Pleasure will wear you down and kill you:

Pleasure will wear you down and kill you:

People in this world seek pleasure and think it is good or beneficial when pleasure is a product of mild force whose prolonged exposure wears the pleasure seeker down and ultimately kills him just like pain.

ANYONE WHO THINKS PLEASURE IS HARMLESS AND EVEN BENEFICIAL IS DELUDED, DOES NOT UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY BECAUSE PLEASURE KILLS JUST AS PAIN KILLS.

I do not like having a fan or air condition ‘full blast’. Even a setting of 28 degrees suffices for me and normally I put a small fan swivelling at some distance at minimum speed. Even that I feel sickened after a while by the incessant blast of the fan and I am aware after I wake in the morning, I am suffering from the deleterious effects of prolonged exposure to the mild force of the fan blowing through the night.

PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD CANNOT HELP IT, THEY SEEK THE COMFORT (PLEASURE) OF A FAN EVEN BLASTING STRONGLY OR AIR CONDITIONER TURNED QUITE COLD TO SLEEP AT NIGHT. WHILST IT MAY BE PLEASANT EARLY ON, AS THE NIGHT WEARS ON, THE INEXORABLE BOMBARDMENT OF FORCE DUE TO BLOWING FAN OR COLD AIR-CONDITION EXERTS ITS INEXORABLE TOLL SO THAT NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE, NO MATTER HOW YOU SWEAR BY THE GOODNESS OR NECESSITY OF THE FAN OR AIR CONDITION, YOU WAKE UP ACTUALLY SUFFERING, YOU MUST SHRUG OFF THE DARK FORCES OF SUFFERING, ASSERT YOUR FORCE OR WILL TO PREVAIL FOR ANOTHER DAY.

PLEASURE AS REPRESENTED BY A BLOWING FAN OR COLD AIR CONDITIONER IS LIKE A SURREPTITIOUS KILLER OR SERPENT THAT TIGHTENS ITS COILS OR NOOSE AROUND YOU GRADUALLY AND IF ALLOWED TO, WILL KILL YOU. THUS EVERY MORNING, NO MATTER HOW YOU SWEAR BY YOUR LOVELY FAN OR AIR-CONDITIONER, YOU MUST DISPEL THE SHROUD OF SIGNIFICANT SUFFERING AND DEATH DUE TO THE FAN/AIR CONDITION, IMPOSE YOUR WILL TO SURVIVE TO BATTLE ON FOR ANOTHER DAY.

THUS THE WISE DOES NOT SEEK PLEASURE, AVOIDS PLEASURE AS HE AVOIDS A VIPER, KNOWING IT IS SLOW MOTION DEATH AND SUFFERING STALKING HIM AND THE PERSON WHO HAS REACHED THE FOURTH HIGHEST STATE OF MIND, NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE HAS A HIGHER HAPPINESS THAN THOSE MIRED IN PLEASURE AND PAIN AND HE IS HEADED FOR 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS SAYS THE BUDDHA.

DO NOT THINK LIGHTLY OF PLEASURE AND THINK IT IS A FRIEND BECAUSE IT IS EVIL HARMFUL FORCE THAT IS THE SOURCE OF PLEASURE, IT IS A DEADLY ENEMY IN DISGUISE THAT STALKS AND WILL ULTIMATELY KILL THOSE UNDER THE SPELL OF PLEASURE.

Pleasure is a bait to pain, suffering and endless death:

Anyone who partakes of pleasure is partaking a bait that leads to pain, suffering and endless death.

PLEASURE IS ACTUALLY MILD TO MODERATE PAIN THAT DELUDED BAITED BEINGS PERCEIVE AS LOVELY, MARVELLOUS WHEN IT LEADS THEM TO THE SLAUGHTER. BECAUSE PLEASURE IS A PRODUCT OF FORCE, IT IS CONDITIONING OR ADDICTIVE AND BEINGS ARE HOPELESSLY ADDICTED TO PLEASURE, THEY ARE NOT MASTERS BUT SLAVES CONDITIONED TO SEEK PLEASURE THAT BURNS THEM AGAIN AND AGAIN.

Pleasure is simply the (pleasant) feeling on contact with mild to moderate force that may be generated externally through the sense touch or mechanical force (touch of woman, touch of wind), taste and smell (chemically released force), radiant force (sunlight, fire), sound or generated internally by self (eg love, pleasure at seeing ‘lovely’ girl or scene).

Ordinary people crave pleasure but they are insensitive to pleasure, they need strong force to experience pleasure because their mental forces are constantly stirring emotionally (eg excited, disgusted) that drowns out perceptions of mild force.

IT IS CONTACT WITH MILD TO MODERATE FORCE THROUGH THE SENSES (SIGHT, SOUND, SMELL, TOUCH, TASTE) THAT GIVES PLEASURE AND FORCE IS ALWAYS HARMFUL AND LEADS TO SUFFERING AND DEATH. WITHOUT FORCE THERE CANNOT BE DEATH AND SUFFERING AND SO IF YOU MUST HAVE PLEASURE YOU MUST LIVE IN A WORLD WITH FORCE AND THEREFORE SUFFERING AND DEATH AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR EVEN ENDLESS SUFFERING AND DEATH. PLEASURE ITSELF IS MILD PAIN AND IT IS A BAIT TO PAIN, SUFFERING AND DEATH.

Delight is origin of suffering says the Buddha:

Delight or the (foolish) stirring of a person’s mental force to like or be attracted to a perception is the origin of suffering says the Buddha.

Liking and disliking is what beings here automatically do whenever confronted by contact through their senses and it leads them to suffering and death.

Because they have never experienced not delighting, they have not known what is not suffering, suffering is what they always know.

Why do people smile and laugh? It is to express their delight (real or faked) at something happening and this the Buddha said is the origin of their suffering.

"There are, Punna, forms cognizable via the eye -- agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, fostering desire, enticing. If a monk relishes them, welcomes them, and remains fastened to them, then in him -- relishing them, welcoming them, and remaining fastened to them -- there arises delight. From the origination of delight, I tell you, comes the origination of suffering and stress.
"There are sounds cognizable via the ear...aromas cognizable by the nose...flavors cognizable via the tongue...tactile sensations cognizable via the body...
"There are ideas cognizable via the intellect -- agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, fostering desire, enticing. If a monk relishes them, welcomes them, and remains fastened to them, then in him -- relishing them, welcoming them, and remaining fastened to them -- there arises delight. From the origination of delight, I tell you, comes the origination of suffering and stress.
"There are forms cognizable via the eye -- agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, fostering desire, enticing. If a monk does not relish them, welcome them, or remain fastened to them, then in him -- not relishing them, not welcoming them, not remaining fastened to them -- there arises no delight. From the cessation of delight, I tell you, comes the cessation of suffering and stress.
"There are sounds cognizable via the ear...aromas cognizable by the nose...flavors cognizable via the tongue...tactile sensations cognizable via the body...
"There are ideas cognizable via the intellect -- agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, fostering desire, enticing. If a monk does not relish them, welcome them, or remain fastened to them, then in him -- not relishing them, not welcoming them, not remaining fastened to them -- there arises no delight. From the cessation of delight, I tell you, comes the cessation of suffering and stress. {By this means, Punna, you are not far from this doctrine and discipline."

Force is blind and blinds:

Force is blind and the only thing it can do is seize and drive, it will seize any entity (eg car, mind, stone) that it is applied to or allowed access and drive it into action or motion.

Thus if you are foolish to permit force to use your mind as a playground (allow force to stir for no useful purpose eg stir in prolonging, changing speed and strength to fashion style and emotions), you seek force (seek pleasure, even pain which are products of force), you use force (to do work that is harmful eg beat someone, to meaninglessly dance or assume stylish provocative poses like sexy men and women), then you are delivering yourself to blind force that will seize your mind, blind it and once blinded, it cannot see and understand truly but it understands falsely and the only way you can consistently understand falsely is if the understanding is programmed, memorized and rehashed from memory to be applied to events happening.

FORCE IS BLIND AND CAN ONLY SEIZE OBJECTS (MINDS) IT IS PERMITTED TO ACCESS AND DRIVE IT INTO ACTIONS THAT CAN HARM (WEAR) AND EVEN KILL/DESTROY IT. FORCE CANNOT UNDERSTAND A THING AND IT HAS NO MERCY, DOES NOT CARE WHO YOU ARE. NO ONE IS SPECIAL IN THE ‘NO EYE’ OF FORCE.

THUS IF YOU PERMIT FORCE LIBERAL AND UNGUARDED ACCESS TO YOUR MIND, YOU USE FORCE LIBERALLY ESPECIALLY TO DO HARMFUL OR MEANINGLESS THINGS (EG HARM OTHERS, SING OR DANCE, FASHION STYLE OR STRETCH SYLLABLES, UNNECESSARILY CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN SPEED AND MOTION), YOU ALLOW YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO STIR WITHOUT DOING WORK (PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH TO FASHION THE EMOTIONS OF LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, CONFUSION AND FEAR), YOU SEEK FORCE (SEEK PLEASURE EVEN PAIN WHICH ARE PRODUCTS OF FORCE) THEN YOUR MIND WILL BE SEIZED BY FORCE WHICH WILL BLIND IT, MAKE IT SEE AND THENCE UNDERSTAND FALSELY AND THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN CONSISTENTLY UNDERSTAND FALSELY IN THE SAME WAY IS VIA CONDITIONING, YOU ARE A ROBOT WITH PROGRAMMED REHASHED FALSE UNDERSTANDINGS OR DELUDED.

