What Is Style?

Style is nothing more than the way with which you posture your body parts (including face, limbs and torso), the way you move and speak, the characteristic stereotyped or repeated things you say or do that differ from others.
Pouting your lips or scowling or grinning or looking sullen or standing with one hip and shoulder presenting ahead of the other, your chin held high and head tilted to one side that differs from others is your style of POSTURE or STANCE.
Moving with stretched (usually curved or rotated) units of motion, constant changes in speed and strength of force (usually accelerating from A to B) that is typical of you but differs from others is your style of movement. In addition there are meaningless habitual movements that are for show or involuntary (eg clapping or wringing your hands, gesturing when talking) that constitute your style.
Speaking with stretched syllables, constant changes in speed and loudness that is typical of you but differs from others is your style of speech. In addition there are meaningless habitual things you say (eg small talk about weather, current affairs or favorite phrases like ‘that’s the way it is, ho, ho, ho’) that are for show or involuntary that constitute your style.
Style has no meaning, does not require meaning or reason but force is indispensable to put the body into the required postures, to stretch, change speed and strength of force.
Although style has no meaning, it has purpose or is intended for show specifically to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others.
Not only do stylish people want to impress you but they want and even demand you be impressed by their style. If you do not they may punish you by withholding favors. If you are exerting psychological pressures on others to display that they are impressed with you that makes them hypocrites and induces stress, restlessness and distraction in them, then in wanting others to be impressed by your antics, you are persecuting others with karma not merit attached.
All ordinary people and animals, even insects have a style that can be discerned objectively by someone who knows what style is and it is this style that pervades all their activities namely how they see, hear, smell, eat, think, move and vocalize that is the source of the insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that beset them, conditions them ever more intensely and is doomed for loss of control and insanity and with which they persecute others in their presence.
Nothing to do with reason:
Whenever the style and even substance of what you say or do is meant to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others, what is transmitted has nothing to do with reason but everything to do with blind unreasoning force. The fact that you perceive your style is meaningful reflects that you have advanced false perception and logic.
Whenever a person is deceived, impressed, pleased, intimidated or dominated by the style or substance of what someone said or did, it is his mental force directly or emotion indirectly that is stirred, not his reason or rationality that is addressed. In other words, deceiving, impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others which are the only purposes of style have nothing to do with reason but are entirely the transmission and reception of force. Thus style is meaningless but entirely a transaction of force between an intending practitioner and his complicit or appreciative recipient.
It is the force in the style of what someone said or did, never reason or calm clear thinking that is transmitted that induces or coerces the recipient to believe or comply with or accept what is said or done to become deceived, intimidated or dominated.
When someone is impressed by the style of what you say or do, what merely happens is that he LIKES the way it is said or done to him or his mental force of going against self has been stirred in an undulating rise and fall in strength and speed as a result of witnessing your particular style. If he is unimpressed, he always dislikes your style although he may pretend he is impressed or indifferent and in this case, his mental force is roused by the sight or sound of your style that caused it to rise unabated in speed and strength that he may then conceal from view or deny to himself and you.
When someone is pleased by the style with which you say or do something that is reverential or deferential in a fabricated or for show way, his mental force has been stirred to like the style of how you say or do, and this has nothing to do with reason but everything to do with stirring the pleased person’s mental force.
Whenever you have a style (eg speaking angrily) to intimidate another, you want him to be intimidated or fearful and therefore the transmission of your mental force to intimidate him is more important than what you say.
Whenever you have a style to dominate a person (eg speak and posture like a doctor), you again are transmitting force that you want the other person to receive so that he becomes subservient.
THUS THE PURPOSES OF STYLE THAT ARE TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH APPEALING TO THE REASON OF THE RECIPIENT BUT THEY ARE ALL ABOUT USING FORCE TO COERCE THE RECIPIENT TO BE DECEIVED (FORCEFULLY ACCEPT THE FALSITY PROFFERED), IMPRESSED (LIKE), PLEASED (LIKE), INTIMIDATED (FEAR) OR DOMINATED (FORCE HIMSELF TO SUBMIT). THE TARGET OF STYLE IS THE RECIPIENT’S MENTAL FORCE NEVER HIS REASON OR CALM CLEAR THINKING. THEREFORE IF YOU ARE A MAN OF STYLE, THERE IS STYLE TO WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE PRINCIPALLY OR ENTIRELY & A MAN OF REASON ONLY NOMINALLY OR MINIMALLY.
