Building a better Singapore is not a valid reason for boosting
Singapore’s population and so it is delusion to speak thus. People’s existence
becomes subservient to the needs of the state.
It reflects a calculating nature which is a form of programming and the
person is a robot to (restlessly) entertain such thoughts and worries.
It is a recipe for disaster to keep planning the future in terms of gain
and loss, your life and the nation’s future become planned in which you and
citizens become mechanical robots living out plans.
IT IS NOT A BETTER MATERIAL SINGAPORE THAT YOU SHOULD BUILD BUT YOU
SHOULD SEEK A SINGAPORE THAT IS HAPPY AND A PLEASANT PLACE TO ABIDE IN. EXACTLY
WHAT THAT BETTER SINGAPORE YOU HAVE IN MIND CAN BE KNOWN AND IF IT IS HIGH TECH
WITH HIGH (MATERIAL LIVING STANDARDS) WHERE PEOPLE ARE MATERIALISTIC AND SELF
CENTRED THEN YOU ARE BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE AND THAT POPULATION THAT YOU
THINK IS THE KEY TO BUILDING A BETTER MATERIALISTIC SINGAPORE IS SIMILARLY DELUDED.
Joke
fulfilled fatally for mechanic:
Jokes are not fun or good but evil and celebrating evil and so you may
or will be called to pay for the jokes you crack either sooner than you realize
or later when you have long forgotten.
MANY DON’T EVEN REALIZE THEY ARE JOKERS AND THEY THINK JOKES IS GOOD
CLEAN FUN. WHEN THE NOOSE OF YOUR JOKE TIGHTENS AROUND YOUR NECK YOU WILL WEEP.
JESUS SAID WOE TO YOU WHO LAUGHS FOR YOU SHALL WEEP.
Girl
power and manpower:
The three
sisters who helped change Chinese history
Just because three sisters helped to change Chinese history (which may
not be that monumental) does not warrant the conclusion ‘girl power’. This is
not harmless but dangerous jumping to false conclusion that may even prove
fatal one day.
WHETHER THE GIRLS’ ACHIEVEMENTS WERE THAT GREAT MAY BE HYPE THAN
REALITY. JUST BECAUSE 3 GIRLS HELPED (NOT CHANGED) CHANGE CHINESE HISTORY
DOES NOT WARRANT THE CONCLUSION ‘GIRL POWER’ WHICH IS DANGEROUS JUMPING TO
FALSE CONCLUSIONS IN THE NAME OF EXAGGERATION.
DRIVEN AND BLINDED BY STIRRED EMOTION PEOPLE SAY FALSE THINGS THAT
COMMIT THEMSELVES TO INSANITY.
This question may be thoroughly deluded and reflects no understanding of
what actually happened.
If Spain was never on the right path in the first place then it is not a
case of what went wrong but what is wrong in Spain.
HUMANITY, OF WHICH SPAIN IS PART OF, WAS NEVER ON THE RIGHT PATH EVEN IN
FINANCIAL OR ECONOMIC MATTERS, ITS PERCEPTION AND APPROACH TO FINANCE AND THE ECONOMY WAS
TOTALLY DELUDED AND SO IT IS NEVER A CASE OF WHAT WENT WRONG BUT WHAT IS WRONG
WITH SPAIN AND HUMANITY IN TERMS OF FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC MATTERS.
What
went wrong with America?
For one who understands rightly, America was never on the right track
economically, the capitalist system is brutal, cut throat, everyone for himself
grab and plunder. It was wrong which was why it ended with the Great Depression
and it recovered not so much as a result of mankind’s reform or genius but
because the population was still young and low with room for much expansion and
there were still plenty of earth resources to rape and now mankind and the
earth has come to the end of the line, exhausted and run to the ground.
