The right and wrong reasons for retirement:
There
comes a time when those who work for a living must retire and people have many
different reasons for retiring and most of them are wrong which means they do
something for a wrong reason that ends in insanity and suffering.
I am too
old or sick to continue is a wrong reason for retiring.
I have
made enough money is a wrong reason for retirement.
I want to
enjoy the rest of my life, see places, do things is a wrong reason for
retirement.
I don’t
need the money is a wrong reason for retiring.
It is materially
advantageous to retire than continue is a wrong reason for retiring.
The
correct reason for retiring is because all work is suffering that conditions
the person to suffering that will not end with death but even thereafter and
the wise person wants to escape from suffering now and forever.
All work
is entanglement, even when the vast majority retire they are still entangled.
If you retire to disentangle yourself, to minimize social contact with this
deluded and troublesome world then that is a right reason to retire.
THERE IS
LIFE AFTER DEATH AND FOR MOST PEOPLE IT IS BETTER IF THERE IS NO LIFE AFTER
DEATH BECAUSE THEY HAVE A LOT TO ACCOUNT FOR, SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN
SAYS THE BUDDHA AND WORK IS ENTANGLEMENT WITH THIS WORLD, IT IS SUFFERING AND
ADDICTS TO SUFFERING AND SO THE CORRECT REASON FOR RETIREMENT IS DISENGAGEMENT,
SEPARATION FROM THIS WICKED DETAINING WORLD.
The Buddha: How to see correctly
The
Buddha said when a person sees (or hears or smells or tastes or touch) without
arising greed, ill will or delusion, he sees/perceives correctly, as it
actually is.
If
something you see stirs a thought or thoughts in you and these are deluded then
you see wrongly.
ONLY WHEN
A PERSON PERCEIVES (SEES, HEARS, SMELLS, TASTES, TOUCH) WITHOUT ARISING GREED,
HATE AND DELUSION DOES HE PERCEIVE CORRECTLY AND BECAUSE BEINGS IN THIS WORLD
ALWAYS PERCEIVE WITH ARISEN GREED, HATE AND DELUSION THEY NEVER SEE CORRECTLY
AND THUS NEVER UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING AND THIS IS THE PATH TO
WOE AND DEATH.
The
correct purpose of the Fed is not to soothe markets but do what is right for
the country’s economy and finances and so if Bernanke is doing that it shows he
is a fool barking up the wrong tree and the nation’s financial system is in the
hands of a fool.
One may
argue that soothing the markets is crucial to maintaining the (economic)
wellbeing of the nation but that is delusion. The markets is not the nation, it
is only one faction, the powerful wealthy faction that is only interested in
grabbing more money, siphoning more money that depletes the system.
AS
CHAIRMAN OF FED ONE SHOULD NEVER CONSIDER SOOTHING THE MARKET BUT CONCENTRATE
ON DOING WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE ECONOMY. SOOTHING THE MARKETS IS APPEASING THOSE
WHO ARE (GANGSTERS) WEALTHY AND INTERESTED IN GRABBING MORE AT THE EXPENSE OF
THE REST AND SO HE IS MISGUIDED, DELUDED, LIKE THE REST AND YOU HAVE A FOOL AT
THE HELM NOT GENIUS OR WISE MAN.
THUS IF
YOU LOOK TO BERNANKE TO BE YOUR SAVIOUR YOU ARE LOOKING TO SOMEONE WHO WILL
LEAD YOU TO RUIN.
Don’t worry the markets will collapse:
Don’t
worry the markets will collapse, if there is money to be made the capitalists
will be around like flies swarming around shit. If you have run out of shit
(money) you should not create and supply more shit to attract the flies but you
should live within the shit you can produce.
One
should look after the economy and so if it is overheated, too heavily in debt,
it should be reined in, cooled down rather than pour more alcohol into the
punch bowl making the people more drunk and the already bulging pockets of
capitalists or markets bulge even more with worthless pieces of paper you
printed to keep the party going with even more disastrous, calamitous
consequences down the line.
People
think they talk such great sense when they are dabbling with nonsense or
delusion and heading for insanity.
There is
no need to have impressions and interpretations of anything. It is only
something said or done that is false or the person receiving cannot see things
truly that it is subject to impressions and interpretations.
The
Buddha said in many places, many times that of all beings, formed and formless,
many legs or no legs he is the highest, is that clear to you or do you need to
form impressions and interpretations?
Thus it
is only if a matter is not true, not clearly stated and therefore false or
deceptive, intending to not tell the truth and not worth knowing or you have
false perception, you cannot see things clearly as they actually are, you are
conceited, have self identity views that you need impressions and
interpretations.
WHATEVER
IS THE TRUTH DOES NOT REQUIRE INTERPRETATIONS, IT IS ONLY WHAT IS DECEPTIVE AND
THEREFORE NOT WORTH KNOWING THAT REQUIRES INTERPRETATIONS. WHAT IS INTERPRETED
IS NOT THE TRUTH. THE TRUTH IS NOT AN INTERPRETATION. THERE IS NO NEED TO HAVE
IMPRESSIONS OF SOMETHING, JUST SEE IT AS IT ACTUALLY IS AND THAT IS NOT AN
IMPRESSION WHICH IS ALWAYS A FALSE DELUDED PERCEPTION OF SOMETHING.
