Force
creates consciousness and consciousness creates this world:
Force creates consciousness or consciousness is a creation of force and
consciousness creates this world, this world does not exist independently of
consciousness but it is entirely a virtual (non-existent) creation of
consciousness that mesmerizes deceived beings as ‘so real’.
Yet there is a being in whom force is active all the time, who has a
share of the universal consciousness that is isolated from others who
foolishly, in deception partakes of what his consciousness perceives and when
this being finally awakens from being mesmerized or spellbound by his stirring
mental force and consciousness he is no longer interested to continue in the
courses of existence because it is not only suffering but terrible extended
suffering in which the rewards are actually also suffering not rewards and so
he extinguishes himself forever.
THE REWARDS OF EXISTENCE ARE ACTUALLY SUFFERING THEMSELVES FOR THOSE WHO
SEE CORRECTLY OR TRULY AND SO WHEN A BEING AWAKENS AND SEES EXISTENCE AS A MASS
OF USELESS SUFFERING, HE EXTINGUISHES HIMSELF WHILST THOSE WHO ARE BLINDED
CONTINUE TO HANKER FOR EXISTENCE PUTTING THEMSELVES AT RISK OF TERRIBLE
SUFFERING THAT ARE AS VAST AS OCEANS.
THIS WORLD THAT APPEARS SO REAL ONLY EXIST IN TERMS OF SIGHT, SOUND,
SMELL, TASTE AND TOUCH AND EXISTS ONLY IN CONSCIOUSNESS, IT IS A CREATION OF
CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONSCIOUSNESS IS A CREATION OR ORCHESTRATION OF MENTAL FORCE
THAT IS ALSO BEHIND THE FERMENTATIONS OF THE MIND THAT IS IGNORANT, DECEIVED BY
THE ALLURES OF EXISTENCE THAT ARE IN TRUTH SIGNIFICANT SUFFERINGS RATHER THAN
THE HAPPINESS THEY ARE MADE OUT TO BE.
Is
romantic love a bad thing?
It takes a deluded person with muddled thinking to pose this question to
others and that is the path to future woe.
Love can be clearly defined as such and such and there is nothing
romantic about it and so he is speaking about something false and thus bad when
he speaks of romantic love.
WHATEVER IS FALSE IS BAD. LOVE IS LOVE AND ROMANCE IS ROMANCE AND THERE
IS NOTHING ROMANTIC ABOUT LOVE EXCEPT IN YOUR DENSE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL
END IN INSANITY.
AND SO IT IS THAT HE CANNOT SEE OR HE SEES FALSELY AND SO HE WANTS TO
ENGAGE OTHERS IN A HARMFUL NOT BENEFICIAL DISCUSSION ABOUT WHETHER ROMANTIC LOVE,
SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT IN DELUSION IS GOOD OR BAD?
ROMANCE IS ABOUT MAKE BELIEF AND EMOTIONS/ATTRACTION THAT CANNOT BE
SUSTAINED FOREVER AND LEAD TO STRESS AND CONFLICT AND SO IT IS BAD. LOVE THAT
IS TRUE IS NEVER A BURDEN (BECAUSE IT DOES NOT INVOLVE STIRRED
EMOTIONS/ATTRACTION) AND GIVES HAPPINESS TO BOTH PARTIES AND SO IT IS GOOD.
THE BUDDHA SPOKE OF DEVELOPING LOVING KINDNESS TO ALL AND IT IS THE PATH
TO HEAVEN AND SO LOVE IS GOOD. IF IT WAS BAD THE BUDDHA WOULD NEVER RECOMMEND
IT.
Romance
is based on fantasy or imagination:
People talk about romance yet do they truly understand romance? They can
recognize romance but they do not understand the true nature of romance as it
is possible to.
JUST BECAUSE A PERSON SPEAKS ABOUT ROMANCE AND EXULT OVER ROMANCE, CAN
RECOGNIZE ROMANCE AS IT HAPPENS DOES NOT MEAN HE UNDERSTANDS ROMANCE, HE
UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT.
Without fantasy (aka imagination or visual falsifications) there cannot
be romance. A man is smitten by a woman (who may be fat as a pig), his
excitement or lust stirred wildly so he has unrealistic perception in sight,
sound and even smell of his object of romance and he keeps thinking or
entertaining fantasies about her, about talking and doing things with her, when
she touches him even slightly he goes into a swoon of heavenly delight, just
the sound of her voice is enough to stir his mental force wildly so he cannot
or find it hard to control his lust.
ROMANCE IS ABOUT UNREALISTIC EMOTION OR FORCE BASED RELATIONSHIP WITH A
MEMBER OF THE OPPOSITE SEX IN WHICH THE PERSON’S PERCEPTION OF THE OTHER PERSON
IS DISTORTED POSITIVELY AND HE LAPSES INTO AND ACTIVELY FABRICATE FANTASIES IN
RELATIONSHIP TO HIS OBJECT OF LUST.
