A sassy comedian

A sassy comedian

If what you say you think is meaningful when it is meaningless then you are deluded, have no understanding and practicing controlled insanity.

No man of true understanding will talk about a sassy comedian (Phyllis Diller) and you talk about it because you think it is ‘full of meaning’.

‘Sassy’ (highly spirited or lively), is about style not substance, about how you behave or use force to behave according to a pattern (thus acted or rehashed) that makes you being perceived as highly spirited. The purpose of a comedian is to make people laugh and that is not about substance but stirring emotions or mental force. If your job is meaningful it is not to make others laugh and if your job is to make others laugh it is never meaningful except in delusion.

THUS IN TALKING ABOUT SASSY YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT STYLE, ABOUT HOW SOMEONE BEHAVES IN A PATTERN THAT CAN ONLY COME ABOUT BY REHASH IN WHICH SHE IS A ROBOT THAT MAKES HER BEING PERCEIVED AS HIGHLY SPIRITED AND IN TALKING ABOUT A COMEDIAN YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT SOMEONE WHOSE JOB IS TO MAKE PEOPLE LAUGH, TO SAY OR DO CERTAIN THINGS NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE TRUE OR MEANINGFUL BUT TO GENERATE LAUGHTER IN OTHERS.

BOTH SASSY AND COMEDY ARE MEANINGLESS AND SO YOU ARE UNWITTINGLY TALKING ABOUT THINGS SENSELESS THAT WILL END IN MADNESS FOR YOU.

Recognising a great man

Malaysia’s first Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj was awarded the title of ‘Father of Independence’ (Bapa Kemerdekaan) in recognition of his contributions in the struggle to free the country from British colonialism.

Driven by emotion and partisanship, people award the accolade of great man to their favourite idols eg Alexander the Great, Chairman Mao, Churchill.

It is not for you or anyone to decide who is great and who is not, there are certain criteria to be fulfilled before a person is truly a great man and if you indiscriminately and wrongly call someone a great man when he is not you are asking for future suffering.

And so it behoves you to know what you mean by a great man before you dispense the label on any man.

And who is truly a great man?

The great man is the man described by the Buddha thus:

Then, the Blessed One disappeared and reappeared among the Bhaggas. He sat down and addressed the monks: "Monks, I will teach you the eight thoughts of a great person. "
"'This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not self-aggrandizing.' There is the case where a monk, being modest, does not want it to be known that 'He is modest.' Being content, he does not want it to be known that 'He is content.' Being reclusive, he does not want it to be known that 'He is reclusive.' His mindfulness being established, he does not want it to be known that 'His mindfulness is established.' Being endowed with discernment, he does not want it to be known that 'He is endowed with discernment.' Enjoying non-complication, he does not want it to be known that 'He is enjoying non-complication.'
"'This Dhamma is for one who is content, not for one who is discontent.' There is the case where a monk is content with any old robe cloth at all, any old almsfood, any old lodging, any old medicinal requisites at all.
"'This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not entangled.' There is the case where a monk, when living in seclusion, is visited by monks, nuns, lay men, kings. With his mind bent on seclusion, he converses with them only as much is necessary.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not is lazy.' There is the case where a monk keeps his persistence aroused for abandoning unskillful mental qualities and taking on skillful mental qualities. He is steadfast, solid in his effort.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not confused.' There is the case where a monk is mindful, remembering even things that were done & said long ago.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not for one whose mind is uncentered.' There is the case where a monk, quite withdrawn from sensuality, unskillful mental qualities, enters & remains in the first jhana. With the stilling of directed thought & evaluation, he enters & remains in the second jhana. With the fading of rapture he remains in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure. He enters & remains in the third jhana.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain he enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness.
"'This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not for one whose discernment is weak.' There is the case where a monk is endowed with discernment of arising & passing away -- leading to the right ending of stress.
"'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys & delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.' There is the case where a monk's mind grows confident, firm in the cessation of complication.

If you disagree with what the Buddha says and he is right then you have wrong view which the Buddha said is the path to hell or the animal womb.

A much bolder vision is needed to lay the foundations for UK growth

Boldness is never a true property of vision but it is a false or deluded property and the person is talking nonsense. If anything, a much clearer vision is needed because if there is a solution clear or true vision will deliver not boldness. Boldness is a function of force, you can add as much force to your vision as you like but still blind force will not give you the answer but because force is blind the boldness will lead to disaster.

IT IS MAD, SILLY TO RECOMMEND BOLDNESS IN VISION AND IT REFLECTS COLLECTIVE DELUSION THAT PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH SUCH DISPENSATIONS.

It is not about vision but what do you see:

A much bolder vision is needed to lay the foundations for UK growth

Confronted by the statement as above it is impossible for anyone to see it as true because it is false or deluded and because it is false and presented to you as true, you must stir resistance even if you accept it as valid or correct or you do not know what to make of it.

The matter is not about vision but tell us what you see, what is the problem and if you have seen the problem correctly, you know what the problem truly is then the answer is straightforward, either you can do something about it or it is out of your hands, irremediable.

THUS THE PERSON IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE OR SILLY TALKING ABOUT BOLDER OR BROADER OR WHATEVER VISION. SO LONG AS YOU CANNOT SEE WHAT THE PROBLEM IS, IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW BOLD OR BROAD YOUR VISION BUT AS SOON AS YOU HAVE IDENTIFIED AND KNOW THE PROBLEM, WHERE IS THE NEED FOR BOLDER OR BROADER VISION?

TELL US WHAT THE PROBLEM TRULY AND THEN IT WOULD BE QUITE STRAIGHTFORWARD WHAT THE ANSWERS ARE; IF YOU CANNOT TELL US WHAT THE PROBLEM IS, THEN ALL THE BOLD VISION IN THE WORLD IS TO NO AVAIL.

Microsoft’s loaded dice to consumers:

When a consumer takes up Microsoft’s offer to install and try out Windows 8 he is faced with the choice of paying for the licenced copy later when the trial ends or he must re-install his old system from recovery disks which means a lot of work, loss of all the software and settings of his computer plus having to download all the many updates for Windows 7 and whatnots like security software.

ONCE YOU HAVE TAKEN UP THE OFFER TO INSTALL WINDOWS 8 TRIAL THE EASY CHOICE IS TO PAY FOR THE SOFTWARE, TO REVERT TO YOUR OLD SYSTEM IS QUITE DAUNTING, COSTLY EVEN IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOME. IF YOU DON’T PAY UP YOU END WITH A COMPUTER THAT REBOOTS EVERY HOUR.

I READ THAT WINDOWS 8 EAGERLY DIRECTS USERS TO BUY MUSIC AND VIDEOS ON THE NET SO THAT IT CAN MAKE MONEY OR STRIP YOU OFF YOUR MONEY.

IT MAY ALL BE COINCIDENCE BUT MICROSOFT AND APPLE MAY BE FAR LESS BENIGN THAN YOU THINK.

Distrust behind the smiles

This is a headline in the Star. Distrust and smiles are not matters of true meaning or substance but they are matters of falsity and meaninglessness and so no one with true understanding would delve on such matters nor would he accept such discussions as valid.

To deluded people ‘trust’ is good and ‘distrust’ is bad but both trust and distrust are in truth bad, harmful, evil, they are matters of using force to accept without knowing, of delivering even endangering oneself to others blindly.

The discerning person does not trust or distrust others, he sees others truly as they actually are, he sees the proposals and shenanigans or ploys of others that are actually transparent not opaque as the confidence trickster and his victim perceives. Seeing others clearly and knowing their ploys, the matter of trust or distrust does not arise. If you are not greedy for unrighteous gains, you will not expose yourself to uncertainty and danger trusting others.

A smile is never about truth or goodness but often it is a mask, a form of cordiality to say the person likes you or what you say but it is a lie, even the opposite may be true.

SMILES ARE FOR SHOW, IT IS A FORM OF LYING WITH THE MUSCLES OF YOUR FACE, IT IS TO SAY YOU LIKE OR YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY BY THE OTHER PERSON OR WHAT HE SAYS. IT IS SENSELESS AND HARMFUL TO HAVE YOUR MENTAL FORCE STIRRED.

TRUST/ DISTRUST AND SMILES ARE NOT MATTERS OF TRUTH OR SUBSTANCE BUT THEY ARE MATTERS OF FALSITY, MAKE BELIEF AND NO PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL DWELL ON THEM.

SHE IS TRYING TO TELL YOU SOMETHING SHE THINKS IS FULL OF MEANING, ‘DISTRUST BEHIND THE SMILES’ WHEN SHE IS TALKING NONSENSE TRYING TO STIR READERS’ EMOTIONS.

Disappointment means don’t like and no 4 eternities in heaven:

Disappointment is not something people elect to experience or not, it is something well-conditioned in them and they are lying when they say they are not disappointed when things don’t go according to their ‘wishes’ or like.

Disappointment is the conditioned stirring of a person’s mental force to don’t like something happening perhaps with a measure of ‘hurt’ and because it is a stirring of mental force doing nothing useful triggered by events, it is meaningless and suffering and the person is also conditioning himself to suffering and meaninglessness.
If a person’s mind is no longer stirred to like and dislike, that is the third higher state of mind that according to the Buddha, gives a lifespan of 4 eternities or Ages in heaven. Thus if you are disappointed, you can be disappointed by things, 4 eternities of heavenly bliss is out of question for you.

NOWADAYS THINGS THAT USED TO DISAPPOINT ME IN THE PAST TRULY DO NOT UPSET ME, WITH MY CONCENTRATED DEVELOPED TO REACH A CERTAIN HIGH LEVEL, I AM UNPERTURBED AND THAT IS NEVER SUFFERING BUT AN INCOMPARABLE RELEASE FROM SUFFERING. I CAN ATTEST THAT THE UNDISAPPOINTED STATE IS FAR HAPPIER THAN THE DISAPPOINTED STATE.

