This is a
fashioned statement that is false and intended to stir emotion or force in
others. It is false because no hitting is involved.
Mentally
ill severely affected by the recession would be the reason based statement that
has no intention to wickedly stir others’ mental forces.
Jesus
said you will be judged for every careless word you say and herein too is
carelessness that may incur judgment and suffering in repayment.
Whatever does not exonerate implicates you:
Whatever
proffered that (objectively) does not exonerate you of wrongdoing (as you hope)
implicates you because only those who are guilty would proffer excuses and
false evidence that does not exonerate.
BECAUSE
ONLY THOSE GUILTY WOULD FABRICATE INFORMATION THAT DOES NOT EXONERATE HIM, IF
WHAT YOU PROFFER DOES NOT EXONERATE IT IMPLICATES YOU, IT CONFIRMS TO THE
DISCERNING THAT YOU ARE GUILTY.
The
implication is that it is good news but an expanding economy is not necessarily
good and can be dangerous.
If the
expansion is fuelled by debt whether borrowed internationally (bonds) or
locally, based on expanding infrastructure that will be white elephants or
based on consumption then this expansion is dangerous, better without than
with.
RATHER
THAN SAY THE ECONOMY WILL CONTINUE TO EXPAND, WHAT SHOULD BE STATED IS THE
BASIS, IS IT BASED ON DEBT OR SAVINGS, WILL IT BE SPEND ON WHITE ELEPHANTS OR
UNAFFORDABLE CONSUMPTION? UNLESS YOU KNOW THE NATURE OF THE EXPANSION YOU ARE A
FOOL TO PERCEIVE EXPANSION EQUALS GOOD.
If you
are a man of true understanding you do not slam others but you point out what
is right or wrong, it is not the incoherence of the ECB that should be the
object of criticism but what they are doing that is wrong.
IT IS
POINTLESS TO BE COHERENT IF YOUR ACTION IS DELUDED AND SO IF YOU HAVE TRUE
UNDERSTANDING YOU WILL NOT CRITICIZE THE ECB ON ITS INCOHERENCE BUT WHAT IS
WRONG WITH ITS ACTIONS AND YOU WOULD NOT SLAM OR USE FORCE TO ATTACK. THUS HE
IS NO BETTER THAN THOSE HE SLAMS. HE IS DELUDED, HE THINKS HE IS BETTER WHEN HE
IS NO BETTER, CLUELESS. THE REASON THE ECB IS INCOHERENT MAY BE BECAUSE IT DOES
NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO, IT IS LOST OR REFUSE TO TAKE UNPALATABLE STEPS OR THE
PROBLEM MAY BE TERMINAL, BEYOND REPAIR.
People
think what they discuss is full of meaning but if in truth it is senseless,
they are deluded and heading for woe.
Culture
cannot in truth (only in falsity or by stirred force) override religion which
is a matter of culture dictating one thing and religion dictating another thing
and through preference or like or stirred force, one chooses one over the
other.
In truth,
in any matter culture can be correct or wrong and religion can be correct or
wrong or they are both wrong and it is a matter of culture is correct and
religion wrong never culture overriding religion.
ONLY
PEOPLE WHO DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND SPEAK OF CULTURE OVERRIDING RELIGION WHICH IS
ALWAYS A FALSE CONSIDERATION.
THE TRUTH
OF ANY MATTER IS WHETHER CULTURE OR RELIGION IS CORRECT OR WRONG AND ADOPTING
THE ONE WHICH IS CORRECT.
WHATEVER
IS CORRECT OR TRUE IS INDEPENDENT OF CULTURE OR RELIGION AND SO YOU ARE
DELUDED, BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE TO TALK ABOUT WHEN CULTURE OVERRIDES RELIGION
AND IF YOU ARE RECEPTIVE OR DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT, YOU TOO HAVE NO
TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND MUST STIR RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS. THE PERSON
WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS KNOWS IT IS A LOAD OF RUBBISH NOT WORTHY OF FINDING OUT.
What matters is not culture or religion but truth:
In
whatever matter or consideration, if one wishes to escape suffering and
insanity then it is the truth or correctness of the matter that is supreme, not
what culture or religion or science or philosophy says.
IF IT IS
TRUTH OR CORRECTNESS THAT IS THE MATTER IF ONE WISHES TO ESCAPE SUFFERING AND
INSANITY, YOU ARE A BIG FOOL AND DELUDED TO TALK ABOUT WHEN CULTURE OVERRIDES
RELIGION.
Only robots speak of when culture overrides religion:
Robots
are not in charge of themselves except in their delusion and so in a matter
arising they have different inputs eg what his culture or traditions say and
what his religion says and being without true understanding, he applies rules
or preferences to help him decide and he decides his culture overrides his
religion.
WHEN
CULTURE OVERRIDES RELIGION IMPLIES CULTURE OR RELIGION IS THE BOSS THAT TELLS
THE PERSON WHO IS A ROBOT WHAT TO DO.
Australia heading for tough times:
SYDNEY: Australia said on Friday its budget deficit
has blown out to Aus$30 billion and revenues are shrinking, as it unveiled a
pre-election mini-budget that includes a controversial plan to tax bank
deposits.
Whilst
many are still clueless or in denial, severely falling resources revenue has
meant Australia’s budget deficit rising sharply and this means belt tightening
and austerity may be the prospect.
