You
can improve your image but you cannot improve reality:
You can improve the image you project to others by working on it until
it satisfies you as a perfect act or show but you can never improve reality
that can only be revealed or exposed, never improved and thus if reality is
that you are not a true Christian only a lip service Christian then you cannot
improve on that reality but you can reveal your true self. You can work to
improve your act as a devout Christian but you cannot improve the truth you are
not a true Christian.
REALITY CAN NEVER IMPROVED, ONLY REVEALED OR EXPOSED, ONLY AN IMAGE OR
APPEARANCE CAN BE IMPROVED (BY MORE MAKE UP) SO WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT IMPROVING
YOUR IMAGE YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT DECEPTION NEVER GOODNESS.
Women
applying make-up are improving their images, their deception:
Women who improve their appearances by applying make-up eg eye shadow,
lip stick, powder are improving their images and that is deception and has
karma to be experienced as future suffering and is not the way to heaven but
woe.
THIS IS AN IMAGE CONSCIOUS WORLD FAR MORE THAN YOU REALIZE OR CONCEDE,
DECEPTION OR APPEARANCES IS THE NAME OF THE GAME HERE AND UNLESS A PERSON IS
BORN AGAIN SHORN OF ALL HYPOCRISY, ALL MAKE UP, ALL PUTTING ON A SHOW, HE
CANNOT ENTER THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN WHERE ANGELS ARE TRULY BEAUTIFUL NOT MADE UP
BEAUTIFUL.
Najib
is concerned about the poor show not what happened:
By saying the government will improve its image in view of negative
publicity he is saying the government will concentrate efforts patching up its
battered image rather than look into why its image has been battered and address
allegations of impropriety. It is because he thinks what he says is good, would
delight Malaysians that he announces that. So you can kiss goodbye to any hope
of reform.
An
image is a false perception:
People have an image of themselves or others as wholesome, clever,
geniuses, masters of the universe, desirable, sexy, etc and these are false, a
form of false perception and delusion that ends in tears, insanity, mad
perception.
You exist, I exist but images of people and governments do not exist,
are subjective, your image of the government may be very different from another
and so it is false.
PEOPLE TRY TO PROJECT IMAGES OF THEMSELVES THAT ARE FALSE EG DEVOUT
CHRISTIAN, DEVOTED HUSBAND, FAMILY MAN AND THAT IS A FORM OF DELIBERATE
DECEITFUL FALSE PERCEPTION YOU TRY TO INCULCATE IN OTHERS WITH DEBT TO BE
REPAID AS SUFFERING. ANYONE WHO PROJECTS A FALSE IMAGE OF HIMSELF THAT HE TRIES
TO SELL TO OTHERS IS ASKING FOR DEBT.
An
image is a fixed rehashable recording:
The person who harbours images of self or others have recordings of self
or others that may be modified repeatedly which they rehash again and again as
the truth or reality about that person or self and that is always false,
delusional.
AN IMAGE OF YOURSELF IS SOMETHING YOU PROJECT TO OTHERS TO BE SEEN AND
IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH A MENTAL RECORDED MODIFIABLE IMAGE OF YOURSELF THAT YOU
REHASH OR PROJECT AS THE SITUATION DEMANDS.
BECAUSE IT IS BASED ON A FIXED RECORDED IDEA OR IMAGE OF YOURSELF, IT IS
ALWAYS FALSE AND ARTIFICIAL, EVIL.
A PERSON OF TRUTH NEVER STORES IMAGES OF HIMSELF OR OTHERS THAT HE
REHASHES TO APPLY TO CURRENT SITUATIONS.
THERE IS NO NEED TO HAVE IMAGES OF YOURSELF AND OTHERS THAT YOU RECORD
AND REHASH AND IT IS ALWAYS FALSE, A FORM OF FALSE RECORDED REHASHED
PERCEPTION.
An
image is not based on reason but desire or force:
Images of self that may be negative or positive about eg yourself are
never based on reality but based on desire, emotions.
PEOPLE HAVE IMAGES OF THEMSELVES THAT ARE EITHER POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE
SELDOM IF EVER ACCURATE. BECAUSE IMAGES ARE FALSE, ARTIFICIAL THEY ARE NEVER
ACCURATE, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ACCURATE IMAGE OF YOURSELF OR OTHERS.
FURTHER IMAGES ARE BASED ON DESIRE, ON STIRRED FORCE AND SO THEY CANNOT BE TRUE
OR REALISTIC OR ACCURATE.
An
image is a mental effigy constructed by emotion:
An image is a mental effigy, something you form and modify driven by
emotion and it is never the real thing and totally unnecessary except in your
delusion it is necessary, meaningful and good that will end in tears and
insanity.
AN IMAGE IS A FORM OF PROGRAMMING, A PROGRAMMED PERCEPTION OF SELF AND
OTHERS THAT CAN NEVER BE TRUE OR ACCURATE, IS CONTRIVED OR ARTIFICIAL AND
CONTROLLED INSANITY.
The
government exists but not an image of it:
The government exists and it does various things but an image of the
government does not exist and it is dependent on those in the government
creating and projecting certain desirable images of it that they want you to
perceive and remember and it is up to the public to subjectively perceive and
form and record in their minds.
It is totally unnecessary to create and project images of your
government but you should concentrate on tending to the affairs of running the
country and it is totally unnecessary for the public to form images of their
governments.
If
it is the truth it is not an image, if it is an image it is never the truth:
Why bother with having an image if it is truth? It is because it is not
the truth that it is merely an image and so whatever is an image is not the
truth and only needed because it is not true and what is true is not an image
of something but the truth about something.
A
realistic self image is still false:
People speak of realistic and unrealistic images of self or reality and
they think a realistic image of self means an accurate or truthful image when
it is nevertheless false but cut down to size, tempered by reality recorded
perception and whatever is a recorded and rehashed perception is always false,
never the truth and dangerous.
EVEN IF YOUR IMAGE OF SELF IS REALISTIC, IF YOU SEE YOURSELF AS SUCH AND
SUCH YOU WILL ACT ACCORDINGLY AND THAT MEANS YOU ARE CONFORMING AND A ROBOT.
THUS YOU THINK YOU ARE A PLAIN JANE YOU WILL ACT A PLAIN JANE, IF YOU THINK YOU
ARE VOLUPTUOUS YOU WILL ACT AS IF YOU ARE VOLUPTUOUS.
YOU SHALL HAVE NO IMAGES OF YOURSELF, NO PERCEPTIONS OF YOURSELF THAT
YOU REMEMBER AND REFER TO OR ACT ACCORDING TO, REALISTIC OR NOT.
I
don’t think of myself as a doctor:
Even though I work as a doctor, I don’t think of myself as a doctor as
ordinary people do, they have an (indelible) image they are a doctor. I don’t
think of myself as male, Chinese or Malaysian and all those who have images of
themselves as such and such are trapped, in danger of future woe because they
are all false.
THE BUDDHA SAID ALL IS NOT SELF, EVEN YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT SELF, IS
SUBJECT TO VANISH, WHAT MORE THAT YOU ARE A DOCTOR, MARRIED, MALAYSIAN, ETC.
How
to reach heaven:
In order to reach heaven and eternal life you must not only achieve the
first higher state (no style, no resistance, no stress) at minimum but you must reside much in
that higher state, love it, enjoy it and if you do not lose it when you pass
away you are born in heaven for one Age.
If you have developed the second higher state (no thinking) and enjoy
and remain much in it then you will be born in heaven for 2 Ages.
Attainment of the third higher state (neither like nor dislike) gives 4
Ages in heaven, attainment of neither pain nor pleasure gives 500 Ages.
Attainment of infinite space, consciousness and nothingness gives 20, 40 &
60,000 eternities in heavenly bliss.
THUS NOT ONLY MUST YOU REACH THE HIGHER STATES OF THE MIND, YOU MUST
FIND DELIGHT IN THEM, RESIDE MUCH IN THEM.
Puggala Sutta: Persons
"Here, bhikkhus, a certain person abides with his heart imbued with loving-kindness extending over one quarter, the second, the third, the fourth quarter, and so above, below, everywhere, and to all as to himself; he abides with his heart abundant, exalted, measureless in loving-kindness, without hostility or ill-will, extending over the all-encompassing world."He finds gratification in that, and looks to it for his well-being; steady and resolute thereon, and if he dies without losing it, he reappears among the gods of a High Divinity's retinue.
"Now the gods of a High Divinity's retinue have a life-span of one aeon. An ordinary person [who has not attained the Noble Eightfold Path] stays there for his life-span; but after he has used up the whole life-span enjoyed by those gods, he leaves it all, and [according to what his past deeds may have been] he may go down even to hell, or to an animal womb, or to the ghost realm. But one who has given ear to the Perfect One stays there [in that heaven] for his life-span, and after that he has used up the whole life span enjoyed by those gods, he eventually attains complete extinction of lust, hate and delusion in that same kind of heavenly existence.
A
stressed man cannot have loving kindness:
A man hounded by stress is a nasty man who hates himself because his
stress is largely self made so it is impossible for anyone suffering daily
stress to have loving kindness to himself let alone to everyone else so he is
not a candidate for heaven according to the Buddha.
In order to be EFFORTLESSLY free of stress you must have no self
resistance in whatever you say or do and that means you must have no style, no
constant stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness that
automatically stirs resistance and thence stress.
