Why
falsity must generate stress:
It is not a mystery why all forms of doing or saying without knowing it
is true or knowing it is false must generate self-resistance in its commission
that not only leads to stress but conditions the person to always say or do
with accompanying self-resistance that detains him in the prison of stress. It
reflects a lack of insight that a being is unable to see it thus.
Whatever is true in speech and deed exists and only requires a being to
see truly and say or do as truly seen.
Whatever is false in speech and deed does not exist and requires a being
to think, fabricate or plan even repeatedly until well rehearsed or recorded in
his mind before he can confidently say or do it (eg he has to rehearse in his
mind how to successfully steal something) and so he must say or do according to
a plan he fabricated in his mind or copied from others that de facto
DANGEROUSLY cedes control of himself to a plan in his mind that is the boss
that tells him what to say or do, in other words he has committed himself to be
a robot and that is always dangerous because he is no longer master of himself
and so it must always generate self resistance that not only leads to stress
but conditions him to say or do with attending self resistance.
Even if what is said or done falsely is done approximately, hastily with
little forethought or rehearsal, it must still stir self-resistance as it
similarly necessitates ceding control of self to hastily hatched plans in the
mind.
WITHOUT HAVING A PLAN OR TEMPLATE HOWEVER APPROXIMATE OR PRECISE,
HOWEVER WELL REHEARSED OR POORLY REHEARSED, COPIED FROM OTHERS, INSTRUCTED BY
OTHERS, FABRICATED BY SELF, A PERSON CANNOT SAY OR DO SOMETHING THAT IS FALSE
OR WITHOUT KNOWING AND THIS MEANS HE IS SURRENDERING CONTROL OF HIMSELF TO THIS
PLAN OF WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY OR DO THAT IS FALSE OR WITHOUT KNOWING THAT MUST
STIR SELF-RESISTANCE NO MATTER HOW DIEHARD A LIAR HE IS BECAUSE IT IS
DANGEROUS.
WHATEVER SAID OR DONE THAT IS TRUE ORIGINATES FROM WHAT IS SEEN THAT
EXIST, IS NOT FABRICATED AND ONE MERELY SAY OR DOES ACCORDING TO WHAT IS SEEN
THAT IS TRUE THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE CEDING CONTROL OF SELF TO A PLAN TO CARRY
OUT. YOU SAW HIM KILL HER AND IT DOES NOT NEED ANY PLAN TO SAY YOU SAW HIM KILL
HER, YOU ARE MERELY STATING WHAT IS TRUE THAT YOU SAW, WHAT IS THERE TO
FABRICATE?
JUST AS YOU WANT OTHERS TO BELIEVE WHAT YOU SAID OR DO THAT IS FALSE,
YOU ARE ALSO TELLING YOURSELF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT IS FALSE IS TRUE AND THIS
MUST AGAIN GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE BECAUSE TO ACCEPT WHAT IS FALSE AS TRUE IS
MAD.
Brinksmanship
is about force and deception never reason:
There is never a true reason for brinksmanship which is driven by greed
and deception to gain unrighteous advantage.
This last minute scramble to resolve America’s funding crisis has many
parallels in ordinary people’s lives eg a customer haggle with shopkeeper,
gives a last price and walks away only to return later to pay the higher price
offered or the shopkeeper going back on his last price when seeing the customer
walking away.
The Democrats and Republicans have ample time to study the problem and
come to an amicable solution not to resort to a last moment dash to meet the
dateline that would necessitate either or both sides giving in or altering
their stances. People see nothing wrong or they blame the opposite party for
making them change their stance but such changes of stance is a form of not
fulfilling your undertaking that has consequences in future suffering.
THE PRESENT IMPASSE BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES IN THE SO CALLED FISCAL
CLIFF IS A FORM OF BRINKSMANSHIP AND IT IS NEVER BASED ON TRUE REASON OR
GENUINE NEED BUT IT IS BASED ON PARTISANSHIP, COMBATIVENESS IN WHICH THE NATION
IS HELD TO RANSOM AND INDICATES THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE COUNTRY ARE INCOMPETENT
AND RECKLESS. SURELY BOTH PARTIES HAD ENOUGH TIME TO STUDY THE PROBLEM TO COME
TO AN AMICABLE SOLUTION THAN TO TRADE HORSES IN THE LAST MOMENT THAT WOULD
ENTAIL THEM RENEGING ON THEIR FORMER POSITIONS THAT HAS CONSEQUENCES IN FUTURE
SUFFERING FOR BREAKING PROMISES.
YOU HAVE RECKLESS FOOLS RUNNING AMERICA AND THE PORTENT FOR THE
WELLBEING OF AMERICA IS NOT GOOD.
Worrying
snapshot of Middle America:
It is the stirred emotion of a person that makes the snapshot worrying
and so she is speaking falsely with consequences in future suffering. She
should say the snapshot of Middle America worries her and even then it is the
wrong understanding of the situation.
