Untitled

Panache & glitter to their bash:

Quote: MACALLUM Street Ghaut residents not only ushered in the New Year a day earlier but they also managed to rope in Hong Kong celebrity Bosco Wong to add panache and glitter to their bash.

Comment: Panache is about how a person does something or something is done that is seen as attractive or ‘wows’ and glitter is about how something has the appearance eg sparkling sequins that attracts or stirs mental force. Thus the person is talking about the stirring of blind meaningless mental force in himself and others regarding the appearance of a HK celebrity, it (panache and glitter) is food that does not last and he and those predisposed are headed for perishing.

To call a party or function a bash is to be insouciant, speaking in a haughty, deprecatory manner that is never the way to heaven but perdition.

THERE IS A STYLE IN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT HE SAID AND IT IS INTENDED TO IMPRESS OTHERS HOW IMPRESSIVE, CONFIDENT AND ‘WITH IT’ HE IS. WHAT IS SAID IS ACTUALLY MEANINGLESS, ALL ABOUT STIRRING FORCE THAT IS BLIND, HARMFUL AND MEANINGLESS.

 

Cheer up

Entrepreneur Sir David Tang on the risks of pessimism

Comment: Optimism or pessimism are opposite false forceful states of mind not reality and so anyone who advises others to be optimistic whilst warning of the dangers of pessimism is deluded, does not know what he is talking about and creating karma for himself.

You should neither be optimistic or pessimistic about anything but to see and know the true state of your situation and act accordingly.

If the situation is ‘dire’ and you are optimistic, you are denying reality and engaging in make belief that may negatively affect your correct response to the situation. If you were pessimistic you risk exaggerating your responses again to your detriment.

ANY SITUATION NO MATTER HOW DIRE OR JOYFUL IS NEITHER OPTIMISTIC NOR PESSIMISTIC BUT OPTIMISM OR PESSIMISM ARE FALSE FABRICATED ARTIFICIAL EMOTIONAL (NOT REASONED) STATES OF THE MIND THAT IS DANGEROUS BECAUSE IT CAN LEAD TO UNDERESTIMATED AND OVERESTIMATED RESPONSES. THUS THE PERSON WHO WARNS OF PESSIMISM BUT ADVICES OPTIMISM IS HIMSELF A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR HIM LET ALONE OTHERS.

A force response to a situation:

Optimism or pessimism is never a reasoned specific to the occasion response but they are a forced, nonspecific or generalized reaction to a situation that is rehashed again and again to face new situations.

When you are optimistic, you wilfully or forcefully downplay the gravity of a situation and are thus denying and will yourself to believe there is better in store when you have no reason to believe so.

When you are pessimistic, you use force to aggravate the gravity of the situation and that too is denial of reality that is conditioning and leads to a disastrous overreaction (eg suicide).

If you speak of optimism or pessimism you should know what you are talking about otherwise you are a fool who does not know what he speaks. Optimism and pessimism are rehashed (robotic) forceful or force based reaction to situations, not based on genuine reason and because it is based on force, it is blind, dangerous, meaningless and apart from being suffering, conditions to suffering and lead to dangerous false responses.

Pessimism is the natural reaction:

Pessimism is the natural reaction of emotional people to a crisis or negative event because their mental forces are automatically stirred to dislike, hurt and be sad and that is the drive for pessimism or despair.

Optimism in the face of despair or a negative situation is a wilful denial of reality, using force to drive out dislike, sadness and hurt and it stirs conflict that is stressful and is foolish, is lying to yourself and others.

PESSIMISM THOUGH HARMFUL, IS THE NATURAL REACTION OF PEOPLE TO NEGATIVE EVENTS AND OPTIMISM IS THE EVEN MORE PERVERSE LYING ATTEMPT TO INSTIL A FALSE REALITY THAT WHAT IS PAINFUL IS PLEASURABLE.

If people are cheerful they do not need you to tell them to cheer up and it is because they are unhappy that you need to tell them to cheer up. Because unhappiness is a forceful mental state, you are telling them to deny and use force to banish their unhappy state to artificially instil and act out a cheerful state and that is dicing with insanity.

IT IS BECAUSE A PERSON IS A FOOLISH SLAVE OF MENTAL FORCE, LIKES AND DISLIKES, USES FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HE PERIODICALLY COMES TO THE STATE OF PESSIMISM WHEN FACED WITH NEGATIVE EVENTS.

BY THE TIME HE EXPERIENCES PESSIMISM IT IS ALREADY TOO LATE TO OVERCOME IT AND IT MUST BE ALLOWED TO RUN ITS DANGEROUS CONDITIONING COURSE.

SO LONG AS THE PERSON WILL NOT ABANDON LIKE AND DISLIKE, WILL NOT ABANDON USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS HE WILL NEVER SEE AN END TO PESSIMISM THAT IS NOT ONLY SUFFERING BUT ADDICTIVE OR CONDITIONING AND HE IS HEADED FOR MAD PERSSIMISM.

Sadness and hurt is the cause of pessimism:

Sadness and hurt that cannot be resolved, because the cause of the sadness and hurt persists, is the cause of pessimism.

Because the cause of pessimism is sadness and hurt, the cure (if possible) is the elimination of that cause of the sadness and hurt. If it is not possible to eliminate the cause of that sadness and hurt, you have false logic and perception to believe you can otherwise, without eliminating the cause of sadness and hurt, cure your pessimism by wilfully stirring up optimism.

ONLY THE ELIMINATION OF THE CAUSE OF SOMETHING CAN CURE SOMETHING. THUS IF SADNESS AND HURT IS CAUSED BY SOMETHING AND THEY LEAD TO PESSIMISM THEN THE TRUE CURE OF PESSIMISM IS NEVER TO WILFULLY INSTIL OPTIMISM BUT TO ELIMINATE THE CAUSE TO THAT SADNESS AND HURT THAT LED TO PESSIMISM.

BECAUSE IN MOST IF NOT ALL CASES THE CAUSES OF THAT SADNESS AND HURT THAT LED TO PESSIMISM IS IMMOVABLE (OTHERWISE IT WILL NOT HAVE LED TO PESSIMISM OR DESPAIR), THERE IS NO CURE FOR PESSIMISM IN MOST CASES, THE PERSON MUST SUFFER FROM PESSIMISM THAT IS NOT ONLY SUFFERING BUT CONDITIONS. WITH TIME THE PESSIMISM WILL FADE BUT ITS TOLL WILL BE IMPRINTED IN THAT MIND AND THE PERSON IS HEADED FOR SORROW AND INSANITY.

THE ONLY TRUE CURE FOR PESSIMISM IS TO ABANDON ALL USE OF FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE OR FASHION STYLE, NAMELY DO NOT STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT LEADS TO SADNESS AND HURT THAT LEADS TO PESSIMISM THAT IS SUFFERING AND CONDITIONING AND WILL END IN INSANITY. TO WILFULLY BE OPTIMISTIC IN THE FACE OF PESSIMISM IS THE WRONG SOLUTION THAT COMPOUNDS THE PROBLEM AND WILL LEAD TO EVEN GREATER SORROW AND SO THE PERSON WHO ASKS OTHERS TO CHEER UP, BE OPTIMISTIC IS ASKING FOR GRAVE KARMA.

No woman no cry:

This is the title of a song and it is conveying that women is the source of sorrow and therefore no women no sorry but it is a false misleading message.

There are many sources of sorrow in this world like sons, possessions, fame, etc. Therefore just because you have no woman does not mean ‘no cry’ and it is false to say that if you just have no woman you will not cry.

IT MAY BE TRUE THAT ASSOCIATING WITH A WOMAN LEADS TO CRYING BUT IT IS NOT TRUE AND THEREFORE FALSE THAT NO WOMAN NO CRY.

A rule not genuine reasoning:

‘No woman no cry’ is a rule to be memorized and rehashed to fit occasions and it is a false generalization. Whilst most even all women here are a source of heartache because they are manipulative dishonest people, it is not necessarily that females cause crying, the female angels in heaven may not be a cause of heartache and so what is said is false and a rule that is indiscriminate.

THUS IT IS THAT EMOTIONAL PEOPLE LIKE TO THINK THEY CAN REASON AND UNDERSTAND BUT WHAT THEY SUBSCRIBE TO ARE RULES OR PROGRAMED OR COMMAND COMPUTER LOGIC AND THEY ARE THUS ROBOTS WHO ARE SLAVES TO RULES NOT GENUINELY REASONING BEINGS.

 

 

Dispassion is the highest quality:

You may dispute, you think God may dispute and the Buddha is a mere man but the Buddha says he is supreme and faith in the supreme confers supreme result for the faithful.

Similarly dispassion or the abolishment of all emotion is the highest of quality a person can endow himself.

Dispassion or the cessation of the incessant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness that is the dynamo that leads to like, dislike, sadness, hurt and fear is what I preach that is in line with what the Buddha preached.

This was said by the Blessed One: "There are these three supreme objects of confidence. Which three?

"Among whatever beings there may be -- footless, two-footed, four-footed, many footed; with form or formless; percipient, non-percipient, neither percipient nor non-percipient -- the Tathagata, worthy & rightly self-awakened, is considered supreme. Those who have confidence in the Awakened One have confidence in what is supreme; and for those with confidence in the supreme, supreme is the result.

"Among whatever qualities there may be, fabricated or unfabricated, the quality of dispassion -- the subduing of intoxication, the elimination of thirst, the uprooting of attachment, the breaking of the round, the destruction of craving, dispassion, cessation, the realization of Unbinding -- is considered supreme. Those who have confidence in the quality of dispassion have confidence in what is supreme; and for those with confidence in the supreme, supreme is the result.

"Among whatever fabricated qualities there may be, the Noble Eightfold Path -- right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration -- is considered supreme. Those who have confidence in the Noble Eightfold Path have confidence in what is supreme; and for those with confidence in the supreme, supreme is the result.

"Among whatever communities or groups there may be, the Sangha of the Tathagata's disciples is considered supreme -- i.e., the four [groups of noble disciples] when taken as pairs, the eight when taken as persons.* Those who have confidence in the Sangha have confidence in what is supreme; and for those with confidence in the supreme, supreme will be the result.

"These, monks, are the three supreme objects of confidence."

A gift of the dharma is supreme:

The Buddha says that compared to material gifts, a gift of the dharma is supreme.

The reason is obvious. Any gift of food will sustain you for awhile and does not alleviate your mental suffering or send you to heaven. Any other material gifts like shelter will only sustain you for this life.

The dharma is not usually obtainable in this world and when successfully understood it leads to heaven and even eternal life and so it is a supreme gift.

This was said by the Blessed One: "There are these two kinds of gifts: a gift of material things & a gift of the Dhamma. Of the two, this is supreme: a gift of the Dhamma. There are these two kinds of sharing: sharing of material things & sharing of the Dhamma. Of the two, this is supreme: sharing of the Dhamma. There are these two kinds of assistance: assistance with material things & assistance with the Dhamma. Of the two, this is supreme: help with the Dhamma."

 

Tonight’s new year party has been cancelled:

This is a headline for an article by Raja Petra who is supposed to be very spiritual, a devout Muslim and he does not realize he is speaking mischievously and falsely, he has no right to say what he said that has karma not merit.

In his mind, the state of the nation is so parlous that there should not be any celebration of the New Year but it is not true the party has been cancelled and so he is speaking falsely misleading others or manipulating reality.

He has no authority to cancel the party and it has not been cancelled and so as a man of truth, he cannot say that.

Should be not has been cancelled:

Exactly which party you are referring to that has been cancelled should be known by you and if it is a national party that you have no power to cancel, has not been cancelled, you are speaking falsely to say it has been cancelled. You have a right to say it should be cancelled, not has been cancelled.

Rashid’s temerity:

Outgoing election commission chairman, Rashid had the temerity to suggest he may sue opposition leaders for besmirching his good name when he himself admitted serious wrongdoing.

He admitted in dialogue with opposition leaders that he cannot abolish the postal vote because without it, many ministers would have lost. The postal vote which is outdated because most military personnel are nowadays not in the jungles fighting communists but in barracks and can personally vote though small (?300,000) is crucial because the ruling party takes it on their prerogative to distribute to whichever seat requires topping up until they win by a slim margin.

According to Raja Petra, without this postal vote, the opposition could have won the last general elections.

RASHID SHOULD KNOW WHAT HE HAS DONE, IT IS NOT HIS JOB TO SHORE UP THE BN BY DISTRIBUTING POSTAL VOTES TO SWING THE ELECTION AND IF DESPITE THIS HE THINKS HE HAS BEEN SLANDERED BY THE OPPOSITION SUCH THAT HE NEEDS TO SUE TO RESTORE HIS GOOD NAME, HE IS ASKING FOR SERIOUS KARMA.

