Three evils of committing falsity:

Three evils of committing falsity:

Do not underestimate the evil and harm of falsity, falsity is like a mire that once entered leads to all kinds of difficulties, complications and suffering that is difficult even impossible for ordinary beings who lack  wisdom and discernment to exit without guidance from others.

Falsity can take the forms of telling lies (saying what did not happen happened, what happened did not happen) or fantasizing (imagining one is rich when one is poor, explaining how things work or the nature of things without knowing).

There are three concomitant evils that accompany all falsity.

1)  The person has to fabricate or copy from others what is false. Without mentally fabricating or copying falsity cannot occur. Fabricating involves manufacturing a string of visual perceptions or words or thoughts about things that did not happen or occur. This fabrication remains in the repository of his mind and can be hijacked by his mental force to be activated even against his own wish. The person who does not falsify does not fabricate and there are no copies of falsity in his mind for his mental force to seize or hijack.

2)  One has to enslave oneself to that fabrication or copied model that is false because one has to act approximately or precisely according to what that copied or fabricated falsity dictates.

3)  One has to activate force that is blind and harmful to falsely or for false and therefore no reason carry out the fabricated falsity. All activating of force is suffering and this activation of force to carry out the falsity is not only suffering but trains one’s mental force to activate for false and therefore no reason such that when it becomes well trained his mental force has strong urge to activate for false or no true reason and that is always tormenting and dangerous. And when it activates out of control it will seize on the many falsities deposited in that mind to activate them dangerously and harmfully even against his wishes.

THUS FALSITY IS NEVER HARMLESS TO SELF BUT IT IS EVEN HARMFUL IN THREE WAYS, IT REQUIRES AND TRAINS ONE’S MIND TO FABRICATE OR FALSIFY AND A COPY OF THE FALSIFICATION REMAINS IN HIS MIND THAT CAN BE HIJACKED BY HIS MENTAL FORCE, HE HAS TO TRAIN HIMSELF TO BE ENSLAVED BY HIS FALSIFICATIONS, TO CARRY OUT ACCORDING TO HIS FALSIFICATIONS AND HE IS TRAINING HIS MENTAL FORCE TO ACTIVATE FOR FALSE OR NO REASONS SUCH THAT HIS MENTAL FORCE DEVELOPS A STRONG URGE TO ACTIVATE MADLY AND THUS ACTIVATED IT WILL SEIZE COPIES OF FABRICATIONS EXISTING TO CARRY OUT DANGEROUSLY INAPPROPRIATELY.

Telling lies must always arouse self-resistance:

No matter if you are the most diehard liar and champion of lying, telling lies must be accompanied by generated self resistance that is conditioning such that in time everything said or done is attended by self-resistance.

This is because you must fabricate or copy to tell lies, you are telling yourself what is false is true, what is true is false and you must deposit a copy of your lie in your mind where it can be hijacked by your mental force, you must make yourself a slave to your lie, carry out in word and deed according to what your lie dictates and you are training your mental force to activate for false or no reasons such that in time your mental force keeps wanting to activate and when it activates it tends to latch on to the many copies of falsity lying in your mind to activate them.

NO MATTER HOW ARDENT A LIAR YOU ARE, TELLING LIES MUST AROUSE AND BE ACCOMPANIED BY SELF-RESISTANCE BECAUSE IT IS COMMITTING ONESELF TO SUFFERING, DIFFICULTY AND INSANITY. AND THIS SELF RESISTANCE IS CONDITIONING AND IS THE SOURCE OF THE STRESS THAT HOUNDS PEOPLE WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO.

NOT ONLY IS IT ALWAYS STRESSFUL TO TELL LIES, YOU ARE COMMITTING YOURSELF TO A TRAP OF SUFFERING/DIFFICULTIES, ENSLAVEMENT AND INCREASING INSANITY THAT YOU MAY NEVER ESCAPE BY YOURSELF.

Speaking for false reasons:

If your intention for saying or doing something is to please, impress, intimidate or dominate another then these are not true reasons but for false, force based reasons and so you are guilty of falsity which must generate self-resistance that leads to stress and they lead to all kinds of suffering related to practicing falsity.

IF YOUR PURPOSE IN SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING IS TO PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS, YOUR PURPOSE IS TO FALSELY, HARMFULLY STIR OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BECOME PLEASED, IMPRESSED, FEARFUL OR SUBMISSIVE AND THIS MUST LEAD TO SELF-RESISTANCE AND THENCE STRESS IN YOURSELF AND YOU ARE PRACTICING FALSITY THAT LEADS TO ALL THE SUFFERINGS OF FALSITY.

YOUR EVER PRESENT STYLE OR STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS HAS NO TRUE MEANING BUT IT IS TO STIR OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BE PLEASED, IMPRESSED, INTIMIDATED OR DOMINATED AND SO IT TOO MUST BE RESISTED AND LEAD TO SUFFERING.

Joking is not a true reason for speaking or doing:

If your purpose for saying or doing something is to make others laugh, because you falsely perceive it as funny and would like to share it with others then it is a false reason for action that ends even in insanity and hell.

IT IS THE ABIDING FALSE PERCEPTION OF A PERSON THAT HE PERCEIVES SOMETHING AS FUNNY OR JOKES AS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL. JOKING IS NOT A VALID REASON FOR SPEAKING AND SO THE JOKER IS HEADED FOR INSANITY AND TORMENT NOT SAFETY.