THUS THE ABOLISHING OF STRESS IS THE KEY TO THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF
MIND THAT IS THE MINUMUM QUALIFICATION LEADING TO HEAVEN.
You
cannot program loving kindness:
A person who has style is a robot rehashing everything he perceives,
thinks, says and does and so whatever loving kindness he has is never genuine
but programmed and rehashed and that is false, faked.
THUS IN ORDER TO HAVE TRUE LOVING KINDNESS YOU MUST QUIT BEING A ROBOT AND
IN ORDER TO QUIT BEING A ROBOT YOU MUST QUIT HAVING STYLE, QUIT STRETCHING
SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
What
can be programmed and cannot be programmed:
You can program a person to be a musician, to play the piano (just
repeatedly show him how to do it and make him repeat after you), to play
football or tennis or golf, you can program someone to speak publicly, to be a
hostess, to be a doctor or nurse but you cannot program a person to genuinely
love others, whatever love that is rehashed mechanically according to
instructions in the mind is never true love.
Only someone deluded would waste his time and effort answering a silly
question. Environmentalism may be true or false, useful or useless but it is
mad to think it can be annoying, it stirs your mental force to be angry.
THERE ARE NO REASONS WHY ENVIRONMENTALISM SHOULD MAKE ANYONE ANGRY
EXCEPT THAT PERSON IS MAD AND SO ONLY A DELUDED PERSON WOULD SEEK AN ANSWER TO
THAT QUESTION.
Why
loving kindness cannot be programmed:
Everything that happens has reason that can be known and understood and
so if it is impossible to program loving kindness there must be reason.
Only actions (what and how you perceive, think, speak and do) can be
reduced to plans that can be committed to memory and reproduced from memory and
thus programmed. Because sex is an action you can program a person to perform
the sex act by showing him what and how to do.
Loving kindness is not an action but it is a state of the mind devoid of
ill will, greed and delusion and so it cannot be programmed and rehashed from
programmed but it must be attained, achieved by cleansing the mind of all evil
hate, greed and delusion and thence maintained by familiarisation until it is
easily obtained.
ONLY ACTIONS (PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS) CAN BE
REDUCED TO PLANS THAT CAN BE MEMORIZED AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY AND THUS REHASHED
ROBOTICALLY.
LOVING KINDNESS IS NOT AN ACTION BUT A HIGHER STATE OF THE MIND DEVOID
OF ILL WILL, GREED AND DELUSION AND THEREFORE IT CANNOT BE PROGRAMMED AND
REHASHED FROM PROGRAMMING.
Style
means no loving kindness means no heaven:
Whatever a styled person perceives, thinks, says or does is rehashed
from programming or memory and that precludes him from having loving kindness
which cannot be programmed and rehashed from program and if he does not have
loving kindness then according to the Buddha he does not have the means to go
to heaven.
What
kind of loving kindness is rehashed?
To one who discerns as it actually is, everything the styled person does
is by rehash and that is impersonal, standardized reproduction for the occasion
and cannot be sincere or true.
Only the person who personally, freshly specifically compose what he
says and does for the occasion can be truly loving kind to others.
IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS REHASHED STANDARDIZED FROM RECORDING, WHATEVER
LOVING KINDNESS YOU HAVE IS PHONY, IMPERSONAL, MECHANICAL.
Loving
kindness is a deprogrammed state of the mind:
The Buddha said it is three things, ill will, greed and delusion that
detain beings in the lower realms and ill will, greed and delusions are forms
of programming of a person’s mental force that governs his actions and speech
that harms others.
Thinking too is a programmed evil, harmful state but thinking does not
harm others unless thoughts are put into actions and so thinking is not a bar
to going to heaven but the deprogramming of thinking is the next higher state
that gives even higher happiness and longer life in heaven.
In the same way to like and dislike is programmed state of the mind but
unless one puts one’s like and dislike into action, it does not harm others,
only self and to be absent of programmed like and dislike is instead a higher
deprogrammed state of mind that gives higher personal happiness and sanity and
is accorded 4 eternities in heaven.
Feeling pain and pleasure too is a programmed state and not to feel pain
or pleasure is an even higher deprogrammed state that gives even higher
happiness and longer 500 eons in heavenly bliss.
ILL WILL, GREED AND DELUSIONS ARE INSTALLED, PROGRAMMED STATES OF THE
MIND AND THE UNINSTALLATION OF THESE GIVES A DEPROGRAMMED LOVING KIND STATE
WHICH OBVIOUSLY CANNOT BE PROGRAMMED.
Only
activities can be programmed, non activities cannot be programmed:
Ill will is an action, activity and because it is an activity it can be
or is amenable to be programmed, recorded and replayed from memory.
The absence of ill will is not an activity but the absence of an
activity namely ill will and this cannot be programmed because it has nothing,
no activity with which the mind can be programmed and so goodwill cannot be
programmed but it is the default state shorn of programmed ill will.
In the same way greed is an activity of the mind and all activities are
amenable to programming and rehashed as programmed. Not to be greedy is not an
activity but an absence of activity that cannot be programmed and does not
require programming.
ONLY ACTIVITIES CAN BE PROGRAMMED AND LOVING KINDNESS WHICH IS THE
ABSENCE OF ILL WILL, GREED AND DELUSION IS AN ABSENCE OF ACTIVITY THAT DOES NOT
REQUIRE PROGRAMMING AND CANNOT BE PROGRAMMED.
ONCE A PERSON IS DEPROGRAMMED OF PROGRAMMED IRRATIONAL ILL WILL (HATE),
GREED AND DELUSION HE IS AUTOMATICALLY LOVING KIND.
IN THE SAME WAY THINKING IS AN ACTIVITY THAT CAN BE AND IS PROGRAMMED
AND NOT TO THINKING WHICH IS THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS THE ABSENCE OF
ACTIVITY, ABSENCE OF THINKING THAT CANNOT AND DOES NOT REQUIRE PROGRAMMING.
LIKING AND DISLIKING IS AN ACTIVITY THAT CAN AND IS PROGRAMMED AND NOT
TO LIKE AND DISLIKE WHICH IS THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS THE ABSENCE OF
ACTIVITY, ABSENCE OF LIKE AND DISLIKE THAT CANNOT AND DOES NOT REQUIRE
PROGRAMMING.
FEELING PAIN AND PLEASURE IS AN ACTIVITY THAT CAN AND IS PROGRAMMED AND
NOT TO FEEL PAIN AND PLEASURE WHICH IS THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS THE
ABSENCE OF ACTIVITY, ABSENCE OF FEELING PAIN AND PLEASURE THAT CANNOT AND DOES
NOT REQUIRE PROGRAMMING.
No
style cannot be programmed:
No style or no stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness
is an absence of an activity, absence of prolonging, changing speed and
loudness that does not require programming (recording and reproduction from
recording) and cannot be programmed and that is never suffering but an
incomparable release from the dungeon of suffering.
Style or stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness are
activities that can be and are ALWAYS programmed, recorded and rehashed from
recordings.
STYLE IS AN ACTIVITY AND SO IT CAN AND MUST BE PROGRAMMED BECAUSE IT IS
DOING SOMETHING MEANINGLESS, HARMFUL THAT IS JUST FOR SHOW.
‘NO STYLE’ IS NOT AN ACTIVITY, IT HAS NO ACTIVITIES BY WHICH IT CAN BE
PROGRAMMED AND IT NEVER REQUIRES PROGRAMMING.
Only
harmful meaningless activities require programming:
It is only activities that are meaningless, for show or for false
reasons and harmful to self that a person repeatedly performs that requires
programming.
Activities that are meaningful, for true or beneficial reasons that are
not mechanically repeated for the demands of a situation do not require
programming.
Thus style or prolonging of syllables, changing speed and loudness are
meaningless, for show, for false reasons (to impress or please others) and is
repeatedly performed by the fool and so it must be programmed and reproduced as
programmed.
There are actually no true or good reasons to think, thinking is
unnecessary and harmful and so thinking too is a programmed activity. In order
to know you do not need to think but you need to see or have insight that has
nothing to do with thinking and so thinking is unnecessary and suffering and
must be programmed.
This is a foolish statement that incurs more karma to be repaid as
suffering. It is said in mitigation, extenuation which rather than exonerating,
is not admitting responsibility that further creates debt.
If you say something and you did not mean it you are guilty of speaking
falsely which has debt rather than merit.
Even if you were inebriated by alcohol or emotions, you are still
responsible for what you said and it is denial of responsibility to say you did
not mean. Even if you drove a car and ‘accidentally’ killed a person, you are
liable for killing.
UNTIL YOU MEAN EVERY WORD YOU SAY, YOU ARE EXPOSING YOURSELF TO DANGER
OF SUFFERING.
IF YOU TRULY DID NOT MEAN WHAT YOU SAID THEN YOU ARE GUILTY OF FALSE SPEECH
THAT TOO HAS PUNISHMENT.
IF YOU ARE PROFFERING AN EXCUSE TO MITIGATE YOUR RACIST WORDS, YOU ARE
AGAIN INCURRING DEBT NOT MERIT.
EVEN IF YOU WERE INEBRIATED WHEN YOU UTTERED THE RACIST WORDS YOU ARE
STILL RESPONSIBLE AND SHOULD TAKE RESPONSIBILITY RATHER THAN SHIRK IT BY SAYING
YOU DID NOT MEAN IT.