THE TRUTH
IS NOT AN IMPRESSION OR INTERPRETATION, IT IS THE TRUTH.
The truth can only be understood not interpreted:
The truth
or whatever is true cannot be interpreted, never requires interpretation but is
to be seen as it actually is and thus understood as such and such.
Thus
whatever is an interpretation is a falsification of the truth or a
falsification of something seen falsely.
ANYONE
WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF WHAT IS TOUTED, IMPRESSIONS AND
INTERPRETATIONS OR HE ACCEPTS IT AS VALID MUST DO SO WITH RAISED SELF
RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
This is
an interpretation (not the truth) of something happening and it is always false
never true.
What
happened is that weak PC sales depresses Microsoft’s profit and it is
interpreted as weak PC market catching up with Microsoft.
Whatever
is an interpretation is unnecessary and never the truth and it is a form of
giving it a spin to sound impressive. No catching up is involved and you are
misleading yourself and others that it is so. You think you are very clever but
you are putting your head on the chopping board.
PETALING
JAYA: Denying sex bloggers Alvin Tan and Vivian Lee bail on the grounds that
they have a “tendency to incite the public” is tantamount to punishment, say
lawyers.
As a
judge you should know the law better than the layman and there is greater duty
for you to act within the law and thus if the judge arbitrarily denied bail and
abused his power he is foolishly asking for even worse divine punishment for abuse
of the law.
JESUS
SAID THOSE WHO WEAR LONG ROBES WILL RECEIVE THE GREATER CONDEMNATION AND SO
GUARDIANS OF THE LAW WHO ABUSE THE LAW WILL RECEIVE GREATER CONDEMNATION.
If
something is true and good, always you must abide in it, not a time for it and
a time not for it.
Restraint
is needed if you have a bad tendency that you restrain. If you never possess
ill will, what restraint of ill will do you require and if you have ill will
then all the restraint in the world does not make you truly clean.
Only
those who speak and act without knowing what they speak or act is beneficial or harmful need reflection, those
who reside in truth and benevolence (as is possible) do not require reflection.
Thus your
advice may be full of goodness falling on receptive ears or it may be so much
empty advice falling on deaf ears. In other words what is said is platitude.
IF
SOMETHING IS MEANINGFUL AND GOOD IT IS NOT A PLATITUDE, IF SOMETHING SAID OR
DONE IS FOR SHOW, SOUNDS GOOD BUT NOT GOOD AND FALLS ON DEAF EARS IT IS CALLED
A PLATITUDE.
Interpretations of the law?
The law
does not require interpretation by anyone but it should be understood and
implemented. People speak of interpretation of the law because they want to
dispute the law or attack the law for nefarious purposes like escaping
punishment for themselves or their clients. Thus murderers have been known to
be discharged because witnesses subsequently admitted they perjured. Just
because they perjured does not mean the whole case is wrong.
THERE IS
NEVER A NEED TO INTERPRET THE LAW WHICH IS SPELT OUT CLEARLY, WHAT IS NEEDED IS
UNDERSTANDING THE LAW AND IMPLEMENTING IT AND SO ANYONE WHO CLAMOUR FOR
INTERPRETATIONS IS ASKING FOR SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT.
IT MAY BE
TRUE THE LAW REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BUT IF IT IS YOUR WRONG UNDERSTANDING THEN
THAT IS DELUSION AND IT IS THE PATH TO FUTURE WOE EVEN ETERNALLY.
Programming work is needed to form impressions and interpret:
Forming
impressions and interpreting are never free but you need to do work to form
anything and you need work to interpret.
If you
never formed anything, never formed impressions you save yourself work that is
always suffering.
If you
never interpreted anything you also save work that is always suffering.
Not only
does a person have to work to interpret or form impressions it is programming
such that in time the person is programmed to interpret and form impressions of
everything.
YOU DO
NOT NEED TO FORM IMPRESSIONS OR INTERPRET ANYTHING, ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS
UNDERSTAND WHATEVER HAPPENING WHICH IS BASED ON SEEING THINGS AS THEY ARE AND
DOES NOT REQUIRE WORK EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION.
YOU
ALWAYS NEED TO WORK TO FORM IMPRESSIONS OR INTERPRET AND WORK IS ALWAYS
SUFFERING AND YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO SUFFER, CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO
ALWAYS FORM IMPRESSIONS AND INTERPRET.
What is the work of forming impressions and interpreting?
In order
to form impressions you have to take what you see, ask yourself what you see or
what you think it is and then commit that to memory or impression that you may
approximately or precisely record to be recalled in the future to explain
things happening and that is always significant work that is suffering. The
person who does not form impressions, who sees correctly and understands
correctly what he sees does not have to bother with forming impressions to be
recorded. He remembers what he saw but that is not the same as forming an
impression and recording that impression.
Again
when you interpret you have to take what you saw and work to interpret or try
to explain what you saw often with reference to past experiences.