Impossible but possible:

It is impossible for all ordinary people in this world not to suffer from stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate, sadness, hurt and fear because they all have style or use force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness that have equivalents in their motions, thoughts and even perception (seeing and hearing) and because they (stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness, hurt and fear) are suffering and distressing they must seek to counter and remedy by various means like exercise, health food, yoga, tai chi, meditation, religion, etc but all these are useless and add to the stress they suffer because only the elimination of the cause can cause a permanent effortless cure of the suffering.

THUS IN ORDER FOR A BEING TO FIND PERMANENT EFFORTLESS RELEASE FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR, HE MUST PAY ATTENTION TO PERSISTENTLY IDENTIFY AND ELIMINATE ANY STRETCHING OF HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND AS SOON AS HE FINALLY HAS STOPPED DOING SO HE WILL EXPERIENCE A JOYFUL EFFORTLESS RELEASE FROM ALL SUFFERING (STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR.

WITHOUT PUTTING AN END TO STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU CANNOT PUT AN END TO YOUR REGULARLY RECURRING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR AND TO FIND REDRESS ELSEWHERE (SPORTS, YOGA, TAI CHI, MUSIC, ETC) IS NOT ONLY FRUITLESS VEXATIONS BUT PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS THAT WILL END IN UNCONTROLLED MADNESS.

If you are stretching your syllables, changing in speed and loudness all the time, even when you speak softly and slowly and you cannot see it, you are a fool who does not know what he is doing and nothing can be done for you.

If you find style or stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness meaningful and necessary then if they lead to stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness, hurt and fear then that is what you wish for yourself and they may be yours for even another eternity and more.

IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHO SUFFERS FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR TO PERMANENTLY EFFORTLESSLY EXIT THEM IF HE SUCCESSFULLY IDENTIFIES AND ELIMINATES ALL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS (AS THERE IS) IN HIS SPEECH THAT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF HIS SUFFERING.

NO ONE BEFORE AND NOW WILL TEACH YOU THIS AND IF YOU FAIL TO TAKE HEED AND CORRECT YOURSELF YOU MAY BE ASSIGNING YOURSELF TO ANOTHER ETERNITY OF TORMENT BECAUSE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR ARE BLIND AND TORMENTING.

You want suffering and will get it:

No matter how wise or good you think you are, whether you realize it or not, if you stretch your syllables, change speed and loudness (the way of this world) then you want suffering (stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness, hurt, fear) for yourself and others and what you want you will get even for an eternity because you will return to this world not to enjoy yourself because nobody here enjoys himself but they are all faking it, to be tormented to death, suicide and homicide, again and again building a pile of skeletons the Buddha said is as high as a mountain over an eon.

ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE OR USES FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WANTS SUFFERING FOR HIMSELF AND OTHERS NO MATTER HOW HE MAY DENY IT AND HE IS HEADED FOR MORE, FAR MORE THAN HE EVER DREAMT POSSIBLE AND THAT WILL BE WEEPING AND GNASHING OF HIS TEETH.

‘Up for grabs’ versus ‘available’:

Anyone who speaks of ‘250 vouchers up for grabs’ instead of ‘250 vouchers available’ is using force, inciting force and headed for torment.

It is not a different correct way of speaking but it is a styled way with the intention of stirring force in self and others because you need force to grab.

You have false perception that will end in mad perception if you think just because there are vouchers available, it is up for grabs.

THE TRUTH IS 250 VOUCHERS ARE AVAILABLE, THEY ARE NOT UP FOR GRABS AND YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION TO PERCEIVE THEM AS UP FOR GRABS.

Non Hokkien speaker wins Hokkien song contest:

Lau Wan Yin does not speak Hokkien but she beat 49 others to win an international Taiwanese singing competition that was held using the Chinese dialect.

It is not amazing but learning to speak or sing Hokkien does not require understanding but it requires good copying, good perception or hearing to then memorize and render in which understanding has nothing to do with it.

If you think understanding is required for someone who does not know a word of Hokkien to sing successfully in Hokkien you may be right or deluded.

What is required is association. Many Indians are able to tell the ‘Ba Kut Teh’ seller they want ‘Bak Kut Teh’ without knowing that it means ‘meat bone tea’. They (Indians) know the dish they want is ‘bak kut teh’, memorize it, retrieve it to utter it without knowing what it means and ‘wah lau’ they get their dish served to them by the hawker who also understands ‘ba kut teh’ stands for a certain dish he makes.

It is all rote perception-memorizing, retrieving and association of certain groups of sounds with certain objects or deeds with no understanding needed.

IT IS ONLY POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT SPEAK HOKKIEN TO WIN A HOKKIEN SINGING CONTEST IF SHE SINGS IT WITHOUT ANY UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT SHE SINGS AND IT IS MERELY A PROCESS OF PERCEPTION, MEMORIZATION AND REHASHING.

Earthquake rattles Afghanistan:

Can you see the earthquake rattling Afghanistan or Afghanistan being rattled by the earthquake? If not then you are imagining things and want others to similarly falsely imagine that is false perception that leads to future mad perception.

Earthquake strikes Afghanistan or has occurred in Afghanistan is what a let his yes be yes only person will say. No fabrication or imagining is involved and he is headed for safety.

No news is good news?

Quote: No news from big companies is good news

Comment: The person is exercising false logic that will lead to mad logic and he is conditioning others to false logic too.

No news is just no news, it is neither good nor bad and to conclude that no news is good news is false logic and perception.

Big companies do not necessarily have to come clean about the bad state of their finances and often, for fear of ‘upsetting the market’ or triggering a run on their companies, they try to remain silent on bad news until it is inevitable, they must reveal them or they are forced by law to reveal.

Thus just because big companies remain silent does not mean it is good news, it could be bad news being held back and the person who has such false logic cannot be trusted to reason truly elsewhere.

Fabrications are not the same:

The Buddha said that from ignorance as a requisite comes fabrications, not consciousness or this world or the sensory media and from the cessation of ignorance (enlightenment) comes the cessation of all fabricating.

You may think what the Buddha says is conjecture, has been debunked by science (we, modern minds know better) but it may be the truth and applies to all beings trapped (painfully and falsely) in existence, not endowed blissfully and truly with existence.

ALL BEINGS FROM THE LOFTIEST BRAHMAS TO THE LOW WORMS AND INSECTS ARE TRAPPED IN IGNORANCE AND FOOLISHNESS IN EXISTENCE THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE, FRAUGHT WITH DANGERS (FROM KARMA INCURRED OUT OF IGNORANCE) AND SUFFERING WHOSE DISADVANTAGES FAR OUTWEIGH ITS ALLURES, THEY ARE NOT WONDERFULLY ENDOWED WITH EXISTENCE.

The fabrications can only be perceiving (how and what one sees, hears, smells, touches and tastes), thinking, speaking and doing.

There is a hierarchy of unwholesomeness in the fabrications with neither perceiving nor not perceiving higher than perceiving higher than thinking higher than speaking and doing.

To speak and do with a style or the additional unnecessary use of force to stretch (eg syllables, curve and prolong units of motion), change speed, strength and direction is more unwholesome than speaking and doing without style. To say or do things that are useless, for show to manipulate others is more unwholesome than not to do so.

Thus the wise will minimise what they say or do to what is absolutely necessary, shorn of pretentious for show style whilst the foolish and evil will say and do as much as they liked pregnant with style even to outrageous intensities of force.

Thinking is a fabrication that is antecedent to saying and doing and even this has been brought to a stop by those whose minds are higher. Thus to only perceive (see, hear, smell, taste, touch) without thinking (something possible but not known by emotional beings) is higher than perceiving and thinking and according to the Buddha, this ability accords that being two eons or Ages in heaven.

The higher beings even do not perceive (see, hear, smell, taste, touch) that necessitates not perceiving others things apart from those you at a moment perceived in a state unknown to beings trapped in this world, neither perceiving nor not perceiving.

IN OTHER WORDS, ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA THERE IS A HIGHER STATE OF THE MIND IN WHICH THAT BEING DOES NOT PERCEIVE (SEE, HEAR) NOR DOES HE NOT PERCEIVE, JUST AS IF YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS NEITHER STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY NOR REPULSIVELY, YOU NEITHER LIKED NOR DISLIKED BUT YOU ARE STILL PERCIPIENT.

Once a being is fully awakened, he sees and knows everything and is a Buddha, he no longer wishes to fabricate, no longer wishes or desires to see, hear, think, speak or do and thus shorn of fabricating there is no more becoming for him and he has gone beyond, gone to nirvana, no longer subject to the suffering from karma that is the shadow of actions and fabrications.

IT IS IGNORANCE THAT CAUSES A BEING TO FABRICATE AND FABRICATIONS HAVE A HIERACHY OF WHOLESOMENESS FROM PERCEIVING TO THINKING TO SAYING AND DOING. TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE UNNECESSARY IS THE LOWEST, TO SAY OR DO THINGS WITH STYLE OR THE UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS LOWER THAN TO SAY AND DO WITHOUT STYLE.

TO ONLY THINK WITHOUT SAYING OR DOING IS HIGHER THAN THINKING TO SAY OR DO.

TO NOT THINK BUT JUST PERCEIVE IS HIGHER THAN TO THINK.

TO NEITHER PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE IS HIGHER THAN TO PERCEIVE SOME THINGS AND (INEVITABLY) NOT PERCEIVE OTHER THINGS.

What is the nature of this ‘good’ news?

What does the person mean when he says no news is good news?

What does he mean by ‘good’?

By good, he means news or an occurrence that is delightful or stirs his mental force to be ‘happy’ or liking.

Why should no news stir his and your mental force to like or be joyful?

Thus he is speaking about force, about stirring his and your mental force to like the no news that is meaningless, blind and does not last. He is talking about force and he thinks he is talking about something meaningful. In other words he is someone who talks nonsense and thinks he talks sense.

Short selling ban to be lifted:

A ban on the short-selling of financial shares is to be lifted, the UK's financial regulator confirms.

It reflects the crassness of society they see nothing wrong with short selling when it is evil and should be PERMANENTLY banned.

Are these short sellers who borrow to sell or sell without having the shares doing it for love of that stock, for charity or for a loss?

If you agree they are doing it solely for profit, they have no interest in that stock, since they do not own that stock they should not be permitted to sell the stock that is to the detriment of existing stock holders and even the public or economy at large.

ALL SHORT SELLING IS EVIL AND SHORT SELLERS ARE CREATING DEADLY KARMA FOR THEMSELVES FAR WORSE THAN THEY MAY EVER IMAGINE AND IT REFLECTS SOCIETY ITSELF IS SICK AND CONNIVING TO ALLOW SHORTSELLING. BROKERS BENEFIT FROM COMMISSIONS BY INCREASING VOLUME SHORTSELLING BRINGS.

Short selling is absolutely never good:

It is wrong view that leads to hell or the animal womb to say it cannot be objectively determined if short selling is evil, it is neither evil or good, it is plain business because all short selling is evil, is to the detriment of share holders and society in general because it destabilizes.

SHORT SELLING MAY BENEFIT IN PROFIT TO SHORT SELLERS AND DEALERS BUT THESE ARE UNRIGHTEOUS GAINS AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS THAT CREATE KARMA THAT RESULT IN PAIN FAR WORSE THAN THEIR GAINS AND SO SHORT SELLING IS EVEN BAD   FOR SHORTSELLERS AND DEALERS IN THE LONG RUN.

THUS YOU CAN SAFELY SAY SHORTSELLING IS NEVER GOOD FOR ANYBODY, NOT EVEN SHORTSELLERS AND DEALERS WHO CONDONE BECAUSE THE KARMA THEY THEREBY ACCRUE WILL CAUSE THEM SUFFERING FAR WORSE THAN THE PROFITS THEY GAIN FROM SHORTSELLING.

SHORTSELLING HARMS SHAREHOLDERS AND SOCIETY IN GENERAL BECAUSE IT DESTABILIZES.

NOW, WHO IS SICK, SOCIETY OR THE SCHIZOPHRENIC UNABLE TO COPE WITH THE DEVIOUS WAYS OF A SICK SOCIETY?

THE SCHIZOPHRENIC IS DEFINITELY SICK BUT SO IS THE SOCIETY HE LIVES IN.

Cloud hangs over Macworld meeting:

He is not talking truthfully but speaking figuratively or falsely about emotion, a proxy of force not reason or something understandable.