AND SO EVEN  IF YOU AND EVERYONE HERE REFUSE TO GIVE UP LIKE AND DISLIKE, REFUSE TO DEVELOP YOUR MINDS BY MEDITATION TO WIPE OUT ALL DISAPPOINTMENT, IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO SO AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR TERRIBLE, EXTENDED NEEDLESS SUFFERING.

So you think you understand disappointment?

People regularly refer to disappointment eg “I am disappointed he didn’t kiss her”, “I am disappointed I did not get 8As”, yet do they understand what they refer to?

They don’t understand disappointment on two counts:

1)  They experience disappointment and can give a name to it you they are clueless about the nature of disappointment which is a repulsive stirring of their mental force to dislike something, maybe with some hurt thrown in.

2)  They see nothing wrong with disappointment, even though it is suffering they think it is natural, unavoidable and of no extended consequences. This is delusion or wrong understanding because disappointment is deadly, is escapable, is conditioning so that disappointment becomes more intense and easily aroused and the person is headed for even eternal torment from his conditioned disappointment.

PEOPLE MAY THINK THEY KNOW WHAT THEY TALK ABOUT ‘DISAPPOINTMENT’ BUT THEY DO NOT KNOW IT IS MERELY A HARMFUL, MEANINGLESS CONDITIONED REPULSIVE STIRRING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCE AND IT IS WARNING OF GRAVE DANGER AND FUTURE SUFFERING NOT NATURAL, INESCAPABLE AND WITHOUT FUTURE DANGERS.

Microsoft revamps logo for first time in 25 years

In their programmed haste or urge to make more than there is to everything, people speak of revamp logo when it is merely change.

You can revamp a car, take an existing car and revamp it, improve it significantly in many ways but a logo is merely a design, you can make changes in it but how can anyone revamp it?

A LOGO IS MERELY A CHOSEN SYMBOL TO REPRESENT A COMPANY, YOU CAN CHANGE OR MODIFY IT BUT THAT IS NOT REVAMP WHICH IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE OR CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF REALITY. IT IS NO BIG DEAL EXCEPT FOR PEOPLE TO WHOM STYLE IS IMPOTENT. A LOGO IS ABOUT STYLE NOT SUBSTANCE, IT HAS NO USE, IT IS JUST FOR SHOW, TO SIGNIFY.

Romney: Obama 'dividing America' New

US Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney accuses his Democratic rival Barack Obama of running a campaign built on "anger and divisiveness".

How do you understand Romney’s allegations?

Firstly America was never truly united but whatever unity is make belief or in fantasy or appearance only and the rich never identified with the masses and are guilty of using their wealth and connections to cement their privileged status and benefit unrighteously. The rich and powerful may think they are united with the masses but it is hypocritical, for show to get what they want. Bush may act ‘folksy’ but he perceives himself as ‘blue blooded’, part of the powerful Republican ruling elite.

Those who are discerning cannot be divided by the arguments of others, they can see for themselves the truth of what is said, those who can be divided by the polemics of others are gullible and deserve to be divided, to suffer and nothing can be done for them. Thus if America can be foolishly divided by Obama’s polemics then it is gullible and deserves to be divided, whatever unity established and maintained in such an America is based on dumb submissive going along obedience not genuine full of true understanding reasoned unity.

THUS ROMNEY IS MAKING AN UNREASONABLE ACCUSATION FOR POLITICAL GAINS, TO DISUNITE AMERICA FROM OBAMA SO THAT IT WILL FALL INTO HIS ARMS AND HERE IS A DELUDED AND FOOLISH MAN WITH SELFISH MOTIVES WHO IS NOT A WORTHY LEADER OF AMERICA.

Why is Romney so concerned about what Obama does?

It is not what Obama does that will send Romney to hell but it is what Romney does that will send him to hell and so if he was wise, he would focus on his own actions and words and leave Obama to do as he thinks right.

Thus if Romney was truly wise he would pay attention to not divide America himself and pay attention to say and do things that are truly for the benefit of America and if Americans ‘buy into his vision’ then they will elect him to carry out his mission.

ROMNEY HAS NO TRUE OR VALID REASON FOR ACCUSING OBAMA OF DIVIDING AMERICA BUT THE PURPOSE IS TO UNRIGHTEOUSLY ATTACK OBAMA AS BAD FOR AMERICA AND THEREFORE VOTERS SHOULD SWITCH TO HIM  AND BECAUSE HIS MOTIVE IS EVIL, HE IS STICKING HIS NECK OUT FOR KARMA FAR MORE TERRIBLE THAN HIS WILDEST NIGHTMARES.

IF ROMNEY WAS A GOOD MAN HE WILL RESTRICT HIMSELF TO NOT DIVIDING AMERICA AND DOING AND SAYING THINGS THAT BENEFIT AMERICA RATHER THAN ATTACK HIS OPPONENT IN THE NAME OF WINNING.

Of course the rich and powerful wants to be united with you:

Of course the rich and powerful want to maintain the status quo, call it what you will, call it ‘America united’ because it means they remain top dogs lording over, living off the dumb masses.

That is the reason why Malaysia’s BN is enthusiastic about 1 Malaysia because it means the country would be united with themselves running the show of course. If it was 1 Malaysia under Anwar you can be sure their enthusiasm will be replaced by implacable dislike.

China’s collapsing bridges a worrying situation

This is his perception and understanding of something happening, namely that it is a worrying situation and it is false or deluded.

China’s collapsing bridges are not a worrying situation but it may indicate shoddy workmanship, lack of supervision or regulations, hasty construction, use of substandard materials and all these can be examined and established and corrected if need be. All the worrying in the world cannot resolve or rectify and so it is false, deluded to say it is a worrying situation.

Sociologist: Look into Singaporeans’ mindset on family in society

People talk about ‘mindset’ and yet do they understand what it means?

If Singaporeans have a mindset as Americans do then it is an admission that their minds are programmed to think, perceive and do in certain ways and citizens who conform to that mindset and practice accordingly are robots.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE A MINDSET WITHOUT BEING A ROBOT, IF IT IS TRUE THAT SINGAPOREANS HAVE A MINDSET IT MEANS THEY ARE ROBOTS BEHAVING COLLECTIVELY ACCORDING TO THAT SOCIETY’S PROGRAMMING AND RATHER THAN GOOD OR HARMLESS, IT IS HARMFUL AND DELUSIONAL. MINDSETS ARE NEVER GOOD BUT EVIL, THE WAY TO WOE. A PERSON OF TRUTH HAS NO MINDSET, THERE ARE NO SETTINGS IN HIS MIND.

What is this Singaporean mindset?

A mindset is the ways and what of perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing of a particular set of people (eg Singaporeans) that is characteristic of it and differ from others like Malaysians or Americans. Thus there is a western and Asian mindset.

In order for a person to behave according to a particular mindset he must register or remember or copy those behaviours and ways of thinking and perceiving and rehash or carry out his behaviour, perception and thinking according to that mindset and so by speaking of mindsets you are unwittingly acknowledging to being a robot, to be a brainwashed robot of that society. Even those who rebel, disavow the mindset of that society are themselves hopelessly robotic, they have their own mindsets that antagonizes with the prevalent mindset.

THERE IS NOTHING WONDERFUL OR GREAT OR TO BE EXALTED ABOUT MINDSET, CULTURE AND TRADITIONS, THEY ARE FORMS OF SLAVERY AND THOSE WHO SUBSCRIBE TO MINDSETS, CULTURE AND TRADITIONS ARE MERELY SLAVES, MINDLESS ROBOTS.

How SA can recapture its mojo:

There are many variations of this standard format or robotic statement eg How Malaysia can recapture is glory or a certain couple can recapture their love or lust for each other.

If what you say or do is genuine or meaningful it is never to recapture your mojo or glory or whatever. If what you say or do is to recapture your mojo it is never genuine or meant.

Whenever you do anything, no consideration should be made to its purpose to recapture your mojo or glory and if you do contemplate it, it means you are doing something for false reasons, to recapture your mojo that is suffering and ends in insanity.

YOU NEVER DO ANYTHING TO RECAPTURE YOUR MOJO BECAUSE IT IS A FALSE REASON FOR DOING THAT ENDS IN INSANITY. IF RECAPTURING YOUR MOJO IS NOT THE REASON FOR DOING IT, THEN ARE YOU MAD TO SPEAK OF ‘HOW SA CAN RECAPTURE ITS MOJO’ AND THEN SPELLING OUT THE WAYS TO DO SO? IF SA NEEDS TO IMPROVE ITS WATER SUPPLY YOU DO IT, NOT TO RECAPTURE SA’S MOJO.

THUS THE PERSON SPEAKING THUS IS A FOOL, DELUDED.

Her delusion got her killed:

Maria Pantazopoulos (she was pretty) was being photographed in her wedding dress near a waterfall when disaster struck.

It is totally unnecessary to wear a wedding gown with long trailing tails on the ground behind.

It is even more unnecessary to pose in the water with such wedding gowns with long tails.

Because she was deluded, she found what is meaningless and for show meaningful such that she arranged for herself to get into water with her wedding gown which became wet and too heavy and was swept on by the flow of the river, she was swept down a nearby waterfall and killed.

HER DELUSION THAT IT IS NECESSARY AND MEANINGFUL TO BE PHOTOGRAPHED IN WATER NEAR A WATERFALL IN HER WEDDING GOWN GOT HER KILLED, THE WATERLOGGED WEDDING GOWN BECAME TOO HEAVY AND WAS SWEPT BY WATER OVER THE WATERFALL.

