventory is involved.
“There are some very smart people — not least, George Soros” is not a substance of speech but a style of speech that people copy from others because it is deemed stylish. It is being polite and condescending and if you like to be pretentious then you are fascinated to speak in this way, which is a style that is meaningless, for show.
There is only one true objective meaning when a person says “why are you so rude” and it is to request the other person to explain the reasons why he is rude. If you think it is to express your perplexity, you are absolutely stumped why I am rude you have false perception and logic.
Firstly I have not even admitted I am rude and so you are asking me an impossible question to give you the reason why I am rude.
If you like to ask others impossible questions you will be subjected to the same and it may even cause you a heart attack.
Instead the person has a motive that is different from the objective universal meaning of what was said and it was to express false or faked perplexity and to use it to attack and challenge me to a verbal fight or argument.
People do reason, depending on their intellectual abilities but they reason with faulty emotional logic and then they file the faulty reasoning into their mental hard disks and thereafter they merely retrieve their conclusions or rules from their hard disks to apply to situations arising and they think they are reasoning specific to the occasion when they are merely applying their own rules or opinions to the occasion.
THUS WHEN PEOPLE REASON (AND SOME LOWER PEOPLE MAY NEVER EVEN REASON, THEY JUST APE WHATEVER THEY SEE AND HEAR), THEY REASON WITH A STYLE, WITH CONSTANT PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND EMOTIONALLY OR LIKING AND DISLIKING AND ONCE THEY FORM FAULTY OR FALSE CONCLUSIONS OF THAT REASONING IT IS CONSIGNED TO THEIR MENTAL HARD DISKS AND THEREAFTER IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF RETRIEVING AND ACTIVATING WITH FORCE THE PLAN OF THAT CONCLUSION IN WHICH THEY ARE SLAVES OR ROBOTS OF THOSE CONCLUSIONS OF THEIR PAST REASONING, NOT FRESH SPECIFIC REASONERS OF WHAT IS HAPPENING ON EACH OCCASION.
IT MAY NEVER BE TRUE REASON THAT IS THE BASIS OF PEOPLE’S ACTIONS BUT IT IS NAKED FORCE AS AGGRESSIVENESS OR ATTACKING OR TOUGHNESS OR STUBBORNS OR IT IS FORCE INDIRECTLY AS LIKE AND DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR AND WHATEVER PART REASON PLAYS IS PRE-RECORDED FAULTY EMOTIONAL REASONING DONE IN THE PAST THAT IS FERVENTLY BELIEVED AS TRUE AND REHASHED TO APPLY TO A CURRENT SITUATION.
False perception always leads to mad perception:
If you think that false logic and perception are harmless or has no everlasting consequences, especially if the matter is trivial, then you may have wrong view and the Buddha said the destination of wrong view is hell or the animal womb.
ALL FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION IS DANGEROUS BECAUSE THEY WILL END IN MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION. YOU HAVE NOT GONE MAD YET AND YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT IS LIKE TO BE MAD AND SO DON’T TALK BIG YOU ARE TOO SOPHISTICATED TO BECOME MAD.
Thus you have false logic and perception if you think that ‘where is the inventory’ is the correct answer to ‘why speculators are not responsible for price rises’ and the fact that you think it is succinct, marvellous an answer reflects advanced false logic and perception.
It is false perception and logic to think your smiling is true and good for yourself and others when it is a form of lying with your face, for show, stresses yourself and others.
It is false perception and logic to think your liking and disliking is meaningful and good when it just a false unnecessary attractive or repulsive stirring of your mental force that harms your mind.
YOU MAY BE RIGHT THAT ‘WHERE IS THE INVENTORY’ IS THE LOGICAL ANSWER TO ‘WHY SPECULATORS ARE NOT THE CAUSE OF PRICE RISES’ OR YOU MAY BE WRONG. YOU MAY BE CORRECT THAT EVEN IF IT IS NOT APPROPRIATE IT IS HARMLESS OR IT MAY BE DEADLY, THE PATH TO MAD PERCEPTION THAT YOU HAVE NOT TASTED YET AND MAY BE WORSE THAN YOU IMAGINE POSSIBLE.