Divorce
will improve Putin’s image:
Quote: Ms. Kryshtanovskaya said she believed that the divorce
would serve to improve his image.
People see nothing wrong but it is sick, calculating to say divorce will
improve his image.
Image is about appearance and it is evil, more concerned about
appearance than what you truly are. It is calculating and evil to link Putin’s
divorce with improving his image.
IMPROVING YOUR IMAGE SOMETHING FALSE IS NOT A VALID REASON TO GET
DIVORCED AND EVEN IF YOU DID NOT DO IT FOR THIS REASON, IT IS CALCULATING TO
JUSTIFY DIVORCE BY SAYING IT WILL IMPROVE PUTIN’S IMAGE. THIS IS DELUSION AND
BEING CALCULATING THAT ENDS IN ETERNAL WOE.
IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY AND FACILE TO THINK DIVORCE WILL IMPROVE
PUTIN’S IMAGE.
Seeking
common ground is evil not good:
Moral: The attitude of negotiation and problem solving is to
find the 18th camel i.e. the common ground.
Only a deluded person will say the above and only those without true
understanding will buy it.
The truth is not subject to negotiation or common ground and so if your
position is based on truth and correctness then it is not open to negotiation
or common ground which is lapsing into falsity and sin.
In any issue there is always the truth and right thing to do and this is
not subject to negotiation or common ground and should be abided to by all
parties, failure to do so incurs karma to be experienced as future suffering
and this is not the path to heaven.
IN ANY CASE YOU SHOULD ABIDE BY THE TRUTH AND RIGHTNESS AND IF THE OTHER
PARTY REFUSES, YOU DENY YOURSELF BY NOT BECOMING PARTY TO COMPROMISE.
NEGOTIATION AND COMMON GROUND IS NOT GOOD AS IT IS PERCEIVED IN THIS WORLD BUT
IT IS COMPROMISE AND EVIL.
Everything
is relative:
This is a rule that people who are robots like to adopt and it is false
and an unwarranted logical conclusion probably linked to Einstein’s theories of
relativity.
There are things that are relative and things that are not relative and
so it is wrong to say indiscriminately everything is relative that must stir
resistance that leads to stress and if you do not know what to make of the
statement or you accept it as valid you too must receive it with stirred
resistance leading to stress.
Whatever is truly good is purely or absolutely not relatively good and
whatever is evil is absolutely evil never relatively evil.
EVIL AND GOOD ARE NOT RELATIVES OF EACH OTHER, THEY ARE THE OPPOSITES
AND MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. JESUS SAID A BAD TREE CANNOT BEAR GOOD FRUIT, THERE IS
NO GOOD IN AN EVIL PERSON AND THAT IS ABSOLUTE, WHAT PEOPLE CALL THE GOODNESS
IN AN EVIL PERSON WHEN SEEN CORRECTLY IS NOT GOOD BUT NICE AND EVIL.
WHATEVER HAS GOOD AND BAD IS NOT TRULY GOOD BUT BAD, WHATEVER IS TRULY
GOOD HAS NO BAD. THUS STYLE OR THE PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED
AND LOUDNESS HAS NO GOOD AND BAD BUT IT IS ABSOLUTELY, TOTALLY BAD AND NO STYLE
IS NOT RELATIVELY GOOD BUT ABSOLUTELY PURELY GOOD.
IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO THINK OF THE PROPOSAL, EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE
OR YOU ACCEPT IT AS TRUE, THEN IT MUST BE UNDERTAKEN WITH STIRRED RESISTANCE
THAT LEADS TO STRESS BECAUSE IT IS AN UNWARRANTED CONCLUSION.
Everything
is relative so there is no good and bad:
When people speak of everything is relative, they are repudiating good
and bad in preference for relativity, nothing is purely good or purely bad,
what is OK in one situation may be not OK in another and this is false and delusion
that ends in woe for the advocate.
There is good and bad and what is good is always good not good in one
situation and bad in another and there is no bad in what is truly good.
Backing means support, means OK and he is putting his head on the
chopping block and this is one of the many bitter prices of being president, he
has to back this and that.
Spying is stealing information that few if any give you permission to
obtain and so that has karma to be repaid as suffering and by backing
surveillance you are backing evil. You need surveillance for false selfish
reasons eg defence is not a valid reason for spying, it is because you are
preoccupied with your material wellbeing here that you need to take
(unrighteous) pre-emptive steps like spying and stealing private information.
Even if you are IRS and you spy on others to convict you are committing an
offence, wrong yourself. The tax evader commits an offence with karma and you
spying on him is also committing an offence.
Everything has a right and wrong and the correct or right thing to do is
never a dilemma but straightforward. It is only when you do not know what to
do, you do not understand the situation you are faced with, you are faced with
choices that are all false that there is a dilemma which is about being stirred
emotionally and struggling to decide under the cloud of blinding force as to
what to do.
DILEMMAS ARE ABOUT FALSITY, NEVER TRUTH. IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT
YOU ARE FACING, YOU WILL KNOW WHAT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO THAT HAS NO
ALTERNATIVES. IT IS ONLY WHEN YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON BUT YOU
NEVERTHELESS WANT TO COMMIT YOURSELF AND THE CHOICES YOU FACE ARE FALSE AND
THUS UNPALATABLE THAT YOU ARE WRACKED WITH DILEMNA WHICH IS SUFFERING AND
CONDITIONING AND LEADS TO WOE NOT HEAVEN.
ONLY DELUDED PEOPLE ARE AFFLICTED WITH DILEMMAS, DILEMMAS NEVER ASSAIL
THE WISE WHO ALWAYS KNOW THE WISE THING TO DO.
The
hardest things to stop:
WHATEVER IS DUE TO FORCE WHEN WELL CONDITIONED IS DIFFICULT TO STOP AND
ACTIVITIES WITH THE LEAST MOMENTUM ARE THE HARDEST TO STOP.
USING FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IN ACTIONS AND SPEECH
HAS THE MOST MOMENTUM AND THUS IT IS THE EASIEST THE STOP AND ITS SUCCESSFUL
ACCOMPLISHMENT GIVES INCOMPARABLE HAPPINESS HERE AND ONE EON IN HEAVEN.
THINKING HAS LESS MOMENTUM THAN PHYSICAL SPEECH AND SO IT IS EVEN HARDER
TO STOP THAN STYLE AND ITS SUCCESS GIVES 2 EONS IN HEAVEN.
BEING STIRRED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE IS DECOUPLED FROM ANY WORK LIKE A
DECOUPLED IDLING ENGINE AND IS EVEN HARDER TO STOP AND ITS SUCCESS IS REWARDED
BY 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
FEELING PAIN AND PLEASURE WHICH INVOLVES MERELY OPENING ONE’S SENSE
DOORS TO BE RECEPTIVE TO FORCE THAT IS THE SOURCE OF PAIN AND PLEASURE HAS THE
LEAST MOMENTUM AND IS THE HARDEST TO STOP AND ITS SUCCESS GIVES 500 EONS IN
HEAVEN.
US China Summit
"unique, positive and constructive"
US President Barack Obama and Chinese
leader Xi Jinping end a two-day summit described by a US official as
"unique, positive and constructive".
There is no need to describe the summit as unique, positive and
constructive but it ensues from a programmed or ritualistic urge to describe a
summit as good even despite behind the doors acrimony. Because such a
description is always false, contorted, a nicety it is controlled insanity for
those who practice it.
If both parties China and the US abide in truth there is never the need
of such wasteful, extravagant for show meetings filled with niceties when there
is even animosity privately. China wants certain things from the US that the US
is likely reluctant to concede and the US wants certain things from China (eg
more free goods please by accepting our IOUs) and then they resort to
‘diplomatic language’ (meaning niceties and lies) to gloss over what happened.
IT MAKES NO SENSE TO DESCRIBE THE SUMMIT AS UNIQUE, POSITIVE AND
CONSTRUCTIVE EXCEPT THAT IT IS DIPLOMATIC SMOKESCREEN TO HIDE EVEN SERIOUS
DISCORD.
IF SUCH TALK IS BULLSHIT AND YOU THINK IT IS FOOD YOU ARE HEADING FOR
MADNESS.
Saying
much to say nothing:
Such descriptions ‘unique, positive and constructive’ may be saying much
to say nothing, worthless and a waste of time and breath and if this is said it
is somnolent controlled insanity in the name of deception that ends in
insanity.
An
evasive not accurate depiction:
To describe the summit as ‘unique, positive and constructive’ is to be
evasive, it is not an accurate or proper summary of what happened and if you do
not know what to make of it, you think it may be a valid summary you are
deluded and must stir resistance that leads to stress when presented with the
statement.
IF YOU SPEAK EVASIVELY YOU ARE GUILTY OF FALSITY AND SUBJECT TO
SUFFERING, DEBT.
Why
it is evasive:
That it is evasive is objective not subjective and the fact that you do
not know what to make of it reflects absence of true understanding.
‘Unique, positive and constructive’ are vague terms that can be recorded
and rehashed to fit many situations or summits.
IT DOES NOT MATTER IF THE SUMMIT WAS UNIQUE, POSITIVE AND CONSTRUCTIVE
BUT WHAT WAS DISCUSSED AND WHAT WAS ACHIEVED, THESE ARE SPECIFICS OF THE SUMMIT
THAT WERE IGNORED IN FAVOUR OF STYLE.
POPE
Francis has told students he never wanted to be the head of the church.
