Because
it is a nonsensical statement you are courting insanity and will get it.
First of
all, thinking is never free, work must be done and force used that creates
suffering and all emotional people are never masters but slaves of their
thinking which is basically mindless uncontrollable rehash of permutation of
the same thoughts in the same person that differ from others.
Secondly
you cannot stop or restrict a person from thinking as the statement suggests.
It is physically impossible to decide that a person can think of A but not B
which is off bound, you can think of love but you must not think about sex.
Finally
whilst thinking is unsavoury, you are not allowed to call it the greatest crime
of all, however evil your thinking it harms yourself not others but telling
lies, hitting someone and killing harms others and so are even more evil.
EVIL
THOUGHTS NEVER KILL OTHERS, IT IS PHYSICAL ACTIONS, ABUSE OF OTHERS THAT HARM
THEM WITH KARMA DUE AND SO YOU ARE ASKING FOR JUDGMENT CHAMPIONING FREE
THINKING AS THE GREATEST CRIME OF ALL.
NO ONE
CAN IMPOSE TRUE LIMITS ON OTHERS, ON THE POPULACE THAT THEY CAN THINK OF A BUT
NOT B AND SO YOU ARE TALKING NONSENSE AND WILL GO MAD. YOU CAN POLICE THE
ACTIONS OF PEOPLE BUT YOU CANNOT POLICE THE THOUGHTS OF OTHERS NOR ARE THEY
MASTERS WHO CAN CHOOSE WHAT THEY CAN THINK AND NOT THINK.
YOU ARE
NOT FREE TO SAY WHAT YOU PLEASE BUT WHAT YOU SAY MUST MAKE SENSE OTHERWISE YOU
ARE ASKING FOR SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT FOR MISLEADING OTHERS.
The man
who speaks of unrealistic or realistic has wrong understanding.
It is not
a matter of realistic and so you implement it but it is a matter whether it is
true or false, useful or useless, beneficial or harmful that you carry or do
not carry it out.
ANYONE
WHO WOULD BASE HIS ACTIONS ON THE SEIVE OF REALISM OR UNREALISM HAS WRONG VIEW.
IT IS NOT THAT IT IS UNREALISTIC THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERTAKE IT BUT IS IT RIGHT
OR WRONG, MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS, HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL?
THE MAN
OF TRUTH DOES NOT SPEAK OF ‘MAYBE’, EITHER IT IS UNREALISTIC OR NOT, THERE IS
NO ‘MAYBE’ BUT BECAUSE UNREALISTIC IS SUBJECTIVE, A FALSE CONSIDERATION, IT
LEADS TO QUALIFICATION OF ‘MAYBE’.
LKY implies 1M is good but ‘maybe’ unrealistic:
LKY is
‘diplomatic’ trying not to offend and what he is trying to say is that he
appreciates the ideals of 1M but he has doubts, he thinks it MAYBE unrealistic
(I said maybe not is).
But
whether 1M or 1 Israel or whatever is show or substance, meaningful or
meaningless is objective and if you get it wrong you are deluded.
LKY is dismissing the opposition:
Quote:
PETALING JAYA: Malaysians hoping that Barisan Nasional’s 1Malaysia concept can
usher in a new era for race relations may be unrealistic, but those counting on
the Opposition to do the same are not very much less so, said Lee Kuan Yew.
Whether
he is right or correct to dismiss the opposition’s credentials can be known and
if it is wrong, there are consequences in terms of debt to be repaid. Jesus
said do not judge others lest you will be judged.
THUS IT
IS CLEAR TO THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING WHICH PARTY SINGAPORE PREFERS TO RUN
MALAYSIA.
Pakatan Rakyat better than replacing Republicans with Democrats:
LKY
thinks PR can do no better than BN. I say PR will be even better than replacing
the Republicans with the Democrats. American politics is cynical and self
serving, neither party is good for America, only for their vested interests eg
the rich is the constituency of Republicans and they only want tax cuts.
10 rules for managing your
penis
Recent
news stories involving sexting, wine, toasters, politicians and penises
indicate some men need a refresher course, so here are my 10 rules
for keeping your penis out of trouble
The
Buddha said faith in rules and rituals is one of three lower fetters to future
woe.
In order
to follow rules first you must formulate them, remember them and then model
your behaviour according to your rules in which you are ceding control of
yourself foolishly to rules. Those who are not robots do not obey rules, they
understand what is the matter at hand and what is the correct thing to do.
IF YOU
THINK NOTHING ABOUT RULES AND OBEYING THEM THEN YOU UNDERSTAND WRONGLY THAT HAS
FATAL CONSEQUENCES FOR YOU. RULES ARE INDISCRIMINATE INSTRUCTIONS FOR A VARIETY
OF SITUATIONS THAT MAY OCCUR AND ONLY REHASHING ROBOTS SUBSCRIBE TO RULES, LOOK
TO RULES TO GUIDE THEM.
They are sticklers or never obey their rules:
People
who are robots have many rules in their heads, rules for this or that, they
forget or confuse their rules, they become obsessed or sticklers or fussy about
their rules or they forget their rules or they go ga ga and forget their rules
once they see a voluptuous girl or money waved in front of them.
IF YOU
KEEP COLLECTING AND CARRYING OUT RULES YOU WILL GO MAD AND SO IT IS AS THE
BUDDHA SAID, RULES DELIVER THE FOOL TO FUTURE WOE NOT HEAVEN. RULES ARE NEVER
NEEDED IF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING AND THUS WHAT IS THE RIGHT THING TO
DO FOR THAT OCCASION.
If your
company is sound, well run and its share price is reasonable not excessive
based on speculative or potential gains that may not be realized why would you
care what the Fed will or will not do?
And so it
is only because your company is not sound, it may need financing or rolling
credit to run, it has much debt, its shares are optimistically or overpriced,
its health is dependent on largesse from consumers or it is risky that you are
anxious, looking over your shoulders for potential adverse news.
And so
the economy and companies are living at the limits, overpriced presumptuously
and dependent on excessive unaffordable consumption that it is always cagey and
this does not augur well for economic safety or health longterm.
What is
expressed by LKY are his views and they are not like it is except in your
delusion.
If what
LKY expresses is not what it actually is then you are either deluded that is
the path to torment or you are misleading others with debt to be repaid as
suffering.
LKY like
Dr M has a penchant for writing books, ‘setting the record straight’ that is
also lucrative, it taps the base of popularity and so if you set your record
straight and make money doing it then if you what you say is wrong there is
also karmic reward in happiness or suffering that you ignore to your future
woe.
WHAT LKY
SAYS IS NEVER TELLING IT LIKE IT IS BUT ACCORDING TO HIS PERCEPTIONS AND SO
ONLY SOMEONE WHO IS DELUDED, DRIVEN BY
EMOTION OR WHO DOES NOT EXAMINE OR UNDERSTAND WHAT HE SAYS WILL SAY THAT.
Only a
deluded person would utter that.
A person
with true understanding, who sees things as they actually are, does not need
life lessons from others to tell what he ought to do or not do and so if you
need life lessons from others, you see nothing wrong with subscribing to life lessons
it means you do not truly understand and see things as they actually and all
life lessons are rules that never deliver you from suffering.
That you
think there are some who are likely sources of life lessons and others who are
not reflect prejudice, programmed false expectations that some are rich mines
of life lessons and others should be deserts of life lessons.
IT IS A
PRESUMPTION THAT IS OBVIOUSLY BY ADMISSION FALSE IN THAT YOU ADMIT THE DUO ARE
UNLIKELY SOURCES OF LIFE LESSONS. YOU DON’T NEED LIFE LESSONS FROM OTHERS TO
GUIDE YOUR CONDUCT, ALL YOU NEED IS TO TRULY UNDERSTAND THE NATURE OF YOUR
CONDUCT WHETHER IT IS MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS (DANCING, SINGING, SMOKING,
SCREWING AROUND), TRUE OR FALSE, HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL.
BECAUSE
EVERYTHING THAT YOU CAN DO OR HAPPEN CAN BE OBJECTIVELY IRREFUTABLY
DIFFERENTIATED INTO MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS, HARMFUL OR HARMLESS, TRUE OR
FALSE, YOU DO NOT NEED ANY LIFE LESSONS UNLESS YOU ARE UNDISCERNING.
