Bush shaves his head:

Bush shaves his head:

Former US President George H W Bush has shaved his head to show support for a toddler undergoing treatment for leukaemia.

Shaving your head to support charity, because it the current fad or to make a statement are wrong reasons for shaving that is never harmless but conditions you to do things for the wrong reasons that ends in insanity.

Shaving your head because you are infested with lice, it is troublesome or hot keeping hair or to renounce all vanity are correct reasons.

YOU SHOULD ALWAYS TRAIN YOURSELF TO DO OR SAY THINGS FOR CORRECT REASONS, IF YOU SAY OR DO THINGS FOR THE WRONG REASONS, YOU MUST STIR RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS YOU TO RESIST AND BECAUSE THEY ARE WRONG REASONS, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY, PRESIDENT OR NOT.

Obama: Reverse economic inequality

He wants to fight for economic equality and he and you may think he is right but he is deluded.

There is no such thing as equality economic or whatever, all men are not equal, you are not anywhere near equal God.

Notwithstanding that it is delusion to seek economic equality, it is not equality that is the matter but the capitalist system driven by greed, everyone for himself, grab as much as you can is evil, the source of the troubles.

AS LONG AS THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM IS IN PLACE IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THERE WILL BE THE DOWNTRODDEN AND FAT CATS WHO GAIN ASCENDENCY BY HOOK OR CROOK (APPLIES TO BILL GATES, SOROS AND STEVE JOBS TOO) AND IT IS DELUDED FIGHTING FOR EQUALITY WITHIN THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM. CAPITALISM ALWAYS ENDS IN COLLAPSE LIKE AN HOUR GLASS FINALLY RUNS OUT OF SAND.

IT MAY BE TRUE EQUALITY IS POSSIBLE UNDER THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM OR IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE CAPITALISM IS RUTHLESS AND YOU HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING OR DELUSION HERE AS IN EVERYWHERE YOU THINK YOU CAN AND DO UNDERSTAND.

Arctic methane 'economic time bomb'

If mankind’s survival is at stake and you are concerned with economic time bomb, aren’t you absurd, silly and you call yourself a scientist?

Economic loss should be of no concern to scientists, what matter is environmental disaster or collapse.

SO SCIENTISTS DON’T THINK ARCTIC METHANE THREATENS MANKIND’S SURVIVAL, IT IS ONLY AN ECONOMIC TIME BOMB AND THEY ARE WORKED UP OVER IT?

Phone for gold:

The headline is deliberately and mischievously deceptive. It gives the impression that you make a phone call for gold but it actually refers to recycling old phones for the valuable gold contacts within.

PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE VERY CLEVER AND IMPRESSIVE SPEAKING SLYLY. YOU THINK HE IS SPEAKING OF A BUT HE IS SPEAKING OF B BUT IT IS DANGEROUS BECAUSE YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF (AND OTHERS) TO BE DECEIVED, TO MISTAKE A FOR B THAT MAY ONE DAY KILL YOU.

Putting it in a way is a fabrication:

When you want to say something eg recycling old phones for gold and you pause to phrase it in a certain way eg ‘phone for gold’ you have to do work to think and it is a totally unnecessary addictive fabrication that ends in suffering and insanity.

IF YOU HAVE TO PAUSE TO THINK AND PUT WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY IN A WAY THAT IS STYLISH, WITTY, IMPRESSIVE YOU MUST DO WORK THAT IS ALSO SUFFERING AND YOU PROGRAM YOURSELF TO FABRICATE WHICH IS NEVER THE HAPPINESS IT IS MADE OUT TO BE BUT TOTALLY UNNECESSARY CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.

They enjoy deceiving others:

There are many who enjoy deceiving others with what they say or do that is sly, not what it appears to be and whilst they may enjoy some pleasure and even thrill doing so, it is always with an aftertaste of stress, restlessness and unable to concentrate and they are dangerously training themselves to be deceived just as they deceive others that can end fatally for them one day.

Singapore the most preferred destination:

SINGAPORE remains the world’s most preferred destination for international meetings, according to the Union of International Association’s global rankings for 2012.
For the second year running, Singapore was the city and country which hosted the highest number of international meetings.

It is wrong and not without reason to label Singapore the most preferred destination.

Just because Singapore hosted the most meetings does not mean it is preferred, it may be cheapest or most popular or most promoted/discounted.

IT IS CORRECT TO SAY SINGAPORE IS MOST POPULAR BUT WITHOUT PARTICIPANTS VOTING TO SAY THEY PREFERRED SINGAPORE YOU ARE WRONG AND UNRIGHTEOUS TO SAY IT IS ‘PREFERRED’ WHICH MEANS PEOPLE CHOSE IT IN EXCLUSION OF OTHERS.

THIS IS A FORM OF JUMPING TO FALSE CONCLUSION OR FALSE LOGIC IN THE NAME OF BEATING ONE’S OWN DRUM WITH KARMA AND INSANITY ATTACHED.

Correct economic wrongs not fight for economic equality:

There are many serious economic wrongs being perpetrated in the economy and they should be corrected rather than fight for equality which is not the overriding issue.

Apparently Goldman Sachs manipulated the prices of aluminium by warehousing which raises the price for consumers, it uses faster computers to snatch buy and sell orders under the noses of those with slower computers.

