Only those without true understanding speak of the desire for change.
It is not desire but reason that should be the basis for change. If it
is desire that is the drive for change it means the change is based on blind
stirred force and that is a dangerous undertaking. If the change is based on
reason then it is based on understanding and cannot be wrong.
ONLY ROBOTS KEEP REHASHING THE SAME THING AND SO NEED CHANGE, THOSE WHO
ARE NOT ROBOTS DO NOT DO THE SAME OLD THING, WHAT THEY DO IS IN RESPONSE
SPECIFICALLY FOR A CURRENT SITUATION AND SO IT IS MAD TO TALK OF THE NEED FOR
CHANGE.
HENCE IF YOU ARE REHASHING AND DOING THE SAME OLD THING THEN YOU ARE A
ROBOT WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND IT IS TO BE EXPECTED YOU WOULD SPEAK OF
FORCE, OR DESIRE FOR CHANGE INSTEAD OF REASON FOR CHANGE WHICH IS NONEXISTENT
IF THE PERSON IS NOT ROBOT. A PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT HAS NO REASON FOR
CHANGE, WHAT HE DOES IS NOT REHASHED AND IS SPECIFIC FOR EACH OCCASION AS IT
ARISES. IT IS ONLY IF YOUR RESPONSES ARE REPEATED, FIXED, RIGID THAT YOU NEED A
REVAMP, A CHANGE.
Contrasting
fortune of Ford Europe & US:
US car
giant Ford reports results that underlined the contrasting fortunes of its
North American and European businesses.
The reason Ford US is doing well may be because of the massive money
printing that made money available for borrowing, it seems you can use your gun
as collateral to get a car loan and many people with poor credit risk are
allowed to borrow to buy cars.
If this is the case then Ford’s fortune in US is illusory and fuelled by
recklessness rather than merit.
This is a deluded statement that leads to insanity for those who hold
it.
Films don’t boost the economy but the pockets of those in the film
industry including actors, studios, cinemas, advertisers at the expense of the
system because it is wasteful, unproductive and drains wealth from the system
into the hands of the few that cannot go on forever. How much of the wealth
earned by the film industry is ploughed back into the system? Minimal and so in
time too much wealth remained sequestered in the wealthy few who tend to
transfer the wealth amongst themselves with little trickle down back to the
system.
IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE HE SHOULD BE SO BULLISH ABOUT FILMS BECAUSE HE
BENEFITS FROM IT AND WANT TO PROMOTE IT.
FILMS DON’T BOOST THE ECONOMY, THEY ARE WASTEFUL WITHOUT RETURNS TO THE
SYSTEM AND BOOST THE POCKETS OF THE FEW AT THE EXPENSE OF THE SYSTEM.
A change
in an outdated food aid restriction would allow the United States to feed
millions more people at the same cost.
‘When food isn’t the answer to hunger’ is a bizarre conclusion of the
situation and the person thinks he is very clever.
Rather than a case of ‘when isn’t the answer to hunger’ it is ‘when a
change in food aid restriction is the answer to hunger’.
IF IT IS A CASE OF ‘WHEN A CHANGE IN FOOD AID RESTRICTION IS THE ANSWER
TO HUNGER’ AND YOU THINK IT IS A CASE OF ‘WHEN FOOD ISN’T THE ANSWER TO HUNGER’
THEN YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND LOGIC THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT FOOD IS THE ANTIDOTE TO HUNGER AND YOU THINK YOU
ARE TOO CLEVER, YOU THINK THERE IS A CASE IT ISN’T WHEN IT IS A FIGMENT OF YOUR
CONCEIT.
Food
is still the answer to hunger:
Even though a change in food aid restriction is the answer to hunger,
food is still the answer to hunger and you are wrong and in danger of suffering
saying when food is not the answer to hunger.
KUALA
LUMPUR: Award-wining actress Lee Sin Jie urged voters to respect the choice of
other people as Malaysia is a democratic country, major Chinese newspapers
reported.
Respect the choice of others is a wrong view and that is the path to
woe.
The choices of others can be examined and objectively determined to be
right or wrong and if it is wrong and you uphold or respect it, there is karma
not merit.
IF A PERSON’S CHOICE IS DELUDED, IT IS NOT TO BE RESPECTED UNLESS YOU
WANT TO INCUR KARMA NOR DO YOU CONDEMN IT BUT YOU SEE IT AS WRONG OR DELUDED
AND DO NOT RECOMMEND IT.
RESPECT IS NOT A PRODUCT OF REASON OR MEANING BUT IT IS BLIND HARMFUL
MEANINGLESS STIRRED FORCE. IF YOU RESPECT A PERSON YOU ARE IN AWE OR FEAR OF
THE PERSON, DARE NOT CROSS HIM AND SO ANYONE WHO FINDS RESPECT MEANINGFUL, WANT
TO BE RESPECTED IS DELUDED.
YOU DON’T FOOLISHLY TELL OTHERS TO RESPECT THE CHOICES OF OTHERS, A NON
SPECIFIC RULE THAT APPEAL TO ROBOT BUT YOU STATE THAT IN THE CASE OF MICHELLE
YEOH, SHE IS RIGHT OR WRONG TO SUPPORT BN. IT IS NOT A CASE OF ‘RESPECT THE
CHOICES OF OTHERS’ BUT IN THIS CASE, IS THE PERSON’S CHOICE RIGHT OR WRONG.
OBJECTIVELY A PERSON’S CHOICE CAN BE DETERMINED AS RIGHT OR WRONG, EVIL OR
GOOD.
YOU DON’T TELL OTHERS ‘RESPECT THE CHOICE OF OTHERS’ UNLESS YOU WANT TO
FOOLISHLY HEAP KARMA ON YOURSELF TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING.
What
is respect?
Respect is a programmed stirring of a person’s mental force to be in
fear or awe plus or minus like of the person or object (eg shrine) respected
associated with similarly programmed behaviour like being subdued, silenced,
bowed, clasped hands, etc. Respect may be genuinely felt or it can be faked,
you fake you respect your conqueror when you hate him.
RESPECT MAY BE FAKED OR GENUINE AND IT IS SIMPLY A PROGRAMMED STIRRING
OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE ASSOCIATED WITH PROGRAMMED BEHAVIOR TO SHOW AWE OR
FEAR OR LIKING FOR THE PERSON THUS RESPECTED.
RESPECT IS NOT LOVE OR WORSHIP WHICH ARE WHOLESOME. YOU LOVE OR WORSHIP
GOD NOT RESPECT GOD.
Boston
police action censurable:
The teenage Boston bomber was found lying motionless in pools of blood
by the boat owner who then called the police and so if the owner can approach
the boat without getting shot surely the police could attempt to capture him
without first spraying the boat with bullets and using a robot to set off flash
bombs, it reflects cowardice.