How come you didn’t know?
I have shown in many instances what people utter can be objectively proven to be false or illogical (eg a saree is anything but a piece of cloth is false, illogical because whatever else a saree is, it is still a piece of cloth and there are many things a saree cannot be like it is not God or a refrigerator).
Since you say you know and understand everything you say or do, how come you did not know what you said (eg where is the inventory) is illogical, does not answer the question? How does the reply ‘where is the inventory’ answer the question ‘why speculators are not responsible for price rises’?
IF YOU DO NOT KNOW OR UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAY IS INAPPROPRIATE OR BASED ON FALSE LOGIC THEN YOU MUST BE A PERSON WHO IS SOMNOLENT, WHO CAN SAY OR DO THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING OR UNDERSTANDING AND THE ONLY WAY THIS CAN HAPPEN IS THAT YOU KNOW IT IS FALSE BUT YOU BRUTALLY USE FORCE TO RAM IT THROUGH OR YOU ARE A ROBOT WHO APED OR COPIED THE LOGIC OF OTHERS IN SAYING SO AND THUS SAYING SO YOU THINK YOU ARE FULL OF REASON WHEN YOU MAY BE JUST A REHASHING ROBOT.
JUST AS YOU DID NOT KNOW WHAT YOU UTTERED CAN BE EXAMINED AND PROVEN OBJECTIVELY FALSE, YOU DO NOT KNOW THAT YOU ARE A SOPHISTICATED REHASHING BIOLOGICAL ROBOT NOT JUST HERE BUT EVERYWHERE ELSE. AS THE BUDDHA SAID A PERSON OF NO INTEGRITY IS A PERSON OF NO INTEGRITY IN WHATEVER HE DOES AND A PERSON WHO IS A ROBOT IS A ROBOT IN EVERYTHING HE DOES AND RATHER THAN UNADULTERATED PLEASURE IT IS TORMENT EXISTING AS A ROBOT AND ONE DAY THE ROBOT IN YOU WILL KILL YOU WITHOUT MERCY.
ANYONE WHO DOES NOT PAY ATTENTION TO EXAMINE WHAT HE SAYS FOR FALSE LOGIC IS HEADING FOR MAD LOGIC THAT HE HAS NO IDEA WHAT IT IS LIKE AND IT IS FAR WORSE THAN HE CAN IMAGINE.
A reversible mental electromagnet:
If you imagine that there exists an electromagnet in the minds of emotional people then the supply of current or mental force in one direction will cause the electromagnetic to be attracted to something it sees or something happening. If the current or mental force flows in the reversed direction that person experiences repulsion or dislike for what has happened.
Just as all electrical circuits need a supply of power, the dynamo supplying power to feed the person’s like and dislike is the constant use of force to fabricate his style, to unnecessarily for show prolong syllables, change speed and loudness.
Just as you can reverse an electromagnetic attraction to repulsion by merely switching direction of current, you can reverse the like to dislike (eg a man’s ‘love’ for a woman can turn to hate or dislike if he is spurned) and the same thing can be loathed if you are sad or tired eg you like a piece of music very much but when you are tired or in trouble the music may even enrage you.
THUS PEOPLE ADULATE THEIR LIKES AND DISLIKES NOT REALIZING IT IS MERELY THE MEANINGLESS BLIND STIRRING OF ATTRACTION OR REPULSION THAT DOES NOT LAST BUT STRESSES AND CONDITIONS THE MIND TO INCREASINGLY LIKE AND DISLIKE THAT WILL END IN TORMENT NOT PURE BLISS.
WHAT I SAY MAY BE WRONG BUT IF I AM RIGHT AND YOU DISAGREE WITHOUT KNOWING YOU ARE RIGHT THEN YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WORLD.
How to combat price rises:
If governments are truly desirous of helping people they should make sure that all those who purchase futures on the commodities markets eg oil or rice are registered and they have a valid reason for buying oil or rice. This will eliminate a lot of speculation. Even if it can be circumvented it will make it harder to speculate.