The entry of investment banks, investors have driven up the price of oil and those with no need for oil should not be allowed to buy oil and push up prices.

PUSHING UP OIL PRICES BY SPECULATING IS NOT ABOUT ECONOMIC INEQUALITY BUT IT IS PROFITING AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS THAT IS WRONG AND SHOULD BE CORRECTED BY ONLY ALLOWING THOSE WITH NEED FOR OIL TO BUY OIL RATHER THAN FIGHT FOR ECONOMIC EQUALITY.

It is not economic inequality but economic criminality:

If you are interested in what is wrong with the economy and how to correct it then it is not economic inequality but economic criminality that is the issue. There is a lot of criminality in the economy that is condoned whose correction would reap far greater returns or improvement.

For instance trading in currency should be controlled, restricted to disable speculators who drive up and down currency rates to reap unrighteous gains, all short selling should be banned.

How to understand economic inequality:

Equality does not exist it is a fabrication of deluded minds.

Instead there is much wrong much criminality is the economy with America the leader of the pack of heedless and these criminality is not amenable to correct, such is the goat like nature of selfish greedy humans here and so no person in his right mind will endeavour to correct the wrongs.

EQUALITY DOES NOT EXIST, IT IS IN THE MINDS OF DELUDED PEOPLE. THERE IS MUCH AND SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH THE ECONOMY BUT THEY ARE NOT AMENABLE TO CORRECTION AND IF YOU THINK YOU CAN CORRECT YOU ARE DELUDED AND A FOOL, YOU DO NOT SEE THINGS CORRECTLY AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE.

Exim Bank targets RM5bil in loans and confident of disbursing the amount this year

What does this statement tell you about the fidelity of bankers?

They speak as if money in their possession which are depositors’ money are goodies to be dished out as plenty as possible to maximize returns without regard to need and risk.

A bank should not have any targets of how much to lend and depositors’ money should only lent safely as the genuine need arises.

As soon as you have targets, you set targets you are committed to meeting the target and would disregard risks especially if there are commissions for disbursing loans.

BANKS SHOULD NEVER HAVE TARGETS TO DISBURSE LOANS WHICH SHOULD BE DISBURSED SCRUPULOUSLY WITHOUT ANY ATTENTION TO TARGETS OR COMMISSIONS DUE FOR MEETING TARGETS.

THE FACT THAT BANKERS SEE NOTHING WRONG EVEN BOAST ABOUT THEIR TARGETS REFLECTS INCOMPETENCE AND UNSCRUPULOUSNESS. EVEN IF YOU HAVE TARGETS YOU SHOULD NOT BROADCAST IT AS IF IT IS WONDERFUL WHEN IT REFLECTS RECKLESSNESS.

So you think our banks are in safe hands?

Malaysian bankers of various stripes routinely boast of the loan expansion targets to impress the public how well their banks are run.

Rather than impressive it indicates the people in charge of banks are dangerous, reckless, like alcoholics of money dedicated to dishing out whatever money deposited in their banks to maximize profits (and commission to bankers).

ANY BANK WHICH BRAGS ABOUT TARGETS FOR LOANS IS IN DANGEROUS HANDS, IT SHOWS CLUELESS GREEDY BANKERS WITH NO REGARD FOR DEPOSITORS’ MONEY.

Tutu won't worship 'homophobic God'

South Africa's Nobel peace laureate Archbishop Desmond Tutu says he would never worship a "homophobic God" and would rather go to hell.

This is a foolish (unskilful) statement born of delusion and driven by emotion (defiance). It requires self identity view (one of three lower fetters to woe) that you are important, your views are important even in contradistinction to truth and God.

First of all does he know if God is homophobic or homophilic? Why is he so eager to make a stance in the matter? Suffice you think nothing wrong with homosexuality, you side with them maybe because part of your popular base is homosexual.

But whether homosexuality is right or wrong is objective not subjective and if you get it wrong you have wrong view that leads to hell or the animal womb.

Jesus said they have become eunuchs for the sake of heaven and the Buddha said to abstain from sex, what more unnatural homosexual sex. If it is true love between two males why do you have to poke each other in the anus?

SEX IS NOT WHOLESOME AND IT IS ABOUT LUST NOT LOVE, SATISFYING YOUR PASSIONS WITH THE BODY OF THE OPPOSITE OR SAME SEX.

JESUS SAID WHAT IS EXALTED BY MEN IS AN ABOMINATION IN THE SIGHT OF GOD AND SO IT IS, HOMOSEXUALITY, BESTIALITY, SADO MASOCHISM ARE EXALTED BY MEN AND AN ABOMINATION TO GOD AND WHAT IS TUTU DOING IN CHRISTIANITY?

You don’t threaten others or set conditions:

What is important is that you view things correctly (as they actually are) and act accordingly (to avoid accruing karma to be repaid as future suffering), you don’t threaten others (threaten God you won’t worship him if he is homophobic) or issue conditions for your worship (that God is not homophobic).

Whatever is conditional is not true, manipulative:

If your worship of God is dependent on God being homophilic then your worship is conditional and that is never true except in your delusion.

