Why Consciousness States Change

Why Consciousness States Changed:
THE REASON WHY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT OCCURRED IN RECENT YEARS AND AFTER 1977 CAN AND HAVE OCCURRED NOT SELECTIVELY TO SOME BUT UNIVERSALLY TO EVERYONE (INCLUDING ANIMALS) IS BECAUSE A BEING’S CONSCIOUSNESS STATE OR THE CONDITION OF HIS CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT WITHOUT CAUSE, NOT FIXED OR UNCHANGEABLE BUT IT ONLY APPEARS SO TO MESMERIZED OR DAZED BEINGS. INSTEAD A PERSON’S CONSCIOUS STATE IS HELD VERY TIGHTLY IN PLACE OR IN STATUS QUO AS IF FIXED, WITHOUT CAUSE, BY NOT JUST INCESSANT BUT MULTI LAYERED INCESSANT MERCILESS FORCEFUL STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY GENERATE IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS AS A RESULT OF THE WAYS THEY BEHAVE THAT THEY ARE UNAWARE HAVE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, MULTI LAYERED CHANGES IN SPEED, FORCE AND EVEN DIRECTION OF THEIR UNITS OF SPEECH, MOTION, THOUGHTS AND PERCEPTION CREATING INSOLUBLE AND INCARCERATING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THROUGH WHICH NO LIGHT CAN SHINE THROUGH TO ILLUMINATE A WAY OUT EVEN THOUGH IT EXISTS. ALL BEINGS, INDEPENDENT OF HOW CLEVER OR STUPID, HOW GOOD OR BAD THEY ARE, ARE CAPABLE OF EXPERIENCING THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN ALL THEIR POTENCY THAT BEHAVIOR WITH CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS GENERATE AND THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS STATE IS PRINCIPALLY CONDITIONED OR KEPT IN PLACE BY THIS ENDEMIC POTENT STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION. HOWEVER, THIS WOEFUL CONSCIOUSNESS STATE CAN AND WILL YIELD TO CHANGE IF A BEING APPLIED SUSTAINED CORRECTLY DIRECTED EFFORT TO ELIMINATE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION BY ALTERING HIS BEHAVIOR THAT WILL ALWAYS REQUIRE THAT HE BECOME INCREASINGLY LESS FORCEFUL IN STRETCHING HIS UNITS OF SPEECH, MOTION, THOUGHT AND PERCEPTION THEREBY GRADUALLY DECREASING HIS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION LOAD THAT CAN BE SENSED OR EXPERIENCED BY THOSE WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH HIM SO THAT THEY TOO MOMENTARILY EXPERIENCE A REDUCTION IN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEN SERVES AS A POTENT CATALYST FOR A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN THEM THAT DOES NOT DEPEND ON HOW GOOD OR INTELLIGENT THEY ARE AND IF IT IS SUSTAINED WILL LEAD TO A PREVIOUSLY INCONCEIVABLE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN THEM TOO AND THEY TOO WILL THEN SERVE AS TRIGGERS FOR CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN OTHERS SUCH THAT IN TIME EVERYBODY IS SEIZED TO CHANGE COMPULSORILY.
IT IS BECAUSE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION ARE UNIVERSALLY DISAGREEABLE BUT PEOPLE SUBJECT THEMSELVES TO THEM PARTLY BY MUTUAL COERCION AND PARTLY TO GO AGAINST THEMSELVES TO DECEIVE, PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS; STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION ARE AUTOMATICALLY EXPERIENCED AS A RESULT OF THEIR BEHAVIOR AND THE BEHAVIOR OF OTHERS THAT WHEN SOMEONE COMES ALONG WHOSE APPEARANCE, THE WAY HE SPEAKS AND BEHAVES DOES NOT STRESS, INDUCE RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THEM LIKE ALL THE OTHERS DO, THEY CAN AUTOMATICALLY SENSE IT AND THUS AFFECTED THEY ARE SEIZED IRRESISTIBLY TO ALSO CHANGE IN AN ACT OF REFLEXIVE SELF PRESERVATION THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE INTELLIGENCE OR GOODNESS BECAUSE NO ONE WANTS TO SUFFER ANYMORE THAN HE HAS TO, TO GET WHAT HE WANTS FROM THIS WORLD.
ONCE THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION LEVELS HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO A CERTAIN OR CRITICAL LEVEL, THE PERSON EXPERIENCES A PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE PERMANENT INCOMPARABLE SUPERIOR MENTAL STATE TO EXIST IN. WHATEVER SUFFERING HE NOW SUFFERS DEPENDS ENTIRELY ON HOW HE STILL SINS AGAINST HIMSELF AND OTHERS.
IN THE DAYS BEFORE 2000 WHEN I WAS INDEPENDENTLY CHANGING MYSELF AND EXHORTING OTHERS I MET OR CORRESPONDED WITH TO CHANGE LIKE I WAS CHANGING MYSELF (JUST AS I EXHORTED OTHERS TO CHANGE AFTER I CHANGED AFTER 1977), I NEVER EXPECTED THAT EVERYONE INCLUDING THOSE WHO ARE CLEARLY EVIL OR MENTALLY HANDICAPPED WOULD BE AFFECTED TO ALL CHANGE IN A PERMANENT WAY THAT BENEFITED THEM AS IF SWEPT LIKE FALLING DOMINOS TO CHANGES AROUND THEM.