The true understanding is the snapshot of Middle America is bad or very
bad not worrying which is suffering and the useless incorrect force based
understanding of the matter.
IT IS POINTLESS AND SUFFERING TO STIR ONE’S MENTAL FORCE TO BE WORRIED
ABOUT THE SNAPSHOT AND WHAT IS RELEVANT IS HOW BAD IT IS. SHE UNDERSTANDS WITH
FORCE, WITH STIRRED FORCE. WHEN FACED WITH A SITUATION HER FOREMOST RESPONSE IS
‘WORRY’, A STIRRING OF HER MENTAL FORCE TO BE DISTURBED, AGITATED AND THAT IS
THE TOTALLY WRONG, USELESS RESPONSE THAT IS SUFFERING AND LEADS TO FUTURE
SUFFERING.
Why
people worry:
Worrying is conditioning or addictive, each time you worry you not only
suffer but you are training yourself to worry better such that in time worry is
triggered faster to stronger intensity to be harder to dissipate and the person
is heading for torment from intense worry.
Anyone who encourages another to worry (you should worry) is asking for
karma. It is because a person is attached to his life here that he worries. A
person who has abandoned his life here, who is not entangled has little or no
worries. He knows he is headed for safety, for escape from this world and even
eternal blissful worry free heavenly existence.
Don't
succumb to despair, there is hope for the future.
This is worthless advice to those with true understanding. He is trying
to sow hope when he himself is without hope because he is doomed for suffering
even eternally.
By despair and hope is meant pessimism and optimism which are
unnecessary, meaningless and woeful stirrings of mental force.
No matter how a person hopes for the future, how strong his optimism he
cannot know what he hoped will occur and so he must be wracked by doubt and
uncertainty and it is a useless, harmful and dangerous enterprise pinning hopes
for the future instead of attending to matters at hand.
HE AND YOU THINK IT IS NECESSARY AND MEANINGFUL TO HOPE BUT IT IS
DELUSION, IT IS UNNECESSARY, SUFFERING NOT PLEASURE TO HOPE AND NO MATTER HOW
STRONG AND SURE YOUR HOPE, IT IS NOT KNOWLEDGE BUT SPECULATION THAT MUST BE
NAGGED BY DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT IS AN ADDITIONAL SUFFERING. THE BUDDHA
SAID THERE SHOULD BE NOTHING OF THE PAST OR FUTURE FOR YOU IF YOU WISH TO
ESCAPE THE CRUTCHES OF SUFFERING SO WHAT MORE YOU SHOULD BE BUILDING HOPES,
CASTLES IN THE AIR?
THIS IS A FOOL GIVING ADVICE, HIMSELF IS WITHOUT HOPE AND HE PREACHES
HOPE FOR OTHERS.
KAJANG:
The rights of non-Muslims in the country are slowly but surely being eroded and
threatened by the Opposition.
It may or may not be possible to critically evaluate or it may only be
possible to evaluate. If it is not possible to critically evaluate then in your
haste to condemn you have lapse into falsity that has serious consequences in
future insanity for you, it does not matter who you are. If you understand what
you say how can you speak nonsense?
Why is he so concerned with critically evaluating the opposition’s
performance? It is because he is entangled trying to profit from the critical
evaluation and that is the path to future woe.
THERE IS NO NEED EVEN TO EVALUATE THE OPPOSITION’S PERFORMANCE LET ALONE
CRITICALLY EVALUATE, BETTER YOU EVALUATE YOURSELF. PERFORMANCE IS NOT ABOUT
SUBSTANCE BUT STYLE, THOSE WHO ARE ROBOTS ARE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT HOW THEY DO
THINGS, APPEAR TO OTHERS, HOW THEY PERFORM RATHER THAN THE GOOD AND BAD,
MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS THAT THEY SAY OR DO.
SUFFICE TO EVALUATE THE OPPOSITION’S PERFORMANCE, EVEN THAT I CANNOT BE
BOTHERED, BN’S PERFORMANCE ITSELF IS WOEFUL, CRITICALLY EVALUATE IS THE MORE
THAT COMES FROM EVIL NOT GOOD.
The US 'cliff' - one small
part of a huge debt crisis
(A REALITY CHECK FOR THOSE THINK GOOD TIMES ARE
AROUND THE CORNER)
So here we are, at the turn of the year, with the
global economy tottering on the edge of America’s fiscal cliff.
The
inconvenient truth is that the US will also hit its federal borrowing limit on
the first day of 2013 – leaving just a few weeks of “extraordinary measures”
before an agreement on that is also required. Photo: Alamy
5:01PM
GMT 29 Dec 2012
What’s
kept springing to my mind over the holiday season is the final scene of The
Italian Job – the iconic 1969 original, not the tacky 2003 remake.