For Europe, a Lost Decade Looms

By JACK EWING 2:44 PM ET

Except for Germany, none of Europe’s biggest economies have returned to their pre-2008 level of output. In Spain, above, more than half of people aged 16 to 24 are jobless.

If you think ‘lost decade’ is an accurate description and correct understanding of what is happening you may be deluded.

‘Lost decade’ may be a false understanding, it makes it ‘clinical’, a matter of loss of wealth or prosperity that might have been had not this financial and economic crisis intervened when what is happening may be a descent into economic suffering that may tear the social fabric apart.

LOST DECADE IS A FALSE READING OF THOSE WHO ARE MATERIALISTIC, ONLY CONCERNED WITH THE MATERIAL LOSSES AS A RESULT OF THE FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS WHEN REALITY MAY BE QUITE DIFFERENT, IT IS NOT A LOST DECADE BUT BEGINNING OF A DESCENT INTO ECONOMIC SUFFERING EVEN SOCIAL DESTRUCTION BROUGHT ON BY A BURDEN OF DEBT THAT HAS BECOME CRUSHING.

NOT JUST EUROPE AS TOUTED IN DELUSION BUT THE WORLD IS FACED WITH THIS PROSPECT AND SO THIS IS THE VIEW OF THE DELUDED WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND TRULY WHAT IS HAPPENING.

Why lost decade is a delusion:

Lost decade implies that all the progress or economic boom leading to the recent crash was genuine, based on true fundamentals and the crash was a visitation of random horror and now through mismanagement or incompetence, political leaders failed to take measures to counter the decline.

IF THE CURRENT ECONOMIC DECLINE IS A TERMINAL COLLAPSE LIKE AN ADVANCED INCURABLE CANCER CAUSED BY WANTON ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ABUSE, THE PILING UP OF MASSIVE DEBT AND WE ARE DESCENDING INTO EVEN ABJECT ECONOMIC SUFFERING THAT MAY TEAR THE SOCIAL ORDER APART AND YOU THINK WE WERE HUMMING ALONG FINE PROGRESSING IN ECONOMIC LEAPS AND BOUNDS AND THIS IS A HICCUP THAT IS WELL REMEDIABLE BUT AS A RESULT OF POLITICAL INEPTITUDE WE ARE FACING ‘A LOST DECADE’ THEN IT IS A DELUDED PERCEPTION OF ECONOMIC REALITY.

Lost decade is a fabrication, never exists:

There is no such thing called a lost decade, it is a fabrication, a form of falsification or lying. Someone invented it eg to explain Japan’s (many not) single lost decades as a result of the property and stock market collapse of the 1980s.

Just because there is economic stagnation for years does not mean it is a lost decade.

THERE ARE THINGS THAT EXIST LIKE YOU AND ME BUT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A LOST DECADE WHICH IS A CONCEPT OR FABRICATION OR FALSIFICATION OF FALSIFYING MINDS.

EVEN IF THERE IS A DECADE OF ECONOMIC STAGNATION OR DECLINE DOES MEAN IT IS A LOST DECADE, A DECADE THAT WAS LOST OR MISSING EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSIFICATION THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.

THIS IS A COPIED WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING REHASHED TERM. HE WAS NOT THE FIRST TO USE THAT TERM AND IT CAN ONLY COME ABOUT BY COPYING.

Things that can and cannot be lost:

You can lose your money, lose your memory, lose your leg but you cannot lose a decade as implied by lost decade because despite economic adversity the decade nevertheless wended its course.

YOU NEVER LOST THE DECADE, THE DECADE WAS WITH YOU, ONLY THE ECONOMIC UPTREND WAS LOST.

IT IS A SIGN OF MUDDLED THINKING THAT IS DEADLY NEVER HARMLESS TO SPEAK OF A LOST DECADE (WHEN A DECADE CAN NEVER BE LOST BECAUSE DESPITE THE ECONOMIC MISERY THE DECADE WAS STILL PRESENT) WHEN YOU MEAN LOST PROSPERITY OR ECONOMIC PROGRESS.

LOST ECONOMIC PROGRESS IS NOT LOST DECADE AND YOU ARE COURTING MUDDLED THINKING, FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION SPEAKING THUS.

Lost prosperity not lost decade:

If what actually happened was lost prosperity and the decade was there, did not go missing then you are courting insanity trying to be too clever to impress others by talking of a lost decade when it is a case of ‘lost prosperity’.

If Japan cannot do it, what more the rest?

Japan had ‘a lost decade or a few’ after the bursting of its massive stock and property bubble but it would be dangerous to assume other nations would stumble along merely ‘lost’ as Japan did.

Japan was an export powerhouse even before it ran into trouble in a world that was booming and sucking in the goods Japan produced and its people are thrifty, save a lot in banks that the Japanese government could fritter away by borrowing and even then it merely managed to stagnate rather than pull out of its slum robustly.

Few if any of the countries now in trouble (eg Spain, Italy, UK, even America) were ever export juggernauts and so it would be a tall order asking them to do what they have never done before, export themselves out of trouble, especially in a world that is now collectively in a slump (where Japan exported into a booming world). Further the citizens of these nations are not as thrifty as the Japanese, did not have massive savings in banks that their governments can mobilize.