DO NOT TAKE DELUSIONS LIGHTLY OR YOU WILL PAY FOR IT EVEN WITH YOUR LIFE. DELUSIONS ARE NEVER HARMLESS, THEY CAUSE SUFFERING AND WILL BE ULTIMATELY FATAL EVEN ETERNALLY.

Jury didn't want to let Samsung off easy

11:38am Jurors felt Samsung should pay significant damages in the landmark Apple patent trial, even though they viewed Apple's demands as too high, according to the foreman.

People speak thus as if they are correct when it is wrong and so they have wrong or no understanding.

It is not the duty of the jury to let Samsung off easy or punish it excessively but it is its duty to assess and give the correct or merited punishment.

If jurors indeed elected to punish Samsung more than they think is correct just not to let Samsung off lightly then it means they are incompetent jurors taking matters into their own hands with karma attached. Their job is to assess what wrong Samsung did and what damage Apple sustained and to decide on the correct compensations.

WHAT KIND OF JURY IS THIS AND IT MAKES A MOCKERY OF THEIR JUDGEMENT? MATTERS OF LETTING SAMSUNG OFF LIGHTLY OR EXTRACTING HEAVIER PUNISHMENT SHOULD NEVER ENTER THEIR CONSIDERATIONS IF THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE IMPARTIAL JURORS.

Jury lapsing into subjectivity and thus falsity:

The jury should understand that it is not its business to punish Samsung more or less on the basis of not letting it off lightly or not and the fact that it thinks it is right, it is its duty reflects delusion and you have a deluded jury whose judgments are suspect.

Even Apple produces a massive expensive desktop:

I happened to browse through an Apple catalogue recently and I found even Apple produces a massive uncool dinosaur like desktop that is listed at more than MYR10,000 I think and so it is that anyone who says the desktop is dead is deluded, do not truly understand.

Strengthening our Singaporean core:

We must continue to strengthen our Singaporean core: DPM Tharman

It is not possible to truly strengthen our Singaporean core but it is only falsely, via coercion or imposing according to a plan possible to strengthen our Singaporean core.

Thus Chairman Mao may have ideas of what he wants China to become, to change China and then by intimidation even extermination he proceeds to mould China according to his deluded ideas.

YOU MAY BE RIGHT IT IS POSSIBLE TO TRULY STRENGTHEN OUR SINGAPOREAN CORE BUT IF IT IS NOT POSSIBLE AND IT IS ONLY POSSIBLE TO DO SO BY MOULDING OR INDOCTRINATION OR COERCION ACCORDING TO DICTATES OR THE TASTES OF THE RULING ELITE THEN WHAT YOU PROPOSE THAT YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE AND GOOD WILL END IN SUFFERING EVEN INSANITY FOR YOU.

Develop yourself not strengthen others or society:

Margaret Thatcher said this lady is not for turning and so you are deluded trying to mould society and strengthen the Singaporean core, which may be a fruitless vexation.

Far wiser and fruitful to develop yourself, specifically develop your mind to attain the higher states so that you escape the crutches of this woeful tormenting lower realm.

THE PERSON WHO IS INTERESTED IN DEVELOPING SOCIETY, STRENGTHENING THE SINGAPOREAN CORE IS MIRED IN THIS WORLD, YOU DON’T EVEN STRENGTHEN YOUR OWN CORE BUT YOU DEVELOP YOURSELF, SPECIFICALLY DEVELOP YOUR MIND TO ATTAIN THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND.

STRENGTHENING IS ABOUT USING FORCE THAT IS HARMFUL AND EVIL AND SO WILL END IN THE CLIFF, DEVELOPING IS ABOUT IMPROVING YOURSELF, ABOUT CHANGING THE SUBSTANCE OF YOURSELF FOR THE BETTER.

Nikon’s intuitive camera:

A camera only has programming and so if it is intuitive as touted then it must mean the camera is able to sense correctly what the user wants or it is programmed to respond correctly to varying conditions. Thus intuition is not about understanding or reasoning but programming and rehashing from programming.

PEOPLE SPEAK OF INTUITION IN THEMSELVES AND IN PRODUCTS LIKE CAMERA, YET DO THEY UNDERSTOOD WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT?

INTUITION THAT YOU MARVEL IS NOT ABOUT UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS ABOUT REHASHING FROM PROGRAMMING THAT IS ACCURATE OR FITS. THUS WHEN YOU SEE SOMETHING YOU INTUITIVELY COME UP WITH THE RIGHT RESPONSE OR PICTURE ABOUT WHAT IT IS ABOUT AND THIS CAN ONLY COME ABOUT FROM PROGRAMMING, FROM PRE-EXISTING PROGRAMMING THAT IS ‘INSTANTLY’ PRESENTED BY YOUR MIND TO EXPLAIN WHAT IS HAPPENING THAT YOU DID NOT QUITE UNDERSTAND.

IF SOMETHING HAPPENING IS ROUTINE, WHAT IS THERE TO BE INTUITIVE ABOUT? IT IS ONLY IF SOMETHING IS UNUSUAL, THAT YOU ARE BAFFLED THAT INTUITION OR CORRECT GUESSING COMES INTO PLAY.

IN OTHER WORDS INTUITION IS ABOUT CORRECTLY GUESSING, ABOUT A HUNCH ABOUT SOMETHING YOU SEE AND HEAR PARTIALLY THAT YOU ARE NOT QUITE SURE EG YOU HEAR SOME FOOTSTEPS AND YOU HAVE THE INTUITION OR EDUCATED GUESS IT IS YOUR WIFE.

Intuition is a nice word for guessing:

Intuition is simply guessing in disguise, there is nothing wonderful or mysterious about intuition.

If you have an uncanny ability to guess correctly then you are said to have good intuition and thus the basis of intuition is the ability to jump to the conclusion that turns out to be correct based on rudimentary or incomplete data received.

IF YOU HAVE INTUITION IT SIMPLY MEANS YOU ARE A GOOD GUESSER AND THERE IS NOTHING MARVELLOUS ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT BEING A GOOD ROBOT. THE MAN OF TRUTH DOES NOT GUESS, DOES NOT PARTAKE OF INTUITION BUT HIS ATTENTION IS FOCUSSED ON WHAT IS HAPPENING AND SEEING IT AS IT IS TRULY IS AND NOT JUMPING TO PREMATURE CONCLUSION OR BEING INTUITIVE.

Apple support:

At the Apple website selling its computers there is a picture of a young male and female couple dressed casually in T shirt with Apple logo and jeans, hands in hip pockets.

Apple (that is not to say Microsoft or Samsung is better) is image conscious which is evil or pretentious not good and its idea of support is actually perverted, they like to present their staff as casual or cool savvy young ‘nerts’.

Support staff should have proper attire. Even the Buddha’s monks have instructions to be properly attired with a cloth robe that is wrapped around the body in a particular way. The monk is never dressed casually but properly, respectfully.

EVEN THE BUDDHA’S SANGHA IS REQUIRED TO DRESS PROPERLY ACCORDING TO WHAT IS STIPULATED OR LAID DOWN.

APPLE’S IDEA OF PROPER DRESS IS IMPROPER, THEY THINK IT IS GREAT THAT ITS SUPPORT STAFF SHOULD BE DRESSED IN T-SHIRTS AND JEANS WITH HANDS IN THE POCKETS.

APPLE IS IMAGE CONSCIOUS AND DESIRES TO PRESENT AN IMAGE OF ITSELF THAT IT THINKS IS WHOLESOME BUT APPLE AND THE SOCIETY THAT SEES NOTHING WRONG EVEN GREAT ARE DELUDED BECAUSE THE ATTIRE OF ITS SUPPORT STAFF IS IMPROPER, UNPROFESSIONAL.

What is the purpose of support staff?

The purpose of support staff is the solve problems that customers may encounter and for that you need to be sedate, attentive (not scatter brained or distracted) and be knowledgeable in the products you are supporting.

Not only has this nothing to do with savvy young male and female teams wearing casual T shirts and jeans, the attire reflects a casual or trivial or cavalier attitude to problems that can prove disastrous even fatal.

THE PURPOSE OF SUPPORT STAFF IS TO BE KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THE PRODUCTS THEY SUPPORT AND TO BE SEDATE OR SOBER SO THAT THEY CAN CONCENTRATE OR FOCUS ON THE PROBLEM AT HAND AND RESOLVE IT. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HOW COOL OR UNCOOL HE APPEARS OR DRESSES AND SO APPLE IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE AND DELUDED AND THERE ARE SERIOUS LIMITATIONS AS TO HOW GOOD ITS PRODUCTS CAN BE. ANYONE WHO MISTAKES STYLE FOR SUBSTANCE, WHO WASTES ENERGY AND EXPENSE ON SHOW CANNOT BE THAT GREAT.

Samsung's loss may be Nokia and Microsoft's gain

People think they are free to think but their thinking may be programmed or fixed in which they are slaves far more than they realize.

He is speculating and to him everything happening is a case of gains and losses so he is driven to conclude that Samsung’s loss maybe Nokia’s gain.

DRIVEN BY GREED AND CALCULATEDNESS PEOPLE ARE DRIVEN TO ‘FOREVER SEE THINGS HAPPENING AS A MATTER OF GAIN AND LOSS FOR SELF OR OTHERS’. REASON OR TRUTH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS ACTION AS HE HIMSELF ADMITS BY SAYING ‘MAY BE’ WHICH MEANS HE IS SPECULATING, COMING TO CONCLUSION WITHOUT KNOWING NOT WITHOUT REASON BUT FOR THE REASON OF GREED TO FIND OUT POTENTIAL WINNERS OR LOSERS THAT MAY BE OF MATERIAL BENEFIT TO HIM AND THOSE ALIGNED TO HIM.