FORMING
IMPRESSIONS AND INTERPRETING IS SOMETHING A BEING HAS TO DO, IT DOES NOT OCCUR
WITHOUT WORK AND THE WORK IS NOT NEGLIGIBLE AND SO IT IS UNDERTAKING
UNNECESSARY SUFFERING THAT IS CONDITIONING, CONDITIONS THE PERSON TO ALWAYS
FORM IMPRESSIONS AND INTERPRET.
IF YOU
DON’T FORM IMPRESSIONS OR DON’T INTERPRET YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO WORK AND THAT
IS NEVER SUFFERING BUT RELEASE FROM SUFFERING.
An impression is a visual or written snapshot:
A person
with true understanding never take snapshots or impressions of things
happening, he pays attention to the entirety of things happening and
understands entirely what is happening and that is not a snapshot.
A person
who does not realize he is a rehashing robot always take snapshots of what is
happening and based on those snapshots he forms impressions that are inaccurate
or false as to what is happening.
WHEN
PEOPLE TALK ABOUT IMPRESSIONS THEY ARE UNWITTINGLY ACKNOWLEDGING THEY ARE
ROBOTS WHO NEVER SEE THE ENTIRETY OF THINGS HAPPENING, THEY TAKE SNAPSHOTS AND
THOSE SNAPSHOTS PLUS THEIR VERBAL OR THOUGHT INTERPRETATIONS ARE THEIR
IMPRESSIONS OF SOMETHING HAPPENING, OF SOMEONE THEY SEE.
Forever left behind:
Time
waits for no man and if you are forever forming impressions and interpreting
things then things are passing you by whilst you make impressions and interpret
and you are left behind in your make believe world of impressions and interpretations
whereas the person who does not form impressions or interpret remain in tandem,
in touch with reality.
Is Kate due today?
It is
actually a frivolous question, there is no big deal and if you pose a question
that others cannot answer in truth then you are asking others to trouble
themselves to answer a question that is not answerable by truth that has
demerit to be experienced as future suffering even insanity and you are a fool
to think nothing even good asking the foolish question.
Only falsity can be interpreted, truth can only be explained:
Only what
is false can be interpreted, what is true can only be explained, truth that is interpreted
becomes false.
Truth
requires no interpretation, it can only be seen and understood and whatever
truth subjected to interpretations no longer is the truth.
What is
false cannot be truly explained; it can only be found to be false or
interpreted in many different ways because it is false.
Thus
‘deafening silence’ cannot be explained, it can be dismissed as false or
interpreted in many different ways why silence is deafening.
Whatever is true, ‘silence can never deafen’ does not require interpretation, it can only be explained why silence cannot deafen.
Whatever is true, ‘silence can never deafen’ does not require interpretation, it can only be explained why silence cannot deafen.
THUS
ANYONE WHO DELVES IN INTERPRETATION IS DELVING IN FALSITY, DELUSION NOT TRUTH.
EITHER THE MATTER HE IS DWELLING ON IS FALSE OR NONSENSE OR IF IT IS TRUE, HE
HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND NOT UNDERSTANDING HE RESORTS TO INTERPRETING THE
MATTER HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND.
THE
PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTAND NEVER INTERPRETS BECAUSE HE SEES WHAT IS TRUE AS
TRUE THAT REQUIRES NO INTERPRETATION AND WHAT HE SEES THAT IS FALSE HE SEES AS
FALSE SO WHAT IS THERE TO INTERPRET?
WHENEVER
MONKS DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID, THEY APPROACH DESIGNATED ELDERS
NOT FOR AN INTERPRETATION OF WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID BUT AN EXPLANATION OF WHAT
THE BUDDHA SAID.
The truth about Singapore:
“Singapore
is world’s third richest country, Forbes March 30, 2012;
“One in six Singapore householders are
millionaires: Boston Consulting.”
“Yet another wealth report has put tiny
Singapore as the wealthiest nation in the world by GDP per capita, beating out
Norway, USA, Hong Kong and Switzerland: Wall Street Journal.” – Aug
15, 2012.
37% of
residents here, including the ultra-rich, are foreigners.
Many of
the millionaires and billionaires mentioned were not Singapore citizens.
The
average Singaporean earns barely enough to pay off housing and raising a family.
The
extreme wealth was only half the truth since it left out the high level of
household debts, especially for housing, children’s university education,
parental healthcare costs among others.
The
riches is only half the story; the other half is mortgages and debt.
Singapore
s household debt – at 75% of the GDP last year (up from 38% in 2000) – was
worse than Hong Kong’s 61%.
The
biggest cause is the craze for property which spiralled over the past five
years.
“This amount of leverage could very possibly see banks
succumbing as well, should a majority of their loans default,” said
a commentator.
Debt per
adult in Singapore is nearly US$40,000. However it is doubtful if it includes
people’s large housing loans (US 40,000 may be underestimation).
As
individuals prosper, so does people’s debts with the help of low interests,
particularly among the well-educated young. (Low
interest rates are criminal not good, encourage people to get into debts,
should interest rates rise later many are left with a noose around their necks)
Official
figures show that there were 65,804 loan sharking cases in the last four and a
half years – or about 1,200 cases a month.
The
government is getting worried about the rising level of personal loans –
judging from the following measures to curb borrowings.