JAPAN ONLY MANAGED TO STAGNATE, NEVER SHRUGGED OFF THE ILL EFFECTS OF THE BURSTING OF ITS STOCK AND PROPERTY BUBBLE EVEN THOUGH IT WAS AN EXPORT JUGGERNAUT EXPORTING IN A BOOMING WORLD WITH A VORACIOUS APPETITE FOR ITS GOODS AND ITS PEOPLE ARE BIG SAVERS, THERE IS MASSIVE SAVINGS IN DOMESTIC BANKS THAT THE GOVERNMENT COULD MOBILIZE.

MOST IF NOT ALL THE COUNTRIES NOW IN BIG DEBT TROUBLE WERE NEVER PROVEN GOOD EXPORTERS AND NOW THEY ARE ASKED A TALL ORDER, TO EXPORT THEMSELVES OUT OF TROUBLE INTO A WORLD THAT IS COLLECTIVELY IN A SLUMP WHILST THEY HAVE NO MASSIVE DOMESTIC SAVINGS TO CUSHION THEM.

TALK IS EASY, DOING IS ANOTHER THING, IF EVEN JAPAN IN MORE BENIGN GLOBAL CONDITIONS COULD NOT QUITE DRAG ITSELF OUT OF ITS ECONOMIC MIRE LET ALONE SOAR ECONOMICALLY, WHAT MORE OTHERS WHO HAVE NOT PROVEN THEMSELVES BIG EXPORTERS IN A WORLD IN A COLLECTIVE SLUMP?

Prince Charles: young jobless should start firms

This is the totally unnecessary speech of a man bestowing karma to be experienced as future suffering.

Not all start ups succeed and so if someone should fail and lose considerable money even commit suicide you are to blame suggesting they start firms. And even if they should succeed, such firms have a net result of siphoning money from the system into their hands that propagates the relentless flow of wealth from the many to the few which is at the heart of the woe of society.

IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO SAY THE WISEST THING IS KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT FOR FEAR OF CREATING KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING, JESUS SAID YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY.

YOU ARE TO BLAME SHOULD PEOPLE SUFFER AS A RESULT OF FAILED FIRMS YOU SUGGEST THEY START AND EVEN IF THEIR FIRMS SUCCEED YOU ARE FOSTERING THE PLUNDER, THE CAPITALIST CREED OF ‘EVERYBODY GRAB WHAT THERE IS ON THE TABLE’.

Mind over matter

IF you believe you are a winner, you can win. (If you are a lousy player you can believe what you like, still you will not win. If you are an evil man, no matter how everyone in this world pray you go to heaven, still you will not go to heaven, the Buddha said)

This is a dangerous delusion that ordinary people either do not know what to make of or they think there is some basis, if you think you are a winner, it will assist in your quest to be a winner when there is no evidence that such wilful, force driven blind belief you are a winner or indomitable will assist your quest to win.

Winning is not a reason for doing something but if the task or activity is meaningful then undertaking and completing that activity is the rational reason. If you are undertaking the activity eg badminton to win then that is a false reason, the intention is to beat others, to show you are the best, the champion and no matter what everyone this world holds it as a valid reason to compete in badminton it is a false and mad reason to play badminton that will end in insanity and torment even if you become indisputable world champion for many years.

In their haste to obtain an unfair advantage over their adversaries, players and their coaches brainwash them that they are superior, unbeatable. Whether this has any bearing on the result cannot be objectively determined, if you are a lousy player no matter how much you brainwashed yourself, still you will not win and no matter how you brainwash yourself you are invincible, still you must train hard enough and develop enough ‘skills’ to beat your opponents.

NO MATTER HOW WELL YOU BRAINWASH YOURSELF YOU ARE INVINCIBLE, STILL YOU MUST PRACTICE AND BE GOOD ENOUGH TO BE WORLD CHAMPION AND IF YOU ARE A LOUSY PLAYER ALL THE BRAINWASHING IN THE WORLD WILL NOT MAKE YOU CHAMPION AND SO THIS MATTER OF MIND OVER MATTER IS A FABRICATION, MAKE BELIEF THAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD IN THEIR HASTE TO OBTAIN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE OVER THEIR ADVERSARIES READILY SUBSCRIBE TO NOT REALIZING THEY ARE SHACKLING THEMSELVES TO DANGEROUS DELUSIONS THAT WILL DRIVE THEM MAD AND THEY WILL HEAD TOWARDS ANOTHER ETERNITY OF WOE.

THERE IS NO NEED TO TALK ABOUT MIND OVER MATTER, SOMETHING YOU CANNOT SEE IS TRUE BUT IS A CONCOCTION OR MAKE-BELIEF THAT IS DICING IN FALSE PERCEPTION.

Jumping to bizarre conclusions:

Just because you think you will win if you think you are a winner or you adopted a positive or brainwashed attitude does not make it a case of ‘mind over matter’ as touted but it is a case for positive psychology or brainwashing.

THE CASE IS ACTUALLY ABOUT ESPOUSING THE VIRTUES OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND IT IS UNWARRANTED AND MAD TO JUMP TO THE FAR FETCHED CONCLUSION THAT IT IS A CASE OF MIND OVER MATTER.

If you do not know the truth of something but you say it, you must stir self-resistance that leads to stress.

This world has a reality that applies to everyone.

Mind over matter implies mind and matter are two separate things and it is mind that is superior or dominates matter.

Suppose this world is a creation of consciousness or mind, there is no objective separate matter that exists which is why it is possible to tell a mountain to move and it shall be done, walk on water, fly in the air, make fresh bread out nothing, to fill nets with fish were none existed previously, it is possible for objects (my CDs) to disappear and reappear, then you are speaking falsely to say mind over matter when it is a case of everything is mind only, no matter exists apart from mind.