“Hang on
a minute, lads,” says heistmaster-in-chief, Charlie Croker, as he and his merry
band of crooks balance precariously in a bus on the edge of an Alpine cliff.
“I’ve got a great idea.”
The
Italian Job’s cliff-hanger finale is all make-believe. A brilliant film ends,
we marvel at Michael Caine’s acting genius, the credits roll and then we get up
and make some tea.
Real-world
predicaments aren’t so easy.
Right
now, Washington’s deeply divided ruling classes are locked in tortuous
negotiations to try to prevent the world’s biggest economy falling over the
fiscal cliff – shorthand for $600bn (£370bn) of tax rises and spending cuts set
automatically to apply from the start of 2013.
29 Dec 2012
If
Congress and the White House can’t agree over the next 48 hours, we apparently
face a renewed US recession that would be likely to push a meaningful global
recovery even further into the future.
The
problem facing America’s political elite is that no single party has genuine
control. The Democrats regained the presidency, yes, but the result was far
from “decisive”.
Obama
prevailed in most of the swing states, so claiming 332 electoral college votes
to Mitt Romney’s 206. Yet such states were won on wafer-thin margins, meaning
the popular vote was extremely close.
If just
1.4pc of Obama’s supporters had switched to Romney – some 850,000 people among
more than 170m registered US voters – then Romney would have out-polled his
incumbent rival.
The
Democrats hold the White House and Senate but the Republicans control the House
of Representatives.
So the
only winner in November’s US election was gridlock – not least on fiscal
issues, as spending bills always start in the House.
The GOP
now controls 238 House votes, compared to 197 for the Democrats.
Having
campaigned for months before the election that deep spending cuts are needed to
tame the US deficit, not higher taxes, Republicans still hold a commanding
House majority.
That’s
why many of them insist, with some justification, that “there is no mandate to
raise taxes”.
Obama has
cut short his Hawaiian holiday and Congress has reconvened.
Unless a
deal is struck by the end of this calendar year, the spending cuts and tax
increases kick in.
This
would amount to a significant fiscal retrenchment, hence the concerns that
going over the cliff would tip America back into recession, with the
International Monetary Fund warning of “large international spill-overs”.
The
Democrats most definitely want higher taxes, especially on the rich, but worry
about spending cuts.
Republicans,
in contrast, think the cuts don’t go far enough and that higher taxes will
stymie America’s fragile recovery.
So
Washington’s political gridlock reflects a deep ideological divide.
The most
likely outcome, in my view, is a minute-to-midnight fiscal cliff compromise,
with lawmakers loudly claiming victory along partisan lines, while covertly
agreeing to delay any fundamental decisions about how to tackle America’s
perilous fiscal future.
I would
also predict, though, that investor angst over the cliff is rapidly replaced by
concern about the US “debt ceiling” and that the current dispute turns out to
be just a dress rehearsal for a much more serious row – one that really could
destabilise global markets.
The
inconvenient truth is that the US will also hit its federal borrowing limit on
the first day of 2013 – leaving just a few weeks of “extraordinary measures”
before an agreement on that is also required.
The
Republicans may try to use the debt ceiling to force more spending cuts, as
they did during a lengthy stand-off in early 2012.
By
messing with the debt ceiling, though, US lawmakers will raise the danger of a
sovereign default, a prospect which, even if it doesn’t happen, has the
capacity to reduce global markets to meltdown status while halting investment
worldwide.
Having
said that, the debt ceiling debate really matters as it concerns the crucial
issue of whether or not America can achieve some kind of meaningful budgetary
retrenchment.
The US
annual budget deficit has almost tripled under Obama, from $450bn in 2008 to
$1,200bn this year.
America’s
national debt is now around $16,000bn, two-thirds higher than when Obama was
first elected. In 2008, US government debt was 70pc of GDP. Now it is 102pc.
Debt
growth at that pace simply cannot go on.
Yet,
above and beyond the fiscal cliff shenanigans, there is no sign whatsoever of
any agreement on how to reform old age benefits so as to avoid Uncle Sam’s
finances going completely haywire over the next decade as tens of millions of
baby boomers retire.
While a
debt ceiling row has the capacity to rock global markets, in many ways this is
the debate that America – and the entire Western world – really needs to have.
My
broader concern going into 2013 isn’t that we fall over America’s cliff.
While
doing so would cause a panic, fiscal retrenchment is actually vital.
My
overwhelming fear, instead, is that the Keynesian policies America has pursued
since 2009-10 will begin to be used in the UK and eurozone, too.
Obama’s
White House has overseen a Keynesian resurgence.
Cheered
on by former US Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers and economist Paul Krugman,
Obama and his ever-flexible Federal Reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke, have
engaged in massive fiscal and monetary expansion – hence the past four years of
huge budget deficits and another looming debt ceiling impasse, coupled with the
Fed’s third round of “open-ended” quantitative easing.