On July
1, the central bank introduced rules to cap a property (of all types) buyer’s
monthly payments at 60% of his income.
This was
to reduce the chances of buyers being caught out by a rise in interest rates.
In
February, it imposed limits on bank loans for motor vehicle purchases, capping
certain loans at 50-60% of purchase price.
Seven
months ago, the central bank proposed rules to encourage responsible use of
credit card and unsecured credit rules aimed at discouraging people to get into
greater debt.
Amidst
our growing wealth, why are so many Singaporeans falling into debt?
The
accumulation generally starts young from university graduates whose starting
salary is about S$2,710 (RM6,811). Not all is attributed to a lavish lifestyle.
A money
website recently painted a picture of a newly-wedded couple, working graduates,
with a combined salary of S$8,000 (RM20,106), who are lucky enough to buy a new
Housing Development Board (HDB) three-room flat for S$350,000 (RM879,500).
This is a
normal start to two or three decades of debt repayment, not to mention a list
of smaller items like the wedding costs, a ring and most likely a medium-size
car costing around S$120,000 (RM301,606).
One of
the changes in Singapore is the widening inequality between the rich and poor,
even without considering foreigners in our midst.
Decades
of prosperity and rising property values have helped many of the middle-class
to upgrade, their riches rising substantially.
Others
have dropped into the poverty class. The city’s dilemma is the widening gap
between the rich and poor, technically computed as Gini coefficient.
On OECD
measurement, Singa-pore’s Gini coefficient of 0.478 last year was the widest in
the world.
This
makes it confusing to judge articles about extreme wealth and increasing
poverty, since both are true.
To put
things into perspective, there are signs of prosperity among the upper class in
certain areas.
In
central places often used by the upper middle class, restaurants are packed and
branded goods fly off the shelves. (There are two sets
of Singaporeans, those who have and those who have not, those who are in demand
are few but those not in demand struggle)
State TV
still runs frequent advertisements about Singapore being a happy place with
dancing crowds of all ages and races prancing around (Much
like Malaysia where state media is full of promotion of Malaysia Boleh and so
Singapore’s government is SIMILAR not different from Malaysia’s).
Not
everyone agrees.
An
English-language newspaper wrote: “Singaporeans are among the world’s
wealthiest, but they are not necessarily a happy lot.”
What has
this got to do with the case? If it has nothing to do with the case and you think
it is relevant you are courting insanity and will get it.
IT IS NOT
A MATTER OF TRAYVON COULD HAVE BEEN OBAMA BUT IS THE KILLING WRONG AND THE
KILLER GUILTY. YOU HAVE A SILLY PRESIDENT WITHOUT TRUE LOGIC.
Explain versus interpret:
When you
explain something, you make clear something to another who is unable to
visualize as it is what is said.
When you
interpret you are attempting to view or make sense something you did not
understand in terms of something else, a false understanding you recorded in your
mental jukebox.
EXPLAINING
AND INTERPRETING ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS THAT ARE NOT TO BE CONFUSED. WHATEVER
IS TRUE CAN BE EXPLAINED TO THOSE WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND, WHAT IS FALSE CANNOT
BE TRULY UNDERSTOOD AND SO IT MUST BE INTERPRETED INTO SOMETHING ELSE.
An interpreter is a converter:
When
someone works as a French interpreter he essentially converts another language
into French and so interpreting is mechanical, about converting A into B, when
you interpret something you did not know or understand either because you do
not possess true understanding or the matter is false, you are essentially
converting the matter into something you have a ready programmed false
understanding that you can rehash to ‘explain’ what is happening.
Interpreting
is totally unnecessary, false and suffering, you need to do work to interpret,
it is trying to explain something false or you cannot understand in terms of
another which you have a recorded rehashable understanding.
Interpreting
is something programmed in the person and he is ‘forever’ interpreting things
rather than understanding things and it is suffering and lapsing into falsity.
A person who does not interpret does not suffer and he is constantly in touch
with reality unlike the interpreting person who must momentarily suspend
contact with reality to interpret what is happening.
Anyone
who entraps another, whether you are police or whatever is guilty of sin
heading for even eternal woe.
You are
deluded if you think God sets traps for you. It is the Devil who entraps and
there is never good entrapment, all entrapment is evil, partaking of evil that
ends in eternal woe for you.
Only robots interpret:
Interpreting
is what robots do all the time in lieu of or substitute of understanding things
as they actually happen. When something happens, robots always referring to the
library of mental recordings of what it could be and interpret what happened in
terms of those recordings and if he cannot find one, he Googles or find one
recorded understanding in the internet.
A PERSON
WHO DOES NOT REALIZE HE IS A ROBOT IS ALWAYS INTERPRETING THINGS HAPPENING
INSTEAD OF SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING, HE HAS A
LIBRARY OF READYMADE EXPLANATIONS THAT HE MAY PERIODICALLY ADD TO, TO WHICH HE
REFERS TO, TO EXPLAIN WHAT IS HAPPENING.
He is
advocating trust and foolishly putting his head on the chopping board not once
but even many times without knowing.
Leave
others to decide for themselves who they will trust because it is dangerous and
blind to trust others and if you tell others to trust and they end up in loss,
suffering or death you have blood on your hands to be repaid as suffering.