Only robots subscribe to life lessons:
In order
to have life lessons you must study the lives of others, try to glean out
lessons, remember those lessons and use those lessons as basis for your own
conduct which means you are subjugating yourself to those lessons, you are
basing your behaviour according to those remembered and rehashed lessons.
If you
wish to escape stress you must only speak what you see and know it is true. How
does the SM know what he said is true, he is saying it on the prestige of his
status driven by emotion to stir emotion as if it is so bad, so intransigent
even a baby bonus won’t help because it is driven by emotion not truth, it must
be accompanied by self resistance that leads to stress and conditions you to
speak with stirred resistance that traps you in the prison of stress.
ANYONE
WHO OFFERS BONUSES FOR HAVING MORE BABIES IS ASKING FOR KARMA, IT IS A FORM OF
BRIBERY AND HAVING BABIES FOR THE WRONG REASONS. WITHOUT SEEING IT IS TRUE AND
IF YOU WISH TO BE FREE OF STRESS AND SELF RESISTANCE YOU MUST NOT SAY IT, SAY
EVEN A BABY BONUS WILL NOT HELP.
A BABY
BONUS IS IRRELEVANT TO THE ISSUE AND IF YOU THINK IT IS RELEVANT YOU HAVE FALSE
PERCEPTION.
Is it an excuse or genuine?
If you
are sincere in fostering local population then you should not offer a one time
baby bonus but undertake free child support (eg monthly $1000) and education
and healthcare.
Thus what
is said may not be so much there is no way to boost local population but the
government is not really interested; it prefers readymade imports.
IF THE
GOVERNMENT WAS TRULY INTERESTED IN BOOSTING THE LOCAL BIRTH RATE IT SHOULD
UNDERTAKE MEANINGFUL CHILD SUPPORT LIKE FREE EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE, EVEN MONTHLY
SUBSIDY. HENCE WHAT IS SAID MAY BE AN EXCUSE FOR LOOKING ELSEWHERE FOR
POPULATION GROWTH.
''Ludicrous'' for Liverpool
to agree Luis Suarez transfer to Arsenal claims Kop chief Henry
There are
never true reasons, only false reasons why it is ludicrous and so you are
exercising false logic and perception that ends in mad logic and perception and
you have debt for wanting others to share your controlled insanity.
There are
no true reasons why Liverpool cannot sell to Arsenal and whatever reasons are
false eg pride, wanting to sabotage rival. Ludicrous is about stirring of
mental force to be incredulous, upset, angry and there are no reason to be
ludicrous which is meaningless and harmful to self.
Respect
has a nature that can be fully understood by everyone. Respect is never about
what is meaningful but it is for show, it is about saying and doing things, how
you say or do things that gives an impression to the receiving party that you
like him, you worship or are in awe of him. This is actually all about show and
it is contrived and stressful, conflicting to conjure and cannot be maintained
indefinitely and is accompanied by bottled resentment and animosity.
THE
RESPECT THAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DEMAND IS ARTIFICIAL, CONTRIVED, FOR SHOW AND
IMPOSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN FOREVER BECAUSE IT DEMANDS WORK, IS TIRING, MEANINGLESS IT
MUST HARBOUR HIDDEN ANGER AND TENSION WITH SELF AND OTHERS. IT IS TOTALLY
UNNECESSARY, WHAT YOU NEED IS GOODWILL, NO ILL WILL EXPRESSED OR HIDDEN FOR
OTHERS.
RESPECT
IS NOT GOODWILL, IF YOU THINK THEY ARE SYNONYMOUS YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR DELUDED.
IT IS GOODWILL, AS THE BUDDHA EXHORTED THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE TOWARDS ALL OTHERS.
Malaysians should have goodwill for each other:
Malaysians
should train themselves to have goodwill for each other, to not harbour or
express animosity, harmfulness for each other. Jesus said turn the other cheek
not respect your assailant.
What a
person says reflects on his nature and so it is people in this world are
undiscerning, do not understand what is said to them and so they fail to
discern the true natures of those who speak to them.
IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO CHEAT OR DECEIVE A MAN WHO IS DISCERNING, A PERSON’S TRUE NATURE
IS EXPOSED BY HIS ACTIONS AND SPEECH AND IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE DO NOT TRULY
UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE IN DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY ABOUT OTHERS.
Your speech and actions always mirrors your nature:
It is
impossible for a person’s speech and actions to be at variance or odd with his
nature, always a person’s speech and actions mirrors, reflects his true nature
and it is lack of discernment of the perceiving person that makes him perceive
incorrect what is bad is good and what is good (Jesus and the Buddha) as
rubbish.
IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON’S SPEECH AND ACTIONS TO BE AT ODDS WITH HIS NATURE BUT
ALWAYS A PERSON’S SPEECH AND ACTIONS DISPLAY FOR ALL TO SEE THE NATURE OF THE
PERSON. MANY THINK THEY ARE QUITE GOOD BUT THEY ARE IN DANGER OF HAVING THEIR
HEADS CHOPPED EVEN COUNTLESS TIMES ETERNALLY AND THEY ARE COMPLACENT, THINK
THEY ARE HEADING FOR SAFETY.
Suarez is
not leaving is not the same as Suarez is going nowhere or will not be sold and
so you are speaking carelessly to exaggerate heading for woe not safety.
MANY
THINK THEY SPEAK THE TRUTH, THEY KNOW THE TRUTH AND CAN SPEAK THE TRUTH BUT
THEY ARE DELUDED, ‘SUAREZ GOING NOWHERE’ IS NOT THE TRUTH, ‘SUAREZ NOT LEAVING
LIVERPOOL’ IS THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER. EVEN IF HE IS NOT LEAVING LIVERPOOL HE
CAN BE GOING ON LOAN, GOING ON LEAVE, IF HE DIES SUDDENLY HE MAY BE GONE FOREVER.
‘SUAREZ
GOING NOWHERE’ IS A WAY OF PUTTING SOMETHING, IT IS A STYLED STATEMENT NOT
WITHOUT PURPOSE BUT TO STIR EMOTIONS, TO EXAGGERATE.
That is
nonsense. There is a lot of criminality involved in banking behaviour both in
UK and US (also Japan during the height of its boom) and this need to be purged
from the system and those who were criminal should be prosecuted, jailed.
HE IS
BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE NOT WITHOUT REASON. THERE WAS A LOT OF GROSS
MISCONDUCT BY BANKERS AND THIS IS CONTINUING AND THOSE WHO DID WRONG HAVE
ESCAPED VIRTUALLY WITHOUT PUNISHMENT.
Just as doctors protect their own, so do bankers:
Just as
doctors (and lawyers and police) protect their own kinds, disciplinary hearings
are for extreme cases, so too, bankers protect their own kinds and try to sweep
under the carpet as far as possible and so many bankers have been sent off with
golden parachutes after they made a mess of the banks they run.
Do you think bankers are blameless in the global crisis?
Do you
think bankers including Fed chairmen Greenspan and Bernanke were impeccable,
cannot be faulted for the system threatening financial and economic crisis
engulfing the world that would have been worse without the massive desperate
money printing engineered by helicopter Bernanke (in itself a wrongdoing)?
If
bankers are very much to blame, may be instrumental for things to come to such
a devastating state, have the bankers been brought to account or have they been
given a slap on the wrist or even less?
AS THEY
SAY, PHYSICIAN, HEAL THYSELF, IF BANKERS ARE SICK AND HAVE NOT HEALED
THEMSELVES, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEY CAN NOW HEAL THE COMATOUS PATIENT.
By Benjamin Kang Lim
and Ben Blanchard
What is
said may be true or it may be crap, it is business as usual, a changing of
guard, one crook down, who is next to arise?
YOU MUST
BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU SAY, IF YOU TRUMPET IT AS A PIVOTAL MOMENT WHEN IT IS HO
HUM, BUSINESS AS USUAL THEN THERE IS DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING. THOSE
OPPOSITE XILAI ARE NO ANGELS.
Respect is always for show, goodwill is never for show:
In order to
have respect for someone you must show it, it must be said and done in what you
say or do or how you say or do in a subordinating way.
RESPECT
IS ALL ABOUT SHOW, NEVER SUBSTANCE AND SO IT IS WORSHIPPED BY THOSE WHO ARE ALL
ABOUT SHOW, THEIR STYLES ARE ALWAYS FOR SHOW AND WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS FOR
SHOW FOR ULTERIOR MOTIVES.