By ‘cloud hangs’ he is speaking of glumness or depression or sadness or pessimism (probably because of rumours of Steve Job’s health.

What is the use of being glum or stirring your mental force to be sad by developments? It is suffering, serves no purpose and even detracts from useful actions that may be undertaken.

CLOUD HANGS IS NOT A LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY STATEMENT OF THINGS BUT IMPLIES SADNESS OR PESSIMISM SHROUDING MEETING. IT IS MEANINGLESS, SUFFERING AND DISTRACTING TO BECOME GLUM ABOUT SOMETHING AND THEREFORE THERE IS NO USE DWELLING ON IT BUT TO ATTEND WITHOUT GLUMNESS MATTERS AT HAND.

The quest for truth:

People talk earnestly about the quest for truth, they even go to remote places, to India or whatever country or guru who strikes their fancy as the fountain of truth but the fact that you have to search for truth indicates you cannot see the truth and no matter how much someone who cannot see the truth searches for the truth he will never find it because he cannot see the truth. The Buddha said truth is the highest savour and so it is and a release from suffering and for one who cannot see the truth, he is barking up the wrong tree and therefore cannot see it wherever and no matter how he strives to seek the truth.

Truth is not something hidden or buried that you or anyone must seek, truth is everywhere in everything you see and hear but the stylish emotional person cannot see or hear it because he is blinded by his mental force, blinded by the distortion and opacity of his constantly active mental force that always prolongs, changes speed, strength and direction in however and whatever he perceives, thinks, speaks and does.

Truth is not something exotic but it is in everything you see and hear, which can be seen or heard as true or false or nonsense (makes no sense) that is objective and universally applies to everyone. Thus what is true for me is also true for you and everyone else, whether you refuse to accept or not, what is false or nonsense to me is also nonsense to you or anyone else, if you insist it is true then you are dabbling with falsity that will end in suffering and insanity.

IF YOU CANNOT SEE OR HEAR THE TRUTH THAT THERE IS CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN YOUR SPEECH AND THAT OF EVERYONE EVEN ANIMALS HERE AND THAT IT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION (DIVIDED CONCENTRATION AND CANNOT CONCENTRATE), SADNESS, HURT AND FEAR YOU MUST EXPERIENCE, THEN YOU ARE DELUDED TO SEARCH FOR TRUTH BECAUSE YOU ARE BLIND AND FOR ONE WHO IS BLIND IT IS FOOLISH TO TRY TO SEE BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE.

BY THEMSELVES THEY CANNOT SEE THE TRUTH THAT THEY ARE CONSTANTLY UNNECESSARILY STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS ALL THE TIME AND THAT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THEIR WOES AND EVEN AFTER IT IS POINTED OUT AND EVEN DEMONSTRATED MANY TIMES THEY STILL CANNOT SEE, STILL CONTINUE TO HAVE STYLE, SO FOOLISH IS IT THAT THEY SHOULD SEEK TRUTH, SEEK AN ANSWER TO THEIR SUFFERING?

Only those who cannot see the truth and only their mental forces, their likes and dislikes and emotions can make them not see the truth, need to search for the truth and no matter how much and where they seek the truth they will never find it because it is their blindness that makes them unable to see the truth, not the truth that is hidden and hard to find.

YOU ARE DELUDED IF YOU TALK ABOUT A PERSONAL QUEST FOR TRUTH, ABOUT SEEKING TRUTH IN INDIA OR SOME REMOTE PLACES OR SOME GURU, SO LONG AS YOUR MIND IS UNDER THE SPELL OF FORCE, YOU HAVE STYLE OR STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU WILL NEVER SEE OR FIND THE TRUTH BECAUSE YOU ARE INDULGING IN FALSITY AND UNNECESSARILY USING FORCE THAT IS BLIND, BLINDING AND HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS.

Two possibilities:

When people talk about searching for the truth, there are two possibilities: they can see the truth and the truth is exotic or hidden so well but can be found or they are blind and cannot see the truth but they think they are not blind and can see the truth and therefore they search for the truth.

The evidence clearly points to the latter, emotional stylish people are blinded by their constantly active mental force that churn up distressing stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness, hurt and fear such that they cannot see or are blind and because they are distressed, troubled, they need to search for the truth that they will never find because the fault is in themselves, not that truth is hidden. The truth is in everything they see or hear but they see or hear what is true as false and what is false and harmful as true and beneficial.

AND UNTIL THEY FREE THEMSELVES FROM THE INCESSANT MAD USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED, STRENGTH AND DIRECTION THEY CANNOT SEE THE TRUTH NO MATTER WHERE AND HOW THEY TRY TO SEE TRUTH. IT IS A VAIN VENTURE THAT BRINGS MORE VEXATIONS.

The Buddha says you cannot see the truth:

The Buddha: "What others call happiness (thrill, excitement, wealth, sensate pleasures liking and disliking, joking and laughing), that the Noble Ones declare to be suffering. What others call suffering that the Noble Ones have found to be happiness. See how difficult it is to understand the Dhamma! For those under the veil (of ignorance) it is obscured, for those who cannot see it is utter darkness. But for the good and the wise it is as obvious as the light for those who can see. Even though close to it, the witless who do not know the Dhamma, do not comprehend it.

THE BUDDHA SAYS TRUTH IS OBVIOUS AS LIGHT TO THOSE WHO CAN SEE BUT FOR THOSE WHO CANNOT SEE, IT IS UTTER DARKNESS. THUS THE BUDDHA IS TELLING YOU THAT IF YOU CANNOT SEE THE TRUTH, THE FAULT IS IN YOU NOT IN REALITY.

The Buddha is referring to you:

Most people conveniently shrug off what they read as not applicable to them, only others when it is totally applicable to them.

This was said by the Blessed One: "Suppose a man was being carried along by the flow of a river, lovely & alluring. And then another man with good eyesight, standing on the bank, on seeing him would say: 'My good man, even though you are being carried along by the flow of a river, lovely & alluring, further down from here is a pool with waves & whirlpools, with monsters & demons. On reaching that pool you will suffer death or death-like pain.' Then the first man, on hearing the words of the second man, would make an effort with his hands & feet to go against the flow.

"I have given you this simile to illustrate a meaning. The meaning is this: the flow of the river stands for craving. Lovely & alluring stands for the six internal sense-media. The pool further down stands for the five lower fetters.* The waves stand for anger & distress. The whirlpools stand for the five strands of sensuality. The monsters & demons stand for the opposite sex. Against the flow stands for renunciation. Making an effort with hands & feet stands for the arousing of persistence. The man with good eyesight standing on the bank stands for the Tathagata, worthy & rightly self-awakened."

Even if it's with pain,
you should abandon sensual desires
if you aspire to future safety from bondage.
Alert, with a mind well-released,
touch release now here, now there.
An attainer-of-wisdom,
having fulfilled the holy life,
is said to have gone to the end of the world, gone
beyond.

Note:

*The five lower fetters are self-identity view, uncertainty, attachment to practices & precepts, sensual passion, & irritation.

Cold comfort:

Quote: The figures, due to be published on Wednesday, will provide cold comfort for the beleaguered UK car industry as it grapples with the economic slowdown.

The person who describes comfort as cold is the man speaking falsely and stirring conflict in himself and others. If it is cold it cannot be comfort and so he does not mean what he says when he calls it ‘comfort’. What is disliked or cold cannot be called comfort and so he is sarcastic, saying the opposite of what he means and therefore speaking falsely. Even ‘little’ comfort is false because it is not comfort but distress that he actually means and he should say truthfully that the figures will distress the beleaguered UK car industry.

Untitled

Grace is about style not substance:

Different people have differ perceptions of what is graceful and what is not but it is all about style, about you say or do something according to a plan or idea of what you deem graceful in which the graceful person is merely a robot using force to realize the plan of how to exit gracefully.

Thus when a person wants another to exit with grace, he wants the other person to exit with style using force according to a plan he deems graceful and because style is meaningless and stressful about the use of force according to a plan, he is incurring karma asking others to exit gracefully.

You have no right to ask others to exit with grace, exit with style that is meaningless, blind & stressful and requires he behaves like a robot according to a plan.

THUS THE PERSON WHO ASKS ANOTHER TO EXIT GRACEFULLY IS A FOOL HEAPING KARMA ON HIMSELF HE THINKS HE IS MERITORIOUS.

WIT TOO IS ABOUT STYLE AND NOTHING ABOUT SUBSTANCE. IN ORDER TO BE WITTY YOU SPEAK OR DO THINGS IN A WAY YOU THINK WILL STIR OTHERS’ EMOTIONS TO SMILE OR LAUGH OR LIKE IN A ‘FUNNY’ WAY WHAT YOU SAY OR DO.

Pope laments global instability:

When a person laments, he dislikes and is saddened by the state of something and that has nothing to do with reason or substance but it is just the repulsive stirring of his mental force to dislike and the unprotected prolonging of his mental force of going against self to experience sadness.

All the lamenting or stirring of mental force to dislike and be sad will not accomplish anything but it creates suffering in self and others.

Instead what is rational is to use reason to define exactly in what ways the world is unstable and in what ways that instability can be remedied by yourself or others. If the instability is irremediable, what is the use of lamenting except it is for show to impress others of your concern and to stir others to similarly foolishly lament.

Politics of unity in US:

Quote headline: Politics of unity in US, politics of division in Malaysia.

This is a naive false statement because even within the Democratic Party there is disunity and vested interest and the Republicans are on a leash when to pounce and sabotage the Democrats.

In the bailout of the car makers, it was the Republicans in the house who ‘torpedoed’ the deals because it was deemed to benefit the workers.

THUS ANYONE WHO IS TRYING TO SELL OTHERS THE IDEA THAT IT IS SO GOOD IN THE US, POLITICS OF UNITY IN CONTRAST TO SO BAD HERE IS CREATING KARMA FOR HIMSELF MISLEADING OTHERS.

WHAT THE AUTHOR IS LIKELY TO SAY IS NOT WORTH READING.

The man who conned the world:

Quote headline: The man (Madoff) who conned the world.

This is a false headline. It may be the biggest fraud (50 billion) but he did not con the world but only some very rich investors who were greedy for his oversized returns.
Truth is not exotic, it is everyday and even simple things people do not understand. If he understands, how come he did not understand his statement to exaggerate, ‘the man who conned the world’ is false and how the newspaper permitted a false headline?

Substance is style:

Quote Honda ad for new City: Substance is style.

What he wanted to say was perhaps substance is stylish but even that is false.

Substance can be clearly defined as such and such and so can style be clearly defined. If substance is style you there will be no need to call it substance, if style is substance then there is no need to call it style.

Substance is whatever is said or done that may be true, false or nonsense.

Style is how something is said or done and that can only be how or the different ways people use force to stretch, change speed and strength even direction if possible in order to transmit force to stir force in others in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating.

There can be style in the substance of what is said and done and it is what is said or done that is false or nonsense rehashed according to plans stored in the person’s mental jukebox with the intention of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others.

Thus the person who says substance is style or stylish is speaking falsely, wanting others to embrace falsity and he is embracing insanity because to forcibly believe substance is style or stylish is mad.

If you use much force (and mental will is force) you can force yourself to increasingly believe or perceive what is false, substance is style is true and the end result of that is totally uncontrollably mad perception and you will weep and gnash your teeth when that happens.

Smiles and scowls in our genes:

Quote: The facial expressions we make to show or hide our emotions are hardwired into our brains, a study concludes.

This is a false statement even without examining the scientific evidence. It absolves the person of any responsibility for his facial expressions blaming his genes when it is the person who is totally responsible for his smiles and scowls that are both are never good but evil, harmful and stressful to self and others.

It reflects how deluded scientists are, how false their perception has become when they can blame genes for conduct (facial expressions) that are harmful, manipulative.

The truth may be that as a result of incessantly forcing oneself to smile and scowl, the urge to do so becomes overwhelming, the person cannot now resist smiling and scowling that are even etched into his face and his mind may be permanently warped to smile and scowl and not to smile for a person with the urge to smile and not to scowl for a person with a well developed urge to scowl is near impossible.

THUS, FIRST YOU FORCE YOURSELF TO SMILE OR SCOWL TO PLEASE, IMPRESS OR INTIMIDATE OTHERS BUT IN TIME YOU ARE FORCED BY CONDITIONING TO DO SO SUCH THAT THE SMILE OR SCOWL IS PERMANENTLY ETCHED INTO YOUR FACE, NOT GENES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR SMILES AND SCOWLS.