TRUST IS
THE OPPOSITE OF SUSPICION AND TRUST IS NOT A DECISION YOU MAKE FOR OTHERS BUT
IT IS FOR OTHERS TO MAKE AT THEIR OWN PERIL. THOSE WHO SEE DO NOT TRUST, THEY
SEE THE NATURES OF THOSE THEY DEAL WITH AND THERE IS NO QUESTION OF TRUSTING OR
BEING SUSPICIOUS. FOR THOSE WHO CANNOT SEE AND MUST TRUST OR BE SUSPICIOUS YOU
DON’T TELL OTHERS TO TRUST, DELIVER THEMSELVES TO BE TRICKED BY OTHERS UNLESS
YOU WANT TO BE DELIVERED TO THE CHOPPING BOARD YOURSELF.
WHY IS HE
SO KEEN TO MOVE FORWARD? YOU DO NOT HAVE TO MOVE FORWARD AND IF THERE ARE
SERIOUS ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED, YOU DO NOT TELL OTHERS TO SWEEP IT UNDER THE
CARPET, SET IT ASIDE AND TRUST BUT WITHOUT RESOLUTION OF THOSE ISSUES THERE
CANNOT BE GENUINE TRUST, ONLY TRUST IN THE NAME OF GETTING WHAT YOU WANT.
Trust and suspicion are functions of force never reason:
Trust and
distrust (suspicion) are functions of force and programming and so anyone who
truly understands would not speak of either, it is those who are deluded, who
do not have true understanding who speak of trust and distrust which are not
good but evil.
This is a
world (entirely) of hypocrisy, people are faking it, not good as they tout
themselves and so it is dangerous to trust anyone here.
Trust is
about using force to open yourself, expose yourself or your secrets (eg how
much in the bank and what is the password) to another based on hearsay or
recommendations of others that he is reliable or faulty yardsticks of
trustworthiness that you subject him to (eg he did not steal the watch you left
in his presence).
You never
order yourself to trust another just because others say so or he did not steal
in the past (passed the test), that is a form of programmed action in which you
the trusting person is a robot but you see the person as he actually is, as is
actually possible and thus knowing him you know he is a danger or not. A person
of integrity does not mix with people of no integrity, he only interacts with
people of no integrity minimally, at a distance as necessary.
THE
BUDDHA SAID HE IS WORTHY OF WORSHIP, OF GIFTS, VERY FEW IN THIS WORLD ARE
WORTHY OF WORSHIP AND THEREFORE NOT TO BE TRUSTED EXCEPT IF YOU ARE BLIND OR A
FOOL.
TRUST AND
DISTRUST ARE PROGRAMMED ACTIONS DRIVEN BY FORCE AND WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING NEITHER TRUSTS NOR DISTRUSTS OTHERS, HE KNOWS
THE TRUE NATURES OF OTHERS THAT ARE ALL THERE TO BE SEEN BY THOSE WHO SEE
THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE.
IF YOU
CAN SEE THE PERSON IS BAD, WHAT IS THERE TO TRUST? IT IS WHEN YOU CANNOT SEE IF
THE PERSON IS GOOD OR BAD BUT FOR SELFISH GREEDY REASONS YOU WANT TO ACCEPT HIM
THAT YOU TRUST HIM.
Trust and distrust are programs:
Trust and
distrust is something you order yourself to do with regard to a person or
object that is indiscriminate, not specific to an occasion, not a case by case
basis.
ONLY
THOSE WHO ARE ROBOTS TRUST AND DISTRUST OTHERS AND TRUST AND DISTRUSTS ARE
PROGRAMS, INSTRUCTIONS THAT YOU ACTIVATE AND CARRY OUT SO THAT ONCE YOU
IDENTIFY THE PERSON AND CONFIRM HE IS TRUSTED BY YOU, YOU LOWER YOUR GUARD,
ACCEPT HIM AND EXPOSE YOURSELF TO HIM AND ACCEPT WHAT HE TELLS YOU ARE TRUE AND
GOOD FOR YOU.
RATHER
THAN GOOD THIS IS ALWAYS EVIL, DANGEROUS AND CONDITIONS YOU TO BE A ROBOT.
Trust is an action that is programmed:
You talk
about trust and you hear others speak of trust but do you understand what trust
is?
Trust is
an action undertaken by a person essentially to accept another, to lower one’s
guard in relation to that person and open one’s secrets to him.
Because
trust is not a case by case basis, not specific to the occasion action it must
be a programmed blind indiscriminate action and anyone who trusts is an
unwitting robot.
TRUST IS
A NONSPECIFIC, GENERAL ACTION AND ONLY ROBOTS TRUST.
From butt man to family
man: Scott Disick relaxes at pool with swimsuit-clad Kourtney Kardashian the
morning after judging 'Miss BumBum' contest
What is
said conforms to a very common format, is a false copied style of speech. The
format goes like this ‘from X to Z, blah, blah, blah’.
Just
because he is relaxing at the pool does not mean he was gone from butt man to
family man and it is a false spurious association that is never harmless but
leads to future insanity and suffering. The purpose is to stir emotions, make
others laugh and that is evil rather than good.