No
European nation has followed America’s fiscal path, even though the UK and
eurozone have competed to out-pace the States on QE.
Despite
America implementing an unprecedented fiscal boost, sustainable recovery hasn’t
arrived.
Europe’s
ongoing torpor, meanwhile, has nothing to do with a lack of government
spending.
Instead,
it is largely about our unresolved banking crises and the massive undeclared
liabilities that continue to gum up the wheels of commerce.
If fiscal
and monetary stimulus worked, Japan wouldn’t have spent the past 20 years in
and out of recession and now be shouldering a debt to GDP ratio of 250pc.
If
printing money worked, Zimbabwe would be in the G7.
The
Italian Job ends with the heroes left in limbo, the gold bars they covet just
out of reach.
But while
the audience is left wondering if the bullion really will fall out of the back
of the bus and into the abyss, there is also the strong impression that Charlie
Croker’s “great idea” will somehow resolve the predicament, using the same nous
that outsmarted the Turin police.
Four
years after sub-prime, our leaders still seem to be hoping for a “great idea”
that will rescue the Western world.
But there
is no quick fix – and most certainly not Keynesian fiscal policy.
Were
Europe to take the Keynesian path, trying to spend its way out of recession
with no reserve currency, by far the most likely outcome would be a creditors’
strike and pandemonium on global markets.
The only
way to rediscover growth in the big “advanced” economies is continued
de-levering, structural banking reform and a steady and deliberate scaling back
of the state.
We’ve
made some moves in this direction but not nearly enough.
The
danger facing us in 2013 is a deeply counter-productive reversal even of this
scant progress.
Whatever
has style is for programming not understanding:
Whatever a person says or writes that can be objectively shown to
contain style or falsity is never meant for (true) understanding but is meant
for programming, remembering approximately or precisely and rehashed later or
utilized to base actions on what was assimilated or recorded either accurately
or erroneously. Whatever said or written that has falsities cannot be truly
understood and so it must be understood falsely as true by recording in memory
for future rehash or acting according to memory.
Only what is said or done that is utterly free of any style whether in
how it is said with force prolonging, changing speed and loudness or style in
the substance (eg ‘well, well, well’, ‘I say, I say’), that is true (without
falsities) can be truly understood and therefore intended for understanding by
the recipient.
UNLESS SOMETHING SAID OR WRITTEN IS FREE OF ALL STYLE (HOW IT IS SAID,
STYLE IN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID) AND FREE OF ALL FALSITIES, IT IS NOT
INTENDED FOR UNDERSTANDING, NOT SUITABLE FOR UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS INTENDED
AND SUITABLE FOR ACCEPTING AND RECORDING BY THE RECIPIENT TO BE REGURGITATED IN
THE FUTURE OR TO BE ACTED UPON AS RECORDED.
You can only remember the style with which something is said or done,
you can only remember the prolonging, changing speed and loudness of the heard
syllables, no one can understand these meaningless accompanying for show force
changes which are inseparable from the substance of what is said, which
listeners in this world never separate but accept as bona fide integrity.
UNLESS THE LISTENER PAINSTAKINGLY SEPARATE THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID
WITH STYLE FROM THE STYLE (WHICH PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD NEVER OR ARE NOT BOTHERED
TO DO), THE ACCOMPANYING FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS FORCE CHANGES AND SO WHAT IS
SAID WITH STYLE IS ALWAYS INTENDED FOR RECORDING OR MEMORY.
SIMILARLY THE STYLE IN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID OR DON IS ALWAYS
FALSE, FOR SHOW AND CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD AND CAN ONLY BE ASSIMILATED BY
LISTENERS OR READERS IF THEY COMMIT IT TO ACCURATE OR APPROXIMATE MEMORY.
AGAIN IF WHAT IS SAID OR WRITTEN CONTAIN FALSITIES IT CANNOT BE TRULY
UNDERSTOOD BUT MUST BE REMEMBERED AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY.
ONLY WHAT IS SAID OR WRITTEN THAT IS ENTIRELY TRUE, SHORN OFF ALL STYLE
IN THE WAY IT IS SAID, IN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID OR WRITTEN, SHORN OF
FALSITIES IN WHAT IS SAID CAN BE TRULY UNDERSTOOD BY THE RECIPIENT AND BECAUSE
WHATEVER IS SAID OR WRITTEN BY ORDINARY PEOPLE CONTAIN SIGNIFICANT STYLE AND
FALSITIES THEY ARE NEVER FOR TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT FOR INDOCTRINATION, PROGRAMMING.
Whatever
is false is intended for acceptance not understanding:
If what somebody said or wrote contain falsities then it is only
intended for acceptance (or recording) by the recipient never for his
understanding because if he understood (as is possible) he will understand it
as false and thus unacceptable.