AMERICA WAS NEVER RIGHT IN THE FIRST PLACE, THE ECONOMY AND FINANCE WAS
ABUSIVE, CUT THROAT AND WHAT WAS WRONG MERELY ACCELERATED IN SPEED AND SEVERITY
IN RECENT YEARS AND SO IT REFLECTS NO UNDERSTANDING TO SPEAK OF WHAT WENT WRONG
WITH AMERICA AS IF IT WAS EVER RIGHT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Upstairs
downstairs:
Most of the money rich people and rich companies spend (eg buying
expensive cars and condos) go to other rich people and so the money is
transferred from the hands of one rich to another, little of it trickle down to
those downstairs, the masses. When a rich person or company goes bankrupt, the
money lost do not go to the masses but it goes to the hands of another rich
person or company.
WITH TIME BECAUSE OF THE INTRINSIC UNFAIRNESS OF THE SYSTEM AND THE RICH
CONTROL THE POLITICAL POWERS OF THE SYSTEM, MORE AND MORE WEALTH IS TRANSFERRED
FROM THE MASSES OR SYSTEM TO THE HANDS OF THE PRIVILEGED RICH AND POWERFUL FEW.
WHEN THE RICH SPEND, MOST OF THE MONEY IS TRANSFERRED AMONGST THEMSELVES,
LITTLE OF IT GOES DOWNSTAIRS TO THE MASSES. WHEN THE RICH BECOME BANKRUPT,
LITTLE OF THE MONEY GOES TO THE MASSES BUT IT IS PASSED ON FROM ONE RICH MAN TO
ANOTHER RICH MAN.
JUST LIKE OIL AND WATER DON’T MIX, THE RICH AND THE POOR DO NOT MIX
EXCEPT MINIMALLY AT THE BOUNDARY. MORE AND MORE WEALTH ACCRUES TO THE RICH WITH
TIME AND IT STAYS THERE, VERY LITTLE RETURN TO THE MASSES. IT IS TO BE EXPECTED
THAT MASS UNREST AND ANARCHY WILL THEN RESULT.
He is expressing outrage but it is self-centred concerned about damage
done to his image as a cyclist and his profession then whether what has
happened was right or wrong.
THE RELEVANT MATTER IS ABOUT WHETHER THE DOPING WAS RIGHT OR WRONG NOT
WHAT DAMAGE IN PRESTIGE YOU SUSTAINED AS
A FELLOW CYCLIST OR WHAT DAMAGE CYCLING THAT YOU IDENTIFY WITH HAS SUSTAINED.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE ONLY CONCERNED WITH THEMSELVES, WHAT IS AT STAKE FOR
THEMSELVES, NOT WHETHER SOMETHING IS RIGHT OR WRONG.
The
reason Steve Jobs speaks nonsense:
The reason Steve Jobs speaks nonsense is self-promotion.
There are those who think Steve Jobs can do or say no wrong but they are
deluded because rather than prescient Steve Jobs have spoken much rubbish that
he will be judged for.
When he introduced the iPad he hyped ‘the post PC era has begun’.
There is no such thing as the post PC era nor has it ever begun because
the PC era though diminished is still with us and will remain with us for a
long time because there is still no substitute for it. Just as medicine has
branched off into specialties and subspecialties, the computer has branched off
and there are specialties like handphones, tablets, ultrabooks and massive
laptops, all in one desktops, mini desktops and full-fledged desktops.
IT IS NOT WITH REASON THAT STEVE JOBS SAID ‘THE POST PC ERA HAS BEGUN’
WHEN HE LAUNCHED THE IPAD BUT IT IS WITH EMOTION TO EXAGGERATE THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE IPAD WITH WHICH HE IS ATTACHED TO, ASSOCIATED WITH IN CONTRAST TO HIS
COMPETITORS AND HE WANTS TO CON PEOPLE TO BUY IT.
HIS REACTION TO THE INTRODUCTION OF THE 7 INCH TABLET WAS ‘DEAD ON
ARRIVAL’ BUT IT LOOKS LIKE GREEDY APPLE IS GOING TO EAT ITS OWN WORDS BY
LAUNCHING A SMALLER IPAD TO ‘TAP INTO’ THAT LUCRATIVE MARKET.