FROM
BUTTMAN TO FAMILY MAN IS UNNECESSARY, A FALSE ASSOCIATION AND SAID TO STIR
EMOTIONS, TO MAKE OTHERS SMILE OR LAUGH AND THAT IS EVIL NEVER GOOD. IT IS A
FORMAT OF SPEAKING THAT IS COPIED FROM OTHERS AND SO THE PERSON IS A REHASHING ROBOT.
Why trust is praised, exalted in this world:
It is not
because trust is a good thing that it is valued in this world but it is the
opposite.
If you
want to exploit another, want to reap material advantage from another, want to
sell something for profit to another then you desire trust, you praise trust,
you want someone eg a pretty girl to trust you but not another.
If you
desire no gains from others (as is possible even though it is absent in this
world) why would you want anyone to trust you? There is no need to trust me,
just see and understand what I say or do as true or false, good or bad,
insightful or useless.
TRUST IS
BECAUSE OF EVIL DESIGNS AND NOT GOOD, YOU NEED TRUST IF YOU WANT TO MANIPULATE
OTHERS.
The
financial reports of the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) show 144 officials
were paid off because they were given permanent contracts despite the authority
winding down in 2014
In view
of the parlous UK public finance it could not afford to stage the Olympics and
should not have staged it because it served no useful function, only to boast
or show off. Whatever economic benefit is little compared to the expenses and
benefit those who already have, not those who are downtrodden and not just here
but if you examined a nation’s finance you can many wasteful deluded parallels.
Few
countries in the world can truly afford to stage the Olympics and yet they are
all lining up to stage. Not even Japan if you realize their parlous public
financial position can afford to stack more debt on top of its mountain of
debts.
THE
BUDDHA SAID DROP BY DROP IS THE PITCHER FILLED AND THESE DROPS (OLYMPIC
EXTRAVAGANCE) ARE BIG DROPS.
Uneasy peace and rocking the boat:
Sunday, 21 July 2013
The younger generation, those born long after the 1950s, need to
understand this. And they need to understand plus respect both the letter and
the spirit of what our Founding Fathers (or founding grandfathers for many of
us) tried to achieve and did to a great extent achieve. You have to be very
careful about ‘rocking the boat’ lest we trigger what the British and our
grandfathers tried very hard to avoid.
|
Whatever
peace built on truth and goodness is never uneasy and so if the peace is uneasy
there is tension and it is false and hypocritical.
It is not
good to preach not rocking the boat, if your peace or harmony can be rocked, it
means it is not true, not stable, make believe, for show and in advocating not
rocking the boat you are preaching keeping up and maintaining the sham and that
is demeritorious not meritorious.
IT IS NOT
THAT YOU SHOULD ROCK THE BOAT OR STIR ANIMOSITY, THAT HAS KARMA TOO BUT YOU
SHOULD DIVORCE YOURSELF, DISSOCIATE YOURSELF FROM THE PRETENSE OR MAKE BELIEVE
TO KEEP THE SHOW GOING.
Malaysia’s household debt and damper on growth:
The household debt in Malaysia, which stands at about
83% of gross domestic product (GDP), is higher than many other countries in the
region like the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Hong Kong and Japan. If not
prevented, it could put a damper on the country’s 5%-6% projected GDP growth
this year.
It
reflects how sick or perverse people are, there are far graver concerns about
rising household debts and the first thing that comes into their minds is that
it will dampen national growth.
THE VAST
MAJORITY OF PEOPLE HAVE NO CONCERNS FOR OTHERS, ONLY WHAT IS IN IT FOR THEM OR
THEIR NATIONS. RISING HOUSEHOLD DEBTS CAN DESTROY FAMILIES AND LEAD TO SUICIDES
AND ALL HE IS CONCERNED IS DENTING NATIONAL GROWTH. WHY MUST THE NATION ALWAYS
GROW AND NOT REMAIN STEADY? IT IS RISKY NOT WITHOUT RISK PURSUING GROWTH.
SINGAPORE’S
HOUSEHOLD DEBT IS SAID TO BE BAD BUT MALAYSIA’S IS WORSE.
THE
Friends of Batu Caves Coalition says political will is needed to preserve the
Batu Caves reserve and its eco-system, which is in danger of extinction.
Whatever
is a matter of politics or political will is never a matter of truth or
goodness but give and take, for material gains, for popularity and gaining
power and so it is not a matter for discussion except if you want to return
here again and again to have your throats cut shedding your own blood the
Buddha said is greater than the four great oceans.
IF IT IS
A MATTER OF POLITICAL WILL IT IS NOT A MATTER FOR PAYING ATTENTION AND SO YOU
ARE PRACTICING WRONG ATTENTION WHICH LEADS TO EVEN ETERNAL WOE. THE BUDDHA
TAUGHT THAT TO ESCAPE ETERNAL SUFFERING, THERE ARE THINGS YOU MUST PAY
ATTENTION TO (BODILY AND MENTAL SUFFERING RISING) AND THINGS YOU MUST IGNORE.
IF YOU HAVE WRONG ATTENTION, THAT IS NOT THE PATH TO HAPPINESS BUT SUFFERING.