Goodwill
is never for show, when a person does not harbour ill will, a wish to harm or
attack others and in addition he has desire to benefit and make others happy or
help them he has goodwill.
GOODWILL
IS NEVER FOR SHOW, IT IS WHEN A PERSON DOES NOT HARBOUR DESIRE TO ATTACK AND
HARM OTHERS, HE WANTS TO MAKE OTHERS HAPPY OR ASSIST THEM THAT HE HAS GOODWILL.
THUS IF
RESPECT IS MEANINGFUL TO YOU, YOU TALK ABOUT SHOWING AND WANTING RESPECT, YOU
ARE AN EMPTY FOR SHOW PERSON HEADING FOR WOE NEVER SAFETY.
Goodwill cannot be for show:
Goodwill
cannot be for show, it is impossible goodwill is for show because in order to
have goodwill you must not harm or attack others, must not try to make life
difficult for others, trouble or bother others and you must wish to make others
happy and assist them.
You can
try to fake goodwill but faked goodwill cannot be passed as true goodwill if
the recipient is discerning, only the gullible are vulnerable to be conned.
On the
other hand, respect must always be fake, for show because it is impossible for
anyone to be naturally truly in awe, fear, deferential, subordinating. People
act submissive to a king for fear of his life rather than truly.
IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO TRULY RESPECT ANOTHER. THERE ARE CULTURAL DIFFERENCES
IN HOW RESPECT IS SHOWN AND IT IS CONDITIONED, PROGRAMMED, ALWAYS FOR SHOW,
SUFFERING AND TENSION INDUCING.
Fawning over a pretty girl or rich man is never goodwill:
A smitten
man may fawn over a girl or many people will surround a prime minister but
these, for the discerning is never goodwill but motivated behaviour, motivated
by gains and if the behaviour is examined, eg smiling at everything the pretty
girl says or does, smiling in approval at anything the PM says, it is in truth
not good but to in evil flatter.
SOME
PEOPLE CAN ACT VERY HELPFUL BUT THAT IS NEVER GOODWILL BECAUSE IT IS TARGETTED
BEHAVIOR. IN FACT THE BEHAVIOR ITSELF (EG SMILING AND EAGER AND ANXIOUS) IS NOT
GOOD BUT BAD FOR SELF AND THE RECIPIENT.
It is goodwill never respect that is the way to heaven:
It is
goodwill or loving kindness never respect that the Buddha said led to one
eternity in heaven.
Metta Sutta:
Good Will
"Monks,
for one whose release of awareness through good will
is cultivated, developed, pursued, given a means of transport, given a
grounding, steadied, consolidated, and well-undertaken, eleven benefits can be
expected. Which eleven?
"One
sleeps easily, wakes easily, dreams no evil dreams. One is dear to human
beings, dear to non-human beings. The devas protect one. Neither fire, poison,
nor weapons can touch one. One's mind gains concentration quickly. One's
complexion is bright. One dies unconfused and -- if penetrating no higher -- is
headed for the Brahma worlds.
"These
are the eleven benefits that can be expected for one whose release of awareness
through good will is cultivated, developed, pursued, given a means of
transport, given a grounding, steadied, consolidated, and
well-undertaken."
Puggala Sutta: Persons (excerpt)
"Here, bhikkhus, a certain person abides with his heart imbued with loving-kindness extending over one quarter, likewise the second quarter, likewise the third quarter, likewise the fourth quarter, and so above, below, around, and everywhere, and to all as to himself; he abides with his heart abundant, exalted, measureless in loving-kindness, without hostility or ill-will, extending over the all-encompassing world."He finds gratification in that, finds it desirable and looks to it for his well-being; steady and resolute thereon, he abides much in it, and if he dies without losing it, he reappears among the gods of a High Divinity's retinue.
"Now the gods of a High Divinity's retinue have a life-span of one aeon. An ordinary person [who has not attained the Noble Eightfold Path] stays there for his life-span; but after he has used up the whole life-span enjoyed by those gods, he leaves it all, and [according to what his past deeds may have been] he may go down even to hell, or to an animal womb, or to the ghost realm. But one who has given ear to the Perfect One stays there [in that heaven] for his life-span, and after that he has used up the whole life span enjoyed by those gods, he eventually attains complete extinction of lust, hate and delusion in that same kind of heavenly existence.
"It is this that distinguishes, that differentiates, the wise hearer who is ennobled [by attainment of the Noble Path] from the unwise ordinary man, when, that is to say, there is a destination for reappearance [after death, but an Arahant has made an end of birth].
Can you speak like the Buddha?
OK the
Buddha is a fake, you are genuine. But can you speak so orderly without breaks
or stammering or stuttering or preparation like the Buddha did?
Anyone
who is discerning will know it is IMPOSSIBLE for a fake to speak like the
Buddha.
Puggala Sutta: Persons (excerpt)
"Here, bhikkhus, a certain person abides with his heart imbued with loving-kindness extending over one quarter, likewise the second quarter, likewise the third quarter, likewise the fourth quarter, and so above, below, around, and everywhere, and to all as to himself; he abides with his heart abundant, exalted, measureless in loving-kindness, without hostility or ill-will, extending over the all-encompassing world."He finds gratification in that, finds it desirable and looks to it for his well-being; steady and resolute thereon, he abides much in it, and if he dies without losing it, he reappears among the gods of a High Divinity's retinue.
"Now the gods of a High Divinity's retinue have a life-span of one aeon. An ordinary person [who has not attained the Noble Eightfold Path] stays there for his life-span; but after he has used up the whole life-span enjoyed by those gods, he leaves it all, and [according to what his past deeds may have been] he may go down even to hell, or to an animal womb, or to the ghost realm. But one who has given ear to the Perfect One stays there [in that heaven] for his life-span, and after that he has used up the whole life span enjoyed by those gods, he eventually attains complete extinction of lust, hate and delusion in that same kind of heavenly existence.
"It is this that distinguishes, that differentiates, the wise hearer who is ennobled [by attainment of the Noble Path] from the unwise ordinary man, when, that is to say, there is a destination for reappearance [after death, but an Arahant has made an end of birth].
Colonies
of bacteria balance growth against risk, just like financial investors,
ecologists have found.
If your
interest is stirred to find out then you are gullible because it is rubbish,
driven by delusion than truth.
You don’t
need bacteria to teach you lessons about the economy, you need to understand
the economy truly and if you don’t understand the economy truly as it is
possible then all the lessons from bacteria and what not is not the answer.
If you
live well within your means as it is possible and that does not necessarily
mean deprivation then you are safe, not in danger of collapse. If you must live
way beyond your means, live riskily fuelled by debt, recklessly utilizing
savers’ money deposited in banks then no amount of lessons will safeguard you
from collapse.
AS LONG
AS A COMMUNITY LIVES SAFELY WELL WITHIN ITS MEANS AND CAREFULLY SAFEGUARDS ITS
SAVINGS IN BANKS, THERE IS NO DANGER OF COLLAPSE SO WHAT LESSONS WOULD YOU NEED
FROM BACTERIA? SO LONG AS YOU LIVE WELL BEYOND YOUR MEANS FUELLED BY DEBT,
EXHAUSTING THE SAVINGS OF PEOPLE DEPOSITED IN BANKS YOU ARE HEADING FOR CERTAIN
DISASTER THAT NO AMOUNT OF LESSONS FROM BACTERIA OR WHATEVER CAN ASSUAGE. IF
WHAT I SAY IS CORRECT THEN THE PROPONENT IS DELUDED AND HEADING FOR INSANITY
AND WOE FOR MISLEADING OTHERS.
The rat race and what it means:
The
landlord says his shop office is now worth more than a million and so the
rental should rise commensurately but business is down for almost everyone;
there is a mismatch between ever rising valuation and yield, most renting
businesses are not doing roaring business that justifies them paying ever
rising rent and many may be forced to close shop.
Even if
renters can afford to pay accelerating rent it may not be true gain but
inflation, he is forced to charge more because his overheads are higher.
And so it
now comes to a crunch, crisis, dilemma, unless property values drop drastically
and yields or rentals fall, you will see a standoff wherein many businesses
die, many descend into joblessness and poverty whilst rich property owners
stare at their beautiful vacant overpriced assets. If asset prices fall there
will be serious repercussions, those who speculated on property may get their
fingers (even bodies) burnt, money that bankers lent to finance may be lost and
so the financial system and economy may be faced with a no win situation, the
only winners are those who have sold off their property at high prices,
developers who have made fat killings selling overpriced property to greedy
gullible buyers.