Romance
is always suffering like being drunk:
Romance is never the pleasure it is made out to be and it is akin to
being drunk or inebriated that is not only suffering and leaves the person
exposed to dangers as a result of his inebriated state, it is conditioning so
that if not exited, the fool, male or female becomes ‘hopelessly romantic’, he
very easily falls in ‘love’ and in danger of being conned.
ROMANCE IS NOT ONLY SUFFERING IT IS DANGEROUS, NOT ONLY IS THE PERSON
INEBRIATED, HE STRUGGLES TO SEPARATE FANTASY FROM REALITY AND LIKE SMOKING AND
ALCOHOL HE BECOMES HOOKED ON ROMANCE, A WOMAN JUST HAS TO SMILE AT HIM AND HE
THINKS ROMANCE IS IN THE AIR.
Attraction
plus fantasy equals romance:
There are two essential ingredients in romance, attraction between
opposite sexes (that is all about stirred force, nothing to do with true
reason) and fantasy (a fertile imagination to concoct scenarios that keep the
attraction fuelled).
FANTASY IS ABOUT FALSIFICATION, IMAGINING THINGS RATHER THAN SEEING
THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE AND ROMANCE IS DEPENDENT ON FANTASY AND ATTRACTION
BETWEEN THE SEXES.
Anyone who thinks such money made is perfectly legitimate has wrong view
and the Buddha said there are two destinations for wrong view, hell or the
animal womb.
There are two ways to make money, one is through sweat of your brow or
work and the only is to use money (often borrowed money) to make money or
speculate/invest/gamble. Soros did not make the money out of nothing, there
must be losers, if it was the Bank of Japan, it is the people of Japan who are
ultimately short changed.
WHENEVER A PERSON MAKES MONEY BETTING IT IS AT THE LOSS OF OTHERS AND
THAT HAS KARMA NO MATTER HOW YOU DENY IT WHICH IS CULTIVATING FALSE PERCEPTION
THAT ENDS IN INSANITY. GOD WILL PUNISH YOU FOR NOT WORKING AND MAKING MONEY OUT
OF THE LOSS OF OTHERS. SOROS IS EVIL NOT GOOD BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN DR M IS
RIGHT TO HATE HIM.
Dr
M is not right but hates Soros:
Malaysia too was making bets about the £ but on the opposite side of
Soros and lost and so Dr M is furious. If you too are speculating it does not
make you better than Soros.
If Dr M had bet and won against Soros or Soros had given tips that enable
him to make a lot of money, D M would not be so adverse to Soros.
A
speculator is worse than a prostitute:
A prostitute works to earn her money whereas a speculator or investor
makes money out of others or the system and so he makes money without work.
Say you bought a house at $100,000 and now it is worth $600,000 for no
true reason because of speculative fever. Now the system has to give you
$600,000 for your house whereas before it was only $100,000. If this rise is
not truly justified your profit is made at the expense of the system or others
who hold the same currency as you hold.
A PROSTITUTE IS LOOKED DOWN ON AND CONDEMNED BUT AT LEAST SHE WORKED FOR HER MONEY, A SPECULATOR IS WORSE, HE WANTS MONEY FROM OTHERS WITHOUT WORKING. HIS ‘EARNED’ MONEY NEVER CAME FROM THE SKY BUT AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS.
A PROSTITUTE IS LOOKED DOWN ON AND CONDEMNED BUT AT LEAST SHE WORKED FOR HER MONEY, A SPECULATOR IS WORSE, HE WANTS MONEY FROM OTHERS WITHOUT WORKING. HIS ‘EARNED’ MONEY NEVER CAME FROM THE SKY BUT AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS.
I SAY A SPECULATOR IS WORSE THAN A PROSTITUTE, IF YOU DISAGREE YOU MAY
BE RIGHT OR HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
Speculators
not prostitutes have brought the world to brink of disaster:
If everyone worked for their money this world would not be facing
economic and financial disaster. It is because people have not earned their
money but they want to get rich quick by speculation at the expense of the
system that it is now facing disaster.
It is oil speculators who have driven oil prices so high it has crippled
the world economy.
It is house and property speculation that has created monstrous property
bubbles whose (coming) collapse will be disastrous.
IF EVERYONE EARNED HIS MONEY THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE IN SUCH TROUBLE
TODAY, IT IS BECAUSE OF SPECULATION FUELLED BY BORROWING OR DEBT THAT HAS
CAUSED SUCH MASSIVE ASSET VALUE BUBBLES WHICH CANNOT BE SUSTAINED INDEFINITELY
AND WHOSE BURSTING WILL BLOW AWAY MANY.
My
mind is now not stirred:
Not always but often my mind nowadays is not stirred, not distressed by
things I see and hear and that is always a happier state to exist in.
As long as a person’s mental force is stirred to be upset, excited, sad,
agitated, confused, hurt or fearful, he is said to be stirred and that is
always suffering, never the happiness it is made up to be, this I know from
experience.
Before a person’s mind can become not distressed, not stirred by things
happening he must first achieve freedom from stress which means he must have
successfully eliminated style or the automatic use of force to prolong, change
speed and loudness.
Further before his mental force cannot be disturbed by others, he must
stop thinking which unifies his mind and renders it resistant from provocation.