THE CRUCIAL DIFFERENCE IS THAT IF IT IS DUE TO GENES, YOU CANNOT HELP IT AND YOU ARE BLAMELESS BUT IF IT IS DUE TO CONDITIONING, HOWEVER DIFFICULT, IT CAN BE DE-CONDITIONED AND YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE MORALLY FOR YOUR SMILES AND SCOWLS IF IT HARMS OTHERS AND YOURSELF.

Boom year for hi tech criminals:

The person who speaks thus is speaking carelessly and therefore falsely to generate conflict in himself and others.

‘Boom’ is associated with likeable conditions and it cannot be a boom year for criminals but it is a record year for hi tech criminals. Whether you are realize or not but by describing record criminality as a boom you are stirring conflict that what is bad (criminality) is good (boom).

BOOM HAS CONNOTATION OF WHAT IS DESIRABLE AND RECORD CRIMINALITY CANNOT BE LIKEABLE AND SO YOU ARE MISCHIEVOUS TO DESCRIBE RECORD CRIMINALITY AS A BOOM.

Thiamine reverses kidney damage:

Whatever effect thiamine has is marginal (and maybe even nonexistent or a figment of the imagination.

If you do not want to suffer from kidney failure, make sure you are genuinely virtuous, you do not call record criminality a boom, otherwise no matter how much thiamine you take it will never prevent kidney failure.

KIDNEY FAILURE IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND IT IS NEVER BLAMELESS BUT DIRECTLY LINK TO THE PERSON’S ABUSE OF SELF AND OTHERS AND IN THIS EQUATION, THIAMINE’S EFFECT IS MARGINAL IF NOT NONEXISTENT.

The highest gift:

Different people have different definitions of what would be the supreme gift. Below the Buddha states his definition of the supreme gift.

There are three factors related to the giver and three factors dependent on the recipient. When all six factors are fulfilled the gift is the highest gift and results in the highest reward.

The three factors related to the giver is that he should give without regret or holding back but be pleased and delighted to give before, during and after the act.

The three factors dependent on the recipient is that he should be freed from greed, hate and delusion. Thus a gift given to a noble person results in much higher reward compared to a gift to sinful people.

 

Here, bhikkhus, there are three factors to the giver and three factors to the acceptor. Bhikkhus, what are the three factors of the giver? Even before giving the giver has a pleasant mind, while giving the mind is pleased and having given the mind is pleased. These are the three factors of the giver. What are the three factors of the acceptor? Here bhikkhus the acceptor is free of greed, free of anger and free of delusion. Bhikkhus, these are the three factors of the acceptor. Bhikkhus, thus it becomes a gift endowed with six factors.

Bhikkhus, it is not easy to account for the merits of a gift endowed with these six factors as, it is a yield of merit, a yield of good, a bringer of pleasantness and heavenly bliss that is conducive to agreeability and pleasantness of such a measure. It becomes a mass of pleasantness that is immeasurable. As the water in the great ocean cannot be measured as it is a hundred vessels full of water, or a thousand vessels full of water or a hundred thousand vessels full of water, yet it becomes a mass of water that is immeasurable. In the same manner bhikkhus, it is not easy to account for the merits of a gift endowed with these six factors as, it is a yield of merit, a yield of good, a bringer of pleasantness and heavenly bliss that is conducive to agreeability and pleasantness of such a measure. It becomes a mass of pleasantness that is immeasurable.

Even before giving the mind is pleased, while giving is pleased,

Having given is pleased, this is the accomplishment in giving a gift.

The restrained, leading a holy life, free of greed, hate and delusion

Are the field for offering gifts.

By oneself cooked and offering with one's own hands

One's belongings offered to others is of great fruit.

The wise offering with faith and released mind

Are reborn in a world of pleasantness without troubles

Untitled

Looking at the bright side:

Reality check: Archbishop (of Canterbury) looks on bright side of economic crisis

When people look at the bright side of something it is usually a form of denial or not accepting what has happened or trying to see good in what is bad or trying to console oneself and others that is never good but cultivating controlled insanity that will end in future insanity.

It is a person who is self centred, always trying to see advantage and disadvantage in a situation, what is there in this for me who tries to see the bright side of things to see if there is anything in there for me or salvageable.

If you speak of ‘reality check’ you are admitting without knowing that you are living in make believe in the past, your previous economic life was a delusion or false and now this is a reality check.

UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO MAD, YOU SHOULD NOT TRY TO SEE THE BRIGHT OR DARK SIDES OF THINGS BUT LET THINGS BE, SEE AND KNOW WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND NOT TRY TO GLEAN ADVANTAGE OR DISADVANTAGE FROM IT.

THERE IS NOTHING BRIGHT IN THIS CRISIS BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU MUST DESPAIR.

Ferrari would not swap Massa for Hamilton:

This is always a false statement of emotion to deprecate, never a statement of truth.

If you read it and you do not know if it is true or false or you think it is true, you are a person who does not know what he reads.

Hamilton is the youngest world champion and so his driving credentials cannot be clearly inferior to Massa’s.

It is always false to compare one good driver with another because you cannot know who is better and to imply that Massa is just as good or better than Hamilton so that you will not swap them is not based on genuine reason, not based on true seeing or knowing but based on emotion, ‘sour grapes’ or stubbornness or scorn.

IT IS A USELESS STATEMENT TO MAKE BECAUSE YOU CANNOT DETERMINE OBJECTIVELY WHO THE BETTER DRIVER IS AND SO THE STATEMENT IS NEVER BASED ON TRUTH BUT DRIVEN BY EMOTION, SCORN OR SOUR GRAPES.

Are your fears well founded?

IF YOU DESIRE TO DESCEND INTO FUTURE CERTAIN INTENSE MAD FEAR THEN YOU SHOULD CONSIDER YOUR FEAR WELL FOUNDED. IF YOU DO NOT, THEN NO FEAR IS EVER WELL FOUNDED.

The question implies that fear is meaningful or beneficial and it may be justified or unjustified and it reflects delusion.

Fear is merely the stirring in speed and strength of a person’s mental force of self preservation with a sudden collapse in speed and strength of his force of going against self that is meaningless, harmful and stressful without doing anything to resolve the problem or danger at hand. Rather than raising fear what is needed is calm clear genuine reason to assess what the real danger and problem is and thus determined, to undertake precise specific to that occasion solution. The fearful mind becomes irrational and may resort to inappropriate action whilst missing a clearly viable action.

The Buddha said the enlightened ones are like a mountain, unshaken by anything happening and do not quake so fear is not mandatory, compulsory. With the cessation of the use of mental force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness the person is depriving his mind of mental force that is required to experience fear and so he is fearless. Without abandoning style you will never see an end to fear that is conditioning so that it becomes more intense and chaotic with age and you are doomed to descend into mad fear, so you are a fool to ask whether one’s fear is well or not well founded.

IF YOU DESIRE TO DESCEND INTO CERTAIN INTENSE MAD FEAR THEN YOU SHOULD CONSIDER YOUR FEAR WELL FOUNDED. IF YOU DO NOT, THEN NO FEAR IS EVER WELL FOUNDED.

Who says you need understanding to survive in this world?

No understanding and knowing the truth is needed to survive in this world but in fact, although it is flirting with danger and death, knowing and understanding falsity is vital to doing well in this world because falsity and harmfulness disguised as goodness is the language and currency of this world.

It may be that the Iraqi journalist was beaten up on the behest or demand of US security personnel as revenge for humiliating Bush and so it is that if you want long life, you must bottle the insults and falsity or hypocrisy dished to you, act as if grateful instead of throwing your shoe at Bush that can cause you even your life (beaten to death) or imprisonment.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO KNOW AND SEE THE TRUTH TO SURVIVE EVEN SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD. JUST COPY WHAT OTHERS ARE DOING AND BECAUSE WHAT THEY DO RESULT IN THEIR SURVIVAL IN THIS WORLD YOU TOO WILL SURVIVE LONG SO LONG AS YOU DO NOT MEET SOME UNFORTUNATE INCIDENT OR THE INABILITY TO SEE AND KNOW THE TRUTH DOES NOT PROVE PREMATURELY FATAL. WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT IS YOU ARE CONVERSANT WITH FALSITY AND DECEIT, THE WAY OF THIS WORLD, THE CAPACITY TO PUT ON A SHOW TO GET ALONG, TO SMILE WHEN YOU ARE BEING DISHED SHIT.

Iraqi shoe-thrower 'was beaten'

By Caroline Wyatt BBC News, Baghdad

The investigating judge in the case of the Iraqi reporter who threw his shoes at US President George W Bush says the man shows signs of having been beaten.

The judge, who saw Muntader al-Zaidi this week, said the journalist had bruises on his face and about his eyes.

It never was there:

AUSTRALIANS have lost about $200bn this year from their super as the share market carnage hit.

Such a person is speaking falsely because Australians did not lose $200 bn, the money was never there in the first place it was just paper gains that have been wiped off.

It reflects serious false perception and logic of people that they believe they are worth so much based on current share prices when it is an illusion, you cannot extrapolate like this unless you are a fool and because humans do so, they are fools, how can fools know the truth?

Gays more threat than rainforest destruction:

A lot of people like to think of themselves as quite selfless not realizing that what they say expose them as self centred.

Recently the pope raised the ire of gays when he said gays are as much a threat to civilization as the destruction of rainforest.

From the earth’s view, gays are no threat at all but the destruction of rainforests is definitely serious.

Thus the pope is showing no concern for the earth and it is there only to support mankind. Civilization includes him and you and because he is addressing a human population he may be pandering to the audience again in putting them, humans first.

The reason why rainforests is a threat to many people is because it threatens to trigger calamitous changes that are a threat to their survival and so they may think they are concerned about the earth but they are concerned with their wellbeing here.

 

Madoff responsible for suicide:

Whilst Madoff is not completely responsible for this swindled imvestor’s suicide the suffering due him for his part is far worse than he and you imagine. Madoff’s has a lot of blood and suffering on his hands even if the people he swindled are not innocent themselves and there is horrendous prolonged suffering due Madoff for his part in this scam.

Madoff investor commits suicide

A French investment manager who put $1.4bn (£1bn) into Bernard Madoff's fraud-hit scheme has killed himself in his New York office, police said.

Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet, 65, was found sitting at his desk with both wrists slashed, New York police spokesman Paul Browne said.

A bottle of pills was found near him, but there was no suicide note.

Mr Madoff is accused of running a $50bn (£34bn) Ponzi scheme that wiped out investors around the world.

Big funds like Mr Villehuchet's were especially hard hit.

Paris newspaper La Tribune said he spent the past week trying "day and night to find a way to recoup his investors' money".

Mr Villehuchet, who was married without children, was co-founder of money manager Access International.

Legal case

Mr Madoff's fraud has ensnared Wall Street investors and charities around the world, although the full extent of the losses is as yet unknown.

He is under house arrest in his Manhattan apartment, and his assets have been frozen.

Another investor who gave Mr Madoff $2m (£1.35m) to manage has taken legal action against US financial regulators.

Phyllis Molchatsky, a 61-year-old retiree from New York, is seeking $1.7m in damages from the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

It is believed to be the first attempt by an investor to recover losses from the SEC.

Honest priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids

Truth never ruins anything but it is falsity that ruins. To say truth ruins Christmas for kids is to imply that sometimes it is better to keep up with pretense and that is false.

To believe and imagine Santa exists when he does not is suffering, flirting with mad perception that will be fulfilled. Just because you know Santa is a myth does not mean you cannot ‘enjoy’ it as when you falsely thought he existed.

When you speak of ruining you are speaking of children becoming disappointed, disliking and sad as a result of the news and this is all about emotion or stirring of mental force that is not only meaningless but suffering by stressing the mind.

Make belief is always suffering. It is impossible the children see and know Father Christmas exists but they force themselves to believe or imagine he exists and that is fabrication and cultivating falsity or fantasy that is training them in false perception that will end in mad perception.

Thus anyone who says honest priest has ruined children’s Christmas has wrong view that is the way to hell or the animal womb, truth never hurt anybody and it is a person’s falsity or pretense that is maintained by force that is hurt by truth.

By David Willey BBC News, Rome

Dozens of parents complained after the priest let out the Santa secret

A Catholic priest has been criticised by parents in a city in northern Italy for telling their children that Father Christmas does not really exist.

Father Dino Bottino, the parish priest of the Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Novara, let out the secret at a children's mass earlier this month.

A local paper published complaints from dozens of parents. "You've ruined my children's Christmas," said one mother.

But an unrepentant Fr Bottino called it his duty to set the record straight.

"I told the children that Father Christmas was an invention that had nothing to do with the Christian Christmas story," he said.

"And I would repeat it again, if I had the chance," he added.