Now Microsoft may be set to prove Apple or Steve Jobs wrong again in dismissing
the convergence between the touch interface and PC computing by launching
Windows 8 which may force Apple to copy.
There are advantages of merging the touch interface with the desktop
environment in a PC or tablet which can handle desktop functions. Adding the
touch interface will boost the versatility of laptops and so Apple’s laptops
run the risk of losing out if they don’t incorporate touch to their laptops in
following the trend set by Microsoft and Intel.
THE ADDING OF TOUCH TO LAPTOPS AND DESKTOPS AND THE EMERGENCE OF TABLETS
WITH ENHANCED DESKTOP CAPABILITIES, THE MARRIAGE OF THE DESKTOP AND MOBILE
OPERATING SYSTEM IN WINDOWS 8 MAY PROVE THAT APPLE IS NOT ALWAYS PRESCIENT BUT
MAY MISS THE BOAT THROUGH ARROGANCE/CONCEIT AND DELUSION.
Post
PC era is a fabrication, delusion:
Post PC era touted by Steve Jobs is never something that exists like you
and me but it is a fabrication which is always false created by deluded people
who imagine so well they think they see things that do not exist and see them
as true when they are phantoms that are dangerous because they end in confusion
and insanity.
EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS THINKING AND JUGGLING WITH WORDS AND
THOUGHTS THAT GET THROWN UP BY THEIR RESTLESS MINDS AND THEY LIKE CERTAIN COMBO
OF WORDS THAT GET THROWN UP EG ‘POST PC ERA’ AND SO THEY DWELL ON IT, IT
BECOMES MORE AND MORE REAL AND THEY ARE CONVINCED POST PC ERA HAS BEGUN AND IT
IS TRUE AND REAL. THE PC ERA IS VERY MUCH STILL WITH US AND THERE IS NO
POTENTIAL SUBSTITUTE FOR IT.
THE ARM CHIP THAT IS THE BASIS OF MOBILE COMPUTING MAY HAVE ITS VIRTUES
BUT IT MAY NEVER SUBSTITUTE THE X86 INTEL/AMD CHIP AND SO THERE IS NO QUESTION
OF MOBILE COMPUTING KILLING OFF DESKTOPS.
Steve
Jobs is about hits and misses never truth:
Steve Jobs is about ‘hits and misses’ never hits and no misses and never about
truth but what works to make money for him and Apple.
Even when Steve Jobs scores hits as with iPhone or iPad, it is not about
truth or good but products that make him and Apple a lot of money, products that
are popular not true or good.
In truth a lot of the gadgets on iPhone or Android are frivolous and you
do not need all the bloated functions of a hand phone which most people seldom
call upon to use anyway. Just because the iPhone is a hit does not mean it is
good and correct, just people may people buy it does not mean they are correct,
if they are deluded then it is popular by delusion not truth.
STEVE JOBS IS ABOUT HITS AND MISSES NEVER HITS AND NO MISSES AND HITS IS
NOT ABOUT BEING CORRECT OR TRUE BUT IT IS ABOUT INTRODUCING GADGETS THAT SELL
TO PEOPLE WHO ARE DELUDED AND GULLIBLE LIKE SELLING CANDY TO CHILDREN, WHAT HAS
THAT GOT TO DO WITH BEING RIGHT AND TRUE?
Steve
Jobs is the candy man and people the children:
Rather than the wise benevolent sage he is made out to be, Steve Jobs
may be the cunning candy man coming up with flavours, tinkering to produce new
combinations of the same old stuff to feed the fancies of gullible children
hooked on candies.
Not always does he come up with flavours that hit and even if they are
hits, they have nothing to do with meaning and reason but vehicles for
consumption and exchange of money or wealth from the consumer to the money
sucking multinational.
What
is your purpose for making the iPhone?
No matter how you may disguise or deny your true purposes for making the
iPhone, it can be known if not by you then by God and cannot be denied.