Never a matter of truth but delusion:
‘When
culture overrides religion’ conforms to a pattern (when ‘x’ verbs ‘y’ eg when
love trumps duty) that is programmed and common in the speech of stylish
emotional people and it is intended not to speak the truth but it is delusional
intended to stir emotion and impress.
A person
who is discerning immediately recognises its nonsensicality and is not
interested to find out what the matter is about.
In truth
X never overrides Y but X may surpass Y, whatever is true cannot be overridden
or cast aside, it remains true and so if you speak of overriding you are not
speaking of something true but false to be cast aside according to whim or fancy
or stirred force.
NOW THE
PERSON SAYS ‘WHEN CULTURE OVERRIDES RELIGION’, NEXT HE MAY TURN AROUND AND SAY
‘WHEN RELIGION OVERRIDES CULTURE’. WHATEVER IS TRUE REMAINS TRUE AND CANNOT BE
REVERSED AND SO WHEN YOU SPEAK OF X OVERRIDING Y YOU ARE NOT SPEAKING OF TRUTH
OR MEANING BUT EXPEDIENCY AND FANCY.
THERE IS
A PATTERN IN A SPEECH OF EMOTIONAL PEOPLE AND IT IS PROGRAMMED AND COPIED AND
THEY SPEAK ACCORDING TO THE PATTERN OR FORMAT THEY THINK IS IMPRESSIVE EG WHEN
X-VERB-Y. ONLY ROBOTS HAVE PROGRAMMED PATTERNS IN THEIR SPEECH.
Truth cannot be overridden:
Truth can
never be overridden but it always remain true and so if the religion you speak
of or what it teaches or tells you is true, it cannot be overridden by culture,
if it can be overridden by culture it means the religion or what it teaches is
not true or you have overridden what is true with what is false (culture).
Whatever
is true cannot be overridden but it can be surpassed.
Thus the
happiness of the first higher state of mind is true, it cannot be overridden
but it can be surpassed in happiness by the second higher state. It is not
possible to one moment the first higher state override the second higher state
and the next moment the second higher state override the first.
If your
purpose is true, to govern the country correctly for the benefit of the country
as elected you do not need strategists but if your purpose is to win elections
(not govern correctly) then you need strategists who will scheme, present you
and do things that will make gullible voters elect you in preference to the
opposition and to this purpose, since the strategist appear to have succeeded
in re-electing Obama, he is sought after.
POLITICIANS
ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE NOT INTERESTED IN GOVERNING THE COUNTRY CORRECTLY AS
ELECTED BUT THEY ARE INTERESTED IN WINNING (THE BOUNTY THAT COMES WITH
WINNING).
STRATEGIES
ARE ALWAYS FALSE AND NEFARIOUS AND ONLY ROBOTS WILL SUBMIT THEMSELVES TO STRATEGIES
NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE SO GOOD OR UNDERSTANDING BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE GREEDY FOR
THE GAINS THE STRATEGIES PROMISE.
Karma not merit for talking nonsense:
Whether
‘when culture overrides religion’ is a matter of truth or it is subjective,
cantankerous, false, a matter of expediency is objective, cannot be disputed.
If you
think it is valid then you are deluded. If you engage others in a matter that
is false, frivolous and renders them similarly deluded, you are creating debt
for yourself to be experienced as future suffering, not merit to be experienced
as future happiness.
IF ‘WHEN
CULTURE OVERRIDES RELIGION’ IS A MATTER OF FALSITY OR DELUSION THEN IN
DISCUSSING THE MATTER YOU ARE CREATING DEBT TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE
UFFERING NOT MERIT TO BE EXPERIENCED AS HAPPINESS.
It is
only possible for a person to live in the past if he is a robot who has been
programmed to behave in a certain way that is immutable to change, not
responsive to change. It is pointless discussing such people and people do so
to mock them.
ANYONE
WHO IS A REHASHING ROBOT IS FOREVER LIVING IN THE PAST, ONCE WELL PROGRAMMED TO
SAY OR DO CERTAIN THINGS THEY ARE REHASHING AND THUS LIVING IN THE PAST.
IF YOU
ARE YOURSELF LIVING IN THE PAST IT IS LIKE THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK
TALKING ABOUT OTHERS LIVING IN THE PAST.
Living in the past and deja vu:
All
stylish (stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness) people must
experience deja-vu or familiarity as if what is happening has occurred before
because whatever they say or do, their understanding of what is happening is
rehashed from recording so that even if they are unaware, there must sense it
is happening all over again or there is a familiarity in what is happening
(that is true because it is being rehashed or replayed).
THE LIFE
OF A STYLISH EMOTIONAL PERSON IS ENTIRELY ONE OF REHASH OR FOREVER LIVING IN
THE PAST AND RATHER THAN THE HAPPINESS THEY ACT IT TO BE IT IS EMPTY,
MONOTONOUS AND TORMENTING.
WHAT AND
HOW THEY SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE AND TOUCH IS ALL PROGRAMMED AND REHASHED.
THERE ARE PROGRAMS THAT TELL THEM HOW TO SEE (STARE, SEE THROUGH THE CORNER,
DARTING MOVEMENTS), WHAT TO SEE (WATCH OUT FOR GIRLS, THINGS TO STEAL, MONEY TO
MAKE).
THEIR
UNDERSTANDINGS ARE RECORDED STANDARDIZED AND REHASHED FROM RECORDING TO APPLY
TO CURRENT SITUATIONS.
