By ANNA NORTH
Is
narcissism really an incurable plague sweeping America? Maybe not.
Narcissism is false or meaningless and
harmful to self and others and so it is not a subject worthy of attention or
study and this is objective and applies to everyone and should you think it is
worthy of attention and discussion you are deluded and that is the path to
future woe not happiness.
RIGHT ATTENTION IS ONE OF THE FACTORS
IN THE BUDDHA’S NOBLE EIGHTFOLD PATH TO RELEASE FROM DEATH AND SUFFERING AND IT
IS WRONG ATTENTION TO PAY ATTENTION AND STUDY THE RISE OR FALL OF NARCISSISM, WHICH
IS ABOUT FALSITY AND NOT WORTHY OF ATTENTION EXCEPT THAT YOU ARE DELUDED AND
WANT TO SPREAD YOUR DELUSION TO OTHERS.
IT IS AN OPINION NOT TRUTH THAT
NARCISSISM IS FALLING BECAUSE IT IS AN AFFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL ORDINARY PEOPLE
WITH SELF INDENTITY. I SEE NO EVIDENCE PEOPLE TODAY OR IN THE US ARE ANY LESS
NARCISSISTIC AS THEY WERE IN THE PAST AND IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT
EMOTIONAL PEOPLE CAN SHED THEIR PREOCCUPATIONS WITH THEMSELVES.
Whatever is false or harmful only
requires recognition and avoidance:
There is much falsity (eg narcissism)
and harmfulness (eg killing, injuring) in this world and whatever is falsity
and harmfulness only requires recognition or identification as being present in
self or others and thenceforth what needs to be done is to eradicate and avoid
that entity, you are deluded to focus on and discuss what is false or harmful
eg narcissism.
ROLF
Harris’s brother and manager has denied pressuring a witness in his child sex
abuse trial and dismissed a make-up artist’s groping claims as “ridiculous”.
The grope claims are never ridiculous,
they are either true or untrue and so you are speaking falsely liable for
suffering in repayment.
ANYONE WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE
OF THE ALLEGATION OR THINK IT HAS BASIS IS GULLIBLE, DOES NOT UNDERSTAND. WHY
SHOULD THE CLAIM BE SUBJECT OF RIDICULE WHEN IT SHOULD BE THE SUBJECT OF
VERACITY?
There is no true and false politeness
and charm, all politeness and charm is conditioned or rehashed from programming
never for good purposes but to deceive, to put the person in the good books of
those they are polite or charming to.
IF POLITENESS AND CHARM ARE MEANINGFUL
EVEN GOOD TO YOU, YOU ARE DELUDED, DO NOT UNDERSTAND TRULY. ALL POLITENESS AND
CHARM ARE CULTIVATED, REHASHED FROM PROGRAMMING FOR NEFARIOUS NEVER GOOD
PURPOSES.
PUTRAJAYA: Hawkers and small businesses hoping to generate extra income
during Ramadhan will be receiving a total of RM45 million in loans with the new
Skim Pembiayaan Mikro-i Bazar Ramadhan 2014.
The implication is that the government
and by extension the politicians are good giving out loans when this is
delusion, it is the opposite, bad to give out loans.
If you (not the government that you
run, using other people’s money to lend) have a lot of money and you want to
give it away then that is always good, meritorious but if you lend, it is not
the next best thing but karma because you encourage others to take risk, go
into debt in the name of business expansion which is actually unnecessary.
People should be encouraged to live and
run their businesses within their means, it is dangerous to borrow and thus
gamble to grow your business faster than it would be.
IF YOU HAVE A LOT OF MONEY (NOT OTHERS’
MONEY) AND YOU WANT TO GIVE IT AWAY THEN THAT IS ALWAYS MERITORIOUS.
IF YOU ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO BORROW, YOU
LEND THEM MONEY TO GROW THEIR BUSINESSES FASTER, THAT IS NOT THE NEXT BEST
THING BUT YOU ARE ENCOURAGING PEOPLE TO GO INTO DEBT, TO TAKE RISKS IN THE NAME
OF (UNNECESSARILY) GROWING THEIR BUSINESSES FASTER THAN THEY OTHERWISE WOULD.
THUS IF YOU UNDERSTAND WRONGLY AND
THINK IT IS GOOD TO LEND MONEY (ESPECIALLY WHEN IT IS NOT YOUR MONEY THAT IS AT
RISK), YOU END UP WITH A LOT OF KARMA NOT THE MERIT YOU THINK YOU ARE DUE.
Give or share but not lend or borrow or
steal:
In the divine scheme of it, it is good
to give or share but it is evil to lend (which require repayment with
interest), borrow or steal.
Lending is not to be confused with
sharing, when people speak of lending you their car, it is not lending but
sharing their car with you.
GIVING AND SHARING IS THE WAY OF
HEAVEN, THOSE WHO ARE NOBLE HAVE FEW WANTS AND THERE IS LITTLE THAT CAN BE
GIVEN OR SHARED WITH THEM. LENDING AND BORROWING ARE EVIL AND THE WAY OF THIS WORLD.
Renting is a form of lending:
Renting is a form of lending, hiring
out your possession for financial return and so it is evil, does not accord
with heaven.
Did a power nap cost Adolf
Hitler victory in World War II? Staff were too scared to wake him on D-Day
This is an untenable speculation only
the deluded can contemplate.
The course of the Second World War had
by the date been fixed, Germany was doomed, with heavy losses in the East and
the Russian onslaught drawing closer and closer to Berlin. The United States
had the atom bomb by then and Allied bombers was reducing major German cities
to rouble and so it was a matter of time before Germany collapsed and the plots
to kill Hitler were attempts to get rid of a mad man so that Germany could sue
for peace.
IT IS NONSENSE THAT IF HITLER WAS NOT
ON SLEEPING PILLS, AWAKE HE COULD MOBILIZE HIS ARMOUR AND REPEL THE NORMANDY
INVASION AND THAT WOULD BE THE END OF THE WORLD.