If your purpose for making the iPhone is to benefit the people, to
invent something that is useful then that is a correct or praiseworthy motive.
If your purpose for making the iPhone is to make money, to wrest market
share from others, to hook consumers to keep buying excessively by frequently
frivolous updates then these are false reasons that result in karma and you are
evil, not good, even if your product serves (some) useful function.
EVEN IF YOUR PRODUCT IS AN INNOVATION THAT SERVES SOME USEFUL NEW
FUNCTIONS, IF YOUR PURPOSE IS TO MAKE MONEY, TO ADDICT CONSUMERS AND WREST
MARKET SHARE FROM OTHERS, THEN YOU ARE AN EVIL MAN DEVOTED TO YOUR OWN MATERIAL
(NOT SPIRITUAL) ADVANTAGE.
THE USEFUL AND MEANINGFUL FUNCTIONS OF A HANDPHONE ARE FAR FEWER THAN
FRIVOLOUS, MEANINGLESS FUNCTIONS (EG PLAYING GAMES, LISTENING TO MUSIC) AND
EVEN THOSE FEW USEFUL FUNCTIONS ARE ABUSED (EG CALLING FRIENDS FOR CHATS
INSTEAD OF USEFUL COMMUNICATIONS. THUS THE IMPORTANCE AND USE OF A HANDPHONE IS
MUCH HYPED. SELDOM IS THE HANDPHONE USED FOR TRUE OR GENUINE PURPOSES BUT THEY
USED ABUSIVELY FOR FRIVOLOUS HARMFUL PURPOSES AND SO THE IMPORTANCE OF AN
HANDPHONE IS MUCH OVERRATED AND FALSELY WORSHIPPED.
This is not a slight but massive deficit nor is this the first deficit
but year after year the US government is operating on serious deficits partly
funded by the savings of other nations (like China and Japan) and the world
(multinationals who buy US bonds).
What this deficit says is that the US government is living way beyond
its means and yet you have people telling the US to continue spending beyond
its means to support the economy because it is bad.
THE US GOVERNMENT HAS TWO RATIONAL CHOICES: CUT SPENDING OR RAISE TAXES
TO FUND ITS EXCESSIVE SPENDING OTHERWISE SUCH HUGE DEFICITS WILL END IN
COLLAPSE AND SOCIAL DESTRUCTION FROM MASS UNEMPLOYMENT AND FAMINE.
IT REFLECTS NO UNDERSTANDING (DELUSION) AND HEEDLESS RECKLESSNESS ON
HUMAN PART TO HAVE ALLOWED SUCH LIVING BEYOND MEANS TO REACH SUCH LEVELS FUNDED
BY BORROWING FROM THE SAVINGS OF THE WORLD. EITHER THE US GOVERNMENT
DRASTICALLY CUT SPENDING OR IT MUST RAISE TAXES DRASTICALLY TO BALANCE AND EVEN
THEN IT IS A VERY TALL ORDER TO BALANCE ITS FINANCES.
$1
Trillion US deficit for fourth year:
The federal budget deficit has topped
$1 trillion for a fourth straight year. But a modest improvement in
economic growth helped narrow the gap by $207 billion compared with last year.The Treasury Department said Friday that the deficit for the 2012 budget year totaled $1.1 trillion. Tax revenue rose 6.4 percent from last year to more than $2.4 trillion, helping contain the deficit.
$1 trillion is $1000 billion and for 4 years the US has been deficit
funding its unnecessary activities like Armed Forces, foreign ventures (Afghan
and Iraq) and space programs like missions to Mars.
WHAT THIS TELLS THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE US IS IN
BIG FINANCIAL TROUBLE DESPERATELY TRYING TO STAY AFLOAT IN DANGER OF SINKING OR
DROWNING IN DEBT WITHOUT TRACE.
Uncle
Sam gets by by borrowing and printing big time:
Without successfully borrowing and borrowing to the tune of $1 trillion
for the past 4 years Uncle Sam would have gone kaput.