This mess
cannot be solved without mass destruction and pain and it is because of the
evil of capitalism and corruption. Anyone who thinks the politicians and the
bankers can guide the populace out of this mess is deluded.
IF YOU
THINK THIS IS AS BAD AS IT GETS YOU ARE DELUDED. THIS IS MERELY THE PROTRACTED
DESCENT (CAUSED BY FURIOUS MONEY PRINTING) ENDING IN A CRASH AND MAYHEM.
The wealth is mostly illusion, the debt is real and worse:
The
wealth you see around is largely illusion, arbitrary will-driven rapid asset
(property, shares, commodities, services) price increases that have little or
no basis, are not supported by actual system wealth increase that virtually
transfer common wealth into the hands of the privileged few whose assets are in
demand at the expense of the system.
The debt
in the system is very real and much underestimated, may far exceed what is
acknowledged. Most if not all savers have lost their money, recklessly lent
out.
THE
WEALTH IN THE SYSTEM TODAY IS MOSTLY ILLUSION, NOT BACKED BY ACTUAL WEALTH AND
THE SYSTEM CANNOT SUSTAIN IT INDEFINITELY. THE DEBT IN THE SYSTEM IS VERY REAL
AND VERY BIG, FAR MORE THAN IS CONCEDED AND IT WILL CRUSH THE SYSTEM AND
EVERYONE.
A Malaysian moment
Posted on
7 August 2013 - 09:28pm
Balan
Moses
AS WE awake to the sound of the Takbir
Raya this Hari Raya morning, I am prompted to remember who we are as
Malaysians.
The
Buddha said, to one who sees (correctly) there is nothing. No moment is worthy
of note, what more that it should be noted as a Malaysian moment. It is never
true reason or seeing that is the basis of what is stated but it is stirred
force, stirred pride, to boast and because there is no such thing as a
‘Malaysian’ moment, he is dicing with mad perception and he has debt fostering
the same in others.
He is
blaming Putin and Russia for strained relations, yet he himself and the US is
far from blameless and so he is sticking his neck out foolishly for the chop
speaking thus.
RUSSIA
AND PUTIN ARE NO ANGELS BUT NEITHER IS THE US AND OBAMA AND BECAUSE HE BLAMES
RUSSIA AND PUTIN HE IS PUTTING HIMSELF FOR JUDGMENT FOR PAIN IF HE IS WRONG TO
POINT HIS FINGER.
Not just useless but inciting and divisive:
What
Obama said that Russia and Putin is at fault is not only useless, it serves no
useful purpose to speak thus, it is divisive and stirs resentment and so he is
creating debt not merit for himself.
IF WHAT
YOU SAY IS USELESS AND UNNECESSARY AND YOU SAY IT, YOU ARE COURTING INSANITY
AND SUFFERING. IT IS BEST TO REMAIN SILENT.
IF WHAT
YOU SAY INCITES OTHERS AND DIVIDE OTHERS TO BLAME RUSSIA AND PUTIN WHEN YOU
YOURSELF IS NOT WITHOUT FAULT IN THE MATTER THEN YOU ARE ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT.
Something
is either true or it is false, there is no such thing as partly true and partly
false.
Something
is either is good or it is bad, there is no such thing as partly good and
partly bad.
Jesus
said a bad tree cannot bear good fruit and if you think it can then either
Jesus is wrong or you are deluded.
People
say somebody is part right and wrong to pander to others, to appease and not
upset others or they are deluded, they think in delusion everything is relative
there is no such thing as absolute right and wrong.
Whatever
has wrong is totally wrong, it is impossible what is right to have part wrong. If
examined, what you accept as part right is also wrong.
THERE IS
A PRICE FOR DELUSION AND IT IS SUFFERING AND INSANITY AND SO IF YOU ARE DELUDED
IN SAYING SOMETHING IS PARTLY RIGHT AND PARTLY WRONG THEN SUFFERING EVEN FOR AN
ETERNITY IS YOUR LOT.
Modern but not necessarily better:
You would
have thought they would have worked out how to design a functional proper can
opener but no, they are modern but stupid.
I bought
this can opener that can pass off as designed by Apple, all minimalist, all
metal with sleek ovoid cylindrical handle but when you try to use it, it is
terrible, the grip is poor and you struggle to puncture the can.
YOU THINK
MODERN MAN IS CLEVER BUT HE IS STUPID, DEVOTED TO STYLE OVER FUNCTION. IF THE
MAKER HAS TESTED HIS ‘BEAUTIFUL MINIMALIST’ CAN OPENER OUT, SURELY HE WOULD
NOTICE THE GRIP IS BAD AND IT IS DIFFICULT TO PUNCTURE A CAN WITH IT.
MODERN
MAN HAS SACRIFICED FUNCTION ON THE ALTAR OF STYLE IN ALL AREAS LIKE CARS,
COMPUTERS AND AEROPLANES SO THAT THEY MAY BE SAFETY HAZARDS RATHER THAN ‘FAIL’
SAFER AS TOUTED.
Anwar is
deluded and has a wrong perception of truth. There is nothing old or new about
his mindset which implies his views were OK in olden times but times have
changed and it is now OUTDATED. Time has changed but truth never changes and
remains the same.
FALSITY
AND LIES MAY BECOME OUTDATED (OLD LIES MAY NOT WORK TODAY AND YOU NEED NEW
LIES) BUT WHAT IS TRUE AND GOOD REMAINS TRUE AND GOOD ALWAYS.
LKY is
not trapped in the old mindset as touted by Anwar but the truth is the senior
minister is deluded now and in the past. It is only possible for a person to
have a mindset if he is a robot and that mindset is his programming like Apple
iOs or Android or Chrome or Win 8 and so LKY is a robot according to Anwar.
Actually Anwar too is a robot without true understanding.
LEE KUAN
YEW IS EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG, IN TRUTH HE WAS WRONG ALL ALONG. IF YOU THINK HIS
MINDSET WAS CORRECT IN THE OLDEN DAYS BUT IT IS DATED OR ANACHRONISTIC FOR
MODERN TIMES YOU ARE DELUDED.
OLD
MINDSET IMPLIES HIS VIEWS WERE OK FOR THE PAST BUT NOT OK TODAY. WHAT IS NOT OK
IN THE PAST IS NOT OK TODAY.
Trapped in old mindset is not a correct response:
You and
Anwar see nothing wrong with Anwar’s answer because you and he both do not
possess true understanding.
That LKY
is trapped in the old mindset is meaningless, senseless, evasive not the
correct answer and Anwar is wiser to refrain from answering.
The
correct answer is LKY is correct or wrong (and why), what he says is true or
false, beneficial or harmful. Any answer that does not embrace these
considerations is controlled (unconscious) insanity that ends in insanity.
IF YOU
WANT TO ANSWER THE QUESTION, SAY LKY IS CORRECT OR WRONG AND GIVE THE REASONS
WHY, DON’T TALK ABOUT BEING TRAPPED IN OLD MINDSET WHICH IS AN EXCUSE AND FALSE
REPLY WITH DEMERIT.
Anwar trying to be polite, skirting question:
Many, not
just Anwar do not realize their answers are evasive, they try to be polite and
avoid saying what they actually think and so they say ‘diplomatically’ LKY is
trapped in old mindset.
SKIRTING
A QUESTION AND AVOIDING SAYING WHAT YOU THINK IS SIN AND TRAINS YOURSELF IN
FALSE LOGIC THAT MAY ONE DAY KILL YOU. IT IS ASCRIBING FALSE REASONS TO THINGS
HAPPENING AND HENCE ACCORDING TO ANWAR, THE REASON LKY SAYS WHAT HE IS SAYING
IS NOT BECAUSE HE IS DELUDED BUT HE IS TRAPPED IN OLD MINDSET AND THEREFORE LKY
IS EXCUSED.
IT DOES
NOT MATTER IF IT IS OLD MINDSET BUT IF WHAT YOU SAY IS WRONG YOU ARE
ACCOUNTABLE IN DIVINE TERMS.