GERMANY’S CAPACITY TO WAGE WAR AT THAT
STAGE HAE BEEN SEVERELY CRIPPLED. AMERICA’S INDUSTRIAL MIGHT FREED FROM BOMBING
PLUS ITS DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR BOMBS WHILST GERMANY’S INDUSTRIAL MIGHT WAS
SEVERELY DESTROYED BY RELENTLESS ALLIED BOMBING MADE THE END RESULT INEVITABLE.
GERMANY HAD LOST MANY MILLIONS IRREPLACEABLE SOLDIERS IN ITS FOOLISH CONQUEST
OF RUSSIA.
Allied air superiority would prevent
Hitler moving his armour:
Hitler wrongly calculated the invasion
would be in the nearer Calais area whilst Rommel who was side lined correctly
guessed it was at Normandy. The Calais region was heavily fortified and armour
divisions were placed near to be mobilized to the invasion area when it came.
Rommel argued that allied air superiority would render such mobilization
difficult and so the armour should be in place beforehand.
And so it was that just before and
during the invasion, allied bombing destroyed communications, road and rail
with the intention of preventing reinforcement arriving.
ROMMEL SAID THAT ARMOUR REINFORCEMENT
SHOULD BE IN PLACE NOT HELD FURTHER BACK TO COVER A LARGER AREA BECAUSE ALLIED
AIR SUPERIORITY WOULD SERIOUSLY HAMPER MOBILITY AND SO EVEN IF HITLER WAS AWAKE
AND ORDERED A MOBILIZATION IT MAY BE DESTROYED IN TRANSIT.
NEVERTHELESS GERMANY WAS FIGHTING A
LOST CAUSE BY THEN, IT WAS THE DEFIANCE AND MADNESS OF HITLER THAT MADE HIM
CONTINUE.
The danger of wishful whimsical thinking:
There is such a thing called wishful,
fantastical whimsical thinking and it is the result of conditioning by self and
others and so it is a form of programmed or robotic thinking that is dangerous,
renders the person gullible, susceptible to deception by others and because he
also influences others to be similarly whimsical, wishful it has karma, is
blameworthy to be repaid by suffering.
Thus to think that if Hitler had been
awake during the onset of the Normandy invasion he could have altered the
course of history is wishful whimsical thinking that is not blameless and is
dangerous to self and others.
MANY DO NOT REALIZE THEIR THINKING IS
NOT RATIONAL, BASED ON TRUE REASON BUT IT IS BASED ON FANTASY, WISHFULNESS AND
WHIMSICAL.
Do whatever it takes:
ECB president is living up
to his promise to 'do whatever it takes'
You never do whatever it takes to
achieve something, it is dangerous and false, it means you will murder, kill or
steal or cheat to achieve.
In any matter you must have regard for
truth, goodness never do whatever it takes.
THE PERSON WHO WILL DO WHATEVER IT
TAKES IS DEMONSTRATING HIS RUTHLESSNESS AND DISREGARD FOR TRUTH AND GOODNESS,
HE IS DANGEROUS AND IF YOU ARE CLUELESS, SEE NOTHING WRONG YOU ARE A FOOL WHO
DOES NOT UNDERSTAND.
Time has no sands and you are
cultivating false perception in yourself and others that ends in insanity.
Just because Normandy and D-Day is
about beaches does not warrant the false conclusion and perception of the sands
of time that is never harmless but has deadly consequences for those who allow
themselves to be recruited.
To speak of D-Day and the sands of time
must stir emotions and it is the stirred emotions that deluded people find
meaningful when it is meaningless and lead to insanity.
Hitler’s only hope of winning World War
2:
Only if Hitler decisively swiftly
invaded and conquered/subdued Britain and Russia would he have any hope of
winning the war he started, once he failed to do so and the extremely unusually
cold Russian winter may have played a major if not decisive part and he was
mauled, sustained serious losses at the hands of the Russians, he was doomed.
The world was in the midst of
disarmament after the disastrous WW1 and Germany, technologically superior and
industrious, gave itself a huge head start so that when it unilaterally without
declaring war invaded country after country including the low countries and
France, it seemed the German juggernaut was invincible when it was not, unless
it subdued UK and USSR, these formidable foes could turn the tide and act as
conduits for massive arms, material and human input from an America too distant
for Germany to attack with which to finally defeat Germany.
Up to the successful conquest of France,
Germany suffered little human losses but after the disaster of the Russian
winter siege, Germany’s army suffered significant losses that was harder for it
to keep replacing compared with the Russians.
Germany suffered from lack of raw
materials especially oil and its industrial bases in Germany were subject to
disruption and destruction by increasingly heavy allied bombing whilst America
was then rich in resources and its considerable industrial production base was
free from German attack.
Whilst Germany did invent some
important weapons like rockets, jet powered planes they were insufficient to be
of critical advantages and towards the end America had beaten Germany to the
development of the atom bomb.
Once human losses both civilian and
military begin to mount for Germany, it was a matter of time before the allies
decisive advantage would be turned to victory.
BECAUSE OF HIS DELUSION HITLER DID NOT
REALIZE HIS WORLD CONQUEST WAS EXTREMELY FOOLHARDY, HIS ONLY HOPE OF SUCCESS
WAS A SWIFT SUBDUING OF BRITAIN AND RUSSIA. WHEN THE EXTREMELY COLD RUSSIAN
WINTER STYMIED HIS MARCH ON RUSSIA, HE WAS DOOMED, THE TIDE HAD TURNED. GERMANY
DESPITE ITS TECHNOLOGICAL, MILITARY ADVANTAGES HAD AN INDUSTRIAL BASE EXPOSED
TO ALLIED ATTACK WHILST AMERICA’S FORMIDABLE INDUSTRIAL CASE WAS NOT SUBJECT TO
ATTACK. ONCE ITS CASUALTIES MOUNTED IT WAS A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE GERMANY
COLLAPSED.
Geography and nature defeated Hitler:
It was the formidable English Channel
that prevented Germany from delivering the decisive blow by defeating England’s
reeling, underprepared army. England lost a lot of its weapons abandoned in
France and its industrial production required time to be boosted and it was the
English Channel that prevented Germany from rolling over England when it was
vulnerable.
The Russian winter during Germany’s
invasion was said to be extremely cold and early in onset and more than the
Russian army, it proved forbidding for the Germans and fatally stalled their
onslaught.
