PM:
Margaret Thatcher a force for good
Thatcher is a person not a force and whoever mistakes force for good is
deluded because force is harmful and the source of suffering and death and the
wise person will avoid force like a viper.
Emotional stylish people subscribe to the creed ‘anything goes’,
anything is possible and so in their emotional urge to magnify Thatcher more
than she really is, they call her a force rather than person of good and
because they are deluded, they perceive there is force that is good and force
that is bad when force is always dangerous, harmful and evil.
THATCHER IS A PERSON NOT A FORCE AND WITHOUT KNOWING THAT SHE IS A FORCE
AND YOU SAY SO, YOU MUST STIR SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND YOU ARE
TRAINING YOURSELF IN FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION. IT IS
DELUSION THAT THERE IS GOOD AND BAD FORCE. ALL FORCES ARE DANGEROUS AND THE
CAUSE OF DEATH AND SUFFERING THAT THE WISE PERSON WOULD AVOID.
Premier League's relegated
clubs to receive £60m boost
That is a false statement because they will receive an additional £12m
not £60m as stated because they already receive £48m.
Because what they say is rehashed rather than specifically mindfully
composed to tell the truth and they are prone to exaggerate, people blurt £60m
that sounds much more impressive than the actual £48m.
YOU CAN ONLY BLURT IF WHAT YOU SAY IS HASTILY REHASHED, WITHOUT A
PRE-EXISTING RECORDING THAT IS HASTILY RENDERED YOU CANNOT BLURT AND THE
EXISTENCE OF BLURTING IS AGAIN EVIDENCE PEOPLE ARE REHASHING ROBOTS.
RPK wants to teach others about something he himself does not or falsely
understands and so he is (incorrigibly) deluded.
Principles are rules formulated to guide the actions of people who
cannot see the truth, who do not understand things happening and they fall back
on principles to instruct them what to do in which they are robots, slaves to
those principles.
The person who is not a robot, who has true understanding never
subscribe to principles but he effortlessly understands the situation before
him and thus truly understanding he knows what he ought to say or do without
resorting to principles.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD WORSHIP PRINCIPLES AND THEY SPEAK HIGHLY OF THE MAN
OF PRINCIPLES. IT IS NOT PRINCIPLES YOU SHOULD HAVE AND ABIDE WITH BUT IT IS
THAT YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE RIGHT AND WRONG, GOOD AND BAD OF EACH SITUATION
AS IT PRESENTS AND THUS TRULY UNDERSTANDING YOU DON’T NEED PRINCIPLES BUT YOU
ACT AND SPEAK ACCORDINGLY FOR YOUR OWN AND OTHERS’ GOOD.
The
principle of equality?
There are many principles that people who are emotional robots subscribe
to and one of them is the principle of equality.
There is no equality, beings are not equal, the Buddha said he has no
equal, he alone is the highest, not even his deputies are his equals and they
refer to him as the Lord. God does not bow to you but you must bow to God.
Even amongst humans there is no equality, some have much higher
intelligence, wisdom and discernment. If I can stop stretching my syllables,
changing speed and loudness and you cannot, you are not my equal but I am
higher because that is the first higher state of mind.
PRINCIPLES ARE GENERALISATIONS FORMULATED BY DELUDED PEOPLE BASED ON
THEIR FALSE OBSERVATIONS AND UNDERSTANDINGS AND THEN MEMORIZED AS TRUE TO BE
REHASHED IN THE FUTURE TO DETERMINE THEIR ACTIONS.
Whilst you could say the funeral drew dignitaries and criticisms, these
two are very different things (beings are very different from criticism) and
should not be lumped together in the same breath which is a fabrication
intended to impress rather than speak the truth.
There is no need to tell others the funeral drew dignitaries and
criticisms and it is much ado about nothing wasting your breath and time and
others’ attention and time and so it is an exercise in silliness that ends in
insanity.
THERE IS NO NEED TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THATCHER’S FUNERAL DRAWING
DIGNITARIES AND CRITICISMS AND IT IS SILLY NOT CLEVER TO LUMP DIGNITARIES AND
CRITICISMS TOGETHER JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH DRAWN BY THE FUNERAL.
Engineered
speech:
Whatever speech that has engineering (fabrications) is not true speech
and true speech never has engineering.
It is never an accident or by chance but it is engineering that is the
cause of the statement Thatcher’s funeral drew dignitaries and criticism. When
emotional people have something to say they always pause to engineer or think
how they might say it that would sound ‘great’ or ‘wow’ or smart.
To engineer one’s speech is never based on reason but it is a
programming based on emotions, to satisfy emotion and once programmed the
person automatically pause to engineer before speaking or writing in a way that
they think will impress others with eg their intellectual or linguistic
prowess.
SPEECH THAT HAS ENGINEERING IS ALWAYS A PROGRAMMED SPEECH AND THE PERSON
IS A PROGRAMMED ROBOT DRIVEN TO ENGINEER/FABRICATE TO IMPRESS OTHERS AND
BECAUSE IT IS BASED ON URGE IT BECOMES MORE BIZARRE AND EXTREME UNTIL IT
BECOMES MAD.
You
don’t speak to be clever:
Unless you want to go mad, you don’t speak to be clever but you speak
without added cleverness because there is something important or meaningful to
communicate.
Many people do not realize there is added cleverness in what they say
and they often speak superfluously just to show how clever they are and that is
controlled unwitting insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity.
The person who truly understands what he says cannot say something that
is silly, it is only a person who speaks without understanding or who
understands falsely who is capable of saying something silly.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE APPLAUSE CAME FROM NOWHERE BUT IT MUST COME FROM
SOMEWHERE AND YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY NOT WITHOUT PURPOSE BUT TO HYPE. I TELL
YOU WHERE THE APPLAUSE CAME FROM, IT CAN FROM PEOPLE LINING THE ROUTE. JUST
BECAUSE THEY ARE NONENTITIES OR IT WAS UNEXPECTED OR SUDDEN DOES NOT MEAN IT
CAME FROM NOWHERE AND YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY SOMNOLENTLY BY REHASH (COPIED
FROM OTHERS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING).
THE PERSON WITH HEIGHTENED DISCERNMENT (ONE OF THE BUDDHA’S THREE URGENT
TASKS) SEES THE FALSITY, THOSE WITH POOR DISCERNMENT SEE NOTHING WRONG, ARE
ACCEPTING.
It
is integrity not principles that you should have:
Ordinary people tend to confuse principles with integrity which are two
different things.
Integrity is about virtues or characteristics of a person that are good,
not principles he subscribe to that govern his actions.
The Buddha praised the man of integrity, he did not praise the man of
principles but he said faith in precepts or principles is a fetter to woe.
"But when a person of integrity acquires lavish
wealth, he provides for his own pleasure & satisfaction, for the pleasure
& satisfaction of his parents, the pleasure & satisfaction of his wife
& children; the pleasure & satisfaction of his slaves, servants, &
assistants; and the pleasure & satisfaction of his friends. He institutes
for priests & contemplatives offerings of supreme aim, heavenly, resulting
in happiness, leading to heaven. When his wealth is properly put to use, kings
don't make off with it, thieves don't make off with it, fire doesn't burn it,
water doesn't sweep it away, and hateful heirs don't make off with it. Thus his
wealth, properly put to use, goes to a good use and not to waste.
Cula-Punnama Sutta: The Shorter Discourse on the Full-moon Night
(excerpt)
I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was
staying near Savatthi in the Eastern Monastery, the palace of Migara's mother.
And on that occasion -- the uposatha of the fifteenth, the night of a very full
moon -- he was sitting out in the open with the community of monks. Then,
having surveyed the silent community of monks, he addressed them: "Monks,
could a person of no integrity know of a person of no integrity: 'This is a
person of no integrity'?"
"No, lord."
"Good, monks. It's impossible, there's no way,
that a person of no integrity would know of a person of no integrity: 'This is
a person of no integrity.'
"Could a person of no integrity know of a person
of integrity: 'This is a person of integrity'?"
"No, lord."
"Good, monks. It's impossible, there's no way,
that a person of no integrity would know of a person of integrity: 'This is a
person of integrity.'
"A person of no integrity is endowed with
qualities of no integrity; he is a person of no integrity in his friendship, in
the way he wills, the way he gives advice, the way he speaks, the way he acts,
the views he holds, & the way he gives a gift.
"And how is a person of no integrity endowed with
qualities of no integrity? There is the case where a person of no integrity is
lacking in conviction, lacking in conscience, lacking in concern [for the
results of unskillful actions]; he is unlearned, lazy, of muddled mindfulness,
& poor discernment. This is how a person of no integrity is endowed with
qualities of no integrity."
