Why no radio response from plane?
Soon after the plane went missing,
planes in the vicinity were asked to establish radio contact with MH370 and they
failed.
This means multisystem (radio, radar,
ASCARS) failure. This could be due to human mischief (disconnection) or due to
destruction (fire, bomb, structural damage). The latter may be excluded if the
various non-functioning parts are far apart and it would take massive damage to
knock them all out which would have meant an immediate crash of the plane.
DEPENDING ON THE LOCATIONS OF THE
RADAR, RADIO AND ASCARS SYSTEMS, IT MAY TAKE (UNLIKELY EVEN IMPOSSIBLE) SEVERE
DAMAGE OR FIRE TO KNOCK THEM ALL OUT WHICH WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE
PLANE TO CONTINUE ON ITS COMPLEX CLIMBING DIVING, NAVIGATED COURSE FOR HOURS.
RADIO, RADAR AND ACARS ALL SUDDENLY
STOPPED FUNCTIONING. COULD A NATURAL CAUSE (FIRE, BOMB, STRUCTURAL DAMAGE) DO
THIS AND YET ALLOW THE PLANE TO BE FLOWN IN A COMPLICATED WAY?
Pilot action is the inevitable
conclusion:
There are never perfect crimes, if the
captain did it, he must have thought about it thoroughly even to extent of
disconnecting ASCARS, flying to 45,000 feet to knock off all passengers and fly
it to the Indian Ocean so that no one will find the wreck but there are always
significant undisputable evidence that point towards the actual cause of the
disappearance that can never be completely obliterated and those who are discerning
are able to piece together the actual cause of the disappearance.
Hijackers can be excluded because the
plane remained at 45,000 feet for 23 minutes that would have knocked them off
unless they brought their own oxygen bottles and how did they smuggle that
through airport security?
Any calamity (fire, bomb, structural
disintegration) must explain the disparate loss of radio, radar, ASCARS (but
not pinging function) and if severe damage is required to cause all to not
function, how did it enable the plane to keep flying for hours following
navigational points and climbing to 45,000 feet?
There is testimony by a pilot friend of
the captain’s frame of mind that was not fit for flying and so the most
plausible if not certain cause is that he got up, went to the first class
section, pull out the carpet, deactivated the ACARS returned to the cockpit,
strangled his co-pilot from behind, disabled the transponder and then took the
plane up to 45,000 feet to knock off everyone whilst he kept himself alive with
the oxygen supply in the cockpit and then he undertook the journey to his
watery grave.
THERE ARE NEVER PERFECT CRIMES THAT CAN
BE COMPLETELY DISGUISED TO APPEAR OTHERWISE, ALWAYS THERE ARE TELL TALE SIGNS
FOR THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING WHILST THOSE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING ARE
BEFUDDLED, CRY IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE.
First the good news:
First, the good news. The
rainy season has begun and will bring relief to those putting up with water
rationing exercise. Now, the bad news. The storms and showers won’t be here for
long. Be prepared for another long, dry spell from June to October. And for
more water rationing.
The truth of the situation is that the
rainy season has begun but it is forecast there will be a dry spell from June
to October.
It is totally unnecessary to refer to
good and bad news, leave others to decide for themselves whether it is good or
bad news and it is a complication to say so and it is copycat, he is not the
first to use this copied format, ‘first the good news, now the bad news’ which
is intended to stir emotion and conflict with karma attached.
FIRST THE GOOD NEWS NEXT THE BAD NEWS
IS A COPIED STYLE NOT SUBSTANCE OF SPEECH AND SO THE SPEECH IS REHASHED AND IT
IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, INTENDED TO WICKEDLY STIR EMOTION, CONFLICT THAT HAS
KARMA ATTACHED, LEADS TO FUTURE SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT.
How to be happy in a world like this?
Even if you see nothing wrong, you
don’t understand, you side with the offender and think it is reasonable,
meaningful to speak of ‘first the good news, next the bad news’ your resistance
must be stirred that leads to stress when people address you in such a way and
this is not isolated but relentless, much more frequent that switched off
robots hiding within their shells realize.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANYONE, NO MATTER
HOW SUCCESSFUL, WEALTHY AND POWERFUL HE IS TO BE HAPPY OR ENJOY HIMSELF IN THIS
WORLD WHEN EVERYONE IS BOMBARDING HIM WITH NONSENSE, FALSITIES PACKAGED AS
TRUTH AND GOOD, THERE IS ACCOMPANYING FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND
LOUDNESS THAT STIRS HIS RESISTANCE LEADING TO STRESS.
12:35pm
Caterers and
mangosteens under scrutiny after investigation fails to uncover any major
leads.
It reflects how deluded people are.
Can ASCAR and radar transponder be
poisoned by the food so that they too were knocked out like all the passengers
and crew?
IF YOU ENTERTAIN ABSURD CAUSES OF EVENTS
YOU ARE HEADING FOR ABSURDITY AND THAT IS INSANITY AND NEVER FUN.
The illegal
party drug, ketamine, is an "exciting" and "dramatic" new
treatment for depression, say doctors who have conducted the first trial in the
UK
All drugs harm even as they ‘cure’ you,
especially certain drugs like ketamine that have strong harmful mental effects.
It reflects delusion that you should
get excited, your mental force stirred strongly to be attracted by the
possibility it treats depression, it is not the therapy that is exciting but
the stirring of your mental force that is meaningless, harmful and blind that
makes it exciting.
Ketamine is never the answer to
depression because the lack of ketamine is not the cause of depression but it
is the automated heedless incessant prolonging of the person’s mental force
that when it seizes the fool like a vice that will not let go that cause him to
become depressed that sometimes, he may be able to shake loose the noose and
recover but at times the grip of depression is too strong for him to overcome
and he descends deeper and deeper into prolonging darkness until he kills
himself to try to end his agony.
DEPRESSION IS DEADLY, WHEN DEPRESSION
GRIPS A PERSON’S MIND IT IS A LIFE AND DEATH STRUGGLE THAT HE MAY SOMEHOW WIN
AND SHAKE OFF THE DARK SHADOW OF DEATH OF DEPRESSION BUT SOMETIMES THE GRIP OF
DEPRESSION IS TOO STRONG, IT PULLS HIM DOWN AND DOWN A PIT THAT HE CANNOT CLIMB
UP SO THAT IN DESPAIR HE KILLS HIMSELF.
IF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE NEVER
PROLONGS, CHANGES SPEED OR STRENGTH (AS IS POSSIBLE EVEN IF YOU ARE EVERYONE
HERE CANNOT AND WILL NOT WORK TO DESTROY) THE PERSON CANNOT BECOME DEPRESSED
BUT IF THE PERSON PERMITS HIS MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG, HE WILL NEVER ESCAPE
DEPRESSION NO MATTER WHAT DRUGS, EXERCISE OR YOGA HE DOES.
THE
PROLONGING OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS THE CAUSE OF DEPRESSION AND SO LONG AS
THE PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS ALLOWED TO CONSTANTLY PROLONG, HE WILL NEVER ESCAPE
DEPRESSION THAT BECOMES DARKER AND MORE MORBID AS HE AGES.
Depression is always the result of sin:
It is impossible for a person who truly
is not a sinner to be depressed and depression is always caused by sin and the
depressed person is never blameless but deserves to suffer even die.
Anyone who prolongs his syllables,
changes speed and strength in his syllables and actions plies all those who
come into contact, including his dearest ones with harmful totally unnecessary
force and so he is guilty of harming others, he is a sinner and deserves to
suffer, to be depressed.
DEPRESSION IS CAUSED BY THE PROLONGING
OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE THAT IS MANIFEST IN HIS SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT PLY
OTHERS WITH FORCE PROLONGING THAT HARMS ALL THOSE WHO COME INTO CONTACT AND SO
HE IS A SINNER, HARMS OTHERS AND DESERVE TO SUFFER FROM DEPRESSION.