IF IT IS TRUE THE TEENAGER WAS SERIOUSLY WOUNDED AND LYING IN A POOL OF
BLOOD THEN THE POLICE’S ACTION IN SPRAYING THE BOAT WITH A HAIL OF BULLETS IS
HIGH HANDED DISREGARDING HUMAN LIFE AND THEY ARE NO BETTER THAN THE TERRORISTS
THEY PERSECUTE.
There
goes the owner’s beloved boat:
Apparently the boat was of some vintage and treasured by its owner.
Whoever shows no care for others’ properties, causes damage or loss even
in the course of duty or it is compensated (using public money) is liable for
suffering in repayment.
NEXT TIME YOU WANT TO TROUBLE OTHERS TO DO WORK FOR YOU THINK AGAIN, IF
YOU CAUSE TROUBLE, SUFFERING, LOSS OR DAMAGE TO SOMEONE OR HIS PROPERTY YOU ARE
LIABLE FOR SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT. THUS THE WISE WILL DISENTANGLE HIMSELF FROM
THIS WORLD, WILL MINIMIZE HIS CONTACTS WITH OTHERS, FOOLS ARE EAGER TO SAY AND
DO, THEY DEMAND THIS AND THAT FROM OTHERS NOT REALIZE THEY WILL WEEP LATER.
It is never exciting products but innovative or useful products that is
the matter. Excitement is about attraction, stirring mental force and so
Apple’s new products is aimed at stirring mental forces so that people become
excited and inebriated to buy them based on blind emotion than true reason.
IF APPLE UNDERSTANDS WHAT IT IS SAYING THEN IT THINKS IT IS MORE
IMPORTANT ITS PRODUCTS ARE EXCITING, STIR CONSUMERS’ MENTAL FORCE TO BECOME
EXCITED AND THUS DRIVEN AND BLIND TO RUSH TO PURCHASE APPLE AND APPLE IS DRUG
PUSHER OF ELECTRONIC APPLIANCES. TO THOSE WHO UNDERSTANDS, APPLE TALK INDICATES
APPLE IS OUT TO MAKE MONEY, TO COME UP WITH NEW PRODUCTS THAT FOREMOST SELL AND
MAKE MONEY RATHER THAN USEFUL OR INNOVATIVE.
Why
is Apple calling its products exciting?
The reason why Apple is callings coming products exciting is because it
falsely, maliciously wants people to become excited in anticipation so that you
will lose your inhibitions and rush to grab one.
PRODUCTS ARE NEVER
EXCITING AND IT IS THE PERSON’S STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT MAKES IT EXCITING AND
SO APPLE IS SPEAKING FALSELY WITH KARMA ATTACHED.
APPLE IS CALLING ITS PRODUCTS EXCITING SO AS TO FALSELY MAKE PEOPLE
EXCITED ABOUT ITS COMING PRODUCTS AND ONCE EXCITED THEY WILL WAIT TO GRAB THEM
RATHER THAN BUY AN EXISTING PRODUCT BY ANOTHER COMPANY.
EXACTLY HOW EFFECTIVE SUCH SUBTERFUGE CALLING NEW PRODUCTS EXCITING IS A
MATTER FOR CONJECTURE, IT WILL DRAW THE GULLIBLE TO WAIT EAGERLY FOR THE NEW
PRODUCTS BUT THERE IS DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING BECAUSE IT IS FALSE AND
MANIPULATES OTHERS.
Selling
on the basis of emotion not reason:
When Apple tells you it’s new products are exciting then if you are
excitable, it might trigger you to become excited and that triggered excitement
becomes the blind force based basis for buying Apple’s new product and so Apple
wickedly wants to sell on the basis of emotion not reason.
WHENEVER ANYONE TRIES TO SELL A PRODUCT AS EXCITING HE IS GUILTY OF
FALSITY LIABLE FOR SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT BECAUSE NO MATTER HOW WONDERFUL,
PRODUCTS ARE NEVER EXCITING, IT IS THE STIRRED MENTAL FORCE OF THE BEHOLDER
THAT MAKES IT EXCITING. GOLD MAY EXCITE YOU BUT I AM NOT EXCITED BY IT. THE
SIGHT OF A NAKED FEMALE BODY MAY NOT EXCITE A HOMOSEXUAL MALE AND SO IT IS NOT
THE FEMALE BODY THAT IS EXCITING BUT THE CONDITIONED REACTION OF THE MALE THAT
MAKES IT EXCITING.
The
tricky issue:
The
'tricky issue' of whether the Treasury should keep 'bad' RBS
Tricky comes from trick which means fool or deceive others and so it is
that in talking of the tricky issue you are unwittingly acknowledging the
deceptive or false or cheating issue. Tricky has also come to mean difficult
and that too is a form of falsity.
Whatever that is true or based on truth is not difficult or tricky, it
is only if you what to cheat others, to avoid facing the truth that things
become tricky or difficult.
When people talk about tricky issue they don’t see the deception, they
see the difficulty in undertaking something.
DIFFICULTY AS IMPLIED BY ‘TRICKY’ IS ABOUT STYLE OR MANNER NOT SUBSTANCE
OF AN UNDERTAKING AND IT IS DIFFICULT OR TRICKY BECAUSE IT IS DEFTLY TRYING TO
AVOID FACING THE TRUTH OR TO COVER UP. IF SOMETHING WAS HANDLED TRUTHFULLY ACCORDING
TO WHAT LOGICALLY NEEDS TO BE DONE IT IS ALWAYS STRAIGHT FORWARD NOT TRICKY OR
DIFFICULT AND SO HE IS NOT TALKING ABOUT THE CORRECT APPROACH TO THE BANKING
PROBLEM BUT HOW TO DEFTLY SWEEP THINGS UNDER THE CARPET OR DENY AND THAT MEANS
DISASTER AWAITS IN THE FUTURE, THE PROBLEM HAS NOT BE SOLVED.
The
havoc of global money flows:
It seems Japanese investors are accelerating the repatriation of their
money from around the world.
There are actually no true advantages of such money flows, it is all
disadvantages.
Thus if Australia is booming it becomes the darling of money flows and
money floods into Australia from the rest of the world eager to be lent for
interest gains. Australia (foolishly) welcomes such influx of money because
they can be borrowed for consumption beyond means, boost property markets
artificially (more money chasing property) and be borrowed by businesses to do
business. But because this money does not belong to Australia and can leave at
even very short notice, should they leave rapidly it can cause even a severe
economic slump where it was previously booming.
In the same way, poor countries like India can become the target for
international hot money that comes in and snaps up cheap properties, shares and
industries, drive things up sucking in greedy foolish locals and they can
suddenly exit with profits made leaving the local economy and people stranded
with massive insoluble debt.
THERE ARE NO PROS AND CONS IN PERMITTING HOT MONEY INTO AN ECONOMY, EVEN
THE PROS ARE IN TRUTH INDISPUTABLE CONS.