It is foolish and bad to say this, once you have made a choice even if
it is imposed on you, it is not just pointless but evil going back on it and
sowing doubt and uncertainty in yourself and others.
If you do something you don’t want to, you must engender conflict in
yourself that is evil and suffering.
The Buddha said it is impossible for him to go back on his words and he
never does things he does want to do.
WHAT IS THE POINT OF TELLING ANYONE THIS? IF IT IS USELESS OR FOR FALSE
REASONS (EG YOU ARE NOT A GLORY OR POWER SEEKER) THAT IT IS FOOLISH AND BAD.
THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST BE SKILLFUL IF YOU WANT TO AVOID SUFFERING AND
SO YOU MUST BE SKILLFUL IN WHAT YOU SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT SAY.
Some
ugly people are great:
This is a deluded statement of no merit and incurs karma.
It is not for you or anyone to define greatness and there is true and
false greatness. If the person you call great is actually not great (eg Dr M)
then although he is ugly, he is not great as you content and so you are
deluded.
Beauty is partly in the eye of the beholder, a girl you find
irresistible might not stir me at all. Nevertheless it is impossible for a
truly great man eg the Buddha or Jesus to be ugly and no evil man is great and
an evil man cannot have a beautiful or handsome appearance except in the eyes
of the deluded.
BEAUTY IS ONE THING, GREATNESS IS ANOTHER THING AND IT REFLECTS MUDDLED
THINKING AND DELUSION THAT YOU ATTEMPT TO LINK THE TWO AS IS DONE ABOVE. WHILST
BEAUTY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GREATNESS, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE A NOBLE PERSON CAN BE
UGLY AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR AN EVIL PERSON TO BE TRULY BEAUTIFUL AND NO EVIL
PERSON CAN BE GREAT EXCEPT IT IS FALSE GREATNESS.
A PERSON’S APPEARANCE IS NOT AN ACCIDENT BUT DEPICTS WHO HE IS AND THE
FACT YOU CANNOT IDENTIFY AN EVIL PERSON BY HIS APPEARANCE AND BEHAVIOUR
REFLECTS FALSE PERCEPTION AND AN EVIL PERSON CANNOT BE TRULY GREAT AND SO YOU
ARE SPEAKING FALSELY TO SAY SOME UGLY PEOPLE (WHO CANNOT BE GOOD) CAN BE GREAT.
Stephen
Hawking is ugly but is he truly great?
Stephen Hawking is truly ugly even grotesque but is he truly great? Even
in physics his ideas are not necessarily true and you may worship him as a
genius, a great intellect but you may be deluded and so he is not an example of
an ugly man who is also great.
A
deluded man cannot be great:
Greatness is reserved for those who are not deluded, what kind of
greatness is it that is associated with delusion?
By his speech, Stephen Hawking reveals himself as deluded and that means
he cannot be great except amongst fellow deluded people.
TRUE GREATNESS IS RESERVED FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT DELUDED, WHO ARE
DISCERNING AND HAVE GREAT WISDOM.
A TRUE GREAT MAN IS WISE AND OF GOOD CONDUCT AND CONCENTRATION OF MIND.
Pope:
Throwing away food is stealing from poor
Only blind emotion can drive a man to say such an irrational statement,
genuine calm clear reason can only say throwing away food is irresponsible and
wasteful so don’t throw away food, give it to the poor.
IF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAY THEN THROWING AWAY FOOD IS IRRESPONSIBLE,
WASTEFUL NOT STEALING FROM THE POOR.
Greatness
amongst gods and men:
Below the Buddha describe a being who is great amongst gods and humans:
"A person of integrity is a person of integrity
in his friendship, the way he wills, gives advice, speaks & acts, the views
he holds, & the way he gives a gift. "A person of integrity is endowed with conviction, conscience, concern; he is learned, with aroused persistence, unmuddled mindfulness, & good discernment."
"He has, as his friends & companions, those contemplatives endowed with conviction, conscience, concern; who are learned, unmuddled mindfulness, & good discernment.
"He wills neither for his own nor the affliction of others.
"He gives advice neither for his own nor the affliction of others.
"He refrains from lies, divisive tale-bearing, harsh speech, idle chatter.
"He refrains from taking life, stealing, illicit sex.
"He holds a view like this: 'There is what is given, what is offered, what is sacrificed. There are fruits & results of good & bad actions. There is this world & the next world. There is mother & father. There are spontaneously reborn beings; there are contemplatives who, practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next after realized it for themselves.'
"He gives a gift attentively, with his own hand, respectfully, not as if throwing it away, with the view that something will come of it.
"This person of integrity, after death, reappears in the destination of people of integrity. And what is the destination? Greatness among devas or among human beings."
What
is greatness?
Humans have perceptions of what it is that constitutes greatness and it
is largely if not totally deluded.
Greatness pertains to a being and it is about the excellence (not
bigness or size) of qualities that are good that are present in him.
Beings have various properties like good conduct, wisdom, discernment,
restraint or discipline, concentration. It is beings that are excellent in
these properties that are truly great. True greatness is associated with
happiness here and leads to happiness and eternal life after death.
RIGHTFULLY GREATNESS SHOULD ONLY BE ACCORDED TO BEINGS NOT OBJECTS (EG
‘GREAT’ WEALTH) AND IT IS EXCELLENCE IN GOOD PROPERTIES OF A BEING THAT
DETERMINE HIS GREATNESS AND WHOEVER DISAGREES HAS WRONG VIEW THAT IS THE WAY TO
HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
Greatness
simply means excellence:
Greatness is not bigness, many think great is big, great simply means excellence
and if you are a great man you are an excellent man and what kind of excellent
man is he who is not great in heaven or is deluded?
A GREAT MAN IS AN EXCELLENT MAN, A MAN WITH GOOD QUALITIES IN ABUNDANCE
AND TO THE ACME OF THAT QUALITY AND SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE ANY DELUDED MAN CAN BE
TRULY GREAT.
Backing
is always done with your head not name:
It is said Obama backed surveillance. It is because he is deluded, he thinks
he is backing with his name or prestige that he is so enthusiastic about
backing or putting his name to anything. If he knew his head was on the
chopping block and would be chopped, he would not be so keen to back anything.
THERE IS NEVER A NEED TO BACK OR SUPPORT ANYTHING OR ANY CAUSE AND IT
REFLECTS DELUSION THAT YOU THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL.
BECAUSE YOU SUPPORT OR BACK SOMETHING, IF IT WAS EVIL INSTEAD OF GOOD,
YOUR HEAD IS ON THE CHOPPING BOARD AND WILL BE CHOPPED.
BACKING IS ABOUT LENDING FORCE, PUTTING YOUR FORCE BEHIND SOMETHING TO
OPPOSE AN OPPOSITE FORCE ARRAYED AND IT IS THUS FIGHTING AND RESISTING THAT IS
EVIL, IF YOU NEED TO FIGHT, SUPPORT AND BACK THEN HEAVEN IS NOT THE PLACE FOR
YOU AND THAT MEANS ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.
WHATEVER THE ISSUE THE RIGHT AND WRONG CAN BE DETERMINED AND IT SHOULD
BE ABIDED BY EVERYONE AND TRUE AND GOOD DOES NOT NEED ANYONE’S BACKING, ONCE
BACKED OR BUTTRESSED BY FORCE IT IS NO LONGER GOOD BUT ENFORCED.
IT IS PARTLY BECAUSE OF SELF IDENTITY VIEW (A FETTER TO FUTURE WOE),
THAT YOU ARE IMPORTANT AND NECESSARY THAT YOU LEND YOUR NAME AND STRENGTH TO
BACK SOMETHING.
IF YOU THINK BACKING IS DONE WITH YOUR NAME AND STRENGTH IN THE NAME OF
GOOD THEN YOU ARE DELUDED, BACKING DONE WITH YOUR HEAD ON THE CHOPPING BOARD
AND IF YOU REALIZE THAT YOU WOULD NOT BE SO KEEN TO BACK ANYBODY.
The
US has the coward’s approach to defence:
On Friday, Mr Obama defended the surveillance programmes as a
"modest encroachment" on privacy, necessary to protect the US from
terrorist attacks.
If you truly want to protect yourself from terrorist attacks you should
act honourably, you should not use helicopters and drones to fire missiles that
kill many civilian collaterals just because suspicion a terrorist is amongst
them.
SO LONG AS YOUR ACTIONS ARE ARROGANT, DISREGARDING THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS
(IF AMERICA WAS TO KILL ITS CIVILIANS LIKE THEY DO TALIBANS, WOULD THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE APPLAUD?) YOU INVITE RETALIATION AND TERRORISM.
SURVEILLANCE IS THE WRONG WAY TO PROTECT YOURSELF SO LONG AS YOU
CONTINUE TO ACT DISHONOURABLY AGAINST YOUR ENEMIES THAT INVITE REVENGE. IF THE
US ACTED HONOURABLY IT WOULD HAVE DEFUSED A LOT OF THE ANIMOSITY AGAINST IT.
AMERICA IS A BIG BULLY IN MANY WAYS NOT JUST MILITARILY, IT IS HAVING A
FREE LUNCH BY PRINTING CURRENCY TO BUY AT WILL FROM THE WORLD.