WHAT I DID NOT REALIZE THEN AS I DID NOT REALIZE AFTER I CHANGED IN 1977 IS THAT I DID NOT NEED TO CAJOLE OTHERS TO CHANGE BUT THE APPRECIABLE REDUCTION IN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MY APPEARANCE AND BEHAVIOR ENGENDERED IN THOSE WHO CAME INTO CONTACT WITH ME, NOT JUST IN THOSE I (FOOLISHLY) THOUGHT TO BE GOOD, WILL MANDATORILY TRIGGER CHANGES IN THEM IN THEIR OWN WAYS AND THUS CHANGED THEY WILL SET IN MOTION CHANGES IN YET OTHERS IN A PROCESS OF CONTAGION.
I THOUGHT THAT PERHAPS ONLY SOME OF THOSE WHO WERE GOOD AND DISCERNING WOULD LISTEN AND CHANGE JUST LIKE ME. IN FACT I FELT CONSTERNATION OR RESENTMENT TO SEE THAT EVEN EVIL PEOPLE TOO WERE CHANGING AS IF THEY WERE BENEFITING FROM THE CHANGE.
THE RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES MUST INVOLVE PROCESSES THAT ARE FUNDAMENTAL THAT DO NOT REQUIRE THE INVOLVEMENT OF INTELLECT OR THINKING IN ORDER FOR IT TO BE UNIVERSAL. IF IT WAS DEPENDENT ON INTELLIGENCE AND THINKING THEN CHILDREN, THE SENILE, MENTALLY HANDICAPPED WOULD NOT HAVE CHANGED. IF IT WAS DEPENDENT ON GOODNESS THEN THE EVIL WOULD NOT HAVE CHANGED.
BECAUSE THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES INVOLVED EVERYONE AND IS THE RESULT OF CONTAGION OR THE INFLUENCE OF OTHERS, IT MUST DEPEND ON THE ABILITY OF THE BEING TO PERCEIVE, TO SENSE VISUALLY AND AURALLY CHANGES HAPPENING IN OTHERS THAT THEY NEVER BEFORE EXPERIENCED THAT THEN STIRRED THE MENTAL FORCE OR EMOTIONS RESIDENT IN THEM TO CAUSE THEM TO ALSO CHANGE IN A FUNDAMENTAL WAY SUCH THAT IN TIME A NEVER BEFORE EXPERIENCED PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE TAKES PLACE IN THEM.
NO INTELLECTUAL ABILITY OR DISCERNMENT OR VIRTUE IS REQUIRED OTHERWISE THE MENTALLY HANDICAPPED OR EVIL WILL NOT HAVE CHANGED BUT THESS RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES REQUIRE THE ABILITY TO PERCEIVE CHANGES IN THE SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR OF OTHERS AND THE ABILITY TO EXPERIENCE THEIR EMOTIONAL IMPACT. THE ONLY UNIVERSAL FORCEFUL OR EMOTIONAL IMPACTS OTHERS’ BEHAVIOR HAVE ON ANY PERSON UPON PERCEPTION THAT DO NOT REQUIRE INTELLECTUAL FUNCTION ARE (FORCEFUL) STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION SUCH PERCEPTIONS GENERATE OR DO NOT GENERATE. THUS IF EVERYONE’S BEHAVIOR IN SPEECH, APPEARANCE AND MOTIONS AUTOMATICALLY INCITED STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND THERE SUDDENLY CAME ALONG A PERSON WHOSE APPEARANCE, BEHAVIOR AND SPEECH DID NOT DO SO (NOT BY MAGIC BUT BECAUSE THERE IS NO FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, NO CONSTANT CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS), IT WILL BE EXPERIENCED BY ALL OBSERVERS INDEPENDENT OF THEIR INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY, DOES NOT REQUIRE THINKING OR WHETHER THEY ARE GOOD OR EVIL THAT THIS PERSON’S BEHAVIOR DOES NOT PROVOKE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THEM THAT THEN SERVES AS A CATALYST FO THEM TO ALSO CHANGE SYMPATHETICALLY IN THAT DIRECTION IN THEIR OWN WAYS.
IF THE CHANGE WAS DEPENDENT ON INTELLECTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT I SAID OR DID TO OTHERS THEN THOSE WHO HAVE NOT HEARD OR HAVE HEARD BUT NOT UNDERSTOOD WOULD NOT HAVE CHANGED. THE FACT THAT EVERYONE, EVEN ANIMALS HAVE ALL YET AGAIN CHANGED IN RECENT YEARS AS THEY DID AFTER 1977 REFLECTS THAT THE RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IS A PERCEPTIVE OR EXPERIENTIAL PROCESS THAT IS DEPENDENT ON THE PERSON SEEING OR HEARING AND EVEN TACTILELY FEELING THE EXTRAORDINARY CHANGING IN OTHERS AND THUS STIMULATED OR STIRRED THEIR MINDS ARE FORCEFULLY OR EMOTIONALLY MOVED TO COMPULSORILY CONSCIOUSLY CHANGE WITHOUT NEED FOR INTELLECTUAL INVOLVEMENT THAT IS THEN REFLECTED IN THEIR CHANGED DEMEANOR AND BEHAVIOR THAT BECOMES A TRIGGER FOR CHANGE IN YET OTHERS.
BECAUSE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION ARE ALL FORCEFUL WITH INTENSITY THAT ALL INDIVIDUALS CAN APPRECIATE, ALLEVIATIONS OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS STATE ARE COMMENSURATE WITH THE REDUCTION OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THEY EXPERIENCE AND IF THEY PROGRESSIVELY REDUCED THEIR ENDEMIC LEVELS OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THEY WILL EXPERIENCE A COMMENSURATE ELEVATION OF THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS STATES.