Geography that meant America’s
industrial might was isolated from German attack whilst Germany’s industrial
heart was fully exposed to allied attack played a crucial part in ensuring
Germany would finally succumb.
Where would England be without the
English Channel?
Its army mauled in France and a lot of
its equipment abandoned, the English army retreated to lick its wounds in
insular England, without the English Channel Germany would have pursued England
and subjugated England before it could reorganize itself with a lot of American
help and boost its defence and production.
THE ENGLISH CHANNEL MAY HAVE PLAYED A
DECISIVE ROLE IN THE COURSE OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR.
Hitler caught the world off guard:
Even though the Germans are renowned
for their ‘humourless mechanical efficiency and industrial technological
prowess, the reason why Hitler was irresistible in the early stages was because
a world devastated by the carnage of WW I had no appetite for war and was in a
process of disarmament with countries like the US scrapping warships and planes
but when Hitler came to power he accelerated the secret and illegal rearmament
of Germany so that when war started he had the most powerful and modern army
& air force in the world and after the allied armies were mauled they
started a hasty rearmament that redressed the initial imbalance.
IT WAS NOT SO MUCH GERMAN (AND
JAPANESE) PROWESS THAT WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR EARLIER SUCCESSES BUT THE
WORLD WAS CAUGHT UNPREPARED AND ONCE THE REST OF THE WORLD CAUGHT UP
PARTICULARLY WITH THE CONTRIBUTION OF AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL AND MILITARY
PRODUCTION THAT WAS ENTIRELY UNMOLESTED BY JAPAN AND GERMANY, WHO WOULD WIN IN
THE END WAS QUITE INEVITABLE.
Hitler could not hit Russian factories:
When war started, even though Russia
had some preparations, they were caught off guard and required emergency
material aid from the US mostly through the Arctic convoy of ships but also
overland from Iran but soon Russia established its industrial production east
of Moscow, out of reach of German bombers and this proved crucial to victory.
IN RUSSIA AND THE USA, GERMANY WAS
FIGHTING TWO FUTURE SUPERPOWERS. NOT ONLY THAT, WHILST GERMANY’S FACTORIES AND
CITIES WERE AT THE MERCY OF ALLIED BOMBERS BASED IN ENGLAND, GERMANY COULD NOT
HIT BACK AT RUSSIAN AND AMERICAN FACTORIES BECAUSE THEY WERE OUT OF REACH TO
ITS AIR FORCE.
AS WAR ENSUED AND CASUALTIES MOUNTED,
GERMANY BECAME SHORT OF MANPOWER SUCH THAT EVEN YOUNG BOYS AND OLD MEN WERE
CALLED TO ARMS, GERMANY WAS SHORT OF MANY RAW MATERIALS LIKE OIL WHILST RUSSIA
AND AMERICA HAD PLENTY AND SO IT WAS INEVITABLE THAT GERMANY FACED DEFEAT AND
IT WAS FOOLHARDY OF HITLER (AND JAPAN) TO PICK A FIGHT AGAINST TWO POWERFUL
GIANTS. JAPAN WAS EVEN MORE FOOLISH BECAUSE IN ADDITION TO RUSSIA AND AMERICA,
EVEN THOUGH CHINA WAS INITIALLY BACKWARD, IT WAS FIGHTING A THIRD GIANT CHINA
IN ITS OWN BACKYARD.
JAPAN AND GERMANY’S FIGHT AGAINST THE
ALLIES WAS UNTENABLE, UNSUSTAINABLE, BOTH JAPAN AND GERMANY WERE BOMBED TO
RUBBLE BY RELENTLESS ALLIED LONG RANGE BOMBERS WHILST THEY DID NOT HAVE THE
ABILITY TO RETALIATE AGAINST AMERICAN AND RUSSIAN FACTORIES.
IN ORDER TO WIN THE WAR HE STARTED,
HITLER MUST DECISIVELY DEFEAT ENGLAND AND RUSSIA AT THE OUTSET WHILST THEY WERE
ON THEIR BACK FOOTS, ONCE ENGLAND AND RUSSIA SURVIVED THE FIRST ONSLAUGHT,
GERMANY HAD A NOOSE OF FINAL DEFEAT AROUND ITS NECK.
The Second World War was a battle of
industrial production:
The face of war changes and in the
second world war, it was essentially a battle of industrial production and so
if your enemies can destroy your factories whilst you are hampered by geography
as to be unable to inflict tit for tat damage, you are fighting an untenable
war.
With the next world war, it may not be
so much industrial production but whose nuclear strikes are more lethal.
THE SECOND WORLD WAR WAS ESSENTIALLY A
BATTLE BETWEEN ECONOMIES, BETWEEN RIVAL INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND FOR ONE WHO
UNDERSTANDS, IT WAS SUICIDAL FOR GERMANY AND JAPAN TO ENGAGE IN WARFARE WITH
THE US AND RUSSIA BECAUSE THEY CANNOT HIT AT RUSSIAN AND US FACTORIES WHILST
THE ALLIED COULD HIT AT WILL GERMAN AND JAPANESE FACTORIES.
Disregard the elements at your own peril:
Not just war but in any situation (eg
driving) you disregard the elements (rain, darkness, cold) to your own peril.
Thus when autumn rains came, it bogged
down Hitler’s all conquering armies, tanks and trucks became stuck in mires of
mud and could barely move and when the exceptionally cold winter set in, engine
oil froze, guns jammed, soldiers did not have warm winter clothes and were
frost bitten.
In the wintry snowy conditions,
Russians mounted on horses in cavalry charges were superior to Germans mounted
on tanks or foot going nowhere.
In the Battle of the Bulge the Germans
were trying to repeat their previous successful spring armoured charge through
the Ardennes but this time it was winter and the tanks could not charge through
as they did in spring. When the fog cleared so that the allies could call in
air reconnaissance, the tanks became sitting ducks to air strikes.
What he says is nonsense and not the
answer and if you do not know what to make of it or you think he may be correct
you are gullible.
Whatever the problem or difficulty, the
first requirement is to understand truly what the problem and situation is, as
it is possible to understand and once you have truly understood the problem you
are facing, the answers (if any) are evident and it is a matter of cooperation,
for the common good to undertake the action, what has ‘D-Day spirit’ got to do
with it?