IT IS A CON NOT A PRO THAT HOT MONEY WILL BOOST BORROWING BY LOCALS TO
CONSUME, SPECULATE IN PROPERTY, SHARES AND FOR BUSINESS USES BECAUSE THEY ARE
DANGEROUSLY BASED ON DEBT THAT CAN BE FICKLE, SWIFTLY EXIT LEAVING THE LOCALS
WITH DEBTS THEY CANNOT SERVICE.
GOVERNMENTS GREEDY FOR ECONOMIC STIMULATION AND DELUDED WELCOME SUCH HOT
MONEY WHICH IS ACTUALLY WELCOMING INCREASED DEBT, WELCOMING DEBT BASED
CONSUMPTION.
SUCH HOT MONEY RUSH INTO MALAYSIA BOOSTING ITS ECONOMY AND SHARE MARKETS
AND THEN SUDDENLY LEAVE LEAVING LOCALS STRUGGLING TO REDRESS AND THEY THEN HEAD
ENMASSE TO SAY INDIA BOOSTING ITS ECONOMY AND THEN LEAVING TO HEAD FOR SAY
VIETNAM OR CAMBODIA.
THUS ONLY A RELATIVELY SMALL AMOUNT OF MONEY LIKE FLOCKS OF BIRD RUSHING
NOW HERE NOW THERE CAN SOW A TRAIL OF HAVOC, DEBTS IN MANY COUNTRIES.
Hot
money a catalyst for global havoc:
Just as a small amount of enzyme or catalyst can speed up a reaction a
relatively small amount of international hot money now flowing into this
country next flowing into that country can create a trail of havoc many times
the size of the catalyst.
It is because of the delusion and foolishness of local governments that
they welcome such hot money because of the stimulation it provides when it is
actually dangerously undertaking short term debt that can swiftly exit, mostly
spent wasteful without returns.
The
karma of your divots:
You like to play golf, you cannot give up playing golf but I tell you
that you disregard to your future suffering that the divots you make is a form
of destruction that has debt never merit and this debt must be discharged as
suffering.
When you sock a tennis ball back at your opponent, you are brutalizing
the ball and attacking your opponent in the name of beating him and that too
has karma.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT YOU WILL FIND THE BUDDHA PLAYING GOLF OR TENNIS
BECAUSE THEY ARE MEANINGLESS AND CONTROLLED INSANITY, INVOLVES AGGRESSION AND
DESTRUCTION THAT RESULTS IN DEBT AND FUTURE SUFFERING DUE.
Cameron:
Suarez sets an appalling example
Prime Minister David Cameron says Liverpool striker Luis Suarez set
"the most appalling example" by biting Chelsea defender Branislav
Ivanovic.
Those with true understanding and who are not programmed robots
understand their own conduct, others’ conduct and they know what is good and
bad and the question of setting good or bad examples do not apply, it is only
if people are robots who look to others to copy their behaviour without
understanding whether what they copy is good or bad that setting a bad (never
appalling) example applies.
Appalling is a nice word for disliked or terrible conduct and conduct is
never appalling, it can be good or bad.
THUS CAMERON DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT OR HE IS TALKING
NONSENSE. UNLESS YOU ARE A ROBOT WHO COPIED CONDUCT WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT YOU
COPY, OTHERS’ CONDUCT SHOULD NOT SET A BAD (NEVER APPALLING) EXAMPLE TO YOU.
THUS SUAREZ’Z CONDUCT IS BAD AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED APPROPRIATELY AND
THE QUESTION OF SETTING EXAMPLE IS WRONG, WHO ASKED YOU TO FOLLOW HIS EXAMPLE,
DON’T YOU KNOW HOW TO BEHAVE YOURSELF? THUS CAMERON IS WRONGLY ATTACKING OR
ACCUSING SUAREZ WITH KARMA NOT MERIT DUE.
Can
you set a bad example for Jesus or the Buddha?
It is impossible for anyone to set a bad or good example for Jesus or
the Buddha because they possess true understanding and do not look to others to
copy their conduct. It is only people who are robots who do not have true
understanding who look to others set example for them to copy.
Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say and so if
you say ‘game’ when you do not mean it is a game you will be punished for
speaking falsely.
If whether to intervene or not in Syria is just a game to you it means
you are a robot mechanically impersonally rendering and responding
non-specifically to events, if no chemical weapons are used it is one game, if
chemical weapons are used it is another game, it is about plans of actions that
dictate what you do and you are a mechanical dead robot.
‘GAME CHANGER’ MEANS YOU HAVE STANDARDIZED PLANS OR PROTOCOLS OF ACTIONS
FOR DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF EVENTS AND YOU ARE MERELY A MECHANICAL ROBOT
IMPLEMENTING AND SWITCHING PLANS OF RESPONSE DEPENDING ON CERTAIN CRITERIA AND
SO YOU ARE A DEAD MECHANICAL ROBOT.
Max Clifford charged with
11 indecent assaults
PR guru Max Clifford has been charged with 11 indecent
assaults allegedly committed between 1966 and 1985.The alleged offences relate to seven different women and girls ranging in age from 14 to 19 years old.
Mr Clifford, 70, from Surrey, who says the allegations are "completely false", will appear in court next month.
Even though he denied the charges and said he had hundreds of people
wanting to support him, from what he said and his demeanour when reading a
press statement, he is likely guilty.
NO MATTER HOW A PERSON MAY DENY WRONGDOING, HIS WORDS AND MANNER BETRAYS
HIM (TO THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING, KNOW WHERE TO LOOK FOR TELL TALE SIGNS AND
ARE NOT TAKEN IN BY RED HERRINGS) AND THERE ARE NO PERFECT LIES.
IT IS NOT HAVING LEGIONS SUPPORTING YOU THAT YOU ARE INNOCENT BUT IT IS
WHEN YOU ARE INNOCENT THAT YOU ARE INNOCENT. IF A PERSON IS TRULY INNOCENT OF
WRONGDOING, AS IN ANWAR’S CASE REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF SODOMY, HIS COMPOSURE
IS DIFFERENT.
Why
are Rolf Harris & Clifford shattered?
Both Clifford and Rolf Harris acknowledged the allegations had been 24
hour relentless horrors for them, Rolf Harris even sought psychiatric advice.
If the loss of face is important to you it means you are pretentious and
false, putting on a front of decency and respectability that you cherish. If
your decency and respectability is true it is not a front or façade and it is
only if they are not true that it is a façade and you deserve to feel shattered
or shamed. Even if they are innocent those to whom face is important have an
appointment with insanity because it is deluded and mad to value ‘face’.
Even if face has been lost, if the allegations are false, they cannot be
proven in court and good lawyers can deliver an acquittal so why should they be
so worried if they are innocent?