IT IS NEVER HAPPINESS BUT SUFFERING TO HAVE YOUR MIND DISTURBABLE BY
OTHERS. BEFORE YOU CAN STOP BEING STIRRED YOU MUST BE ABLE TO STOP THINKING
WHICH RENDERS THE MIND UNIFIED AND MORE RESISTANT TO PROVOCATION. BEFORE YOU
CAN STOP THINKING YOU MUST BE FREE OF STRESS, FREE OF STYLE, YOUR MENTAL FORCE
MUST STOP PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
Finance
ministers of the G20 nations meeting in Moscow will not criticise Japan for
weakening the yen, a leaked draft communique suggests
If what Japan did has nothing wrong you are mad to consider criticizing
Japan and it is only if there is something wrong and you do not criticize that
what has happened is valid.
IT IS NOT A MATTER OF CRITICIZING BUT WHAT IS WRONG SHOULD BE STATED SO
THAT EVERYONE IS CLEAR IT IS WRONG. TO IGNORE WRONGDOING BECAUSE THE PERSON IS
ON YOUR SIDE OR TO BE SYMPATHETIC IS DELUDED OR COMMITTING A FALSITY THAT LEADS
TO EVEN MORE DIFFICULTY LATER ON.
IF WHAT JAPAN DID IS NOT WRONG, ARE YOU MAD TO TALK ABOUT CRITICIZING?
IF WHAT IS DONE IS WRONG, IMPROPER THEN IT SHOULD BE STATED NOT SWEPT UNDER THE
CARPET WHICH LEADS TO EVEN MORE DIFFICULTIES LATER.
Trying to sell:
A lot of people do not realize they are robots programmed to try to sell
things they say or do by putting what they say or do in a way that is appealing
or attract targeted audiences.
Thinking
divides a person’s mind:
It is thinking that permanently divides a person’s mind.
Other people’s style bombards the person with a simultaneous cocktail of
syllable, prolonging, changing speed and loudness but it is EXTRINSIC, trying
to draw the person’s attention four ways at once but it is a person’s THINKING
that is INTRINSIC, what he is doing that divides his mind.
ONCE A PERSON HAS ATTAINED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND, HE HAS
ELIMINATED THE DIVISION OR DISTRACTION OF HIS MIND CAUSED BY THE SIMULTANEOUS
RENDITION OF SUBSTANCE (SYLLABLE), PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND
WHAT REMAINS IS HIS CONSTANT THINKING THAT DIVIDES HIS ATTENTION BETWEEN WHAT
HE IS DOING AND WHAT HE IS THINKING. ONCE HIS THINKING IS ELIMINATED, HE HAS
SUCCEEDED IN PUTTING AN END TO HIS THINKING HIS ATTENTION IS EFFORTLESSLY
AUTOMATICALLY ENTIRELY FOCUSED ON WHAT HE IS DOING OR SAYING.
AFTER THE PERSON HAS CONQUERED/DESTROYED HIS STYLE WHAT REMAINS TO
DIVIDE HIS CONCENTRATION IS HIS CONSTANT THINKING AND ONCE HIS THINKING IS
STOPPED HIS CONCENTRATION IS UNIFIED AND IT BECOMES CONDUCIVE TO NOT BEING STIRRED
AND SHAKEN BY OTHERS TO BE UPSET, LIKE OR DISLIKE, THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF
MIND. WITHOUT STOPPING THINKING YOU CANNOT NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE.
Scatterers
of concentration:
Anyone or anything that scatters a person’s concentration is evil and
guilty of sin because a scattered concentration is the path to suffering and
death even endlessly.
Thus if you speak and act with style, whether you know or not you are
guilty of trying to divide another’s concentration four ways between the
substance of what is said, the prolonging, the changing speed and the changing
loudness. You can only avoid others’ efforts to scatter your concentration by
seclusion, minimising contact with those who possess style.
The other culprit is your own style, which hopelessly divide your
concentration and will condemn you to even endless suffering and death.
After your style it is your constant thinking that scatters your
concentration and once you have stopped thinking, your mind is FINALLY united.
OTHERS’ STYLE SERVE TO SCATTER OR DIVIDE YOUR CONCENTRATION FOUR WAYS
AND SO ANYONE WITH STYLE IS GUILTY OF HARMING OTHERS, GUILTY OF PERSECUTING
OTHERS WITH DISTRACTION.
YOUR OWN STYLE SCATTERS YOUR OWN CONCENTRATION AND SO YOU ARE TO BLAME
FOR HAVING STYLE.
ONCE YOUR STYLE IS ELIMINATED WHAT REMAINS THAT SCATTERS YOUR MIND IS
YOUR ENDLESS THINKING.
ONCE THINKING HAS STOPPED A PERSON’S MIND IS FINALLY UNITED AND THAT IS ALWAYS
HAPPINESS NEVER BORING OR SUFFERING.
How
to stop thinking:
Before you have tasted no thinking you can dismiss it as useless and you
are defiling yourself doing so. I have tasted no thinking and I know it is an
incomparably happier and saner mode of existence.