Emotional people routinely threaten others in a carrot and stick fashion not realizing they are hypocritical in their endeavours and headed for suffering not happiness eg I won’t love you unless you do as I say, I won’t walk faster unless you say ‘I love you’.

The limits to freedom

NO HOLDS BARRED

Whatever is conditional is not true and hence if there are limits to the freedom you espouse then it is not true freedom but faked freedom.

True free press has no limits, if there are limits to your press freedom it is hypocritical not genuine.

THUS IN TALKING ABOUT LIMITS TO FREEDOM AND ADVOCATING OR SUPPORTING THAT, RPK IS AGAIN DEMONSTRATING HIS DELUSION, HIS SIDING WITH THE STATUS QUO THAN TRUTH AND GOODNESS.

IF YOUR FREEDOM HAS LIMITS IT IS NOT TRUE AND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY TALKING ABOUT FREEDOM.

Is the Economy a Zero Sum Game in Asia?

Room for Debate asks whether China’s rise as a business power would necessarily lead to an American decline.

Zero sum game is recorded rehashed understanding stored amongst many other recorded understandings that people who are robot are fond of storing and whenever something happens, they search their libraries of recorded understanding to pigeon hole the current situation into one of those recorded understandings.

There is no need to register and rehash ‘zero sum game’, people like to think they are very sophisticated, talking about something exotic but they are forever living in rigid recorded understandings they think are very impressive instead of freshly specific to the occasion understand what is happening.

THE RISE OF CHINA WILL LEAD TO THE DECLINE OF AMERICA IS THE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION UNDERSTANDING, THAT IT IS A ZERO SUM GAME IS A RECORDED REHASHED UNDERSTANDING OF SOMEONE WHO IS A ROBOT.

Tunisian dies in violent protests in southern city of Gafsa

It is not a matter of Tunisian dies but violent protests in Gafsa and so by speaking thus you are demonstrating a muddled mind that is never harmless. Which is more important, the head or the tail, the death or the protests?

If it is a case of violent protests in Gafsa with fatality and you think it is a case of Tunisian dies in violent protests then you have wrong view, a poor sense of what is essential and not essential and in danger of loss and death.

THIS IS A WORLD OF EMOTIONAL PEOPLE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHO SPEAK IN A MUDDLED WAY WITHOUT A SENSE OF WHAT A MATTER IS ABOUT.

Are you better than God?

No one is better than God, who is perfect.

And so if you say you won’t worship God if he is homophobic, you would prefer to go to hell, you are saying you know better than God, God is not as good as you if He is homophobic.

GOD IS ALL SEEING AND ALL KNOWING AND SO IF YOU SAY YOU WON’T WORSHIP A HOMOPHOBIC GOD, YOU IMPLY HE CANNOT BE HOMOPHOBIC OR IF HE IS, YOU KNOW BETTER THAN HIM, HE IS WRONG AND YOU ARE RIGHT.

Pope says Jesus 'bigger' than World Cup

If you speak what you say must make sense or you are courting suffering and insanity.

There are things that are related and have correct connection eg you see two children standing together and you say the boy is bigger than the girl.

There are things that totally unrelated, have no comparisons eg Jesus compared with football and if there is no need to say that and you say it, you are foolishly courting suffering.

Why did the Pope say it?

Obviously he is in a soccer crazy country that is going to host the world cup and he tells Brazilians Jesus is bigger than football.

Just because you are in a soccer mad country that you want to convert to Christianity does not mean you have to say Jesus (food that does not perish) is bigger than football (food that perishes). Those who are obsessed with soccer, for whom soccer is religion are not open to conversion and as Jesus said, you cannot serve two masters, God and football. Either you are with Jesus or you are with football and that is not a case of Jesus being bigger than football, Jesus is true, football is phony.

Merger makes world's biggest ad firm

France's Publicis and US firm Omnicom announce a merger to create the world's biggest advertising company worth $35.1bn (£22.8bn).

Would you underestimate or overestimate the value of your firm to make you number one and obtain unfair advantage over rivals?

And so it is the tendency of firms to exaggerate how big they are rather than smaller than they are and these valuations are accepted indifferently by people whose eyes are blinded by greed and all this has serious repercussions on the system.

THE TRUE WEALTH IN THE SYSTEM IS FAR LESS THAN BOASTED, A LOT OF THE WEALTH OF COMPANIES LIKE AD FIRMS IS WHAT YOU CLAIM, IT MAY BE WORTHLESS IF THIS WORLD DO NOT NEED ADS. ALL THESE ARE CLAIMS ON THE COMMON WEALTH OF THE SYSTEM THAT SERVES TO DILUTE IT AND POSSESS IT.

HOW DO YOU VALUE ADVERTISEMENTS? THEY ARE JUST ARBITRARY CLAIMS. MICROSOFT WINDOWS IS PRICEY WHEN LINUX IS FREE AND MICROSOFT WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN KILLING OFF ALL RIVALS SO THAT IT MONOPOLIZED THE MARKET AND IT KEPT APPLE ALIVE BY INVESTING IN APPLE AT ONE STAGE TO GIVE THE SEMBLANCE OF COMPETITION.

MICROSOFT WAS THE GOLIATH AND APPLE THE PUNY DAVID TOTTERING ON EXTINCTION IN THE PAST.