Unless you can account for the commodity you purchase, you are not licensed or allowed to bid on the markets.
The trouble is governments are in cohorts with their crony speculators and bankers and they give the excuse that they must not interfere with efficient free markets.
They always want to make you like, dislike, sad, hurt or fearful:
Whatever people say or do, they want to make you like, dislike, sad, hurt or fearful but they never say that and may even deny that and so they never say or do what they mean, no matter how intellectual they are, and they are therefore hypocrites.
There may be something meaningful or true in what they say or do but in addition they always want you to like or dislike, feel sad or hurt or fearful of what they say or do and that is intention that the Buddha said is karma.
The pure do not mix with the impure which why beings here cannot see heaven but heavenly beings are watching you even now.
Jesus said you must be perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect.
The Buddha refused to recite the Pattimoka because someone in the audience was impure. As he sat in meditation with the monks, Ananda approached in three times saying that the night is late, let the Blessed One recite the Pattimoka but the Buddha remained silent and on the third occasion he said the audience was impure. After the person was evicted he said it is impossible that the Buddha will recite the Pattimoka before an impure audience.
What is a robot?
A robot is a mechanical entity that can detect or perceive (see and hear) only things that it is programmed to detect or see and hear and based on what it detects, it activates pre-recorded behaviour that it has been instructed to activate because the programmer thinks it is desirable but that behaviour may not be correct or good or beneficial or harmless.
All stylish people (that embraces all ordinary people and animals) are sophisticated biological robots that in addition have consciousness that act as voyeurs experiencing the actions of its robot and disk jockeys directing which program to activate on each occasion.
The Buddha said that there are things that are possible and things that are impossible and it may be the truth that it is impossible for a person to attentively say or do what he wants to say or do whilst at the same time pay attention to stretch syllables or units of motion, change speed and strength of force and the only way this substance and style combo can be rendered is to commit it to memory and render it by rote mindlessly.
Another pointer that stylish people’s speech and actions are robotic or rehashed is that the style is always consistent in him and differs from others.
It is impossible by chance that a person always pronounce a word the same way with the same stretching, changing speed and loudness but it must be based on recall and therefore he is rehashing.
Because everything the person says or does, even what and how he thinks and perceives is typical, stereotyped and consistent, everything the person undertakes (namely what and how he perceives, thinks, speaks and does) must be committed to memory and retrieved from memory to meet the demand of the situation depending on the judgment of that disk jockey.
THE DANGER OF BEING A ROBOT IS THAT IT IS NOT YOU PERSONALLY THAT IS SAYING OR DOING BUT IT IS A ROBOT OR PARROT IN THE MIND THAT IS REHASHING AND THIS MENTAL PARROT CAN GO ON STRIKE OR BECOME MAD, ACTIVATING WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION AND THAT IS MADNESS.
FURTHER IT IS TORMENTING EXISTING AS A ROBOT BECAUSE EVERYTHING YOU UNDERTAKE MUST BE UNDERTAKEN INDIRECTLY THROUGH THE PARROT AND IN ORDER TO SAY OR DO NEW THINGS YOU MUST PAINSTAKINGLY RE-PROGRAM YOUR MENTAL PARROT AND YOU CANNOT SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE NOT PROGRAMMED IN YOUR MENTAL PARROT.
IT IS ACTUALLY TORMENTING, MADDENING, CONTROLLED MADNESS TO EXIST AS ROBOT AND ANYONE WHO IS A ROBOT MUST HAVE A DISTURBED MIND THAT HE STRUGGLES TO CONTROL. IF YOU ARE A ROBOT AND YOU CANNOT SEE IT SO, YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING AND SINCE YOU CANNOT SEE YOURSELF AS A ROBOT WHEN YOU ARE, THERE IS NO HOPE FOR YOU, NO WAY OUT FOR YOU FROM YOUR TORMENT THAT MUST BESET YOU.