I correctly surmised Singapore prefers BN:
Even
before LKY exposed his deprecatory views about PR I surmised Singapore sided
with BN and prefer BN to rule Malaysia and so PR is a pariah coalition unloved
by everyone, including Australia, UK, US and royalty who prefer BN.
11 August
2013
GEORGE
TOWN: DAP chairman Karpal Singh has lashed out against Lee Kuan Yew after the
former Singaporean prime minister made some negative remarks about Pakatan
Rakyat in his new book.
This too
is an incorrect answer. The correct answer to LKY’s jibes is not to put your
own house in order first, a form of tit for tat but that it is wrong and why it
is wrong.
IT IS
ACTUALLY POSSIBLE TO EXAMINE WHAT LKY SAID AND CONCLUDE IT IS WRONG OR DELUDED
AND GIVE REASONS WHY IT IS SO AND THERE IS NO NEED TO RESORT TO TIT FOR TAT
MUDSLINGING WHICH REFLECTS ABSENCE OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Singapore is a massive asset bubble waiting to burst:
A lot of
Singapore’s wealth is illusory, virtual not real, it is based on a massive
property bubble that is straining to sustain and will burst wreaking havoc.
You can
say Apple has cash reserves of USD 90 billion but unless it is kept in a vault
it is likely lent out seeking returns and if those who borrowed cannot return
the money it may be cash reserves in name not reality.
A LOT OF
MONEY DEPOSITED IN GERMAN BANKS WERE LENT TO LATIN COUNTRIES LIKE GREECE AND
SPAIN AND IF THESE ARE NOT REPAYABLE THEN GERMAN PEOPLE HAVE LOST THEIR MONEY
DEPOSITED IN GERMAN BANKS. EVEN SWISS BANKS LIKE UBS SUSTAINED MASSIVE
DERIVATIVE LOSSES.
CHINA IN
THEORY HAS A LOT OF MONEY IN US TREASURIES BUT IF THEY ARE NOT REPAYABLE EXCEPT
BY PRINTING THEN IN REALITY CHINA HAS LOST ITS SAVINGS.
AND SO IN
NAME APPLE MAY HAVE CASH RESERVES OF 90 BILLION BUT IF THIS HAS BEEN LENT OUT
RECKLESSLY IT MAY BE LOST FOREVER.
SINGAPOREANS
MAY NEVER DREAM THE DAY WHEN EVERYTHING IS IN TATTERS BUT IT IS POSSIBLE IN
THIS FECKLESS RECKLESS WORLD.
FROM THE
LITTLE I SAY OF CHINESE TV, CHINA IS DECADENT AND DELUDED AND SO CHINA TOO WILL
CRASH LIKE THE REST.
Tit for tat is a verbal force exchange:
Tit for
tat is simply a programmed exchange of forces, you attack me, I attack you.
Thus
Karpal perceives LKY as attacking PR and proceeds to attack him by telling to
put his own house in order.
If you
think there is reason to it you are deluded, it is merely an exchange of
forces, you attack me, I attack you that is devoid of true reason and ends in
insanity or woe for both.
TIT FOR
TAT IS A PROGRAMMED EXCHANGE OF FORCES OR ATTACKING. IN THOSE WHO ARE WELL
PROGRAMMED, WHEN ATTACKED THEY MUST RESPOND BY RETURNING THE ATTACK.
Why your opinions will reap you sorrow and bitterness:
What I
say is not my opinion but the truth.
Even LKY
himself may concede some if not all he says is his opinion.
Opinions
never lead to future happiness but future suffering and so if you cannot tell
if what you say is the truth or your opinion you are well advised to refrain
from expressing them.
Truth is
never an opinion and so if what you say is the truth it is never an opinion and
if what you say is an opinion it is never the truth and so it is false,
misleads others and subject to punishment and that is always unhappy.
IF YOU
KNOW SOMETHING YOU ARE GOING TO SAY IS THE TRUTH, YOU ARE MAD TO SAY, ‘IN MY
OPINION’ BECAUSE IT IS THE TRUTH. IF SOMETHING YOU SAY IS IN YOUR OPINION YOU
ARE STICKING OUT YOUR NECK TO BE CHOPPED AND IT WILL BE CHOPPED.
IF YOU
CANNOT TELL WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SAY IS THE TRUTH OR IN YOUR OPINION, THEN YOU
ARE A MUDDLED FOOL AND THAT IS NEVER THE WAY TO SAFETY AND ETERNAL HAPPINESS.
I feel and I think are signs of an opinion:
When a
person qualifies or precedes what he is going to say with “I feel”, “I think”
it is a sign that what ensues is an opinion, not the truth and he is lapsing
into danger and punishment.
What is
the truth does not ensue from thinking but from seeing either externally or as
insight.
I believe, I suspect are signs of opinion:
When a
person says, “I believe this is what happen” or “I suspect” he is venturing
into opinion or speculation and that is like putting a noose around your neck.
Opinions result from self identity views:
Without
self identity views that the Buddha said led to future woe, you cannot have
opinions, it is because you identify with yourself and think you are meaningful
and important, special that you form opinions, personal viewpoints that you
even deliberately try to distinguish or differ from others.
PEOPLE
WITH SELF IDENTITY VIEWS THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO
FUTURE WOE TEND TO HAVE OPINIONS THAT THEY EVEN LIKE TO BE DIFFERENT FROM
OTHERS, ARE PROUD THEY SEE THINGS DIFFERENT FROM OTHERS, THEY THINK THEY ARE
CORRECT AND CLEVER AND OTHERS ARE WRONG.
THE TRUTH
DOES NOT BELONG TO ANYONE AND APPLIES TO EVERYONE AND THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO
CORRECTLY OR TRULY SEE SOMETHING AND SO OPINIONS IS ALWAYS LAPSING INTO FALSITY
AS A RESULT OF CONCEIT AND SELF IDENTITY VIEWS.
Why opinions is always suffering:
In order
to have opinions you must form them in your mind (or borrow from others), even
remodel them and then remember them and broadcast them from memory and that is
always suffering. And if you are egoistic and have lotsa opinions then your
mind is cluttered with lotsa confusing, conflicting opinions that will one day
drive you mad and confused.
If what
you say or see is the truth, there is no need to formulate them and remember
them and clutter your mind with all those different views on different subjects
and so your mind is free, uncluttered and happy and you only speak what you see
externally or as insight.
IF WHAT
YOU SAY IS OPINION, IT DOES NOT EXIST IN REALITY AND SO IT MUST BE FABRICATED
BY YOU OR COPIED FROM THOSE YOU WORSHIP EG DR M OR LKY AND THEN IT MUST BE
REHASHED FROM REMEMBERED AND IF YOUR MIND IS FULL OF OPINIONS THAT BY NECESSITY
MUST CLASH YOU ARE A BURDENED MAN AND THAT IS NEVER HAPPINESS.
Opinions never have basis:
Opinions
never have true basis and so they must be formulated either by yourself or
borrowed from others and remembered and rehashed from memory in which they
person becomes a robot.
If what
you say is an opinion and you do not know it is an opinion, you are deluded,
you perceive falsely what is an opinion is a fact and that makes worse your
quandary, there is no way out. If you know what you express is an opinion then
it can only exist if there is a plan for your opinion in your mind and you must
rehash from it and you must exist as a robot and that is always tormenting
apart from having to clutter your mind full of different opinions that by
necessity must conflict.
Only robots have opinions:
Only
robots have or harbour opinions, those who are not robots, who truly understand
will never allow themselves to clutter their minds with memorized views of what
things should be and broadcast those views which are the masters and they are
merely slaves of those views they so cherish in delusion.
YOU
CANNOT HAVE OPINIONS WITHOUT BEING A ROBOT AND A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING
WILL NEVER ALLOW HIMSELF TO BE A ROBOT.
So do you understand opinions?
You talk
about opinions, but do you understand opinions?
What you
say is either the truth or it is an opinion, this is objective never subjective
and cannot be refuted by anyone. If you are confused you are not sure what you
say is the truth or an opinion then you have muddled thinking that is the way
to woe not safety.
If what a
person says is an opinion, there must be a plan of that opinion in his mind
that is recorded and it is rehashed from that recording which means he must be
a robot to have opinions. To have recordings and rehash from recording is
always suffering and clutters up the mind when opinions pile up and conflict
with each other and the opinionated man is headed for loss of control and
madness and that is never the way to safety and heaven.