If Windows 8 was $50:

I am not a software expert but I find a lot of crap in Windows 8 and Office that could be thrown out and a lot of developers would be jobless and you do not need to upgrade so often especially when some of the upgrades are worse not better.

Even at $50, the profit would be ‘handsome’ (considerable) and Microsoft may not be as fat as it is. If Apple paid Chinese workers a fair share for the hard work, Apple would not be so fat.

THUS A LOT OF THE WEALTH OF THE SYSTEM IS INFLATED, OPPORTUNIST PLUNDER BY THOSE WHO EXPLOIT THEIR POSITION, KILL OFF COMPETITORS TO GRAB AS MUCH WEALTH AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND PEOPLE LIKE BILL GATES AND STEVE JOBS HAVE PLACES IN HELL RESERVED FOR THEM.

New virus 'not following Sars' path'

The new Mers virus, which has killed half of those infected, is "unlikely" to reach the same scale as Sars, ministers in Saudi Arabia say.

Without seeing (not thinking) that this is so, you are not entitled to say that and if you say that, self resistance must be aroused that leads to stress and conditions you to resist everything you say or do.

One may say he is an expert in his field and based on the genetic profile of the virus and whatever reasoning he utilized, he comes to the conclusion the new virus will not follow the Sars path but that is not based on seeing but it is based on (false, deceptive) thinking, logic that may be faulty and tainted by emotion (prejudice).

IF YOU SAY SO BASED ON THINKING, BASED ON LOGIC (THAT MAY NOT BE TRUE BUT PROGRAMMED RULES) THEN YOU ARE SPEAKING WITHOUT KNOWING COURTING RESISTANCE AND STRESS AND THERE IS DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING MISLEADING CONFUSING OTHERS.

THE REASON PEOPLE SAY THAT IS NOT BECAUSE THEY SEE AND KNOW BUT THEY LIKE TO FALSELY REASSURE THEMSELVES AND OTHERS AND APPEAR EXPERT OR KNOWLEDGEABLE WHEN IT IS BASED ON DELUSION AND MAKE BELIEVE.

God sees and can tell you:

Whether the new virus will follow Sars path or not can be objectively known. God sees and can tell you but if you do not see but you say that based on thinking, based on reasoning, logic that is always programmed and false, then you are speaking without seeing and knowing and must thus stir resistance in self that leads to stress and you are guilty of misleading others.

High-powered team to probe shooting

The statement is always false and misleading.

You do not need a high powered team to probe shooting but you need a competent or experienced team.

TO INVESTIGATE A CRIME YOU NEED A COMPETENT OR EXPERIENCED NOT HIGH POWERED TEAM AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK YOU NEED A HIGH POWERED TEAM REFLECTS DELUSION THAT IS NOT HARMLESS BUT THE WAY TO WOE. THE REASON FOR TALKING ABOUT HIGH POWER IS TO HYPE, TO MAKE MUCH WHEN THERE IS NOTHING.

‘High powered’ is robot speak, can be rehashed for many situations to impress. Experienced team is a specific to the occasion speech.

MB Mukhriz makes his mark

If what somebody did or said is true and meaningful it is not to make his mark, if what is said or done made his mark, impressed others, it is never the truth and good except in your delusion.

MAKING YOUR MARK IS NOT THE CONSIDERATION OF THOSE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHO ONLY SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE TRUE, BENEFICIAL FOR SELF AND OTHERS, MAKING YOUR MARK (IF TRUE AS TOUTED) IS TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT WOULD IMPRESS OTHERS, MAKE THEM RESPECT YOU.

THE STATEMENT IS SAID IN DELUSION BY ONE WHO WORSHIPS STYLE, WHOSE MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED, IT IS INTENDED TO FLATTER THE PRAISED PERSON THAT HE HAS MADE HIS MARK, ‘WOW’. MAKING YOUR MARK IS NOT ABOUT TRUTH AND MEANING, IT IS ABOUT DOING AND SAYING THINGS THAT IMPRESS OTHERS.

Making your mark and resting on your laurels:

Both are hallmarks of those who are all show and little or no substance.

For those who are true and good there is no question or consideration about making your mark or resting on your laurels which are emotional considerations of people who are all show and no substance but it is about what is the matter at hand and what is the right thing to do or say with respect to.

ONLY ROBOTS DEDICATED TO PUTTING ON SHOWS IMPRESSING OTHERS TALK ABOUT MAKING THEIR MARKS AND RESTING ON THEIR LAURELS, THEY DO NOT CROSS THE MINDS OF THOSE WHO ARE NOT ROBOTS.

Making a name for themselves:

They themselves may not be aware about it but one of the prime aims of most people (apart from making money, satisfying their sensual needs) who are rehashing robots, is to make a name for themselves, making a mark is another way of saying making a name for themselves, making themselves famous and then they rest on their laurels or they are driven by obsession to make even better name for themselves until they drive themselves to destruction.

PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD, OR AT LEAST THOSE WHO ARE DOMINEERING GOATS ARE CONCERNED WITH MAKING A NAME (MARK) FOR THEMSELVES AND GRABBING AS MUCH AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE AND THEN THEY MAY BE SATISFIED AND REST ON THEIR LAURELS OR THEIR APPETITE FOR REPUTATION MAY BE INSATIABLE.