WHATEVER
THEY THINK, SAY OR DO IS REHASHED.
Rehash requires detachment from reality:
Whenever
a person is rehashing what he is saying or doing, he must disengage himself
from reality either intermittently or totally and he returns to full contact
with the present (provided he is not lost in thought) when he has stopped
speaking or doing.
If
something he wants to say or do is complicated and seldom rehashed, the person
must pay more attention to what he is rehashing to insert into reality but if
something said or done has been repeated umpteen times (eg hello, luv), it is
reeled out without paying attention.
THE
SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE (PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS)
COMBO CANNOT BE RENDERED LIVE BUT MUST BE RECORDED AND REHASHED FROM RECORDING.
WHENEVER
A PERSON IS REHASHING HE MUST BE PARTIALLY OR TOTALLY DETACHED FROM REALITY AND
HE ONLY REJOINS REALITY FULLY WHEN HE HAS STOPPED SPEAKING OR DOING (PROVIDED
HE IS NOT LOST IN THINKING OR DAYDREAMING).
DEPENDING
ON THE COMPLEXITY OR FREQUENCY OF REHASH, HE HAS TO PAY MORE ATTENTION TO WHAT
HE IS REHASHING (EG REHASHING SHAKESPEARE) OR WHAT HE IS REHASHING IS RAPID
FIRE AUTOMATED WITHOUT NEED FOR MUCH ATTENTION (EG ‘HELLO HOW ARE YOU?’).
THUS TO
GREATER OR LESSER EXTENT IF A PERSON IS REHASHING WHAT HE IS SAYING OR DOING,
HE MUST DETACH HIMSELF FROM REALITY TO REHASH AND INSERT WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY
OR DO INTO REALITY AND HE ONLY REJOINS REALITY ONCE HE HAS STOPPED SPEAKING OR
DOING.
IF YOU
KEEP REHASHING YOU KEEP TRAINING YOURSELF TO INCREASINGLY DETACH FROM REALITY
THAT HAS DANGEROUS AND FATAL CONSEQUENCES.
No wonder rehashing leads to stress:
You may
refute you are a rehasher or deny that rehashing is counterfeiting and thus
false, but so long as a person rehashes what he is saying or doing he must
force himself to detach from reality or the present moment either
intermittently or completely and because this is dangerous and potentially
fatal it must stir self-resistance that leads to stress and conditions the
person to always resist that detains him in the permanent prison of stress.
EVEN IF
YOU REFUTE THAT REHASHING CONSTITUTES FAKING IT OR COUNTERFEITING WHAT IS
STANDARDIZED AND PRE-RECORDED, FOR THE DURATION OF REHASHING WHAT YOU ARE
SAYING OR DOING YOU MUST INTERMITTENTLY OR TOTALLY DETACH FROM REALITY WHILST
YOU ARE BUSILY ACCESSING, REPRODUCING AND INSERTING IT INTO THE CURRENT
SITUATION AND BECAUSE SUCH CONDITIONED DETACHMENT FROM REALITY IS DANGEROUS AND
SUFFERING IT MUST STIR SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO REHASH WITHOUT SELF RESISTANCE AND THENCE STRESS AND SO IF YOU
REHASH, STRESS IS YOUR LOT.
You are attached to this world and yet you keep detaching yourself?
Ordinary
people are kidding themselves if they think they are detached from this world,
they are strongly attached to life here and yet they must stir resistance
because they keep detaching themselves from this world that they so crave
whenever they are rehashing what they say or do.
The wise
have given up this world, they are not attached to this world and yet they do
not keep foolishly harmfully detaching themselves from the world they are not
attached to.
THE
FOOLISH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS WORLD YET THEY KEEP DETACHING THEMSELVES FROM THIS
WORLD WHEN THEY ARE REHASHING WHAT THEY SAY OR DO AND THIS MUST STIR RESISTANCE,
DISTURBANCE AND CONFLICT.
Seeing in snapshots too is dangerous and stressful:
Part and
parcel of rehashing is seeing in snapshots, the person who is rehashing has no
time to pay continuous attention to what he is happening and he is forced to
take snapshots of reality and guess what is happening based on snapshots that
may be misleading and this is always suffering and must stir resistance,
protestation.
A PERSON
WHO IS REHASHING HAS NO TIME TO PAY FULL TIME TO WHAT IS HAPPENING AND SO HE IS
DEPENDENT ON HASTY SNAPSHOTS THAT MAY BE MISLEADING TO INFORM HIM WHAT IS
HAPPENING AROUND HIM AND THIS IS DANGEROUS AND MUST STIR RESISTANCE.
AND SO IT
IS THAT THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO THAT DEMANDS REHASH FROM RECORDING CAUSES
A LITANY OF ENDLESS WOES, DETACHMENT FROM REALITY, TAKING SNAPSHOTS INSTEAD OF
FULL ATTENTION, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION NOT TO COUNT THE MANY
MADNESSES DUE TO STYLE EG MAD ROTE BEHAVIOUR, DEMENTIA OR FAILED MEMORY.
No one can be happy here, heaven is the place to be in:
All
beings here (including insects) have style in their movements and sounds and
there is an endless litany of terrible suffering associated with style and the
rehashing that it mandates.
TO REHASH
IS SUFFERING AND STYLE MANDATES YOU MUST REHASH FROM MEMORY.