It is difficult if not impossible to stop what has great momentum and so
before you attempt to stop thinking you must reduce the momentum in thinking.
THINKING THAT IS ACCOMPANIED BY STYLE, BY FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING
SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO STOP AND SO BEFORE YOU CAN
STOP THINKING YOU MUST ELIMINATE THE STYLE IN YOUR THINKING WHICH MEANS YOU
HAVE TO FIRST SUCCEED IN ELIMINATING STYLE OR FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED
AND STRENGTH IN YOUR SPEECH AND ACTIONS.
THEN YOU MEDITATE FREQUENTLY TO CALM YOUR MIND, TO SLOW DOWN THE TEMPO
OF YOUR THINKING FROM SAY 10 TO 8 TO 6 TO 4 THOUGHTS PER MINUTE UNTIL THINKING
FINALLY STOPS ONCE YOUR MIND HAS REACHED A CERTAIN STEADINESS.
IF YOU ARE MORE INTERESTED IN SLEEPING, IN BEING OCCUPIED BY AFFAIRS OF
THIS WORLD, BY WATCHING TV THEN IT IS DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT YOU WILL
EVER STOP THINKING.
THINKING IS CONDITIONING AND SO CAN RELAPSE, YOU CAN REDUCE YOUR
THINKING TO NEAR ZERO AND IT CAN RELAPSE IF YOU ARE LACKADAISICAL.
(What I say is in accordance to what the Buddha who claims he is the
highest teacher taught. How come no one bullshits like me? Because no one here
speaks like me, I do claim exclusivity that may be even of the utmost
importance, the difference between eternal suffering and death and eternal
happiness and life.)
Directed
and undirected thinking:
Thinking can be divided in directed rational or purposeful type and
undirected rambling, aimless, fantastical imaginative, manipulative,
calculating, plotting type.
Before you can stop thinking you must first diminish the undirected
harmful mad type until all your thinking is directed.
NOWADAYS MY THINKING IS DIRECTED, I DO NOT INDULGE IN FANTASY AND
SCHEMING.
Stop
thinking and two eternities in heaven is yours:
The person who can stop thinking has a much happier existence here
compared with those who cannot and he is heading for two eternities in heaven
according to the Buddha.
Anyone who dismisses no thinking as impossible or worthless is making a
very big fatal mistake because he is missing out on much happiness here and
even two eternities of heavenly bliss that makes any king here’s happiness
meagre said the Buddha.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO STOP ALL THINKING HERE AND IT IS INCOMPARABLY HAPPIER
COMPARED WITH NONSTOP THINKING AND IT IS THE KEY TO 2 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN SAID
THE BUDDHA.
She
paid with her life:
A
CELEBRITY TV show has aired haunting footage of Oscar Pistorius's slain
girlfriend speaking about the need to leave a positive mark on life. "Not
just your journey in life but the way that you go out and make your exit is so
important," Reeva Steenkamp said.
It is not meritorious telling others their journey in life and the way
they go out is important because it encourages people to be self-centred, self
identity view is one of three lower fetters to future woe according to the
Buddha.
How did she exit? Apparently she was cowering and screaming behind a
locked bathroom door as Pistorius stalked her with a gun.
He pleaded not guilty but it is in delusion, even if he truly mistook
her for an intruder there is deadly karma shooting another let alone shooting
first and asking later.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO SEE OTHERS CLEARLY, EVEN BEFORE THIS INCIDENT IF YOU
LOOK AT PISTORIUS WITH DISCERNING EYES, HE IS NOT SOMEONE YOU WANT TO ‘HANG
AROUND’ OR ASSOCIATE WITH.
God
take me away:
When you say God take me away you mean God remove me from this world but
it is a lie because now he denies killing her and want to live on.
People think they understand what they say and they say the truth but it
is not the truth they speak and they will be called to account. He said God
take him away and so he will be taken away, not as easily as he thinks it will
be.
WHAT MEN SPEAK IS NEVER THE TRUTH EXCEPT IN THEIR DELUSION AND IF YOU
SPEAK FALSELY YOU MAY BE ASKED TO FULFILL WHAT YOU SPOKE FALSELY BUT BLINDED BY
THEIR EMOTIONS MEN CANNOT HELP HANGING THEMSELVES WITH THEIR OWN WORDS, AGAIN
AND AGAIN, WEEPING TEARS THE BUDDHA SAID IS GREATER THAN THE FOUR GREAT OCEANS.
What
the horsemeat scandal suggests:
Unless they have just begun substituting horsemeat for beef, the rampant
widespread nature of the substituting suggests nobody is in charge, the
authorities are asleep or incompetent.
You think the leaders of nations are competent and doing their jobs but
they are incompetent even in top countries and sleeping on the job.
In the same way, regulators in financial markets are incompetent,
deluded (wrong understanding) and sleeping on the job.
AND SO JUST BECAUSE EVERYTHING SEEM FINE DOES NOT MEAN SOME TERRIBLE
DISASTER IS BREWING AND MANKIND RATHER THAN CLEVER IS INCOMPETENT, DELUDED AND
SLEEPING ON THE JOB.