"And how is a person of no integrity a person of
no integrity in his friendship? There is the case where a person of no
integrity has, as his friends & companions, those priests &
contemplatives who are lacking in conviction, lacking in conscience, lacking in
concern, unlearned, lazy, of muddled mindfulness, & poor discernment. This
is how a person of no integrity is a person of no integrity in his friendship.
"And how is a person of no integrity a person of
no integrity in the way he wills? There is the case where a person of no
integrity wills for his own affliction, or for the affliction of others, or for
the affliction of both. This is how a person of no integrity is a person of no
integrity in the way he wills.
"And how is a person of no integrity a person of
no integrity in the way he gives advice? There is the case where a person of no
integrity gives advice for his own affliction, or for the affliction of others,
or for the affliction of both. This is how a person of no integrity is a person
of no integrity in the way he gives advice.
"And how is a person of no integrity a person of
no integrity in the way he speaks? There is the case where a person of no
integrity is one who tells lies, engages in divisive tale-bearing, engages in
harsh speech, engages in idle chatter. This is how a person of no integrity is
a person of no integrity in the way he speaks.
"And how is a person of no integrity a person of
no integrity in the way he acts? There is the case where a person of no
integrity is one who takes life, steals, engages in illicit sex. This is how a
person of no integrity is a person of no integrity in the way he acts.
"And how is a person of no integrity a person of
no integrity in the views he holds? There is the case where a person of no
integrity is one who holds a view like this: 'There is nothing given, nothing
offered, nothing sacrificed. There is no fruit or result of good or bad actions.
There is no this world, no next world, no mother, no father, no spontaneously
reborn beings; no priests or contemplatives who, faring rightly &
practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next after having directly
known & realized it for themselves.' This is how a person of no integrity
is a person of no integrity in the views he holds.
"And how is a person of no integrity a person of
no integrity in the way he gives a gift? There is the case where a person of no
integrity gives a gift inattentively, not with his own hand, disrespectfully,
as if throwing it away, with the view that nothing will come of it. This is how
a person of no integrity is a person of no integrity in the way he gives a
gift.
"This person of no integrity -- thus endowed with
qualities of no integrity; a person of no integrity in his friendship, in the
way he wills, the way he gives advice, the way he speaks, the way he acts, the
views he holds, & the way he gives a gift -- on the break-up of the body,
after death, reappears in the destination of people of no integrity. And what
is the destination of people of no integrity? Hell or the animal womb.
"Now, monks, could a person of integrity know of
a person of no integrity: 'This is a person of no integrity'?"
"Yes, lord."
"Good, monks. It is possible that a person of
integrity would know of a person of no integrity: 'This is a person of no
integrity.'
"Could a person of integrity know of a person of
integrity: 'This is a person of integrity'?"
"Yes, lord."
"Good, monks. It is possible that a person of
integrity would know of a person of integrity: 'This is a person of integrity.'
"A person of integrity is endowed with qualities
of integrity; he is a person of integrity in his friendship, in the way he
wills, the way he gives advice, the way he speaks, the way he acts, the views
he holds, & the way he gives a gift.
"And how is a person of integrity endowed with
qualities of integrity? There is the case where a person of integrity is
endowed with conviction, conscience, concern; he is learned, with aroused
persistence, unmuddled mindfulness, & good discernment. This is how a
person of integrity is endowed with qualities of integrity."
"And how is a person of integrity a person of
integrity in his friendship? There is the case where a person of integrity has,
as his friends & companions, those priests & contemplatives who are
endowed with conviction, conscience, concern; who are learned, with aroused
persistence, unmuddled mindfulness, & good discernment. This is how a
person of integrity is a person of integrity in his friendship.
"And how is a person of integrity a person of
integrity in the way he wills? There is the case where a person of integrity
wills neither for his own affliction, nor for the affliction of others, nor for
the affliction of both. This is how a person of integrity is a person of
integrity in the way he wills.
"And how is a person of integrity a person of
integrity in the way he gives advice? There is the case where a person of
integrity gives advice neither for his own affliction, nor for the affliction
of others, nor for the affliction of both. This is how a person of integrity is
a person of integrity in the way he gives advice.
"And how is a person of integrity a person of
integrity in the way he speaks? There is the case where a person of integrity
is one who refrains from lies, refrains from divisive tale-bearing, refrains
from harsh speech, refrains from idle chatter. This is how a person of
integrity is a person of integrity in the way he speaks.
"And how is a person of integrity a person of
integrity in the way he acts? There is the case where a person of integrity is
one who refrains from taking life, refrains from stealing, refrains from
illicit sex. This is how a person of integrity is a person of integrity in the
way he acts.
"And how is a person of integrity a person of
integrity in the views he holds? There is the case where a person of integrity
is one who holds a view like this: 'There is what is given, what is offered,
what is sacrificed. There are fruits & results of good & bad actions.
There is this world & the next world. There is mother & father. There
are spontaneously reborn beings; there are priests & contemplatives who,
faring rightly & practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next
after having directly known & realized it for themselves.' This is how a
person of integrity is a person of integrity in the views he holds.
"And how is a person of integrity a person of
integrity in the way he gives a gift? There is the case where a person of
integrity gives a gift attentively, with his own hand, respectfully, not as if
throwing it away, with the view that something will come of it. This is how a
person of integrity is a person of integrity in the way he gives a gift.
"This person of integrity -- thus endowed with
qualities of integrity; a person of integrity in his friendship, in the way he
wills, the way he gives advice, the way he speaks, the way he acts, the views
he holds, & the way he gives a gift -- on the break-up of the body, after
death, reappears in the destination of people of integrity. And what is the
destination of people of integrity? Greatness among devas or among human
beings."
That is what the Blessed One said. Gratified, the
monks delighted in the Blessed One's words.
Israel
has the right:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tells the BBC that Israel has
a right to prevent weapons from falling into the wrong hands in Syria.
Rights come with karma and suffering never happiness attached and any
fool who thinks he is right to have rights, who thinks right is the stairway to
happiness is deluded headed for woe.
The Buddha said all is not self (not even your consciousness, feelings
and perceptions are self) and that holds absolutely for everyone and he further
said whoever makes an acquisition in this world is a fool heading for
suffering.
It is stretching Israel’s right too far to say it has a right to prevent
weapons from falling in wrong hands as if Israel has the right to determine who
is right and wrong hands in Syria. This is high handed and the path to woe not
happiness.
Jesus said turn the other cheek which means giving up your rights of
retaliation.
THE WISE PERSON ABANDONS THIS WORLD, HE HAS GIVEN UP ALL HIS RIGHTS, HE
HAS NO RIGHTS AND THAT IS THE WAY OUT OF THE TERRIBLE TORMENT OF THIS WORLD.
Speaking
with accelerating speed and loudness even more agonizing:
Ordinary people do not just change speed and loudness whilst speaking but
they always accelerate in speed and loudness within syllables, between syllables
and words and this triggers more intense self resistance and thence stress.
It does not matter whether you realize or not, care or not, if it is
true you accelerate in speed and strength through stretch syllables, between
syllables and words, you must experience agonizing stress and tension or
conflict.
SPEECH WITH ACCELERATING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS EVEN MORE AGONIZING THAN
SPEECH WITH MERELY SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES AND IT IS MORE DIFFICULT TO STOP
START.
FURTHER THERE IS INTENSE CONFLICT OR CLASH WITH THE CONCURRENT DELAYING
THAT THE STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES DENOTES.
ACCELERATING LOUDNESS AND SPEED DENOTES RUSHING AND THIS CLASHES WITH
THE STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES THAT DENOTE DELAY AND SO THE STYLISH PERSON IS EVEN
VIOLENTLY DELAYING AND RUSHING AT THE SAME TIME.
You
cannot accelerate forever:
No one can accelerate in speed and loudness forever and so when it comes
to stopping to change syllables or words, the force needed to stop is even
brutal and exacts a toll on the fool who thinks he is stylish, marvellous in
his speech.
ALL ACCELERATION IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS MUST COME TO AN END AND IT TAKES
MUCH GREATER COUNTER FORCE TO ARREST SPEECH WITH ACCELERATING SPEED AND
LOUDNESS AND THIS IS ALWAYS AGONIZING.
Karma
pain far exceeds other pains:
People in this world don’t like pain and they go to great lengths to
avoid pain and seek pleasure like using air conditioner, hiding from the sun,
avoiding work, etc. Yet the pain that is due to them as a result of their evil
deeds and speech that they severely underestimate is far greater and so they
are wiser paying attention to and avoiding creating karma to be repaid as
future pain and suffering.
THE PAIN AND SUFFERING A PERSON WILL HAVE TO EXPERIENCE IN REPAYMENT FOR
KARMA CREATED IN SPEECH AND DEED FAR EXCEEDS WHATEVER PHYSICAL SUFFERING THEY
CAN AVOID HERE AND SO THE WISE PERSON WOULD IGNORE AND BEAR HIS PHYSICAL PAINS
AND DEVOTE HIS ATTENTION TOWARDS AVOIDING CREATING DEBT.