THE ONUS IS ON ACCUSERS TO PROVE THEIR CASES IN COURT AND FALSE
ALLEGATIONS CAN ALWAYS BE REFUTED AND COURTS ALWAYS GIVE THOSE ACCUSED THE
BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE HIGH STANDING AND ACCUSERS LOW
STANDING SO WHY ARE THEY SO WORRIED ABOUT?
Lose
face? You will lose your life eternally.
You are concerned about the image you project to your status conscious
peers? Loss of face troubles you?
Anyone who values face suffers because it drives him to do or say all
kinds of things just to maintain and project the desirable image of himself as
eg clever, sophisticated, easy going, sociable, high class, etc. That is
controlled madness that leads to uncontrollable madness that is never the path
to safety and heaven.
UNTIL FACE IS NO CONSIDERATION OR AWARENESS IN YOU LET ALONE IMPORTANT
AND A PREOCCUPATION, YOU SUFFER CONSIDERABLY HERE AND IN DANGER OF EVEN ANOTHER
ETERNITY OF SUFFERING AND DEATH.
AND SO EVEN IF ROLF HARRIS AND MAX CLIFFORD ARE INNOCENT OF THE
ALLEGATIONS, IF THEY LIVE BY FACE AND DESIRE TO PROJECT A RESPECTABLE IMAGE OF
THEMSELVES THEY DESERVE TO SUFFER FROM THEIR FOLLY NOT TRUTH OR GOODNESS.
The
Syrian war is not a game:
The Syrian war is not a game but it is deadly and there is terrible
suffering and losses for many and so you are supercilious, deluded sitting remotely
in your arm chair reducing it to a game with rules in which use of chemical
weapons is a game changer.
Putting
on a show exists and is always suffering even mad:
There is such a thing called putting on a show and another thing called
not putting on a show and if the person before you is putting on a show for you
and you do not know it, you are not sure then you are a fool who does not know
what he sees and in danger of being conned.
If something said or done is true, meaningful and essential it is not
called putting on a show and it is only something said or done that is false
(in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating or dominating others) that it
is called putting on a show and this is what actors on stage do all the time.
If what you say or do is for show, you must add plenty intended to be seen or
heard and so you spice up what you say or do with facial expressions (smile,
grin, frown, glum, fear), you gesticulate even violently with your hands, you
put your body into complex contorted poses to be seen as charming or
intimidating, you stretch your syllables, change speed and loudness constantly
even outrageously.
PUTTING ON A SHOW IS NEVER THE FUN IT IS OFTEN MADE UP TO BE BUT IT IS
TERRIBLE SUFFERING BECAUSE NOT ONLY MUST WORK BE DONE PUTTING ON A SHOW, IT
ENGENDERS RAISED SELF RESISTANCE THAT IS ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE DONE, AND
BECAUSE IT IS FOR SHOW IT MUST BE REMEMBERED AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY
ROBOTICALLY BECAUSE FOR YOU TO PUT ON A SHOW, IT MUST BE EFFECTIVE AS A SHOW
AND FOR EFFICIENCY, WHAT IS FOR SHOW MUST BE REMEMBERED AND REHASHED RATHER
THAN FABRICATED FRESH EACH TIME.
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE EVERYONE IS PUTTING ON A SHOW NOT SOME OF THE TIME
BUT ALL THE TIME, EVEN IN BED WITH THEIR SPOUSES IT IS STILL A SHOW, STILL FOR
SHOW AND IT CAN BECOME EXASPERATING FOR SELF AND OTHERS AT TIMES.
IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS TRUE AND ESSENTIAL, FRESHLY COMPOSED IT IS
NEVER FOR SHOW.
IT IS ONLY IF SOMETHING SAID OR DONE IS REHASHED FROM RECORDING, HAS
ACCOMPANYING STYLE (PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS), FACIAL, HAND AND
BODILY MOVEMENTS, PADDING IN EXTRA FOR SHOW USELESS WORDS THAT IT IS FOR SHOW
AND THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING NEVER THE PLEASURE IT IS MADE OUT TO BE AND IT IS
THE PATH TO FUTURE INSANITY THENCE ETERNAL DEATH.
What
is meant by for show?
Whatever accompanies what a person says or does that has no meaning or
true use and is meant to be seen or heard is termed ‘FOR SHOW’.
Thus the stretched syllables, accelerating speed and loudness serve no
true purpose, are not necessary to state what is stated, are meaningless, on
intended to be heard because they are perceived as charming, lovely, musical.
THE PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE MEANT TO
BE HEARD ONLY AND SO THEY ARE ENTIRELY FOR SHOW.
Facial expressions eg smiling, frowning, stunned, fearful, pained are
for show, to be seen only serve no true purposes.
You do not need to move your hands or arms when you speak and it is for
show because it is deemed impressive or to divert attention from what is
falsely said.
There are many words added or incorporated into what people say that are
not needed and divert attention and are even bombastic to impress others and
they too are for show.
WHATEVER SAID OR DONE THAT ARE NOT NECESSARY, JUST TO BE SEEN OR HEARD,
IS FOR SHOW. THUS PROLONGING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE FOR
SHOW. WORDS OR PHRASES INCORPORATED INTO WHAT IS SAID, PADDING UP WHAT IS SAID
ARE FOR SHOW. FACIAL EXPRESSIONS AND HAND GESTURES ARE FOR SHOW, NOT NECESSARY
TO SAY WHAT IS SAID.
People see nothing in going back on their words when it has future
suffering due in repayment. Terry had announced his retirement and now he is
changing his mind that renders what he said in the past false.
When Ananda asked the Buddha to reconsider his decision to pass away in
three months the Buddha said it was impossible He could go back on his word.
ANYONE WHO GOES BACK ON HIS WORD, WHO CHANGES HIS MIND IS ASKING FOR
FUTURE SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT. YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO BE FICKLE THAT IS
THE PATH TO DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY. CONSIDER CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING UP YOUR
MIND AND ONCE YOU HAVE COMMITTED YOURSELF THERE IS NO GOING BACK UNLESS YOU
WANT TO SUFFER IN THE FUTURE. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN SOMETHING TO SOMEONE IT DOES
NOT BELONG TO YOU ANYMORE AND IF YOU ASK FOR IT BACK IN A HUFF YOU ARE ASKING
FOR DEBT AND SUFFERING.
US
base money supply increased three times:
Of course the relevant governments will not point it out to you but I
read that the US base money supply increased 3 times, the UK 4 times and Europe
2 times since the Lehman crisis and rather than lavish even such prodigious
money printing was the bare minimum, a desperate stopgap to keep the financial
system from crashing. It is an indication of the excesses and abuses built up
in the system as a result of the previous boom.
Even now governments are attempting to ride out of trouble by
stimulation, by printing and borrowing more money to sustain the economy on the
hope that somehow the economy would revive, the engine will restart. This is
fatuous deluded thinking.