YOU DO NOT NEED THE D-DAY SPIRIT, WHAT
YOU NEED IS TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND GOODWILL TO COLLECTIVELY SET OUT TO SOLVE
WHATEVER DIFFICULTIES FACING YOU. IF YOUR UNDERSTANDING IS FALSE, YOU ARE
DELUDED THAT YOU CAN NEVERTHELESS FIND AND IMPLEMENT THE RIGHT ANSWERS.
GOODWILL IS GOODWILL NOT D-DAY SPIRIT AND WITHOUT GOODWILL YOU CANNOT ARRIVE AT
THE COMMON GOOD.
The
International Monetary Fund warns the UK government that accelerating house
prices and low productivity pose the greatest threat to the UK's economic
recovery.
Low productivity is much more difficult
if not impossible to resolve and feckless people ignore low productivity whilst
they celebrate and tout rising house prices as evidence of recovery when it may
be a recipe for even more disaster down the line.
This indicates that housing is a key
element buttressing the UK economy and it is based on virtual or illusory price
rises that does not require sweat and work and so it is a bubble that may burst
even explosively killing many who are foolhardy.
Never a need to make calls which are for
show:
For those with true understanding and
goodwill, there is never a need to make calls to them but what is needed is to discuss
with them what is the matter and then to undertake collective action.
For those without true understanding
and goodwill, they are stubborn and bent in their selfish ways and they are not
open to discussions and so what remains is to make calls and pleas which fall
largely if not totally on deaf ears and they may smile and nod but continue the
same afterwards.
Third world war not about industrial
muscle but first and lethal strike:
The third world war, should it happen
will not be about industrial muscle and endurance but who strikes first and how
lethal his nuclear strikes are, should there be anyone around to be declared
winner.
THE THIRD WORLD WAR IF IT HAPPENS WOULD
NOT REVOLVE AROUND INDUSTRIAL MUSCLE AND MAY NOT LAST VERY LONG NOR WOULD THERE
BE A CLEARCUT WINNER.
IT IS A MATTER OF HOW LETHAL, STRATEGIC
THE STRIKES ARE AND BOTH VICTORS AND VANQUISHED MAY BE MORTALLY WOUNDED.
D-Day Spirit requires rehash:
Hollande’s call for D-Day spirit is
false and evil because it requires robotic rehash.
Even if he cannot define what he means
by D-Day spirit, even it is false, D-Day spirit can be defined as such and such
which must be remembered and then used as a base for action which demands a
robotic existence.
WHATEVER IS REHASHED ACCORDING TO A
SCRIPT IS FALSE AND EVIL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND SO A CALL FOR THE D-DAY SPIRIT
IS NEVER GOOD BUT BAD, EVIL.
WHATEVER IS THE TRUTH AND GOOD IS NOT
THE D-DAY SPIRIT BUT THE TRUTH AND GOOD, WHATEVER IS THE D-DAY SPIRIT CANNOT BE
THE TRUTH AND GOOD. THERE IS NO NEED TO RESORT TO THE D-DAY SPIRIT, JUST
UNDERSTAND WHAT IS TRUE AND GOOD AND ACT ACCORDINGLY.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO SEE AS
TRUE AND GOOD HOLLANDE’S CALL AND SO THEY MUST CONDITION THEMSELVES TO IGNORE
IT (SWITCH OFF) WITH STIRRED RESISTANCE OR PRETEND TO APPRECIATE.
Hitler came within whisker of taking
Moscow:
Hitler came within a whisker (20 miles)
of capturing Moscow (and its strategic implications); its residents feared its
fall within days/weeks but a combination of extreme cold/snow and possibly
blunders Hitler failed in the end and that marked the beginning of his ultimate
inevitable defeat later.
Like Genghis Khan who slayed all before
him, Hitler seemed invincible after he swiftly conquered the low land countries
(Holland, Belgium) and France and the next year he marched on Russia which had
the largest army, most tanks and air force in the world. However Russia’s army
had antiquated equipment and it had just suffered a brutal systemic purge of
its officer corps by Stalin.
Hitler coveted Russia for its vast
resource rich lands (steppes, grain land, resources and oil. Germany was
dependent on Finland for iron ore and Rumania for oil and when Hitler annexed
East European countries without first declaring war, Russia also moved forward
and took part of east Rumania that threatened Hitler’s vital oil supplies.
Operation Barbarossa, Hitler’s codename
for the operation to conquer Russia was (?fatally) delayed for a month by the
need to intervene in Yugoslavia and Greece to quell rebellions and when he
commenced hostility, his army rapidly advanced in a broad front into Russia
until he came close to Moscow. If he had immediately taken Moscow when the
weather was still good, he may have succeeded but instead he thought he had
better prizes elsewhere and directed his tanks south to capture Stalingrad and
the Ukraine.
When the first autumn snow came and
melted it made roads a quagmire of mud unpassable to his vehicles such that
soldiers had to commandeer local horses for personal transport and carrying.
But when winter came and the soil hardened, he recommenced his advance and
broke through Moscow’s defence in several places to be within 20 miles of
Moscow. However, the winter with its bitter cold and relentless snow that was
said to be extreme, the worst in many years set in and his soldiers were
without proper clothes and Hitler failed to supply them and many died of cold
whilst the tanks and trucks could not be started because of frozen lubricant
oils.
Unknown to the Germans, Moscow’s
defence was in the hands of an able new general Zhukov and he had a secret
elite or crack Siberian army in reserve to launch an attack. And so with the
Germans suffering from the cold, Zhukov’s crack Siberian troops suddenly
launched a counter attack on skis and horseback together with tanks and
artillery adapted to the cold and they inflicted the first defeat on German
soldiers so that they had to retreat and it was a psychological blow that the
German army was not invincible.
SOMETIMES ARMOUR AND THE BEST EQUIPMENT
ARE NO MATCH FOR SKIS AND HORSES AND SO IT WAS WHEN THE GERMAN ARMY WAS
CRIPPLED BY FROST, THEY WERE NO MATCH FOR CRACK SIBERIAN TROOPS ON SKIS AND
HORSEBACKS.