Our great cultural malaise

You may think you are clever but you are a fool heaping unnecessary future suffering on yourself.

‘Great’ is reserved only for things that are good and happy so you are wrongly attributing greatness to cultural malaise, something that is bad. You have to be sarcastic, mocking to speak of greatness in relation to cultural malaise and that has karma to be repaid as suffering that you ignore and defy to your own eternal chagrin.

A world obsessed with making marks:

This is a world obsessed with making marks, many dream of making a name for themselves be it as singer, actor, politician or whatever and others are obsessed, worship, adulate those who have made their marks.

This is delusional or meaningless, it is about doing and saying things, not what you say or do that is true and meaningful, that stir others, impress others, make them in awe of you and ends in insanity for those who have made their marks and those who are attracted to those who have made their marks.

MAKING A MARK OR MAKING A NAME FOR YOURSELF IS ABOUT DOING AND SAYING THINGS THAT STIR OTHERS TO BE ATTRACTED TO YOU, TO RESPECT YOU, TO BE EXCITED BY YOU AND BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT IS BLIND, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL, ALL THOSE WHO SEEK TO MAKE THEIR MARKS, ALL THOSE WHO APPLAUD THOSE WHO MADE MARKS ARE HEADED FOR THE SCRAP YARD OF ETERNITY NOT HEAVEN.

The Buddha said all is not self:

The Buddha said all is not self, even your consciousness, your feelings are not self, they are a trick and trap in even endless suffering and death, what that you should seek to make a name for self, to be famous, known widely.

YOU WOULD NOT MAKE A MARK, MAKE A NAME FOR YOURSELF, WANT TO BE FAMOUS IF YOU DID NOT HAVE SELF IDENTITY VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS (PLUS FAITH IN RITUALS AND RULES, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY) TO FUTURE WOE NOT SAFETY AND HAPPINESS. HE ALSO SAID WHOEVER MAKES AN ACQUISITION IN THIS WORLD IS HEADING FOR SUFFERING, MAKING A NAME FOR YOURSELF, WANTING TO BE FAMOUS TOO IS AN ACQUISITION THAT LEADS THAT FOOL TO WOE.

Bill Gates a shattered man:

When I see a current picture of Bill Gates, I see a shattered man with a heavy burden of suffering visible on his face and his eyes tells me he is in a daze, like a zombie.

You may see a different picture of Bill Gates but if I am correct then you have wrong view that is the path to hell or the animal womb says the Buddha.

London Luxury-Home Values to Rise 6% in 2013, Knight Frank Says

You will be a fool to extrapolate that to think the property market is bullish in UK, it reflects the dichotomy in the economy, the rich are very rich, have never been richer and they and their playthings, luxury houses and football clubs and expensive cars are still bullish, it is the rest that is getting poorer and poorer, sicker and sicker with time.

CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND THEIR BUSINESS CRONIES HAVE NOT BEEN IMPOVERISHED BY HARD TIMES, THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN RICHER IN THEIR LIVES, IT IS THE REST THAT ARE SUFFERING.

He is acquiring suffering and you praise him?

When a person makes a mark he is acquiring suffering and you praise him? You must be sick.

When a person praises you for acquiring suffering and you are delighted you must sick or deluded.

Acquiring a name (fame), wealth and children, treasures in this world is acquiring future woe said the Buddha and so if you praise others for doing so you are asking for suffering not merit.

Thus the hordes who congratulated and celebrated the birth of the prince are asking for suffering.

No matter how deluded and grand you perceive yourself, if you thank others for acquiring a son, even a prince, you must do so with resistance because you have nothing to be truly grateful about, that you can truly see as happiness in accepting their congratulations.

If you praise an MB for making his mark you are praising him for acquiring suffering and that has karma due to be experienced as future suffering.

If you praise a prince for acquiring a son and thus suffering you too are putting a noose of suffering around your neck. If you are grateful to others for their well wishes you too must do so with reservations, disquiet, resistance.

Doubting, you become uncertain:

Doubt and uncertainty are linked and it is one of three lower fetters the Buddha said led to future woe or suffering.

Without knowing something is true or false (eg Jesus is the son of God) you have no right to question or doubt it, you just do not know and if you question, never driven by genuine reason but by emotion, stirred force, resentment, ill will, attacking then this force driven doubt in time blinds you to what is true and false and you become uncertain, your mind is agitated by an inability to see and decide even when it is there to be seen and decided by those without uncertainty.

ONCE YOU HAVE DOUBTED, DISMISSED OR REJECTED WHAT YOU CANNOT AND DO NOT KNOW IS WRONG OR FALSE, YOU BECOME UNCERTAIN, UNSURE OF YOURSELF SINCE YOU HAVE PREJUDGED AND DISMISSED SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING AND IF YOU KEEP DOUBTING YOU KEEP BECOMING UNCERTAIN UNTIL IT BECOMES THE DEFAULT STATE AND THAT IS NEVER HAPPY OR SAFE BUT IT IS SUFFERING AND DANGEROUS, EXPOSES YOU TO HARM AND DEATH.

You like to question others?

There are many who like to question others, ask awkward questions, pester others with endless questions not realizing they are putting a noose around their necks that will strangle them.