YOU SEE
NOTHING WRONG WITH OPINIONS YOU EVEN EXALT OPINIONS IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS BUT
YOU ARE DELUDED AND A FOOL, OPINIONS ARE DEADLY.
This is a
BBC headline and it is misleading, thus with karma attached.
I don’t
see India declaring war on poverty and I don’t see a war in India against
poverty nor is poverty a target that you can fight against.
Wealth is
not desirable as deluded people here believe but it leads to complacency and
attachment to life here that detains the fool in endless death and suffering
and so poverty is not that bad, if you relinquish all desire and head out of
this world you can subsist like the Buddha on handouts and one meal and two
sets of clothes and living in caves or under trees.
IF THERE
ARE NO WARS AGAINST POVERTY ONLY LIP SERVICE EMOTIONAL PROMISES BY POLITICIANS
TO GARNER SUPPORT AND HALF HEARTED FOR SHOW ATTEMPTS WHICH BECOME OPPORTUNITIES
TO SIPHON OR DIVERT MONEY INTENDED FOR THE POOR THEN YOU ARE SPEAKING
CARELESSLY TALKING ABOUT WINNING WARS AGAINST POVERTY.
SUFFICE
THE RICH AND POLITICIANS DO NOT PLUNDER THE SYSTEM LEAVING LITTLE LEFT FOR THE
MASSES, WHAT MORE THEY CAN AND WILL DECLARE WAR ON POVERTY.
WARS ARE
DECLARED AND FOUGHT AGAINST OTHER BEINGS AND YOU ARE COURTING FALSE PERCEPTION
AND MISLEADING OTHERS TALKING ABOUT FIGHTING WARS AGAINST POVERTY, MALARIA,
IGNORANCE.
Poverty cannot fight you nor can you fight poverty:
When you
talk about war you are referring to fighting between two opposing parties.
Poverty is not a party that you can fight against nor can poverty resist and
fight you so what war are you talking about?
YOU SEE
NOTHING WRONG WITH WAR AGAINST POVERTY BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE CORRECT,
YOU MAY BE DELUDED, TOLERANT OF FALSITY, HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD
PERCEPTION.
False not without purpose:
Politicians
speak about war against poverty not without purpose but it has the false
purpose of exaggerating their efforts to look after the poor who wields
considerable electoral clout.
WAR
AGAINST ‘X’ IS A FORM OF COPIED NONSPECIFIC ROBOT SPEAK THAT SOUNDS NICE, IS
INTENDED TO IMPRESS THAN SPEAK THE TRUTH. IT CAN BE REHASHED FOR A WIDE VARIETY
OF SITUATIONS AND SO IS USEFUL TO RECORD FOR REPLAY IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX IF
YOU WANT TO EXIST AS A REHASHING ROBOT.
The
substance of the matter is ‘a banker can live on £1 million salary’, shock has
nothing to do with it and it is a dangerous force based false association. He
is expressing incredulity which is not a product of meaning but stirred mental
force which is blind, meaningless and harmful to self and so he is guilty of
illogic (that shock is relevant) that is dangerous and guilty of trying to
promote the same in others with karma attached to be repaid as future
suffering.
THAT A
PERSON WHO CAN MAKE A MISTAKE THAT SHOCK IS MEANINGFUL AND RELEVANT CAN BE A
RELIABLE SOURCE OF INFORMATION IS NOT POSSIBLE, HE IS DELUDED.
The truth
is always simple, straight forward, so says the Buddha.
If by
sophistication you mean complicated, convoluted then it is not good but false
and deluded, it is a false perception of the mind.
SOPHISTICATION
IS NOT OBJECTIVE BUT SUBJECTIVE, IT IS A PRODUCT OF FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ONE
STYLE IS MORE DESIRABLE AND EXALTED OR ‘INTELLECTUAL’ THAN ANOTHER. IF
SOPHISTICATION IS COMPLICATION THEN AS THE BUDDHA SAID, COMPLICATION IS THE
PATH TO WOE, INSANITY NOT HAPPINESS BECAUSE IT IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
This is a
statement of delusion and if you buy it you too are deluded.
If there
are no drawbacks to shale gas, he would not have to speak of affording. If your
financial or economic situation is so bad that you cannot afford to miss out on
shale it means you are living dangerously, at the edge and so you are reckless.
If you
live within your means, sedately you can afford to miss out on shale gas. It is
only if you are greedy for more, living excessively and need more fuel to
sustain that lifestyle that you cannot afford to miss out on shale and that is
reckless, blameworthy, like a gambler who will end disastrously sooner or
later.
THIS IS
SALESMAN TALK AND IT IS ALWAYS FALSE AND MOTIVATED TO ENTICE YOU TO AGREE.
It is an opinion and a sales pitch and that is karma:
‘We
cannot afford to miss out on shale gas’ is an opinion and sales pitch, not
because he sees and knows what he says is true and that is karma that leads to
suffering.
AS I
SAID, WHATEVER IS SAID IS EITHER THE TRUTH OR AN OPINION, IF YOU MUST HAVE
OPINIONS YOU MUST HAVE SUFFERING BECAUSE YOU MUST FORMULATE, REMEMBER AND
REHASH THOSE OPINIONS AND THAT MEANS YOU MUST BE A ROBOT AND YOU MUST CLUTTER
YOUR MIND WITH OPINIONS THAT CONFUSE AND BURDEN.
Many
papers routinely have an opinion page and this is always an opinion and false
and is the way to future woe, insanity never happiness.
Why
should any eye surgeon do you proud and of what use and meaning is it to stir
your mental force that is blind and meaningless to become proud by his deed?
She is
saying it to beat the surgeon’s drum, boom, boom, boom rather than see and tell
the truth and there is accountability for misleading others what is false and
senseless is true and meaningful.
Why you never find happiness:
There is
happiness, it exists and can be everlasting and it is not without reason but it
is with reason why you and everyone never find happiness even if you look high
and low, the reason is because they are barking up the wrong tree, even after
they have been told.
Whether
it is in meditation or in activities people seek happiness in pleasure and
stimulation (excitement, thrill) and that is barking up the wrong tree and it
is impossible for anyone to find happiness when they seek pleasure and
excitement because both are dependent on force and you are seeking force that
is the NEMESIS of true happiness when you seek pleasure or thrills.
WHEN I
MEDITATE I AM NOT SEEKING PLEASURE OR STIMULATION OF MY MIND, I DO NOT USE
FORCE TO FIGHT OR SUPPRESS THE AGITATIONS OF MY MIND BUT INSTEAD I AVOID
STIRRING FURTHER FORCE AND ALLOW THE ARISEN FORCE TO DISSIPATE BY ITSELF.
IN ORDER
TO FIND HAPPINESS YOU MUST AVOID FORCE, AVOID SEEKING PLEASURE AND EXCITEMENT
WHICH ARE PRODUCTS OF FORCE AND YOU MUST NEVER STIR FRESH FORCE TO FIGHT THE
ARISEN AGITATIONS AND SUFFERING OF YOUR MIND BUT YOU MUST ALLOW IT TO DISSIPATE
BY ITSELF. IF YOU ARE TRULY MOTIVATED TO MAKE AN END TO SUFFERING (AND THUS
FIND HAPPINESS) YOU WILL PAY ATTENTION TO THE ARISING OF PAIN OR TENSION IN
YOUR MIND AND BODY AND SECLUDE YOURSELF SWIFTLY TO DISPEL THE ARISEN SUFFERING
EARLY BEFORE IT HAS GAINED IN STRENGTH TO BECOME TENACIOUS.
THERE IS
HAPPINESS AND IT CAN BE VERY DEEP AND SATISFYING BUT IT IS A FATAL MISTAKE TO
USE FORCE TO FIGHT SUFFERING AND TO SEEK FORCE, TO SEEK PLEASURE AND
STIMULATION.
Style disqualifies a person from happiness and eternal life:
So long
as a person remains in style, he prolongs syllables, changes speed and
loudness, he is disqualified from ever tasting true happiness and eternal life.
STYLE OR
STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS AN ETERNAL DEATH AND
SUFFERING SENTENCE, DISQUALIFIES THE PERSON FROM EVER FINDING TRUE MEANINGFUL
HAPPINESS, NECESSITATES A TERRIBLE ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE THAT IS CURSED
BY INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE APART FROM MANY
OTHER SERIOUS DEBILITIES.
How to be happy when you are constantly using harmful force
unnecessarily?