AS A
RESULT OF REHASHING YOU MUST CONDITION YOURSELF TO DETACH FROM REALITY, TO SEE
IN DANGEROUS MISLEADING SNAPSHOTS, TO RESIST WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT LEADS TO
STRESS, TO BE RESTLESSNESS AND UNABLE TO CONCENTRATE (YOUR ATTENTION SPLIT BY
THE SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO), YOU DESTROY YOUR MEMORY BY REHASH
LEADING TO DEMENTIA, YOU RISK MAD ROTE BEHAVIOUR THAT AUTOMATICALLY REHASHES
INAPPROPRIATELY, YOU SUFFER MAD EMOTIONS, MAD PERCEPTIONS, MAD LOGIC AND MORE.
ANYONE
WITH STYLE SUFFERS AND IS DOOMED, HE FACES INSANITY AND DESTRUCTION. THIS WORLD
IS NOT THE PLACE TO BE IN, HEAVEN IS THE PLACE TO GO TO.
Even when still and silent they are rehashing and detached:
Even when
the stylish person is silent and motionless he is still rehashing.
The
reason is because they are motionless with a style in their stance or sitting
and this style in their postures no matter how automated must be fabricated, is
actually automatically rehashed and so they are doing work and even then they
are detached partially or intermittently from reality.
BECAUSE
THERE IS STYLE IN THE POSTURES THEY ADOPT, THEIR POSTURES MUST BE REHASHED EVEN
IF THEY ARE MOTIONLESS AND SILENT AND THIS REHASHING MUST PARTIALLY DETACH THEM
FROM THE PRESENT MOMENT OR REALITY AND THEY CAN NEVER BE FULLY IN TOUCH WITH
REALITY UNLIKE THE PERSON WITHOUT STYLE, I KNOW THIS FROM EXPERIENCE BECAUSE
NOWADAYS I AM EFFORTLESSLY IN BETTER TOUCH WITH REALITY AND I AM MORE PRESENT
IN WHAT I DO.
Even in meditation they have style:
If you
observe with discernment ordinary people meditating, from chic girls to
professional Zen monks, there is a style in the way they sit still and their
faces may be grim or have a smile as in chic girls and this means even in
motionless they are fabricating that detaches them from reality and must keep the
fire of resistance and stress burning.
I
meditate much less than Zen monks but the states of the mind that I have
achieved far exceed theirs. They (including the Dalai Lama) have not even
achieved the first higher state of the mind (the absence of style) whilst I
have increasingly tasted no thinking, neither like nor dislike even likely
briefly neither pain nor pleasure.
More
people think the UK economy will improve next year than those who think it will
get worse, a survey by consumer group Which? suggests
Trivia is
objective, applies to everyone and if some information is trivia and you think
it meaningful to bother your mind with it, you have false perception that ends
in madness.
You have
to bother or trouble your mind to attend to anything and if something is trivia
and you bother yourself with it, it is conditioning yourself to suffering that
ends in tears.
More
believe economy will recover is trivia, not based on truth and a lot of news is
actually worthless trivia that foolish people bother their minds with and
clutter their minds with.
Mankind
is totally deluded and so more people believe the economy will recover means
more fools not wise men believe it will recover. What is the point and
reassurance that more deluded people believe the economy will recover.
MORE
BELIEVE ECONOMY WILL IMPROVE MEANS MORE DELUDED PEOPLE OR FOOLS BELIEVE THE
ECONOMY WILL RECOVER SO IS THAT REASSURING TO YOU AND WHY WOULD SOMETHING THAT
MAY NOT BE TRUE REASSURE YOU?
MORE
PEOPLE BELIEVE THE ECONOMY WILL IMPROVE IS TRIVIA NOT AN ESSENTIAL MATTER AND
FURTHER THESE ‘MORE’ ARE DELUDED, FOOLS NOT WISE.
4 August
2013
JAKARTA:
Communal feasts are nothing new in this nation that prides itself on rich
culinary traditions and strong social ties, with familial and cultural values
embedded in its every breath.
If you
talk nonsense you are heading for madness and there is debt to be repaid as
suffering misleading others.
Ramadan
is Ramadan, stop telling others what Ramadan should be.
RAMADAN
IS RAMADAN, NOT THIS OR THAT. YOU WILL GO MAD AND YOU HAVE DEBT MISLEADING
OTHERS.
Pop, pro and right meditation:
Whilst
many would not deign to meditate, they think they have far more important
things to spend their time in (not realizing they are making the biggest
mistake in their lives, there are all sorts of practitioners of meditation from
chic pop meditators seeking relief from lifestyle abuses to fully professional
meditators like Zen adherents.
I do not
meditate all the time but spent some time, hours daily doing so first thing in
the morning and during breaks in the day and yet I have achieved much fruit in
meditation than even ardent meditators.
Do not
underestimate the value of meditation, when done correctly and achieving its
goals, there can be nothing of greater benefit here and thereafter for a
meditator than anything else in this world.
THE GOAL
OF MEDITATION IS TO ACHIEVE THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND (NO STYLE, NO THINKING,
NO LIKE AND DISLIKE, NO FEELING OF PAIN OR PLEASURE.)
THE
HIGHER THE STATES YOU ACHIEVE THE HAPPIER AND LESS YOUR SUFFERING HERE THAT
SURPASSES WHATEVER HAPPINESS YOU MAY OTHERWISE FIND HERE AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR
1-500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
THERE IS
CORRECT AND WRONG MEDITATION AND WHATEVER MEDITATION THAT DOES NOT PRODUCE THE
HIGHER STATES IS WRONG MEDITATION.