But Father Dino could not have imagined the scorn that would be heaped upon him after he told children at mass that neither Father Christmas - nor the kindly witch called the Befana who provides presents at New Year to Italian children - really exist.

The priest said he had never intended to hurt anyone, but it was his duty to distinguish the reality of Jesus from the story of Father Christmas which was a fable just like Cinderella or Snow White.

Why the pope speaks falsely:

Unless you see and know that gays are as much a threat to civilization as rainforest destruction you should not speak so not only because it is speaking carelessly with judgment due but it is conditioning yourself to perceive as true what you did not see and know that will end in mad perception.

Homosexuality has existed not just in humans but animals and throughout civilization and it is not a cause of destruction to civilization, sexual debauchery that is not necessarily homosexual can bring about decay but heterosexuals are just as bad as homosexuals in their actions.

How many of the top bankers and company CEOs that are responsible for the financial mess that threaten social instability homosexuals? Is Hitler, Stalin, Mao, corrupt leaders like Mugabe overtly homosexual? Heterosexuals are just as bad in their evil and criminal deeds that threaten civilizations and just because a person is heterosexual do not mean he is clean or morally upright.

The Buddha said that one should refrain from all sexual activity and it is an obstacle to brahma faring or the heavenly realms and so per se heterosexuality too is not wholesome.

Exiting gracefully:

There is no such thing as exiting gracefully and if you perceive there is you have false perception that will end in mad perception.

A certain faction in MCA has called for Dr Chua who is tainted by a sexual scandal to exit gracefully.

When you want someone to exit gracefully you want them to exit ‘with dignity’ or pride or with a smile or as if happy or grateful. This is false and hypocritical. If Dr Chua is tainted and you disliked him you cannot mean for him to exit graceful but the truth is you want him to exit in shame.

A person who lets his yes be yes only (as Jesus exhorted) says ‘exit’ anything more, ‘gracefully’ is false, hypocritical and comes from evil.

Exit gracefully is always hypocritical:

If a person desires to exit he would have done so without your prompting and so you are asking a person to go against his natural intention to exit.

If you are pleased with what he is doing you would not ask him to exit and so it is that you must be displeased or disliked with what he is doing that you ask him to exit.

If you are displeased and you ask him to exit gracefully, you are being hypocritically polite, never genuinely polite and you want the person to do something (exit) against his wish with grace or composure or liking or happiness and that is asking for the person to pretend or generate conflict in himself with karmic debt for you.

Thus you just call for someone’s exit, you are a hypocrite who will yourself be punished by hypocritically asking another to ‘swallow his pride’, pretend and exit ‘gracefully’.

It is objective never subjective:

It is never because I say that ‘exiting gracefully’ is false and hypocritical, wanting others to do the impossible, exit on your demand and also do it gracefully or ‘charmingly’ that it is so and you or anyone can refute it or say it is a worthless truth or semantics.

Because it is objective, if what I say is true then to speak of graceful exit is sinful and false, with demerit not merit as foolish ordinary people even insist (they think they are praiseworthy asking others in such a civilized way, ‘exit gracefully’). How many if any ordinary person is able to discern what I said is true.

They get emotional when they ask others to exit gracefully, they become agitated if others ask them to exit gracefully but they do not see and understand they are emotionally disturbed because what is said is false or hypocritical, never meritorious as they are brainwashed to perceive but sinful or evil.

THUS IF YOU SAY YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SEE AND HEAR, WHY DID YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS WICKED TO ASK SOMEONE TO EXIT GRACEFULLY? PERHAPS YOU HEAR BUT DO NOT HEAR, YOU DO NOT GENUINELY UNDERSTAND BUT YOU UNDERSTAND BY ROTE OR PROGRAMMED COMPUTER LOGIC.

 

Untitled

At last Strauss showing the class he has:= o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 

Quote: At last Strauss (England batsman) is showing the class he has. 

The person himself and those who read think they understand what is said but they are deluding themselves because what is said is meaningless, is about emotion, stirring emotion and that is without understanding and about stirring blind harmful force. 

The person is talking about converting his previous disappointment or dislike (repulsive stirring of his mental force) at Strauss’ cricketing performance to approval, he is impressed or excited or thrilled by Strauss’ latest batting performance.  

And what is this class he is talking about? When people speak of class, they are talking of style or how a cricketer deals with a ball or hits a ball. Thus this class he is talking about is Strauss’ style and that is about how he uses force to prolong, change speed, direction and strength when he bats. 

Further there is nothing to understand in cricket or batting which is a rote activity in which the batsman is merely rehashing his strokes as faithfully as possible from innumerable past practices. If cricket and all sports is about how a sportsman rehashes his strokes that has a characteristic consistent style that differs from others, it is impossible for anyone to understand cricket, it is only possible for anyone watching to be attracted to what and how a batsman hits the ball. 

A PERSON CAN ONLY BE ATTRACTED TO CRICKET, LIKE HOW A BATSMAN HITS THE BALL IN HIS CONSISTENT STYLE THAT DIFFERS FROM OTHERS IN WHICH HE IS MERELY REHASHING ROBOTICALLY, NO ONE CAN UNDERSTAND CRICKET OR CRICKETING ACTIONS. 

WHEN THE WRITER IS TALKING ABOUT STRAUSS’ STYLE HE IS TALKING ABOUT HOW STRAUSS USES FORCE TO FABRICATE HIS BATTING STYLE THAT CHARACTERIZES HIS BATTING AND HE IS THEREFORE TALKING ABOUT FORCE THAT HAS NOTHING THAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD BY ANYONE EXCEPT THOSE WHO HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT THE MANIFESTATIONS OF FORCE IS MEANINGFUL. 

IN TALKING ABOUT AT LAST, STRAUSS IS SHOWING THE CLASS HE HAS, HE IS AGAIN TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING THAT IS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING, THE CONVERSION OF HIS PREVIOUS DISAPPOINTMENT (DISLIKE) AT STRAUSS’ PERFORMANCE TO HIS NOW DELIGHT OR LIKE FOR STRAUSS’ BATTING. 

THUS WHAT WAS SAID WAS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING, HE IS TALKING ABOUT FORCE (DISAPPOINTMENT TO LIKE), FORCE (CLASS IS STYLE IS HOW STRAUSS USES FORCE) AND FORCE (CRICKET IS ALL ABOUT ROBOTIC REHASHING THAT HAS NOTHING TO BE UNDERSTOOD BUT FORCE CHANGES ACCORDING TO PLAN TO BE LIKED OR DISLIKED). 

JUST AS HERE PEOPLE THINK THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID BUT THEY DON’T IT MAY BE THAT THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND IN MANY PLACES BUT IS THEIR FALSE NOT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING. 

Who is the new chief justice: 

TO THE ORDINARY PEOPLE, ZAKI IS JUST ANOTHER APPOINTMENT BUT THE TRUTH MAY BE HE IS AN UNSUITABLE CANDIDATE BASED ON HIS PERSONAL LIFE AND CONNECTIONS WITH BUSINESS AND HE MAY HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY GROOMED AND PUT IN PLACE BY BADAWI TO BECOME CJ ABOVE MORE LEGALLY QUALIFIED CANDIDATES. 

Badawi spoke about reform and preached an independent judiciary but in the Attorney General and now the new chief justice, he has put in place puppets who will do his bidding or rubber stamp what he decides. 

Therefore Badawi is a hypocrite who does do what he preaches and far from good, he is like a man with an iron fist under a velvet glove dedicated to preserving his own self interest whilst avowing the public interest. 

According to the article below (that pours unnecessary emotional scorn) Zaki is an UMNO lawyer who sits on the boards of many UMNO companies and therefore not suitable to be CJ. Privately he secretly married a very young wife in Thailand and soon after divorced her and he burnt the marriage certificate to hide it from his wife.  

Zaki was nominated to the bench earlier in preparation for his ultimate appointment as CJ above more senior and eligible judges. 

THUS TO THE ORDINARY PEOPLE, ZAKI IS JUST ANOTHER APPOINTMENT BUT THE TRUTH MAY BE HE IS AN UNSUITABLE CANDIDATE BASED ON HIS PERSONAL LIFE AND CONNECTIONS WITH BUSINESS AND HE MAY HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY GROOMED AND PUT IN PLACE BY BADAWI TO BECOME CJ ABOVE MORE LEGALLY QUALIFIED CANDIDATES.  

BADAWI MAY BE FAR MORE DECEPTIVE AND EVIL THAN PEOPLE THINK. HE IS NICE BUT NICE IS NOT GOOD BUT CLOAKED EVIL. 

If Zaki is morally unfit to serve in Umno’s disciplinary board, how could he be considered morally fit to be a federal court judge, not to mention his lightning elevation to the No.2 position, and anticipated imminent rise to the top job in the judiciary? 

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER



Martin Jalleh  

The Palace of Justice has a new “prince” – Zaki Tun Azmi. He was promptly sworn in as Chief Justice (CJ) soon after the Conference of Rulers went through the procedural motions.



His Lordship had leap-frogged from the legal profession into the Federal Court last September. Two months later he was proclaimed Court of Appeal (CoA) president. Now (almost a year later) he is proudly perched on the highest post in the judiciary.



Zaki’s political “parachuting” has no precedent. But be not perturbed. Did not the PM promise (especially after his party had quickened his passage into the sunset) that he would produce profound changes in the judiciary?



Indeed, before he packs his bags and participates fully in Umno's early retirement plan for him, Pak Lak would prove to the whole of Bolehland that he still has the penchant to produce the very opposite of what he initially promises. (There is no need to speak of boleh-land which he copied from others and is therefore a robot and it is intended to be mocking that is never the way to heaven but woe)



In April this year, at a Malaysian Bar Council dinner where he paid tribute to former Lord President Salleh Abas and four former Supreme Court judges all of whom were sacked in 1988 by Dr M, Pak Lah had promised the setting up of a Judicial Appointments Commission to help the PM choose judges.



Pak Lah had also very proudly declared then that such a step was to “renew the people’s trust in the judiciary” and to “make the process of nominating, appointing and promoting judges more transparent and representative”.



In his perfect closing the PM pleaded poignantly, pointedly and so passionately: “Let us move on…The rakyat wants movement and progress, not continuing strife… Let us write this proud and new chapter together!”



5 months later, the PM picked out a Umno lawyer from the Bar, parked him in the Court of Appeal for a while, so as to place him at the pinnacle of the judiciary at the opportune time!



The PM’s preference of the most junior judge in the Federal Court to take the place of the outgoing CJ implied that it was the government’s perception that there were no senior serving Federal Court judges qualified for or worthy of the job.





Many had predicted Zaki’s promotion to CJ.  When the latter was made CoA president, Lim Kit Siang (who was then the opposition leader in parliament) called the appointment “a prelude” to Zaki becoming “Umno's Chief Justice”.





Can anyone be more accurate than Raja Petra?: “Imagine having two Umno men at the top of the judicial hierarchy, one as AG and the other as CJ. You will be able to literally get away with murder (as if they are not already getting away with it).”







Zaki was a key player in Umno. He was chairman of the party’s election committee, deputy chairman of its disciplinary board of appeal, party legal advisor, etc. As Umno’s legal man, he was involved with “the party’s myriad scandalous financial misadventures that were bailed out by the government (of Dr M)".



“Apart from acting as Umno’s nominee, Zaki also has held directorship in scores of major companies… Even if he has the superhuman capability to totally severe his umbilical cord to the ruling party and his commercial interests to eliminate conflict of interests, there is still the insurmountable problem of public perception.”



Kim Quek had also questioned Zaki’s “moral integrity arising from his controversial marriage and divorce from his second wife Nor Hayati Yahaya”, who was half his age and whom he married in a ceremony conducted by a kadi from Thailand in a textile shop in Perlis in March 2005.



“They separated three months later. In the messy divorce that ensued, it was revealed that Zaki burned the original marriage certificate to hide the marriage from his first wife. Further, the marriage was ruled by the Syarah court as illegal.



Badawi more like Mugabe than you think: 

It is not farfetched to say that Malaysia and Zimbabwee share more in common than people concede. 

Mugabe has denied there is a cholera epidemic and instead accused the West of spreading malicious lies about him. 

In Malaysia too, everything has been engineered to keep the ruling coalition in power, the AG & Chief Justice are both UMNO cronies and the IGP is reputed to be a crime kingpin himself if not the kingpin. 

There is large scale unsustainable plunder of the country’s wealth and resources by the politicians and their cronies at the expense of the nation and because it is unsustainable, a day of reckoning will come and may have come. 

BADAWI IS NOT MUGABE BUT HE AND MALAYSIAN POLITICIANS MAY NOT BE THAT FAR BEHIND AS YOU MIGHT FALSELY PERCEIVE. 