A PERSON DELIVERS HIMSELF TO FORCE THAT IS EVIL, HARMFUL,BLIND AND BLINDING BY A) USING FORCE LIBERALLY FOR HARMFUL PURPOSES B) STIRRING FORCE WITHOUT DOING ANY WORK (FASHIONING EMOTIONS AND C) SEEKING FORCE BY SEEKING PLEASURE AND PAIN.

FOOLISH DELUDED PEOPLE IDENTIFY WITH THEIR MENTAL FORCE THAT THEY THINK WILL PROTECT AND DEFEND THEM WHEN IT IS THEIR WORSE ENEMY, WILL TORMENT THEM WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE AND MANDATING A TERRIBLE ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE AND WILL ACCRUE KARMA FOR THEM TO BE EXPERIENCED AS SUFFERING THAT IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN.

SUPPOSED YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS INSTRUMENTAL IN YOU CREATING KARMA THAT RESULTS IN SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN, AREN’T YOU A FOOL TO CALL YOUR MENTAL FORCE FRIEND AND PROTECTOR?

Seeking force:

If you seek pleasure (even pain for self and others), you are seeking force that is blind and harmful and so you can expect yourself to be harmed.

If you seek emotions, you are emotional and see nothing wrong or harmful, see emotions as meaningful and good then you are also seeking force that is blind, blinding and harmful.

If you have style, there is prolonging of syllables, changing speed and loudness in your speech and you see nothing wrong, see it as perfectly natural and charming, then you too are a seeker of force.

ANYONE WHO SEEKS PLEASURE, EVEN PAIN FOR SELF AND OTHERS IS SEEKING FORCE THAT IS HARMFUL AND LEADS TO DEGRADATION AND DEATH.

ANYONE WHO SEEKS EMOTIONS, FINDS EMOTIONS MEANINGFUL IS FOOLISHLY SEEKING AND INDULGENT OF FORCE AND WILL HEAD FOR DESTRUCTION AND SUFFERING.

ANYONE WITH STYLE, WITH STRETCHED SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS UNNECESSARILY USING FORCE THAT IS HARMFUL AND WILL KILL HIM EVEN ETERNALLY.

IF YOU HAVE STYLE, YOU ARE EMOTIONAL AND YOU SEEK PLEASURE EVEN PAIN FOR SELF AND OTHERS, YOU ARE SEEKING FORCE THAT IS BLIND THAT WILL TORMENT YOU AND THEN TEAR YOU TO PIECES AND KILL YOU MERCILESSLY.

Talk shows:

Talk shows have mushroomed all over the world aping American example, there is Good Morning America/ Australia/ Malaysia.

Seldom if ever are such talk shows truly meaningful, there is a lot of idle chatter on meaningless topics and the hosts and support staff are paid large amounts of money that might otherwise go to other more useful pursuits. Check out girls at supermarkets, road sweepers perform a more meaningful or useful function that such talk show hosts.

MANY JOBS THAT ARE HIGHLY PAID ARE IN FACT SUPERFLUOUS, SUPERFICIAL IRRELEVANT JOBS THAT DRAIN PRECIOUS FINANCIAL RESOURCES FROM THE COMMUNITY WHICH COULD OTHERWISE BE USED FOR USEFUL PURPOSES LIKE EMPLOYING MORE POLICEMEN, PARKING ATTENDENTS AND CHECK OUT GIRLS.

THE WELLBEING OF A SOCIETY IS NOT DEPENDENT ON PERPETUAL ECONOMIC GROWTH WHICH HARMS THE EARTH, IF A LOT OF HIGHLY PAID PEOPLE DOING IRRELEVANT JOBS ARE FIRED, THE RESOURCES SAVED CAN BE DIVERTED TO EMPLOY OTHERS WHO CAN PROVIDE REALLY MEANINGFUL SERVICES TO SOCIETY. THERE IS A LOT OF WASTE GOING ON THAT IS NOT AFFORDABLE AND IT WILL LEAD TO DISASTER AND SOCIAL BREAKUP EVEN STRIFE.

Even Paul Krugman should be fired:

Paul Krugman might think he is a very important productive member of society but if he is deluded and his advice deluded and a lot of the things he does contributes little if any to society, then he should be fired and it reflects the delusion of society that he is paid to spout delusions that mislead others, newspapers pay him money to write nonsense.

JPMorgan reveals shock $2bn trading loss on investments

JPMorgan Chase, the biggest US bank, has revealed a surprise trading loss of $2bn (£1.2bn) on complex investments made by its traders.

Big banks have investment banking arms which use money from their retail section to make bets on the derivatives and commodity markets to make profits for the banks that put depositors’ money at risk.

The Bank of England governor Mervyn King criticism of the banks and calls for the separation of investment and retail banks made him unpopular with the financial community in London, which is against such a separation. In recent years, a lot of his powers have been taken away or watered down by the Labour government and Gordon Brown allowing the financial community free reign in its shenanigans that have bankrupted banks and the economy.

THE RECKLESSNESS OF BANKERS AND THE BANKRUPTING OF THE SYSTEM IS NOT AN ACCIDENT AND EVEN NOW, THESE RECKLESS PEOPLE ARE RUNNING THE BANKS AND RESISTING CHANGES THAT WOULD SAFEGUARD THE SYSTEM TO THEIR DETRIMENT.

DO YOU THINK MALAYSIAN BANKS ARE MORALLY SUPERIOR TO AMERICAN AND UK BANKS?

Gay rights:

Obama places big bet on gay marriage issue

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama called his decision to support same-sex marriage the result of a personal evolution but it also appears to have been a calculated political choice made with an eye on the November 6 election.

What is the correct understanding of gay rights?

Anyone who demands for his rights as gays or whatever has self-identity views that is the path to future woe.

The Buddha said that self identity views, doubt and uncertainty and faith in rituals and rules are the three lower fetters to future woe and so all those who assert their gay rights, who identify themselves as gay are deluded, headed for woe.

THE BUDDHA SAID ALL IS NOT SELF, EVEN YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT SELF LET ALONE YOUR BODY OR SEXUALITY OR SEXUAL RIGHTS AND SO ANYONE WHO DEMANDS HIS GAY RIGHTS IS HEADED FOR WOE, MAKING A FUSS, CHALLENGING AND ASKING FOR WOE.

THE BUDDHA HAS RENOUNCED EVERYTHING WITHOUT REMAINDER AND THE MORE YOU DO NOT RENOUNCE BUT UPHOLD, THE MORE YOU WILL SUFFER NOW AND IN THE FUTURE.

£25 trillion debt refinancing tsunami coming:

Mankind may be living on borrowed money big time and it may be due for refinancing and a crash if it fails.

THE WORST MAY BE YET TO COME. THIS IS THE PHONEY WAR LULL BEFORE THE TSUNAMI.

Global credit markets face a 'perfect storm'

Harry Wilson

May 11, 2012 - 10:18AM

•  

Companies across the world face a "perfect storm" as they have to raise more than £25 trillion ($40 trillion) to finance an upcoming "wall" of debt.

Businesses will need to secure as much as £28.5 trillion to refinance old borrowings and fund new spending, raising major questions over the ability of the world economy to avoid a recession, according to a report from Standard & Poor's.

British companies will have to find between pounds £220-£268 billion of new financing to fund their growth plans on top of refinancing hundreds of billions of pounds more of existing debt, according to the ratings agency.

The scale of the refinancing required, as well as the amount of new debt companies must sell, could create what S&P described as a "perfect storm for credit markets".

The report continued: "Governments and banking regulators are now not as well placed to counter another perfect storm scenario, given that they have already expended so much of their fiscal and monetary arsenal to mitigate the problems arising in recent years."

The consequences of this are already being felt in the rising cost of borrowing faced by everyone from the largest banks to homebuyers, when taking on new debt or refinancing existing loans.

The CBI last night echoed the warning and said central banks and governments needed to beware the problems brewing in credit markets.

"These figures show why monetary policy around the world needs to support growth, and why banks need to be given enough time to recapitalise and to meet their future regulatory requirements," said Matthew Fell, a director at the CBI.

British banks have dramatically reduced the size of their balance sheets in the past three years, as well as tripling the amount of capital they hold against potential losses.

However, these moves have led to a shrinkage in the amount of credit available to businesses and soaked up some of the investor demand for new debt.

Anthony Peters at SwissInvest said it was likely there would "not be enough money" available in the coming years for companies to refinance and raise the amount of new debt required.

"There is not enough money on planet Earth to fund it all. We are living on borrowed money and there is no way of avoiding that," he said.

Fears over the ability of countries to fund their debt have led borrowing costs to soar. This week, Spanish 10-year bond yields rose above the 6 per cent danger level, while Italian bond yields have also jumped.

S&P said this is likely to only be the start of a wider credit crisis as national austerity programmes and sovereign debt fears combine to put "refinancing needs in jeopardy".

Yesterday, the Dutch central bank said it thought Europe was on the brink of a "lost decade" of low economic growth as the region struggles to get its finances in order.

Against this backdrop, eurozone and British companies will have to have to deal with managing the £7.1 trillion debt pile they have accumulated, equivalent roughly to 80 per cent of the region's economy.

Obama gets $1 million donation on gay stance?

It was said that Obama received a $1 million donation (possibly from gay activists) as a result of his stance.

If that is the case it reflects how cynical, self-serving and calculating American politics is. Once he gets elected it is rewarding his backers and grabbing a piece himself instead of looking of the voters as vowed.

Not just nations but companies are in heavy debt:

The fact that globally companies who have borrowed (heavily) need to refinance or borrow up to £28.5 trillion reflects the scale of living beyond means heavily dependent on debts, not just of governments borrowing on behalf of its people but of companies.