HOWEVER MUCH THE SUFFERING YOU ENDURE HERE IT CANNOT MATCH ANYWHERE NEAR
THAT OCEAN OF SUFFERING YOUR KARMA CREATES FOR YOU.
FURTHER THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENRTATE YOU DAILY
EXPERIENCE IS PAYBACK FOR YOUR SINFUL STYLE THAT HARMS YOURSELF AND OTHERS. THE
RELEASE FROM SUFFERING THAT RESULTS FROM ELIMINATING STYLE, ELIMINATING LIKE
AND DISLIKE FAR EXCEEDS WHATEVER PHYSICAL PAIN YOU CAN DIRECTLY AVOID.
FURTHER A LOT OF THE PAIN A PERSON SUFFERS DAILY IS AVOIDABLE, IS
CREATED BY HIS CARELESSNESS, INATTENTIVENESS AND REHASHING. EG A PERSON TRIPS
AND FALLS, CUTS HIMSELF IS BECAUSE HE WAS RUSHING, NOT PAYING ATTENTION.
IF ANYONE IS INTERESTED IN AVOIDING SUFFERING, HE CAN DO FAR BETTER
AVOIDING CREATING DEBT FOR HIMSELF TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING, AVOIDING STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE BY ELIMINATING STYLE AND BEING
MINDFUL SO AS NOT TO CUT HIMSELF OR TRIP AND FALL THAT DIRECTLY AVOIDING
SOURCES OF PAIN AND SEEKING PLEASURE.
Rolf
Harris suspected of paedophilia:
The Sun named Rolf Harris as the prominent Australian being suspected of
paedophilia and it would not surprise me but to be expected in my mind, the
smiling, laughing friendliness is ‘too good to be true’ and if this is true,
the pain he will have to suffer in repayment far exceeds whatever pain he has
succeeded in avoiding here. He may be roasted in hell and you think it is hot
here.
On
the one and other hand:
On the one hand people go to great lengths (and expense) avoiding
suffering and pain and pampering themselves.
On the other hand they cause totally unnecessary suffering for
themselves now and even much worse later by creating insoluble renewing stress,
restlessness and distraction with their style (stretching syllables, changing
speed and loudness), by harming themselves with totally unnecessary like and
dislike of everything happening.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE BIG FOOLS, THE SUFFERING THEY CREATE FOR
THEMSELVES NOW AND LATER WITH THEIR STYLE, LIKE AND DISLIKE FAR EXCEEDS
WHATEVER SUFFERING THEY STRIVE TO DIRECTLY AVOID AND PLEASURE THEY SEEK.
If
you are really interested in happiness and ending suffering:
If you are really interested in happiness and ending suffering you
cannot do better than ignoring your daily aches and pains and paying full
attention to eliminating style, eliminating stretched syllables and
acceleration in speed and loudness that will release you from the terrible
prison of stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and would also
release you from the ocean of suffering for persecuting others with your
constant style.
AS LONG AS YOU REMAIN IN STYLE YOU ARE KIDDING YOURSELF YOU WANT
HAPPINESS AND NO PAIN.
Here is the muttering of a foolish man already in considerable suffering
heaping even more karma to be repaid by suffering in the future.
It is not a matter of the Big Bang needing or not needing God to set it
off but if you did not see it you are embracing falsity and misleading others
delving on a matter you cannot know.
What did the Buddha say about creation or the big bang?
He said from an in-construable moment comes transmigration, a beginning
point is not evident. And so if the Buddha is right, the beginning cannot be
construed, there is no beginning point evident and Hawking is wrong.
Long before science the Buddha spoke of countless eons of cosmic
expansions and contractions which means to say the Age will come to a close
with a big crunch.
IF YOU DO NOT KNOW SOMETHING YOU WILL BE WISE TO KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT OR
YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD SAID WITH SUFFERING DUE. HAWKING HAS
NO RIGHT SAYING WHAT HE SAID UNLESS HE KNOWS IT IS TRUE.
Cosmology
according to the Buddha:
The Buddha said space is infinite, consciousness is infinite which mean
to say space is endless, so is consciousness.
In Buddhist lore, the Buddha said there are many Brahma palaces in
infinite space and Brahma or the Father is through his merit, the first born in
an empty Brahma palace and He stays there alone for a very long time and then
later other beings start to be born there to join him. At the close of the Age
those who are headed for happiness head for the realm of streaming radiance.
THUS ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA, SPACE AND CONSCIOUSNES ARE INFINITE NOT
FINITE, THERE ARE MANY ISLAND UNIVERSES IN SPACE EACH PRESIDED BY A SINGLE
BRAHMA.
A PERSON WHO HAS RAISED HIS CONCENTRATION TO REACH THE REALM OF THE
INFINITUDE OF SPACE HAS A LIFESPAN OF 20,000 ETERNITIES, THE PERSON WHO HAS
REACHED THE INFINITUDE OF CONSCIOUSNESS HAS A LIFESPAN OF 40,000 AGES.
How
to be really special:
People in this world like to think they are special in one way or
another but it is born of delusion and conceit rather than true.
As long as a person has style, he objectively stretches his syllables,
changes speed and loudness there is nothing special about him because style is
meaningless, worthless and suffering and nothing distinguishing and what is so
special about you when everyone else also has style?
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT YOU IF YOU HAVE STYLE JUST LIKE EVERYONE HERE,
YOU REHASH ROBOTICALLY JUST AS EVERYONE HERE AND YOU SUFFER STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE JUST LIKE EVERYONE HERE?
IF YOU DO NOT STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, DO NOT CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS,
YOU ARE NOT A REHASHING ROBOT AND YOU ARE RELEASED FROM THE TERRIBLE PRISON OF
STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE WHERE EVERYONE HERE CANNOT DO
SO, ARE TRAPPED IN STYLE THEN YOU ARE TRULY SPECIAL, TRULY HAPPY AND HEADED
EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
FURTHER IF YOU CAN STOP THINKING WHERE EVERYONE HERE CANNOT STOP
THINKING YOU ARE EVEN MORE SPECIAL AND HAPPIER HEADING FOR TWO ETERNITIES IN
HEAVEN.
IF YOU CAN STOP STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE AND DISLIKE YOU ARE
EVEN MORE SPECIAL AND HEADING FOR 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
IF YOU HAVE STYLE THERE IS NOTHING
SPECIAL ABOUT YOU BECAUSE EVERYONE HERE HAS STYLE. IF YOU ARE A ROBOT THERE IS
NOTHING SPECIAL ABOUT YOU BECAUSE EVERYONE HERE IS A ROBOT.
IT IS ONLY IF YOU HAVE NO STYLE, YOU ARE NOT
A ROBOT THAT YOU ARE TRULY SPECIAL BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONE LIKE YOU HERE AND
YOU HAVE LEFT SUFFERING EVEN TORMENT BEHIND YOU WHERE EVERYONE HERE HAS NOT.
IF YOU THINK YOU ARE SPECIAL WHEN YOU ARE
NOT THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND HEADED FOR INSANITY AND WOE NOT SAFETY.
Too
good to be true:
You hear it commonly bandied that something is ‘too good to be true’ and
this is a copied rehashed falsity and delusion that incurs karma to be repaid
as suffering.
There is nothing too good or bad to be true and what is said is said
without knowing falsely to disparage or dismiss. You never dismiss something,
either you know something is false, not true and say so or you do not dismiss
it by saying it is too good to be true.
WHEN PEOPLE SAY SOMETHING IS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE, THEY ARE CASTING DOUBT
AND THAT IS EVIL AND LEADS TO DEBT. EITHER YOU KNOW SOMETHING IS TRUE OR FALSE
OR YOU DON’T KNOW, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO CAST DOUBTS, TO DISMISS IT AS TOO
GOOD TO BE TRUE THAT IS LAPSING INTO FALSITY, MISLEADS OTHERS WITH KARMA ATTACHED.
DO MEAN THAT TO BE TRUE, IT CANNOT EXCEED A CERTAIN GOODNESS, THAT WHAT IS TRUE
CANNOT BE VERY GOOD?
Style
is a programming of a person’s mental force:
Style or the prolonging, changing speed and strength of all a person’s
activities (what how he perceives, thinks, says and does) is a programming of
the person’s mental force. Different people are programmed to prolong, change
speed and strength in different ways and that is reflected in their different
styles.
STYLE IS NEVER A SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG,
CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH BUT IT IS A PROGRAMMED AUTOMATIC PROLONGING, CHANGING
SPEED AND STRENGTH OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE THAT IS STEREOTYPED,
CHARACTERISTIC OR RIGID IN HIM AND DIFFERS FROM OTHERS.
