Silent mentors:

Silent mentors:

Doctors and loved ones pay their last respects to Malaysia’s first silent mentors

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia’s first pair of donated cadavers were given a grand send off by their loved ones and the doctors who practised on them at the University Malaya Medical Centre.

Those are cadavers, dead bodies not silent mentors and it is not good but evil and dicing with mad perception referring to them as silent mentors.

With the advent of computer graphics there is probably little need to dissect smelly bodies to learn anatomy, whatever the benefits of medicine and science is limited not boundless and those who are devoted to medicine are deluded, headed for torment even insanity.

YOU MAY BE RIGHT AND MERITORIOUS REVERENTIALLY CALLING THEM SILENT MENTORS OR YOU MAY BE DELUDED, HEAPING KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING NOT CALLING A SPADE AND SPADE AND ADVOCATING THE SAME TO OTHERS.

Plans, ideas are products of thinking:

Plans, ideas, instructions according to or based on which people carry out their speech and actions robotically or by rehash are all products of thinking, without thinking you cannot have plans, ideas or instructions which once formed however tenuously have the tendency to become the source for actions and speech.

Thus the person who does not think (as is possible as I can attest, even if you and everyone here cannot help thinking), who has stopped thinking has stopped the factory of plans, ideas and instructions so that he does not rehash.

Not distracted by thoughts or rehashing, he focuses completely singularly on what is happening, he understands what is happening correctly and based on that understanding he elects to either say or do something appropriately or he elects to remain silent or inactive.

THINKING IS THE FATHER OF ALL PLANS OR IDEAS OR INSTRUCTIONS AND THEY ARE ALL EVIL, HAVE A TENDENCY TO BECOME THE DICTATOR OF THE PERSON’S ACTIONS. THE PERSON WHO CAN STOP THINKING HAS STOP THE CAULDRON CHURNING OUT PROGRAMMING THAT ENSLAVES HIM, DICTATES OR TELLS HIM WHAT TO DO OR SAY.

ONCE A PERSON STOPS THINKING HE STOPS THE POSSIBILITY OF REHASHING BECAUSE YOU NEED THINKING, IDEAS OR INSTRUCTIONS TO ACTIVATE TO REHASH.

YOU MAY BE RIGHT THINKING IS GOOD, THERE IS GOOD AND BAD IN THINKING BUT THE TRUTH MAY BE THINKING IS EVIL, ONLY CERTAIN THINKING IS RELATIVELY GOOD AND THE TERMINATION OF THINKING IS THE ONLY LIBERATION FROM EVIL.

If you can think you can be a robot:

If you can think, you can and will be a robot because instructions, plans and programming are the stuff of thinking, once churned out, ideas, plans and instructions have a tendency to become the (autonomous) source of actions and speech.

Rather than dumb, the person who has stopped thinking is far more wise and present, rooted in reality than the person who cannot stopped thinking and thus more wise and present, he does not need thinking to interact with the world, he directly, personally attends to whatever speech or action that is required of him.

IF YOU CAN THINK YOU CAN AND WILL BE A ROBOT BECAUSE ONCE PRODUCED THOUGHTS HAVE THE TENDENCY TO TAKE OVER, TO BECOME THE SOURCE OF ACTIONS THAT YOU CARRY OUT.

IF YOU HAVE STOPPED THINKING YOU CANNOT BE A ROBOT BECAUSE THE FACTORY OF PLANS OR THOUGHTS NEEDED TO DRIVE ACTIONS ROBOTICALLY HAS BEEN STOPPED.

Thinking and remembering:

Thinking and remembering go hand in hand and whatever is remembered has a tendency to reactivate either by self driven by emotion or electively according to the nefarious aims of the person and the more the person thinks about the same thing the more tenacious is it imprinted and easily activated and such habitual thoughts then become the sources of the person’s actions and speech which are then reproduced by rote, rehashed.

REMEMBERING IS PART AND PARCEL OF THINKING AND IF YOU KEEP THINKING ABOUT THE SAME MATTER, IT HAS INCREASING TENDENCY TO RE-ACTIVATE AND SERVE AS THE SOURCE FOR SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT CONDITIONS THAT PERSON WHO THINKS INTO A ROBOT WHOSE THOUGHTS ARE THE PUPPETEER.

YOU ARE THE PUPPET OF YOUR THOUGHTS AND YOU THINK YOU ARE A MASTER OF YOUR THOUGHTS.

Nothing thought, nothing remembered, nothing rehashed:

If you did not think, what is there to remember and if you did not remember anything what is there to be re-activated to serve as platform or plan for actions and speech?

THUS THE END OF THINKING IS THE END OF ALL WOES OF THE ROBOT. THINKING IS A CURSE NOT BOON. YOU NEED THINKING BECAUSE YOU ARE VESTED, YOU NEED TO SCHEME TO GAIN AND MINIMIZE LOSSES.

Barclays a ‘rotten, thieving bank’ says MP John Mann

It is not the bank but its management that is guilty of fraud and so it is mad with suffering due for labelling the bank thus.

You can compile even a laundry list of sins Barclays had committed but that does not make it rotten thieving except in your perverted perception and emotional need to attack.

IT IS ATTACKING WITH KARMA ATTACHED TO CALL BARCLAYS ROTTEN THIEVING. IT IS NOT THE BANK BUT THE MANAGEMENT WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING THE BANK TO DISREPUTE.

Thinking is a burden:

Thinking is a burden that can get quite unbearable at times and so to stop thinking is like letting down a considerable burden, not a loss, as the Buddha says and those who have achieved the cessation of thinking have experienced for themselves.

IT IS POSSIBLE TO STOP THINKING AND IT IS LIKE LETTING DOWN A HEAVY BURDEN, NOT A LOSS OR DEPRIVATION. THOSE WHO CANNOT GIVE UP THINKING ARE LIKE SMOKERS WHO CANNOT GIVE UP SMOKING.

Economic gloom seen pushing ECB to cut rates 3:36am EDT

FRANKFURT - The European Central Bank is widely expected to cut borrowing costs to a record low on Thursday to support a deteriorating euro zone economy and complement measures agreed by government leaders last week to tackle the bloc's debt crisis

Cutting rates is the totally wrong, dangerous action and yet reflecting their delusion, most people even experts think it is the right thing to do.

Cutting rates attempts to boost the economy by promoting debt indiscriminately without considering whether what is borrowed is used productively that will earn back money to repay and whether the people borrowing are good credit risks. Because the money borrowed is likely to be spent unproductively on consumption and many are not creditworthy, it may temporarily support the economy but it postpones a collapse that will be even more severe because debt keeps piling up, swept under the carpet.

YOU NEVER ATTEMPT TO BOOST A FLAGGING ECONOMY BY CUTTING RATES TO PROMOTE DEBT INDISCRIMINATELY, IT IS DELAYING A RECKONING WITH RECESSION THAT GETS MORE SEVERE THE LONGER IT IS POSTPONED. SAVERS ARE PUNISHED AND THEIR SAVINGS MAY EVEN BE LOST, LENT RECKLESSLY TO BOOST UNPRODUCTIVE UNAFFORDABLE CONSUMPTION BY PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT CREDIT WORTHY.

The euro did not cause the European crisis:

The flawed creation of the euro with a central bank but no political or governing union may have contributed or aggravated to the current European crisis but it is never the cause, it is being blamed and used as scapegoat and those who call for the dismembering eg Greek or German exit are barking up the wrong tree; it is a false solution that will not resolve the crisis.

Even if there was a central government backing up the currency union, it is likely if not certain to be corrupt, pandering to the masses and incompetent and thus pave the way for the same crisis.

There is no euro in Japan yet there is a crippling chronic financial crisis dating from the 1980s Japanese crash.

There is no euro in UK, US, Malaysia or China yet there are financial and economic crises that are just as bad if not worse current or brewing.

Regions in the US, UK or Italy are not uniformly wealthy, there are rich (eg London & the south) and deprived areas (eg Scotland and northern England) but this does not prevent them being in the same country and system, so why should Greece not be allowed in the union just because it is a poor cousin?

It is collective human deceit (corruption, greed), irresponsibility or recklessness (eg borrowing for wasteful unproductive consumption), foolishness and delusion (eg heedless stoking of a consumptive debt bubble by repeated easing, tax cuts and lowering of interest rates) in general and dereliction of duty and plundering by the ruling and wealthy elite that is the cause.

THE FLAWED CREATION OF THE EURO MAY HAVE FACILITATED AND MAGNIFIED THE CRISIS BUT BENEATH IT, WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT IS HUMAN FECKLESSNESS, IRRESPONSIBILITY, DECEIT, FOOLISHNESS AND DELUSION. EVEN IF THE STRUCTURE OF MONETARY UNION IS FLAWED, IF THE PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE, HAVE NOT BORROWED TO SPENT WASTEFULLY ON CONSUMPTION THAT COULD NOT REPAY WHAT WAS BORROWED, THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. IF BANKERS AND RULING POLITICIANS HAVE NOT ACTED CORRUPTLY AND REINED IN SPENDING MUCH EARLIER THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED.

THUS THE EURO IS A SCAPEGOAT ON WHICH BLAME HAS BEEN LAID WHEN THOSE WHO BLAME IT SHOULD LOOK AT THEMSELVES IN THE MIRROR AND SEE THE SHIT THERE INSTEAD OF THE HALO ON THEIR HEADS.

THE EURO MAY HAVE BEEN THE ALCOHOL BUT IT IS THE ALCOHOLIC WHO IS MORE TO BLAME FOR HEEDLESS ADDICTIVE CONSUMPTION.

Greeks not paying taxes is not the cause:

IMF chief Lagarde ‘famously’ said if Greeks had duly paid their taxes, there would not be a crisis when it turned out she herself did not pay taxes on her considerable income.

If Greeks did not pay their taxes then the Greek government would have less to spend and they should spend less and there would be no crisis. It is because the Greek government borrowed and spent it on unproductive consumption, on useless prestige projects (eg hosting Olympics like UK is now doing) that the country is now in so much trouble.

GREEKS CAN PAY ALL THE TAXES IN THE WORLD BUT IF THEIR GOVERNMENTS CONTINUE TO BORROW AND SPEND THE MONEY WASTEFULLY ON ITEMS THAT DID NOT EARN MONEY TO REPAY WHAT IS BORROWED, IT WILL STILL END UP BANKRUPT.

IF GREEKS DON’T PAY TAXES THEN THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SPEND ONLY WHAT IT HAS AND LENDERS SHOULD REFRAIN FROM LENDING TO GREECE THAT HAS LITTLE TAX INCOME.

Bizarre logic of Pitot tubes:

Pitot tube failure (frozen up) has been cited together with pilot error as the causes behind the Air France Atlantic crash.