COMPANIES ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE NOT AS HEALTHY OR WEALTHY OR STRONG AS THEY MAY APPEAR TO BE BECAUSE THEY ARE HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON DEBT TO CONTINUE. THE DEBT IN THE SYSTEM MAY FAR OUTWEIGH THE WEALTH IN THE SYSTEM AND THIS MAY HAVE COME ABOUT BY REPEATED CYCLES OF LENDING AND REDEPOSITION OF WHAT IS LENT IN THE BANKING SYSTEM SO THAT IN TIME MANY MULTIPLES OF DEBTS OVER WEALTH EXISTS.

THE WEALTH IN THE SYSTEM IS ACTUALLY MUCH LESS, EVEN MANY TIMES LESS AND THE SEMBLANCE OF WEALTH IN THE WORLD TODAY WITH SHINING SKYSCRAPERS AND LUXURIOUS DWELLINGS ARE DEPENDENT ON DEBT THAT IS UNPAYABLE TO CREATE.  

AND SO EVERYONE IS IN SERIOUS EVEN FATAL DEBT, NATIONS AND COMPANIES, WHO IS GOING TO RIDE IN TO THE RESCUE, THE CONSUMER AGAIN, THE US LOCOMOTIVE?

Swallow your pride

The person is telling others what to do and if swallowing your pride is unpalatable and leads to agony, unresolvable conflict then he or she is advising for the affliction of others.

PRIDE IS PAINFUL TO SWALLOW AND IT IS DOING THE INCORRECT AND HARMFUL. AS LONG AS THE PERSON REMAINS IN PRIDE, HAS PRIDE IN HIM HE IS EXPOSED TO SUFFERING, CAN BE HURT AND NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES HE SWALLOWS HIS PRIDE, HIS VULNERABILITY TO HURT AS A RESULT OF A DENTED PRIDE INTENSIFIES WITH CONDITIONING.

PRIDE IS SENSELESS AND HARMFUL, A (CONDITIONED) STIRRING OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE SELF AND THINGS ASSOCIATED WITH SELF AND THUS BOAST ABOUT SELF AND THOSE THINGS HE IDENTIFIES WITH. WHAT IS THE MEANING OF STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE PROUD OF YOUR ACHIEVEMENTS, YOUR FAME, YOUR BODY OR WHATEVER?

PRIDE IS NOT TO BE SWALLOWED BUT DESTROYED WITHOUT REMAINDER IN SELF AND IF YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED BY THINGS, YOU ARE NOT EMOTIONAL, YOU CANNOT BE PROUD, SO LONG AS YOUR MENTAL FORCE CAN BE STIRRED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE, YOU ARE KIDDING YOURSELF YOU ARE NOT PROUD. AND STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE FATHER OF EMOTIONS OF WHICH PRIDE IS A PARTICULAR MANIFESTATION OR INCARNATION OF ‘LIKE’ AND SO IN ORDER TO TRULY SHED PRIDE, ONE MUST SHED ONE’S STYLE THAT IS THE DYNAMO FEEDING HIS EMOTIONS, AND PRIDE IS A SPECIFIC INSTANCE OF EMOTION OR LIKING.

YOU NEVER TELL OTHERS TO SWALLOW THEIR PRIDE UNLESS YOU WANT TO PUT YOUR HEAD ON THE CHOPPING BOARD EVEN MANY TIMES.

Pride afflicts those with self-identity views:

Pride is the affliction of those with self-identity view that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe, not just a return to this world but future suffering.

THUS UNLESS YOU KILL YOUR PRIDE, YOUR PRIDE WILL KILL YOU AND CONDEMN YOU TO FUTURE SUFFERING.

SO IF YOU ARE PROUD AND YOU DON’T KNOW OR YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG ABOUT BEING PROUD, YOU ARE A FOOL WITH A NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK HE THINKS IS HIS LAUREL.

Pride cannot be directly destroyed:

Anyone who tries to eliminate his pride directly is doing what is impossible and practicing controlled insanity.

Pride is not to be destroyed by direct attack but pride can be destroyed if its dynamo, generator, style or the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness is destroyed.

SO LONG AS A PERSON REMAINS IN STYLE, HE STRETCHES HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGES SPEED AND LOUDNESS, HE IS TRAINING HIS MENTAL FORCE TO STIR IN PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT THEN BECOMES AUTONOMOUS, HIS MENTAL FORCE STIRS IN PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH WITHOUT DOING WORK AND THAT IS THE SOURCE OF EMOTIONS WHICH THEN LEAD TO PRIDE.

WITHOUT DESTROYING STYLE YOU CANNOT DESTROY PRIDE AND YOU ARE LIKE THE FOOL TRYING TO SCOOP WATER WITH A FISH NET IF YOU TRY TO DIRECTLY DESTROY PRIDE.

Job statistics can't beat word on the street

JESSICA IRVINE I have always found taxi drivers to be enthusiastic economic commentators. This week, I had a great chat with one driver who told me his plans.

In their emotion driven and blinded haste to boast people do not realize they speak FALSELY not truly and inviting karma to be repaid as suffering.

Whilst job statistics may sometimes not beat word on the street it is impossible it is always so and so you are speaking falsely saying job statistics cannot beat street word. Such hyperboles are conditioned, rehashed to exaggerate and people think they speak and hear the truth when it is falsity they speak and hear.

WHILST WORD ON THE STREET MAY BEAT STATISTICS, NOT ALL STREET SPEAKERS ARE DISCERNING AND SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE AND FALSE TO SAY JOB STATISTICS CAN’T BEAT WORD ON THE STREET. IF YOU ARE NOT A ROBOT AND YOU FULLY TRULY UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU SAID THAT IS NOT MINDLESSLY REHASHED, HOW IS IT THAT YOU CAN SAY SOMETHING FALSE? IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU HEAR HOW IS IT YOU DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID IS FALSE?

Australia lags as New Zealand PM comes out for gay marriage

Gay marriage or whatever the issue does not need the support or endorsement of anybody and it reflects insanity that people find endorsement or support important. What is important is whether gay marriage is correct or not, beneficial or harmful, true or false, meaningful or meaningless.

IT REFLECTS SOMNOLENT SELF IDENTITY VIEWS THAT PEOPLE FIND THEIR SUPPORT OR ENDORSEMENT FOR THINGS HAPPENING IMPORTANT AND MEANINGFUL WHEN IT IS BESIDE THE POINT, WHAT IS RELEVANT IS WHETHER GAY MARRIAGE MAKES SENSE, IS MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS, HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL.
THE MATTER OF LAGGING IS A WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION AS IF ONE UPMANSHIP IS INVOLVED OR MEANINGFUL, THAT AUSTRALIA MUST ALWAYS BEAT NZ. WHAT HAS LAGGING OR LEADING EACH OTHER GOT TO DO WITH THE ISSUE EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.

World economy built on massive debt not wealth:

The global economy is built on debt not wealth or savings in many ways, from the US printing paper instead of earning the money to finance its purchases from the world to companies owing trillions in debts to many countries raking up crippling debts to many consumers raking up bankrupting personal debts through credit cards and mortgage debts. The reason why such mountainous monstrous debt can come about is through repeated cycles of deposition, lending & re-deposition of the same money in banks so that debt many times the actual wealth in the system can result.

The rationale behind such debt profligacy is that the new wealth created with debt today will be more than be recouped in the future by economic and technological advances that more than offset the trifling debts being incurred. Now that the future has arrived and we are in much debt trouble, what do misguided economists like Krugman think? He thinks that rather than austerity to trim incurring more debts, we should spend more money by borrowing and printing to tide us through and when we have recovered then the recovered robust economy can more than pay for the debts incurred.

MANY INDIVIDUALS ARE IN DEBT TROUBLE THROUGH CREDIT CARD AND MORTGAGE BORROWINGS SO THAT THEY HAVE NO HOPE OF REPAYING.

MANY COMPANIES ARE IN TROUBLE NEEDING TRILLIONS IN REFINANCE (THEIR BUSINESS MODELS) TO KEEP GOING.

MANY NATIONS ARE IN DEBT TROUBLE NEEDING MASSIVE REFINANCING TO CONTINUE TO SURVIVE AND SERVICE THEIR DEBTS.

WITHOUT THE WORLD’S BIGGEST ECONOMY PRINTING MONEY IT DOES NOT HAVE TO EARN TO PAY FOR ITS IMPORTS, THE US WOULD BE IN TROUBLE ECONOMICALLY.

THE RATIONALE BEHIND SUCH PROFLIGATE DEBT CREATION IN THE PAST IS THAT THE ADVANCES AND WEALTH CREATED BY SUCH DEBT WILL MORE THAN REPAY THE DEBTS WITH PLENTY TO SPARE.

NOW THAT THE FUTURE HAS ARRIVED AND WE ARE IN DEEP TROUBLE, THE ‘INVESTMENTS’ HAVE FAILED TO DELIVER THE REPAYMENTS IN DEBT, WHAT DO MISGUIDED ECONOMISTS LIKE KRUGMAN ADVOCATE? MORE SPENDING BASED ON BORROWING AND PRINTING TO SUPPORT THE ECONOMY AND WHEN THE ECONOMY RECOVERS THEN IT WILL REPAY THE DEBTS WITH PLENTY TO SPARE. IS MANKIND INCORRIGIBLY DELUDED? HE THINKS WHAT DID NOT WORK AND LED TO DISASTER IN THE PAST WILL NOW WORK IN THE FUTURE.

Why spending will never rescue economy:

A lot of spending that keeps the economy humming in the past and present are extravagant, wasteful, serves no productive purpose, is celebratory spending and clearly we cannot afford it otherwise the current crisis will not have happened. Thus by substituting private spending with government spending based on more borrowing and printing, you are trying to provide temporary support and hope that the economy in time will revive which means going back to the same old profligate celebratory spending.