EVEN IF YOU AND EVERYONE CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID OR WRITTEN THAT
IS FALSE AS FALSE, THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING CAN DO SO AND SO IF WHAT IS SAID OR
WRITTEN HAS FALSITY EITHER IN THE SUBSTANCE OR STYLE OR STYLE IN THE SUBSTANCE
IT CAN NEVER BE TRULY UNDERSTOOD BY THE RECIPIENT AND CAN ONLY BE ACCEPTED OR
RECORDED OR MEMORIZED FALSELY AS TRUE BY THE RECIPIENT.
SO LONG AS SOMETHING SAID OR WRITTEN HAS FALSITY, HAS STYLE IN THE
SUBSTANCE OR STYLE IN ITS DELIVERY, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO TRULY UNDERSTAND AND SO
IT MUST BE ACCEPTED AS BONA FIDE BY RECIPIENTS AND THAT MEANS INDOCTRINATION OR
PROGRAMMING.
This
world is about programming never understanding:
And so what you see and hear people say, write and do is about
programming each other, never intended for understanding because whatever said
or done contain falsities and style that render them unfit for understanding
only fit for acceptance or recording or programming.
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE EVERYONE IS TRYING TO PROGRAM OTHERS WITH WHAT
THEY SAY OR DO, WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS INTENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE THAT PEOPLE
EITHER DO OR ARE DISMISSED AND YOU NEED FORCE NOT REASON TO DISMISS. PEOPLE
LIKE OR DISLIKE WHAT IS PRESENTED TO THEM AND THIS IS NOT UNDERSTANDING BUT A
FORCE BASED ‘UNDERSTANDING’ OF WHAT IS PRESENTED.
You need force never reason to push and so it reflects the lack of
understanding of people that they speak in terms of force.
If the deal is based on reason then it should be case of ‘final
adjustments or fine tuning towards a fiscal deal’.
AND SO THEY UNDERSTAND IT AS FINAL PUSH WHEN THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING
SHOULD BE FINAL ADJUSTMENTS OR FINE TUNING.
Final
negotiations not push:
It may a case of final negotiation towards US fiscal deal not final push
and so if you accept what is said as accurate then you may have false
understanding and the only way a person’s understanding can be consistently false
is that it is programmed and rehashed from programmed.
KUALA
LUMPUR: The RM200 rebate for smartphones should not be limited to devices which
cost RM500 and below, says the MCA.
If Chua will be paying for the rebate he may not be so enthusiastic.
This is using public money to encourage the purchase of smartphones
whose economic contribution to society (and indeed the person) is likely far
outweighed by the costs, it is likely for extravagant purposes, (you do not
need a smartphone but a stupid phone suffices for daily essential needs).
SMARTPHONES ARE A LUXURY, THE PURPOSES OF COMMUNICATIONS ARE SERVED BY
ORDINARY DUMB PHONES WHICH ARE MUCH MORE COST EFFECTIVE AND IT IS RECKLESS
ENCOURAGING OWNERSHIP OF SMARTPHONES USING PUBLIC SUBSIDIES.
This
is a world about image and show and that is deception:
This is a world dedicated to show and image not truth and goodness, it
worships image and show never substance.
Doctors have marble fronts for their clinics, mahogany desks and doors
to impress patients and patients are impressed by the image, the neckties,
smart dresses and manner of their doctors.
It is not the marble fronts, mahogany desks and doors, the clothes and
airs that make a person a good doctor but his knowledge and techniques and the
ability to apply those knowledge and skills and if you think that has something
to do with his marble fronts, mahogany desks etc you are deluded.
YOU DON’T NEED A GRAND MAHOGANY DESK TO BE A GOOD PRESIDENT AND JUST
BECAUSE YOU SIT BEHIND A GRAND MAHOGANY DESK DOES NOT MAKE YOU A GREAT
PRESIDENT. YET THIS IS A WORLD THAT WORSHIPS IMAGES AND SHOW, APPEARANCE IS
VERY IMPORTANT AND MEANINGFUL TO PEOPLE AND THAT IS THE PATH TO EVEN ETERNAL
DEATH AND SUFFERING.
THE APPEARANCE OF A PERSON TELLS A LOT ABOUT THE PERSON BUT PEOPLE TELL
WRONGLY. THE SMARTLY DRESSED MAN IS PERCEIVED AS MARVELLOUS OR GOOD WHILST THE
DISCERNING PERSON TELLS THAT THIS IS A MAN WHO IS FOR SHOW, FOR IMAGE AND THUS
BAD.
Anyone
taken in by show is gullible, in danger:
Everything that is done or said by a person that is merely for show, for
image to impress or please others can be known, if you do not know or you
perceive it as genuine or true then you are gullible and in danger of being
conned even killed.