China
and US’ deceitful embrace courts disaster:
US
President Barack Obama and Chinese leader Xi Jinping end a two-day summit
described by a US official as "unique, positive and constructive"
China’s economy is in serious trouble and needs to keep churning exports
for pieces of paper that may be worthless (USD) in order to support the
tottering economy.
The US too is in big trouble and it certainly does not mind supporting
its own burgeoning appetite for consumption with goods cheaply manufactured by
Chinese slave labour in exchange for pieces of IOUs or USD that it may not be
able to honour or has to do so with crippling suffering.
Whilst this may temporarily save the bacon or skin for China and US, the
debt mountain and illusion keeps inflating until it becomes monstrous and will
crush and kill both parties.
How
the sham is sustained:
China has plenty of USD and so long as it can use that USD to buy raw
materials (eg iron, oil) from the world it can produce the goods cheaply to be
exported to the US for more of the same pieces of USD that the US is struggling
to repay if these USD were returned for goods and services the US cannot
provide.
But China is spending or wasting its cash on useless prestigious
property developments that also saddles its people with debts and an illusion
of paper gain wealth and although this can be sustained for a very long time,
it becomes harder to support as the bubble becomes big and will inevitably
burst blowing apart all those involved.
Why
property bubbles have been so resilient:
The UK economy is in big trouble yet London property prices remain
healthy for various reasons. Because property demand is now global, the cheaper
pound makes trophy London properties desirable to rich overseas investors.
Furthermore the rich has been bailed out by governments all over the world,
those who cannot repay their properties have their properties seized and
bankrupted but the rich who hold bonds have been repaid or redeemed and flushed
with cash they must greedily find places to park their money and London
properties look attractive to these investors.
IT IS BECAUSE GOVERNMENTS ALL OVER THE WORLD HAVE CHEATED MASSIVELY,
RESORTED TO UNDERHAND TACTICS LIKE ZERO INTEREST RATES, MASSIVE PRINTING THAT
PROPERTY BUBBLES AT LEAST IN EXCLUSIVE AREAS ARE STILL THRIVING. FURTHER THE
RICH ARE AS RICH IF NOT RICHER THAN EVER AND THEY ARE PREFERRED CUSTOMERS TO
GOVERNMENTS WHO BAIL THEM OUT BUT DO NOT BAIL OUT ORDINARY PEOPLE.
This too is a form of unrighteous action, bullying and abusing its
powers to get what it wants. If Iran was in its good books then whatever wrong
is turned a blind eye.
IF IRAN HAS DONE ANYTHING WRONG IT SHOULD BE SPECIFIED AND ANY ACTION
DIRECTED AT THAT OFFENCE RATHER THAN USING WHATEVER LEVERAGE AT YOUR DISPOSAL
TO PUNISH IRAN.
Tiredness
is suffering and caused by sin:
DO YOU
find that no matter what you do, you're always tired? Try setting your alarm
for 7:22am, plus nine other tips.
It is unlikely if not impossible that angels in heaven also suffer
tiredness like you and everyone here because tiredness is a form of suffering
derived from sinful conduct.
If tiredness is due to running out of energy then it should be a simple
matter of refuelling, like filling up at a gas station, taking a high energy
drink to cure your tiredness.
Tiredness is largely if not entirely because there is self resistance in
every action and speech a person makes and as the person persists in his sinful
conduct (eg violently emotionally having sex with his partner) and speech the
resistance rapidly builds up and becomes intractable, remain high rendering all
further action or speech very difficult if not impossible to continue and so
the person experiences tiredness, struggles painfully to continue.
IF WHAT A PERSON SAYS OR DOES IS TRUE AND MEANINGFUL OR NECESSARY AND
THERE IS NO STYLE IN IT THAT GENERATES SELF RESISTANCE, THE PERSON CANNOT EXPERIENCE
TIREDNESS. RESISTANCE BUILDS UP AND BECOME INTRACTABLE, HARD TO DISSIPATE AS
THE PERSON FOOLISHLY PERSISTS IN HIS FALSE PURSUITS THAT HAS ACCOMPANYING
STYLE, ACCOMPANYING PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND IT IS THIS THAT
IS THE BASIS OF TIREDNESS.
YOU AND EVERYONE HERE SUFFER TIREDNESS YET DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU
ARE SUFFERING? TIREDNESS IS CAUSED BY SINFUL NOT MERITORIOUS CONDUCT, IT IS
BECAUSE YOU GREEDILY PUSH YOURSELF HEEDLESSLY IN SINFUL PURSUITS EVEN WHEN YOUR
BODY IS PROTESTING AND THERE IS RESISTANCE IN WHATEVER YOU DO OR SAY THAT YOU
SUFFER, NOT ENJOY TIREDNESS.
Why
saints don’t get tired:
Rest, silence is the default and preferred state of those who are noble,
they are comfortable and enjoy remaining still not just in speech and action
but even their minds are stilled, not thinking, not stirring even not feeling
pain or pleasure. And they will only say or do if there is something necessary
to say or do and afterwards they revert to stillness, so whence can tiredness
come from?
EVEN THEIR MINDS ARE STILLED, THEY ARE NOT STIRRING, NOT THINKING UNLESS
NECESSARY AND THEIR DEFAULT AND PREFERRED STATE IS STILLNESS AND THEY WILL ONLY
SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE NECESSARY AFTER WHICH THEY REVERT TO THEIR STILLNESS
SO WHENCE CAN TIREDNESS COME FROM?
IT IS ONLY IN SINFUL ORDINARY PEOPLE WHOSE MINDS ARE NEVER STILL BUT
MADLY RESTLESS, WHO ARE NOT COMFORTABLE WITH STILLNESS AND PREFER ACTION, WHO
SAY AND DO THINGS FOR SHOW, FOR UNNECESSARY AND FALSE REASONS AND WHO
AFTERWARDS REFUSE OR ARE UNABLE TO RETURN TO STILLNESS WHO CAN DRIVE THEMSELVES
TO THE GROUND, DRIVE THEMSELVES TO EXHAUSTION OR TIREDNESS.
You
will never see me slogging on a tennis court so how to get tired?
You will never see me slogging, slugging it out on a tennis court or
pursuing a golf ball under the frying sun, so how can I be tired? Me pay $100
to play one round of golf, even if you pay me to play golf I would not agree
because golf is meaningless and controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable
insanity for its aficionados.
Tiredness
is a warning of eternal suffering:
Tiredness is never blameless but it is blameworthy and so if you are
frequently tired or exhausted you are heading for woe after you die.
The deluded man is delighted that he had a hard day’s work, he has made
a lot of money not realizing he is conditioning himself to suffering in the
name of altar of wealth.
WHOEVER DELIGHTS IN ACTION, IN WORK IS A FOOL WHO DELIGHTS IN SUFFERING,
IS HEADED FOR EVEN ENDLESS WOE.
Navakammika Sutta: The Builder
Now
at that time the brahmin Navakammika ("Builder") Bharadvaja was
getting some work done in that forest thicket. He saw the Blessed One sitting
under a sala tree -- his legs folded crosswise, his body held erect, with
mindfulness set to the fore. The thought occurred to the brahmin: "Here I
am, taking delight in getting work done. But what does this contemplative take
delight in getting done?"
So he went to the Blessed One saying:
"What jobs are getting done, monk in the sala
forest?
Alone in the wilderness, in what does Gotama
find delight?"
Alone in the wilderness, in what does Gotama
find delight?"
[The Buddha:]
I have no work to do in the forest.
The forest of restless dancing about I've cut
at the root.
Though in the forest, I'm deforested, de-arrowed.
I delight alone, discontent cast away.
The forest of restless dancing about I've cut
at the root.
Though in the forest, I'm deforested, de-arrowed.
I delight alone, discontent cast away.
Tiredness
is the result of using force:
Tiredness is the result of using force, if a person never used force or
exposed himself to force or used force to resist, he cannot be tired. And all
force is harmful to self and others, totally unnecessary, the wise refrains
from action in this world.
WITHOUT USING FORCE, EXPOSING TO FORCE AND RESISTING FORCE YOU CANNOT
EXPERIENCE TIREDNESS AND NO ACTION IS JUSTIFIED IN THIS WORLD. FORCE IS EVIL,
HARMFUL AND THE WISE WOULD REFRAIN FROM USING FORCE, EXPOSING AND RESISTING
FORCE. AND SO TIREDNESS IS EVIL AND WHATEVER IS EVIL IS SUFFERING AND LEADS TO
MORE SUFFERING NOT HAPPINESS.
Just because you think she is innocent and she was a bystander killed
does not warrant the conclusion God took her and you are training yourself (AND
OTHERS) in false logic that has debt and leads to totally unnecessary suffering
for yourself.
Without knowing God took her and you say so, you must stir self
resistance in yourself that leads to stress and conditions yourself to resist.
Anyone who does not know what to make of what is said or accepts it must do so
with stirred resistance that leads to stress.
The
dangers of borrowing internationally:
The Australian dollar has been sliding seriously in recent weeks (just
as Soros has so kindly or self servingly warned).
Australia is a favoured destination for international money and their
entry make more funds than otherwise would be available for Australians to
borrow to fund their spending and mortgage finance.
Now the Australian dollar is sliding seriously and this may arouse
anxiety amongst international lenders who might pull out in a panic to cut
losses and protect themselves leaving locals who have over borrowed to fend for
themselves or face ruin.