Instructed seeing:
People think they are free to see or hear everything or anything they like but they may be deluding themselves because they cannot see or hear other than the substance and style way that they or others have programmed them to see or hear.
THERE ARE INVISIBLE PROGRAMS THAT STYLISH PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE THAT TELL THEM WHAT AND HOW TO SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE AND TOUCH AND THEY CAN ONLY SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE AND TOUCH IN THAT STYLE AND SUBSTANCE THEY ARE TOLD TO DO.
For instance greedy people program themselves to look for investment opportunities and so whatever they see or read in papers or books, they are consciously or subconsciously looking for investment opportunities. A thief is told by himself or his parents or fellow thieves to look out for opportunities to steal and how to look for opportunities to steal that he will memorize and thereafter practice makes perfect and he will always look out in a certain style and substance (visiting houses to see if things are lying unguarded or watching parked cars for unlocked doors and valuables).
THUS THE FOOLISH PERSON MAY INSIST THAT OF COURSE I SEE EVERYTHING, I AM FREE TO SEE WHATEVER I WANT BUT THERE ARE INVISIBLE PROGRAMS TELLING HIM WHAT TO SEE AND NOT SEE AND HE CANNOT SEE ANYTHING THAT HIS PROGRAMS DID NOT TELL HIM TO SEE WHICH IS WHY DIFFERENT PEOPLE SEE DIFFERENT THINGS IN THE SAME SCENERY).
Playing the bongo and piano at the same time:
Paul McCartney has recorded tracks in which he played all the instruments. This is impossible live because no one can play the bongo drum and piano at the same time and the only way to do so is to record himself playing piano and bongo separately and then merging them together in a single track.
It may sound very impressive Paul McCartney playing so many instruments at one time but it is fixed and once recorded, it cannot be altered without the laborious remixing that is necessary. It is not possible to hear Paul McCartney sometimes play and not the bongo at a certain section but once recorded it is always him playing bongo with piano in the same old way.
THUS ANY SPEECH WITH STYLE IS ALWAYS REPLAYED THE SAME WAY, YOU MAY TURN UP AND DOWN THE VOLUME BY BOOSTING OR LOWERING THE POWER BUT THE TUNE REMAINS THE SAME ONCE RECORDED AND CAN ONLY BE CHANGED IF YOU RE-RECORD IT.
YOU MAY BE FOOLED YOU ARE HEARING ANDY WILLIAMS SINGING ON THE RADIO BECAUSE IN TRUTH YOU ARE HEARING THE SAME OLD TUNE REHASHED, IT IS NOT ANDY WILLIAM SINGING BUT A RECORDING LIFELESSLY BEING RENDERED AGAIN AND AGAIN. WHEN YOU HEAR ANDY WILLIAMS LIVE AT A CONCERT IT IS STILL NOT LIVE BECAUSE HE IS THEN REHASHING FROM HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX WITH SOME VARIATIONS DUE TO HIS OCCASIONAL DELIBERATE PAYING ATTENTION TO ALTER THE STRETCHING OF NOTES OR SPEED OR LOUDNESS CHANGES TO ‘SPRUCE IT UP A BIT’.
STYLISH PEOPLE ARE ROBOTS MAY EXTEMPORANEOUSLY OR FOR A SPECIFIC OCCASION ALTER THE REHASHED STYLE OF THEIR SPEECH AND ACTIONS BY PAYING MOMENTARY ATTENTION ON THAT OCCASION TO ALTER THE STYLE OR PROLONGING, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES OF THAT PARTICULAR SEGMENT BUT WHEN THEY DO THIS, THEY CANNOT BE PAYING ATTENTION TO THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY SAY THAT IS STILL BY ROTE. THUS STYLISH PEOPLE CAN INTRODUCE SOME VARIATION INTO THE STYLE OF THEIR SPEECH OR ACTIONS BUT WHILST THEY ARE PAYING ATTENTION TO VARY THEIR STYLE ON THAT OCCASION THEY CANNOT BE PAYING ATTENTION THE SUBSTANCE OF THAT OCCASION THAT IS STILL BY ROTE OR REHASHED.