PRESERVING
THE BATU CAVES IS NOT, SHOULD NOT BE A MATTER OF POLITICAL WILL BUT DOING WHAT
IS RIGHT OR CORRECT AND SO HE IS GUILTY OF WRONG VIEW THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE
PATH TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WORLD.
Death on the roller coaster:
Apparently
a child fell to her death riding a roller coaster with a strap that was not
properly applied. Those who recommend others ride roller coasters, those who
make a living off it are asking for karma to be repaid by suffering.
There are
never true reasons for roller coasters which have become even more extreme
today compared with the past. The purpose of roller coasters is to stir
emotions, primarily terror and this exposes riders to extreme danger especially
if they have not strapped themselves in properly.
A few
decades ago I had a ride in one and it was a sensation of terror being yanked
around in sharp turns which must be even worse today.
ROLLER
COASTERS ARE CRIMINAL, IT REFLECTS DELUSION OF HUMANS THAT THEY SEEK A RIDE AND
THOSE WHO ORGANIZE THEM HAVE DEBT IN REPAYMENT.
Lending
rates should play little or no part in a sound economy and if lending rates are
crucial, watched closely and responded to by market it reflects the economy is
living precariously, too dependent on debt to prosper and if the debt is spent
on consumption, on speculation, on fruitless or unproductive expenditure it is
a SUREFIRE indication of final, ultimate collapse, the longer the excesses have
been allowed to fester the worse the outcome and mankind in its delusion is
trying to rekindle the excessive consumption of the past they do not realize is
like flogging the dead horse.
FOR THOSE
WHO DISCERN, SEE THINGS AS IT ACTUALLY IS, THE HORSE IS DEAD AND THERE IS NO
USE FLOGGING IT BUT TO THE DELUDED THE HORSE IS STILL VERY MUCH ALIVE, LETS
FLOG IT MORE.
Learn to accept what cannot be changed:
This is
mad advice.
Whatever
has happened does not require a person’s acceptance or non acceptance and both
are associated with suffering. The acceptance that you learnt is never genuine
or true but forced, conditioned and attended by disturbance.
A person
who truly neither likes nor dislike has reached the stage where his mind is not
perturbed by anything happening and he truly accepts whatever is happening, it
is not learnt or conditioned or programmed.
WHATEVER
ACCEPTANCE YOU LEARNT IS NEVER TRUE, IT IS CONTRIVED, FORCED AND COMES WITH
EFFORT AND SUFFERING.
A PERSON
WHOSE MIND HAS REACHED THE THIRD HIGHER STATE NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE IS NOT
PERTURBED BY ANYTHING HAPPENING AND THERE IS NO QUESTION OF HIM ACCEPTING OR
NOT ACCEPTING WHAT IS HAPPENING. WHEN HE GETS ALMS, THAT IS FINE, WHEN HE GETS
NO ALMS THAT TOO IS FINE.
If something can be changed you don’t accept?
In other
words if something bad happens but it can be changed you don’t accept it, you
only learn to accept what you cannot change?
This is
fantasy, impossible in practice, delusion.
IT IS
DELUSION, IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON TO ACCEPT ONLY THINGS THAT CANNOT BE CHANGED
AND NOT ACCEPT WHAT CAN BE CHANGE AS IMPLIED BY THE ADVICE.
Why no one can cherry pick acceptance:
It is
impossible for a person to cherry pick things he will accept and not accept, he
will accept unpalatable things that cannot be changed and not accept
unpalatable things that can be changed.
You talk
about acceptance but do you understand the nature of ‘acceptance’?
Acceptance
is a fancy word for ‘like’, it is ‘like’ in disguise and like is merely a blind
meaningless harmful stirring of force that is indiscriminate, once programmed
to dislike certain things the person cannot help disliking it, he is a slave
not master of his dislike or not accepting.
NOT
ACCEPTING IS DISLIKE IN DISGUISE AND THAT IS A PROGRAMMED STIRRING OF MENTAL
FORCE, WHATEVER IS GAINED IS LIKED OR ACCEPTED, WHATEVER IS LOST IS DISLIKED OR
NOT ACCEPTED. FOR GREEDY ACQUISITIVE PEOPLE ALL LOSSES IRRESPECTIVE OF
CHANGEABILITY IS DISLIKED, NOT ACCEPTED AND YOU ARE DELUDED AND COURTING
INSANITY IF YOU THINK YOU CAN CHOOSE AND TRAIN YOURSELF TO NOT ACCEPT THINGS
THAT ARE LOSSES BUT CHANGEABLE AND ACCEPT THINGS THAT ARE LOSSES BUT
UNCHANGEABLE.
ACCEPTANCE
IS A FUNCTION OF FORCE NEVER REASON AND SO IT IS BLIND, INDISCRIMINATE AND YOU
ARE NOT A MASTER BUT SLAVE OF YOUR ACCEPTING OR NOT ACCEPTING ARE TOTALLY
UNNECESSARY ADDITIONAL SUFFERING NOT THE WONDER OR MEANINGFULNESS IT IS MADE
OUT TO BE.
Japan warns UK about leaving EU
Once you
have joined some organization you should never go back on your commitment and
leave, it is always wrong and has karma to be repaid as suffering.