People and nations buying US treasuries are a form of lending to Uncle
Sam.
In addition, to cover the shortfall, Uncle Sam has cranked up the
printing presses printing money to pay others be it wages for civil servants or
creditors and this enable Uncle Sam to get by.
But such printing money may appear magical but recipients of this
printed pile will one day return the printed money to request repayment in
goods and services and even if Uncle Sam can fulfil, it means austerity or
material starvation as a large chunk of goods and services would to simply
repaying or redeeming these currently printed USDs or IOUs.
Should the US refuse to honour those obligations then it would be
default and threaten chaos as others refuse to deal with the US.
Barack
Obama and Mitt Romney prepare for their next high-stakes clash on Tuesday, as
the Republican's campaign registers a record month of fundraising.
This is a totally delusional fixation on the debate which is a
ritualized beauty contest when the presidential election is about electing a
president and surely both sides have made their cases clear in many speeches
and statements so far as to not need for a series of debates let alone
obsession about who won and who is under pressure.
THE US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DEBATE HAS BECOME A RITUAL AND FIXTURE
EXTENDED TO THREE DEBATES MUCH COPIED BY THE REST OF THE WORLD AND IF YOU THINK
IT IS A SUBSTANCE CONTEST BASED ON REASON THEN YOU ARE DELUDED. IT IS A BEAUTY
CONTEST, A POINT SCORING CONTEST WHERE OPPPOSING CANDIDATES TRY TO PRESENT A
DESIRABLE OR ATTRACTIVE PERCEPTION OF THEMSELVES AND TRY TO UNRAVEL THEIR
OPPONENTS.
IT REFLECTS THIS A MAD WORLD BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE THAT THEY THINK
SUCH DEBATES ARE IMPORTANT, ESSENTIAL IN THE ELECTION PROCESS. IT HAS BECOME
COMMERCIALIZED AND HYPED WITH THE MEDIA AND ADVERTISERS TRYING TO USE THE
OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE MONEY.
The
presidential election is not about winning but choosing:
The US presidential election is about choosing the next president but
you are deluded if you think that is what is happening because it is about each
candidate trying to win even at all costs even if illegal if they can get away
with it, by slander and innuendos.
THE DEBATES ARE SAID TO BE HIGH STAKED BECAUSE CANDIDATES ARE DESIROUS
OF WINNING, OF DEFEATING THEIR OPPONENTS FOR THE BIG PRIZE ON OFFER (OF COURSE
THEY ARE NOT THINKING OF THE MONEY THAT CAN BE MADE IF YOUR CANDIDATE WINS
PRESIDENCY) WHEN IT SHOULD BE A CASE OF HONESTLY STATING WHAT YOU WILL DO IF
ELECTED AND IT IS UP TO THE ELECTORATE TO CHOOSE.
IT IS BECAUSE THERE IS MUCH AT STAKE IN TERMS OF MONEY AND POWER THAT
BOTH PARTIES ARE SO EAGER TO IMPRESS VOTERS.
Ryan: 'Obama risking lost generation'
By speaking of ‘risking lost generation’ instead of ‘costing a lost
generation’ he is acknowledging he is not speaking out of knowledge but
speculation not without self interest but with the potential gain of swinging
voters against Obama.
‘Risk’ means ‘possible’, may or may not be true and you have no
right speaking of something speculative that may slander another.
Whether he or you are aware or not, he is thus speaking without knowing
what he says is true (in order to reap potential self-gain) and this must stir
self-resistance in him and trains him to speak with self resistance that leads
to stress and whoever speaks without knowing it is true is speaking
unrighteously courting karma to be repaid as future suffering.