YOU CANNOT DECEIVE ANOTHER PERSON UNLESS HE IS GULLIBLE. GULLIBILITY IS
NOT A VIRTUE OR BLAMELESS BUT BLAMEWORTHY; A FAULT WITH DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.
The
persistent practice of falsity always ends in insanity:
You do not need others to tell you but you need insight to know that the
persistent practice of falsity in speech and action, no matter how tough or
disregarding for truth you are, will end in insanity for you.
WHATEVER IS FALSE THAT IS SAID OR DONE DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY TRUE REASON
TO ARISE AND SO IT CAN OCCUR AT ANY TIME SO LONG AS THE (FOOLISH) BEING WISHES
IT TO ARISE AND WHAT CAN ARISE AT ANY TIME WHEN WELL CONDITIONED OR SLICK, CAN
ARISE ALL THE TIME INCLUDING THE TIMES YOU DID NOT WISH IT TO ARISE AND THAT IS
INSANITY.
BECAUSE WHAT IS FALSE DOES NOT NEED CONTEXT, ONLY TRIGGERING BY THE
DECEPTIVE PERSON, WHEN WELL PRACTICED, WHAT IS FALSE HAS A STRONG AUTOMATISM TO
ARISE EVEN AGAINST THE WISH OF THE FOOL AND WHEN IT DOES SO THE FOOL BECOMES
MAD, UNABLE TO CONTROL HIS STRONG FALSE VOLITIONS.
AND SO IT IS THAT IF YOU KEEP FORCING YOURSELF TO STRETCH SYLLABLES,
CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, TO SMILE TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS, IN TIME IT
BECOME CONSTANT AND YOU ARE STRUGGLING TO KEEP YOUR SANITY AND WILL ONE DAY
SUCCUMB TO MAD PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, MAD SMILING OR
LAUGHTER.
IT IS NEVER FOR THE SAKE OF OTHERS THAT YOU SHOULD REFRAIN FROM FALSITY
BUT IF YOU CHERISH YOUR SANITY AND DO NOT WISH TO BECOME INSANITY THEN YOU MUST
AVOID FALSITY LIKE YOU AVOID A VIPER.
Rehashing
ends in insanity:
Rehashing is rendering from what is already recorded and it false or not
genuinely intended for an occasion but intended for replay for a variety of similar
occasions and so rehashing is indulging in falsity that ends in insanity.
WHETHER WHAT A PERSON SAYS OR DOES IS TRUE, SPECIFICALLY COMPOSED FOR
THE OCCASION OR IT IS RENDERED FROM RECORDINGS IN HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX CANNOT BE
DISPUTED AND FOR ONE WHO DISCERNS PEOPLE HERE ARE REHASHERS PRACTICING FALSITY
ALL THE TIME THAT WILL END IN THEIR INSANITY.
THE PERSISTENT PRACTICE OF FALSITY IS THE CAUSE OF INSANITY SO DON’T
BLAME DRUGS, YOUR FATHER OR MOTHER, YOUR GENES OR VIRUSES FOR YOUR INSANITY. IF
YOU ARE NOT GUILTY OF PERSISTENT FALSITY YOU CANNOT GO INSANE BECAUSE WHATEVER
IS TRUE REQUIRES REASON AND CONTEXT TO BE SAID OR DONE AND IT CAN OCCUR WITHOUT
REASON OR CONTEXT SO HOW CAN IT BECOME INSANE?
Your
marvellous golf strokes will end in insanity:
It does not matter if it is your marvellous golf or tennis strokes or
your marvellous oratorical skills, if they are rehashed, based on rehashing
then you have an appointment with insanity because whatever is rehashed ends in
insanity that you defy or refute to your even everlasting chagrin later.
YOU MAY MARVEL AT YOUR GOLFING SKILLS, HOW YOU CAN UNERRINGLY PLACE A
BALL ON THE GREEN BUT IF YOUR STROKE IS REHASHED, BASED ON MEMORY, IT WILL END
IN TEARS AND INSANITY FOR YOU SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE.
Redefining
Technology:
The tech world reimagines everything amidst accelerating changes.
Sounds very impressive or stirring of mental force but because it does
not make sense such talk is the talk of the deluded and is the path to
insanity.
Technology cannot be redefined unless you want to include things that
were formerly not technology. Just because things are advancing prodigiously
does not make it a redefining of technology except in your muddled thinking.
If the tech world has drastically refashioned or revamped many products
then it may be worth talking about. Reimagining is about rethinking that may
not translate into any product changes and so why is he getting so excited
about the tech world reimagining everything? And is this accelerating changes
he is talking about? Isn’t this about changes in products.
TO SPEAK JUST OF ACCELERATING CHANGES IS VAGUE & FALSE. YOU MUST
STATE WHAT THE CHANGES ARE AND IN WHAT (EG GADGETS).