Only modifying recordings not specifically composing anew:
Stylish people can introduce variety into their rehashed speech and actions by paying momentary attention on that occasion to modify their style by altering the amount of stretching, speed and loudness changes but that speech is still retrieved rehashed from a copy in their mental jukeboxes and whilst they are paying attention to modifying their style for that occasion they cannot be paying attention to their substance on that occasion that is still rehashed intact.
In the same way, the stylish person can on occasions pay attention to modify the substance (not style) of what they say on that occasion or insert a section of substance from another recording and this may give the impression that the speech is unique or specific for the occasion when it isn’t because the style remains the same as recorded, only the substance has been modified or has incorporated pre-recorded substance from a different mental file.
BY PAYING ATTENTION ON A PARTICULAR OCCASION THE PERSON CAN EITHER MODIFY HIS REHASHED STYLE FOR THAT OCCASION OR MODIFY HIS REHASHED SUBSTANCE FOR THAT OCCASION BUT HE CANNOT PAY ATTENTION TO MODIFY BOTH THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE FOR THAT OCCASION AND WHAT AND HOW IT IS SAID IS STILL REHASHED IN THE SENSE THAT THERE IS A FILE OF IT EXISTING IN HIS MIND, IT IS NOT COMPOSED LIVE FOR THAT OCCASION AND HE IS MERELY ON THAT OCCASION PAYING ATTENTION TO MODIFY EITHER THE STYLE OR SUBSTANCE BUT NEVER BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.
XAY, YAX, AXY, AYX:
Supposed a person has three different tracks X, A, Y recorded or memorized in his mental jukebox which he can retrieved.
By rehashing sometimes XAY, sometimes AXY, sometimes AAX, sometime XXA, the person may fool the gullible that he is a marvellous spontaneous speaker fashioning specifically for each occasion but all these things he speaks, A, X, Y, exist as recordings in his mind and thus he is still regurgitating and he is merely juggling or permuting the sequencing with which they are rehashed. In addition he may occasionally pay attention to alter the style by altering the stretching, changing speed and loudness on that occasion that may fool the gullible that he is a live person when he is a clever fake.
SO LONG AS THERE EXIST A COPY OF WHAT HE SAID OR DID AS A FILE IN HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX, HE IS REHASHING AND A ROBOT. IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW HE PAY ATTENTION TO MODIFY HIS STYLE ON A PARTICULAR OCCASION OR JUGGLE THE SEQUENCE OF SUBSTANCE OF DIFFERENT FILES REPRODUCED, HE IS STILL A ROBOT BECAUSE THERE ARE COPIES OF THOSE FILES IN HIS MIND.
Jeezus Christ & Jeeeezzuuusss Cchrriisssttt!
A person may have a predilection of using the exclamation ‘Jesus Christ’ that can only come about because there is a recording of it in his head that is absent in another who never uses it.
Thus on an occasion when he is really worked up, he may pay attention to stretch ‘Jesus Christ’ more outrageously than he usually does eg “JJJeeeezzzzuuuuuzzzzz Ccchhrrriiisssssttttt!!!!” and he may think he is a spontaneous live person but what he said ‘Jesus Christ’ exists as a file in his head and he is merely modifying on that occasion his style by paying attention to stretch more.
Why it is always force not reason that is behind people’s actions:
Because whatever people say or do is based on plans or files in their minds, they only need to select and then supply force or power to the file in order to say or do the thing the file orders. It is not them personally but it is the fixed non negotiable file that determines what they say or do and all they are entitled to is to pick the file and supply force or power.
In order to ‘learn’ new behaviour or speech, stylish people must first plan and record it into their mental hard disk and then based on that file, dish it out impersonally, standardized and fixed.
When they are initially learning to render the file hesitancy and errors may occur but with repeated practice the rendering becomes slick and assured and the robot becomes convinced he is genuine and what he robotically rehashes is an integral part of him, his personality.
With time the file may evolve, may be modified with parts added and eliminated or it may fall to disuse but without recording speech and actions into files and then using these files, robots cannot function.