THUS A PERSON WITH STYLE HAS A MENTAL FORCE THAT IS PROGRAMMED & HE
IS A SLAVE OF HIS PROGRAMMED MENTAL FORCE. THE PERSON WITHOUT STYLE HAS A
MENTAL FORCE FREE OF PROGRAMMING & HE IS IN CHARGE OF HIS MENTAL FORCE.
Programmed
style has to be erased:
Because style is programmed it must be erased before it can be
eliminated. If the person is not mindful, does not pay attention to the
presence of prolonging, changing speed and strength in what he says or does or
does not persistent work to erase them, he will not escape from the programming
of style.
BECAUSE STYLE IS A PROGRAMMING OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE, IN ORDER TO
EXIT STYLE (AND STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE) HE MUST
PAINSTAKINGLY UNDO THE PROGRAMMING BY PAYING ATTENTION TO THE PRESENCE OF STYLE
AND WORKING LABORIOUSLY TO CURTAIL AND FINALLY ERADICATE THEM.
There is proper and improper speech and rather than a harmless option,
improper speech precludes heaven which means eternal suffering.
We have captured him is proper speech, ‘we have got him’ is improper
speech that has serious, deadly implications if you care about not suffering in
the future.
‘Got him’ is nonspecific rehashed robotic speech that can be modified
and rehashed in many situations. The specific to the occasion proper speech is
‘he has been captured or taken into custody’.
TO THE ROBOT, EVERYTHING IS A MATTER OF ‘GOT OR NOT GOT’. ‘GOT’ MEANS
OBTAINED OR POSSESSED HIM, WHAT HAPPENED IS THAT HE HAS BEEN CAPTURED.
The timeless allure of
microcars
It is lapsing into falsity saying the allure is ‘timeless’, not without
purpose but with the purpose of making more than there is in something for self
promotion.
It is impossible for anyone to see the statement as true and so if you
do not know what to make of it or you accept it, there must be stirred self
resistance that leads to stress and trains you to receive with self resistance
that traps you in stress.
Allure is something meaningless, it is attraction or a stirring of
mental force that is fickle even in the same person let alone in everyone. If
you are sick, the car won’t look too good and just because you and your cohort
persistently find the car alluring does not mean others are not jaded.
ALLURE IS SOMETHING FICKLE EVEN IN THE SAME PERSON AND IT IS A DELUDED
MAN WHO PLACES EMPHASIS ON A MEANINGLESS, HARMFUL STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE BY
THE FORM OF A MICROCAR. JUST BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR COHORT HAVE NOT LOST THEIR
ATTRACTION DOES NOT MEAN OTHERS ARE SIMILARLY ATTRACTED. JUST BECAUSE THEIR
APPEAL IS PERSISTENT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS TIMELESS, HAS NO TIME. EVERYTHING IN
EXISTENCE HAS TIME, DOES NOT REMAIN FOREVER ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA, WHAT IS
SUBJECT TO BEGINNING IS SUBJECT TO VANISH AND SO IT IS FALSE TO SAY THEY ARE
TIMELESS.
Although Di Canio is manager Sunderland is not his and the pertinent
matter is Sunderland beat Everton and so the person is speaking nonsense
fostering false associations in himself and others heading to future suffering.
SUNDERLAND IS NOT DI CANIO’S EVEN IF HE IS MANAGER AND EVEN IF
SUNDERLAND IS HIS, IT IS NOT RELATED TO THE MATTER.
Why
Messi is the perfect football captain:
There is no perfection in whatever is false and hence if football is
false, meaningless, there is no perfection in being a football captain and you
are speaking falsely with karma attached to be repaid as suffering.
The Buddha said he is perfect, perfect in every way eg restraint,
wisdom, conduct, speech, supernatural powers.
How might the Buddha be perfect in speech?
Unlike you are everyone here, the Buddha said he will only speak what is
true and benefits others, if something is true and unbeneficial he will not say
it, if something is true and disagreeable to others, he has the sense of the
right occasion to say it.
WHETHER SOMETHING SAID IS TRUE AND BENEFITS OTHERS IS OBJECTIVE NOT SUBJECTIVE
AND SO IF THE BUDDHA ONLY SAYS THINGS THAT ARE TRUE AND BENEFICIAL, IF IT IS
DISAGREEABLE TO OTHERS HE HAS THE SENSE OF THE RIGHT OCCASION TO SAY IT THEN HE
HAS PERFECT SPEECH AND ALL THOSE WHO CANNOT MATCH HAVE NO PERFECT SPEECH.
Whether a question is essential or unessential is objective. Whether
Tesco will be deposed as retail king is an unessential question that crops up
only in restlessness minds greedy for gains and fearful of losses. That there
is gain or loss at stake does not make it an essential question except in the
deluded and calculating.
Unless you can answer the question with truth, if you can only answer it
with speculation, calculation, then you are lapsing into falsity undertaking
suffering doing so and in the future as debt repayment.
IT IS POINTLESS POSING QUESTIONS THAT NO ONE KNOWS THE ANSWER AND YOU
ARE COURTING INSANITY TRAINING YOURSELF TO POSE ALL SORTS OF QUESTIONS THAT
CANNOT BE ANSWERED TRUTHFULLY AND YOU HAVE DEBT FOSTERING THE SAME IN OTHERS.
WHETHER TESCO WILL BE DEPOSED IS NOT AN ESSENTIAL QUESTION EVEN IF ITS
COLLAPSE IMPACTS ON THE UK ECONOMY AND IF YOU ASK NON ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS YOU
ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.
Questions
you must not ask:
You are not free to pose and ask whatever questions you wish but if you
cherish your sanity and hence future happiness you should only restrict
yourself to questions others or you can answer with truth.
Is the water boiled, is dinner ready are questions that can be answered
with truth and so they pose no danger in terms of debt.
Who will win the election, BN or PKR is an answer nobody here can answer
in truth, they can answer by guessing or partisanship and so you are flirting
with insanity and courting karma posing the question to others.
Further the question must be essential, questions always trouble others
because they require answers and so a wise person will ask questions that are
essential, necessary.
IF YOU CHERISH YOUR SANITY AND DO NOT WISH TO TAKE ON DEBT TO BE REPAID
AS SUFFERING, YOU MUST NOT ASK UNESSENTIAL QUESTIONS THAT HAVE NO ANSWERS IN
TRUTH, THAT YOU AND OTHERS MUST RESORT TO SPECULATION TO ANSWER.
In order to deal with Gen Y as posed, you must formulate tactics and act
according to those tactics and so only robots will ask that question and you
need to be a robot to carry out tactics.
In truth Gen Y does not exist, it is a fabrication, generalizations and
characterisations that are misleading and appeal only to people who are robots
who like to pigeon hole everything including people.
PEOPLE THINK THEY TALK GREAT SENSE BUT THEY UTTER NONSENSE IN DANGER OF
INSANITY. GEN Y IS A FABRICATION, DOES NOT EXIST AND IN TALKING ABOUT DEALING
WITH GEN Y YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT TACTICS THAT ARE ACCEPTABLE ONLY TO THOSE WHO
ARE ROBOTS. EVERYTHING IS PLANNED AND CARRIED ACCORDING TO PLANS FOR ROBOTS AND
SO THEY DISCUSS HOW TO DEAL WITH GEN Y.
Why
they always perceive falsely:
So long as there is resistance or stirred force or rejection aroused and
accompanying what you hear and see, your perception is false. Only when there
is no accompanying resistance or stirred force or rejection is the perception
true.
PEOPLE’S RESISTANCE ARE NOT ONLY STIRRED BECAUSE THERE IS STYLE OR FORCE
PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN WHATEVER OTHERS SAY OR DO TO THEM,
BUT THEIR RESISTANCE OR REJECTION IS AUTOMATICALLY TRIGGERED OR PRESENT IN
WHATEVER THEY SEE OR HEAR RENDERING HIS PERCEPTIONS FALSE.
THUS EVEN WHEN THEY HEAR AND SEE ACTIONS WITHOUT STYLE, EVEN WHEN THEY
HEAR AND SEE ME MOVING, THEIR SELF RESISTANCE OR REJECTION IS AUTOMATICALLY
AROUSED AND THEY SEE AND HEAR FALSELY AND THUS UNDERSTAND FALSELY WHAT I SAY OR
DO.
SO LONG AS A PERSON’S SELF RESISTANCE IS ACTIVE, THERE IS REJECTION IN
WHATEVER HE SEES AND HEARS, HE HAS TOTAL FALSE PERCEPTION.
People think they are good and polite speaking thus when it is evil,
hypocritical with deadly karma attached speaking thus.
It is hypocritical calling someone dear when you don’t like or hate his
child, which is not about meaning but stirred meaningless force.