WITHOUT KNOWING MIND AND MATTER ARE TWO SEPARATE THINGS AND IT IS MIND THAT RULES OVER MATTER YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY IT ONLY YOU WANT TO LAPSE INTO FALSITY AND STIR RESISTANCE IN YOURSELF TO WHAT YOU SAY. IF NO MATTER EXISTS APART FROM MIND, MATTER IS MIND MADE THEN IT IS FALSE TO SAY ‘MIND OVER MATTER’ BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS ‘ALL IS MIND MADE’. IT IS NOT A CASE OF MIND OVER MATTER BUT MATTER IS MADE BY MIND.

A rehashed recorded understanding:

People who do not have true specific to the occasion understanding have many recorded understandings stored in their minds which they search and retrieve to apply as appropriate to an event occurring presently.

‘Mind over matter’ is a non-specific unwarranted generalised understanding that can be stored and rehashed for future occasions.

Thus when confronted by a situation where you think it pays to have a positive attitude, to think you are a winner in your quest to beat others, you are driven to jump to the grandiose, impressive inappropriate conclusion, ‘mind over matter’ which you think is a perfect epithet of the situation when it is a totally unwarranted and inappropriate rehashed understanding of the matter at hand.

What makes possible jumping to conclusions:

It is only possible to jump to conclusions if you have readymade or pre-recorded conclusions or understandings that come into your mind, present to your mind or that you searched and found in your mental jukebox.

Thus in the case where you think or postulate that a positive attitude or perception that you are a winner helps make you win, you jump to the recorded conclusion, ‘mind over matter’. In another case where a person survives against all odds, you again jump to the recorded understanding, ‘Ahah! Mind over matter’.

If a person’s understanding is true, fresh specific to what is currently happening he can never jump to conclusion because there are no pre-existing conclusions for him to jump to.

Jumping to conclusions is something you have to train yourself to do and when well trained, when you do so all the time then jumping to conclusion becomes automatic and even irresistible.

YOU CAN NEVER JUMP TO A TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE PRESENT OCCASION UNDERSTANDING. YOU NEED PRE-EXISTING RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS IN YOUR MIND THAT PRESENT THEMSELVES SWIFTLY TO YOU OR YOU SEARCHED AND FOUND PRE-EXISTING UNDERSTANDINGS IN ORDER TO JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS.

JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS IS WHAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE WELL TRAINED AND CANNOT HELP DOING WHICH IS WHY THEY SOMETIMES MAKE A FOOL OF THEMSELVES.

The Lady's blind spot

Burma's Rohingya Muslims suffer appalling violence and discrimination, but so far Aung San Suu Kyi has been notably silent on their plight. By Jerome Taylor and Oliver Wright.

Let others decide if they want to comment or not, it is not for you say she should and to imply she is bad because she did not and so those who make such criticism is heaping karma to be experienced as suffering not acquiring merit.

JUST BECAUSE SHE HAS REMAINED SILENT INSTEAD OF SPEAKING OUT IN CONDEMNATION DOES NOT MEAN SHE IS BAD AND IF YOU THINK IT IS EXPECTED OF HER TO SPEAK UP AND SHE IS CRIMINAL IN NOT SPEAKING UP REFLECTS DELUSION AND FOOLISHLY PRESENTING YOUR NECK TO BE CHOPPED.

IT IS NOT WHAT OTHERS LEAVE UNDONE THAT YOU ARE GUILTY OF BUT IT IS WHAT YOU DO OR DO NOT DO THAT WILL DETERMINE YOUR FUTURE HAPPINESS OR SUFFERING AND SO YOU ARE A FOOLISH BUSYBODY TO BE CONCERNED BY WHAT SHE DOES OR DO NOT DO.

HERE AGAIN THEY ARE JUMPING TO (UNWARRANTED) CONCLUSIONS, IMPUTING ON HER VIRTUES FROM WHAT IS HAPPENING.

They expect:

The wise have no expectations whilst fools are full of expectations of themselves and others.

No one is a master of his expectations but he is a tormented slave of his and others’ expectations.

Thus people have expectations of Su Kyi as icon of justice and freedom to speak even ‘hit out’ at all forms of injustices or wrongdoing and when she fails to do so they attack her.

People are conscious of expectations on them and so they speak or do according to what they perceive others expect of them and so it is not true reason or understanding that is behind what they say or do but it is expectations, the scourge of expectations that make them robots of what they say or do.

YOU EXPECT OTHERS TO SAY OR DO CERTAIN THINGS, YOU ARE AWARE OF EXPECTATIONS SPOKEN OR UNSPOKEN OF YOURSELF THAT DRIVES OR IMPELS YOU TO SAY OR DO THINGS ACCORDING TO THOSE EXPECTATIONS AND SO YOU BECOME A MINDLESS ROBOT OF EXPECTATIONS. EXPECTATIONS ARE EVIL NOT GOOD, ENSLAVING NOT LIBERATING.

Expectations are rehashed understandings:

Expectations are essentially recorded rehashed understandings of what one should do or say, what others you ‘know’ are ‘expected’ or understood to say or do.

JUST AS JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS IS A MANIFESTATION OF REHASHED UNDERSTANDINGS, EXPECTATIONS IS ANOTHER FACET OF PEOPLE WHO RECORD AND REHASH UNDERSTANDINGS, THEY HAVE EXPECTATIONS OR RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS OF WHAT THEY AND OTHERS OUGHT TO SAY OR DO IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS.