Hitler usually did not declare war, when
he did it was a blunder:
Hitler’s modus operandi was to secretly
amass troops and armour at the border and then suddenly attack, he did this in
all countries like Poland, Holland, Belgium and France but inexplicably maybe
out of frustration at America’s meddling to support England and Russia he
declared war on the USA after Japan attacked Pearl Harbour.
This brought America officially to be
at war with Germany and Roosevelt did not need to justify Congress to go to war
with Germany since war was forced on the US.
The relentless bombardment of Germany
at the later part of the war was almost entirely an American affair and so if
war wasn’t declared on America it would have little justification to bomb
Germany.
Hitler was treacherous:
Many times Hitler would assure his
neighbours he had no intentions of invading them and yet within months he would
suddenly without declaring war attack them blitzkrieg fashion.
Hitler had a non aggression pact with
Russia (so that he can attack Poland without fear of reprisal from Russia) but
within a year after he disposed of Poland he reneged on his treaty and launched
an undeclared war on Russia.
Only those who are deluded would ponder
such questions.
If Britain’s race tolerance is
fabricated, contrived, never genuine, it has strain or tension, then it does
not matter if Britain is more tolerant or racist, they are both false,
contrived.
For those who understand, race is never
an issue of truth or falsity, good or bad, only those who are partisan, deluded
does race matter and racial tolerance is never without underlying strain or
hypocrisy and so it is deluded to discuss whether Britain is more racist.
WHETHER RACIAL TOLERANCE IN BRITAIN IS
TRUE OR HYPOCRISY IS OBJECTIVE CANNOT BE DISPUTED. IF IT IS HYPOCRITICAL AND
YOU THINK IT IS GENUINE THEN YOU ARE DELUDED.
IF IT IS HYPOCRITICAL, MERELY A VENEER WHAT
DOES IT MATTER IF RACISM START REARING ITS UGLY HEAD WHERE IT WAS CONCEALED IN
THE PAST?
Whether Britain is more racist does not
matter:
Whether Britain is more or less racist
does not matter except if you are deluded, what matters is whether you are true
or false, good or bad because Britain is heading for perishing, it is rotten
and those who are attached to Britain will similarly perish and so what matters
is that you be true and good so that you may be saved from endless death and
suffering.
WHETHER BRITAIN IS MORE RACIST OR NOT
DOES NOT MATTER FOR THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY AND SO IF YOU THINK IT
MATTERS YOU ARE DELUDED, PARTISAN, ATTACHED TO THIS WORLD AND HEADING FOR
PERISHING.
Britain more racist is a distraction:
The Buddha said you must set aside the
many distractions of the world (wrong attention to pay attention to them) that
bind you and keep you in this world.
Right attention is a factor in the Buddha’s
eightfold path and right attention is paying attention to the stress,
restlessness and scattering of your concentration and identifying the sources
as there are to their arising and putting them to a stop.
There are many kinds of interviews like
job interviews, celebrity interviews and the reason why people fumble is
because what is asked of them is not the truth but deluded and what they answer
is not the truth but deluded, designed to create false impressions of
themselves.
IF YOUR CONVERSATION IS (TRULY) MEANINGFUL,
IT IS NOT AN INTERVIEW AND PEOPLE FUMBLE AT INTERVIEWS, THERE IS TENSION AT
INTERVIEWS BECAUSE IT IS DECEITFUL, WHAT IS ASKED OF THOSE INTERVIEWED ARE
FALSE OR DELUDED AND THEIR ANSWERS ARE NOT THE TRUTH BUT DESIGNED TO PRESENT AN
IMAGE OF THEMSELVES THAT IS FALSE AND INTENDED TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE.
Russian steppes disorientated German
armies:
In those days there was no GPS to tell
you where to go and even if there were spotter planes, communications are not
immediate.
And so German troops complained of
serious disorientation, miles upon miles, horizon to horizon of grasslands keep
coming up and they became disorientated, there are video clips of German
officers with maps in their hands pointing here and there deciding where in a
featureless grassland they are stuck in the middle of to head out.
War 1st Versus 2nd
World War style:
Apart from secret illegal rearmament, a
decisive advantage Hitler had over his adversaries was the German adoption of
new war technology, the use of mobile armour to punch holes in enemy defence
lines on two sides and then encircle them and the use of modern air force to
drop paratroopers behind the line to create havoc and occupy until terrestrial
reinforcements could arrive.
WWI was fought on trenches with brutal
artillery bombardment of each other, use of chemical weapons, strafing of enemy
positions by crude biplanes.
German methods in WWII took its enemies
by surprise in the use of massed armoured charges using tanks to punch holes
rapidly in enemy defensive lines and these pincers then closed at the back of
the enemy lines to encircle and cut off retreat and supplies. Further modern
air forces enabled paratroopers to be dropped behind enemy lines to subvert
their frontline defences and hold awaiting charging armoured thrusts.
Whilst all this may impress fellow
robots, it is about tactics using what is available now (tanks and armoured
vehicles) that was not available previously, using speed and surprise to
overwhelm robotic enemies still used to the old style of warfare.
BLITZKRIEG IS NOTHING MORE THAN A NEW
STYLE OF WARFARE ADAPTING TO NEW WEAPONS (ARMOURED VEHICLES AND AIRDROPS), IT
IS A THEORY AND PLAN AND ONLY ROBOTS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING CARRYING OUT
ACCORDING TO PLANS ARE REQUIRED.
VERY SOON THE ENEMIES (RUSSIAN,
AMERICANS) CAUGHT ON OR COPIED AND USED THE SAME TACTICS TO DEVASTATING EFFECTS
ON THE GERMAN PIONEERS THEMSELVES.
THE MODUS OPERANDI OF WWII IS MASSIVE
ARTILLERY BOMBARDMENT FOLLOWED BY CHARGING ARMOUR ON EITHER SIDES OF THE ENEMY
POSITIONS AND ONCE IT HAS PUNCHED THROUGH THE TWO PRONGS TURN AROUND TO
ENCIRCLE THE TRAPPED ENEMIES CUTTING OFF RETREAT AND SUPPLIES.