There was a prior fire in clothing factory that killed many before the
recent building collapse that killed many women sewing clothes for export.
Capitalists set up in poor countries where they pay cheaply to make
clothes to sell in the West and they pocket the big difference. Even the money
they use to pay Bangladeshi workers, the USD is printed not earned and it may
become worthless or worth much less.
WORKERS IN THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES ARE PAID ‘A PITTANCE’ IN USD, MONEY
THAT IS PRINTED RATHER THAN EARNED (AND MAY BE ACTUALLY WORTHLESS IF UNCLE SAM
CANNOT HONOUR THE PAPER IT PRINTS). THEY WORK IN TERRIBLE CONDITIONS FOR MEAGRE
PAY THAT MAY TURN OUT WORTHLESS WHILST THE CAPITALIST SELL THE GOODS FOR GOOD
PROFIT IN THE WEST AND POCKET THE DIFFERENCE. WHAT THESE CAPITALISTS DO NOT
REALIZE IS KARMA CAN EQUALIZE AND WHEN THEY GET STRICKEN WITH CANCER THEY WILL
WEEP.
Surprise
and autumn vegetable:
You'll be
surprised how versatile this autumn vegetable is. Pair it with steak, quinoa,
salmon and more.
Leave out the surprise because it is not about meaning but stirred
mental force and mushroom is a fungus not vegetable and even if it is available
in autumn it is distorting reality to term it autumn vegetable.
People think they are very clever when they are stupid, asking for the
chop for speaking for show instead of truth.
Let others decide whether they want to be surprised or not, by saying
they will be surprised you are presumptuous and wanting to stir others’ mental
forces. Just say mushrooms go well with steak, quinoa, salmon and more. Just call them
mushrooms rather than pretentiously autumn vegetables when they may actually be
fungus.
Editorial: Reasons to be
cheerful, part six
There are never reasons to be happy let alone cheerful, the harmful
suffering stirring of mental force to like.
Cheerful means your mental force is stirred to like and even if you are
happy, freed of all suffering it is still not reason to be stir your mental
force to be cheerful to spoil your happiness.
There are even never any reasons to be happy. Whenever a person’s mind
is freed of all suffering, freed of all force intruding or stirring, he is
automatically happy and this is not reason to be happy.
HAPPINESS IS NOT BASED ON ANY REASON. WHEN A PERSON’S MIND IS FREE OF
ALL SUFFERING, FREE OF ALL FORCE INTRUSION EITHER EXTERNAL OR SELF GENERATED,
HE IS AUTOMATICALLY HAPPY AND THAT IS NOT BASED ON REASON OR CAUSE.
BECAUSE CHEERFUL IS A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT DESTROYS THE
HAPPINESS OF A MIND, THERE IS NEVER REASONS TO BE CHEERFUL EXCEPT IN DELUSION.
YOU HAVE FOUND A JOB. WHY SHOULD IT STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE
CHEERFUL THAT MAKES YOU RESTLESS AND UNABLE TO SLEEP?
It
is mad to be cheerful:
There is no need to be cheerful and it is actually a show put on to show
how happy you are when it is not true, to stir jealousy and envy in others, to
deny your suffering.
It is suffering, destroys happiness to be cheerful because you have to
stir mental force to like or be mildly or strongly excited and also exhibit by
muscular actions in your face and movements to show you are cheerful.
The Buddha said what others call happiness, being cheerful that the
noble ones have found is suffering, what others call suffering, not cheerful,
that the noble ones have found is happiness.
CHEERFULNESS, APART FROM BEING AN ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE,
IS AN ACT MEANT TO BE SEEN OR FOR SHOW AND IT IS REFLECTED IN FACIAL AND BODILY
EXPRESSION, A SPRING IN THE GAIT AND SPEECH WHICH CAN ONLY MEAN ACCELERATING
SPEED AND STRENGTH CHANGES AND IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND LEADS TO EXHAUSTION
AND STRESS AFTERWARDS AND THAT IS NOTHING TO CHEER ABOUT.
Max Clifford: I’m innocent
and so are star pals
Even if he is their close pals, does he hang around all the time with
them to know their private lives? And so if he would speak without knowing he
is not a reliable man and the innocence he pleads too is not reliable.
UNLESS HE IS MAD HE SHOULD KNOW IF HE IS INNOCENT BUT HOW DOES HE KNOW
HIS STAR PALS ARE INNOCENT THAT HE VOUCHES FOR THEM? IN HIS HASTE TO DEFEND
HIMSELF HE EXPOSES HIMSELF AS AN UNRELIABLE WITNESS.
Defining
cheerfulness:
There are cultural differences in cheerfulness and even within a culture
there are individual differences in expressions of cheerfulness but even though
there are individual differences, how a person is cheerful is quite fixed which
means it is programed and rehashed from program in that person that may be
modified with age.
Certain pleasing things happen eg your girlfriend agrees to marry you
and your mental force is stirred to become excited and then you go about being
cheerful, rehashing the way you say and do things, smile and laugh, greet
everyone with a smile to show others you are cheerful.
Some people seem to be always cheerful whistling and greeting everyone
as if it is a bright sun shiny day every day. This is an act that they recorded
and rehashed so well it is not irresistible.
THUS CHEERFULNESS IS A SHOW, AN ACT TO SHOW OTHERS YOU ARE HAPPY OR
ENJOYING YOURSELF THAT MAY BE FAKED AND IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH A STIRRED MENTAL
FORCE TO LIKE.
BECAUSE IT IS AN ACT, FALSE THERE ARE NEVER REASONS TO BE CHEERFUL AND
ANYONE WHO SPEAKS THUS IS DELUDED.
Obama
pokes fun at himself:
President Barack Obama pokes fun at himself and his adversaries at the
annual White House Correspondents' Association dinner.
It is delusion that it is good and humble to poke fun at yourself. It is
defiling yourself that has debt to be repaid as future suffering.
IT IS NOT THE TRUTH BUT IT IS COLLECTIVE WELL CONDITIONED DELUSION THAT
IT IS GOOD OR MERITORIOUS TO POKE FUN OR MOCK YOURSELF IN A ‘FRIENDLY’ OR ‘FUN’
WAY. IF YOU MOCK YOURSELF IN JEST OR FOR FUN OR FOR A LAUGH IT MEANS YOU DO NOT
MEAN IT AND YOU ARE GUILTY OF FALSITY. IF YOU MEAN IT, THAT IS HOSTILITY OR ILL
WILL TOWARDS SELF THAT IS NOT GOOD BUT HAS DEBT.
The
insanity and waste of the annual White House
Correspondents' Association dinner
Many human activities are identical to the annual White House Correspondent’s
Assocn dinner: they are totally meaningless and unnecessary and wasteful in
terms of consumption and expenses and whilst there are many jobless and
famished such money wasted could be better given to those who are needy and so
those who continue to fete themselves and celebrate their lives here do not
realize they will face deprivation, famine and hunger themselves in the future
in repayment.