Similarly
once Greece has been accepted in the EU, it should not be expelled but however
unpalatable, Greece should be assisted and rehabilitated, that is the right
course of action.
IT IS NOT
BECAUSE THERE ARE SERIOUS MATERIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR BRITAIN IF IT LEAVES THE EU
BUT IT IS BECAUSE IT IS WRONG, BREAKING A COMMITMENT JUST BECAUSE IT IS NOW A
BANE THAN BOON BEING IN THE EU.
GOING
BACK ON YOUR WORD OR COMMITMENT HAS SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES IN SUFFERING DUE THAT
YOU IGNORE AND DO NOT REALIZE TO YOUR FUTURE SORROW.
Accept your cancer? You got to be kidding:
Cancer is
something that can befall a person and which cannot be changed.
So how
many people, including the person advocating accepting what cannot be changed
will accept his cancer?
Emotional
people will become upset, angry and fight to the last when faced with cancer
they cannot change rather than accept and go without a fight.
NOT
ACCEPTING IS ABOUT FIGHTING WHAT IS DISLIKED OR A LOSS AND EVEN THOUGH CANCER
IS IRREVERSIBLE, IT IS AN IMPOSSIBLE NOT TALL ORDER FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE ATTACHED
TO THEIR LIVES HERE TO ACCEPT, NOT FIGHT WHAT IS IRREVERSIBLE.
We couldn't be happier
Wills' joy after Kate has boy
That
statement is always spoken in delusion not truth.
There is
no need to say that and it is not said knowing it is true there is no greater
happiness possible for them but to falsely exaggerate how big the joy of the
birth of a son.
UNLESS
THE COUPLE CAN SEE THERE IS NO GREATER HAPPINESS POSSIBLE FOR THEM THEY ARE
SPEAKING FOOLISHLY WITH SUFFERING DUE. ONLY IF YOU CAN SEE AND YOU SEE NO
GREATER HAPPINESS CAN YOU SAY THAT TRULY. IF YOU CAN FOR SURE THERE IS NO
GREATER HAPPINESS AND YOU SAY THERE IS NO GREATER HAPPINESS YOU MUST DO SO WITH
RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND YOU ARE GUILTY OF SPEAKING FALSELY WITH
KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING.
EVEN IF
THEY DO NOT ACHIEVE IT FOR THEMSELVES THIS LIFETIME, THERE IS FAR GREATER
INCOMPARABLE HAPPINESS IN THE FIRST, SECOND, THIR AND FOURTH HIGHER STATES OF
MIND.
ONLY IF
YOU CAN SEE AND YOU SEE NO GREATER HAPPINESS ARE YOU ENTITLED TO SAY YOU CANNOT
BE HAPPIER OTHERWISE YOU ARE INVITING SUFFERING NEEDLESSLY.
Nibbana is the highest happiness:
Nibbana,
the laying down of the heavy burden, the end of all birth and death, the
destination of no falling away is the highest happiness.
The
formless existence of brahmas confers much higher happiness than the formed
existence of angels in heaven and the higher your concentration or state of
mind the higher your happiness and the highest state is neither perceiving nor
not perceiving wherein you are All Seeing, All Knowing.
FOOLS
MAKE MUCH OF THE LITTLE FLEETING HAPPINESS THEY FIND HERE THAT IS LIKE A
FLICKERING LIGHT COMPARED TO THE INCANDESCENT SUN HAPPINESS IN THE HIGHEST
REACHES OF HEAVEN AND NIBBANA.
Malaysian household vs government debt:
Malaysian
household debt was recently declared as 80+%, worse than Singapore’s 77% (also
bad). This is separate from government debt which 55% for 2012.
What
about Malaysian companies debt as percentage of GDP?
It looks
like profligacy all round, everyone is living in debt, beyond his means and
hoping nothing will crash.
Worry is
the wrong force based understanding, rising household debt is a danger is the
correct or reason based understanding.
Why should
it worry anyone and of what use is it to worry or raise fear even panic for
rising debt? What is relevant is that you understand the dangers posed by
rising debt and take the correct actions to rectify it.
THAT
RISING DEBT IS A WORRY AND A DANGER ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS NOT TO BE CONFUSED
ONE WITH ANOTHER AND IT REFLECTS MUDDLED THINKING IF YOU THINK THEY ARE
SYNONYMOUS. WORRY IS ABOUT STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO BE AGITATED, FEARFUL AND
CONFUSED.
How UK is reviving its economy:
Property
is at the centre of the past crash globally and you would think UK has learnt
its lesson but no, it is trying to revive the bubble.
Not that
the UK government is cash rich but it is heavily in debt and yet it proposes to
spend £16 billion to subsidize mortgage payments. Instead of paying a deposit
of 20% before you can qualify to buy a house, you pay a deposit of 5% and the
government will pay the rest interest free for 5 years in order to enable more
people to buy houses and hopefully pull the housing industry out of its slump.
This is reverting to the bad dangerous excesses and debt incurring practices of
the past.
Reports
say 30% of those mortgages in the US that were restructured favourable to
enable mortgagees to service their loans have now started to fail again.
No comments:
Post a Comment