Hitler could have won the Battle of
Britain, but so what?
Had Hitler or his egotistic Luftwaffe
chief Goering persisted and not switched tactics, Hitler could have won the
Battle of Britain but even if he had won, his plan to invade Britain was make
shift and vulnerable and he had to choose between taking Britain or Russia and
Russia is likely to be the more desirable prize to covetous Hitler.
That may be the reason his deputy Hess
secretly parachuted into Britain seeking a peaceful settlement with the British
whom Hitler considered fellow Aryans so that Hitler could concentrate on
conquering Russia instead of having to wage two wars at the same time with
Britain and Russia that was against his own tenets of warfare.
Hitler was an avaricious man in a hurry
to conquer the world but he could not take Britain and Russia at the same time
and so if he wanted to take Britain first it would mean postponing his Russian
conquest for one year which would allow Russia more time to bolster itself.
A seaborne invasion is far trickier
than the usual blitzkrieg and his preparations had been makeshift if at all and
he needed to establish air superiority so that the RAF cannot destroy his seaborne
invasion fleet.
HITLER WAS NOT THAT MIGHTY THAT HE
COULD TAKE BRITAIN AND RUSSIA AT THE SAME TIME AND SO IF HE WERE TO TAKE
BRITAIN THROUGH A FAR TRICKIER SEABORNE INVASION THAT HE HAD NOT MADE
PREPARATIONS, HIS PREPARATIONS WERE VERY MAKESHIFT, HE WOULD HAVE TO ESTABLISH
AIR SUPERIORITY BY DESTROYING THE RAF FIRST TO PROTECT HIS INVASION FLEET.
DELAYING THE RUSSIAN ATTACK WOULD GIVE THE RUSSIANS MORE TIME TO BOLSTER
DEFENCES AND SO TREACHEROUS HITLER WHO CONSIDERED BRITONS FELLOW ARYANS WAS
PREPARED TO MAKE PEACE AND THAT MAY BE THE REASON HIS DEPUTY SECRETLY
PARACHUTED INTO BRITAIN.
The RAF was seriously depleted after the
Dunkirk evacuation but the Battle of Britain began slowly with Luftwaffe
attacks on shipping in the channel before Goering turned his attention on the
British airfields to try and destroy the RAF.
He had almost destroyed the RAF when he
blundered by shifting his bombing focus to London which allowed the RAF time to
recover so that they devastated the Luftwaffe conducting daylight bombing over
London to such extent that they turned to night raids.
The Luftwaffe was at a disadvantage
over Britain because its bombers can carry limited bomb loads because of fuel
considerations, their fighter pilot escort could only remain for 30 minutes
before having to return because of fuel constraints. By contrast the RAF could
remain airborne for much longer because their bases were nearby and the radar
network along the coasts allowed them early warning of raids so that they can
time their take offs.
For 70 days nonstop the Luftwaffe
rained bombs including incendiaries designed to cause fires and this caused
serious destruction to London but they suddenly came to an end in the nick of
time as Hitler shifted his resources to the conquest of Russia.
HITLER CAME VERY CLOSE TO THE
DESTRUCTION OF RAF IN HIS ATTACKS ON AIRFIELDS BUT AT THE LAST MOMENT HE
SHIFTED FOCUS TO LONDON WHICH ALLOWED THE RAF TIME TO RECOVER AND IT THEN
INFLICTED A DEVASTATING TOLL ON HITLER’S BOMBERS CONDUCTING DAYLIGHT LONDON
RAIDS. THE BOMBING OF LONDON INCLUDING USE OF INCENDIARIES CAUSING FIRE WAS
SERIOUS DAMAGING LONDON WHEN IT SUDDENLY STOPPED BECAUSE HITLER SHIFTED HIS
ATTENTION TO RUSSIA.
IJM
offers to privatise IJM Land for RM1.98 billion
People say of course they understand
and they know money does not grow on trees or out of thin air but reflecting
their lack of true understanding money does grow on trees or out of thin air
with such (inflated) valuations of assets that are common place in today’s
avaricious world.
Developers, listed companies or
businessmen acquire land or assets at low prices and these in the course of
time grow monstrously in value making their owners very rich at least on paper
and they are a form of (unrighteous) claims on the existing wealth of the system,
that serves to drain or dilute wealth of the system into the hands of those
privileged to own assets that they can insert into the system at much inflated
values without any work being done.
IT MAY BE TRUE SUCH ASSETS ARE WORTH
BILLIONS OR IT MAY BE HYPED, ALLOWED TO BE JACKED UP BY INDIFFERENT AUTHORITIES
AND THESE MAKE THEIR PRIVILEGED OWNERS VERY RICH OVERNIGHT AND IT IS AT EXPENSE
OF THE SYSTEM, DRAINS VALUE FROM THE SYSTEM AND DILUTE THE WEALTH OF THE SYSTEM
THAT IF ALLOWED TO FESTER WILL SEVERELY DISTORT AND CHANGE THE WEALTH STRUCTURE
OF THE SYSTEM.
Turning shy to confident speakers:
If a person dwells in truth and
goodness then there is nothing to be shy or confident about what he says and it
is only if a person does not dwell in truth or goodness, what he says is
pretentious, deceptive, not intended to be true and good but motivated,
intended falsely to please and impress, to get what he wants that he is
afflicted with shyness or he must galvanize himself to deceive others he is
confident in himself and what he says.
Therefore shyness and confidence are
meaningless, controlled insanity necessitated by the falsity and harmfulness to
self and others of what one says and it reflects human delusion and complicity
that they talk about shyness and confidence as if one is undesirable and the
other desirable when they are mad, evil.
AS LONG AS WHAT YOU SAY IS FALSE AND
MOTIVATED, YOU CANNOT TRULY CONVERT A SHY SPEAKER TO A CONFIDENT SPEAKER, YOU
CAN LEARN OR TRAIN AT GREAT COSTS IN MENTAL INSANITY AND STRESS TO SUPPRESS
DISPLAYING YOUR SHYNESS OR DIFFIDENT BUT IT IS A CAN OF WORMS THAT WILL HARM
THE FOOL.