Pitot tubes are supposed to measure air flow that indicates the plane’s airspeed. But no air flow through the tubes is not an indication of stalling but that the tube is blocked because even if the plane has stalled, it is still moving in the air and there should be air flow through the tube unless it is blocked.

ONLY IF THE TUBE IS BLOCKED EG BY ICE WOULD THERE BE NO AIR FLOW WHICH IS NOT AN INDICATION OF STALLING BUT THE TUBE IS BLOCKED.

YOU WOULD THINK MANKIND IS CLEVER ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THAT BUT IT MAY BE A MONUMENTAL FATAL MISUNDERSTANDING. NO AIR FLOW IN PITOT TUBE DOES NOT MEAN PLANE STALLED WHICH WOULD STILL HAVE SOME AIR FLOW IN THE TUBE BUT NO AIR FLOW MEANS THE TUBE IS BLOCKED BY ICE STOPPING ALL AIR FLOW.

ONLY A BLOCKED TUBE CAN CAUSE NO AIR FLOW, A STALLED PLANE WOULD STILL PRODUCE SOME AIRFLOW THROUGH THE TUBES BECAUSE IT CANNOT BE STATIONARY. EVEN IF IT IS FALLING VERTICALLY THERE WILL BE SOME AIR FLOW THROUGH THE VERTICAL PITOT TUBES.

Rehashing requires a suspension of reality:

No matter how slick rehashing has become through repeated practice, it requires a suspension or detachment from reality whilst the person is rehashing so that he is forced to only take intermittent snapshots of the situation so as not to completely lose touch.

Just as your Windows computer tell you to wait whilst it is processing a task you designated it or your program tells you it is not responding because it is busy, rehashing is a considerable task of locating and then playing back the track that requires your attention and so the rehasher is forced to juggle, to pay attention to correctly rehash whilst intermittently returning to reality to keep in touch.

REHASHING IS A TASK THAT REQUIRES ATTENTION THAT DETACHES THE PERSON FROM REALITY AND IN ORDER TO KEEP IN TOUCH WITH REALITY WHILST HE IS REHASHING, HE HAS TO INTERRUPT HIS FOCUS ON REHASHING REGULARLY TO KEEP IN TOUCH WITH REALITY.

IT IS NEVER HAPPINESS BEING CONSCIOUS AND DETACHED FROM REALITY AND THE PERSON WHO REHASHES IS CONSTANTLY TRAINING AND WILLING HIMSELF TO DETACH FROM REALITY THAT IS DANGEROUS APART FROM SUFFERING.

SAY WHAT YOU WANT ABOUT REHASHING, SEE NOTHING WRONG EVEN THAT IT IS WONDERFUL BUT IT IS DANGEROUS TRAINING ONESELF TO BE REMOTE FROM REALITY. THUS AFTER A CONVERSATION THE PERSON BECOMES DAZED AND IT TAKES AWHILE BEFORE HE CAN SUFFICIENTLY REJOIN REALITY.

Germany’s prosperity is based on illusion:

Germany’s and China’s prosperity in recent years are not based on reality but illusion. Without nations like Greece, Spain, Italy (not to mention ‘whopping’ big brother US, ‘little’ UK, et al) living way beyond their means, Germany and China would have much less to export and now that they are forced to live within their means (something that is only beginning), Germany and China will find much of their past prosperity disappearing like mist in the morning sun.

Not only that the savings Germany and China like to think they have are also gone, lent to feckless borrowers like Greece and the US who cannot repay them except in their fantasy they can.

Busy searching, retrieving, playing back and inserting:

A person who is rehashing only has time to take snapshots of the reality before him before he ‘excuses’ himself from reality to consult his mental jukebox; to search for suitable play back tracks, read and playback and ensure it is inserted into reality as smoothly and fittingly as possible. And whilst he is busy rehashing he can only pay intermittent attention to what is happening around him.

Because the person who is not rehashing does not need to refer to his mental jukebox for his speech and actions, he can remain fully immersed in the current situation as it unfolds and what he says and does is live, freshly specifically composed for the situation without requirement for taking leave of reality to consult his mental jukebox as to what to say or do and then playback as carefully as possible what his mental jukebox dictates.

See truly and the answer is obvious & immediate:

If a person is rooted in reality, calm and clearly see or hearing, the meaning of what he hears or sees is immediately obvious, does not require thinking or processing and the required speech and action is usually if not always straightforward and so he does not have to take leave of his senses, to excuse himself from reality whilst he searches for recorded response to playback.

Insight not thinking provides answers:

It is not so much thinking that provides answers to problems or questions but it is the sudden occurrence or flash of (mental) insight that provides the solution.

Thinking is not needed to understand, it is correct or truly seeing that always provides understanding. See something correctly or truly as it is and that already is the correct understanding, you will be a fool or have mad doubt and uncertainty to need to think. In situations where you do not immediately understand the nature of something, it is not so much the thinking that provides the final understanding but the flash of insight, it suddenly occurs to your mind that provides that elusive understanding you sought by thinking in vain.

WHEN PEOPLE FIND SOLUTIONS BY THINKING IT IS NOT SO MUCH THEIR THINKING THAT PRODUCED THE ANSWER BUT A SUDDEN FLASH OF INSIGHT OR MENTAL SEEING WHAT THE PROBLEM IS ABOUT THAT PROVIDED THE SOLUTION AND SO IT IS THAT ALWAYS IT IS SEEING WHETHER PHYSICAL OR MENTAL (INSIGHT) THAT IS THE VEHICLE FOR UNDERSTANDING. THINKING IS NOT NECESSARY AND CANNOT PROVIDE THE UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU FAILED TO SEE.

THUS IF YOU SEE CORRECTLY FULLY ATTENTIVELY WHAT IS HAPPENING BEFORE YOU, WHAT IS SAID TO YOU, THEN IT IS IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTOOD WITHOUT RESORT TO THINKING AND ONCE TRULY UNDERSTOOD THE REPLY IN SPEECH AND ACTION IS STRAIGHT FORWARD UNLESS YOU ARE DEVIOUS OR YOU WANT TO FABRICATE A SHOW OFF RESPONSE.

THUS THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT REHASH IS PLANTED TOTALLY IN REALITY, HE PAYS FULL ATTENTION TO WHAT HE SEES AND HEARS AND HE IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTANDS WITHOUT NEEDING TO EXIT REALITY TO REFER TO THINKING AND WHAT IS DIRECTLY UNDERSTOOD BY SEEING LEADS TO OBVIOUS ANSWERS IN SPEECH OR ACTION UNLESS HE IS DEVIOUS OR WANTS TO IMPRESS OTHERS.

Thinking leads to delusions:

Thinking never leads to true understanding but ends in delusions, false understandings and beliefs constructed by thinking that the person perceives falsely and accepts as true.

In order to understand one must see truly and thus truly seen it is understood without need for any thinking.

If you did not see physically then mental insight or mental seeing will provide true understanding that can then be physically verified. Thus when my USB fax modem stopped working, I thought about various causes and then it suddenly occurred to me that it might be a software problem and sure enough when I clicked the devices and printers explorer there was a note that it was faulty that I did clicked to resolve and the software was reinstalled.

ALWAYS IT IS SEEING CORRECTLY EITHER DIRECTLY IMMEDIATELY OR INDIRECT VIA INSIGHT (MENTAL SEEING) THAT RESULTS IN TRUE UNDERSTANDING. THINKING DOES NOT LEAD TO ANSWERS TO WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE PHYSICALLY OR MENTALLY BUT THINKING LEADS TO DELUSIONS. WHERE THINKING PRODUCED RESULTS IT IS NOT SO MUCH THE THINKING THAT CAUSED THE UNDERSTANDING BUT THE FLASH OF INSIGHT IN THE COURSE OF THINKING THAT PRODUCED THE UNDERSTANDING, IF THE INSIGHT DID NOT OCCUR YOU CAN THINK FOREVER AND STILL NOT ALIGHT ON THE CORRECT ANSWER.

SEEING MAY BE TRUE OR FALSE AND COMES IN TWO FORMS, DIRECT PHSYICAL SEEING OR INDIRECT MENTAL SEEING OR INSIGHT. IT IS ALWAYS CORRECT SEEING EITHER DIRECTLY OR MENTALLY AS INSIGHT THAT RESULTS IN TRUE UNDERSTANDING.

THE PRODUCT OF CORRECT SEEING AND INSIGHT IS TRUE UNDERSTANDING.

THE PRODUCT OF THINKING IS DELUSIONS.

True and false insights:

Just as you can have true and false seeing you can have true and false insights. False insights are always recorded that your mind throws up or present to the gullible person as the true answer.

If you did not see something, you can think and think and still you did not see. However you can have correct insights as to what happened that may be verified by circumstantial evidence as correct.

Republicans reap $100m bonanza

Mitt Romney and the Republicans raise a whopping $100m in June, as Barack Obama launches his first bus tour of the campaign.

The rich support the Republicans and they would like to put their man in the White House so that they can pull strings to gain materially and be protected from prosecution. Thus the relentless transfer of wealth from the system to the elite few continues until the system collapses from instability.

Second straight day:

Quote: GEORGE TOWN: For the second straight day, Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng has denied allegations of a relationship with a former staff member and that his wife had assaulted the person in question.

There is nothing straight or crooked about a day and so he is speaking falsely without knowing the meaning of what he said. He is not the first to say that and so it is copied and rehashed from others and he is a robot.

The purpose is to emotionally make much of the issue when it is a mole hill.

SPEAKING WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT YOU SAY ‘STRAIGHT DAY’ IS TRUE MUST STIR SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.

REHASH, COPYING WHAT OTHERS SAY MAKES YOU A ROBOT AND THAT MEANS SUFFERING EVEN TORMENT.

There is no need to speak of second straight or consecutive (not synonymous) day, suffice to say Lim again denied allegations. It is ponderous, constipated to speak the way he says which is by programming never live specific to the occasion.

LIM AGAIN DENIED THE ALLEGATIONS, THAT IS ALL THERE IS TO IT, IT IS MAD TO TALK ABOUT SECOND STRAIGHT DAY WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MATTER EXCEPT TO MAKE MUCH OF IT.

Straight is not consecutive:

If by ‘straight’ day you mean ‘consecutive’ day you are speaking falsely with deadly consequences because straight means not crooked or bent not ‘consecutive’.

Concentration never thinking is the vehicle to knowledge:

Always, absolutely concentration and never thinking is the key or portal to knowledge from the mundane to the highest ultimate truth and whoever would seek true knowledge whether about mundane daily problems or the meaning of existence would be wise to develop his CONCENTRATION to the highest levels rather than bark up the wrong tree developing his thinking which is a dead end that will end in torment, despair.

And whatever the right concentration must encompass serenity of mind with discursive thinking progressing to a cessation of thinking to neither liking nor disliking to neither pain nor pleasure. Whatever concentration that does not contain the above higher states of mind is not true concentration.

It is in the nature of things that when a person’s concentration reaches increasingly higher levels, insight or vision that leads to knowledge arises.