SHORN OFF USELESS WASTEFUL ACTIVITIES, THERE ARE FEW HUMAN ECONOMIC
ACTIVITIES THAT ARE TRULY ESSENTIAL, MEANINGFUL. BECAUSE YOU AND EVERYONE DO
NOT SEE ANYTHING WRONG, SEE IT IS OK TO HAVE SUCH CELEBRATORY FUNCTIONS YOU ARE
HEEDLESS, HEADING FOR AN APPOINTMENT WITH SUFFERING IN PROPITIATION.
That’s
impressive stuff:
Quote: The display is obviously larger – more on that in the next
section – but the dimensions of the GALAXY S 4 itself are little changed. In
fact, although at 136.6 mm long it’s identical in length to the Galaxy S III,
judicious slimming of the bezels have left the newer phone narrower, at 69.8 mm
versus 70.6mm, and thinner, at 7.9 mm versus 8.6 mm. That’s impressive stuff, whether you like
the design or not.
It is inappropriate to speak of ‘impressive stuff’ but the correct words
to use are ‘excellent achievement’.
‘Impressive’ means it stirs your mental force to be ‘wowed’ and it is
the wrong understanding, ‘excellent’ is the correct understanding that it is
very good. It is not stuff which is vague typical of rehashed speech and the
correct word is ‘achievement’.
‘IMPRESSIVE STUFF’ AND ‘EXCELLENT ACHIEVEMENT’ ARE TWO VERY DIFFERENT
PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS HAPPENING. PEOPLE WHO REHASH TEND TO SPEAK VAGUELY OF
‘STUFF’ INSTEAD OF SPECIFICALLY OF ‘ACHIEVEMENT’ AND BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE
TRUE UNDERSTANDING, THEY SPEAK OF SOMETHING AS ‘IMPRESSIVE’, STIRS THEIR MENTAL
FORCE ‘WOW’ INSTEAD OF PERCEIVING IT TRULY AS ‘EXCELLENT’.
PEOPLE THINK THEY SPEAK GREAT SENSE AND THOSE READING ARE CLUELESS BUT
WHAT THEY SAY IS ACTUALLY INAPPROPRIATE, THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING
ABOUT.
A
feat not stuff:
Putting a larger display on a phone that is smaller is an achievement or
feat not stuff and reflecting that it is rehashed without examining
appropriateness people speak of stuff when it should be feat or achievement.
PUTTING A BIGGER SCREEN ON A MARGINALLY SMALLER PHONE IS A FEAT NOT
‘STUFF’ AS TOUTED AND SUCH SPEECH HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE IT REFLECTS A
PERSON WHO SPEAKS WITHOUT ACTUALLY UNDERSTANDING WHAT HE SAYS THAT LEADS TO
INSANITY.
Excellent
not impressive:
When the monks answered the Buddha’s questions correctly, the Buddha
said ‘excellent’ not impressive, reflecting that the Buddha understands what he
is talking about and would not say something silly.
Excellent means very good or marvellous. Impressive means it stirs your
mental force to like or be attracted to which is absurd.
THE BUDDHA SAID HE KNOWS EVERYTHING AND THERE IS NOTHING HE DOES NOT
KNOW AND SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT HE SHOULD SPEAK FALSELY AND SAID AN ANSWER
WAS IMPRESSIVE WHEN IT WAS EXCELLENT. ALL THOSE WHO REGULARLY REMARK EG THE
MERC IS IMPRESSIVE DO NOT REALIZE THEY TALK NONSENSE AND ARE IN DANGER OF
INSANITY.
You
made a mistake, you forgot to check? You must be a robot:
One might argue that one understands that fitting a bigger screen into a
smaller body is an excellent feat not impressive stuff, one was under pressure,
made a mistake, forgot to check beforehand otherwise one would not have made
that silly mistake.
The only way it is possible for someone to ‘make a mistake’, forget to
check before saying is if what was said was rehashed from recording to be
applied to the situation. It is impossible for someone who is not a robot, who
speaks after truly understanding the situation and truly understanding what he
is going to say to be guilty of speech that can be found to be inappropriate.
IF WHAT YOU SAID WAS SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND TO BE INCORRECT, IT CAN ONLY
HAPPEN IF WHAT YOU SAID WAS REHASHED TO FIT THE SITUATION AND YOU REHASHED THE
WRONG STUFF. IF A PERSON CORRECTLY UNDERSTOOD THE SITUATION, CORRECTLY
UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS GOING TO SAY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT WHAT HE SAID WILL TURN
OUT TO BE INCORRECT.
Apple
raises $17bn (£10.9bn) via a bond sale, the biggest ever by a non-banking
company, to help fund its plan for extra payouts to shareholders.
Supposedly cash rich Apple needs to borrow to fund its dividends? This
indicate the cash Apple has is tied and may not be there, it may be lent and
lost if borrowers cannot return.
IN THEORY APPLE IS CASH RICH BUT IN REALITY THAT MONEY, LIKE CHINA’S US
TREASURY HOLDINGS MAY BE GONE, SPENT AND UNRETURNABLE.
Apple’s
shenanigans:
It seems Apple is borrowing the money to pay dividends to US
shareholders because it cannot repatriate money into the US without incurring
considerable taxation.
If Apple (ditto Microsoft) avoided paying taxes by keeping the money
overseas, its cash pile minus taxation would be much less and if it were to
retrieve money from the markets, that would mean those who borrowed that money
must find alternative credit that may be hard to find today. Further, those who
borrowed Apple’s money may not be able to repay in which case Apple would have
lost the money and Apple is taking a risk borrowing money to pay dividends
because the money it thinks it has overseas may not be there actually.
Borrowing
against savings is still evil, dangerous:
Even if a person has savings in the bank to cover everything he borrows,
it is still evil and there is danger borrowing to use. The proper thing is to
withdraw the cash which means the bank will lose the money you deposited and
use it.
APART FROM THE PRESUMPTION THAT THE SAVINGS DEPOSITED IN BANKS IS STILL
THERE AND BORROWING TO USE INSTEAD OF WITHDRAWING IT TO USE RESULTS IN YOU
BEING INDEBTED AND ALLOWS YOUR SAVINGS TO CONTINUE TO BE AVAILABLE FOR OTHERS
TO BORROW.
EVEN IF YOU HAVE SAVINGS IN THE BANKS, BY BORROWING YOU ARE INDEBTING
YOURSELF AND EXPOSING YOURSELF TO THE RISKS OF BEING IN DEBT AND SO IT IS EVIL
AND DANGEROUS.
There
is karma even borrowing against savings:
You think nothing wrong but you may be deluded and whoever borrows is
incurring debt, creates karma to be repaid by suffering in the future.