Frequently robots have an irresistible urge or forceful drive to say or do certain things when certain things occur (eg they have an urge to argue and oppose when certain things are proposed to them) and thus it is force or urge not reason for them to speak or do something on that occasion.
Based on their liking or disliking they do or do not say or do certain things. Eg they like the look of a car and they buy it and they don’t like the look of something they avoid it. Because liking and disliking are all about force, speech and action based on liking or disliking is based on force not reason.
Based on the aggressiveness or fierceness or toughness or stubbornness they do or say certain things to challenge or fight or dominate.
In the same way, based on their sadness, hurt or fear they say or do certain things.
Just as their speech and actions are based on force directly (fierceness is about naked force), like or dislike, sadness, hurt, fear or indirectly because whatever they say or do exists as plans in which they only select and supply power, the intentions or motives of what they say or do is also based on force, they want to attack or antagonize, make others like or dislike, sad, hurt or fearful with what they say or do.
ALTHOUGH YOU MAY REASON USUALLY IF NOT ALWAYS FAULTILY OR EMOTIONALLY WHEN YOU CONSTRUCT A PLAN OF ACTION OR SPEECH, AFTER THE PLAN IS FORMULATED AND FILED IN YOUR HEAD, IT IS NO LONGER YOU WHO IS SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT THE PLAN SPECIFY BUT YOU ARE MERELY THE DISC JOCKEY SELECTING IT AND SUPPLYING POWER TO THE PLAN AND YOU ARE A ROBOT OR SLAVE OF THAT PLAN WHOSE EXISTENCE IN YOUR HEAD IS OBJECTIVE, CAN BE DETERMINED AND KNOWN BY GOD AND THOSE WHO DISCERN IF NOT YOU.
IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO ON AN OCCASION IS FIXED, STANDARDIZED AND RENDERED IMPERSONALLY FOR A VARIETY OF OCCASIONS, YOU ARE NOT SINCERE BUT A HYPOCRITE REHASHING IMPERSONALLY JUST TO GET ALONG.
THUS IT IS ALWAYS FORCE THAT IS BEHIND WHATEVER PEOPLE SAY OR DO BECAUSE WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO IS FROM PLANS IN WHICH THEY ONLY SELECT AND SUPPLY FORCE AND IN ADDITION THEY OFTEN SAY OR DO THINGS BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN URGE (A FORM OF FORCE) TO SAY OR DO SO OR WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS A PRODUCT OF THEIR AGGRESSIVENESS, LIKE OR DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT OR FEAR THAT DRIVES WHAT THE SAY OR DO.
Why people cannot understand me:
It is not because what I say is nonsense or false but it is because people are all puppets of force and emotions whose father is force not reason that they cannot understand and carry out what I say.
What I say is not nonsense because I can demonstrate precisely every instance people stretch syllables and change speed and loudness and these are the roots of the stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and hurt they must suffer from because if I were to imitate their stretching, changing speed and loudness I will experience stress, restlessness and distraction gradually rising and then helplessly seizing me.
THUS BECAUSE I CAN DEMONSTRATE HOW DIFFERENTLY THEIR SPEECH WILL SOUND WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THESE ARE INFALLIBLY LINKED TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS AND HURT BY DEMONSTRATING THEIR ARISING IN ME IF I WERE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, WHAT I SAY CANNOT BE NONSENSE AND THE FACT THAT PEOPLE CANNOT GRASP AND CARRY OUT WHAT I SAY EVEN WHEN THEY ARE TORMENTED BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR IS BECAUSE IT IS THE TRUTH THAT THEY CANNOT SEE AND RECEIVE, THEY ARE IN TRUTH SLAVES OF FORCE AND EMOTIONS (PROXIES OF FORCE) DEVOID OF GENUINE REASON. WITHOUT GENUINE REASON THEY CANNOT SEE AND UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY THAT IS PRECISE AND CLEAR.
Rebranding Australia:
Quote: How to go about rebranding Australia?
People talk about rebranding and branding but do they know precisely what they are talking about or are they talking approximately aping others?