YOU CANNOT BY THINKING OBTAIN HIGH KNOWLEDGE BUT HIGH CONCENTRATION IS THE VEHICLE BY WHICH KNOWLEDGE ARISES.

Notice below the Buddha spoke of his knowledge and vision, not his thinking. He did not think out the knowledge he attained but his knowledge was naturally obtained when he reached the highest concentration or Samadhi not attained by any being in this eon.

"And, monks, as long as this knowledge & vision of mine -- with its three rounds & twelve permutations concerning these four noble truths as they actually are present -- was not pure, I did not claim to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos with its deities, Maras, & Brahmas, with its contemplatives & priests, its royalty & commonfolk. But as soon as this knowledge & vision of mine -- with its three rounds & twelve permutations concerning these four noble truths as they actually are present -- was truly pure, then I did claim to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos with its deities, Maras & Brahmas, with its contemplatives & priests, its royalty & commonfolk. Knowledge & vision arose in me: 'Unprovoked is my release. This is the last birth. There is now no further becoming.'"

Concentration is the key to happiness, long life and wisdom says the Buddha:

If it is happiness, long life and wisdom that you want then if the Buddha is correct, it is concentration that is the secret.

According to the Buddha the first higher concentration (serenity of mind with thinking) gives one Age or eon in heaven, the second higher concentration (no thinking) gives 2 Ages or eternity, the third higher concentration (neither like nor dislike) gives 4 Ages and the fourth higher concentration (neither pain nor pleasure) gives 500 Ages.

Increasing concentration gives increasing happiness according to the Buddha, there is no greater happiness than increasing concentration.

"There are five strands of sense desire. What are these five? Forms cognizable by the eye that are wished for, desirable, agreeable and endearing, bound up with sensual desire and tempting to lust. Sounds cognizable by the ear...odors cognizable by the nose...flavors cognizable by the tongue...tangibles cognizable by the body, that are wished for, desirable, agreeable and endearing, bound up with sense desire, and tempting to lust. These are the five strands of sense desire. The pleasure and joy arising dependent on these five strands of sense desire, that is called sensual pleasure.

"Now, if someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure and joy that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is this pleasure? Here, quite secluded from sensual desires, secluded from unwholesome states of mind, a monk enters upon and abides in the first meditative absorption (jhana), which is accompanied by thought conception and discursive thinking and has in it joy and pleasure born of seclusion. This is the other kind of pleasure which surpasses that (sense) pleasure and is more sublime.

"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is that pleasure? Here, with the stilling of thought conception and discursive thinking...a monk enters upon and abides in the second meditative absorption...in the sphere of the infinity of space...of the infinity of consciousness ...of no-thingness...of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.

"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure that can be experienced,' I would not concede that. And why not? Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime. And what is this pleasure? Here, by completely surmounting the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, a monk enters upon and abides in the cessation of perception and feeling. This is the other kind of pleasure which surpasses that pleasure and is more sublime.[3]

Concentration the Buddha said is the key to great wisdom or knowledge.

"Such and such is virtue; such and such is concentration; and such and such is wisdom. [9] Great becomes the fruit, great is the gain of concentration when it is fully developed by virtuous conduct; great becomes the fruit, great is the gain of wisdom when it is fully developed by concentration; utterly freed from the taints [10] of lust, becoming, and ignorance is the mind that is fully developed in wisdom."

THUS ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA WHO CLAIMS TO BE THE HIGHEST TEACHER, CONCENTRATION IS THE GATE WAY TO HAPPINESS, LONG LIFE AND WISDOM. IT IS NOT THINKING BUT CONCENTRATION THAT IS THE PORTAL TO KNOWLEDGE. IT IS INSIGHT OR MENTAL SEEING NOT THINKING THAT DELIVERS KNOWLEDGE.

Whooping cough makes a comeback

This is a false statement only people who do not understand and are careless can make.

Whooping cough never left so how can it come back? There are always sporadic cases and so the truthful statement is ‘whooping cough cases rising again’.

PEOPLE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY SAY, WHO DO NOT REHASH, WHO FRESHLY COMPOSE WHAT THEY SAY WILL KNOW COMEBACK MEANS HAVING GONE AND NOW RETURN. IF THERE ARE ALWAYS SPORADIC CASES OF WHOOPING COUGH THEN IT IS NOT A CASE OF ‘COMEBACK’ BUT RISING CASES.

SUCH INDIFFERENCE TO TRUTH IS CONDITIONING AND SUFFERING AND YOU ARE GUILTY OF MISLEADING OTHERS SPEAKING CARELESSLY. JESUS SAID YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD SAID.

RPK is heading for insanity:

Quote: Let’s be clear about one thing, the job of the government-of-the-day is to try to hold on to power. And the job of the opposition is to whack the government and try to grab power. And the job of anarchists is to oppose whichever happens to be the government-of-the-day to keep them on their toes and not allow them to become complacent and arrogant and take us for granted. That is what I do. That is my job. That is the nature of the beast.

This is RPK’s view and it is wrong and the destination for wrong view is hell or the animal womb, the Buddha says.

The duty (not job) of the government is to govern the nation well, a job they were entrusted by the electorate, not to hold on to power, it is up to the electorate to be satisfied and approve to re-elect them, if they disapprove then they should gracefully relinquish power.

The duty (not job) of the opposition is present themselves as a viable superior alternative for election, point out glaring abuse of power or incompetence by the ruling power.

There is no place for an anarchist in the scheme of things. You don’t oppose whichever government of the day but you point out or criticize true faults and malpractices.

RPK THINKS HE IS VERY CLEVER AND GOOD BUT HE IS DELUDED, MISGUIDED AND A ROBOT. WHAT HE STATES ABOVE ARE RULES THAT HE APPLIES, HE HAS CERTAIN VIEWS ABOUT THE ROLE OF THE RULING PARTY, OPPOSITION AND THE ANARCHIST.

Reveal your policies first, Pakatan told

Activist Kua Kia Soong says Pakatan must announce its defence, fiscal and education policies before embarking on its journey to capture Putrajaya.

Fellow deluded people think what he says make sense but he is deluded. If you think God need plans, act according to plans you are deluded.

What he is saying is that you must announce or make plans in defence, fiscal or education. If you make plans you must make effort to remember your plans and carry out however approximately or precisely those plans in which you are a robot. There is karma in wanting others to be robots.

YOU DO NOT NEED PLANS TO DO THINGS, WHAT YOU NEED IS TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION, THE PROBLEMS AND THUS CORRECTLY UNDERSTANDING THE ANSWERS ARE STRAIGHTFORWARD.

BY MAKING PLANS YOU MAKE YOURSELF A ROBOT ACTING ACCORDING TO PLANS. HE HIMSELF IS A SOMNOLENT ROBOT AND HE WANTS TO RECRUIT OTHERS TO BECOME ROBOTS.

FAITH IN PLANS IS FAITH IN PRECEPTS AND RITUALS THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE AND SO THE ACTIVIST IS A FOOL HEADED FOR WOE NOT CLEVER AND GOOD.

Foolishly sticking out his neck:

If what you tell others to do is bad not good as you think, you are sticking your neck out to be cut.

A lot of advice by people are misguided, they think they are doing good but they are preaching suffering and will meet with suffering themselves that will be far worse than their worst nightmares; how about an eternity of weeping and gnashing of your teeth?

Asking others to make plans and present their plans is not good but sticking out your neck to be (certainly) chopped.

MANY DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE FORGING BOND AFTER BOND TO BE REPAID BY FUTURE SUFFERING THAT IS FAR WORSE THAN WHATEVER AVOIDANCE OF SUFFERING THEY SUCCEED PHYSICALLY BY PAMPERING THEMSELVES HERE.

Even more deluded today:

With modernity (scientific and technical ‘progress’) and consciousness changes people today are even more extremely deluded rather than less deluded.

EVEN THOUGH CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES PERMIT EXIT FROM DELUSION AND SUFFERING, DESPITE MUCH MATERIAL AND TECHNICAL PROGRESS, MODERN MAN IS EVEN MORE EXTREMELY DELUDED THAN LESS AND MANY DO NOT REALIZE THEY FACE THE SCRAPYARD OF ETERNITY. MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT MAD YET, THEY HARBOUR MAD VIOLITIONS AND STREAKS BUT THEY ARE NOT MAD YET, WHAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT THERE IS INSANITY IN STORE FOR THEM IN THE FUTURE AND IS FAR WORSE THAN WHATEVER SUFFERING THEY NOW EXPERIENCE. THEIR HEADS ARE NOT CHOPPED YET, THEY DO NOT REALIZE THEY WILL SCREAM IN TERROR WHEN IT IS CHOPPED.

No need for plans, just stop the rot:

If you are throwing your voice in, you should understand the situation. There is no need for defence or financial or educational plans, just stop the plundering, incompetence and corruption that is bleeding the nation dry.

IF YOU THINK CORRUPTION AND INCOMPETENCE ARE NOT BLEEDING THE NATION DRY BUT EVERYTHING IS OK AND THE OPPOSITION MUST SHOW PLANS TO SATISFY YOU THEN YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR WRONG. IF YOU ARE WRONG, THERE IS A PRIZE IN SUFFERING FOR YOU.

Just stop buying submarines and betting on the currency markets:

No need for grandiose plans, just stop buying submarines and Sukhoi fighters and gambling billions on the financial markets.

Prepare in advance and carried out according to plans:

Ordinary people who think they are full of understanding will speak about preparing in advance and carrying out according to plans and not realize this is a tacit admission they are robots.

Preparing in advance and carrying out according to plans are the trademarks or hallmarks of robots.
The programs or recordings in their mental jukeboxes are their advance preparations and they carry out their speech and actions according to plans or recordings in their mental jukebox.

NO ONE WHO IS A TRULY UNDERSTANDING SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION LIVE BEING WILL TALK ABOUT ADVANCE PREPARATIONS (POLICIES ARE ADVANCED PREPARATIONS) NOR WOULD THEY SPEAK AND DO ACCORDING TO PLANS, ACCORDING TO POLICIES WHICH ARE RULES THAT DICTATE WHAT THEY DO.

THUS IF YOU SPEAK OF ADVANCED PREPARATIONS AND CARRYING OUT ACCORDING TO PLANS YOU ARE ADMITTING YOU ARE A (SOMNOLENT) ROBOT.

The truth about style:

By style is meant the constant prolonging, changing speed and strength of force (loudness) present in the speech and actions of beings.

What is the truth about style in people?

Not only can all ordinary people here use force to prolong, change speed and loudness, they all (without exception) do it all the time not some of the time, they are incapable of saying or doing anything without prolonging, changing speed and loudness and they are grimly determined to robotically rehash style despite the terrible toll in suffering, in stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate.