What are expectations?

People think ‘of course I understand expectations’ but they are mistaken, they recognize expectations but they do not understand the true nature of expectations.

This is my understanding of expectations and if others’ understanding differ then if I am right they are all wrong.

Expectations are preconceived notions (that means they are recorded and rehashed to be applied to a current situation) about how things will happen or turn out, how others will behave (say or do).

This means the person has rehashed understandings just as everything he says or does is rehashed. Indeed even what and how he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touch is also programmed by rehash.

Not only do ordinary people have expectations but they are far more widespread and unconscious than they realize or know, they are in truth rehashing their understandings all the time and on occasions when things don’t meet their expectations or they rehashed the wrong expectations, they become disturbed, puzzled even panicky that things do not go according to plans or prediction.

Whatever understandings that are recorded and re-applied to a current situation is never true but false, it must be standardized or generalized so that they are applicable to many situations with similarities. Expectations are dangerous because reality never conform to expectations but the deception of expectations exposes the person to danger even death.

The person of true understanding never resorts to or refers to expectations to understand what is happening at the moment, he pays attention and because he sees truly, calmly and completely he understands exactly what is happening and then he composes an action or speech specifically freshly for that occasion.

EXPECTATIONS ARE RECORDED PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS OR UNDERSTANDINGS OF EVENTS THAT ARE REHASHED TO BE APPLIED TO CURRENT SITUATIONS AND IT MEANS THE PERSON DOES NOT HAVE TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION UNDERSTANDING BUT HE HAS FALSE RECORDED REHASHED STANDARDIZED EXPLANATIONS OR UNDERSTANDING OF EVENTS. EXPECTATIONS ARE NEVER PART TIME BUT IT IS THE DEFAULT WAY OF UNDERSTANDING.

A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING NEVER RESORTS TO EXPECTATIONS, HE NEVER ALLOWS EXPECTATION TO USURP HIS TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS HAPPENING AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE A PERSON RULED BY EXPECTATION COULD ALSO POSSESS TRUE UNDERSTANDING.

(Is there anyone who has or can define or explain expectation as I have done? If I am correct then all other explanations are wrong and they don’t understand expectations.)

Rate cuts lift China home prices

How can rate cuts instantly lift home prices except that it is by expectations or jumping to conclusions?

Greedy expectant jumping to conclusion people or robots receive the news of a rate cut and they jump to the conclusion or expectation or recorded understanding that this will stimulate the property market and so sellers will raise their selling prices and buyers will be lulled to bid higher for the houses.

THUS THE LIFTING OF HOME PRICES IF IT IS TRUE ON THE BASIS OF RATE CUTS IS A FORM OF ACTION BASED ON EXPECTATIONS (NOT REALITY) & DANGEROUS JUMPING TO (PRECONCIEVED) CONCLUSION AND SO IT IS ANOTHER UNWITTING EXAMPLE OF EXPECTATIONS AND JUMPING TO CONCLUSION AT WORK.

Is the real Mitt Romney about to stand up?

If there is no possibility of the real Mitt Romney showing up because there never was a real Mitt anyway then you are speaking falsely with future suffering due.

The vast majority of people are just putting on shows they are like empty carton boxes attractive and nicely painted outside but empty inside and since it is empty, there is nothing to stand up.

THE VAST MAJORITY OF STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE EMPTY BOXES, VERY NICE AND ATTRACTIVE AND DONE UP ON THE OUTSIDE BUT EMPTY INSIDE, YOU WILL NOT FIND ANYTHING OF SUBSTANCE INSIDE AND IF THAT IS THE CASE AND YOU ASK IF THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF THE REAL SO AND SO TURNING UP THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND THAT IS THE PATH TO WOE NEVER HAPPINESS.

It is just a change of tune not real Mitt turning up:

That Mitt Romney will delve or revert to his Mormon roots is not a case of the real Mitt turning up but a change of tune, if it happens it must be a calculated ploy that he or his handlers think will advantage him in his quest to be president.

THAT MITT ROMNEY WILL MANIFEST OR DISPLAY HIS MORMON ROOTS IS NOT A CASE OF THE REAL MITT TURNING UP BUT IT IS A CASE OF CHANGING SUITS, CHANGING TUNE USUALLY PREMEDITATED, CALCULATED FOR SELF-ADVANTAGE.

IF SOMETHING IS JUST A CASE OF A CHANGE OF SUITS OR CLOTHES AND YOU THINK IT IS A CASE OF SHOWING YOUR TRUE COLOURS THEN YOU ARE MISTAKEN, YOU UNDERSTOOD WRONGLY THAT HAS SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES IN TERMS OF FUTURE SUFFERING.

Which is more likely?

By implication you mean the present Mitt Romney is not real and you are speculating if the real Mitt will now stand up.

It is much more easier and possible for Mitt to change to a new set of clothes for the sake of his presidential ambitions then for the ‘real him’ to stand up.

THIS WORLD IS NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THE ‘REAL’ YOU, IT IS ALL ABOUT SHOW AND WHAT IS IN IT FOR ME, PROTECTION OF VESTED INTERESTS AND IN ORDER TO BECOME PRESIDENT, IF THAT IS YOUR AIM, IT IS NOT ABOUT REVEALING THE REAL YOU BUT DOING AND SAYING WHAT WILL GET YOU ELECTED AND SO IF YOU THINK YOUR CURRENT PLOY IS NOT WORKING THEN IT IS A MATTER OF CHANGING TO A NEW SET OF CLOTHES RATHER THAN STRIPPING OFF YOUR CLOTHES TO EXPOSE THE NAKED OR REAL MITT.