Branding is all about images and perceptions (usually favourable, making the entity desirable) that you want others to remember so that it will benefit you materially. Therefore it is about manipulation, trying to imprint a favourable image of the product eg Mercedes Benz for selfish purposes. It is always false because things can change, just because Mercedes makes good cars does mean they cannot make so bad cars or make disastrous decisions like their merger with Chrysler of America.
THE PERSON OF TRUTH DOES NOT DEAL IN BRANDS, DOES NOT TRY TO CREATE BRANDS, IS NOT INFLUENCED BY BRAND BUT HE TREATS EACH CASE ON ITS MERITS. IT IS A FORM OF RULES BEHAVIOR. SO LONG AS IT IS A MERCEDES IT IS ‘WOW’ AND PERFECT.
PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE VIRTUOUS TALKING ABOUT BRANDING WHEN THEY ARE ADMITTING TO DECEIT OR MANIPULATION TRYING TO BUILD A FALSELY FAVORABLE IMAGE OF SOMETHING.
LET OTHERS SEE AUSTRALIA IN WHATEVER WAYS THEY WANT AND DO NOT TRY TO PROJECT AN IMAGE OF AUSTRALIA AS THIS OR THAT BECAUSE AUSTRALIA IS NOT THIS OR THAT BUT AUSTRALIA IS AUSTRALIA, NOT A BRAND. IF YOU TRY TO REBRAND AUSTRALIA YOU WILL GO MAD BECAUSE WHAT YOU DO IS NONSENSE AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL ONLY REFLECT THE DEPTH OF YOUR DELUSION.
Rebranding is changing the act:
When a person rebrands himself, it implies he is putting on one show that he now dislikes or think will cast him in bad light and so he rebrands himself or switch to another show.
THUS BRANDING IS ALL ABOUT AN IMAGE OR SHOW OR ACT YOU PUT ON AND REBRANDING IS JUST SWITCHING TO ANOTHER IMAGE OR SHOW AND A PERSON WHO TALKS ABOUT BRANDING IS A PERSON ENAMOURED BY ACTING OR PUTTING ON SHOWS.
Houses & shops go up in smoke:
Emotional exaggerating people can never let things be and therefore they like (attraction, nothing to do with reason) to use colourful false language.
The flames and smoke of a fire go up but the houses and shops do not go up in smoke but they are destroyed by a fire.
Thus the person speaking correctly says ‘houses and shops destroyed in a fire, the person who thinks he is clever not realizing he is courting mad perception speaks of going up in smoke.
DO YOU SEE THE HOUSE GOING UP IN SMOKE? IF YOU DON’T, IT IS BEING DESTROYED, THEN YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY COURTING FALSE PERCEPTION AND INCITING OTHERS TO DO THE SAME.
Motive & Meaning:
People often deny their self serving motives from themselves so that they are often only vaguely aware of their motives in saying or doing something that belie their motives.
For instance, the statement by a diamond expert that half a diamond’s value is in its cutting may have motives that differ from what is said. One possible motive is to project his authority or expertise as someone knowledgeable that you can trust in matters pertaining to diamonds. Another motive may be to justify a diamond’s expensive price, in particular justifying the possibly exorbitant charges some cutters demand.
It is likely difficult if not impossible to assign an objective value to what a raw diamond is worth and what its cutting is worth. Just as different mechanics can charge rates that vary greatly, there may be good cutters who might charge reasonably eg cutters in India might cut for much less than those in the west and so it may be meaningless or false to state unequivocally that half the price of a diamond is its cutting.
If you took a diamond to an expert cutter in India bypassing the usual channels, it is likely he can cut expertly for much less than the usual rate.
DIAMONDS ARE EXPENSIVE AND THUS IN ATTRIBUTING HALF ITS PRICE TO AN INTANGIBLE ENTITY CALLED ITS CUTTING HE MAY HAVE VESTED INTERESTS IN PROMOTING ACCEPTANCE OF HIGH PRICES APART FROM TOUTING HIS EXPERTISE.