I
MEDITATE TO CALM MY FABRICATIONS, TO FIRST STOP MY MENTAL FORCE CONSTANTLY
PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND THIS LEADS TO A CESSATION OF
THINKING, CESSATION OF LIKE AND DISLIKE AND FINALLY NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE.
ORDINARY
PEOPLE USE FORCE EVEN WHEN IN MEDITATION, THEY USE FORCE TO SUBDUE THE
RESTLESSNESS OF THEIR MINDS AND THAT IS A CONDITIONED OR FORCED CALM THAT IS
NOT TRUE CALM. I LET ARISEN FORCE SUBSIDE BY ITSELF AND WHEN FORCE HAS FADED
AWAY IT IS AUTOMATICALLY EFFORTLESSLY TRULY CALM. SUBSEQUENTLY IT IS A MATTER
OF PAYING ATTENTION NOT TO STIR FORCE, NOT TO ALLOW OTHERS TO APPLY FORCE ON
YOUR MIND.
I HAVE
EXPERIENCED THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE BECAUSE SPITTING
AND HARSH LOUD NOISES THAT USED TO CAUSE ME PAIN NOW NO LONGER GIVES PAIN WHEN
MY MIND HAS REACHED A HIGH STATE OF IMPERTURBILITY.
I DO NOT
CLASSIFY MYSELF AS AN EXPERT MEDITATOR BUT MY ACHIEVEMENTS IN MEDITATION MAY
FAR EXCEED THOSE WHO ARE PROFESSIONAL OR SERIOUS MEDITATORS.
THE
BUDDHA SPOKE OF RIGHT CONCENTRATION AS A FACTOR OF THE NOBLE EIGHTFOLD PATH,
THOSE WHO MEDITATE, MEDITATE WRONGLY AND THUS STILL HAVE WRONG CONCENTRATION.
IF YOU
MEDITATE INCORRECTLY HOWEVER MUCH, YOU HAVE WRONG CONCENTRATION.
Do you have right concentration?
There is
such a thing as right concentration and it is a factor of the Buddha’s noble
eightfold path.
If you
have stopped your mental force prolonging, changing speed and strength, you do
not stretch your syllables, change speed and loudness, you have right
concentration, you have achieved the first higher state of mind.
If in
addition you have stopped thinking and your mind is unified, singular, you have
right concentration, you have achieved the second higher state of mind.
If you
further has stopped your mental force from stirring to like or dislike anything
happening, you have even higher right concentration, the third higher state of
mind.
Finally
if you have reached the high concentration whereby you experience no pain or
pleasure you have the fourth higher right concentration.
NOWADAYS
WHEN MY MIND HAS REACHED A CERTAIN CONCENTRATION THINGS THAT CAUSED PAIN IN THE
PAST DO NOT CAUSE PAIN (EG PEOPLE SPITTING AT ME) AND SO I HAVE REACHED THE
FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND.
WOULD YOU
PREFER OTHERS’ SPITTING TO HURT YOU OR WOULD YOU PREFER NOT TO BE HURT BY
OTHERS’ SPITTING? HENCE NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE IS A HIGHER STATE THAN
FEELING PAIN AND PLEASURE.
Without right concentration you are doomed:
Anyone
without right concentration is doomed, condemned to severe suffering here and
he is headed for more even eternal suffering after he passes away.
Anyone
with right concentration is safe, no matter what happens to him here, he has
achieved the highest possible happiness here and he is headed for the highest
eternal life possible after he dies.
ANYONE
WHO HAS ACHIEVED RIGHT CONCENTRATION EXPERIENCES THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE HAPPINESS
HERE AND HE IS HEADED FOR ETERNAL LIFE WITHOUT SUFFERING AND HIGH HAPPINESS
AFTER HE DIES.
ANYONE
WITHOUT RIGHT CONCENTRATION MUST SUFFER TERRIBLY MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY AND HE
IS HEADED FOR ENDLESS WOES AFTER HE DIES.
NO STYLE,
NO THINKING, NO LIKE OR DISLIKE, NO PAIN OR PLEASURE, THESE ARE THE RIGHT
CONCENTRATIONS OF THE MIND.
Nothing more urgent than developing right concentration:
The
Buddha said there are three urgent tasks for a being who treasures his life,
namely to heighten his virtue (right conduct and speech), his concentration and
discernment.
THERE ARE
THREE URGENT TASKS FOR YOU ABOVE ALL ELSE IF YOU VALUE YOUR LIFE ACCORDING TO
THE BUDDHA AND IT IS TO HEIGHTEN YOUR VIRTUE, CONCENTRATION AND DISCERNMENT
(ABILITY TO SEE THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE).
EXCLUSIVE: Simon Cowell
jets off on month-long break to St Tropez with friends to escape furore of
married pregnant lover
- X-Factor creator to holiday on yacht he was pictured embracing Lauren Silverman on last year
- Cowell expected to be joined by ex-girlfriends Sinitta and Mezghan Hussainy
You may be very rich and able to instantly jet off for holiday to escape the heat but it never works, your troubles are like your shadow that never leaves you and the trying to shake off makes it worse.
If you
don’t want trouble you must be wise not to create it or expose yourself such
that you land in trouble, once you are in trouble, no matter how you try with holidays
or alcohol or music or whatever it will never leave you until you have repaid
your debts due by suffering.