STYLE IS ALL ABOUT USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OR LOUDNESS THAT IS ADDRESSED TO RECIPIENTS’ MENTAL FORCES CAUSING THEM TO BECOME STIRRED TO BE DECEIVED (FORCEFULLY ACCEPT WHAT IS FALSEFULLY SAID OR DONE), IMPRESSED (LIKE), PLEASED (LIKE), INTIMIDATED (AROUSING FEAR) OR DOMINATED (FORCE THEMSELVES TO SUBMIT).
AND IT IS THIS INCESSANT APPLICATION ON THE STYLISH PERSON’S MIND AND TRANSMISSION OF FORCE TO OTHERS IN STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT IS ETHE ESSENCE OF STYE THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) THAT ASSAILS THE STYLISH PERSON AND PERSECUTES HIS RECIPIENT WHILST INEXORABLY CONDITIONING HIMSELF TO FORCE, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTABILITY THAT WILL END IN MADNESS OR LOSS OF CONTROL.
THUS IF YOU HAVE A STYLE IN HOW YOU PERCEIVE (SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE AND TOUCH), THINK, SPEAK, POSTURE AND MOVE YOU HAVE A SIGNIFICANT CONSTANT PART OF YOU, YOUR STYLE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON BUT EVERYTHING TO DO WITH FORCE AND YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE NOT TRUE REASON WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FORCE. IF YOU THINK YOU ARE A MAN OF REASON NOT FORCE, YOU ARE DELUDING YOURSELF THAT WILL END IN TRAGEDY.
REASON OR MEANING IS ALWAYS SPECIFIC FOR A PARTICULAR OCCASION, THEREFORE THE PURPOSE OF STYLE THAT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE THAT ARE NOT SPECIFIC FOR A PARTICULAR OCCASION BUT GENERALLY APPLIED TO MANY OTHER OCCASIONS CANNOT BE REASON. STYLE HAS AIMS OR OBJECTIVES NOT REASON OR DOES NOT TRANSMIT A SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION MESSAGE.
FURTHER ALL STYLE CANNOT BE REPRODUCED LIVE FRESH FOR EACH OCCASION BUT MUST BE COMMITTED TO MEMORY AND RENDERED BY ROTE STANDARDIZED FOR ALL OCCASIONS ARISING AND THEREFORE IT IS IMPERSONAL OR HYPOCRITICAL APART FROM CONVERTING THE PERSON INTO A ROBOT WITHOUT HIS AWARENESS. PEOPLE LIKE TO THINK THEY ARE WONDERFUL ALIVE PEOPLE BUT THEY ARE ISOLATED FROM REALITY, ONLY MONITORING WHAT IS HAPPENING AROUND INTERMITTENTLY, CONSTANTLY REHASHING BY ROTE WHAT THEY SAY, DO OR POSTURE WHILST THEY ARE LOST IN THEIR PRIVATE WORLD OF FANTASY AND SCHEMING.
STYLE IS USUALLY IF NOT ALWAYS (MINDLESSLY) COPIED FROM OTHERS (BECAUSE ONE LIKES THE STYLE DISPLAYED) AND IT IS ALL ABOUT USING MENTAL FORCE TO PUT ONE’S BODY & FACES INTO CERTAIN STYLISH POSTURES, USING FORCE TO STRETCH ONE’S UNITS OF MOTION AND SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING, IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS.
THE RECEPTION OF STYLE PRESENTED TO YOU IS NOTHING MORE THAN AROUSING LIKE (IMPRESSED, PLEASED) OR DISLIKE (UNIMPRESSED, UNPLEASED) OR FEAR (INTIMIDATED OR DOMINATED) IN YOUR MIND IN COMPLIANCE TO WHAT THE STYLISH PERSON WANTS AND THIS (DECEIVED, IMPRESSED, PLEASED, INTIMIDATED OR DOMINATED) IS NOTHING MORE THAN YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS AS A RESULT OF THE UNDULATING RISE AND FALL OR UNABATED RISE OF YOUR FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF OR THE UNABATED RISE OF YOUR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION (FEAR) AS A RESULT OF THE IMPACT OF THE FORCE IN THE STYLE THAT IS PRESENTED TO YOU.