This is a false misleading statement emanating from delusion that has
karma attached.
It is not possible for a truly good policeman to turn rogue and it is
only possible because he was not good in the first place. Even if he was
racially persecuted, it is not possible for a good policeman to the law into
his hands and turn murderously on his oppressors.
Even you look at his burly body and face with steroidal smile, that is
never the hallmark of a good person but a stressed person. You can blame others
for your stress but in truth you are very much to blame for your stress and
anyone who is stressed is guilty of significant sin.
WITHOUT DELVING INTO HIS HISTORY, HIS BURLINESS AND GRIN DEPICTS A
STRESSED PERSON AND ROBOT AND NO ONE WHO IS STRESSED AND A ROBOT IS BLAMELESS
AND SO IT IS NEVER A POSSIBILITY HE WAS A GOOD COP TURN BAD EXCEPT IN YOUR
DELUSION.
BY SAYING HE WAS A GOOD COP TURNED ROGUE YOU ARE FOSTERING DELUSION IN
OTHERS THAT THIS IS POSSIBLE AND THERE IS KARMA FOR DOING SO TO BE EXPERIENCED
AS FUTURE SUFFERING.
The hallmark of the deluded man is that he sees something where there is
nothing and he sees nothing where there is something.
What does it matter if you label it food fraud or food danger? If you
are talking about food safety then there is a body of health inspectors whose
job it is to maintain safety and surely they would especially focus on minced
meat/sausages that is a prime target for fraud and would have discovered it as
unsafe.
WHAT DOES IT MATTER, FOOD FRAUD OR FOOD DANGER? ONLY A DELUDED MAN CAN
SEE SOMETHING WHERE THERE IS NOTHING, NOTHING WHERE THERE IS SOMETHING VERY
IMPORTANT (EG PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT LEADS TO STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION).
Is
a retired pope still infallible?
Fallibility and infallibility are not considerations of those with true
understanding, the requisite for subscribing to infallibility is absence of
true understanding.
To a person of true understanding, it is senseless to talk about
infallibility and to accord another being with infallibility which is
indiscriminate. The person of true understanding treats each occasion on a case
by case basis and so he cannot treat another being as infallible so that
whatever he says or does is not subject to question, reason and understanding.
WHATEVER A PERSON SAYS OR DOES CAN BE EXAMINED AND SEEN AS TRUE OR
FALSE. FALLIBILITY AND INFALLIBILITY PERTAINS TO A BEING, NOT TO THE MATTER AT
HAND, WHAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS EITHER TRUE OR FALSE, GOOD OR BAD/HARMFUL,
MEANINGLESS OR MEANINGFUL.
FALLIBILITY AND INFALLIBILITY ARE ABOUT A PERSON, ABOUT ACCORDING
WITHOUT KNOWING INFALLIBILITY TO A PERSON. IF YOU SEE WHAT THE PERSON IS SAYING
OR DOING IS TRUE YOU ARE MAD TO CONSIDER FALLIBILITY OR INFALLIBILITY WHICH IS
AN INDISCRIMINATE ACROSS BOARD SENSELESS APPROVAL OF A PERSON RATHER THAN
SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION HAPPENINGS.
Malaysia-Market factors to
watch on Feb 18(Monday)
This statement does not require reason and it is purely an instruction
that may be true or false and requires following and anyone who follows what he
said is a robot following instructions.
THE STATEMENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON, IT IS MERELY TELLING YOU
WHAT TO DO THAT IF A READER SUBSCRIBES, HE CARRIES ACCORDING TO INSTRUCTIONS
AND HE IS THEREFORE A ROBOT BECAUSE HE IS GREEDY FOR GAINS.
Infallible
or not you still have to consider what a person is saying:
Even if a person has been accorded infallibility you still have to
consider if what he is saying or doing is true or not. If what he is saying or
doing is clearly not true and benevolent, it is pointless treating him as
infallible and lapsing into falsity and suffering treating someone as
infallible. Thus it is only if someone has no true understanding, he is blind
and need another as guide that he needs to accord another person infallibility
so that he can be his walking stick.
ONLY THE BLIND NEED A WALKING STICK. IT IS BECAUSE A PERSON CANNOT SEE
THE TRUTH (WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO) THAT HE NEEDS TO ACCORD ANOTHER
INFALLIBILITY SO THAT HE CAN FOLLOW HIS PRONUNCIATIONS WITHOUT QUESTION.
FOR A PERSON WHO CAN SEE THE TRUTH, IT IS SILLY AND EVIL TO ACCORD
ANOTHER INFALLIBILITY BECAUSE HE CAN SEE FOR HIMSELF WHAT THE OTHER SAYS OR
DOES IS TRUE OR NOT AND IF WHAT IS SAID IS FALSE, IT IS EVIL, DENYING THE TRUTH
AND COURTING INSANITY TO SANCTION HIS INFALLIBILITY.
AUSTRALIANS
must keep working past 65 because Baby Boomers reaching the pension age are
intensifying pressure on the nation's finances, the ageing minister says.