STYLE OR USING FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE ONLY THING PEOPLE HERE DO, THEY CANNOT, ARE IMPOTENT, TO SPEAK WITHOUT PROLONGING SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.

IN ORDER FOR THEM TO SAY OR DO ANYTHING, THERE MUST A TEMPLATE, A PLAN OR RECORDING IN THEIR MINDS TO TELL THEM WHAT AND HOW TO SAY OR DO THAT THEY FOLLOW EITHER FALTERINGLY OR WITH SLIK PRECISION.

PEOPLE HERE DON’T DO ‘NO STYLE’, IT IS OUT OF BOUNDS, EVERY MOTION AND VOCALISATION (EG ‘AARRGGHH’ OR ‘YIIIKKKSSS’) IS MARKED BY ACCOMPANYING PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE NOT TO DO SO.

AND THE FIRST FUNDAMENTAL EXIT FROM SUFFERING AND DEATH EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY IS TO QUITE STYLE. SO LONG AS YOU REMAIN IN STYLE, SO LONG ARE YOU DOOMED TO ENDLESS TORTURE AND DEATH.

PEOPLE HERE HAVE NEVER HEARD SPEECH OR SEEN ACTIONS WITHOUT STYLE AND SO THEY HAVE NO IDEA HOW DIFFERENT, PEACEFUL, GENUINE AND SATISFYING IT IS.

SPEECH WITHOUT STYLE CAN NEVER BE MISTAKEN FOR SPEECH WITH STYLE FOR THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING.

Why style is truly the only prison of death and agony:

You can be sent to jail and it may be a life sentence but after you die or are released you are no longer imprisoned or trapped.

Style is truly a prison of death and agony because so long as you remain either knowingly or somnolently in style, in prolonging, changing speed and loudness, you remain trapped, imprisoned in endless death, eternal habitations with suffering, weeping and gnashing of your teeth the Buddha said shed tears that are as vast as an ocean.

THERE IS NO OTHER PRISON OR TRAP APART FROM STYLE THAT CAN TRAP A PERSON IN DEATH AND SUFFERING FOR ETERNITIES.

ONLY A STYLED PERSON CAN COMMIT SINS LIKE DEVELOPING A MIND OF ILL WILL TOWARDS A BUDDHA THAT CAN SEND YOU TO MANY ETERNITIES IN THE DEEPEST HELLS.

THE FIRST FUNDAMENTAL TRAP IN ENDLESS DEATHS AND SUFFERING TO THE DEEPEST LEVELS IS STYLE. THEREAFTER THE NEXT TRAP IS CONSTANT THOUGHT FOLLOWED BY THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE AND DISLIKE FOLLOWED FINALLY BY FORCE EXPOSURE TO FEEL PAIN AND PLEASURE.

YOU CAN STILL GO TO HEAVEN IF YOU CANNOT STOP THINKING, LIKING OR DISLIKING BUT YOU CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN BUT MUST LANGUISH IN ENDLESS DEATH AND SUFFERING IF YOU CANNOT SHED YOUR STYLE.

Style mandates suffering now and forever:

You can strive to protect yourself from suffering by whatever means eg a healthy lifestyle, all the exercise you want, pamper yourself with whatever luxuries money can buy, meditate or practice yoga or tai chi for all you want, live in total isolation with nature but so long as you possess style, the shadow of stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate will follow you wherever you are here.

YOU CAN SEEK WHATEVER REMEDIES (MEDICINE, HEALTH FOODS, REGULAR EXERCISE), SEEK WHATEVER GURUS OR MEDITATE FOR ALL YOU LIKE, LIVE A RECLUSIVE EXISTENCE BUT SO LONG AS YOU POSSESS STYLE IN YOUR SPEECH AND STYLE THE SHADOW OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, INSANITY AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE WILL FOLLOW YOU, HAUNT AND FINALLY KILL YOU ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.

AND BECAUSE STYLE PRECLUDES HIS ESCAPE TO THE HIGHER HAPPY REALMS OR HEAVEN, SO LONG AS HE HAS STYLE HE IS DOOMED TO EXIST IN SUFFERING AND ENDLESS DEATH IN THE LOWER REALMS AS ANIMALS, GHOSTS OR IN HELL.

SHED STYLE AND YOU ARE A CLEAN MAN WHO DOES NOT PERSECUTE OTHERS WITH FORCE AND YOU ARE QUALIFIED TO GO TO HEAVEN. YOUR PLACE IN HEAVEN IS YOURS AS JESUS SAID BUT IT WILL BE GIVEN TO YOU ONLY IF YOU ARE PURE OR CLEAN ENOUGH TO JOIN THE PURE AND CLEAN.

Cock a doodle do:

A natural heritage in distress

As George Town celebrates its fourth anniversary as a Unesco World Heritage Site, Penangites are lamenting the continual loss of their natural heritage - the state's lush, green hills.

It is not a natural heritage and not distress but the environment or forestry subject to continued destruction, Unesco World Heritage has nothing to do with the subject at hand, there is no need to bring it in except to stir irony or emotion and there is nothing truly lush about the green hills except to reflect false perception.

SENSUAL PEOPLE WHO LIKE TO STIR EMOTIONS IN OTHERS TEND TO TALK ABOUT LUSH THIS AND THAT WHICH IS A FORM OF FALSE PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.

UNESCO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MATTER AND IS BROUGHT IN TO STIR EMOTION, BE IRONIC OR SARCASTIC.

IT IS NOT A NATURAL HERITAGE BUT THE FORESTS OR ENVIRONMENT. HERITAGE IS USED TO MAKE MUCH OR BOAST.

Why people struggle at times:

People talk about times when they struggle, experience or are having difficulties, find the going hard without knowing what the nature of their experience is.

When people are struggling, it is because their mental force of resistance has reached sustained elevated level that forms a formidable level for them to keep going. Even if there are situational demands that contribute to the difficulties they experience, these situational demands stir their resistance present in what they are doing to rise until like the proverbial straw that breaks a camel’s back they admit they are struggling.

WHEN PEOPLE STRUGGLE, EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTIES IN WHAT THEY ARE SAYING OR DOING, THEIR SELF RESISTANCE THAT IS EVER PRESENT HAS REACHED SUSTAINED HEIGHTENED LEVELS THAT BLOCK THE WAY TO CONTINUED ACTIVITY. WITHOUT SELF-RESISTANCE IN WHAT A PERSON SAYS OR DO, HE CANNOT EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTIES.

THUS WHEN A PERSON BECOMES EMOTIONAL HE BECOMES ALMOST SPEECHLESS BECAUSE THE SELF RESISTANCE THAT ACCOMPANIES HIS STIRRED EMOTION IS SO STRONG IT BLOCKS FURTHER SPEECH.

Impossible to exit mental prisons:

There are mental prisons that by themselves, in the normal course of events emotional people will never exit, it is IMPOSSIBLE for them to escape even when escape is possible.

Even when it is pointed out to them many times in no uncertain terms, demonstrated to them, still they are clueless and refuse to escape, what more that by themselves they should find the escape?

Style is the lowest and most evil mental prison here and it is extremely near impossible to exit because style is reinforcing, each time you practice style you are reinforcing, strengthening your prison and you may partially reduce your style but it is possible if you are foolish and relenting for style to relapse, rebuild itself like partially cleared weed can regrow to engulf a field. In order to exit the terrible prison of style you must have discernment and persistence to eliminate style until it is fully vanquished. Physical prisons are ‘peanuts’ by comparison, once you have finished your sentence or die, the prison is finished. You do not have to do anything.

There are mental and physical prisons and no matter what the sufferings of physical prisons, once you have served your time or died, the prison automatically ends.

There is another kind of prison that is mental, that people cannot see or even see it as a paradise when it is terrible torment that is constructed and strengthened by themselves that require much effort or persistence and correct effort to escape.

STYLE OR THE (CONSTANT) USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE FOREMOST, LOWEST MENTAL PRISON THAT PEOPLE CANNOT SEE OR SEE IN DELUSION EVEN AS MARVELLOUS THAT IS SELF REINFORCING (THE PRISON BECOMES STRONGER, A BASTION BY PRACTICING STYLE) THAT REQUIRES DISCERNMENT AND PERSISTENCE UNWINDING IF ONE IS TO ESCAPE THE MIRE OF TORMENT THEY CALL STYLE. EVERY TIME YOU PRACTICE STYLE YOU ARE REINFORCING THE PRISON OF STYLE AND YOU MAY PARTIALLY ESCAPE THE PRISON OF STYLE BUT AS SOON AS YOU ALLOW STYLE TO REGROW LIKE WEEDS IT WILL SOON RE-ESTABLISH ITSELF AS A WATER PROOF PRISON SEEMINGLY WITHOUT ESCAPE, EVEN WITHOUT A RAY OF LIGHT COMING THROUGH.

THINKING IS THE NEXT MENTAL PRISON THAT IS TORMENT THAT DELUDED PEOPLE ARE HOOKED ON, IT IS REINFORCING SO THAT EACH TIME YOU THINK EMOTIONALLY YOU ARE BONDING YOURSELF MORE TIGHTLY TO THIS PRISON OF TORMENT CALLED THINKING AND IT NEEDS DISCERNMENT AND RELENTLESS PERSISTENCE TO SEE THE EFFORT TO THE END TO ESCAPE. YOU CAN PARTIALLY SUCCEED IN STOPPING THINKING BUT IF YOU RELENT YOU WILL FALL BACK INTO THE PIT OF THINKING.

LIKE AND DISLIKE IS THE HIGHER MENTAL PRISON THAT IS HARD TO ESCAPE, THAT REQUIRES EFFORT AND DISCERNMENT TO SEE IT TO A FINAL SUCCESS. EACH TIME YOU LIKE OR DISLIKE YOU ARE NOT ONLY SUFFERING UNNECESSARILY BUT BONDING YOURSELF TIGHTER TO LIKE AND DISLIKE AND IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON TO WEAKEN MUCH OF HIS LIKE AND DISLIKE TO THEN RELAPSE INTO INCREASINGLY STRONG LIKE AND DISLIKE IF HIS RESOLVE TO EXIT WEAKENS OR HE FACES PEER PRESSURE TO LIKE AND DISLIKE.

PAIN AND PLEASURE IS A MENTAL PRISON THAT IS CAPTIVATING THAT LEADS TO ENDLESS DEATH AND SUFFERING. IT REQUIRES EFFORT AND DISCERNMENT TO EXIT AND BECAUSE EACH TIME YOU EXPERIENCE PAIN AND PLEASURE, IT CONDITIONS, YOU CAN RELAPSE INTO PAIN AND PLEASURE IF YOU HAVE SUCCEEDED IN CURTAILING MUCH PAIN AND PLEASURE.

Waterproof terrible prisons:

A waterproof prison binds beings in terrible endless renewing suffering that often reach nightmare proportions even in perpetuity for endless eternities. Death does not bring respite because they are headed for suffering after death that is as vast as oceans the Buddha said.