THE REAL MITT CANNOT STAND UP BECAUSE IT WOULD EXPOSE BARE SHARP LONG FANGS AND TOO MUCH SHIT FOR THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT.

EXACTLY WHO THE REAL MITT ROMNEY IS CAN BE KNOWN AND IF HE WERE TO REVEAL WHAT HE HAS DONE IN HIS PAST EG HOW HE GOT RICH, IT WOULD BE THE END OF HIS AMBITIONS AND SO THE REAL MITT CAN NEVER STAND UP. 

Most people cannot take down their masks or open their closets:

If you interact with the world through a mask or you have a closed closet that have things hidden (skeletons), then in order for the real you to stand up you must take down that mask or open that closet for others to see what is in it.

Without taking down that mask or opening the closet how can you say the real you has stood up?

But most people cannot take down that mask because behind their immaculate poised smiles lie sharp long fangs and their closets have skeletons, exactly how Mitt got to be so rich can be known and if it is told, it will turn off many voters.

BY IMPLICATION YOU SAY THE CURRENT MITT IS NOT REAL, HE IS PUTTING ON A SHOW OR HIDING BEHIND A MASK.

AND SO IF THE REAL MITT IS TO STAND UP AS YOU SUGGEST AS A POSSIBILITY (WHEN IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE), HE MUST TAKE DOWN HIS MASK AND OPEN HIS CLOSET FOR INSPECTION.

BUT HE CANNOT TAKE DOWN HIS MASK BECAUSE THAT WOULD EXPOSE LONG SHARP FANGS AND IF HE WERE TO OPEN HIS CLOSET THERE WOULD BE TERRIBLE SKELETONS TO SEE.

THUS IF THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF THE REAL MITT STANDING UP, WHAT IS HAPPENING IS A CONVENIENT, CALCULATED CHANGE OF CLOTHES THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND GUILTY OF MISLEADING OTHERS WITH KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING TO SPEAK OF THE REAL MITT STANDING UP.

Impossible for the real Mitt to stand up:

The real Mitt Romney exists but it is impossible for him to turn up.

Anyone with style or objectively determinable force prolonging, changing speed and strength is a fake, a rehasher, an actor putting on a show not a real person.

For one who sees correctly Mitt Romney falls into that category, he is a full and consummate actor putting on a show.

In order for the true Mitt to stand up, he must be shorn off his style, without shedding his style any talk of being real is hypocritical, delusional.

EVEN THOUGH IT IS POSSIBLE FOR MITT ROMNEY TO SHED HIS STYLE, IT IS AS GOOD AS IMPOSSIBLE THAT BY HIMSELF HE COULD OR WOULD SHED HIS STYLE THAT MANDATES A PUTTING ON A SHOW EXISTENCE.

IT IS NOT FOR YOU OR ANYONE TO ARBITRARILY DETERMINE WHEN THE REAL MITT HAS STOOD UP BUT IT IS OBJECTIVE, ONLY TRUE THAT THE REAL MITT HAS STOOD UP IF HE HAS BEEN SHORN OFF HIS STYLE SO THAT HE IS NO LONGER PUTTING ON A SHOW AND ALTHOUGH THAT IS POSSIBLE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT IT WILL OCCUR IN THE NEAR FUTURE, IN THIS LIFETIME.

Jalan Tanjung closed

BARELY a day after the long-barricaded Jalan Tanjung in Bandar Utama, Petaling Jaya, was re-opened to traffic, StarMetro received calls and emails from road users saying that the road has been closed again.

Those who are responsible are incurring deadly karma and those who see nothing wrong or see it as right are deluded and headed for woe.

It is out of selfishness without consideration or sharing that the road is closed. If anyone understood what the Buddha taught, he will share everything rather than hoard something (access to a road) for the sake of one’s own convenience depriving others of the ease of use.

This was said by the Blessed One: "If beings knew, as I know, the results of giving & sharing, they would not eat without have given, nor would the stain of selfishness overcome their minds. Even if it were their last bite, their last mouthful, they would not eat without having shared, if there were someone to receive their gift. But because beings do not know, as I know, the results of giving & sharing, they eat without have given. The stain of selfishness overcomes their minds."

If beings knew what the Great Seer said,
how the result of sharing has such great fruit,
then, subduing the stain of selfishness
with brightened awareness,
they'd give in season to the noble ones,
where a gift bears great fruit.
Having given food as an offering
to those worthy of offerings, many donors,
when they pass away from here,
the human state, go to heaven.
They, having gone there to heaven, rejoice,
enjoying sensual pleasures.
Unselfish, they partake of the result of sharing.

Romney calls for Akin to drop out

There are true or false reasons for making the call, it does not necessarily reflect devotion to truth and goodness.

You can call for Akin to drop out because he is deluded or talks nonsense which is harmful for someone who desires to hold public office or you can call for him to drop out because he is a liability, he will lose to a Democrat opponent and he negatively reflects on the Republican party of which you are part of. These are false, calculated reasons that if it is the basis of your call, will end in your insanity.