IN THE EARLY DAYS I STROVE TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO CHANGE BY PREACHING AND SETTING EXAMPLES HOPING THAT SOME WILL LISTEN AND CHANGE. WHILST WHAT I SAID WAS NOT IN VAIN, IT DID HAVE SOME INTELLECTUAL IMPACT ON THOSE WHO WOULD LISTEN AND PUT TO PRACTICE, THERE WAS SOMETHING BESIDES THIS THAT WAS HAPPENING THAT ESCAPED MY AWARENESS. WHAT I DID NOT REALIZE UNTIL MUCH LATER WHEN THE CHANGES IN OTHERS BECAME TOO OBVIOUS TO BE IGNORED, WAS THAT IT WAS NOT SO MUCH THE INTELLECTUAL IMPACT OF WHAT I SAID OR DID THAT MOVED PEOPLE TO CHANGE BY CHOICE BUT THEY WERE ALL SEIZED BY THEIR NOVEL EXPERIENCE OF REDUCED STRESS THAT MY BEHAVIOR ENGENDERED TO CHANGE, THEIR CHANGING THEN SERVED AS TRIGGERS FOR OTHERS WHO CAME INTO CONTACT WITH THEM.
ALTHOUGH PEOPLE FIND IT DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO DISCERN THE CONSTANT ADDED FORCE, STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES AND CHANGES IN SPEED AND FORCE IN THEIR OWN AND EVERYBODY’S SPEECH THEY CAN ALL EXPERIENCE THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION COMPULSORILY ENGENDERED. IF IN THIS MILIEU OF CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS BY EVERYONE THERE APPEARS A MAN WHO EXTRAORDINARILY CAN SPEAK WITHOUT ADDED FORCE, WITHOUT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, NO MATTER HOW STUPID OR EVIL THEY ARE, THEY CAN ALL EXPERIENCE THE REDUCTION OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THIS NEVER BEFORE HEARD WAY OF SPEAKING COMPULSORILY BRINGS AND STIRS THEIR EMOTIONAL MINDS TO CHANGE OR AWAKEN CONSCIOUSLY WITHOUT INVOLVING THEIR INTELLECT OR DISCERNMENT. IT SUGGESTS THAT EXTRAORDINARY CONDUCT, NEVER BEFORE HEARD OR SEEN BEHAVIOR LIKE NOT STRETCHING, NOT CONSTANTLY CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE ARE REQUIRED TO STIMULATE OTHERS TO COMPULSORILY CHANGE CONSCIOUSLY AND IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORINARY PEOPLE WHO THEMSELVES BEHAVES WITH CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO HAVE BEEN THE ORIGINAL TRIGGER FOR THE EXTRAORDINARY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT OCCURRED IN RECENT YEARS.
JUST AS I NEVER EXPECTED EVERYONE TO CHANGE YET AGAIN IN RECENT YEARS, I EXPECTED PERHAPS I CAN INFLUENCE SOME TO CHANGE LIKE I WAS CHANGING TO EXPERIENCE A MEASURE OF RELIEF FROM STRESS THAT I MYSELF WAS EXPERIENCING, I NEVER EXPECTED THAT I MYSELF WILL EXPERIENCE AN INCOMPARABLLY SUPERIOR MENTAL STATE WITH WHICH TO EXIST IN, I NEVER EXPECTED THAT I WOULD DISCOVER THAT THE ROOT TO STRESS IS THE CONSTANT APPLICATION OF FORCE ON THE MIND, THE ONLY CAUSE OF RESTLESSNESS IS THE CONSTANT FORCEFUL CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN A PERSON’S SPEECH, MOTION, THOUGHTS AND PERCEPTIONS, THE ONY CAUSE OF DISTRACTION IS THE PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO RENDER SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO OF THEIR SPEECH AND MOTION. BY NEVER APPLYING FORCE ON ONE’S MIND, NEVER STRETCHING SYLLABLES, NEVER CHANGING SPEED OR LOUDNESS, ONE COULD PERMANENTLY EXIT STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
Why I Am The Trigger:
For one who sees correctly, by their demeanor and behavior everyone, young and old, stupid and smart, good and evil have changed in recent years.
It is impossible that each and everyone of the stupid, old and evil could spontaneously or on their own accord change and since they have all changed, they must have changed by a process of contagion by experiencing changes in others that caused them to change.
If they changed by contagion then this contagion can only come about through seeing, hearing and perhaps even by touch and it must not require intellectual processes (need to think) or virtue otherwise the stupid or evil will not have changed.
For one who sees correctly all people in this world (including animals) always forcefully stretch all their syllables or vocalizations, always change speed and loudness in their vocalizations and it is essentially the stress, restlessness and distraction that this stretching, changes in speed and loudness generate that can be compulsorily experienced by all recipients independent of their intelligence or virtues that can be transmitted by contagion between individuals. Therefore if everyone is constantly stretching, changing speed and loudness as they have always done since time in memorial there is no reason why anyone amongst them can or should trigger consciousness changes in others.
It is only in a situation when someone suddenly comes along whose appearance, speech and motion do not induce stress, restlessness and distraction like everyone else that it jolts him because he can experience the absence of stress, restlessness and distraction this never before see or heard appearance, behavior and speech conveys and he is seized by the absence of stress, restlessness and distraction his mind briefly experiences in the course of the interaction as he has never experienced before to himself change consciously.
Therefore whoever is to trigger this consciousness change in recent years must behave in speech, motion and posture in a way that is unique, never experienced before to stir all others compulsorily to change.
BECAUSE I INDEPENDENTLY (FOLLOWING NOBODY’S EXAMPLE) SET OUT MUCH EARLIER THAN THERE WERE VISIBLE CHANGES IN OTHERS IN 1997 TO BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY FROM OTHERS IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE MY STRESS (BY INITIALLY NOT SMILING & NOT SAYING OR DOING THINGS TO BE PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS THAT LED GRADUALLY TO MY AWARENESS OF AND STEADFAST ELIMINATION OF STRESSFUL UNNECESSARY STYLISH STRETCHING, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES IN MY SPEECH IN THE PROCESS EXPERIENCING A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE I NEVER ENVISAGED BEFORE WHEREIN I WAS EFFORTLESSLY CALM CLEARLY THINKING WITHOUT STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, UNDISTRACTED, FREED FROM DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY INCAPABLE OF BEING DEPRESSED, UNLESS THERE ARE MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT PERSONS WHO TRIGGERED RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD, I MUST AGAIN BE THE TRIGGER OF CURRENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES.
IF THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE TRIGGER FOR RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES AS IT WAS ME WHO TRIGGERED THE CHANGE AFTER 1977, THEN BECAUSE I SET OUT TO CHANGE MYSELF MUCH EARLIER WITHOUT IMITATING ANYBODY, I MUST BE THE TRIGGER FOR RECENT CHANGES.
IN THIS CASE, A NONENTITY, UNHERALDED, UNAPPRECIATED AND DISRESPECTED THOUGH I MAY BE, I HAVE TWICE TRIGGERED BENEFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD THAT ALSO WENT UNACKNOWLEDGED. WHAT ARE THE CHANCES BY RANDOM THAT THE SAME PERSON OUT OF 6 BILLIONS IN EXISTENCE WILL CAUSE THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE WORLD TO CHANGE TWICE, WHO IN ADDITION SAYS MANY UNIQUELY INSIGHTFUL THINGS AND ELUCIDATED WHAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA SAID IN A WAY NO ONE HAS DONE BEFORE OR EVEN TODAY (WHEN THE CHANGED CONDITIONS APPLY FOR THE REST AS FOR ME, HOW COME NO ONE HAS EXPLAINED WHAT THEY SAID LIKE I DO)?
THAT I TRIGGERED CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT REDUCED SUFFERING THAT SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD AGAIN IN RECENT YEARS PROVES THAT THE FIRST TIME WAS NO FLUKE & IT IS IN MY NATURE TO DO SO WHERE ALL OTHERS CANNOT.
There were two distinct separate beneficial consciousness changes that occurred to everyone that they could not possibly imagine was possible beforehand, the first occurred sometime after 1977 and another more gradual but equally extraordinary change starting around the close of the previous millennium.
I myself was taken by surprise by recent and still ongoing consciousness changes and only remarked about it to others very late when I became certain that this was so because I thought that whatever consciousness change that was possible had already occurred after 1977.
I was definitely the trigger for the change after 1977 because I know I changed myself abruptly, irrevocably then without imitating anyone and it was only about a year later when I ‘bottomed out’, became involuntarily relaxed as if incapable of suffering when I saw people everywhere became even violently agitated just on sight of me that it gradually dawned on me with increasing certainty that everyone was changing. I even thought then that the world would come to and end when everyone became totally calm but I underestimated the implacable wickedness of men because till this day, they have not exited stress, restlessness and distraction because they still stretch their syllables, constantly changed speed and loudness in their speech.
(I had actually become involuntarily calm by exiting acting again in 1985 and though it was an wonderful state to exist in, it made interactions with others almost impossible and the hostility of others must have somehow forced me to revert to the cover of acting just like the rest)
I again set out to deliberately change myself sometime in 1996-7 without anyone else’s influence because I was intolerant of the stress and restlessness that beset me. I resolved not to behave like others that I felt was stressful by refusing to smile or do or say things to be nice to please and impress others and I in addition meditated daily to calm myself. In due course in my relentless prosecution of stress, I became aware I was stretching my syllables and how this was creating stress and I thus worked to eliminate stretching to experience an appreciable amelioration of stress. Still later I became increasingly aware of speed and loudness changes in the speech of everyone and it dawned on me that these incessant forceful unnecessary changes in speed and loudness that inevitably became uncontrollable episodically were the only causes of restlessness and I therefore strove to eliminate speed and loudness changes when I spoke. Still later I discovered that distraction, the scattering of one’s attention and inability to concentrate was because people were dividing their attention by doing more than one thing at a time like eating when they spoke or talking to someone whilst he was doing something (eg speaking to the teller as she process your transaction). It then dawned on me that the constant substance and style present in people’s speech and motion permanently divided their attention and the attention of those they interacted with, the usual consciousness state of ordinary people is forcefully divided, only the degree of distraction varied and they only forcefully unite their attention with difficulty on occasions to attend to important matters at hand.
As a result of unrelenting prosecution of stress, restlessness and distraction by not smiling, not saying or doing things to please or impress others, not stretching my syllables, shedding all unnecessary changes in speed and loudness, shedding all style in my speech and movements, I became increasingly imbued by an effortless calm centered clear emotionless thinking consciousness state that I never dreamt was possible beforehand. My changed demeanor, speech and behavior must be visible to others and coupled with the many things I communicated to others both by writing and in speech, I must have served as the trigger that by a process of contagion again swept around the world because for one seeing correctly, everyone has irrevocably changed again in recent years even though they still stubbornly act.
Spontaneity versus contagion:
It is impossible that everyone changed spontaneously by themselves in recent years uninfluenced by perceived changes in others because if this consciousness change was so simple that everyone can spontaneously change on his own it would have happened long ago haphazardly with a scattering of changes here and there rather than wait for recent years and occurring in concert or together.
If they did not change or mutate spontaneously then they must have all changed recently by contagion as they did after 1977 when I was then definitely the trigger of consciousness changes that has similarity with recent changes.
Just like an explosion always has a point source however vast and removed from the origin it becomes, a genetic mutation starts at a single point of time to a single gene not many genes at the same time amongst a vast pool of the same gene existing in different individuals, contagion usually if not always have a single source if you trace it back far enough to its origin.
If it is agreed that all processes of contagion can only have one original trigger then because I knew I set about to change myself behaviorally in a way no one has done before, namely not smiling, not trying to please and impress others, not stretching my syllables and changing speed and loudness where everyone does them (even today) much earlier in 1997 than anyone else and as a result of my changing the entire way in which I behaved in a way that is unprecedented, never seen in this world, I experienced progressive permanent beneficial changes in my conscious state that I never previously dreamt was possible, my unique behavior and the changes in my consciousness state were clearly perceivable to others, possibly jolting them out of their complacency to change themselves in their own ways that then were perceived by yet others who then also changed by contagion.
Because all ordinary people’s (and indeed animals) behavior and speech even today still have constant stretching and changes in speed and strength of force that maintain them enslaved in permanent stress, restlessness and distraction, it is not credible or even impossible that anyone amongst them could have by themselves embarked on a sustained course of behavior change aimed at destroying stress and restlessness that is the necessary prerequisite for the consciousness changes in recent years to occur. The consciousness change of recent years is the result of the effacement or reduction of baseline levels of stress, restlessness and distraction in everyone. Why should or could all ordinary people in the world who are still contented to stretch their syllables, constantly change speed and loudness when it is possible to exit stress, restlessness and distraction by desisting (as I have done) embark on their own a sustained dedicated course of behavior designed to permanently eliminate stress, restlessness and distraction and therefore serve as the trigger for consciousness change but instead to a man, they have all been passive passengers who went along on the ride of the recent consciousness changes because they were helplessly swept up in it?
As the Buddha said: "Cunda it is impossible that one who is himself sunk in the mire should pull out another who is sunk in the mire. But it is possible, Cunda, if one is not sunk in the mire himself to do so. In the same way the current consciousness changes are in the direction towards reduced empiric suffering of which the cessation of constant stretching, constant changes is the goal. It is impossible for anyone amongst all ordinary people who still continue to act today despite changes after changes, who still continue to stretch their syllables and changed speed and strength of force even when it is now possible not to, even when I have achieved that, to have been the trigger of the extraordinary consciousness changes in recent years but instead they were all passengers going along for the ride of change sweeping the world never knowing why or what happened.
If people even today cannot help or cannot stop their stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness, how can anyone amongst them be expected to have stopped stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness that is the indispensable prerequisite to enable the recent consciousness changes?
All along when I acted, it was predominantly defensive to please and impress others whilst others even those who call themselves good acted to aggressively, willfully indirectly or openly dominate, intimidate or manipulate others, which is why it is easy or possible for me to change and so hard for the rest to give up. Many have concealed their motives for acting so well they believe they are acting for the good of others when it is the opposite.
Just as I changed myself in a way I can definitely sense in the middle of 1977 whilst changes in others only became increasingly evident (to me) after 1978, in the same way I could sense vague consciousness changes occurring in me in tandem with the unconventional behavioral changes I made and although I was exhorting others to change like I was changing, I did not realize that everyone and not just the good was changing yet again until much later towards the year 2000.
I thought then that only the good or discerning, not recalcitrant evil ones, would listen to what I say, would be influenced by my behavior towards them to change themselves to experience a blissful transformation in themselves as I experienced myself in changing my conduct to stop being falsely nice to others.
IN THE EARLY DAYS BEFORE 2000 WHEN I WAS CHANGING AND TRYING TO EXHORT OTHERS THAT I INTERACTED OR CORRESPONDED WITH TO CHANGE LIKE I WAS CHANGING, I NEVER EXPECTED THAT EVERYONE, EVEN THOSE WHO ARE CLEARLY EVIL WOULD CHANGE IN A WAY THAT BENEFITED THEM AS IF SWEPT ALONG INVOLUNTARILY BY CHANGES AROUND THEM. I THOUGHT THAT PERHAPS SOME OF THOSE WHO WERE GOOD AND DISCERNING WOULD FOLLOW SUIT AND CHANGE JUST LIKE ME. IN FACT I FELT CHAGRIN OR RESENTMENT THAT EVEN EVIL PEOPLE TOO WERE CHANGING AS IF THEY TOO WERE BENEFITING FROM THE CHANGE.
IT WAS ONLY SLOWLY SOME YEARS AFTER I HAD INITIATED BEHAVIORAL CHANGES IN ME THAT IT BECAME INCREASINGLY CLEAR TO ME THAT EVERYONE WAS CHANGING YET AGAIN AS THEY DID AFTER 1977 AND NOW I SEE THAT THESE RECENT CHANGES HAVE NOT STOPPED BUT THEY ARE STILL ONGOING. PEOPLE ARE STILL CHANGING AS REFLECTED IN THE APPEARANCES AND BEHAVIOR AND WHETHER SOME WILL FINALLY STOPPED ACTING REMAINS TO BE SEEN.
IN THE EARLY DAYS I THOUGHT THAT SOME PEOPLE WERE FALSELY ACTING BUT THERE WERE SOME WHO WERE NOT ACTORS BUT IT GRADUALLY DAWNED ON ME THAT NOT JUST SOME BUT EVERYBODY AND INDEED ALL ANIMALS IN THIS WORLD ACT TO DECEIVE, PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS BECAUSE THEIR SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR HAD A COMBINATION OF SUBSTANCE AND A STYLE THAT CAN BE REDUCED TO THE INDIVIDUALLY DIFFERENT WAYS IN WHICH THEY STRETCHED THEIR UNITS OF SPEECH OR MOTION, CHANGED SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE. ALL ACTING IS FALSE, HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND THEREFORE EVIL AND THEREFORE EVIL WAS ONLY RELATIVE, ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE GUILTY OF SERIOUSLY PERSECUTING EACH OTHER BY CRUELLY ACTING TOWARDS EACH OTHER THEY CALL BEING BENEFICIAL.
WHEN I CHANGED AGAIN GRADUALLY IN RECENT YEARS, I OFTEN DESPAIRED TO WONDER IF ANYONE WILL FOLLOW WHAT I SAY, I NEVER EXPECTED THAT EVERYBODY WOULD CHANGE YET AGAIN IN RECENT YEARS AS THEY DID AFTER 1977. I THOUGHT THAT SOME OF THOSE WHO WOULD LISTEN AND PUT INTO PRACTICE WHAT I SAID WOULD CHANGE THEMSELVES.
SIMILARLY WHEN I INITITATED THE BEHAVIORAL CHANGES IN MYSELF, I EXPERIENCED A REDUCTION IN SUFFERING BUT I NEVER EXPECTED THAT I WOULD FINALLY EXPERIENCE A PERMANENT INCOMPARABLY EFFORTLESSLY CALM CLEARLY THINKING MENTAL STATE. I WOULD BE LYING IF I SAID I DID NOT SUFFER IN THE PAST FROM BOUTS OF SADNESS THAT CAN DESCEND INTO DEPRESSION BUT NOW I DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT BEING SAD, DEPRESSED OR EMOTIONALLY HURT BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY PASSIVELY BANISHED FROM MY FORCE FREE MIND.
How I might have triggered contagion:
Even as early as 1997 I knew that the way with which I behaved towards others was unique, unlike the behaviors of others and I could sense the way I behaved was truly not faked appreciated by many (people went out of their ways to say it was very nice to talk to me) whilst without being paranoid, many others spat venomously just at the sight of me. I remember the girl who served me at a fast food joint choked when she said ‘Have a nice day’ after I received my order without pestering her and then as I sat eating and talking by the wayside a little girl passing by stood silently beside me holding the railing refusing to move on despite her mother’s pleas but subsequently quietly relented without a tantrum as if she heard a voice and a way of speaking she had never heard before that captivated her. Even though I could sense people responding as if appreciative to the way I uniquely behaved, I could not see then that people were changing and it was only much later that it became increasingly certain to me that just as after 1977 people were once again changing.
THUS IT MAY HAVE BEEN THAT MY NEVER BEFORE SEEN WAY OF BEHAVING & WHAT I WROTE TO OTHERS MAY HAVE, UNKNOWN TO ME, JOLTED THEM COMPULSORILY TO CHANGE THEMSELVES THAT WAS VISIBLE IN THEIR DEMEANOR AND BEHAVIOR THAT THEN SERVED AS SOURCES OF CONTAGION FOR OTHERS IN A PROCESS IN THIS DAY OF INSTANT MEDIA AND TRAVEL AGAIN SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD. REFLECTING THAT EVERYBODY WAS SUFFERING, EVEN THOSE WHO ARE EVIL WERE JOLTED TO COMPULSORILY CHANGE.
The Difference A Word Makes:
There are two (different) versions of what the Buddha was purported to have said. Either or both versions are false. Just a difference in one word namely ‘born’ versus ‘reborn’ that may reflect the interpreter’s unconscious penchant gives a vastly different perspective to what the Buddha actually said transforming it from credible to incredible.
Version One:
2) Nakhasikaü Ý On the Nail of the Thumb
1. I heard thus. At one time the Blessed One was living in the monastery offered by Anàthapiõóika in Jeta's grove in Sàvatthi.
2. The Blessed One raised a little soil on the nail of his thumb and addressed the monks:
3. ßMonks, look at the little soil on the nail of my thumb and tell me what is more, is it the soil on my nail of the thumb or on this great earth?û
4. ßVenerable sir, the soil on this great earth is very much more than the little soil raised by the nail of the thumb.û
5. ßIn the same manner, monks, it's only a few that are born as human and those born other than human are the major portion.û (all the animals you see around, including insects may be valid beings like you)
6. ßTherefore monks, you should train thus: `We will live diligently'.û
According to the version above, those who are born as humans compared to those who are born elsewhere is like the dust on the Buddha’s fingertip compared to the great earth implying that it is an exceedingly rare privilege to be born a human and if you take into consideration what the Buddha said that there is an infinitude of points of consciousness in this universe of existence and all the animals (fish, reptiles) including insects may all be valid beings like yourself, then like the dust on his fingertip compared to the great earth, few are born as humans and therefore you should take this extremely hard to get opportunity to be born a human to redeem yourself.
Version Two:
Nakhasikha Sutta: The Tip of the Fingernail
"What do you think monks? Which is greater: the little bit of dust I have picked up with the tip of my fingernail, or the great earth?"
"The great earth is far greater, lord.
"In the same way, monks, few are the beings reborn among human beings. Far more are those reborn elsewhere. Thus you should train yourselves: 'We will live heedfully.' That's how you should train yourselves."
The second version implies that after a human dies, like the dust on his fingertip compared to the great earth few are reborn as a human, let alone go to heaven. This is likely to be false. Although the Buddha said elsewhere that very few are reborn in heaven (most run up and down this side) there must be far more that go to heaven than the dust on his fingertip compared to the great earth.
Therefore just the difference in interpretation of one word, ‘reborn’ versus ‘born’ casts what the Buddha said in very different light, one version makes what the Buddha said difficult if not impossible to reconcile with reality whilst the other version is easy to reconcile with reality. What the Buddha is telling you is that all the creatures large and small you see everywhere are valid beings like you and the next opportunity for you to become a human may be another eternity.
THEREFORE IF SOMETHING THE BUDDHA SAID PUZZLES YOU, IT MAY NOT BE HIS FAULT BUT THE FAULT OF THE TRANSLATOR.
In the same way, there is a difference as vast as between heaven and hell between saying “I have grave doubts about your not prying, not laughing, not stretching syllables and changing speed and loudness when you speak” as compared with saying, “You are prying into my affairs, laugh when you speak, stretch your syllables and change speed and loudness”.
Similarly, it is definitely malicious to say “I gravely doubt your high standing” compared to saying “You are not high standing”.
The Buddha Has No Teacher:
Now Upaka, a man belonging, to the âjãvaka sect saw the Blessed One travelling on the road, between Gayà and the Bodhi tree; and when he saw Him, he said to the Blessed One: `Your countenance, friend, is serene; your complexion is pure and bright. In whose [\q 91/] name, friend, have you retired from the world? Who is your teacher? Whose Doctrine do you profess?'
8. When Upaka the âjãvaka had spoken thus, the Blessed One addressed him in the following stanzas: ``I have overcome all foes; I am all-wise; I am free from stains in every way; I have left everything; and have obtained emancipation by the destruction of desire. Having myself gained knowledge, whom should I call my master? I have no teacher; no one is equal to me; in the world of men and of gods no being is like me. I am the holy one in this world, I am the highest Teacher, I alone am the absolute Sambuddha; I have gained coolness (by the extinction of all passion) and have obtained Nirvàna.’ To found the kingdom of Truth I go to the city of the Kasis (Benares); I will beat the drum of the Immortal in the darkness of this world.'
9. (Upaka replied): `You profess then, friend, to be the holy, absolute Jina.' (25)
(The Buddha said): `Like me are all jinas who have reached extinction of the àsavas (26); I have overcome (gita me) all states of sinfulness'; therefore, Upaka, am I the Jina.'
When He had spoken thus, Upaka the âjãvaka replied: `It may be so, friend;' shook his head, took another road, and went away. (He was a skeptic)
Why No Female Father, Buddha & Satan:
In Christianity, the Father is male, Jesus is male and Jesus refers to the counselor as male. Thus what the Buddha said below may reflect reality. The differences between male and female are relative than absolute as all the body parts of males have their equivalents in females but the female state may be a more contrived state than the male state and reflecting their perversion, some males long to become females.
278. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that two universal monarchs (Buddhas) be born in the world at one and the same time. It is possible that one universal monarch be born in the world at a certain time.
279. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the worthy, rightfully enlightened all knowing one. It is possible that a man could be the worthy, rightfully enlightened all knowing one (but it does mean all men will achieve that)
280. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the universal monarch. It is possible that a man could be the universal monarch.
281. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the king of gods. It is possible that a man could be the king of gods.
282. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the king of Death (Màara). It is possible that a man could be the king of Death {Màra}
283. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the highest divine one.{Brahmà} It is possible that a man could be the highest divine one {Brahmà)
Sanankumaran:
On one occasion, the Buddha spoke of Great Brahma having two sons named Tissa (may be Jesus who is called Yeshua in Aramaic and Isa in Islam) and Sanankumaran:
Subrahma and Paramatta Brahma,together with sons of the Powerful One,Sanankumara and Tissa:They too have come to the forest meeting.Great Brahma (the Father), who stands over 1,000 Brahma worlds,who arose there spontaneously, effulgent:Prestigious is he, with a terrifying body.
There is no mention of contact between Tissa and the Buddha but Sanankumaran is mentioned in a number of places in the Pali Canon as for example he is quoted by the Buddha below:
The Buddha: Bhikkhus, the bhikkhu endowed with these two things is complete, reached the summit, the end of the holy life, perfect peace and has become the chief among gods and men. Bhikkhus, even the Brahma Sanankumara has said this verse about them.
Of the born, the warriors are chief, to one who thinks about the clan
One endowed with knowledge and conduct is chief among gods and men.
Sanankumára
A Mahá (Great) Brahmá. In the Nikáyas (D.i.121; M.i.358; S.i.153; A.v.327) he is mentioned as the author of a famous verse, there quoted:
Khattiyo settho jane tasmim ye gottapatisárino
Vijjácaranasampanno so settho devamánuse.
(Of the born, the warriors are chief, to one who thinks about the clan
One endowed with knowledge and conduct is chief among gods and men.)
In one place (S.ii.284) the verse is attributed to the Buddha, thus endowing it with the authoritativeness of a pronouncement by the Buddha himself. Sanankumára is represented as a very devout follower of the Buddha.
In a sutta of the Samyutta (S.i.153), he is spoken of as visiting the Buddha on the banks of the Sappiní, and it was during this visit that the above verse was spoken. Sanankumára was present at the preaching of the Mahásamaya Sutta (D.ii.261).
In the Janavasabha Sutta, Janavasabha describes to the Buddha an occasion on which Sanankumára attended an assembly of the Devas, presided over by Sakka and the Four Regent Gods. There was suddenly a vast radiance, and the devas knew of the approach of Sanankumára. As the usual appearance of the Brahmá is not sufficiently materialized for him to be perceived by the Devas of Távatimsa, he is forced to appear as a relatively gross personality which he specially creates. As he arrives, the Devas sit in their places with clasped hands waiting for him to choose his seat. Then Sanankumára takes on the form of Pañcasikha (because all devas like Pañcasikha, says the Commentary, DA.ii.640) and sits, above the assembly, cross legged, in the air. So seated, he expresses his satisfaction that Sakka and all the Távatimsa Devas should honour and follow the Buddha. His voice has all the eight characteristics of a Brahmá's voice. (These are given at D.ii.211). He then proceeds to create thirty three shaper, of himself, each sitting on the divan of a Távatimsa Deva, and addresses the Devas, speaking of the advantages of taking refuge in the Buddha, the Dhamma and the Sangha. Each deva fancies that only the shape sitting on his own divan has spoken and that the others are silent. Then Sanankumára goes to the end of the Hall, and, seated on Sakka's throne, addresses the whole assembly on the four ways of iddhi; on the three avenues leading to Bliss, as manifested by the Buddha; on the four satipatthánas, and the seven samádhiparikkhárá. He declares that more than twenty four lakhs of Magadha disciples, having followed the teachings of the Buddha, have been born in the deva worlds. When Sanankumára has finished his address, Vessavana wonders if there have been Buddhas in the past and will be in the future. The Brahmá reads his thoughts and says there certainly were and will be.
Sanankumára means "ever young." Buddhaghosa says (MA.ii.584; cf. SA.i.171) that, in his former birth, he practised jhánas while yet a boy with his hair tied in five knots (pañcacúlakakumárakále), and was reborn in the Brahma world with the thána intact. He liked the guise of youth and continued in the same, hence the name. Rhys Davids (Dial.ii.292, n.3; cf.i.121, n.1) sees in the legend of Sanankumára the Indian counterpart of the European legend of Galahad. The oldest mention of it is in the Chándogya Upanisad (Chap. VII), where the ideal, yet saintly knight, teaches a typical brahmin the highest truths. In the Mahábhárata (iii.185, Bombay Edition) he expresses a sentiment very similar to that expressed in the stanza quoted above. In mediaeval literature he is said to have been one of five or seven mind born sons of Brahma who remained pure and innocent. A later and debased Jaina version of the legend tells in detail of the love adventures and wives of this knight, with a few words at the end on his conversion to the saintly life. See J.R.A.S.1894, p. 344; 1897, p.585 f; Revue de, Histoire des Religions, vol.xxxi.pp.29ff.
As Deluded As Ever:
Quote Condeleeza Rice: We may face no greater challenge from a single country than Iran.
Comment: Ms Rice has changed as visible in her appearance like the rest of humanity but despite changes after changes, she is still deluded as ever.
She has no right to speak for the United States where many will disagree with what she said, let alone speak for the world by saying ‘we’ as if Iran is such a concern for others as it is for her. She is trying to un-righteously influence others to share her deluded beliefs and garner support for actions she may intend to take against Iran.
Adam & Eve:
There may be more truth in the story of Adam & Eve than derisive skeptics may concede.
Although there were other females alive then, DNA and mitochondrial genetic studies indicate that all modern humans are descendents of one female (Eve) who lived in Africa (garden of Eden) about 150,000 years ago and there was similarly an Adam through his Y chromosome who was the father to all humans living today.
Thus just like today’s consciousness changes have a single not multiple sources, all humans today were descendants of a single male and female in Africa 150,000 years ago.
Curved Motion Is Stretching & Restless:
If a motion is can be carried out straight but is made curved fir style then it is always stretching because the curved path is the longer path and it is always practicing controlled unnecessary change that leads to restlessness or uncontrollable change because force must always be used to change direction and therefore constant forceful direction change is necessary to make a movement unnecessarily curved. Constant forceful direction change as necessitated by curving one’s movement is a form of controlled constant change that leads to restlessness.
Why Emotion Is The Style Of The Speech:
Whenever anyone speaks with emotion eg anger, sadness, sarcasm or boastfully, the emotion is the style of the speech that divides the listener’s attention.
For instance when someone speaks angrily, the listener must contend with the substance of what he is trying to say (eg ‘I don’t like what you did’) that can be severely distorted by his anger whilst monitoring at the same time his anger eg how strong is the anger, whether it is rising or declining.
Therefore if a person speaks angrily, he forces the listener to divide his attention between what is said and how it is said. Often they just switch off or only listen to bits and pieces of the substance and style. Being switched off is to be detached from reality which it itself a form of suffering.
Therefore whoever speaks angrily or sadly or emotionally is not meritorious but dividing others attention with karma attached. If you said “I am angry with what you did” without being physically angry the listener can pay full attention to understand that you are angry with him. Partly the accompanying anger is intended to intimidate and that is sin that even sends the person to hell according to Jesus and the Buddha.
Quote: Decision Not To Date Pays Off.
Comment: It is foolish to get carried away and ascribe your success in an exam to a decision not to go dating. A foolish person might believe that not dating is the secret to exam success.
If you are wise you will not make much of your exam success the talking about which encourages others to be obsessed with material success.
No Buddha:

Bomjan spent 10 months under this tree
This is the boy ‘Buddha’ that is causing a stir in Nepal.
He is a fake because there is only one Buddha per eon and all those who could be enlightened were born around the Buddha’s time to be led by him to enlightenment or depart for heaven never to return.
All buddhas shave their heads to renounce whatever vanity there is but this boy has an outrageous growth of hair that obstructs his vision. He is deceptively hiding behind his hair. If your eyes are meant for seeing then you should provide it with an unobstructed path, not see behind a thicket of hair. Therefore he is not an honest person but hiding behind his hair.