THE PAST BOOM WAS DEBT FINANCED WASTEFUL CELEBRATORY CONSUMPTION AND SO IF GOVERNMENTS WERE TO STEP IN TO SPEND TO SUPPORT THE ECONOMY HOPING FOR A FUTURE RECOVERY, IT IS PINNING ITS HOPE THAT THE PAST PROFLIGATE CONSUMPTION CAN BE RESUMED. THE PAST BOOM WAS NEVER BUILT ON SOLID CONSTRUCTIVE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS AND SO UNLESS MANKIND IS GOING TO TURN OVER A NEW LEAF (THERE IS NO SIGN OF THAT, THE SAME GOATS ARE STILL RUNNING THE BANKING AND POLITICAL SYSTEMS) IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THERE CAN BE A RECOVERY THAT ARTIFICIAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING CAN FOSTER. AND THE PROPOSED GOVERNMENT SPENDING WILL BE DIRECTED AT UNPRODUCTIVE PURSUITS RATHER THAN CONSTRUCTIVE PURSUITS THAT WILL REPAY THE SPENDING AND MORE.

WHEN IT IS CHECKMATE, THERE IS NO WAY OUT AND SO THERE IS NOT NECESSARILY A WAY OUT OF THE CORNER MANKIND HAS PAINTED HIMSELF INTO.

Recovery to debt fuelled boom?

The past boom can only be seen in truth as a debt fuelled boom and so if you want recovery with government assisted deficit spending you want recovery to debt fuelled booming. There was never a productive constructive solid foundation boom in the past and so unless mankind was to make a break with the past, transform from debt fuelled show off consumption to constructive, meaningful sustainable or perpetuating boom, there never be a return to economic health.

BECAUSE THE PAST BOOM WAS A WASTEFUL DEBT FUELLED CONSUMPTIVE SHOW OFF BOOM THERE CAN NEVER BE A RETURN TO IT, A RETURN TO DEBT FUELED CONSUMPTION.

CAN MANKIND CONVERT FROM DEBT FUELED CONSUMPTION BOOM TO SAVINGS GENERATING DEBT CONCELLING PRODUCTIVE BOOM? IT IS FAR FETCHED IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE. AND SO ALL THOSE PINNING HOPES ON RECOVERY ARE DELUDED, HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING.

Opportunities abound in the health-care sector

Anyone speaking of opportunities is a calculating person and opportunist whom you trust at your own risk. This is a man looking for openings, for carving a niche for himself and making money or a living off something or someone.

IT IS NEVER OPPORTUNITIES IN THE HEALTH SECTOR THAT YOU SHOULD CONSIDER BUT IT IS WHETHER YOU HAVE A NEED FOR IT (NOT NEED FOR MONEY). ANYONE SPEAKING OF OPPORTUNITIES, OF MAKING A KILLING IS HEADED FOR TORMENT AND ETERNAL PUNISHMENT NO MATTER HOW SUCCESSFUL HE IS EXPLOITING HIS OPPORTUNITIES.

YOU CAN SPEAK OF VACANCIES OR JOBS AVAILABLE IN THE HEALTH CARE SECTOR AND IT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM OPPORTUNITIES. JOBS OR VACANCIES ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS WITH OPPORTUNITIES EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION THEY ARE INTERCHANGEABLE.

A job is never an opportunity:

If it is a vacancy or job you are speaking of then you are speaking falsely courting mad perception calling a job an opportunity.

A VACANCY IS A JOB THAT IS AVAILABLE, HAS NO OCCUPANT.

A JOB IS A POSITION WITH SPECIFIC DUTIES TO BE PERFORMED BY A SUITABLE CANDIDATE.

AN OPPORTUNITY IS SIMPLY A CHANCE OR OPENING.

REFLECTING ORDINARY PEOPLE’S ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THEY PERCEIVE JOB, VACANCY AND OPPORTUNITY AS SYNONYMOUS WHEN THEY ARE NOT, AN OPPORTUNITY IS AN OPENING OR CHANCE THAT YOU GRAB. A VACANCY OR JOB IS A PARTICULAR EMPLOYMENT THAT IS AVAILABLE OR YOU CAN CHOOSE TO UNDERTAKE.

Vacancy or job is specific, opportunity is nonspecific:

Opportunity is robo-speak, it is something vague that can be rehashed for many situations eg job opportunities, opportunity with a girl (who has broken with her boyfriend), opportunity for escape.

OPPORTUNITY WHEN SPOKEN BY EMOTIONAL PEOPLE IS VAGUE AND CAN REFER TO MANY THINGS, OPPORTUNITY IS NOT SPECIFIC AND NOT EQUAL TO JOB OR VACANCY, IT REFLECTS THE TENDENCY OF ROBOTIC PEOPLE TO USE WORDS THAT ARE NON-SPECIFIC THAT CAN BE USED INTERCHANGED FOR MANY SITUATIONS.

JOB OR VACANCY IS SPECIFIC. OPPORTUNITY MEANS OPENING AND CAN REFER TO MANY THINGS NOT JUST JOBS EG OPPORTUNITY FOR SEX, FOR RAPE, FOR THEFT.

What is acting?

People accuse others of acting, say someone is an actor, yet do they understand what they mean by ‘acting’?

Something is only an act if you had forethought, had planned how and what to say or do and reproduced it according to plan with a motive or objective in mind eg to show how good or kind or clever or stupid you are. Thus it is only possible to act and be an actor if the person is a robot. After many cycles of acting, the person and others think it is spontaneous, not reproduced according to a plan and they are genuine, being themselves.

ALTHOUGH AFTER COUNTLESS REPETITIONS THE PERSON AND UNDISCERNING OBSERVORS MAY COME TO ACCEPT WHAT IS ACTED AS GENUINE, AN ACT IS ONLY POSSIBLE IF THERE IS PREMEDITATION AS TO WHAT AND HOW TO SAY OR DO TO ACHIEVE A CERTAIN OBJECTIVE (EG AS IF YOU ARE INNOCENT WHEN YOU ARE GUILTY, YOU ARE VERY CLEVER OR SUAVE OR CHARMING) AND THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF WHAT IS SAID OR DONE IS REHASHED (THE PERSON IS A ROBOT) AND THE SPEECH OR ACTION IS REHASHED NOT GENUINE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION.

ACTING IS ABOUT BEHAVING IN SPEECH, ACTION OR POSTURE WHAT IS PLANNED BEFOREHAND TO ACHIEVE CERTAIN MOTIVES OR OBJECTIVES AND IT IS REPRODUCED MECHANICAL. AFTER MANY CYCLES OF REHASHING YOU MAY LOSE TRACK OF THE ORIGINAL MOTIVES AND IT BECOMES SO SLICK YOU DO NOT THINK IT IS CONTRIVED, MOTIVATED.

WITHOUT BEING A ROBOT, WITHOUT REHASHING STANDARDIZED, A PERSON CANNOT BE AN ACTOR AND SO WHEN SOMEONE IS ACTING, HE MUST BE A ROBOT DOOMED TO ROBOT FAILURE AND INSANITY. ACTING IS NEVER GENUINE, IS ABOUT FAKING IT AND YOU CAN ONLY FAKE IT BY PREMEDITATING AND THEN CARRYING IT OUT (ROBOTICALLY) ACCORDING TO PREMEDITATION.

Premeditation can be visual or audion without thought process:

The premeditation that accompanies acting can be visual, eg you see how Elvis or Marilyn Monroe strut and talk and you have a visual plan or image that become the basis of your act aping Elvis or Marilyn.

You don’t need intelligence to act, all you need is fairly good perception of models for acting based visually (without need for thought) upon which you act.

THE PREMEDITATION THAT ACCOMPANIES ACTING CAN BE MERELY A PERCEPTION, HEARING AND SEEING HOW AND WHAT OTHERS SAY OR DO AND THEN COPYING THEM.

Acting is behaving according to a model:

Acting is speaking and doing based on a model that you must fabricate yourself or incorporate by copying others (eg copying Elvis’ hairstyle or postures or speech). There is always motive behind the model you fabricated or motive in copying Elvis even if you have forgotten the motive and think you are naturally like Elvis.

IF YOUR ACTION OR SPEECH IS TRUE IT IS NOT ACCORDING TO A MODEL BUT SPECIFICALLY FASHIONED FOR THE OCCASION. IF YOUR SPEECH AND ACTION IS ACCORDING TO A MODEL OR PLAN TO SATISFY CERTAIN MOTIVES (EG HOW CHARMING OR WELL ADJUSTED YOU ARE) IT IS NEVER GENUINE OR TRUE BUT FAKED.

THUS ANYONE WHO ACTS IS A FAKE, ANYONE WHO REHASHES WHAT IS NONSPECIFICALLY COMPOSED DESIGNED TO FIT MANY OCCASIONS IS A FAKE, THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM, IT IS ALL JUST A SHOW, A MASK, IMPERSONAL.

Non acting is the minimum qualification for heaven:

Jesus said you must be born again to enter heaven.

This is a world of actors where everyone is rehashing falsely what they have recorded in their minds for show to please, impress, intimidate and dominate others.

Heaven is a world of non-actors, the minimum qualification for entering heaven is to be a non-actor. Subsequently if you can stop all thinking, that will be even higher and gives 2 Ages in heaven, neither liking nor disliking gives 4 Ages in heaven and neither pain nor pleasure gives 500 Ages in heaven.

THE MINIMUM QUALIFICATION FOR HEAVEN IS TO BE TRANSFORMED FROM ACTOR TO NON-ACTOR AND THAT MEANS YOU MUST NOT REHASH WHAT YOU SAY OR DO WHICH MEANS YOU CANNOT HAVE STYLE.