Prehistoric mites?

Amber drops yield ancient mites

Some of the earliest fossils of pre-historic arthropods - dating to about 230 million years - have been discovered entombed in amber.

Everything that happened in the past is history, what then prehistory? By prehistory is meant the period before recorded history but this is mankind’s muddled thinking.

IT SHOULD BE PRERECORDED HISTORY NOT PREHISTORY BECAUSE WHATEVER HAPPENED IN THE PAST IS HISTORY AND NOTHING CAN ANTEDATE HISTORY, JUST BECAUSE THERE WAS NO RECORDING THEN DOES NOT MAKE IT PREHISTORY.

IT REFLECTS MANKIND IS MUDDLED MINDED, DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING.

Many benefits of a powerful computer:

I got my new Dell XPS 8500 computer with Intel i7 processor and 12GB RAM and the differences are obvious immediately.

Everything runs smoother and faster.

1)  Before I realized, many programs live TV cards that used to take some time to install had installed itself. Installations are much faster.

2)  Even USB devices transfer files faster than what I am used to, USB3 is even faster.

3)  Picture in Picture on my digital TV used to crash but now with superior processing there has yet to be a crash.

4)  Web pages load faster and I have yet to suffer the troublesome web page not found or web page refresh crashes that I used to suffer.

5)  Multitasking (eg transferring files, watching PIP TV, web surfing are handled with ease.

6)  High definition videos used to judder and break up when I played them at x2-3 speeds on my VLC player. I reasoned it was because of the limitations of the CPU and sure enough with the i7 the VLC player can play back HD video at even x3 speed without distress.

7)  The screen looks smoother and better.

JUST ON A CURSORY INITIAL EXPERIENCE THERE ARE BIG DIFFERENCES OPERATING A POWERFUL COMPUTER AND YOU DO NOT NEED TO BE A HIGH END USER TO EXPERIENCE THE BENEFITS. THOSE WHO SAY THAT TABLETS WILL RENDER DESKTOPS OBSOLETE OR THAT ANY RUN OF THE MILL INTEL CHIP WILL DO ARE SERIOUSLY MISTAKEN. I DID NOT REALIZE THE BIG DIFFERENCES A POWERFUL COMPUTER BRINGS.

Ben, don't do it, step away from QE3

MICHAEL PASCOE 1:57pm Odds are that the Fed chairman's increasingly-awaited speech will be more of the recent same, leaving the possibility of another round of quantitative easing blowing in the breeze

Quantitative easing is a nice term for cheating, deep down some central bankers may realize this is so but it may be that their delusion is so dense they think it is merely a valid morally correct monetary tool.

What happened is the debt burden has become too massive and many are beginning or have defaulted so that there is a serious system threatening shortfall of money or credit or liquidity to keep the system ticking and so central bankers have stepped in to pump much liquidity or print much money to substitute for the shortfall caused by debtors’ inability to service their debts.

This printing does not resolve the problem because the debtors have defaulted and cannot pay and the money printed is to fake as if defaulters have paid.

IN REALITY QUANTITATIVE EASING IS A FORM OF CHEATING, DEBTORS CANNOT PAY AND SO YOU STEP IN TO PRINT MONEY AS SURROGATE AND THE MASSIVENESS OF QUANTATIVE EASING REFLECTS THE SEVERITY OF THE DEBT BURDEN. AS MASSIVE AS THE EASING IS, IT IS MERELY SUFFICIENT TO KEEP THINGS GOING AND SO IT IS AN INDICATION THAT THE TRUE EXTENT OF THE DEBT BURDEN IS EVEN MUCH GREATER.

Provoked and provoked:

People in this world are kidding themselves if they think they are not being provoked by others (others are trying to stir their mental forces) and they are not provoked by others.

ALWAYS, BY WHAT AND HOW THEY SAY OR DO THINGS, EVEN THEIR VERY APPEARANCES ARE INTENDED TO INTENTIONALLY OR UNINTENTIONAL PROVOKE OTHERS AND ALWAYS HELPLESS PEOPLE ARE PROVOKED BY OTHERS FAR MORE SEVERELY THAN THEY REALIZE.

A PROVOKED MIND ALWAYS SUFFERS AND IS CONDITIONED TO BECOME MORE EASILY PROVOKED TO MORE INTENSE LEVELS AND THE PROVOKED PERSON IS HEADED FOR INCREASING TORMENT EVEN ETERNALLY.

NOW THAT I EXPERIENCE NOT BEING PROVOKED I KNOW IT IS ALWAYS THE INCOMPARABLY SANER AND HAPPIER STATE TO EXIST IN.

AND SO HOW DOES ONE ATTAIN THE STATE OF BEING UNPROVOKED?

BY PRACTICING SECLUSION AND MINIMAL CONTACT WITH OTHERS, BY TRAINING ONESELF NOT TO STIR ONE’S MENTAL FORCE FOR FALSE REASONS EG TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH TO FASHION STYLE. SUBSEQUENTLY, TO TRAIN ONESELF TO STOP RATHER THAN KEEP THINKING.

Three evils of committing falsity:

Three evils of committing falsity:

Do not underestimate the evil and harm of falsity, falsity is like a mire that once entered leads to all kinds of difficulties, complications and suffering that is difficult even impossible for ordinary beings who lack  wisdom and discernment to exit without guidance from others.

Falsity can take the forms of telling lies (saying what did not happen happened, what happened did not happen) or fantasizing (imagining one is rich when one is poor, explaining how things work or the nature of things without knowing).

There are three concomitant evils that accompany all falsity.

1)  The person has to fabricate or copy from others what is false. Without mentally fabricating or copying falsity cannot occur. Fabricating involves manufacturing a string of visual perceptions or words or thoughts about things that did not happen or occur. This fabrication remains in the repository of his mind and can be hijacked by his mental force to be activated even against his own wish. The person who does not falsify does not fabricate and there are no copies of falsity in his mind for his mental force to seize or hijack.

2)  One has to enslave oneself to that fabrication or copied model that is false because one has to act approximately or precisely according to what that copied or fabricated falsity dictates.

3)  One has to activate force that is blind and harmful to falsely or for false and therefore no reason carry out the fabricated falsity. All activating of force is suffering and this activation of force to carry out the falsity is not only suffering but trains one’s mental force to activate for false and therefore no reason such that when it becomes well trained his mental force has strong urge to activate for false or no true reason and that is always tormenting and dangerous. And when it activates out of control it will seize on the many falsities deposited in that mind to activate them dangerously and harmfully even against his wishes.

THUS FALSITY IS NEVER HARMLESS TO SELF BUT IT IS EVEN HARMFUL IN THREE WAYS, IT REQUIRES AND TRAINS ONE’S MIND TO FABRICATE OR FALSIFY AND A COPY OF THE FALSIFICATION REMAINS IN HIS MIND THAT CAN BE HIJACKED BY HIS MENTAL FORCE, HE HAS TO TRAIN HIMSELF TO BE ENSLAVED BY HIS FALSIFICATIONS, TO CARRY OUT ACCORDING TO HIS FALSIFICATIONS AND HE IS TRAINING HIS MENTAL FORCE TO ACTIVATE FOR FALSE OR NO REASONS SUCH THAT HIS MENTAL FORCE DEVELOPS A STRONG URGE TO ACTIVATE MADLY AND THUS ACTIVATED IT WILL SEIZE COPIES OF FABRICATIONS EXISTING TO CARRY OUT DANGEROUSLY INAPPROPRIATELY.

Telling lies must always arouse self-resistance:

No matter if you are the most diehard liar and champion of lying, telling lies must be accompanied by generated self resistance that is conditioning such that in time everything said or done is attended by self-resistance.

This is because you must fabricate or copy to tell lies, you are telling yourself what is false is true, what is true is false and you must deposit a copy of your lie in your mind where it can be hijacked by your mental force, you must make yourself a slave to your lie, carry out in word and deed according to what your lie dictates and you are training your mental force to activate for false or no reasons such that in time your mental force keeps wanting to activate and when it activates it tends to latch on to the many copies of falsity lying in your mind to activate them.

NO MATTER HOW ARDENT A LIAR YOU ARE, TELLING LIES MUST AROUSE AND BE ACCOMPANIED BY SELF-RESISTANCE BECAUSE IT IS COMMITTING ONESELF TO SUFFERING, DIFFICULTY AND INSANITY. AND THIS SELF RESISTANCE IS CONDITIONING AND IS THE SOURCE OF THE STRESS THAT HOUNDS PEOPLE WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO.

NOT ONLY IS IT ALWAYS STRESSFUL TO TELL LIES, YOU ARE COMMITTING YOURSELF TO A TRAP OF SUFFERING/DIFFICULTIES, ENSLAVEMENT AND INCREASING INSANITY THAT YOU MAY NEVER ESCAPE BY YOURSELF.

Speaking for false reasons:

If your intention for saying or doing something is to please, impress, intimidate or dominate another then these are not true reasons but for false, force based reasons and so you are guilty of falsity which must generate self-resistance that leads to stress and they lead to all kinds of suffering related to practicing falsity.

IF YOUR PURPOSE IN SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING IS TO PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS, YOUR PURPOSE IS TO FALSELY, HARMFULLY STIR OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BECOME PLEASED, IMPRESSED, FEARFUL OR SUBMISSIVE AND THIS MUST LEAD TO SELF-RESISTANCE AND THENCE STRESS IN YOURSELF AND YOU ARE PRACTICING FALSITY THAT LEADS TO ALL THE SUFFERINGS OF FALSITY.