Without the intervention of divine beings, by themselves ordinary people will not make an end to their endless suffering, they are content to sit around and do nothing or if they attempt to escape they go around in circles.

The Buddha called himself Tathagatha, the One Who Thus Comes, He was born here from the highest reaches of heaven to win the battle against death and suffering and guide men who can be tamed out of this terrible mire of suffering. In the same way Jesus said he was sent by his Father with a message of salvation for those who will listen.

STYLE IS NOT MARVELLOUS BUT IT IS A TERRIBLE WATERPROOF PRISON THAT BINDS THE PERSON IN ENDLESS SUFFERING AND DEATH SHEDDING THEIR BLOOD THE BUDDHA SAID IS GREATER THAN THE FOUR GREAT OCEANS. BY THEMSELVES ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE WELL DEFEATED, RESIGNED TO ENDLESS DEATH AND SUFFERING AND IT IS ONLY WITH THE GUIDANCE OF DIVINE BEINGS BORN INTO THIS WORLD THAT THERE IS AN ESCAPE OPENED FOR THOSE WHO WILL BE TAMED.

IN ORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES PEOPLE WILL NOT CLEAR THIS FIELD OF WEEDS BUT EVEN IF THEY PARTIALLY CLEAR THE FIELD OFF WEEDS, WHAT REMAINS CAN REGROW AND OVERWHELM THE FIELD ONCE AGAIN.

Chua Soi Lek Guan Eng debate:

The Buddha said his teaching is not for those who are entangled but for those who are disentangled.

You are entangled if you find this debate meaningful.

Guan Eng is no where near as bad as Soi Lek but he too is (significantly) entangled and whoever is entangled faces difficulties and suffering that is considerable in the future.

THERE IS NO NEED FOR ANY DEBATES, IN ANY MATTER WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG CAN BE CLEARLY DETERMINED AND THEREFORE NOT SUBJECT TO DEBATE IN WHICH THE ISSUE IS JUST AN EXCUSE FOR PARTISANSHIP AND VERBAL JOUSTING OR FIGHTING.

DEBATES AND ARGUMENTS ARE MEANINGLESS AND PARTICIPANTS ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY. DEBATES ARE USING MOUTHS TO FIGHT AND LEAD TO DISTURBED MINDS AMONGST PARTICIPANTS AND ONLY FOOLS ENGAGE IN DEBATES.

No need to deny myself:

I was forced to listen to part of the broadcasted debate and I found the conduct of the debate very emotional attacking each other and deluded by all those present (including moderators).

People are drawn to such debates; they get emotionally stirred by such debates. I do not need to deny myself, I find such debates almost intolerable to listen to, a sound pollution of the air and after awhile I chose to retire to a location where I cannot hear the commotion of the debate.

EMOTIONAL PEOPLE HAVE TO DENY THEMSELVES, USE FORCE TO EXTRICATE THEMSELVES FROM SINFUL CONDUCT (LIKE LISTENING TO THE DEBATE), THERE IS NO NEED FOR ME TO DENY MYSELF BECAUSE I SEE THE DEBATE AS IT ACTUALLY IS AS MEANINGLESS VERBAL WARFARE AND IT IS NATURAL THAT I SHOULD WITHDRAW. YOU ARE A MASOCHIST SUBJECTING YOURSELF TO SUCH DEBATES.

Possible but impossible:

There is the case that something is possible but impossible.

It is possible to escape style, escape the constant use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness but it is impossible for ordinary people to do so by themselves, impossible for many to do so even when it is pointed out even demonstrated to them how they have style.

It is possible to fully conscious stop thinking but it is impossible for ordinary people who are robots, not in charge of themselves to do so.

It is possible to fully conscious stop liking and disliking but it is impossible for ordinary people who are robots, not in charge of themselves to do so.

IT IS NOT SPEAKING FALSELY BUT THERE IS THE CASE WHERE SOMETHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IMPOSSIBLE.

THAT A PERSON IS A GOAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO DEBATE OR CONTENTION. IF A PERSON IS A GOAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO SHED HIS STYLE EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO SO. IF A PERSON IS DELUDED, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO SHED STYLE EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE.

I will not embrace style for all the wealth in this world:

You and everyone here cling tenaciously to style, will not give up style but you are (incorrigibly) deluded and headed for endless slaughter of yourself not others.

I will not embrace style for all the wealth, power, glory or sensate delights of this world.

I SEE STYLE AS A CURSE, AN ABOMINATION, EVIL, OFFENSIVE. IF I AM CORRECT THEN ALL THOSE WHO SEE STYLE AS MEANINGFUL, GOOD ARE DELUDED.

Soi Lek: Promise of free education a sham

Only when DAP has come into power and not enacted free education can you say in truth it is a sham.

WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE AND YOU SAY IT, THERE MUST BE SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND SELF RESISTANCE IS CONDITIONING SO THAT IN TIME IT IS CONSTANT AND SO YOU ARE A FOOL SHACKLING YOURSELF TO SELF-RESISTANCE, TO DRIVING WITH THE HANDBRAKE ON THAT LEADS TO STRESS.

IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST WITHOUT STRESS, WITHOUT SELF-RESISTANCE IN WHATEVER YOU SAY OR DO BUT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR FOOLISH STYLISH PEOPLE TO DO SO.

How deep is your style?

Deep indeed is people’s style, it is more extensive and deeper than ordinary people may concede.

No matter how slowly or softly people speak, for those who understand there is still detectable significant style that must stir self resistance and lead to stress, restlessness and distraction and mandates a robotic rehashing existence.

NOT A MOMENT PASSES IN STYLISH PEOPLE’S LIVES WHEN THEY ARE WITHOUT STYLE JUST AS NOT A MOMENT ARE THEY WITHOUT THEIR SHADOWS.

THERE ARE SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES WITHIN SYLLABLES THEY ALWAYS STRETCH, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES BETWEEN SYLLABLES AND BETWEEN WORDS.

James Lawton: History wasn't against him. Unfortunately, Federer was…

History is just what happened and it is not a being and so cannot be against anyone. It is impossible for him to know what he says is true because it is false designed to exaggerate what is happening and so if you speak without knowing what you say (in the name of impressing others) then you are courting self resistance to what you say that is bondage to stress.

ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES IF THEY THINK THEY KNOW WHAT THEY SPEAK BECAUSE THEY SPEAK WITHOUT KNOWING FAR MORE OFTEN THAN THEY REALIZE AND THAT MUST STIR SELF RESISTANCE THAT IS BONDAGE TO STRESS.

According to the Buddha I am great:

The Buddha said that those who matched the description he made below are great and I match his description.

No fake could ever speak like the Buddha below and so if you think the Buddha may be or is a fake you are undiscerning.

CAN YOU SPEAK LIKE THE BUDDHA BELOW AND IF YOU CANNOT, IN WHAT WAY DO YOU SEE IT AS FALSE?

The Blessed One said, "Now, what are the eight thoughts of a great person? This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not for one who is self-aggrandizing. This Dhamma is for one who is content, not for one who is discontent. This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not for one who is entangled. This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not for one who is lazy. This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not for one whose mindfulness is confused. This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not for one whose mind is uncentered. This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not for one whose discernment is weak. This Dhamma is for one who enjoys non-complication, who delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.
"'This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not for one who is self-aggrandizing.' Thus was it said. With reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk, being modest, does not want it to be known that 'He is modest.' Being content, he does not want it to be known that 'He is content.' Being reclusive, he does not want it to be known that 'He is reclusive.' His persistence being aroused, he does not want it to be known that 'His persistence is aroused.' His mindfulness being established, he does not want it to be known that 'His mindfulness is established.' His mind being centered, he does not want it to be known that 'His mind is centered.' Being endowed with discernment, he does not want it to be known that 'He is endowed with discernment.' Enjoying non-complication, he does not want it to be known that 'He is enjoying non-complication.' 'This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not for one who is self-aggrandizing.' Thus was it said. And with reference to this was it said.
"'This Dhamma is for one who is content, not for one who is discontent.' Thus was it said. With reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk is content with any old robe cloth at all, any old almsfood, any old lodging, any old medicinal requisites for curing sickness at all. 'This Dhamma is for one who is content, not for one who is discontent.' Thus was it said. And with reference to this was it said.
"'This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not for one who is entangled.' Thus was it said. With reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk, when living in seclusion, is visited by monks, nuns, lay men, lay women, kings, royal ministers, sectarians & their disciples. With his mind bent on seclusion, tending toward seclusion, inclined toward seclusion, aiming at seclusion, relishing renunciation, he converses with them only as much is necessary for them to take their leave. 'This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not for one in entanglement.' Thus was it said. And with reference to this was it said.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not for one who is lazy.' Thus was it said. With reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk keeps his persistence aroused for abandoning unskillful mental qualities and taking on skillful mental qualities. He is steadfast, solid in his effort, not shirking his duties with regard to skillful mental qualities. 'This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not for one who is lazy.' Thus was it said. And with reference to this was it said.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not for one whose mindfulness is confused.' Thus was it said. With reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk is mindful, highly meticulous, remembering & able to call to mind even things that were done & said long ago. 'This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not for one whose mindfulness is confused.' Thus was it said. And with reference to this was it said.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not for one whose mind is uncentered.' Thus was it said. With reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk, quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful mental qualities, enters & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. With the stilling of directed thought & evaluation, he enters & remains in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought & evaluation -- internal assurance. With the fading of rapture he remains in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure. He enters & remains in the third jhana, of which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasurable abiding.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain -- as with the earlier disappearance of elation & distress -- he enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain. 'This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not for one whose mind is uncentered.' Thus was it said. And with reference to this was it said.
"'This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not for one whose discernment is weak.' Thus was it said. With reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk is discerning, endowed with discernment of arising & passing away -- noble, penetrating, leading to the right ending of stress. 'This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not for one whose discernment is weak.' Thus was it said. And with reference to this was it said.
"'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys non-complication, who delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.' Thus was it said. With reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk's mind leaps up, grows confident, steadfast, & is firm in the cessation of complication. 'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys non-complication, who delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.' Thus was it said. And with reference to this was it said."

One not many greatness amongst beings:

Greatness is not for you or anyone to define, there is only one universal greatness and whoever does not match that greatness is not great except in delusion or falsity.

It is not birth or position or power or wealth or sex or whatever that determines a person’s greatness but whoever has higher knowledge and conduct is greater.