RYAN HAS NO RIGHT TO STATE THAT OBAMA IS RISKING A LOST GENERATION
BECAUSE HE CANNOT KNOW THAT IS TRUE AND SO HE IS SPEAKING UNRIGHTEOUSLY WITHOUT
KNOWING FOR SELFISH MOTIVES THAT NOT ONLY GENERATES SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS
TO STRESS BUT TRAINS HIM TO SPEAK WITH SELF RESISTANCE AND HE IS DUE FOR KARMA
FOR SPEAKING WITHOUT KNOWING WHICH IS A FORM OF SPEAKING FALSELY.
YOU RIGHTEOUSLY GAIN ELECTION BY CONVINCING VOTERS WHAT YOU WILL DO WHEN
ELECTED THAT IS SUPERIOR NOT BY ATTACKING AND DEPRECATING YOUR OPPONENT TO
SCARE VOTERS FROM HIM WHICH IS ALWAYS EVIL AND ASKING FOR KARMA TO BE REPAID AS
SUFFERING.
Right
and wrong election conduct:
You should not covetously desire election but you mindfully offer
yourself for election by the people to serve them, to manage to the needs of
those who elected you.
Thus if you emotionally or passionately make your case to be elected
thereby appealing to the emotion not reason of voters you are asking for
suffering in repayment even if you win.
If you calmly clearly state your case and then undertake what you stated
when elected then you are not asking for suffering.
If you attack your opponents, saying things that are without knowing or
knowing it is false then you are overstepping and asking for suffering in
repayment.
UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU SAY ABOUT YOUR OPPONENT THAT IS NEGATIVE IS
TRUE YOU ARE ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT. IF WHAT YOU ALLEGE ABOUT YOUR OPPONENT IS
HEARSAY, SPECULATION OR DOWNRIGHT FALSE, THEN YOU ARE ASKING FOR YOUR HEAD TO
BE CHOPPED EVEN ETERNALLY AND ONLY A FOOL WILL THINK THAT IS A PRICE WORTH
PAYING TO BE ELECTED.
IF YOU EMOTIONALLY, PASSIONATELY STATE YOUR CASE THEN THERE IS SUFFERING
DUE TOO.
THE PERSON WHO IS NOT GREEDY TO BE ELECTED CALMLY STATES HIS CASE FOR
ELECTION AND ALLOWS THE ELECTORATE TO DECIDE CALMLY WITHOUT AROUSED PASSIONS
WHO IS RIGHT TO REPRESENT THEM.
The
duties and glories of the president:
A person can seek the office of the president for the sake of its duties
and responsibilities or for glory, to make a name for himself now and in
history, for the privileges of the office and an opportunity to amass wealth on
the side lines and reward those who has supported him.
You may deny you are in for the glory, you want to serve your country
but exactly what your motives are cannot be denied and if you lie to yourself
and others you are courting insanity.
Seeking the presidency for its glories is a wrong and mad reason and
will end in woe for the person not just here but even for many eternities
afterwards depending on the wrongs he has done in office. The wise do not seek
high offices here because it is fraught with karma that far outweigh whatever
material benefits to be derived.
YOU SHOULD SEEK THE PRESIDENCY BEARING IN MIND THE HEAVY DUTIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES THAT COME WITH AND NOT THINK ABOUT IS GLORIES AND PRIVILEGES
WHICH ARE BAITS THAT LEAD TO ENDLESS WOES AND SO THE DISCERNING WILL NOT SEEK
HIGH OFFICE WHILST FOOLS LIKE FLIES ATTRACTED TO FECES ARE IRRESISTIBLY DRAWN
TO SEEK HIGH OFFICE.
Whoever
will be president shall be servant to the rest:
Jesus said whoever shall be the greatest in heaven shall be servant to
the rest and so whoever shall be president will be the servant to the rest.
Does it cross the mind of any president that this is the case? And so if
you are in it for self glory, self exaltation then the price is very heavy for
the fleeting glory and whatever wealth you may amass.
PUTRAJAYA:
The tendency of Malaysians to pop antibiotics as a quick fix to a range of
ailments can lead to antimicrobial resistance that can kill.
The person is telling you something ‘antibiotic overuse can kill’ that
you can choose to ignore or pay attention to, remember and act according to
what you accurately or inaccurately remembered.