I DO NOT QUESTION OTHERS, STRAIGTHAWAY I KNOW WHAT THEY SAY IS FALSE AND WHY IT IS FALSE AND SO WHY WOULD I NEED TO TROUBLE MYSELF TO QUESTION OTHERS? WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT HE SAYS IS FALSE, OR YOU DISLIKE AND REJECT IT AND TRY TO ATTACK HIM BY QUESTIONING HIM, YOU ARE PUTTING A NOOSE AROUND YOUR NECK.

THERE IS NEVER ANY NEED TO QUESTION OTHERS IF YOU ARE DISCERNING BECAUSE YOU WILL IMMEDIATELY SEE WHAT IS SAID TO YOU IS TRUE OR FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE, MAKES SENSE OR DOES NOT MAKE SENSE AND SO YOU SAVE YOURSELF THE TROUBLE OF QUESTIONING OTHERS, UNLESS YOUR PURPOSE IS TO ATTACK, TO MAKE LIFE DIFFICULT FOR OTHERS.

They don’t like and they don’t understand:

Stylish emotional people do not possess true understanding and so they never truly understand what is proposed to them and so they usually don’t like what is proposed to them especially when it is at variance to their fixed cherished world views and thus driven by no understanding and resentment (dislike) they are driven to question, to mock and insult and attack what is proposed to them not realizing they are putting their heads on the chopping board even for an eternity.

A person who truly understands and have no personal world views to uphold immediately see what is proposed to him as it actually is, true or deluded, plausible or implausible and thus seeing he does not need to question others and it is like stirring a hornet’s nest engaged in ‘debate’ with emotional deluded people and so he remains silent.

'If I'm happy, I'm drinking': Gangnam Style star Psy reveals alcohol problem in candid interview... and calls vodka his 'best friend'

One look at him and his antics I know there is a place in hell for him and so it is not a surprise to me he is hooked on alcohol that is like being hooked on a demon that will destroy his mind and make him do deeds (eg kill or rape) that incur further karma.

Pope: 'Who am I to judge' gay people?

How do you understand the pope’s statement?

He is questioning himself, casting doubt on himself and that is not good or wise. He is de facto passing the buck and that is not a valid reason for speaking which is either gay is good or bad.
There are suggestions that the Catholic church is infested with gays (as well as paedophiles) and so his statement may be sidestepping the unpalatable or there may be behind the scenes pressure on him to adopt certain stances or be conciliatory.

IF YOU ARE QUESTIONING YOURSELF, CASTING DOUBT ON YOURSELF AND YOU DO NOT REALIZE IT THEN YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU DO AND DOUBTING YOURSELF IS NOT HARMLESS BUT IT IS A FETTER TO WOE THE BUDDHA SAID.

I DO NOT HAVE TO DOUBT OR QUESTION OTHERS BECAUSE I CAN SEE AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IS PROPOSED TO ME AS RIGHT OR WRONG, SO WHAT IS THERE FOR ME TO QUESTION OR DOUBT?

Just say you are not qualified to judge gays:

There is never a need to cast doubt on yourself, if you see it as true you are not qualified to judge gay people then say so, ‘I am not qualified to judge gay people’. If you cannot see you are not qualified then you do not question whether you are qualified, you just do not know.

Pope Francis has said gay people should not be marginalised but integrated into society.

The Buddha said just as the sea does not tolerate dead bodies but it will cast them out, even so the community of the holy has no communion with those who are unclean and if gays and pedophiles are unclean they should be expelled from the Church just as Buddhism expel misbehaving monks and the Buddha refused to recite the Pattimokka because someone in the audience was impure. Just said he has come to set father against son, daughter against mother and that is not about compromising or tolerance. When the King appeared He asked how did a man without the proper gown get in and ordered that he be cast into the outer darkness.

No place for noncelibate monks let alone gays and pedophiles:

The Buddha laid down very clear guidelines for his monks and those who did not meet those guidelines are to be expelled, although it has decayed today.

THERE IS NO PLACE FOR NONCELIBATE MONKS IN BUDDHISM LET ALONE GAYS AND PEDOPHILES.

Why money is an abomination to God:

The acquisition of money is an abomination to God not because God is weird or a spoil sport or old fashioned but with reason and understanding.

No one is a master of his money but if money is important to him and he possesses much money, he is a slave of money that dictates what he does or says and it is suffering.

ALL MAKING MONEY WHETHER BY CROOK (STEALING, CHEATING) OR HOOK (ROBBERY, PLUNDER) OR WORK IS SUFFERING AND ONCE YOU HAVE ACQUIRED YOUR MONEY YOU BECOME ITS SLAVE, YOU ARE WORRIED THAT YOUR MONEY WILL BE LOST OR STOLEN.

THERE IS ANOTHER REALM (HEAVEN) WHERE THERE IS NO NEED OF MONEY, WHERE THERE IS NO NEED TO MAKE A LIVING AND EVERYTHING THE HEART’S DESIRE IS OBTAINED EFFORTLESSLY AND SO THE WISE PERSON WILL WASH HIS HANDS OFF THIS EVIL WORLD AND HEAD FOR HAPPINESS, FOR HEAVEN WHERE THERE IS NO MONEY TO DISPUTE AND TOIL OVER. IT IS BECAUSE OF MONEY THAT PEOPLE BECOME HYPOCRITICAL, TO GET MONEY, THEY SAY AND DO THINGS TO PANDER TO, PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS THAT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.