TELL OTHERS THEIR CHILDREN ARE A NUISANCE, CUT OFF THE ‘DEAR’ CRAP THAT
IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT THAN MERITORIOUS.
The
Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat have got their campaigns off to an
electrifying start, with both sides launching a psychological war for the
hearts and minds of voters.
You see nothing wrong, deem it as a correct interpretation of what
happened but it is a dead wrong false understanding with an eternity of
suffering for those who say it and those who accept it as valid.
NO SHOTS HAVE BEEN FIRED AND SO YOU ARE GUILTY OF FALSITY IN THE NAME OF
DRAMATIZATION. ‘THE CAMPAIGN HAS STARTED’ IS THE CORRECT REPORT OF WHAT HAS
HAPPENED AND THEY ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS. AND SO IF YOU WANT TO KEEP YOUR HEAD ON
YOUR SHOULDERS FOR AN ETERNITY THEN YOU BETTER ATTAIN HEIGHTENED DISCERNMENT BY
NOT ACCEPTING SUCH STATEMENTS AS FACT, OBTAINED HEIGHTENED VIRTUE BY NOT
UTTERING SUCH INCENDIARY STATEMENTS.
Hell,
who cares anyway?
And
how many of you signed the petition asking for Dr Wan Azizah to be given a seat
to contest the coming general election? Do you know and do you care? Well, let
me tell you. From the more than 13 million registered voters, less than 2,000
signed the petition. So that comes to only…hell, who cares anyway?
It is impossible for a Buddha to utter ‘hell, who cares anyway’, if you
do you are asking for repayment in suffering that may exceed your wildest
nightmare.
By “Hell” is not meant hell but he is upset or angry which means he
‘cares’ and he contradicts himself (lies) creating conflict in himself and
others by saying next who cares anyway.
WHAT HE SAID IS COPIED FROM OTHERS WITHOUT TRULY UNDERSTANDING THE
MEANING OF WHAT HE COPIED AND SO HE IS A SOMNOLENT REHASHING ROBOT. HE DOES NOT
MEAN WHAT HE SAYS BECAUSE HE DOES NOT MEAN HELL BUT HE MEANS ‘ANGRY’, ‘UPSET’.
HE IS UPSET BUT HE STIRS CONFLICT BY SAYING WHO CARES ANYWAY. THIS IS CONTROLLED
INSANITY THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT WOE AND THE FACT THAT YOU SEE IT AS
FUNNY AND CORRECT REFLECTS DELUSION NOT TRUTH.
How
to be truly out of this world:
It is possible to be truly, irrefutably out of this world.
How is that so?
Firstly if you can speak without stretching your syllables, changing
speed and loudness you are truly MEANINGFULLY out of this world because there
is not an animal or human here who can achieve that and you will have achieved
a freedom from stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate and you are
heading for eternal life where the rest will PERISH.
Secondly if you can stop thinking you are truly MEANINGFULLY out of this
world because there is no one here who can stop thinking and you will have
achieved an unification of your mind that gives a higher happiness here than
even the man who can stop stretching his syllables, changing speed and loudness
and you are headed for two eternities in heaven.
Thirdly, if you can further stop your mental force stirring to like or dislike
then you will be even higher in happiness here and truly unique because there
is no one like you here.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD LIKE TO THINK THEY ARE VERY SPECIAL AND GREAT BUT
THEY ARE CONCEITED AND DELUDED HEADED FOR THE SCRAP HEAP.
IF YOU CAN STOP STRETCHING YOUR SYLLABLES, STOP CHANGING SPEED AND
LOUDNESS THEN YOU ARE TRULY SPECIAL AND GREAT BECAUSE YOU HAVE ACHIEVED
SOMETHING EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD IS INCAPABLE OF. IF YOU THINK YOU CAN SPEAK
WITH CONSTANT SPEED AND LOUDNESS, LET ME DEMONSTRATE HOW YOUR SPEECH IS STILL
PREGNANT WITH SIGNIFICANT SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES EVEN WHEN YOU SPEAK SLOWLY
AND ‘CALMLY’.
No
matter how soft or slow, still there are speed and loudness changes:
It does not matter how soft or slow or tender stylish people speak, still
there are significant prolonging, speed and loudness changes.
IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE HEARD SOMEONE SPEAK WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES,
CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU ARE DELUDED BECAUSE I HAVE NOT HEARD ANYONE
ELSE SPEAK LIKE THIS.
IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE HEARD MUSIC WITHOUT PROLONGING NOTES, CHANGES OF
SPEED AND LOUDNESS, YOU ARE DELUDED BECAUSE SUCH MUSIC DOES NOT EXIST IN THIS
WORLD.
BEFORE YOU HAVE HEARD SPEECH AND MUSIC WITHOUT PROLONGING, CHANGING
SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISMISS IT AS WORTHLESS, INFERIOR
UNLESS YOU WANT PUNISHMENT. FIRST ACHIEVE IT YOURSELF BEFORE DECLARING IT AS
INFERIOR OR WORTHLESS.
Music
without style is incomparably superior:
There is music in heaven too and when the Buddha passed away, heavenly
music played and there was a continuous falling of heavenly flowers and
perfume.
THERE IS A DIFFERENT KIND OF MUSIC NOT HEARD ON EARTH AND IT IS A TYPE
WITH HARMONIOUS MEANINGFUL NOTE CHANGES WITHOUT ANY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED
AND LOUDNESS AND FAR FROM DULL OR INFERIOR IT IS INCOMPARABLY PLEASANTER AND
DOES NOT RESULT IN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE
AFTERWARDS.
IF YOU LIKE YOUR MUSIC TO EXCITE OR MOVE YOU THEN HEAVEN IS NOT THE
PLACE FOR YOU BUT ETERNAL PUNISHMENT IS THE CORRECT DESTINATION.
People in this world like to pride themselves in being better even top
in certain things and yet it may be the way to even eternal ruin even if you
are better as Italians are said in making expresso and tomato sauces.
There are things that are essential and things that are unessential and
so if you are better even best in something unessential it is not meritorious
but even the path to future woe.
THERE IS ONLY ONE ESSENTIAL THING THAT YOU SHOULD BE BETTER AND EVEN
UNIQUE HERE AND IT IS THE ABILITY TO STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED
AND LOUDNESS THAT CONVERTS YOU FROM REHASHING ROBOT TO A GENUINE SPECIFIC TO
THE OCCASION PERSON.
YOU MAY BE BETTER AT MAKING LOVE, MUSIC OR COOKING OR SCIENCE BUT IT IS
ALL RUBBISH.
TO CHANGE FROM A STYLED PERSON TO A STYLE FREE PERSON IS THE ONLY WAY TO
BE TRULY BETTER THAN OTHERS BECAUSE IT IS THE PATH TO FREEDOM FROM STRESS HERE
AND KEY TO ETERNAL LIFE AND OPENS THE DOOR FOR FURTHER ADVANCEMENT TO NO
THINKING, NO LIKING AND DISLIKING, NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE.
Worthless
Goodness:
If a person is doomed, he is suffering and heading for eternal suffering
and death then it is useless being good at anything (eg art, sex, maths,
poetry, music, sewing) that does not deliver him from eternal death and
suffering.
Only something that delivers a person doomed to endless death and
suffering is precious, worthy.
BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE HERE HAVE SUFFERING DUE THEM AS VAST AS AN
OCEAN AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR ETERNAL DEATH AND SUFFERING IT IS WORTHLESS BEING
GOOD AT ANYTHING THAT DOES NOT RELEASE THEM FROM THIS TERRIBLE FATE AND BECAUSE
ELIMINATION OF STYLE IS THE KEY TO ESCAPE IT ALONE IS TRULY GOOD TO BE GOOD AT
(NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS).
Paul
Krugman’s delusion:
Paul
Krugman 1:24pm
Even as
the case for debt hysteria is collapsing, the US' worst fears about the damage
from long-term unemployment are being confirmed.
Debt is serious not hysterical, the debts facing America is deadly
serious and has Krugman come up with any answers how to deal with it than
blithely assume that we should spend to revive the economy and once it is
revived, lets grapple with the debt?
KRUGMAN’S PRINCIPLE IS LET THE GOVERNMENT SPEND TO STIMULATE THE
ECONOMY, INCREASING DEBT DOES NOT MATTER AND ONCE REVIVED THE DEBTS WILL TAKE
CARE OF ITSELF (HOPEFULLY BY INFLATING OURSELVES OUT OF DEBT, A FORM OF
CHEATING CREDITORS). THIS IS DELUDED AND HAS INSANITY AS THE PRIZE.