What you must understand: 

If you truly understand what is being said, you must understand that when the person said that ‘at last Strauss is showing the class he has’ he is merely speaking about force that is blind and without meaning and thus what he said is meaningless. He is saying now he likes what he disliked previously (Strauss’ batting performance), when he speaks of Strauss’ class, he is speaking of Strauss’ cricketing style which is all about force, force changes in speed, strength and direction in his strokes, his stances and how he treats the cricket ball with his bat that has nothing to do with reason but is all about force. 

Being a good cricketer or any other sport is about being a good robot, you need to practice and practice until you can reproduce shots without thinking, it is about doing something (hitting the ball) according to a plan in your mental jukebox. Thus anyone fascinated (attracted to) with cricket is fascinated with robotics or the blind meaningless rehash of strokes and stances that is meaningless, for show to impress self and others how wonderful or attractively stirring the mental force the strokes and stances are. 

BECAUSE PEOPLE NEVER UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY ABOVE, THEY UNDERSTAND THAT CRICKET AND CRICKET CLASS IS MEANINGFUL AND UNDERSTANDABLE, THEY HAVE FALSE UNDERSTANDING WHICH IS WORSE THAN NO UNDERSTANDING FOR IT DECEIVES THE PERSON HE UNDERSTANDS WHEN HE DOES NOT. 

Badawi more mad and wicked than you think: 

What Badawi said below reflects his advanced madness and wickedness. 

How can the Pakatan Rakyat government be blamed for the mishap when it has only been in government recently, the previous BN government was responsible for all the approvals? 

Thus Badawi is wicked in ticking off the opposition government over the mishap and he has advanced false logic to think he has a case to castigate the opposition. 

FAR FROM GOOD, BADAWI IS A MAN WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT, TALKS NONSENSE, IS UNFAIR OR WICKED IN LOOKING FOR OPPORTUNITIES TO DENIGRATE THE OPPOSITION WHEN THERE IS PLENTY WRONG IN THE BN GOVERNMENT ITSELF. 

Don’t blame others for mishaps, Pak Lah tells Selangor govt 

 

JAKARTA: Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has hit out at the Selangor Government for apparently trying to wash its hands of the Bukit Antarabangsa landslide tragedy. 

The Prime Minister said the Pakatan Rakyat government should accept responsibility and correct any mistakes or weaknesses which have occurred. 

“This is not the way to govern – taking credit only for the good things and blaming others for the mishaps. 

 “As the new state administration, they should improve on all aspects and take things in their stride,” he told the Malaysian media here when commenting on claims by Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim that a total of 99 risky hillside projects were approved by the previous government. 

Abdullah said there was no need for him to teach the present administration how to do their work as they should be fully aware of what was good for the people. 

On the Kuala Terengganu by-election, Abdullah said Umno leaders should not be campaigning for themselves but use the time to help the Barisan Nasional candidate. 

“We must bear in mind that if our candidate loses, it will affect our party’s image. 

“I hope those vying for posts (in the Umno polls) will not use the by-election for personal gains,” he said. 

S'pore expected to be first Southeast Asian country to recover from crisis 

People fondly expect this to be a short sharp crisis and that good times will coming rolling by, hopefully not too long down the road but they may be deluded because this may be a prolonged and severe crisis that may be far worse than they expect. 

When you say ‘recovery’ you mean return to the previous state of ‘good health’. 

But if the past state was not good health but gross abuse, reckless consumption of other people’s (savers’) money, you cannot recover to the previous state of crass abuse, the money that was previously there has been spent and no longer there and so what recovery are you talking about?  

The only entity who has been bailing out mankind all this while is the earth and it has been plundered to the verge of collapse in terms of forestry, fisheries, agriculture (plant and animal farming) and resources (oil) and may not ride to mankind’s rescue this time and it reflects mankind does not understand when it speaks of recovery when there can be no recovery if the previous state is not a healthy productive one but a sick abusive consumptive one. 

Return to living WAY beyond your means? 

If the previous economic boom was living beyond your means using borrowed money that you cannot possibly return, do you think you are mad to talk of returning to the previous state of living way beyond your means using borrowed money that is now longer there, no longer eagerly extended to you? 

IF MANKIND HAS IN RECENT YEARS BEEN LIVING WAY BEYOND ITS MEANS FUELED BY RECKLESS LENDING, CAN YOU HOPE FOR A QUICK RECOVERY TO THE GOOD OLD DAYS OF LIVING WAY BEYOND YOUR MEANS? 

IF YOU BELIEVE YOU CANNOT RETURN TO THE DAYS OF LIVING BEYOND YOUR MEANS THEN YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND THERE CAN BE NO RECOVERY. 

Daly hurls camera at tree: 

It may be just an inanimate camera but there is deadly karma in its abuse and you are conditioning yourself to explosive anger that will end in loss of control and insane anger.  

Daly was irritated or angered by this spectator constantly pointing his camera even inches away as he lined up for his shot and things boiled over when he was taking a drop for a bad shot in a bad round that he may blame it on this camera toting spectator, he confiscated the camera and smashed it against a tree. It is a foolish act that incurs serious karma apart from conditioning himself even stronger to anger. 

Putting on a show more important than seeing the truth: 

Seeing and knowing the truth is totally unnecessary for survival and success in this world but what is far more important is learning how to fake, pretend, put on a show, saying and doing things that pleases, impresses and intimidates others. So long as you copy what others are saying or doing even if you do not understand what you say or do or you falsely understand what they say or do, so long as what you say or do are not too dangerous or out of touch with reality as to endanger you, most of time you will survive to ripe old age although sometimes you may succumb prematurely. You will suffer even to tormenting levels at times stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate, sadness and hurt but you will get along in life, get your share of sensate pleasures, successes and acquisitions.  

SEEING AND KNOWING THE TRUTH IS NEVER A REQUISITE FOR SURVIVING IN THIS WORLD ALTHOUGH DICING WITH FALSITY IS RISKING DEATH LIKE PUTTING YOUR HAND ON THE CHOPPER BOARD AND MAKING SURE YOU WITHDRAW BEFORE THE CHOPPER LANDS. WHAT IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT IS THE ABILITY TO FAKE, TO PUT ON A SHOW, TO TELL LIES AND SAY AND DO THINGS DISHONESTLY TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS AND GET WHAT YOU WANT. 

YOU NEED A MODICUM OF TRUTH TO SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD BUT YOU CAN APPROACH TRUTH INDIRECTLY THROUGH RULES OR PROGRAMMED REASONING THAT MAY BE COPIED FROM OTHERS. 

How to survive and get there: 

A computer or robot understands nothing yet a robot car can now be programmed to reach its destination safely most of the time baring some unforeseen circumstance that it has not been programmed to deal with. 

In the same way if a human robot has been programmed or immunised sufficiently so that he can cope with most situations he is likely to meet in life (it is impossible for a human robot to be well programmed for everything and so it is there are human robots who are a great success in public or working life but a great failure in personal or family life), then so long as what he says or does is not too virulent or fatally dangerous, by and large he will cope quite well with life and survive to old age barring unforeseen circumstances. His perceptions and beliefs may be false or deluded, his reason or logic similarly faulty or false but so long as he avoid doing or saying silly fatal things it is likely he will survive long in this world. 

TOWARDS SURVIVING IN THIS WORLD, A KNOWLEDGE OF AND SPEAKING THE TRUTH WILL MAKE YOU UNPOPULAR AND EVEN ENDANGER YOUR LIFE BUT THE ABILITY TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS WHICH MEANS FALSELY PANDERING TO OTHERS BY FALSELY SAYING AND DOING THINGS THAT ARE NOT INTENDED FOR TRUTH BUT TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT. PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DON’T LIKE TO HEAR AND SEE GENUINE TRUTH, THEY LIKE TO SEE OR HEAR FAKED OR MAKE BELIEVE TRUTH. 

JUST AS A ROBOT CAR THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING CAN BE PROGRAMED TO DRIVE ITSELF SAFELY TO ITS DESTINATION A HUMAN ROBOT CAN BE PROGRAMMED BY HIMSELF AND OTHERS TO SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING, WITHOUT SEEING AND KNOWING WHAT IS TRUE AND FALSE. 

Rote rules understanding: 

Although stylish emotional people would like (attracted) to believe they are made of better stuff, they are not capable of true specific to the occasion total understanding of what is said, done or happening but they are only capable of partial rote (rehashed) rules or instructional understanding. Once they have been programmed by what is said or done to them, they understand, if they have not been successfully programmed by what is said or done to them, they do not understand.  

In order to program someone you need a plan and force to ram it into the person. Thus in order to make an emotional man understand, you must have a plan and apply force often repetitively until it ‘sticks’, it is imprinted into his jukebox that he can retrieve and utilize to carry out what he ‘understood’ you wanted. 

Thus I may say ‘AasStTWw’ to people who are robots and they will have different incomplete understanding of what I said ‘AasStTWw’. 

One person will only understand partially thus: ‘A sS TWw’ and no matter how you try to make him understand, ‘A sS TWw’ is the only way he can understand or perceive what you said whilst another person will always perceive what I said as ‘ asSt Ww’ but never ‘A sS TWw’.  

Even if the person perceived the entirety of what I said ‘AasStTWw’ it is tainted because he perceived or understood it as ‘aassttww’ instead of the ‘AasStTWw’ I actually said. 

UNLESS SOMETHING SAID OR DONE CAN BE MEMORIZED AND RETRIEVED FROM MEMORY TO BE REAPPLIED IN THE FUTURE, THE STYLISH EMOTIONAL PERSON CANNOT UNDERSTAND, AS SOON AS SOMETHING SAID OR HAPPENED HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY MEMORIZED OR EMBEDDED IN THE PERSON’S MENTAL HARD DISK, HE HAS ‘UNDERSTOOD’ OR BEEN PROGRAMMED.  

THE DIFFERENCE IN THE PERSON OF GENUINE UNDERSTANDING IS THAT HE UNDERSTANDS THINGS SAID OR HAPPENING ON EACH OCCASION, HE PAYS ATTENTION AND UNDERSTAND EACH WORD SPOKEN TO HIM AND UNDERSTANDS WHAT ALL THE WORDS SPOKEN TO HIM COLLECTIVELY MEAN AND THUS TRULY UNDERSTANDS HE KNOWS WHAT TO DO OR SO THAT HE COMPOSES BY HIMSELF UNLIKE THE PERSON OF ROTE UNDERSTANDING WHO RETRIEVES WHAT HE UNDERSTOOD OR MEMORIZED TO APPLY OR ACT ACCORDING TO THAT INSTRUCTIONAL UNDERSTANDING TO SAY OR DO SOMETHING ACCORDING TO HIS REHASHED ‘UNDERSTANDING’. 

Thus if I tell you there are constant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness in your speech then if you truly understood you will immediately hear the stretching, changing speed and loudness and if you understood what is stretching, changing speed and loudness you will also understand what is not stretching, changing speed and loudness and if you understand what is NOT stretching, changing speed and loudness you will be able to thus speak without stretching, changing speed and loudness, especially it is the KEY to a permanent effortless, free (no need to pay) freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction. 

THUS EITHER PEOPLE, EVEN VERY EDUCATED ONES UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY BUT THEY ARE POWERLESS TO STOP THEMSELVES FROM STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS (IN OTHER WORDS THEY ARE SLAVES OR ROBOTS OF MENTAL FORCE) OR THEY DO NOT HEAR THEMSELVES STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS OR THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND BECAUSE NOT HEARING THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND. 

Lip stick: 

= v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" /> 

 

Lipstick generally serves no function, it is supposed to be attractive, to augment the person’s attractiveness and that is about stirring the observer’s mental force to become attracted or liking. 

To befuddled ordinary people, applying lipstick to attract men is meaningful, reason to apply but that is false meaning because it is meant to stir mental force (attraction) that is blind and meaningless. 

Because you insist it is meaningful even after I tell you it is meaningless, if what I say is true, you have advanced false perception of what is meaningless is meaningful and the destination of that is mad perception and this never bliss. 

No matter how meaningful a girl may insists her application of lipstick, it is meaningless, serves no purpose except to attract, she has to force herself to do so because others do so, because it is a ritual and obsession that compels her to do so Because she is doing something that is meaningless, she will go mad. 