REIMAGINING IS NOT SOMETHING CONCRETE UNLIKE REFASHIONING OR REMODELLING
AND SO HE IS GETTING EXCITED OVER SOMETHING UNREALIZED.
TECHNOLOGY CANNOT BE REDEFINED, JUST BECAUSE IT IS ADVANCING RAPIDLY
DOES NOT MAKE IT REDEFINING TECHNOLOGY.
Neil
Armstrong regurgitated on the moon:
Science
editor Alan Boyle's blog: Neil Armstrong's brother tells the BBC that he gave
the late astronaut feedback on his history-making speech months before it was
uttered on the moon.
If Armstrong had thought about what he was going to say first on the
moon as suggested above then his ‘one small step for man’ line is rehashed from
planned and he is guilty of rehashing what he said.
The person who is not a robot does not think beforehand what he is going
to say and does not say what he previously prepared which makes him a rehashing
robot.
The world makes a great about what he said when he should had
concentrated his attention to stepping down rather than wisecracking about what
he is doing which is inappropriate and senseless, making more than there is to
it.
IF YOU LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY AS JESUS SAID, THEN YOU MINDFULLY STEP
ON THE MOON, WISECRACKING THIS IS ONE SMALL STEP FOR A MAN IS THE MORE THAT
COMES FROM EVIL.
ARMSTRONG’S FIRST WORDS ON THE MOON WAS REHASHED FROM WHAT WAS PREPARED
BEFOREHAND AND IN HIS EXCITEMENT IT FLUFFED IT A BIT.
One
small step one big leap is a false association:
Reflecting mankind’s collective false understanding, ‘one small step for
a man, one giant leap for mankind’ is not only an unnecessary complication but
it is a false association that is cultivating insanity.
There is nothing big or small about the step and it is said to be small
to contrast with the desired big leap of mankind. Understood as stated it meant
the small step is a big leap for mankind and that is false.
From caveman to man on the moon may be considered a big leap but it is
‘small’ step is a big leap for mankind. The fact that ordinary people accept
its premise and even think it very clever reflects collective delusion not true
understanding.
THERE IS NOTHING SMALL ABOUT ARMSTRONG’S FIRST STEP AND IT IS
CONVENIENTLY ASCRIBED AS SMALL TO CONTRAST WITH THE BIG LEAP FOR MANKIND HE
WANTS TO FALSELY TOUT. THAT STEP HE MADE IS NOT A BIG LEAP FOR MANKIND, IT IS A
FABRICATION THAT IS FALSE THAT THAT SMALL STEP IS A BIG LEAP FOR MANKIND THAT
IS NOT HARMLESS BUT CONDITIONS THE GULLIBLE TO DELUSION OR FALSE PERCEPTION.
THERE IS NO NEED TO MAKE THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ARMSTRONG’S ‘SMALL’
STEP AND A BIG LEAP FOR MANKIND NOR IS IT A TRUE ASSOCIATION BUT A COMPLICATION
THAT ONLY FOOLS UNDERTAKE. THAT STEP IS JUST A STEP, NOT A BIG LEAP FOR MANKIND
EXCEPT IF YOU WILFULLY WANT TO CULTIVATE FALSE LOGIC.
Seeing is knowing not believing unless you doubt what you see or you see
but do not see. For a person who sees truly, unemotionally as things actually
are, seeing is knowing not believing, it is when you did not see that you need
to believe.
YOU DON’T TRUST YOURSELF OR WHAT YOU SEE? IF YOUR EYES ARE NOT PLAYING
TRICKS ON YOU THEN SEEING IS KNOWING NOT BELIEVING AND YOU NEED TO BELIEVE ONLY
WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE, WHAT OTHERS TELL YOU.
WHAT IS SAID IS TO EXAGGERATE SOMETHING AS SO GREAT THAT SEEING IS
BELIEVING WHEN IT IS NO BIG DEAL EG SEEING IS BELIEVING HOW BEAUTIFUL MARILYN
MONROE IS.
A
dangerous false linkage:
Linkages that are not true are always dangerous because it can lead to
loss and even death apart from cultivating insanity. If you think some false
linkages are harmless, some dangerous then you may be a fool with wrong
understanding of reality.
Armstrong’s first step on the moon may be small and the first moon
landing may represent a big leap for mankind but the two are unrelated, should
not be linked together and it is only linked together to try to be clever,
witty as if that small step is a giant leap for mankind when to perceive so is
to train oneself to perceive falsely because that one small step is not a giant
leap for mankind. The fact that ordinary people see nothing wrong and even
applaud the wit reflects common delusion and false understanding that is the
path to future woe.