Matt McGrath Environment
correspondent
- More from Matt
- Follow Matt on Twitter
14:23 UK
time, Monday, 31 March 2014
This is the speech of a fool, a deluded
man.
He is more concerned about whether the
report is overly alarming or not, overly stirs his mental force to be fearful,
agitated when it is a matter of whether the report is true or accurate or not.
In fact mankind may have severely
underestimated the destruction of the earth and thus alteration of the climate
than even that ‘alarming’ report.
ONLY A PERSON WITHOUT TRUE
UNDERSTANDING WILL HOME IN ON THE ALARMING ASPECT OF A REPORT, THOSE WHO TRULY
UNDERSTAND KNOW IT IS POINTLESS TO BE ALARMED BUT WHAT MATTERS IS WHETHER IT IS
TRUE OR ACCURATE, AN OVERESTIMATE OR UNDERESTIMATE.
Dorairaj Nadason
This is what fascinates (fascination is
a matter of stirred mental force) deluded people, pairing sense in
insensitivity which is a show people put on and sense in ‘no sense’ or no
meaning, they find such coming together or play of words fascinating and that
is controlled insanity.
Insensitivity and no sense are actually
two totally different things that share the same word ‘sense’ and stylish
people are fascinated by the play of words and think they are very clever
speaking thus.
Sensitivity and insensitivity are never matters of meaning or sense but they are conditioned rehashed shows or
acts people put on, when something tragic happen you may put on a show of pious
sympathy or you may become hardened to be indifferent even mocking.
If you think there are insensitivities
or sensitivities that make sense you are deluded, do not understand sensitivity
or insensitivity.
THERE IS NEVER ANY SENSE IN SENSITIVITY
OR INSENSITIVITY, THEY ARE ACTUALLY SHOWS PEOPLE PUT ON, THEY ARE ABOUT
HYPOCRISY, THEY ARE ROBOTICALLY, SOCIALLY CONDITIONED SHOWS PEOPLE PUT ON, YOU
PUT ON A SHOW OF SENSITIVITY OR YOU BECOME HARDENED AND PUT ON A SHOW OF
INSENSITIVITY AND SO IF YOU THINK THAT THERE ARE CASES WHERE SUCH SHOWS MAKE
SENSE AND CASES WHERE THEY DON’T MAKE SENSE, YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW
WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
IT IS NEVER THAT YOU SHOULD BE
SENSITIVE OR INSENSITIVE ABOUT A SITUATION BUT YOU SHOULD TRULY UNDERSTAND IT
AND BEHAVE APPROPRIATELY.
Caring for others is not being sensitive:
In times of need when someone is
suffering, you care for them, you provide care for them and if you think that
is being sensitive you may be right or thoroughly deluded. Sensitivity is a
pious show people who are actors put on, trained by society, they put on glum
faces as if they are sad or troubled and speak and do things condescendingly as
if they share your grief or they too are aggrieved.
BEING SAD, ACTING AS IF YOU ARE SAD IS
ALWAYS A SHOW, SHOWING SENSITIVITY, IT IS USELESS AND SUFFERING FOR THE SAD
PERSON BUT WHAT MATTERS IS THE ASSISTANCE AND COMFORT YOU PROVIDE TO THE
PERSON. IF YOU THINK ASSISTANCE AND COMFORTING IS BEING SENSITIVE YOU ARE DELUDED.
THUS BEING SENSITIVE IS ABOUT PUTTING ON A SHOW AND IT NEVER MAKES SENSE
EXCEPT TO THE DELUDED.
Sensitivity is something you show, care
is something you do:
Sensitivity is always something a
person shows, never something he does and what is shown must be rehashed
according to recording in keeping with the culture of the society but caring is
not something you show but you do.
Show is something you do to be seen, it
is not meaningful and it is controlled insanity no matter how you swear by your
sensitivity.
Anwar: Malaysian government concealed
MH370 information
MALAYSIAN Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim claims Malaysia is
deliberately concealing information about missing flight MH370 and the
country’s radar system should have easily tracked the plane. The explosive claims come in an interview with the UK Telegraph , in which the former Deputy Prime Minister called for an international group to lead the investigation into the missing flight, as Malaysia’s integrity “is at stake”.
Mr Ibrahim stated that when he was Malaysian finance minister in 1994, he authorised the installation of a sophisticated radar system.
It was “not only unacceptable but not possible, not feasible” that Malaysia’s radar system did not track flight MH370 after it changed course while flying over the Gulf of Thailand in the early hours of March 8, he told The Telegraph.
“We don’t have the sophistication of the United States or Britain but still we have the capacity to protect our borders,” he said.
Under standard operating procedure, the Malaysian air force should have been alerted to a problem with MH370 within minutes, he said.
Mr Ibrahim accused the Malaysian government of an “intention to suppress key information” about MH370.
On the one hand the police say they
have very good leads they are following but will not reveal for fear of
jeopardizing investigations and on the other hand they say the mystery may
never be solved.
If you have very good leads that you
are now pursuing surely you should not be so negative as to say it may never be
solved.
Malaysia’s crucial early obstruction of
search:
According to Anwar, Malaysian authorities
through its military radar information knew MH370 turned away from the gulf and
flew to the Straits of Malacca and so rather than waste valuable time searching
the gulf, if it had acted on its information, should have searched the Indian
Ocean.
The US may have been saying something
when its sophisticated Orion surveillance aircraft was searching the Straits
even as others concentrated on the gulf.
EITHER BY INCOMPETENCE OR WILFUL
PRETENCE (AS ACCUSED BY ANWAR) THE MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT HAVE WASTED
EVERYONE’S TIME SEARCHING THE GULF WHEN IT
If possible causes of MH370’s
disappearance can be eliminated, what remains is the cause:
IF
YOU CAN ELIMINATE ALL POTENTIAL CAUSES UNTIL YOU END UP WITH ONLY ONE POSSIBLE
CAUSE THEN THAT MUST BE THE CAUSE.
ONLY
IF A FEW POSSIBLE CAUSES CANNOT BE ELIMINATED WILL THE DISAPPEARANCE BE
UNSOLVABLE.
It is never in truth but in delusion
that it is said MH370 may never be solved because despite the deliberate
attempts of the culprit to disguise the flight and destiny of the plane,
sufficient information is available for a person to come to the conclusion what
actually happened.
Potential causes like hijackers, fire,
bombs, structural failure can be eliminated by information available.
BOEING EXPERTS SHOULD KNOW WHETHER IT
IS POSSIBLE OR IMPOSSIBLE FOR A FIRE TO DESTROY ACARS, RADAR TRANSPONDER AND
RADIO COMMUNICATION WITHOUT DESTROYING THE PINGING FUNCTION. IF THE PINGING AND
ACARS APPARATUS AND THEIR POWER SUPPLIES ARE INTIMATELY LINKED SO THAT IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO DESTROY ACARS WITHOUT DESTROYING PINGING AND THE FIRE MUST BE
DEVASTATING TO ALSO DESTROY TRANSPONDERS AND RADIO, THEN IT CAN BE EXCLUDED AS
CAUSE BECAUSE PINGING CONTINUED AND THE PLANE DESPITE SEVERE FIRE MANAGED TO
FLY HOURS AFTER ON A SOPHISTICATED COURSE.
HIJACKERS CAN BE RULED OUT BECAUSE THE
PLANE CLIMBED TO 45000 FEET FOR 23 MINUTES THAT WOULD HAVE KILLED HIJACKERS IF
THEY DID NOT BRING THEIR OWN OXYGEN BOTTLES.
AND
SO IF YOU CAN ELIMINATE ALL POTENTIAL CAUSES UNTIL YOU END UP WITH ONLY ONE POSSIBLE
CAUSE THAT MUST BE THE CAUSE.
Elimination is a valid conduit to
answers:
Because there are things that are
possible and things that are impossible, it is not everything is possible as
some fools contend, by a process of SCRUPULOUS elimination a discerning person
working with available data can come to a valid conclusion what happened if all
other causes can be eliminated.