In the above transaction, no true understanding is required nor or
present but it is entirely about programming. If you think true understanding
is involved or needed then you have wrong understanding, you do not truly understand
here as everywhere you think you understand.
A prerequisite is that you are programmed or conversant in English (not
understand English) in order to partake of the transaction.
EVEN IF A PERSON HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING, IT IS NOT REQUIRED IN THE TRANSACTION
‘ANTIBIOTICS OVERUSE CAN KILL’. IT IS A MATTER OF TELLING OTHERS AND A MATTER
OF RECEIVING AND REMEMBERING AND CARRYING OUT ACCORDING TO THE PROGRAMMING OF
THE MESSAGE.
IN TRUTH THE VAST MAJORITY IF NOT ENTIRETY OF TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD INVOLVE MERELY EXCHANGES OF PROGRAMMING OR INSTRUCTIONS OR
DATA THAT REQUIRES TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHICH IS NEVER INVOLVED AND IN TRUTH EVEN
THOSE WHO ARE INTELLECTUALLY SOPHISTICATED, WHO THINK THEY ARE GREAT THINKERS
FULL OF UNDERSTANDING HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, WHAT THEY DEAL WITH ALL THE
TIME IS PROGRAMMING, EXCHANGES OF PROGRAMS THAT ARE OFTEN IF NOT ALWAYS
REHASHED EITHER IN THE SAME OR NEW GUISES.
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE EVERYONE IS TELLING EACH OTHER THINGS THAT MAY BE
DELUDED AND FALSE, IT IS AN EXCHANGE OF PROGRAMS, REAFFIRMATION OF PROGRAMS
WITH NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING PRESENT. AND THEY THINK THEY ARE FULL OF
UNDERSTANDING TELLING YOU ‘ANTIBIOTICS OVERUSE CAN KILL’ AND THEY THINK THEY
TRULY UNDERSTAND WHEN THEY ‘GOT IT’ ‘ANTIBIOTICS OVERUSE CAN KILL’.
THERE IS SUCH A THING CALLED UNDERSTANDING AND WHETHER IT IS PRESENT OR
REQUIRED IN A SITUATION IS OBJECTIVE CANNOT BE DISPUTED. IF YOU DO NOT KNOW
WHETHER UNDERSTANDING IS INVOLVED OR NOT OR YOU THINK IT IS INVOLVED WHEN IT IS
NOT THEN YOU ARE A PERSON WHO DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND AND THAT IS ALWAYS
SUFFERING AND DANGEROUS.
Theoretically
impossible true understanding involved in this world:
Theoretically it is impossible that true understanding is present in the
transactions of people of this world.
The reason is because whatever they all say or do is rehashed and you
never need true understanding to rehash, what you need is to pay attention for
cues that will tell you which previously recorded programs or speech sequences
to activate and thereafter you need to devote attention to accurately reproduce
it. There is no time left to understand what you are saying or what is
happening.
OFTEN WHAT PEOPLE SAY OR DO IS BY REFLEX, KNEE JERK ‘SEE THIS DO THAT’
AND IN MORE COMPLICATED SITUATIONS, THEY NEED TO SEEK CUES THAT WILL DECIDE
WHICH RECORDED SEQUENCES TO REHASH AND APPLY AND THEREAFTER IT IS A MATTER OF
MONITORING AND RENDERING AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE THAT LEAVES NO TIME FOR
HARRASSED STRESSED, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS
HAPPENING AND WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
No
wonder it appeals to ordinary people:
The reason why statements like antibiotic overuse can kill appeals to
ordinary people is because it is something that does not require true
understanding which they do not have and they are anxious for their lives here.
What I say does not appeal to ordinary people because it requires
understanding that they do not have, not understanding they are not attracted
to it especially when it pertains to matters that are not relevant to their
survival and wellbeing here.