Why is it that even if you borrowed when you have cash backing there is
karma?
BORROWING MONEY EVEN IF YOU HAVE CASH BACKING IS KARMA CREATING BECAUSE
IT CREATES AN ILLUSION OR FALSE SCENARIO THAT YOU STILL HAVE THE MONEY WHEN YOU
HAVE SPENT IT. IN NAME (NOT REALITY) YOU STILL HAVE THE CASH IN THE BANKS BUT
BECAUSE YOU HAVE BORROWED AGAINST IT, IT IS NO LONGER THERE BUT STILL IT IS
AVAILABLE OR HAS BEEN LENT OUT TO OTHERS. IF YOU WITHDREW THAT MONEY TO SPEND,
THEN YOU DEPRIVE THE SYSTEM FOR LENDING OF THAT MONEY YOU WITHDREW AND SPENT.
BY NOT WITHDRAWING YOUR MONEY TO SPEND BUT BORROWING INSTEAD, YOU ALLOW
THE MONEY YOU KEPT IN BANKS TO BE AVAILABLE FOR BORROWING BY OTHERS AND SO YOU
PROMOTE EXCESSES BY THE SYSTEM.
Creating
risk for self and others is karma:
By not withdrawing your money to spend but borrowing against it, you are
creating risk for yourself and risk for others.
It is risk for yourself because the money you think you can withdraw
from the bank may not be there and you are putting yourself at risk by
borrowing.
You are creating risk for others because you allow the money that you
have spent to be available for lending to others which would otherwise not be
available had you withdrawn it to spend thus others and the system are put on
risk borrowing or using money that you now do not have because you have
borrowed against that money.
IF YOU WITHDREW THE MONEY TO SPEND, YOU ARE CREATING NO RISK FOR
YOURSELF BECAUSE NOW YOU HAVE NO MONEY IN THE BANK, ONLY WHAT YOU BOUGHT AND
THE BANK HAS NO IMAGINARY MONEY BELONGING TO YOU THAT IT CAN LEND TO OTHERS THAT
OTHERS CAN BORROW.
Having
the cake and eating it too:
Either you eat the cake and then you have no cake or you don’t eat it
and have the cake, you cannot have the cake and eat it too by keeping your
savings in banks and spending it too.
What she said is false, it cannot have happened to anyone and so she is
not a person who understands what she says or speaks the truth and what she
said that she is innocent, someone else killed Meredith is unreliable, she may
be a liar caught up even intensely with her lies and heading for insanity.
Academic
or a heaven and hell difference?
One may be of the view that the difference is academic between borrowing
against your savings to spend and withdrawing your money to spend or the
difference may be between heaven and hell.
If you withdrew your money to spend then you no longer have money in the
bank that the bank can lend out and you do not need to borrow creating debt and
risk for yourself.
If you don’t withdraw your money to spend then you still have money in
the bank that the bank can lend out and you need to borrow to spend creating
debt and risk for yourself.
Don’t think God views tolerantly such shenanigans as borrowing against
savings as you, you may have wrong view that the Buddha said leads to hell or
the animal womb not heaven.
Everything
settled vs not settled:
If you withdrew money from the bank and spent it, everything is settled,
there is no more money in the bank (that the bank can lend out) and you do not
owe anyone money.
If you do not withdraw your money to spend then everything is unsettled,
you still have money in the bank that the bank can lend out and you are now in
debt to others.
Apple
is calculating and that is greed driven programming:
Apple calculates in whatever actions it takes including borrowing to pay
dividends rather than used its purported huge cash pile.
If you think calculation is based on understanding and intelligence you
are deluded because calculating is a programming in which the person is a slave
never master, it is the programming that dictates a person driven by greed to
consider in every matter or action so as to maximize gains and minimize losses
(a rule).
Thus Apple think it can exploit its creditworthiness by borrowing
cheaply from the market to repay whilst it does not touch its ‘cash pile’ which
it probably thinks can make more money left alone or it can avoid hefty taxes
by not repatriating it, but this action has risks that may have dire
consequences to Apple and so Apple is undertaking risks in the name of
maximizing gains and minimizing losses.
BEINGS IN THIS WORLD ARE CALCULATING AND THAT IS NOT BASED ON REASON OR
UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS A PROGRAMMING IN WHICH THE PROGRAMMED CALCULATING
PERSON IS ALWAYS ASKING THE QUESTION, WHAT IS IN IT MATERIALLY OR SENSATELY FOR
ME, WHAT HIDDEN LOSSES MAY THERE BE RATHER THAN CONSIDERATIONS OF RIGHT OR
WRONG, TRUE OR FALSE. A MAJOR RULE THAT DRIVES CALCULATING PEOPLE IS MAXIMIZING
MATERIAL GAINS AND MINIMIZING LOSSES.
CALCULATION IS NOT HARMLESS BUT IT IS SUFFERING NOW AND LATER BECAUSE A
CALCULATING PERSON CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN AND THAN MEANS ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.
Malaysian
Opposition Leader confident:
Anwar is confident about winning the election.
THERE IS NO NEED TO BE CONFIDENT OR DIFFIDENT ABOUT ANYTHING, THE RESULT
OF THE ELECTION HINGES ON FACTORS LIKE HOW MUCH TAMPERING AND SO NO ONE CAN BE
CERTAIN OF WINNING.
IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE INTERESTED OR GREEDY THAT YOU WANT TO PREDICT AND
EXPECT RESULTS AS A RESULT OF WHICH YOU ARE EMBRACING FALSITY AND SUFFERING.
LET THE FUTURE TELL YOU THE RESULT, NO NEED TO EXPECT OR PREDICT WHICH
IS FOOLISHLY BESTOWING SUFFERING NOT HAPPINESS.
Confidence
stems from acting:
Confidence has its root in acting, in rehashing from memory what you
plan to say and do and each time a person successfully rehashes he becomes
confident in his ability to rehash or carry out a plan and this confidence or
mindset becomes ingrained or conditioned in him and spreads to infect other
things like something will happen, confident he will pass his exams, that
others will give him what he wants.
A PERSON WHO IS A ROBOT, WHO REHASHES WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES DEVELOPS
CONFIDENCE IN HIS CAPABILITY FOR REHASHING AND THIS CONFIDENCE SUBSEQUENTLY
SPREAD TO INFECT OTHERS THINGS APART FROM HIS ACTING, HE IS CONFIDENT OF
WINNING ELECTIONS, ETC. CONFIDENCE IS FOR SHOW AND FELLOW ACTORS SUBSCRIBE TO
CONFIDENCE AND SO THEY SPEAK OF CONFIDENCE TO FALSELY ASSURE THEMSELVES AND
OTHERS AS TO OUTCOMES THAT THEY CANNOT BE SURE.