Work
stress drives some to take holidays but these are never the answers they are
made up to be. Give up work like the Buddha and there is no need to escape the
stress of work and if you won’t give up work you can take all the holidays you
like but there is a noose of suffering and death around your neck that will
make you suffer and ultimately kill you and you are headed for more suffering
after you do. So anyone who justifies work and encourages others to work is
creating debt not merit for himself.
This
statement is never issued out of reason but out of emotion to stir emotion.
There is no big deal and it is making a fuss out of a molehill, being a dad as
if it is something to get excited or overboard about.
WHETHER
THERE IS ANY NECESSITY TO DWELL ON HIM BEING A NEW DAD AND PLAYING POLO IS
OBJECTIVE NOT SUBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE REFUTED. IF THERE IS NOTHING TO BE
CELEBRATED ABOUT, IN FACT BEING A DAD IS A BURDEN NOT PLEASURE, YOU ARE
TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS IN DELUSION, YOU WILL GO MAD AND YOU HAVE DEBT
FOSTERING THE SAME IN OTHERS.
CARRYING
BALLS IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT TO HELL.
It is
hypocrisy that the US and UK should express concern over the Zimbabwee vote and
not the Malaysian vote and the reason is self serving. If it suits the US &
UK the faction they want should win, then they acquiesce.
DO YOU
THINK SERIOUS MALPRACTICES THAT INFLUENCED THE RESULTS DID NOT OCCUR IN
MALAYSIAN ELECTIONS? IS THE US AND UK UNAWARE THAT THIS IS SO OR DID THEY TURN
A BLIND EYE EXPEDIENTLY WHILST THEY HYPOCRITICALLY RAISED THEIR VOICES IN
ZIMBABWEE?
The US preferred government for Malaysia:
The US’
preferred government for Malaysia does not necessarily correspond with the
people’s preferred government and you think America cares for the people of
Malaysia or that it should have a reliable bulwark against burgeoning Islamism?
Those
running the US policy knows Anwar’s Islamic credentials are far more convincing
than the ruling elite and there is the bogey of Pas that they do not like and
so like Singapore, the ruling elite is the preferred government and it
hypocritically thread the line of democracy.
UNDERNEATH
THE HYPOCRISY IN THE WEST, ISLAMOPHOBIA THAT IS NOT BASED ON UNDERSTANDING BUT
DISLIKE AND FEAR RULES AND THEY PREFER CERTAIN GOVERNMENTS FOR SELF SERVING
REASONS THAT ARE NOT NECESSARY CORRECT. IN MALAYSIA’S CASE THE FEAR FOR ISLAMIC
FUNDAMENTALISM IS DELUDED, MISGUIDED.
Impossible the US can be neutral:
The US
always has vested interests in any matter, to preserve its dominance or
ascendancy or influence, to gain and reap material advantage from its dominant
position, to prevent upstarts (eg China) from usurping its influence and so if
you think the US can be neutral in any international affair, it has no interests
and does nothing to side with preferred governments overseas you are deluded.
Even in developed countries like Australia, America secretly has preferred
parties it likes installed as government. In Japan the US may prefer the LDP to
its opponents as government.
AMERICA
IS AVARICIOUS AND BEING DOMINANT IT EXERCISES ITS POWERS AND INFLUENCES AND
TRIES TO PREVENT UPSTARTS (ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM IS AN UPSTART) FROM USURPING
ITS DOMINANCE.
This
article pretends to answer what has gone wrong. I tell you my answer.
All these
people who dress themselves as defenders of Islam are only posturing, putting
on a show, point scoring and trying to impress others with their credentials
and fervour and using opportunities (excuses) to persecute others.
IT IS ONE
UPMANSHIP IN MALAYSIA GONE BESERK, EACH ONE TRYING TO SHOW OTHERS HOW PIOUS AND
DEFENDING HE IS AND ALL THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE FAWNING ATTITUDE AND HYPOCRISY
OF THE RULING ELITE THAT ENCOURAGES SUCH PEOPLE TO MAKE A NAME FOR THEMSELVES. IT
IS NOT UNIQUE BUT HAS HAPPENED MANY TIMES IN THE PAST.
HUIZHOU,
China (Reuters) - Chinese bloggers trying to expose corruption say they are
coming under increasing physical and verbal attack over their reports, in what
anti-graft activists describe as another blow to efforts to make Chinese
officials more accountable.
One
whistle blower had his ears cut off, hands chopped off and blinded in one eye.
It shows
that the basis of China is not goodness but even unfettered corruption.
Corruption
is never good for any country and any economy built on corruption, in which
corruption is rife is a recipe for disaster and collapse.
THERE ARE
MANY PORTENDS THAT SPELL ECONOMIC DISASTER IN CHINA FOR THOSE WHO ARE
DISCERNING. THE PRESENCE OF SIGNIFICANT VIRULENT CORRUPTION IS FURTHER
INDICATION THE END POINT FOR CHINA ECONOMICALLY IS NOT GOOD BUT DISASTROUS AND
IT MAY NOT HAVE MUCH LONGER TO RUN.
‘My wife taught me it is an adventure’ is not a valid reason for being
not frightened of death and so what he says is so much bravado not based on
knowledge. Many do not realize they have false logic and this is an example of
somnolent false logic. If you see and know there is no suffering for you after
death then that is a correct reason for not being frightened by death.