The Buddha:

28. `Moreover it was one of the Brahmà gods, Sanaü-kumàra, [47] who uttered this stanza [48]:

[\q 122/] ßThe Kshatriya is the best of those among this folk
who put their trust in lineage.
But he who is perfect in wisdom and righteousness,
he is the best among gods and men.û

`Now this stanza, Ambaññha, was well sung and not ill sung by the Brahmà Sanaü-kumàra, well said and not ill said, full of meaning and not void thereof And I too approve it; I also, Ambaññha, say:
"The Kshatriya is the best of those among this folk who put their trust in lineage. [49]
But he who is perfect in wisdom and righteousness, he is the best among gods and men."'
Here ends the First Portion for Recitation [50]

Chapter II [\q 123/]

1. `But what, Gotama, is the righteousness, and what the wisdom spoken of in that verse?'
`In the supreme perfection in wisdom and righteousness, Ambaññha, there is no reference to the question either of birth, or of lineage, or of the pride which says: ßYou are held as worthy as I,û or ßYou are not. held as worthy as I.û It is where the talk is of marrying, or of giving in marriage, that reference is made to such things as that. For whosoever, Ambaññha, are in bondage to the notions of birth or of lineage, or to the pride of social position, or of connection by marriage, they are far from the best wisdom and righteousness. It is only by having got rid of all such bondage that one can realise for himself [100] that supreme perfection in wisdom and in conduct.'
2.' But what, Gotama, is that conduct, and what that wisdom?'
[Here follow, under Morality (Sãla) [51]
The introductory paragraphs (Section 40-42 of the Sàma¤¤a-phala, pp. 62, 63 of the text) on the appearance of a Buddha, his preaching, the conversion of a hearer, and his renunciation of the world: then come
1. The Sãlas, above, pp. 4-12 (Section 8-27) of the text. Only the refrain differs. It runs here, art the end of each clause, through the whole of this repeated passage: `This is reckoned in him as morality.'
[\q 124/] Then under Conduct (Caraõa)
2. The paragraph on Confidence, above, p. 69 of he text, Section 63. The refrain from here onwards is: `This is reckoned to him as conduct.
3. The paragraph on `Guarded is the door of his senses,' above, p.70 of the text, Section 64.
4. The paragraph on `Mindful and self-possessed,' above p. 70 of the text, Section 65.
5. The paragraph on Content, above, p.71 of the text, Section 66.
6. The paragraph on Solitude, above, p.71 of the text Section 67.
7. The paragraphs on the Five Hindrances, above, pp. 71-72 of the text, Section 68-74.
8. The paragraphs on the Four Rapt Contemplations, [52] above , pp. 73-76, Section 75-82. The refrain at the end of each of them (`higher and better than the last') is here, of course to be read not as higher fruit of the life of a recluse, but as higher conduct.
Under Wisdom (Vijjà)
9. The paragraphs on Insight arising from Knowledge (¥àõa-dassanaü),above, p.76 of the text, Section 83,84. The refrain from here onwards is: `This is reckoned in him as wisdom, and it is higher and sweeter than the last.'
10. The paragraphs on the Mental Image, above, p.77 of the text, Section 85, 86.
11. The paragraphs on Mystic Gifts (Iddhi), above, p. 77 of the text, Section87, 88.
12. The paragraphs on the Heavenly Ear (Dibbasota) above , p.79 of the text, Section 89, 90.
13. The paragraphs on the Knowledge of the hearts of others (Ceto-pariya-¤àõaü), above, p.79 of the text, Section 91, 92.
14. The paragraphs on Memory of one's own previous [\q 125/] births (Pubbe-nivàsa-anussati-¤àõa), above, p. 81 of the text, Section 93, 94.
15. The paragraph on the Divine Eye (Dibbacakkhu), above, p. 82 of the text, Section 95, 96.
16. He paragraphs on the Destruction of the Deadly Floods (âsavànaü khaya-¤àõaü), above, p. 83 of the text, Section 97, 98.] [53]
`Such a man, Ambaññha, is said to be perfect in wisdom, perfect in conduct, perfect in wisdom and conduct. And there is no other perfection in wisdom and conduct higher and sweeter than this.'
3. `Now, Ambaññha, to this supreme perfection in wisdom and goodness [101] there are Four Leakages. [54] And what are the four?'
`In case, Ambaññha, any recluse or Brahman, without having thoroughly attained unto this supreme perfection in wisdom and conduct, with his yoke on his shoulder (to carry fire-sticks, a water-pot, needles, and the rest of a mendicant friar's outfit), should plunge into the depths of the forest, vowing to himself: ßI will henceforth be one of those who live only on fruits that have fallen of themselvesû Þthen, verily, he turns out worthy only to be a servant unto him that hath attained to wisdom and righteousness.
`And again, Ambaññha, in case any recluse or Brahman, without having thoroughly attained unto this supreme perfection in wisdom and conduct, and without having attained to living only on fruits fallen of themselves, taking a hoe and a basket with him, should plunge into the depths of the forest, vowing to himself: ßI will henceforth be one of those who live only on bulbs and roots and fruitsû Þthen, verily, he turns out worthy only to be a servant unto him who hath attained to wisdom and righteousness.
[\q 126/] `And again, Ambaññha, in case any recluse or Brahman, without having thoroughly attained unto this supreme perfection in wisdom and conduct, and without having, attained to living only on fruits fallen of them-selves, and without having attained to living only on bulbs and roots and fruits, should build himself a fire-shrine near the boundaries of some village or some town, and there dwell serving the fire-god [55] Þ then, verily, he turns out worthy only to be a servant unto him that hath attained to wisdom and righteousness.
`And again, Ambaññha, in case any recluse or Brahman, without having thoroughly attained unto this supreme perfection in wisdom and conduct, and without having attained to living only on fruits fallen of themselves, and without having attained to living only on bulbs and roots and fruits, and without having attained to serving the fire-god, [102] should build himself a four-doored almshouse at a crossing where four high roads meet, and dwell there, saying to himself: ßWhosoever, whether recluse or Brahman, shall pass here, from either of these four directions, him will I entertain according to my ability and according to my powerû Þ then, verily, he turns out worthy only to be a servant unto him who hath attained to wisdom and righteousness.
`These are the Four Leakages, Ambaññha, to supreme perfection in righteousness and conduct. [56]
4. `Now what think you, Ambaññha? Have you, as one of a class of pupils under the same teacher, been instructed in this supreme perfection of wisdom and conduct?' [57]
`Not that, Gotama. How little is it that I can profess [\q 127/] to have learnt! How supreme this Perfection of wisdom and conduct! Far is it from me to have been trained therein?'
`Then what think you, Ambaññha? Although you have not thoroughly attained unto this supreme perfection of wisdom and goodness, have you been trained to take the yoke upon your shoulders, and plunge into the depths of the forest as one who would fain observe the vow of living only on fruits fallen of themselves?
`Not even that, Gotama.'
`Then what think you, Ambaññha? Although you have not attained unto this supreme perfection of wisdom and goodness, nor have attained to living on fruits fallen of themselves, have you been trained to take hoe and basket, and plunge into the depths of the forest as one who would fain observe the vow of living only on bulbs and roots and fruits?'
`Not even that, Gotama.'
`Then what think you, Ambaññha? Although you have not attained unto this supreme perfection of wisdom and goodness, and have not attained to living on fruits fallen of themselves, and have not attained to living on bulbs and roots and fruits, have you been taught to build yourself a fire-shrine on the borders of some village or some town, and dwell there as one who would fain serve the fire-god?'
[103] `Not even that, Gotama.'
`Then what think you, Ambaññha? Although you have not attained unto this supreme perfection of wisdom and goodness, and have not attained to living on fruits fallen of themselves, and have not attained to living on bulbs and roots and fruits, and have not attained to serving the fire-god, have you been taught to build yourself a four-doored almshouse at a spot where four high roads cross, and dwell there as one who would fain observe the vow to entertain whosoever might pass that way, from any of the four directions, according to your ability and according to your power?'
`Not even that, Gotama.'
[\q 128/] 5. `So then you, Ambaññha, as a pupil, have fallen short [58] of due training, not only in the supreme wisdom and conduct, but even in any one of the Four Leakages by which the complete attainment thereof is debarred. And your teacher too, the Brahman Pokkharasàdi, has told you this saying: ßWho are these shavelings, sham friars, menial black fellows, the offscouring of our kinsman's heels, that they should claim converse with Brahmans versed in the threefold Vedic lore!û Þhe himself not having even fulfilled any one even of these lesser duties (which lead men to neglect the higher ones). See, Ambaññha, how deeply your teacher, the Brahman Pokkharasàdi, has herein done you wrong.' [59]
6. `And the Brahman Pokkharasàdi, Ambaññha, is in the enjoyment of a grant from Pasenadi, the king of Kosala. But the king, does not allow him to come into his presence. When he consults with him he speaks to him only from behind a curtain. How is it, Ambaññha, that the very king, from whom he accepts this pure and lawful maintenance, King Pasenadi of Kosala, does not admit him to his presence? See, Ambaññha, how deeply your teacher, the Brahman Pokkharasàdi, has herein done you wrong.'
7. `Now what think you, Ambaññha? Suppose a king, either seated on the neck of his elephant or on the back of his horse, or standing on the footrug of his chariot, [104] should discuss some resolution of state with his chiefs or princes. And suppose as he left the spot and stepped on one side, a workman (Sådra) or the slave of a workman should come up and, standing there, should discuss [\q 129/] the matter, saying: ßThus and thus said Pasenadi the king.û Although he should speak as the king might have spoken, or discuss as the king might have done, would he thereby be the king, or even as one of his officers?'
`Certainly not, Gotama.'
8. `But just so, Ambaññha, those ancient poets (Rishis) of the Brahmans, the authors of the verses, the utterers of the verses, whose ancient form of words so chanted, uttered, or composed, the Brahmans of today chant over again and rehearse, intoning or reciting exactly as has been intoned or recited -to wit, Aññhaka, Vàmaka, Vàmadeva, Vessàmitta, Yamataggi. Angirasa, Bhàradvaja, Vàseññha, Kassapa, and Bhagu [60] Þ though you can say: ßI, as a pupil, know by heart their verses,û that you should on that account be a Rishi, or have attained to the state of a Rishi Þ such a condition of things has no existence!'
9. `Now what think you, Ambaññha? What have you heard when Brahmans, old and well stricken in years, teachers of yours or their teachers, were talking together -did those ancient Rishis, whose verses you so chant over and repeat, parade about well groomed, perfumed, trimmed as to their hair and beard, adorned with garlands and gems, clad in white garments, in the full possession and enjoyment of the five pleasures of sense, as you, and your teacher too, do now?'
[105] `Not that, Gotama.'
`Or did they live, as their food, on boiled rice of the best sorts, from which all the black specks had been sought out and removed, and flavoured with sauces and curries of various kinds, as you, and your teacher too, do now.
`Not that, Gotama.'
`Or were they waited upon by women with fringes [\q 130/] and furbelows, [61] round their loins, as you, and your teacher too, do now?'
`Or did they go about driving chariots, drawn, by mares with plaited manes and tails, [62] using long wands and goads the while, as you, and your teacher too, do now?'
`Not that, Gotama.'
`Or did they have themselves guarded in fortified towns, with moats dug out round them [63] and crossbars let down before the gates, [64] by men girt with long swords, as you, and your teacher too, do now?'
`Not that, Gotama.'
10. `So then, Ambaññha, neither are you a Rishi, nor your teacher, nor do you live under the conditions under which the Rishis lived. But whatever it may be, Ambaññha, concerning which you are in doubt or perplexity about me, ask me as to that. I will make it clear by explanation.'
11. Then the Blessed One went, forth from his chamber, and began to walk up and down. And Ambaññha did the same. And as he thus walked [\q 131/] up and down, following the Blessed One, he took stock of the thirty-two signs of a great man, whether they appeared on the body of the Blessed One or not. And he perceived them all save only two. [106] With respect to those two Þ the concealed member and the extent of tongue [65] Þ he was in doubt and perplexity, not satisfied, not sure.
12. And the Blessed One knew that he was so in doubt. And he so arranged matters by his Wondrous Gift that Ambaññha the Brahman saw how that part of the Blessed One that ought to be hidden by clothes was enclosed in a sheath. And the Blessed One so bent round his tongue that he touched and stroked both his ears, touched and stroked both his nostrils, and the whole circumference of his forehead he covered with his tongue. [66]
[\q 132/] And Ambaññha, the young Brahman, thought: `The Samaõa Gotama is endowed with the thirty two signs of a great man, with them all, not only with some of them.' And he said to the Blessed One: `And now, Gotama, we would `fain depart. We are busy, and have much to do.'
`Do, Ambaññha, what seemeth to you fit.'
And Ambaññha mounted his chariot drawn by mares, and departed thence.