YOUR EVER PRESENT STYLE OR STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS HAS NO TRUE MEANING BUT IT IS TO STIR OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BE PLEASED, IMPRESSED, INTIMIDATED OR DOMINATED AND SO IT TOO MUST BE RESISTED AND LEAD TO SUFFERING.

Joking is not a true reason for speaking or doing:

If your purpose for saying or doing something is to make others laugh, because you falsely perceive it as funny and would like to share it with others then it is a false reason for action that ends even in insanity and hell.

IT IS THE ABIDING FALSE PERCEPTION OF A PERSON THAT HE PERCEIVES SOMETHING AS FUNNY OR JOKES AS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL. JOKING IS NOT A VALID REASON FOR SPEAKING AND SO THE JOKER IS HEADED FOR INSANITY AND TORMENT NOT SAFETY.

For Europe, a Lost Decade Looms

By JACK EWING 2:44 PM ET

Except for Germany, none of Europe’s biggest economies have returned to their pre-2008 level of output. In Spain, above, more than half of people aged 16 to 24 are jobless.

If you think ‘lost decade’ is an accurate description and correct understanding of what is happening you may be deluded.

‘Lost decade’ may be a false understanding, it makes it ‘clinical’, a matter of loss of wealth or prosperity that might have been had not this financial and economic crisis intervened when what is happening may be a descent into economic suffering that may tear the social fabric apart.

LOST DECADE IS A FALSE READING OF THOSE WHO ARE MATERIALISTIC, ONLY CONCERNED WITH THE MATERIAL LOSSES AS A RESULT OF THE FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS WHEN REALITY MAY BE QUITE DIFFERENT, IT IS NOT A LOST DECADE BUT BEGINNING OF A DESCENT INTO ECONOMIC SUFFERING EVEN SOCIAL DESTRUCTION BROUGHT ON BY A BURDEN OF DEBT THAT HAS BECOME CRUSHING.

NOT JUST EUROPE AS TOUTED IN DELUSION BUT THE WORLD IS FACED WITH THIS PROSPECT AND SO THIS IS THE VIEW OF THE DELUDED WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND TRULY WHAT IS HAPPENING.

Why lost decade is a delusion:

Lost decade implies that all the progress or economic boom leading to the recent crash was genuine, based on true fundamentals and the crash was a visitation of random horror and now through mismanagement or incompetence, political leaders failed to take measures to counter the decline.

IF THE CURRENT ECONOMIC DECLINE IS A TERMINAL COLLAPSE LIKE AN ADVANCED INCURABLE CANCER CAUSED BY WANTON ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ABUSE, THE PILING UP OF MASSIVE DEBT AND WE ARE DESCENDING INTO EVEN ABJECT ECONOMIC SUFFERING THAT MAY TEAR THE SOCIAL ORDER APART AND YOU THINK WE WERE HUMMING ALONG FINE PROGRESSING IN ECONOMIC LEAPS AND BOUNDS AND THIS IS A HICCUP THAT IS WELL REMEDIABLE BUT AS A RESULT OF POLITICAL INEPTITUDE WE ARE FACING ‘A LOST DECADE’ THEN IT IS A DELUDED PERCEPTION OF ECONOMIC REALITY.

Lost decade is a fabrication, never exists:

There is no such thing called a lost decade, it is a fabrication, a form of falsification or lying. Someone invented it eg to explain Japan’s (many not) single lost decades as a result of the property and stock market collapse of the 1980s.

Just because there is economic stagnation for years does not mean it is a lost decade.

THERE ARE THINGS THAT EXIST LIKE YOU AND ME BUT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A LOST DECADE WHICH IS A CONCEPT OR FABRICATION OR FALSIFICATION OF FALSIFYING MINDS.

EVEN IF THERE IS A DECADE OF ECONOMIC STAGNATION OR DECLINE DOES MEAN IT IS A LOST DECADE, A DECADE THAT WAS LOST OR MISSING EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSIFICATION THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.

THIS IS A COPIED WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING REHASHED TERM. HE WAS NOT THE FIRST TO USE THAT TERM AND IT CAN ONLY COME ABOUT BY COPYING.

Things that can and cannot be lost:

You can lose your money, lose your memory, lose your leg but you cannot lose a decade as implied by lost decade because despite economic adversity the decade nevertheless wended its course.

YOU NEVER LOST THE DECADE, THE DECADE WAS WITH YOU, ONLY THE ECONOMIC UPTREND WAS LOST.

IT IS A SIGN OF MUDDLED THINKING THAT IS DEADLY NEVER HARMLESS TO SPEAK OF A LOST DECADE (WHEN A DECADE CAN NEVER BE LOST BECAUSE DESPITE THE ECONOMIC MISERY THE DECADE WAS STILL PRESENT) WHEN YOU MEAN LOST PROSPERITY OR ECONOMIC PROGRESS.

LOST ECONOMIC PROGRESS IS NOT LOST DECADE AND YOU ARE COURTING MUDDLED THINKING, FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION SPEAKING THUS.

Lost prosperity not lost decade:

If what actually happened was lost prosperity and the decade was there, did not go missing then you are courting insanity trying to be too clever to impress others by talking of a lost decade when it is a case of ‘lost prosperity’.

If Japan cannot do it, what more the rest?

Japan had ‘a lost decade or a few’ after the bursting of its massive stock and property bubble but it would be dangerous to assume other nations would stumble along merely ‘lost’ as Japan did.

Japan was an export powerhouse even before it ran into trouble in a world that was booming and sucking in the goods Japan produced and its people are thrifty, save a lot in banks that the Japanese government could fritter away by borrowing and even then it merely managed to stagnate rather than pull out of its slum robustly.

Few if any of the countries now in trouble (eg Spain, Italy, UK, even America) were ever export juggernauts and so it would be a tall order asking them to do what they have never done before, export themselves out of trouble, especially in a world that is now collectively in a slump (where Japan exported into a booming world). Further the citizens of these nations are not as thrifty as the Japanese, did not have massive savings in banks that their governments can mobilize.

JAPAN ONLY MANAGED TO STAGNATE, NEVER SHRUGGED OFF THE ILL EFFECTS OF THE BURSTING OF ITS STOCK AND PROPERTY BUBBLE EVEN THOUGH IT WAS AN EXPORT JUGGERNAUT EXPORTING IN A BOOMING WORLD WITH A VORACIOUS APPETITE FOR ITS GOODS AND ITS PEOPLE ARE BIG SAVERS, THERE IS MASSIVE SAVINGS IN DOMESTIC BANKS THAT THE GOVERNMENT COULD MOBILIZE.

MOST IF NOT ALL THE COUNTRIES NOW IN BIG DEBT TROUBLE WERE NEVER PROVEN GOOD EXPORTERS AND NOW THEY ARE ASKED A TALL ORDER, TO EXPORT THEMSELVES OUT OF TROUBLE INTO A WORLD THAT IS COLLECTIVELY IN A SLUMP WHILST THEY HAVE NO MASSIVE DOMESTIC SAVINGS TO CUSHION THEM.

TALK IS EASY, DOING IS ANOTHER THING, IF EVEN JAPAN IN MORE BENIGN GLOBAL CONDITIONS COULD NOT QUITE DRAG ITSELF OUT OF ITS ECONOMIC MIRE LET ALONE SOAR ECONOMICALLY, WHAT MORE OTHERS WHO HAVE NOT PROVEN THEMSELVES BIG EXPORTERS IN A WORLD IN A COLLECTIVE SLUMP?

Prince Charles: young jobless should start firms

This is the totally unnecessary speech of a man bestowing karma to be experienced as future suffering.

Not all start ups succeed and so if someone should fail and lose considerable money even commit suicide you are to blame suggesting they start firms. And even if they should succeed, such firms have a net result of siphoning money from the system into their hands that propagates the relentless flow of wealth from the many to the few which is at the heart of the woe of society.

IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO SAY THE WISEST THING IS KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT FOR FEAR OF CREATING KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING, JESUS SAID YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY.

YOU ARE TO BLAME SHOULD PEOPLE SUFFER AS A RESULT OF FAILED FIRMS YOU SUGGEST THEY START AND EVEN IF THEIR FIRMS SUCCEED YOU ARE FOSTERING THE PLUNDER, THE CAPITALIST CREED OF ‘EVERYBODY GRAB WHAT THERE IS ON THE TABLE’.

Mind over matter

IF you believe you are a winner, you can win. (If you are a lousy player you can believe what you like, still you will not win. If you are an evil man, no matter how everyone in this world pray you go to heaven, still you will not go to heaven, the Buddha said)

This is a dangerous delusion that ordinary people either do not know what to make of or they think there is some basis, if you think you are a winner, it will assist in your quest to be a winner when there is no evidence that such wilful, force driven blind belief you are a winner or indomitable will assist your quest to win.

Winning is not a reason for doing something but if the task or activity is meaningful then undertaking and completing that activity is the rational reason. If you are undertaking the activity eg badminton to win then that is a false reason, the intention is to beat others, to show you are the best, the champion and no matter what everyone this world holds it as a valid reason to compete in badminton it is a false and mad reason to play badminton that will end in insanity and torment even if you become indisputable world champion for many years.

In their haste to obtain an unfair advantage over their adversaries, players and their coaches brainwash them that they are superior, unbeatable. Whether this has any bearing on the result cannot be objectively determined, if you are a lousy player no matter how much you brainwashed yourself, still you will not win and no matter how you brainwash yourself you are invincible, still you must train hard enough and develop enough ‘skills’ to beat your opponents.