THAT MY WIFE TAUGHT ME DEATH IS AN ADVENTURE IS NOT A VALID REASON FOR
NOT BEING FRIGHTENED BY DEATH. AS THE BUDDHA SAID, THERE ARE THOSE WHO HAVE NOT
DONE GOOD AND WHO ARE ATTACHED TO THEIR LIVES HERE WHO WILL FIND DEATH FEARFUL
AND SO BECAUSE THE REASON HE PROFFERS IS FALSE, HE IS DELUDED OR TELLING A LIE
THAT IS THE WAY TO WOE AND FEAR MUST LURK IN HIS MIND NO MATTER HOW HE DENIES.
AN ADVENTURE IS NOT ALWAYS FUN AND CAN BE WITH UNCERTAINTY AND ANXIETY OR FEAR AND SO EVEN IF IT IS AN ADVENTURE IT IS NOT WITHOUT FEAR. HE IS TALKING RUBBISH, MUDDLED AND THAT IS ALWAYS ACCOMPANIED BY FEAR.
AN ADVENTURE IS NOT ALWAYS FUN AND CAN BE WITH UNCERTAINTY AND ANXIETY OR FEAR AND SO EVEN IF IT IS AN ADVENTURE IT IS NOT WITHOUT FEAR. HE IS TALKING RUBBISH, MUDDLED AND THAT IS ALWAYS ACCOMPANIED BY FEAR.
He is expressing his defiance not the truth:
What he
said that he is not frightened by death because his wife taught him it is an
adventure is never true, out of knowing but it is in defiance, in stirred
emotion or force to deny his fear and falsely state he is different from the
rest.
Death is
death and it has a nature that is never pleasant according to the Buddha who
guides the way out of death to the Deathless, if death could be an adventure or
fun the Buddha would not have taught the way out of death and so he is speaking
falsely, death is never fun or an adventure and he is heading for a ‘rude’
surprise if he expects an adventure and fun.
Incredible that ordinary people are fearless:
Until a
person has reached the third higher state of mind where his mental force is not
stirred to like, dislike, be sad, hurt, confused and fearful he is never truly
effortlessly free of fear. Instead he may use force to suppress his fear that
is never genuine but controlled fearlessness that is subject to loss of control
and uncontrollable fear.
Further
no one is a master of his fears but he is a slave and it is not in his power to
say I shall now fear, I shall now not fear.
FEAR IS
AN INVOLUNTARY CONDITIONED STIRRING OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE AND IT REFLECTS
DELUSION THAT PEOPLE BOAST ABOUT THEIR FEARLESSNESS. ONLY WHEN A PERSON HAS
REACHED THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE IS HE TRULY
EFFORTLESSLY WITHOUT FEAR BECAUSE YOU NEED TO BE STIRRED TO BE FEARFUL.
Anyone who goes against himself must be fearful:
Anyone
who does or says things that goes against himself, harms himself must be
fearful no matter how he tries to deny to himself and others.
Anyone
who never does or says things that harm himself does not need to be fearful.
Prolonging
syllables, changing loudness and speed is useless, for show and applies force
on self and so he must do so with suppressed fear or resistance.
In the
same way, smiling and laughing is for show that demands the use of force that
is harmful and the person must stir fear with his smiling and laughter.
ORDINARY
PEOPLE ARE GOING AGAINST THEMSELVES ALL THE TIME AND THIS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED
BY FEAR BECAUSE IT IS HARMFUL AND POTENTIALLY FATAL AND SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE
THAT THEY SHOULD BE WITHOUT FEAR.
This
question should not arise in the minds of those with true understanding. You do
not find things to talk about, that is a false and thus mad reason for speaking
but when the occasion or need arises you talk.
Only a
person who is a robot who follows a ritual of speaking, he always speak at an
allotted time is moved to ask himself, what shall he speak today, to find a
topic to speak about.
Again a
person whose speaking is programmed, he has an urge to speak rather than reason
to speak, driven by the urge to speak, asks what shall we talk today.
IT IS
SILLY AND THUS CONTROLLED INSANITY TO ASK WHAT SHALL I SPEAK TODAY BECAUSE IT
REFLECTS SPEAKING COMING FROM URGE, FORCE, PROGRAMMING RATHER THAN GENUINE
NEED. ALL TALKING IS ACTUALLY SUFFERING AND SO THE WISE PERSON WILL SPEAK
MINIMALLY AS WHEN NECESSARY, ONLY (MAD) CHATTERBOXES WILL ASK WHAT SHALL I
SPEAK TODAY.
Without rehashing from a library you cannot ask what shall I speak?
In order
to ask what shall I talk about you need to have a library of recorded talks
that you scan to find a topic to speak about. If a person’s talk is not
pre-prepared, rehashed, it needs an occasion to arise before it can be
specifically freshly prepared addressing the occasion.
ONLY IF A
PERSON IS A ROBOT WITH A REPERTOIRE OF RECORDED TALKS FROM WHICH HE PICKS AND
REHASHES CAN HE ASK ‘WHAT SHALL I TALK ABOUT?’
Speaking out of expectation not need:
‘What shall
we talk about today’ is speaking out of expectation not need or reason and it
is controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity.
The fool
feels resplendent in his pride as if he is a master ‘what shall I talk about’
when he is a slave of expectation, a robot in danger of suffering. When there
is nothing to speak the wise person remains silent and when he speaks it is
sparingly pertinent to the subject at hand.