THOSE WHO DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING LIVE FEARFUL LIVES WHICH THEY
SEEK TO PRESERVE BY LOOKING HITHER AND THITHER FOR INSTRUCTIONS OR INFORMATIONS
THAT MAY ASSIST THEM AND SUCH STATEMENTS AS ‘ANTIBIOTIC OVERUSE CAN KILL’ SUITS
THEM FINE SINCE IT REQUIRES NO UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY CAN INCORPORATE INTO
THEIR EXPANDING MENTAL STORE OF ‘KNOWLEDGE’.
WHAT I SAY REQUIRES TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHICH PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE AND SO
THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND AND IT IS NOT RELEVANT ANYWAY TO THEIR MYOPIC SURVIVAL
NEEDS.
Now
then, now then:
Quote: When Sir
Jimmy Savile died in October 2011, it was his trademark tracksuit, cigar and
catchphrase "Now then, now then," that many remembered.
The reason why ‘now then, now then’ is associated with him is because
the phrase has been programmed in him and rehashed ‘countless times’ by him
that it has come to be associated with him whilst others do not say it is
because they have not been programmed by themselves or others to say that.
ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE FAVOURITE PHRASES THAT THEY UTTER FREQUENTLY THAT
OTHERS DO NOT AND THE REASON THIS COMES ABOUT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE REHASHING,
WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS NEVER FRESHLY SPECIFICALLY COMPOSED FOR THE OCCASION BUT
RECORDED AND REPLAYED FROM RECORDED. EVEN THE CLOTHES THEY WEAR (TRACKSUITS)
AND CIGARS THEY SMOKE COME FROM ‘HABIT’ WHICH MEANS IT IS REGULARLY PRACTICED
OR REHASHED.
THIS IS A WORLD OF ROBOTS. ROBOTS CAN ONLY DO AS PROGRAMMED BUT HUMAN
ROBOTS IN ADDITION POSSESS CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH VICARIOUSLY EXPERIENCE WHAT IS
REHASHED AND THEIR REHASHING IS DRIVEN BY EMOTIONS, BY GREED AND ILL WILL
WHEREAS MECHANICAL ROBOTS ARE UNEMOTIONAL AND CAN DO AS PROGRAMMED.
IF GOD WANTS ROBOTS IN HEAVEN HE CAN CREATE MORE OBEDIENT ROBOTS FAR
SUPERIOR TO THE ROBOTS HUMAN CAN CREATE AND FAR SUPERIOR TO THE CANTANKEROUS
ROBOTS THAT HUMAN THEMSELVES ARE.
00:00 UK
time, Friday, 5 October 2012
Remember
swine flu? When the pandemic happened, did you avoid kissing family or friends
in order to limit the spread of the virus? A survey in the Lancet suggests
Britons were less likely to adopt "social distancing" techniques than
people in several other countries.
The headline does not accurately reflect the matter at hand and not only
is it mischievous and false it is courting insanity and inciting others to view
reality in a distorted way with karma attached to be experienced as suffering.
It was not just kissing but Britons failed to take preventative measures
to resist the spread of the flu.
IT IS A PROGRAMMING THAT WHENEVER YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING YOU MUST
THINK OR MENTALLY FABRICATE TO FIND A WAY TO PUT IT THAT IS WITTY, WILL STIR
READERS’ MENTAL FORCE TO LAUGH AND SHOW HOW CLEVER YOU ARE IN THE PROCESS YOU
DISTORT REALITY WHICH IS NOT BRITONS KISSED THROUGH THE SWINE FLU BUT THEY
FAILED TO TAKE MEASURES TO AVOID CLOSE PERSONAL CONTACT WHICH INVOLVES MORE
THAN KISSING BUT HAND CONTACT. KISSING WAS CHOSEN BECAUSE OF ITS SEXUAL
CONNOTATIONS TO TITILLATE. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO KNOW BRITONS KISSED
THROUGH THE FLU BUT HE IS PRESUMPTUOUS.
No comments:
Post a Comment