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO UNDERSTAND THE REASON FOR PUTTING LIPSTICK BUT THEY ALWAYS USE FORCE TO APPLY LIPSTICK ACCORDING TO A PLAN BECAUSE OTHERS ARE DOING IT, BECAUSE THEY WANT TO ATTRACT MEN (STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES ATTRACTIVELY THAT IS ALL ABOUT FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND MEANINGLESS) OR IT IS A RITUAL THAT THEY HAVE BECOME SLAVES OF. 

A smile of distrust: 

 

 

 

This is not a smile to please or impress others but it is a smile to express reservations or suspiciousness or rejection or doubt.  

You need force never genuine reason to be reserved, suspicious or doubt. 

If a person sees and understands the nature of the person facing him, the truth or falsity of what is said to him and he is honest, what is there to doubt or be suspicious? 

IT IS BECAUSE A PERSON CANNOT SEE WHAT HE IS FACING, CANNOT TELL THE TRUTH OR FALSITY OF WHAT IS SAID OR DONE TO HIM OR HE IS DISHONEST THAT HE HAS TO USE FORCE TO SMILE ACCORDING TO A PLAN THAT HE HAS ACTIVATED SO MANY TIMES BEFORE (THEREFORE HE IS A ROBOT) TO FAKE THAT HE LIKED WHAT HE DID NOT LIKE, DID NOT TRUST. 

How can you not understand? 

If you can understand, you truly understand, how can you fail to see and therefore understand what you are doing all the time that is the source of all your woes namely stress, restless, distraction, sadness and hurt? 

USING FORCE TO PROLONG (EG STRETCH SYLLABLES), CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HAVE PARALLELS IN THOUGHT AND MOTION IS WHAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE DOING ALL THE TIME. THEY HEAR THE EFFECTS OF PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS, LIKE OR DISLIKE IT BUT THEY DO NOT KNOW, DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS MINDLESS, MEANINGLESS FORCE CHANGES THAT THEY ARE HEARING AND APPRECIATING AND HOW THEY ARE THE ONLY INEVITABLE SOURCES OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, SADNESS AND HURT THEY REGULARLY EXPERIENCE OFTEN TO DIFFICULT TO CONTROL LEVELS. 

Only a person who cannot hear themselves using force to prolong, change speed and loudness (although they can hear the charming and annoying effects of doing so) and therefore does not understand can do so. 

I know people even those I have pointed out many times cannot hear themselves using force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness and therefore not hearing they do not understand and they have no genuine understanding. 

No one enjoys stress: 

No one, not EVEN THE TOUGHEST MEANEST UNREPENTANT GOAT who from suffer never enjoys stress that can at times be exasperating like a noose around the necks stressed people that keep tightening and threatening to strangle them alive and what they can only do is periodically loosening its grip for it to keep retightening.  

AND STRESS IS NOT SOMETHING NATURAL OR MYSTERIOUS BUT IT HAS ONLY ONE CAUSE AND CURE AND IT IS THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. BECAUSE STRESS IS DIFFICULT TO BEAR, DRIVES THE STRESSED PERSON UP THE WALL AT TIMES, IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE GOAT TO SEE THAT HE IS CAUSING HIS OWN STRESS BY USING FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS HE WILL NOT DO SO.  

IT IS PRECISELY BECAUSE ALL STRESSED PEOPLE CANNOT SEE AND THEREFORE CANNOT UNDERSTAND HOW THEY ARE CREATING STRESS FOR THEMSELVES AND OTHERS BY CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT THEY DO SO. THUS ANYONE WHO IS REGULARLY STRESSED DOES NOT SEE AND DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, HAS NO GENUINE UNDERSTANDING. 

Of what use is your genuine understanding? 

Of what use is your genuine understanding, if present, if you cannot see and understand such a simple or fundamental thing like how you are constantly using force to prolong, change speed and loudness that is crucially important because it is the source of the stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and hurt that will kill you and drive you mad? 

WHAT IS THE POINT OF ANY GENUINE UNDERSTANDING IN YOU WHEN YOU CANNOT GENUINELY SEE AND UNDERSTAND HOW YOU ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THIS WILL LEAD TO TORMENT AND DEATH? THEREFORE IF A PERSON CANNOT SEE AND UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THERE IS NO POINT IN GENUINE UNDERSTANDING BEING PRESENT IN HIM AND BECAUSE THERE IS NO POINT, IT (GENUINE UNDERSTANDING) DOES NOT EXIST IN STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE. 

If a person cannot understand: 

If a person after being told cannot see and therefore understand that there is constant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness in his and everybody else’s speech and how these lead to stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and hurt, there is no use having genuine understanding in him, it is impossible that he genuinely understands elsewhere and so he has no genuine specific live understanding only rote rehashed programmed functional understanding. 

How phobias and obsessions develop: 

Initially you may do something because there is reason to do so but if at the same time you also like or disliked or feared what you did it, in time the reason withers and the like or dislike and fear grows like a cancer to seize you to do it and because force is blind, it is dangerous and irrational. 

For instance initially you go to the supermarket because you have a reason or necessity, you need to get some items but if at the same time you also liked shopping at the supermarket (so many times, bright light, so many people, you think it is impressive or chic to shop at the supermarket) or disliked (the chore of going there, finding a parking space, walking around, jostling with crowds, the noise or bustle) or feared it (afraid of meeting people you know and having to socialize) then in time to come the reason for shopping becomes displaced by the emotion (like, dislike, fear) of shopping that is dangerous because force is blind and irrational. 

Thus a person who develops a like or obsession for shopping will go for the sake of going, will buy a lot of things on whim that he may not need until it becomes so strong he is addicted and cannot help it and he may waste a lot of his money and time. 

A person who disliked shopping would suffer more when shopping because he has to do it grudgingly, dislikingly.  

A person who is fearful of shopping because of dread of meeting social contacts may in time develop a phobia for supermarkets that he is ashamed of such that he dares not step into a supermarket or at peak hours. 

THUS EVEN IF YOU HAD REASON TO DO A CERTAIN THING IN THE FIRST PLACE IF AT THE SAME TIME YOU ALSO LIKED, DISLIKED OR FEARED DOING IT, IN TIME TO COME THE FORCE OR EMOTION BECOME ASCENDANT AND THE BLIND, DANGEROUS DRIVE FOR THAT ACTIVITY. 

ALL EMOTIONAL, STYLISH LIKING AND DISLIKING PEOPLE MUST HAVE CERTAIN OBSESSIONS, PHOBIAS OR THINKS HE HATES TO DO.

NOT ONLY DOES LIKE, DISLIKE AND FEAR REPLACE REASON FOR THE THINGS THEY DO, BECAUSE FORCE IS CONDITIONING AND CAN SPREAD TO OTHER AREAS, IN TIME TO COME,  LIKE AND DISLIKE AND FEAR BECOME THE PRIME MOTIVATOR OR ARBITER OF WHAT THEY DO AND THAT IS NEVER A PLEASURE BUT TORMENTING, IS BLIND AND DANGEROUS BECAUSE IT IS NOT BASED ON UNDERSTANDING ANYMORE.

More fraud to come? 

Wealthy (greedy) investors wanting to make more money from their money became victims of a fraudster and there may be more such cases to come that will undermine further the feeble confidence or trust in the financial market and so far worse may be yet to come as the can of worms of global high finance is finally opened. 

Bernie Madoff's alleged $50bn fraud may be just a foretaste of what's to come  

First come the losses and the stupidities committed by bankers working for their own self-interest.  

  

By Rob Cox, breakingviews.com

Last Updated: 5:47PM GMT 12 Dec 2008 

Then come the rogue traders, who are unable to 'fess up on market bets gone wrong. The last to arrive is the "bezzle".  

That was economist JK Galbraith's word for the outright frauds built up when markets are good. These can be kept hidden for as long as the lies hold up. But the truth will out.  

The first big outing in the current financial crisis is an alleged scam that may cost investors as much as $50bn. It was committed, according to a US criminal indictment, by a highly respected member of the financial community, a one-time Nasdaq executive and a legendary trader in New York.  

Bernard Madoff is accused of orchestrating a multi-year fraud in which generous returns were manufactured for sophisticated investors. The technique was the usual Ponzi scheme. Old investors were paid off by the new funds lured into to Madoff's art-laden New York headquarters.  

Losses of $50bn would probably make Madoff the biggest single fraudster in history. But in fairness, such an accomplishment shouldn't come as a great surprise. In Galbraith's model of a speculative cycle, good times spawn the excess and corruption which eventually bring them to end. The last good times were especially profitable, fertilising the ground for especially large frauds.  

But the first frauds to be discovered are usually the not the largest. Madoff's alleged billions could only be a foretaste of what receding markets will eventually expose.  

Bernanke’s dangerous logic: 

The current Fed Chairman Bernanke is apparently a keen student of depression economics who also examined Japan’s ‘loss decade’ after the bursting of the Nikkei & property bubble of the 1980s. 

He perceived that the sudden severance of credit lines was the greatest mistake of the Great Depression and so his antidote is to open the credit floodgates at all cost to keep the economy going and if the governments like the US and UK are full of debts they could use their prerogative to print money, print, print and print until the economy recovers. 

This is a dangerous logic & playing with fire because just as it is not right for you and me to sign checks to pay debts when you know you have no money in the bank, surely it is not right for governments who have no money to print money and just because they own the currency printing presses does not give them right to do so which may have unforeseen consequences like undermining and devaluing the currency until it is worthless. 

MUCH AS THEY MIGHT LIKE TO MAKE IT, THERE IS NO FINESSE IN BERNANKE’S APPROACH TO THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS. THERE IS A SEVERE CREDIT CRUNCH AND PERCEIVING THE CAUSE OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION AS THE COLLAPSE OF CREDIT, BERNANKE’S PRESCRIPTION IS SIMPLE, PRINT, PRINT AND PRINT UNTIL YOU BEAT BACK THE DEPRESSION. 

IF THE PAST WAS A CREDIT ABUSE OF A MEGA SCALE AND YOU HAVE CREATED A BIG HOLE TOO BIG TO COVER, NOTHING YOU CAN DO BY PRINTING WILL REVERSE THE HARM DONE AND ITS PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES. 

PRINTING MONEY MAY AMELORIATE THE EFFECTS BUT IT MAY NOT BE MUCH AND TO THINK IT IS A PANACEA MAY BE DELUSION AND THE FOLLY OF THE LOGIC REFLECTS THE QUALITY OF MEN WHO RUN HUMAN AFFAIRS NOT JUST IN POLITICS AND FINANCE BUT EVEN ITS SCIENCES. TIMES MAY BE DESPERATE BUT BERNANKE HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO STUDY HIS ACTIONS, HE HAD BEEN A STUDENT OF DEPRESSION ECONOMICS FOR YEARS. 

What printing money can achieve: 

In so far as humans are emotional and tend to overshoot in withdrawing credit through fear, the supply of credit by governments will mitigate this effect. 

To the extent that the drying up of credit would negatively affect the running of viable businesses the printing of money will also mitigate. 

But it will be dangerous for government to spend, embark on construction projects just to provide demand and employment. 

If a bulk of the problem is because of abuses of credit and plunder of the system such that a lot of the money savers think they have in banks are irretrievably lost, many have debts that will take them years if ever to repay, then we cannot return to ‘the good old days’ of binging and blind unfettered extension of credit. 

IF A LOT OF PAST ECONOMY WAS ABUSIVE CONSUMPTION BASED ON BORROWED MONEY, WE CAN NEVER RETURN TO THAT STATE AND IF NOT RETURNING MEANS A COLLAPSE IN DEMAND, NO AMOUNT OF PRINTING WILL DO MORE THAN CUSHION THE COLLAPSE. TO EXPECT PRINTING TO RETURN THE ECONOMY TO ITS PREVIOUS ‘HEALTH’ IS FOLLY. 

IF PRINTING MONEY IS LIKE PAPERING OVER THE CRACKS AND YOU THINK IT IS THE CURE FOR THE FINANCIAL CRISIS YOU HAVE FALSE LOGIC, EVEN PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN INSANITY FOR YOU. 

What is the purpose of money? 

Why print money and make it hard if not impossible to forge with various security measures? 

The purpose of printing money is to provide a very easily portable or mobile universally accepted vehicle of value that anyone in its possession can use to buy or sell goods. Thus the piece of paper represents value and so if you abuse that value by indiscriminately printing money without backing it with assets or your assets remain the same then the worth of your money will be increasingly diminished. 

THUS UNLESS YOUR NEW MONEY IS BACKED BY NEW ASSETS YOU SHOULD NOT PRINT MORE MONEY AS THAT WOULD BE CHEATING AND ROBBING VALUE FROM EXISTING HOLDERS OF THAT CURRENCY AND SO IT IS THAT BY PRINTING THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD ARE CHEATING, PULLING A RABBIT OUT OF THE HAT TO DECEIVE THEMSELVES AND OTHERS. 