IF YOU MUST HAVE STYLE, MUST STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THEN YOU MUST REHASH AND BE AN ACTOR FOREVER REHASHING WHAT YOU SAY OR DO AND YOU ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM HEAVEN AND HAVE CONDEMNED YOURSELF TO ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.

Acting requires a script and rehearsing:

The universal indispensable hallmarks of all acting are that it requires a script in one form or another (mental or written or instructed verbally) and rehearsing whether arduously or briefly/approximately. The goal of acting is to reproduce as accurately or faithfully as possible from the script to achieve a desired (evil) objective eg deceive others or portray something eg historical act. A portrayal of an historical act or encounter is never the genuine article but a fabrication that may be riddled with inaccuracies and even garnishments to exaggerate it for drama purposes.

When you watch a movie or stage play you may not be aware of the machinations that goes towards making it, actors and actress are provided with usually detailed scripts of what the movie is about, what they are required to say or do with particular scenes which they study and try to memorize as far as they are capable and then there are rehearsals even many ‘takes’ of the scenes to the satisfaction of the director.

BEHIND EVERY MOVIE AND STAGE PLAY YOU SEE ARE COUNTLESS HOURS OF REHEARSALS AND WHAT YOU SEE ON STAGE IS A SLICK FAITHFUL RENDITION OF THE SCRIPT. IT IS A REHASH EVEN TO UTMOST ROBOTIC PERFECTION.

If what you say or do is genuine, it is never according to a plan or script that is in place beforehand, that you have rendered from before even many times but it is specifically composed after full understanding of what is happening before you.

If what you say or do has a script, is according to a plan in your head and you have rendered it many times before, it is never genuine except in your delusion or false perception that it is.

After many repeated cycles of rehash what you acted may become so slick, it is even knee jerk reflex, the sight of something triggers the rehash of the act and you may lose sight of your acting, think what you say or do that is rehashed is genuine and specific for the occasion when it is in general for the occasion.

THUS ACTING HAS INDISPENSABLE UNIVERSAL HALLMARKS AND IF SOMETHING HAS THESE HALLMARKS THEY ARE ALWAYS ACTED, ACTING, NEVER GENUINE.

1)  THERE IS A PLAN OR SCRIPT OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO FROM WHICH THE ACTION OR SPEECH IS DERIVED THAT MAY BE MENTAL, COPIED FROM OTHERS OR FABRICATED BY SELF OR IT MAY BE A WRITTEN PAPER FROM WHICH YOU ACT OR VERBAL INSTRUCTIONS BY THE DIRECTOR.

2)  WHAT IS SAID OR DONE IS REHASHED ACCORDING TO A SCRIPT EITHER APPROXIMATELY OR TO HIGH STEREOTYPED PRECISION.

3)  ACTING ALWAYS HAS PURPOSE, HAS MOTIVE AND IT IS ALWAYS DECEPTIVE/FALSE OR HARMFUL NEVER GOOD (BENEFICIAL) OR TRUE. THE PURPOSES MAY BE TO FALSELY PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS, TO INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE.

Whether someone behaving before you is acting (faking it) or not is objective not subjective, is clearly visible for those who are discerning and for those who understand, this is a world where everyone (including animals even insects) are acting, behaving and vocalizing by programming, by robotic rehash in a stereotyped or standardized way and it is always a tormenting existence with accompanying suffering leading to death and destruction.

THERE IS A WORLD OF NON-ACTORS AND IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST FREE OF ALL ACTING AND IT IS A MARVELLOUS EXISTENCE BUT IT IS NOT SEEN IN THIS WORLD. TO YOU IT IS A MATTER OF BELIEF AND DISBELIEF, BUT TO ME WHO HAS KNOWN NON ACTING, WHO DOES NOT ACT, IT IS REALITY BEYOND REFUTATION.

Consistent substance and style cannot be rendered live:

People pronounce words very consistently that is characteristic of them and differs from other and this is because they always stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness in a very consistent, characteristic pattern.

The only way a person can consistently stretch his syllables, change speed and loudness during a word uttered is if it is reproduced from memory or he is rehashing. If there is no rehashing involved it is impossible by chance that he will always or consistently come up with the same permutation of stretching, changing speed and loudness that is his trademark and separates him from others.

IF THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO IS RENDERED LIVE, NOT BY REHASH IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT HE WILL CONSISTENTLY COME UP WITH THE SAME SIGNATURE COMBO.

BECAUSE THERE ARE FOUR INDEPENDENT VARIABLES OCCURING AT THE SAME TIME IN SUBSTANCE AND STYLE SPEECH, NAMELY FORMING SYLLABLE, CHANGING SPEED, CHANGING LOUDNESS, PROLONGING THE SYLLABLE, NO ONE CAN PAY FULL ATTENTION TO EACH FACET AS HE FORMULATES THE WORD BUT THE (SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF THE) WORD HAS TO BE COMMITTED TO MEMORY AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY MANDATING A ROBOTIC EXISTENCE.

Two alternative modes of behaviour:

There are two alternative mutually exclusive ways of behaving.

One is to have plans of what you want to say, pose or do, commit them to memory and render them from memory as the situation demands and this is the default way of this world, the hard tormenting way to behave and exist.

The other never seen way is to pay full attention to what is happening around and after understanding fully, to freshly, on the occasion specifically fashion a response in speech or action that is then not committed to memory for reuse in the future.

IF YOU THINK BEHAVIOUR IS BEHAVIOUR AND THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO BEHAVE YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND THINGS AS IT TRULY IS.

THERE ARE TWO ALTERNATIVE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE WAYS TO BEHAVE, EITHER BY REHASH WHERE ONE HAS A SCRIPT OF WHATEVER ONE WANTS TO SAY, COMMIT IT TO MEMORY AND THEN KEEP PRACTICING PERFECTING TO SAY OR DO IT BY REHASH TO MEET SITUATIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE OTHER ALTERNATIVE NEVER SEEN IN THIS WORLD IS TO PAY FULL ATTENTION TO THINGS HAPPENING, UNDERSTANDING IT TRULY AND THEN TO SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION SPEAK OR DO WHICH IS THEN DISCARDED, NEVER COMMITTED TO MEMORY FOR RE-USE IN FUTURE OCCASIONS.

APART FROM THESE TWO MODES OF BEHAVING THERE MAY BE OR ARE NO OTHER WAYS TO BEHAVE.

Maxis is successful but needs debts:

Maxis (and for that matter probably Celcom) are two supposedly highly successful, profitable Malaysian telecommunication companies (not so much by merit as by clout or connections) but they are heavily dependent on borrowings for continuation.

I think recently Maxis had to arrange billions in refinance of existing loans. What would happen if they failed to refinance their loans is a matter for conjecture.

THERE ARE MANY COMPANIES IN THIS WORLD WHO ARE SUPPOSEDLY HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL OR PROFITABLE BUT THEY ARE EVEN HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON FINANCE TO CARRY OUT THEIR BUSINESS. IT IS SAID £28 TRILLION IN CORPORATE FINANCE ARE DUE FOR REFINANCE IN THE NEAR FUTURE AND SHOULD CREDIT MARKET SEIZE UP THIS COULD BE A ‘SPECTACULAR’ CREDIT CRUNCH AND BLOW TO THE GLOBAL ECONOMY.

Blue chip TNB had $16 billion debt:

Blue chip electricity monopoly TNB was said to have debts of $16 billion in 1997 and this was more than the worth of all its blue chip shares.

And so it is many ‘solid’ companies may be full of even insoluble debts.

One reason why they are full of debt is because a lot of the profit is diverted to major shareholders or siphoned off and the debt undertaken by companies are the responsibilities of the company not the individuals who run the company.

WHATEVER PROFITS COMPANIES MAKE DO NOT BELONG TO THE SYSTEM OR COMMONWEALTH BUT TO THOSE COMPANIES. EVEN THEN COMPANIES MAY BE HIJACKED BY MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS AND CEOS SO THAT PROFITS ARE NOT EQUALLY SHARED BUT A LION SHARE GIVEN TO EXECUTIVES AND MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS WHO MAY DOCTOR ACCOUNTS AND SIPHON OFF PROFITS. FURTHER THEY MAY BORROW HEAVILY ON BEHALF OF THEIR COMPANIES, SIPHON OFF A BIG PART OF THE BORROWINGS (EG AWARD PROXY COMPANIES OWNED BY THEM WITH EXORBITANT CONTRACTS THE COMPANIES THEY DIRECT PAY WITHOUT QUESTIONS) SO THAT WHEN A CREDIT CRUNCH COMES, IT IS THE COMPANY, NOT MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS OR EXECUTIVES WHO ARE LEFT WITH THE SHIT.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS DO NOT SHARE FAIRLY PROFITS AND THEY ALSO UNDERTAKE MASSIVE LOANS IN THE NAME OF THE COMPANY THAT THEN END ONE WAY OR ANOTHER IN THEIR POCKETS SO THAT THE COMPANY IS LEFT FACING BANKRUPTCY WHEN VENTURES FAIL.

There are never part time robots:

A non rehashing, non-robotic existence is a higher, incomparably happier and sane existence and so no one who has tasted, known non-robotic existence would ever return to the robotic existence. It is deluded, clueless people who do not know they are robots, who think they are blissfully existing when they are tormented headed for insanity who sticks 100% to rehashing.

REHASHING IS A CONDITIONING AND CONDITIONED WAY OF EXISTENCE AND SO ONCE A PERSON REHASHES HE IS CONDITIONED TO DO SO TOTALLY AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO BE A PART-TIME ROBOT BUT HE IS A DEDICATED ROBOT, TRAPPED IN ROBOTICS, TORMENTED AND HEADED FOR CERTAIN DOOM EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY AT LEAST.