MONEY IS THE SOURCE OF MANY EVILS AND SUFFERING AND THE NATURE OF EXISTENCE IS SUCH THAT TRUE DEEP SATISFYING HAPPINESS (THE HIGHER STATES OF THE MIND) IS FREE AND CANNOT BE GOTTEN BY MONEY, IN FACT MONEY DISQUALIFIES THE PERSON FROM SUCH HAPPINESS.

YOU CANNOT SEE AND REFUSE TO BELIEVE BUT ALL ACQUISITION OF MONEY IS NOT HEALTHY AND ENDS IN SORROW AND DEATH AND ETERNAL HABITATIONS.

Premier League 'flops' unfairly written off

South American stars like Juan Sebastian Veron should not be discarded because they failed in England, says Tim Vickery

There is no need to categorize them as flop nor is it true and there is no need also to defend these ‘flops’ and so you are deluded to trouble yourself over senseless matters with insanity as your reward.

TO EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE THIS IS A SERIOUS MATTER, THEY FIND IT FULL OF MEANING AND YET OBJECTIVELY IT IS SENSELESS TO LABEL SOME PLAYERS AS FLOPS AND TO SPEAK TO DEFEND THEM.

China: Friend of foe?

Did China declare war on you? So why do ask if it is a foe?

China is China, not friend or foe and it reflects the programmed mind sets of people who do not realize they are robots that they need to categorize and pigeon hole objects and China into friend or foe which are never true or necessary. China has its vested interests which may by synergistic or antagonistic to yours in some areas and not others and it is silly and childish to accuse China of being an enemy if it opposes you in one area and to turn around and wrap your arm around China as friend if it meets your approval in another area.

ALL ROBOTS LIKE EVERYTHING IN BLACK OR WHITE, CATEGORIZED AND CONSIGNED TO MEMORY FOR REHASH AND SO THEY ROUTINELY ASK SILLY FALSE QUESTIONS LIKE CHINA, FRIEND OR FOE NOT REALIZING THEY WILL GO MAD.

Doubt is a program:

Doubt is actually a program just like computer programs and so you need to be a robot to doubt and thence become uncertain. People have been programmed well by themselves and others to doubt, to question, to not accept things alien that they do not like and with regular exercise of doubting they become well programmed to doubt and they do not even realize they are doubting themselves and others.

DOUBTING HAS A NATURE THAT CAN BE FULLY UNDERSTOOD BY THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING. I SAY DOUBTING IS A PROGRAM AND YOU NEED TO BE A ROBOT TO DOUBT AND ONCE YOU SUCCESSFULLY TRAIN OR PROGRAM YOURSELF TO DOUBT, YOU DOUBT EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN, YOU DOUBT YOURSELF, YOU DOUBT EVERYTHING.

Rubik's cube solved in 7.3 seconds

If you ‘teach’, tell me the steps that must be taken to ‘solve’ the cube and I keep practicing it, I would be pretty good at solving it.

People get excited, thrilled by such feats when they are feats of expert rehashing. Without having done it mindlessly many times in the past and mindlessly automatically rehashing it, these people cannot solve the cube so fast and so rather than marvellous it is ho hum, no big deal and because you think it is a big deal you have false perception and are deluded headed for insanity.

IGP says Sanjeevan’s friends shot him

(TMI) - The suspects behind the attempted murder of MyWatch chairman R Sri Sanjeevan could have been his own friends.
Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar said initial investigations had led police to this startling revelation.

Such a conclusion would be convenient and self serving because it absolves the police of complicity.

It is too early to jump to such conclusions, without clear evidence and charging anyone and so it reflects a unseemly haste to find an answer that only indicates a can of worms that vested interests may not want to see daylight.

YOU MAY BE RIGHT TO JUMP TO THAT (CONVENIENT) CONCLUSION BASED ON EVIDENCE YOU HAVE OR YOU MAY BE UNRIGHTEOUS, IF IT IS UNRIGHTEOUS, WHAT MIGHT THE REASON?

Why would his friends shoot him?

If his friends are at risk of being exposed by him and so he is a danger and they shot him then they cannot be his friends but enemies, surely he would know who he will be exposing and know they might want him killed not to treat them as friends.

If his friends who tried to kill him were paid, acted on orders from others to kill him then it is not his friends but those who paid them who wanted him killed.

IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE HIS FRIENDS WOULD WANT TO SILENCE HIM. IF THEY DID THEY MUST BE PAID BY SOMEONE TO KILL HIM IN WHICH CASE IT IS NOT HIS FRIENDS BUT THOSE WHO PAID HIS FRIENDS WHO ARE THE TRUE KILLERS.

It goes to show:

You must be gullible to buy the story his friends tried to kill him, most people who are sceptical do so on stirred dislike not reason or understanding. They give false reasons why they are sceptical.

It is preposterous that his friends tried to kill him, if they did, it must be on instruction of those in danger of being exposed and whilst you are still clueless, the shenanigans indicate the web of complicity and corruption is well entrenched and deep.

A PERSON WITH DISCERNMENT ON A CURSORY VIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS WILL SURMISE THAT CORRUPTION AND COMPLICITY IS RIFE AND DEEP.