GOVERNMENTS WELCOME OVERSEAS HOT MONEY BECAUSE IT BOOSTS THE ECONOMY AND
MAKE POLITICIANS POPULAR BUT HOT MONEY CAN DISAPPEAR SWIFTLY SHOULD EXCHANGE
RATES ENDANGER THEM LEAVING LOCALS WHO HAVE BORROWED EXCESSIVELY TO FEND FOR
THEMSELVES OR FACE RUIN.
If
the US did no wrong why is it so defensive, vindictive?
The US denies wrongdoing in this PRISM affair as in previous WIKI leak
affair where the person was court martialled and detained.
If the US did no wrong then it should inform the public what it was
doing secretly and it should not be defensive and vindictively go after such
whistle blowers but rather congratulate them.
THE US REACTION IS A TACIT ADMISSION WHAT IT DID WAS FAR FROM RIGHT AND
THE FACT THAT IT WOULD GO AFTER SUCH WHISTLE BLOWERS VENGEFULLY REFLECTS
INTENTION TO HIDE ITS EVIL DEEDS.
It is impossible the snooping claim is baseless but it always has some
basis, it is a matter of how serious or invasive and not only is it not
baseless but it may be extensive and abusive and so the fool who uttered that
driven by emotion never true understanding in the name of partisanship is
putting his head on the chopping board even many times.
If everything is above board why is it so secretive, the US should
honourably warn the public that it is snooping on their conversations, it can
listen in on what you say and why is the US coming down harshly on whistle
blowers?
Obama is actually not the boss but he is a robot who does what his
advisers and national security chiefs tell him to do and so he defends their
deluded overreaching actions not realizing his head too rests uncomfortably on
his neck.
BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE IT IS TRUE THAT SNOOPING CLAIMS ARE BASELESS
WHOEVER SAYS IT MUST SAY IT WITH RAISED SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS
AND CONDITIONS HIM TO RESISTANCE AND THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT
MUST SIMILARLY STIR RESISTANCE AT ITS RECEPTION.
He is referring to the US spy leaker affair. It is a bizarre or
illogical description of the affair, just because the person is in the IT field
does not make him a nerd and there is no rise involved except in his false
perception.
And so what is his motive in choosing this headline? It is to pass
derogatory comments and side with the establishment and if the establishment is
wrong and the ‘nerd’ is right, he is unnecessarily foolishly putting his head
on the chopping board not once but even eternally.
He described the nerd as idealistic and that is wrong, there is nothing
idealistic about it but it is about upholding truth and repudiating wrong or
evil.
ANYONE WHO THINKS WHAT WAS DONE REFLECTS IDEALISM IS DELUDED AND HE IS
ADVOCATING CONNIVANCE, GOING ALONG WITH THE COMPROMISED NATURE OF THIS WORLD.
COMPROMISED IS A NICE WORD FOR DECEITFUL WORLD. THE AFFAIR IS NOT ABOUT
IDEALISM NOR IS IDEALISM AND ITS OPPOSITE PRAGMATISM ABOUT GOOD OR TRUTH BUT
LAPSING INTO EVIL AND FALSITY.
YOU SHOULD NEITHER BE IDEALISTIC OR PRAGMATIC, BOTH ARE HEADED FOR WOE.
Idealism
and pragmatism are evil:
Idealism is about not being happy with things and the ways of this world
but you wish things would fit a mould fashioned by you or your particular guru.
One man’s utopia is another’s hell and so idealism is about daydreaming and
even if they could live their lives idealistically, it is not a recipe for
happiness but delusion and suffering.
The pragmatist is the opposite who will close one or both eyes, jump in
and swim and even thrive according to the filthy conditions existing.
The idealist cannot stand the world and he starts mentally concocting
his dream world that he thinks in delusion will cure all his problems when in
reality they are no better.
The person who has genuine understanding does not need Greek lessons to
draw and apply to the current situation to guide his actions but he
specifically understands the situation as it is possible to and thus
understanding he acts accordingly.
The statement is an unwitting admission that people have no true
understanding, they record understandings that they retrieve to apply to future
situations.
IT IS DANGEROUS TO EXTRAPOLATE AND APPLY GREEK LESSONS TO A PRESENT
SITUATION BECAUSE THERE MAY BE CRITICAL DIFFERENCES THAT RENDER THAT APPLICATION
FATAL.
IF YOU CORRECTLY UNDERSTAND THE CURRENT SITUATION THEN YOUR ACTIONS
REFLECTING THAT CORRECT UNDERSTANDING MUST BE CORRECT.
IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTAND THE CURRENT SITUATION YOU ARE CRAZY TO TALK
ABOUT GREEK LESSONS FOR THIS SITUATION.
ONLY THOSE WHO ACT WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING CAN MAKE MISTAKES AND IF BY
GREEK LESSONS YOU MEANS MISTAKES THAT YOU SHOULD AVOID REPEATING THEN IT MEANS
YOU ARE BLIND AND TRYING TO BLINDLY AVOID REPEATING MISTAKES.
It may be that what he said is full of truth or it may be nonsense and
because he obviously thinks it makes sense, he is deluded and headed for
insanity and here is a man whose views are worshipped and courted.
A model is only appealing to copycats, those who dwell in truth do not
need models to copy or study and memorize. If something is the truth it is not
a model (amongst many different models). Truth has no models, there are no
versions of the truth, only versions of falsity.
IF JAPAN IS A MODEL THEN IT IS ABOUT FALSITY, STYLE NOT TRUTH AND SO YOU
ARE MAD TO WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THE JAPANESE MODEL AND WHAT DOES IT MATTER IF
JAPAN IS A MODEL EXCEPT THAT YOU PERCEIVE IN DELUSION A MODEL IS TRUTH.
IF JAPAN IS AN ECONOMIC MODEL IT MEANS ITS ECONOMY HAS CERTAIN
CHARACTERISTICS THAT DIFFER EG FROM THE US MODEL AND THIS IS ALWAYS ABOUT
STYLE, FALSITY. IF IT WAS ABOUT TRUTH THEN IT APPLIES TO JAPAN AS TO AMERICA.
If
Japan is a cautionary tale then it is worth finding out:
If Japan is a cautionary tale, not model then it may be worth finding
out what that tale is, if Japan is a model (to study and copy and admire) not a
cautionary tale as Stiglitz contended then it is not worth finding out except
that you are a fool, deluded.
Elvis
is a model, the Buddha is not a model:
Elvis is a model because there is nothing true or good about his persona
which is an act amongst many differing or similar acts, he is a robot and you
can only copy another robot who has nothing to understand.
The Buddha is never a robot because he is about truth and goodness that
can be understood by the discerning and there is no use copying the Buddha or
using him as a model.
This was said by the Blessed One: "Even
if a monk, taking hold of my outer cloak, were to follow right behind me,
placing his feet in my footsteps, yet if he were to be greedy for sensual
pleasures, strong in his passions, malevolent in mind, corrupt in his resolves,
his mindfulness muddled, unalert, uncentered, his mind scattered, & his
faculties uncontrolled, then he would be far from me, and I from him. Why is
that? Because he does not see the Dhamma. Not seeing the Dhamma, he does not
see me.
"But even if a monk were to live one hundred
leagues away, yet if he were to have no greed for sensual objects, were not
strong in his passions, not malevolent in mind, uncorrupt in his resolves, his
mindfulness established, alert, centered, his mind at singleness, & his
faculties well-restrained, then he would be near to me, and I to him. Why is
that? Because he sees the Dhamma. Seeing the Dhamma, he sees me."
Though following right behind,
full of desire, vexation:
see how far he is! --
the perturbed from the unperturbed,
the bound from the Unbound,
the greedy one from the one with no greed.
full of desire, vexation:
see how far he is! --
the perturbed from the unperturbed,
the bound from the Unbound,
the greedy one from the one with no greed.
But the wise person who, through
direct knowledge of Dhamma, gnosis of Dhamma,
grows still & unperturbed
like a lake unruffled by wind:
see how close he is! --
the unperturbed to the unperturbed,
the Unbound to the Unbound,
the greedless one to the one with no greed.
direct knowledge of Dhamma, gnosis of Dhamma,
grows still & unperturbed
like a lake unruffled by wind:
see how close he is! --
the unperturbed to the unperturbed,
the Unbound to the Unbound,
the greedless one to the one with no greed.
Stiglitz
thinks his backside is his head:
By saying Japan is a model not a cautionary tale Stiglitz is telling you
the backside is the head and if that is the case isn’t he silly, deluded?
WASHINGTON:
A solid
majority of Americans support the US government's programs tracking telephone
records to try to uncover terror, a Washington Post-Pew Research Center poll
found Monday.
It does not matter how many Americans back NSA phone tracking, what
matters is whether it is right or wrong, harmful or beneficial so why are you
conducting such a survey?
Many people do not even know what the matter is about and even if they
knew, the tracking may be far more extensive and devious than the government
admits and so what is the point of them approving something they do not know
much about? So long as they are not at disadvantage people will back but as
soon as they are at the receiving end they will scream.
THIS WORLD WILL BACK THINGS SO LONG AS THEY ARE NOT DISADVANTAGED BUT AS
SOON AS THEY ARE AT THE RECEIVING ENDS THEY WILL SCREAM FOUL.
EVEN IF A MAJORITY OF AMERICANS BACK IT, IT IS STILL WRONG, ILLEGAL AND
JUST BECAUSE THE MAJORITY ARE GOING TO PERISH DOES NOT MEAN YOU SHOULD JOIN
THEM.