Style not hell is the worst, mother of all prisons:

A PERSON’S SUFFERING IN HELL IS BECAUSE OF SINS COMMITTED BY HIS STYLED EXISTENCE AND WHATEVER SUFFERING IN HELL ENDS AFTER HE HAS COMPLETED HIS SENTENCE BUT THE SUFFERING OF STYLE DOES NOT END SO LONG AS THE PERSON REMAINS IN STYLE.

Thinking, liking and disliking are also prisons but you can go to heaven even if you cannot stop thinking or liking and disliking but you cannot go to heaven if you have style.

Suffering can reach even levels you cannot imagine here in the deepest of hells and last even countless eternities according to the Buddha but it is not the worst prison, style is the worst prison. Why is that?

To those who have not tasted freedom of style, style may seem alluring at times but they are deceived, style means a robotic rehashing existence and constant insoluble renewing stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate.

No matter how terrible and long suffering in hell may be, once you have finished your sentence in hell, it ends. By contrast, there is no end to suffering due to style, so long as you remain in style and that is likely to be much longer than whatever time you spend in hell, so long will you suffer.

It is the styled existence that drives foolish deluded men to commit terrible evil deeds that caused them terrible agony in hell.

WITHOUT LIVING A STYLED EXISTENCE HITLER, STALIN, MAO AND EVEN LITTLE MALAYSIAN DICTATORS WOULD NOT HAVE RACKED UP SUCH TERRIBLE KARMA AS TO SPEND EONS IN THE DEEPEST HELLS. WHOEVER CAUSED ANWAR TO BE PUNCHED HAS TERRIBLE SUFFERING AWAITING HIM.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON FREE OF STYLE TO COMMIT SINS THAT RENDER HIM LIABLE FOR EONS OF SUFFERING IN HELL.

A PERSON’S SUFFERING IN HELL IS BECAUSE OF SINS COMMITTED BY HIS STYLED EXISTENCE AND WHATEVER SUFFERING IN HELL ENDS AFTER HE HAS COMPLETED HIS SENTENCE BUT THE SUFFERING OF STYLE DOES NOT END SO LONG AS THE PERSON REMAINS IN STYLE.

You need style to go to hell:

Without style a person cannot go to hell, style is a requisite to go to hell.

If a person has no style he has achieved the first higher state of mind that qualifies him to be a sheep and one eternity or Age in heaven so how can he go to hell?

It is only a person with style who driven by tormenting stress, restlessness and distraction and living a robotic existence vulnerable to influence or programming by others and the Devil who will commit terrible crimes that make him go to hell.

A PERSON WITHOUT STYLE CANNOT GO TO HELL BECAUSE HE HAS ACHIEVED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT GIVES ONE AGE IN HEAVEN. IT IS ONLY A PERSON WITH STYLE WHO CAN COMMIT TERRIBLE CRIMES THAT SUBJECTS HIM TO HELL AND THE ANIMAL STATE.

Style is a universal, hard to exit self-perpetuating total prison:

Style is a universal prison because all beings trapped in the lower realms (human, animal, ghost and hell states) are endowed with style that they automatically reinforce and enforce or maintain in each other.

Style is self-perpetuating because each time a person practices style he is reinforcing himself, training himself better to use force to prolong, change speed and strength so that after much reinforcement the automatism backing and sustaining his style because formidable even impossible to unwind.

Style is a total prison because it involves every facet of the being. Whatever he perceives, thinks, does and speak is accompanied by style, by force prolonging, changing speed and strength so that he is a TOTAL CAPTIVE of style who has never tasted the alternative, no style in themselves or others.

EVERYWHERE THEY TURN TO, THEY ARE BOMBARDED BY STYLE IN THE BEHAVIOUR OF NOT JUST HUMANS BUT ANIMALS/INSECTS AND EVERY FACET OF THEIR OWN BEHAVIOR IS TAINTED, ACCOMPANIED BY STYLE SO THAT THEY ARE TOTALLY CAPTIVE OF STYLE, HAVE NEVER KNOWN OR TASTED NON-STYLE. THEY HAVE NO CLUE OR IDEA THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST WITHOUT STYLE AND IT IS INCOMPARABLY SANER AND HAPPIER.

A person’s style is very difficult to dismantle because there is formidable automatism or programming behind his style and everywhere he turns to he is bombarded by force prolonging, changing speed and strength in others’ actions that tends to stir his mental force to resonate with these received force changes and thus maintained in style.

THERE IS MUCH INGRAINED AUTOMATISM IN A PERSON’S STYLE THAT WOULD TAKE MUCH EFFORT AND PERSISTENCE TO ERADICATE AND HE IS LIKELY TO RELAPSE INTO STYLE IF HE IS LACKADAISICAL OR EXPOSES HIMSELF TO THE INFLUENCE OF OTHERS.

EVERYWHERE HE IS BOMBARDED BY INCESSANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN OTHERS’ STYLES THAT EXERT HARD TO RESIST URGE FOR HIM TO FOLLOW SUIT AND ONCE INDUCTED HE IS SUCKED EVER DEEPER INTO THE WHIRLPOOL OF STYLE PEOPLE HERE RECOMMEND AS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL.

STYLE IS NEVER A PALACE BUT A NIGHTMARE PRISON IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO ESCAPE AND THEY ARE DOOMED TO NEVER ENDING TORMENT BUILDING UP MOUNTAINS OF SKELETONS. WITHOUT JESUS COMING AS RANSOM AND DIVINE BEINGS LIKE THE BUDDHA COMING TO GUIDE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR PEOPLE TO EXIT THIS MORASS OF ENDLESS TORMENT CALLED A STYLED EXISTENCE.

STYLE IS A PRISON HARD TO EXIT BECAUSE IT IS TOTAL, INVOLVES EVERY FACET OF THEIR BEINGS AND EVERYWHERE THEY ARE BOMBARDED WITH STYLE FROM OTHERS THAT TEND TO INDUCE THEIR OWN MENTAL FORCES TO SIMILARLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH. ONCE CONDITIONED, STYLE IS SELF REINFORCING AND IT WOULD TAKE MUCH SUSTAINED EFFORT TO UNRAVEL THE FORMIDABLE AUTOMATISM TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH WHILST BEING CONSTANTLY BOMBARDED BY THE FORCE INDUCEMENT FROM THE STYLES OF OTHERS INTERACTING WITH HIM.

NOT ONLY IS A STYLED EXISTENCE A TORMENTING ROBOTIC EXISTENCE HOUNDED BY RENEWING INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, THE PERSON THUS TORMENTED IS LIEABLE TO COMMIT SINS THAT SENDS HIM AGAIN AND AGAIN TO HELL.

Proof doing without knowing stirs resistance:

If a medical student is asked to demonstrate something in front of a class that he has not done before, he will be stirred, disturbed to greater or lesser degree that he may try to hide because he is being asked to do something he has not done before, does not know and doing merely because he was asked to. This stirred or nervous state of his mind is because his self-resistance has been raised.

Similarly if someone is asked to stand up and give a talk his mind will be stirred no matter how he tries to hide it, no matter how tough or conscienceless he is because he is doing something not out of necessity but because he is asked to.

If a minister is asked a question he does not know the answer but is keen to impress on his competence, he will attempt to say something that he does not know is true (eg something is being investigated when he does not know it is) and this must stir self-resistance in him that he further stresses himself by trying to hide.

IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW TOUGH OR WITHOUT CONSCIENCE A PERSON IS, OR HOW MANY TIMES HE HAS SPOKEN WITHOUT KNOWING, WHOEVER SPEAKS WITHOUT KNOWING MUST AROUSE SELF-RESISTANCE IN HIM AND IT IS THIS SELF-RESISTANCE OR CLASH OF FORCE THAT IS THE CAUSE OF THE STRESS THAT HAUNTS HIM AND WILL BECOME MAD LATER, TO RISE SUDDENLY OUT OF PROPORTION AS IF WITHOUT CAUSE.

AND SO IF YOU WISH TO AVOID SELF RESISTANCE YOU MUST STOP SAYING OR DOING THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING THEY ARE TRUE OR BENEFICIAL TO SELF.

“I believe”:

Many qualify what they say with “I believe (this is what happened)”. It is not good enough to believe this is what happened. You should say “I know this is what happened”

“I believe this is what happened” means you are speaking without knowing that may be camouflaged by the eagerness accompanying what you say. This is a form of speaking without knowing that is conditioning and must stir resistance in you and you are delivering yourself into arms of stress that will torment and kill you and is difficult to extricate for the fool addicted to speaking without knowing.

SAY “I KNOW WHAT HAPPENED” NOT “I BELIEVE THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED”. IF YOU CANNOT SAY “I KNOW” THEN YOU ARE EMBRACING SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS SAYING SO.

Mahathirism is dead and gone, says Dr M

PETALING JAYA: Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said he is actively campaigning for Umno and the Barisan Nasional in the general election but the era of Mahathirism is no more.

It is impossible for anyone to speak knowing it is true that Mahathirism is dead and gone. As time passes his memory and (bad) influence may wane but so soon after he departs when his shadow still casts over the political scene, he is speaking without knowing because it suits his agenda to say. He may turn around the next occasion to say that Mahathirism is very much alive when it suits his agenda then.