WHENEVER YOU SPEAK ANGRILY, THE ANGRY WAY YOU SPEAK IS YOUR STYLE THAT IS INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE THE OTHER PERSON TO GET WHAT YOU WANT.
The Dark Side Of America:
In the aftermath of the Iranian Islamic Revolution and the holding of American hostages at its embassy, America had an interest in toppling the Iranian government by whatever convenient means preferably without spilling American blood.
America thought that an attack by Iraq on Iran will topple the Iranian Islamic government. Thus it was said that with America’s covert encouragement and provision of detailed satellite photos of Iranian positions may have emboldened Saddam to attack Iran thinking victory is certain. America also secretly supplied components to make chemical and biological weapons that were used against the Iranians and later used against the Kurds. There were stories that American advisers were covertly engaged in the conflict.
In the early days of Saddam’s rule, American intelligence supplied Saddam with the names of alleged communists that enabled Saddam to arrest and exterminate them.
Thus Saddam may be a demon who has killed millions both Iraqis and Iranians but behind the scenes it may be the Americans who were more culpable in pulling the puppet strings, who provided him with encouragement and means for genocide just as Bush may be largely a puppet being manipulated by a rightwing cabal behind the throne.
According to BBC, CIA agents who were supposed to be in Vietnam were at the hotel when Robert Kennedy was shot and one of them had boasted he was there when the ‘SOB’ JFK was shot and he was there when RFK was shot. CIA operatives may be angry with Kennedy because they blame him for the Bay of Pigs fiasco and apparently JFK wanted to disengage from Vietnam. Chile’s Pinochet dethroned Allende with the CIA’s help.
Not such a no brainer:
Just as Bush’s rightwing cabal foolishly thought it was a no brainer to storm and win in Iraq but instead they are bogged down in a quagmire, Saddam may have been seduced by America to think it is a no brainer invading and conquering Iran making himself a great Arab hero with the covert decisive aid of American satellite photography. Without American prompting and provision the means, Saddam may not have dared launch his Iranian adventure.
America has proven in many ways that it is far from righteous.
It is not averse to hold prisoners often without scrupulously ascertaining their guilt in illegal prisons in East Europe and Guantanamo Bay.
America is not averse to brutal torture and abuse of prisoners as demonstrated at Abu Ghraib.
America is not averse to fire rockets at wedding parties and houses in residential areas based on the hearsay that there are combatants.
America is not averse to telling lies eg weapons of mass destruction as an excuse to intervene.
America is not averse to rape and massacres of civilians, to killing defenseless wounded combatants merely on the fear they may be suicide bombers.
America is not averse to using banned weapons like phosphorus bombs that burn skin.
Right wing Americans resorted to all kinds of wrongdoing and dirty tricks, eg illegal contributions, smear, sabotage, disenfranchising black voters, even tampering with the voting mechanism in order to win elections.
America is living way beyond its means at the expense of the world because it is quite happy to keep paying for its purchases by pieces of paper that it prints that the foolish world is quite happy to keep receiving.
The Buddha is the highest:
The Buddha said he had spent seven eons (each may last billions of years) as the holder of power or all powerful one) and he came by himself (nobody sent him) in this destined to be his last life to teach those with ears the way out of suffering either to heaven or if they were wise to a complete cessation of all further existing. He claimed to be the Perfect One, the Knower Of All and no one in the cosmos can do anything to him. He never claimed to the only Buddha but he said each eon has its Buddha and he is this eon’s self awakened one. Only He could awake himself whilst his deputies and disciples were awakened by him.
By contrast, Jesus was sent by his Father with a message to humans (not animals).
The Buddha is higher than God because he knows things that God does not know and he knows things about God that he himself does not know. He can do things to God eg make him unable to see the Buddha but God cannot make the Buddha unable to see Him.