With so many young people unemployed all over the world you would think
it would be logical governments encourage the aging to retire to make way for
the young but there may be a calculative deceitful reason why retirement age is
being raised in many nations.
By raising the retirement age, it may mean the governments have to pay
less retirement money to those who would have retired whilst also paying new
recruits. Further by postponing retirement, hopefully some would have died off
and thus reduce the retirement payment burden.
THE REASON WHY RETIREMENT AGES IS BEING PUSHED BACK FURTHER MAY BE
BECAUSE OF COST CONSIDERATION, POSTPONING RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND HOPING SOME
RETIREES WILL DIE IN THE INTERIM.
HERE IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MANKIND RECKLESSLY LIVING AT THE EDGE, GOING
FOR BROKE.
Microsoft:
Introducing live tiles:
Unless you want to court insanity and suffering, you are not permitted
to speak falsely even if it is ‘just an advertisement’.
There is nothing live or dead about those tiles which are merely a
variation of the theme of icons or buttons.
The purpose of saying it is ‘live’ is to falsely make more than there
actually is in those tiles.
YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE PERCEPTION OR IGNORING
TRUTH WHEN YOU CALL THOSE TILES ‘LIVE’ WHEN THERE IS NOTHING LIVE OR DEAD ABOUT
THOSE TILES. ANYONE WHO SPEAKS THUS MUST STIR SELF-RESISTANCE IN HIM THAT LEADS
TO STRESS WHICH IS A NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK.
IT WOULD BE CORRECT TO SAY ‘INTRODUCING WINDOW TILES’ TO SAY ‘LIVE’ IS
TO FALSELY EXAGGERATE.
Why
there is poverty and mass unemployment:
Poverty and mass unemployment have causes and they are never blameless
but reflect greed and the merciless selfishness of capitalism
The poor are often blamed for their lack of employment and being
parasites and stupid when the rich are very much to blame for the woes of the
downtrodden that they ignore and refuse to care.
Whether a person’s job is necessary or unnecessary, meaningful or
meaningless, beneficial or harmful is objective and cannot be denied in truth,
only in falsity or delusion.
A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE DOING HIGHLY PAID JOBS THAT ARE IN TRUTH USELESS,
UNNECESSARY AND IF THEY ARE FIRED, THE MONEY SAVED COULD BE SPENT ON EMPLOYMENT
THE HOARDS OF IMPOVERISHED TO DO ESSENTIAL WORK LIKE KEEPING STREETS CLEAN AND
SAFE, TO BOOST SECURITY.
Increasingly robots do jobs that were done by workers eg assembly, even
road sweeping where automated machines sweep and remove debris. The money saved
using robots are pocketed not by the poor but by rich entrepreneurs.
MANY ARE POOR AND UNEMPLOYED BECAUSE THEY ARE NEGLECTED BY SOCIETY AND
THEIR SHARE GRABBED BY THOSE WHO ARE ALREADY VERY RICH. MANY WELL TO DO PEOPLE
ARE DOING JOBS THAT ARE ACTUALLY USELESS, UNNECESSARY AND THEY DRAIN WEALTH
THAT COULD OTHERWISE BE SPENT EMPLOYING THE POOR TO DO ESSENTIAL WORK THAT ARE
LEFT UNDONE BECAUSE THE MONEY HAS BEEN SIPHONED OFF.
THERE IS MASSIVE POVERTY BECAUSE THE MONEY THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN
TO THEM HAS BEEN CONFISCATED BY GREEDY MINORITY AND MANY DOING OVERPAID
UNNECESSARY FOR SHOW JOBS.
NOBODY CARE BUT THIS IS LIKE A CANCER THAT WILL ONE DAY DESTROY SOCIETY
THROUGH UNREST AND VIOLENCE.
RPK should be fired, dismissed because he is deluded and doing a useless
job.
Only a deluded fool without true understanding will say the above and if
you think he has a case you too are deluded.
There is no such thing as the average voter that he can converse with
and so he is lying and if a 5 minute conversation is his best argument against
democracy then he is making a poor case.
You never argue for or against democracy but you reason out whether
democracy is good or bad, viable or non viable and that reasoning is objective,
applies to everyone and does not belong to anyone, does not need you to
identify with and support.
IF DEMOCRACY IS BAD OR NOT VIABLE, IT CAN BE REASONED OUT OR UNDERSTOOD
AS SUCH AND THIS REASONING DOES NOT BELONG TO ANYONE AND DOES NOT NEED YOU TO
UPHOLD AND CANNOT BE ARGUED AGAINST. AND SO IT IS NEVER ABOUT THE BEST OR WORST
ARGUMENT AGAINST DEMOCRACY WHICH IS ABOUT VERBAL FIGHTING OR FORCE CLASHING BUT
IT IS ABOUT REASONING OUT WHY DEMOCRACY IS BAD OR WILL NOT WORK AND THIS
REASONING SHOULD BE ABIDED TO BY ALL AND IF OTHERS REFUSE TO ABIDE THEN YOU
PART WAYS RATHER THAN PERSIST IN HEATED USELESS ARGUMENTS.