Why people are shy:
The reason some people are shy is
because there is strong resistance present in their speech and the reason there
is strong resistance is because what is said contain falsity and harmfulness
rather than truth and benevolence.
Those who are confident are either
tough goats who have learnt to suppress their resistance very well or they are
without conscience or concern and their natural resistance to falsity and
self-harm are lower, they don’t give a damn to self and others.
The world might still be Nazi had Russia
capitulated like France:
It was because Russia heroically stood
up to Hitler, refused to surrender under much duress and privation or hardship
unlike France which capitulated cowardly taking the easy way out (not because
it turned the other cheek as Jesus commanded but to save Paris and France from
destruction) that the world was rid of the scourge of Nazism.
If Russia had toppled at the first sign
of trouble, then swiftly, with his army still pristine, intact but emboldened
and war experienced, Hitler would have gained control of the whole of Europe
with Russia’s prized grain fields, resources and oil and manpower added to his
fiefdom he could consolidate his power over Europe making him even harder to
dislodge and Britain would be fighting an even impossible war against Nazi
capture and America might be threatened by a Nazi Germany much strengthened and
unscathed by attrition from not having to fight Russia.
NOT ONLY HAD RUSSIA RESISTED DESPITE
HEAVY LOSSES, REPEATED RETREATS AND STOICALLY DEFENDED LENINGRAD, STALINGRAD
AND MOSCOW, UNDER COMMUNIST CENTRAL COMMAND, ENTIRE FACTORIES TOGETHER WITH
THEIR WORKERS WERE DISMANTLED, CARTED THOUSANDS OF MILES AWAY TO THE EAST OF
THE URAL MOUNTAINS OUT OF REACH OF HITLER, REASSEMBLED TO PRODUCE THE WEAPONS
NECESSARY TO FIGHT HITLER, GRAIN AND FACILITIES WERE SCORCHED TO DENY THE
OCCUPYING NAZIS SUSTENANCE.
IT WAS SAID THAT THE
SINGLE ACT OF DISMANTLING AND TRANSPORTING BY RAIL FACTORIES AND WORKERS OUT OF
CAPTURE BY GERMANY WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR RUSSIA’S FINAL ASCENDANCY OVER GERMANY.
The world today is still very evil but
it could be much worse under the Nazis, Hitler was treacherous, mad and wicked,
he never declared war but instead assured his intended victims, secretly massed
troops and suddenly launched massive attacks. Millions of Jews, gypsies and
undesirable elements were sent to concentration camps to be eliminated or work
extracted from them and discarded afterwards when they could not work further.
France was ruled by weak government and
its military presided by geriatric generals out of touch with changing military
technology, when Hitler invaded the lowland countries (Holland, Belgium,
Denmark) France’s best armies together with a British expeditionary force was
foolishly sent to these countries to counter the invasion but Hitler had set a
trap for them. His panzer armoured divisions were secretly massed to cut
rapidly through poorly defended, what was thought to be unpassable Ardennes
mountainous region and these divisions immediately swung north to trap the
French and British forces in a pocket.
The French army threw down their
weapons and surrendered en masse when challenged and when Paris was encircled,
many fled Paris and to spare their dear Paris from destruction, the French
requested an armistice and surrendered, even Hitler and his generals were
amazed how easy their victory had been.
THE NAZI ARMY MAY APPEAR INVINCIBLE,
ALL CONQUERING AND THEIR SUCCESSES IMPRESSIVE BUT ACTUALLY APART FROM THE
INITIAL SUCCESSES CULMINATING IN THE CAPTURE OF FRANCE (PLUS MINOR SUCCESSES IN
AFRICA, BALKANS AND GREECE), THEY (SOON) MET WITH DEFEAT IN RUSSIA AND
THENCEFORTH IT WAS DOWNHILL.
RUSSIA BY INFLICTING DEFEAT AND DAMAGE
TO HITLER’S ARMY PUSHED BACK THE TIDE AND THEN THE POWER OF RUSSIAN AND
AMERICAN WAR PRODUCTION UNMOLESTED BY GERMAN BOMBING INEVITABLY TRIUMPHED OVER
GERMAN PRODUCTION HARASSED BY ALLIED BOMBING.
HOWEVER IF RUSSIA HAD CAPITULATED LIKE
FRANCE AT THE FIRST SIGN OF TROUBLE THEN WITH HIS ARMY STILL INTACT, HITLER
WOULD HAVE CONTROLLED EUROPE TOGETHER WITH RUSSIA WITH ITS PRIZED RESOURCES AND
MANPOWER AND THEN HE WOULD BE EVEN MORE DIFFICULT TO DISLODGE AND BRITAIN AND
AMERICA WOULD STRUGGLE EVEN MORE TRYING TO REMAIN INDEPENDENT.
Hitler invited America to bomb Germany:
Although America was providing much
material assistance to Britain and Russia, it was not at war with Germany and
so had no cause to attack Germany but when Hitler foolishly, emotionally
declared war on America after Japan attacked Pearl Harbour, America had cause
to bomb Germany since it was now at war with Germany and America with its
considerable resources, was the principal supplier of bombing missions especially
those B17 super fortresses that relentlessly bombed German cities and
facilities in the later years of the war.
CONCEITED AND ARROGANT WITH HIS POWER
HITLER DID NOT REALIZE IT WAS FOOLISH TO DECLARE WAR ON AMERICA, HE WAS ONLY
UNNECESSARILY INVITING AMERICA TO ATTACK GERMANY FROM BRITISH BASES.
Imagine Pol Pot running the world:
The world might be evil and bad as it
is, but imagine Pol Pot who conducted mass genocide of his people was to rule
the world, it would be disaster.
SIMILARLY AS BAD AS THE WORLD IS
ALREADY, IT WOULD BE WORSE IF HITLER HAD REMAINED IN POWER, HE WOULD HAVE
CAUSED MAYHEM BECAUSE HE IS MAD, EVIL AND TREACHEROUS.
This is a false statement said without
knowing to hype what the person wants to sell and it has debt to be repaid as
suffering.
Without knowing what you say is true
you are not entitled to say it unless you want to incur debt to be repaid as
suffering.
ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE SUBJECT TO
STRESS, THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRESS THEY EXPERIENCE AND IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEIR CASHLESS SPENDING CAN BE STRESS FREE BUT IT MUST ALSO BE
ACCOMPANIED BY STRESS AND SO WHAT YOU SAY IS FALSE LIABLE FOR DEBT.
KUALA
LUMPUR: Management consultant Cheong Mei Kuen said as banker Hussain Ahmad
Najadi lay dying from an assailant’s bullet outside a temple here last year, he
whispered to her, “My darling.”
The common (wrong) understanding is
that it is touching, poignant, somehow meaningful and the person is good.
What it denotes is that the person is
emotional and attached to his wife, it is not good but actually bad, the way to
more suffering and death.
THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING FROM THE
UTTERANCE IS THAT THE PERSON IS EMOTIONAL, ATTACHED TO HIS WIFE AND THAT IS THE
PATH TO MORE BECOMING, MORE SUFFERING AND MORE DEATH WHEN THE PERSON CAN BE IN
HEAVEN OR PUT AN END TO ALL SUFFERING.
Don't trust Ridhuan, after all he has Chinese blood
What is so ‘after all’ about having Chinese
blood?
What has Chinese blood got to do with
the matter?
It is not good to trust and solicit
trust from others. You cannot hide your true nature from others, for those who
understand, the nature of the person before him, his intentions for saying or doing
things is evident and for him it is never a matter of trust, since he knows the
person is evil, dishonest, what is there to trust? And so it is those who do
not understand, who are gullible, who are greedy who need to trust others and
that is not good or blameless but it is bad and blameworthy.
IT IS BLAMEWORTHY NOT BLAMELESS TO
TRUST OTHERS, IT MEANS YOU ARE BLIND, DO NOT SEE THE PERSON TRULY AND ARE
WILLING TO ENTRUST YOURSELF OR YOUR ASSETS BLINDLY TO OTHERS.
THERE IS NOTHING AFTER ALL ABOUT HAVING
CHINESE BLOOD AND WHAT HAS CHINESE BLOOD GOT TO DO WITH MATTERS?
BECAUSE IT IS SENSELESS, THERE IS
SUFFERING AND INSANITY AWAITING.
It is dangerous to trust others and you
are at fault:
Whatever others say or propose can be
truly understood, cannot be truly concealed from others and if you truly
understand what is proposed, the question of trust does not arise, if what is
proposed is devious, evil, what is there to trust or not trust?
The Buddha said you must see danger in
the slightest of faults and trusting others is a fault not a virtue and the
wise person abstains from trusting others, from committing himself to what he
cannot see or know is true. The wise person can see and he sees what is
proposed as evil so what is there for him to trust or not trust?
Pubbakotthaka Sutta: Eastern Gatehouse
I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was
staying in Savatthi, at the Eastern Gatehouse. There he addressed Ven.
Sariputta: "Sariputta, do you take it on conviction that the faculty of
conviction, when developed & pursued, plunges into the Deathless, has the
Deathless as its goal & consummation? Do you take it on conviction that the
faculty of persistence...mindfulness...concentration...discernment, when
developed & pursued, plunges into the Deathless, has the Deathless as its
goal & consummation?"
"Lord, it's not that I take it on conviction in
the Blessed One that the faculty of
conviction...persistence...mindfulness...concentration...discernment, when
developed & pursued, plunges into the Deathless, has the Deathless as its
goal & consummation. Those who have not known, seen, penetrated, realized,
or attained it by means of discernment would have to take it on conviction in
others that the faculty of conviction...persistence...mindfulness...concentration...discernment,
when developed & pursued, plunges into the Deathless, has the Deathless as
its goal & consummation; whereas those who have
known, seen, penetrated, realized, & attained it by means of discernment
would have no doubt or uncertainty that the faculty of
conviction...persistence...mindfulness...concentration...discernment, when
developed & pursued, plunges into the Deathless, has the Deathless as its
goal & consummation. And as for me, I have known, seen, penetrated,
realized, & attained it by means of discernment. I have no doubt
or uncertainty that the faculty of
conviction...persistence...mindfulness...concentration...discernment, when
developed & pursued, plunges into the Deathless, has the Deathless as its
goal & consummation."
"Excellent, Sariputta. Excellent. Those who have
not known, seen, penetrated, realized, or attained it by means of discernment
would have to take it on conviction in others that the faculty of
conviction...persistence...mindfulness...concentration...discernment, when
developed & pursued, plunges into the Deathless, has the Deathless as its
goal & consummation; whereas those who have known, seen, penetrated,
realized, & attained it by means of discernment would have no doubt or
uncertainty that the faculty of conviction...persistence...mindfulness...concentration...discernment,
when developed & pursued, plunges into the Deathless, has the Deathless as
its goal & consummation."
Is gun violence a public
health issue?
Gun violence is never a public health
issue but it is a public danger and it reflects wrong understanding people
think nothing wrong.
GUN VIOLENCE IS NOT ABOUT PUBLIC HEALTH
BUT DANGER, IT IS NOT AN ISSUE BUT A DANGER.
HEALTH IS A GENERALIZED VAGUE CATEGORY
AND MANY THINGS CAN BE THROWN INTO THE BIN OF HEALTH, DANGER IS MORE SPECIFIC
AND IT IS INDICATIVE OF REHASHED SPEECH THAT THEY PREFER TO SPEAK IN
GENERALITIES THAT MAKES FOR EFFICIENT REHASHING RATHER THAN GO TO THE HEART OF
A MATTER.
GUN VIOLENCE IS NOT ABOUT VAGUE PUBLIC
HEALTH BUT SPECIFIC INJURY AND DEATH.
Rehashing robots tend to reduce things to
vague broad categories:
In the name of efficient rehashing
which is demanding because everything you say must be committed to memory and
rehashed from memory, events and things should be converted to vague broad
categories so that what you say or rehash has broad currency, can be applied to
many similar situations.
Thus an issue is broad and vague,
danger is specific to gun violence, health is a broad vague category, danger is
specific to gun violence.
Those shot are healthy, so what are
talking about health?
Gun violence unlike smoking or drinking
is not a public health issue because those shot are healthy, they have no
health issue but it is a public safety, death injury concern.
No comments:
Post a Comment