POPULARITY IS NOT A VALID REASON FOR DOING SOMETHING AND SO YOU ARE COURTING
FALSE LOGIC THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
Robots
can only be copied, they have no meaning:
Any person or entity that is a robot or model has no intrinsic meaning
or worth, it can only be studied or examined to define or determine its
programming and copied.
A robot human or mechanical is about carrying out according to plans or
recordings and so a robot can only be studied to determine its plans and
copied.
THUS IF JAPAN IS A MODEL AS STIGLITZ CONTENDS THEN IT IS A ROBOT WHOSE
PLANS CAN BE DETERMINED AND THENCEFORTH IT IS A MATTER OF COPYING THE MODEL
CALLED JAPAN.
Elvis
can only copied there is nothing to understand:
Elvis is a robot and he can only be copied by anyone interested, there
is nothing in him to be understood.
The Buddha is not a robot, there is nothing in him to be copied and he
can be understood.
A PERSON WHO IS A ROBOT IS HOLLOW, THERE IS NOTHING IN HIM TO BE
UNDERSTOOD AND HE CAN ONLY BE COPIED BY THOSE INTERESTED TO COPY.
Hidden
shared unemployment:
Recession prompted
'unprecedented' fall in wages
Wages
have fallen more in real terms during the current economic downturn than ever
before, according to a report.
One third
of workers who stayed in the same job saw a wage cut or freeze between 2010 and
2011, said the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
Working for reduced or frozen wages is a form of deprivation and
reflects the recession is far bigger blow than reflected in the already serious
unemployment levels and recovery (if ever) would be more arduous.
Hollande said the euro crisis is over, if there is no basis to say that
he is dabbling with insanity.
THE ECONOMIC RECESSION IS A FAR BIGGER BLOW THAT APPARENT AND SO IT IS
MORE SEVERE AND RECOVERY MAY NOT ENSUE AND WOULD BE MORE DIFFICULT. PEOPLE MAY
BE STILL EMPLOYED BUT THEY ARE NOW POORER SO HOW TO SPEND LIKE NO TOMORROW?
Japan
as a test bed:
Sometimes when people refer to Japan as a model as Stiglitz did, they
mean Japan as a test bed or guinea pig or experiment for theories or a
different way of doing things and this is always about falsity, about doing
things without knowing for a greedy or evil motive.
A person who abides in truth does not do things without knowing, he
would not experiment in the hope of reaping material gains and so it is never
meritorious but debt incurring to talk about or undertake experiments, using
something or animals as test beds for products for material gains.
IF YOU TALK ABOUT JAPAN AS A MODEL AS IN USING OR REFERRING TO JAPAN AS
AN EXAMPLE, TEST BED FOR DIFFERENT ECONOMIC THEORIES WITH THE AIM OF MATERIAL
GAINS THEN YOU ARE SPEAKING OF SOMETHING FALSE AND EVIL, NOT WORTH FINDING OUT
UNLESS YOU ARE DELUDED AND WANT TO COURT INSANITY AND ETERNAL SUFFERING.
I AM NOT INTERESTED IN JAPAN AS A MODEL OF ANYTHING, EG AS MODEL OF HOW
TO MANAGE A FINANCIAL CRISIS OR ECONOMIC WELLBEING. IF YOU HAVE BEEN
CONSCIENTIOUS IN LIVING WITHIN YOUR MEANS AND NOT SADDLING YOURSELF WITH
CRIPPLING DEBT THERE IS NO NEED FOR MODELS OF HOW TO CONDUCT YOURSELF
ECONOMICALLY OR FINANCIALLY. IT IS BECAUSE YOU GREEDILY LIVE AT THE LIMIT OF YOUR
RESOURCES, OVERSTRETCH YOURSELF THAT YOU NEED FALSE MODELS TO GUIDE YOU. AND
FALSE MODELS ALWAYS LEAD TO DISASTER AND SO ARE NOT WORTH STUDYING.
Only
copycats need models:
Only copycats need models and speak of models, because they do not truly
understand they look to others for examples, for templates or plans that they
may copy and rehash without understanding because it works or is successful.
A person who is not a copycat, not a robot needs to understand what is
happening, what he is doing or saying and what he does or say is based on what
he understood is happening and what his action truly means. What has models got
to do with the situation, with what he does or says?
MODELS ARE ANATHEMA, ABOMINABLE FOR THOSE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT
RELISHED BY THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW THEY ARE BIOLOGICAL ROBOTS DEVOID OF TRUE
UNDERSTANDING, WHO ARE LOOKING AT OTHERS TO COPY.
YOU CANNOT COPY LOVING KINDNESS, COPY THE HIGHER STATES OF THE MIND BUT
YOU MUST DISCOVER THEM, ESTABLISH AND DEVELOP THEM UNTIL THEY ARE MATURE NOT
EASY TO LOSE.
Japan
is never a model except to the deluded:
Japan is doing this and this and this (and they are correct or
incorrect) to those who truly understand, they don’t see Japan as a model nor
is Japan truly a model.
It is only people who see falsely, who fabricate, imagine things who see
Japan as a model and go about fabricating what the Japanese model is about,
dicing with future insanity.
IN TRUTH JAPAN IS DOING CERTAIN THINGS THAT CAN BE DEFINED AND
DETERMINED AS RIGHT OR WRONG, BENEFICIAL OR HARMFUL, THAT JAPAN IS A MODEL IS A
PRODUCT OF THE FALSE PERCEPTION OF DELUDED PEOPLE WHO THEN GO ABOUT DEFINING
THAT MODEL THAT THEY THEN ATTEMPT TO COPY OR REHASH FOR THEMSELVES SO THAT THEY
MAY REAP THE SAME ECONOMIC BENEFITS OR AVOID ITS DISASTERS.
Models
do not exist:
You exist, I exist but models do not exist but they are virtual
creations of evil thinking in those who are robots who are desirous of copying
the behaviour and activities of others in the name of material gains.
People who are copycats study others, study objects (eg cars) that they
find desirable to copy to find characteristics that they may copy or reproduce
in order to reap desired benefits.
They then speak of models as if they are real or exist not realizing
they are descending into false and thence mad perception.
IF YOU THINK MODELS EXIST AS YOU AND I EXIST OR YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT
MODELS ARE ABOUT THEN YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND. MODELS ARE PRODUCTS OF
THOUGHT AND THOUGHT IS EVIL, SUFFERING NOT GOOD AND TRUE.
A BEE IS A BEE NOT A MODEL OF EFFICIENCY AS MISCHIEVOUS PEOPLE LIKE TO
TOUT INCURRING KARMA NOT MERIT FOR THEMSELVES.
No
update becomes 10 important updates:
Microsoft revamps its software but the basic things it does reflects
idiocy.
This morning I checked for updates on my ultra-book and was told there
are no updates but I nevertheless requested it to check for updates and after
much time it came back with the message there are 10 important updates.
HOW CAN YOU SAY THERE ARE NO UPDATES WHEN YOU HAVE NOT CHECKED? IT IS A
SIMPLE BASIC RULE THAT YOU CANNOT SAY SOMETHING YOU HAVE NOT VERIFIED.
IN THE SAME WAY, EVERY TIME I CLICK A FOLDER, WINDOWS 8 TELL ME THIS
FOLDER IS EMPTY ONLY TO BE FACED WITH A FOLDER FULL OF FILES LATER. IF YOU
BELIEVE WHAT MICROSOFT TELLS YOU, YOU MAY HASTILY DELETE THE FOLDER WITH ALL
ITS FILES.
MICROSOFT IS SHOWING FUNDAMENTAL STUPIDITY IN HOW IT PROGRAMS, DON’T SAY
‘THIS FOLDER IS EMPTY’. SAY ‘WAIT WHILST WINDOWS CHECK THE FOLDER’.
MUAR: The government will accept any
decision by the MCA on its stand whether it will accept positions in federal
and state governments, said Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.
If MCA renege on its stance to not accept government positions in the
light of its poor electoral performance those involved are asking for divine
punishment.
ANYONE WHO BREAKS HIS PROMISE INCURS DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING,
THUS IF YOU DEMAND BACK YOUR WEDDING RING BECAUSE YOU ARE DIVORCING YOU ARE
DEMANDING WHAT NO LONGER BELONGS TO YOU. IF YOU GIVE A WEDDING RING, IT IS NO
LONGER YOURS BUT YOUR (FORMER) WIFE’S.
Foolish
to comeback from retirement:
Many people have announced their retirements only to comeback eg Michael
Schumacher, Paul Scholes. Their actions are foolish, incurs karma to be repaid
as suffering.
You never go back on your word, once you have decided on something don’t
go back on it unless you want the chop, suffering.
Foolish
to ask others to change their minds:
Just as it is foolish to change your mind, it is foolish asking for
karma not merit asking others to change their minds and come back from
retirement.
FOOLS ARE EAGER TO PROFFER ADVICE AND THINK THEY ARE BEING GOOD WHEN
THEY ARE PUTTING THEIR HEADS ON THE CHOPPING BOARD UNNECESSARILY. IT IS NOT
MERITORIOUS BUT DEBT INCURRING TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO CHANGE THEIR MINDS. TELL
THEM WHAT THEY DO IS WRONG BUT DON’T TELL THEM WHAT TO DO, LET THEM DECIDE AND
YOU DON’T MAKE THEM CHANGE THEIR MINDS ON WHAT THEY HAVE DECIDED.