IF ALL OTHER CAUSES CAN BE (SCRUPULOUSLY)
ELIMINATED THEN WHAT REMAINS MUST BE THE CAUSE.
Sooner or later wreckage must turn up:
Debris from the Fukushima earthquake
has turned up along the Pacific shores of America and so if MH370 did meet its
end in the Indian Ocean, it will break up and material from it (crates, life
jackets, buoyant objects must rise to the surface and be swept by currents to
reach remote shores sooner or later and it is a matter of someone getting hold
of it and notifying authorities.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR MH370 TO DISAPPEAR
WITHOUT TRACE EVEN IF A CATASTROPHIC EXPLOSION, OBJECTS WITH BUOYANCY WILL
FLOAT TO THE SURFACE TO BE CARRIED BY CURRENTS TO EVEN REMOTE SHORES OR PASSING
SHIPS.
What caused ACARS, transponder and radio
communication to fail?
ACARS, radar transponder and radio
communications were noted to fail in short order and whatever caused the flight
to disappear must explain their failure.
If the co-pilot was flying the plane it
could not have been him. Obviously the captain could have been the culprit.
Because ACARS requires difficult access, any hijackers who in any case would
have been wiped out in the flight to 45,000 feet, it is unlikely they would
want ACARS turned off when it is troublesome to turn off. If hijackers were
responsible and the flight to 45,000 feet was a pilot attempt to knock them off
then it would be foolhardy because the pilot will end up with a plane load of
dead passengers and why did they not radio for help or press the emergency
button if there was a hijack?
If the captain hijacked the plane for a
suicide flight it is understandable he might want to be undisturbed by
passengers on his journey and so he will knock them off for good before he
embarked on his journey.
A fire or bomb or structural failure
bad enough to cause widespread spreading damage to ACARS, transponder and radio
communications but nevertheless allow complicated navigation on an extended
flight to the Indian Ocean is absurd.
If RMAF had not been derelict but scrambled
a plane up to investigate, it would have at least confirmed the plane was
intact, there was no sign of life amongst passengers and who was flying the plane
before it vanished into the vast expanses of the Indian Ocean.
IT IS DIFFICULT TO EXPLAIN ACARS,
TRANSPONDER AND RADIO COMMUNICATION FAILURE THAT ALL OCCURRED EXCEPT BY PILOT
ACTION.
This is a highly unusual crash:
How many crashes are there where the
ACARS, radar transponder and radio communication fail hours before the actual
crash and the crash was far from where initial loss of communications occurred
and here is another indication of foul play by pilots.
There are many cases of doctors killing
many of their patients and routinely people run amok and shoot their colleagues
in the America and so what is so special about MAS pilots that they cannot
snap, go berserk and end it all by hijacking their planes?
THIS IS A HIGHLY UNUSUAL CRASH NOT
BECAUSE IT IS A MYSTERY BUT IT IS NOT ACTUALLY A NATURAL CRASH BUT A DISGUISED
SUICIDE.
Poseidon pilot: Indian Ocean most
desolate, remote
The pilot of the most sophisticated
search plane, the US Poseidon P8 said it was his first time over the Indian
Ocean and his impression was that it was the most desolate Ocean he has seen,
no shipping, no islands and so if the captain has done some research it would
have been the ideal place to dump his plane deep where it is most difficult to
recover.
Sensitivity is conditioned rehashed behaviour
to please and hypocritical:
Sensitivity in one’s behaviour and
speech is never something natural or true but it is conditioned, learnt,
remembered and rehashed according to the situation to curtail behaviour deemed
insensitive and express behaviour deemed sensitive to please and impress
others, it is purely for show no matter how meaningful you swear it is and it
is hypocritical because it is not that insensitive or hurtful behaviour is
absent in you but you curtail, do not express it for the occasion.
Suppose someone is grieving and you
learn not to laugh, boast, to crack dirty jokes in his presence so as not to
upset him. It is not that the urge to boast, laugh, crack dirty jokes is truly
absent in you but you hypocritically suppress it just to be sensitive.
Suppose someone has no urge to boast,
to laugh and crack dirty jokes. He does not boast, laugh or crack dirty jokes
in front of a grieving person because he truly is not boastful or dirty and so
it is never hypocritical but genuine.
SENSITIVITY IS ABOUT BEHAVIOUR IN
SPEECH AND ACTION THAT YOU TEMPORARILY CURTAIL, BEHAVIOUR THAT YOU EXPRESS THAT
IS PURELY FOR SHOW, LEARNT FROM OTHERS AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY THAT IS
ACTUALLY HYPOCRITICAL JUST TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS, TO NOT UPSET SOMEONE
BECAUSE HE IS SUFFERING.
IF A PERSON’S BEHAVIOUR IS TRULY
WHOLESOME, HE NEVER JOKES LET ALONE TELL DIRTY JOKES, HE DOES NOT LAUGH AT
OTHERS, HE IS NOT BOASTFUL, HIS BEHAVIOUR THAT DOES NOT UPSET A SUFFERING
PERSON IS NOT TEMPORARILY HYPOCRITICALLY CURTAILED TO BE SENSITIVE BUT IS
GENUINE.
THIS IS A WORLD THAT UPHOLDS
SENSITIVITY AS MEANINGFUL AND GOOD WHEN THAT IS DELUSION, FALSE UNDERSTANDING,
BEING SENSITIVE IS MEANINGLESS, HYPOCRITICAL, CONTROLLED INSANITY FOR SELF AND
BAD FOR OTHERS YOU DECEIVE.
This is a statement of delusion that
also makes others deluded and so it has debt never merit.
In any matter, whether you are a
Malaysian or journalist should be a consideration but it is whether something
is true or false, correct or incorrect, beneficial or harmful.
You need programming and you must be a
programmed robot to adopt the attitude, a Malaysian first, a journalist second
and being a robot is the path to future woe.
THERE IS NEVER A NECESSITY TO THINK OF
YOURSELF AS A MALAYSIAN FIRST AND JOURNALIST SECOND, IT IS A COMPLICATION AND
IF YOU THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL, NECESSARY, YOU ARE DELUDED AND THAT IS THE PATH
TO FUTURE SUFFERING NOT HAPPINESS.
PETALING
JAYA: Youth and Sports Minister Khairy Jamaluddin has criticised Opposition
Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for trying to score political points with
baseless claims that the Government knows more than what it has told the people
about Flight MH370.
What is said is actually not a valid
reply to Anwar’s allegations and he is attacking Anwar which is a form of ill
will and so he is creating karma for himself.
The correct answer is whether there is
basis or no basis in Anwar’s allegation, what has that got to do with Anwar
sinking to new lows?
IF YOUR RESPONSES TO SITUATIONS IS
INCORRECT YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL END IN
UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY THAT YOU IGNORE TO YOUR BITTER PAIN LATER.
Indications Malaysian government hindered
investigations:
IMMARSAT NOTIFIED THE MALAYSIAN GOVT
WITHIN 3 DAYS THAT MH370 FLEW FOR HOURS AFTER IT DISAPPEARED BUT THIS WAS ONLY
ADMITTED BY THE MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT ONE WEEK LATER, 4 DAYS WERE WASTED
SEARCHING THE SOUTH CHINA SEAS.
ACTUALLY MALAYSIA’S OWN MILITARY RADAR
DETECTED THE PLANE TURNED WEST, SO DID VIETNAM’S TRAFFIC CONTROL AND THAILAND
ADMITTED THE SAME MUCH LATER.
Quote Independent:
Even the most basic facts -
the sequence of events between take-off and the flight’s disappearance - has
been altered. Initially the last verbal communication from the aircraft was
said to be “Alright, goodnight,” spoken by the first officer (co-pilot), but
the transcript shows it was a fairly standard sign-off – "Good night
Malaysian three seven zero” - and it is not clear whether the captain or first
officer spoke.