The Jasbir Singh Chahl caper:

Recently the so called architect of the scandal and murder ridden Malaysian submarine deal was presented to the public and he declared he was even willing to swear on the holy book that the deal was clean, legitimate and Altanturya was not involved.

Let dead dogs lie, why are you so anxious to exonerate and it is futile?

Whatever he may say, it does not explain why Altanturya was killed by bodyguards of the deputy PM who claimed they were paid to kill, scapegoats for those who were not brought to court and she was alleged to be girl friend of Razak Baginda who was linked through Perimaker to the deal and it reaped a very handsome commission in the deal.

PEOPLE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING THINK WHAT THEY DO MAKE SENSE WHEN IT DOES NOT ADD UP. WHATEVER JASPAL SINGH AS ARCHITECT OF DEAL MIGHT SAY, STILL RAZAK BAGINDA THROUGH PERIMEKAR REAPED MILLIONS IN COMMISSION AND HE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED AS ALTANTURYA’S GIRL FRIEND AND THE BODYGUARDS WHO KILLED SAID THEY DID SO FOR MONEY AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE WERE NOT BROUGHT TO COURT. THESE ARE FACTS OF THE CASE THAT NO AMOUNT OF TESTIMONY BY JASPAL OR FRENCH AUTHORITIES CAN WHITEWASH.

Malaysian court audaciously pinned Altanturya’s murder on PM’s bodyguards?

OK the submarine deal was above board, you mean Malaysian courts dare charge and convict the deputy PM’s bodyguards and they charge his close associate Razak Baginda when he was entirely innocent?

THE GULLIBLE AND THOSE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING ARE VULNERABLE TO PERSUASION BUT THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND AND KNOW THE FACTS OF THE CASE THINK IT IS AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY, THE DEAL MAY BE CLEAN BUT ALTANTURYA’S MURDER IS A SORE THUMB, NOT CLEAN, CANNOT BE EXPLAINED.

Impossible the deputy PM will allow himself and his associates to be wrongly blamed for Altanturya’s death:

It cannot be denied Altanturya was taken away from Razak’s house and then murdered.

If the two policemen did not murder her, it is impossible the deputy PM would stand by so graciously and allow them to be falsely convicted of her murder.

If the two policemen killed her, surely they would have told their colleagues on whose order they carried it out, and their affidavit said they were paid to do it by people who were not brought to court.

FROM THE DAMAGING FALLOUT OF THIS CASE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE RULING ELITE WOULD PERMIT THEMSELVES TO BE LINKED TO THE MURDER IF IN TRUTH THEY WERE INNOCENT AND SO IT IS SENSELESS TRYING TO SANITIZE THE SUBMARINE DEAL BY BELATEDLY WHEELING OUT THE ARCHITECT OF THE DEAL WHO TRIES TO SELL HIS TESTIMONY BY SAYING HE IS WILLING TO SWEAR ON HIS HOLY BOOK LIKE SAIFUL.

Crimes that can and cannot be whitewashed:

For those who understand truly, they know there are cases that are amenable to whitewash and cases which are lost causes, un-whitewashable and so he desists.

For those without true understanding they think nothing is impossible to whitewash, they think their efforts are totally convincing (and the gullible are taken in) when there are glaring discrepancies.

The police will not allow it, the potentate will not allow it:

If the two policemen charged and convicted with killing Altanturya were truly innocent, would the police permit two of their brethren who are special bodyguards to be subject to such injustice? It is unthinkable that this would be so.

If the two policemen who are special bodyguards to the deputy PM and Razak Baginda who is a close associate were truly innocent, would the deputy PM permit them to stand trial and be permitted to be convicted or would he raise a stink, champion their causes?

Thus the fact that they were charged must indicate their involvement somehow in Altanturya’s death and so no matter how you might try to whitewash the affair, it is in vain for those who truly understand.

Botched exonerations automatically implicates:

If information tendered by those who are vested fails to exonerate the person it is evidence of an attempt to sanitize which implicates those who proffered the information.

Why is the information that Altanturya never entered France in the specified period presented to public knowledge and the supposed architect of the submarine deal vouching that the deal was entirely bona fide?

The purpose is to exorcise the ghost of and murder of Altanturya and with it official involvement in high places to the affair. If this fail to achieve exorcise, then it is evidence of an attempt to do so which perversely validates that a crime took place.

So what if Altanturya never entered France and the submarine deal was clean? Still she was taken away from the front of the house of Razak Baginda by two specialist bodyguards of the deputy PM and they were subsequently convicted of her murder and they issued statements that they were scapegoats for persons never brought to court.

IF THOSE INVOLVED IN THE DELUDED ATTEMPT TO PROPITIATE BY PROFFERING NEW INFORMATION UNDERSTAND THE MATTER THEY WILL REALIZE ALL THESE NEW INFORMATION TENDERED ARE BESIDE THE POINT, DOES NOT EXONERATE ANYONE OF INVOLVEMENT IN ALTANTURYA’S MURDER. IT IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY MAKE A FOOL OF THEMSELVES, WASTE A LOT OF MONEY (EG BRIBING THE ARCHITECT) AND INADVERTENTLY IMPLICATE THEMSELVES.