THERE IS NO NEED TO SAY ANYTHING UPON STEPPING ON THE MOON EXCEPT
PERHAPS TO SAY I HAVE SAFELY STEPPED ON THE MOON (DID NOT SINK). TO SAY
SOMETHING FOR THE RECORD OR TO BE HISTORIC IS NOT A VALID REASON TO SPEAK AND
IF YOU DO SO, YOU ARE DRIVEN BY PROGRAMMING TO SAY SO AND YOU ARE BEHAVING
ROBOTIC PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
JUST BECAUSE IT IS A HISTORIC MOMENT IS NOT VALID REASON TO SAY
SOMETHING FOR POSTERITY.
It is always speaking falsely boastfully calling it an amazing year and
if you think it may be true you are gullible.
It is impossible anyone’s life here can be amazing, suffering is never
far from the surface, even if you don’t look for trouble it will come to you
and so it is impossible for anyone to have a truly amazing year which implies
his mental force is stirred strongly to like in a surprise way what has
happened.
AMAZING IMPLIES A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED TO BE SURPRISED AND
LIKING WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND EVEN IF IT IS TRUE, IT IS NEVER THE EVENTS THAT
ARE AMAZING BUT THE SUBJECTIVE AND FALSE HARMFUL STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT
CAUSES THE AMAZEMENT. TO BE STIRRED IS SUFFERING AND NOT TO BE STIRRED IS
HAPPINESS AND SO HOW CAN SOMETHING THAT IS SUFFERING, TO BE AMAZED, BE GOOD AS
TOUTED?
IT IS NEVER GOOD BUT BAD AND MEANINGLESS TO BE AMAZED COMPARED TO BEING
UNPERTURBED AND SO IF BY AMAZING YOU MEAN IT IS GOOD OR LOVELY THEN YOU ARE
DELUDED AND SPEAKING FALSELY. HE IS TRYING TO MAKE MUCH OF HIS FAMILY’S YEAR
AND THAT IS A FORM OF BOASTING OR BEATING THE DRUM.
ANYONE WHOSE LIFE HERE CAN BE AMAZING IS HEADED FOR EVEN ETERNAL WOE.
THOSE WHO HATE THEIR LIVES HERE, WHO HAVE CEASED TO BE AMAZED BY HAPPENINGS
HERE ARE HEADED FOR EXIT FROM SUFFERING.
The reason the rape dampened revelry is because revelry is a matter of
emotions, stirred mental forces. If revelry is something true, meaningful and
essential it cannot be dampened and so all revelry is heedless, it is suffering
not the happiness touted to be and all those who revel are headed for the pit of
depression.
REVELRY IS STIRRED MENTAL FORCE OR EXCITEMENT ACCORDING TO PLANS (A
RITUAL) BECAUSE OF AN EVENT AND IT IS MEANINGLESS, ROBOTIC AND HARMFUL.
Pope
Benedict condemns "unregulated capitalism" for contributing to world
tension, in a new year address to worshippers.
How to truly understand the pope’s action?
Capitalism is actually suffering and harmful even to the most successful
practitioner and so if a person has no concern for himself in heedlessly
pursuing capitalism then no amount of admonition by others will make him turn
like a drug addict the capitalist is addicted to money and acquisitions even as
he suffers even terribly from his affliction.
It is not just rampant capitalism that is bad, there is no such thing as
mild or moderate capitalism that is OK and so by deploring only rampant
capitalism you are saying mild to moderate controlled evil is OK and this may
not be approved by God.
CAPITALISM IS TOTALLY EVIL AND SO IT IS NOT TO BE TOLERATED IN MILD OR
MODERATE FORMS AND TO DECRY RAMPANT CAPITALISM IS TO SANCTION MILDER FORMS THAT
MAY NOT ACCORD TO GOD’S VIEW. CAPITALISM IS DEDICATION TO WHAT IS HARMFUL AND
SUFFERING LIKE DRUG AND ALCOHOL AND IF A PERSON WILL NOT TAKE CARE OF HIMSELF
THEN DEPLORING WHICH IMPLIES THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO SCOLD IS TO LITTLE
OR NO AVAIL OR IT IS A FUTILE PURSUIT.
RATHER THAN DEPLORE OR CONDEMN CAPITALISM ONE SHOULD SPEAK OF THE EVIL
AND HARM OF ALL FORMS OF CAPITALISM AND IT IS UP TO THE AUDIENCE TO UNDERSTAND
AND APPLY.
Exposing
the ugly side of greed:
You have probably heard the statement above bandied by others before and
so it is rehashed without true understanding because it is false.
There are no beautiful side of greed, greed is evil and harmful and if
by ugly you mean it is evil and harmful then there are no beautiful side of
greed and you are speaking falsely or without true understanding talking about
exposing the ugly side of greed.
ANYONE WHO SPEAKS FALSELY EVEN IF HE DOES NOT REALIZE IT MUST DO SO WITH
AROUSED SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND DETAINS HIM IN STRESS EVEN FOR
AN ETERNITY.
No comments:
Post a Comment