A PERSON WHO HAS TASTED THE RELEASE FROM SUFFERING OF A NON-REHASHING EXISTENCE WILL NEVER CONTEMPLATE A RETURN TO THE HELL OF REHASHING AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE WOULD BE A PART TIME ROBOT.

Maxis wants to raise $2.45 billion:

It was announced in Feb 2012 that Maxis, apparently the nation’s largest telco plans a $2.45 billion sukuk for capital expenditure and refinance debts.

People ‘don’t bat an eyelid’ but this is a big sum of money.

Why should such a big and successful company need massive borrowings to refinance debt rather than repay?

When a major company defaults there may be serious knock on effects on other companies who are otherwise solvent. Thus if Maxis owes you a lot of money and it defaults then you too may lapse into insolvency or struggle. Thus a major credit event in world financial markets may have widespread repercussions.

Is Syria turning into the new Iraq?

Comparing Syria with Iraq reflects an unconscious need to explain or understand the present (Syria) in terms of the past (Iraq).

IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, DELUDED TO ASK THE QUESTION WHETHER SYRIA IS THE NEW IRAQ, AS IF HE OR ANYONE CAN TRUTHFULLY ANSWER THAT QUESTION. SYRIA IS SYRIA NOT IRAQ AND IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY NOR DOES IT SERVES ANY PURPOSE TO COMPARE THE TWO. INSTEAD IT REFLECTS THE UNCONSCIOUS TENDENCY OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS THAT THEY APPLY TO NEW SITUATIONS TO LOOK AT SYRIA IN TERMS OF THE PAST UNDERSTANDING, IN TERMS OF IRAQ. WHAT IS NEEDED IS TO UNDERSTAND SYRIA AS IT UNIQUELY IS RATHER THAN REHASH THE RECORDED UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HAPPENED IN IRAQ TO APPLY IT TO SYRIA WHERE IT WILL NEVER FIT PERFECTLY.

WHILST THERE IS INTERNECINE STRIFE IN IRAQ IT IS FUNDAMENTALLY AN INSURGENCY AGAINST A FOREIGN OCCUPYING FORCE WHO HAS NOT MANAGED TO CONTROL THE COUNTRY, INSTIL LAW AND ORDER ALLOWING INTER-RELIGIOUS STRIFE TO RISE. SYRIA IS MORE LIKE A TRUCULENT REGIME TRYING TO IMPOSE ITS WILL ON ITS REBELLING PEOPLE. IF ANYTHING IT IS MORE LIKE LIBYA THAN IRAQ.

Gallows Humour:

SIMPLE TRUTH 1

Partners help each other undress before sex.

However after sex, they always dress on their own.

Moral of the story:

In life, no one helps you once you're screwed.

It is impossible for anyone who truly understood what I have said to appreciate such humour which is not only not good clean fun, it is celebrating what is improper and the person who appreciates is putting his head on the chopping board even for an eternity.

What is stated is not in keeping with what the Buddha and Jesus taught and if you think so, you are deluded.

THERE IS DEADLY KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING PROPAGATING SUCH (GALLOWS) HUMOUR WHICH LEADS TO THE ETERNAL CHOPPING BOARD.

THERE ARE MANY WHO ARE OFFENDED BY SUCH HUMOUR BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY UNDERSTAND, IT MEANS MERELY THEIR MENTAL FORCES ARE STIRRED REPULSIVELY BY SUCH HUMOR.

THERE ARE MANY WHO ARE DRAWN IRRESISTIBLY BY SUCH HUMOUR THAT IS APPLAUDED BY THE DEVIL BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY UNDERSTAND TRULY BUT THEIR MENTAL FORCES ARE STIRRED TO BE ATTRACTED.

SO LONG AS A PERSON REMAINS IN STYLE, HE STRETCHES HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGES SPEED AND LOUDNESS, HE HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND IS A SLAVE OF HIS MENTAL FORCE AND THE EMOTIONS ORCHESTRATED BY HIS MENTAL FORCE AND HE WILL APPRECIATE SUCH HUMOUR NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES HE HEARS WHAT I PREACH. WHAT HE DOES NOT REALIZE, WHICH IS NOT BECAUSE I AM BEING NASTY, IS THAT HE HAS AN APPOINTMENT EVEN WITH TERRIBLE SUFFERING BECAUSE SUCH HUMOUR IS NOT IN LINE WITH HEAVEN. AS JESUS SAID, THE KING WILL COME AND HE WILL ASK, ‘HOW DID HE GET IN HERE, BIND HIM AND CAST HIM INTO THE OUTER DARKNESS.’

A false not true promotion of cynicism:

If you are promoting cynicism and you do not realize it you are a fool who does not know what he does.

Essentially the tale about a couple undressing each other before and then dressing themselves after sex is to promote cynicism, it is all about making use and then abandoning each other and this is false because even if 99 couples do that, if one couple help each other get dressed afterwards to show love and gratefulness for each other (instead of using each other for sexual gratification) then what you say is false and you are subject to punishment for tendering what is false is true, that everyone does not help the partner get dressed.

IF THERE IS TRUE LOVE IN THE HEARTS OF A COUPLE THEY MIGHT HELP EACH OTHER GET DRESSED AFTERWARDS AS A GESTURE OF LOVE. EVEN IF COUPLES IN THIS WORLD SELDOM DO THAT, IT IS FALSE AND ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT TO IMPLY ALL COUPLES DO NOT HELP EACH OTHER DRESS.

AND SO WHAT IS SAID IS NOT A TRUE BUT FALSE PROMOTION OF CYNICISM, ENCOURAGES OTHERS TO ADOPT A SIMILAR CYNICAL ATTITUDE TO SEX.

Spill one drop and your head will be cut:

The Buddha said that even if someone pushes you and you spill one drop of oil from the pot that is brimful on your head, straight away your head be cut by someone following.

And so if you want to preserve your dear life and go to heaven, avoid future suffering you have to be extremely careful with what you say or do.

MANY ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES IF THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT, EVEN AMONGST THE HIGHEST ECHELONS OF PRESENT BUDDHIST RELIGION THEY DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT THE TRUE BUDDHA LAID DOWN AND THE DEVIL WILL BE PLEASED THAT THE BUDDHA HAS BEEN THWARTED.

Sedaka Sutta: At Sedaka (2: The Beauty Queen)

I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was living among the Sumbhas. Now there is a Sumbhan town named Sedaka. There the Blessed One addressed the monks, "Monks!"

"Yes, lord," the monks responded.

The Blessed One said, "Suppose, monks, that a large crowd of people comes thronging together, saying, 'The beauty queen! The beauty queen!' And suppose that the beauty queen is highly accomplished at singing & dancing, so that an even greater crowd comes thronging, saying, 'The beauty queen is singing! The beauty queen is dancing!' Then a man comes along, desiring life & shrinking from death, desiring pleasure & abhorring pain. They say to him, 'Now look here, mister. You must take this bowl filled to the brim with oil and carry it on your head in between the great crowd & the beauty queen. A man with a raised sword will follow right behind you, and wherever you spill even a drop of oil, right there will he cut off your head.' Now what do you think, monks: Will that man, not paying attention to the bowl of oil, let himself get distracted outside?"

"No, lord."

"I have given you this parable to convey a meaning. The meaning is this: The bowl filled to the brim with oil stands for mindfulness immersed in the body. Thus you should train yourselves: 'We will develop mindfulness immersed in the body. We will pursue it, give it a means of transport, give it a grounding, steady it, consolidate it, and undertake it well.' That is how you should train yourselves."

A dangerous false conclusion:

It is a dangerous false conclusion ‘In life, no one helps you once you're screwed’ just because couples do not help each other get dressed after sex.

IT IS AN UNWARRANTED FAR FETCHED CONCLUSION THAT REFLECTS FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS TO BE RECORDED AND REPLAYED IN THE FUTURE THAT JUST BECAUSE COUPLES DO NOT HELP EACH OTHER GET DRESSED, NOBODY HELPS YOU ONCE YOU ARE SCREWED.

‘NOBODY HELPS YOU ONCE YOU ARE SCREWED’ IS A FORM OF RULES, WHAT ROBOTIC PEOPLE EXPERIENCE IS CONDENSED INTO A RULE LIKE ‘NOBODY HELPS YOU ONCE YOU ARE SCREWED’ THAT IS THEN COMMITTED TO MEMORY TO BE REHASHED AND REAPPLIED TO FUTURE EVENTS. IT IS NOT A SPECIFIC UNDERSTANDING OF A SPECIFIC EVENT. EEVRYTHING IS MECHANICAL, FITS A GENERALIZATIONS AND THEIR LIVES ARE ALL ABOUT GENERALITIES.

IF YOU CULTIVATE FALSE CONCLUSIONS AND LOGIC YOU ARE AT RISK OF DANGER AND DEATH DUE TO FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF A SITUATION AND ALSO INSANITY, THE END POINT OF FALSE PERCEPTION AND LOGIC IS MAD PERCEPTION AND MAD LOGIC AND THAT IS NEVER A PLEASURE I TELL YOU. YOU ARE NOT MAD YET BUT WHEN YOU ARE MAD YOU WILL DEFINITELY WEEP.

Trading blunder?

JPMorgan executive Drew resigns

JPMorgan Chase says its chief investment officer Ina Drew is to leave after a $2bn (£1.2bn) trading blunder.

It may be a delusion and false to call it a trading blunder, if it was not JPM who sustained the massive loss, it would have been someone else.