There is also the
inexplicable delay in the release of the first significant data, obtained by
the British company, Inmarsat. The firm analysed some fragmentary satellite
data, found that the aircraft has been flying for far longer than previously
thought, and notified the Malaysian authorities of its discovery within 72
hours of the disappearance. But that was revealed only after a week – meaning
that four days were wasted searching the South China Sea.
MH 370’s black box overdue for service:
According to the manufacturer, MH370’s
black box missed its battery replacement in 2012 or 2013 and so it may not
transmit as long as 30 days as expected.
MAS appears to be cutting costs, not
doing routine maintenance of its planes and did not subscribe to some of the
flight monitoring services that Boeing provides that would have enabled it to
be tracked better.
AND SO WHAT THIS EPISODE EXPOSES IS THE
LACKADAISICAL MAS CULTURE WITH REGARD TO SAFETY (THAT IS NOT TO SAY THAT BEHIND
YOUR BACKS, BRITISH AIR, QANTAS AND SIA DO NOT DO THE SAME).
Wong Chun Wai
Things happen and sometimes when it
rains it pours but you get on and attend to the problems as they arise rather
than bother with bad publicity.
Bad and good publicity is only of
concern to people who are putting on a show impressing others and so they
welcome good publicity and become preoccupied with bad publicity and damage
control.
IF YOU ARE CONSCIOUS ABOUT BAD
PUBLICITY IT MEANS YOU ARE A SHOWMAN, WHAT YOU DO IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS
AND WHEN THINGS HAPPENED YOU ARE NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THE SUBSTANCE OF THE
ARISEN PROBLEM BUT YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE BAD PUBLICITY THAT YOU FALSELY
PERCEIVE IT GENERATES.
ANYONE CONCERNED WITH BAD PUBLICITY IS
DELUDED, HAS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN INSANITY, MAD PERCEPTION.
IT IS CONDITIONED SHARED FALSE
PERCEPTION OF MEN WHO ALL PUT ON SHOWS THAT THERE IS SUCH A THING CALLED BAD
PUBLICITY THAT THEY SHOULD AVOID AND GOOD PUBLICITY THAT THEY SHOULD TRY TO
CREATE ALWAYS (TO PROMOTE THEMSELVES).
From one
coffee bar to a 99-strong chain
Coffee is one thing, caffeine is
another different thing even though coffee contains caffeine and it is never
harmless or speaking true to call the person a caffeine king when it is coffee
that is the matter and it trains self and others to jump to unwarranted
conclusions and being vague than precise.
YOU AND EVERYONE SEE NOTHING WRONG,
THINK IT IS CHIC OR CLEVER CALLING A SUCCESSFUL COFFEE MERCHANT ‘CAFFEINE’ KING
WHEN IT TRAINS SELF AND OTHERS TO JUMP TO UNWARRANTED CONCLUSION. CAFFEINE AND
COFFEE ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS THAT SHOULD NOT BE INTERCHANGED AND CONFUSED
ONE FOR THE OTHER.
A
broad-based tax such as the goods and services tax is generally considered to
be a regressive tax. Before we go further, let us look at what 'regressive'
actually means.
If something is meaningless and you
think it full of meaning then you are deluded and headed for insanity.
It does not matter if the tax is
regressive or progressive but what matters is if it is right or wrong, harmful
or beneficial, necessary or unnecessary.
WHAT DOES IT MATTER IF IT IS REGRESSIVE
OR PROGRESSIVE? MONEY MATTERS ARE ACTUALLY IRRELEVANT TO THOSE WHO DO NOT WISH
TO BE PART OF THIS WORLD AND EVEN IF YOU ARE PART OF THIS WORLD, WHAT MATTERS
IS IF IT IS GOOD OR EVIL, CORRECT OR WRONG BUT BECAUSE YOU THINK IT MATTERS TO
KNOW IT IS REGRESSIVE YOU ARE HEADING FOR INSANITY YOU WILL DISCOVER IN DUE
COURSE.
Why MH370 hijacking can be excluded:
There is no reason why hijackers will
want to take the plane up to 45,000 feet for 23 minutes which jeopardizes them
especially if they have no oxygen supply of their own and people don’t do
unnecessary things (like ordering the plane up to 45,000 feet) for no reason
unless they are mad, if you said the captain took the plane up to 45,000 feet
to knock off the hijackers then that is foolhardy because he risks killing all
aboard.
THERE IS NEVER REASON FOR HIJACKERS TO
WANT TO TAKE THE PLANE UP TO 45,000 FEET FOR 23 MINUTES ESPECIALLY WHEN IT
RISKS KILLING THEMSELVES BUT THERE IS REASON FOR A SUICIDAL CAPTAIN TO WANT TO
DO SO IMMEDIATELY TO KILL EVERYONE ON BOARD SO HE WOULD HAVE SOME PEACE ON HIS
LONG JOURNEY TO HIS WATERY GRAVE.
YOU DO NOT NEED EXPERTISE TO REASON
THIS BUT YOU NEED DISCERNMENT, TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION TO WORK THIS
OUT AND BECAUSE THEY DO NOT DISCERN, ALL THE EXPERTS FAIL TO COME TO THIS
CONCLUSION.
Pings almost certainly from MH370:
Even Australian ship with US sensors
have detected the characteristic pings and yet experts are cautiously
optimistic and say this is the best lead so far when luck is on their side,
this almost certainly must be the location of the wreck.
So the Chinese are not hearing things,
the Australians have heard the same frequency pings for sustained periods and
yet reflecting their virulent doubt and uncertainty and lack of true
understanding they are suspicious.
This is virtually in the middle of
nowhere, in deep ocean and what else spurious could emit those characteristic
black box signals and what other missing airlines are there especially in this
part of the world so that it can be confused for MH370?
THIS IS A REMOTE PART OF THE INDIAN
OCEAN AND THERE HAVE BEEN NO RECENT CRASHES WITH PINGING BLACK BOXES IN THE
VICINITY AND YET REFLECTING THEIR LACK OF UNDERSTANDING THEY REMAIN CAUTIOUSLY
OPTIMISTIC WHEN IT IS ALMOST CERTAIN THIS IS WHERE MH370 CAME DOWN.
Two pings appear to be strong lead:
There is no strength in leads, it is a
matter of probability or likelihood and it is very probable or likely the pings
came from the stricken flight.
It is wrong understanding to think there
is strength in the lead, it is a matter of probability.
LEADS HAVE NO STRENGTH, IT IS FALSE
PERCEPTION THAT IS CONDITIONING THAT LEADS TO SUFFERING, LEADS ARE A MATTER OF
PROBABILITY, LIKELIHOOD AND STRENGTH AND LIKELIHOOD ARE DIFFERENT THINGS THAT YOU
CONFUSE YOURSELF AND OTHERS TO YOUR FUTURE SUFFERING.
Talking cock:
(The
person says a lot of things as if it is the truth and he is an expert. He is dismissing
suicide because the pilot could have committed suicide where the plane
disappeared. It is precisely because the pilot wants to disguise his
suicide perhaps for insurance fraud that he went to such elaborate shenanigans)
A lot of people with some expertise
like to proffer their opinions that they have not bothered to verify and they
risk misleading and confusing others when in fact what they say is not true and
they do not realize their necks are on the chopping board and they will be
punished for confusing and misleading others.
The piece below has the effect as if
radar is so sophisticated and governments and the military so efficient that
MH370 could never elude detection. If it is contrary to the picture he paints
he is asking for punishment.
Osama B Laden was killed because the
vaunted Pakistani radar failed to detect the intruders. If Malaysian air
defence was so scrupulous they would have sent up a fighter to look at the
deviating MH370.
He is debunking a suicidal pilot
because he would have just crashed it on take off. That is nonsense or talking
cock because there may be insurance implications, he may want to disguise the
suicide as a crash and so hijack the plane to crash in a remote location he
hoped would never be found and so the disguised suicide remains disguised.
Let's cover five indisputable facts about
governments, radar and aircraft:
Fact #1) Every modern nation tracks air traffic with military radar systems
All the key nations involved in Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 run military radar systems 24/7. This includes Malaysia and India, of course. These radar systems are operated for purposes of national defense, making sure each nation can identify aircraft entering its air space.
If you don't believe that military-grade radar systems can track the altitude, direction and speed of a Boeing 777, then you don't believe in radar at all.
Fact #2) Every modern nation runs civilian air traffic control "passive" radar systems that work even without aircraft transponders
Beyond the military radar, modern nations also run air traffic control radar systems which work in both "active" (transponder) modes and "passive" mode (requiring no transponder). Although civilian air traffic control systems are generally not as powerful or accurate as military systems, they are nonetheless fully capable of detecting and tracking a Boeing 777.
In fact, as any air traffic controller will tell you, their radar systems are fully capable of tracking flocks of birds and other airborne objects which are far smaller than a Boeing 777.
Fact #3) A Boeing 777 has a massive radar signature
Unless equipped with some sort of exotic technology we've never heard of -- like a radar "invisibility cloak" borrowed from the Klingons of Star Trek -- a Boeing 777 has a massive radar signature. The cylindrical fuselage, curved wings and surface controls (flaps, ailerons, rudder) all reflect radar waves with very high efficiency. A commercial Boeing aircraft is not a stealth bomber.
The explanation that this Boeing 777 "vanished" from radar simply doesn't hold water. And if the explanation is that "the pilot flew the aircraft at very low elevation to evade radar," then it makes no sense that the pilot would carry out this complex evasion for 4-7 hours and then plunge the aircraft into the Indian Ocean.
Furthermore, a suicidal pilot has no need to evade radar in the first place! If he wanted to crash the plane, he could have done it immediately after takeoff, or at any point during the first few minutes of flight. There is no need to evade radar if you wish to consciously crash the aircraft.
Fact #4) Boeing 777 aircraft cannot survive a collision with the ocean and remain intact
One of the most ridiculous theories currently being floated around the mainstream media -- and written by journalists who apparently have no education in fundamental physics or flight mechanics -- is that Flight 370 "crashed" into the Indian Ocean and somehow magically remained fully intact!
Although it's comforting to think that airplanes are made of incredibly strong steel that can withstand high-velocity impacts with bodies of water, the far more sobering truth is that aircraft are flimsy structures made primarily of aluminum. Aircraft are not rigid; they flex and bend, even during flight. If you've ever watched the wings during flight, you've no doubt noticed that they have a surprisingly wide range of movement, almost as if the wings are flapping. An aircraft fuselage moves, bends, expands and compresses due to changes in temperature, ambient pressure and structural stress.
A large commercial aircraft that crashes into water simply cannot remain intact. While there are some miraculous water landings where skilled pilots were able to "land" aircraft on water thanks to near-stall speeds, flaps and amazing flying skills, a full-speed crash into water can never result in the aircraft remaining fully intact. The nose, wings, fuselage and tail would all be torn apart by impact with a body of water.
Even many attempted "water landings" still result in huge structural failures of the aircraft, as seen in this photo of a relatively gentle water landing of a flight headed for Bali:
Fact #1) Every modern nation tracks air traffic with military radar systems
All the key nations involved in Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 run military radar systems 24/7. This includes Malaysia and India, of course. These radar systems are operated for purposes of national defense, making sure each nation can identify aircraft entering its air space.
If you don't believe that military-grade radar systems can track the altitude, direction and speed of a Boeing 777, then you don't believe in radar at all.
Fact #2) Every modern nation runs civilian air traffic control "passive" radar systems that work even without aircraft transponders
Beyond the military radar, modern nations also run air traffic control radar systems which work in both "active" (transponder) modes and "passive" mode (requiring no transponder). Although civilian air traffic control systems are generally not as powerful or accurate as military systems, they are nonetheless fully capable of detecting and tracking a Boeing 777.
In fact, as any air traffic controller will tell you, their radar systems are fully capable of tracking flocks of birds and other airborne objects which are far smaller than a Boeing 777.
Fact #3) A Boeing 777 has a massive radar signature
Unless equipped with some sort of exotic technology we've never heard of -- like a radar "invisibility cloak" borrowed from the Klingons of Star Trek -- a Boeing 777 has a massive radar signature. The cylindrical fuselage, curved wings and surface controls (flaps, ailerons, rudder) all reflect radar waves with very high efficiency. A commercial Boeing aircraft is not a stealth bomber.
The explanation that this Boeing 777 "vanished" from radar simply doesn't hold water. And if the explanation is that "the pilot flew the aircraft at very low elevation to evade radar," then it makes no sense that the pilot would carry out this complex evasion for 4-7 hours and then plunge the aircraft into the Indian Ocean.
Furthermore, a suicidal pilot has no need to evade radar in the first place! If he wanted to crash the plane, he could have done it immediately after takeoff, or at any point during the first few minutes of flight. There is no need to evade radar if you wish to consciously crash the aircraft.
Fact #4) Boeing 777 aircraft cannot survive a collision with the ocean and remain intact
One of the most ridiculous theories currently being floated around the mainstream media -- and written by journalists who apparently have no education in fundamental physics or flight mechanics -- is that Flight 370 "crashed" into the Indian Ocean and somehow magically remained fully intact!
Although it's comforting to think that airplanes are made of incredibly strong steel that can withstand high-velocity impacts with bodies of water, the far more sobering truth is that aircraft are flimsy structures made primarily of aluminum. Aircraft are not rigid; they flex and bend, even during flight. If you've ever watched the wings during flight, you've no doubt noticed that they have a surprisingly wide range of movement, almost as if the wings are flapping. An aircraft fuselage moves, bends, expands and compresses due to changes in temperature, ambient pressure and structural stress.
A large commercial aircraft that crashes into water simply cannot remain intact. While there are some miraculous water landings where skilled pilots were able to "land" aircraft on water thanks to near-stall speeds, flaps and amazing flying skills, a full-speed crash into water can never result in the aircraft remaining fully intact. The nose, wings, fuselage and tail would all be torn apart by impact with a body of water.
Even many attempted "water landings" still result in huge structural failures of the aircraft, as seen in this photo of a relatively gentle water landing of a flight headed for Bali:
How passengers may be suffocated:
Apparently the air in an airliner is
drawn in from the outside and compressed by the plane’s engines and after being
filtered it is fed at pressure maintained at 8000 feet to the cabin.
Possibly when the plane is flown even
exceeding its limit to 45,000 feet as opposed to normal cruising 35,000 feet,
the engine compression may be deficient to compensate and may not compress the
air to the pressure at 8000 feet and so the passengers will suffer from relative
hypoxia at the least.
If the pilot has a means of switching
off the engine compression of air then it would certainly ensure the passengers
are all dead.
Australian ship Ocean
Shield picks up signals consistent with flight data recorders in the "most
promising lead so far", plane search officials say.
If you are commenting on a situation,
you should have an understanding or knowledge of it and if you understand what
you say it should be an accurate rather than wrong description of it.
It is impossible for a person who truly
understands what is happening in the MH 370 case (despite much confusing
misinformation by people touting themselves as experts) and understands what he
says to say the signals are the best lead by far because the correct statement
is it is the ‘FIRST AND CRUCIAL BREAKTHROUGH’ IN THE CASE.
SO FAR IN THE SEARCH ALL THE LEADS HAVE
TURNED OUT EMPTY AND SO IT IS A CASE OF NO LEADS NOT ‘SO SO’ LEADS.
SUCH ULTRASOUND EMISSIONS DO NOT LAST
FOREVER AND THERE HAVE NOT BEEN ANY CRASHES IN THE AREA RECENTLY AND SHORT OF
SOMETHING LIKE A RUSSIAN SUBMARINE PRANK TO SABOTAGE SEARCH IT IS LIKELY THE
SOURCE OF THE SIGNALS IS THE STRICKEN MH370.
AND SO THIS IS THE ONLY LEAD OR
BREAKTHROUGH SO FAR AND IT MAY BE DECISIVE, CLINCHES THE LOCATION OF THE CRASH
AND IT REFLECTS MUMBO JUMBO, NO UNDERSTANDING TO SAY IT IS THE BEST LEAD SO
FAR. WHAT OTHER LEADS HAVE YOU SO FAR?
INVERTED COMMAS ‘THE BEST LEAD SO FAR’
WERE USED BECAUSE SUBSCONSCIOUSLY THE DELUDED PERSON KNOWS WHAT HE SAYS IS NOT
QUITE THE TRUTH.
Only a deluded person can pose the
question.
He is concerned with his sleep because
he is misguided, thinks sleep is good when it is bad, the path to eternal death
and suffering. The person who truly does not defile himself is not exhausted
and requires very little sleep and rather than sleep he is alert, he guards his
sense doors so that no evil can ingress, he pays attentions to the right things
and does pay attention to the wrong things like delicious food, sexy girl.
WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT APPLIES
ABSOLUTELY TO EVERYONE, HE SAID WAKE UP, WHAT SLEEP IS THERE FOR ONE HEADING FOR
ENDLESS SUFFERING AND DEATH AND HE PREACHES ALERTNESS, GUARDING YOUR SENSE
DOORS ALWAYS FOR THE INTRUSION OF EVIL DESIRES AND THOUGHTS.
AND SO ALL THOSE WHO DESIRE SLEEP, FOR
WHOM SLEEP IS DEAR ARE HEADED FOR PERISHING. SMARTPHONES ARE EVIL AND SO IS SLEEP.
Black box signals at point of last half
handshake:
The UK Telegraph reported that the location of these two signals
matched the point at which the aeroplane made its final electronic “half
handshake” with a satellite.
Normally the plane makes hourly
handshake communications with the satellite and this half-shake came early possibly
because something catastrophic happened at this point that triggered the
premature and last handshake and so it marks the point of the crash.
Why signals may indicate crash site:
There are indications to those who
understand that the signals came from MH370.
1) Its location coincides with last premature half-shake by the aircraft.
2) This is a remote deep ocean and there have not been any recent crashes
there and it is almost impossible there are spurious sources of the signals
which have been picked up for 2 hours at one stage in the Australian ship using
sophisticated equipment. The battery may be exhausted so that it may fade and
then gather strength again in gasps like a dying man.
3) Two signals were detected that fits with MH370 dual transmitters in the
voice and flight recorders at different parts of the plane.
THE LIKELIHOOD THE SIGNALS ARE SPURIOUS
IS LOW, IT HAS CHARACTERISTIC OF BLACK BOX TRANSMISSIONS AND THIS IS A REMOTE
DEEP LOCATION WITHOUT RECENT CRASHES AND SO WHAT ELSE CAN THE SIGNALS FROM THE
DEEP BE?
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF A SPURIOUS
SIGNAL HAPPENING AT THE REGION OF MH370’S PREMATURE HALF-SHAKE IN DEEP REMOTE
OCEAN?
Why premature half shake may mark crash
site:
Why should a plane making routine
hourly handshakes suddenly make a premature last half-shake?
It may indicate something catastrophic
happened to the plane at the point that triggered the premature handshake that
was cut off because perhaps power supply was cut by a crash or the sinking
plane cut off transmission.
AND SO IT IS LIKELY THE POINT OF THE
HALF SHAKE MARKED THE POINT OF THE CRASH.
Why did they not give priority to search
at the site of half shake?
I remembered reading about the last
half-shake and it occurred to me then it was something significant that the
plane would suddenly sign off with an early half shake.
THE FACT THAT THE PLANE MADE A
PREMATURE HALF SHAKE SHOULD ALERT THESE MANY EXPERTS THAT IT MAY MARK THE
LIKELIEST SPOT SOMETHING CATASTROPHIC HAPPENED TO THE PLANE AND THEY SHOULD
HAVE GIVEN PRIORITY TO SEARCH THIS AREA.
Silly bungling experts without
understanding:
Why should a plane emitting routine
hourly handshakes suddenly make a premature half shake and then disappear?
Whilst it may not mark the point of the
crash, surely there is a good possibility something catastrophic happened to
the plane at that point to trigger a premature half shake and if you are faced
with a vast ocean to search surely the best place to start is at the location
of the half shake.
FACED WITH A VAST OCEAN TO SEARCH
SURELY THE FIRST PLACE TO SEARCH WOULD BE THE SITE OF THE LAST PREMATURE HALF
HANDSHAKE WHICH WHILST IT MAY NOT INDICATE THE POINT OF CRASH, SUGGESTS
SOMETHING SERIOUS HAPPENED TO THE PLANE AT THAT POINT TO CAUSE IT TO MAKE A
TRUNCATED PREMATURE HANDSHAKE.
IT IS A SERIOUS OVERSIGHT, A FAUX PAS,
THAT EXPERTS FAILED TO GRASP THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PREMATURE TRUNCATED
HANDSHAKE AND DID NOT INVESTIGATE THE SITE FOR THE CRASH AT THE SOONEST
POSSIBLE.
The obsessed one track minds of robots:
A lot of people who do not realize they
are biological robots think they are flexible, versatile, fully capable of
understanding what they are presented with when they have one track minds, they
are obsessed with calculating based on the known fuel supply of the plane they
calculate where it is likely to end up in the ocean when it is far from
reliable.
Actually you do not need to bother with
calculating and how much fuel, the hourly handshakes tell you where the plane
is heading and its final destination must be beyond the last handshake and if
it made a truncated premature handshake (8 minutes after the last normal
handshake) it is indicating something serious happened at that point that may
very well be the point of crash.
Below is an explanation for the
truncated premature handshake.
ALL THE JAZZ OF FUEL SUPPLY AND
CALCULATING WHERE THE PLANE WILL RUN OUT OF FUEL MAY BE A LOAD OF BALONEY.
EXPERTS IN CHARGE COULD HAVE SAVED
THEMSELVES A LOT OF TIME AND TROUBLE CALCULATING WHERE THE PLANE MIGHT END UP
BECAUSE THE HOURLY HANDSHAKES TELL YOU WHERE THE PLANE HAS REACHED AND THE
PREMATURE TRUNCATED HANDSHAKE INDICATES SOME DISASTER BEFELL THE PLANE THEN.
THERE ARE A LOT OF UNKNOWN VARIABLES THAT CAN INFLUENCE THE RESULT OF
CALCULATIONS BASED ON FUEL SUPPLY.
Chris
McLaughlin, from British satellite company Inmarsat, which helped to identify
the route of the plane by analysing its satellite "handshakes", said
the location of the new signals appeared to coincide with the likely site of
the aircraft's final mysterious transmission at 00.19 GMT - eight minutes after its last regular hourly handshake.
After
Inmarsat discovered the half-handshake two weeks ago, it estimated a possible
endpoint for the flight much further north than previously thought.
The analysis
was then further refined by a team of international experts, who assessed that
the plane was travelling faster than thought, burning up more fuel, and would
have landed even further north along the same arc. Likening
the sequence to a car spluttering as it runs out of fuel, Mr McLaughlin said:
"The partial handshake would be the plane running out of fuel and
faltering for a moment, so the system went off network and then briefly powered
up and had communication with the network. The plane looked for a
final communication before it went off - and that was it."
Searching with eyes and walking stick:
Those who do not have true
understanding are like the man searching with a walking stick, he may be very
close and yet miss his target and walk away from it. You can find something
searching blind with a walking stick but it is very much hit and miss and
laborious.
And what is the walking stick of those
who are blind? They are rules or programming telling him what to do and he must
search according to those rules or protocols.
The person who understands is like the
man searching with his eyes, straightaway he sees what he is searching and he
saves himself and others a lot of effort and time.
My explanation of truncated premature
handshake:
When the plane finally crashed into the
ocean the impact disrupted power supply temporarily and when power was
restored, the plane automatically commenced liaising with the satellite which
was short lived either because power was now permanently disrupted as seawater
finally short circuited or cut off the power supply as it sank and so the
handshake was disrupted and so the location of the half handshake marked the
point of impact of the plane into the ocean.
MAYBE THE PLANE AUTOMATICALLY CONNECTS
WITH THE SATELLITE WHEN IT IS POWERED AND IMPACT DISRUPTED POWER TEMPORARILY
AND WHEN IT WAS BRIEFLY RESTORED THE PLANE AUTOMATICALLY CONTACTED THE
SATELLITE ONLY FOR SINKING OR CONTACT WITH WATER TO FINALLY CUT OFF POWER
SUPPLY BEFORE THE HANDSHAKE CAN BE COMPLETED.
IF YOU ARE GOING TO ORGANIZE A SEARCH
FOR A LOST PLANE THEN THE LOGICAL STARTING POINTING IS AT THE LAST TRANSMISSION
AND WORK YOURSELF FURTHER DOWN SOUTH IN A SWEEPING LINE MOVING SOUTHWARDS WITH
MORE EAST WEST LINES OF VESSELS STATIONED FURTHER SOUTH AND ALSO SWEEPING SOUTH
IN A COORDINATED LINE TO QUICKEN THE PROCESS.
THE PLANE IS UNLIKELY TO BE FOUND ABOVE
THE POINT OF LAST HANDSHAKE AND SO AN ORDERLY RATIONAL SEARCH SO AS NOT TO MISS ANYTHING SHOULD START FROM
THE POINT OF LAST HANDSHAKE WORKING SOUTHWARDS WITH MULTIPLE
EAST-WEST LINES OF SHIPS SWEEPING SOUTHWARDS AND IF THIS HAD BEEN DONE IN THE
FIRST PLACE, THE MISSING FLIGHT MAY HAVE BEEN INSTANTLY FOUND.
MH370 must have crashed within 550 miles
of last handshake:
Because the Boeing 777 has a maximum
cruising speed of 560 mph it must have crashed within 500 miles of the last
satellite handshake otherwise it would have made another handshake and so
mankind is foolish and proving his lack of true understanding to have resorted
to estimating complicated fuel supply and various factors to approximate where
it might have run out of fuel.
HOW MUCH FUEL THE PLANE HAD AND
CALCULATING WHEN IT WILL RUN OUT OF FUEL AND THUS CRASH DEMONSTRATES NO
UNDERSTANDING ON THE PART OF THESE EXPERTS.
BECAUSE MH370 MAKES HOURLY CONTACT WITH
THE SATELLITE AND IT CAN ONLY TRAVEL 550 MILES AN HOUR IT MUST HAVE CRASHED
WITHIN AN ARC OF 500 MILES SOUTH OF ITS LAST HANDSHAKE OTHERWISE IT WOULD HAVE
MADE ANOTHER HANDSHAKE.
AND IT WAS FRUITLESS, WASTED VITAL TIME
TICKING AWAY TO LOCATE THE BLACK BOX WHEN THE SEARCH WAS INITIALLY CONDUCTED
MUCH FARTHER SOUTH.
NOTWITHSTANDING THE PREMATURE TRUNCATED
HANDSHAKE MAY HAVE MARKED THE POINT OF MH370’S CRASH, A PERSON WHO TRULY
UNDERSTANDS, KNOWING THE 777 CAN ONLY TRAVEL 550 MILES IN AN HOUR AND IT DID
NOT MAKE ANOTHER HANDSHAKE MUST HAVE CRASHED WITHIN A RADIUS OF 500 MILES SOUTH
OF THE LAST HANDSHAKE AND HE WOULD CONCENTRATE HIS SEARCH PRUDENTLY IN THIS
MUCH SMALLER AREA RATHER THAN THE CUMBERSOME CALCULATING OF FUEL SUPPLY AND
WHEN IT WOULD RUN OUT AS FOOLISH MEN WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING HAVE DONE.
AND SO IT IS A WASTE OF TIME AND EFFORT
(AND LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING) TO SEARCH ANYWHERE MORE THAN 550 MILES AWAY
FROM THE LAST HANDSHAKE BECAUSE THE PLANE CANNOT POSSIBLY HAVE CRASHED THERE
EVEN IF IT HAD SUFFICIENT FUEL. FUEL SUPPLY IS BESIDES THE POINT, IT IS HOW FAR
MH370 CAN FLY AFTER THE LAST HANDSHAKE BECAUSE IT NEVER MADE ANOTHER HANDSHAKE
AND SO MUST HAVE CRASHED BEFORE THE DUE HANDSHAKE, LESS THAN 550 MILES FROM THE
KNOWN LAST HANDSHAKE.
IF MANKIND TRULY UNDERSTANDS HOW COME
IT HAS BEEN ‘SEARCHING ALL OVER THE VAST INDIAN OCEAN’?
THE LOCATION OF THE LAST HANDSHAKE IS A
CRUCIAL INFORMATION BECAUSE THE PLANE CANNOT CRASH MORE THAN 550 MILES SOUTH.
THUS THE FACT THE UNDERWATER SIGNALS
HAVE BEEN LOCATED RIGHT WHERE THE LAST HANDSHAKE WAS INDICATES MH370 CRASHED
THERE.
IF YOU UNDERSTAND THE SITUATION YOU CAN
ABANDON ALL SEARCHES MORE THAN 550 MILES FROM THE LAST HANDSHAKE AND
CONCENTRATE ON THE AREA WITHIN WHICH IS MUCH SMALLER TO SEARCH. DEBRI CAN BE
SWEPT OUT OF THE AREA BUT THE CRASH MUST OCCUR WITHIN THIS AREA.
Not understanding incurs immense losses
and danger:
Suppose true understanding is essential
for heaven and absent understanding leads to eternal weeping and gnashing of
the teeth, would that be a terrible price to pay for not understanding? Even in
secular matters, no understanding incurs immense losses and danger, is never OK
or harmless not to understand.
If those in charge of the MH 370 search
had understood that it must have crashed within 550 miles of the last handshake
because the plane failed to make the next handshake and it can only cruise at
550 mph, they would not have wasted much valuable time and expense searching
much farther afield and would have discovered the black box emitter much
earlier when its signals would be stronger.
In addition, if they had understood
that the premature handshake that was cut off may be because the plane was
being destroyed at that moment which was why it was cut off and so the position
of that last half handshake may mark the point of crash, they would have located
the black box emitter much earlier.
MUCH WASTAGE OF TIME AND
EFFORT/MATERIAL/UNNECESSARY SEARCHING WOULD HAVE BEEN OBVIATED IF THOSE
INVOLVED HAD UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PLANE MUST HAVE CRASHED LESS THAN 550 MILES
SOUTH OF THE LAST NORMAL HANDSHAKE (AND THE PREMATURE HANDSHAKE MAY EVEN MARK
THE SPOT WHERE IT WAS DESTROYED).
TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS AN INDISPENSABLE
QUALITY TO OBTAIN IN ORDER FOR THE BEING TO AVOID TOTALLY UNNECESSARY DANGER
AND SUFFERING/LOSS.
NOT UNDERSTANDING IS NEVER OK OR
HARMLESS, IT HAS TERRIBLE EVERLASTING CONSEQUENCES FOR THAT BEING.
MH370 would have been located much
earlier, cheaply if mankind understood:
It is not because the disappearance is
shrouded in mystery, there is insufficient information that MH370 has eluded
discovery even today but there is actually sufficient information to pinpoint
where MH 370 is and it is the absence of true understanding that has resulted
in much costly delay and wasted search expenditure.
If MH370 had been consistently making
hourly handshakes with the Immarsat, the reason it failed to make the next
hourly handshake is because it had crashed by then and knowing that the Boeing
777 has a maximum cruising speed of 550 mph, it must have crashed within 550
miles of the last handshake, a much better defined and restricted search area
to focus on. The fact that MH370 made a premature half handshake 8 minutes
after the last regular handshake should alert understanding investigators that
the truncated handshake may be because the plane was being destroyed at that
moment and so it marks the precise location of the crash, as is borne by
undersea signals being picked up.
THE UNDERSEA SIGNALS ALMOST CERTAINLY
COME FROM MH370’S BLACK BOXES AND THIS IS WHERE THE PLANE CAME DOWN AND EVEN IF
IT HAS STOPPED TRANSMITTING, DEEP SEA SONAR LOCATION WILL DETECT BIG SEABED
METAL OBJECTS AND THUS LEAD TO THE DISCOVERY OF THE PLANE IN DUE COURSE.
SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO FIND MH370
MUCH EARLIER AND CHEAPLY WITHOUT THE DRAMA IT HAS ENGENDERED GLOBALLY, HAS BEEN
THERE ALL ALONG BUT MANKIND IS UNABLE TO UTILIZE IT BECAUSE HE LACKS TRUE
UNDERSTANDING AND HAS BEEN BEATING AROUND THE BUSH INSTEAD OF GOING STRAIGHT TO
THE HEART OF THE MATTER.
MANKIND IS ABOUT SHOW, HOT AIR, NOT
SUBSTANCE, HE LIKES TO PRETEND AND IMAGINE HE UNDERSTANDS BUT HE IS A ROBOT AND
ROBOTS OR COMPUTERS NEVER UNDERSTAND, CANNOT UNDERSTAND. NO COMPUTER HOWEVER
POWERFUL POSSESSES UNDERSTANDING EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION AND FALSE PERCEPTION
THEY CAN AND DO.
MH370 search is now in the right place:
For those who truly understand, the
current search location is in the right place, the crash cannot be anywhere
else, logically MH370 cannot have crashed anywhere outside 550 miles of the
last satellite handshake and so any search should be concentrated within this
area.
Searchers very lucky in nick of time not
clever:
Searchers do not realize they have been
very lucky just in the nick of time as the black box emitter was going to
expire soon that a Chinese vessel happened to be (blindly) in the right area
with ultrasound listening equipment turned on and it happened to capture the
dying emissions and a second Australian vessel with more sophisticated
equipment managed to recapture the same emission.
IF THE CHINESE VESSEL HAD NOT BEEN IN
THE AREA AND FORTUITIOUSLY CAPTURED THE BLACK BOX SIGNALS AND THE AUSTRALIAN
VESSEL HAD NOT CONFIRMED DETECTION, THE BLACK BOX COULD HAVE EXPIRED AND
SEARCHERS MAY HAVE MOVED ON ELSEWHERE AND MH370 MAY REMAIN UNFOUND EVEN FOR A
LONG TIME.
BY COMPARISON THE UNDERSTANDING PERSON
KNOWS THIS IS THE AREA TO FOCUS SEARCH AND HE WOULD HAVE ARRIVED MUCH EARLIER
WITH LISTENING EQUIPMENT, PICKED UP THE STILL STRONGER SIGNALS EARLIER AND EVEN
LOCATED THE OCEAN BOTTOM WRECKAGE.
By KIRK SEMPLE 8:21 PM ET
Many of the
governments involved will face a difficult decision about whether to keep
bearing the extraordinary expense.
They beat their chests about costs and
yet it is totally unnecessary, wasted because mankind lacks true understanding
that would have rendered much of the expenditure unnecessary.
MANKIND IS TO BLAME NOT BLAMELESS FOR
SQUANDERING MUCH MONEY ON UNNECESSARY SEARCH WHEN HE COULD HAVE HOMED IN ON THE
AREA AROUND THE LAST TRUNCATED PREMATURE SATELLITE HANDSHAKE.
All this is said for public consumption
not truth and you do not have to be cynical and derisive. If you truly have
accountability and enhanced ownership you do not need to split exploration and
production unit but if you have no true accountability and enhanced ownership,
you can split and split what you like and still there is no accountability and
enhanced ownership but instead there may be unstated true reasons for doing so.
If you don’t understand, you pay even
dearly:
Wrong or no understanding is never
harmless or OK, if you understand wrong or do not understand, you pay dearly in
terms of suffering, material losses and even eternal totally unnecessary
deaths.
The person endowed with true
understanding never envies those without true understanding because unless you
understand things happening you must be fearful of loss and danger and you will
pay dearly in suffering and material losses for not understanding. As the
Buddha said, the benefits of obtaining the
dharma eye, ability to see the truth as it actually is, is tremendous,
far exceed whatever wealth you may gain here.
Missing MH370: More signals
detected
This shows the search area is
where the plane went down and the wreckage should be found here and if
searchers had understood the significance of the last handshake and searched
this area much earlier, then all the wasted efforts and expenses would have
been avoided.SEARCH crews have relocated signals, hoped to be from MH370’s black box, another two times.
Search coordinator and retired Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston has told reporters in Perth the discovery by Australian ship Ocean is “further encouraging”.
“The detection yesterday afternoon was held for approximately five minutes and 32 seconds,” he said.
“The detection late last night was held for approximately 7 minutes.”
It takes the number of transmissions detected by Ocean Shield to four.
London’s deceptive not truly robust
property market:
Rich international buyers snap up
property in London and leave them empty driving up prices and reducing property
for rent for those who need accommodation.
AND WHAT APPEARS A ROBUST BOOMING
LONDON PROPERTY SCENE MAY BE DANGEROUSLY WARPED AND HEADING FOR COLLAPSE.
International buyers of London apartments who leave them vacant are hurting
the city’s economy by making it too expensive for people who
come to the capital to work, former City of London planning
officer Peter Rees said. “They’re buying those apartments, furnishing them, locking the door and leaving them empty,” said Rees, 65, who left his post last week after 29 years in charge of planning. “Large parts of London are becoming ghost towns and a lot of the young people who come to work here can’t find anywhere to live.”
Sound and unsound basis for action:
The foolish person does not know
whether his basis for action is reliable/sound or not or he undertakes actions
based on unreliable basis and exposes himself to loss and danger.
The wise person undertakes actions only
on reliable basis and he establishes the reliability of the basis of his action
before embarking.
Estimating where MH370 will crash by
calculating when its fuel supply will end is an unreliable basis for launching
a search action because there are many variables eg pilot may choose to crash
plane well before fuel has run out and so it is foolhardy to base one’s search
on estimated fuel supply and if you do not realize that then you are a person
who acts without knowing whether the basis of your action is sound or not.
Estimating where the plane will crash
based on hourly handshakes the plane makes is a reliable basis for action
because unless the electronic communication equipment should suddenly fail, the
reason the plane has stopped making hourly handshakes is because it is no
longer flying but has crashed and so the plane must have crashed less than one
hour after the last handshake otherwise it would have made another handshake
and knowing the maximum cruising speed of the Boeing 777 is 550 mph, you know
it must have crashed within 550 miles of the last handshake and you organize
your search within that area. Further it fact the plane made a premature
truncated handshake 8 minutes after the last formal handshake indicates
something extraordinary happened then, maybe it crashed 8 minutes after the
last handshake.
THE WISE PERSON ENSURES HIS ACTIONS ARE
BASED ON SOUND REASONS TO AVOID LOSS AND NOT ENDANGER HIMSELF.
ORGANIZING AN URGENT SEARCH BASED ON
ESTIMATED FUEL RUNOUT IS NOT A SOUND BASIS. ESTIMATING CRASH SITE BASED ON
HOURLY HANDSHAKES AND KNOWN MAXIMAL CRUISING SPEED OF THE AIRCRAFT IS A SOUND BASIS
FOR DIRECTING THE SEARCH.
No comments:
Post a Comment