IF THE BASIS OF YOUR ACTIONS IS FALSE THEN THE ENDPOINT IS INSANITY. ONLY PERSON WHOSE ACTIONS ARE BASED ON TRUE OR GOOD REASONS WILL NOT END UP INSANE. THUS IF YOUR CALL IS SO THAT REPUBLICANS STAND A CHANCE IN THE SEAT AKIN CONTESTS OR TO COUNTER NEGATIVE PUBLICITY ON THE REPUBLICANS THEN YOU ARE ASKING FOR INSANITY.

Star is caught devouring planet

What is said may be an accurate depiction of the truth or it may be far from the truth.

If it is a case of ‘planet seen falling into its star’, there is no catching nor devouring involved then you are guilty of falsity saying so and you are gullible and deluded accepting it as truth.

The plot thickens:

There is no need to talk about plots thickening nor does it exists in reality but it is a fabrication that is remembered, copied from others and rehashed because it sounds impressive or intriguing. Because it is false the person and those who accept as correct are dicing with insanity.

‘Plot thickening’ is a nonspecific generalized rote understanding of something that can be remembered and rehashed for many different occasions. There is no need to divert self and others to plot thickening, just go to the heart of the matter, why there are discrepancies in the readings of the job market where some measures seem to suggest recovery whilst others point to the opposite.

IN THEIR DRIVE OR DESIRE TO IMPRESS OTHERS, TO MAKE THINGS ‘INTERESTING’ PEOPLE RESORT TO COPIED NONSPECIFIC PHRASES THAT ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND IRRELEVANT TO THE SITUATION. THERE IS NO PLOT AT ALL NOR IS IT THICKENING EXCEPT AS A FIGMENT OF HER IMAGINATION THAT SHE WANTS TO IMPLANT IN GULLIBLE READERS, WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTING SIGNALS IN THE JOBS DATA THAT MAY BE RESOLVABLE. AND SO ‘JOBS THICKENING IS A FALSE REHASHED UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS HAPPENING’.

In the Chancellor of the Exchequer we do not trust

The deluded person who does not know he puts a terrible noose of future suffering around his neck is proud of the truth of what he proclaims above when it is deadly wrong.

You have no right to speak for others ‘we do not trust’ and so you are asking for punishment.

This is divisive speech that sows discord and attacks the Chancellor.

If the Chancellor is powerless to deliver what you want and you think he can but won’t then you have a wrong perception that ends in insanity. If it is financial cancer and no chancellor can cure financial cancer then you are a fool attacking him.

It is not a matter of trusting him or anyone but what is he doing that is wrong and what do you think is the correct thing to do?

IF IT IS A MATTER OF WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG, THEN YOU ARE A FOOL BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE SPEAKING OF TRUST.

Trust is dangerous and evil:

The nature of everyone is there for anyone to see and it is his false perception that makes a person unable to see the true nature of another.

No matter how a person may try to disguise himself as a wolf in sheep’s clothes, it is discernible to one who sees correctly.

Trust only applies to a person who is unable to see the true nature of others but is nevertheless eager or desirous for material reasons to accept him as bona fide or benevolent, accept without knowing what the other person proposes.

THE PERSON DEVOTED TO TRUTH DOES NOT RESORT TO TRUSTING OTHERS, IT IS LAPSING INTO FALSITY AND EVIL. BECAUSE HE IS DEVOTED TO TRUTH, HE SEES THE TRUTH OF OTHERS AND SO THE MATTER OF TRUSTING OR NOT TRUSTING OTHERS DOES NOT ARISE, DOES NOT APPLY. YOU SEE CORRECTLY THE PERSON AS A WOLF IN SHEEP CLOTHES, SO THE MATTER OF TRUSTING OR NOT TRUSTING HIM DOES NOT ARISE.

THUS BY SAYING ‘IN THE CHANCELLOR WE DO NOT TRUST’ YOU ARE FOOLISHLY ACKNOWLEDGING YOUR INABILITY TO SEE OTHERS TRULY, YOU ARE ADVOCATING THE USE OF FORCE ACCORDING TO A PLAN TO EITHER TRUST OR DISTRUST ANOTHER WHEN THE MATTER IS TO SEE THE OTHER PERSON AS WHAT HE TRULY IS.

Firms still facing 'huge’ funding shortfall

 

Fewer than one in 10 small businesses applying for finance over the past year succeeded in gaining the amount they applied for, a survey of 1,000 firms has found.

There have been accusations that banks are withholding funds that governments pumped into the banking system by ‘quantitative easing’, many credit worthy (small) businesses are deprived of funding yet everyone seem clueless as why this may be the case.

It may be the case that notwithstanding the massive quantitative easing, the debt hole or burden in the banking system dwarfs what was pumped in, much more need to be pumped in for banks to have ‘surplus’ money to lend to customers.

In any case, any business that needs funding to continue is living beyond its means and so the scale of living beyond means has been seriously underestimated.

IF ‘HEALTHY’ BUSINESSES NEED CREDIT OR BORROWING TO CONTINUE, EVEN IF IT IS FULLY CAPABLE OF REPAYING, IT IS STILL DEPENDENT ON DEBT TO SURVIVE AND THEREFORE LIVING BEYOND ITS MEANS OR LIVING DANGEROUSLY. IT INDICATES THAT MODERN BUSINESS IS LIVING BEYOND MEANS, ADDICTED TO DEBT FAR MORE THAN CONCEDED.

Why still not enough?

Massive amounts of money has been pumped into the system through the euphemistic quantitative easing, so why is credit still tight?

1)  The debt burden in the system is massive, what has been massively pumped into the system was enough to stave off collapse not restore it to health.