IT IS A DELUSION AS IF MONEY GROWS ON TREES. AT A GAMBLING TABLE, FOR YOU TO WIN, SOMEONE MUST LOSE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THERE TO BE WINNERS WITHOUT LOSERS AND SO JPM’S MASSSIVE LOSS IS AN INEVITABLE RISK OF GAMBLING. IT SO HAPPENS JPM WAS THE LOSER. ALL THESE DERIVATIVES ARE HOCUS POCUS, DELUSIONAL AND WHEN THEY ARE FINALLY PUT TO THE TEST IN AN ECONOMY UNDER PRESSURE, THEY WILL FAIL AND COUNTER PARTIES WILL END WITH MASSIVE LOSSES.

Obama says JPMorgan loss shows need for Wall Street reform

People think they talk great sense, they hear great sense but what is said does not make sense.

You don’t need JPM loss to show Wall Street needs change.

Irrespective of JPM’s loss, if there is something seriously wrong about Wall Street’s methods, it is clearly evident to someone who examines it with discernment and whatever is wrong or dangerous should be corrected, it does not need JPM’s loss to show need for reform.

IF THERE IS ANYTHING SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH WALL STREET, IT DOES NOT NEED JPM’S LOSSES TO SHOW NEED FOR CHANGE, IT SHOULD BE EVIDENT TO REGULATORS WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE SUPERVISING. IF YOU NEED JPM’S LOSS TO SHOW YOU THE NEED FOR REFORM IT MEANS YOU ARE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING, YOU ARE STUMBLING ALONG CLUELESS.

THAT JPM SUFFERED SUCH SERIOUS LOSS SHOWS THERE WAS SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH WALL STREET THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN SEEN AND CORRECTED BEFORE THIS HAPPENED.

Pleasure is a misperception of pain:

Pleasure is a misperception of pain not pain a misperception of pleasure.

When people perceive and experience pleasure they perceive and experience it as something the OPPOSITE of pain, to be desired or sought when pleasure is SIMILAR to pain.

PLEASURE IS NOT THE OPPOSITE BUT SIMILAR TO BE PAIN BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH COMPOSED OF THE SAME STUFF, NAMELY FORCE PERCEIVED. DEPENDING ON THE INTENSITY OF FORCE EXPERIENCED, IF IT IS MILD TO MODERATE IT IS PERCEIVED AS PLEASANT OR PLEASURE, WHEN IT IS TOO INTENSE OR DEPENDENT ON THE MENTAL STATE IT IS PERCEIVED AS PAIN.

THE SAME PLEASURE (EG FAVORITE MUSIC, FOOD) MUCH SOUGHT AFTER CAN BE ON OCCASIONS PAINFUL OR SICKENS IF THE PERSON IS UNWELL OR NOT IN THE RIGHT ‘MOOD’ OR EMOTIONAL STATE. THUS PLEASURE IS NOT IMMUTABLE OR OBJECTIVE BUT SUBJECTIVE AND THUS FALSE OR DECEPTIVE.

PROLONGED EXPOSURE TO A PLEASURE LEADS TO PAIN. NO MATTER HOW TASTILY PLEASURABLE A FOOD IS, HOW WONDERFUL AN AROMA, HOW DELIGHTFUL A SEXUAL CONTACT, HOW PLEASANT A FAN BLOWING OR AIR CONDITION CHILLING, EXTENDED EXPOSURE LEADS TO MALAISE, SUFFERING, PAIN.

THUS ANYONE WHO PERCEIVES PLEASURE AS THE OPPOSITE OR DIFFERENT IN NATURE TO PAIN, TO BE DESIRED HAS FALSE PERCEPTION, IS DELUDED BECAUSE PLEASURE IS SIMPLY MILD TO MODERATE PAIN (NEVER PAIN IS INTENSE PLEASURE) AND NO MATTER HOW ALLURING A PLEASURE, IN PROLONGED CONTACT IT TURNS TO PAIN.

THUS THE MENTAL STATE WHEREIN THE PERSON PERCEIVES NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE CONFERS A HIGHER FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING, IS HAPPIER AND MORE DURABLE, GIVES MUCH LONGER LIFE (500 AGES OR ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS).

NOT TO HAVE PLEASURE IS ACTUALLY NOT A DEPRIVATION BUT A DELIVERANCE FROM SUFFERING AND IT REFLECTS BEINGS HERE ARE THOROUGHLY DELUDED THAT THEY PERCEIVE WHAT IS MILD PAIN AS PLEASURE AND THE OPPOSITE OF PAIN.

The six consciousness stations:

Sleep is the lowest consciousness station that exhausted defiling ordinary beings lapse into when dark forces of suffering and death engulf him and when he wakes up to his usual styled robotic rehashing existing, he has shrugged of the dark forces of death and suffering to a higher mental state.

What ordinary people have never achieved is the next higher mental state or station (the first higher state of mind) that is devoid of style and robotic rehashing and is more pleasant and further away from dark death and suffering.

The next higher state of consciousness is one wherein all thinking has ceased, the being exists with a one pointed unified mind without the distraction of thinking.

The next higher station of consciousness is when the person’s mental force is not stirred to be attracted or like or repulsed or dislike whatever is happening.

The fourth higher station of consciousness is when the person stops perceiving force to experience neither pain nor pleasure.

SLEEP IS A DESCENT IN CONSCIOUSNESS INTO THE DARK BOWELS OF DEATH AND SUFFERING AND SO THOSE WHO LIKE TO SLEEP A LOT LIKE TO DIE AND SUFFER A LOT. THE BUDDHA ADVOCATES ALERTNESS, WATCHFULNESS, WHEN HE MEDITATES HE SUMMONS ATTENTION OR WATCHFULNESS TO THE FORE AND HIS CONSCIOUSNESS IS VACANT NOT FILLED WITH THOUGHTS, LIKE AND DISLIKE & FEELINGS.

EVERYDAY WHEN PEOPLE GET UP FROM SLEEP, THEY HAVE TO EXTRICATE THEMSELVES FROM THE DARK FORCES OF SUFFERING AND DEATH, STABILIZE IT IN THEIR USUAL ORDINARY STYLED ROBOTIC STATE AND GO OUT TO WORK. AS THEY GROW OLDER, THEIR VITALITY OR ABILITY TO PUSH BACK THE DARK FORCES OF DEATH CONSTANTLY ATTACKING AND TRYING TO OVERWHELM THEM INEVITABLY SAPS AND THEY ULTIMATELY SUCCUMB TO DEATH, DESCEND INTO COMA AND PASS AWAY.

IF PEOPLE REALIZE THEY WOULD REALIZE THAT EACH MORNING WHEN THEY WAKE, IT IS A STRUGGLE OR BATTLE TO DISPEL THE DARK FORCES OF SUFFERING AND DEATH TO RESUME THEIR USUAL PAROCHIAL MEANINGLESS REHASHING LIVES HERE.

The Buddha passed away by ascent not descent of consciousness:

When ordinary people pass away, they die by descent of their consciousness into coma.

In contrast the Buddha passed away by ascent of his consciousness rising from the first to second to third to the fourth higher consciousness states thence to the sphere of infinite space, infinite consciousness, nothingness, neither perceiving nor not perceiving and thence nibbana.

What’s Siri?

People get thrilled, think it is marvellous, there may be life and a soul in their phone when they ask their iPhone, “What’s Siri?” and it answers “that’s me!” They are deluded and have been deceived by a gimmick.

It is because their phone or the Siri server has been programmed to say ‘that’s me’ that it says so, without first programming it to say so it cannot say so. In other words it is not true understanding but faked true understanding.

IT IS NOT BECAUSE YOUR IPHONE TRULY UNDERSTANDS AND COMPOSED THE ANSWER ‘THAT’S ME’ TO YOUR QUESTION ‘WHAT’S SIRI?” BUT IT IS BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN INSTRUCTED TO SAY SO THAT IT SAYS SO. IF IT WAS NOT INSTRUCTED TO SAY SO, IT CAN NEVER SAY SO EVEN IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO SAY SO.

THUS PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE EASILY FOOLED BY GIMMICKS, THEY THEMSELVES ARE PROGRAMMED ROBOTS WHO CANNOT SPEAK OR DO WHAT IS NOT PROGRAMMED IN THEM (EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO SAY OR DO SO) AND THEY THINK THERE IS LIFE, THERE IS CONSCIOUSNESS IN THEIR PHONES BECAUSE IT ANSWERS ‘BRILLIANTLY’ TO THEIR QUESTIONS.

RPK’s Raja Nong Chik revelations:

What RPK say may not be true but if the system is being plundered as he implies then it will ultimately collapse like a termite ridden wooden house:

I have actually known Raja Nong Chik since back in the 1980s and even then he was already a successful government contractor. And I am sure that after almost 30 years of ‘printing money’ he must be pretty wealthy by now. Hence, financing his bid for the Parliament seat of Lembah Pantai should be child’s play for him. And ‘financing’ the voters to vote for him should be no effort as well.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

On 24th August 2010, a company by the name of Istijuara Sdn Bhd was awarded a government contract amounting to RM30,800,000 by the Ministry of Youth and Sports. You can see the details below.

Now, that may appear quite normal. After all, billions of government contracts are awarded every year. So what’s a small RM30 million or so against the backdrop of hundreds of billions?

The only problem with this ‘small’ RM30 million contract is that Istijuara Sdn Bhd is owned by Raja Nong Chik Zainal Abidin, the Minister of Federal Territories and Urban Well-being. And this is not his only company and this is not the only government contract that his companies have been awarded.

If you think that Shahrizat Jalil’s RM250 million NFC cow project is a cardinal sin, wait till you see how much Raja Nong Chik’s companies have taken. Raja Nong Chik’s contacts make Shahrizat’s RM250 million look like chicken feed by comparison.

Raja Nong Chik’s 26-year old daughter, Raja Farhana, is listed as one of the two Directors of the company. She also owns 399,999 of the 400,000 shares. That means she is practically the sole owner of the company with the other Director owning only one share.