IF IT IS TRUE WHAT THEY HAVE DECIDED IS THE WRONG DECISION THAT LEADS TO
SUFFERING, YOU CAN TELL THEM WHAT THEY DO IS WRONG. IT IS UP TO THEM TO THEN
DECIDE WHETHER TO REVERSE OR NOT.
IF SOMEONE DOES NOT WANT TO BUY SOMETHING, DOES NOT WANT TO BUY
INSURANCE YOU ARE A FOOL TO MAKE THEM CHANGE THEIR MINDS.
Why
love matters:
Love is not something that matters or not matters, something you argue
for or against with another and incorporate into your conduct. It is a
calculating nature that would treat things in terms of matter or don’t matter.
If by love you mean lust and possessive attraction then it does not
matter and you are wrong to say it matters.
A mind and conduct without love, care and concern for self and others is
cold, suffering and leads to woe even eternally and so it is not a matter of
whether love matters but if you cherish happiness now and forever, you wish to
escape an endless, meaningless mechanical life of suffering and eternal
wandering then you must seek and abide much in love.
LOVE IS NOT SOMETHING YOU INDULGE IN AN INTELLECTUAL ARGUMENT WITH
ANOTHER ABOUT THE PROS AND CONS AND THEN INCORPORATE AS IF IT IS AN INGREDIENT,
IT IS SOMETHING YOU EITHER KNOW AND HAVE OR NOT, IT IS SOMETHING THAT IS
MANDATORY TO DEVELOP IF YOU WANT TO BE HAPPY NOW AND FOREVER, YOU DON’T WANT TO
SUFFER NOW AND FOREVER.
YOU THINK NOTHING ABOUT ARGUING WHY LOVE MATTERS BUT YOU MAY BE BARKING
UP THE WRONG TREE.
There
are many without love in their hearts:
WON’T YOU BE SILLY IF YOU TOLD YOUR
COMPUTER WHY LOVE MATTERS?
There are many without love, without care and concern for themselves and
others in their hearts, they are merely putting on a show that is obvious to
those who are discerning, faking it, manipulating others for material and
sensate gains and you might as well tell the Devil why love matters.
JESUS SAID DO NOT GIVE DOGS WHAT IS HOLY, DO NOT THROW PEARLS AT SWINE
LEST THEY TRAMPLE THEM UNDERFOOT AND TURN TO ATTACK YOU. THERE ARE MANY WHO EXIST
BUT THERE IS NO LOVE IN THEIR HEARTS, ALL THEY KNOW IS ATTACK AND MAKE USE OF
OTHERS AND IT MAY TAKE ETERNITIES BEFORE THEY FINALLY DEVELOP LOVE IN THEIR
HEARTS AND YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME LECTURING THOSE WITH DEAF EARS TELLING
THEM WHY LOVE MATTERS.
FOR THOSE WITH LOVE IN THEIR HEARTS THEY DO NOT NEED TO BE TOLD WHY LOVE
MATTERS, FOR THOSE WITHOUT LOVE IN THEIR HEARTS YOU ARE A FOOL AND ASKING FOR
YOUR THROAT TO BE CUT TELLING THEM WHY LOVE MATTERS.
ANYONE WHO REHASHES IS A ROBOT AND A ROBOT IS MERELY MECHANICALLY
RENDERING AND HAS NO TRUE HEART OR LOVE AND SO LONG AS A PERSON REMAINS A ROBOT
HE OR SHE HAS NO TRUE LOVE IN HIS OR HER HEART, IT IS ALL FAKED. IT IS USELESS
TALKING ABOUT LOVE TO ROBOTS. SO LONG AS A PERSON REMAINS A ROBOT YOU CAN ARGUE
FOREVER WHY LOVE MATTERS AND YOU MIGHT AS WELL TELL YOUR COMPUTER WHY LOVE
MATTERS.
Why
people cannot love even to save themselves for an eternity:
The reason why ordinary people cannot love, even if it was to save their
lives for an eternity is because they wield a sword in their hands that they
use to defend themselves and attack others and even though this sword causes
them much suffering and will ultimately kill them and consign them to eternal
punishment they are deluded that their sword is their friend, their protector
that they will not and cannot relinquish and so long as a person cannot and
will not lay down that sword, he cannot, is incapable of truly loving anybody,
not
even himself.
A PERSON WITH A SWORD IN HIS HAND CANNOT LOVE TRULY, UNTIL HE LAYS DOWN
THAT SWORD HE IS AN EUNUCH OF LOVE AND ORDINARY PEOPLE CANNOT AND WILL NOT LAY
DOWN THAT SWORD THAT THEY USE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AND ATTACK OTHERS AND
PERCEIVE AS THEIR FRIEND AND PROTECTOR WHEN IT CAUSES THEM MUCH INSOLUBLE
SUFFERING AND WILL ULTIMATELY KILL THEM AND CONSIGN THEM TO ETERNAL SUFFERING.
IT IS POINTLESS TELLING THOSE WHO WILL NOT LAY DOWN THEIR SWORDS WHY
LOVE MATTERS BECAUSE WHAT THEY DO IS NOT AMENABLE TO REASON AND THAT LOVE THAT
IS REFERRED TO IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO BE TRUE LOVE. IT IS LIKE A MAN
PEDDLING FAKE LOVE, DELUDED LOVE TELLING OTHERS WHO CANNOT LOVE (BECAUSE THEY
WILL NOT LAY DOWN THE SWORD IN THEIR HANDS) WHY LOVE MATTERS. IT IS SILLY,
ABSURD BUT DELUDED PEOPLE THINK IT IS PERFECTLY REASONABLE.
The
joker in the global warming pack:
Global warming may accelerate swiftly when huge methane (a more powerful
heat retaining gas than CO2) is released from warming.
THE END MAY BE NEARER THAN YOU THINK.
NASA warns Arctic thaw
could have huge impact on global warming
By Matt Brian
on June 12, 2013 05:18 am Email @m4tt 11Comments
Don't
miss stories Follow The Verge
4
inShare
inShare
The
Arctic's permafrost soils have NASA worried. Scientists monitoring carbon
levels in the top layers of Arctic soils have identified huge deposits that, if
thawed sufficiently, could upset its carbon balance and magnify the impacts of
global warming. The agency estimates that the Arctic's permafrost soils store
as much as 1,850 petagrams (one petagram equals 1 billion metric tons),
comprising around half of all the carbon stored in Earth's soils — most of it
lying within 3 meters of the surface.
One
percent of permafrost methane has the same environmental impact as 99 percent
of carbon dioxide
Worried
that the permafrosts might not be as permanent as the name suggests, NASA
believes the warming of Earth's surface could lead to the release of the
Arctic's carbon stores into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide and methane. If
the Earth gets warmer and drier, scientists expect most of the carbon to be
released as carbon dioxide, but if it gets warmer and wetter, most will be
released as methane. Methane is considered the more potent greenhouse gas and
NASA is making it one of its top priorities to predict potential emissions.
Studies
have found that global warming is making the Arctic greener, adding more layers of
organic carbon beneath the soil. NASA is leading the Carbon in Arctic
Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE) project which will study how
climate change is affecting the Arctic's carbon cycle. By observing the
permafrosts, scientists hope to identify how global warming is impacting the
frozen land mass, providing a better insight into Earth's future climate.
Whether
you are aggressive or defensive is objective:
Whether you wield a sword in your hand that you are constantly waving to
threaten, ward off or attack others is objective not subjective, cannot be
denied and is clearly visible to those who are discerning.
If there is a knife or sword in your hand and you do not know it then
you are a fool who does not know what he is doing.
And so long as a person has a knife or sword or dagger in his hand he is
guilty of harming or threatening others and that precludes him from ever loving
anybody, not even his dearest ones or himself.
A PERSON WITH A DAGGER IN HIS HAND CANNOT LOVE EVEN HIS DEAREST ONES AND
HIMSELF, HE IS A MENACE TO EVERYONE AND THOSE WITH DAGGERS IN THEIR HANDS ARE
CONSTANTLY WAVING THEM THREATENINGLY IF NOT TO WARD OFF OR ATTACK OTHERS. THE
BUDDHA SAID THERE ARE THOSE WHO ARE BORN WITH DAGGERS IN THEIR MOUTHS THAT THEY
USE TO ATTACK OTHERS VERBALLY.
True
love has no emotion:
True love is not emotional, has no emotional accompaniment, whatever
love that has emotion is not true love but badly tainted love at best.
Whatever love that has emotion is suffering and has a distaste, true
love has no emotion and is joyous, does not give a bad taste afterwards.
BECAUSE ALL THE LOVE IN THIS WORLD IS TAINTED BY EMOTION IF NOT PURELY
EMOTIONAL IT IS FAKED LOVE NOT TRUE LOVE.
Not
why love matters but do you know love, can you love?
The pertinent question is not why love matters but do you know love, can
you love?
If you do not know love, you cannot and will not love then it is
pointless, futile telling him why love matters because he does not know love,
cannot love.
If a person knows love, he can and will love it is silly telling him why
love matters.
Why love matters implies love is something he can acquire like a laptop
when love is something alien to some people (because he holds a knife or dagger
in his hand to protect himself and attack others that he refuses to throw away
and you cannot love so long as the dagger remains in your hand) and it is
pointless reasoning or arguing with them why love matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment