Muslim first or cop first?
IGP
hammered left and right over middle path 12:44PM Jun 11 |
88
UPDATED 1.50PM An NGO asks if Khalid Abu Bakar is 'Muslim or cop
first'.
Cop first, Muslim second or vice versa
is a rule that those who are robots consult as a basis for their actions, it is
never a valid basis of action and therefore leads to insanity but the correct
basis for action is if it is correct or wrong, beneficial or harmful, necessary
or unnecessary.
YOU DO NOT UNDERTAKE AN ACTION ON THE
BASIS OF COP FIRST, MUSLIM SECOND WHICH IS A RULE THAT ONLY ROBOTS OBEY, BUT
THE CORRECT BASIS IS WHETHER WHAT IS DONE IS RIGHT OR WRONG, NECESSARY OR
UNNECESSARY, BENEFICIAL OR HARMFUL.
12:19pm
Al Gore's
issues words of warning for Tony Abbott on Australia's role in climate change.
What is said is not in truth but to
insult and that has debt to be repaid as suffering.
Nature may not even have a mother let
alone it has a voice and it is louder than PM’s and so you are not guarding the
truth as the Buddha taught, speaking thus as a result you are asking for
suffering not future happiness.
NATURE MAY NOT HAVE A MOTHER LET ALONE
IT HAS A VOICE AND IT IS LOUDER THAN PM’S AND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING WITHOUT
REGARD FOR THE TRUTH TO INSULT.
Stalingrad destroyed Hitler’s army:
Germany’s sixth army, its largest and
all conquering in the low countries (Holland, Belgium) and France, was
vanquished, surrendered in Stalingrad which was a fatal disaster from which the
German army never recovered.
Hitler’s generals sensed danger and
advised Hitler to order a retreat but he stubbornly angrily refused, even
dismissing his generals replacing them with those who would carry out his
orders and this resulted in Sixth Army’s entrapment and destruction.
The Russian armies at Stalingrad were
different from the earlier armies; they were disciplined, well trained,
organized and passionate in their defence of the country that had been brutally
invaded. Stalingrad was the birth of urban guerrilla warfare in which superior
armoury and weapons offered little advantage. Rather than surrendering, the
Russians were willing to fight street to street, use underground tunnels and
they were supplied fresh nocturnal reinforcements from across the river.
Hitler suffered significant losses when
his attempt to take Moscow failed at the last hurdle and so when the next
spring came, he could not order an all out offensive but he needed to be
selective and he chose to cut Moscow from its supplies in the south by
advancing on Stalingrad the hub of traffic from south to Moscow and Caucasia
the site of oilfields.
The Sixth Army met little resistance as
it advanced towards Stalingrad which straddled a bent in the large Volga river
but when it entered the city, it met with fierce street by street, house by
house resistance such that although it managed to control 90% of the western
bank, it could not take the entire bank so that Russians were able to cross
over to the bank they held tenaciously and offer sustained resistance.
As winter approached and fearful of
entrapment, Hitler’s generals advised retreat but Hitler, in his far off
dreamland, demanded his army take over the entire west bank.
Much like Hitler ambushed France and
Britain’s best by an encircling blitzkrieg through what was thought impassable
Ardennes, the Russians were preparing a winter ambush for foolish Hitler who
refused to retreat. Under the cover of darkness, the Russians assembled a
powerful armoured army either side of the sixth’ army’s line which were poorly
defended by the Germans’ Rumanian allies and so assisted by the inset of
winter, the Russians broke through the Rumanian lines on either side of the
sixth army and encircled it. Hitler’s generals requested they break through and
retreat but Hitler insisted they stay put and wait for rescue whilst his
Luftwaffe would supply them from the air.
When the Russians encircled the sixth
army, they also cut off the escape route of the German army that marched to
Caucasia to take the oil fields and so this had the making of a major
potentially fatal military disaster for the now not so clever Fuehrer.
The Luftwaffe never supplied near
enough to sustain the trapped German armies (which was much larger than the
Russians estimated) and the bleak winter plus starvation took its toll so that
increasingly the trapped army was incapable of breaking through even if it
wanted.
HITLER SUFFERED SIGNIFICANT LOSSES
AFTER HIS FIRST ATTACK ON RUSSIA AND SO ON THE NEXT SPRING HE DECIDED TO CUT
OFF MOSCOW FROM ITS SUPPLIES SOUTH AND THAT MEANS TAKING STALINGRAD AND
CAUCASIA.
AT STALINGRAD, THE PREVIOUSLY
VICTORIOUS SIXTH ARMY ENCOUNTERED FEROCIOUS STREET TO STREET FIGHTING AND NEVER
QUITE MANAGE TO CAPTURE ENTIRELY THE WEST SIDE OF THE CITY ALLOWING RUSSIAN
REINFORCEMENTS TO ARRIVE ACROSS THE RIVER FROM THE RUSSIAN HELD EAST SIDE TO
SUSTAIN THE RESISTANCE UNTIL WINTER CAME AND THEN THE RUSSIANS PREPARED A
SECRET ASSAULT ON EITHER FLANKS OF THE SIXTH ARMY MANNED BY WEAKER RUMANIAN
TROOPS AND THIS SUCCEEDED IN ENCIRCLING THE SIXTH ARMY AND ALSO CUT OFF THE
GERMAN ARMY THAT HAD GONE SOUTH TO CAUCASIA IN WHAT WAS A DISASTROUS AND
POTENTIALLY FATAL POSITION FOR THE GERMAN ARMY.
THE LOSSES THE GERMAN ARMY SUSTAINED AT
STALINGRAD DEBILITATED IT BEYOND RECOVERY AND HITLER’S UNEASY RELATIONSHIP WITH
HIS ARMY GENERAL STAFF DETERIORATED IRREPARABLY.
‘Soul
searching’ needed on gun violence: Obama
The correct things to do with regard to
gun violence can be known and these should be undertaken, if you are unable to
know or discern them or refuse to undertake them then all the soul searching is
in vain, if you can see what is right and wrong and you implement what is
right, what is there to search your soul?
SOUL SEARCHING IS NEVER THE CORRECT
ANSWER, THERE IS NEVER NEED TO SEARCH YOUR SOUL NOR WILL YOU FIND THE ANSWER
THERE. IF YOU REFUSE TO DO THE RIGHT THING THEN IT IS POINTLESS SEARCHING YOUR
SOUL, IF YOU DO THE RIGHT THING, WHAT IS THERE TO SEARCH YOUR SOUL. AND SO IT
IS DELUSION AND THAT IS THE WAY TO SUFFERING NOT HAPPINESS.
Corruption
scandals and protests have left world football in turmoil.
If something is wrong with football
then it is its (corruption) elimination that will redeem football and so you
have wrong or no understanding to think the world cup will redeem football of
corruption.
IT IS BECAUSE DELUDED MEN BATH
THEMSELVES IN HOLY RIVERS TO CLEANSE THEMSELVES OF SIN THAT THEY THINK WORLD
CUP FOOTBALL WILL REDEEM FOOTBALL OF CORRUPTION AND PROTESTS WHEN IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE.
THERE IS CLEAR AND MUDDLED THINKING AND
MUDDLED THINKING IS THE WAY TO SUFFERING NOT SAFETY.
World Cup 2014: Croatia should
give up and go home - Niko Kovac
He is speaking not out of reason but
anger and he is sulking and it is never harmless justified venting of emotion
but controlled insanity and blameworthy.
It is not a matter of should Croatia go
home but does it want to go home and if so then do it, has he the authority to
decide if Croatia withdraws and if he has no authority then he is speaking
without authority which is blameworthy.
HE IS LASHING OUT AND THAT IS ILL WILL
THAT HARMS SELF MIND AND ATTACKS OTHERS EVEN IF CROATIA HAS BEEN WRONGED.
CROATIA GOING HOME IS THE INCORRECT OR INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE AND IF HE HAS NO
AUTHORITY TO WITHDRAW THE TEAM HE IS SPEAKING WITHOUT AUTHORITY. IF YOU WANT TO
WITHDRAW THEN DO IT, DON’T DWELL IN SHOULDS.
Oh no, what have you done now Qantas?
What is said is always false,
disingenuous or hypocritical designed to stir emotion than speak the truth and
incurs debt to be repaid as suffering.
You are asking what Qantas has done
when your ‘oh no’ reflects disapproval. How can you disapprove what you do not
know what Qantas has done? Therefore you know or think what Qantas has done is
bad and yet you hypocritically pretentiously ask as if you do not know what it
has done and this has demerit not merit.
This is a false understanding and
depiction of reality not without purpose but to stir emotions.
The reality or substance of what
happened is that there was a match in which Brazil won 3-1, Croatia went into
the lead through an own goal, Neymar then scored two, the second of which was a
penalty that may have been or was wrongly awarded, all this talk of double and
rescuing is about style and it is not true but the more that comes from evil
never good.
What is said is deluded and nurtures
harmful self-identity views that incurs karma never merit.
It is never a matter of Madam
(secretary) made a difference but what she did that was correct or right or
good and what is right or good does not depend on, has nothing to do with the
person’s sex or a particular person and so you are deluded, wrong to bring in
the matter of sex (madam instead of Mrs Clinton or Albright), it is not about
her making a difference, it is not about her, but it is about what is done
right or wrong.
AND SO IT IS, MANY THINK THEY
UNDERSTAND BUT THEY DON’T. WHAT THEY CALL UNDERSTANDING IS WRONG AND THE ONLY
WAY A PERSON CAN BE CONSISTENTLY WRONG IN HIS UNDERSTANDING IS BECAUSE IT IS
PROGRAMMED AND REHASHED AND HE IS A ROBOT.
Tan Sri Dr Munir Majid
Ordinary people in this world are faced
with many decisions, major or minor and it is not only always suffering to make
decisions but it is bondage to this world that is suffering and endless death.
Whatever requires decision is always
false and harmful, and this trans Pacific partnership is always about food that
perishes and if you seek food that perishes then you will perish.
If you think that there are matters
that require decisions that are wholesome and others that are unwholesome you
have a wrong understanding, all matters that require decisions, all decisions
are evil, entrapment in suffering now and the future, the wise person has
abandoned everything in this world so what decisions have he to make, what he
need to do or say are all essential, meaningful and good and they do not
require decision but seeing the need and carrying it out.
The reason why it is a (difficult)
decision for some people to give up their lives here, shave off heads and
become a monk is because their renunciation is not true but false, they have
not and cannot give up their desires for this world, what they are abandoning
for the other is in name not substance, the teachers or fellow monks they
embrace are just as deluded and evil in their ways.
THE BUDDHA SAID EXISTENCE IS A VERY
HEAVY BURDEN EVEN SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND SO FOR THE PERSON WHO
UNDERSTANDS CORRECTLY IT IS NOT A DECISION OR CHOICE TO ABANDON THE WORLD, DO
YOU NEED TO DECIDE WHETHER TO HAVE YOUR HEAD CHOPPED OR NOT? AND FOR SOMEONE
WHO HAS TRULY ABANDONED THIS WORLD, HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN ANYTHING OF THIS
WORLD, FOOD, SIGHTS, SEX, MONEY AND SO WHAT HE DOES OR SAY IS MINIMAL AS
REQUIRED OR NECESSARY AND WHAT IS MEANINGFUL AND NECESSARY DOES NOT REQUIRE
DECISIONS EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION DECISION IS STILL NEEDED. IF YOUR CLOTHES
HAVE BECOME DIRTY AND SMELLY, IT IS NOT A DECISION TO WASH IT OR IS IT STILL A
DECISION OR DILEMMA?
THUS DECISIONS ARE NOT ONLY SUFFERING,
THEY ARE BONDAGE TO FUTURE SUFFERING.
‘Good? Bad? Who Knows?’
Ajahn
Brahmavamso Mahathera or better known as Ajahn Brahm, has released ‘Good? Bad?
Who Knows?’, with 108 stories that illustrates how sometimes, when bad things
happened in one's lives, it can be a blessing in disguise.
Here is someone revered as a religious
authority and he is deluded and misleads others.
If you have discernment, you can see
things as they actually are then everything can be determined (correctly) to be
true or false, good or bad, necessary or unnecessary and so it is never a
premise of ‘who knows”.
HE IS ADVOCATING LAXITY AND DIVERSITY
WHICH IS WRONG AND HAS KARMA NOT MERIT. THE QUESTION MARKS AFTER GOOD (?), BAD
(?) AND WHO KNOWS (?) DENOTE UNCERTAINTY, QUESTIONING, DOUBT AND SO HE IS IN
DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO
FUTURE WOE.
Those who have abandoned this world are
not afflicted by decisions:
There are few if any decisions to make
for those who are truly given up this world and heading for safety.
Got food or alms? Fine. No food, no
alms? Fine.
Decisions are a curse now and forever,
the wise see decisions as deadly proffered poison and would not put himself
into situations where he needs to make decisions and so anyone who encourages
others to make decisions, who offers others choices are incurring karma not
accruing merit.
MH370: What’s the matter? You don’t trust
your senses?
If you have true understanding it is
easy to work out almost completely what happened even if the plane is still
missing.
Inmarsat said the plane was making
hourly contacts with its Indian Ocean satellite. You don’t trust that? The
satellite was seeing or hearing things, it was not in contact with the plane?
The reason MH370 was making contact
with Inmarsat satellites is because MH370 is programmed and logged into its
network.
Inmarsat has four satellites over
Indian, Pacific and Atlantic Ocean so why was it liaising with the Indian Ocean
satellite? The reason is because it flew into the Indian Ocean instead of
heading for China and there is supporting radar evidence that it turned west
and Malaysian military radar tracked it flying out of the straits of Malacca
towards the Indian Ocean.
ALL PLANES SERVED BY INMARSAT AUTOMATICALLY
LOG ON AND MAKE HOURLY CONNECTIONS WITH ITS GLOBAL SATELLITE NETWORK WHEN
AIRBORNE AND THE FACT THAT MH370 MADE HOURLY CONNECTIONS FOR SEVEN HOURS AFTER
IT DISAPPEARED WAS BECAUSE IT FLEW INTO THE DOMAIN OF THE INDIAN OCEAN
SATELLITE AS VERIFIED BY MALAYSIAN MILITARY RADAR.
IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE
MH370 CAN FLY FOR HOURS STRAIGHT ACROSS TO INDIA OR UP NORTH TO
BANGLADESH/CENTRAL ASIA WITHOUT DETECTION AND THE LIKELY DESTINATION IS SOUTH
OVER THE OCEAN. AND CALCULATIONS BASED ON DELAY AND DOPPLER EFFECTS INDICATE IT
TOOK A ROUTE SOUTH IN THE INDIAN OCEAN.
NO HIJACKER WOULD TAKE THE PLANE
SECRETLY TO A SUICIDE LOCATION IN THE MIDDLE OF THE OCEAN AND SO ONLY A VERY
EXPERIENCED PILOT COULD HAVE HIJACKED HIS PLANE BY FIRST DISCONNECTING THE
ACARS, KILLING HIS CO-PILOT, TURNING OFF RADAR AND RADIO, FLYING TO 45,000 FEET
TO KILL ALL PASSENGERS THEN FLY DANGEROUSLY LOW ACROSS PENINSULAR MALAYSIA TO
EVADE RADAR AND THEN HE TOOK THE SECRETIVE JOURNEY TO THE MIDDLE OF THE INDIAN
OCEAN WHERE HE DITCHED THE PLANE AND IT SANK WHOLE WITH ALL ABOARD WHICH IS WHY
THERE IS NO DEBRIS.
WITHOUT EVIDENCE YOU CANNOT RESORT TO
FANCIFUL THEORIES OF HI TECH OR SUPERNATURAL DISAPPEARANCES, NOR COULD THESE
FIT THE OBSERVED CIRCUMSTANCES AND SO RATHER THAN FULL OF UNKNOWNS, IT IS QUITE
CLEAR IF NOT CERTAIN WHAT HAPPENED WAS CONCEALED CAPTAIN SUICIDE.
If what you say is not a possibility
(thus not true or false), you misunderstand human nature, sexual violence is as
part and parcel of the human psyche today as in the ‘dark ages’ then you are
muttering nonsense and deluded and that is not without consequences but you are
heading for insanity.
IF WHAT YOU SAY ‘BANISH SEXUAL VIOLENCE
TO DARK AGES’ AND MANKIND IS NO MORE BENIGN THAN HE WAS DURING THE DARK AGES
THEN YOU ARE TALKING NONSENSE AND THE ENDPOINT OF TALKING NONSENSE IS INSANITY
AND YOU HAVE DEBT MISLEADING OTHERS.
Wanting to deceive and conceal is ill
will:
People in this world who think they
have bountiful goodwill are deluded.
The basis of deception and concealment
is ill will; whenever a person wants to deceive another in what he says and
does and he wants to hide things from another, he is displaying ill will which
is suffering, must stir self-resistance that leads to stress and is one of
three lower fetters (delusion and greed) that detains him in this world.
THE PERSON WITH TRUE GOODWILL DOES NOT
DESIRE OR STRIVE TO DECEIVE OTHERS OR CONCEAL THINGS. DECEPTION AND CONCEALMENT
ARE INDICATIVE OF ILL WILL WHICH IS A BOND TO THE LOWER REALMS TOGETHER WITH
GREED AND DELUSION.
IF YOU LEAD A SINFUL LIFE (AND ORDINARY PEOPLE’S LIVES ARE FULL OF SIN,
FULL OF SHIT) YOU CANNOT HAVE A HEALTHY MIND AND BODY LET ALONE A HAPPY LIFE
HERE. IT IS NOT BY KEEPING YOUR BODY AND MIND HEALTHY THAT YOU FIND HAPPINESS
BUT IT IS BY GUARDING YOURSELF WITH TRUTH AND GOODNESS THAT YOU FIND TRUE
HAPPINESS.
This is always a statement of delusion
and if you are unable to tell or it appeals to you, you are gullible and
similarly deluded.
Your body (and mind here) is not a
temple of wholesomeness but as the Buddha said, it is a cesspit full of filth,
decay, disease and suffering, it takes effort and stress to look after this
cesspit and it is ultimately futile and end in sorrow and torment.
THE BUDDHA SAID ALL IS NOT SELF, THE
BODY IS NOT SELF, THE MIND OR CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT SELF, BUT INSTEAD THEY ARE A
MASS OF SUFFERING THAT CAN BE ABANDONED AND WHEN THEY ARE ABANDONED, SUFFERING
IS ABANDONED AND HAPPINESS OBTAINED SO HOW CAN HAPPINESS BE FOUND IN A HEALTHY
BODY?
YOUR BODY AND MIND ESPECIALY THE UNTIDY
DESIRE RIDDEN MINDS AND BODIES OF ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE A SOURCE OF SUFFERING
THAT REACHES HOMICIDAL SUICIDAL LEVELS AND YOU THINK YOU CAN FIND HAPPINESS IN
IT? YOU ARE A FOOL INCURRING KARMA FOR MISLEADING OTHERS.
Freedom from stress, not heath is the
source of happiness:
A healthy life is a happy life implies
that freedom from disease is the source of happiness and that is always wrong,
deluded.
It is stress and suffering in all its
forms (restlessness, inability to concentrate, mad emotions, mad rote
behaviour) that precludes mental and bodily health and happiness.
It is not health that is the panacea
for happiness but it is freedom from stress (as is possible) that delivers
health (without trying to be healthy) and happiness.
The health that a person makes
strenuous efforts to achieve (eg jogging, sports, yoga) is in vain, suffering
in itself but true health is the result of not abusing your mind and body and
not allowing others to abuse your mind and body and this gives a healthy body
and happiness, not a healthy body gained by striving giving a happy life.
SO LONG AS A PERSON REMAINS A ROBOT
REHASHING EVERYTHING HE SAYS OR DOES, HE PROLONGS SYLLABLES, CHANGES SPEED AND
LOUDNESS THAT LEAD TO INSOLUBLE RENEWING TORMENTING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND
DISTRACTION, HE IS A FOOL TO THINK HE CAN NEVERTHELESS HAVE A HEALTHY MIND AND
BODY BY VARIOUS PLOYS (EG REGULAR EXERCISE, HEALTH FOODS). ABANDON STYLE AND
HEALTH AND HAPPINESS AUTOMATICALLY ENSUES.
You cannot be healthy and happy without
being good:
You cannot be healthy and happy without
being good.
Ordinary people cannot and do not want
to be good but they want to be healthy and happy. What they call happiness and
healthy is actually also suffering and unhealthy.
Because they cannot be good but still
want to be healthy and happy, they tout befuddled answers like:
A healthy life is a happy life.
Or they twist it around and think they
are very clever:
A happy life is a healthy life, ha, ha,
ha!
They do not realize they are heading
for a cliff down which they will plunge screaming.
TRUE HAPPINESS AND TRUE HEALTH ARE THE
RESULTS OF BEING GOOD, WITHOUT BEING GOOD YOU CANNOT HAVE HEALTH AND HAPPINESS
AND IT REFLECTS MUDDLED THINKING AND DELUSION THEY THINK HEALTH IS THE KEY TO
HAPPINESS.
How can you be healthy without being
happy?
A depressed or stressed man cannot be
very healthy if at all and so happiness is an ingredient of a healthy man not
the source of a health the answer to a happy life.
YOU CANNOT BE VERY HEALTHY IF YOU ARE
DEPRESSED AND STRESSED AND SO HAPPINESS AND HEALTH ARE INTERLINKED NOT HEALTH
THE KEY TO HAPPINESS.
FREEDOM FROM SIN (STYLE IS SIN, HARMS
SELF AND OTHERS WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND NECESSITATES A
FALSE REHASHING EXISTENCE) IS THE PANACEA TO BOTH HEALTH AND HAPPINESS AND YOU
CANNOT OBTAIN HEALTH BY MINDLESS JOGGING AND HEALTH FOODS.
Health and happiness are brothers not
father and son:
The deluded person with muddled
thinking thinks health is the father of happiness but health and happiness are
brothers and the father of health and happiness is truth and goodness.
The cause of restlessness that will go
mad:
Whatever a person says or does can be
examined and determined to be true or false, necessary or unnecessary,
meaningful or for show and if it is false, unnecessary, for show then if he
keeps willing himself to do or say it, in times it become automated, constant
and that is controlled insanity that will end in uncontrollable insanity,
uncontrollable restlessness.
WHATEVER IS FALSE, UNNECESSARY, FOR
SHOW DOES NOT REQUIRE REASON OR OCCASION TO ARISE, SO LONG AS THE PERSON OR
FOOL DESIRES TO ACTIVATE, IT WILL ACTIVATE AND SO IF YOU KEEP ACTIVATING WHAT
IS FALSE, UNNECESSARY, FOR SHOW THEN IN TIME TO COME IT BECOMES AUTOMATIC EVEN
IRRESISTIBLE TO ARISE AND THIS IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL NOT REMAIN THE
SAME BUT IN TIME TO COME CONTROL WILL BE LOST AND THAT BECOMES UNCONTROLLABLE
INSANE RESTLESSNESS.
WHATEVER IS TRUE, NECESSARY, NOT FOR
SHOW CANNOT TURN MADLY ACTIVATING BECAUSE IT REQUIRES REASON OR OCCASION TO
ARISE AND IF THE REASON OR OCCASION DOES NOT ARISE, THE SPEECH OR ACTION DOES
NOT ARISE AND SO IT CAN NEVER TURN RESTLESS OR AUTOMATED.
THE STYLE OR PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES,
CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS UNNECESSARY, MEANINGLESS, FOR SHOW, STRESSFUL
TO SELF AND OTHERS AND SO IF YOU KEEP STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS,
IN TIME TO COME STYLE BECOMES AUTOMATIC, IRRESISTIBLE AND THAT IS ALWAYS
CONTROLLED RESTLESSNESS THAT WILL END IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND UNCONTROLLABLE
RESTLESSNESS.
IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW HOLY OR PIOUS OR
INNOCENT YOU THINK YOU ARE, WHAT AN INCORRIGIBLE TOUGH RASCAL YOU ARE, KEEP
PRACTICING STYLE AND UNCONTROLLABLE RESTLESSNESS THAT TURNS FATAL AWAITS YOU.
NOT JUST THEIR EVER PRESENT STYLE, BUT
MANY IF NOT EVERYTHING THEY SAY OR DO IS UNNECESSARY, FALSE, FOR SHOW AND SO
ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH MAD RESTLESSNESS AND THAT IS NOT THE
WAY TO HEAVEN.
Unnecessary thinking and perceiving leads
to restlessness:
There is a joyful way out of insane
restlessness but restlessness is far more entrenched and difficult to defeat
than you think or wrongly understand.
Anyone who has escaped the hell hole of
restlessness would return to it, I have escaped the hell hole of restlessness
and I do no envy anyone still trapped in it.
NOT JUST WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT IS
UNNECESSARY OR FALSE LEADS TO RESTLESSNESS BUT WHAT AND HOW YOU THINK AND
PERCEIVE (SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE, TOUCH) THAT IS UNNECESSARY OR FALSE
CONDITIONS YOU TO RESTLESSNESS, BECOMES MORE INTENSE WITH PRACTICE AND ENDS IN
RESTLESSNESS TOO INTENSE TO CONTROL FURTHER.
If you keep thinking about a subject
(eg a ‘pretty’ girl or handsome boy) then it is not just suffering but because
it is conditioning, you are unwittingly bonding yourself to restlessness that
gets stronger each time you foolishly pine over that boy or girl and rather
than sheer ecstasy it is an appointment with intense uncontrollable unnecessary
thinking.
WHAT YOU THINK AND PERCEIVE CAN BE
OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED TO NECESSARY OR UNNECESSARY AND IF THEY ARE UNNECESSARY
THEN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED RESTLESSNESS THAT BECOMES MORE INTENSE AND
HARDER TO CONTROL AND ENDS IN INSANITY.
WHATEVER IS FALSE (INCLUDING THINKING
AND PERCEIVING) REQUIRES NO REASON TO OCCUR AND SO IT CAN OCCUR ANYTIME THE
FOOL DEEM NECESSARY TO OCCUR, WHATEVER CAN OCCUR ANYTIME CAN OCCUR ALL THE TIME
IF YOU KEEP ACTIVATING IT AND THAT IS COURTING MAD RESTLESSNESS.
THERE IS A WAY OUT OF RESTLESSNESS AND
IT IS JOYFUL, NEVER A LOSS BUT RESTLESSNESS IS ENTRENCHED, NOT AS EASY TO
DEFEAT AS YOU THINK OR WRONGLY UNDERSTAND.
Style is the generator at the heart of
restlessness:
A person’s style or how he prolongs
syllables, changes speed and loudness is constant and unconscious and it is the
dynamo or generator of restlessness that cannot be eradicated without
eradicating his style.
IT IS A PERSON’S STYLE THAT KEEPS THE
FIRE OF RESTLESSNESS BURNING BRIGHT AND WITHOUT PAYING ATTENTION TO TOTALLY
EXTINGUISH HIS EVIL HARMFUL STYLE, THERE CAN BE NO TRUE EXIT FROM RESTLESSNESS.
Restlessness will kill you, sooner or
later:
If you are restless and you are not
aware, you are a fool who does not know what he does, you are even lower than
the fool who is restless and knows he is restless.
RESTLESSNESS IS NOT JUST AN AFFLICTION
OF ORDINARY EMOTIONAL PEOPLE BUT RESTLESSNESS IS THE BASIS TO GREATER OR LESSER
EXTENT OF THEIR ACTIONS AND RESTLESSNESS IS A DANGEROUS WRONG BASIS
OF ACTION THAT SOONER OR LATER LEADS TO DISASTER THAN CAN PROVE FATAL.
YOU MAY NOT REALIZE IT, RESTLESSNESS IS
THE BASIS FOR WHAT PEOPLE SAY OR DO AND THAT IS A DANGEROUS FALSE BASIS THAT
CAN PROVE FATAL SOONER OR LATER.
What is the truth about MH370 authorities
failed to tell?
In this contentious world, it is still
possible to tell the truth about MH370 which those responsible have avoided,
ignored or are clueless resulting in much anguish and uncertainty amongst those
affected. This has karma to be repaid as suffering.
IF THE AUTHORITIES HAVE UNDERSTOOD
TRULY WHAT THEY HAVE FOUND ABOUT MH370 AND SPOKE THE TRUTH, IT WOULD BE THIS:
SOMEONE AMONGST THE CREW TAMPERED WITH
THE PLANE, DEACTIVATED ACARS, TURNED OFF RADAR AND RADIO AND HIJACKED THE PLANE
FROM ITS INTENDED ROUTE TO THE INDIAN OCEAN AND FLEW FOR HOURS OVER A ROUTE
THAT IS LIKELY IF NOT CERTAINLY OVER THE SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN AND THE LIKELY
MOTIVE IS SUICIDE. THE PLANE GLIDED ONTO THE OCEAN AND SANK COMPLETE WHICH IS
WHY THERE IS NO DEBRIS.
WHETHER THE PUBLIC ACCEPTS THIS
EXPLANATION OR NOT DOES NOT MATTER, WHAT MATTERS IS ‘SETTING THE RECORD
STRAIGHT’.
Officials: MH370 ended in Indian Ocean, how
it got there is taboo
Officials’ explanations so far are
unacceptable, inadequate. What they are saying is that based on Inmarsat
records which they think are reliable, the plane is somewhere in the Indian
Ocean, how it got there, they are either clueless or too pretentious to delve
into.
EVEN THOUGH THE PLANE IS MISSING, THERE
IS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE GARNERED THAT ALLOW OFFICIALS TO HAVE A GOOD IDEA WHY
MH370 ENDED UP IN THE INDIAN OCEAN AND SO WHY ARE THEY KEEPING MUMB OVER WHAT
APPEARS A TABOO SUBJECT, HOW THE PLANE GOT THERE?
IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO JUST TELL THE
PUBLIC THE PLANE ENDED IN THE INDIAN OCEAN, SURELY YOU CAN DETERMINE HOW IT GOT
THERE?
Officials never admitted ignorance why
MH370 is in Indian Ocean:
As officials involved with
investigation of MH370’s disappearance you have a duty to be clear and precise
in your findings and this is lacking.
EVEN IF OFFICIALS ARE BAFFLED, HAVE NO
IDEA WHY MH370 ENDED SO FAR FROM ITS INTENDED FLIGHT IT HAS A DUTY TO SAY ‘WE
HAVE NO IDEA WHY IT WAS DIVERTED SO FAR’ BUT BY IGNORING THE SUBJECT IT IS
REFLECTING DERELICTION OF DUTY OR WILFUL IGNORING OF A VERY IMPORTANT SUBJECT,
WHAT HAPPENED TO MH370.
Wise or stupid Tan Siew Sin?
Tan Siew Sin says (according to
daughter) the government has no business going into business:
This is a rule and all rules are wrong
or have exceptions. A government that is responsible, for the welfare of the
people has a business going into business, eg the government could have built
many of the highways much cheaper with lesser or even expired tolls by now had
it built it rather than tender them out to crony capitalists.
‘LETS FACE IT’ (PARDON MY IMITATION OF
ROBOTS), BUSINESSMEN ARE IN THERE FOR PROFIT EVEN KILLINGS, ESPECIALLY IF YOU
ARE CRONIES OF MINISTERS OR PM AND SO IT WOULD BE CHEAPER AND BETTER FOR THE
PEOPLE IF THE GOVERNMENT THAT IS EFFICIENT AND CARING UNDERTOOK PROJECTS
THEMSELVES.
Tan Siew Sin says the federation needs
foreign capital far more than foreign capital needs the federation. In other
words Malaysia must prostrate itself and appease foreign investors. If you are not
greedy for gains and content with what you have, there is no need to be
desperate for foreign investors who are no angels, if they can make a fast buck
out of you they won’t care who they are dealing with.
FOREIGN INVESTORS ARE NOT HERE BECAUSE
THEY LOVE YOU BUT TO EXPLOIT TO MAKE MONEY ANYWAY THEY CAN AND SO ONE SHOULD BE
WARY OF THE MOTIVES AND REPERCUSSIONS OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT, NOT WOO THEM AS
TAN SIEW SIN IMPLIES.
It is not about governments or foreign
investors but fidelity and capability:
It is not a matter of whether
governments should go into businesses or not or foreign investors should be
valued and wooed but it is about fidelity and capability. If the government has
the ability and the good of the people at heart, there is no reason why it
should not be in business as a service to the people. Government businesses
fail or are inefficient not because of the nature of government businesses but
the feckless irascible nature of those entrusted with running them.
Government company profits remain in the
system:
Government company profits remain in
the system to be recycled into the system whereas profits made by private
companies are lost from the system and they are often loaned back to the
government to make more profits that is not sustainable.
Similarly profits made by foreign
investors are repatriated and are a drain on the host nation’s wealth. Whilst
initially the capital investment may add to the collective wealth, in the long
term they tend to drain the wealth of the nation.
The UK
satellite company Inmarsat tells the BBC that the search for the missing
Malaysian Airways jet has yet to go to the area its scientists think is the
plane's most likely crash site.
Confidence does not exist, it is a
fabrication and a matter of true or imagined stirred mental force of the
confident person that is blind and meaningless and it is a shared delusion that
confidence is meaningful.
There is no need to be confident or not
confident about the new hotspot, which unnecessarily bring into play self
identity, the truth of the situation is that new calculations have a high or
good probability of being correct.
IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND
MEANINGLESS TO BE CONFIDENT OF THE NEW HOTSPOT, THE TRUTH IS THAT THEY THINK
THAT NEW CALCULATIONS HAVE A HIGH OR GOOD PROBABILITY OF PINPOINTING THE SITE
OF ENDING (NOT CRASH) OF THE PLANE.
IT REFLECTS DANGEROUS MISLEADING
PRESUMPTION TO ASSUME THE PLANE CRASHED THERE AND IT WAS ON AUTO-PILOT. BEARING
IN MIND THE UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DISAPPEARANCE, THE PERSON OF TRUE
UNDERSTANDING WILL REALIZE THE PLANE MAY BE BEING PILOTED RATHER THAN ON AUTO
PILOT AND THE PLANE MAY HAVE BEEN DITCHED NOT ENDED IN A CRASH OUT OF FUEL.
RATHER THAN INNOCUOUS IT IS SERIOUS AND
POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS TO ASSUME THE PLANE WAS ON AUTO PILOT AND IT CRASHED AT
THE CALCULATED SITE, YOU CANNOT IGNORE THE POSSIBILITY IT WAS BEING FLOWN AND
IT LANDED RATHER THAN CRASHED INTO THE OCEAN.
The good and
bad of the strong pound
Whatever is truly good has no bad and
so whatever has good and bad is not truly good and it is mutually shared
delusion that has serious consequences in insanity and future suffering and
endless death to think what is (truly) good has good and bad.
Thus it is because the strong pound is
not truly good that it has good and bad and for those with true understanding
even those so called good points are actually bad.
That foreign goods are cheaper and it
is cheaper to service foreign debt is touted as good points of a strong pound
whilst uncompetitive British goods overseas is touted as bad but this is
delusion not true. Because the pound is ‘strong’ it promotes excessive
consumption of foreign goods and encourages foreign borrowing to live beyond
one’s means and this is dangerous and therefore bad not good.
A STRONG POUND PROMOTES EXCESSIVE
IMPORT OF FOREIGN GOODS AND BORROWING OF FOREIGN CREDIT TO CONSUME DANGEROUSLY
BEYOND ONE’S MEANS AND SO THIS IS ACTUALLY BAD OR DANGEROUS AND IT IS DELUSION
TO PERCEIVE IT AS GOOD.
AND SO A STRONG POUND IS NOT TRULY GOOD
AND EVEN THE SO CALLED GOOD POINTS ARE ACTUALLY BAD.
WHATEVER IS TRULY GOOD HAS NO BAD
POINTS. THE SHEDDING OF STYLE HAS NO BAD, IT IS ENTIRELY GOOD.
HEAVEN HAS NO GOOD AND BAD POINTS, IT
IS PURELY GOOD UNLESS YOU ARE DELUDED, HELL HAS NO GOOD POINTS UNLESS YOU ARE
SICK.
Confidence is a product of mutually
shared delusion and deception:
People talk about confidence frequently
and if they truly understand what they speak they should know that confidence
is false, it is a product of mutually shared delusion and deception.
WHEN A PERSON SAYS HE IS CONFIDENT IT
MEANS HE IS SURE (BUT HE DOES NOT KNOW IT IS TRUE), TRUST HIM, IT IS ABOUT
DEMANDING TRUST IN SOMETHING THE PERSON DOES NOT KNOW IS TRUE EG HE IS
CONFIDENT ENGLAND WILL WIN BUT HE CANNOT BE SURE. IT IS SHARED DELUSION THAT CONFIDENCE
IS SOMETHING TRUE AND MEANINGFUL AND IT IS DECEPTION BECAUSE CONFIDENCE IS
MEANT TO DECEIVE OTHERS EG SOMEONE CARRIES OUT HIS ACT OF DECEPTION WITH
APPARENT CONFIDENCE AS IF IT IS TRUE OR HE IS NOT NERVOUS.
AS LONG AS YOU SUBSCRIBE TO CONFIDENCE,
ACCEPT CONFIDENCE AS VALID, YOU ARE DELUDED AND THAT IS NOT THE CHARACTERISTIC
TO HEAVEN.
There is nothing key about war rape and
it is only part of a wide spectrum of war atrocities (plunder, murder of
civilians and troops, destruction) that cannot be addressed individually in
isolation, not even in toto because so long as humans remain murderous there is
no solution to war crimes let alone war rape.
Whether what she is doing is useful,
can work is objective, just because she is a celebrity and female does not mean
it would be effective more than a passing hypocritical lip service act of
remorse or contrition. If what she is doing is all for show then it is controlled
insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity.
THERE IS NOTHING REMARKABLE OR KEY
ABOUT WAR RAPE, IT IS PART OF A BROAD SPECTRUM OF WAR CRIMES. CRIMINALITY
CANNOT BE ELIMINATED ON EARTH, JESUS SAID HE HAS NOT COME TO BRING PEACE AND IF
YOU THINK YOU CAN END OR CONTROL WAR RAPE THEN YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR DELUDED. IF
YOU ARE DELUDED, IT ENDS IN INSANITY. WHAT AUTHORITY HAS SHE GOT IN THIS MATTER
EXCEPT SHE IS A CELEBRITY AND IT IS DELUSION TO THINK THE RECRUITMENT OF
CELEBRITY WILL BE MEANINGFUL OR USEFUL TO THE CAUSE.
Rolf’s reputation badly trashed:
That Rolf Harris’ reputation is badly
trashed is not about meaning but image or show and it is irrelevant to the case
and in drawing the court’s attention to the matter his defence is guilty of
drawing attention away from the matter of the case which is whether he did what
he was accused of and trying to gain sympathy and both these have karma to be
repaid by suffering.
EVEN IF ROLF HARRIS’ REPUTATION HAS
BEEN BADLY TARNISHED, HE MAY DESERVE IT AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE
MATTER WHICH IS WHETHER HE DID IT OR NOT AND IN DRAWING THE COURT’S ATTENTION
TO HIS TRASHED REPUTATION, HIS ATTORNEY IS GUILTY OF DISTRACTING THE COURT AND
TRYING TO DRAW SYMPATHY THAT UNFAIRLY INFLUENCES THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE AND
THESE ARE TACTICS THAT HAVE KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING.
'I’m quite old fashioned':
Sian Williams tells celebrities to keep it clean on her show
Does she (and you) understand what she
means when she says she is old fashioned?
A person can only be old fashioned if
she is a rehashing robot, her actions and values (programmed instructions as to
how to behave) are from a previous not current age.
It is not a surprise that people from
another era are old fashioned because programmed behaviour are difficult to
perfect and they become used to it and it is troublesome and difficult if not
impossible to keep reprogramming yourself to keep up with the times.
ONLY A ROBOT OR REHASHING PERSON CAN BE
OLD FASHIONED AND IT IS SUFFERING NEVER HAPPINESS BEING A ROBOT WHO IS HEADED
FOR MAD ROBOTIC BEHAVIOR AND THENCE TO MORE SUFFERING AFTER DEATH.
Rolf Harris's secret affairs
'doesn't prove his guilt', the jury has been told
The perverse logic of people who are
even lawyers is that because ignore stories of secret affairs, he is innocent
despite them but on the contrary, the fact that he has demonstrated wrong
behaviour in these secret affairs indicate he is capable of behaving wrongfully
and likely than not to behave similarly as accused so why are you telling the
jury to ignore such stories.
MANY THINK THEY ARE VERY CLEVER, GREAT
LOGICIANS BUT THEY ARE DICING WITH MAD LOGIC TELLING OTHERS WHAT IS SHIT IS
FOOD.
Everything you tell others must make
sense or you are dicing with insanity:
Why tell the jury that Rolf’s secret
affairs don’t prove his guilt (and therefore he is not guilty despite the
acknowledged affairs).
But the truth or logic of the matter is
that if he can behave incorrect sexually in those secret affairs he has
demonstrated a capability to behave incorrectly sexually that is likely to have
occurred as accused and thus he is capable of behaving incorrectly sexually as
accused.
YOU CALL YOURSELF A LAWYER BUT IT IS
BANKRUPT LOGIC (AND THEREFORE YOU ARE DICING WITH INSANITY WITH DEBT FOR TRYING
TO SIMILARLY CORRUPT OTHERS THAT ROLF’S SECRET SEXUAL AFFAIRS DOESN’T PROVE HE
IS GUILTY WHEN IT PROVES HE IS CAPABLE OF BEHAVING SEXUALLY INAPPROPRIATELY AND
THEREFORE THE ACCUSATIONS HAVE CREDIBILITY.
Dangerous, unnecessary and wrong to
assume MH370 was on autopilot:
Inmarsat said it came up with the new
target search site based on assumption the plane was on autopilot and this is
totally unnecessary, dangerous and wrong assumption because the pilot may be
alive and piloting the plane, the fact that no debris have been found indicate
that it is more likely ditched than crashed out of fuel into the ocean.
Reputations are false, suffering and lead
to insanity:
This is a world that worships
reputations, cultivates reputations and projects false wholesome images of
themselves to others and whoever subscribes to reputations in themselves and
others is walking the tightrope of insanity that ends in suffering and endless
deaths.
It is because people project false
images of themselves that they want others to perceive them as true (eg sexy,
macho, tough, notorious, clever, knowledgeable, witty) that they begin to live
or act according to those images they desire to project and they become robots
or slaves of those reputations and this is always suffering and controlled
insanity. Instead of being themselves they want to live up to their
reputations.
WITHOUT BEING A ROBOT LIVING
CONSISTENTLY ACCORDING TO THE REPUTATION YOU WISH TO PROJECT TO OTHERS, YOU
CANNOT HAVE A REPUTATION AND PEOPLE DEFEND THEIR REPUTATION, THEY GO TO GREAT
LENGTHS TO PROJECT THEIR REPUTATIONS AND THAT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY.
IF SOMETHING IS TRUE IT IS NOT A
REPUTATION, IF SOMETHING IS A REPUTATION IT CANNOT BE TRUE BUT AN ACT, A SHOW,
A FRONT. REPUTATIONS ARE ABOUT MAKE BELIEVE AND MAKE BELIEF IS NOT THE TRUTH BUT
CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.
THUS IF ROLF HARRIS HAS A REPUTATION
AND IT HAS BEEN TARNISHED OR DESTROYED BY COURT PROCEEDINGS THEN HIS MASK HAS
BEEN RIPPED OFF, REPUTATION IS NOT GOOD AND IF HE FEELS SHATTERED HE IS TO
BLAME FOR HIS PRETENSE OR DECEIT, FOR PROJECTING A REPUTATION. IF HE IS TRULY
GOOD THAT CANNOT BE SHATTERED, ONLY REPUTATIONS OF GOOD CAN BE SHATTERED
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT TRUE.
A JUDGE has
ruled that Rolf Harris’ guilt or innocence on 12 counts of indecent assault
will have to be determined with a unanimous verdict.
This is a deluded or wrong ruling and
so the judge is deluded.
This ruling is consciously or unconsciously
siding with Rolf Harris as if he is someone special who need special protection
of unanimity. Judges are themselves often deluded, misguided, what more jurors
and so to have an unanimity of verdict is much more difficult.
ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE DELUDED AND
UNRELIABLE AND IT IS HARD TO ESTABLISH COMPLETE AGREEMENT AMONGST A GROUP OF
DELUDED PEOPLE AND SO IT IS UNREASONABLE TO DEMAND UNANIMITY OF VERDICT THAT
FAVOURS THE ACCUSED AT THE EXPENSE OF ACCUSERS, WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT ROLF
THAT HE SHOULD BE ACCORDED SPECIAL TREATMENT?
THE JUDGE MAY BE RIGHT OR WRONG
DEMANDING SUCH A RULING, IF IT IS WRONG, THERE IS KARMA TO BE REPAID AS
SUFFERING, LEARNED JUDGE OR NOT.
It is the correctness not unanimity of
verdict that matters:
It is never the unanimity of the
verdict but it is the correctness of the verdict that matters and rather than
difficult or impossible to establish, for those endowed with true understanding
conversant with the facts of the case, he can arrive at the correct verdict
where others are befuddled in doubt and uncertainty.
IT IS NEVER THE UNANIMITY OF THE
VERDICT BUT THE CORRECTNESS OF THE VERDICT THAT SHOULD BE SOUGHT (AND THE
CORRECT VERDICT IS NOT NECESSARILY UNANIMOUS) AND RATHER THAN IMPOSSIBLE TO
ESTABLISH, THE CORRECT VERDICT CAN BE ESTABLISHED IN MANY CASES DEEMED
IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH BY THOSE WHO ARE CLUELESS AND WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING.
ROLF HARRIS’ TESTIMONY AND
DISCREPANCIES EVEN BLATANT LIES THAT HE THOUGHT HE COULD GET AWAY WITH (EG
DENYING HIS PRESENCE AT AN EVENT WHEN TV FOOTAGE SHOWED HIS PRESENCE) AND
DENIALS SAYS MUCH ABOUT HIS RELIABILITY AS WITNESS.
Why was Rolf Harris singing at his trial?
Why was Rolf Harris singing at his
trial? This is improper even buffoonish behaviour that he thinks he can get
away with because of his celebrity and so even here he is exposing the truth
about himself that those who are clueless think nothing.
John Cleese: 'The BBC makes
crap comedy and would never commission Monty Python now'
This is the opinion (and all opinions
are false and deadly) of a deluded man not a statement of truth.
All comedy is crap so anyone who thinks
there are great and crap comedies is deluded and headed for insanity.
ALL COMEDY IS CRAP, THERE IS NO SUCH
THING AS GREAT AND CRAP COMEDY EXCEPT IF YOU ARE DELUDED THAT LEADS TO INSANITY
AND RUIN.
No true reason why a verdict must be
unanimous:
There are never true reasons why a
verdict must be unanimous but the important thing is that it must be correct, a
unanimous verdict favours the accused at the expense of litigants because it
would be harder to convict him even if he was guilty because even if he is
guilty, so long as there is one dissenter the charges are dismissed and so the
judge whether he realizes or not is not being neutral but favouring the
accused, maybe because of his stature and he is trying to protect Rolf.
What the judge should instruct the jury:
Rather than tell them to arrive at an
unanimous decision which exerts pressure to conform and compromise, the judge
should instruct the jury to be scrupulous to arrive at the correct verdict,
what to consider and what not to consider.
THE JUDGE MAY BE INCOMPETENT TELLING
THE JURY TO DO THE WRONG THINGS.
Rolf Harris: It takes two to tango
By saying it takes two to tango, he is
trying to shift and share the blame with the accused, but in divine law, he is
the senior one, a married man and if the sex was illicit, he too is guilty and
bears the heavier guilt than the girl especially if she had been seduced or
pressure exerted on her.
If I remember correctly Rolf’s defence
was that his relationship with his daughter’s girlfriend was platonic and only
turned sexual after she was above the age of legal consent when it was
consensual. Rather than exonerating this is incriminating and it is farfetched
the relationship was platonic and only turned passionate after her maturity.
‘IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO’ IS A FOOLISH
INCRIMINATING ATTEMPT TO SPREAD OR SHIFT THE BLAME BUT THE TRUTH IS THAT WHAT
HAPPENED IS ILLICIT, YOU ARE MUCH MORE SENIOR AND SURELY YOU SHOULD KNOW WHAT
YOU ARE DOING TO THE GIRL EVEN IF SHE WAS WILLING WAS NOT FOR HER WELLBEING BUT
HARM?
Rolf Harris was never wholesome:
I recently watched a video clip of Rolf
in his younger days and if you are discerning he was never wholesome then and
his appearance and manner shows aggressiveness and nastiness that would make
one wary.
Cost of
buying new home rose 2% in April, the highest monthly figure for almost four
years
Why do people monitor and pay attention
to such figures? Do they truly understand the significance of such figures?
Most people do not know what to make of such figures or they may think it is
good when it is a wrong understanding. The economy should not be dependent on
such price rises for its wellbeing, there is actually a painful reckoning even
calamity as such prices keep rising and whatever ‘advantages’ are like taking
steroids, also bad not good as perceived.
THE WEALTH EFFECT OF SUCH HOUSE PRICE
RISES ARE ILLUSORY, NEVER GENUINE AND THEY PROMOTE EXCESSES IN CONSUMPTION AND
BORROWING AND AS SUCH PRICES KEEP RISING IT IS LIKE CLIMBING UP A CLIFF WHERE YOU
ARE EITHER STUCK HIGH UP OR YOU JUMP TO YOUR DEATH. DOES ANYONE HERE
THINK SO? IF THEY DON’T AND THAT IS THE TRUTH, THEN THEY ALL DO NOT UNDERSTAND
THE TRUTH ABOUT ASSET PRICE RISES BE IT PROPERTY, SHARES, OIL OR COMMODITIES.
How to understand truly house price
rises:
Such relentless rises to high levels
are totally harmful especially as it gets higher, whatever benefits are never
true, only serve to satisfy those who have a stake in benefiting from such
rises (eg developers, agents, speculators or those who own property who see
their values rise without work). If your economy depends on such price rises to
boom or feel wealthy, it is false, illusory and cannot be sustained forever but
will face a painful reckoning sooner or later as the productivity or income
generating falls increasingly behind such inflating asset value rises.
WHILST THOSE IN THE PROPERTY SECTOR,
WHO OWN PROPERTY MAY BE THRILLED TO SEE THEIR WEALTH SOAR WITH PRICE RISES AND
THEY MAY THEN SPEND MORE THAN THEY CAN ACTUALLY AFFORD LULLED BY THE FALSE
SENSE OF WEALTH, INCREASINGLY THE ECONOMY STRUGGLE TO MATCH SUCH PRICE RISES
AND AN INCREASING SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION IS LEFT FURTHER AND FURTHER BEHIND.
SUCH RELENTLESS PROPERTY PRICE RISES ARE DANGEROUS AND BAD FOR THE ECONOMY AS A
WHOLE AND IT REFLECTS DELUSION MANKIND THINKS NOTHING EVEN GOOD.
House price rises unjustified, about
selfishness without regard for common welfare:
SELDOM IF NOT ALWAYS, HOUSE PRICES
GLOBALLY ARE NOT JUSTIFIED BUT THEY ARE DRIVEN BY GREED AND SELFISHNESS WITHOUT
REGARD FOR THE COMMON GOOD AND IS A FORM OF GRABBING OF THE COMMON WEALTH INTO
THE HANDS OF THOSE WITH THE PRIZED COMMODITY IN THIS CASE A HOUSE OR THEY ARE
ABLE TO BUILD AND SELL HOUSES OR THEY ARE AGENTS.
IF WHAT I SAY IS TRUE, ACCURATE IT
CANNOT GO ON FOREVER BUT AS IT GOES ON, IT BECOMES MORE SEVERE AND THERE IS A
RECKONING WITH RUIN LATER.
Pizza, anyone?
This is not a proper way of speaking if
you wish to escape suffering.
It is an impersonal way of speaking,
not addressed to anyone in particular as in ‘do you want a pizza?’ and so it
must be a rehashed mechanical speech, cannot be genuine and it is designed to
stir others’ emotions as if it is funny or humorous.
PIZZA, ANYONE IS IMPERSONAL, NOT
ADDRESSED TO ANYONE IN PARTICULAR AND SO IT IS IMPROPER SPEECH INTENDED TO STIR
EMOTIONS THAN SPEAK THE TRUTH AND IT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES, NOT FUNNY OR A
GREAT STYLE OF SPEAKING AS YOU WRONGLY UNDERSTAND. BECAUSE IT IS IMPERSONAL IT
DEGRADES THE PERSON’S EXPERIENCES SO THAT LIFE BECOMES DEPERSONALIZED, DISTANT.
No comments:
Post a Comment