Force is
the nemesis of happiness.
A person
with style is constantly using force unnecessarily to prolong, change speed and
strength that harms himself (and others) so how can he ever be happy?
Style is
unnecessary, for show, intended to stir force in others that harms never
benefits them and if you are constantly subjecting yourself and others to force
that causes suffering it is impossible that you should find happiness.
Truly understanding work:
Because
all work, sporadic or organized requires the use of force it is always
suffering and if you disagree you may be right or a fool and deluded.
Thus if
you seek work, you must always find something to do you are willing yourself to
suffer that becomes enslaving, work is the evil master and you are delivering
yourself to the jaws of suffering.
Further
because suffering degrades your body and mind, work degrades your body and mind
until a day comes when your body and mind is ruined, beyond repair and your
suffering becomes permanent.
ALL WORK
IS SUFFERING, THAT IS THE CORRECT VIEW OF WORK.
THUS
EVERY TIME YOU WORK YOU ARE WILLING YOURSELF TO SUFFER UNTIL YOU BECOME A VERY
GOOD ADDICTED ADDICT OF SUFFERING.
WORK
DEGRADES YOUR BODY AND MIND SO THAT IN TIME YOUR BODY AND MIND BECOMES
PERMANENTLY SERIOUSLY DEGRADED AND YOUR SUFFERING BECOMES PERMANENT AND
ULTIMATELY KILLS YOU.
THUS
ANYONE WHO THINKS NOTHING OF WORK, WHO THINKS WORK IS A FRIEND, WHO ADVOCATES
WORK FOR OTHERS IS ADVOCATING SUFFERING AND SLAVERY AND DEATH THAT HAS
SUFFERING AND DEATH NOT MERIT AS ITS REWARD.
What is work?
Talking
is work, singing is work.
Whatever
is a doing with hands, legs (walking, dancing), and body is work. Adopting
stylish provocative postures is work.
Thinking
is work.
Like and
dislike is work.
Perceiving
is work compared with shutting your perceptions, looking at a computer screen
is work compared with shutting your eyes not looking at the screen.
ANYONE
WHO CHAMPIONS WORK, ADVOCATES WORK IS DELUDED, A FOOL BECAUSE ALL WORK IS
SUFFERING AND ENSLAVING, BECOMES ADDICTIVE IF YOU KEEP SUBMITTING YOURSELF TO
WORK UNNECESSARILY. WORK WILL DEGRADE YOUR BODY AND MIND AND DESTROY YOU.
THE
BUDDHA DOES NO WORK NOT BECAUSE HE IS LAZY OR WEIRD BUT WITH REASON. NO ONE IS
A MASTER OF WORK BUT HE IS A SLAVE OF EVIL WORK AND FORCE.
Bill
Clinton tells the BBC's Komla Dumor about his work in Africa
Here is a
deluded man speaking. If he truly loves this job he is a masochist or he loves
this for the material rewards (eg feeling of power or popularity) or he is
lying, ignoring the suffering he must surely experience that comes with the
job.
The
Buddha never said he loved his job of teaching humans and gods. To teach is
suffering, not to teach is not to suffer. The Buddha taught because he was
requested by a brahma to teach and he agreed to teach not for his benefit but
the benefit of others.
ANYONE
WHO SAYS ‘I LOVE THIS JOB’ IS GUILTY OF FALSITY, BOASTING WITH SUFFERING
ATTACHED. HE ‘LOVES’ THE PERKS THAT COME WITH THE JOB NOT THE JOB.
YOU SAY
YOU LOVE WORK, KARMA WILL FIND ENDLESS WORK FOR YOU TO DO AND LOVE. YOU ARE
GUILTY OF TELLING OTHERS WHAT IS SUFFERING IS FUN.
What is the point of telling others you love this job?
Anything
you say or do must have reason and if they are not valid then you are courting
insanity and will get it.
OK, you
enjoy your job but why tell others? The reasons are always false never true and
they are to stir envy in others, to boast as if everything you do is great or
to reassure others often falsely that you are loving it when it is even a
burden.
No matter
how you love a job surely there are moments when it is a bore, a chore,
exasperating and so if you give the impression it is unbridled pleasure when it
can also be suffering then you are guilty of falsity.
THERE CAN
BE NO TRUE REASONS TO LET OTHERS KNOW YOU ENJOY THIS JOB, THE REASONS ARE
ALWAYS FALSE, TO BOAST, TO STIR ENVY, TO FALSELY REASSURE OTHERS. AND IF YOU
ARE WASTING YOUR TIME AND ENERGY TELLING OTHERS, YOU ARE COURTING INSANITY.
How to combat loneliness in space:
This is a
BBC site heading.
Only a
deluded person with wrong understanding will speak thus and if you think he has
a case you too do not truly understanding the nature of loneliness.
Loneliness
is a conditioned, false emotional or force dominated orchestrated state of the
mind and as long as a person harbour loneliness he can do whatever he can to
fight or suppress or divert loneliness but it is futile, mad (because it is the
false answer) and more suffering. For instance you can drink alcohol or find
some hobby to drown loneliness but it never truly works, makes it worse, allows
loneliness to fester and consolidate to become stronger.
When a
person’s mind has reached a high concentration when it is no longer stirring on
its own volition, neither liking nor disliking, he is automatically never
lonely, he does not need company or anything, he is happy by himself and without
destroying loneliness thus, killing false harmful loneliness thus you are like
a fool trying to scoop water with a net combating loneliness in space.
How to destroy loneliness:
The
person who preaches how to combat loneliness is speaking falsely leading others
astray and that has karma not merit to be experienced as future suffering.
Loneliness
can be permanently destroyed even if you and everyone cannot and will not do
it.
Loneliness
is truly destroyed by first achieving the first higher state of mind where
one’s mental force is no longer constantly prolonging, changing speed and
strength. Next you develop the even higher state of mind where you are no
longer thinking so that your mind becomes unified focused singularly. Finally
you develop the concentration wherein your mind is no longer stirred to like or
dislike anything happening and once a mind’s mental force has stopped stirring
without doing any work, he cannot be lonely, sad, depressed or agitated or
confused.
Fighting is all they know, force is their answer:
It is not
an accident but it is to be expected that emotional people speak of how to
combat loneliness because they do not truly understand anything and force is
their understanding of everything happening and so force is their answer to
everything happening.
When you
talk about combating loneliness you are talking about fighting and so force or
resistance or pushing back is your answer to a problem.
When you
see something and you become excited, greedy, disgusted, angered, fearful,
shocked or sad, this is your force based understanding of that something you
saw.
FOR
STYLISH PEOPLE WHO DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE ROBOTS, STIRRING FORCE IS THEIR
UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THEY PERCEIVE AND NATURALLY THEIR ANSWER IS ALSO ALWAYS
FORCE. FIGHT! TRIUMPH! DEFEAT! WIN!
Icahn’s
assessment may be right or he may be getting madder as is the natural
destination of those who are greedy and made much money being a predator.
There is
an appointment with insanity, mad perception for all predators who make money
by gambling, speculating at the expense of others and what Icahn is saying may
be because he is shrewd (cunning) or he is descending in his final well
deserved journey to insanity.
There is
a case that can be made that Apple is more a flash in the pan than solid
performer, it was with the advent of the ipod, iphone and ipad that Apple became
a very profitable company and that is not a very solid track record.
Asking
patients to identify pictures of famous people, such as Elvis Presley, could be
a good way to spot early dementia, say researchers.
If you
know dementia, understand dementia you do not need to device tests to tell you
somebody has dementia.
Tests can
never reliably tell you a person has or has not dementia and those who
subscribe to the tests become like robots told by the tests whether the tested
person has or has not dementia.
YOU DO
NOT NEED TESTS TO TELL IF A PERSON HAS DEMENTIA, YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT
DEMENTIA IS. IF YOU DEVICE TESTS THEN YOU BECOME A ROBOT OF THE TESTS, IT IS
THE TESTS THAT TELLS YOU THE PERSON HAS DEMENTIA NOT YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT
TELLS YOU HE HAS DEMENTIA.
DEMENTIA
IS THE TERMINAL ILLNESS OF THOSE WHO ARE REHASHING ROBOTS WHEN THEIR RECORDING
AND PLAYBACK MECHANISM SUFFER PERMANENT SERIOUS IMPAIRMENTS RENDERING THEM
UNABLE TO SAY OR DO SIMPLE THINGS THAT THEY HAVE DONE MANY TIMES BEFORE.