SPEAKING
OUT OF EXPECTATION IS THE DEFAULT MODE IN SOCIETY AND IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY
THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.
If you
speak without discernment like this you are heading for even eternal woe.
It is not
sleep that is a driver’s worst enemy but falling asleep at the wheel that is
dangerous.
SLEEP IS
NEVER A DRIVER’S ENEMY, FALLING ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL IS DANGEROUS. ENEMY AND
DANGER ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS AND ONE. AGAIN IT REFLECTS THE PREDILECTION OF
EMOTIONAL PEOPLE TO SEE FALSELY AN ENEMY WHERE THERE IS ONLY DANGER.
Jesus: You cannot serve God and mammon
Jesus: "No one can serve two masters; for
either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the
one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.
Mammon is
money, wealth, prosperity, greed, ambition.
Jesus
says money, wealth, prosperity, greed, ambition are incompatible with God and
because even devout Christian and clergy are greedy, ambitious and hoard wealth
(the Church has lots of money and gold) even Christians do not obey what Jesus
commanded.
The
Buddha said God has no money or wives and so if you want to follow the Father
you too must similarly not be acquisitive because such acquisitiveness consumes
the person, he becomes the slave of acquisition and is led on to endless
suffering and death with the Devil and his angels cheering you on.
And
people go to universities to study so that they can work and make money, settle
and find a niche for themselves in this world, establishing themselves in this
world, establishing themselves in death and suffering.
WORK IS
NOT GOOD, IT IS THE DEVIL’S BAIT AND YOKE WELL ASSUMED BY DELUDED PEOPLE, IT IS
ALWAYS SUFFERING AND BONDS THE PERSON TO SUFFERING AND A LIFETIME’S WORK WILL
DESTROY THE DOPEY FOOL SO THAT HE BECOMES SHATTERED TO DIE IN RUIN HEADING FOR
ENDLESS CYCLES OF BIRTH, SUFFERING AND DEATH WHEN HE COULD BE HEAVEN ENJOYING
HIMSELF FREE FROM SUFFERING AND DEATH.
This is a
delusional and nonsensical statement and if you are receptive to its message,
you are gullible and do not truly understand.
If
Singaporeans know they have good jobs why do they speak of feeling? Feeling is
subjective, deceptive and it is not about knowing and so the survey findings is
not about truth or facts but feelings.
Singaporeans
feel they have good jobs because it is impossible to know you have good jobs
because all jobs is suffering even death inducing and you submit yourself to a
job for the material rewards it brings and so it is impossible for any job no
matter how ideal or ‘enjoyable’ or easy to be good.
THERE IS
NO SUCH THING AS A TRULY GOOD JOB. YOU ARE DELUDED AND MASOCHISTIC IF YOU THINK
SOME JOBS CAN BE GOOD BECAUSE ALL JOBS INVOLVE SUFFERING, RESTRICTIONS AND
MONOTONY AND SO IT IS SENSELESS TO ASK OTHERS ABOUT THEIR FEELINGS ABOUT THEIR
JOBS. EVEN IF YOU FEEL GOOD ABOUT YOUR JOBS IT DOES NOT AMELIORATE ITS
SUFFERING AND KILLING YOU, INSTEAD IT LULLS YOU INTO DANGEROUS COMPLACENCY
ABOUT YOUR JOB.
You feel good about suffering and being killed?
Whether
your job causes you suffering daily and is slowly killing you is objective not
subjective. If it is causing you serious stress and killing you and you think
not then you are deluded.
And if it
is killing you and causing you suffering and you feel good about your job, you
are sick and must stir conflict that ends in torment.
I SAY ALL
JOBS ARE SUFFERING AND KILLING YOU. IF YOU THINK SOMETHING THAT CAUSES YOU
SUFFERING AND KILLS YOU IS GOOD THEN YOU MUST BE SICK.
Obama disappointed by
Snowden asylum
This
shows you have a fool as president and he is unnecessarily heaping karma to be
repaid as suffering.
There is
no need and it is mad to be disappointed because it is a blind meaningless
harmful stirring of mental force, he is wishing Snowden harm for doing
something right, exposing wrongdoing and that has further karma. He would be
wise to be glad Snowden found refuge.
OBAMA
WOULD BE WISE TO SAY HE IS GLAD SNOWDEN FOUND ASYLUM BUT TO BE DISAPPOINTED
DENOTES ILL WILL ESPECIALLY WHEN WHAT SOWDEN DID WAS CORRECT TO EXPOSE
WRONDOING AND THIS HAS KARMA FOR HIM.
FURTHER
IT IS MAD AND WIL LEAD TO MADNESS TO STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE DISAPPOINTED.
Meditating without aim:
If your
aim in meditation is false then it is no different to meditating without aim
and a person who meditates without aim can only go around in circles, it is
impossible that meditating without aim or with false aim you can come to exit
from suffering and death.
And so if
one wishes to escape endless suffering and torment one must keep in mind the
targets to be achieved by meditating and these are:
Firstly
to stop one’s mental force from constantly madly prolonging, changing speed and
strength.
Secondly
to be aware of one’s constant (emotional) thinking and put a stop to it so that
one achieves the second higher state of mind.
Thirdly
to stop one’s mental force from stirring to like and dislike.
Finally
to stop one’s mind from seeking and perceiving pain and pleasure that is not a
deprivation but an incomparable exit from suffering because pleasure too is
suffering.
No comments:
Post a Comment