THE EMPLOYMENT CREATED WILL BE UNPRODUCTIVE PRODUCING GOODS THE PEOPLE
CANNOT AFFORD TO BUY EXCEPT BY CREDIT AND INFRASTRUCTURES THE COUNTRY WOULD
LIKE BUT CANNOT AFFORD BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY FULL OF DEBTS.
JUST BECAUSE THE ECONOMY IS IN DIRE STRAITS, IN DANGER OF COLLAPSE AND
MANY PEOPLE ARE JOBLESS IS NO EXCUSE FOR DEBT RIDDEN COUNTRIES TO SPEND BY
PRINTING AND HOPING THAT CURRENT AND ADDITIONAL DEBTS WILL TAKE CARE OF
THEMSELVES ONCE THE ECONOMY IS REVIVED BECAUSE IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN BUT YOU END
UP WITH AN EVEN DEEPER DEBT HOLE.
Mankind’s
debt delusion:
If the recent boom was not based on debt but meritorious it is
impossible we would have been stranded with the current debt crisis.
If the recent boom was based on WASTEFUL excesses and mountainous debt
creation then unless the economy can boosted in a meritorious or productive way
that will not increase the debt burden but significantly reduce the existing
debt burden, true recovery as opposed to illusory recovery is impossible.
The world was living WASTEFULLY way beyond its means in the past boom as
a result of various factors like America, the world’s biggest economy not
needing to pay for its imports by earned money but printed money, by repeated
recycling of borrowed money back into the banking system to be re-lent creating
many multiples of debt to actual wealth ratio, the illusion that people are
much richer than they are because they own properties and assets that have
become very valuable by inflation. Now the wealth is preponderantly in the
hands of the few and the system has become emptied of wealth even full of debts
and there is no way of redressing this imbalance. When the wealthy spend it
largely benefits others who are also wealth and so there is a ‘two speed
economy’, one for the haves and another for the majority have nots who are
struggling to make ends meet.
MANKIND DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THIS, THEY THINK SOMEHOW GOOD TIMES WILL BE
BACK AGAIN, THEY THINK THEIR USELESS TINKERING WILL PRODUCE A RECOVERY. THEY
ARE TOTALLY DELUDED.
EVEN NOW THE WASTEFUL EXCESSES ARE CONTINUING SIGNIFICANTLY WHAT MORE
ABOUT TRULY TURNING TO LIVING WITHIN OUR MEANS AND REDRESSING DEBTS.
Sometimes
I wished I’d never won:
People think they are good and speaking the truth speaking thus but they
are deluded, they are incurring debt saying something that is intended to stir
sympathy or envy from others.
Make up your mind whether you want the lottery win or not, don’t speak
of sometimes yes and no, don’t trouble others with your vacillations which are
meaningless.
IT IS NOT GOOD BUT BAD TELLING OTHERS ‘SOMETIMES I WISHED I’D NEVER
WON’, IT IS ABOUT HESITANCY, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF
THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE. MAKE UP YOUR MIND AND DON’T TROUBLE OTHERS
WITH YOUR AGONIZINGS WHICH ARE BLAMEWORTHY NOT BLAMELESS.
The Buddha or Jesus never needed anyone’s support and so defending the
support for anyone is controlled insanity that ends in insanity.
There is no need to defend any action but tell people why it is correct
or true you undertook a particular action and supporting anyone even DAP or
whatever is wrong.
ANYONE WHO SUPPORTS CAUSES OR PEOPLE ARE DELUDED, IT IS ABOUT LENDING
FORCE OR YOUR STRENGTH TO A PARTICULAR CAUSE THAT IS THE WAY TO FUTURE
SUFFERING NOT HAPPINESS.
TO SUPPORT IS WRONG UNDERSTANDING AND TO DEFEND A DECISION TOO IS WRONG
ACTION, WHAT YOU NEED TO SAY IS WHY YOU ARE RIGHT TO DO SOMETHING AND
SUPPORTING ANYONE IS NEVER A RIGHT THING TO DO.
No
need to defend, no need to support:
There is never a need to defend any action and there is never a need to
support anything except in the person’s delusion that is the path to future
suffering.
AND SO IF YOU THINK YOU ARE RIGHT TO DEFEND YOUR ACTIONS, RIGHT TO
SUPPORT DAP OR WHATEVER THEN YOU ARE DELUDED IN DANGER OF FUTURE SUFFERING.
Defending
and support is about applying force never reason:
What a person is doing when he defends or supports a particular stance
or cause is to supply force either directly or indirectly through a plan or
course of action (eg taking part in a march) not because there is some
meaningful work to do but to protect or stop something falling and so it is
about fighting that is never the way to heaven. If you think reason is involved
you may be right or deluded.
Jesus never said defend me, support me if you love me.
You
vote or choose not defend:
You vote or choose X because it is the better choice but there is never
need to support X unless you want to be partisan that the Buddha said is the
path to woe.
Be
contented:
You hear others exhort others to be contented.
Contented is not something you tell others to be but something that you either
are or are not.
It is never happiness but it is suffering to be discontented and the
person is driven restlessly endlessly to acquire and as the Buddha said,
whoever makes an acquisition in this world is headed for suffering, there is
debt involved whenever you acquire (at the expense of others).
SO LONG AS A PERSON REMAINS IN STYLE BESET BY INSOLUBLE STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE DRIVEN BY GREED, IT IS TO BE EXPECTED
HE WOULD BE DISCONTENTED NOT CONTENDED AND IT IS USELESS ADVICE FALLING ON DEAF
EARS AND PEOPLE WHO ARE SLAVES OF DISCONTENT ARE NOT MASTERS OF THEMSELVES AND
SO IF YOU ARE ASKING THE IMPOSSIBLE OF THEM YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING USELESS AND
CAUSING THEM DISTRESS.
AS SOON AS A PERSON IS FREE OF STYLE AND THUS FREE OF STRESS, IT IS EXPECTED
HE WOULD BE HAPPY IN HIMSELF AND HE WOULD NOT UNDERTAKE WHAT CAUSES SUFFERING
NOW AND LATER IN REPAYMENT BY BEING DISCONTENTED.
How
to stop thinking:
Thinking is suffering that causes people much distress even intense hurt
from what others said or did and the Buddha said it is possible to stop
thinking and it is the second higher state of mind that gives much higher
happiness here because the non thinking mind is unified focussed on the present
and he is headed for 2 eternities in heaven.
So how does one stop thinking?
If every time you catch yourself thinking you tell yourself ‘stop’ you
keep interrupting your thought train and for the duration of your telling it to
stop you have briefly arrested or stopped the train of thought and although you
will revert to thinking again, if you keep interrupting your thought train by
telling it to stop in time it will truly stop and you will experience the
incomparable freedom from suffering it brings.
KEEP INTERRUPTING YOUR THOUGHT TRAIN EVERY TIME YOU CATCH YOURSELF
THINKING AND IF YOU ARE GENUINE IN ENDING THINKING IN TIME DISRUPTING AND THUS
STOPPING OF THINKING BECOMES THE DEFAULT MODE INSTEAD OF MINDLESS CONTINUOUS
AGONIZING THINKING.
Anyone
who suffers must be discontented:
Anyone who suffers must be discontented, it is impossible he should be
contented for that would mean acceptance of his suffering and his suffering
driven discontent causes him to acquire restlessly that cannot assuage his
discontent but adds to his suffering agonizingly.
It is possible for a person to be truly free of suffering and a person
released from suffering is automatically contented with himself and has no
desire to seek anything to assuage his suffering that is non-existent.
ANYONE WITH STYLE IS BESET BY SERIOUS INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT CAN REACH HOMICIDAL SUICIDAL PROPORTIONS AND
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT HE SHOULD BE CONTENTED WITH HIS LOT WHICH WOULD BE TO
ADMIT DEFEAT AND SUBMIT TO HIS BLEAK DIRE FATE AND BECAUSE DISCONTENT NOT BASED
ON REASON BUT BASED ON FORCE, IT IS CONDITIONING AND TRANSFERRABLE AND SO HIS
DISCONTENT IS TRANSFERRED TO SUBSTITUTES, RESTLESS ACQUISITION OF MATERIAL AND
SENSATE GRATIFICATIONS IN A FUTILE AND IRRATIONAL ATTEMPT TO REDRESS HIS
SUFFERING THAT NOT ONLY NEVER WORKS BUT MAKES IT MORE TORMENTING.
ANYONE WITHOUT STYLE IS EFFORTLESSLY FREED FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND
DISTRACTION AND HE HAS NO RESON TO BE DISCONTENTED WITH HIMSELF, HE IS NOT IN
NEED OF ANYTHING TO ASSUAGE HIS NON EXISTENT SUFFERING.
IN THE SAME WAY THE PERSON WHO CAN STOP THINKING, WHO NEITHER LIKES NOR
DISLIKES IS IMBUED WITH EVEN HIGHER HAPPINESS AND FREEDOM OF SUFFERING AND HAS
EVEN LESS REASON OR CAUSE TO BE DISCONTENTED.