IF A PERSON DID NOT ACT HE DOES NOT NEED CONFIDENCE AND CONFIDENCE DOES
NOT EXIST IN HIM AND SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE WILL SPEAK OF CONFIDENCE IN
ANYTHING.
Confidence
is needed to do or say without knowing or knowing it is false:
So long as a person says or does something without knowing it is true or
false or knowing it is false, he stirs self resistance that requires confidence
to undertake.
Because the presence of style requires rehashing or being a robot in
which one’s mental jukebox is the boss, it is doing or saying without knowing
that stirs resistance that requires confidence to undertake.
IT IS THE PRESENCE OF RESISTANCE BY SELF THAT OPPOSES WHAT ONE DOES OR
SAY THAT IS WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR FALSE OR KNOWING IT IS FALSE THAT
NECESSITATES CONFIDENCE.
IF A PERSON ONLY SAYS OR DOES THINGS HE KNOWS IS TRUE THERE IS NO
RESISTANCE BY SELF AND NO CONFIDENCE NEEDED.
Indelible
Ink That Is For Show:
If it is true the indelible ink can be erased with solvents and the EC
knows about it then the use of indelible ink is a scam, for show to prove the
electoral process is free of multiple voting when it can be circumvented.
THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE TRUE AND THINGS THAT ARE FOR SHOW AND WHATEVER
THAT IS FOR SHOW IS FALSE, TO DECEIVE OTHERS AND SO IT IS, ALL STYLISH PEOPLE’S
SPEECH AND ACTIONS ARE FOR SHOW. IT IS NOT THAT THEY ARE TRULY CONCERNED FOR
YOU BUT THEY ACT FOR SHOW THAT THEY ARE CONCERNED FOR YOU.
Why
it is never fun being a robot:
Even if you cannot see you are a robot, you champion what you say or do
by rehash, it is never fun being a robot or rehashing what you say or do.
The person who is a robot is condemned to doing and saying the same old
things and no matter how enjoyable you may find it at times, at times it
becomes dreary even tormenting always doing and saying the same old things. And
even if you falsely perceive yourself as the boss, you are actually a slave and
it is your mental jukebox that dictates approximately or precisely what you
should say or do. And it is never fun existing as a slave, ceding control of
yourself to a mental jukebox that is degradable and can blindly lead to death
and injury.
TO ONE WHO SEES CORRECTLY THIS IS A WORLD OF ROBOTS NECESSITATED BY THE
SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO AND IT IS NEVER FUN BEING A ROBOT
BECAUSE YOU ARE CONDEMNED TO DOING AND SAYING THE SAME OLD THINGS AND YOU ARE
CEDING CONTROL OF YOURSELF DANGEROUSLY FATALLY TO A MENTAL JUKEBOX.
A
slave to self and others:
Anyone who is a robot is not only a slave to himself (actually his
mental jukebox) but also to others because what he says and does is actually
triggered or trigger-able by what he sees or hears, by what others say or do to
him.
MUCH AS THE PERSON WHO IS A SOMNOLENT ROBOT LIKES TO SEE HIMSELF AS
INDEPENDENT AND FREE, WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES IS TRIGGERED BY THINGS HE SEES OR
HEARS, THINGS OTHERS SAY AND DO TO HIM, HE IS A REACTIONIST, HE HAS
PRE-RECORDED SEQUENCES OF SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT CAN BE ELICITED BY OTHERS, BY
EVENTS.
Humans
are worse than robots:
Mechanical robots are programmed to do certain productive chores, they
are not driven by delusion, emotions, hate and greed.
Humans are robots whose basis of actions is emotions, primarily like
(greed, covetousness, lust, excitement) and dislike (hate, anger, irritation)
and secondarily sadness, hurt, agitation and fear.
MECHANICAL ROBOTS ARE RESTRICTED TO THINGS THEY ARE PROGRAMMED TO SAY OR
DO THAT PERFORM CERTAIN DESIRED TASKS.
HUMAN ROBOTS ARE DRIVEN BY FORCE, BY AGGRESSION DIRECTLY AND EMOTIONS
SECONDARILY PLUS DELUSIONS, THEY HAVE FALSE DANGEROUS BELIEFS THAT DRIVE THEM
TO HARM THEMSELVES AND OTHERS THEY THINK IS DOING GOOD.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANYONE WHO IS NOT A ROBOT WILL PERFORM EVIL ACTS,
IT IS THE FORCE DRIVEN BLIND ROBOT WHO WILL COMMIT EVIL THAT HARMS HIMSELF AND
OTHERS THAT HE DELUDES HIMSELF AS GOOD.
QE
bails out the rich at the expense of the system:
Fed Seen Slowing Stimulus
With QE Cut by End of This Year
When governments print money to buy bonds or property mortgages, they
are essentially using the system as surrogates to pay rich bondholders who are
unable to redeem their bonds in the markets because of default, borrowers being
unable to repay. Hence governments are not bailing out the people but they are
bailing out rich holders of these junk bonds and transferring their burden to
the system or people.
09:02 UK
time, Tuesday, 30 April 2013
Announcements
today from Lloyds and Carphone Warehouse tell the story of the UK’s uneven
economic recovery.
Only beings can teach and Lloyds and
Carphone are not beings who can teach and so it is a matter of what do you (truly)
understand of the Lloyd and Carphone situation?
A person with true understanding does not need Lloyds and Carphone to
teach him anything, he understands truly as it actually is the Lloyd and
Carphone situation, he remembers it but he does not record a story or moral or
principle to be remembered and retrieved to be applied to situations that may
arise in the future that he similarly examines and truly understands as it each
rather than apply what Lloyd and Carphone taught him.
THE STATEMENT IS AN UNWITTING ADMISSION PEOPLE RECORD AND REHASH UNDERSTANDINGS
TO BE FALSELY AND DANGEROUSLY APPLIED TO OTHER FUTURE SITUATIONS. YOU CORRECTLY
UNDERSTAND AND REMEMBER THE LLOYD SITUATION JUST AS YOU TRULY SPECIFICALLY
UNDERSTAND FUTURE SITUATIONS THAT ARISE, IT IS NOT A MATTER OF WHAT LLOYD
TEACHES YOU AND THUS TAUGHT YOU ‘UNDERSTAND’ FUTURE SITUATIONS IN TERMS OF THE
LLOYD SITUATION. IF YOU DO NOT INTEND TO APPLY WHAT YOU LEARNT IN THE LLOYD
SITUATION, WHAT IS THE POINT OF TALKING ABOUT WHAT LLOYD TEACHES US?
IT IS NOT A MATTER OF WHAT LLOYD TEACHES US BUT WHAT DO YOU UNDERSTAND IS
THE LLOYD SITUATION?
LLOYD IS NOT A PERSON WHO CAN TEACH AND IT IS A MATTER OF UNDERSTANDING
WHAT IS HAPPENING.
No comments:
Post a Comment