IF YOU ARGUE THAT DESPERATE TIMES REQUIRE DESPERATE MEASURES YOU ARE A FOOL BECAUSE DESPERATE TIMES REQUIRE CALM CLEAR THINKING AND WELL REASONED CALM MEASURES. YOU NEED FORCE NEVER REASON TO PRINT MONEY, ANY FOOL CAN PRINT MONEY IF HE HAS THE PRESSES AND ELECTICITY OR FORCE TO DO SO. 

Blues won’t be held to ransom: 

Kenyon (Chelsea chief executive): Blues won’t be held to ransom. 

He is warning off those who will raise the asking price just because it is rich Chelsea that is interested in a player. 

Warning is about force, threatening and that has nothing to do with reason. Thus what is spoken is not based on reason but based on blind force. If it was based on reason it would be that Chelsea will only pay the market rate. There is no warning here, it is merely a statement of intent. 

If a player was to come along that Chelsea is covetous for, then it is likely they can be held to ransom, they will pay what it takes to get that player and so what he said may be a lie that Chelsea will not be held to ransom. 

Blues is not Chelsea and thus anyone who likes to substitute the proper names with something that they perceive is an equivalent when it is not is courting mad perception that ‘Blues’ means Chelsea. 

THUS THE STATEMENT 'BLUES WILL NOT BE HELD TO RANSOM' IS A STATEMENT OF FORCE, A THREAT, NOT A STATEMENT OF TRUTH, IT MAY BE FALSE BECAUSE CHELSEA CAN BE HELD TO RANSOM IF A PLAYER THEY COVET COMES ALONG. ANYONE WHO USES BLUES TO DEPICT CHELSEA IS COURTING MAD PERCEPTION.

A conman: 

 

He was a former Nasdaq chairman and ran the hedge fund that defrauded investors of billions. 

Foolish people looking at him may be taken in to perceive he is friendly and trustworthy when it is an act usually with motive to manipulate others. 

His friendliness is an act, never genuine and consists of sporting a ready wisp of a smile, being soft spoken even deferential and never showing anger that is always there hidden behind the façade. 

Such readiness to smile, soft spoken-ness and deference is rehashed, rendered repeatedly according to plans that are well memorized and well repeated that it is automatic even involuntary, he now cannot help it and he is therefore a mindless robot never a genuine live specific to the occasion person. 

PEOPLE WHO APPRECIATE STYLE OR CHARM, ARE TAKEN IN BY HIS EXPRESSIONS AND MANNERS WHEN THEY ARE ALL REHASHED SHOW OR AN ACT USUALLY IF NOT ALWAYS WITH MALICIOUS MOTIVE AND SO THEY ARE TAKEN ABACK WHEN HE BARES HIS FANGS TO CON THEM BUT FOR ONE WHO SEES, HE IS AN ACTOR, A FAKE, HIS GOODNESS IS ACTED NOT GENUINE GOODNESS AND IT IS NOT A SURPRISE HE TURNS OUT TO BE A ROGUE. 

Like to receive Email: 

There is reason to receive Email and there is like and dislike to receive Email. 

There are many who develop an increasingly intense like to receive Emails, they are thrilled to receive mail and become disappointed or disliking if they do not receive any mail. 

There are those who hate receiving Email and get annoyed if there is mail arriving in particular from certain individuals they loathe or from companies like HP or Dell or Apple soliciting business. 

There is reason to receive Email, you neither like nor dislike receiving emails or emails from particular entities and you treat each email on its merit and that is rational approach to mail. 

THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO DISLIKE RECEIVING EMAILS OR RECEIVING EMAILS FROM CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS NOR IS THERE REASON TO LIKE RECEIVING EMAILS. IF YOU DO SO, YOU ARE NOT ONLY STRESSING YOURSELF BY LIKING AND DISLIKING BUT IT IS CONDITIONING SO THAT YOUR LIKING AND DSILIKING FOR EMAIL BECOMES MORE INTENSE AND YOU HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THEM AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR LOSS OF CONTROL AND INSANITY. 

LIKING AND DISLIKING IS BLIND AND TRANSFERABLE, WITH INCREASING PRACTICE LIKING AND DISLIKING CAN BE AROUSED TO GREAT INTENSITY AND THIS CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO NEW OBJECTS OR SITUATIONS SUCH THAT THEY TOO AROUSE INTENSE LIKE AND DISLIKE WHERE THEY PREVIOUSLY DID NOT AND THIS PERSON IS ON THE PATH TO MAD LIKE AND DISLIKE. 

Bush brushes off shoe attack: 

Only force can brush off the shoe attack or dismiss it or play down its significance, genuine reason can never brush off the shoe attack and so you should not brush off or play down anything that happened to you but mindfully realize its full significance or meaning. 

Exactly what happened and why the reporter threw the shoe can be known and as Bush, you should understand why or what the true reason is for the reporter to throw the shoe rather than brush it off or give an excuse eg that it is understandable given the frustration in Iraq to the situation the country for which I, Bush am not to blame but it just happens to be so. The actual reason for the throwing may be that there is a lot of hatred for Bush because he is perceived as the cause of so much hardship and death in Iraq. 

YOU CAN BRUSH OFF SOMETHING EMBARASSING OR SHAMEFUL BY DENIAL (REFUSING TO ACKNOWLEDGE IT OR FORGET IT), DOWNPLAYING IT OR PROFFERING EXCUSE AND THEY ARE ALL FORMS OF LYING TO SELF AND OTHERS THAT WILL END IN MADNESS FOR THE PERSON. ONLY FORCE CAN DENY OR BRUSH OFF, GENUINE REASON KNOWS SOMETHING HAS HAPPENED. THUS YOU NEED TO USE MENTAL FORCE TO BRUSH OFF OR DENY NOT REALIZING YOU ARE COURTING INSANITY AND CONFLICT. 

Hypocrisy & criminality of officials: 

When you are a hypocrite, you do not do the things you say you do. 

Ministers, officials (eg police, fire dept) make statements of swift investigation and actions whenever something happens when nothing may be done, it is just lip service. They give an impression of competence and diligence when they actually do not know what is going on and even do what is criminal instead. 

There is credible allegation by this man who lost his young wife in the recent Ampang landslide that as he frantically dug to reach his wife and had reached her hand, arriving officials just threw him a shovel to help him dig. Apparently the next day this man found police personnel drinking his expensive wine and even had the gall to ask if he still wanted his wine collection. His safety box was broken into and expensive items stolen. 

The police officer had the temerity to tick off the press for making unsubstantiated allegations and should have checked with him before publishing. 

In the Johore floods a few years back, rescuers arriving in boats demanded bribes to evacuate people and left an old lady to drown because she could not offer a bribe. 

FOR ONE WHO SEES, THE DEMEANOR AND WAY THEY SPEAK EXPOSES OFFICIALS AS HYPOCRITES WHO MAKE EMPTY IMPRESSIVE PROMISES OF SWIFT INVESTIGATION AND ACTIONS. WHAT THIS REPORT INDICATES IS THAT THIS IMPRESSION IS NOT JUST TRUE BUT OFFICIALS CAN BE CALLOUS, IGNORE PEOPLE IN TROUBLE AND EVEN LOOT THEIR HOUSES. 

How not to brush off shoe attack: 

No matter how jovially you try to put it, it is courting future insanity brushing off or dismissing the shoe attack. If you think the incident is funny it is even worse because you think a shoe thrown at you in aggression and insult is fun and that is sick and you will become sick in due course. 

THE CORRECT APPROACH IS TO BE FULLY AWARE THE INCIDENT OCCURRED, SOMEONE THREW A SHOE AT YOU IN ANGER AND THEREFORE HE WAS ANGERED BY YOU. YOU MAY CONJECTURE WHY HE SHOULD BE SO ANGRY WITH YOU BUT IT MAY NOT BE WISE TO PRESUME YOUR CONJECTURE MUST BE CORRECT. YOU DO NOT TRY TO FORGET OR BRUSH OFF OR OFFER EXCUSES FOR THE SHOE THROWING BUT YOU MAKE NO EFFORT TO REPRESS OR DWELL ON THE INCIDENT WHEN A SHOE WAS THROWN AT YOU. 

IT IS SINFUL WITH KARMA INCURRED TO THROW A SHOE AT ANYONE AND IT IS NEVER GENUINE REASON BUT FORCE OR EMOTION THAT DRIVES THAT. THE PLAN TO THROW SHOES EXISTS IN HIS MIND (MAY NOT EXIST IN OTHERS) AND HE WAS MERELY SUPPLYING FORCE TO ROBOTICALLY THROW THE SHOE. FAR WORSE THAN SHOES WILL BE THROWN AT BUSH AND HIS CABAL OF OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IRAQ MESS (CHENEY, RUMSFELD). 

Here we go again: 

You hear Badawi lauding the passing of new laws (feather in the cap of the BN government) designed to improve performance in judiciary appointments and combat corruption. 

YOU DON’T NEED NEW LAWS TO BE FAIR AND HONEST BUT NO MATTER HOW MANY NEW LAWS YOU ENACT, IF IT IS JUST FOR SHOW YOU WILL ACHIEVE NOTHING. 

IF BADAWI BELIEVES IT IS A FEATHER IN THE BN’S CAP WHEN IT IS HOLLOW FOR SHOW SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING, HE IS COURTING MADNESS. 

Abdullah: Move a feather in the cap of Barisan Government

 

KUALA LUMPUR: The passing of the bills to set up the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) will rid any misconception on the integrity of the two institutions.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ab- dullah Ahmad Badawi said the move was a feather in the cap of the Barisan Nasional Government.

“The passing of the two important bills in Parliament to instil confidence in the country’s important institutions is a reflection of the Barisan Government’s strength,” he said.

He said this was because the Government’s efforts to improve the judiciary and the Anti-Corruption Agency through the introduction of new legislation had been successfully implemented without having to make amendments to the Federal Constitution.

The Judicial Appointments Com- mission Bill and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Bill were passed in the Dewan Rakyat after several days of debate.

“But we had taken a good approach in getting the two bills passed although there was talk that this could not be done because the Barisan had less than two-thirds strength in Parliament.

“People were asking how the Barisan could do this without having the needed strength in the House.

“This is because the Government is committed to eradicating corruption.

“The new law will give the ACA stronger capabilities through tougher regulations, while its enforcement personnel will be significantly in- creased.

“God willing, we will prove that we are able to rid the problem of corruption,” Abdullah said at the Parliament lobby in a live interview telecast over TV1 last night.

On the JAC, Abdullah said the new regulation related to the judicial system and the appointment of judges would help to ensure that the appointments would be carried out in an open and fair manner.

“The confidence of the people in the judiciary and the efforts to fight corruption will increase.

“This will give us a better edge in international competitiveness, in which more investors will be attracted to come here because they know corruption cases will be minimised and they are confident with our judicial system too.

“Previously, there was negative perceptions of these two institutions and we aim to eradicate such perceptions,” he added.

Laws cost money: 

Laws are not free and it costs money to draft and gazette and even copies made. 

Hence if you have a penchant for enacting new laws that are for show, you do not apply the laws or it is not applicable to the ruling elite then you are asking for punishment. Anyone who is a hypocrite suffers because no matter how he insists what he is doing is meaningful, deep inside he knows he is a bull shitter and later there is judgment and punishment by God who sees in secret. 

YOU DON'T NEED LAWS TO TELL YOU TO BE FAIR, TRUTHFUL AND GOOD AND IF YOU NEED LAWS TO DO SO, IT IS HYPOCRITICAL, FOR FEAR OF PUNISHMENT RATHER THAN BECAUSE YOU KNOW AND SEE WHAT THE LAW SAYS IS TRUE AND GOOD. 

Why Badawi is courting insanity: 

If Badawi believed as he said that the passing of the two bills, the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) will rid any misconception on the integrity of the two institutions, thenceforth these two institutions should be accepted with unquestioned impeccable credentials then he must be very naive or mad because just as dictators can tamper with the system now, they can similarly tamper with judicial appointments and the working of the ACA by exerting behind the scenes pressure on those on the committees and so the new laws achieve nothing. 

If he himself has doubts about the efficacy of the law then he is lying in going overboard (feather in the BN’s cap) about the passing of the laws. 

NO MATTER WHAT LAWS ARE ENACTED AND INDEPENDENT COMMITTEES SET UP TO APPOINT JUDGE AND SUPERVISE THE ACA, IT IS ALL FOR SHOW, CAN BE CIRCUMVENTED BY A DETERMINED DICTATOR.