THUS SO LONG AS YOU SUFFER YOU MUST BE DISCONTENTED, DISSATISFIED WITH
YOUR LOT AND DISCONTENTED YOU LOOK ELSEWHERE, YOU SEEK AND ACQUIRE IN A VAIN
ATTEMPT TO ESCAPE YOUR SUFFERING THAT ONLY ADD MORE FUEL TO THE SUFFERING.
Sin
causes suffering causes discontent causes suffering:
Suffering is never blameless but the person is to blame for his
suffering because it is sinful conduct that leads to suffering.
Style is a cardinal sinful conduct because it is meaningless, for show
to impress and please others, subjects self and others to a relentless
bombardment of for show force.
Thus it is because of sin never merit that a person suffers and as a
result of his suffering he is discontented, not satisfied with himself and his
lot and this drives him to seek and acquire that never assuages but adds to his
suffering.
AND SO YOU CANNOT CURE DISCONTENT DIRECTLY OR IN ISOLATION BUT
DISCONTENT CAN ONLY CURED BY ELIMINATING ITS ROOT SUFFERING WHICH MEANS SIN
MUST BE ELIMINATED. THUS THE PERSON WHO TELLS OTHERS NOT TO BE DISCONTENTED IS
A FOOL GIVING IMPOSSIBLE ADVICE WITH KARMA NOT MERIT ATTACHED. HOW CAN A PERSON
WHO IS SUFFERING SERIOUSLY (AND HEADED FOR ENDLESS DEATH) BE CONTENTED WITH HIS
LOT?
GE13: I am the most
winnable candidate, says Jenice Lee
A general election is not about winning a seat in parliament for
yourself or your party, neither should a party select the most ‘winnable’
candidate and it exposes the selfish motivations of the person and party rather
than offering yourself to be elected to serve the community.
BECAUSE WINNING IS THE WRONG REASON FOR STANDING FOR ELECTION THOSE WHO
HAVE THIS WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF ELECTIONS ARE HEADING FOR INSANITY AND THAT IS
NOT THE PATH TO HEAVEN OR SAFETY.
AN ELECTION IS CALLED FOR BECAUSE THE COUNTRY NEEDS TO BE RUN, IT IS NOT
TO BECOME DEGENERATED IN A CONTEST OF PERSONAL POPULARITY AND EGOISM, OF WINNING
OR DEFEATING. POLITICIANS THINK ELECTIONS IS ABOUT THEM (WINNING) AND THEIR
PARTIES. BECAUSE THIS IS WRONG THEY ARE DELUDED HEADING FOR INSANITY.
The
sin of asking voters to vote for you:
As candidate you are correct to make voters aware you are running for
election in that constituency and to tell them what you espouse but you have no
right to tell them to vote for you which is straying into impropriety that
incurs debt to be repaid as suffering.
POLITICIANS CAJOLE, EXERT ALL KINDS OF PRESSURE ON VOTERS, INTIMIDATE
AND ENTICE VOTERS TO VOTE FOR THEM AND ALL THESE ARE LAPSING IN WRONG THAT HAS
DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING.
WHY ARE YOU SO KEEN TO SERVE THE PEOPLE? AS CANDIDATE YOU ARE CORRECT TO
PUBLICIZE YOURSELF AND WHAT YOU PROPOSE TO DO
BUT IT IS UP TO VOTERS TO DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES WHO THEY VOTE AND ANY
ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE OR PRESSURE VOTERS TO VOTE FOR YOU IS LAPSING INTO WRONG
THAT HAS DEBT TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING.
For morality to be truly meaningful it must denote correctness or
rightness of actions. You can be either correct or incorrect in your actions,
moral or immoral in your actions, never more or less moral or correct.
Thus it reflects muddled thinking and wrong understanding to speak of
more morality.
MORALITY MAY BE ALL OR NONE NOT MORE OR LESS AND IF YOU THINK IT EXISTS
MORE OR LESS THEN IF IT IS NOT SO YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION. THE CONDUCT OF
BANKERS CAN BE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE IMMORAL, EVIL, WRONG AND YOU ARE SILLY
TO CALL FOR LESS WRONG INSTEAD OF NO WRONG.
So what? Britain is in a depression not blamelessly but as a result of
the collective sinful or reckless conduct.
Just as a man might find himself in hell even for millions of years not
by accident or misfortune but as a result of his actions and there is nothing
he can do about it except bear his suffering and await his release from
purgatory, Britain is in economic depression as a result of past excesses and
there is nothing that can be done except accept its suffering. If you try to
keep the fire of wasteful consumption stoked by debt going, it will end in an
even bigger depression or devastation.
American
barbarity towards Boston bomber:
America is no better than its enemies. It seems the boat the teenage
Boston bomber was hiding in was riddled with dozens of bullets (and he was hit
in head, neck and body) which reflect murderous vengefulness.
If you know he is hiding in there, surely you can flush him out with
more patience and less murderous brutality and it reflects America is no better
than its enemies and a lot of people who think they are righteous carry deadly
karma to be repaid by future suffering.
EVEN IF HE IS A KILLER, IT IS ATTEMPTED MURDER RIDDLING THE BOAT WITH
BULLETS AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE AND THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT HAVE SERIOUS KARMA.
The
coward’s creed: Were the police under fire?
If the teenager was firing at the police there may be justification to
fire at him. You are supposed to be law enforcement not some vigilante group.
The coward’s creed (though they like to think they are great big heroes)
is that it is OK for them to shoot and kill you but they will never give you a
chance to kill them and so they will shoot first and ask questions later,
better you dead than me.
Thus American military routinely remotely take out Taliban targets even
if there are civilians at risk and they never give you a chance to engage them
in a fight that might get them killed.
KARMA CAN ARRANGE FOR YOU TO BE KILLED EVEN MANY TIMES WITHOUT HAVING AN
OPPORTUNITY TO DEFEND YOURSELF AND SO YOU MIGHT SAVE YOUR SKIN NOW AT THE
EXPENSE OF OTHERS BUT LATER YOUR COWARDICE WILL BE PUT TO THE TEST EVEN
ENDLESSLY.
What
if it wasn’t the bomber?
It would be reckless and irresponsible if the police riddled the boat
with bullets and it turned out to be someone else eg a drunkard hiding in the
boat and if police are certain it was the bomber then it is high handed to
riddle it with bullets instead of flushing him out.
I
understand & we are doing everything possible:
"I understand change is
always unsettling, particularly for those directly affected,"
said HSBC's chief executive, Brian Robertson."We are doing everything possible to offer impacted employees opportunities from the many newly created roles, and I'm confident a significant majority will remain with the bank."
The proffered ‘I understand change is always unsettling’ and ‘we are
doing everything possible’ are standardized copied rehashed speech and they are
false, unnecessary, useless, said not meaningfully but to please others.
It is not ‘change is always unsettling’ but ‘sacking is often traumatic’
and so he is being falsely euphemistic not describing the situation correctly
and there is never a need to say that nor does it do any good because still you
will be sacked but it is to deflect blame, that you are forced to sack you.
‘I UNDERSTAND CHANGE IS ALWAYS UNSETTLING’ IS A REHASHED COPIED
STATEMENT THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE, UNDERSTATES THE SITUATION, SERVES NO USE
EXCEPT FOR SHOW ‘TO OFFER LIP SERVICE SYMPATHY’.
AGAIN ‘WE ARE DOING EVERYTHING POSSIBLE’ IS A STANDARDIZED COPIED
STATEMENT THAT IS DESIGNED FOR SHOW (MAY NOT BE TRUE THAT THEY ARE DOING
EVERYTHING POSSIBLE) THAT THEY ARE SINCERE AND HAVE YOUR WELFARE AT HEART,
SERVES NO TRUE PURPOSE.
WHAT IS SAID IS SAID TO SHOW SYMPATHY AND TO REASSURE AND THESE ARE NOT
VALID REASONS FOR SPEAKING BECAUSE THEY ARE INTENDED TO STIR LISTENERS’
EMOTIONS THAT IS NOT ONLY USELESS BUT SUFFERING.
Only
the good deserve good government:
Only the good deserve good government and if you are not good you do not
deserve good government except in your delusion you do and because the vast
majority of people, even those who think they are quite good and understanding
are not good but even evil, they do not deserve good government and will not
get it.
People today are more up in arms or angry with the BN government not
because they have suddenly turned good or truly understand now but they hate
the overboard corruption, the soaring inflation and the economic famine now
starting to affect them.