If you speak without knowing that Mahathirism is dead and gone you must stir self-resistance no matter how callous or hardened or hard core you become and that is the sure fire path to stress that is deadly and tormenting.

STRESS IS NEVER BENIGN BUT DEADLY LIKE A VIPER AND SO WHOEVER COEXISTS WITH STRESS IS A FOOL SLEEPING WITH A VIPER OR ANACONDA THAT WILL ONE DAY STRANGLE YOU.

Roger Bootle

Capitalism is in crisis but it's still our best bet for prosperity

If capitalism is at the heart of this current crisis and you think it is our best bet for prosperity then you are deluded.

PROSPERITY FOR THE FEW AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MANY THAT FINALLY ENDS IN A DESTABLIZING CONCENTRATION OF WEALTH IN THE FEW WHILST THE WEALTH AND SAVINGS OF THE MANY ARE SQUANDERED. EVEN THE WEALTH OF MANY OF THE RICH ARE ACTUALLY NON EXISTENT, THERE ARE MULTIPLE CLAIMANTS TO THE MILLION YOU THINK YOU HAVE IN THE BANK.

Roger Bootle was awarded some prize recently for his commentary, if I am right he is deluded, what hope has the average person of understanding and correctly redressing the present crisis?

Taking risks & guessing is doing without knowing:

Whenever a person takes risks be it entering into traffic without seeing or buying a counter on the stock market or taking a guess, he is doing without knowing that is always accompanied by self-resistance and he is embracing stress, embracing self-resistance to whatever he says or does like the man willing himself to drive with his handbrakes on.

Always doing without knowing:

Their styles or prolonging, changing speed and strength which is always present in their perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing is always done without knowing that it is false, meaningless, unnecessary and harmful.

BECAUSE STYLE OR THE STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS MUST BE UNDERTAKEN KNOWING IT IS FALSE, MEANINGLESS, UNNECESSARY AND HARMFUL AND PEOPLE NEVER KNOW THIS, THEY ARE ALWAYS DOING THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING THAT IS A RECIPE FOR STIRRING SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.

IT IS NOT SOMETIMES OR OFTEN THAT A MAN OF STYLE DOES THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING BUT ALWAYS HE IS SOMNOLENTLY DOING THINGS, FASHIONING STYLE IN WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT THEY FASHION (STYLE) IS FALSE, MEANINGLESS, UNNECESSARY AND HARMFUL.

Why style precludes heaven but not thinking, liking & disliking:

It can be understood why style precludes heaven but thinking, liking and disliking which are also harmful and false do not.

Although thinking, liking and disliking are false, harmful and meaningless, they do not impact on others do not harm others even though it harms self and so they do not preclude heavenly existence. It is only style that constantly radiates or bombards others indiscriminately with unnecessary for show force prolonging, changing speed and strength that causes others stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate that precludes.

IT IS BECAUSE STYLE BOMBARDS OTHERS WITH FORCE CHANGES THAT HARMS OTHERS THAT IT PRECLUDES THE PERSON FROM ENTERING THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN.

WHILST THINKING, LIKING AND DISLIKING ARE NOT WHOLESOME EVEN EVIL, SO LONG AS THE PERSON DOES NOT HAVE STYLE HE IS NOT RABIDLY, CONSTANTLY HARMFUL TO OTHERS. WHATEVER HARM HIS THINKING AND LIKING AND DISLIKING DOES IS TO SELF NOT OTHERS.

How can you know what you are doing?

If you are constantly using force to prolong your syllables, change speed and loudness within and between syllables and you do not know it, how can you know what you are doing?

If it is only when you have style and you know you have style, you know you are prolonging, changing speed and loudness that you know what you are doing and if you truly know what you are doing you will know it is senseless, harmful to self even if you don’t care about others.

STYLISH PEOPLE CAN HEAR THE SOUND EFFECTS OF THEIR USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS BUT THEY DO NOT KNOW THEY ARE STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS NOR DO THEY KNOW AS IT TRULY IS THAT WHAT THEY DO IS MAD, SENSELESS, HARMS THEMSELVES EVEN IF THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT OTHERS.

Safety first:

(Ministry guidelines to beef up security at business premises.)

Safety first is a (general) rule that is recorded and intended to be rehashed to be applied to situations occurring and it is false.

It is never ‘safety first’ that should dictate your response or action in any situation but it is your correct understanding of what that situation is and what the correction action is.

Thus faced with a threatening situation that has arisen, the robot applies his programmed rule, ‘safety first’ that may dictate him to ‘shoot then ask later’ or better the man who endangers others die than others should die should he attack.

ANYONE WHO AGREES AND SUBSCRIBE TO ‘SAFETY FIRST’ IS A ROBOT WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING DRIVEN BY RULES OR STANDARDIZED PROTOCOLS OF WHAT TO DO IN THREATENING SITUATIONS.

THE PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT DOES NOT HAVE THE RULE ‘SAFETY FIRST’, HE UNDERSTANDS THE SITUATION PRESENTING AND THUS UNDERSTANDING THE CORRECT RESPONSE IS OBVIOUS. YOU DON’T NEED ‘SAFETY FIRST’ TO ACT CORRECTLY TO MITIGATE POTENTIAL HARM.

Do you live above the bread, butter and jam line?

When you ask others a question there are two valid purposes: 1) You need an answer that is important or useful to you that the other person can provide you 2) the question is important for the person asked to consider and answer for himself.

THUS IF YOUR QUESTION IS NOT ESSENTIAL FOR YOURSELF TO OBTAIN THE ANSWER OR FOR THE PERSON ASKED TO CONSIDER AND PROVIDE AN ANSWER FOR HIMSELF, IT IS FRIVOLOUS AND THAT HAS SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES IN FUTURE SUFFERING FOR YOU.

HE ASKED THE QUESTION AND IF HE HAS NO INTEREST IN YOUR ANSWER OR THE QUESTION HE ASKS YOU IS NOT ESSENTIAL FOR YOU TO ANSWER THEN HE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY.

JUST BECAUSE THE TOPIC IS ABOUT THE POVERTY LINE DOES NOT MEAN HE SHOULD POSE THE QUESTION.

AS THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST SEE DANGER IN THE SLIGHTEST FAULT AND THIS IS A SERIOUS FAULT POSING FRIVOLOUS QUESTIONS FOR OTHERS TO ANSWER THAT YOU HAVE NO INTENTION OF FINDING THE ANSWER.

THE QUESTION IS A PLOY, A TACTIC TO GET READERS INTERESTED OR DRAWN INTO THE TOPIC AND THAT IS DEVIOUS OR FALSE WITH KARMA NOT MERIT.

Ploys and tactics:

Ploys and tactics are not harmless but evil and hallmarks of manipulative people with evil designs.

People say or do things not because it is necessary or intended as it is but to achieve hidden motives.

Only robots can practice ploys and tactics which are programmed actions that is conditioning so that increasingly the person resorts to ploys and tactics to get what he wants.

“Do you live above the bread and butter line” is not a genuine question but a ploy to draw readers’ interest to read his article.

PLOYS AND TACTICS ARE NEVER HARMLESS BUT CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY. YOUR PLOYS AND TACTICS WILL INCREASINGLY SEIZE YOU AND DRIVE YOU INSANE. BY ASKING A PERSONAL QUESTION HE APPEARS INTERESTED IN YOU PERSONALLY WHEN IT IS HYPOCRITICAL.

Spain rescue 'a victory for euro'

Spanish PM Mariano Rajoy says a decision by eurozone ministers to help Spain shore up its struggling banks is a "victory for the euro".

You do not need supernatural powers or to be a genius or expert to understand the nature of what happened is about, you need true understanding that is totally absent in mankind.

WHAT IS HAPPENING IS NOT TREATING AND CURING THE FINANCIAL CRISIS BUT DENIAL, REFUSAL TO RESOLVE THE CRISIS. BY PROVIDING FUNDS TO PROP UP BANKRUPT SPANISH BANKS YOU ARE ALLOWING THEM TO PRETEND THEY ARE HEALTHY AND NOT RESOLVING THEIR PROBLEMS WHICH MAY AND WILL GROW EVEN WORSE WITH DELAYED ACTION JUST LIKE A CANCER GETS WORSE WITH DELAYED TREATMENT.

AND SO IF YOU THINK MANKIND IS MEANINGFULLY ADDRESSING THE FINANCIAL CRISIS IT FACES YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT LEADS TO HELL AND THE ANIMAL WOMB. MANKIND IS STILL TRYING TO HIDE, REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PROBLEMS, TRYING TO PROP UP DEAD BANKS WITH PRINTED MONEY SO THAT THE PROBLEM FESTERS AND GETS WORSE WITH TIME.

Have ePaper will travel, says retired businessman

“I cannot travel without ePaper” is a specific to the occasion non-rehashable statement. “Have ePaper will travel” is a generalized, non-specific statement beloved of people who are robots who rehash who need recordings that can be rehashed for more situations.

Not only is it a rehashed falsely sweeping statement, it is false in meaning. You can travel without ePaper, it is not a requisite for travel and so what he says is false with karma not merit attached.

How to truly stop thinking:

When a person attains a level of concentration high enough thinking automatically stops. It is not the stopping of thinking that causes a person’s concentration to attain a certain high level.

When a person has finally succeeded in stopping thinking, it is when his mind is focussed on doing something, subsequently even when his mind is unoccupied, still he does not think.

IT IS NOT THE CESSATION OF THINKING THAT CAUSES A MIND’S CONCENTRATION TO INCREASE BUT IT IS THE INCREASED CONCENTRATION THAT CAUSES THINKING TO CEASE.

WHEN A PERSON’S CONCENTRATION REACHES A CERTAIN HIGH LEVEL HIS THINKING STOPS, FIRST WHEN HE IS DOING SOMETHING WHEN HE STOPS THINKING TO CONCENTRATE ON WHAT HE IS DOING, THEN EVEN WHEN HIS MIND IS VACANT.

WHEN HIS CONCENTRATION HAS REACHED AN EVEN HIGHER LEVEL, HE AUTOMATICALLY STOPS LIKING AND DISLIKING.

THE NEXT HIGHER LEVELS OF CONCENTRATION ARE MARKED BY NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE, NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING.

AS THE BUDDHA SAID AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF CONCENTRATION EVEN BREATHING HAS STOPPED (WITHOUT DYING).

What is concentration?

Concentration is simply the steadiness of his awareness. Even when they think they are calm, the minds of ordinary people are wavering or unsteady quite significantly. It is the force active in a mind that causes it to be unsteady or wavering and so the less his mental force stirs the more concentrated his mind is.

IT IS THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT AFFECTS NEGATIVELY ON A PERSON’S CONCENTRATION AND THE MORE A MIND IS FREED FROM HIS FORCE STIRRING THE MORE CONCENTRATED HIS MIND BECOMES.