NO MATTER HOW WELL YOU BRAINWASH YOURSELF YOU ARE INVINCIBLE, STILL YOU MUST PRACTICE AND BE GOOD ENOUGH TO BE WORLD CHAMPION AND IF YOU ARE A LOUSY PLAYER ALL THE BRAINWASHING IN THE WORLD WILL NOT MAKE YOU CHAMPION AND SO THIS MATTER OF MIND OVER MATTER IS A FABRICATION, MAKE BELIEF THAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD IN THEIR HASTE TO OBTAIN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE OVER THEIR ADVERSARIES READILY SUBSCRIBE TO NOT REALIZING THEY ARE SHACKLING THEMSELVES TO DANGEROUS DELUSIONS THAT WILL DRIVE THEM MAD AND THEY WILL HEAD TOWARDS ANOTHER ETERNITY OF WOE.

THERE IS NO NEED TO TALK ABOUT MIND OVER MATTER, SOMETHING YOU CANNOT SEE IS TRUE BUT IS A CONCOCTION OR MAKE-BELIEF THAT IS DICING IN FALSE PERCEPTION.

Jumping to bizarre conclusions:

Just because you think you will win if you think you are a winner or you adopted a positive or brainwashed attitude does not make it a case of ‘mind over matter’ as touted but it is a case for positive psychology or brainwashing.

THE CASE IS ACTUALLY ABOUT ESPOUSING THE VIRTUES OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND IT IS UNWARRANTED AND MAD TO JUMP TO THE FAR FETCHED CONCLUSION THAT IT IS A CASE OF MIND OVER MATTER.

If you do not know the truth of something but you say it, you must stir self-resistance that leads to stress.

This world has a reality that applies to everyone.

Mind over matter implies mind and matter are two separate things and it is mind that is superior or dominates matter.

Suppose this world is a creation of consciousness or mind, there is no objective separate matter that exists which is why it is possible to tell a mountain to move and it shall be done, walk on water, fly in the air, make fresh bread out nothing, to fill nets with fish were none existed previously, it is possible for objects (my CDs) to disappear and reappear, then you are speaking falsely to say mind over matter when it is a case of everything is mind only, no matter exists apart from mind.

WITHOUT KNOWING MIND AND MATTER ARE TWO SEPARATE THINGS AND IT IS MIND THAT RULES OVER MATTER YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY IT ONLY YOU WANT TO LAPSE INTO FALSITY AND STIR RESISTANCE IN YOURSELF TO WHAT YOU SAY. IF NO MATTER EXISTS APART FROM MIND, MATTER IS MIND MADE THEN IT IS FALSE TO SAY ‘MIND OVER MATTER’ BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS ‘ALL IS MIND MADE’. IT IS NOT A CASE OF MIND OVER MATTER BUT MATTER IS MADE BY MIND.

A rehashed recorded understanding:

People who do not have true specific to the occasion understanding have many recorded understandings stored in their minds which they search and retrieve to apply as appropriate to an event occurring presently.

‘Mind over matter’ is a non-specific unwarranted generalised understanding that can be stored and rehashed for future occasions.

Thus when confronted by a situation where you think it pays to have a positive attitude, to think you are a winner in your quest to beat others, you are driven to jump to the grandiose, impressive inappropriate conclusion, ‘mind over matter’ which you think is a perfect epithet of the situation when it is a totally unwarranted and inappropriate rehashed understanding of the matter at hand.

What makes possible jumping to conclusions:

It is only possible to jump to conclusions if you have readymade or pre-recorded conclusions or understandings that come into your mind, present to your mind or that you searched and found in your mental jukebox.

Thus in the case where you think or postulate that a positive attitude or perception that you are a winner helps make you win, you jump to the recorded conclusion, ‘mind over matter’. In another case where a person survives against all odds, you again jump to the recorded understanding, ‘Ahah! Mind over matter’.

If a person’s understanding is true, fresh specific to what is currently happening he can never jump to conclusion because there are no pre-existing conclusions for him to jump to.

Jumping to conclusions is something you have to train yourself to do and when well trained, when you do so all the time then jumping to conclusion becomes automatic and even irresistible.

YOU CAN NEVER JUMP TO A TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE PRESENT OCCASION UNDERSTANDING. YOU NEED PRE-EXISTING RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS IN YOUR MIND THAT PRESENT THEMSELVES SWIFTLY TO YOU OR YOU SEARCHED AND FOUND PRE-EXISTING UNDERSTANDINGS IN ORDER TO JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS.

JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS IS WHAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE WELL TRAINED AND CANNOT HELP DOING WHICH IS WHY THEY SOMETIMES MAKE A FOOL OF THEMSELVES.

The Lady's blind spot

Burma's Rohingya Muslims suffer appalling violence and discrimination, but so far Aung San Suu Kyi has been notably silent on their plight. By Jerome Taylor and Oliver Wright.

Let others decide if they want to comment or not, it is not for you say she should and to imply she is bad because she did not and so those who make such criticism is heaping karma to be experienced as suffering not acquiring merit.

JUST BECAUSE SHE HAS REMAINED SILENT INSTEAD OF SPEAKING OUT IN CONDEMNATION DOES NOT MEAN SHE IS BAD AND IF YOU THINK IT IS EXPECTED OF HER TO SPEAK UP AND SHE IS CRIMINAL IN NOT SPEAKING UP REFLECTS DELUSION AND FOOLISHLY PRESENTING YOUR NECK TO BE CHOPPED.

IT IS NOT WHAT OTHERS LEAVE UNDONE THAT YOU ARE GUILTY OF BUT IT IS WHAT YOU DO OR DO NOT DO THAT WILL DETERMINE YOUR FUTURE HAPPINESS OR SUFFERING AND SO YOU ARE A FOOLISH BUSYBODY TO BE CONCERNED BY WHAT SHE DOES OR DO NOT DO.

HERE AGAIN THEY ARE JUMPING TO (UNWARRANTED) CONCLUSIONS, IMPUTING ON HER VIRTUES FROM WHAT IS HAPPENING.

They expect:

The wise have no expectations whilst fools are full of expectations of themselves and others.

No one is a master of his expectations but he is a tormented slave of his and others’ expectations.

Thus people have expectations of Su Kyi as icon of justice and freedom to speak even ‘hit out’ at all forms of injustices or wrongdoing and when she fails to do so they attack her.

People are conscious of expectations on them and so they speak or do according to what they perceive others expect of them and so it is not true reason or understanding that is behind what they say or do but it is expectations, the scourge of expectations that make them robots of what they say or do.

YOU EXPECT OTHERS TO SAY OR DO CERTAIN THINGS, YOU ARE AWARE OF EXPECTATIONS SPOKEN OR UNSPOKEN OF YOURSELF THAT DRIVES OR IMPELS YOU TO SAY OR DO THINGS ACCORDING TO THOSE EXPECTATIONS AND SO YOU BECOME A MINDLESS ROBOT OF EXPECTATIONS. EXPECTATIONS ARE EVIL NOT GOOD, ENSLAVING NOT LIBERATING.

Expectations are rehashed understandings:

Expectations are essentially recorded rehashed understandings of what one should do or say, what others you ‘know’ are ‘expected’ or understood to say or do.

JUST AS JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS IS A MANIFESTATION OF REHASHED UNDERSTANDINGS, EXPECTATIONS IS ANOTHER FACET OF PEOPLE WHO RECORD AND REHASH UNDERSTANDINGS, THEY HAVE EXPECTATIONS OR RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS OF WHAT THEY AND OTHERS OUGHT TO SAY OR DO IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS.

What are expectations?

People think ‘of course I understand expectations’ but they are mistaken, they recognize expectations but they do not understand the true nature of expectations.

This is my understanding of expectations and if others’ understanding differ then if I am right they are all wrong.

Expectations are preconceived notions (that means they are recorded and rehashed to be applied to a current situation) about how things will happen or turn out, how others will behave (say or do).

This means the person has rehashed understandings just as everything he says or does is rehashed. Indeed even what and how he sees, hears, smells, tastes and touch is also programmed by rehash.

Not only do ordinary people have expectations but they are far more widespread and unconscious than they realize or know, they are in truth rehashing their understandings all the time and on occasions when things don’t meet their expectations or they rehashed the wrong expectations, they become disturbed, puzzled even panicky that things do not go according to plans or prediction.

Whatever understandings that are recorded and re-applied to a current situation is never true but false, it must be standardized or generalized so that they are applicable to many situations with similarities. Expectations are dangerous because reality never conform to expectations but the deception of expectations exposes the person to danger even death.

The person of true understanding never resorts to or refers to expectations to understand what is happening at the moment, he pays attention and because he sees truly, calmly and completely he understands exactly what is happening and then he composes an action or speech specifically freshly for that occasion.

EXPECTATIONS ARE RECORDED PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS OR UNDERSTANDINGS OF EVENTS THAT ARE REHASHED TO BE APPLIED TO CURRENT SITUATIONS AND IT MEANS THE PERSON DOES NOT HAVE TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION UNDERSTANDING BUT HE HAS FALSE RECORDED REHASHED STANDARDIZED EXPLANATIONS OR UNDERSTANDING OF EVENTS. EXPECTATIONS ARE NEVER PART TIME BUT IT IS THE DEFAULT WAY OF UNDERSTANDING.

A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING NEVER RESORTS TO EXPECTATIONS, HE NEVER ALLOWS EXPECTATION TO USURP HIS TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS HAPPENING AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE A PERSON RULED BY EXPECTATION COULD ALSO POSSESS TRUE UNDERSTANDING.

(Is there anyone who has or can define or explain expectation as I have done? If I am correct then all other explanations are wrong and they don’t understand expectations.)