2)  The appetite or demand for credit or borrowing in the system is massive, too many companies and people are dependent on borrowing to survive or keep their business going and because the available credit is far outstripped by the demand, credit remains tight or insufficient.

Poetic justice:

You hear ‘poetic justice’ being bandied or cited regularly and it is a false copied rehashed understanding of things happening. There is nothing poetic about justice except in the figment of the imagination or delusion of the subscriber.

Poetry is not about substance but style, poetry is playing with words just as art is playing with figures, if something is true it is not poetry, if something is poetry it is not the truth but playing with words.

Because poetry is false, it is about style not substance designed to stir mental force or emotion or impress, justice can never be truly poetic. It can be falsely poetic never truly poetic and so you are speaking falsely talking about ‘poetic justice’.

Apple is not overvalued ... yet

Anyone who says this is foolishly unnecessarily putting a noose around his neck even many times because if others buy what he says and buys Apple and loses, he is responsible for their losses.

Apple’s current PE is 14.6. Its profits has been soaring in recent years and so it has not always earned so much for many years, whether it can be sustained or it will decline cannot be determined. And so based on older earnings, current PE is even higher. Granted, Apple has cash reserves and other assets, this is still a very high asking price to sell and you must be quite greedy and indifferent to risk to buy at this price.

NOT WITHOUT REASON DOES A PERSON SAY SO, HE IS TRYING TO JUSTIFY APPLE’S PRICE PERHAPS FOR SELF OR APPLE GAIN. WHAT HE DOES NOT REALIZE IS THAT HE IS ENCOURAGING HEEDLESSNESS. MICROSOFT WAS A PAST DARLING BUT NOW ITS STOCKS ARE MUCH LESS VAUNTED. THE BEATLES FOR ALL THEIR GREATNESS LASTED BARELY 10 YEARS.

Whatever happened to Apple TV?

If you speak without understanding what you speak you must speak with self-resistance that leads to stress and conditions you to speak with self-resistance active.

When you say ‘whatever’ happened it means you don’t care what happened to Apple TV but still you want others to tell you.

You are practicing controlled insanity, generating conflict in yourself by saying you want to know but you don’t care what happened (whatever) to Apple.

PEOPLE HAVE A PERVERTED PERCEPTION THAT IT IS FUNNY OR CUTE OR THEY ARE BEING CLEVER ASKING WHATEVER HAPPENED INSTEAD OF ‘WHAT HAPPENED’ WHEN THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY SAYING THEY DON’T CARE (WHATEVER) BUT STILL THEY WANT YOU TO TELL THEM WHAT HAPPENED TO APPLE TV.

Akin rebukes party bosses

A Republican candidate under fire for saying women's bodies can prevent pregnancy in rape cases has lashed out at party bosses who want him to quit.

Congressman Todd Akin said it was not right for the party establishment to over-ride Missouri voters who had picked him to run for the Senate.

In a new fundraising appeal, Mr Akin claims "the liberal elite" are trying to take down a "pro-life conservative

Party bosses asked Akin to step down for wrong vested self-interests because Akin is seen as a liability than asset. Akin is wrong to attack his Republican bosses and cite the liberal elite trying to take down a conservative.

THUS THE REPUBLICAN LEADERS HAVE FALSE REASONS FOR ASKING AKIN’S DEPARTURE AND AKIN HAS FALSE REASON (LIBERAL REPUBLICANS TRYING TO TAKE DOWN A CONSERVATIVE) IN REFUSING TO RELENT.

THE TRUE (THAT IS FALSE) REASONS FOR ASKING AKIN TO STEP DOWN IS BECAUSE HE IS NOW A LIABILITY THAN ASSET, LEADERS ARE PROTECTING SELF INTERESTS AND THE TRUE REASON AKIN REFUSES TO STEP DOWN IS BECAUSE OF AMBITION AND MATERIAL LOSSES AT STAKE FOR HIM.

BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTING ON FALSE NOT TRUE REASONS THEY ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY. THEY BETRAY NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE MATTER IS ABOUT, WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG.

DON’T REBUKE OR ATTACK THE REPUBLICAN BOSSES AND IT MAY NOT BE A MATTER OF LIBERALS VS CONSERVATIVES BUT PROTECTION OF VESTED INTERESTS THAT IS A FALSE REASON FOR ASKING AKIN TO STEP DOWN. AKIN NEVER SAID THE LEADERS WERE WRONG TO ASK HIM TO RESIGN BECAUSE HE HAS BECOME A LIABILITY AND SO HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE MATTER.

THE TRUE REASON FOR ASKING AKIN TO STEP DOWN IS THAT HIS STATEMENT BETRAYS DELUSION AND BIAS AGAINST WOMEN. THE LEADERS DID NOT CITE WHAT IS WRONG BUT THEY ARE PROTECTING THEIR SELF INTERESTS IN THEIR CALLS AND SO THEY DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND THE MATTER.

Both sides cannot come clean:

Akin cannot come clean and accuse his leaders of abandoning him because he is now a liability because that would be acknowledging that he has made a fool of himself, besmirched himself with what he said so he looks for scapegoats, liberals trying to take down a conservative.

Republican leaders cannot come clean to state that they want Akin to step down because he is now a liability because that would redound negatively on them and so they act pious, it is for the sake of the people that Akin should step down.

BOTH SIDES CANNOT COME CLEAN AND SO THEY RESORT TO A SHENANIGAN OR CHARADE.