Why
does anyone want to argue against democracy?
If you know that democracy is false and bad then it is false and bad so
why argue against democracy?
It is only if a person is a befuddled fool, wracked by doubt and uncertainty,
who does not understand what he is confronted with, does not truly understand
what democracy is or understand falsely democracy yet he wants to stake a
position about democracy that he puts forward arguments, even best arguments
why he is against democracy.
IF YOU PUT FORTH ‘BEST’ ARGUMENTS WHY YOU ARE AGAINST DEMOCRACY YOU
IMPLY YOU ARE NOT SURE WHAT DEMOCRACY IS ABOUT OR WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD BUT
YET YOU WANT TO DIVINE ON THE MATTER OF DEMOCRACY AND SO YOU RESORT TO
ARGUMENTS TO SUPPORT OR BOLSTER YOUR CASE.
IN THAT CASE YOU ARE LAPSING INTO FALSITY AND UNRIGHTEOUSNESS AND
COURTING FUTURE WOE. IF YOU DO NOT KNOW THE NATURE OF SOMETHING EG DEMOCRACY
YOU ARE WISE TO REFRAIN FROM ADOPTING POSITIONS, FROM ARGUING FOR OR AGAINST
BECAUSE YOU ARE DELIVERING YOURSELF TO DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT THE BUDDHA
SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE. A WISE PERSON ONLY STICKS TO
WHAT HE KNOWS AND HE DECLARES DEMOCRACY IS FALSE AND HARMFUL IF HE KNOWS IT IS
THUS. IF HE DOES NOT KNOW, HE REFRAINS FROM TAKING SIDES AND RESORTING TO BEST
ARGUMENTS TO BOLSTER HIS CASE.
Truth
is never an argument:
If what you say about democracy is the truth it is never an argument but
the truth about democracy and it is not subject to argument or dispute by
anyone.
It is only if what you say about democracy is an opinion, is without
knowing it is true or it is false that it is an argument, your argument for or against
democracy, that you have to make a case against democracy.
AND SO BY SAYING THE BEST ARGUMENT AGAINST DEMOCRACY, YOU ARE ADMITTING
YOU DO NOT KNOW THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER BUT YOU NEVERTHELESS WANT TO INTERVENE,
YOU WANT TO FORM AN OPINION AND YOU BOLSTER YOUR CASE BY ARGUMENTS.
IF YOUR POSITION AGAINST DEMOCRACY IS THE TRUTH IT IS NOT AN ARGUMENT,
NOT THE BEST ARGUMENT AND IF YOUR POSITION AGAINST DEMOCRACY IS THE BEST
ARGUMENT THEN IT IS NOT THE TRUTH AND WHAT IS NOT THE TRUTH IS FALSE AND SO
YOUR POSITION IS FALSE AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR SUFFERING.
Politicians
not voters give democracy a bad name:
It is politicians not voters who give democracy a bad name. If there was
not cheating in the electoral process power would have changed hands even long
ago. It is politicians not voters who are responsible for mass legalizing
illegal immigrants who shifted the political power in Sabah. Even in the US
there is much tampering of the electorate by parties to gain power.
THUS IF ANYTHING, THE BEST CASE AGAINST DEMOCRACY IS NOT THE AVERAGE
VOTER BUT DASTARDLY POLITICIANS WHO ABUSED THEIR POWERS TO WIN BY HOOK (FORCE)
OR CROOK (CHEATING).
Thus it may be more sensible nonsense to say the best argument against
democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average politician.
DEMOCRACY SHOULD BE BANNED NOT SO MUCH BECAUSE OF VOTERS BUT BECAUSE OF
CRIMINAL POLITICIANS.
Democracy
is dangerous because of politicians:
If there is a case against democracy it is never so much because of the
stupid average voter but it is that crooks gravitate towards politics because
being in government gives the politician access to the wealth of the nation
that he can acquire for himself and his cronies.
Very few decent people will proffer themselves for election and those
few that stand for election are vulnerable to assassination, intimidation and
being influenced to be corrupt and so the biggest argument against democracy is
that like shit that attracts flies, democracy attracts crooks, murderers and
power lusting deluded people who are like paedophiles.
POLITICIANS TO DEMOCRACY ARE LIKE PAEDOPHILES TO CHILDREN AND SO IN
ORDER TO DESTROY THE PAEDOPHILES OF DEMOCRACY YOU HAVE TO TAKE AWAY DEMOCRACY.
ONLY A DELUDED MAN OBSESSED WITH POWER, FAME AND WITH AN EYE ON THE MONEY WILL
WANT TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA.
What
I can’t understand:
What I can’t understand is, while the federal government terminated
Penang’s free port status in 1969 and withdrew Terengganu’s oil royalty in 1999
(or rather in 2000, a few months after the state fell in November 1999) because
the opposition had won those states, when these two states went back to the
ruling party Penang’s free port status and Terengganu’s oil royalty were never
reinstated.
It is a fool making a fool of himself who says, ‘what I can’t
understand’ because it is not the fault of others or the world that you can’t
understand but it is always because you do not have understanding in the first
place or you are befuddled or confused and confusable that you sometimes can’t
understand.
EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AND SO THERE IS NEVER A
BLAMELESS CASE OF YOU NOT UNDERSTANDING SOMETHING. THERE MAY BE INSUFFICIENT
INFORMATION OR CONCEALED INFORMATION THAT PREVENTS UNDERSTANDING BUT THAT IS
NOT A CASE OF CANNOT UNDERSTAND BUT INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION AND YOU ARE
TALKING NONSENSE SAYING YOU CAN’T UNDERSTAND.
IF THERE IS INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION THEN THAT IS THE CAUSE OF BEING
UNABLE TO MAKE A CONCLUSION AND YOU ARE A BEFUDDLED FOOL TO SAY YOU CAN’T
UNDERSTAND.
Really
you can’t understand?
Often when people say they can’t understand, it is not because they
cannot think of any possible explanation, the situation is so baffling but they
are trying to make much of something or pretending they cannot understand or
trying to be sarcastic.
OFTEN WHEN PEOPLE SAY THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND IT IS NOT BECAUSE THEY
CANNOT THINK OF POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS BUT THEY ARE CONDESCENDING AND PRETENDING
AS IF SOMETHING IS SO BAFFLING. THIS HAS KARMA BECAUSE IT IS DISHONEST.
This is the foolish talk of a man who does not realize he is putting a
noose around his neck.
You don’t tell others what to do, what she wants to do is her business
and if she listened to you, she becomes your robot and if she does not listen
to you then you are uttering useless advice and will go mad. Unless what you
tell others to do is wholesome, for her benefit you are asking for karma. There
is nothing intrinsically good about her resigning and so your advice is not for
her good but woe. Further you are guilty of hypocrisy because your advice
belies your friendly ‘dear’.
UNLESS YOUR ADVICE TO ANOTHER IS FOR HER BENEFIT YOU ARE ASKING FOR
KARMA TELLING OTHERS WHAT TO DO AND IF YOU BELIE YOUR ‘GOOD’ ADVICE BY CALLING
HER ‘DEAR’ WHEN SHE IS NOT DEAR TO YOU, YOU ARE ASKING FOR EVEN MORE SUFFERING.
YOU WANT HER TO BE YOUR ROBOT, TO DO WHAT YOU TELL HER AND THAT TOO IS KARMA.
This is an unwitting admission that the basis of people’s actions is not
reason but stirred force, stirred emotion.
He is acknowledging the stirred terror caused him to scream and fire
both actions of which are never fresh specific to the occasion but rehashed
from recordings, he has screamed and fired many times before.
IT MAY BE TRUE THAT TRUE REASON IS THE SOURCE OF YOUR ACTIONS AND SPEECH
OR IT MAY BE DELUSION. STIRRED FORCE OR EMOTION IS THE SOURCE OF PEOPLE’S
SPEECH AND ACTIONS WHICH ARE NEVER COMPOSED FRESHLY FOR THE OCCASION BUT
REHASHED FROM RECORDINGS. HIS STIRRED TERROR (FORCE) CAUSED HIM TO SCREAM AND
FIRE BY REHASH AS HE HAS DONE EVEN MANY TIMES IN THE PAST.
A real
alternative to money would benefit many, writes author and journalist David
Wolman. So are the days of cash numbered?
There are never any true or valid reasons for anyone to pose the
question and then make effort to attempt the question, the reason is idle
speculation and greed that conditions or programs the fool to keep throwing up
frivolous or calculation driven questions that drive him to think for answers
that ends in insanity for him.
What does it matter if cash is ‘killed off’ except you are greedy to see
if you can predict and exploit trends for personal gains or it is idle
curiosity.
IDLE THINKING AND SPECULATION IS NOT HARMLESS BUT IT IS CONTROLLED
INSANITY, TRAINS THE FOOL TO CONSTANTLY THINK AND FEED HIS MIND WITH QUESTIONS
ABOUT THIS AND THAT TO ANSWER, THIS AND THAT TO WORRY ABOUT THAT ENDS IN
TORMENT. AGAIN THE CALCULATING MAN WILL ALWAYS BE POSING QUESTIONS TO HIMSELF
TO SEE IF THERE ARE AVENUES FOR GAIN.
Circumstances
in Pistorius case difficult to refute:
Pistorius was said to have discharged a gun threateningly in a
restaurant and then asked someone else to take the blame.
On the night of the murder, neighbours heard rowing even lasting an hour
before the gun shots which came in two bursts, there was a blood stained
cricket bat which may have been used to bash her, she likely hid in the toilet
and shots were directed through the door towards the toilet seat.
For one who sees correctly, the visage of Pistorius is one of a
calculating ‘cold blooded’ person and so all this row about justice is delusion
and lying.
UNLESS YOU THINK NEIGHBOURS ARE FRAMING PISTORIUS THE ROWING BEFORE AND
ON PAST OCCASIONS ARE INDICATION PISTORIUS IS LYING. THERE IS A PLACE IN HELL
AWAITING HIM.
No comments:
Post a Comment