Rate cuts lift China home prices

How can rate cuts instantly lift home prices except that it is by expectations or jumping to conclusions?

Greedy expectant jumping to conclusion people or robots receive the news of a rate cut and they jump to the conclusion or expectation or recorded understanding that this will stimulate the property market and so sellers will raise their selling prices and buyers will be lulled to bid higher for the houses.

THUS THE LIFTING OF HOME PRICES IF IT IS TRUE ON THE BASIS OF RATE CUTS IS A FORM OF ACTION BASED ON EXPECTATIONS (NOT REALITY) & DANGEROUS JUMPING TO (PRECONCIEVED) CONCLUSION AND SO IT IS ANOTHER UNWITTING EXAMPLE OF EXPECTATIONS AND JUMPING TO CONCLUSION AT WORK.

Is the real Mitt Romney about to stand up?

If there is no possibility of the real Mitt Romney showing up because there never was a real Mitt anyway then you are speaking falsely with future suffering due.

The vast majority of people are just putting on shows they are like empty carton boxes attractive and nicely painted outside but empty inside and since it is empty, there is nothing to stand up.

THE VAST MAJORITY OF STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE EMPTY BOXES, VERY NICE AND ATTRACTIVE AND DONE UP ON THE OUTSIDE BUT EMPTY INSIDE, YOU WILL NOT FIND ANYTHING OF SUBSTANCE INSIDE AND IF THAT IS THE CASE AND YOU ASK IF THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF THE REAL SO AND SO TURNING UP THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND THAT IS THE PATH TO WOE NEVER HAPPINESS.

It is just a change of tune not real Mitt turning up:

That Mitt Romney will delve or revert to his Mormon roots is not a case of the real Mitt turning up but a change of tune, if it happens it must be a calculated ploy that he or his handlers think will advantage him in his quest to be president.

THAT MITT ROMNEY WILL MANIFEST OR DISPLAY HIS MORMON ROOTS IS NOT A CASE OF THE REAL MITT TURNING UP BUT IT IS A CASE OF CHANGING SUITS, CHANGING TUNE USUALLY PREMEDITATED, CALCULATED FOR SELF-ADVANTAGE.

IF SOMETHING IS JUST A CASE OF A CHANGE OF SUITS OR CLOTHES AND YOU THINK IT IS A CASE OF SHOWING YOUR TRUE COLOURS THEN YOU ARE MISTAKEN, YOU UNDERSTOOD WRONGLY THAT HAS SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES IN TERMS OF FUTURE SUFFERING.

Which is more likely?

By implication you mean the present Mitt Romney is not real and you are speculating if the real Mitt will now stand up.

It is much more easier and possible for Mitt to change to a new set of clothes for the sake of his presidential ambitions then for the ‘real him’ to stand up.

THIS WORLD IS NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THE ‘REAL’ YOU, IT IS ALL ABOUT SHOW AND WHAT IS IN IT FOR ME, PROTECTION OF VESTED INTERESTS AND IN ORDER TO BECOME PRESIDENT, IF THAT IS YOUR AIM, IT IS NOT ABOUT REVEALING THE REAL YOU BUT DOING AND SAYING WHAT WILL GET YOU ELECTED AND SO IF YOU THINK YOUR CURRENT PLOY IS NOT WORKING THEN IT IS A MATTER OF CHANGING TO A NEW SET OF CLOTHES RATHER THAN STRIPPING OFF YOUR CLOTHES TO EXPOSE THE NAKED OR REAL MITT.

THE REAL MITT CANNOT STAND UP BECAUSE IT WOULD EXPOSE BARE SHARP LONG FANGS AND TOO MUCH SHIT FOR THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT.

EXACTLY WHO THE REAL MITT ROMNEY IS CAN BE KNOWN AND IF HE WERE TO REVEAL WHAT HE HAS DONE IN HIS PAST EG HOW HE GOT RICH, IT WOULD BE THE END OF HIS AMBITIONS AND SO THE REAL MITT CAN NEVER STAND UP. 

Most people cannot take down their masks or open their closets:

If you interact with the world through a mask or you have a closed closet that have things hidden (skeletons), then in order for the real you to stand up you must take down that mask or open that closet for others to see what is in it.

Without taking down that mask or opening the closet how can you say the real you has stood up?

But most people cannot take down that mask because behind their immaculate poised smiles lie sharp long fangs and their closets have skeletons, exactly how Mitt got to be so rich can be known and if it is told, it will turn off many voters.

BY IMPLICATION YOU SAY THE CURRENT MITT IS NOT REAL, HE IS PUTTING ON A SHOW OR HIDING BEHIND A MASK.

AND SO IF THE REAL MITT IS TO STAND UP AS YOU SUGGEST AS A POSSIBILITY (WHEN IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE), HE MUST TAKE DOWN HIS MASK AND OPEN HIS CLOSET FOR INSPECTION.

BUT HE CANNOT TAKE DOWN HIS MASK BECAUSE THAT WOULD EXPOSE LONG SHARP FANGS AND IF HE WERE TO OPEN HIS CLOSET THERE WOULD BE TERRIBLE SKELETONS TO SEE.

THUS IF THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF THE REAL MITT STANDING UP, WHAT IS HAPPENING IS A CONVENIENT, CALCULATED CHANGE OF CLOTHES THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND GUILTY OF MISLEADING OTHERS WITH KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING TO SPEAK OF THE REAL MITT STANDING UP.

Impossible for the real Mitt to stand up:

The real Mitt Romney exists but it is impossible for him to turn up.

Anyone with style or objectively determinable force prolonging, changing speed and strength is a fake, a rehasher, an actor putting on a show not a real person.

For one who sees correctly Mitt Romney falls into that category, he is a full and consummate actor putting on a show.

In order for the true Mitt to stand up, he must be shorn off his style, without shedding his style any talk of being real is hypocritical, delusional.

EVEN THOUGH IT IS POSSIBLE FOR MITT ROMNEY TO SHED HIS STYLE, IT IS AS GOOD AS IMPOSSIBLE THAT BY HIMSELF HE COULD OR WOULD SHED HIS STYLE THAT MANDATES A PUTTING ON A SHOW EXISTENCE.

IT IS NOT FOR YOU OR ANYONE TO ARBITRARILY DETERMINE WHEN THE REAL MITT HAS STOOD UP BUT IT IS OBJECTIVE, ONLY TRUE THAT THE REAL MITT HAS STOOD UP IF HE HAS BEEN SHORN OFF HIS STYLE SO THAT HE IS NO LONGER PUTTING ON A SHOW AND ALTHOUGH THAT IS POSSIBLE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT IT WILL OCCUR IN THE NEAR FUTURE, IN THIS LIFETIME.

Jalan Tanjung closed

BARELY a day after the long-barricaded Jalan Tanjung in Bandar Utama, Petaling Jaya, was re-opened to traffic, StarMetro received calls and emails from road users saying that the road has been closed again.

Those who are responsible are incurring deadly karma and those who see nothing wrong or see it as right are deluded and headed for woe.

It is out of selfishness without consideration or sharing that the road is closed. If anyone understood what the Buddha taught, he will share everything rather than hoard something (access to a road) for the sake of one’s own convenience depriving others of the ease of use.

This was said by the Blessed One: "If beings knew, as I know, the results of giving & sharing, they would not eat without have given, nor would the stain of selfishness overcome their minds. Even if it were their last bite, their last mouthful, they would not eat without having shared, if there were someone to receive their gift. But because beings do not know, as I know, the results of giving & sharing, they eat without have given. The stain of selfishness overcomes their minds."

If beings knew what the Great Seer said,
how the result of sharing has such great fruit,
then, subduing the stain of selfishness
with brightened awareness,
they'd give in season to the noble ones,
where a gift bears great fruit.
Having given food as an offering
to those worthy of offerings, many donors,
when they pass away from here,
the human state, go to heaven.
They, having gone there to heaven, rejoice,
enjoying sensual pleasures.
Unselfish, they partake of the result of sharing.

Romney calls for Akin to drop out

There are true or false reasons for making the call, it does not necessarily reflect devotion to truth and goodness.

You can call for Akin to drop out because he is deluded or talks nonsense which is harmful for someone who desires to hold public office or you can call for him to drop out because he is a liability, he will lose to a Democrat opponent and he negatively reflects on the Republican party of which you are part of. These are false, calculated reasons that if it is the basis of your call, will end in your insanity.

IF THE BASIS OF YOUR ACTIONS IS FALSE THEN THE ENDPOINT IS INSANITY. ONLY PERSON WHOSE ACTIONS ARE BASED ON TRUE OR GOOD REASONS WILL NOT END UP INSANE. THUS IF YOUR CALL IS SO THAT REPUBLICANS STAND A CHANCE IN THE SEAT AKIN CONTESTS OR TO COUNTER NEGATIVE PUBLICITY ON THE REPUBLICANS THEN YOU ARE ASKING FOR INSANITY.

Star is caught devouring planet

What is said may be an accurate depiction of the truth or it may be far from the truth.

If it is a case of ‘planet seen falling into its star’, there is no catching nor devouring involved then you are guilty of falsity saying so and you are gullible and deluded accepting it as truth.

The plot thickens:

There is no need to talk about plots thickening nor does it exists in reality but it is a fabrication that is remembered, copied from others and rehashed because it sounds impressive or intriguing. Because it is false the person and those who accept as correct are dicing with insanity.

‘Plot thickening’ is a nonspecific generalized rote understanding of something that can be remembered and rehashed for many different occasions. There is no need to divert self and others to plot thickening, just go to the heart of the matter, why there are discrepancies in the readings of the job market where some measures seem to suggest recovery whilst others point to the opposite.

IN THEIR DRIVE OR DESIRE TO IMPRESS OTHERS, TO MAKE THINGS ‘INTERESTING’ PEOPLE RESORT TO COPIED NONSPECIFIC PHRASES THAT ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND IRRELEVANT TO THE SITUATION. THERE IS NO PLOT AT ALL NOR IS IT THICKENING EXCEPT AS A FIGMENT OF HER IMAGINATION THAT SHE WANTS TO IMPLANT IN GULLIBLE READERS, WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTING SIGNALS IN THE JOBS DATA THAT MAY BE RESOLVABLE. AND SO ‘JOBS THICKENING IS A FALSE REHASHED UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS HAPPENING’.

In the Chancellor of the Exchequer we do not trust

The deluded person who does not know he puts a terrible noose of future suffering around his neck is proud of the truth of what he proclaims above when it is deadly wrong.

You have no right to speak for others ‘we do not trust’ and so you are asking for punishment.

This is divisive speech that sows discord and attacks the Chancellor.

If the Chancellor is powerless to deliver what you want and you think he can but won’t then you have a wrong perception that ends in insanity. If it is financial cancer and no chancellor can cure financial cancer then you are a fool attacking him.

It is not a matter of trusting him or anyone but what is he doing that is wrong and what do you think is the correct thing to do?

IF IT IS A MATTER OF WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG, THEN YOU ARE A FOOL BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE SPEAKING OF TRUST.

Trust is dangerous and evil:

The nature of everyone is there for anyone to see and it is his false perception that makes a person unable to see the true nature of another.

No matter how a person may try to disguise himself as a wolf in sheep’s clothes, it is discernible to one who sees correctly.

Trust only applies to a person who is unable to see the true nature of others but is nevertheless eager or desirous for material reasons to accept him as bona fide or benevolent, accept without knowing what the other person proposes.

THE PERSON DEVOTED TO TRUTH DOES NOT RESORT TO TRUSTING OTHERS, IT IS LAPSING INTO FALSITY AND EVIL. BECAUSE HE IS DEVOTED TO TRUTH, HE SEES THE TRUTH OF OTHERS AND SO THE MATTER OF TRUSTING OR NOT TRUSTING OTHERS DOES NOT ARISE, DOES NOT APPLY. YOU SEE CORRECTLY THE PERSON AS A WOLF IN SHEEP CLOTHES, SO THE MATTER OF TRUSTING OR NOT TRUSTING HIM DOES NOT ARISE.

THUS BY SAYING ‘IN THE CHANCELLOR WE DO NOT TRUST’ YOU ARE FOOLISHLY ACKNOWLEDGING YOUR INABILITY TO SEE OTHERS TRULY, YOU ARE ADVOCATING THE USE OF FORCE ACCORDING TO A PLAN TO EITHER TRUST OR DISTRUST ANOTHER WHEN THE MATTER IS TO SEE THE OTHER PERSON AS WHAT HE TRULY IS.

Firms still facing 'huge’ funding shortfall

 

Fewer than one in 10 small businesses applying for finance over the past year succeeded in gaining the amount they applied for, a survey of 1,000 firms has found.

There have been accusations that banks are withholding funds that governments pumped into the banking system by ‘quantitative easing’, many credit worthy (small) businesses are deprived of funding yet everyone seem clueless as why this may be the case.

It may be the case that notwithstanding the massive quantitative easing, the debt hole or burden in the banking system dwarfs what was pumped in, much more need to be pumped in for banks to have ‘surplus’ money to lend to customers.

In any case, any business that needs funding to continue is living beyond its means and so the scale of living beyond means has been seriously underestimated.

IF ‘HEALTHY’ BUSINESSES NEED CREDIT OR BORROWING TO CONTINUE, EVEN IF IT IS FULLY CAPABLE OF REPAYING, IT IS STILL DEPENDENT ON DEBT TO SURVIVE AND THEREFORE LIVING BEYOND ITS MEANS OR LIVING DANGEROUSLY. IT INDICATES THAT MODERN BUSINESS IS LIVING BEYOND MEANS, ADDICTED TO DEBT FAR MORE THAN CONCEDED.

Why still not enough?

Massive amounts of money has been pumped into the system through the euphemistic quantitative easing, so why is credit still tight?

1)  The debt burden in the system is massive, what has been massively pumped into the system was enough to stave off collapse not restore it to health.

2)  The appetite or demand for credit or borrowing in the system is massive, too many companies and people are dependent on borrowing to survive or keep their business going and because the available credit is far outstripped by the demand, credit remains tight or insufficient.

Poetic justice:

You hear ‘poetic justice’ being bandied or cited regularly and it is a false copied rehashed understanding of things happening. There is nothing poetic about justice except in the figment of the imagination or delusion of the subscriber.

Poetry is not about substance but style, poetry is playing with words just as art is playing with figures, if something is true it is not poetry, if something is poetry it is not the truth but playing with words.

Because poetry is false, it is about style not substance designed to stir mental force or emotion or impress, justice can never be truly poetic. It can be falsely poetic never truly poetic and so you are speaking falsely talking about ‘poetic justice’.

Apple is not overvalued ... yet

Anyone who says this is foolishly unnecessarily putting a noose around his neck even many times because if others buy what he says and buys Apple and loses, he is responsible for their losses.

Apple’s current PE is 14.6. Its profits has been soaring in recent years and so it has not always earned so much for many years, whether it can be sustained or it will decline cannot be determined. And so based on older earnings, current PE is even higher. Granted, Apple has cash reserves and other assets, this is still a very high asking price to sell and you must be quite greedy and indifferent to risk to buy at this price.

NOT WITHOUT REASON DOES A PERSON SAY SO, HE IS TRYING TO JUSTIFY APPLE’S PRICE PERHAPS FOR SELF OR APPLE GAIN. WHAT HE DOES NOT REALIZE IS THAT HE IS ENCOURAGING HEEDLESSNESS. MICROSOFT WAS A PAST DARLING BUT NOW ITS STOCKS ARE MUCH LESS VAUNTED. THE BEATLES FOR ALL THEIR GREATNESS LASTED BARELY 10 YEARS.

Whatever happened to Apple TV?

If you speak without understanding what you speak you must speak with self-resistance that leads to stress and conditions you to speak with self-resistance active.

When you say ‘whatever’ happened it means you don’t care what happened to Apple TV but still you want others to tell you.

You are practicing controlled insanity, generating conflict in yourself by saying you want to know but you don’t care what happened (whatever) to Apple.

PEOPLE HAVE A PERVERTED PERCEPTION THAT IT IS FUNNY OR CUTE OR THEY ARE BEING CLEVER ASKING WHATEVER HAPPENED INSTEAD OF ‘WHAT HAPPENED’ WHEN THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY SAYING THEY DON’T CARE (WHATEVER) BUT STILL THEY WANT YOU TO TELL THEM WHAT HAPPENED TO APPLE TV.

Akin rebukes party bosses

A Republican candidate under fire for saying women's bodies can prevent pregnancy in rape cases has lashed out at party bosses who want him to quit.

Congressman Todd Akin said it was not right for the party establishment to over-ride Missouri voters who had picked him to run for the Senate.

In a new fundraising appeal, Mr Akin claims "the liberal elite" are trying to take down a "pro-life conservative

Party bosses asked Akin to step down for wrong vested self-interests because Akin is seen as a liability than asset. Akin is wrong to attack his Republican bosses and cite the liberal elite trying to take down a conservative.

THUS THE REPUBLICAN LEADERS HAVE FALSE REASONS FOR ASKING AKIN’S DEPARTURE AND AKIN HAS FALSE REASON (LIBERAL REPUBLICANS TRYING TO TAKE DOWN A CONSERVATIVE) IN REFUSING TO RELENT.

THE TRUE (THAT IS FALSE) REASONS FOR ASKING AKIN TO STEP DOWN IS BECAUSE HE IS NOW A LIABILITY THAN ASSET, LEADERS ARE PROTECTING SELF INTERESTS AND THE TRUE REASON AKIN REFUSES TO STEP DOWN IS BECAUSE OF AMBITION AND MATERIAL LOSSES AT STAKE FOR HIM.

BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTING ON FALSE NOT TRUE REASONS THEY ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY. THEY BETRAY NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE MATTER IS ABOUT, WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG.

DON’T REBUKE OR ATTACK THE REPUBLICAN BOSSES AND IT MAY NOT BE A MATTER OF LIBERALS VS CONSERVATIVES BUT PROTECTION OF VESTED INTERESTS THAT IS A FALSE REASON FOR ASKING AKIN TO STEP DOWN. AKIN NEVER SAID THE LEADERS WERE WRONG TO ASK HIM TO RESIGN BECAUSE HE HAS BECOME A LIABILITY AND SO HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE MATTER.

THE TRUE REASON FOR ASKING AKIN TO STEP DOWN IS THAT HIS STATEMENT BETRAYS DELUSION AND BIAS AGAINST WOMEN. THE LEADERS DID NOT CITE WHAT IS WRONG BUT THEY ARE PROTECTING THEIR SELF INTERESTS IN THEIR CALLS AND SO THEY DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND THE MATTER.

Both sides cannot come clean:

Akin cannot come clean and accuse his leaders of abandoning him because he is now a liability because that would be acknowledging that he has made a fool of himself, besmirched himself with what he said so he looks for scapegoats, liberals trying to take down a conservative.

Republican leaders cannot come clean to state that they want Akin to step down because he is now a liability because that would redound negatively on them and so they act pious, it is for the sake of the people that Akin should step down.

BOTH SIDES CANNOT COME CLEAN AND SO THEY RESORT TO A SHENANIGAN OR CHARADE.