The company, which was incorporated almost 20 years ago when Raja Farhana was still in standard one, has losses carried forward amounting to about a quarter of a million Ringgit and current liabilities of about RM400,000 -- against current assets of about half a million and a share capital of RM400,000.

This does not give a very bright outlook of the company’s finances but I am sure this RM30 million contract can clean up the company’s balance sheet soon enough.

I have actually known Raja Nong Chik since back in the 1980s and even then he was already a successful government contractor. And I am sure that after almost 30 years of ‘printing money’ he must be pretty wealthy by now. Hence, financing his bid for the Parliament seat of Lembah Pantai should be child’s play for him. And ‘financing’ the voters to vote for him should be no effort as well.

On top of that, there is the RM1.5 billion EPF funds at his disposal to pay for the thousands of low cost houses that he is soon going to dish out to Kuala Lumpur residents, in particular to those in Lembah Pantai. With all that, how to lose the Lembah Pantai seat?

The question is, putting aside Raja Nong Chik’s enormous wealth -- which was actually our money to start off with -- do you want a Member of Parliament like this to represent you in Lembah Pantai?

Granted, PKR has a host of problems and is not the most organised party in Malaysia. Also, granted, Nurul Izzah Anwar does not have tens of millions to dish out to buy your votes. But if it is good governance, honesty and integrity that you are looking for in your Member of Parliament, instead of Raja Nong Chik you are better off with Al Capone. At least, with Al Capone, Valentine’s Day would be celebrated with a bang, or rather plenty of bangs.

Anybody’s guess:

Polls date is anyone’s guess but parties already flying banners

It is speaking falsely without knowing what one says is true to say it is anyone’s guess as if nobody knows when the date is. Driven by emotion without regard to truth a person blurts out ‘it is anyone’s guess’.

THERE MAY BE SOME EXAMPLE THE PM WHO KNOWS WHEN THE NEXT POLL IS AND SO WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE THAT IT IS ANYBODY’S GUESS, YOU ARE WRONG TO SAY SO.

IT IS MOST PEOPLE’S GUESS IS CORRECT BUT IT IS ANYBODY’S GUESS IS ASKING FOR KARMA.

IF YOU SPEAK WITHOUT KNOWING YOU MUST GENERATE SELF-RESISTANCE THAT IS CONDITIONING SO THAT EVERYTHING YOU SAY OR DO IS RESISTED BY YOURSELF AND THAT IS STRESS.

ANYONE WHO SPEAKS WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE IS COURTING SELF-RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND THAT IS ALWAYS TORMENTING.

DAP asks Tunku Aziz to reconsider his decision of resigning from party

GEORGE TOWN: After openly snubbing Senator Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim, DAP has now urged him to reconsider his decision to resign from the party.

ANYONE WHO ASKS ANOTHER TO RECONSIDER HIS DECISIONS IS ASKING FOR KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING, NOT MERITORIOUS. YOU ACCEPT OTHERS’ DECISIONS AND HE SHOULD NOT GO BACK OR RENEGE ON HIS DECISION (THERE IS KARMA FOR RENEGING). ONCE YOU MAKE A DECISION YOU MUST CARRY IT OUT, TO GO BACK IS TO LAPSE INTO FALSITY, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY. IT IS NOT GOOD BUT FOR SELFISH REASONS TO ASK OTHERS TO RECONSIDER.

AND SO HERE AS EVERYWHERE PEOPLE THINK THEY UNDERSTAND BUT THEY DON’T.

FURTHER DAP MAY BE PLAYING THEMSELVES INTO THE HANDS OF THEIR ENEMIES DOING SO.

Dr M going back to UMNO:

Dr M resigned, left UMNO and then he returned to the fold. This event has implications in terms of future happiness or suffering, is not without implications.

The person poised on the rooftop to jump is setting himself for future pain. Even if he is persuaded not to jump, karma may make him fulfil his decision to jump in some later life.

ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE STEEPED IN DELUSION, THEY THINK IT IS OK TO GO BACK ON THEIR DECISIONS, THEY THINK THEY ARE GOOD TO PERSUADE OTHERS TO CHANGE THEIR MINDS WHEN THEY ARE PUTTING  A NOOSE AROUND THEIR NECKS.

The delusion of comparing Greece to Argentina:

Ben Chu: Argentina managed to survive a huge default – so could Greece do the same?

It is totally unnecessary nor is it wise to compare Greece with Argentina.

The world in those days was still economically robust and Argentina may have resources Greece does not have and so Argentina could pull itself out of default.

WHAT IS THE POINT OF COMPARING GREECE WITH ARGENTINA? WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS TO UNDERSTAND THE GLOBAL SITUATION AT THE MOMENT AND UNDERSTAND GREECE’S SITUATION AT THE MOMENT AND THUS HAVING TRULY UNDERSTOOD IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO DECIDE IF GREECE CAN ESCAPE DEFAULT. IT AGAIN REFLECTS THE TENDENCY OF PEOPLE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO REHASH OLD RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS (ARGENTINA’S CASE) THAT MAY BE FAULTY TO HELP THEM UNDERSTAND THE PRESENT (GREECE).

IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTOOD THE GLOBAL AND GREEK SITUATION, YOU DO NOT NEED TO REFER TO THE ARGENTINA SITUATION TO GUIDE YOU.

Who is your worst enemy?

For all ordinary emotional stylish people there can only be one indisputable answer: themselves.

Nobody else comes close; they are by far, by many, many miles their own worst enemies.

The Buddha said the vast majority of people run up and down this side of the sea, very few cross over to heaven and he said they have suffering due to them that is as vast as an ocean and lasts even eternities, they have shed their own blood and tears greater than the four great oceans.

No one except by themselves, by their deeds in words and action can create debt to be repaid by suffering as vast as an ocean.

A LOT OF A PERSON’S DAILY SUFFERING CAN BE EXAMINED AND DELINEATED AND IT CAN BE FOUND THAT MUCH OF HIS SUFFERING IS SELF CREATED, TOTALLY AVOIDABLE AND UNNEEDED EXCEPT BECAUSE HE IS FOOLISH (DELUDED), GREEDY AND DRIVEN BY ILL WILL (NASTINESS). AND SO EVEN IN DAILY LIFE, THE SUFFERING NEEDLESSLY EXPERIENCED IS SELF RATHER THAN OTHER CREATED, BECAUSE THE PERSON IS UNSKILLFUL IN CONDUCT AND HE IS DELUDED, GREEDY AND HAS ILL WILL.

NO ENEMY OF PEOPLE HERE CAN CREATE SUFFERING FOR THEM THAT IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN. IT IS BY THEIR OWN ACTIONS THAT THEY ARE CONDEMNED TO SUFFERING THE BUDDHA SAID IS AS VAST AS THE FOUR GREAT OCEANS.

THOSE WHO ARE NOBLE AND WISE HAVE THEMSELVES HAVE THEIR BEST FRIENDS BECAUSE THEY NEVER MISBEHAVE THEMSELVES SUCH AS TO SUBJECT THEMSELVES TO SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN. THEY ARE SKILLFUL IN DAILY CONDUCT SO THAT THEY MINIMIZE THEIR SUFFERING HERE AND MAXIMIZE THEIR (GENUINE) HAPPINESS HERE.

Sixty and going strong:

This is the heading of an email and it indicates the person is deluded.

Strength is a function of force and so when he speaks of going strong he is indicating force is important and desirable to him.

The statement is always a boast, not based on reason or meaning or to make much of someone’s situation, ‘sixty and going strong’. If something said is meaningful it is not ‘sixty and going strong’, if it is ‘sixty and going strong’ it is hype or boasting not meaningful.

If by ‘strong’ you mean healthy or fit then you are speaking falsely and have wrong understanding.

HEALTHY AND FITNESS IS NOT THE SAME, NOT SYNONYMOUS WITH STRENGTH AND SO YOU ARE MISLEADING EQUATING STRENGTH TO FITNESS AND HEALTH. THE FACT THAT YOU NEVERTHELESS STILL INSIST STRONG MEANS HEALTHY OR FIT REFLECTS THE INTENSITY OF THE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION AND THAT IS NEVER PLEASANT. ‘GOING STRONG’ IS ROBO-SPEAK, IT IS VAGUE, INTENDED TO BE REHASHED FOR MANY OCCASIONS AND SO PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS HAVE COME TO ACCEPT ‘GOING STRONG’ AS MEANING A VARIETY OF THINGS LIKE ‘FIT’, ‘HEALTHY’.

TO BE AN EFFICIENT ROBOT YOU MUST RECORDED PHRASES THAT CAN BE APPLIED TO A BROAD SPECTRUM OF FUTURE EVENTS SO THAT YOU HAVE MORE EVENTS COVERED RATHER THAN NARROW SPECTRUM RECORDINGS THAT HAVE FEW APPLICATIONS.

Sounds more impressive, doesn’t it?
“Sixty and going strong” sounds much more impressive than “Sixty and healthy” or “Sixty and fit”. Thus for emotional stylish people, what they speak is not to convey the truth but to impress or please others.

ALWAYS WHEN EMOTIONAL PEOPLE SPEAK, THEY WANT TO STIR OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES AND SO THEY SPEAK IN A WAY THAT WILL STIR AND THUS IT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT THEY SAY ‘SIXTY AND GOING STRONG’ RATHER THAN THE MORE SEDATE, “SIXTY AND FIT”.

IT IS NOT BECAUSE HE IS SIXTY THAT HE IS GOING STRONG BUT IT MAY BE BECAUSE OF HIS LIFE STYLE, HOW HE TAKES CARE OF HIMSELF AND SO YOU SHOULD HOME IN ON WHAT HE HAS DONE TO REMAIN HEALTHY RATHER THAN TALK ABOUT HIS AGE.