IT IS DELUSION AND STIRRED EMOTIONS (ATTRACTION, GREED) PLUS CHEATING
THAT CAUSED PEOPLE TO VOTE AND ALLOW BN TO RULE WITH IMPUNITY IN THE PAST. IF
YOU THINK THEY NOW UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY YOU ARE DELUDED. IT IS STIRRED EMOTION,
ANGER AND DEPRIVATION THAT IS SPURRING THE BACKLASH AND IT MAY NOT BE
SUFFICIENT TO COUNTER THE CHEATING AND BRIBERY. THE PEOPLE ARE FAR FROM
INNOCENT, FAR FROM GOOD TODAY AND SO THEY DO NOT DESERVE GOOD GOVERNMENT
EITHER.
ONLY THE WORTHY DESERVE JESUS, THOSE WHO ARE BAD DO NOT DESERVE JESUS
AND WILL BE ALLOWED TO PERISH AND SO IF THE PEOPLE ARE NOT GOOD THEY DO NOT
DESERVE GOOD GOVERNMENT ANYWAY, NOR DO THEY WANT IT OR APPRECIATE.
A
divergence of selfish vested interests:
The vast majority of people are not good. Those who are good are much
fewer than people perceive.
In the past the selfish vested interests of the ruling elite and the
people coincided and so they were happy to close one eye and walk hand in hand,
now the selfish vested interests of the people and ruling elite are diverging
and so they clash and rise in dissent.
WHAT IS HAPPENING TODAY IS A DIVERGENCE OF VESTED OR SELFISH INTERESTS
BETWEEN THE RULING ELITE AND THE MASSES THEY USED TO MANIPULATE TO OBTAIN ILL
GOTTEN GAINS, BOTH PARTIES ARE JUST AS ROTTEN AS EVER, IT IS LIKE TWO PARTIES
IN CRIME SPLITTING APART AMIDST MUTUAL RECRIMINATIONS.
Whatever said or done that is true, beneficial to self and others does
not require confidence and it is only what is said or done that is false,
rehashed faked as true, harmful to self and others dressed as beneficial to
self and others that require confidence and so he is referring not to matters
of truth or goodness but matters of falsity and harmfulness that he
nevertheless wants to undertake.
ONLY THE DELUDED SPEAK OF CONFIDENCE. CONFIDENCE DOES NOT ARISE AT ALL
IF THE MATTER IS ABOUT TRUTH AND GOODNESS. IF YOU ARE PUTTING ON A SHOW,
REHASHING THEN YOU NEED CONFIDENCE. IF WHAT YOU SAY IS FRESHLY COMPOSED,
MINDFUL AND MEANINGFUL CONFIDENCE IS NOT A CONSIDERATION. AND NO MATTER HOW
CONFIDENT YOU ARE, IT IS FASHIONED OF FORCE AND THERE IS DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY
IN ITS HEART THAT WILL SOMEDAY OVERWHELM THAT CONFIDENCE.
AND SO IF THE ECONOMY, MANUFACTURING OR CONSUMER ACTIONS ARE DEPENDENT
ON CONFIDENCE IT MEANS THEY ARE NOT TRUE BUT BASED ON FALSITY AND IN DANGER OF
COLLAPSE.
Those
who understand do not talk about confidence:
Those who truly understand do not talk about confidence (or poise) let
alone place emphasis on it, it is only those who are deluded, who are somnolent
rehashing robots for whom confidence is desirable who talk about confidence and
place importance in confidence.
CONFIDENCE IS NEVER ABOUT SUBSTANCE OR MEANING BUT IT IS ABOUT STYLE,
HOW YOU DO OR SAY SOMETHING THAT IS FALSE AND HARMFUL IN A WAY AS IF IT IS
GENUINE AND GOOD, YOU SUPPRESS WHATEVER HESITANCY IN YOU WITH EVEN DETERMINED
FORCE SO AS TO APPEAR CONFIDENT OR GENUINE.
Who
is Ezam and Nalla trying to fool?
KOTA
BARU: Two nemeses of opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim have challenged
him to take a religious oath to deny that he is not the man in the alleged
controversial sex video involving a woman from China.
If Ezam and Nalla were persons of integrity and their former associate
Anwar the devil they portray him, then they should have become independents
rather than join the ruling elite and attack Anwar from there.
IT ACTUALLY MAKES NO SENSE THAT IF ANWAR IS BAD AND EZAM AND NALLA ARE
GOOD THAT THEY SHOULD DESERT ANWAR AND JOIN THE RULING ELITE. A GOOD MAN DOES
NOT JUMP FROM ONE BAD MAN TO ANOTHER BAD MAN UNLESS YOU THINK THE RULING ELITE
IS A BASTION OF GOOD.
Fooling
the fool:
Only fools can be fooled, the wise cannot be fooled, they are not taken
in by the machinations of fools.
Anyone who tries to fool others MUST BE a fool, it is impossible he is
not a fool because in lying to himself he is setting himself up for insanity
and punishment in repayment and it is only fools who can be fooled by him
because those who are not fools can see the fooler is a fool.
Even those who disbelieve Ezam or Nallla do not truly understand why
they have no credibility, they may have nagging doubts that Ezam and Nalla may
be speaking the truth, thus they are also fools who can be fooled, if not by
Ezam or Nalla then someone else.
ANYONE WHO FOOLS OTHERS IS A FOOL BECAUSE HE DOES NOT REALIZE HIS LIES
ARE DEADLY, LEADS TO INSANITY.
ONLY FOOLS CAN BE FOOLED BY OTHER FOOLS. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE A PERSON WHO
IS NOT A FOOL CAN SUCCUMB TO THE SHENANIGANS OF FOOLS BECAUSE HE SEES A FOOL
AND HE KNOWS FROM THE MANNER AND LOGIC OF WHAT IS SAID THAT IT IS UNTENABLE AND
SO FALSE.
There
are no part time fools:
In order to be fooled you must be a fool and for those who truly
understand, there are no part time fools, being a fool is something you either
are or are not and you are a fool until the day if even you develop
discernment, the ability to see things as they actually are, not as you like
and dislike them to be.
IN ORDER TO BE FOOLED YOU MUST BE A FOOL AND SO IF YOU ADMIT YOU CAN BE
FOOLED BY OTHERS YOU ARE A (FULL TIME) FOOL UNTIL THE DAY IF EVER YOU DEVELOP
DISCERNMENT, THE ABILITY TO SEE THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE, NOT AS YOU LIKE OR
DISLIKE THEM TO BE.
Who
is the fool?
Anyone who is heading for eternal punishment must be a fool, it is
impossible if someone is truly wise that he would be heading for eternal death
and suffering.
The Buddha said the Flood is difficult to cross and most people just run
up and down this side of the flood and so the vast majority of people are
fools.
Lakkhana Sutta: Characterized (by Action)
"Monks, a fool is characterized by his/her
actions. A wise person is characterized by his/her actions. It is through the
activities of one's life that one's discernment shines.
"A person endowed with three things is to be
recognized as a fool. Which three? Bodily misconduct, verbal misconduct, mental
misconduct. A person endowed with these three things is to be recognized as a
fool.
"A person endowed with three things is to be
recognized as a wise person. Which three? Good bodily conduct, good verbal
conduct, good mental conduct. A person endowed with these three things is to be
recognized as a wise person.
"Thus, monks, you should train yourselves: 'We
will avoid the three things that, endowed with which, one is to be recognized
as a fool. We will undertake & maintain the three things that, endowed with
which, one is to be recognized as a wise person.' That's how you should train
yourselves."
What
they call good conduct is also misconduct:
What others call good conduct, smiling, laughing, joking, being witty,
‘friendly’, flattering others, being anxious, excitable is also misconduct and
so they severely underestimate their misconduct and they are much more a fool
than they think.
Tim
Cook’s fabrication and karma:
Tim Cook wants investors to "think different" about Apple:
less as a hyper-growth startup-like company and more as a mature but robust
technology corporation with the world's most lucrative dividend.
There is no need and it is false or wrong for Cook to tell investors how
to think about Apple and the reason is self serving, to falsely calm investors
so that they would not negatively affect Apple’s share price.
WHAT HE SAID IS TYPICAL OF APPLE SPEAK THROUGHOUT THE YEARS, ALWAYS
TRYING TO TWIST THINGS AROUND OR GIVING THINGS A SPIN IN A WAY THAT PAINTS
APPLE POSITIVELY. HE IS TRYING TO BRAINWASH THOSE WHO ARE GULLIBLE OR FOOLS TO
REMAIN ENAMOURED BY APPLE.
ACTUALLY APPLE’S TRACK RECORD IS NOT THAT GREAT, ITS PRODUCTS MAY BE
EXCELLENT IN THE PAST BUT IT WAS STRUGGLING ALONG AND THEN CAME IPOD, IPHONE
AND IPAD THAT MAY BE PART FORTUITOUS WHICH RESCUED IT FROM BANKRUPTCY.
No comments:
Post a Comment