BECAUSE THEIR RECORDING APPARATUS IS IMPAIRED THEY CANNOT REGISTER RECENT
MEMORY BUT OLD RECORDED MEMORIES REMAIN PATCHILY HAPHAZARDLY ACCESSIBLE.
IF YOU
ARE NOT A REHASHER, WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS FRESHLY, SPECIFICALLY COMPOSED BASED
ON TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION HOW IS IT YOU CANNOT PERFORM A SIMPLE
TASK LIKE OPENING THE CAR DOOR THAT YOU HAVE DONE UMPTEEN TIMES IN THE PAST?
WHAT IS SO DIFFICULT OR INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGING ABOUT OPENING A CAR DOOR? IF
ON THE OTHER HAND YOUR OPENING OF CAR DOOR IS AUTOMATED, REHASHED WITHOUT
THINKING NEEDING THE OPERATION OF A MENTAL RECORD AND PLAYBACK MACHINE THEN IF
THAT MACHINE IS JAMMED, YOU ARE DEAD, CANNOT OPEN THE DOOR.
Constant abuse of the memory system is the cause of dementia:
If a
person is constantly rehashing from recording whatever he says or does, he is
constantly using (abusing) his memory recording and playback system and it is
not a surprise but to be expected that with aging the memory system goes kaput
and he becomes demented.
IF YOU
SPARINGLY, SENSIBLY USE YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM TO REMEMBER AND RECALL IMPORTANT
THINGS, DO NOT CONSTANTLY USE IT TO SAY OR DO EVERYTHING, YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM IS
LIKELY TO BE PRISTINE IN OLD AGE.
A PERSON
WHO FRESHLY SPECIFICALLY COMPOSES HIS SPEECH BASED ON TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE
SITUATION DOES NOT USE HIS MEMORY SYSTEM FOR HIS SPEECH AND HOW CAN HIS MEMORY
SYSTEM BE SHOT TO BITS IN OLD AGE?
‘Star
discovered at Carole King musical’ is very different from ‘Carole King musical
finds its star’ and if you think they are synonymous you have muddled thinking
and perception that is the path to confusion and insanity.
It
reflects what people say is without understanding, is by approximate rehash
from their mental jukebox that they are guilty of illogical statements that
appeals to them, make sense to them.
No need for tests, all rehashers will end demented:
Unless
early death circumvents all those with style and rehash whatever they perceive,
think, say or do are doomed to suffer to variable degree dementia. Even those
that tests show are not demented to those who are discerning, have significant
dementia.
UNLESS
ORDINARY PEOPLE DIE PREMATURELY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEIR MEMORY SYSTEM AND
THUS THEIR ACTIONS AND SPEECH DO NOT SUFFER SIGNIFICANT IMPAIRMENT WITH AGE AND
I CAN DETECT SIGNIFICANT MEMORY AND BEHAVIOURAL LOSS IN OLD PEOPLE AND SO IT IS
DELUDED TO TALK ABOUT DEMENTIA IN SOME AND NOT OTHERS. MANY OLD PEOPLE’S SPEECH
AND ACTIONS ARE HESITANT, THEY EASILY LOSE TRACK OF WHAT THEY ARE SAYING OR
DOING AND THESE ARE SIGNS OF DEMENTIA.
Jesus needing tests to tell if you are going to heaven?
What are
you, a robot? You need tests to tell you if someone has dementia? You cannot
tell by what you see? Only those who are somnolent robots need tests to tell
them this and that.
Can you
imagine Jesus depending on tests to tell if you are good or bad, going to
heaven or not?
11:37am
The two
messages only comprised 49 words. But the posts from tycoon had a remarkable
effect.
It is misleading
to say the tweets earned Apple $12 billion, the news caused Apple shares to
surge in value increasing its paper value by so much; that is different from
earning Apple $12 billion. It can vanish just as quickly as it arose.
IF YOU
MISLEAD OTHERS WHETHER INTENTIONALLY OR UNWITTINGLY YOU ARE LIABLE FOR
SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT.
THIS TOO
IS HOW SHARKS MAKE MONEY, THEY (EG ICAHN) KNOW THEY ARE MARKET MOVERS OR
INFLUENTIAL AND THEY ANNOUNCE THEIR STAKES AND THEIR OPINIONS WHICH DRIVE
PRICES UP AND THEY MAKE A KILLING SELLING TO SUCKERS COMING IN FOR BARGAINS.
Hesitancy is a sign of rehashing:
Only
rehashed speech and actions can be slick or hesitant. If the speech or action
is well rehearsed and familiar it can be reeled out rapidly flawlessly to be slick
and in contrast if it is unfamiliar, seldom rehashed or there is malfunctioning
of the replay mechanism then hesitancy creeps in, the person may lose track of
what he is rehashing.
If
something said or done is freshly composed after full understanding of a
situation it is impossible it can be hesitant or you can lose track of what you
were saying.
A life of make believe:
People
talk about others’ lives as being ones of make believe, but when is it that a
person’s life is make believe?
When a
person rehashes what he says or does, it is never genuine but make believe as
if genuine what is faked or rehashed.
Thus
because all ordinary stylish people rehash what and how they perceive, think,
say or do, their entire lives are ones of make believe.
ALL THOSE
WHO REHASH ARE LEADING LIVES OF MAKE BELIEVE BECAUSE WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO IS
NEVER GENUINE BUT REHASHED, FAKED, COUNTERFEIT.
WHATEVER
IS REHASHED IS NEVER GENUINE AND BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE PERCEIVE THEY ARE
GENUINE, THAT IS MAKE BELIEVE.
Tests are actually rules:
When you
formulate a test to diagnose dementia you are formulating rules or criteria
that will determine for you the obedient clueless robot whether someone has
dementia or not.
Thus
those who have faith in tests have faith in rules, those who depend on tests to
tell them whether they or others have nascent dementia depend on rules.
Faith in
rules (precepts) and rituals is one of three lower fetters to future woe the
Buddha said.
IF
SOMETHING IS TRUE OR EXISTS EG DEMENTIA, IT CAN BE SEEN OR KNOWN AND IF YOU
CANNOT SEE OR KNOW THEN YOU ARE BLIND AND MUST DEPEND ON CRITERIA, RULES, TESTS
TO TELL YOU THIS IS DEMENTIA.
What is the need and urgency in detecting dementia?
If
dementia is the fruit of lifelong abusive constant rehashing then so long as
the person remains in rehashing there is no cure or mitigation for it and it is
futile trying to detect and cure something that is inevitable so long as a
person keeps rehashing.
If
dementia is due to a lack of omega three then there may be a case for urgent detection
and treatment with omega three. Thus it is silly and deluded this much ado
about nothing trying to detect dementia early, as if you can cure it without
stopping rehashing.
THERE IS
NO HURRY IN TRYING TO ASCERTAIN DEMENTIA, YOU CANNOT CURE IT AND IT IS THE
INEVITABLE COURSE TO GREATER OR LESSER EXTENT OF ALL REHASHING PEOPLE.
IT IS NOT
THE LACK OF MEDITATION THAT CAUSES SMOKING BUT SMOKING HAS CAUSE/CAUSES AND SO
LONG AS THESE CAUSES PERSIST YOU ARE A FOOL TO TRUST MEDITATION TO DELIVER YOU
FROM SMOKING.
THE
CORRECT PURPOSE TO MEDITATION IS TO ACHIEVE AND CONSOLIDATE THE FOUR HIGHER
STATES OF MIND, NAMELY NO PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, NO THINKING,
NO LIKE AND DISLIKE AND FINALLY NO PAIN AND PLEASURE.
Calculated lowly uses of meditation:
Using
meditation to curb smoking, eating or manage (not eliminate) stress are
calculated uses that at best have limited transient beneficial effects.
Meditation has the highest effect if the person is not deluded, greedy or
hateful and it is aimed at destroying not managing or restricting stress.
Whatever
happened, it is never 2006 all over again except in your delusion it can be so.
There is no need to invoke 2006, it is evidence people record their
understanding and rehash their understanding to apply to present situation.
Suffice you truly understand what is happening now and delineate it, it is
folly to not just compare the present to 2006 but shall it is 2006 all over
again as if it is identical.
No comments:
Post a Comment